Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESPONSE - RFP - 7084 CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICEScity f. October 28, 2009 Fo $toCollins -�,.... Technical Engineering Proposal RF:PM7084 Magnolia Street Stomwater Outfall Project And /suture Wa ter, Waste wa ter and .Storm water Facilities Capital /mproVOMents ANdERSON CONSU[TLNq ,ENgiNEERS, ;INC. � Civil • Water>hesources • Environmen161 d�tesco� �. DEE,R°E j6z AU;LT. �� Alp,neEco I'] 11 Just as important, we have unique insight into the interrelated functions of all proposed Old Town Basin improvements, thereby allowing for the focused evaluation of alternatives for the Magnolia Outfall that may reduce the cost of storm drainage improvements for the basin This familiarity and understanding of the local drainage systems, coupled with our extensive experience in analyzing and developing improvement plans for stormwater mitigation, will serve the project well by allowing us to quickly and thoroughly evaluate and design the elements of the project. With'respect to the'Mlghblia Street Project.,--ACE,s? r specific corporate experience includes ���`�����k �k' `�♦ PrelimmaF,y and final design of storm sewers Li`mlets; detention ponds, water quality ponds, � strxeam'channels, and`utihty elocations " ♦ Formulation and evaluation of alternatwe vd t x c ry, storm drainage improvements 4" v J t sue..«^ ♦ Hydrologic ^i and hydraulic modeling of storm drainage facilities ` ' ;; ♦ Preparation,of final design construction and: � cvfiH An example of our experience in designing a storm sewer project is the ongoing Bestway Detention Pond and Storm Sewer Project located at 35th Avenue and 4th Street, in Greeley, CO. This project, which is currently under design by ACE staff, includes the hydrologic analysis of the drainage basin, the hydraulic analysis and design of the detention pond, the pond; inlet and outlet facilities; the analysis and design of the 42h Street storm sewer and inlet capture system, and the preparation of construction plans, contract documents, and specifications. Another example of our experience in completing a storm sewer project is the VTH Outfall project located north of Drake Road near Spring Creek, in Fort Collins. This project, which was designed by ACE staff in 1999 and was constructed in 2000, included the hydrologic analysis of the drainage basin, the hydraulic design of the storm sewer system, the preparation of construction plans, contract documents, and specifications, and construction management services during the construction of the project. A project that exemplifies our use of innovative project elements is the Canal Importation Ponds and Outfall (CIPO) project in Fort Collins. To provide flood control to several neighborhoods in West Fort Collins, ACE performed hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for the ponds and the appurtenant storm R F> sewer system, designed an underdrain system to dewater the ponds, designed and prepared construction plans and specifications for the ponds, hydraulic structures, storm sewers, underdrain system, and utility relocates, and provided resident engineering construction management services. The Norris Avenue Viaduct and the Henderson Flood Control Improvement Project projects in XCOFC2009-Magnolia.doc 1.6 ANdERSON CONSUITING ENgiNEERS, INC. I C 1 Cheyenne, Wyoming are two high profile outfall projects that Anderson Consulting Engineers and AVI Professional Corporation teamed on to provide solutions to storm water issues in two major drainage basins in the city (Henderson Basin & Holiday Basin). The Norris Avenue Viaduct is the largest public works project undertaken by the City of Cheyenne and incorporated storm sewer improvements and realignment to move the existing storm sewer system traversing through an oil refinery to a location that was a minimum of one block away from the refinery. The project involved the hydraulic analysis of the existing and proposed systems which included deep storm sewers, siphons, box culverts, and energy dissipating structures. One block of storm sewer was 20-25 feet deep and involved pipe jacking and tunneling beneath existing sanitary sewer facilities paralleling the new storm sewer within a 16' wide alleyway. A variety of pipe materials were utilized within the new system, reinforced concrete water contamination, ductile iron piping at siphon location and reinforced concrete box culverts. The Henderson Flood Control Improvement Project is located in the City of Cheyenne's third highest flood hazard area. ACE and AVI teamed to perform hydraulic analysis and develop a storm water management system to upgrade the existing system from less than a 2-year protection to a 25-year protection in two sump areas with potential for 100 year protection with additional downstream improvements. The project provided a 27 acre-foot detention facility to detain upper Henderson Basin flows that were captured with the addition of inlet galleries, conveyed through 1000± l.f. of 12' x 6' reinforced concrete box culverts and directed to the detention pond. The detention pond involved excavating 116,000 cubic yards of material and is sited approximately 20 feet below the surrounding topography. The project also included numerous utility adjustments and street improvements to accommodate the storm sewer facility. ACE has completed numerous flood control projects that share similar design issues with the Magnolia Street Outfall Project. Table 1.1 provides a summary of these and other pertinent projects as they relate to the engineering issues identified in the RFP. Detailed project descriptions of selected projects that pertain to the engineering services required by the City are provided in the appendix included at the end of this proposal. 1.4 Qualifications for Future Projects The ACE Project Team is uniquely qualified to o z e ,Q corporate experience includes provide engineering services in support of future ♦ Storm(,twa Vdrologhc,and hydraulic projects to be identified by the City of Fort Collins modelin '}`Y X l `t `` r ACE has successfully completed literally hundreds of g lu 1 FEMAfloodplam`mappmg and FIS revisions projects for the City of Fort Collins over the last 19 years that have covered a myriad of stormwater, •�stream�assee ssmnt,and rehabil�tat�on, water and wastewater related issues. The ACE Water quality BMPs and LIDTechniques i�'�' '-MC , Project Team is qualified in diverse engineering Ewstmg infrastructure rehabilitation,l, disciplines such as hydrologic and hydraulic mclutlmg stormwater, wader, and sl wastewaLCr systems s , modeling, floodplain mapping including FEMA map,,, -� .•u,� . ". c..rs^ revisions, stream rehabilitation studies, the design of stormwater quality BMPs, utility relocation design, trenchless pipe rehabilitation, the analysis and design of water and wastewater conveyance and treatment facilities, and drainage master planning. I XCOFC2009-Magnolia.doc 1.7 ANdERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. k k An example of our experience in designing a water line project is the Midway Drive Water Line Project located at Midway Drive, and Shields Street in Fort Collins. This project, which was designed by ACE staff, included the design of a new 8-inch water line and fire hydrants, the tapping of an existing 18-inch water line, the design of a county road and cul-de-sac, and the preparation of construction plans, contract documents, and specifications. Table 1.1 provides a summary of this and other pertinent projects as they relate to the future engineering disciplines identified in the RFP. 1.5 Alternative Product Delivery System (APDS) and Partnering Experience The members of the ACE Project Team have considerable experience with the City of Fort Collins' APDS process, as well as experience in partnering for the design and construction of projects. The value provided by the APDS process can be measured directly in dollars, but can also be quantified through additional benefits, similar to the environmental and water quality benefits realized by combining the Red Fox Natural Area and stormwater detention functions of the CIPO Project. The process, which is built upon the commitment and participation of the City's Project Managers, the construction general contractor, and the design team, has resulted in "value added" benefits that greatly improve the final design drawings, reduce potential construction problems, greatly reduce change orders, and produce a quality construction product that meets and/or exceeds the expectations of the citizens of Fort Collins. The ACE Project Team experience within the APDS process and other formal partnering processes is summarized in Table 1.2. le 1 2 : ACE Project Team APDS Experience MO� TabIN Project Name �;�Locat�ori 5g Canal Importation Ponds and Outfall Project Fort Collins, CO Oxbow Levee Project Fort Collins, CO Drake Road Storm Sewer/VTH Pond Outfall Project Fort Collins, CO Taft Hill/Rolland Moore Detention Pond Project Fort Collins, CO Riverside/ Jefferson and Mulberry/ Riverside Inlet Improvements Fort Collins, CO Bobcat Ridge Access Road Drainage Improvements Masonville, CO Spring Creek Utility Line Protection Fort Collins, CO Oak Street Outfall (1)and (2) Fort Collins, CO Mulberry Water Reclamation Facility (2) Fort Collins, CO Spring Creek Channel Rehabilitation at Lemay Avenue Fort Collins, CO S S 3 a� 4 ' x 7 "' ° a as � �3 � " i Formal:Partnerng Experience�� f ACE Pro ect Team .w . City of Fort Collins Partnering Session for APDS Process - 2000 Fort Collins, CO City of Fort Collins Partnering Session for APDS Process - 2005 Fort Collins, CO Timberline Road/Dry Creek Channel Improvement Project Fort Collins, CO Big Goose Creek Drop Structure Sheridan, WY "' Deere and Ault Personnel (z) Ditesco Personnel I XCOFC2009-MagnoIia.doc 1.8 ANdERSON CONSU[TING ENGINEERS, INC. r Table 1.1 ACE Project Experience Matrix — Magnolia Street Clutfall and Future Projects. �a PROJECT NAME LOCATION a Canal Importation Ponds and OuttPipe Fort Collins.all Colorado x x x ' Rolland Moore Detention Pond Fort .0's, Colorado x x Drake Road Storm Sewer and VTH Pond Outfail Fort x: x ' Bestway Detention Pond and Storm Sewer Cdo olorado x x Oxbow Levee F��al do x x x Robert Benson Reservoir Dam Rehabilitation Fort Collins,Colorado x x Avery Park Regional Detention Pond Fort Collins,Colorado x x Henderson Basin Flood Control Project Cheyenne, Wyoming x x x Taylor Ditch Siphon R Wyoming �x� x a Norris Avenue Viaduct wyommp' SIN z x ' Blevins Junior High School Drainage Improvements Fort Collins. Colorado x x ,� Riverside/ Jefferson and Mulberry/ Riverside Inlet Foil Collins, x Improvements Colorado x•. Harmony Park Regional Detention Pond Fort Collins,Colorado x x Midway Drive Water Line FOCdCado • Timnath El. School Sanitary Sewer Improvements Tirtmtah, Colorado € x* Eagle View Natural Area Ditch Relocation F�Collins,w xn' Spring Creek Channel Rehabilitation at Lemay Fort Collins, ' Avenue Old Town Basin Master Drainage Plan Coloraoo Fort Collins, Colorado x x x Poudre RiverlBoxelder Creek/Fossil Creek Fort Collins, x, Stability Studies colors& Spring Creek Utility Line Protection Fort Howes Street Outfali Fort Collins Bobcat Ridge Access Road Drainage Design F�w� , x Boyd Freeman Ditch Rehabilitation Greeley, Colorado xah Ciearview Channel Improvements For Items. x z ' Spring Creek Channel Restoration / Drake Road Fort Collins, X X. Bridge Colorado �- Poudre R-1 South Bus Facility Water Quality Fort Collins,X Pond Colorado West Side Storm Sewer Wetlands / Water Quality Windsor, ' Pond Colorado ;v Poudre R-1 1999 Elementary School Regional Fort Calms ` Ft Detention Pond Colorado X Foothills Regional Channel Improvements Fort Collinsbra coao x Avocet Road Storm Sewer/ Drainage Fort calms R Improvements Colorado x xsx ¢fx Dry Creek Overflow Channel / Timberline Road Fort Collins, x r x' ' Major Drainage Improvements Colorado a�i c/ o vo /�mrf rc wC� m c� cm `tea Qm �m 07 A a� � ` I XCOFC2009-Magnolia.doc 1.9 ANdERSON CONSUITINCI ENGiNEERS, INC. October 28, 2009 rciby of Technical Engineering Proposal ort CO[IIt1S Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project PUT qMngand Future Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Capital Improvements RFP-7084 Section 11- Key Tear' Members ANdERSON CONSU[TINq ENqINEERS, INC. Civil • Water Resources • Environmental o "iCONSL7L1'AN TS:dNC Q-1 0 en"' I SECTION II — KEY TEAM MEMBERS ' The members of the ACE Project Team bring a wealth of experience to the City of Fort Collins that is directly applicable to the Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project, as well as any future stormwater, water, and wastewater projects. ACE's expertise is derived primarily from previous project ' experience, backed by our technical education which is supported by additional training and continuing education. This expertise is manifested in the outstanding capabilities of the ACE staff and our team members. The goal of the ACE Project Team is to work together with the City of Fort Collins and the ' APDS Construction Contractor to provide engineering designs that are economical and buildable, and that provide flood control, economic, environmental, and social benefits to the citizens and property owners of Fort Collins. 1 Brief summaries of experience pertinent to the Magnolia Outfall Project and similar projects applicable to future work are provided in the following sections for the ACE Project Team members, including the Project Manager and key team personnel. ' 2.1 Project Manager 1-J The ACE Project Manager for the Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project and any future projects will be Mr. Bradley Anderson, P.E., CFM. Mr. Anderson is President and senior principal engineer with Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc.; he has over 28 years of experience in the field of water resources engineering. Mr. Anderson is an experienced civil engineer proficient in and responsible for all aspects of water resources engineering projects including the complex hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, stream restoration, hydraulic structure evaluation and design, water quality improvements, Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, and the preparation of final design plans and specifications. Mr. Anderson has served as a member of the Floodplain Task Force Committee for the City of Fort Collins. He has also served as Chair of the Advisory Committee for the Colorado Floodplain and Stormwater Criteria Manual and Chair of the Colorado Association of Stormwater and Floodplain Managers (CASFM). Mr. Anderson has also been the Project Manager for several City of Fort Collins projects including the Oxbow Levee Project, the Canal Importation Ponds and Outfall (CIPO) Project, The Spring Creek Rehabilitation Project, and the Veterinary Teaching Hospital (VTH) Outfall Pipe Project. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado, Nevada, Oregon, and Wyoming and is a Certified Floodplain Manager. Mr. Anderson will act as the primary point of contact for all correspondence between the City and the Project Team. Mr. Anderson, working closely with the ACE Senior Engineers, will direct and oversee all aspects of the engineering, design, and permitting work associated with the Magnolia Street Outfall Project, and any future projects for the City. Pertinent to the Magnolia Street Outfall and Future Projects, Mr. Anderson has been the project manager for studies involving: (a) hydrologic and hydraulic evaluation of stormwater improvements (b) preliminary and final design of stormwater sewers, utility relocations, water quality ponds, and hydraulic structures; (c) stormwater master planning studies including floodplain mapping; (d) environmental permitting; (e) design of water and wastewater facilities; (f) CLOMRs and LOMRs submittals to FEMA, and FIRM and FIS revisions; and (g) preparation of construction plans, specifications, and contract documents. Specifically pertinent to the Magnolia Street Outfall Project and other City projects, Mr. Anderson was the project manager for the CIPO project which was designed and constructed in conjunction with the City and Garney Construction through the City's Alternative Product Delivery System (APDS) process. XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 2.1 ANdERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 1 2.2 Key Project Team Members At Anderson Consulting Engineers we have assembled a technical staff that is unsurpassed with ' respect to hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, floodplain and floodway analyses and delineation, stormwater, water and sanitary sewer system evaluation and design, flood mitigation, development of ' construction documents, and FEMA floodplain revisions. Combined with our support staff of CAD designers and technicians, GIS specialists, and administrative staff, we are able to provide a broad range of engineering, design, data collection, mapping and analytical services using the latest advances in engineering analytical software, design packages, CADD drafting software, and GIS analysis tools. We take great pride in our technically based, yet common sense approach to solving complex engineering problems in order to arrive at well-founded engineering solutions that meet our clients' ' needs while also being economical and practical. We have proven through our past contracts with the City of Fort Collins that we are eager and willing participants in the City's APDS process, and we fully realize the importance and benefits of this process to the citizens of the City of Fort Collins and to the staff of the City's Utilities Department. ' Anderson Consulting Engineers has assembled a project team that we believe is unsurpassed with respect to providing the experience, expertise and attention to detail necessary to support the Magnolia Street Outfall Project in an exceptional manner. The ACE Project Team includes personnel ' that offer many years of experience collaborating in the fields of hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, hydraulic design, and the preparation of construction plans and specifications. Brief introductions for the key personnel on the ACE Project Team are provided below. Focused resumes for the personnel ' listed below, as well as other important team members can be provided upon request, but are omitted from this RFP due to space constraints. Aaron M. Hansen, P.E., CFM Mr. Hansen is a Project Manager with Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. He has 14 years of experience conducting hydrologic and hydraulic modeling projects and channel stability studies, preparing flood hazard delineations and flood mitigation plans, utility relocations, preparing CLOMR and LOMR applications, preparing construction plans and specifications, as well as designing flood ' control and urban drainage systems, and preparing master drainage plans for public agencies and private sector clients. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado and a Certified Floodplain Manager. ' Pertinent to the Magnolia Street Outfall and Future Projects, Mr. Hansen has been the project manager or senior engineer for studies involving: (a) hydrologic and hydraulic evaluations of natural and improved river systems and irrigation delivery systems; (b) the design and analyses of storm sewer ' systems, detention ponds, water quality ponds, and stormwater BMPs; (c) the design and preparation of construction plans and specifications for flood control projects; and (d) floodplain and floodway delineations in both natural and urban riverine settings in support of CLOMR/LOMR applications to ' FEMA. Mr. Hansen is one of the design engineers responsible for the design of the CIPO Project, the Rolland Moore Detention Pond Project, and the Clearview Channel Design Project for the City of Fort Collins. ' Mark K. Kempton, P.E., CFM Mr. Kempton is a Project Manager with Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. He has over 10 ' years of experience conducting hydrologic and hydraulic studies, preparing construction plans and specifications, evaluating flood mitigation alternatives, designing water and sewer transmission lines, utility relocations, preparing FEMA FIRM and FIS revisions, as well as providing project and I XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 2.2 ANdERSON CONSULTING EN(iiNEERS, INC. construction management services. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado and a Certified Floodplain Manager. Pertinent to the Magnolia Street Outfall and Future Projects, Mr. Kempton has been the senior project engineer on studies involving: (a) design of stormwater, water, and sewer systems; (b) hydrologic and hydraulic analyses of natural and improved watercourses; (c) floodplain and floodway delineations in both natural and urban riverine settings in support of CLOMR/LOMR applications to FEMA; and (d) design and preparation of construction plans and specifications for flood control projects including storm sewers and detention/water quality ponds. Mr. Kempton is one of the project engineers responsible for the development of the Old Town Basin Master Drainage Plan. Mr. Kempton was also the Project Manager responsible for the design of the Robert Benson Reservoir Rehabilitation, the Midway Drive Water Line, the Riverside Avenue Stormwater Improvements, the Bobcat Ridge Road Drainage Improvements, and the Resource Recovery Farm Outlet Pipe, all of which were completed for the City of Fort Collins. Gregory J. Koch, P.E., CFM Mr. Koch is Vice President and principal engineer with Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. He has over 24 years of experience managing hydrologic modeling and hydraulic modeling studies, sediment transport and channel stability studies, as well as designing channel stabilization/restoration improvements, flood control and urban drainage systems, and preparing master drainage plans for public agencies and private sector clients in Colorado, Nevada, Wyoming, California, Utah, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, and the Republic of China. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado and a Certified Floodplain Manager. Mr. Koch has an acute awareness of the issues involved in the Magnolia Outfall Project and Future Projects having conducted numerous hydrologic and hydraulic modeling studies, prepared numerous hydraulic designs of flood control improvements, and effectively obtained the adoption of numerous LOMCs through local, FEMA and CWCB review processes in Larimer County. His expertise extends to direct familiarity with the Magnolia Street Outfall Project, having been the project manager for the Old Town Basin Master Drainage Plan, which initially identified the Magnolia Outfall improvement. Mr. Koch also has extensive experience in drainage master planning, stream rehabilitation, and utility relocations. Christopher J. Pauley, P.E., CFM Mr. Pauley is a Senior Project Manager with Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. He has over 19 years of experience in hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, stream restoration design, the preparation of master drainage plans, the preparation of CLOMRs and LOMRs and FEMA map and FIS revisions, and ' the preparation of final construction plans and specifications for flood control projects. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado, Nebraska, and Arizona and is a Certified Floodplain Manager. Pertinent to the Magnolia Street Outfall and Future Projects, Mr. Pauley has managed projects entailing: (a) hydrologic, hydraulic, and bridge scour analyses of natural and improved river systems and irrigation delivery systems; (b) conceptual and final design of channel erosion protection measures, ' hydraulic structures, and storm sewers; (c) hydraulic analyses and flood plain/floodway mapping in support of CLOMR/LOMR applications and FIRM/FIS revisions to FEMA; and (d) construction of various hydraulic structures. In addition, he has performed inspection services during construction of hydraulic, ' erosion protection, and water quality structures. Mr. Pauley was the Resident Engineer for the City's VTH Outfall Project. XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 2.3 ANdERSON CONSUITINc, ENCiiNEERS, INC. ' Brian A. Smith, P.E. ' Mr. Smith is a Project Engineer with Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. He has 7 years of experience conducting hydrologic and hydraulic modeling projects and channel stability studies, preparing flood hazard delineations and flood mitigation plans, utility relocations, preparing construction plans and specifications, as well as designing flood control and urban stormwater drainage systems, and providing project and construction management services. