Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHANGE ORDER - RFP - 7272 ENHANCED TRAVEL CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN FOR HARMONY ROADC ''For t Collins � ngineering Planning, Development & Transportation Transportation Planning 281 North CoOege Avenue P.O. Bmr 680 Fart Conns, CO 805220560 970.221.6603 970.221.637a -fax Change Order Form PROJECTTITLE: Enhanced Travel Corridor -Master Plan, Harmony Rd. ETC PROJECT NUMBER: 901019 CONTRACTOR: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (PO #9117087) CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 2 n preparing change orders show in order as separate numbered paragraphs the o ng: 1. Reason for change. 2. Description of change. 3. Change in contract cost 4. Change in contract time. 1&2. Sea attached sheet for detail. 3. The contract cost will Increase by $ 15,000.00 4. There will be no change In contract time. ORIGINAL CONTRACT COST TOTAL APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS TOTAL PENDING CHANGE ORDERS TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER TOTAL % OF THIS CHANGE ORDER TOTAL C.O. % OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT ADJUSTED CONTRACT COST (Assuming all change orders approved) $139,914,00 $50,OD0,00 $0.00 $15'0D0.00 10.72% 46.46% $204,914,00 ACCEPTED BY: DATE: _I I —IF] ILL (Cant is Rep" ep s live) SUBMITTED BY: 10 DATE: (rn3rtspc tbn P Wing) APPROVED Sr DATE: (Department H 9 ) APPROVED BY: DATE: (Purchasing Agent over $60,000) ca ConOadOr PurdmWng Project F119 FELSBURG HOLT ULLEV IG conttecting fold.. enhancing Communities November 13, 2012 Mr. Aaron Iverson City of Fort Collins 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Change Order Request Harmony ETC Alternatives Analysis FHU Project No. 11-184-01 Dear Aaron: The original scope of work for the Harmony ETC Alternatives Analysis identifies the travel demand modeling for the project to be completed by the City of Fort Collins. Based on work load constraints at the City and in order to maintain the desired schedule for the project, we have prepared this scope and fee estimate for FHU to complete the travel demand modeling effort for the project going forward. J� " ti;Jy x t�° ' l 3i { Buck Marfitano4 r f f Tas s r Total g, 'Alternative ''1'-.xs a .? J;Y �1 a� c-; 3 �Q ($160) r ($90�. I` s xx. x y h T.'$ty? .,.'.'. =F c i Code/Run Model 16 $1440 No Action -_ ____ .... .__._ - _-__. __ __ Post -Processing ....._ 20 $1800 Code/Run Model 30 $2700 Tier 2 Alternatives Review Model Results 8 24 $3440 (estimated to be 6 -- 18 $1620 model runs) Post -Processing ........ _... ..... - _..._ __._ .. ... ...... - .............. ....__. Coordinate Results with Fort Collins 8 20 $3080 Coordination with Fort Collins 2 4 $680 Locally Preferred Code/Run Model 8 $720 Alternative Review Model Results 2 2 $500 Post -Processing 4 $360 Model Documentation 4 16 $2080 TOTAL $18,420 To maintain a project completion date of June 2013 and to help offset the additional costs associated with the modeling effort described above and re-evaluation of the No Action scenario, we have identified elements within the original scope of work that could be streamlined: 6300 Soutli Syracuse Wa:, Suite 600 C:cntannial, CO 80.111 tel C3.721.1440 fix 303.72.1,0832 www'III uen"'.Corn info@11weng_conl Mr. Aaron Iverson November 13, 2012 Page 2 • Hold three public meetings instead of the four. The first two public meetings have had relatively low attendance; however, the online "virtual open houses" have received abundant participation and input. We propose presenting the Locally Preferred Alternative at a third and final public meeting, while continuing to provide project updates and opportunities for public input through the project website. • Streamline the Tier 2 evaluation. We propose that the Tier 2 evaluation focus on the measures that will differentiate the Tier 2 alternatives. This streamlined process will involve taking the Tier 2 alternatives development to a level that will allow us to effectively compare the alternatives and deferring conceptual design details (such as intersection configuration and typical station design) as well as environmental mitigation strategies to refinement of the Locally Preferred Alternative. We estimate that the cost savings associated with the items described above to be $3,420. Therefore, we estimate the additional cost associated with the travel demand modeling effort (less the $3,420 savings) to be $15,000. We have prepared an updated schedule for the remainder of the project with consideration of the items described herein. Task ; ksu}bask/Meetings Duration `:V. fT z, a Modeling and Post -Processing Nov 12 - Nov 16 No Action Operational Analysis Nov 19 - Nov 21 Documentation Nov 26 - Nov 29 Alternatives Development Complete Structure Tier 2 Evaluation Process Nov 12 - Nov 16 - _......... _............... ...... ......... Environmental Resources and ROW . ..._._...._.._...._... Nov 12- Nov 16 Tier 2 Evaluation (bike, ped, safety, Nov 19 -Nov 30 sustainability, etc.) Tier 2 Alternatives I Modeling and Post -Processing Nov 19 - Nov 30 Development and Evaluation ,..--- _ . _- _ ...._. _- Operational analysis .. _._..__----_-- _ __.._.._ _.............. .. Dec 3 - Dec 7 Tier 2 Transit and Traffic Evaluation Dec 3 - Dec 12 Compile Tier 2 Evaluation and Screening Dec 12 - Dec 14 Project Team Discussion Dec 14 TAC Meeting #S (Present Tier 2 Screening) Week of Dec 17 LPA Modeling and Post -Processing s. . Dec 26 - Dec 31 LPA Refinements Jan 2013 Locally Preferred Alternative - ..- -.... TAC Meeting #6 (Present LPA) Week of Feb 4 Public Meeting #3 (Present LPA) Late February Phasing and Funding Plan March 2013 Implementation Plan TAC Meeting #7 (Present Phasing and Late March Funding Plan) Mr. Aaron Iverson November B,2012 Page 3 ! ETC Master Plan Report Jan - Mar 2O13 i Submit draft ETC Master Plan Report to � ! Early April Project Team and TA[ | _ ' _ | Project Team and TA[Review / 2week period Report and Plan Adoption '-------'-------�-----------��--� ! Submit Final Draft ETC Master Plan Report � -� -'------ -' - Early May a»dpsL Questionnaire- i City Adoption Process � __----�---_�_-_�����-- May -June .-^,__---_-'---_ ' Final ETC Master Plan ]une2O13 Thank you for the opportunity to provide additional services on this project, Please call either of us if you have any questions about the additional scope and fee or the proposed schedule. Sincerely, FE H@LT& ULLEVIG Project Manager Deputy Project Manager ) Z� Je: ung, PE,