HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESPONSE - RFP - P936 FINANCIAL ADVISORY INVESTMENT BANKINGProposal to Provide
Financial Advisory Services
to the
City of Fort Collins
City of Fort Collins
April 28, 2004
Advisors Inc.
Proposal to Provide Financial Advisory Services
To
THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
Requests for Information
Overview of James Capital Advisors Inc.
Briefly describe, in two pages or less, the nature of the firm's experience as it
relates to providing financial advisory services to municipalities, particularly for
tax-exempt revenue bonds and lease -purchase transactions financed through
COPS.
James Capital Advisors Inc. is an independent financial advisory firm which
specializes in financings for Colorado municipalities and other local governments.
As an independent advisor, James Capital does not underwrite bonds or cross -sell other
financial products to its clients. James Capital acts in all instances as the borrower's
representative in the structuring and marketing of bond and lease transactions. By
concentrating its services in this manner, James Capital avoids the conflicts of interest
which may arise when a financial advisor also acts as an underwriter and represents
both buyers and sellers in the same transaction.
Financial Advisory Services provided by James Capital include:
• Debt structuring and refinancing;
• Oversight of the bond rating and insurance process;
• Competitively bid bond transactions;
• Privately placed bond transactions;
• Selection and retention of underwriters for negotiated bond transactions;
• Borrower representation in negotiated bond transactions;
• Interest rate, marketing, and pricing evaluations;
• Review and evaluation of unsolicited bonding and refinancing proposals;
• Coordinating bidding procedures for all related services.
James Capital's areas of specific expertise include:
• Lease/purchase COP financings;
• Sales tax revenue bonds;
• Utility revenue bonds;
• Tax increment revenue bonds;
• General obligation bonds;
• Recreational facilities financings;
• Special assessment bonds;
• State loan and revolving fund programs;
• Refunding analysis and escrow structuring.
JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
James Capital's cumulative financial advisory experience is summarized as follows:
Total Number of Financings 1996 to Present: 116 Issues
Total Par Amount 1996 to Present:
$1.74 Billion
Negotiated Sales:
50 Issues $803.9 Million
Competitive Sales:
41 Issues $820.8 Million
Private Placements/State Loans:
25 Issues $116.4 Million
Included in these totals are a number of revenue bond and COP transactions similar to
those proposed by the City of Fort Collins. James Capital has acted as financial advisor
on 55 revenue bond transactions totaling $821.5 million, and on 25 COP transactions
totaling $235.2 million. These include 10 revenue bonds and 2 COP transactions for the
City of Fort Collins.
With respect to the proposed financing for the Fort Collins DDA, James Capital has had
the opportunity to work on the Series 2000 Subordinate Lien Bonds and the Series 2001
First Lien Bonds. The DDA financings have picked up some complexity as they have
evolved over the years, and the new financing will require a somewhat different security
from the two variations on the credit which exist today. James Capital would look
forward to the opportunity to meet with City and DDA staff to make sure that all parties
hold realistic expectations as to the DDA's financing capacity.
As further evidence of James Capital Advisors' experience as it relates to providing
financial advisory services to municipalities, the following listing of financial advisory
clients is presented:
Town of Berthoud
Adams County
Arapahoe County Water
City of Durango
Douglas County
Denver SE Suburban Water
Town of Estes Park
Jefferson County
East Cherry Creek Water
City of Lafayette
La Plata County
Pueblo Board of Water Works
City of Longmont
Mesa County
City of Louisville
Summit County
Forest Hills Metropolitan
City of Loveland
Weld County
Goldsmith Metropolitan
City of Fort Collins
Piney Creek Metropolitan
Town of Parker
Boulder Valley Schools
Plum Creek Metropolitan
City of Pueblo
Cherry Creek Schools
Superior Metropolitan
City of Sterling
Douglas County Schools
South Suburban Park & Rec.
Town of Windsor
Eagle Valley Library
Univ. of Northern Colorado
City of Woodland Park
Weld County Library
Great Outdoors Colorado
2 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
James Capital Advisors: Ability and Experience
State in two pages or less, why your firm is well qualified to provide the services
outlined in the Scope of Services section above and your experience in providing
such services. In citing prior engagements, indicate the role and responsibilities
your firm undertook (financial advisor, senior managing underwriter, etc.).
Identify the individual from the firm who had the principal responsibility for the
financing. Identify at least three individuals from different entities with phone
numbers who can be contacted to serve as references.
The RFP places an emphasis on Open Space financing as well as COP and revenue
bond financing for both the City and the DDA.
James Capital has advised on both revenue bond and COP transactions to acquire
Open Space for Jefferson County ($130 million), the City of Longmont ($22 million),
Douglas County ($17.8 million), and the South Suburban Park and Recreation District
($8.7 million). James Capital is also part of the financing team for Great Outdoors
Colorado, the state agency which has $100 million of open space bonding authority.
In addition to its background with the Fort Collins DDA, James Capital has tax
increment financing experience with the Longmont DDA, the Estes Park Urban
Renewal Authority, and the Westminster Economic Development Authority, the City
of Westminster's urban renewal authority.
James Capital continues to operate a broad -based practice in general government
finance, as indicated in the exhibit below.
