HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESPONSE - RFP - 7428 ON-CALL FINANCIAL SERVICESProposal
The Economics ofLand Use On -Call Financial Services
Proposal No. 7428
Prepared for:
City of Fort Collins
Prepared by:
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
October 4, 2012
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
730 17th Street, Suite 630
Denver, CO 80202-3511
303 623 3557 tel
303 623 9049 fax
EPS #123078
Berkeley
Den ver
Los Angeles
Sacramento
www.epsys.com
RTD FasTracks Joint Development, Denver, Colorado
Client
Regional Transportation District
Project Description
EPS is assisting RTD TOD staff with the
implementation of joint development and TOD
partnerships at FasTracks station locations. EPS
is providing a range of market and financial
analysis services including market studies, pro
forma financial analysis, public -private
development partnerships, and strategies and
assistance with development solicitations and
negotiations. Specific assignments have included
negotiation support on a development
agreement and long-term lease for the Denver
Union Station redevelopment and real estate
market and financial analysis and developer
negotiations for the four selected TOD Pilot
Projects at the Alameda, Olde Town, Federal
Center, and Welton stations. Pilot Project tasks
have included:
Providing ongoing financial analysis in
support of the successful execution of a
developer agreement and purchase and sale
of an RTD surface parking lot to develop a
new light rail plaza and a 200-unit
multifamily apartment project at the Alameda
Station;
Facilitating a two-part community workshop
co -sponsored by the Urban Land Institute
(ULI) regarding the potential development of
an RTD surface lot to expand knowledge of
the local market context and the potential for
low-income housing tax credits to catalyze
future development at the Welton Street
Station;
• Providing preliminary market context for a
half -day workshop to facilitate the initial
stages of a public partnership between RTD,
the City of Lakewood, and the federal GSA for
the future master development of the Federal
Center Station.
Deliverables
- RFP proposal evaluations
- DUS developer selection and negotiation
- Financial proforma model
- Alameda station sale terms review and
evaluation
Outcomes
- Purchase and sale agreement for Alameda
Station
- Denver Union Station developer selection
- DUS term sheet under negotiation
Reference
Bill Sirois
Manager of TOD
RTD-Denver
(303) 299-2417
bill.siroisCalRTD- Denver. com
Denargo Market Tax Increment Financing Negotiations, Denver, Colorado
Client
Cypress Development
Project Description
The Denargo Market site is a 28 acre
redevelopment in Denver's River North or "RiNo"
neighborhood northeast of Downtown Denver.
The property was named after the farmer's
market that o�erated on the site during the first
half of the 20t century. After the market closed,
the property was gradually developed with
industrial uses including junkyards. As a result,
the property had extensive subsurface
contamination that required remediation,
estimated at $3.2 million. As part of the
project's entitlements, the developer was
required to dedicate land for a park along the
Platte River Trail. Cypress applied to the Denver
Urban Renewal Authority (DURA) for tax
increment financing (TIF) revenue to offset the
remediation and park development costs.
Cypress retained EPS to conduct and
independent third party market and financial
feasibility review of the project. Key issues
addressed by EPS included the competitive
position of the Denargo project compared to
other proposed competitive residential projects,
the expected revenue from land sales to vertical
developers, and Cypress' expected rate of return
on the project with and without TIF. DURA's
policy is that TIF should only be used to fund the
gap needed to make a project attractive to
private investment. DURA therefore requires
developers requesting TIF to demonstrate that
the project could not process without public
financing; a "but for" test. The measure of this
"but for" test is the anticipated rate of return on
the project with and without TIF. EPS prepared a
land development pro -forma that estimated the
project's rate of return, based on expected land
values, residential absorption, and development
costs. Assumptions in the proforma were
supported by market research on competitive
developments and comparable land sales,
documented in a memorandum with supporting
tables, maps, and charts. DURA awarded the
project $2.4 million in TIF, to be refunded to the
developer as it accrues. The project's first phase
began construction in late 2011.
Deliverables
Financial proforma
TIF forecasts
DURA negotiations
Outcomes
- DURA awarded $2.4M in TIF
- First Phase under construction
Reference
Nic Whittaker
Asset Manager
Trustland Development Co.
(512)615-1594
nwhittaker(a)trustlanddevco.com
Colorado Regional Tourism Act, State of Colorado
Client
State of Colorado Office of State Planning and
Budgeting (OSPB) and the Office of Economic
Development and International Trade (OEDIT)
Project Description
EPS was selected by the State of Colorado Office
of State Planning and Budgeting (OSPB) and the
Office of Economic Development and
International Trade (OEDIT) to serve as the
Third Party Analyst to evaluate proposals under
the new Regional Tourism Act (RTA) legislation.
The RTA provides a mechanism for the State to
award state sales tax increment funding to up to
two tourism projects each year. EPS' role was to
independently review each project application
and determine the proportion of sales tax
revenue generated by the Project that is new to
the State, as well as the economic and fiscal
impacts of the Project.
