Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Addenda - RFP - P954 POLICE SERVICES FACILITY DESIGN & BUILD (10)
CITY OF FORT COLLINS ADDENDUM No. 3 SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Description of Bid: P954 Police Services Facility — Design/Build OPENING DATE: 3:00 P.M. (Our Clock) December 13, 2004 To all prospective proposers under the specifications and contract documents described above, the following changes are herby made. A. DESIGN/BUILD SERVICES The Design/Build Team shall design a facility that is: state-of-the-art for Police Facilities; innovative, yet practical; and constructible, without discipline conflicts. The City expects the construction to be: of the highest quality, utilizing the latest construction processes; durable and maintainable; built with the most innovative products and systems; constructed within the timeframe proposed; and under budget. The City expects the BEST possible Police Services Facility that can be designed and built! B. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS The design and construction of our Police Services Facility will meet or exceed the policies and standards provided by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Activities (CALEA). Additionally, the crime lab will conform to the American Society of Crime Lab Directors/Lab Accreditation standards, attached as Attachment "A". Information on these policies and standards will be provided at the November 16th Pre -proposal Meeting. This facility will also meet the City's Building Design Standards and the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) standards. The updated City of Fort Collins Building Design Standards Manual (2004) will also be available at the November 161h Pre -proposal Meeting. C. SPACE PLANNING Each design/build team is receiving the Space Plan that was developed in September 2000 as Attachment °B". The single facility information should be used. Attachment "C" provides the current staffing plan for Police Services that should be used in conjunction with the Space Plan. Your conceptual (schematic) design should be based upon this information. The successful Design/Build Team will need to update the Space Plan to the current and projected needs of Police Services. D. COMMUNICATIONS AND SECURITY SYSTEMS Given the current state of society, the communications and security systems for this facility will be a major component of the project. The communications installations shall conform to the City's Information Technology Standards. Coordination of these systems during the design phase will be critical. We anticipate different levels of security starting with the site, the main lobby, and within the facility — police area, escorted police areas, staff only areas, restricted to certain staff, and detainee areas. The revised City of Fort Collins Information Technology Standards will be available at the November 16th Pre -proposal Meeting. Page 1 of 7 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Forensic Laboratories: Handbook for Facility Planning, Design, Construction, and Moving Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program Coordinated by Office of Law Enforcement Standards National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001 April 1998 NCJ 168106 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: RECORDS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE I CURRENT', PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF I UNITI EXIST AREA REQUIRED 1 SF SF 2000 ! 