1999-2003
Combined Colorado Financial Advisory Rankings
Long Term, Fixed Rate General Government Finance
(Excludes Housing, Healthcare, Student Loan, Private Placements)
Volume in $ Million — Minimum 10 Transactions or $250 Million
James Capital
Kirkpatrick Pettis
George K. Baum
Piper Jaffray
First Albany
Public Financial
Management
BD Advisors
RBCDain
Hanifen Imhoff
A.G. Edwards
Negotiated Competitive Total
Number $ Volume Number $ Volume Number $ Volume
31
$583.9
25
$408.50
56
$992.40
33
686.7
12
433.50
45
1,120.20
11
1,214.7
28
771.20
39
1,985.90
7
430.6
22
645.50
29
1,076.10
22
2,517.9
6
138.20
28
2,656.10
8
586.0
9
501.70
17
1,087.70
12
390.0
5
150.00
17
540.00
8
692.1
4
144.40
12
836.50
3
277.3
5
127.60
8
404.90
4
1,654.2
0
0.00
4
1,654.20
Source: Securities Data, Thomson Municipals
3 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
References for James Capital Advisors
Mr. Rich Lemke, Finance Director
$15,890,000 Lease/Purchase COPS, April 8, 2003
Adams County
$11.100,000 Lease/Purchase COPs, September 13, 1999
450 S, 4t' Street
Brighton, CO 80601
(303) 654-6290
Ms. Karen Montgomery, Finance Director $14,230,000 Road Improvement Bonds, April 25, 2004
Douglas County
$17,805,000 Open Space Bonds, October 9, 2002
100 Third Street
$5,140,000 Parks Bonds, September 24, 2002
Castle Rock, CO 80104
(303) 660-7434
Ms. Terry Cole, Financial Analyst
$41,750,000 Lease/Purchase COPs, September 9, 2002
Jefferson County
$20,040,000 SE Local Improvement Bonds, August 28, 2002
100 Jefferson County Parkway
$30,460,000 Open Space Bonds, May 17, 2001
Golden, CO 80419
$100,000,000 Open Space Bonds, May 13, 1999
(303) 271-8568
Mr. Jim Golden
$4,619,388 Golf Course Lease Financing, September 15, 2003
City of Longmont
$19,000,000 Water Revenue Bonds, June 3 & 10, 2003
350 Kimbark Street
$9,335,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds, September 10, 2002
Longmont, CO 80501
$22,000,000 Open Space Revenue Bonds, July 24, 2001
$22,800,000 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, March 7, 2000
$2,600,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, July 28, 1998
Ms. Mary Ann Parrot, Finance Director $38,525,000 Economic Dev. Tax Increment Revenue Bonds
City of Westminster
$15,590,000 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, December 4, 2002
4800 W. 92nd Avenue
$7,490,000 Var. Rate Revenue Bonds, September 25, 2002
Westminster, CO 80030
$20,990,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, November 5, 2001
(303) 430-2400, x. 2042
$13,275,000 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, August 28, 2001
$18,740,000 Lease/Purchase COP, May 22, 2001
$14,998,357 Utility Revenue Bonds, May 10, 2000
$1,600,000 Lease/Purchase COP, January 24, 2000
$2,650,000 Open Space Bonds, September 28, 1999
$19,720,000 Lease/Purchase COP, August 26, 1999
$19,495,959 Lease/Purchase COP, November 12, 1998
$6,300,000 Golf Course Revenue Bonds, July 16, 1998
$13,995,000 Lease/Purchase COP, March 17, 1998
JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
James Capital Advisors: Approach
Based on your understanding of the Scope of Services, describe the general
framework the firm would use to analyze the financing options available to the
City and discuss the key factors to be evaluated.
James Capital offers the City the flexibility to evaluate each financing independently to
determine the lowest -cost approach to each project. The framework for analyzing these
options is presented below.
STEP ONE: The first decision to be made in selling the City of Fort Collins' bonds or
COPs is the choice between a private placement and a public offering.
In a private placement, the securities are sold directly to a bank. Although interest
rates are typically higher than in a public offering, a private placement can still be more
efficient for smaller transactions, especially those repaid in ten years or less. Compared
to a public offering, the advantages of a private placement are:
Fewer outside professionals (financial advisor, bond counsel, trustee
bank only)
• Lower costs of issuance
• No requirement to produce a disclosure document (official statement)
No reserve fund requirement
In larger transactions, however, an issuer will save money by making a public offering
of the securities. Public offerings create higher costs of issuance because of the need to
retain an underwriter, the need for an official statement, and the use of rating agencies
and bond insurers. However, these additional costs are more than offset by the interest
rate savings on a larger issue, especially when repaid over fifteen or more years.
STEP TWO: If the decision is made to sell the securities in a public offering, the City
can then choose between a negotiated sale and a competitive sale.
In a negotiated sale, the underwriter is selected in advance of the actual sale, usually
after responding to a request for proposals. The City will know in advance what
compensation the underwriter will receive, but will not know what the final interest rates
will be.
In a competitive sale, the City and its financial advisor develop the payment structure
and arrange for ratings and insurance for the issue. The underwriter is then selected by
bid process in which all final terms are locked in. The underwriting business is then
awarded to the underwriter who bids the lowest -cost package, considering both the
interest rates and underwriting compensation.
Competitive Bond Sales
Advantages:
• Competitive bidding is a reliable method for selling highly -rated or insured
issues at a low overall cost.
5 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
• Underwriters are rewarded for bidding lower interest rates and fees.
• Risk is typically assumed by the underwriter, not by the borrower.
• The selection process for underwriters is straightforward and easily
understood, and promotes fairness and objectivity in financial matters.
Disadvantages:
• Competitive sales can be less flexible in choosing the precise timing of
. the sale.
• Unusual or challenging bond issues are less likely to perform well in
competitive sales.
• Underwriters are less motivated to provide election support or other
related services which may have value to the borrower.
Neaotiated Bond Sales
Advantages:
• Negotiated sales can offer more opportunity to "time the market", which, if
successful, can reduce borrowing costs.
• Unusual or challenging bond sales benefit from pre -marketing by the
underwriter's sales force.
• Underwriters may be willing to provide election support or other useful
services if they are allowed to purchase the bonds in a negotiated sale.
Disadvantages:
• In negotiated sales, there are no financial incentives or rewards for the
underwriters to price the bonds at lower interest rates.
• Borrowers typically assume more risk in negotiated sales.
• The results of a negotiated sale are sometimes more difficult to evaluate
and may be subject to "second-guessing" by other market participants.
• Negotiated sales are more likely to raise concerns over favoritism or
conflicts of interest in the borrower's dealings with the underwriters.
To summarize, James Capital is committed to providing the City of Fort Collins with a
complete range of financing options and selecting the most efficient approach to each
transaction, including private placements, negotiated bond sales, or competitive bond
sales.
6 IAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
In addition:
Identify and discuss any services or methods of approach which the firm
believes to be either unique or outstanding or is recognized as giving your
firm a superior competitive advantage.
Founded in 1996, James Capital has operated as an independent financial
advisor longer, and has assisted more governmental clients, than any other
advisory firm in Colorado. While working with many clients on negotiated bond
sales, which are the still prevalent in Colorado, James Capital has introduced
many clients to competitive sales, an area in which the firm has one of the
strongest track records in the market. Where underwriting firms are reluctant to
recommend competitive sale, James Capital has introduced competitive bidding
to the following clients:
Adams County
Douglas County
Jefferson County
La Plata County
Mesa County
Summit County
City of Durango
City of Fort Collins
City of Louisville
City of Pueblo
Boulder Valley Schools
Cherry Creek Schools
%/
1AMES Capital Advisors Inc.