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado and a Certified Floodplain Manager. ' Pertinent to the Magnolia Street Outfall and Future Projects, Mr. Smith has been the project engineer for studies involving: (a) hydrologic and hydraulic evaluations of natural and improved river systems and irrigation delivery systems; (b) the design and analyses of storm sewer systems, detention ' ponds, water quality ponds, and stormwater BMPs; (c) the design and preparation of construction plans and specifications for flood control projects; and (d) floodplain and floodway delineations in both natural and urban riverine settings in support of CLOMR/LOMR applications and FIRM/FIS revisions to ' FEMA. Mr. Smith is also one of the design engineers responsible for the design and construction management of the CIPO Project and the Oxbow Levee Project for the City of Fort Collins. Brian L. Van Zanten, P.E., CFM Mr. Van Zanten is a Project Engineer with Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. He has 16 years of experience conducting hydrologic and hydraulic modeling projects, channel stability studies, and ' preparing flood hazard delineations and flood mitigation plans. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado and a Certified Floodplain Manager. Pertinent to the Magnolia Street Outfall and Future Projects, Mr. Van Zanten has been the project engineer for studies involving: (a) hydrologic and hydraulic evaluations of natural and improved river systems; (b) the analyses of storm sewer systems, detention ponds, water quality ponds, and stormwater BMPs; (c) the preparation of stormwater master plans; and (d) the design of stormwater BMPs and the selection of LID techniques for implementation in future development. Mr. Van Zanten is ' also one of the project engineers responsible for the development of the Old Town Basin Master Drainage Plan for the City of Fort Collins. ' Daryl Johnson, P.E. Mr. Johnson is a vice president and senior design engineer with AVI, p.c. He will be responsible for all structural design elements of the Magnolia Street Outfall and Future Engineering projects. Mr. Johnson has collaborated frequently with ACE staff in the successful completion of drainage projects that included structural design elements. His extensive experience includes design and construction management in support of numerous general civil and drainage -related construction projects. Mr. ' Johnson has also been the project Manager for several projects that involved water and wastewater treatment plant upgrades. ' Christoph Goss, P.E., PhD. Dr. Goss is a Principal with Deere & Ault Consultants Inc. and will be the Project Engineer for tunnel and shaft investigation and design. In his over 12 years of experience, Dr. Goss has worked on ' the investigation, design, and construction of numerous tunnels including shallow urban tunnels, highway crossings, hard rock tunnel rehabilitations, microtunneled lake taps, river crossings, shafts, mine adits, roadheader tunnels, and subways. He is a licensed professional engineer in Colorado. Dr. ' Goss was involved in the investigation, design, and construction of the Oak St Outfall tunnel in Fort Collins. This is of particular importance given that the Magnolia St Outfall is expected to encounter very similar geologic conditions. I XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 2.4 ANdERSON CONSUITINq ENGINEERS, INC. Robin Dornfest, PG ' Mr. Dornfest has over 9 years of varied geologic and geotechnical experience. Prior to joining CTLIThompson, he worked as an Exploration Geologist in the mining industry, as a Geologist for the United States Geological Survey, and as an Engineering Geologist for Secure Consulting Engineers. Mr. ' Dornfest manages and works on geotechnical and geologic projects for a wide range of project types. Currently, Mr. Dornfest is the Geotechnical Department Manager and Senior Engineering Geologist in the Fort Collins Branch. His areas of expertise include geologic and geotechnical investigations for public works, residential, and commercial projects, as well as, geologic hazard assessments, geologic mapping, deep excavations, construction dewatering, groundwater control, and geo-structure design. Mr. Dornfest will act as the project manager for work conducted by CTLIThompson for this project. Roger Sherman, Landscape Architect Mr. Sherman is a principal with BHA Design, and licensed landscape architect and has over 19 years experience. During this time he has managed numerous projects involving both natural areas and urban landscapes. He has extensive experience in designing and coordinating complex projects, preparing all phases of design and construction documents, and in observing and reporting on construction activities related to landscape architecture. Some of his recent relevant project experience includes: The City of Fort Collins, Canal Importation Project (CIPO) and Eagle View Natural Area. Roger will serve as the Principal in Charge for BHA's activities on the Magnolia Street Outfall Project as well as other projects related to the RFP. Keith Meyer, P.E. Mr. Meyer has over 16 years experience in design, project, and construction management for a multitude of projects ranging from water and wastewater treatment facility improvements to water storage tanks and pipelines, trenchless pipeline rehabilitation, and the rehabilitation of sanitary sewer systems. Specific projects that Keith has managed include multiple projects for Colorado State University such as the $2 million CSU Campus Steam Line Replacement, and the $1.4 million CSU Sewer Collection System Evaluation and Design. He has also successfully worked on several large and complex projects such as the $20 million City of Fort Collins Water Treatment Facility expansion. Mr. Meyer is also intimately familiar with the City's APDS process, having previously been a Project Manager for the City of Fort Collins Utilities. Mr. Meyer will provide support services as needed for future projects identified by the City of Fort Collins. Andy Herb, Ecologist Mr. Herb, Project Manager and Owner of AlpineEco, has worked as an ecologist for nearly 10 years. He has successfully completed projects in most western states, as well as internationally. He has extensive experience with environmental permitting, especially as it relates to wetlands, wildlife, and botanical work. He has also been involved in many projects that included National Environmental Policy Act compliance (EAs and EISs), Endangered Species Act compliance (Section 7 Consultation), and general natural resource management (INRMPs and RMPs). Mr. Herb has managed both research -oriented and infrastructure -related projects for nearly all types of clients in the private and public sectors (including several different branches of the federal government). Mr. Herb was responsible for the environmental permitting for the Dry Creek Flood Control Project for the City of Fort Collins. A personnel experience matrix, detailing the qualifications of each of the Project Team members is presented in Table 2.1. I XCOFC2009_Magnolia outfall.doc 2.5 ANdERSON CONSUITINq ENGINEERS, INC. ANdERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Civil • Water Resources • Environmental October 28, 2009 Mr. Dean Saye Fort Collins Utilities PO Box 580 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Re: Request for Proposal for Consulting Engineering Services, Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project and Future Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater Facilities Capital Improvements [City of Fort Collins RFP # 7084 —ACE Proposal No. XCOFC2009] Dear Dean: Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. (ACE) is pleased to submit the attached technical proposal for the Consulting Engineering Services, Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project and Future Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater Facilities Capital Improvements. We believe this proposal demonstrates the exceptional qualifications of the ACE Project Team for providing consulting engineering services in support of the Magnolia Street Outfall and Future Projects. As indicated in the enclosed document, ACE is exceptionally well qualified to provide engineering in the following areas identified under the request for proposal. X Alternative Product Delivery System (APDS) process k Engineering Design, Construction Drawings, Technical Specifications, and Construction Services for Stormwater, Water, and Waste Water Projects X Permitting x Stormwater Drainage/Quality Master Planning X Complex Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis X River Restoration and Geomorphology X Stormwater Quality BMPs and LID Techniques X Floodplain Mapping and CLOMR/LOMR Submittals X Flood Insurance Program Issues and Planning We appreciate being considered for the opportunity to continue to work together with the City of Fort Collins and the whole APDS Team, to further enhance the communities' Stormwater, water, waste water facilities. We are dedicated to the continued evaluation of future projects in a manner that considers not only economic and constructability criteria, but also additional criteria, such as environmental, social, and aesthetic benefits to the citizens and rate payers of Fort Collins. If you require additional information or clarification regarding this submittal, do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, ANdERSON CONSULTING ENCiiNEERS, INC. X &4��� radley A. Anderson, P.E. President BAA/AMH/tlw Project Manager 375 East Horsetooth Road, Bldg. 5 • Fort Collins, CO. 80525 Phone: (970) 226-0120 • Fax: (970) 226-0121 • www.acewater.com Tnhla 7_1 ParcnnnPl FvnPrianra Matrix fnr the Anrlarrnn rnmidtino Fnoinaarc Prniart Taam_ Cad �f,G^ d '9 a t a d/ a s ' . d i k d 7 / a f Iti i i •e` N to N Q mod/ F� f�f 01+F a �j 9O of 9�d�`i �o/^d ��p/ yo/ 7m&ass d, -fd OA y�A y di !Ld FACEPROJECTTEAM� :KEY PERSONNEL' �� �� ��� d� oo, °•�`� q a�. �� ? �d F f p F o p g of p: Brad Anderson, P,E., CFM 29 (22) X X X X X X X. a X X X X X Greg Koch, P.E., CFM 24 ( 19 ) X x 'X X �� x X X X X° X X ems..: n Chris Pauley, P.E., CFM 19 (14) X X X X x XX? .. X �. v X Aaron Hansen P.E CFM 14 (14) X X X X r1v x X X X g X� .. X X Mark Kempton, P.E., CFM 14 (10) x X X X X X X X X X X Brian Van Zanten, P.E., CFM 16 (11) x X X X X X X X , Michelle Martin, P.E. 8 (8) x X+sX� X X X &� Brian Smith, P.E. 7 (7) X X �,X X X x �X X x X X X Jamis Darrow, P.E. 6 (6) X X X X X XX X a Scott Parker, P.E. 7 (7) XX X X X X ta X X Jason Albert, P.E. 6 (6) X X �X X �a yea Travis Rounsaville, EIT 2 (2) X X ;X1G SIR X Daryl Johnson, P.E. - AVI 38127 's XX X X IVX; X X X x L z: Dennis Dawson, PLS - AV] 41 �. X ZI, e' Robin Dornfest, PG - CTLT 9 X x MY x x s 4 Christoph Goss, P.E., Phd. - D&A 12'. X X X X X ",._ ` Roger Sherman, L.A. - BHA 19�, `y �' X X X X X X a, ,..,:.... ,, Keith Meyer, P.E. - Ditesco 16 X� s. X X X X ' X X y „Y , } �: u AndyHerb- AlpineEco _ 10. "° X i October 28, 2009 City of Technical Engineering Proposal Fort Collins Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project Purcnasmg and Future Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Capital Improvements ' RFP-7084 Section III - Project Understanding CTLITHpMPSD,N h _ N b ANARSON CONSULTING ENqINEERS, INC F av d1 tescCivil • Water Resources • Environmental o DEERE & AULT #� { Alp;1tEeo _N- :9y-1 00 i I SECTION III — PROJECT UNDERSTANDING ' Based on this Request for Proposal "Consulting Engineering Services, Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project and Future Water, Wastewater and Stormwater facilities Capital Improvements" (Proposal No. 7084), discussions with City of Fort Collins Staff, previous experience in ' the project area, and additional research into the salient issues surrounding this RFP, it is our understanding that this project consists primarily of the following components: ' (1) Alternative formulation and evaluation, preliminary design, final design, and construction services for a stormwater sewer system to address flooding along Magnolia and Mulberry Streets west of College Avenue; and ' (2) Future possible design and construction services contracts for water, wastewater, and stormwater capital improvement projects. Detailed discussion and information concerning each of the components of this project are ' presented in the following sections. 3.1 Magnolia Street Storm Sewer Outfall ' 3.1.1 Problem Identification Flooding within the Old Town Basin is primarily the result of encroachment and urbanization of ' natural drainage corridors east of the Larimer County Canal No. 2. Flood hazards throughout the Old Town Basin are generally caused by the inability of the existing system of streets and storm sewers to adequately convey storm runoff from moderate to large storm events. This situation is exacerbated by ' the basin's heavy reliance on the street system to convey storm flows on a widespread basis. In addition, few detention ponds have been constructed in the basin, and the few actual detention ponds that do exist serve only small, local areas. Many of the detention areas in the Old Town Basin are ' actually inadvertent detention resulting from ponding behind the crowns of streets. In the Old Town Basin, storm runoff is conveyed primarily along the east -west streets. According to the Master Plan, the critical Product Number (depth x velocity) of 6, in conjunction with a ' minimum flow depth of 1 foot, would be exceeded during the 100-year event at 33 of the 52 identified cross streets and in all 27 reaches within the detailed study area. For the 100-year event, overall flow velocities average from 3 to 9 feet per second; resulting in an average Product Number of 9 at the ' intersections and 14 for the street reaches. One area identified in the Old Town Master Drainage Plan as having severe hydraulic conditions was the Magnolia/Mulberry Street Corridor. A floodplain map of the Magnolia/Mulberry Street Corridor is included as Figure 3.1. ' With respect to actual damages, it was estimated in the Master Plan that 135 and 259 structures would be damaged within the Magnolia/Mulberry Street Corridor during a 10-year and 100-year storm event, respectively. Based on values determined in 2003, this would equate to $5.96 and $17.71 million ' in damages for a 10-year and 100-year storm event, respectively; or an average annual damage of $2.43 million for this corridor. It is noted that the Magnolia/Mulberry Street Corridor generates nearly 50 percent of the 100-year flood damages for the entire Old Town Basin. ' 3.1.2 Magnolia/Mulberry Street Corridor Drainage Improvements To address the significant flooding potential associated with the Magnolia/Mulberry Street Corridor, the Selected Plan of Improvements for the Old Town Basin identified the Magnolia Street Outfall as a flood control project. As stated in the Master Plan the Magnolia Street Outfall would include ' construction of a major storm sewer outfall from the Poudre River west along Magnolia Street, ending at I XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 3.1 ANdERSON CONSULTING ENCiiNEERS, INC. � � R,�: , ", �� i,"�,,,�ez4*�,-�,-�,�;-,v-,��,,�1,1, , , ­­ jirfi.t , - -­ ­ 7?�-_ � � 11 11 . I - - ' Ut ��, 1, � , _�V,N7Z-, '�gyt,',�, , " _; , ", �,­,, ," 17 r, .`1'?1`;11`l,. I N"; S. � � ", �,_: "", II, 01!0! pt;�i��;,6� �?:-�n,�A __111� �_-;,;--5� _­ :g,�,'l ,mr " 1 " � ,,,,i 1,77-W-i', -! , , 7' '10 �4 �� _ _,J,,P�111; ,,,,,�,�;��j��j � ,&; , ", - - , . 11 - * 1�1 - ­', I , " � 1 ,�­ ,� 'Z, , - �,_ , ..: � - ,� -,4- p'. ,;�,, , , � �, �'p, " , .11 1, '�­ '�` , - � , , � , , ,� ,, , � , , ��., , .- !I �L,1, - - , I" - 1, _,� , '�_ � ­­ �7 i " t A �� �` ,`� -- -,',,,,, - I 4 __­ - , " , " , N V _L , - �f 7 -R!�4t - p ` C" , 41 , , - . ,�,�. ,i, �u � , n. 'n , .- IWIN , i, ,pj ; , At A , � j A, ""' *­ , .� : A �,, 3 ,- - I �, Y-49 �1�v . ­�,,, .0 - ,�_,, �K I �,,' ­_", �;�i,l-.'�",", �." �i' %37 ;�=!,.;_�. ,,',!_�'. ,., _'V', N�%,,'z 1��,� , ". ", , ,� 1� 44 , .." ­ � I I �, � , - �,;� , __ __-, " - � �_ I Nll_�11 ,L�l '7� �.- i ,�;m', `:,�, �� - ,z ,_f , , " - I � _," I— , .11 H"'71-,_4A,� - .__ _ ­_11.1W, '! .�,'4�'�el,�,,, Ij ,;�, �'.`:V,�,`.':, ��­ , . �\ ­ - 1; _ , -'­­-­,­.­ r I W -, , �� -, I XIL k I ,�, �, -1 � - � 4 i N tR N �` I � , - 71v­ I I' , - �i , ,I .11 �',_P_" ; '? �, 1� It. -1 , , ,;� -�, " x I , .1 � ­V, , . ��- .,t� � � 1. _11.. I "Ali.- , , - �, I ftt 4z­,111.�',­.....�. .1 - 1. � I11, I .1 Al I � :1, I J�j'_�� V.�-,r,�-�*, - � 1. " _­ - - 1 �7' �- . __ � � �41 , 2 IV � I '. 1. , -1 � �, 11111-1 11 � . - ,It %% ,','.' 1I.N1,14,1i"�­ys" ,�,� " ; �-­ _t6l �_Ij _iL..;6& -- I., h� ­ �­ � - ;, � , I I'll , __ 4 " ,� 11 , I , I" ��:, I �, ��',­�' ­ - � 11 ­1�111_111 0, � � 11 1- , �_, ; - ;", "..11 L � � , Z, I %�.� N�-� � ` 1, ­ -- , "; I � ,­' ". � .� I - , , , gz , , -p � - :: - - ".,, 7 ._�,­'_­ , " ,�i ... 1�1 ­,A� . 1-1 I '.., , , '� -- , -- -";, " , - - " 13 '1,,I�,. ,�,� - �, � , , - '���, Ak- 1-�' N . , . - I ­ j�v, � , � ME I, 1w -,�,-, ."', i A-�, . - �. M - . _�_7 z � � if _:_*,:,, '%, '111, �; 1�_, 4 - � � - , __ - ,t r� , i - 0 ." _.. - . ,, , - , _­`_ , I , " — 1-f- -- ..'�..", - , 1_4­ ,7 " - 4Z _ �vff`�,,,�,- A I , 6, 0, � ; i j "'w', f v M . . ­­ -, , ­JJ, vs-;.�,­ -Z�_­e,,�' ,�-�7'�. _1 1% . M �:_; �� V; ., , " , ­11- � � �,�',,��.�i�,,,!�.-�-,�,.,;�-,-'�.,�,,�,",'i.,,� ... " _ -,.�. '_,q - � %�,_­,­�,­ " "' N- ��- �� ��` �_'44- �.�,5,�,,, � , , W_ , , , ,� - `1 - , , ,,,,, --'� -, `��,-- -'r - __"�_-_ i Tr 11 11. N �_ -4 " - , ""I -, " - - -- --, �: � __, � .1 _" ­�'. 4. � I _.,�, ,��,,­ ,.� -����,�,-,%,i.�r-,,_�--�..���-��-�,,,�',',---io � — . �". L' -;�' _ .j15 " - _�'­­,,�-,',A i'� � , (� " ,. ,L ­ _11wz- %,­- _�_--_ i4�, 7-, ,� , , -,;,: ". , - . -1 ��4� . V,,r 1­v­'-15,� ��w 4;-­.; . t_!��_ ,., . � I " - - - ".;, i;',�_ � �_ 1: ­ ffl­ wI!�_�,; - , . � I, ", � , . ­1 �', , - - �!;;_�z - — - � -W,, I - -1-1, - 11 .q��, � i : �- �,,- ­,�,�,:'­'­�,_� tL`�' �'�'��,,;�_z , , — �_�_, — ,;F ­ � ,11k­ �Z�,�­�-- 1-. -, ­ �0-_t­.",jK�.�?,. � ­-,,Z,,-� . , . , g­,'x t 7 - I " .- -,%,. . i��'.I��'; � -, - , ­ %-�I!�,, ,I-, � .,'��,Offj�_,- " , , ­ ­ ,� :�_, "' _­ I I � . -,/ - f-­��tq _r . .L - --'iii'� __ �­ , � -%- - "I I .1"i " . L�, " ';k-�" " -.1, -1111, . . . . . . �� ­­ ,f. . �,:. j I , ��,,? , 11-11,ih �;;� ., , - � , ',�, ,'�,U- � `:i - . "I _`�',' _ �. f � __ - " 1� I IN % .p - � .;v - � � -1 , ,-, N, : , , ,;"-!,'. ,','�,,Z_. "�'% � �j- - N . " L" , '-; , -, `� - - � I 1, -, � ___._ ;: �jp:_�:j_jj?%" . , - , . , - � `T;L� 11 -_,in �, . 'ii� �� � "�___&_,�-p ,,,,.* " I * -_ - , x A� i:i�:i:�",�.,*'�.",.ii���]�iii��'!14 ,R,�. - D, -- .. �� , , " ". � ,,,, '1_11_1 P.,�,,_`�� , �'. -, I 1. '. ", I 'i; ,-`14 C', �'w �,,' �­ ", ,,� g" _00: , c- � Ul,_"W,� , IT .11ii , - � ,: , ,. " . ,,, , , ,..�;51i�', ­_,11, I "f"', "6.1 _� I' �V' � - t :1�,filiiiiiiiiiii!!, 51,�, 1, _,_.;:� � , - ilAl �h. - - ,;,1141'T� - -g_-_,__N'�,.�4;_'�� � - !- "'k?"; i�j`� il ..'....., " --- � ,,, .6R - -.-�I�:M.if - , , - - , ",-, , - �,- � �-- 11 ��_,;�%, -, ` Acli�?: � M, �,�- ", t, ��!.ili-�,­­' �� t., i ,;,r� .. ,,�, - " � " .,-\- - ,��JA'�,,,�-,,'�'��* ., F "�'-'­... -;�,�l��ti�,��""!,����1--,':-""", - - --- , '�11' __ - I , g'�" - ­ ,V4- r, -I, - � - -1 - - - I I ­y, " - ', , - _N ". _ -_;�,,-�,� . - "", ��,­;,, �, -;�., v,c, ". � " � - , I , - �� . � " ,* ,� , " , , X -111"N 1, -, - " -, -- � ��-,­�i-' , , �1 , N­ ,1 I - iv , - ­ - , - ,,� ­i: ... i iiil*iiii--,��,-,-,�- � ,%", , _ .... ,�,� - � 4�`:;��N­I:M ; XI ��_i�� 41%41*14. r7rt"U4 ­0 , 4'�_ ! e .. ... W. ­­ - 11 _� "I - , W �;-::;i,ct �, - - �� `�-, " , - - - - - - - , -, �- � :11N., - �1_ _r" " , - 11 ., �. 5 _4� - 1� ,_- , - _ .. ,.1 ., _ '17, - 1 A __,_rll , - �.:;;;:. , "' I - , , '�';, _�!-':ii!. ..- .� 1� V'�, -, - _z " -, , ., . 4 1: R,.I� , -Ri- --, ..ii;Ii- i1i , _,.9`,�, - ,.), � "A'­�k- "I"."Vi� � - � V 0 "". .f _ , , , ` - "-- I , I , -.1 t- I...., � �. ­K�';j_#.---NF -1 ,��T; _% , ��V,, X��A- ---- ­T_ 3,1,i w Y­ - - � IN .. , - I . �,., .- �,,, L tz�' it--, R ­� ­4 - . Vu-' 40.1. I. - , � 9 w.. :-j­ ;,4-1-� �t�_of­ -, � ,:v , ' ;_r, w2v r�Ti'!�.�., 7; - N '_ � - .. , "u... ­_1 , �� . - 11 - � ­? , A � . � Y � �� ­IfL,4�11`1_ LAFLE, ST, �, " 2 � 1i .1 ,�!?,�L _:� 'N' �%_,',4 - , � , _ _ - , � - � r 7 _� , It, .,i"' , ­'. - . R , �:�­f L !;�' '. , I ____ , Ng ,'.� -,­ - I I _1 k"� -1. "I � I -I - �WV �1_1'? �i , I � 1 V.4i* - �F,"X_t 'j - -w -0, , 1W . ,;_ _ " _gF n lu�9!rl�:_�,_��..11 11-011 ;, - - , --, �, _t - -- -1 A i - 13 r N , I - � , �­ _� , k t_,Aa ..... . 1-!:_ ,K;..zll�i .... � f, -;!;" �`? 'n-144 -�K _:: 7-4 R W. .7 9 " ir .. " )�;" I:- .., � I .* ­:.�u -.1 ,�i � -.14-,.),P'�, ": - " -, � "i ,. " � . , , ,�Owx�i�� - ,_��k,-'Igi"r.-gft `: if ;!-�� I_ ": �-L, - - 'III 14i -1 5, �. - - 1'��_ ­� ­,Ig - ­��. " - ��:�' " , ,--,' �,',,,Z� &", -, - ,� __,%�jj?j�­­� ��.001,;_ k',,", . . � , I _j _t - j; �a I", " 'i" I � ilEi, g :::I., �, � - .�_ ,-- I -.1 '1=1", 1.11 1. i ­` -;---,, - , I-Ita I" 1�.` ; ­g . , - �:;:;;�*. , �; ­f `,�;,!�-�4�­� , � 1j, I - ��, -�� . ,�,F � ___ . . 1P.-I � ',�� �­-�,�-; _,�. � ,,I , ,4 ,,, _ - , I -1 ­1'111� ... I a' I &­ -,;"" 'y�:,, - -- 7��,,'i� , I I ,,� �_,� , A,, �21,-�� � ,,,, , 11\ . �,­­- �N�, -,\ -, '� _11� -.1 I - - , - 11 . -, , � 1.,:2 lfli�ft,­.,�­_____ �_11 -.-Ili I- .-".�,S.�. - �&'i,,'-k­ ��;77 , .- , �ii6,'�� 0 - , I , " , , ,,�� %, - - _­`7 - , " 11 ,_ �,,-�,',; " ,,, ,,,,, - � , , , IM ", � . I I `�, �­ " -, ­, , " ,�� � " � - 11�,�­,,,; - - ,�111'1, -, , li, 11,1 � , -1 ­,�77�-,,-,, 19 -!,,, -, ,�.;�; Y-4" ON' ,,, - - � -.'.,:� 1 �, F, - 4s�;,wt,A "-���,�-,�-,t,,,���,l�"*"�,��i,,,,,-�,,��,,,,�,-,�,,�,�,,,-,,-�,,�-,-�,i�, , e�p','i%*,&- -'7�,J��;:::; -4, , _ - , , , ,_ � "'11, �,­, -f,!'� - , I "I I A -,,-,;�,�-�--,--�,%i.",i.."�,;:;:::f, �,�_,,',,,',5,', :�z2lw, ,'�:, "I" _"T ", i , ,,� '�,�� -I- *�,�g�� � , �'*' � 1� V, 4i,61 ` , If- - -, 11--c 1�1';* - Lt' . , ...., 3 _ ��­ _ .,:,', � " : F"� - 4 � I --, , -_ , ..: i , , ',�'_;�, p -�,��, - -'�,,� - -_ I I'] _,�, "" ,�F`-Z- ,_ 3 RV �� �, R�. �,, 1, :::: �-v,"­',, '�, ,,�TE " ", �-`, "i , ­�- , , , , � 'r "elF. , ��-�,, �_ _­ : " I , ��',_ � '�__Ii_ �� , " � _ - ., !'�"' . - , ... _V ,� 'A 5� ��4-,',�,,�..�,��-,N':�i!!4����.",��,;. � ! , _��-`,fi' 1=11 .p �_ , , �,�t. t� ',!�,'�`-­'-4�,:_� ,_ I § 1'. I � F r . __Kb , _ , - �� -71 2i ,I , ,..-, ��",;;,,`,.' :4 I - �Ng - ,� , ,� �, , -, _ ,,r� F";,.! 'If L;i!,�! , h �, ­za 7, -.-- , I -Z-,�­ , - , ... , ,-. A M - I i. , - , - , "M , ,� � ,Ii:�,:, 3 i!4,�N 9'� �� """""', � A-, _. - � , _ E', , i , r, -, ,�. , "E i , -I ,�­= - 'AR I N . ", I ig 4 W, i - � -�,41, -;�W­, ,, ��`�.'o­ .-'� i i �� -_�_.�4, --."_44 t-J� -�x, �T�,�,,,!'t f", ,,,N,� %,"ki �, L.,­rj­ " , , .. .., - ­ � , , , ,� - � - 1M. ,'­�,L�­ , , � � - � _,_� _ I'k - F ;Vkh "� gr'v �, . , 6 ,�4 1..." I j,j+,,'t', -- - - ___j ,,,, _ "' �' "nd , " � - - 1 17- , I. " - , , , 4� ��'114:i� � , - 'K � �� �� � , it,�Lc� T " iUAi;- , �� i;s__ , _E p,;-A-"!T,-,', I �, V� vl,li_- W`aivi, - " " �fl " c ��,­ _ , 'M Q, 4�,�!,i��,�,�i i*m , " , I �.:v ��� - �11_ - . �, " __ A , , . .? _1 _ - , � 10'1�',�, , '. 'n', _,"; 1, _ &�;7 ­. " �,�,, , __ � 7 ",", - -I i, k 'I, . .11"­", .. � -1 _� ­11; I, - I ­­ ,'!­,�'_.;­-, �.'­,. I 1�. ,", ,_ ,,; _;, , ',�, - , 6�, ,�;.?, _rf-, " , ,, ,Ll " I - ,,,�, , I �, , , ".", I " ­ , IN, ,�;,, A _), ", _�,N,N',­,f­f� -;11 ­111 , , ,� , ,,, �i� , Y , - - f; � " , - , i , ,'�t:. _ - ,,.,,,,, � " - �..