Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWORK ORDER - AGREEMENT MISC - WESTERN ECOSYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INCyla sga9 WORK ORDER FORM PURSUANT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF FORT COLLINS AND GREELEY AND WEST, Inc. DATED: 8/18/2005 Work Order Number: HS-6 Purchase Order Number (Fort Collins): Purchase Order Number (Greeley): Project Title: HALLIGAN-SEAMAN WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT Commencement Date: September 19, 2012 Completion Date: March 31, 2013 Maximum Fee: $1,028,552 Project Description: Continue NEPA permitting for the Halligan -Seaman Water Management Project. Scope of Services: See Exhibit "A", attached Professional agrees to perform the services identified above and on the attached forms in accordance with the terms and conditions contained herein and in the Professional Services Agreement between the parties. In the event of a conflict between or ambiguity in the terms of the Professional Services Agreement and this work order (including the attached forms) the Work Order shall control. The attached Exhibit "A", consisting of fifty five (55) pages is hereby accepted and incorporated herein, by this reference, and Notice to Proceed is hereby given. Professio By: Date: / 0 / a _ Attachment A CDM SMITH Status Update for HSWSPs — August 2012 Overview <3-4 sentences that provide: general description of the progress made overall; clearly identify any area of concern regarding schedule or budget; steps being taken or assigned to resolve any issues. > �r r PercentE MonNs i � .. Task Statue Xtiiv.a icPereent:. 'rComments Development Task,1 yeriflcafion of Cities M00SIM Hy8rology Model IBSNZ-AItern811v8 SCrBBldllg � -. ':,, . I - Ie` s .';.L' _ _ Address comments from 3PC review on - alternatives report Task 3 -Meetings andadministration buppowng DOCLUTIeWS Task 11-Purpose and Need (Chapter and Attested Erivlrodmerit (Chapter 3) Revise text In Purpose and Need (Chapter 1) per latest hydrology modeling Task 7(a) r Hydrol ogy ns Simutatla, .• Report Prepare draft and finalize report Summary of report Prepare draft and finalize modeling presentation Task 8= Meetings and -administration Details <Overall state the progress for the headings below. State which tasks cannot be initiated and why (alternatives not identified or hydrology not available etc)> Attachment A HARVEY ECONOMICS (HE) SIX-MONTH BUDGET (August 1.2012 through January 31, 2013) SIX-MONTH SCOPE OF WORK Phase II Alternatives Screening Task 2 - Identification, Screening and Analysis of Alternatives: HE will participate in the alternatives screening by reviewing the process and providing input as the final alternatives are developed. An additional round of coordination with the Participants for defining the No Action Alternative will be required. Sub -task 2.1 Draft Chapter 2 (Alternatives) of the EIS: HE will provide limited review and input regarding the preparation of Chapter 2 during this time period. Sub -task 2.2 Draft Alternatives Report: HE will prepare a provide review and No Action Alternative information for the draft alternatives report. Task 3 - Meetings and Administration: HE will attend meetings and perform monthly project management activities. Phase III Draft EIS and Supporting Documents Task 1 - Purpose and Need and Affected Environment: HE assumes that one update of the demand analysis based on current methodology will be required, along with limited further coordination with EPA. Prior to finalizing the report, a review and modifications of the supporting technical memorandums will be performed. This task will be completed during the six-month period. Task 7 (b) —Technical Reports: During the six-month period identified HE will initiate socioeconomic impact technical report. Monthly Status Report The monthly status report for HE identifies the various sub -tasks that will be completed or initiated during the identified six-month period. This report will be updated by HE at the end of each month to reflect the progress of the identified tasks. Current Budget Request HE requests a budget of $117,020 for the scope of work provided above to be completed over the six-month period of August 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013. Attachment A HE Status Update for HSWSPs — August 2012 Overview <3-4 sentences that provide: general description of the progress made overall; clearly identify any area of concern regarding schedule or budget; steps being taken or assigned to resolve any issues. > past Teak,_ H , _,,,:.' Status