Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout128072 HERSCHONG MAHONE - CONTRACT - RFP - P700 LP UTILITY BILLING ANALYSISPROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into the day and year set forth below, by and between THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and HESCHONG MAHONE GROUP, a partnership hereinafter referred to as "Professional". WITNESSETH: In consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations herein expressed, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Scope of Services. The Professional agrees to provide services in accordance with the scope of services attached hereto as Exhibit "A", consisting of six (6) pages, and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Time of Commencement and Completion of Services. The services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be initiated within five (5) days following execution of this Agreement. Services shall be completed no later than July 2, 1999. Time is of the essence. Any extensions of the time limit set forth above must be agreed upon in writing by the parties hereto. 3. Early Termination by City. Notwithstanding the time periods contained herein, the City may terminate this Agreement at any time without cause by providing written notice of termination to the Professional. Such notice shall be delivered at least fifteen (15) days prior to the termination date contained in said notice unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties. All notices provided under this Agreement shall be effective when mailed, postage prepaid and sent to the following addresses: PSA 7/24 1 The amount billed for these items will be based upon the number of each actually completed and the unit costs shown. Detailed analysis description Definitions • "Building data" = physical description of the homes, based on data collected by energy raters on the full 80 home sample and performance data collected by Boulder Design Alliance on a 40 home subsample. • "People data" = occupancy and operating information, based on market research data, data collected by energy raters on the full 80 home sample and performance data collected by Boulder Design Alliance. • "Simplified model' = ENERGY SCORE (REM/Rate) for heating and water heating, and a to - be -determined model for cooling (probably REM/Design). • "Detailed model' = DOE2.1. • "Standard schedules" = a limited number of "typical' occupancy and operating schedules, based on the people data. • "Pre -code conditions" = average building data values observed in the pre -code sample (averages weighted as necessary). • "Post -code conditions" = average building data values observed in the post -code sample (averages weighted as necessary). City tasks • Provide building data and simplified model results for 80 homes, in electronic format. • Provide simplified model documentation. • Provide Public Service Company billing data, in electronic format. HMG tasks • Based on the people data, define standard schedules. • Based on the people data, building data, and sample composition, develop the following averages (weighted as necessary): — Thermostat schedule — Occupancy — numbers and patterns — Hot water use — Interior shading — Air leakage rates (develop separate pre- and post -code averages) — Duct leakage rates (develop separate pre- and post -code averages if significant differences are observed) Vie, — Basement conditions (develop separate pre- and post -code averages) • Based on the building data, develop pre -code and post -code conditions. • Sort and filter the building data to create a hierarchy of building information that allows the key similarities and differences in the houses to be identified. Identify the parameters that significantly affect energy consumption and group the 80 houses accordingly. • Create a smaller number of primary detailed models (-20), based on the building data. Select the homes on which these models are based to represent a group of homes that are similar on all the key parameters. • Using all available data for each site (building data, people data, actual weather data), "calibrate" the primary detailed models against the utility billing history to provide high confidence in the accuracy of the models. Perform calibration based on engineering rationale, with a target of matching the simulation results to the monthly gas and electric utility billing data to within 10%. • Use the primary detailed models to create secondary detailed models for most of the remaining 60 houses for which data was collected. In the secondary models, plug in actual values for square footage, orientation, insulation levels, window -wall ratio, glazing type, exterior shading, interior shading, air leakage, duct leakage (when available), equipment efficiency and other building parameters that affect energy consumption to create a relatively accurate model of each of the secondary models. Some houses (-10) will be excluded at this step because they are not similar enough to any other house to make this approach applicable. • For each secondary model, run a simulation using the standard schedule that best matches the people data for the site, plus the actual weather data. The end use energy consumption predicted