• Identify the firm's position as to (a) requesting a rating for the bonds or the
certificates, and (b) seeking insurance. Describe the key topics and
strategies upon which you would focus in conducting a rating agency or
insurance company presentation.
This discussion assumes that the bonds or COPS will be sold in a public offering
because in a private placement, ratings and insurance will not be required.
In a public offering, it is recommended that an underlying rating be sought from at
least one rating agency. Bond insurance is also recommended unless the
underlying rating is in the "AK category. In a competitive bond sale, it is
sometimes possible to take bids with or without insurance to further assure the
City that the cost of insurance is justified.
Ratin4 and Insurance Credit Considerations: Revenue Bonds
All City of Fort Collins revenue bonds are AAA -insured with the exception of its
Sales and Use Tax Revenue Bonds. The City's direct or underlying revenue
bond ratings are:
City of Fort Collins
Revenue Bond Type
Sales and Use Tax
HUTF
Sewer
Storm Drainage
Water
Rating:
Moody's S&P Fitch
Aa2 AA
Aa2
Al AA -
Al A+
A2 A+
For revenue bonds generally, the rating criteria would include the following items:
o Pledged Revenues and Coverage Ratios — The source of pledged
revenues and their coverage of maximum annual debt service are the
primary revenue bond credit factors. 2002 debt service coverage for the
City's revenue bond obligations are summarized below.
2002
City of Fort Collins Debt Service
Revenue Bond Type Coverage
Sales and Use Tax 18.9 x
HUTF 6.7 x
Sewer 1.5 x
Storm Drainage 2.2 x
Water 2.1 x
8 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
o Administrative Practices — Administrative practices are a factor in utility
revenue bond ratings, where the frequency of rate adjustments and the
ability to anticipate regulatory changes may indicate management's skill
in avoiding financial pressure in the long run.
o Legal Covenants — Rate maintenance covenants, additional bonds tests,
and reserve requirements can be structured to add credit strength when
doing so does not interfere with reaching the City's financial objectives
and future flexibility. However, legal covenants can also be improved to
the City's advantage. For example, when refunding the City's Sales and
Use Tax Revenue Bonds in 2003, the previous requirement for a funded
reserve was replaced by a "springing reserve", which saved the City the
cost of a $15,000 reserve fund surety premium.
Rating and Insurance Credit Considerations: COPs
For lease/purchase COPs, in addition to the usual economic and financial
criteria, the rating criteria would include the following items:
o Sources of Recurring Revenues - Since COP payments rely on the
same current tax collections which fund City operations, the City's general
fund flexibility will be examined closely.
o Real Estate and Collateral Issues — The currently -leased Civic Center
facilities and the proposed Police Services Building would be considered
"essential" to the City's operations, and therefore make attractive
collateral to investors and insurors. Using Open Space property as
collateral, however, can sometimes present a credit problem. In all
cases, the leased property should be on a parcel with clear title, with no
environmental problems or outside mineral rights, and with no limitations
on alternative uses under foreclosure of the lease.
James Capital would like to make the recommendation at this point that
the City consider amending its 1998 Civic Center Facilities Lease
Indenture to create a master property lease. If additional collateral
could be pooled together with the Civic Center Facilities in a single lease,
it would provide an excellent way to finance the acquisition of open
space, for example. In pooled collateral leases, the credit agencies tend
to weight the analysis in favor of the most essential asset in the pool as
long as that asset remains subject to the full term of the lease.
In a master lease, the City could leverage the Civic Center Facilities and
the Police Services Building in order to substantially reduce the financing
costs for the Southeast Branch Library and eligible Open Space
acquisitions. When equity has been accumulated in the leased collateral,
a master lease can also be used to finance other non -lease -able assets
such as street improvements and streetlights.
9 1AMES Capital Advisors Inc.
• Identify the municipal bond interest rate scales that would be used as
benchmarks for pricing the transactions specifically listed in the proposal.
Using the scales as of April 15, 2004, estimate the rates the City would have
attained, had the transaction been completed that day. Provide the basis
for your estimates.
The Municipal Market Data "AAA" Index for April 15, 2004 is presented in the
table below, along with the MMD spread analysis from the past three City of Fort
Collins competitive bond sales. Performance in the past three sales allows the
April 15 pricing to be projected in the right-hand column for a 20-Year insured
issue.
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Exhibit "A"
Projected Pricing
City of Fort Collins 20-Year Insured Financing
April 15, 2004
April 15, 2004
AAA MMD
Scale
Feb. 2, 2002
City of Fort
Collins
Storm Drainage
MMD Spread
Sept. 17, 2002
City of Fort
Collins
G.O. Water
MMD Spread
April 1, 2003
City of Fort
Collins
Sales Tax
MMD Spread
Projected
Pricing
City of Fort
Collins
April 15, 2004
1.18 %
0.40%
0.02%
0.03%
1.38%
1.71
0.05
0.00
0.01
1.73
2.01
0.04
0.02
0.05
2.05
2.42
0.04
0.02
0.05
2.46
2.73
0.04
0.02
0.05
2.77
3.01
0.04
0.03
0.05
3.05
3.26
0.04
3.30
3.47
0.02
3.49
3.63
0.04
3.67
3.79
0.04
3.83
3.91
0.04
3.95
4.00
0.06
4.06
4.09
0.06
4.15
4.18
0.06
4.24
4.27
0.07
4.34
4.37
0.06
4.43
4.47
0.06
4.53
4.57
0.07
4.64
4.65
0.07
4.72
4.73
0.07
4.80
10 1AMES Capital Advisors Inc.