The State received six project applications from
around the State in the 2011-2012 application
cycle. The highest profile and most controversial
project application proposed a 1,500 room
Gaylord Hotel and Conference Center and to
relocate the National Western Stock Show
facilities from Denver to Aurora. Other
applications proposed a year-round ski
adventure park in Estes Park; expansions to the
Convention Center and Riverwalk in Pueblo; $1.4
billion of dispersed recreation improvements and
municipal capital projects in Montrose County; a
paleontological museum and sports complex in
Douglas County; and a Riverwalk entertainment
district in Glendale. For each project application,
EPS quantified total project visitation, the
proportion of visitors estimated to be new to the
State, and the amount of sales tax generated by
the Project net of competition with existing
facilities. EPS also evaluated the Projects'
financing plans to answer the question: "but for"
the State funding, could the project be built in
the foreseeable future? The State relied on EPS'
visitation and revenue estimates in its decision
to award funding to the Gaylord Hotel and
Pueblo Riverwalk Projects.
N
WAGE IF I
Deliverables
- Six RTA project application analyses
- Financial proforma models
- Determination of net new economic
activity to State
Outcomes
- Economic Development Commission
accepted
- EPS' analysis and basis for selecting two
projects at the determined funding
levels.
Reference
Erick R. Scheminske
Deputy Director
Office of State Planning and Budgeting
(303)866-3024
erick.scheminske(a)state.co.us
I .•
Winrock Town Center and Quorum at ABQ Uptown —Albuquerque, New Mexico
Client
Winrock Partners LLC
Hunt Development Properties
Project Description
The Winrock Mall is being redeveloped as a
mixed use town center. It will retain the existing
department store anchors while the aging mall is
demolished to build an open-air retail and
entertainment center. The Quorum at ABQ
uptown is an adjacent 7-acre former school site
to be developed as an infill mixed use office,
hotel and higher density residential
development. Both projects are in the aging
Uptown major activity center area.
EPS conducted a feasibility study to verify and
validate the market potentials, and revenue and
financing forecasts and assumptions. EPS also
conducted a comprehensive fiscal impact
analysis for the City of Albuquerque to
determine the portion of City tax dollars needed
to cover operation and maintenance costs
associated with the project. Based on the fiscal
analysis, the two projects were approved for
over $130 million in public financing based on 75
percent of the future property and 70 percent
GRT tax revenues to support revenue bonds to
pay for the eligible public improvements.
Deliverables
- Project market analysis
- Financial feasibility analysis
- Public financing package
- Fiscal and economic impact analysis
Outcomes
Approval for $160 million in tax increment
financing from the City of Albuquerque and the
State of New Mexico utilizing a Tax Increment
for Development District (TIDD).
Reference
Michael Kelly, CMB, President
Realty Mortgage & Investment Co.
(505)830-7664
mkellyag10RMIC.com
Winrock Site Plan
;o
..' y WP_
r
Silverthorne Home De
Client
Town of Silverthorne, CO
Fiscal Impact Analysis, Silverthorne, Colorado
Project Description
In 2009, EPS performed a Fiscal and Economic
Impact Analysis as part of the pre -development
negations for a proposed 118,000 square foot,
$23 million dollar Home Depot store in the Town
of Silverthorne, CO. As part of its application,
The Home Depot sought to participate in the
Town's enhanced sales tax incentive program
(ESTIP), established to attract new retail
businesses to the Town that generate new retail
sales tax revenues and expand the local
economy. The ESTIP allows the new or
expanded retail business to apply for up to 50
percent of the eligible net new sales tax
revenues to be used to fund specified public
expenditures. As part of the ESTIP application,
EPS conducted a retail sales flow analysis that
estimated the net new retail sales and related
sales tax revenues that the Town can reasonably
expect to receive. This sales flow analysis
considered the market demand of the existing
trade area, the increased leakage capture of the
surrounding area, and the estimated
displacement of existing home improvement
stores in the Town.
The development application also required an
economic and fiscal impact analysis that
quantified expected net annual costs and
revenues to the Town based on the direct and
indirect impacts of the project. EPS estimated
total revenues and expenditures incurred by the
Town as a result of the proposed development.
In addition, new employment generation and its
effect on the current employment base was also
estimated. The resulting analysis demonstrated
a net positive fiscal and employment impact to
the Town.
T!4 n =Itulv� »�
Deliverables
- Fiscal impact analysis report
- Net new sales tax forecasts
- ESTIP terms proposal
Outcomes
Project has not moved forward
References
Carolynne White
Attorney
Brownstein Hyatt Farber
(303)223-1197
cwhite(�bhf-law.com
Brian Cannard
The Home Depot
Real Estate Manager, Northwest Division
(206)574-3578
brian cannard(alhomedeoot.com
San Juan County Economic Base Forecasts, New Mexico
Client
San Juan County and Farmington, New Mexico
Project Description
A coalition of business leaders in the coal
mining, power generation, and oil and gas
industries formed a committee known as the
E>P Committee to begin a collaborative
economic development program for the San
Juan County region. The committee was formed
out of concerns that the area's resource based
economy is declining. The San Juan basin oil and
gas resources have passed peak production, and
one of the two coal fired power plants recently
announced it would close three of its five
generating units, and the entire plan may close
in the coming years due to the high cost of
retrofitting new pollution control technology.