%'��' , lz, � ­iuu ii4,7, A,. -, . , , , . , ,/ �- " 1� 1, !t, " -11.1 , �­­ , ­ "J'""4"�,,z" .311 _4 -, �,U­�� z �, �,Inv, Ai�E �,'�11 " 'IoA",�? " , - I �1�1�',�i,131,� ,L,R�111141k - -.�����,�t��"-L��.����"",�,,,, -',�,T,�i-',­' ,", ,,'�,` - .. vs'_ - " -_�j,,: �i:,�,,:�A '114_11'_111�_,, 111'�;__� ;'1111.��,�, N" _4, ,11, - R im, H, ,I �' , I , . ,,, N n2w �% "'� I , * P. 11 I ,,�-,.!,��,��,�����N�_,,�l,--,��� '�,Ir,,M,;:�-�­_�__;,_ ..i,3�,l.�i-1-t",.-,-,,-, _._.�"",7,w �A'7,t�r_ �,, ,n��,� .. .... �­___­­, , ..... - - -_ , 11 , = I __ ...... . , - I - I __�Z 1� _ 11'1t�`� 0 I .- � , 1;2��'�,��k,14'1._�I'al Z',_ ,­ . ­- ., _ , . ; " ,��,,AK­ I ,__­,___­,_ ;" �;,,,,.,,�,,,�;�,71�",4�,�,��,', ­­ ,,­­'1h'n­111 'i, . , T I " - - - , , , "I 1. I I'll", v . ,;7 . , ! Z�, , ��,'�',' .�'t, �; ", ,'� - � _- ­ ­­ , , -­ `;"'� � � '� �� L N lk, JV� _,,,`��`, � - , P�j -, ,­__.,&;-',',S�z;o" g-,,�j, " - ��­6ii�1�,oi­" , "I�,��,,�;*,',,"-�4',;',��,�,';,,',,��,,�,,�.-,��,,�-;.-.,-,,,,��M,,;,.,,,,,,-�,,�,,��-�- -1­­14,,1_­, ­-�:7 � � � , , � i2l��4i�� � � , __ ", X l'i". - -, , El"., , ­1 V w , `�-, -7'-,�'�'-* . -,� , ;jp�,�j;� �,�� *W� � ,��,, � I.'' 1­11 ..". , - �� -,,��, � .. .... �.-­ �� .... .. �,�� " _!� �, , � '', , __ , � ""'.4" �'��,�� � , I .1 " , "'­.�i , " N,7�,��,'A�, �, , q, ,� � !� �,;5�, � I , - , - -, ­1 - , �� �� I �. _%_ , , 10_-,,� , , . t� - � , - ­ �,�- �',�',� ,il�, , -­ , " ­��!:�t �, �� ���! : , . , - � , � ,,­'��ji;" , �,')�,J, , k , ,a 't.�, ,-,� i�`.­,k,",� 7 "' - , ,)�,J, , ,)�,J, I , , ,)�,J, -1 � '. �,,',131�'11 I � P­�I�,,�,,,�,'�� � I , �, � �, ��, ,A , ­� 1, %. -1; ­­1 " - , - ­'� ",'' - �­ , , 11 -,% "': , , " ,, , A , �� 11. � li, __�_ ,w, m,,,,�r , , , , ­7 - -, __­', '' I ,�. . -1 ­ ­­ I - - ',��'I, �'_ __ -_,f`," "t`,�W­,�j:�;�, �"?,".,�_,�L'l ;N17 - 11, �: ,,,%,.,t,, �,�),,, ;',K" .�, � , , !.Ld ,j��,'�,b� ; ", " , , ,iL4 '!""I ��,��,4�,Q 1, �, P, - ; I " " , \, , , , I - ­ 11 11 ­ rk ,,� - - , `,,�'L.� -.:�",�".� ­ - - �'A ,5 ,4 _w!_ � , . - I ,�,�­,fp�,,�7 , , , _, 't�`��,_%'4�,, , ­ I �. ,""', �-_'4`_"'�'.7.4',J� ­­­­ 11­1 1­11 ,.7k, , XV ; , ,,= _- ,_ , "'ll, - - , " � �. , � �,, ";: :�, ��N'..,�_ " '1b;"- ' -t I �, "k, -'o'1'1, -.ir � . il, ,t ­� _ I 'j�,:Ai ­:" I" A �, -,;,,�!7,::',;,,.t�,,,_ , � � �� - � A - -IV a - ,- - , , ��, �� "; , � _. �': , , ,,�.".! - 4 -,- " �,�5�,",�:�,, ­� Y: - " ,,,,,, I , , Z � .- __, �F_ - �', "" * __ j � , , , 4 �� , -0 " 1�1 � , ,� -;7,1A,W ,17'� , it��M�,�, ,'� I _. _'t',,,,', �,�o.,�,' Y: "I i , � , 1 11 ,� I iN, t ! Y - ,�,, � , - , 0 -� ;' ,� 4� ,f 11 I I ,-:, 1�'q -_ , �'�i - - - , -�, — , Y: .e I I - _.�, .� � , R i �, _ n , , , ,,�,' , . 'r I .Z� , -1 , - I I - I �_� ,, ,' Ve �, �11 ,� ", ,,, I �i_­,� -,,,,,, -A! _?r , , , r '��,,��-�,,,��',, `,`_'_­­� - �-, ��W; �_�,F� � , , I'll - , 1-"o ­ ' __ _�iL I ­_,1_ - �11 fll�, Is , .-,,r, 1,�', .z,f � , I,-.,- � __"___ - ­ji�,� �,3-�,!. ,� - ­ , � - 1, - ', �'l - , ­­ .11 - 'L , ,,, "I 0�0!1'.� , I � , J',7�'�: � �� ­L­-7,�, p 11 1�� — � �, ­ , - � -: -- -, 7; i �,' � 4, � �, �� T_7�­.A -("Alik - � " _ - ,.,", : ­1_1� I - - , . ` '�T"'�' ", ­ �j ' ­­ ­ ­ - -1 M" " , .", -�� �,V*,,�",' i "',��`�� V­ , ­ - I i!, - 1j, .1, . - � - 1. I � " ­1 " �,'�,�__:�, ��.4k, �V,"E�,­�­,, L. . , , ��, 7%&'" , ; 1� �, ", � ,� � I i - j, � �- ""', � -, _ _ "_ 1�­ ­_ _-, j�,_,,_,, .­ , ,- , f � ... �,­ ­,-,-��,,,�� �7-� _e';,�',��-,,�,'�,, .�, 1-11 ­�,, .� ,,,,'7,�i 4- e,,� . ­ ,� ,4. � , , �V, __ _ � -­,­ ,*,­ I'�, � 4, -,- " �, � V 1, , - ,f, , 'k , ­1 W ; ;­ , - —, ­ _7,- - "I � 9, p __ , � �., ,,,� "� : _)�� " _�_!,,i��,, �� e -4i�' , Ift ... . ... --- - h-- �' Q'+'�ii�7ja:�� ­ �, � "_jj'.kk�t,Z "t"z"i �­ ", - � , , � , , � t­" 7,� - Z � �-,A 7 1 ".'�! , , t7l',� �5,111 , � , 'a ­�` �_ ,* �_ , f � ,I_ - Y, ­ -11 � �­' , _ , ,, , � ,� - , , �� � � 0i , _ , i -.,,, �_ i 7 ''17 410 - t"A 14, � , - "411— � ;l , � , , - � 'J�Y ,. �, , .. __ ") N , - -,f � - !Tz!T!___, , 'X'_` I ,� ,_ � , - , " , , , I' , 11­� I I r , *v— __ fi�l v L , , ,� �, __ ," w _, _ , _'b7'p - � - _'_), ,- "" .4�1. '7,;,., , ,, , , -, % �,,11 1, �, �; , "T, " " !'7MY �" , """ !" , " J VA, ­­I,�� t I ­�, �J�11�*o 4,��p ­ , - , " """' ,- � . J �,' ,. �.,-""qj �[-11:1 ­'Iw� `1,t'7� " "_, ""­ ,�j �, N Q'i ,q ... .... rr, 51'r" �� �­ - ­­­­­L,,­,", q � , , , , �,�.,_` -, �#;A", ��Ji' I ,, 1_i�, � ,,,, 11 I. , I I *,#' ��,;" �_ A-,,� I ." "' � - , , , " ", �, �J,' k5, 1;: , IT _, , , # - " �� 9 -I-,­.W, 10,� ,jr 9 .', 53,-" ", i !tp �, -k §21" *w A .. � !, w I , - A I'll - I, ; � � fi-4 7 P� 11��.__, . , . 3,14 "" ", - _7_, - \ ,- ___. .i "T"I 1_ - , - I'll - . � - "q'. " " . - - _ � ­­__ , --- .- - - � K ", .� - �5�1, �, � - ��_, - �,­. 0; I" "_ W , - ;_ N - " 1­ _,',;",:�','��, ,.-, M ,�'A­N*04N­ ''. . L�N .11 � , �! -.. _­­.$� � �� � 4 ��,,,��7,��,�,`,,!,' 11-1 , - " ", , I " , , 7 , I- _ �, . 77 ,,��--�_5-z-,��,�:�7�,- , "; , ­ i,i,;,� � _1`�',`-' '5;,,� � , � � , --�-,�_­,,, _�-�,,�:",�__,�_Wl� N , 11�1 `�,,�,,`,,�v-. " .,­­e,_,­1? ��_r , . , " , _k. ;� � " - -, - V�*" I , Y. -,N , , , ;� - . % ,.� �,,,*, ", _,,�_ , 'ja .- - � ;� = I " , , "" . . , ,"'. _k,_ `j111 "I . i - __ i4:, n 11, 't - ,z - � , - �,�k-`�` - ; ;�4,�2 �,. .,, , % t'L - N - :,� �', � , ; , , . 'A ` _r­.­� . mg-g-tio-vtp --- - 4 �, ., - �.,4� ,-- � �, ,,, , � ­ � ___ � , 1%. -_-�4 , ­­ 'I NA �-W - ". " � V1P�'?r�1,`,.-_,1,' -1 :4 ­­ ,,A 'j, , F,:]M_t"1!1�'11_1]0 T�i, �,Z - �� - � - _&: , . SON . - " � �­17 _-%'11-111 , ­­ , DS. 'N." - P�11M - �g�* * totp, U 1 fLv � , - � 11-1 , - - - . — - I . � ". ­ � �1, � ', -,, I I.-, -, - �1 :�Ll�_­'to��z " , 7 ", , �,� . � — I 15-1 *r - -- ' ' I --I '.1"'%14 IN L -�­q - 7 I , � , .. ;1 , " N. - 1� I 1'1� I '_ _J��,_._ � - . .,� "It", .., I,x,_ � - - _ � , 25 M _4 z" M ­11, 1, N ­_ " 4 , , -_ - I, �V I � I - - 'Ili I , , . " , A I - - - - ' -4­ "­V ,' ��Oft"!�� i. r � i. I I", ­ -11 �12`1 -1 - " . ,,�. - - � -1_-w,,, ­,4z�� -, , _ � , t* ­ - � , I � . , 31 1 1� ­'pk ,1 ­ - , �, - , ; ­_ �0­�` ­­ I- ­�, 1"A , _ " . �:ig - , - "I ­­ .j ` , -I--- - -- * IF ­ - 1 41-111, , , -, , , __ , - I , � 1c, ,; -\' - ­ -, -� , , , - :,�; 4�� 1 " , . --I , , , , -, . . - , .! ,�. �V, " - - 1 !:i , -?,�_ � , -�4_�, , - I � . % : . � , �4 -�, � �'4 ,,­--�:-f"" _;'A J�l -4 'i �� ;, i I "gy,j, - " _ , JIN , � -1-rcIp J1 "I i , �;, ,47 L, , , - i�, I , - ­_, V ,� ... I, - , �­. , , � �, ' *;',5,71 - ,-,, .g. ._ , ,q4 � � - 1, �, , � " I 3 _., � I �' _ -, & " " r , ;,. � , �. , 'I I WA IV. gf, � - I , ,:;",�`,, �:',,.� � - ,,_ � - , � 4_20311 . _*I' ,Y Am x , ' . 4 &� � . 4 . 7 1 -::'r'_,4,,`-`­,,�,5­ ,. 0 � �171';�� '1� ,15? ,� . �1'6'� , , . I . �. � ,"!5 _��q_ � � - .� . 3 , , Z, � , i, , , - � SN".. Q , � i , - � -a- - 7 ;� , � ,.,�,�,.,--,��:���',��,-�;":n���,�,-..�-- 7 , , " . , _ . . ,, � - 4W I -,) 11 , _4a I ) .� ft r � 5 _ali i­­ , , ­­ _��V.u, � -1. - -�.­�Ltu i�,� � q 51�: � ­.;,�', , , - � _,Ar - _-� %4�5 ",'---,,",&�,�,��'-,I'tt!--'�l�,-4�;����V � , i�l 'r-1- F - - - ; I . ., ­z­,.­'1-_,. &'. , , - , '!;.- ',* �,',':­,' � "� - - , - 1, �Lt ­_��­, _- _ . , , �ii,'�;j , P'.."), ­"`�, _ A ,� ,"%4- � t; _ 7f,tj � ; �* �� � -, '' I ,, �,�, , . �', �, - __L WA alp "N . ',I] %.,� L: , - .-,- . u_ �L !_ .,, lx I-- _­ . ___ -,- � .7 , - , -­ - ­!7­_ t � - - " , ­.k �_�,. - '. � - , - ZT. 7, , -�,.", :,!�'!_'-3 . - - 1. � - - � � -� " `�.* - ­ - . .n, , 1. ­ I - -,", ��,, - .7 ;�,, _ - .;,f _', , I _In,f� -z-,---f-, ,;;�� zin,,,­,��ALia,�c -1 I � I— I � _ _1 I 1� 1,7 1, -, - � - ... - ,. ­ I '. ; 1 � Ij , - � - ��- , . � , :; a mrm_��* -_ �_; - , �` _ _ � ­­: . , , , �� ", _,n ,'' .� , - �fY," ",:T.'�.:�fii,ii!,, JHTN" 4�, , ,�2��,-w'�i-,;,' WOONT�1W,AVE�,'-��,',,,�,,',.;,,� X11,11 VE �-��3?`,I­._�, . _V� '. ,� � � I I -, - I ­ 1- 'r .,A4­� z � ` 1 ­ � - `�" = * zT­ - "�. " ­' - ­'.1 ­ .� .,- "' 7 .- - - - - , ;� , , , �V�_­�tak� � - , - �4 - I - � ,�4�4 . = � -i � - , , � ,�,�%�_�-�'t,, - - '' , _ I., _ ;­� 7 " � .1 _'_"�;,. 4 '� - � , '11 -1 - � _', . ., _�r _ 1 z, . . - "t _,. �!�,_��_�:. -iA`,,,; �:--- - -_ ,.�,­ - . s,.,,.;.;.,..., ,�i! - . ­7 � �,Q�,1,' . I - - --I 'ff" ,f�'�'iry - , � I!, I � T� � 7,i k;�,;r ,� , -V­J-,-,-0 �,m ,-�', - . Wk �1,;,r-,,,A4--., -�F� , -�,­ I , . :� - - , I "_,_,,r. W 1�,!'� �, , " - � , " , �. - I 4W.,­-, ­ , m�1­1�4417._.&.�­­ 1"; ., ,,zn� ��:�,, - ; ,, -.� 1 ,�;��i,i�- - ,,-�-,��_.11!�ii� I , _1�'�V�`�R,'�'_',Q __; ,,, �,P� � - � ,�%, _ ­ - -, -.11 A'i - , " '� 'I; � "'. , 4 � , ", � .; ,,� ": j , ___. � -,. . . f.,-'f elAli .- _ _n �t� _.- - _i_`� '", AW-4, �'��'i:%,.v`i;. --j;g _41-1­v "I" - h-J-4", - , �" ". ,11 I ' -v ­-­�?�n,� ­ � I I - -, .1 I I �z ,l, � " , , - �,�­ - !A, ZI I " � - I � - Y . oaff�k , 11�, �,;�, - .�;. .,A� I A- - " 4 1 , �� " -,�F , . - . Y , - -.- - Nox, - ). �:.�*4­-"K " I �k � -1 _71 - _., ,.. , �777:�7y,- �­ ­_�­ , 1, ,4� - .1 , 'I . I I. , , ­­ 1-�: I -11'�.::� , - - �,�_ ,0 ?-,,�,�4,� ,m� ��:i,� ,,,,, I I � . . . -I,- - � IT - "e, � , �,N,',r,';-'.-' � I ?,�;.�'-',:fl, * 7,�___ - ,.;, -�, I 1�,.­�'N'j' , - ­ _�` ill , * ". 1 ". -4t - __ � �. I - 1.ffl , � - , .-,7br L I i _ - ,M;r T,,,_,,�w ,': Ak'c , 7, I W%'.,A`­,;v_x1q I ­_ " i.,", 1; , , � , � � _ _ __ , V - 1�1 , , - - � ­1­1 _'. 4"" _,_ � . ,�: _9 5 - ,�, � .��=, I I VIt ,_ __ - -, �_,_ ,� - . -11, ­" q ' 7'�- , .. I ­ ;,Tzl', : �. ,_ _. - � - � ii�,.�,�j " .,,,4'T,',��T�.!�-rAi�oj i­'��y,j !�" �� ,.R; #­_­ � . ; � ­ �i,y, �� �!, � Z ,'�l r " �- , , - . � ;r, 1:11 L � �� : .�- , .1 11 �, �- 7, �� .A , `,44:1,­ - t! - , __;"F`tf": _._" � `��Z'j ­ ­­�,:JZT I , I � 11',�)�_­ i" - 4 � : 1�,, I I . � �- , , � _'��, ,,, � )i " - - I ,,�� � - �, ZT � �,' " �_ 'L ,- t ;,;), - I, A rllt I , 1 �;7, = �� !"",,#"�:.',i�s"-,i�,-,,-a�-�,-.� J, ��",'�li�-7�,;6--�.',,',���:Z,� I li , I - ,�__1`11�,�,�z "'�`1,44i , ,,;_,,-�4 ­'­1 , , , . , --- - ,� �,� z� . , . 4-,* , � A � - R_" --- ,-;�,, 7 N.14391%_,­_.-� W, n 1� _Iff,*,,'�� , .�', , _,.�'__. , Y � ',� � ��,,� � , o � :: .:..1�:.i.:.;.:.;,:___ � ,L' , I 11 gl -11 .1, 1.�, 111. __1 I'll, 1-1: � , , 111, 11 ­ - '_­�- I "v'..", : - � �, � �', , A � L �', ,,, .­�, "', �','-�,�4`� , � - J�. ��-�k"� L,�,� �j:',:�,,: "'Z �,, , 4�, nil-g-,- 6iiiiii".: , , F- ""'� � . � - __ � , � � �47 ,�- _ ". � � , , , � , -1 ,t!% ki P�, ,g',�;,;4, . t: , ;:�:t�:ioi_t:Ml' ,� D "N 4 �,, , - , - IV 4 04"V cW-21 ),!', '' Z "i. �, , , - Zz , !;,,- -%%1�_' �. _ I �_��;;, 1 V 11 . e 'N j I - A I I - �, xw I I " ,� ��; - , _, A A 1. i 4" , � � , - .��1.ni 1;,­'j. N161:1Yjr_"_-1kZ_* ov-, , t " , - - `u , 'M � - , M " - �_Z, �.VA� , - .11 ;t 0 " V? " - ""' ",­ - "�'�' �` _,i "' - W111 -, .i1V m -1 A��4 ­�:�z�e­_r_,; �� - - - Z__ I -� - � V_ . - 4 -11 �'i U ; @ � - '. , - , -, ,9�.l , ,;� � - i�T� Rtl, , I W93-,-:,,--!V,� - I-- P;4 J, �, ,. -�, �,' . , , Z � � ,�7:: . ­--�,F��Z-;,�., e 1 ?x, � *,.�L� 1 �, -;-�- ­;; -1, rn 07� , � _� F..' , , , `F" '; ., ., N I ", __?��,__­__�,v �_ ­_�' - �:�F, _ , - 'a, , `�i;,-,-�-,Y,�,&,�-,��. , " ow. 5� - .4ap.,4%., ­,Q, _,,_ _r 11 ,� ,�,� �-.i�, �, I ­*, ,,�x -,i;i:i , vx�; 2 � ; " , �' *"s3v .�k i 5i­ - ­_ "�_�, � I- , -1 � "; , �� =m., .�_Zw;� _4 4 , j 16� _. I- � � " � J," .� , - , , - - I " ,,� grL ,,�. ,;,�, �: , - - _ .V4�t - :1 _-.,�� - ,� . � �� ­, m _Fziti�7 , � � r � v;,�,;�Jl .$, zq � , W� R . 14 .,fth M - . ,--, ". , , � �'�-UWP 1 , ,_�A ZI�IRPI . 7." gpe,� - 0", 1 4 .4 miy.g� , 1, .11 ,Z , ,,�,,,_, ��, - , ,a& L' 11� 1-4: - � , � i . 'i .0 '� " 1� ��%,�.i, . "- I _& _-_-j� - �q;? � " � ,�, " , � . . - � ! '.7 � - - .� � ­ - -1- "I 1� '. _._;t__' , �: T�t ,� . _ , ," _ ,� . . , '� �' .� ,. fi L . Zj� ,F �� 1";7Vt 1� _ , I , �� �_ j _ a � � .* ,. . , � . I p I , lt� , , , " - " --,,,,i4 "" _11it", � _,:p4 , _AQ,_,7�t��.r U t � �, � V6 _0 C� - � I 1i .__ t Ze�k , 4� * 1, , �,�, 1`4 , ""; .5 � . , lw I _ , ,F �� _,: I .; ',-�-,- � .. � . I , - , Pt. ,j, '__�� 'Ift _it ­1 'i"i , �'_' . �._Ilt Wx I �"ttl; , - , 7, J_� � k1_1_f T. - --,A,-�:7,_�_-­4, - ,�,,�,,�Zl, , � ?�,,,--_ --,, � I �, � '' .�_T_g.. ,,,,, .-i , , __ - 4 ­ I I._ ""c _",�,:-� I , '' _,w _�`, ��­, "W'. , h0l * , _ "?�,','?'.s,�,,�: , �-,,11;­;.�.41,,�_`_ . 41 1 _- :�L,,��­,,,�,,,: �� - � ­ - ,_ �� � .;;� - " �M,Q�r lil$l �,,`�', . /�, - I ­i � " , ,--,, ;1� % _:r 112. I- I-, _� ,�J, " � � I-— _1 " - -, _.­�Iw-­�_j­ I ,, ,, %, j, ;� - -�­;��X; I ­ , � �_, _ i, " � ; " �'17. , - 1: -I "1311.�, >_ � — ,n;�; , �; - � �� ,��. i: 1� tl�,. - 1 , , �4 � _ 4- � R_�.51 .... .. �,'�� " ;�,� ��,. _, � � ­ nm� af,"j, 114N'7100'�L j"S!''!f,'��.."g,­—, " _7,1A1 , �,, .�7' - 1, -,',' t4fi* Eli" _m - 11"U"Vi""Y' 11 'I- ivnv, , " '1�7,'�j , , � .14 , V,7t'.1 %_ -4'- X n � �, lz ,� k :_ "' k,;r 426 F!"-; -, wl -�, ��� J 4r.-T 1j,VN � _14 W'T�., "I . � �� , - If j�,-,v�-,41��T771 _7 B;;�,;, .- -�,_ " � _ -----..I- I" ,, !" . , "77", 4 , , � 'p ,�;41 - ... ... �, M , 1?47.,­­� - . - �!,� F 7 - zT�,-,-g, H ,*- � I A - - .-INI'�N-6ti.�,,", � , , I , , , 4 11 � i, " ,-, 4", . , I . "'11 " F I L �1 , , I - ­�; ­q 1;� ... � ,� �,��,._z : .�,,Y,5�1 ,I �; , �, - -, ,��­ �, f,�, e ,_� , ­_­ ,S��k, !,' �, _( -- 11, I�L - �. �jj��iig. ,1� ,';t�ig�� �__,_� T, " , - -Ar' ,��­ - � `71.1 " , , � �,��,;,t,� I` , �;�,, , ", _! . 'i , � " t,�*v -,. P � 0-111.", - ,L. '. �, i ;� F� 5,11v, ;01'. , � , , ,�--" � N "�', �,�,Y,,,t,,'�",:;",""�,�,,',,'�,r- , - , - .. - � - "", 11 - M�, ", 2 , ­11- , ,,,�Ii, I., I ­ - 11 _­­ 11 I , ,!,,.;�,�,; �. � " , :11, ,o-�'��- , ?­�, ,, ,;,A� T��, j" � , � �,;,f,"` , 'I, , : , " . " ,� :v , '�� i�!, t "' i� ­� �� - 1­1,111 a A -:­1 I I I . , , - , , -, - ,� �_ !�t, -1. " - � " " - �,� r I , ,"� 11 I ','�­6 W* 11"k J�l ��l '5"', t , - _ � _"�1 i' 1" a I ^1',�,-,,,:�,*.:cmt 1�1 A 1'�"11'1,�11, pf,� " 4',; "' � ­ , , 7" "' " w 1� , , '. `� " I- , t � 11 � � 7�� , 4r5!'_ �,4'.;­. -Z ­ , I �­_` I - . , � .! i 11, � i " �',","" , 1. T 77 ,�, _�,��,111, ,.i , I K � � ,��';�,.,' A 1, ,. ", � L-1 � ­7;� _,'M -- , _��'-; ... , , W,i��:i'-.�. � A�l - - rA." Z; I - ,,, ,I"- � , '" - 6 � Z, 'i 4 T:j �lw- ,-:1 .:. ",", . ,a! , _.. ­�' , , ,�.., . �'-'g,,,� - ,�'�4_41,111�f'11`01 qeA, �z�,�Z,�_-- �,� 4, 4 �7,4,w;lk,_-"� f, r"', � ", �2' k - i f� � k4ll _!�:, "; , � , .�, � ,: 01 - I ,;'L : 71�'�- �, , 4k- .:-.�,;-.;,�W.,_',f­- ',�§ M, ,";;1171k1` V�-,*t��A,A "S91 __ 14 " . - t,'�, I � "' �.. I I I ­ I , , q . 3 -1 ..... . � ,,,, , i � 11 V�,,, ,Y� "' , , ;dl 14��a 1� �t ­4 , K,� * - - I - , 7 , r . ii i,�, - rn I L15i -tt -.'ii�� - _ "" IM5, ,�­,,,�, ;�,i ,,�::-,�-', rA, I . , 5�, , , , 'L, , - - A , � , fi,l � 1, - _, L , ,� 1-z-­ "" _­_ ­ ­1 - , , , , I ;,,�111, , _� . . , ,* , - , gr , .- � i "I , - - - � - ­'. " ,�*, ", ,i�n�*?_ � ,_,, I 4, � . jg,'�tr,...� _,�I­P,vx , �, ;;r", ,Vv, �, ��O�; ­ " , ;� , ". 11 , , '- " 44 �� � f, ..-- -, f,:, , ,.,, L: - - - - t; )� - ,. - " k 'g V , , " .1 " - � - -A, , "i - I . __ , !3:____�, ,,� �-_ _i� Z, � p 'i ,�, V'4- g: ,fl "" r7i � I L-�. 3 � _,,I . 'IrIT-11) �: T,.- 14 � vr:j i ,` , � "Iff, 4 M�� ""Ttt"'. _,�' �V� _;F "I ;1 ,;f X !T I... T , �1, ',, 1,�V_V,,r­ , _ �,�,,,��01, i�- , ,il"t ­_ , - � �,��t,AY t1�. V- - , 1, * -- - , 1� - ,,'� ,�, - .;­­ - . . ­111 I 1*1W ",7� -, � �Li`f �K ­ ,- - , "O" it, '" ��, I ,A ,,,- ��I, , , � ,. . � pO,,,_,��, ,-V - " , , � , , - ­­,-, 1. , 11 -, , . " ",0w_:Sj �, , , _�. ;L�­' -;; - -_I,,_.�fl�::�Pp.:;�­&*,, , -,,��, - � - .1 ,:,,r,',. ",,, ,��l�r�,-�IX,�.k�,,�-i��i�--,�-,� ti 1- I �, "I ". ��_ � , . '�� -, � V-1.1 .1, : - ,� �, "" � " - � , t , ��-��, - , ", ­­v ,,, ` "! ��'��.�.,�,;,."-�,'�,,,-.,�i:,��,�,,., - , , " I � -, .1 'k '7141k,", , 1;�' ­7 �, -, - A, , L � I ',.,,II.,- - 1, �, L , .., --.A. � 5 , . ,�� , . R3., .w ..­. _ � ­�� ­­1 1, ,� -­� ­­'-�­ %__;, � , - ! ` 'ijv'�-,� -,,,,,,: ,,-,�pw�� �m ­_`41 ' .� - :& I . . , , ' , I -�, - , ,,,*:,.�!� , , "N , 11 I 'k"­,��!�Z, Kpi,�"­,14­j _t ­­i!i , % - i" ­,__�, , W�;,@ ""', , " W, N - N'i­-_,-,,�� .t _ , "". , - , ,�,-'J"4Z - ,'-U,-1 , :N0 . 4��46 - ? �� ,:, , ,�_ ­;�, , * ff 0 zR'j��-i�, ; 4 I .� , ��,!Zvlq-, � .1 �-N'!4 � . . ­ - I , " __ - , - 4 -1- - - _ ,� � -IN � ,� ,� � it ,I�A. " - 1", 11 , i I - g" IN't � I � , ;,. " I . � Iffil, j 1, P , , � - 1� Ir , � " , - � ir , , , _��, -i,eu;,�O..­.�,-, "I - , T"o M, ;; , P I I 'I � � - .."n, --,, ��', I 4- ,� __ � , ; PA. t$ i i - i, , p 1� I - , $ . I , � ij �'�r:,�, - , . .� , - *1 � - - 4 V .,* I , - 11 , , A �1 , " k, i 41 ,� �; 4�1,3' ii �`ci"111111 � - i -, , - �' bo t I . i , � , ", -I _� , , - _,,,� I � �i_ ,��;k�� , ,� -� ,�;i'� I -, ", "e, I I . I , I 5"; I - 37z� , A . " - U A � ��11 , :1 .1 � zi �4- . ,�i-,p%;:� ' _,,�7, -,�,_,' - I`- j,;, _G_,..'��i: �i�, 7g, ', � ;�i�� - '370, , " - J"', � .Z� , ." Wg�'� i , -!',I 1� - �`R: _-.1-1:1 __ " ,�� ., - , 'I � - " , � -Z 't , W-1 , r, _' . . , �1% ., �7_'1�., -,. - , .1 li� . 11, L'a .1, . 5 - - �. � - ". , - - i _� I" i . � N i � � �Z, 4,, � , .11 �"� .91 - , , ,_ RM 4H, ,� _!��, 9" ,:_ f" �t�,": .7 , � I -,.-.. - j­. *­,",jj' IL u. ­:�­�",: - - - TLI. - , , A -, '4`4* "4-,o 1 _ '-Oi - I , � " ,K,�. �, _­ '�"" -­ va�.&_ - ,�, _)�:, �jt:, -. ­.xf;,'t7 tll­-­­A�.. 1- ,.i - z .. - p ;-T�­j,,�, ­, '4�(­J'­_�_ x,�, - /" . j, ,� - 711��';A­' ., 1, 11 __ UW._ I i R �j�27 A, &,r "t I -.77 'Al 1 �­­ -- . - _,", - _, '�`- 41i:!�i:iT�::�,! � -;F.,��IIL5 4__,_�,_A�� - - - -� -!,� 1 4 1 '�A, 1)1,'� i ,:.,u__j i�it��-, Mlll�. 7�3� :1, �. . ­j#, ' , -11 -4 �r,._I�j .. , , "'."t, Z�-,,,4t.: - ,�.. , gi*d111A .� 41;0.0. . �r.-_. - .i!t M. s,f_ffe .f.-.4'.!".�,- - z .- ,­ .. , fw�_ . � 4�� `_`� , , ��i "' , I _N " , , X, � - �11_ >u ly� , _�4 - I � . , � . T P ', , - to N X-pl, , 44 , _), " " :1� .11 7- 'I' �. 5 -k T. PkL_ ,��Z. .-'#,:. 11 - ­­ , �il.;.Z�� D. I- [ � ­.­ -, K"­ ., , , �, 1 '�,��,,_� ;!;,% - _�� " � - z 4j­ ' , �--�­ , , - 1 )4 t , "'i, - �,- ��,','�i-q , I -1. ­ 1. - � F - .... _ __ " lil. � , . ,� �i"; A , �,,t - �­ , 2 ` , ­ �, - � " ,jL - "Q`�", _,,�-�5�, -, -- , - "; _-.e, - - , 7� �.-` ­��,, i "o -j " " - ki_:W� IT, ii I - ,_ �N--�,��; 4%, 14 - �' "M , ,_,� � � . , , -11-1 I Z,, , ____ - -w,; %-I�� -.1" j�­' - ­ .1-10 !�v -1 3 � - , �, _..__� I ­ I ----- Eli __ � ', 1, ;-r­;g*n�,�-Ar'-�'..-_ _,_.7,z_. __ , !, W,iq, - I X __ � ;;,I 1! _-��__, .. f F-W,- � - j 7 � 7rl . . - ; - - �, . I , , " . , M iZ , A-_:Ft'14,� . ��,�1- I 4wll, , �� 1" - . , I . , i"71 , _"'. � .�' ­ � N, c ..': ,o -1 '�:_Y71 " ' ' � ";�# ­ � - W, ,_.,ii.� �VWZI�111515t',�__J I - '_� X N, .. � ... _�4itzl� ... ;M% X. ,A�'-J�:�__ - I - I - - � .:,..I �.. Q - , , ; - - ""i, :;: , � " _m .M� . I �V�i:. _,� 9-11ANI�iitil§N;'. I .� ,;­­­;­�� , - -, �i� �il �­ , � i 5,.:�'Iii_ * :,... i it i . i;� --.r, � i[". .7, , - 4 f7i!--,��--7 !-.,?_?w%,?� ilip,:.'i'111 ,!,t.-�,,�-,�;,O",.�"F�,14"�,.-,- .% .-T.- 141"i, - I , 15-m , z it - -n-,�-,Lp ;V*, g7z,_17��A,�":,.,q _� .. '. , M: I ,.,-. , 1� 1- , . ��Y, 5, " - -1 � p�h - -- , " .!Rl ii j': , - -! I, - _'­':RX� , -?,��oi,,��,�,2��!,I��..�,'t.,,�i��i��'.4.�t ,i�:;:;:�;j'.*�jj?.: ig., , �� -, ­g� , _,*11 ",4" � .�', �� � - , _.- , --i".­ �,­; -;*r�_I!��.,, �, ,:Ii - - , �, .. ..... I .fj "; e 4 - � - ... ... � . :. :j:j ,w ,�, . , . ��,],_�iij .! , ,;,j �', , .. , , , �4 - ., - o � 71vcl�� ,,�� - , ": �� A,X­ , . I ; , ��T_ , , , - - ,�`� , - iiii ` ..; _ , �_�� I � vi" TF Rf --..,'.: �..­ �� 1: .t � , , - " " , W�:; itiw, , I ;�t� . -,�, icv&,­�V�;� " " - ,,,�Z Q � __' . _.tW . . . � �-�, 1� .. -4 g ­�-�n!',­",­'--, , ,4 ,�4-_' i v , - , , I- '�,, �F-" .,� - , -f­;-,--�,,,_Q ffl,� , , _7 1 , ''. ­��t;,� - , , . : !�: �11`j�g 04:'� , t .Wilt � �43 - � t rl�;.t�"-_� , -� ,­_­� I:�_:--­ . - , . ­_ ,R_,-T,_; K'51-10VI 4�11z' . . , _,I , . 4 , - L:' , - 4 11 , ii-.1�,f,,'�.-i,�.�i,:,,ii�i-j�.W ,t�;! "'. .. �, � �, 1, � ,7 , ­ . . ..., " - - _ I , � , -- I,- t � - - I . I ­;g ,-, . : i �-�, 4N - i", .`� - � 7, ,0- -� .: -N ,,-.. - .T , , . - q , _!�L_�:, _q , , 'N4 j, p:. j% W1.1." i I -, - ., � , 'M Z. ,�,�, , _4i i , _ �', . , *4;i .., I I - UN -amj _,;-:,:.,,;' A, . 1, - ,� �f-l--&­;4- �RC - ,1gT&vAp5;­ ­Tv,� , �, � _ *,�,�,L,,,!,�',' �� oo - � .: ­i- -T -, - I . " ��t �It' Y _ - , . , - -4 ,:,��,N��,_�,�_�i" _­�­ _,� , �'.`%�iii ., - `0.14- . . �� -4. ::1 ii��,.;Z<,�,_,,­, , "' _ -L , � , _,�� - , - F " - � , 5, �Ik_ � ­11-11111- - ", tr11 , """ 1* " , � I _',-_�__,.,.r �, , - pq;� ��,,-.-,- j�'-r � . - _ "I 41! , , - � , _.�� �" "�' �' - _: I - u- - 11?, Y, ; ! �" ` KII, -- ._, i.-I.N -. � I i I Ji. � - , - .1 - i "; .,� I , - " 0 4 z X &I I I i K I I . . . I I . . . 0:4. �.,, I - "..!, I .,.,� .� , � . ,c ..; __ �;. ! q, I - $1. MiQ . � , , �, . . � p 1 ... V . . . . i �, ,� �4 w 4.. , . , . � ,�. � IrI , 5� - �-"'- . _ , -i - , - , " - L� W.i1�---_W _ _, �, - ,�7 1-1 � _ - .� I , , � . . � . � � , , ,, - , � , I �_ ... " - " �4 . .- -, - --i , , : I "' , ... ...... , -_ ::j:* - . . :--t.11- - _, " "i ""' � ... I ­ ­ I — j- L I - -7- , .:�F, - . � L - 'S - - . _. .... . I I - , �, -, - " - , . .�-:-.:r:� , , - ,, , _".­., 6, �i _�iiiii * , - ` , . . -1 - , "',n�t ,'4 ,�-'-.'�p-,,t4,,---w--�,�ge--�-"�-� ,4,; . 5 rc I - ,�; �Ai _� L, .�, 2 1�'Q_­_ 1-1,., , ��, - �� ..... . 7, -3 " I , Xi - , � __� , , "'i- ; 7 186, , " ­ ,l, - , "SET'', V-11— , I ix , - ljl,!� , N - ." ­­7 , � , ;S -ho-a . . � - X_ . iid. , ,,, t - ,,:,i, , , I - 'I ,�'. � � _ - j I � 3 " 1 �� *, P 7� . . � " , Ar , , , . I - -, %. , I *, U . , .4 , 1 :t , , � M.'s i� �� , _.� � � � �7 1,�� A � �A. , . - _ g ,"M , , = �� ., � n 4, ?-, �i ,� _ 1, � � , g � W il �� I 0, ;: � k: LL ,- . _ - . t 1� Z_,C�.A'�ff' � -z * 3­,'; , � I - - I , I � I z M., K__�, -,N �;i .. 's "t , � - _ _ ,.,- - � . �t. "ut ,,,4 , ., _q. _4%:�j : J., �5 � , 1­1 I , , , .1.. - � , ­­ 7 l 5 ii � ;',� - MAGNO& � �z 1. ­� � -'7Y,'_ k, , - - . , - q W ; � " .. 0 _�� -.1-014 P_". �1.,D'1'1.'1i %,�-,�vK­,��.�,�-, -:':5­:�,�: . 0.41 �' 11 -11 " A I 'T - � k I 11 - - "I ?�,,,� ,""Wi­ - � _ -, , T*,.,. , .'-�,:­V�,�-�_ m. .., 4,�, . L I - _ � ­ - , - - - - . � . � . - - I �-- - ­ ,� , _� A., �111'1,% -1 ­1 �j . "I, ­ =1 ��, . -1 __ , , - --f � . "I ,"M ' ,77��-',!.,�g g.-j 6 f - I :m " I J. " . �. �, ,q, � , _� 3 � � �i�, � . — '.� , i , 'W14-T-1� '. I - � - �'i jE;::.;j?, �, f,:;:;, - .- , , , I . '6'V,�,35,9`�� _",�,-­; , , i:;::11,�,Ix i 9:9,%-W, � - - 0- - - � � �::;ij.lf��:i`4 �- � �,�� .. � r. - * � � " I I .1", �::�:i , , , ­� -.,.,:;:;:;:;iii�;,.i�::;:1 '4r�"k�l, " . I �, I" L R. . i 4t.4 V, , - 4 --.1-.R,P1;WP, ""'! '-'-'-W-. I 1i - "Z t_,w.,z ,,�7j�,�"', �-,' .L ,V.- i - ,� ::::::: ::::, - � , '. �, . I , � - N � I — 0, � - 1 " - - P.P.-I : 1 �. , 11 -1 11".. . - � I ... k;::�,�01 tr t� �,� � _�� - 1� : " ­1 . , - - ­­—�.'t". ,,,O.�, ,, - ,_4 ,_Zr�y_, . — , - , , - , , , ,; , ; , . , � _. 1_� - I ��]_ Iulf:,�� �,,,,-- ", , " � - - - �-A � , * `2' �,: - � , � - ;_,'Q`! I �� ._." ­� - �'-�z !:',;�, .! N �--,, ­ . -� V& , "'— +�, , ­ ­1 1� -1 - :`­� ;-,q" ILI', -�!% , ":,;,�Z-11 �, - z I I......., ... " - - , -, I . ­1 � , , - � �,, , - ,� �, , " � , � .- _ - - - " �, � !�, , ��.r�'- '' � , � , 7 ;�,r�,��-,'��,:",��'.,,�.-LE�-',,,�, - ,,, ,, ." _ �, '. I _ilfiv 'P, �4� Q �44`,�%,,,,` ,,,,,� �­i f�;R-__ el! -�!-t-,'4�`_3"Z" - _i­'� '�."�_ - �_ '1' 0, - � -Tg4;�7,�,,��,,7��,�,��,,��,,-I�s'y , -, I .: 1.11 , .,�l�,,,,'��1,1,1,�.,�i'�-1,�.�.- u ': v­ � �� ­%­-1- v'­ � _J�,�� li�� ,,-�' � � 1. "I I .1.1. I 11 I. ­­­ - - 1. I , , ,: :�, 4 " ,� , ,,�,%"Aj 4,;,tl �'��'kl "A , .. �,,�zt�­­­";7�__ 7�', . . I . .. � .. ... . .... 1. . .. " " ' , _­� - 4 �w . � , �,��, � , :: I I �: I I �: I .. 4 !?��"F ,�- ,�,',,,,,., - , ,v . �, " � ur , -, ,,P,,',',`r"­�,�,�,�­k , . , , "'� , � ', - I I 1.1- I. I.. I.. e R, .�,w,�,:i,�,�,�-,,���':,;,�7,,7$-w,�-,,.��,-�-,is:� ,4"A�_f'lrs� ��, ,;"., �!� " . � � , _', ttl 9712r-,N , ,,, �,,,�. � i �" - L, � .�' 1 i _�� "; �, ' ' �'�'��,:M 11'i* , , �� ��, , , ��', - I.. 11 I ...., .... .. . .1 I 1. �: ,,,�;,' �!,'-� " .1 I � ... ­1 -� , � " ,7 ft*� __ ", � , , I i .tP 'A , - ,. p, -I 'IF - 1, 1, - --LAURL � '' ��"O�,� _',�j��;', ':�f - .... I., I .. .1 ,�Z�_ . ��'. n'm �gl 11, - �j,�,'�,��-, � I , -, '�. 'i�".�ii��Iki,*4.�;. , `,4 ,t-, �� , _I, '','I'L, , , ''" .. I .. .1 ,." .1, " , * `f _�7,­,_-,�:ll,;:��%-�n,4 , , . � 111191vi- ­�.,:-:.: , ��, _. _ - ,�� " ­­­­­ _­ _� � I oodplain Determined by Detailed Anal IF,�,".-,�,�,,,,',',;-�i:,�?,"V, ,�,,�,�,e;l�,�,��,i,F�,,�,�*�-,4� , ,,�­�, ,,�� Ile,.. 10 11 .1-1-17%. I ... I �� � I 1. I ,;i � - il W, . ..... Vi'.", K j,,'iL7,1Q,`,L - q-, " �- ,�� ­,:'k, " � " "' ... .. . ... I I I .. .. I _-, r�-� `41 1111, -, , � 11 tV,21, 1!