2005 2013 ! 2020I 2000' 2005 ! 2013' 20201 NOTES I WORK PLACES I OFFICES Records Manager 1 1 1 1 150 137 : 150 150- 150. 150. SUBTOTAO 1 '' 150I 150, 150 150', CIRCULATION 251V.1 i 38 381 38 38, j OFFICES TOTAL! 1; t I 1 ! l 1 1881 188' 18Bj 188, 1 WORK STATIONS Supervisor 2 1 2 1 3 I 3 1 1 80 I 160{ 240'' 240� 240 Police Report Specialists 1 9 12 15 17 64 576� 640640 640 Police Data Tech 8 8 8 8 64 512 512 512'. 511 I Public Info Database Workstation 0 0 0 0 64 64 64' 64 I 64 Desk Officer 1 1 1 1 ! 64 -+. 64 64 64 64 SUBTOTAL 20 23 27 29 I 1,376 1,520' 1,5201 1,5201 CIRCULATION 35%1 1 j 1 482j 532, 532, 532; WORK STATIONS TOTAL! i 1,858; 2,0521 2,0521 2,052, WORK PLACES TOTAL' 1 21 j 24 28 1 30 1 j 1 2,04512,24012,240; 2,2401 % INCREASE IN STAFF' 114% I 17 % ; 7 % I SPECIAL AREAS! AREAS it j SUBTOTAL! I ! ' 1 0� Oj 0� 1 P CIRCULATION 25% � ! 0 0; 01 DI AREAS TOTAL! 7 0 Oj e; 0! ROOMS Conference j 200j 200! 200; 200� 200 Records File Storage j 1 ! 200' 200' 229!; 267� 2861 Mail Room Central Supply Ii. i 200I j 200� 200I 200' 200� Press Room 1 ! 600' I 380; i 6001 80I 600i 600, 80) 80i 600i 80� Copier / Fax / Supplies / MF Rest Rooms j 1 ! 150' 130 150i 1501 130 150I Coffee / Break I 40 100I 651 2131 80� 100! 801 80I 1001 tool SOi 1001 SUBTOTAL' 1,61011,639i 1,677 11696I CIRCULATION 25%i l I I 403I 410I 419I 424I ROOMS TOTAL 1 2,01312,04812,09612,120 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL! 2,0132,04812,0961 2 1201 TOTAL REQD STAFF & AS 1 21 24 28 30 i 14.OSSi 4,Z8B'4.33514.359 NOTES: SWORN] 1 0 O j O j 0 CIVILIAN: 21 1 24 1 28 30 j Fort Collins Police Services 16 ENTITY: SECTION: CURRENT LOCATION: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES DISPATCH 300 LAPORTE I CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF !. UNITI EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF SF 2000 2005120131 7.020 120003. 20051 2013, 2020, NOTES WORK PLACES I OFFICES 1 Communications Manager ! t t 1 1 180 180: 180. 180. 180 SUBTOTAL,,I 1i 18011 180'. 180 180. CIRCULATION 25% I ! 45; 45 45' 45' OFFICES TOTALI 1 1 1 1 225, 225 223 225 1 WORK STATIONS Supervisor j 5.5 5.5 5.5 1 6 1 80 1 440! 4401 440, 480' I Dispatchers / Call Takers 21 1 25 j 30 1 34 ; 80 1 80 1 560': 800 960' 960 Call Taker Consoles ' 1 64 3201 320' 320' 320� SUBTOTAL 26.5 30.5 35.5 40 1,3201 1,560, 1,720i 1,7601 CIRCULATION 35% 462', 546! 6021 616: WORK STATIONS TOTAL ! 11,782; 2,1061 2,32212,376i WORK PLACES TOTAL 27.5 1 31.5 136.5 41 2,0071 2,331; 2,54712,601,I % INCREASE IN STAFF' 15% 16°:° I SPECIAL AREAS ' I AREAS 19111 Telephone eP i � 120 1 12DI 120i 720 120j 1 1201 1 Radio / Phone 500 217 500i 500i 5001 5001 UPS / Switchgear 200i Z001 2001 200j 200 SUBTOTAL' 1 820i 8201 8201 820� CIRCULATION 25% ! 205 2051 I 205 205: AREAS TOTAL! I I 11,025t 1,02511,0251,025 1ROOMS 1 Conference I Kitchen / Break I Training Work Room Copier / Fax / Supplies Dispatch Lockers Rest Rooms CIRCULATION ROOMS T 1 j I I 1 200 2001 200! 200' 2001 200, 2001 200l 200j 2001 150! I 1501 1501 1501 150 120� I 1201 1201 120) 120 51 65i 80 901 105! 815 830 840� 85 204 208 210 21 1,0191 1,038, 1,05011 Af TOTAL REOD STAFF & AS j 27.5 31.5 36,5 41 114.051 4 394i 4 62TI4 695 NOTES: I SWORN 1 0 p p 1 p CIVILIANI 27.5 1 31.5 . 