rGom late=Peicenf Comments Phase 11 - ALTERNATIVE SCREENING D DEVELOPMENT Task 2 Ideetifieation,'Sereeriing and _ Analyals,of Attematives .: ; Further work on identification, screening and evaluation of altematives Further development of no action alternative Review of alternatives for impact evaluation Sub Task2:? Oraft.Chapte►2 (Alternatives) of the EIS Request to engineering team members for cost, employment and other characteristics of altematives Sub -Task 22'- Draft Altemativas Report:. Review of Alternatives Report Teak 3 IVleetings`end'Adminlatration PHASE III DRAFT EIS AND£SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Need and Affeetad Task 1 P,uiPoae and -j En% l4 meM(Chepters 1 and 3'of the 'b EIS) Continue to gather social, economic, demographic, and recreational data for the affected environment section Continue to gather public facility, service, and fiscal data for the affected environment section Respond to requests for Purpose and Need information Respond to requests for coordination with the EPA regarding Purpose and Need Task 7(b) - TechNcal Reports: Initiate socioeconomic Impact analyses Affachmenf A GEI SIX-MONTH BUDGET (August 1. 2012 through January 31, 2013) SIX-MONTH SCOPE OF WORK Phase III Draft EIS and Supporting Documents Task 1 - Affected Environment (Chapter 3): Based on the baseline technical report, GEI will provide a summary of the information to be incorporated into the aquatic resources section of Chapter 3 of the PDEIS. This task will be completed during the six-month period. Task 2 - Environmental Consequences (Chapter 4): GEI will coordinate with the 3PC Team to develop the approach for the impact analysis that will be discussed in Chapter 4 of the PDEIS. GEI will draft the aquatic resource section of this chapter, which will be largely based on documentation of detailed analysis conducted in the impact technical reports. It is anticipated that during the identified six-month time period this effort will be initiated, but not completed. Task 7 (b) - Technical Reports: The baseline reports require revisions to all technical analysis based on the revisions to the CTP hydrology. These revisions include changes to documentation, exhibits, and reporting and will be completed during the identified six-month period. GEI will prepare the habitat assessments and resource impacts report for the HSWSPs and the final alternatives. This task is based on the anticipated availability of hydrology and identification of final alternatives. Monthly Status Report The monthly status report for GEI identifies the various sub -tasks that will be completed or initiated during the identified six-month period. This report will be updated by GEI at the end of each month to reflect the progress of the identified tasks. Current Budget Request GEI requests a budget of $43,843 for the scope of work provided above to be completed over the six-month period of August 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013. Attachment A GEI Status Update for HSWSPs — AUGUST 2012 Overview <3-4 sentences that provide: general description of the progress made overall; clearly identify any area of concern regarding schedule or budget; steps being taken or assigned to resolve any issues. > t Y , Tk ?;Percents MoMh's Tasks .Status , ' Com leto_ _Perc ent _ r , .,Comments-, PHASE III Diift EIS and SUIDI)OIling DOCLHII-elltS Task 1 Affected Enylronment ' n ' ' � =(Chapter3) Finish Affected Environment section of North Fork (Not included in CTP) Begin preparation of HSWSPs draft Chapter 3 aquatics section. Task 2- Envlronmental Corise_quenees (Chapter 4) Begin preparation of Draft Chapter 4 aquatics section with 313C EIS Team. TASK 7(b)`-7eehnlcal,Repoifa Incorporate the revised hydrology into the CTP Baseline Technical Report Rerun 2-D fish habitat simulations for baseline conditions Incorporate changes in habitat runs into revised CTP Baseline Technical Report Incorporate 2011 agency and municipality comments into revised CTP Baseline Technical Report Update CTP Baseline Technical Report with any new data available since spring 2011 Incorporate information from other related resources (geomorphology, water quality, etc.) into revised CTP report Release next version of CTP Baseline Technical Report to 313C Team for review Revise report based on comments from 3PC Team Coordinate impacts approach with 3PC EIS Team Attachment A CENTENNIAL ARCHAEOLOGY. INC. (CENTENNIAL) SIX-MONTH BUDGET (August 1. 