�fs
CITY OF FORTCOLLINS
PROJECTED POLICE SERVICES BUILDING DING LLEASE/PURCHASE COPS
Market `of=May 26, 2004
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Period Total Fiscal Total
12/ l/ 4 400,779.33 400,779.33 400,779.33
12/ 1/ 5 1,070,000.00 1.710000 1,202,338.00 2,272,338.00 2,272,338.00
12/ 1/ 6 1,090,000.00 2.030000 1,184,041.00 2,274,041.00 2,274,041.00
12/ 1/ 7 1,110,000.00 2.520000 1,161,914.00 2,271,914.00 2,271,914.00
12/ l/ 8 1,140,000.00 2.890000 1,133,942.00 2,273,942.00 2,273,942.00
12/ 1/ 9 1,175,000.00 3.190000 1,100,996.00 2,275,996.00 2,275,996.00
12/ 1/10 1,210,000.00 3.400000 1,063,513.50 2,273,513.50 2,273,513.50
12/ 1/11 1,250,000.00 3.570000 1,022,373.50 2,272,373.50 2,272,373.50
12/ 1/12 1,295,000.00 3.750000 977,748.50 2,272,748.50 2,272,748.50
12/ 1/13 1,345,000.00 3.900000 929,186.00 2,274,186.00 2,274,186.00
12/ 1/14 1,400,000.00 4.030000 876,131.00 2,276,731.00 2,276,731.00
12/ 1/15 1,455,000.00 4.170000 820,311.00 2,275,311.00 2,275,311.00
12/ 1/16 1,515,000.00 4.300000 759,637.50 2,274,637.50 2,274,637.50
12/ 1/17 1,580,000.00 4.390000 694,492.50 2,274,492.50 2,274,492.50
12/ 1/18 1,650,000.00 4.470000 625,130.50 2,275,130.50 2,275,130.50
12/ 1/19 1,725,000.00 4.550000 551,375.50 2,276,375.50 2,276,375.50
12/ 1/20 1,800,000.00 4.620000 472,888.00 2,272,888.00 2,272,888.00
12/ 1/21 1,885,000.00 4.690000 389,728.00 2,274,728.00 2,274,728.00
12/ 1/22 1,975,000.00 4.780000 301,321.50 2,276,321.50 2,276,321.50
12/ 1/23 2,065,000.00 4.850000 206,916.50 2,271,916.50 2,271,916.50
12/ 1/24 2,170,000.00 4.920000 106,764.00 2,276,764.00 2,276,764.00
29,905,000.00 15,982,127.83 45,807,127.83
ACCRUED
29,905,000.00 15,982,127.83 45,887,127.83
Dated 8/ 1/ 4 with Delivery of 8/ 1/ 4
Bond Years 362,18B.333
Average Coupon 4.412657
Average Life 12.111297
N I C it 4.451940 4 Using 99.5000000
Arbitrage Yield 4.482304 %
Bond Insurance:
0.550000 • of (Total Debt Service Only)
Prepared by JAMES CAPITAL ADVISORS INC.
252.379.20
Micro -Muni Sizing Date: 05-27-2004 0 07:56:48 Filename: FTCCOP Key: 2004POLICEPRO
James Capital Advisors: Staffina
Identify the specific individual(s) who would be assigned to work with the City and
specify which individual would be the principal contact. Identify the nature of the
work each individual would perform, together with proposed time commitments
and their related professional knowledge and experience.
Jim Manire, President of James Capital Advisors, will be the primary contact for the City
of Fort Collins. He will be responsible for structuring and sizing the issues, coordinating
applications for rating and insurance (or for bank financing in a private placement), and
representing the City in selecting and negotiating with underwriters.
Mr. Manire has handled over 300 tax-exempt bond transactions in Colorado, and has
successfully represented his clients as a financial advisor in both competitive and
negotiated bond sales. For eleven years, Mr. Manire worked as an investment banker in
the Colorado public finance market, first with Boettcher & Company (1985-1990), and
then with Piper Jaffray (1990-1996). In 1996, Mr. Manire formed James Capital Advisors
Inc. to meet the need in the Colorado bond market for an independent financial advisor.
Mr. Manire is a past president of the Colorado Municipal Bond Dealers Association
(1995) and a former director of the Colorado Water Congress (1994-1996). He has
been an active member of the Colorado Municipal League's TABOR Technical Review
Committee since 1992. Mr. Manire holds a bachelors degree from Yale University and
a masters in business administration from the University of Colorado.
' Dawn Herrington has been with James Capital since 2003, acting as a Financial
Analyst on a part-time basis. She will act as a backup to Mr. Manire for the Fort Collins
engagement, and will be available to produce the final debt service schedules and any
related supporting financial analysis.
Ms. Herrington is a Certified Public Accountant who acted as Manager of Financial
Forecasting at Clifton Gunderson LLP before moving with her family from Denver to
the Grand Junction area on the Western Slope of Colorado. At Clifton Gunderson, Ms.
Herrington also acted as the escrow verification agent for dozens of tax-exempt bond
refinancings in Colorado. Prior to her tenure at Clifton Gunderson, Ms. Herrington was
the Finance Director for the Town of Castle Rock and performed numerous local
government audits while employed as a Staff Accountant at Anderson, Doty &
Company. Ms. Herrington holds a bachelors degree from the University of Northern
Colorado.
James Capital Advisors: Office Location
Identify the location of the office from which the individuals identified in the staff
item above will be operating.
Mr. Manire operates James Capital from an office located in his residence at 17390 E.
Jamison Avenue, Centennial, CO. For mailing and delivery, the mailbox address is:
4950 S. Yosemite, Suite F2-502
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
11 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
James Capital Advisors• Disclosures
Disclose any relationship which could create or appear to create a potential
conflict of interest if your firm is selected.
James Capital has no relationships which could create or appear to create a potential
conflict of interest if selected as the City's financial advisor.
James Capital has never been involved in any type of litigation or legal proceeding.
James Capital carries professional liability insurance in the amount of $500,000 with a
$10,000 deductible.
12 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
Proposal to Provide Financial Advisory Services
To
THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
Responses to Additional Questions
Outline the procedures your firm would use to provide the services listed above.
The City is interested in many types of innovative financing which should be
established to achieve the highest possible quality ratings from Fitch's, Moody's
and Standard & Poor's and the most favorable insurance quotes on each
transaction.
Innovations which James Capital has applied for its client's benefit include:
• Electronic bidding for competitive bond sales. With James Capital acting as its
advisor, the City of Fort Collins became the first Colorado issuer to offer its bonds
in an electronic bid on December 1, 1998, selling $31,580,000 of Water Revenue
Refunding and Improvement Bonds.
• The use of "bidder's option insurance" in competitive sales, which puts the
burden of proof on the market to establish whether the cost of an insurance
premium is justified by the interest rate savings over an uninsured issue.