by these "as -built, as occupied" models will be compared against actual utility billing history as a check on the reasonableness of the models. • Use all of the detailed models to calculate savings from the code. — Use average (Typical Meteorological Year) weather data. — Simulate all homes twice, using pre -code conditions and post -code conditions. For both runs, hold occupancy and other non -code characteristics fixed as in the "as -built, as - occupied" models. • Project the modeled code savings estimates back to the whole population, using model - based ratio expansion techniques, as described in the Heschong-Mahone Group's proposal for this work. • Compare and correlate the simplified model results to the detailed model results, by end use (heating, cooling, water heating). — For all "as -built" detailed models (using building data), plug in simplified model occupancy and operating conditions (thermostat schedules, occupancy, internal gains, hot water use, interior shading). Simulate using TMY weather data. Compare detailed model output vs. simplified model output to see how the models compare. — For all "as -built" detailed models (using building data), plug in average occupancy and operating conditions. Simulate using TMY weather data. Compare detailed model output 11 VS. simplified model output to see the impact of different ooerating assumptions. — Develop correlations, by end use, between simplified and detailed model results, that can be used to correct simplified model results. 12 EXHIBIT B YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION AND INDEMNITY Section 1. Contractor hereby certifies that all information resources or systems to be provided or used in connection with the performance of this Agreement are "Year 2000 Compliant", except as otherwise expressly described in Section 2, below. "Year 2000 Compliant" shall mean that information resources meet the following criteria: a. Data structures (e.g., databases, data files) provide 4-digit date century recognition. For example, 1996" provides date century recognition; "96" does not. b. Stored data contains date century recognition, including (but not limited to) data stored in databases and hardware/device internal system dates. C. Calculations and programs logic accommodate both same century and multi -century formulas and date values. Calculations and logic include (but are not limited to) sort algorithms, calendar generation, event recognition, and all processing actions that use or produce date values. d. Interfaces (to and from other systems or organizations) prevent non- compliant dates and data from entering any state system. e. User interfaces (i.e., screens; reports; etc.) accurately show 4 digit years. f. Year 2000 is correctly treated as a leap year within all calculation and calendar logic. Section 2. Contractor has identified the following information resources or systems that will be provided or used in connection with the performance of this Agreement that are not, or will not by December 1, 1998, be Year 2000 Compliant: 13 Section 3. a. Contractor hereby certifies that the instances of information resources or systems not Year 2000 Compliant identified in Section 2, above, will be Year 2000 Compliant no later than December 1, 1998, and that Contractor shall notify the City of the status of Year 2000 Compliance for such resources or systems upon the earlier of the date Year 2000 Compliance is achieved or on June 30, 1999. b. Contractor hereby certifies that the instances of information resources or systems identified in Section 2, above, as not Year 2000 Compliant, and for which Year 2000 Compliance is or will not be achieved by December 1, 1998, are not related to and do not impair the performance by Contractor of the terms of this Agreement, and do not produce new non -compliant information resources or systems. Section 4. Contractor agrees to notify the City immediately of any information resources or systems that are not Year 2000 Compliant upon encountering the same in connection with the performance of the Agreement, including without limitation any information resources or systems in use by Contractor in the performance of the Agreement or information resources or systems of the City regarding which Contractor obtains information in the course of its performance of the Agreement. Section 5 Contractor agrees to permit examination, by the City or agents thereof, of any and all information resources and systems in use in connection with this Agreement, and related Year 2000 Compliance implementation plans, in order to evaluate Year 2000 Compliance and potential implications of the same for the City and for performance of the Agreement. Section 6. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from and against all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorneys fees, arising out of or resulting from the Contractor's failure to disclose instances of information resources or systems that are not Year 2000 Compliant, or failure to comply with the terms of this Exhibit B. 14 Professional: City: With Copy To: Heschong Mahone Group Doug Swartz Opal F. Dick, CPPO, Sr. Buyer 11626 Fair Oaks Blvd. City of Fort Collins Utilities City of Fort Collins Utilities Suite #302 P. O. Box 580 P. O. Box 580 Fair Oaks, CA 95628 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Fort Collins, CO 80522 In the event of any such early termination by the City, the Professional shall be paid for services rendered prior to the date of termination, subject only to the satisfactory performance of the Professional's obligations under this Agreement. Such payment shall be the Professional's sole right and remedy for such termination. 