2012 through January 31, 2013) SIX-MONTH SCOPE OF WORK Phase III Draft EIS and Supporting Documents Task 7 (b) - Technical Reports: Based on the preliminary draft of alternatives, there will likely be additional field work required for the cultural analysis. Centennial assumed that a Class II survey may be required at three to four locations, along with several small pipeline routes and a pump station. Centennial has prepared a draft technical report with the alternatives previously identified. The budget for this six-month period will allow Centennial to conduct the additional Class II surveys. Centennial will use their remaining reallocated budget to continue to update the draft report, but the report preparation for the additional field work is not included in this budget. Monthly Status Report The monthly status report for Centennial identifies the various sub -tasks that will be completed or initiated during the identified six-month period. This report will be updated by Centennial at the end of each month to reflect theprogress of the identified tasks Current Budget Request Centennial requests a budget of $8,750 for the scope of work provided above to be completed over the six-month period of August 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013. Attachment A Centennial Status Update for HSWSPs — August 2012 Overview <3-4 sentences that provide: general description of the progress made overall; clearly identify any area of concern regarding schedule or budget; steps being taken or assigned to resolve any issues. > F , Y y < Percent MoMh'B ask = .: Statuae. Core late. ,.* PerieM : Com�ents '. , .. survey at four Details <Overall state the progress for the headings below. State which tasks cannot be initiated and why (alternatives not identified or hydrology not available etc)> Phase III Draft EIS and Supoortina Documents <Provide details here about any problems or unexpected changes — or requests by Corps or Cooperating Agencies that were not anticipated, data not readily available, etc — that will result in delay or increase costs > Attachment A SWWRC SIX-MONTH BUDGET REQUEST Tasks 11 Alternatives Screening and Development Principal Anderson $175PH,ASE Principal O'Grady $155 Alts. Assistance Staff $80 SWWRC SUBTOTAL Task 1 Verification of Cities MODSIM Hydrology Model - Task 2 - Identification, Screening and Analysis of Alternatives 110 20 220 $39,950 Sub -Task 2.1- Draft Chapter 2 (Alternatives) of the EIS 20 8 60 $9,540 Sub -Task 2.2 - Draft Alternatives Report 20 4 20 $S,720 Task 3 - Meetings and administration 8 8 - $2,640 Subtotal Hours 158 40 300 1 498 Subtotal Labor $27,6S0 $6,200 $24,000 $57,850 Reimbursable Expenses - $200 $200 Phase 11 Labor and Expenses PHASE III - Draft EIS and Supoorting Documents $58,050 Task 1 - Purpose and Weed and Affected Environment (Chapters 1 and 3 of the EIS) 40 $6,200 Task 2 - Environmental Consequences (Chapter 4 of the EIS) _ Task 3 - Cumulative lmpacts (Chapter, 5)' and Coord' &Consul (Chapter 6) a :.. Task 4 - Biological Assessment Task 5 - Section 404(b)(1) Analysis Task 5 - Printing and'Distribution of DEIS.and Prep for`Public Hearings':. ,. Additional Appendices a. Hydrology Simulations Report b. Technical Reports C. Recreation Opportunities and Constraints Report d. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report _ e. Draft and.fIhal Mitigatlon,ariti Monitoring Plan t. 'Draft Programmatic Agreement on Cultural Resources Task 8 - Meetings and administration Subtotal Hours 40 40 Subtotal Labor $6,200 $6,200 Reimbursable Expenses $200 Phase III Labor and Expenses $6,400 PHASE 11 AND PHASE III TOTAL Nlnfc- V.11-,.. ­11I I...iln .n _.L..L_.... $64,450 Attachment A ANDERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. (ACE) SIX-MONTH BUDGET (August 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013) SIX-MONTH SCOPE OF WORK Phase III Draft EIS and Supporting Documents Task 1 - Affected Environment (Chaoter 3): ACE will provide a summary of the information to be incorporated into the sediment transporUgeomorphic section of Chapter 3 of the PDEIS in conjunction with the 313C Team. This task will be completed during the six-month period. Task 2 - Environmental Consequences (Chapter 4): ACE will coordinate with the 3PC Team to develop the approach for the impact analysis that will be discussed In Chapter 4 of the PDEIS. ACE will draft the sediment transport section portion of this chapter, which will be largely based on documentation of detailed analysis conducted in the impact technical reports. It is anticipated that during the identified six-month time period this effort will be initiated, but not completed. Task 7 (b) - Technical Reports: The Baseline Report (Mainstem) requires revisions to all technical analyses based on the revisions to the CTP hydrology. These revisions include all technical analyses for channel hydraulics, sediment transport and geomorphic assessment for baseline conditions. Comments received on the draft report will be addressed prior to finalizing. ACE will assist other resource specialists in support of their CTP baseline technical reports. This task will be completed during the six-month period. The 2-D Modeling Report draft has been submitted to the Corps and the assumption is that revisions will be required. This task will be completed during the six-month period. Baseline Report (North Fork) requires revisions to all technical analyses based on the revisions to the CTP hydrology. These revisions include changes to technical documentation. This task will be completed during the six-month period. This task will be completed during the six-month period. The HSWSPs Project Report (Project Alternative(s) Impact Assessment) will be initiated but not completed during the identified time frame. Monthly Status Report The monthly status report for ACE identifies the various sub -tasks that will be completed or initiated during the identified six-month period. This report will be updated by ACE at the end of each month to reflect the progress of the identified tasks. Aftachment A AGE SIX-MONTH BUDGET REQUEST Senior Senior Senior Protect Project GIST Principal Affiliate Affiliate Scientlal Engineer Englnoet Engineei CADD Engineer Engineer Scientist 11 11 I 11 Tech. Admin ACE Tasks S150 615o S110 $105 504 $84 $7111 $70 • $60 SUBTOTAL'PHASE 11 Alternatives �crecmnq and Development ask 1—Verification of Clues MODSIM HydrologyModel ask 2 - Identlfieatlon, Screening and Analysis of Alternatives Sub -Task 2.1 - Draft Chapter 2 (Alternatives) of the EIS Sub -Task 2.2 - Draft Alternatives Report Task 3 - Meetings and administrallo Subtotal Hours Subtotal Labor Reimbursable Expenses Phase 11Labor and Ex nses '01JASE III - Draft ES and SUpporting Documents ask 1 - Purpose an Need and Affected Environment 8 8 2 4 $2,332 (Chapters 1 and 3 of the EIS Task 2 - Environmental Consequences 8 - - - 8 - - - - $1,852 (Chapter 4 of the EIS Task 3 = Cumulative Impacts (Chapter 5) and Cooid ti �: ..; _ - Consul C ....ter6- ,• , ,._. Task 4 - Biological Assessment Task 5 . Section 404 b 1 Analysis - - - ask 6 = Printing and Distribution of DBS and Prep for yA PublIc Hearings City of Fort Collins: Submitted By: lX Special P ects Manager Date: M - 20 - I'Z Reviewed By:� Water Re ources & Treatment Manager Date: _ "t - 2 k - kjZ. Approved by; Director Date: z14.1'� Approved by: ��— V C;i'L�._�_,u ? Di ctgr of Purchasing & Risk Management Date: 7 2 ( Z-- City of Greel Submitted 83 Date: Approved by: ��I r 'n Di for Water & Sewer Department Date: Approved by: City torney Date: I_-n Approved by: Director of Fin Date: A —� Approved by: City Date: Attachment A ACE Status Update for HSWSPs — August 2012 Overview <3-4 sentences that provide: general description of the progress made overall; clearly identify any area of concern regarding schedule or budget; steps being taken or assigned to resolve any issues. > Task �'-Sttrh Pe GAonth's . w v , , Ids}� Pe►c6M r.. Comments PHASE III Draft EIS aii d Supportiliq Oocillilelits Task 1 Phase Affected EnvlronmeM s Provide sediment transporUgeomorphlc section for HSWSPs draft Chapter 3 in conjunction with 3PC EIS Team .Task 2 -Envlronmental.Consequenees '` Ch ter 4 - y ; Coordinate Impacts approach with 3PC EIS Team Finalize approach to Impacts assessment Task 7(b)'- Techm , Reports ' r13asal/neStem - .. ,._.:. Incorporate the revised hydrology into the CTP Baseline Technical Report Revise all technical analyses for channel hydraulics, sediment transport and geomorphic assessment for baseline conditions Incorporate changes in technical analyses Into revised CTP Baseline Technical Report Provide technical support to other resource specialists in support of their CTP Baseline Technical Re orts Submit draft CTP Baseline Technical Report to 3PC EIS Team Revise CTP Baseline Technical Report based an comments from 3PC EIS Team Submit CTP Baseline Technical Report for a en / roecl artid ant review Revise and resubmit CT Baseline Technical Report based on comments received from agency/protect artici ants 2D ModeUno Submit 2D modeling report to 3PC EIS Team Revise 21J modeling report based on comments from 3PC EIS Team Submit 2D modeling report for ag reveency/praject Revresbw modeling report based on comments from agency/project participants Attachment A ERO SIX-MONTH BUDGET (August 1. 