� -11 - .... - ,. . : :: fr �,;,,-," , i�111.41'1'1'_­ i t F.."Att", 1 7,��_ 1 � 4 " ,:,k, F,;k,'� ,,, L ' "�,'� , , �� '0, 'A"", "7�1�,_4�1­i� ��_�,�,�:,Js ,,,,, --;,;,� 1.,-,-�'&,,� - , , 11 � .� � ­ � � 1. I . I .. . . I . . :: I iil. I 11 ­i�7 , , _ . - �;"�',�, .. I.., . .. . ...... --��,� 7, ­-� ... �4,1 "' ­11-Wl"', 'NA ,,,.,;I- ­&,O,,,�, 0 �' . . � � . I . -'- I � ", � � ... I 11 -, .I.... .... ... 11.1 I .�_ 11 S - ' ­�! " ." - Y .." 1: ::: �...: - . � ,� ... .I.- - I I.- ,,, _I 1,t,_-�J_ ,, -- "�, 11Q, "", t"'V, 'i ,��,�-,', '0 4r­" --- - � W , , ;��,��,i,IN9 "' - ­­ , , ­1=11.,1­11 A-,%�,",,!,,g� I ysis "I � "�'�,�`L:"?,; ,,�_',�,,7;,,,�,, _", � - �'i';'i " " _` " �4 W110-1- 1,01� __ - " INKI'�Z4 !� A, �­ i ­ t,,,, W-1­11�?Ij-v ') "t,�,'�_ �,t,'r',� j,-ffl� ,� � 41, ��4�V,_O, - 1�1?�;�,�-,,-,dtF-F:i', k� "k AA- , - �,�,j4!,A �-,��l I r , -,�,�'j#n , -, ; 4 , , I � ­­ ,*w ­ ` 2­ ` ­ ­ - �,­,,,,f4 " . , . . � i V � 44, - , - - I I ­_ - , ,� I .. . ,,, 1, 1�1�1�"�",K'��', 4,41"R , , � _� ,,_­�%�`,,,`, , � , - � W�,, i� i! , , � � "V11"fl,"Y" ..... . - _',,', - --%f,�-,-,-�,,. " , �4,� ,;,� .A " - I., , 'i , , .. I � .... 1".". _ k I t.-_.. 111�' -, ,tt`­,_­ I # , � . .... .. -,, I - ,, 1, 'r ,# - ', I w, , k1l"', ,Y ,�- -, " , . "" , - 7. __ �, . __ ,, � ii� �1,'w*�D� " u5,i;'5 - I ,­­_ z�.���r�--"O�'t,��-�,,,r�,��i'I , 111. , . - ", , :��',`,"�:,,;�,I,-,,',�� �_-,',�",-.' _��'��`p , - - I? ­v , , _ 1 " 7 1 . ­+_k#1144�11_ - �, , , ,* , .1 - � 11 .. I I.. 11 . . I .1 . . 11­1­1��io, ,At-, � #�_f --- I 1­1199101110`_W=_',mk�i�, "7-7,­Aiv,� 4�� ,., ,�� � ��,�,,;�� f­4­ 11 I � ,P�, f5 --- 8 , � - , ­­ , 't ,,, ,�4,r".,.%,,� � , "', -2,­ - , __�_ 1� " _­ ,1711., - ­,j,;�Ia . Wstina. Fj 9. "_,� -11�, " A v I � - - A '21� il , � t �.,',, " '!�-IM'l-V � __j_Zt�, , - ... I I I . I I I I .. ­­... . 1,��-' ,�,,,,,',`�_�.,;�­� `�fl',MXI_1�1"i ,�­ -iiii., - �, I . . .1 , , t; - . , , ";,� " ',,t2�i�l-_V,11,0`�,4, _4 11, W �',',' -�,�� � ,,, �A­ � I I ...1-1. , . � ; , - -, --,;� ­ ­�,V!"*4�`�, .1 , - , . , �, S ­­ Y � r�,�I;,� I - RK ul. r�11:1111SFIVIF I , : � ?, �. � I : IXGEND.. . . ',��V-,'�,-. , , , "" . " - , , A111111,1_1 p . � I , . : ,;;� � -, _�`�� �, �'j , �4';'ii,�K�� . , - � " , '. ' - � . X',,,,-4­ _ -, , .& _#,-., .., .- .- t, !4 ," �X'--,` 1 �,F,77,7 � - "� I . ,4; - , " I k �� - I 10 , , i . LIN K : A "i W,� 1�, v li ... �-; - , � .. 1. I , `7 , -),� " '­_ f ", _M'l .. .. - � I . I . 1. , :. p 1. � �5,`i` , ��4,,, - '*1 -t _ "" , - 1. . . I.. , . ...... .... .11'.. . : � � I . I�. - , , , , `:�'j'-- li " �. : ­ - 1. .. .. " , , ,-- w ,� ` �l=., �,,,, I �-__"_�t !; I - - - . ''. "I., .. - �i I. ­` ;""� � . , M - , - mc , , �, ", 11 ,','� r - -� � Existin 1� - i ,-, �,­ - , -11 1� . , , " , , " , � - � �ii�i,:_:�' �: I " ­,�,,�,7 , � , , .�!' '' _ � �� 11 I . I . a ow, oo 6 ... I .1 . ... ... " , t t " A ��,,t � , �� 11�W=l "St,"'3 -tV�' I 1­11 , _le,-" L ­,­­ � : -- ' rax?mat , . , � - � , , , - -V - , , 11','-"�I'v!'- ,�A� � � � "�­� � , Z B, " I it ,_',,,111�11 V -7 If, - 1, " .1 � f,�i i:,-_:,-,:.-_:'_, ,",.,, � � App e Methods ' : : : - " , , g , 11 I I... --I �.. .1 I . I - � ,_�Z,!-,�p ,� "'i-I .f�&,14t , , �_I%Ie,:� . . I 1 I , _4�; ,. , , w,i�, *,­4. -�'. t"V` _­ - �,',�, , , , I , C�L. �, .. � I I - .. .. I I ,,.,, i DW I I I _` , - , , , " j , I I . I I 11 - .. . - .. I.., . . p 4' � '0 1. I ... 1. . . - I I , - . ..., - I , I "t., i� , - � . . 1. I , _ I -_ � I - I .. � � - I .. . . . _ � , �,_ ., � - .. I ... I I 1. .. - I . . , � IS, � ,, � 71 � 1""! - "M "," " ,`, - I , � I ', "", ,, ., : � I I I I . � I -11 . ­ o z _ -,- �'. " , -I ` I -i Sh 11 Fl di g � Determined by ,� _�f " � It. " - � . 1_1. �,,�,"p , - - - , " I �t , _ - I , I .�__ _ ­11-11 �w - , �k, . � � . � ::.­� � . . :: � �, _ ;- 14 , " i I .:..: I I I I I...., I ... ... I . I I .1 th-0 .�����,�,-�,�,�_,.�_,��,,�'e--�, , ,A;! ,,,��-'.�'�,;,-----,-""�",i,�.-�� �,,V . - �, I. - � "I'll I .­­ .­_ � ___:1 11 1-11,1- - 1-1111.11 I'll �, - , POW= � W, __ — I .=Soo , . XCOFC2000 SAS A&� CITY OF FORT COLUNS Cfty of MAGNOUA STREET OUTFALL . I FIGURE nAGO M& ' ocaffin an ANdERSON CONSUITiNq ENqiNEERS, INC OLD TOWN BASIN F ort Collins REV4 N Boo lIX17 SEL-i"PROV AUHIBAS Ovil - Wat�B��w - Enviro�tal EXISTING 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN &I — 375&�R.& #5 F_C.ut�cawsz MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN /_� IOWA I 0M Comm on �� �Mon"=/W(i;��ui "M 10/26/2000 AMH1aAA I I I I I I I I I . - . . 3.2 - u ' the intersection of Shields and Myrtle Streets. This system would include laterals along Sherwood, Whitcomb and Washington Streets all north of Magnolia, and a lateral along Grant Avenue between ' Magnolia and Mulberry. In addition, this system would intercept the existing 48-inch storm sewer entering from the south along Whedbee Street. Numerous other small storm sewers along the proposed alignment would also be intercepted. Storm sewer inlets would be enlarged along Magnolia ' Street at both Howes and Wayne Streets, and on Mulberry Street at both Grant Avenue and Shields Street. New storm sewer inlets would be installed at the Myrtle/Shields intersection. In addition, storm sewer inlets would be enlarged on Olive Street at both Sherwood and Whitcomb Streets, and at ' Washington and Akin Avenues The Grant Avenue Lateral would divert residual street flows and local runoff along Mulberry Street into the MSO. The Sherwood and Whitcomb Street Laterals would intercept residual street flows ' and local runoff from Olive Street into the MSO. The Washington Avenue Lateral would collect local runoff that would otherwise be conveyed east along Olive and Oak Streets adding to flows coming from Mountain Avenue, and direct it into the MSO. In addition, this system would provide an outfall for the ' proposed Myrtle Street Storm Sewer. The Magnolia Street Outfall (MSO) system would primarily serve to reduce flooding along Magnolia and Mulberry Streets, and along all cross streets between Magnolia and Mulberry, west of College Avenue. This system would also reduce flood flows along both Myrtle and Mulberry Streets east of College Avenue, as well as street flows on College Avenue and Mason Street north of Magnolia Street. The MSO Project will also improve the function of the existing storm sewer within Whedbee street north ' of Magnolia; allowing it to more closely provide 100-year protection for the corridor along Whedbee and Oak Streets to the Cache La Poudre River. Should the Myrtle Street Storm Sewer be considered as part of the MSO Project, the Myrtle Street Storm Sewer would involve the enlargement of the existing storm sewer along Myrtle Street from Remington Street west to Sherwood Street. This storm sewer would then be directed into the MSO at Remington and Magnolia. This system would intercept two small storm sewers, one each at Remington t and Howes Streets, as well as the relatively large existing storm sewer entering from the north along College Avenue. Storm sewer inlets would be enlarged along Myrtle Street at College Avenue and Sherwood Street. The Myrtle Street storm Sewer system would reduce flood flows along Myrtle Street ' east of Sherwood Street, including overtopping of College Avenue. This reduction in flows along Myrtle Street would also serve to reduce surface flow diversions that direct runoff north to Mulberry Street along Peterson Street. ' To address stormwater quality, the Old Town Master Plan identified an extended detention water quality capture volume detention pond at the downstream end of the MSO (located between Riverside Avenue and the Cache La Poudre River). However, a study was conducted that evaluated ' water quality capture scenarios for the Old Town Basin [November 2006]. In this study it was concluded that due to vertical constraints and possible contaminated soils at the outlet of the MSO, first flush flows should be redirected into the existing water quality system in the Udall Natural Area. To accomplish this, a new water quality diversion structure and outfall pipe (identified as a 60-inch RCP) would need to be constructed from the intersection of Magnolia and Whedbee Streets to the north along Whedbee Street to Oak Street, where it would parallel the Oak Street Outfall to the Udall Natural Area. It is noted that the existing 54-inch Whedbee Street storm sewer, north of Magnolia Street, is not conducive for ' use as a water quality conveyance system for the MSO (based on the Master Plan alignment) due to its significantly higher vertical profile. However, utilizing this storm sewer for water quality conveyance could be a consideration with other pipe configurations and/or alignments. The MSO was identified as a conceptual drainage improvement to reduce flooding along the Magnolia/Mulberry Street drainage corridor. However, this master plan drainage improvement was developed on a macro scale for the purposes of identifying a solution and associated cost. XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 3.3 ANdERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. r] 1 Consequently, this project will invoke an evaluation of alternatives to identify the optimal drainage solution for the Magnolia/Mulberry Street corridor. In that regard, ACE has conducted a preliminary investigation and developed an alternative alignmentworth consideration. After some initial investigation and field work in support of this proposal effort, it was determined that the MSO outfall alignment could potentially be optimized by re -orienting the portion of the MSO between Matthews Street and Riverside Avenue east on Olive Street as opposed to Magnolia Street. This re -alignment would be preferred for the following reasons: (a) Olive Street is the low point along the Magnolia/Mulberry Street Corridor east of Remington Street; consequently, inlets installed along this reach would not require laterals along north -south oriented streets in order to connect to the MSO; (b) the existing utilities along Olive Street for this reach would be less construction prohibitive (along Magnolia Street, a 10-inch sanitary sewer would need to be relocated from half a block west of Smith Street to half a block east of Stover Street); (c) with the alternative alignment it would likely be feasible to construct a water quality diversion structure and pipe on the east side of Riverside Avenue, eliminating the need for the water quality diversion structure/pipe at Whedbee Street; and (d) the outfall location would be in an area more conducive to construction (avoiding the vertical bank on the west side of the Cache La Poudre River, and less vertical gradient from the invert of the river to the overbanks). A plan and profile of the proposed Magnolia Street Outfall, as identified in the Old Town Master Plan, is included as Figures 3.2 through 3.4. It is noted that Figure 3.2 illustrates the alternative alignment for the MSO between Matthews Street and Riverside Avenue. 3.1.3 Other Considerations In addition to the inherent challenges associated with the installation of a large capacity storm sewer in a highly urbanized area; several other issues will need to be considered as part of the formulation and evaluation of the ultimate configuration. A sample of these other considerations is listed below: ' (1) Utility conflicts will be encountered regardless of the final outfall configuration. Consequently, identifying the potential utility conflicts, discussing the utility conflicts with the various City Departments, and collecting detailed horizontal and vertical information ' (through utility locates, potholing, and surveying) will be paramount to successful completion of the project. The crossing of the Arthur Ditch near Canyon Avenue will also pose a unique obstacle. ' (2) High groundwater will likely be encountered throughout the entire project area. Keeping the storm sewer system as shallow as possible, while attempting to avoid utility conflicts, may help to mitigate this issue. In addition, utilization of RCBCs at specific locations could ' also provide extra utility clearances while reducing overall depth of the system. (3) Subsurface soils contamination may be encountered at numerous locations throughout the project area, particularly near the location of the old pickle plant at Riverside and Magnolia. ' Initial geotechnical investigations may be beneficial to avoiding these adverse soil conditions. (4) Tunneling under Riverside Avenue/Railroad, College, and Mason Street may be required to ' mitigate traffic and railroad disruptions during construction and to avoid potential utility conflicts. It is noted it may be more cost effective to tunnel from the west side of Mason Street to the east side of College Avenue due to the high set-up costs of tunneling and to ' avoid the potential communications lines on the south side of the existing Qwest building. Based on Deere & Ault's experience on the Oak Street tunnel, three critical geologic issues drove the tunneling alignment and pipe design. These issues were: (a) the upper quarter of XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 3.4 ANdERSON CONSULTING EN(iiNEERS, INC. -t: I W _ NOTE: ;.INFORMATION PRESENTED ON THE PLAN AND PROFILES ARE FOR GENERAL PURPOSES ONLY AND REPRESENT ALIGNMENTS, PIPE I I 5000 _ I SIZES, AND PIPE SLOPES SPECIFIED IN THE MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN. 5000 Wi 4990 i -EXISTING W I 4990 3 G 0 �� � ra � 0 W o2 La 2 4980 a?? W i It�_in W Q W La C3 C d 4980 z cc 4970 Y _ _ _ ( 4960 — i---_ _ I i 60 _ _ ## ON MAGNOLIA CONNECT 68' RCP _ _ - I _ _ _ — _ _ _ I I _ _ _ I o POUGRE RIVER a 4950 _ 49 50 4940 SEWER TO MAIN LINEPLAN INTERCEPT STORM SEWER AND CONNECT CEF 18-WNE TO PAIN LINE ( i — _ _ _ _ _ _ — y' _ 4940 I SIZES AND LOPES !PIPE -+T I 4930 PROPOSED 3 120 LF. OF 114'L RCP !----'� 1 4930 SLOPE = 0.007 "/FT 4920 i f:H aA9L1 LO+UU Zu+uu 10+UU IU+UU O+UU U+Uu —Z+UU SCALE FOR PROFILE PrAm rAmm sh VERTICAL• 1'=20' XCOFC2009 OAS CITY OF FORT COLLINS City of MAGNOLIA a I R EI II' OUTFALL i nk' �,„ 5 10 20 PLAN & PRO AMN/BAS ANfIERSON CONSUIi1N ENINFERS, INC Civil • Wate Pao=es • Emft unental OLD TOWN BASIN art Collins PLAN ARID PROFILE HORIZONTAL1'=300' 77lBH^m &R—k --- 05, Fa ColllmC0M0 MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN WM a Im Fh (00)2tb = F.(970)11 Ul 75 150 300 10/26/2009 AMN/BOA ....mm� u 47 CONTOUR INTERVAL _ 1 FOOT 0 75 150 300 MEND --��--�» SANITARY LINES - SANITARY SEWER SEWER MANHOLE- —s—s—�— MUNICIPAL WATER UNES- R MUNICIPAL FIRE HYDRANTS - MUNICIPAL WATER VALVES* —^—^—^—w— FIBER OFM LINES- - • ftch— ARTHUR DITCHS PROPOSED MASTER PLAN ALIGNMENT OF MAGNOLIA STREET OUTFALL POSSIBLE ALTERNATNE ALIGNMENT OF MAGNOLIA STREET OUTFALL Cry i.r r-/rj IDENTIFIED BORING/TUNNELINO LOCATIONS -INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM CRT OF FORT COLUNS G6 DATABASE NOTE: EXISTING STORM SEWER FACILITIES AND ELECTRIC LINES ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY PURPOSES FIGURE �2 3.5 _1 Kill' IV 1 qo 14 IWO LNEND SANITARY SEWER UNEV ui SANrrARY SEWER MANHOLE - MUNICIPAL WATER VALVES - FIBER OPTIC PROPOSED MASTER PLAN ALIGNMENT OF MAGNOLIA STREET OUTFALL CO UR INTERVAL POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT FOOT OF MAGNOLIA STREET OUTFALL IDENTIFIED BORINQ/TUKNELJMG LOCATIONS _16 *INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM CITY OF FORT COLLINS CIS DATABASE owl F -INFORMATION PRESENTED ON THE PLAN AND PROFILES ARE FOR 1 GENERAL PURPOSES ONLY AND REPRESENT ALIGNMENTS, PIPE SIZES, AND PIPE SLOPES SPECIFIED IN THE MASTER DRAINAGE 5020 lo DITCH 0 RUA IN LINE LIACE EXISTING n W R. L! DOrN ryIcmmr I ON MAGN -q-q CONNECT 86' RCP MYRTLE STREET STORM o in MASTER PLAN pPE CONNECT 60' RCP LATERAL TO MAIN LINE ED 500 F. OF RCR LF. OF Be RCp! PROPOSED 500 LF. OF 90* RCP 1. 0 LF.1 OF 10Z RCP —44 PROPI(Id 950 940 VERTICAL 1"=20' 5 10 2D XCO#rC2009 IRAS ANdERSON CONSUhiNq ENqiNEERS, INC Civil - Waterllar�m - E=mnmmtal (t CITY OF FORT COLLINS City of OLD TOWN BASIN Ro-rtCollins MAGNOLIA STREET OUTFALL PLAN AND PROFILE FIGURE 32 mb PLAN & PRO � aft AMNIBAS REVII mm wh 3.6 LE�EiID $ a 1' —•—e•»---eo*— SANITARY SEWER LIMES - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. —s—s— MUNICIPAL WATER UNES- Art^,.,,wa s?`*K I'y, R MUNICIPAL FIRE HYDRANTS- r> CONTOUROOINTERVAL �t d MUNICIPAL WATER VALVES* » i Ie 16 1'_300' xf^ _�— —�—�— FIBER OPTIC LINES �'++s.F aAl' ;r —)rl. aca— ARTHUR DITCH 0 75 150 300 � PROPOSED MASTERPLAI ALIGNMENT' OF MAGNOLIA STREET OUTFALL �•i, Ka l� POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT - �'� i� OF MAGNOLIA STREET OUIFALL ,� ✓,y wL, �Sapa;"eaa a I; ,t W �1 / i,3-i�� IDENTIFIED BORINO�TUNNEl1NG LOCATIONSMATION „., RED EWACn1S�TRCSSARES�WSTISTORM SEWER FACILITIES FORT COLLINS LINEANOT sa a fi , FOR CLARITY PURPOSE rn m * a �ii 441 tot a h '' t auxi 1� Ik ,•, eat,.' dwf^' ;?mod`' ,� °`' , en` v�'° +Eir: .,>. a;c a� so I i CENTERLINE PROFILE CENTERLINE jj PROFLE i j CENTERLINE PROFILE ( I t r i NOTE: INFORMATION PRESENTED ON THE PLAN AND PROFILES ARE FOR GENERAL PURPOSES ONLY AND REPRESENT ALIGNMENTS, PIPE SIZES, AND PIPE SLOPES SPECIFIED IN THE MASTER DRAINAGEW. PLAN. , 5040 ALONG SHIELDS STREET ALONG MULBERRY STREET I ALONG WAYNE STREET 5040 p(ISTIN ra o GROUND 5030 5030 i; i fs_ I i c4i i z i 5020 5020 — _ _ _ 5010 solo a im _ CONNECT 54' WASNINGTON1STREEf WTERAL-TO-MAIN-LINE�.. RCP ev 1 o �__�....I c �_r 5000__ i o � _ W a OC I— — 'PASTE 4990 SIZES AND PkAN-PIPE SLOPES —--- _ �-- -499C I 4980 � � � � � CONNECT BA i GRANT RCP AVENUE 498C — PROPOSED ----.-�.7--- 470 LF. OF 60 RCP i ROPOSED 650 LF. OF an" REP PROPOSED 780 F. OF 72' RCP PROPOSED LATERAL: I 500 TO -MAIN -LINE LR OF D2' RCP. 497( 4970 SLAPE = 0.003 Fi/FT SLOPE = 0.007 FT/FT SLOPS = 0.066 FT/FT SLOPE = 0.013 FT/FT AQr { I UUtUU wo*uu vuTuu OuTVV OYTVV .Vrvv ••••••� SCALE FOR PROFILE VERTICAL: 1 •=20' S 10 20 HORIZONTAL- 1'=300' 0 7S 150 300 rmumr wWig XCOFC2009 SAS ANdERSON CONSULTING ENqiNEERS, INC melum�ame nF_P_ m msst >�(9'�N usaimiv..lmal asau1 yam/ CI I M OF FORT COLLINS City of TOM L t OLD TOttA/I�A BASIN Fort CollinsPROFILE �w- MASTER DRAINAGE PLANSIN ���®�t� STREET ®a!'B'�i�LL ���I �® �RO�IdJG �0�$�R� 3 n VYV ,� na PLAN � PRO Imw>m m AMH/BAS oAto f 0/26/2009 am®mcii—A on 3.7 ' the tunnel had to be set in the stiff clay to provide stabilization; (b) to keep the face stable, the water table had to be within the lower third of the tunnel; and (c) the tunneling ' equipment had to be capable of effectively excavating both the stiff clays and the cobbles. Due to the proximity of the Oak Street tunnel to the MSO, these issues may also be applicable to this project. ' (5) Water quality capture volume may need to be addressed with the redirection of first flush flows to the Udall Natural Area. This has been evaluated in the past and it was determined that the Udall Natural Area is slightly exceeded when assuming extended detention water I quality capture volume criteria. Consequently, in -line BMP's (Snouts or other measures) may be considered at the inlets to help reduce the demand on the Udall Natural Area. (6) Potential Permitting that may be required could include, but is not limited to: (a) Poudre River Floodplain Use Permit from the City of Fort Collins; (b) Section 404 Clean Water Act Permit; (c) SWMP; (d) permits from CDOT to cross Riverside Avenue (State Highway 14) and College Avenue (State Highway 287); (e) permits for the railroad crossings at Mason Street and Riverside Avenue; and (f) street excavation permits form the City of Fort Collins Engineering Department. All permitting, with the exception of the SWMP, would be the responsibility of ACE with support from the project team members. Through the APDS ' process, ACE would support in the development of the SWMP. (7) Potential for a CLOMR and a LOMR along the Poudre River, depending on the Magnolia ' (8) Street Outfall outlet configuration and location. Assigning the Design Engineer as the Resident Construction Engineer, has shown to be highly effective in addressing construction related questions in a timely fashion. Our presence also promotes immediate response to address problems encountered during ' construction. (9) Traffic Control throughout the project will be critical, especially in the vicinity of such high traffic areas as Mulberry and Shields, Mason and College/Magnolia, and Riverside and ' Magnolia. Maintaining access for residents along the pipe alignment as well as access to high pedestrian volume facilities such as the Lincoln Center and the Fort Collins Public ' Library will be essential. Due to the similarities between the existing Oak Street Outfall project and the proposed Magnolia ' Street Outfall project, a comprehensive review of the Oak Street design process should be considered to discover what lessons were learned on the Oak Street project, with the goal of applying these lessons to the Magnolia Street Outfall project. It is our belief that this "lessons learned" investigation ' benefits the design and construction of the Magnolia Street Outfall project. 3.2 Future Engineering Services ' As shown in the previous sections, the ACE Project Team is extremely well qualified to provide engineering services in support of the Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project. In addition to the skills and expertise necessary for this outfall project, the ACE Team possesses a wealth of experience ' that will be available to City staff in support of future capital improvement projects. It is our understanding that support may be required in terms of engineering evaluation/studies, design, surveying and construction management services for future water, wastewater and stormwater facilities capital improvements. XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 3.8 ANdERSON CONSUITINci ENGINEERS, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I - Corporate Qualifications and Experience.................................................................................................1.1 1.1 The ACE Project Team - Qualifications..........................................................................................1.1 1.2 References.....................................................................................................................................1.3 ' 1.3 Qualifications in Flood Control Improvement Analysis and Design...............................................1.3 1.4 Qualifications for Future Projects..................................................................................................1.7 1.5 Alternative Project Delivery System (APDS) and Partnering Experience.......................................1.8 ' Section II - Key Team Members.................................................................................................................................2.1 2.1 Project Manager............................................................................................................................ 2.1 2.2 Key Project Team Members...........................................................................................................2.2 ' Section III - Project Understanding............................................................................................................................3.1 3.1 Magnolia Street Storm Sewer Outfall............................................................................................3.1 ' 3.1.1 Problem Identification.....................................................................................................3.1 3.1.2 Magnolia/Mulberry Street Corridor Drainage Improvements ......................................... 3.1 3.1.3 Other Considerations....................................................................................................... 