4. Design Project Indemnity and Insurance Responsibility. The Professional shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, timely completion and the coordination of all services rendered by the Professional, including but not limited to designs, plans, reports, specifications, and drawings and shall, without additional compensation, promptly remedy and correct any errors, omissions, or other deficiencies. The Professional shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the City, its officers and employees in accordance with Colorado law, from all damages whatsoever claimed by third parties against the City; and for the City's costs and reasonable attorneys fees, arising directly or indirectly out of the Professional's performance of any of the services furnished under this Agreement. The Professional shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in the amount of $500,000 combined single limits, and errors and omissions insurance in the amount of $100,000. 5. Compensation. In consideration of the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement, the City agrees to pay Professional a fixed fee in the amount of Thirty-four Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty Dollars ($34,850) plus reimbursable direct costs. All such fees and costs shall not exceed Thirty-five Thousand Fifty Dollars ($35,050). Tasks involving unit costs shall be billed and paid at the unit cost provided in the budget section of Exhibit A. Monthly partial payments PSA 7/24 P) based upon the Professional's billings and itemized statements are permissible. The amounts of all such partial payments shall be based upon the Professional's City -verified progress in completing the services to be performed pursuant hereto and upon the City's approval of the Professional's actual reimbursable expenses. Final payment shall be made following acceptance of the work by the City. Upon final payment, all designs, plans, reports, specifications, drawings, and other services rendered by the Professional shall become the sole property of the City. 6. City Representative. The City will designate, prior to commencement of work, its project representative who shall make, within the scope of his or her authority, all necessary and proper decisions with reference to the project. All requests for contract interpretations, change orders, and other clarification or instruction shall be directed to the City Representative. 7. Monthly Report. Commencing thirty (30) days after the date of execution of this Agreement and every thirty (30) days thereafter, Professional is required to provide the City Representative with a written report of the status of the work with respect to the Scope of Services, Work Schedule, and other material information. Failure to provide any required monthly report may, at the option of the City, suspend the processing of any partial payment request. 8. Independent Contractor. The services to be performed by Professional are those of an independent contractor and not of an employee of the City of Fort Collins. The City shall not be responsible for withholding any portion of Professional's compensation hereunder for the payment of FICA, Workers' Compensation, other taxes or benefits or for any other purpose. 9. Personal Services. It is understood that the City enters into this Agreement based on the special abilities of the Professional and that this Agreement shall be considered as an agreement for personal services. Accordingly, the Professional shall neither assign any responsibilities nor delegate any duties arising under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City. PSA 7/24 3 10. Acceptance Not Waiver. The City's approval of drawings, designs, plans, specifications, reports, and incidental work or materials furnished hereunder shall not in any way relieve the Professional of responsibility for the quality or technical accuracy of the work. The City's approval or acceptance of, or payment for, any of the services shall not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights or benefits provided to the City under this Agreement. 11. Default. Each and every term and condition hereof shall be deemed to be a material element of this Agreement. In the event either party should fail or refuse to perform according to the terms of this agreement, such party may be declared in default. 12. Remedies. In the event a party has been declared in default, such defaulting party shall be allowed a period often (10) days within which to cure said default. In the event the default remains uncorrected, the party declaring default may elect to (a) terminate the Agreement and seek damages; (b) treat the Agreement as continuing and require specific performance; or (c) avail himself of any other remedy at law or equity. If the non -defaulting party commences legal or equitable actions against the defaulting party, the defaulting party shall be liable to the non -defaulting party for the non -defaulting party's reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred because of the default. 