2012 through January 31 2013) SIX-MONTH SCOPE OF WORK Phase III Draft EIS and Supporting Documents Task 7 (b) - Technical Reports• The budget request of $5,026 is the HSWSPs portion required to complete the CTP work on the technical reports assigned to ERO. This includes the task of redoing the completed Water Quality and Riparian and Wetland baseline reports due to the upcoming changes in baseline hydrology. Monthly Status Report The monthly status report for ERO identifies the various sub -tasks that will be completed or initiated during the identified six-month period. This report will be updated by ERO at the end of each month to reflect the progress of the identified tasks. Current Budget Request ERO requests a budget of $5,026 for the scope of work provided above to be completed over the six-month period of August 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013. Attachment A ERO Status Update for HSWSPs — AUGUST 2012 Overview <34 sentences that provide: general description of the progress made overall; clearly identify any area of concern regarding schedule or budget; steps being taken or assigned to resolve any issues. > .Task ' �,. � �"s�: ,. b :Statuer tCoin lete4 taPe►¢ent� �CommeMs��;_` SupportingPhase III - Draft EIS and Documents Task 7(b) Teohnkal RepoRa Incorporate the revised baseline hydrology into_the CTP Water Quality Baseline Report Incorporate the revised baseline hydrology into the CTP Wetland and Riparian Baseline Report Incorporate the revised baseline hydrology into a memo or revised report addressing socioeconomic resources on the mainstem Incorporate the revised baseline hydrology into a memo or revised report addressing recreation resources on the mainstem Details <Overall state the progress for the headings below. State which tasks cannot be initiated and why (alternatives not identified or hydrology not available etc)> Phase III Draft EIS and Supporting Documents <Provide details here about any problems or unexpected changes — or requests by Corps or Cooperating Agencies that were not anticipated, data not readily available, etc — that will result in delay or increase costs > Attachment A Monthly Status Report The monthly status report for Hydros identifies the various sub -tasks that will be completed or initiated during the identified six-month period. This report will be updated by Hydros at the end of each month to reflect the progress of the identified tasks. Current Budget Request Hydros requests a budget of $39,595 for the scope of work provided above to be completed over the six-month period of August 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013. Attachment A Hydros Status Update for HSWSPs — August 2012 Overview <3-4 sentences that provide: general description of the progress made overall; clearly identify any area of concern regarding schedule or budget; steps being taken or assigned to resolve any issues. > 4;r Phase 11 Alternative Screening and Devolopment M 7 Completion of conceptstelements/altemativas screening process Including modeling If necessary Development of final alternatives and guidance or review of incorporation Into modeling 'Sub -Task 2.1 - Ansft Chajgpr 2 1A Review of alternatives sections written by CDM Review of alternatives sections written by CDM Task 3 --fileoUnno and Adminisitrartion - _ . - .- - - , ., , - * �, -- ­ . � 7 QAIQC of model runs by CDM, including meebrips and on -call avallabi PHASE III - Draft EIS and SLIP[Jorting DOCL1111011t$ �T" Purpose and Needand '2_by E Provide support and review for finalizing the Purpose and Need report and Chapter 1 of the PDEIS Task 21-EnvironnM talCoFIS"IMCM of Provide support for Initiating sections regarding the alternatives Impact analysis hydrology modeling ThskTja and lo)-Techrflcall Reports writing and/or review of various technical reports (e.g. climate change memo, modeling I I report, review of P&N !qp2j_ Details <Overall state the progress for the headings below. State which tasks cannot be initiated and why (alternatives not identified or hydrology not available etc)> Table 1 — Summary Six -Month Budget Request July 2012 without Alternatives Modeling Period August 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013 Consultant Six -Month Budget Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. $411,074 DiNatale Water Consultants $51,350 CDM Smith $142,500 Harvey Economics $117,020 GEI, Inc. $43.843 Centennial Archaeology $8,750 States West Water Resources