3.4 3.2 Future Engineering Services..........................................................................................................3.8 SectionIV - Scope of Work........................................................................................................................................4.1 4.1 Task 1- Data Collection and Field Reconnaissance.......................................................................4.1 4.2 4.3 Task 2 - Base Map Preparation.....................................................................................................4.1 Task 3 - Utility Locates..................................................................................................................4.2 4.4 Task 4 - Geotechnical Investigation..............................................................................................4.2 ' 4.5 4.6 Task 5 - Surveying..........................................................................................................................4.3 Task 6-Alternative Formulation and Evaluation..........................................................................4.3 4.7 Task 7 - Preliminary Design...........................................................................................................4.4 4.8 Task 8 - Final Design...................................................................................................................... 4.4 4.9 Task 9 - Construction Drawings and Specifications.......................................................................4.5 4.10 Task 10 - Permitting......................................................................................................................4.6 4.11 Task 11- Design Report and Documentation...............................................................................4.6 ' 4.12 4.13 Task 12 - Design Coordination and Meetings...............................................................................4.6 Task 13 - Public Involvement, Council Workshop/Meetings.........................................................4.7 4.14 Task 14 - Construction Services.....................................................................................................4.7 ' 4.15 4.16 Task 15 -As-Built Services and Drawings......................................................................................4.7 Task 16 - As -Built analysis and Report..........................................................................................4.7 LIST OF FIGURES/TABLES/APPENDICES Figure 1.1 ACE Project Team Organization Chart...........................................................................................1.4 Figure 1.2 Selected Letters of Commendation...............................................................................................1.5 Figure 3.1 Magnolia Street Outfall Existing 100-Year Floodplain...................................................................3.2 ' Figure 3.2 Magnolia Street Outfall Plan and Profile.......................................................................................3.5 Figure 3.3 Magnolia Street Outfall Plan and Profile.......................................................................................3.6 ' Figure 3.4 Magnolia Street Outfall Plan and Profile.......................................................................................3.7 Table 1.1 ACE Project Experience Matrix - Magnolia Street Outfall and Future Projects ............................1.9 Table 1.2 ACE Project Team APDS Experience..............................................................................................1.8 ' Table 2.1 Personnel Experience Matrix for the Anderson Consulting Engineers Project Team .................... 2.6 Table 4.1 Proposed Budget for the Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project........................................4.8 Appendix A: Project Descriptions XCOFC2009-Magnolia Outfall.doc I ANdERSON CONSU(TINq ENGINEERS, INC. The ACE Project Team has been specifically assembled to provide the engineering services required to support these future projects. The professionals that comprise the ACE Project Team have the direct experience and the specific expertise necessary to address future projects related to: X Water transmission/distribution pipelines ' k X Water storage facilities Stormwater and sanitary sewer pipelines k Sewer flow monitoring X Trenchless pipeline rehabilitation ' k Drainage channels and detention ponds X Stream channel rehabilitation and enhancement k Water, wastewater and stormwater modeling ' k Minor improvements (pump/lift stations) at Water Treatment Facility/Water Reclamation Facilities ACE understands that the future projects may be completed solely in support of the Fort Collins Utilities or may involve a cooperative effort with other City departments. Based on our experience, the work with other City departments typically involves specific expertise pertaining to stormwater, water ' or wastewater facilities that is integral to the completion of project. It is also our understanding that this contract is not intended to supplement the services provided by existing engineering consultants in support of the water treatment and wastewater treatment facilities. In general, the services have ' included design and construction of drainage channels/storm sewers or detention facilities; stream restoration; storm sewer, water transmission/distribution pipeline or sanitary sewer relocation; or completion of drainage planning or floodplain studies/submittals. In each instance, a multi -disciplined ' team has been assembled to complete the project. Future projects will likely be reviewed, evaluated, and scrutinized by City staff as well as City Council. In that regard, the process may involve a "re -purposing" effort. This effort may focus additional attention on the cost of improvements versus affordable protection; integration of social, environmental and water quality measures as well as visual/aesthetic improvements; and work related to stream enhancement and rehabilitation. It should be noted that this process has been utilized on ' several previous and on -going projects completed on behalf of the Utilities. Noteworthy examples include the CIPO Project, Oxbow Levee Project, and Robert Benson Reservoir Project. While it is understood that this work has typically been integrated into previous projects completed for the Utilities, additional emphasis may be focused in these areas. The benefits of the ACE Team to the City for future projects, and the value of the ACE Project Team to City staff can be summarized as follows: ' X Our direct project experience and ability to integrate our efforts and support the Utilities Department with a multi -disciplined team to address all aspects of the project including ' stormwater, water quality, water/wastewater, park planning, natural areas, streets, etc. We are committed to designing mutually beneficial projects for the Utilities Department as well as various City Departments, while working closely with other interested parties and stakeholders. ' k Due to our very low staff turnover, the same ACE staff that has participated in hundreds of engineering design and evaluation projects for the City since 1991, such as the CIPO, Oxbow Levee, VTH Outfall, and the Howes Street Outfall projects, will be the same staff that will work ' with City staff of future projects. N Our local presence and previous experience in other City drainage basins gives us insight into the stormwater problems and issues throughout the City, not just those of the Old Town Basin. XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 3.9 ANdERSON CONSU[TING ENGINEERS, INC. ' Our local presence imbues our company and staff with a personal stake in the successful completion of these projects and promotes a responsive and cost-effective work effort in ' response to the needs and requirements of the City staff. As part of the APDS process, we become public servants and due to our local presence, we are also members of the public that benefit from these projects. ' k The ACE Team is well versed in the APDS design/build process, and will not require a "learning curve" for any future projects. We are fully committed and ready to be a contributing part of the evaluation, design and construction process from the initial identification of the project. We ' firmly believe that this process results in a quality, economical product for the City of Fort Collins. More detailed information related to our experience and commitment to the APDS Process is provided in Section I. ' X The ACE Team is committed to the continued use of stormwater quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) that may include, but are not limited to measures such as snouts, infiltration galleries, sedimentation facilities, and water quality ponds in future City projects. ACE is also committed to the integration and development of Low Impact Development (LID) techniques that may include, but are not limited to porous pavement, tree box filters, green infrastructure, ' wetland swales, and bioretention facilities. k Permitting expertise will be vital to the successful completion of future projects. ACE has assembled a team of professionals that can address all permitting requirements anticipated for future projects. We have learned that it is critical to have the ACE project manager lead the permitting effort supported by technical staff to develop the permit document. k We are dedicated to the continued evaluation of future projects in a manner that considers not only economic and constructability criteria, but also additional criteria, such as environmental, social, and aesthetic benefits to the citizens and rate payers of Fort Collins. ' X The ACE Team will also assist City staff in the possible "re -purposing" of future projects. The ACE Team, as we have done in past collaboration with the City staff, is poised to evaluate these projects through such analyses as the evaluation of lower return period protection, evaluating the environmental benefits of stream restoration projects, and visual impact analyses. x The ACE Team has displayed a commitment to provide stormwater, water, and wastewater design services to City Departments outside of the Utilities Department. This is evidenced by our successful design of projects such as the Robert Benson Reservoir Rehabilitation project, the Soapstone and Bobcat Ridge Access Road projects, the Midway Drive Water Line, the Resource Recovery Farm Outfall Pipe, and the LPATH Spill project, all of which were performed for other ' City Departments. X The ACE Team is committed to incorporating the City's new Detention Pond Landscape Guidelines into any future projects. We believe that these guidelines will provide both aesthetic ' and water quality benefits to future detention pond projects. The goal of the ACE Project Team is to work together with the City of Fort Collins staff and the APDS Contractor to provide engineering designs that are: (1) economical and constructible, and (2) provide flood control, economic, environmental, and social benefits to the citizens and property ' owners of Fort Collins. In addition, ACE is committed to supporting the City with services related to drainage way planning studies, floodplain permitting/delineation, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, stream rehabilitation and enhancement, water quality BMPs and LID techniques, and the development of social economic and environmental benefits. XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 3.10 ANdERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. October 28, 2009 City of . Technical Engineering Proposal Fort.'....-Otins Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project Purchasing and Future Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Capital Improvements RFP-7084 Section 1V - Scope of Work OTLITHOMPSONyq ,°, ANdERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. a ditesco Civil Water Resources • Environmental DEERE & AULT �,;s�_ 1 11 SECTION IV — SCOPE OF WORK Based on conversation with the City Project Manager the following scope of work and engineering cost estimate reflects all engineering services required to complete the Magnolia Street Outfall Project. Consequently, the scope of work for the Magnolia Street Outfall includes five major activities: (1) initial project site investigation, base map preparation, utility location, geotechnical investigation, and surveying; (2) alternative formulation and evaluation; (3) preliminary design; (4) final design, preparation of construction drawings, and technical specifications; (5) support for public involvement/council workshops and team meetings and (6) construction services. Detailed tasks that define the anticipated work effort for this project are presented below. Table 4.1, included at the end of this section, provides a proposed budget based on the following task items and assumes 2009 billing rates. 4.1 Task 1— Data Collection and Field Reconnaissance This task will include the collection, review and evaluation of all available data and information necessary to complete the hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, alternative formulation and evaluation, and preparation of preliminary and final construction drawings. This information includes but is not limited to: (a) the City of Fort Collins' 2002 topographic mapping; (b) available aerial photography of the project areas; (b) City of Fort Collins utility inventory maps; (c) ownership, and right-of-way information from the City of Fort Collins GIS database; (d) the design/as-built drawings, design reports, and geotechnical reports for all previous roadway, water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, other utility and development projects within the project area; (e) hydrologic and hydraulic models prepared for the Old Town Drainage Basin; and (f) the Old Town Master Drainage Plan. It is acknowledged that easement information is not readily available in the GIS database; consequently, pertinent information related to existing easements will be researched through the City and County records. During this task, a detailed field reconnaissance effort will also be completed. The purpose of this work will be to familiarize ACE Project Team members with specific site conditions, identify all visible physical design constraints, and clarify any additional design issues identified by City Staff. The field reconnaissance effort will also be used to identify all field survey requirements. 4.2 Task 2 — Base Map Preparation The base map for the project will be prepared using a two-step process. The first step will involve the preparation of a preliminary base map that will be suitable for the alternative evaluation, including the identification of key issues and potentially affected interests. The preliminary base map will utilize the City's 2002, 2-foot topographic mapping with a 2007, %-meter resolution, aerial photography of the subject area. Available utilities will be obtained from the City of Fort Collins' GIS utility maps, database, other construction documents, or from drawings obtained from the respective utilities. Current ownership, right-of-way, and easement information will also be researched and incorporated into the preliminary base map. A separate property ownership map will be prepared to assist in the identification of stakeholders and potentially affected property owners. After selection of the preferred Magnolia Street Outfall (MSO) alternative (as identified in Task 6), a final base map will be prepared. Data collected as part of Tasks 3, 4, and 5 will be included in the final base map. This will include, but is not limited to: (a) all located utilities for sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water, gas, electric, communication (fiber/phone/cable), etc.; (b) location of geotechnical bore holes; (c) topographic survey in support of 1-foot topographic mapping and spot elevations along the proposed alignment corridor; (d) detailed tree information (location and drip line); and (e) other notable I XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 4.1 ANdERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. physical features. Survey control for construction will also be established and included on the final base map. It is anticipated that both horizontal and vertical control will be provided at 1,000 foot intervals, at ' a minimum. All base mapping will be projected to the City of Fort Collins Ground Master horizontal coordinate system. The vertical datum for the base map will be NGVD 29. ' 4.3 Task 3 — Utility Locates ' With the highly urbanized nature of the proposed MSO location, existing utilities will be a significant factor in the overall design. Utilities that could cause potential construction constraints for the MSO include, but are not limited to: (a) sanitary sewers; (b) storm sewers; (c) water; (d) electric; (e) ' gas; and (f) communication lines (fiber/phone/cable). For utilities located along the preferred MSO alignment corridor (identified in Task 6), the following procedure will be applied: (1) obtain any available utility maps or GIS database information from the City of Fort Collins or the appropriate utility office; (2) ' discuss the known utilities with the appropriate City Staff/Department to identify any inconsistencies with the available utility information; (3) have the utilities identified by a utility locating service; and (4) identify select utilities for potholing and survey. ' Potholing efforts will be conducted in order to ascertain vertical information on select utilities along the preferred MSO alignment. This will include potholing sanitary sewers between manholes to identify any gradient or alignment changes that may occur between manholes. It is noted that utilizing ' the City's Utility Crews to conduct camera inspections of existing sanitary sewers could aid in identifying the horizontal location of the sewers (tracing the camera), identifying structural issues and identifying the location of service connections to the main sewer line. 4.4 Task 4 — Geotechnical Investigation Similar to the Base Map Preparation Task (Task 2), the geotechnical investigation will be ' conducted using a two-step process. An initial subsurface geotechnical investigation will be conducted in order to identify the geologic and geotechnical information (soil material, groundwater levels, etc.) in support of the Alternative Formulation and Evaluation (Task 6). At the completion of this investigation a ' preliminary geologic and geotechnical report will be prepared discussing the geologic and geotechnical conditions and potential effects on the proposed design alternatives. Following the completion of Task 6, a detailed geotechnical investigation will be conducted to characterize the subsurface and provide geotechnical and construction recommendations for the project. Specifically, the following tasks will be completed: (1) obtain all necessary permits and provide traffic control, as needed, for drilling operations; (2) drill 21 borings along the alignments of the ' pipelines and at potential tunneling locations and 5 borings in the area of the planned outfall (borings will be drilled to depths between 25 and 40 feet or to auger drill refusal, samples will be taken for additional testing, groundwater levels will be measured in the borings, and borings will be backfilled as ' deemed appropriate); (3) install temporary piezometers to monitor groundwater conditions, as needed; (4) observe test pits excavated by the APDS Construction Contractor; (5) test samples from the borings and test pits, as needed; (7) for the selected MSO alignment, prepare a design level geotechnical report ' summarizing the results of the field and laboratory work, analysis, opinions, conclusions and recommendations; and (8) deliver to the City of Fort Collins two hard copies and one digital copy of the design level report signed by both a Professional Engineer and Professional Geologist. ' In addition to supporting the MSO pipe construction (identifying trenching techniques, corrosion prevention, groundwater, etc), the geotechnical investigation will also be critical for the tunneling efforts identified for this project. Deere & Ault will utilize the information collected through this geotechnical investigation in order to prepare the Geotechnical Interpretive Report for Tunneling. XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 4.2 ANdERSON CONSUITINq ENGINEERS, INC. 4.5 Task 5 — Surveying ' Surveying will be conducted in support of developing 1-foot topography along the preferred alternative alignment corridor. Supplemental spot elevations will be collected, as necessary, to define gutter flow lines, street crown profiles, etc. ' Additional items that will be collected through surveying efforts, along the preferred alignment corridor, include the following: (a) utilities located and potholed as part of Task 3 (both vertical and horizontal data will be collected); (b) upstream and downstream invert elevations of existing sanitary and storm sewers; (c) boreholes collected as part of the Geotechnical Investigation (Task 4); (d) tree ' location and drip line; and (e) other notable features. This task also includes the development of survey control for construction. It is anticipated that ' both horizontal and vertical control will be provided at 1,000 foot intervals, at a minimum. All control will be established using the City of Fort Collins' Ground Master for the horizontal datum and NGVD 29 for the vertical datum. 4.6 Task 6 — Alternative Formulation and Evaluation The vertical and horizontal alignment of the MSO, identified in the Old Town Master Plan, was ' completed at a conceptual level in order to identify a potential drainage solution and associated costs. This task will refine the Master Plan assumptions to identify alternatives that take into account many of the construction related obstacles typically encountered during the construction of a large capacity t stormwater pipe in a highly urbanized area. Included in this task is the formulation and evaluation of a maximum of three alternative outfall alignment configurations. The three configurations will be determined based on review of the preliminary base map (Task 1) and discussions with the City of Fort Collins Utilities Staff. The alternative formulation and evaluation will include, but not be limited to, consideration of the following issues: ' X Utility constraints/conflicts and relocation/replacement feasibility; X Outfall structure location on or adjacent to the Cache la Poudre River; X Geotechnical investigation results - groundwater levels, corrosive sulfate levels, constructability ' of soil (compressive strength, cohesive strength, quantity of expansive materials, backfill suitability, etc.); X Crossing existing railroads, which will require tunneling versus open cut techniques; X Crossing busy roads/intersections, which may require tunneling versus open cut techniques; X Crossing of the Arthur Ditch/Pipe (open cut and replace the section of the Arthur Ditch/Pipe or tunnel); ' X Orienting the outfall within the low point of the overall drainage corridor, as feasible, to reduce the number of laterals; X Orienting the outfall as shallow as is feasible to limit the depth of open cut (and the possible use of a slide -rail system); X Locating inlets in sump locations, where feasible, to maximize the stormwater capture capacity and limit the stormwater carry over; therefore reducing the number of inlets and laterals; and ' X Achieving economic, social, and environmental success (Triple Bottom Line). Hydrology for the alternative evaluation will be obtained from the Old Town Master Drainage ' Plan ModSWMM models and modified, as necessary, to ascertain discharges at key design points along the alternative outfall alignments. Hydraulic analysis of each alternative outfall alignment will be conducted and will include hydraulic sizing of storm sewers based on "pipe full" calculations and ' hydraulic sizing of inlets using design spreadsheets developed by the Urban Drainage Flood Control I XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 4.3 ANdERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 11 I 1 District. If needed, a benefit/cost evaluation will be conducted to determine the benefit/cost ratio for more frequent design storms (return periods less than the 100-year). A summary report will be developed for the Alternative Formulation and Evaluation Task, and is discussed in greater detail in Task 12. Based on information provided in this report, in conjunction with discussions held between the City of Fort Collins and ACE Staff, the appropriate design event and corresponding outfall alignment alternative will be selected and will be carried forward to Preliminary Design. 