13. Binding Effect. This writing, together with the exhibits hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and shall be binding upon said parties, their officers, employees, agents and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of the respective survivors, heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of said parties. 14. Law/Severabilut r. The laws of the State of Colorado shall govern the construction, interpretation, execution and enforcement of this Agreement. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision of this Agreement. PSA 7/24 4 15. Special Provisions. Special provisions or conditions relating to the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement are set forth in Exhibit "B", consisting of two (2) pages, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Assistant City Attorne t_- PSA 7/24 THE CI , OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO '1 John F. F2 ch City ManagV By: 1 �l V• Ja es B. O'Neill II, CPPO Direct f Purchasing & Risk Management DATE: 2 f I HESCHONG MAHONE GROUP, A Partnership By: < p Title: PARTNER Date: �11n, 5 Exhibit "A" Energy code evaluation and air conditioning study project Scope of Work for Heschong-Mahone Group The Professional will conduct market research and energy analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the residential energy code that was implemented in Fort Collins in 1996 and characterize residential air conditioning in Fort Collins. The primary questions the market research will address are: • What perceptions and experiences do builders have related to the energy code change? • What are homeowner perceptions and reality related to home comfort, energy costs, value and quality? How have these changed with the change in energy code? • How are decisions made about cooling systems? The primary questions the energy analysis will address are: • What effect did the energy code change and related support efforts have on energy usage (for heating, cooling, and other uses)? • How do energy projections based on simplified models, energy projections based on detailed models, and actual metered energy use compare? The tasks described in this scope of work will be done in parallel with other phases of the larger code evaluation and air conditioning study project, including inspections of homes under construction and energy ratings and performance testing of completed homes. Some of the samples will be shared by multiple phases. The strength of the evaluation will reflect both the results of individual tasks and how effectively these results can be linked together to answer questions about code implementation, building practices, and energy efficiency in new homes in Fort Collins. To strengthen the design of the project as a whole and encourage collaboration, professionals for all phases of the project will be encouraged to provide input as details of other phases are planned. Professionals for each phase will have access to data and findings of the other phases, as they become available. Professionals are encouraged to use all available data for each home in their attempts to understand the data, link the findings and identify trends. Final task reports are not due until draft reports from all phases are available. Regular communication with the project manager is expected throughout the duration of this contract. Professionals working on different phases of the project are encouraged to communicate directly with each other as well. Tasks, deliverables, and timelines This section outlines tasks, deliverables and timelines for the market research and energy analysis phases of the project. The initial and final tasks (kickoff meeting and review of overall project report) are common to both phases. Dates shown are completion dates for each major task. 11 Several deliverables specified below represent formal approval points, beyond which the Professional shall proceed only upon receiving written approval from the City. The emphasis is not on formality but on communication, so that effort is not put into subsequent tasks prior to clear agreement being reached on earlier tasks. All tasks below are the responsibility of the Professional unless otherwise noted. Market research 1.0 Kickoff meeting 1/5/99 Participate in a kickoff meeting with City staff and the inspection/testing consultant to discuss the final work plan, sample selection criteria, data needs, coordination with other phases of the study, and other details as needed. 2.0 Sample design and selection 1/12/99 2.1 Solicit input from the City and BDA regarding sample design. Design samples of homeowners and builders that best meet the needs of all phases of the project. 2.2 The City provides the sample frame, consisting of data available from the City's Development Tracking System and Customer Information System. 2.3 Obtain and verify phone numbers as necessary to proceed. 2.4 Select random sample points for the study from the sample frame. There will be 150 homeowners and 20 builders in the samples. 