Corp. $64,450 Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. $144,944 ERO $5,026 Hydros Consulting $39,595 Total Budget Requested for Six -Month (without hydrology modeling for alternatives, but includes technical assistance) $1,028,652 DELIVERABLES FOR SIX-MONTH BUDGET Submitted on September 10, 2022 Associated time frame: August 1, 2022 through January 31, 2013 OVERARCHING ASSUMPTIONS: 1) The budget associated with these deliverables does not include the verification of the alternative model runs. 2) The deliverables are dependent upon the budget submitted and not the time frame. Some of the tasks may extend beyond the six -months due to delays brought about by delays in other critical path items or due to more than expected changes to the deliverables based on reviews by the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and/or Applicants. 3) The budget submitted assumed 40% of the hydrology modeling for project alternatives would be completed during this period. Therefore, analysis dependent upon the hydrology (i.e., fish habitat simulations, sediment transport, geomorphology, etc) could only achieve a maximum completion of 40%. 4) "Completion at end of budget" is the level of completion of the task as defined by scope submitted September 10 and assumptions listed below. 5) Deliverables are contingent upon an approved budget. PHASE II ALTERNATIVES SCREENING AND DEVELOPMENT Task 1—Verification of Cities MODSIM Hvdroloev Model 1) Technical support for Cities modelers, or consultants, to familiarize them with executing a the suite of models. This task includes two meetings (four hours each) followed up with on -call support. Assumptions: This budget does not include the verification of the alternative model runs which will be addressed in a separate budget submittal. Completion at end of budget 100% Task 2 - Identification. Screenine and Analysis of Alternatives 1) Identification of final alternatives to be evaluated in the EIS with the exception of the No Action Alternative. Completion at end of budget 100% ,4 PHASE III — DRAFT EIS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Task 1- Purpose and Need and Affected Environment (Chapters 1 and 3 of the EIS) 1) Final Draft Purpose and Need Report Assumptions: The budget submitted assumes limited further coordination with EPA and no significant revisions from Applicants. This budget does not include the demand update that will be conducted prior to submitting the DEIS to the Cooperating Agencies. Completion at end of budget 100% 2) Final Supporting Technical Memorandums prepared by Harvey Economics Completion at end of budget 100% 3) Draft Chapter Ito Applicants for review Assumption: No significant changes to purpose and need report are made. Completion at end of budget 100% 4) Preliminary Draft Chapter 3 (sections ready for internal 3PC review) Assumption: The elements (i.e., reservoirs) and land based components of concepts (i.e., gravel pits, pipelines) of the final alternatives presented on September 28, 2012 will not significantly change as a result of the hydrology modeling of alternatives. Due to the uncertainty of when the No Action Alternative would be available, the preliminary draft of chapter 3 does not include the No Action Alternative. Surface Water A budget for this task was not requested Completion at end of budget 0% Stream Morphology Assumption: the information will be extracted from the baseline sediment transport/geomorphic reports Surface Water Quality A budget for this task was not requested Completion at end of budget 100% Completion at end of budget 0% Wildlife Completion at end of budget 100% Assumption: information will be extracted from the wildlife technical report Completion at end of budget 100% Fish and Other Aquatics Assumption: information will be extracted from the aquatic baseline technical report. Completion of this task is requires coordination with the following resource sections, water quality, geomorphology/sediment transport, and riparian. Completion at end of budget 90% Species of Concern Assumption: information will be extracted from the species of concern technical report Recreation A budget for this task was not requested Cultural Resources A budget for this task was not requested Aesthetic and Visual Resources A budget for this task was not requested Land Use A budget for this task was not requested Completion at end of budget 100% Completion at end of budget 0% Completion at end of budget 0% Completion at end of budget 0% Completion at end of budget 0% 4 2) Draft and Final Executive Summary