The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWELLS FARGO PARKING LOT AND ATMS - MJA190003 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSCity of Fort Collins December 20, 2019 Brad Schlagbaum Wells Fargo NA 9780 S Meridian Blvd Englewood, CO 80112 RE: Wells Fargo Parking Lot & ATMs, MJA190003, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of Wells Fargo Parking Lot & ATMs. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review Coordinator, Tenae Beane via phone at 970-224-6119 or via email at tbeane@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Matt Simpson, (970)416-2754, masimpson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6689 970.224.6134 - fax lcgov. com/developmentreview Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: Please adjust grading so that the area draining to Paver Area 5 is sheet flow and not concentrated flow. The grading on Paver Area 5 needs adjustment so that the low point is near the south curb. See redlines for more information. The runoff now sheet flows towards paver area 5. The grading for paver area 5 has been updated. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: Is there a way to adjust the grading and drainage plan so that inflows to Paver Area 4 can sheet flow onto the pavers? The grading intent for this area is for runoff to sheet flow from the spill curb and flow south. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: On the grading or drainage plans, please identify and label the location(s) where stormwater will spill (surface flow) from all sumped locations, if the pavers Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 FOR INFORMATION: Any existing electric infrastructure required to be relocated or underground as part of this project, will be at the expense of the developer and will need to be relocated within a dedicated easement. Please coordinate all relocation with Light and Power. Acknowledged. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 FOR INFORMATION: Service to the building is considered a commercial service; therefore, the service is required to be installed, owned and maintained by the property owner. Acknowledged. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 FOR FINAL: A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one -line diagram for all commercial meters will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering for review prior to Final Plan. A link to the C-1 form is below: http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1 Form.pdf Sheet E-2.0 shows the Riser Line Diagram. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 FOR INFORMATION: Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and any system modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this development. Please contact me or visit the following website for an estimate of charges and fees related to this project: http://www.fcgov. com/uti I ities/business/bu i lde rs-and-developers/plant-investmen t-development-fees Acknowledged. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 FOR INFORMATION: Light & Power will require AutoCAD files of the Site Plan, Utility Plans, and Landscape Plans prior to the Entitlement Process approval. Acknowledged. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 FOR INFORMATION: Please reference our policies, construction practices, development charge processes, electric services standards, and fee estimator at hftpJ/www.fcqov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers. Acknowledged. 10 Department: Forestry Contact: Molly Roche, 224-616-1992, mroche@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/13/2019 12/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL Texas Red Oak is not considered an ornamental tree. Please place this tree in the shade/canopy tree section of the plant list. All canopy shade trees, include Shumard Oak, Discovery Elm, and Texas Red Oak should be sized 2.0" caliper B&B. Tables have been revised as directed. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/13/2019 12/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL City Forestry is not familiar with Austrian Komet Pine. Please specify Arnold Sentinel Austrian Pine or Iseli Fastigiate Spruce (Picea pungens) in it's place. Evergreen trees may be sized at 6' height B&B minimum. Substituted with Arnold Sentinel Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/13/2019 12/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL In order to maximize canopy coverage on this site, please include one additional shade trees along West Magnolia Street. If trees are spaced at 30-ft intervals, an additional tree can fit. See Forestry redlines for clarification. Tree added along Magnolia Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/13/2019 12/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL Please explore shifting the line and manhole outside of the critical root zone of Existing tree #1. The critical root zone is approximately 15-feet from the center of the trunk. Dry well shifted east outside of the critical root zone of the existing tree. In Land Use Code section (G)(7), it states that The installation of utilities, irrigation lines or any underground fixture requiring excavation deeper than six (6) inches shall be accomplished by boring under the root system of protected existing trees at a minimum depth of twenty-four (24) inches. Low pressure hydro excavation, air spading or hand digging