EPS was retained by the E>P Committee and
San Juan Economic Development Services to
develop an economic base analysis of the county
to educate the public on the contributions and
impacts of each industry, and to underscore the
negative impacts of a loss of energy and
extractive industries. EPS quantified the major
economic drivers in the County and forecasted
the impacts to employment and unemployment,
population, and major local government
revenues resulting from a decline in these
industries over 20 years. The E>P committee is
using the study as part of an education and PR
effort to build support for a broader economic
development and workforce training program.
Deliverables
- A slideshow on economic base multipliers and
a written report directed at local decision
makers and news media.
Outcomes
Study was used as an initial communication tool.
The County is now evaluating options for
additional workforce training to educate the fast
growing labor force.
Reference
T. Greg Merrion
Merrion Oil & Gas
(505)324-5300
TGREGCamerrion.bz
Louisville Fiscal Impact Analysis, Louisville, Colorado
Client
City of Louisville
Project Description
EPS has been hired by several developers to
complete fiscal impact analysis on their projects
as a part of the development submittal process in
the City of Louisville. The projects EPS have
analyzed have varied greatly from a larger, single
user office campus to a proposed new church and
tennis center, as well as residential and
commercial developments. The City of Louisville
required EPS to modify the comprehensive plan
fiscal model to generate a fiscal impact model that
analysis the specific uses and aspects of each
project. The fiscal impact analysis evaluates the
operation and capital revenues and costs
generated by the proposed development. EPS has
provided the results of the analyses in concise,
easy to understand memorandums and
presentations that allow City Staff and elected
officials to easily understand the unique aspects of
each project and assumptions used to measure
the fiscal impact of the projects.
Deliverables
- Fiscal impact analysis
- Reports for four complete projects
Outcomes
Three approved projects and one still under
review
References
North End Development Fiscal Impact Analysis
Michael Markel, President
Markel Homes
(303)449-8689
michael(d)markelhomes. com
Takoda Village Fiscal Impact Analysis (now Steele
Ranch
Rick Brew
RMCS, LLC
(303)448-1870
rick(�rmcslanclxom
Conoco Phillips Fiscal Impact Analysis
Les Carnell
Finance Consultant
ConocoPhillips Company
(918)661-0320
les.carnell(o)conocophillips.com
Louisville Safeway Fiscal Analysis
Jim Loftus
Loftus Developments, LLC
(303)938-1329
jrl(c0loftusdevelopments.com
PROJECT TEAM ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
� I
Daniel R Guimond, Principal
I
Project Manager / Primary Contact I
Analysis Impact Analysis
I
I
I I
I
I
I �
I ' I
I I
I I
I
I Chris Leutzinger Brian Duffany
I Senior Associate Vice President
I I I I
I I
i I
I
I Matt Prosser j David Schwartz I
Associate Senior Associate I
I I
I I
\ i
The (f' 1 Team
Project Manager
The primary project manager will is Daniel Guimond. His contact information is as follows:
730 17th Street, Suite 630, Denver, CO 80202; (303) 623-3557; dguimond(&eosdenver.com
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 7 Project Team
PROJECT BUDGET AND SCHEDULE
EPS can be available on short notice to provide financial or economic and fiscal impact
evaluations of City incentives. With adequate notice, in most cases, an analysis can be completed
within 30 days.
The budget for each analysis would be prepared on a case -by -case basis. However, based on our
past experience with similar projects with the City, we anticipate that a concise analysis and
memorandum can be prepared for most projects for approximately $5,000 to $10,000.
Table 1
2012 Hourly Staff Billing Rates
Principal $210
Vice President $170
Senior Associate $140
Associate $115
Research Analyst $80-$90
Production and Administrative Staff $75
Billing rates updated annually.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 8 Project Budget and Schedule
Key Personnel Resume
October 4, 2012
Mr. Joshua Birks
Economic Health Director
City of Fort Collins
215 North Mason Street
2nd Floor
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Subject: On -Call Financial Services — Proposal No. 7428; EPS #123078
Dear Josh:
EPS is pleased to submit this proposal to provide independent financial feasibility
analyses and economic and fiscal impact analyses for projects seeking tax
The Economics of Land Use increment financing or business incentives to the City of Fort Collins. We are
very interested in continuing our work with the City on these important
economic development activities.
As you know, EPS is a full -service economic consulting firm with over 40
professional staff and offices in Denver, Colorado and Berkeley, Los Angeles, and
Sacramento, California. The firm has a broad -based practice in real estate and
land use economics including market and feasibility analysis, fiscal and economic
impact analysis, public finance, redevelopment, and land use policy. EPS was
founded on the principle that real estate development and land use -related
public policy should be built on realistic assessment of market forces and
economic trends, feasible implementation measures, and recognition of public
policy objectives, including provisions for required public facilities and services.
The firm's entire practice is focused on the Economics of Land Use, specifically
the interrelationships between real estate development and municipal finance
and land use policy. We have successfully completed numerous projects for the
City comparable to the expected assignments under this on -call contract. We are
proud of the quality of work we have conducted for the City in the past and look
forward to the opportunity to work on future assignments.