• The implementation of "springing" reserve funds in eligible revenue bond issues,
such as the City of Fort Collins' Series 2003A Sales and Use Tax Revenue
Bonds. This technique eliminates all reserve fund costs, whether it is the cost of
cash -funding a debt service reserve (and the associated arbitrage rebate
compliance issues) or the cost of an insurance premium for a surety reserve.
• The sale of subordinate securities to allow additional bonds to be issued in spite
of unfavorable legal covenants in the first lien bonds. This approach can be very
successful if the lien on the original bonds is "closed off'. This alternative is
preferable to refunding the first lien bonds in cases where the issuer would lose
" money in the refunding.
Provide a concise history of your firm.
Although the role of independent advisors had been developed to a high level in many
states, the Colorado bond market in 1996 was dominated by underwriters who
exclusively promoted negotiated bond sales. While working as an underwriter from 1985
to 1996, Mr. Manire had developed an appreciation for the value of independent bond
advice and competitive bonds sales which was not shared by his employer or other firms
on "the Street". With the support of a core group of clients who shared Mr. Manire's
interest in making their bond transactions more efficient and less expensive, James
Capital Advisors Inc. was established in 1996 as the first Colorado -based independent
financial advisory firm.
For most of its history, Mr. Manire has been the sole employee of the firm. Through the
electronic media such as Bloomberg, Thomson Municipal Markets, Parity/1-deal, and
13 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
Muni -Auction, James Capital operates with the same access to market information that
any Colorado underwriter would have.
Large firms carry large overhead, and are therefore under constant pressure to bring
issues to the market and to cross -sell other financial products to their underwriting
clients. By focusing exclusively on the advisory role, James Capital has been able to
effectively keep its business focus and objectives in alignment with those of its clients.
The City requires that the selected f nv(s) would be completely independent and
work in an unbiased manner. Please explain any agreements that your firm would
have that may conflict with the needs of the City or prevent full disclosure.
` James Capital has no agreements which would conflict with the needs of the City or
prevent full disclosure.
The City will also receive this assurance from the underwriting firms who respond to this
proposal. It is therefore important to remember that underwriters are used to
representing two clients in a single transaction, and are therefore constantly
compromising between the interests of issuers and investors in an attempt to avoid
risking their own capital. Furthermore, underwriting firms are routinely engaged in
trading securities and forming syndicates among themselves, practices which can add
unnecessary complexity to an advisory engagement. When acting as the City's advisor
in an underwriting negotiation, they may find themselves in an awkward position if the
underwriter has a financial influence over them in another transaction.
Since James Capital has no investor clients or trading relationships with other firms, it
remains free of these potential conflicts and brings a truly independent perspective to the
City's bond business.
List the dollar volume of your underwritings in the tax-exempt market for 2001,
2002, 2003, and 2004 to date.
As a point of clarification, James Capital does not provide underwriting services, so the
figures provided below are for financial advisory engagements, not underwriting
engagements. Similarly, figures submitted by other proposing firms for underwriting
volume will not accurately reflect their level of financial advisory activity.
James Capital's volume of financial advisory transactions for the requested period is:
2001
$ 387,231,000
2002
218,684,000
2003
279,229,000
2004 to date
226,720,000
14 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
Provide complete information, including background, overall abilities, and
experience for the person who would serve in the role as described above. The
City needs this information to include consulting on tax exempt debt issues with
special emphasis on the various types of instruments listed above.
Jim Manire, President of James Capital Advisors, will be the primary contact for the City
of Fort Collins. He will be responsible for structuring and sizing the issues, coordinating
applications for rating and insurance (or for bank financing in a private placement), and
representing the City in selecting and negotiating with underwriters.
Mr. Manire has handled over 300 tax-exempt bond transactions in Colorado, and has
successfully represented his clients as a financial advisor in both competitive and
negotiated bond sales. For eleven years, Mr. Manire worked as an investment banker in
the Colorado public finance market, first with Boettcher & Company (1985-1990), and
then with Piper Jaffray (1990-1996). In 1996, Mr. Manire formed James Capital Advisors
Inc. to meet the need in the Colorado bond market for an independent financial advisor.
Mr. Manire is a past president of the Colorado Municipal Bond Dealers Association
(1995) and a former director of the Colorado Water Congress (1994-1996). He has
been an active member of the Colorado Municipal League's TABOR Technical Review
Committee since 1992. Mr. Manire holds a bachelors degree from Yale University and
a masters in business administration from the University of Colorado.
15 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
Fees and Expenses:
For advisory services, propose a flat dollar amount fee respective to each
financing. Indicate whether any economies of scale will be obtained if more than
one of the transactions is completed by your firm. Estimate and commit to a not -
to -exceed dollar amount for each respective transaction not included in the flat
fee quote.
For transactions specifically identified in the RFP, James Capital proposes to act as the
City's Financial Advisor on a fee -for -service basis, with fees to be collected only upon
the successful closing of the issue. Proposed fees are as follows:
Fort Collins DDA Tax Increment Revenue Bonds
Financial Advisory Fee for a Private Placement: $6,000
Financial Advisory Fee for a Public Offering: 8,000
Other City Revenue Bonds and COPS
Financial Advisory Fee for a Private Placement: $6,000
Financial Advisory Fees for Public Offerings
will be priced proportionately on a sliding scale
based on the following benchmarks:
Issues of $5,000,000 or less:
$ 8,000
A $10,000,000 issue:
12,500
A $15,000,000 issue
15,000
A $40,000,000 issue or greater
24,500
Examples of the resulting fees are $10,700 for an $8 million issue and $16,140
for an $18 million issue.
An escrow structuring fee of $2,500 will be added to any advanced refunding
issue. The maximum fee for a state loan financing will be $9,500.
James Capital would submit any charges incurred for travel and lodging outside
Colorado, as well as any charges incurred for hosting conference calls for more
than three parties, for reimbursement to the City.
16 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
For negotiated sales, indicate how your firm will manage transactions to minimize
costs to the City. Provide specific examples of the fee levels and arrangements
obtained for other clients.
James Capital has obtained the best results in negotiating underwriting fees by using a
request for underwriting proposals. Good results have also been achieved when
James Capital has been authorized to make the initial contact with an underwriter who
may be preferred for the engagement.
Part of this success is due to the generally good working relationships James Capital
has maintained with the underwriting community. Most underwriters know that James
Capital will assume an equal share of the responsibilities in document preparation and in
coordinating rating agency and insurance applications. When this is taken into account,
an underwriter may be willing to bid a more aggressive fee if they know the work load
will be divided with a proactive financial advisor.