4.7 Task 7 — Preliminary Design The hydraulic design efforts for the selected MSO configuration, conducted as part of the Alternative Formulation and Evaluation Task, will be refined as part of this task. Pipe sizes for the MSO, main laterals, and inlet laterals will be hydraulically optimized through the use of closed conduit hydraulic analysis software (StormCAD). Based on the additional detail collected for the final base map, in conjunction with the hydraulically optimized pipe sizes, the outfall's horizontal and vertical alignment will be finalized. Inlet location and hydraulic design will be refined for the final MSO outfall alignment. Spreadsheets developed by the Urban Drainage Flood Control District will be used to determine hydraulic design requirements (inlet type, size and quantity). In addition, hydraulic calculations will be completed to ensure the inlet boxes, and connections between the boxes, are sufficient to convey the design discharge. In -line BMPs, as appropriate, will also be incorporated into the Preliminary Design to help reduce the water quality capture burden on the Udall Natural Area. Given the final MSO alignment, a preliminary design will be developed for the outfall structure located on the east side of Riverside Avenue. Depending on the final alignment, the outfall may incorporate a water quality diversion component to direct first flush flows into the Udall Natural Area, while directing the remaining flows into the Cache La Poudre River. This task also includes the identification of tunneling locations, which will be determined through recommendations provided by Deere and Ault and discussions with City Staff. It is noted that based on the Master Plan Alignment for the MSO, three locations (Mason Street, College Avenue, Riverside Avenue) have initially been identified as tunneling locations to limit the disruptions to existing railroads and major roadway arterials. It is noted that it may be more cost effective to do a single tunnel between the west side of Mason Street to the east side of College Avenue, effectively reducing the number of tunnels to two. A preliminary design plan set of construction drawings containing the detailed plan and profile of the MSO (including plan and profile sheets for the tunneling sections as well as temporary and permanent support details) will be prepared. Any details available when the plan and profile sheet are completed will also be included in the preliminary design plan set. A total of eight (8) full-size (24" x 36") plan sets will be delivered to the City of Fort Collins and the APDS Construction Contractor for review and comment. Digital copies of the preliminary design plan set, in AutoCAD 2008 and PDF format, will also be available upon request. A meeting is included as part of this task to go over any comments generated by the City/APDS Construction Contractor pertaining to the preliminary design plan set. It is noted that this task identifies a complete submittal of the preliminary design plan set. However, as progress is made on this task, prior to submitting the complete package, sheets will be presented at the bi-weekly coordination meetings to ensure all project goals are being satisfied. 4.8 Task 8 — Final Design All comments generated by the City of Fort Collins/APDS Construction Contractor as part of the preliminary design plan set review will be addressed as either modifications to the design or by XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 4.4 ANdERSON CONSU[TING ENgiNEERS, INC. 1 communication/clarification with City Staff/APDS Construction Contractor. Changes to the horizontal/vertical alignment of the MSO will be hydrologically/hydraulically re-evaluated, as necessary, ' to ensure optimal pipe sizes and inlet locations. Construction drawings will be prepared to a 90-percent level for the MSO. It is assumed that traffic control, erosion control, and SWMP plans will be developed cooperatively through the final ' design and initial construction phases of the project and, consequently, will not be included as part of the construction drawing plan set. It is anticipated that the constructions drawings will include the following sheets, at a minimum: X Title sheet, with sheet index; X Project information sheet; ' X Overall site plan and features (2 sheets anticipated); X Survey control and geotechnical borehole/monitoring well location sheets and details (6 sheets anticipated); X Plan and profile sheets for the MSO, laterals (including the Myrtle storm sewer lateral), and inlets that incorporate demolition and relocation of existing utilities as necessary (40 sheets anticipated); ' X Boring/tunneling details (2 sheets anticipated); X Temporary and permanent support details for the tunneling efforts (2 sheets anticipated); X Utility relocation sheets (12 sheets anticipated); ' X Outlet structure detail, grading, and landscaping sheets (12 sheets anticipated); X Asphalt and concrete removal, replacement and details (6 sheets anticipated); X Inlet detail sheets (6 sheets anticipated); and ' X Miscellaneous construction details (6 sheets anticipated). The deliverables for this task will consist of a 90-percent level construction drawing set to be ' provided to both the City of Fort Collins and the active APDS Construction Contractor. To facilitate the review, a total of eight (8) full-sized (24" x 36") construction drawing sets will be provided. Digital copies of the 90-percent level construction drawings, in AutoCAD 2008 and PDF format, will also be available ' upon request. A meeting is included as part of this task to go over any comments generated by the City/APDS Construction Contractor pertaining to the 90-percent level construction drawings. It is noted that this task identifies a complete submittal of the 90-percent level construction drawings. However, as progress is made on this task, prior to submitting the complete package, sheets will be presented at the bi-weekly coordination meetings to ensure all project goals are being satisfied. 4.9 Task 9 — Construction Drawings and Specifications All comments generated from the review of the 90-percent level construction drawings will be addressed as either modification to the design or by communication/clarification with City Staff/APDS Construction Contractor. Changes to the horizontal/vertical alignment of the MSO will be hydrologically/hydraulically re-evaluated, as necessary, to ensure optimal pipe sizes and inlet locations. Specifications will be prepared using the City of Fort Collins Utilities' Standard Technical ' Specifications in CSI format and City of Fort Collins modified EJCDC General Conditions and standard front end documents. It is anticipated that the technical specifications will include, but are not limited to, applicable sections of Division 1 (General Requirements) including bid schedules and the ' measurement and payment section, Division 2 (Site Work), Division 3 (Concrete), Division 5 (Metals), Division 7 (Thermal and Moisture Protection), and Division 9 (Finishes). XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 4.5 ANdERSON CONSUUING ENGINEERS, INC. ' This task also includes the preparation of legal descriptions and exhibits for project -related construction easements, drainage/floodplain easements, etc. In addition, through the APDS process ' ACE will provide support in the development of quantities and costs. The deliverables for this task will consist of a final design construction drawing set and technical specifications to be provided to both the City of Fort Collins and the active APDS Construction ' Contractor. A total of ten (10) half -sized (11" x 17"), eight (8) stamped full-sized (24" x 36"), and one (1) stamped full-sized mylar final construction sets will be provided to the City of Fort Collins Utilities for their use and distribution to other City Departments and the APDS Construction Contractor. A total of ' eight (8) copies of the technical specifications will also be provided to the City of Fort Collins for their use and distribution. Digital copies of both the final design construction drawings, in AutoCAD 2008 and pdf format, and technical specifications will be provided on CD, as requested. 4.10 Task 10 — Permitting It is anticipated that several permits will be required for successful completion of this project. ' This task includes the preparation and submittal of the following anticipated permits: (a) CDOT permits; (b) Railroad permits; (c) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act permit; (d) floodplain use permit; (e) street excavation permits and (f) SWMP Permit. ACE will utilize the team identified in this RFP to assist in the ' preparation of the required permits; however, with the exception of the SWMP Permit ACE will ultimately be responsible for the final permit application and submittal. 4.11 Task 11— Design Report and Documentation A final design report will be prepared documenting all hydrologic, hydraulic and final design ' efforts outlined in this Scope of Work. The final design report will include the following documentation: (a) hydrologic modeling of the study area, including backup information and a summary of results; (b) hydraulic evaluation and design of all drainage improvements; (c) a copy of all meeting minutes; and (d) h copy of the construction documents. Two (2) copies of the final design report will be provided to the City of Fort Collins Utilities Department. 4.12 Task 12 — Design Coordination and Meetings As part of the APDS process, there is significant interaction between the City of Fort Collins Staff, the APDS Construction Contractor, and the Engineer. It has been shown on previous projects that this interaction results in less confusion, better achievement of project goals, and most importantly, a superior project at the conclusion. To facilitate this interaction between parties, bi-weekly coordination meetings have been a key component. To continue this method of success, bi-weekly meetings have been included in this task beginning from the initial kickoff meeting through the final design efforts. Additional meetings have also been included should the need for weekly progress meetings arise. ACE Staff involvement in these meetings will be adjusted depending on the needs of the City of Fort Collins. However, it is anticipated that the Project Manager and/or Senior Design Engineer and the Design Engineer will be present at all bi-weekly meetings. ACE will be responsible for conducting all progress status meetings during the design process. This responsibility will include preparation of meeting agenda and compilation of meeting minutes. In addition to the bi-weekly coordination meetings, it is anticipated that several other meetings/presentations will be conducted throughout the design. Ten (10) coordination meetings with other City Departments and entities are assumed and may involve the Stormwater Department, Streets Department, Department of Natural Resources, CDOT, U.S. Corps of Engineers, ditch companies, railroad companies, etc. XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 4.6 ANARSON CONSUiTINq ENgiNEERS, INC. ' 4.13 Task 13 — Public Involvement, Council Workshop/Meetings At certain points during the design phase, it is anticipated that there will be a need to present ' the project to the public and to the City Council. Consequently, this task includes time to prepare materials in support of up to four (4) open house presentation/meetings and two (2) City Council workshop/meetings. In addition to the preparation of materials, the Project Manager and/or Senior ' Design Engineer and the Design Engineer will be present at all open house presentation/meetings. For the City Council workshop/meetings it is anticipated that the Project Manager and/or Senior Design Engineer will be present. ' 4.14 Task 14 — Construction Services ACE is committed to providing the Design Engineer, involved in the design and development of the final construction drawings, for resident engineering services. The Resident Engineer will be responsible for conducting inspections, coordination (utilities, residents, business, City Departments, etc.), collecting and organizing construction documentation, attending weekly construction meetings, collecting as -built information, and resolving questions/issues that arise during construction. By having the Design Engineer on site, any questions/issues that arise can quickly be resolved due to the inherent knowledge possessed by the engineer involved with the design. Support for the Resident Engineer is ' also readily available through our local presence. All construction submittals will be reviewed by the Resident Engineer and by the Senior Design Engineer/Project Manager. In addition, this task includes time for the ACE Senior Design ' Engineer/Project Manager and representatives of the ACE project team to conduct site visits on an as - needed basis. 4.15 Task 15 -- As -Built Services and Drawings Following substantial completion of the project, ACE's Resident Engineer will be on -site for the final inspection of the as -built facilities. Problems and issues arising from the inspection will be utilized ' to generate punch list items for the contractor. The final construction drawings will be updated to reflect as -built information, as necessary. It is ' anticipated that a total of eight (8) half -sized (11" x 17") sets of the draft as -built construction drawings will be distributed to the City of Fort Collins/APDS Construction Contractor for review and comment. Comments generated from the review will be addressed as either modification to the as -built drawings ' or by communication/clarification with the City /APDS Construction Contractor. With all comments addressed, the final as -built construction drawing set will be prepared. A total of four (4) stamped full- sized (24" x 36") paper, one (1) stamped full-sized mylar, and eight (8) half -sized (11" x 17") paper final ' as -built construction sets will be provided to the City of Fort Collins Utilities for their use and distribution to the appropriate entities. A digital copy, in AutoCAD 2008 and PDF format, of the as -built construction drawings will also be available on CD, as requested. 4.16 Task 16 -- As -Built Analysis and Report Following the completion of the project, an as -built hydrologic/hydraulic evaluation will be ' completed to illustrate the final operating characteristics of the drainage project. Since it is assumed that the MSO will reduce flooding below the 200 cfs threshold identified in the Master Drainage Plan for mapping floodplains; it is not anticipated that residual floodplain mapping will be required. ' An as -built design report will be prepared documenting all hydrologic and hydraulic evaluations completed as part of this task. This report will also include the following documentation: (a) a copy of all meeting minutes conducted after the final design report; and (b) a copy of the as -built drawings. Two ' (2) copies of the as -built design report will be provided to the City of Fort Collins Utilities Department. I XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 4.7 ANdERSON CONSUITINCt ENGINEERS, INC. i October 28, 2009 ' City of - .Collins Technical Engineering Proposal Fort Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project ' Purchasing and Future Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Capital Improvements 1 RFP-7084 Section / - Corporate Qualifications and Experience CTLITHO,MPSON ANdERSON CONSU[TINCI EN iNEERS INC. CI r W Civil • Water Resources • Environmental ditesco '< DEERE & AULT AlpneEco 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 4.1 Proposed Budget for the Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project. , SeS1 Proet�+.REOE.»,Ma .fJa:P .�cXKA 5411, x. <.. ... ,5F 52 w 4u....vxz..T .Antle_rso.n:,C,oDire$ctLaw.baWo... r nsuttEn Inees� n �r , .Y .....r... g s �m � t mo, T v „.. .,.,.;..... -.,,.,:. , *F'� Principal Senior Project Senior Project Project Senior GIS/CADD Admin. ACE PROPOSAL NO.: XCOFC2009 Engineer Project Manager Engineer I Engineer II Engineer I Engineer I GIS/CADD Tech II Admin. Assistant Other PREPARED BY. BAA/AMH/BAS Manager Technician Direct DATE: 10/26/2009 S130/hr $124/hr S108/hr $98,1ir $92/hr $81/hr $76/hr $761hr $71/hr $71/hr S64/hr Costs TasklDescrlptlon Hours .. Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours r Hours'' Hours Is= Hours Cost 1. Data Collection and Field Reconnaissance 8 0 0 24 56 24 0 8 8 4 4 S300 136 $12,604 2. Base Map Preparation 4 0 0 8 20 30 0 20 10 0 0 S300 92 $8,104 3. Utility Locates 6 0 0 30 40 60 0 4 10 4 4 $100 168 $13,914 4. Geotechnical Investigation 8 0 0 16 20 10 0 4 6 0 0 $0 64 $6,988 b. Surveying 2 0 0 4 10 20 0 4 6 0 2 s0 48 $4,060 6. Alternative Formulation and Evaluation 80 0 0 80 200 20 0 60 20 10 8 S1,500 478 $46,962 7. Preliminary Design 100 0 0 400 800 80 0 120 40 0 0 S1,500 1640 $146,740 8. Final Design 80 0 0 250 550 50 0 80 30 0 0 S1,500 1040 $99,260 9. Construction Drawings and Specifications 8 0 0 120 250 20 0 40 16 6 12 S2,000 472 $44,790 10. Permitting 16 0 0 60 40 20 0 16 0 8 0 $500 160 $16,644 11. Design Report and Documentation 16 0 0 20 30 50 0 8 8 8 16 S500 156 $14,118 12. Coordination and Meetings (assumes 60 meetings) 100 0 0 300 200 0 0 0 0 0 16' $1,000 616 $62,824 13. Open Houses I Council Presentation & Workshops (assumes 6 meetings) 40 0 0 40 40 0 0 4 4 2 2 ' S100 132 $13,768, 14. Construction Services (assumes 10 months of services) 80 0 0 100 1800 20 0 60 20 16 24 S1,000 2120 $197,072 16. As -Built Services and Drawings '16 0 0 30 120 20 0 120 40 8 8 S1,500 362 $32,220 16. As -Built Analysis and Report 16 0 0 20 20 40 0 8 8 8 16 $300 436 $12,188 ^^ i 9�gg ' �.a ' 74�1" x' v :*. »» ..t ..a , ,>, . ..' . ,: ..:w a e -.. � ..r. : %,:. - • ACE.PROJECT,BUDGET ,» $76 400 . � .Xr?��..YF_.&�km a : , , ... , , ,.. dn,m«u,f'.... » .S4 $ » ti $121.00 - 729 036 Outside Servicesmom AVI; p.c. - structural I civil I surveying (water / wastewater) $60,000 Deere and Ault Consultants, Inc - tunnel design / geotechnlcal $40,000 CTLIThompson, Inc. - geotechnlcal I material testing $66,000 Utility Potholing Service $20,000 BHA Design, Inc. - Landscape Architect $16,000 Alpine-Eco - environmental permitting / wetlands $6,000 TOT y AL OUTSIDESERVICES ems., � ax.............. a ., arm x ».. .R. .:.. ......n .....�. ,..<..., ... T .: n Y � . � ._ . Z` �a^'w r<< ,«s. .. 4 .n :.:,{ .:...... .... .. _ .., .. . _.: _ . .._. ., , , .>. �: ,�< rot «, . .... «. , , ... q$� .. ,. .. i � �� e�ct�n xe `�« ..? ' $ 20b 000 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $934,036 Note: Budget based on 2009 Fee Schedule I XCOFC2009 Magnolia Budget.xlsx 4.8 ANDERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 0 Illescl i 'S ..4 I I U Canal Importation Ponds and Outfall Project Fort Collins, Colorado Client: Mr. Owen Randall' City of Fort Collins ANdERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ' 700 Wood Street Civi! • WaierResorrrces • F.nvlmnmcniaf Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (970) 221-6809 The Canal Importation Basin is located in west -central Fort Collins, Colorado, and encompasses approximately 3,200 acres of nearly fully -developed land. In 2001a Master Drainage Plan was completed by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. (ACE), which identified over $50 million for regional drainage related improvements within the basin. The Canal Importation Ponds and Outfall (CIPO) Project addresses two of the thirteen drainage improvement projects identified in the Master Drainage Plan, with a constriction cost of $21 million. Installation of the 8'W x 4'H RCBC siphon under the Larimer County Canal No. 2. F � 74 RZ A?R 18 206$ .r rY�P' �33 i; rx� t• Finished headwall and wingwalls for the 8'W x 4'11 RCBC siphon. The purpose of the CIPO Project was to develop: an outfall for the Canal Importation Basin, that would collect, detain, and convey stone water runoff generated within the basin, and discharge to Spring Creek. This project consisted of the following: • Hydrologic modeling of the tributary drainage basin to define design discharges; • Formulation and hydraulic design of all listed drainage improvements; • Final design of three regional detention ponds, providing nearly 140 acre-feet of active storm water detention capacity; • Final design of over 2 miles of subsurface drains; • Final design of a 700 foot long, 12-inch diameter water line; • Final design of approximately 750 feet of 8-inch diameter PVC sanitary sewer lines; • Final design of a nearly 900 foot, 16-inch diameter PVC sanitary sewer line; • Final design of a 112 foot, 8'W x 4'H RCBC siphon under an irrigation ditch; • Final design of a 175 foot, 48-inch RCP siphon under a major roadway arterial; • Final design of a 745 foot storm sewer consisting of 42-inch RCP, 36-inch RCP, and 33-inch RCP; • Final design of a 415 foot storm sewer consisting of VW x 3'H RCBC, 48-inch RCP and 42-inch RCP; • Final design of a 550 foot storm sewer consisting of 42-inch equivalent HERCP, 42-inch RCP and 12-inch PVC; • Final design of a 56-foot storm sewer consisting of 30-inch RCP; • Final design of a 20-foot storm sewer consisting of a 48-inch RCP; • Final design of several smaller drainage improvements (spillways, cutoff walls, swales, water quality outlet structures, etc.); • Final design of erosion control measures (riprap and turf reinforcement mat); • Preparation and coordination of a 91 sheet set of final design drawings, technical specifications, and contract documents; i • Preparation of an Individual 404 Permit for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; • Preparation of a well permit for the State Engineers Office; • Preparation of a Floodplain Use Permit for the City of Fort Collins; • Assisted in preparation of the Storm Water Management Plan; • Preparation of as -built drawings (currently ongoing); • Construction management services during the approximately 3; year construction time period (currently ongoing); and • Preparation of a design report documenting post -project condition results and residual floodplain information. Installation of a storm sewer junction box. Excavation of the Red Fox Detention Pond. .� ll , ` # �,• Tom_ w '"' � � � � � -�` atplp uwe a t± L'-- n ! i _ � , ppt i s f�� p s ;.pja; a •'-i p ips � �i�-i Ali i :s s i 3 � .� Y!p ;ap pL .ti�9e. k.t ht,,-pr-e•.,# #1 df ® ;_._ �:➢La±3 #'.< -:« '- . ': � lt�§ #si z 4..: ,.. r.#a'ttea#�3u±r�tz4f��a###r_§a?li�wp§a:t..'.a^ i'iP�i�i�:l"t`�r�!#:'aL�l#:'u§e5pE§.�,,, 11: .rg_ `_r.� crtr a wm cacao //.��—` wua rnovom aeoa To xa t. CY.L aYIpRAIgM fNIRV �.+.{ IIFD !