Included with this letter is EPS' proposal including Project Understanding and
Approach, Scope of Work, List of Deliverables, Relevant Experience, References,
and Resumes of assigned staff. I, Daniel R. Guimond, will be the overall project
manager for any assignments under this proposed on -call contract.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
73017th Street, Suite 630
Sincerely,
Denver, CO 80202-3511
303 623 3557 tel
ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS, INC.
303 623 9049 fax
Berkeley
Denver
Los Angeles
Sacramento
Daniel R. Guimond
Principal
www.epsys.com
DANIEL R. GUIMOND, PRINCIPAL
Dan is a real estate economist and planner with over 30 years'
EDUCATION
experience in economic and financial analysis and development
M.A., Urban Geography,
planning for the public and private sectors. He has completed
University of Colorado,
over 100 real estate market and financial feasibility studies for
1976
retail, office, and mixed use projects at both newly developing
and infill revitalization settings. He is has completed financial
B.A., Political Science,
university of Colorado,
feasibility and economic impact analyses of public/private
1972
development partnerships and has advised real estate
development firms and cities on a range of public financing,
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
fiscal, and economic impact issues.
1999-present
Principal
SELECTED PROJECT MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE
Economic & Planning
Systems, Inc.
Mesa del Sol Market and Financial Analysis, Albuquerque, NM
Market analysis, development programming, TIF financing,
1997-
Principal, In Motion, Inc.
fiscal impact analysis, and development strategies for 9,000
,
acre infill project under development on a state land parcel.
1993-1997
Vice President, BRW Inc.
Winrock Town Center Redevelopment, Albuquerque, NM
Market analysis, financial feasibility, TIF financing and fiscal
1978-1992
Vice President, Hammer
impacts for the redevelopment of the former Winrock Mall as a
Siler, George Associates
mixed use town center redevelopment.
1976-1978
Denver Union Station Market and Revenue Forecasts Evaluation,
Planner, Jefferson
Denver, CO
County Planning
Third party independent peer review of development program,
Department
market analysis and TIF revenue forecasts for the 40-acre
Denver Union Station Downtown Development District and
AFFILIATIONS
Denver Union Station Project Authority (DUSPA).
American Institute of
Certified Planners
Sandia National Labs Campus Commons Business Case Analysis,
Albuquerque, NM
Urban Land Institute
Market analysis for private tenant opportunities and business
International Downtown
case analysis for financing development including the
Association
recommended alternative finance lease options.
Denver Planning Board,
Lowenstein Theatre Feasibility Analysis, Denver, CO
1992 to 2005
Market analysis and public financing for infill redevelopment
ICSC Colorado Alliance
including Tattered Cover bookstore, Twist and Shout music
store, and an independent cinema.
Midtown Corridor Redevelopment Study, Fort Collins, CO
Project feasibility, market analysis, development potentials, and
public/private financing strategy for an aging retail commercial
corridor including the Foothills Mall.
Buckley Annex Redevelopment Plan, Denver, CO
Economic& Planning Systems, Inc.
Development of a market analysis to forecast residential, retail,
730 17th Street, Suite 630
and office development potentials on the last remaining parcel
Denver, CO 80202-3511
of the former Lowry Air Force Base.
303 623 3557 tel
303 623 9049 fax
Diagonal Plaza Redevelopment Feasibility Study, Boulder, CO
Market and financial evaluation of redevelopment options for an
Berkeley
aging 250,000 square foot community shopping center on a 25
Denver
acre site in north Boulder.
Los Angeles
Sacramento
www.epsys.com
BRIAN L. DUFFANY, VICE PRESIDENT
Brian Duffany is an economist and planner with 10 years of EDUCATION
experience in land economics. Prior to joining EPS, his Master of Regional
experience included commercial real estate valuations, market Planning, Cornell
analysis and feasibility studies, and environmental consulting. University
Brian has a broad base of experience in local government
finance, fiscal impact analysis, transportation planning, Bachelor of Arts,
Geology, Colby College
demographic analysis, real estate development feasibility
analysis, and financial and economic modeling. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE 2010-Present
Vice President
Colorado Regional Tourism Act Reviewer, State of Colorado Economic & Planning
Served as the State's Third Party Analyst to review applications Systems, Inc.
for State tax increment financing (TIF). Reviewed and revised 2007-2010
application development and revenue forecasts, project Senior Associate
The Economics of Lang! l development pro-formas and determined the portion of project Economic & Planning
• p p p p � revenues eligible for State TIF. Evaluated employment and Systems, Inc.
spending multipliers using IMPLAN. 2004-2007
Associate
Denargo Redevelopment, Denver, CO Economic & Planning
Prepared a third party evaluation of the land development pro- Systems, Inc.
forma for an 18-acre brownfield redevelopment project as part 1999-2001
of the developer's application to the Denver Urban Renewal Real Estate Analyst
Authority for TIF. Performed market research on land sales, and value Research Group
rental and ownership housing absorption to refine and provide LLC
support for pro -forma inputs. Prepared an independent pro- 1997-1998
forma analysis and accompanying report. Environmental Geologist
Dames & Moore Group
Economic Base Scenarios, San Juan County, NM
Economic base study and scenario modeling to estimate the AFFILIATIONS
fiscal and economic impacts of a loss of jobs in oil and gas and American Institute of
power generation. Industry impacts and contributions were Certified Planners
estimated using the IMPLAN model. Fiscal impacts to local
governments were modeled using methods developed by EPS. American Planning
Association
Study forms the basis of a new economic development
program. Urban Land Institute
Carbondale Fiscal Impact Model, Carbondale, CO
Developed a fiscal impact model with Town staff for use in
development review. The model estimates municipal revenues
and service costs for the Town's General Fund and major
departments. To date the model has been used to evaluate the
proposed Marketplace, Thompson Park, and Overlook projects.