are additional tools/practices that will help reduce impact to the tree(s) root system when excavating at depths of twenty-four (24) inches or less. Refer to the Critical Root Zone (CRZ) diagram, Figure 2, for root protection guidelines. The CRZ shall be incorporated into and shown on development plans for all existing trees to be preserved. Please include the CRZ on the landscape plans for all existing trees on -site. This is a new code requirement, so please reach out to Forestry if you need clarification. ? Critical root zones are as followed: EX Tree 1: outer CRZ 30-ft, inner CRZ 15-ft EX Tree 2: outer 15.5-ft, inner 31-ft EX Tree 3: outer 10-ft, inner 20-ft EX Tree 4: outer 9-ft, inner 18-ft 11 EX Tree 5: outer 9.25-ft, inner 18.5-ft EX Tree 6: outer 9.5-ft, inner 19-ft EX Tree 7: outer 9.5-ft, inner 19-ft Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/13/2019 12/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL Please confirm that the sidewalk along Magnolia is existing and to remain. The sidewalk along Magnolia is to be replaced with a 6' sidewalk. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/13/2019 12/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL Please provide and show mulch rings around all existing trees to remain. Note added and shown on plans Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/13/2019 12/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL Please include the City of Fort Collins Tree Protection Notes to the utility plans. Notes added to the Landscaping Plan. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: No comments. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: Poudre Fire Authority has no comment. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/13/2019 12/13/2019: INFORMATION ONLY: Unless required during PDP, a complete review of all plans will be done at FDP. Acknowledged. 12 capacity is exceeded. Please note the maximum ponding depth(s). The overflow paths have been called out on the Drainage Plan. Max ponding depth is 6". Comment Number: 9 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 Please add more detail to grading plan. Since the site is small and flat, it is hard to tell where grade breaks are. Consider adding grade break lines or tighter interval contours. See redlines for more information Grade break lines have been added to the plan for clarification. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: On the grading plan, please label all high points and low points on curb lines. High and low points have been labeled on curb lines. Comment Number: 11 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 The proposed underdrain pipe will need to maintain a minimum of 10-feet separation from trees and 6-feet from large shrubs. See redlines for more information. Underdrain has been shifted to maintain a 10' minimum from landscaping. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: The 6-inch outlet pipe and concrete U channel were sized for 0.45-cfs. What does the 0.45-cfs correspond to? Where did this flow rate come from? 0.45 cfs corresponds to the 2yr historic rate. Comment Number: 13 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: Could you supply a cut/fill map for this site? changes in grading on this site. A cut/fill map has been provided. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 It would help understand the Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: Please see the included redlines for minor comments and clarification of written comments. Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions, we can set up a phone meeting or in office meeting to discuss. Redlines addressed. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR FINAL PLAN: On the plans, is there a specification, note, or detail that explains the transition between catch and spill curb? Spill curb line type has been added to the plans and legend. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR FINAL PLAN: Please use current Fort Collins permeable pavers detail, D-54. (provided with redlines) detail D-54 provided. E Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: FOR FINAL PLAN: Please show a pipe profile through the dry well — include 1 pipe upstream and downstream of the drywell. Provide confirmation that the pipe hydraulics through this section will work. What flow rate and design frequency is this pipe designed for? Dry well profile added to plans. The pipes have been modeled to release at the 2-yr historic rate. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: FOR FINAL PLAN: I think you should consider a subgrade grading plan to clearly present the subgrade elevations with the numerous grading intricacies of this site. Per phone call meeting on 1/20/2020 with Matt Simpson, this is just a suggestion. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: FOR INFORMATION: If this project does not require a building permit (I am unclear if ATM machines will require a building permit), please note that stormwater PIF's (and water fees for irrigation) will need to be paid prior to us signing mylars on this project. If there is to be a building permit, then the fees will be paid at the time of building permit. Acknowledged. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Matt Simpson, (970)416-2754, masimpson@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/18/2019 12/18/2019: 12/17/2019: FOR INFORMATION: If this project does not require a building permit (I am unclear if ATM machines will require a building permit), please note that water fees for irrigation(and stormwater fees) will need to be paid prior to us signing mylars on this project. If there is to be a building permit, then the fees will be paid at the time of building permit. Acknowledged. Department: Erosion Control Contact: Basil Harridan, 970-222-1801, bhamdan@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/11/2019 12/11/2019: FOR FINAL: Please provide an Erosion Control Security cost estimate. Please address the redlines provided on the Erosion Control Plan. Redlines have been addressed. Department: Floodplain Contact: Claudia Quezada, (970)416-2494, cquezada@fcgov.com Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: A portion of this property is located in the City -regulated, 100-year Old Town floodplain. City -regulated floodway extends to the back of walk. Any 3 development within the floodplain must comply with the safety regulations of Chapter 10 of City Municipal Code. The Developer shall obtain a Floodplain Use Permit from the City of Fort Collins and pay all applicable floodplain use permit fees prior to commencing any construction activity (building of structures, grading, fill, detention ponds, bike paths, parking lots, utilities, landscaped areas, flood control channels, etc.) within the City of Fort Collins floodplain limits as delineated on the Final Development Plan Documents for this Development. Floodplain Use Permit has been submitted. Comment Number: 3 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 Depending on which is applicable, please add either of the following notes to plan set: "Any ATMs located in the 100-year floodplain fringe, shall be elevated 18 inches above the 100-year base flood elevation (BFE) to protect them from flood damage." OR "Any ATMs located in the 100-year floodplain fringe, shall be floodproofed 18 inches above the 100-year base flood elevation (BFE) to protect them from flood damage." Please keep in mind that if the method selected is floodproofing, a Colorado Licensed architect or professional engineer will have to complete a Floodproofing Certificate. Noted added to floodplain notes. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR CONSTRUCTION: Per section 10-45 of City Code, any construction activities, nonstructural development (curb -cuts, driveways, sidewalks, vegetation, etc.) in the regulatory floodway must be preceded by a No -Rise Certification, which must be prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado. (Received as part of submittal, but cross-section exhibit does not match proposed layout) No -Rise Certification has been submitted. Comment Number: 5 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING: Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 Please Review the Floodplain Review Checklist for required notes to include on the plans and items to include in the Drainage Report. The checklist can be found at: https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/im g/site_specific/up loads/fp-checklist 100-2018- update.pdf? 1522697905 Required notes added to the plans. Comment Number: 20 12/18/2019: FOR HEARING: Comment Originated: 12/18/2019 Please make sure all plans reflect proposed project layout. The cross-section exhibit in the Flood Report does not match site plan or utility plans. Cross-section exhibit has been updated. Department: Planning Services Contact: Meaghan Overton, 970-416-2283, moverton@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING - Please provide additional information about the colors and materials used on the ATMs. Ensure that the materials are of high quality and contribute to the compatibility of the project, particularly as relates to the request for APU. Additional ATM information provided in the site plans. Topic: General Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: CLARIFICATION -What is the potential for allowing the parking lot to be used for public parking outside of bank business hours? The bank has indicated our intent to allow for the public to use the lot outside of business hours. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING - Have the two existing trees already been removed? If not, please identify which trees are planned to be removed on the landscape plans. Please discuss with Forestry. There are 7 existnig trees on site (all to remain and protected) as located on the landscape plans. This was determined on the site visit with Forestry held on 11/8/19. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: FOR HEARING - The bike rack is shown in the middle of a planting area with what appear to be day lilies and smooth cobble. Please update landscape plans as needed to ensure that the bike parking on the site is accessible to users without requiring passage through landscape areas. The landscaping plans have been updated to show that the bike rack connects to the existing sidewalk. Topic: Modification of Standard Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING - Your modification request needs to be updated to match the recent changes to the Downtown Zone District. The updated code assigns a "mixed use street frontage" to this site: Mixed use street frontage (ROW included) Min. 19' from back of curb to building — meets this standard (measured at 24.5 feet) `Min. 6' sidewalk if detached — does not meet this standard (existing 5 ft sidewalk) Min. 5' back of walk to building — meets this standard (measured at 5 feet to screen wall) 0' Sidelot measured from property line — meets this standard (measured at 4.5 feet) '5 Alley measured from property line — does not meet this standard (proposing 3 feet instead of 5) The modification request letter has been updated. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING - In general, the justification for the APU does not adequately explain the unique circumstances that support adding this use to the Downtown Zone in this location. The evaluation for an APU is based on the context of the surrounding area, and allows staff to consider supporting an APU because of "emerging issues, site attributes, or changed conditions within the neighborhood surrounding and including the subject property." Please address one or more of these potential circumstances when you resubmit. 5 We have provided a revised statement of the unique circumstances for consideration in this request on the Justification letter. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING -For the APU justification, please address the proposed ATM use in relation to the uses that are permitted in the Downtown Zone District where this is specifically mentioned (Criterion B, D, and F — 2, 4, and 6 in your submittal). Uses permitted in the Downtown Zone can be found in the table in Section 4.16. We have provided response on this item in the justification letter. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING -Please provide additional detail for Criterion B (2 in your submittal) — indicate where sites with a similar drive-in facility use exist in the Downtown (Canyon Avenue Subdistrict) Zone and what the characteristics of those sites are (number of ATMs, etc.). This can be provided in a table. The table is provided in the justification letter. Also in Criterion B, please reference how the proposed APU conforms to the basic characteristics of the Downtown Zone: The table is provided in the justification letter. Purpose. The Downtown District is intended to provide a concentration of retail, civic, employment and cultural uses in addition to complementary uses such as hotels, entertainment and housing, located along the backdrop of the Poudre River Corridor. It is divided into nine (9) subdistricts as depicted on Figure 18. The development standards for the Downtown District are intended to encourage a mix of activity in the area while providing for high quality development that maintains a sense of history, human scale and pedestrian -oriented character. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING - Criteria G and H (7 and 8 in your submittal) do not apply as this is not in a residential neighborhood and is not a medical marijuana business, so you do not have to address this in your justification. Criteria G and H have been removed from the Permitted Use Justification Letter. Topic: Planning Objectives Comment Number: 2 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING - The project narrative describes the desire of Wells Fargo to convert the now -closed drive-thru lanes (Motor Bank) into additional parking at some point in the future. We have previously discussed the opportunity to plan a cohesive project for this area by including both the dirt lot and the Motor Bank area. Staff has concerns about creating additional surface parking lots in the Downtown zone and would appreciate clarification of Wells Fargo's intent for the Motor Bank area. Why not redevelop the Motor Bank for employee parking and drive -through ATMs instead of locating this use across the street? We have indicated the unique circumstances on the justification letter which highlights our desire to have the Motorbank lot sold and redeveloped into mixed use retail and housing. This eliminates one surface lot 2 and allows for development along the new Mason line planned on that street. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING - If the parking lot is complementary and accessory to the main Wells Fargo lot and building, please include information in the Site Tabulation table showing total number of parking spaces and square footage of the bank. Show that the total number of spaces still falls within the range permitted (45-72 based on my calculations). See comment 8 from the conceptual review letter dated August 9, 2019 for more details about what to include on the site plan. Existing bank square footage and parking county have been added to the civil plans. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING - Have the pedestrian access points shown in the previously approved plan been eliminated? If so, how will pedestrians move safely and conveniently around the site? Staff encourages you to add these connections back into the site plan. Pedestrian access points have been added to the site layout. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING - As mentioned in the August 9 conceptual review letter, staff encourages you to consider a different location for accessible parking spaces that is located closer to the Wells Fargo building and the crossing of Magnolia Street if these spaces are intended primarily for employee use. It is expected that pedestrians will cross the street at the stoplight at College and Magnolia, we would like the handicapped spaces to remain where they are located. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019: FOR HEARING -Index Sheet GN-1.0 has incorrect information in the Site Tabulation table. Please update and ensure it is consistent with the rest of the plan set. Also update titles as needed to reflect that this is a Major Amendment of PDP 160040. The FDP (180017) was not approved or recorded, so can not be amended. This table has been updated. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: FOR HEARING -The parking dimensions on the site plan do not meet the minimum dimensions required in Section 3.2.2(K)(5) and 3.2.2(L). These standards require parking stalls at 90 degrees to be 9 feet by 19 feet, unless overhanging a required landscape area - in which case the length can be reduced to 17 feet. Most of the parking stalls shown are 18 feet in length and are not overhanging a landscape area with a wheel stop. Additionally, the accessible spaces must adjoin a minimum 8-foot wide access aisle and be a minimum of 8 feet wide. The access aisle is insufficient as shown. Note that in a lot of this size only one accessible space is required, though you may provide more if desired. Please revise for the next round. Parking stalls revised. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: INFORMATION -Consider aligning the parking lot lighting on the 7 south and west side of the site with the parking stall lines to maximize the available parking area. Acknowledged. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: INFORMATION -Signs will need to be approved by separate sign permit. Please note this on the site plan for any proposed signage. Acknowledged. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 12/18/2019 12/18/2019: FOR HEARING -Please add the screen wall detail back onto the site plans. Detail has been added to the landscape plans. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Morgan Stroud, 970-416-4344, mstroud@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: For Approval: Please continue to work with me and Technical Services to get the utility easements dedicated. Acknowledged. Comment Number: 2 12/17/2019: For Approval: See my redlines for minor comments/adjustments. Redlines addressed. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: Development Construction Permit: This project will require a Development Construction Permit "DCP" before construction can begin. For the application, cost and quantity estimates, and more information about this permit please follow this link: hftps://www.fcqov.com/engineering/devrev.php Acknowledged. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: Development Agreement: This project will require a Development Agreement. Once all contributing departments have their comments resolved, I will be able to put a draft together. I have provided the "Information for Development Agreement' form in our redlines. Please fill this out and return it back to me. Acknowledged. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/17/2019 12/17/2019: FOR FINAL The proposed striping on Magnolia needs to account for a 5 ft space between 8 the curb return and the parking space line. This may reduce the number of parking spaces by one. Acknowledged. Department: Light And Power Contact: Cody Snowdon, 970-416-2306, csnowdonCfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 FOR HEARING: The proposed transformer location is within a public Utility Easement. along the frontage of Magnolia. These easements are meant for the use of regional infrastructure. Please relocate the transformer within your site within 10' of an all weather surface accessible by a line truck. Please adhere to all clearance requirements in the Electric Service Standards at the following link. http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-fo rms-guidelines-regulations Transformer has been omitted. Design calls to connect to existing electric vault. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 FOR HEARING: Please show the primary and secondary routing of the electric line on the Utility Plans to show adequate separation from other utilities. The primary line feeding the proposed transformer will come from the existing oval located west of the existing alley. No primary electrical lines. Design calls to connect to existing electric vault. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 FOR HEARING: The electric service to the site will need to be metered separately with an address associated with that meter. Meter location will need to be coordinated with Light and Power. Please show proposed meter location on the utility plan. Reference Section 8 of our Electric Service Standards for electric metering standards. A link has been provided below. hftps://www.fcqov.com/utilities/imq/site specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStanda rds FINAL 18November2016 Amendment.pdf Refer to electrical drawings for meter location. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 FOR INFORMATION: Light & Power has existing 3-phase electric facilities running North/South adjacent to this property in the alley ROW. There are also some streetlight feeds adjacent to the property along Magnolia and along College. Acknowledged. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/16/2019 12/16/2019 FOR INFORMATION: There is an existing 400W HPS floodlight on the North side of the property. If this light is to be removed please contact Light & Power to have this structure removed prior to any demolition. Light pole noted to be removed on demolition plan. N