As requested, recent examples of negotiated sale underwriting fees achieved for James
Capital's clients are provided below in $ per $1,000.
Client: East Cherry Creek Valley Water & Sanitation District
Issue: $19,115,000 Variable Rate Water Revenue Bonds
Rating: A-1+ (Dexia Credit Local Standby Bond Purchase Agreement)
Sale Date: March 10, 2004
Underwriter: Wells Fargo Brokerage Services
Underwriting fee: $1.75 / $1,000
Client: Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority
Issue: $4,165,000 Tax Increment Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds
Rating: Moody's "Baal"
Sale Date: October 8, 2003
Underwriter: George K. Baum & Company
Underwriting fee: $11.00 / $1,000
Client: City of Lafayette
Issue: $6,360,000 Sales and Use Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds
Rating: Aaa/AAA (Ambac Insured); S&P's "A+" Underlying
Sale Date: September 17, 2003
Underwriter: Stifel, Nicolaus and Company, Inc., Hanifen Imhoff Division
Underwriting fee: $5.05 / $1,000
Fees will be billed after closing of any transaction(s). If a transaction is not
consummated, the City will not be responsible to pay any fees or expenses related
to that transaction. Identify all fees for other services that may be required to
complete the transaction.
Typical issuance costs include fees or premiums for the following services:
Bond Insurance Bond Ratings Bond Counsel
Disclosure Counsel Printing Services Paying Agent
Financial Advisor Underwriter
17 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
Include all other information or data that may uniquely qualify your firm in serving
the City in the role outlined in this document.
It is a great source of pride that James Capital Advisors has had the privilege of serving
as the City of Fort Collins' financial advisor since 1998. During this period, there have
been twelve transactions closed for the City. We think the City finance staff would agree
that the working relationship with James Capital is excellent, and that our knowledge of
the City's debt policies and programs makes for a very efficient process for all parties.
We also believe the firm's availability, responsiveness, and creativity in meeting the
City's needs would be hard for any other proposing firm to match, in spite of differences
in size and resources.
James Capital's President, Jim Manire, has worked with and for the leading investment
banking firms in Colorado for nineteen years, and understands the differences between
working for large and small firms. James Capital's ability to provide consistently high
levels of service comes from its focus on one particular aspect of the bond business:
providing financial advisory services to Colorado local governments.
It is true that the larger firms employ many talented professionals. However, it is very
difficult for these firms to keep their focus on any specific service when they are also
attempting to be retained for virtually every type of related engagement. Many firms
claim excellence in every capacity: financial advisor, underwriter, investment broker,
retail sales, institutional sales, money manager, election consultant, swap provider, etc.
Some of these firms also seem to spend more time searching for new clients than they
do serving their existing ones.
James Capital is happy to keep its business simple. Fort Collins' bond business has
been a priority for James Capital for over five years now, and it will remain so if our
performance justifies our continued service to the City.
18 1AMES Capital Advisors Inc.
List all clients for which your firm has provided financial advisory or underwriting
services over the past three years and those which will provide a reference.
James Capital Advisors Inc. - Colorado Financial Advisory Experience
References and transaction details are available upon request.
April 9, 2004
Municipal Government
Town of Berthoud:
$6,325,000 General Obligation Wastewater Bonds, May 8, 2002
Town of Estes Park:
$4,165,000 Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority, October 8, 2003
City of Fort Collins:
$5,730,000 Sales and Use Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, April 1, 2003
$19,255,000 General Obligation Water Refunding Bonds, September 17, 2002
$2,765,000 Storm Drainage Revenue Refunding Bonds, September 17, 2002
$12,300,000 Storm Drainage Revenue Bonds, February 5, 2002
$3,720,000 Lease/Purchase Certificates of Participation, September 7, 2001
$3,640,000 Tax Increment Revenue Refunding Bonds, April 10, 2001
$9,845,000 Storm Drainage Revenue Bonds, April 10, 2001
City of Lafayette:
$6,360,000 Sales and Use Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, September 17, 2003
$2,830,000 General Obligation Water Bonds, August 27, 2003
$15,645,000 Water Revenue Bonds, April 3, 2003
$7,861,138 Sewer Revenue Bonds, April 8, 2001
City of Longmont:
$4,619,388 Golf Course Lease Financing, September 15, 2003
$19,000,000 Water Revenue Bonds, June 3 & 10, 2003
$9,335,000 General Obligation Civic Center Refunding Bonds, September 10, 2002
$22,000,000 Open Space Sales and Use Tax Revenue Bonds, July 24, 2001
City of Louisville:
$7,405,000 Limited Tax Library General Obligation Bonds, January 21, 2004
$3,830,000 Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, September 29, 2003
$2,215,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, November 18, 2002
Town of Parker:
$7,715,000 Lease/Purchase Certificates of Participation, May 23, 2001
City of Pueblo:
$8,402,620 Sewer Revenue Bonds, May 6, 2003
$2,500,000 Lease/Purchase Certificates of Participation, July 13, 2001
City of Westminster:
$38,525,000 Westminster Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Revenue Bonds
$15,590,000 Sales and Use Tax Revenue Bonds, December 4, 2002
19 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
$7,490,000 Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, September 25, 2002
$20,990,000 Water and Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds, November 5, 2001
$13,275,000 Sales and Use Tax Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds, August 28, 2001
$18,740,000 Lease/Purchase Certificates of Participation, May 22, 2001
Town of Windsor:
$5,000,000 Sales and Use Tax Revenue Bonds, July 25, 2002
City of Woodland Park:
$2,107,000 General Obligation Water Refunding Bonds, February 21, 2002
County Government
Adams County:
$15,890,000 Lease/Purchase Certificates of Participation, April 8, 2003
Douglas County:
$14,230,000 Road Improvement Sales and Use tax Revenue Bonds, March 25, 2004
$1,548,000 Certificates of Participation, March 26, 2003
$1,555,000 Special Assessment Bonds, November 19, 2002
$17,805,000 Open Space Sales and Use Tax Subordinate Revenue Bonds, October 9, 2002
$5,140,000 Parks Sales and Use Tax Revenue Bonds, September 24, 2002
$1,100,000 Special Assessment Bonds, May 8, 2002
Jefferson County:
$41,750,000 Certificates of Participation, September 9, 2002
$20,040,000 SE Local Improvement District Sales Tax Refunding Bonds, August 28, 2002
$30,460,000 Open Space Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, May 17, 2001
Summit County:
$1,117,000 Special Assessment Bonds, May 6, 2002
$8,175,000 Certificates of Participation, October 23, 2001
Special Districts
Denver Southeast Suburban Water and Sanitation District (The Pinery):
$7,045,000 Wastewater Revenue Bonds, October 8, 2002
East Cherry Creek Valley Water & Sanitation District:
$19,115,000 Variable Rate Water Revenue Bonds, March 10, 2004
$5,000,000 Water Revenue Notes, December 17, 2003
$20,520,000 Water Revenue Bonds, June 5, 2002
Goldsmith Metropolitan District:
$11,730,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, August 21, 2002
Parker Jordan Metropolitan District
$13,395,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, June 5, 2003
Piney Creek Metropolitan District:
$3,490,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, August 21, 2003
20 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
PROJECTED POLICE SERVICES BUILDING LEASE/PURCHASE COPS
Market of May 26, 2004
Sources and Uses of Funds
Delivery Date: L 8/ 1/ 45
Sources of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds ................... $29,905,000.00
+Premium /-Discount ................... $0.00
Bond Proceeds ........................................... 29,905,000.00
-------------------
$29,905,000.00
Uses of Funds
Police Facilities .......................................