EverVail Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis, Vail, CO
Prepared a fiscal impact analysis (FIA) of a proposed $1.1
Economic& Planning Systems, Inc. billion dollar resort base village development. Analysis included
73017th Street, Suite 630 estimates of retail sales and lodging cannibalization from
Denver, CO80202-3511 existing establishments. Participated in and facilitated
303 623 3557 tel negotiations between the developer and the Town. Provided
303 623 9049 fax policy and negotiation recommendations to the Town Council.
Berkeley
Den ver
Los Angeles
Sacramento
www.epsys.com
DAVID T. SCHWARTZ, SENIOR ASSOCIATE
David has a diverse skill set for solving land use economic
issues within multiple contexts. His understanding of land use
economics issues, such as public/private development
feasibility, public finance mechanisms, economic impacts, and
the assessment of regional economic conditions and trends,
guides his work for clients. His background in mathematics,
statistics, urban economics, and a familiarity with the
implications of land use controls also complement his work.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Economic Impacts of US Air Medical Transport Industry,
Washington, D.C.
Assessed the nationwide and regional direct, indirect and
induced economic impacts of jobs and spending by the air
The Economies o%Lrind Use medical transport industry on other industries. Surveyed US
industry collecting programmatic and financial data on staffing,
aircraft counts, annual contract, staffing and non -staffing
operational expenditure, as well as capital reserves and
frequency and magnitude of goods and service purchases.
Uranium Mining Impacts & Forecasts, Montrose County, CO
(Cal Regional economic analysis, estimation of socio-economic
impacts from new uranium mining, manufacturing, and other
industrial activity. Modeled dispersion of economic and fiscal
impacts of employment and demographics in County. Provided
geo-spatial 50-year employment -based population forecasts.
Village Center Public Finance Options, Greenwood Village, CO
Provided guidance to the City Council regarding the purpose,
structure, functionality, and advantages and disadvantages of
various public finance and organizational structures, such as
URAs, DDAs, Metro Districts, GIDs, and SIDs, that exist to
assist in the provision of a City's public infrastructure.
Infrastructure Financing, Durango, CO
Identified employment, population, and retail expenditure
growth potential for La Plata County; documented expenditure
in -/out -flow across neighboring county and state lines;
projected non-residential development potentials over 20-
years. Recommended appropriate public financing improvement
district for issuing bonds and administrative objectives.
Inclusionary Housing Rental Policy Update, Boulder, CO
Analyzed the market and financing conditions surrounding the
development of rental housing to formulate new policies that
Economic& Planning Systems, Inc.
better meet the City's overall affordable rental housing goals.
730 17th Street, Suite 630
Explored financial return implications of policy changes such as
Denver, CO 80202-3511
adjusting AMI limits, cash in -lieu amount, adding a density
303 623 3557 tel
bonus, and adjusting unit size proportionality.
303 623 9049 fax
Economic Development Incentives and Impacts, Kansas City, MO
Berkeley
Forecasted revenues and expenditures under city-wide
Denver
scenarios to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of
Los Angeles
incentives, abatements, and debt service guarantees. The
Sacramento
findings constituted a series of alternative policies to guide the
City's strategic investment in future projects.
www.epsys.com
EDUCATION
Masters of City &
Regional Planning, The
Ohio State University,
2006
B.M., University of
Cincinnati, 1999, magna
cum laude
Also attended: B.A.,
Miami University, 1994-
1997
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
2009-Present
Senior Associate,
Economic & Planning
Systems, Inc.
2006-2009
Associate, Economic &
Planning Systems, Inc.
2004-2006
Planner, Department of
Land Use & Long Range
Planning, City of Dublin,
Ohio
2002-2004
Technical Assistant,
Citizens for Civic
Renewal, Cincinnati,
Ohio
AFFILIATIONS
American Planning
Association, 2004-
present
Board Member, 2007-
present, Denver
Association of Business
Economists
ULI Housing Taskforce,
2008-present
Colorado Symphony
Sustainability Study
Committee, 2011
el Sistema Budget
Committee, 2011
CHRISTOPHER L. LEUTZINGER, SENIOR ASSOCIATE
Chris Leutzinger has seven years of consulting experience in
planning and real estate development with a particular
expertise in urban redevelopment and public finance. Prior to
joining EPS, Chris worked as a financial analyst, tracking the
performance of urban residential development along the East
Coast and Chicago. He has knowledge in fiscal impact analysis,
public finance, and real estate finance and development.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
The Woodlands Incorporation Study, The Woodlands, TX
Developed a comprehensive fiscal model for The Woodlands
Township to estimate future ongoing budget requirements
under potential incorporation, as well as upfront one-time
capital expenditures necessary to become a stand-alone city.