of modeling report Completion at end of budget 100% 3) Draft and Final Modeling presentation Completion at end of budget 100% Task 7(b) — Technical Reports 1) Draft Species of Concern Technical Report (WEST) —ready for Corps review Completion at end of budget 100% 2) Draft Vegetation Technical Report (WEST) —ready for Corps review Completion at end of budget 100% 3) Draft Wetland Resources Technical Report (WEST) —ready for Corps review Completion at end of budget 100% 4) Preliminary Draft Wetland and Riparian Resources on North Fork (WEST) Assumptions: The impact analysis for this report requires the spells analysis provided by Anderson Consultants Engineers. As the alternatives hydrology becomes available and the spells analysis provided, the wetland and riparian impacts will be evaluated and incorporated into the report. It is assumed that 40% of the hydrology modeling will be completed with this budget. Completion at end of budget 40% 5) Draft Wildlife Technical Report (WEST) —ready for Corps review Completion at end of budget 100% 6) Draft Cultural Resources Technical Report (Centennial Archaeology) Assumptions: Currently, the impact analysis for this report considers only the alternatives identified in March 2008. All of the updates to the cultural resources technical report and the additional field work for the alternatives identified on September 28, 2012 will be completed within the budget for the six-month scope of work. Updates to the technical report based on the results of the additional field work were not included in this budget. Furthermore, as the final alternatives are defined, additional field work may be necessary if the alternatives identified on September 28, 2012 are significantly altered as a result of the hydrology modeling. Completion at end of budget 65% 7) Draft Baseline Aquatic Technical Report (GEI) —ready for Corps review Attachment A GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS: The requested budget will fund the work effort through the six-month period of August 1, 2012 through January 31, 2012. To prepare the current budgets the following hydrology modeling and alternative screening schedule was assumed: • CTP hydrology modeling has been finalized with the exception of Run 5a, which will be final by July 2012, • HSWSPs hydrology modeling; including alternative comparisons, no action alternative, and cumulative impacts; will occur between September 2012 to April 2013, • forty percent of the alternative hydrology modeling for run series 3, 4 and 5 will be completed during the six-month period identified, • the final alternatives will be identified by the end of September 2012. Several other assumptions were made in preparing the budget request. Those assumptions were as follows: • We assumed four action alternatives for Halligan, four action alternatives for Seaman, and three action alternatives for NPIC will be analyzed in the PDEIS. • We assumed there will be a need to conduct biological reconnaissance surveys and Class II archeology surveys on 3 to 4 additional locations as a result of finalizing the alternatives. • We assumed that where overlap occurs with the NISP EIS, information will be extracted from the NISP EIS or Technical Reports rather than be re -generated for the HSWSPs PDEIS, as per Corps direction. • Costs for the CTP will be shared with the NISP EIS consultant team (half charged to HSWSPs when related to EIS material, two-thirds to HSWSPs and one-third to NISP when related to modeling). • This budget was prepared assuming no unforeseen requests from the Corps, Cooperating Agencies, or the participants. 15) Draft UP Mainstem Wetland and Riparian Baseline Report (ERO) Completion at end of budget 100% 16) Draft CTP Mainstem Socioeconomic Baseline Report (ERO) Completion at end of budget 100% 17) Draft UP Mainstem Recreation Resources Baseline Report (ERO) Completion at end of budget 100% 18) Draft Water Resources Report (CDM Smith) 19) Draft Surface Water Quality Report (CDM Smith) 20) Draft Groundwater Report (CDM Smith) 21) Draft Geology Report (CDM Smith) 22) Draft Soils Report (CDM Smith) 23) Draft Aesthetics and Visual Resources Report (CDM Smith) 24) Draft Hazardous Sites Report (CDM Smith) 25) Draft Noise Report (CDM Smith) 26) Draft Air Quality Report (CDM Smith) Completion at end of budget 0% Completion at end of budget 0% Completion at end of budget 0% Completion at end of budget 0% Completion at end of budget 0% Completion at end of budget 0% Completion at end of budget 0% Completion at end of budget 0% Completion at end of budget 