28,000,000.00
Cost of Issuance ........................................
130,000.00
Bond Insurance ..........................(
0.550000%)... 252,379.20
Underwriters Discount ...................(
0.500000%)... 149,525.00
Capitalized Interest ....................................
1,302,532.84
Surety Bond .............................................
68,302.92
Contingency .............................................
2,260.04
$29,905,000.00
Prepared by JAMES CAPITAL ADVISORS INC.
Micro -Muni Sizing Date: 05-27-2004 ® 07:56:43 Filename: FTCCOP Key: 2004POLICEPRO
Plum Creek Metropolitan District:
$3,590,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, September 9, 2003
Superior Metropolitan District Nos. 1, 2 & 3
$3,570,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, November 13, 2002
$7,490,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, November 13, 2003
$9,000,000 Variable Rate Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, November 13, 2002
Superior McCaslin Interchange District
$6,220,000 General Obligation Variable Rate Bonds, April 13, 2004
South Suburban Park and Recreation District:
$7,920,000 Lease/Purchase Certificates of Participation, December 5, 2001
$8,730,000 Lease/Purchase Certificates of Participation, January 17, 2001
Public Schools
Boulder Valley School District:
$7,275,000 Certificates of Participation, November 6, 2003
$20,000,000 Tax Anticipation Notes, October 22, 2003
$70,000,000 Tax Anticipation Notes, August 19, 2003
$24,230,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, September 25, 2001
Cherry Creek School District:
$179,750,000 General Obligation Refunding and Improvement Bonds, January 15, 2004
$19,015,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, September 4, 2003
Douglas County School District:
$135,500,000 General Obligation Bonds, January 16, 2001
Additional Clients
Eagle Valley Library District:
$3,565,000 Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, January 27, 2003
University of Northern Colorado:
$50,000,000 Auxiliary Facilities Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds, July 24, 2001
Weld Library District:
$11,930,000 Lease/Purchase Certificates of Participation, March 21, 2001
21 JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
US TREASURY N/B T 4 02/15/14
Mid Lin
ae. ; ..a
Govt G Y
95-10+ / 95-12+ ( 4.60 /59) BGN @ 9:28
ily
d Line Movi
Australia 61 2 9777 8600 Brazil 5511 3048 4500 Europe 44 20 7330 7500 Germany 49 69 920410
Hong Kong 852 2977 6000 Japan 81 3 3201 8900 Singapore 65 6212 1000 U.S. 1 212 318 2000 Copyright 2004 Bloomberg L.P.
G453-605-0 27-May-04 9:28:59-
l INW lietus 1-Ij In
ODATA-IP4 MENU 11 *RETURN TO CURRENT PAG�]I 46HISTORICAL PAGE
_--■ AS OF 05/26/2004
[
Municipal Yield Curves as of 05/26/2004 ]
[
General Obligations
] [
"AAA" Coupon Range ]
"AAA"
PRE RE
INSURED
"AA"
IRA"
"BAA"
"LOW"
"HIGH"
1
2005
1.51
1.51
1.57
1.56
1.66
2.06
4.50
5.00
2
2006
2.01
2.04
2.09
2.07
2.21
2.66
4.50
5.00
3
2007
2.48
2.52
2.57
2.55
2.72
3.17
4.50
5.00
4
2008
2.85
2.89
2.94
2.92
3.11
3.53
4.75
5.25
5
2009
3.15
3.20
3.25
3.23
3.44
3.85
4.75
5.35
6
2010
3.36
3.43
3.47
3.45
3.69
4.08
5.00
5.35
7
2011
3.53
3.60
3.65
3.62
3.87
4.25
5.00
5.35
8
2012
3.71
3.78
3.83
3.80
4.06
4.43
5.00
5.35
9
2013
3.86
3.98
3.95
4.21
4.58
5.00
5.35
10
2014
3.99
4.11
4.08
4.33
4.70
5.00
5.35
11
2015
4.13
4.25
4.22
4.47
4.83
5.10
5.35
12
2016
4.24
4.36
4.33
4.57
4.94
5.10
5.30
13
2017
4.33
4.45
4.42
4.67
5.03
5.10
5.20
14
2018
4.41
4.53
4.51
4.76
5.11
5.10
5.20
15
2019
4.49
4.61
4.59
4.82
5.18
5.10
5.20
[
Municipal
Yield Curves
as of 05/26/2004 ]
page 14903
[
General Obligations
] [
"AAA" Coupon Range ]
wJLUA"
PRE RE
INSURED
"AA"
"A"
"BAA"
"LOW"
"HIGH"
16
2020
4.56
4.69
4.66
4.88
5.24
5.10
5.20
17
2021
4.63
4.74
4.73
4.94
5.31
5.10
5.20
18
2022
4.71
4.82
4.81
5.01
5.37
5.10
5.20
19
2023
4.78
4.89
4.88
5.07
5.40
5.10
5.20
20
2024
4.85
4.96
4.95
5.11
5.43
5.05
5.15
21
2025
4.92
5.03
5.02
5.18
5.48
5.00
5.15
22
2026
4.96
5.07
5.06
5.21
5.52
5.00
5.15
23
2027
4.98
5.09
5.08
5.23
5.54
5.00
5.15
24
2028
4.99
5.10
5.09
5.24
5.55
5.00
5.15
25
2029
5.00
5.11
5.10
5.25
5.56
5.00
5.15
26
2030
5.00
5.11
5.10
5.25
5.56
5.00
5.15
27
2031
5.01
5.12
5.11
5.26
5.56
5.00
5.15
28
2032
5.01
5.12
5.11
5.26
5.56
5.00
5.15
29
2033
5.02
5.13
5.12
5.27
5.57
5.00
5.15
30
2034
5.02
5.13
5.12
5.27
5.57
5.00
5.15
Your
MMD Whars Feedback PSA MMD
Free Trial New as Glossary Mo1P
■
Copyright2004 by Municipal Market Data - 617.856.2900 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
https://www.tin3.com/mmd/mmdpage jsp?date=05%2F26%2F2004&action=page&showC... 5/26/2004
tustoncat -t_P�a - v.v. iteius
ODATA-LINE) MENU
�MSTORICALPAGEloe
L18"AAA"MunicipalYields
Analysis NEXT PAGE,
Historical "AAA" G.O. Yields
Data -Line page 6
Municipal Market Data -Line
[ AAA General obligation Yields ]
1-yr
3-yr
5-yr
7-yr
10-yr
12-yr
15-yr 20-yr
25-yr
30-yr Slope
05/26/04
1.51
2.48
3.15
3.53
3.99
4.24
4.49
4.85
5.00
5.02
351
05/25/04
1.52
2.51
3.19