The Economics of hand U.w, Assessed current and future service levels based on a set of
peer communities and analyzed the future revenue sources
available to The Woodlands as a city under state legislation,
including a potentially substantial impact to property taxes.
Also, estimated the impact to water and wastewater utilities, as
the existing Municipal Utility Districts (MUDs) that serve the
Township would need to be consolidated under incorporation.
Fiscal Impact and Cost of Growth Analysis, Basalt, CO
Developed a comprehensive fiscal model for the Town of Basalt
to analyze the fiscal impacts of two large developments in the
planning process, Willits Town Center and Stott's Mill.
Developed a set of net cost of growth factors for a number of
prototypical residential products (single family, townhome, and
condo) as well as retail and office formats. Presented results to
staff and stakeholders to better inform the community of the
fiscal implications of future land use policy.
Park County Cost of Community Services Study, Fairplay, CO
Developed a comprehensive fiscal model to analyze existing
fiscal conditions in Park County as a result of the high ratio of
out -commuters and second homes in the county. Identified
existing ratio tax revenue to service costs for a variety of land
uses, including residential and commercial. Determined the
revenue -to -cost ratios under a variety of residential densities.
Forecasted the fiscal effects of future development scenarios
over the long-term to inform land use policy decisions and as
well as potential fiscal mitigation.
Milliken Comprehensive Plan and Fiscal Model, Milliken, CO
Economic &Planning Systems, Inc. Developed a comprehensive fiscal model to analyze the
730 17th Street, Suite 630 potential fiscal impacts of three potential growth scenarios
identified in the comprehensive planning process. Analyzed the
303 623
Denver, 35 9049 tel 7 tel 3s11 impacts of the existing development agreement in place
between large private residential community and city.
303 623 049 fax Estimated potential mitigation solutions.
Berkeley Louisville Fiscal Impact Analysis, Louisville, CO
Denver Assisted a two private clients and the City of Louisville in
Los Angeles determining the fiscal impacts of a proposed 430-acre corporate
Sacramento campus along the US 36 corridor, as well as a proposed grocery
store redevelopment on South Bolder Road.
www.epsys.com
EDUCATION
Master of City and
Regional Planning,
University of North
Carolina -Chapel Hill,
2008
B.B.A., Real Estate with
High Honors, University
of Georgia, 2003
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
2011-present
Senior Associate
Economic & Planning
Systems, Inc.
2008-2011
Associate
Economic & Planning
Systems, Inc.
2007
Project Researcher
Preservation North
Carolina
2004-2006
Senior Associate
TriMont Real Estate
Advisors
2003-2004
Commercial Appraiser
Childers Associates
AFFILIATIONS
Urban Land Institute
MATT PROSSER, ASSOCIATE
Matt Prosser has a broad base of experience and education in EDUCATION
planning, urban design, and real estate with four years of Master of Urban &
consulting experience. He has worked on several projects in Regional Planning,
resort communities studying both the fiscal impact of new University of Colorado at
development and also the market demand for development. He Denver, 2008
also has background knowledge of land use and entitlement Bachelors of
planning, real estate development and finance, and Geographic Environmental Design,
Information Systems (GIS). University of Colorado at
Boulder, 2005
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
Cost of Services Study, Copper Mountain, CO
2007-2010
Assessment of the cost to provide essential services to the
Research Analyst II
Copper Mountain ski area community. The study included a
Economic & Planning
comparative analysis of several base areas of ski resorts and
Systems, Inc.
resort towns to determine the competitive position of Copper
2005-2007
Mountain and best approaches to service provision and revenue
Planner I
generation for resort towns and base areas.
Tetra Tech RMC
Fiscal Impact Assessments, Louisville, CO
2004
Modeled the fiscal impact for a variety of development projects
Infrastructure Planning
in the City of Louisville. The City requires a fiscal impact
Intern
City and County of
assessment for major developments. A modified impact model
Denver
has been created to incorporated factors from the City's
comprehensive plan model and accurate determine project
AFFILIATIONS
specific revenues and costs. Modified models have been created
American Planning
for the proposed Conoco Phillips development, and North End
Association
and Steel Ranch mixed use projects.
Urban Land Institute
Adams County Comprehensive Plan, CO
Currently modeling the fiscal impact of new growth on the
County for development scenarios formed during the
comprehensive plan process. Analyzed development fees and
impact fees assessed in other counties to determine how
Adams County compares to other counties and cities.
Town of Superior Comprehensive Plan, Superior, CO
Currently modeling the fiscal impact of new growth on the Town
of Superior for development scenarios formed during the
comprehensive plan process.
Colorado Regional Tourism Act Reviewer, State of Colorado
Served as the State's Third Party Analyst to review applications
for State tax increment financing (TIF). Reviewed and revised
application development and revenue forecasts and determined
the portion of project revenues eligible for State TIF.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
730 17th Street, Suite 630
Denver, CO 80202-3511
303 623 3557 tel
303 623 9049 fax
Berkeley
Denver
Los Angeles
Sacramento
www.epsys.com
CONSULTANT BACKGROUND
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) is a land economics consulting firm
experienced in the full spectrum of services related to real estate development,
the financing of public infrastructure and government services, land use and
conservation planning, and government organization.