(Y[ IMOp -. �L LID IIYRALL all(16T 6i3'v �lMl IJm Ip0161 RP6 .. Design plan for Canal Importation Pond Outlet connection plan and profile. I Bestway Detention Pond and 41h Street Storm Sewer Project Greeley, Colorado ' Client: Mr. Bert Leautaud City of Greeley Stormwater Division ANdERSON CONSUIriNG ENGINEERS, INC. 1:001 9" Ave. Civil IValer Resources Environmental Greeley, Colorado 80631 ' (970) 336-4121' ' This ongoing project, which was identified as a major capital improvement in the City of Greeley Master Drainage Plan (which was also completed by ACE); includes the capturing and detention of stormwater flows from the Grapevine Basin in a proposed detention pond at the intersection of 4t' Street and 35°i ' Avenue, in Greeley, CO. The purpose of the detention pond project is to capture stormwater flows on 4`' Street and detain them for measured release to the existing 35'h Avenue storm sewer system. The detention of the flows from the ' southern portion of the Grapevine Basin will prevent flows from entering the Greeley No. 3 Ditch, and exceeding the capacity of the ditch at downstream locations and flooding neighborhoods which are located to the east of the pond, and adjacent to the Ditch. This project consists of the following components: • Hydrologic modeling of the tributary drainage basin to define design discharge points to 4`h Street; • Hydrologic modeling of the pond to ensure that it.meets City of Greeley release criteria; ' • Hydraulic design using StormCAD of pond the pond's inlet and outlet pipes and the 4'h St. storm sewer system; • Formulation and hydraulic design of a complex stormwater inlet and conveyance pipe system ' on 4'h Street to capture and convey flows to the pond; • Final design of the Bestway detention pond including pond grading, trickle pans, headwalls and wingwalls, emergency spillway, and erosion protection; ' • Final design of the 4'h St. storm sewer, laterals, and inlet banks; • Integration of the pond design within the constrains imposed by a planned residential development around the pond site; • Preparation of a re -vegetation plan for the disturbed areas; and ' • Preparation of final construction plans, technical specifications, and contract documents; 1 Bestway Pond Site. Greeley No. 3 Ditch at pond outlet. Final Design and Construction Services for the Oxbow Levee Project on the Cache la Poudre River Near Old Town Fort Collins, Colorado Client: Mr. Dan Mattson City of Fort Collins 700 Wood Street P.O. BOX 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 (970)416-2733 ANdF.RSON Co4S6hiNC, ENGINFERS,. INC. - Civil • � 'If mrr Resviereee E7vironmenl6( Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. was contracted by the City of Fort Collins Utilities Department to design, develop, and provide final construction drawings and specifications for the Oxbow Levee Project. The project included the design and construction of a 1300-foot long levee along the east bank of the Cache la Poudre River near Old Town Fort Collins, Colorado. A 120-foot long interior drainage pipe was also designed and installed through the levee to convey local runoff from behind the levee to the river. Once approved by FEMA, the Oxbow Levee removed approximately 90 residential and commercial properties from the 100-year floodplain. The staff of Anderson Consulting Engineers completed the following specific, tasks for this project: • collection of existing site data and identification of possible borrow site with material suitable for levee construction; • coordination of the surveying efforts necessary to develop existing topography and identification of existing utilities on the project site; • coordination with geotechnical engineers concerning the identification of a satisfactory borrow source site, the drilling and analysis of borehole samples along levee centerline, and the development of a seepage analysis model that would meet FEMA's standards; • obtained' all necessary federal, state, and local permits required for construction; • coordination with the City of Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Department and Natural Resources Department concerning the design of a bike path/running trail to be constructed on top of the completed levee and the possible impacts of the levee on the nearby Buckingham Park; • development of a hydrologic (MODSWMM)' model to determine the size of pipe needed to pass offsite flows from Project Highlights: behind the levee into the river; � Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling • coordination with FEMA and the Army Corps of o FEMA compliant levee design Engineers regarding the design and installation of a filter Construction plans and specs collar around the interior drainage pipe passing through the p levee; • LOMR application • final design and development of a 21-sheet set of construction drawings, including a grading plan, cross section information, plan and profiles of the levee and bike trail/running path, installation of new interior drainage pipe through the levee, a drainage and erosion control plan, and a landscaping/revegetation plan; • development of bid documents and construction specifications; • resident engineering services during construction that included the review of shop drawings, constriction observations and documentation, coordination of weekly progress meetings, processing pay requests, and completion of as -built drawings; • coordination between the Owner and Contractor during construction; and • preparation of all LOMR application materials. Levee During Construction Levee Construction Completed H 11 Drake Road Storm Sewer & VTH Pond Outfall Fort Collins, Colorado Client: Mr. Owen Randall City of Fort Collins ANdERSON CONSUITINCG ENGINEERS, INC. 700 Wood Street Civil WawrRcsonrces • Fnrira»in6ital Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (970) 221-6809 This project included the preparation of plans and specifications for a storm sewer along Drake Road, storm water detention pond improvements, and a storm water outfall system along Bay Farm Road in Fort Collins, Colorado. In addition, Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. provided all hydrologic, hydraulic, and design services required for this multifaceted project. Specific design elements included: Storm Sewer Construction ` `4 4-1 r R nMO VTH Pond Outfall Channel • hydraulic evaluation of alternative outfall systems; ' • design of storm water detention pond enlargement and replacement of outlet facilities; • design of 1,400 feet of 48" and 42" diameter RCP storm sewer; ' • design of major canal crossings for the storm sewers; • design of 575 feet of 12W' x 4H' and 8W' x 4H' RCB storm sewer; ' • design of 905 feet of 72" diameter RCP storm sewer; • design of inlet and outlet structures and tie-ins for all storm sewers; ' • design of 1°,980 feet of outfall channel including two driveway crossings with twin 12W' x 4H' RCBs; ' • coordination and design of numerous utility relocates; • preparing construction plans, specifications, and contract documents; and ' • obtaining required easements and permits. In addition Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. provided construction management services during the approximately 6-month construction time period. Construction management services included: (a) review of shop drawings, (b) construction observations, (c) weekly progress meetings, (d) pay request processing, (e) completion of the as -built record set. Henderson Basin Flood Control Improvement Project, Cheyenne, Wyoming Client: Mr. Daryl Johnson AVI, p.c. 1103 Old Town Lane, Suite 101 Cheyenne, WY 82009 (307)637-6017 ANdERSON .CONSUITINq ENgjiNEERS, INC. Civil � WaterResources - Envirounwnial The Henderson Basin, located near downtown Cheyenne, Wyoming, has been plagued by flooding problems for many years. Specifically, flooding in the Upper Henderson Basin occurs with such frequency that the area has been deemed the third highest flood hazardwithin the City of Cheyenne. The City of Cheyenne applied for a Pre -Disaster Mitigation (PDM) grant in 2005 from FEMA through its NFIP Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Program. A requirement as part of the grant application was to address the ongoing flooding issues through proposed flood control improvements. The grant was awarded to the City by FEMA in 2007. This project was performed in conjunction with ACI, pc of Cheyenne, WY. The purpose of this study was to support the final design of major storm drainage facilities for the Henderson Basin by way of updated hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, including detailed alternative analyses in order to achieve the highest level of flood protection possible while maintaining costs within limits set by the PDM grant. To accomplish these goals, the following tasks were completed. (a) hydrologic modeling, using EPA- SWMM, of 388 acres of the Upper Henderson Basin, in order to quantify local stormwater runoff associated with the 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year events; (b) hydraulic modeling, also with EPA- SWMM, of the existing street/storm sewer system, utilizing the model's ability to account for conveyance losses, channel storage, backwater effects, flow reversal, and culvert pressurized' flow; preparation of sheets representing existing subbasins, existing facilities, and 100-year flood inundation mapping; detailed evaluation of the original PDM grant scenario to assess the alternative's flood' mitigation potential, including the resulting 100-year flood inundation mapping as a result of the original improvements; detailed evaluation of an alternate PDM grant scenario, capable of providing an increased level of flood' protection over what was provided in the original PDM grant scenario; evaluation and hydraulic design of improvements capable of providing the highest level of protection possible given the existing storm drainage limitations. The recommended improvements included. i. a 27 acre-foot detention facility; ii. 865 linear feet of 12'Wx6'H box culvert; and iii. 550 linear feet of varying sizes pipe culverts. (g) 100-year flood inundation mapping as a result of the recommended improvements; (h) documentation supporting the preparation of the topographic work map, field reconnaissance efforts, hydrologic modeling, hydraulic modeling, floodinundation mapping, alternative evaluation, and identification of the recommended alternative; and (i) coordination with the City of Cheyenne and the project team throughout the project. U West Side Storm Sewer Wetlands Windsor, Colorado Client Mr. Dennis Wagner ANdErsson Consulrinq ENGiNEEas, INC. ' Town of Windsor Civil • WurerResources - Envimmental 301 Walnut Street Windsor, Colorado 80550 (970)686-7476 This project included the development and preparation of construction plans and specifications for a water quality detention pond located at the outfall to the West Side storm sewer, adjacent to the Cache la Poudre River in the Town of Windsor, Colorado. Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. performed all hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, as well as the final design for this project. Specific design elements included: • hydraulic analysis of a concrete diversion structure at the entrance to the detention pond; • hydraulic analysis of 158 feet of 18" RCP storm sewer from the diversion structure to the sedimentation forebay of the detention pond; • design of 1-acre surface area detention pond including areas of alternating depth to promote wetland vegetation; ' • design of a concrete water quality capture outlet structure; • design of 24 feet of 24" diameter RCP storm sewer outlet pipe; ' • design of the Cache la Poudre River outfall structure/pipe and co-ordination with Division of Wildlife staff regarding the placement of the pipe in a designated wildlife area; ' • design of modifications to existing 72" RCP storm sewer outlet box to tie-in to new wetlands; • hydraulic evaluation of existing 72" RCP storm sewer to insure pre -project capacity is ' maintained after installation of wetlands detention pond, • development of construction plans, specification, and contract documents; and ' • development of a wetland vegetation, and site landscaping plans. 11 u M Tina" x 1 3 ., IC t West Side Storm Sewer Wetlands During Construction M� I 3 t ft Y p ( »a L 1n ri � N p� r rr a r� .c �•s, West Side Storm Sewer Wetlands Post Construction Hydrologic -Hydraulic Analyses and Final Design of Robert Benson Reservoir Dam Fort Collins, Colorado Client/ Matt Day Reference: City of Fort Collins Park Planning 215 N. Mason Street P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (970)224-6096 AN&FiSON CoNSU[TNq ENgjiNEEM, (NC: Civil - WaurrResources - Environmental Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. was contracted by the City of Fort Collins Natural Resources Department to design, develop, and provide final construction drawings for the rehabilitation of the Robert Benson Reservoir Dam in southeast Fort Collins. The dam was purchases as part of the Pelican Marsh Natural Area, and was placed' under a drain order by the State of Colorado Dam Safety Office due to the condition of the principal outlet and the undersized spillway. The project included the geotechnical analysis of the existing dam, hydrologic analyses to route flows through the dam, the design of the principal outlet and a new emergency spillway, and the incorporation of a new irrigation intake structure. The staff of Anderson Consulting Engineers completed the following specific tasks for this project: • hydrologic analyses to determine the Probable Maximum Flood for the basin upstream of the reservoir; • hydraulic analysis and design of the ponds principal outlet structure and pipe; • hydraulic analysis and design of the ponds new 2 emergency spillway to meet State of Colorado dam safety requirements:,; c • hydraulic analysis and design of a pond outlet ` structure to limit the 100-year event release from the + + pond to 2-year existing condition releases, and the a. ` hydraulic design of the ponds emergency spillway; and • final design and development of a set of construction drawings and specifications , including plans and profiles of the new dam, the emergency spillway, and the principal'outlet. 771-44 s �3�j�al a «�� ....�\'r a �F$' �2i i 11- I., l 7 / ,.,q,m" •, i. I T i,, I t i.11.1.1t 111- - i . IY:�«�<, LRln,v l:R<I :YSCF✓<I <,IVI - I E....P._ _ ..._ ..'..' ._ :....... ,.. ,.._ .. ............'.... !, j. .+,�..._...._._._._._. .. c.x..a. V�V ROD 0040 CRV OF FOgT CAIldl9 p, 0 II FMIMC NT EIIEROEtICY FIN, MOF"Y ..• TV..- i 23 NA P110F6E Final Design of Parking Lot, Drainage and Water Quality Improvements for Blevins Junior High School, Fort Collins, CO Client: Jerry Garretson Poudre School District ANdERSON CONSUhiNq ENqiNEERS, INC. 2407 LaPorte Avenue Civil Water Resources • Environmental Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 (970)490-3589 Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. (ACE) contracted with the Poudre School District to design, develop, and provide final construction drawings and specifications for parking lot and drainage improvements at Blevins Junior High School on Taft Hill' Roadin west Fort Collins. This project involved the rehabilitation of existing parking lots, the construction of new parking lot areas and the addition of new drainage/ivater quality facilities at the existing school site. The staff of Anderson Consulting Engineers completed the following specific tasks for these projects. • hydrologic analyses of the proposed' drainage improvements, and the incorporation of these improvements into the Canal Importation Basin Master Plan; • hydraulic analyses of the on -site detention ponds and water quality facilities for the site; ' • preparation of a site drainage report documenting all hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for submission to and subsequent approval by the City of Fort Collins Utilities Department; • collection of existing site data and coordination -of the surveying efforts necessary to develop existing topography and identify existing utilities; ' • coordination with the Poudre School District staff regarding the layout of parking spaces, driving lanes and anticipated traffic flows; • design of two new parking lots including new asphalt pavement sections, driveway entrances, drain pans, curb ' and gutter, sidewalk, bus and car driving lanes, and parking space layouts; • design of a new detention pond, a water quality infiltration bed in the base of the pond, storm sewer outlet pipes, and concrete headwalls; • design of water quality infiltration swales in a severely constrained space, to treat initial flushes of stormwater runoff from parking lot areas; • development of a set of construction drawings (20 sheets), technical specifications and bid documents, including demolition plans, grading plans, striping plans, detail sheets, landscape and irrigation plans ; ' • construction consultation services during the bidding and construction phases of the projects. I ll Blevins Junior High School Pre -Project Parking Lot Blevins Junior High School Post -Project Parking Lot with Water Quality Swale (During Construction) Project Description City of Fort Collins Downtown Storm Sewer System: Oak Street Outfall Fort Collins, Colorado The Fort Collins Downtown Storm Serer System involved construction in difficult geologic conditions beneath existing railroad tracks, streets, and utilities. The picture shows the digger shield entering the Riverside embai.tkment. Two segments turned this routine pipe -laying job into a challenging project. The first segment was a 96- inch diameter tunnel 160 feet long, which passed beneath three sets' of railroad tracks and a busy road. Most of the tunnel was in claystone bedrock, but the start of the drive encountered weak, saturated clays and gravels. The tunnel was excavated' with a pipe jacked digger shield. The second challenging segment was a tunnel under College Avenue. Since the alignment passed' underneath a busy and historic area, settlement, sinkholes, and traffic disruptions were unacceptable. While the alignment was adjusted to keep the crown mainly within stiff clay, the rest of the face consisted of sand-, gravel; and cobbles with nested boulders. Construction during winter kept all but the tunnel invert above the water table. The College Avenue tunnel (650-feet) was driven by the same digger shield, but ground support was ribs and boards with a filter fabric backing. The carrier pipe was 78-inch diameter Hobas pipe grouted into place. Extensive collaboration was required between D&A staff and the contractor to choose a tunneling method that would allow tunneling through cobbles while keeping control of the face. Further collaboration was required with the client to address permitting issues and the crossing of railroad tracks. Client: City of Fort Collins Project Cost: $7.3 million DEERE & AULT F . ANdERSON CONSUITINC� 'ENC�iNfERS, INC. Civil Water Resources Environmental' oventber 17. 200'$l IMerview =Brochure r IPP7044 JAIF- ter Outfalli,Project A'ftd Future f�l/ater, an mwjo v Wr Nor Capital /provements ANdEl6ON,,CO t"Tr -EN NE 'INC; NSIATINq EnWi6minfill, 003330MM I CCINSUL'rAN-17S,INC: I MAGNOLIA4STREET STORMINATER r OUTFALL PROJECT and FUTURE WATER, WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS �f INTERVIEW PRESENTATION SECTION I — CORPORATE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE 1.1. The ACE Project Team - Qualifications Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. (ACE) is a 23-person company consisting of 14 engineers/scientists, of which 10 have Masters of Science degrees in hydraulic engineering or in a related water resources area of civil engineering. Eleven of these staff members are Registered Professional Engineers in Colorado. Six of our engineers are also Certified Floodplain Managers. We also offer outstanding expertise and the capacity to complete a high volume of complex projects in both CAD and GIS design, with three CAD technicians and three GIS Specialists. Our engineering staff offers over 130 years of experience conducting projects that culminate in a wide range of water resources projects including: X analysis and design of major stormwater improvements; X preparation of construction plans, specifications, and contract documents; X hydrologic and hydraulic analyses; X rehabilitation of natural stream channels; X floodplain mapping and FEMA map revisions; and X selection and design of stormwater quality BMPs and LID techniques. These projects are often supported by hydrologic modeling, hydraulic design, the preparation of construction documents, and construction management services to optimize the project configuration, producing a cost effective product for our clients. Our approach combines the strong technical capabilities necessary to evaluate feasible alternative solutions and produce a comprehensive set of construction plans and specifications that are easy to understand, along with strong communication skills and a "common sense attitude" toward providing the most cost effective and innovative system of stormwater capture and conveyance facilities, floodplain modeling and mapping, water and wastewater systems, and natural channel improvements. Our previous experience with the Old Town Basin Master Drainage Plan and the Canal Importation Ponds and Outfall (CIPO) Project, along with the technical design and coordination aspects of similar previous projects, provides us unique insight to the Magnolia Street Outfall Project. This insight will allow ACE to efficiently formulate an optimal, cost effective solution that meets the drainage and flood protection needs of the City within the constraints that will be placed on the project with regard to the several utilities within the Old Town area, potential tunneling operations, railroad easement and access issues, affected residents and property owners, outfall location issues, permitting issues, and potential easements and right -of way acquisitions. In addition ACE's nearly 20 years of experience completing a wide variety of projects for various City departments provides us with unparallel technical experience within the City of Fort Collins. Our unsurpassed experience with City projects affords us the personal insight required to ensure the success of a wide range of other future stormwater, water and wastewater projects. I XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 1.1 ANdERSON CONSULTINci EN(iiNEERS, INC. w w w ww w w w w ■w iw w �w ww wi w w w iw w ANdERSON :CONS01TING ENrliNEERS, INC'. Crvrl • Il crle) Resorn c" • Em.n ownenlol Prime Consultant Hydrology/Hydraulics Environmental Permitting Floodplain Mapping/Master Plans RR, State, and City Permitting Alternative Evaluation Water Quality Improvements Hydraulic Design Design Reports Design Services through APDS Water/Wastewater/Utility Design Construction Plans and Specs. Channel Stability/Restoration Construction Observation Project QA/QC Public Process Subconsultant Coordination DEE:RE' & AULT Tunneling Design Geotechnical Analyses dilesco- Water and Wastewater Facility Improvements Water and Sewer Line Rehabilitation Utility Relocations Construction Manaqement 0 Structural Engineering Surveying Services Legal Descriptions Utility Relocation Design M, �F N®R, Landscape Architecture and Design Water Quality BMPs =� CTLITHOMPSON I I. Geotechnical Services Construction Materials Testing Alp+neEco IV Environmental Permitting T&E Species Surveys Wetlands Delineations :... . ,F.. M M M M M M M M M M S M = M M i M M CITY OF FORT COLLINS City -of Fort:Collins Construction Management Mark Kempton, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. Scott Parker, P.E. ACE Prolect Team Anderson Consulting Engineers Avi CTL Thompson Deere and Ault BHA Design Ditesco AlpineEco Brad Anderson, P.E. Aaron Hansen, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. Scott Parker. P.E. Brad Anderson, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Andy Herb Brad Anderson, P.E. Aaron Hansen, P.E. Greg Koch, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. Daryl Johnson, P.E. Keith Meyer, P.E. ANdERSON CONSUITINq ENfiNEERS, INC. -" nderson Consulting Engineers, Civil WalerRe"sourcev .Environnicnial Brad Anderson, P.E. Project Manager Greg Koch, P.E. Daryl Johnson, P.E. Chris Pauley, P.E. Dennis Dawson, PLS Ryan Rigg, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. Jamis Darrow, P.E. BMPs, and 'Vater Quality Design,Engineering/Tunneling Techniques Geotechnical Stream Assessment and Rehabilitation Aaron Hansen, P.E. Christoph Goss, P.E., Phd. Brad Anderson, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. Robin Dornfest, PG Chris Pauley, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Greg Koch, P.E. Roger Sherman Michelle Martin, P.E. Jason Messaros Design Brad Anderson, P.E. Greg Koch, P.E. Aaron Hansen, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. r m m= m m m= m m m m m ='= == m gglrg ACE.,TEAM PERSON N EL WITH ARDS`.EXPERI ENCE z>4, zew- s ti tf� tF Sa 5 S:"gY§e`,'�, �,a�v,'�al>`��a" -.vs,� �Y5 S �, a. ft t tE i'3 r :i n'�'u s��•� .'i.:•:a.' s r '; ,'.e- tk'Sa�5"; ,5au� � f t tuY,` � €3 ,.•: o "I "IN 1�1 Surveying, � aTotalYeas :°,Flood laini Y g' ,a iStormwater,; Hydrologic: H Hydraulic .