3.58
4.04
4.28
4.53
4.89
5.03
5.05
353
05/24/04
1.52
2.54
3.23
3.64
4.09
4.32
4.56
4.92
5.06
5.08
356
05/21/04
1.52
2.54
3.25
3.66
4.11
4.33
4.57
4.93
5.07
5.09
357
05/20/04
1.52
2.54
3.25
3.66
4.11
4.33
4.57
4.93
5.07
5.09
357
04/30/04
1.25
2.22
2.94
3.44
3.96
4.15
4.37
4.77
4.89
4.93
368
03/31/04
1.02
1.70
2.35
2.90
3.43
3.68
4.02
4.40
4.49
4.53
351
02/27/04
1.00
1.56
2.22
2.69
3.31
3.56
3.88
4.30
4.41
4.44
344
01/30/04
1.10
1.79
2.45
2.95
3.54
3.79
4.10
4.49
4.57
4.60
350
12/31/03
1.11
1.74
2.36
2.86
3.40
3.66
3.99
4.41
4.59
4.63
352
11/28/03
1.11
1.72
2.39
2.94
3.55
3.79
4.12
4.52
4.68
4.72
361
10/31/03
1.05
1.65
2.40
3.02
3.68
3.91
4.22
4.63
4.76
4.82
377
09/30/03
1.00
1.37
2.15
2.86
3.47
3.70
4.03
4.52
4.60
4.73
373
08/29/03
1.05
1.87
2.69
3.39
3.95
4.15
4.46
4.86
4.99
5.02
397
Your
MMD VIkO s Feedback PaA MMD
Free Trial Now Glos wy Help
Copyright 2004 by Municipal Market Data - 617.85C2900 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Last Update: Wed May 26 18:1S: 43 EDT 2004
https://www.tfn3.com/mmd/g_14906.htmi 5/27/2004
Advisors Inc.
ndent Financial Advisor
Mr. Alan Krcmarik, Finance Director
Mr. James O'Neill, Director of Purchasing
City of Fort Collins
215 N. Mason 80524
Fort Collins, CO 80522
Dear Alan and Jim:
April 28, 2004
Thank you for inviting James Capital Advisors Inc. to submit this proposal to provide
financial advisory services to the City of Fort Collins.
James Capital's working relationship with Fort Collins has been one of the truly
satisfying aspects of my business. I'm very proud of assisting the City in breaking
away from the traditional mind -set of the Colorado market in which negotiated bond
sales are often a foregone conclusion. Fort Collins has successfully brought private
bond sales and competitive bidding into its marketing strategy, while still using
negotiated sale when it offers the best advantage.
The opportunity to help my clients fairly evaluate all their options and choose for
themselves the most efficient bonding approach is basically what attracted me to
opening an independent advisory practice in the first place. The early opportunity
given to me to work with the City played an important part in supporting a business
which is now thriving in its eighth year.
I hope you still see a benefit to the City in James Capital's approach to the bond
advisory business, and I sincerely hope to continue this very positive relationship into
the future.
Respectfully submitted,
JAMES CAPITAL ADaiISORS INC.
w y ,
es Manire
iident
4950 S. Yosemite
Suite F2-502
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
(303) 699-4464
Fox (303) 699-4888
SIGNATURE FORM
We propose to furnish a consultant in accordance with the terms, conditions, and
specifications detailed in the City's Request for Proposal and in our accompanying
written response without exception, deletion, or qualification.
Company Name
James Capital Advisors Inc
Business Address Telephone Number
4950 S. Yosemite Suite F2-502 Greenwood Village CO 80111 (303) 699-4464
RPF No. P-936 Date of Proposal: April 28, 2004
Sign d by: James Manire, President
JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.
Proposal to Provide Financial Advisory Services
to
THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
Presented by
JAMES CAPITAL ADVISORS INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TAB A — Requests for Information
Overview of James Capital Advisors..........................................1
Ability and Experience.............................................................3
Approach to Services
Evaluation Framework.....................................................5
Competitive Advantage...................................................7
Ratings and Insurance.....................................................8
Projected Pricing of April 15, 2004..................................10
Staffing..............................................................................
. ..11
OfficeLocation.......................................................................11
Disclosures...........................................................................12
TAB B — Responses to Additional Questions
Innovative Procedures.............................................................13
Historyof the Firm..................................................................13
Dollar Volume of Financings.....................................................14
Biographical Information..........................................................15
Feesand Expenses.................................................................16
Managing Negotiated Sale Costs..............................................17
Other Fees and Services..........................................................17
Other Information...................................................................18
ClientListings........................................................................19
JAMES Capital Advisors Inc.