EPS was founded on the principle that real estate development and land use -
related public policy should be built on realistic assessment of market forces and economic
trends, feasible implementation measures, and recognition of public policy objectives, including
provisions for required public facilities and services. The firms' areas of expertise are as follows:
• Real Estate Market and Feasibility Analysis
• Public Finance
• Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis
• Reuse, Revitalization, and Redevelopment
• Housing Development Feasibility and Policy
• Regional Economics and Industry Analysis
• Land Use Planning and Growth Management
• Open Space and Resource Conservation
• Government Organization
• Transportation Planning and Analysis
• Asset Valuation and Repositioning
Since 1983 EPS has provided consulting services to hundreds of public- and private -sector clients
in Colorado and throughout the United States. EPS is located in Denver, Colorado, and Berkeley,
Los Angeles, and Sacramento, California. EPS clients include cities, counties, special districts,
education and other non-profit institutions, multi -jurisdictional authorities, property owners,
developers, financial institutions, and land use attorneys.
The professional staff of 40 includes specialists in public finance, real estate development, land
use and transportation planning, government organization, and computer applications. The firm
excels in preparing concise analyses that disclose risks and impacts, support decision making,
and provide solutions to real estate development and land use -related problems.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1 Consultant Background
PROPOSAL
Project Understanding and Approach
The City of Fort Collins is seeking an economic consultant to provide on -call analyses for projects
requesting business incentives and/or tax increment financing assistance. Although smaller
projects are currently being reviewed by the Economic Health Office (EHO) staff, the City would
like to have the resources of an experienced consultant in both financial pro forma analysis for
evaluating larger and more complex TIF and other financial incentives to real estate projects, as
well as fiscal and economic impact analysis to evaluate the broader benefits of a range of other
incentives packages.
Fort Collins is to be commended for the balanced and fiscally responsible way it approaches
economic development and urban renewal incentives. Providing incentives, whether through tax
increment financing (TIF), sales and use tax rebates, or other sources, should be granted to
those projects or business for which there is a documented financial need and would not proceed
"but for" the incentive. There should also be a clear public benefit from project or applicant,
which can be defined fairly broadly to include enhanced City revenues, new or retained jobs,
public amenities or infrastructure improvements, or a likely potential to catalyze additional
economic growth or revitalization. Incentives should be evaluated judiciously to ensure that the
public's investment is truly needed and that the funds are not enriching an applicant's bottom
line, inflating land costs, or supporting business operations that are inefficient or that have
questionable viability.
The RFP points out TIF incentives and manufacturing use tax rebates as examples of the most
common types of incentives the City offers. The approach to evaluating the need for and benefits
of these incentives is different. TIF is typically a real estate development incentive that applies to
the development phase of a real estate project. Evaluating the effect of TIF incentives requires
examining a real estate development pro forma to ensure that the estimated costs and revenues
are realistic and that the rate of return with TIF is not unreasonably high. A use tax rebate could
apply to business operations or capital equipment or facility expenses for a new or existing
business. Evaluating the justification for a use tax rebate can involve evaluating a real estate pro
forma, or business operating expenses in order to judge the need for the incentive and may be
less concrete than evaluating a TIF application. It can also be informative to evaluate the
broader economic impacts of a business to determine or illustrate its importance in the local
economy. Businesses that do not create substantial economic impacts could be given a lower
priority in a competitive incentives process.
EPS has been conducting financial, fiscal, and economic impact analyses for local and state
governments throughout its 30 year history. Due to our long track record serving public and
private clients, we have the unique ability to construct objective and credible analyses, and to
gain the trust of both parties.
Additionally, over the last 10 years, we have worked with the City of Fort Collins numerous times
on all of the types of services expected to be needed under this on -call contract including the
following projects:
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 2 Proposal
On -Call Financial Services
October 4, 2012
• Front Range Village Financial Analysis and Negotiation
• North College Marketplace TIF Financial Analysis
• Foothills Mall Financial Model and Incentives Evaluation
• Floodplain Ordinance Revisions Economic Impact Analysis
• Large Format Retailer Incentives Package Analysis
• East and West Neighborhood Zoning Amendment Economic Impacts
EPS draws from its core practice areas of real estate market and feasibility analysis, and fiscal
and economic impact analysis when evaluating economic development incentives. We begin by
evaluating and understanding the market for a project or business and its potential for success;
the City would not be advised to fund a project that does not have a viable business plan. EPS
knows well the Fort Collins and Northern Colorado real estate market and can draw from this
knowledge to streamline the initial market analysis needed to support pro forma inputs. We
review pro formas and business operating expense data to ensure that an applicant is including
only reasonable and directly related costs and revenues, and that these costs and revenues are
in line with other comparable projects. Finally, we prepare transparent analyses with methods
and assumptions documented, and concise conclusions and recommendations targeted to senior
staff and/or elected officials as appropriate. Our approach to this assignment will be to continue
to provide the same high quality and timely services we have been providing for Fort Collins and
our other municipal clients for years.