0% Attachment A WEST will provide statistical support to most of the analyses and ensure the all of the technical discussions are presented as reader friendly as possible. WEST anticipates completing drafts of all technical reports they are responsible for, with the exception of the impact analysis associated with the riparian resources technical report. Monthly Status Report The monthly status report for WEST identifies the various sub -tasks that will be completed or initiated during the identified six-month period. This reportwill be updated by WEST at the end of the month to reflect the progress of the identified tasks. Current Budget Request WEST requests a budget of $411,074 for the scope of work provided above to be completed over the six-month period of August 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013. Attachment A . Draft Programmatic .. Agreement on Guttural Resources. Task 8- Meetings and adminlstration 96 144 240 $48,720 Subtotal Hours 386 861 581 543 150 82 70 139 440 3,042 Subtotal Labor $71,410 $74,865 $61.005 $57,015 $15,000 $6,970 $4,900 $10,425 $26,400 $327,990 Reimbursable Expenses - - - _ $6,809 Phase III Labor and Ex enses RASE If AND PHASE III TOTAL $411,07 Attachment A Details <Overall state the progress for the headings below. State which tasks cannot be initiated and why (alternatives not identified or hydrology not available etc)> Phase 11 - Alternative Screeninq and Development <Provide details here about any problems or unexpected changes — or requests by Corps *or Cooperating Agencies that were not anticipated, data not readily available, etc — that will result in delay or increase costs > Phase III - Draft EIS and Supporting Documents <Provide details here about any problems or unexpected changes — or requests by Corps or Cooperating Agencies that were not anticipated, data not readily available, etc — that will result in delay or increase costs > Attachment A Monthly Status Report The monthly status report for DiNatale Water identifies the various sub -tasks that will be completed or initiated during the identified six-month period. This report will be updated by DiNatale Water at the end of the month to reflect the progress of the identified tasks. Current Budget Request DiNatale Water requests a budget of $51,350 for the scope of work provided above to be completed over the six-month period of August 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013. Attachment A DiNatale Water Status Update for HSWSPs — August 2012 Overview <3-4 sentences that provide: general description of the progress made overall; clearly identify any area of concern regarding schedule or budget; steps being taken or assigned to resolve any issues. > _ t.aet Task 1 =. f Stefue' `:Co Mete+ > Pereent • ' commonte wC'� Task 2 Identlfleatlon, Screening and �: o, .`OfAltBmeUYBBs An ;� sF Sub -Task 2.1 - Draft Chapter 2 (Altematives) of the EIS Sub -task 2.2 Revlew of altematives report written by CDM Task 3 = Mead ww a and AdmInIatrat ton _ . �� a x t....? �.z . � ° . a.. ti x, ; - _ Documents Task;1;FP and NeW,Cha ter,f�lrl" !s',,. . Task 78= drat :Stmulatlons Repoft- Task 8,- Meatings and Adminlstrellon Details <Overall state the progress for the headings below. State which tasks cannot be initiated and why (alternatives not identified or hydrology not available etc)> Phase II Alternatives Screening and Development <Provide details here about any problems or unexpected changes — or requests by Corps or Cooperating Agencies that were not anticipated, data not readily available, etc — that will result in delay or increase costs > Phase III Draft EIS and Suoportino Documents <Provide details here about any problems or unexpected changes — or requests by Corps or Cooperating Agencies that were not anticipated, data not readily available, etc — that will result in delay or increase costs > Attachment A In addition to the modeling report, CDM will assist in developing the Modeling Executive Summary and Modeling Presentation based on NISP cost estimate (two-thirds to HSWSP and one-third to NISP). Monthly Status Report The monthly status report for CDM Smith identifies the various sub -tasks that will be completed or initiated during the identified six-month period. This report will be updated by CDM Smith at the end of the month to reflect the progress of the identified tasks. CURRENT BUDGET REQUEST CDM Smith requests a budget of $142,500 for the scope of work provided above to be completed over the six-month period of August 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013.