The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCORRESPONDENCE - BID - 7282 LP TRANSFORMERS 25KVA & 100KVA PADMOUNTED SINGLE PHASE (2)Ikite 1 o [1 Opal Dick From: Adam Bromley Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 1:17 PM To: Opal Dick; Kraig Bader Subject: Transformer Bid # 7282 Attachments: Xfmr_1 -phase_Pad_Bid_Ta11y7282.xls Opal, I have finished the evaluation of the bids for the 25 kVA and 100 kVA single phase padmounted transformers, Bid #7282. We will be splitting this bid between the 25 kVA Notes: - Howard does not meet height requirement (quoted 3h” instead of 32 thin holds true ter bnth BSE and Westem United - ECU accepts Cooper Eeceptioss: Cooper takes eeception to coal tar epnep undercoating internal iiquid level markings, and the EEl “Finishing Gv:de/sns specihcat:vr ‘Cooper slardard meets IEEE C57 2 29-2005/ - GE quoted 2$ kVA that did not meet moe height 8 Units Size NL Loss Cost FL Loss Cost Specified Impedanoe % 100 kVA 3 80 1 50 Bid 8: Date: Notes: - Ro.ca:c quote does not meet impedance speciticaton requirements, this holds tree tsr both BSE end Western United - FCU accepts Cooper heceptieno: Cooper takes euceptien to coal tar epeey undercoating, internal liquid lecel markings, and the EEl “Finishing Gaidelineo” speciticatien (Cooper standard rneets IEEE Cb7.12 28-2005( - Gh quoted an ANSI Type 2 tranotorrner tor the 103 kVA - FCU only specihes that it will accept ANSI Type br the tOO kVA - NESCO S S not till out spreadsheet as asked Irby bidding 100 kVA Cooper tranotormers, comes out to be the lowest eualuated bid I Phase Padmounted Transformer Bid Evaluation 238 (See impedance Requirements Table in Speciticatinn( Base Bid Rank eased en Rank eased or ease Cd 0 War tin Lead War Tetal Impedance Eualaated Ertended Cent NL Less NL FL Less FL erd It u best Eeeleated bid (t Supp’ er t.taeutactuier Each DeIWks Less Gear Full Lead Less Impedance t.teet Spers’ Enealat:en Lead Less Variance Bid (Total SI Lens Cent Less Cost eherse( is best aherne( ‘Aester” r’rsd CE 5 2 805.00 5 143 891 202 No in not 1134 -15.13% S 4,840.20 S 86,10000 5 557.70 S 1,486.50 1 - Westerm United Hc,uard 0 3,005.00 6 161 639 240 No ru Net tOlg 0 84% S 5,017.90 5 01,10000 5 70590 0 1 257C0 d - herder Sru:ue nq’.vem 5 3.02632 E to 6 ldt 638 240 Ne is net 1019 0.04% S 4,909.22 S 6D,52E.40 5 705.90 5 1,297.00 3 - -n, Cooper 0 2.95038 tE to 18 “50 032 230 Yes is tInt 982 0.00% 9 4.81938 S 59,727.00 5 88800 5 1,24800 2 1 ‘A’euco ASh 0 3,231 00 10 to 12 198 889 1 96 Yes is net 875 -17.65% 5 4,989.90 5 84,82000 S 72840 S 1,03380 5 4 requirement (32.b” instead et 32) - GE transformer drawegs are very pour qualitp and there is much dimens:ueal informative that is not included and/or vlear - Western United’s bid documents for GE also stated that thep have eocnptiuns to oar spec hut the “detailno Eucnp:iocs Onee1 is sot :n their uttacsnd dscumeets WESCG, bidding 2$ kVA ABS transformers, comes oat to be the best evaluated bid I Phase Padmounted Transformer Bid Evaluation 9 Units 30 Bid 9: Size 28 hVA Date: NL Loss Cost S 3 90 FL Loss Cost $ I ho Spenifind Impedance % 2 16 (See Impedance Requirements Table io Spncihcatien( Ease s:d Rank based as Rank based or Ease E:d Guar Lv Load Guor Pall Load Guar Total Impedasee EvalualedEevrjev Cost ‘L ess rLess - eL 9;d 7 ‘s best h•alvule CU It Suppl:er f,tanaferturer 0/ Each Dei[’Jks Loss Less Impedanve trot breve 1 escalation Load Loss Vaeaeve Bid (Total di tess Cast Less Cost ccv ye: e reel esv en) WasformUn/ted GE d 1419.00 d dl 2b4 tbbi.v isevl 305 -t2DdH $ 2,08390 0 42a9000 $ 33793 5 vrflO I - iflvvieiee Ua,led Hnwaid 0 1,555.05 9 Sb 3/9 2 ‘30 No is Nrl 379 -74’’’, 0 3263.90 S 4995000 S 230.tO S 47990 3 - Border Slates Hvavard 0 1502.93 6 lv 8 58 319 2.00 Nv is nC 378 -7 4’S: S 2.29t.23 $ 49 578.80 $ 230th $ d78.bd 2 - Irby Cvvper $ 1 570.70 rb lv Id 70 249 2 16 Yes is Net 3t9 0.03/i $ 2.82225 5 5927250 $ 27300 $ 37390 4 5 Wesce ABS $ rdot 00 tOte t2 Sb 234 tOO Yes w nvr 2W -9.29/a $ 249210 S bd.d30.00 $ 230 tO S 39’ 03 $ $ and 100 kVA transformers. The bid for 25 kVA transformers from Wesco for the ABB manufactured transformers were the best evaluated bid. I recommend that we award the bid for the 25 kVA transformers to Wesco for the ABB transformers. The bid for 100 kVA transformers from Irby for the Cooper manufactured transformers were the best evaluated bid. I recommend that we award the bid for the 100 kVA transformers to Irby for the Cooper transformers. Any questions let me know. Thanks, Adam Bromley, P.E. Senior Iectricol Engineer Standards Engineering bivision Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 (970) 221-6673 abromley@fcgov.com 10/17/2011