3.0 Survey instrument development 1/12/99 3.1 Develop homeowner and builder phone survey instruments. Maximum duration of the homeowner interviews is 15 minutes. Maximum duration of the builder interviews is 30 minutes. The homeowner survey will include prescreening questions that will enable subsamples to be selected for other phases of the project. 3.2 Provide draft versions of the instruments to the City for review and comment. 3.3 Finalize the pre -test version. 4.0 Survey pre -test and revision 1120/99 4.1 Train surveyors on the survey instruments. 4.2 Pre -test the instruments on approximately 5 homeowners and 2 builders. 4.3 Discuss the results of the pre -test with the City and revise the instruments as needed for a successful survey. Deliverable: Final versions of the survey instruments. Written City approval required to proceed past this point. 5.0 Conduct surveys 1/29/99 5.1 Survey the remainder of the samples. 5.2 Enter all survey data into the analysis database and check it for quality. 5.3 Provide a final disposition report to the City. 6.0 Subsample selection 2/5/99 Based on the prescreening information gathered during the surveys, select subsamples for the other phases of the project: energy ratings, performance testing, and detailed models for energy analysis. 7 7.0 Data analysis and draft report 2/19/99 7.1 Analyze the data using SPSS software. Develop tabulations of responses for each question and use cross -tabs to explore differences between groups. Use relevant tests to understand significance of differences. Explore patterns in the data to understand underlying trends and differences between groups. 7.2 Prepare a draft report summarizing the findings. Deliverable: Draft report. 8.0 Final report 614/99 8.1 The City reviews and comments on the draft report. The City also provides comments from the inspection/testing consultant. 8.2 Review data and findings from other phases of the overall project. 8.3 Prepare the final report, reflecting the comments and findings from other phases of the overall project. Deliverables: Final report, in electronic and hard copy formats, and survey data in electronic format. 9.0 Project final report 7/2/99 Review and comment on project final report drafted by City staff. Energy analysis The analytical methods upon which this contract and scope of work are based are described in the attachment, "Detailed analysis description." 1.0 Kickoff meeting 1/5199 Participate in a kickoff meeting with City staff and the inspection/testing consultant to discuss the final work plan, sample selection criteria, data needs, coordination with other phases of the study, and other details as needed. 2.0 Data collection 4/15/99 2.1 The City provides the following data, as it becomes available for homes in the energy analysis subsample: • ENERGY SCORE energy rating data. • Supplemental data collected by the energy raters. • Home inspection and performance testing data on approximately half of the homes. • Natural gas and electric billing histories. • Simplified model results. 2.2 Obtain weather data. 3.0 Analytical methods testing and refinement 4/2/99 3.1 The City provides information on built-in assumptions in the simplified models. 3.2 Test the analytical methods on the first few homes for which building data becomes available. Demonstrate detailed models, calibration to billing data, secondary model development, pre- and post -code parametric analysis, and comparison and correlation of the simplified models and detailed models. s 3.3 Discuss the results of the pre -test with the City and revise analytical methods as needed for a successful analysis. Deliverable: Revised description of the analytical methods. Written City approval is required to proceed past this point. 4.0 Analysis and draft report 5/28199 4.1 Complete the analysis on the entire sample, using the revised techniques. Explore patterns in the data to understand underlying trends. Explore outliers or anomalies. Take advantage of all available data and findings from other phases of the project to enhance the interpretation. 4.2 Prepare a draft report summarizing the findings. Deliverable: Draft report. 5.0 Final report 6/11/99 5.1 The City reviews and comments on the draft report. The City also provides comments from the inspection/testing consultant. 5.2 Review data and findings from other phases of the overall project. 5.3 Prepare the final report, reflecting the comments and findings from other phases of the overall project. Deliverables: Final report, in electronic and hard copy formats, and analysis data in electronic format only. 6.0 Project final report 7/2/99 Review and comment on project final report drafted by City staff. Budget asks Project Management & Coordination Market Research Design survey and sample Conduct surveys -150 homeowners * Conduct surveys - 20 builders Analysis and Reporting Subtotal Energy Analysis Utility billing data processing Detailed models - 20 Primary Detailed models - 50 Secondary Analysis and Reporting Subtotal Direct Expenses Travel Phone Subtotal Grand total Costs $2,000 $2,200 $3,000 $20 $700 $35 $6,500 $12,400 $450 $10,000 $500 $5,000 $100 $5, 000 $20,450 $0 $200 $200 $35,050 9