-G.,"., P, .o- •: Le al Geotechmcal:" : water Y Ma m g a r=: Utilit Locates : Construction :`Resident / Quaht°: ' k " .` Analysis Analysis +, Pps^,,:Descriptions,:Engineeringi=Struttural- Y' »ate, ,,,:Wastewater= Stream":** wd"z: APDS& ° z Ex erience": Y Y :(and FEMA^; . : and - .Plans and :. En meering; BMPs and ; Permits p.: t and and v a"oaae, and mcl. ;Engmeenng;E-::-Pipelines&;,Rehabilitation Partnering;:. Z (Years wrth? FIS { ,Relocatiohs Speiifiwtions Services" LIO w _a Modeling : Modelingr Topographic : Tunneling Facilities Facilities ACE/LA) Revisions Techmques �# k" $ Mapping ACE PRCIIECTTEAMk to KEYPERONNEL f 29 rl X:: X Xa X i X XX"Brad Anderson, P.E., CFM (22) X X X ............................. .... .'s ; X XGreg Koch, P.E., CFM 24(19) X X X XX X X T .............................. ..... ., .............. ....................................... . ... rXXX XX XChris Pauley, P.E., CFM 19 (f4). ....................................... . .. :� . f Aaron Hansen, P.E., CFM 14`,(14) '-- X X ; , . X X X" .. X X ' X X X ................. ... ....._.. ....., .......... gi Mark Kem ton, P.E., CFM 14 10) X X X X X.: ... X-: X X Xc X X . ..............:...... ...... .... Brian Van Zanten, P.E., CFM 16 wi X X > X X 4 " -- - :X:` X�' tX X X� - a :< ... ....... .................. .::.. .................... ....... ....... .. _ MichelleMarti P.E?. 8 (8) X X )f X X` s _: X .......... ............. ...:.: ............ ... ....... .. _ ........ ...... .. Brian Smith, P.E. 7 (7) X X as w�4, X�" X, XX X X`:. Xy� X X .... .. ..... .. .......... 7arm Darrow P E., 6 (6)' X X X X z, x X X f X.+:: �X X : #:......"z .. .a a .tt �a Scott Parker P.E. 7 (7)' X X a X X`• s.X X X X X .`: . X6 (6)X X XJasonAlbert PE. . - .......... .. .: .: .. .........:. ..... .............. ... ........ ...... ...:...... ....Y.......7raws Rounsa`ville, EIT 2 (2)' X X X� ,, X •..:i; ....... .......:-. ........... ........ ............... ...... ..... ..... .. . ....:. s e .:.... K $ a......... 38 aF9xt X X XDaryl Johnson, P.E. -AVI X s X � X X ..... ........ ........ a `Dennis Dawson PLS -.AVI 41 X .' ................................:..... .................................. .................... ... Robin Dornfest, PG - CTLT 9 X s i:� c X X X ............ P ..... .._... ..................... .............. ......... .. Christo h Goss, P.E., Phd. - D&A 12 X s X )(: X X .cam �<,.. - ; .......g...... _... ......... ... .......... ....... ..r. ....................... ... .. .......... Roger Sherman, L.A. -BHA 19 X : X X — X X X .......... :30 X X:XKeith Meyer, P.E. - Ditesco 16 X X X ................................... ..... XAndYHerb - AIPmeEco m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m r� rr �r rr rr rr r rr rr rr r� rr rr �r r� ■� r r r • �. "f:d� � .. X„,:� �� ,,.y plw¢.AD s � a ti ' �..3 : 3 � c r `TS7. �-^- � PRIN CREEK nLEOM BA41N� aml _ la s ° "s ��" ��� �. Dnfpn/[ ruction ProJc 4 � Hydmloplc . °rM m Ile ai�� r zro� 9�yioasrro°`riw"t i. a,e� Pr�� A"°q ° _ s. x - 'T `< it'• "t 3—'a---,',y x Mkt S"``;.X noo° fain MP to R t �., �� � .�r t � r � � �: , �c•t# • �_�d4" "�}� �,«r :�, JY' �°jt'., �� � P PP 9 cx """5al,s sr.µ ET .x•^G,.� x�. v „ ^,5 ..,•€ �& '� ,€ {oti;r. a 3c �?.,j, yam'„" f'. M°ofar PI°n 'Or°In°pa. Boain r: M�iia r+• f�ila`�p' +,i €`"9L .�'5'o rt�''t A u¢ 2y�u L�fa'��t^� . 'tg ,�T ✓'a SlotntHaener - Stuer. °c 92W _ . , IT � �'i`�vt?i,--i,sY C{ of r-'� Fort Collins rt �.¢k _. ,:���. �„�N�t.) � ����.�a'���"�ti,•'i�u`�,`�`3 ��;. .r.*..i�.,,� - xcoresooc ran - ,. N CRY OF FORT, GOWNS` MAP OF ACE: PROJECTS WRHIN'FORT COWNS , xF 1 MARNOLIA STREET $TORMWATER OUiFALL _PROJECT 1W TO 2W9 m m m m m m m m m = m m m w m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m (APDS) & PARI Canal Importation Ponds and b0utfaII Project Fort Collins,.CO, OxboWIevee Project ForfCollins, CO . Drake.Roaa StormSewer/VTH Pond Oitfall Project FortCollins,.CO . Taft Hill/12olland;Moore Detention Pond Project:: Fort Collms,'CO Riversidehefferson;and Mulberry/ Riverside Inlet Improvements Fort'C61Iins, CO Bobcat.Rdge.AccessRoa d'Drainageampro�ements Nlason�ille,,CO . • . Spring Cr.eek,Utility Line'Protection Fort-CollinsC0.1 Oak Streef'0utfall _ Fort 'Collins ,>CO Mulberry Water Reclamation Facility 'Fort Collins, CO 'Spring Creek ChanneLRehabilitation at L'emay Avenue FortCollins, CO.--.,-. ACEProtectTeam Formal Partnering Experiences . Cityof,Fort;;Collins:Partnering Session f.or.APDS.Process ,::2000,. - Fortr:Collms, Co City of Fort CollmS Partnering Session fo[APDS Process -2005 Fort'Collins, CO Timberlirie�Road/Dry,Creek Channel Improvement Project Fort Collins, CO Big;Goose Greek Drop Structure -Sher, clan, m m m m m n 1 Due to our staff long-term commitment to the company, ACE offers continuity in personnel and long-term commitment in service to the City of Fort Collins under this contract. All of our senior staff members have been with the company for more than 10 years. This includes the same staff that worked on the Old Town Basin Master Drainage Plan, and subsequent APDS projects such as the CIPO The ACE Project Team offers: Project, Rolland Moore Detention Pond, and the • Extensive knowledge of the Old Town Basin Oxbow Levee Project. In addition, our principal through the conceptual design of the engineers and office manager have been intimately Magnolia Street Outfall Project involved with City of Fort Collins projects since 1991. • Outstanding staff continuity with all of ACE's This continuity of ACE personnel, combined with the Senior staff having been with ACE for more ACE Project Team's familiarity with the Magnolia Outfall than 10 years Project and numerous other stormwater issues • Extensive hydrologic and hydraulic modeling throughout the City, will provide the City of Fort Collins expertise within the City of Fort Collins with the greatest opportunity for a timely and cost including the design of flood control effective design of the outfall system, and any future structures and facilities stormwater, water, and wastewater projects. ♦ Several years of successful participation in The ACE Project Team is strengthened by key the City's APDS process personnel from several firms with experience in such • Hydraulic design of flood control structures select disciplines as water resources, water and and facilities wastewater design and construction management, ♦ Extensive stream rehabilitation experience geotechnical engineering, structural and general civil • Innovative uses of stormwater quality BMPs design and surveying, wetlands mitigation, and ♦ Proven success in carrying numerous environmental permitting. projects through the CLOMR/LOMR and AVI, p.c. provides the ACE Project Team with FEMA floodplain adoption process exceptional experience and depth in the surveying and -- - ---- - - structural engineering components of the project. AVI and ACE have collaborated on several successful stormwater design projects over the last ten years, including several projects under ACE's current contract with the City of Fort Collins. AVI provides fully integrated professional services in numerous branches of engineering, surveying, and planning and environmental sciences. In support of the Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project, AVI has direct project experience with surveying, legal easement preparations, and the structural design of storm drainage facilities. Structural engineering services have also been provided by AVI on several minor and major capital improvement projects completed by ACE in support of the City of Fort Collins APDS process. Deere and Ault Consultants, Inc. (D&A) provides exceptional and highly experienced professional engineers in tunnel design to the ACE Project Team. D&A's business practice is focused on water resource projects and related engineering services, including the investigation, design and construction of tunnels, dams, slurry walls, canals, drainage channels, ditch structures, and pipelines. D&A employs a geologic based approach to engineering because understanding the physical geologic framework for a tunneling project is key for locating test holes, developing geologic cross -sections, locating the tunnel alignment, and preparing appropriate reports and design documents. D&A's staff has a long history of projects for the City of Fort Collins. These include the Oak St Outfall Tunnel, Harmony No. 5 Transmission Pipeline, and Drake Waterline. While D&A is the team's tunneling consultant, their experience with pipelines allows an objective evaluation of pipe installation methods. CTLIThompson, Inc. offers extensive experience and a broad scope of capabilities to expedite the Magnolia Outfall Project. CTL's primary historical focus has been on engineering geologic studies, geotechnical engineering and construction materials testing. Many of the engineers involved with these projects are still employed by CTL and are included on the ACE Project Team. Services provided on these projects included: geologic site characterization, and geotechnical investigations. XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 1.2 ANARSON CONSU[TING ENGINEERS, INC. n.•6_�h� Rffi?�oS m m m m r m m m m m m m m m m m m m m M M M PUBLIC 1NV 0'VEME� Drainage K u" Improvement Project Importation Ponds & Outfall Construction Begins in 2008 Open House Scheduled Final design plans and construction and construction work is scheduled to schedule for Phase I of the Canal begin on the west side of the Red Fox Importation Ponds & Outfall (CIPO) Natural Area in the spring. Drainage Improvement Project are Before excavation begins, Fort Collins nearing completion. City Council Utilities will be hosting an open house approved the project in October and with final Phase I design plans and a construction will begin in early spring. proposed construction schedule. By late winter, you will see pre- Utilities and Natural Resources staff, construction activities in the area, in addition to engineering consultants, including set-up of construction landscape designers and contractors, will trailers, building of temporary access be on hand to answer your questions roads and bridges and installation of and address your concerns. a pipe system to lower the ground- water prior to excavation. Excavation Contact Information: job phone: (970) 222-5099 Web: www.fcgov.com/C/P0 Utilities Project Managers: — Dean Saye, dsoye@fcgov.com — Dan Mattson, dmattson@fcgov.com — Matt Fater, mfater@fcgov.com City of Fort Collins Utilities x, r P ' T R" R OU�TIFALL P,ROj,ECT VA M V -1 MR' , q.. � �.F y,�, f � x d 'v t :.a ''`+'aY Av • 1 r Magnolia. atCanyon.s„ x� Magnolia at Mas on ,, .': .�` 1t1 .....t4lw. �4• ,.>:.:� y .'R s .l+.a^--" E rw�,., ,l N `� m � y -_ i,rk+4 Magnolia at Wayne yd 4 }K4,�y'4a.:.�' a, '" �:� "'�. ,fr "'' `� s `'��rr" �.•. � � "=�'�` r . t _ �, a�`�=-a � � a s # 9 z a.<w "gar ti � �p rs, s ',� �� t' �•',a*; `rw'. ��u„ ✓'.vy- Magnolia at RemingtonY t t.- nd fi�t� zv _ry e .i/t' .. . �: ,. „_, i � s�l*'�..�i�.�'+LYi.:�i..•f- :�u+-iL�.e�.' zr .. Y— LEGMD�� ExhtTng, Floodplotn `Detannlnad Dr Def611ed Anay aTs ` Y3... �" sin , b �/Com�ity¢of 3`4 Extattngg Shapev,F7loe g Doferminad by r�VrtCO«1P1S' f dpproxlihate Yethoda' 1 � s No Text 1�� LEQEND y.a p1 y pw 5 !f 1 �Ir wkol 'Exlating' Roodplla �'Determined �DY- Defatled Analysis y �,.yll �• , City of F' rrefl�g 'shanaw Flood Determined by F�Qrt Collins Approximate Methods s ,.LEND: Existing Floodpiain Determined by Dataded Analysts Y* , .' sisk. Cft of j x i Existingg 'Shadow Flooding Datertntned try l Collins 34 Approximate Methods i17 _ 4-n^\,.- � ) � d" �� -�� � � .,�-ks�g�^.'•a c§�, ' '"s ,k -1. ss C} ♦+y A (',�'`a A,,� W»a r . „ ,`. ` :�, p � p� n� � fAIEOtt ®R �g4�' ~.'u �� 7 ,�'� V 1• '� k Tl d".,+...'�t"'j� IRi `8 � R ,} ��. k syr;. f • .�y„� �' u Per t }',q#. y^�p �§ ' >f�- �82 Q `"A P I,�,�i Y.`»}' F M. �i „s. : �"..• Y r• d Se y?c. � i 1 $ \� � �,. � `�. El ��f �,,;" �` D.._y¢ } u'_"•'..G•ii �'.�'R.4�'%.zv g,... �� a� t "s �; 'e'S. i S+am 'c.� .I. } ' *,.4 `�.€A g � `"� ,.. , N�� � �. eta (4 � �� �. ��,�a �m �� �� ���'i'' �„ „�d ,�A►�, i ' ' .* .�� � - .;��,r �:, fit;, �s. � �, f �� �` • i f I � � .,.a —� �-- _=! _i.. �fy_�__ vowm ��� _ w+ ..tea 2 s yj'j- +amra rwn cm JL rr v;v�u v stgnueo.'wa ;-1� vuvm ,+aor' City ofAL ort:Colltns ��R ' CTLIThompson is currently providing on -call geotechnicaI engineering services for the City of Fort Collins involving laboratory testing, field inspection and testing, and providing support to the City of Fort Collins ' on various projects. BHA Design, Inc. would serve as the landscape architect for the project. They would coordinate with the engineering team and provide aesthetic guidance in the forming and shaping of detention ' basins, in the urban design of walls and structures, coordination with artists, and in the development of landscape rehabilitation strategies to provide wildlife habitat and reclamation. Additionally BHA would provide visual simulations and digital fly -through simulations if required as part of the project. BHA, as ' the authors of the City's Detention Pond Landscape Guidelines, will provide the team with in-depth expertise in the use of BMPs and LID techniques. Ditesco is a full service program, project and construction management firm based in Fort ' Collins, Colorado. Ditesco can provide design and construction management services related to minor improvements for water and wastewater treatment facilities, storage tanks and trenchless pipeline rehabilitation in support of future work identified in the RFP. ' Alpine-Eco will provide all environmental permitting services, wetland mitigation site design and monitoring services for the Magnolia Outfall Project, and any future projects. These services may include general environmental permits, USACE Section 404 permits and any wetland delineation, mitigation, and monitoring issues that may arise as part of the Magnolia Outfall or future projects. The function of each of the corporate members of the ACE Project Team, as indicated by the roles of key members of these consultants, is shown in the organization chart provided as Figure 1.1. ' 1.2 References In support of similar projects completed in the last five years, the following references are ' provided; if necessary, additional references can be provided. In addition, two selected letters of commendation ACE has received from clients on previous projects are provided in Figure 1.2. ' Mr. Bert Leautaud Mr. Mark Sears Mr. Dennis Wagner Project Manager Natural Resources Department Director of Engineering City of Greeley Stormwater Division City of Fort Collins Town of Windsor ' 1001 9th Avenue 281 N. College Avenue 301 Walnut Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Windsor, CO 80550 (970) 336-4121 (970) 416-2096 (970) 686-7476 ext. 2406 Mr. Jerry Garretson Resources Manager Poudre School District 2407 W. Laporte Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80521 (970) 490-3589 Mr. Tom Browning CWCB Watershed Protection & Flood Mitigation Section Colorado Water Conservation Board 1580 Logan Street, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866 3441 ext. 4804 Mr. Jeffrey Moore Project Manager Garney Companies, Inc. 10822 W. Toller Dr., Suite 100 Littleton, CO 80127 (303) 791-3600 1.3 Qualifications in Flood Control Improvement Analysis and Design The ACE Project Team is uniquely qualified to provide the required engineering services in support of the tasks associated with the design of the Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project. As the authors of the Old Town Basin Master Drainage Plan, the ACE Project Team staff is intimately familiar with the specific purpose and function of each element of the stormwater improvement plan for the Magnolia Street Outfall. I XCOFC2009_Magnolia Outfall.doc 1.3 WERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■r = = = = m = = = = = r = m = m m m m m 0 = m m 0 0 �■o 0 0 0 0■ o0 0 0 �0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 r'Cis I �., s• a k ns n r m .'^F .uN 4si' ,! ss s r . r4istc , a r ti .z s" k sits �,sar� dre� 4a' 3" s ti<e K : eta _ zY lyv"'.y'xv' iy„''tr.S�2"s�°39s"�'':3'''tH �� WOMEN '... 4,, >i•. .veh Ab `'�{ 2S �GF i4� ( ��i"`k'�s` u. �, J1 ��'�, k�'.41 H'r��1 �3Y �}r� T g{yl iSi y'i ® 0 City of FOCI Collins Magnolia Street Outfall Project ANdERSON CONMATinq FNGInEUM. INC. rl.,^„,r• Design and Construction Services Schedule °f ....... 10 Teak Name Stan. Finarr Cost 1 2014 2015 Feb Mar Apr May Jun JO Auq Sro tiOct Nov pec Jan Feh Mar Apr May_ Jtm_I_JW_ j_Aup _9eD Oct Nov _Dec„(_Jeny FpD Ma Apr I � I 1 - Task 1. Data Collection and Field Reconnaissance Mon 3/3/14 Fri 3/14/24 $12,604.00 2 ..___..,.. ................_..... _ _. ....... ..... Task 2 Base Map preparation - ._ .. - Fd 4/4/14. ...... ,._.._.,., Mon 9/25/141 $8 104.00 NNW 3 Preliminary Basa Map '�� fri 4J4/14 Mon 4/34/14; $3,320.00 ._ 4 . ...... _.. frost Base Map _ __..._ Tue 9/2/14 i ;.,......... ..._...... Mon 9/15/14 i 54,784.00 5 Task 3 = Uti0ry Locates • • — _ � � Mon 3/17/14 Mon 9/8/14 i $13,910.00 n Mon3/17/34` ,6 Thu4/3/14G 957.00w 7 Location and potholing -------------- Tue 8/19/14 , Mon 9/8/14 s 56,957.00 8 Task 9- Geotechnical Investigation Mon 3/17J74. Mon 9/8/14 E $S,988.00 9 _Initial Subsurface Investigation n Mo3/17J34 lhu 4/3/l4 $2,994.00 _ 10 Detailed Subsurface Investigation Tue 8/19ilWNIon 9J8J14 j $2,994.00 11 Task S-Surveying Tue 8/19/14Mon 9/1/141 $4,050.00 , 12 Task 6. Alternative Formulation and Evalu"n Tue 4/1S/14 ? Mon 9/1/14 j $46,962.00 - 13 Task 7 • Prelimina_ry Design - - _ - - > Tue 9/16/14 �_� _ _ ___. Mon 12/8/14 ( $245,740.00 14 15 Task 9 - Construction Drawings and Specification Tue 2/3/15 Mon 3/2/1S F $44,790.06 16 Task 10- Permittin8 Mon 3/10/14 Fri 12/5/14 ( $SS,544.00 17 Task 11. Design Report and Documemation � � � � � Tue 3/3/IS; Mon 3/16/15 9 � �$24,118.00 is Task 12.Oesign Coordination and Mon 3/3/14._._.Fri 3/13/15 r_-, $62,824.00 19 Task 3i• Public hwoNemem, CouncO Workshop/Meetings Tu! 7/22/14 Mon 3/16/25$13,7S8.00 20 Task 14 •Construction Services. --� Tue 3/3/15 Mon 1/4/16 $297,072.00 721 Task 15r As -Bull[ Services and Drawings, Tue 1/5/16 , Mon 2/29/16 ! $32,220.00 " 22 .. .. ,.. .... .._..... Task 16 • AS•Bulh Analysis and Repon: .._.._...,,. ., Tue 3/1/16.. . ... . .........._...........__ Mon 3/21/261 $12,188.00 Outside Services (Surveying, Geotech, Potholing, Structural Mon 3/3/141 Mon 1/4/16 i $205,000.00 Engineering, Tunneling, Envirommental, Landscaping) 24 Project Total .............. ... '-$9.M136.00 '^ ; 3,71. Project: MSO project ScheduM.mpp. Task —.. Milestone ♦ Summary � � � � � � � � � � � � � � o � � � � ® m m m B � � r ` - 1,w •,qt w '''��;{AM _. r o 1 S�£;`A•u� d `xas s u ° •�;:.: .a .:... E,ST�, , ,..... r £'-1ej �• 'yy ���, ;�., .� x� , ,.;Magnolia at M� a'so .Al ' a y } Magnolia at Wayne ; ri _ IMpf *r^xagf „max„ .. 4 u�`���.. +,y. ,,,� c ,°� �"' _ ` i � rkS" •�2-.. 1 ° - Magnolia at'. M emington . � 5 _. _ .�x '^c'•` �� "rr'w'"":•_'�, ;',aire^.�^r^"r--'-'�`i ,• � -'`" �-3'�'.`" �L�"'•i.'�#�".c.rci.«Li+k`y, '��4•'•;�� :�ut+s _z .. �.°J Civil Xater Resources Environmental M M M r x n 0 n n N 0 0 I� 0 v 0 Q 0 n x ACE Project Team Anderson Consulting Engineers AVI CTL Thompson Deere and Ault BHA Design Ditesco AlpineEco Aaron Hansen, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. Brian Van Zanten, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Jamis Darrow, P.E. Michelle Martin, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E Brian Smith, P.E. Scott Parker, P.E. Keith Meyer, P.E. Brad Anderson, P.E. Aaron Hansen, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. Scott Parker. P.E. Brad Anderson, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Andy Herb Brad Anderson, P.E. Aaron Hansen, P.E. Greg Koch, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. Daryl Johnson, P.E. CITY Of FORT COLLINS Brad Anderson, P.E. Project Manager Daryl Johnson, P.E. Ryan Rigg, P.E. Aaron Hansen, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Roger Sherman Jason Messaros ANdERSON CONSUITINq ENqINEERS, INC. Civil • Water Resources • Environmental Greg Koch, P.E. Chris Pauley, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. Jamis Darrow, P.E. Christoph Goss, P.E., Phd Robin Dornfest, PG Brad Anderson, P.E. Greg Koch, P.E. Aaron Hansen, P.E. Mark Kempton, P.E. Brian Smith, P.E. Dennis Dawson, PLS Brad Anderson, P.E. Chris Pauley, P.E. Greg Koch, P.E. Michelle Martin, P.E. Figure 1.1 ACE Project Team Organization Chart. !_1 in November '4; 2004 To Whom It May Over the past 4 years Poudre School District has bccninvolved--inthe implementation of a 175-millon dollar buildissue. Through this bon&issue there has been malty projects that have the need for engineering, services. I(his been my pleasure to have the: -opportunity to work with AlldersonConsulting Engineers; Inc:. The engineering team at Aiidcrsoh-has always, prod Iced the product that "I was. looking for. Andeison Engineering is a company that -listens to the heeds of their customer and provides engineering -services that are always of the highest.quality. It.is through myassociation with A dersortEngineering that I Rcl`that they care about the product from inception to completion. Their response.time to changes 'has ahvays been quick, concisc.iind their attention to details -has been excellent. It is through; the consistency of their product that I know that,I can count on thenrao address my. needs. What,it comes down to is the question. -of- Would I use them again?-The<answcr is ..a sesounding;yes. I would reconiinend Anderson, Consulting Engineers, Inc. for• "all of your engineerin&needs. Sincerely,. 1 rr alhetson Resource Manager Poudre; Scloo 1=District Hismrlo County C anhowe LARAMIE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WMT Planning- Zoning a Grants e Addresses o Mapping a Permits May 23, 2006 I have had:the pleasure to work with Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc: over thepast tltrec years., During this time, Laramie County was twice selected to participate in the Cooperating Technical PartnersProgrdm. with; Homeland SecurityTEMA.for the completion of food inapping projects. The first project was to mnp: a portion of n recently completed channelizaton<project and the second was conversion of existing FIRM's, of the entire county,:into a_ digital.fotigat In both cases, Lammie County entered into Agreements with Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. to complete the technical requirements. of each process. My role has been to coordinate with Anderson,Consultntg Engineers; inc: andllomcland Security/FEMA to assure that all requirements Were':being met. Through this process, Anderson Consulting Engincers,,lnc. has,eamed my respect for several reasons. First, they consistently exhibited an understanding of the requirements of each project. This was hest' displayed ,with the Work completed on the Field Surveys, Topographic Data. Development, Hydrologic/Hydratilic,Analyses and Floodplain Mapping: Upon,submittal, the technical review found, this workao be sound and'the few modificationsrequested were responded to in a timely and complete manner: Also, Anderson Consulting Engineers, the. understands the dynamics of Tbcnl, .State ;and 'Federal Governments. The lines of communication were always open, phones calls/eamils.:retumcd and information shared was;in:n form understood by all parties involved. In addition, they were very cognizant of budget (limitations and displayed outstanding :fiscal ethics. to assure that the greatest amount of work could be completed with the funding available. Due to the -professional approachi knowledge base and ethical -manner in .which Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. conducts their work, I would recommend their' engineering services to anyone. As stated earlier, Laramie County has been completely satisfied and I'took :forward to the possibility of -working with them on future projects: If you would like to discuss this matter in more detain am available to do so at your convenience. Sincerely, John W. Kluever, M.P.A. Grants Manager 310 West 1l)' 81reet r Butte 400 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 It (307)8334303 Fox (307) 833.4819. Figure 1.2 Selected Letters of Commendation.