Scope of Work
Financial Analysis
Although each project is different, the primary tasks anticipated to be needed to review the
financial feasibility of a real estate development or redevelopment project are as follows:
Task 1: Development Program
EPS will review and evaluate the proposed development program (including signed and
prospective tenants), schedule, cost and revenue assumptions, and needed public
improvements. Based on our knowledge of the Fort Collins market, we will also evaluate the
underlying market assumptions on rents and/or sales prices, occupancy rates, and absorption.
We will also conduct a site visit to better understand area market conditions and the public
infrastructure and redevelopment improvements needed for the project.
Task 2: Financial Model Review
EPS will also obtain and review the applicant's submitted financial pro forma model and analysis
with and without the requested public financial investments. EPS will sign a confidentiality
statement agreeing to keep the project proprietary financial information confidential and will
provide to the City summary information regarding estimated performance on an unleveraged
basis. EPS will then construct its own financial model to evaluate the project against acceptable
measures of return for public investment in a real estate development project. The analysis will
calculate the developer's internal rate of return on a leveraged and/or unleveraged basis with
and without public investment to determine 1) "but for" the public investment the project is
financially infeasible, and 2) with the public investment the project is feasible with a reasonable
IRR given current financial conditions and the associated level of developer risk. The analysis will
be transmitted to the EHO/URA staff and the applicant in draft form for review and discussion.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3 Proposal
On -Call Financial Services
October 4, 2012
Task 3: Applicant Meeting
EPS will meet with the applicant and staff in person or by phone to review the draft financial
analysis, identify any corrections needed, and to discuss any outstanding issues. If needed, the
financial model will be revised and any additional sensitivity analyses will be performed.
Task 4: Report and Presentation
EPS will prepare a concise report to summarize its analysis and conclusions regarding the
project's financial feasibility with and without TIF or other financing incentives. We will also
attend a City Council meeting to present our conclusions and respond to Council questions.
Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis
A comprehensive fiscal impact analysis is generally not warranted for business investment
projects. These projects are considered for incentives because they are potentially bringing
significant new jobs and other economic activity to the City. The objective is to identify the level
of this new economic activity, but also to identify any major offsetting cost impacts, generally in
the form or needed on- or off -site infrastructure improvements. The major tasks anticipated are
as follows:
Task 1: Project Evaluation
EPS will evaluate the economic components of the proposed business investment program
including new facilities cost, number and type of jobs, average wages by job class, and
development timing and phasing. We will also meet with EHO staff to discuss the proposed
incentives and the level of investment requested and the level of investment under consideration
by staff on a preliminary basis.
Task 2: Economic Impacts
EPS will calculate the direct and indirect economic impacts of the proposed investments. Direct
impacts will be measured in terms of jobs and wages, and corporate business volume in the local
economy. The indirect and induced impact will be measured through an input output model (e.g.,
Implan or RIMS II).
Task 3: Fiscal Impacts
EPS will quantify the direct revenues gained by the City through sales and property taxes
associated with the business investment (paid by the business not its employees). The revenues
will be estimated on an annual basis over the period of investment as well as the time period for
any incentives to be paid out. We will also measure the costs to the City associated with the
incentives as well as any additional on- and off -site infrastructure needed to serve the project. A
number of metrics can be used to evaluate the project benefits including the ratio of revenues to
costs, and/or net revenues per new job as appropriate for the type of project under evaluation.
Task 4: Fiscal and Economic Impact Report and Presentation
EPS will prepare a concise fiscal and economic impact report for EHO staff review. We will consult
with staff on refining the incentives package as necessary based on the impact analysis. We will
also attend a City Council meeting to present our conclusions and respond to Council questions.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 4 Proposal
LIST OF DELIVERABLES
Financial Analysis
• Financial pro forma model
• "But for" determination of financing need
• Recommended level of return on investment
• Recommended level of TIF or ESTIP investment needed
• Report and presentation
Economic and Fiscal Analysis
• Economic impact model results
• Level of investment metrics and recommendations
• Report and presentation
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 5 List of Deliverables
(f�
Relevant Experience
North College Marketplace Financial Analysis, Fort Collins, Colorado
Client
City of Fort Collins
Project Description
EPS conducted a "but for" analysis of the need
for public financing for the North College
Marketplace, a community shopping center in an
underserved area anchored by a King Soopers
marketplace superstore. The 27.83-acre site
includes 10.95 acres of wetlands and storm
water detention enhancements. The cost
associated with these enhancements and other
eligible public improvements totals
approximately $7.94 million.
EPS performed an independent and confidential
analysis of the developer's project costs and
revenues. The focus of the analysis was to
determine the legitimacy of the request for
public funds to offset the eligible public
improvements. Based on the risk associated
with the project, the targeted rate of return was
estimated at 12.0 percent. EPS' analysis
indicated that the proposed North College
Marketplace project will generate an estimated
5.5 percent unleveraged internal rate of return
(IRR) without any public investment. The
addition of the $7.94 million in requested public
investments will increase the estimated IRR to
11.4 percent, which was determined to be a
reasonable and not excessive rate of return for
this project.
Outcomes
- TIF agreement completed
- Project built and opened in 2012
Reference
Mike Freeman
(Former CFO City of Fort Collins)
CEO
Rocky Mountain Innosphere
(970)221-1301
mike.freemanCa>rmi2.ora