365 1 41 Fort Collins Police Services T7 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION PROPERTY / EVIDENCE / LAB CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE & OFF SITE I CURRENT PROIECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF I UNIT, EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF 5F 2000 20051 2013 2020! 1 : 2000'. 2005'. 2013! 20201NOTES I WORK PLACES I OFFICES , j ! j Supervisor - 1 I 7 1 2 1' 150 150, 150, 150 216 SUBTOTAL] I 1501, 150, 150 216 CIRCULATION 25 % 38 38 38 54 OFFICES TOTAL: 1 i l t 2 I 188' 188 188 270- WORK STATIONS j Property / Evidence Technicians 2 1 2 3 4 64 1 128; 128I 192 256;; Crime Scene Investigators 2 3 4 5 64 12811 192. 256 320. AFIS Tech. 0.5 j 1 I 1 . 1 100 1 100, 100 100 100 Lab Clerical l 0.75 I l 1 I 64 641 64: 64: 64, SUBTOTAL 5.25 7 9 11 420i 484,E 6121 740, CIRCULATION 35% i I 1471 7691 214, 259, WORK STATIONS TOTAL; 567 653I 826!, 999 WORK PLACES TOTAL 6.25 8 /0 13 755I 841 j 1,074�, 1,269j % INCREASE IN STAFF, j 1 28% 125% 1 30%'. SPECIAL AREAS f AREAS 1 P/E Storage 1,151 1,1511 1151 1,473j 1,84212,394 Narcotics Storage I 150I 150 150 ISO ISO Secure Storage I 1501 I ISO 150I 150; ISO Large Property Storage 5471 547 547 700, 875 1,138 1 Evidence Processing I 150, 150j 112 240 312, Vehicle Processing ,� 1,100I 1,10011, 100! 1,10011,100j Dry Room Bio - Clean Up j 80.' 401 72: 80 401 1021 1281 511 641 1661 831 I AFIS / Livescan 80I 80i 80 80, 80I i SUBTOTAL I 16211,00011,1571,393 .1 , , 5,573 CIRCULATION 25%1 f ( 8 � AREAS TOTAL; ROOMS i 4,310I 4,9991 5,7861 6,967 Conference 200 200 200 2001 201 Forensic File Room Photo Room i 120I 1001 120 168 1681 168 Change Room Ii ' 601 95i 100 60) 100 100 60 60 100 60� Crime Lab i I 430 4301 430 430 430 Latents Trace Evidence I 100 115 1001 115� 100 100 115 115 100 175 Digital Imaging { Crime Lab Storage I 1201 120 20 120 I Evidence Packaging / Storage I I 70: 1211 70 120 70I 70 1211 110 70 120I Viewing Room Copiu / Fax j I 200 200 200 200 200j I 120 98 120I 120 120 120 SUBTOTALI ( I 1,7551 1,803� 1,803 1,803 CIRCULATION TA ROOMS TOTAL] j 1 j I 439I 2,194i 451 451I 2,254i 2,25412,2541 451 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL' I 6.5041, 7,253 8 040� 9,221 TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASFI 6.25 8 10 13 �_ ! 7,258! 8.093 9 a53 10 49d NOTES: 1 SWORNI 0 0 0 1 0 CIVILIAN: 10 1 73 I ' Fort Collins Police Services 18 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION: COMMANDER CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE I CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF I UNIT; EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF SF - 2000 2005 12013 2020 20002005 2013' 20201 NOTES I WORK PLACES I OFFICES Commander l 1 7 1 1 200 : 213 200; 200'. 200'. 200 Lieutenant 0 1 1 1 : 1AO' i n. 1An' Inn' 1Rn SUBTOTAL � 1 200' 2001 200 200 1 CIRCULATION 25% : 50 50'• 50 50 1 OFFICES TOTAL 1 2 2 2 1 1 250 250' 250 250 I WORK STATIONS j ! Admin. Supervisory 80 91 80'� BOI 80 80� i Admin. Clerk 1 2 2 2 2 I 1 64 1281 1 128' 128 128''i SUBTOTALI 3 3 3 3 1 208' 208', 208' 208, 1 CIRCULATION 359/6 ! 731 731 73; 73 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 281i 2811 281 281 WORK PLACES TOTAL 1 4 j 5 1 5 5 1 1 5311 531 531 531 % INCREASE IN STAFF' 25 % 0 % 1 0% SPECIAL AREAS I AREAS j SUBTOTAL 1 I I I OI OI OI O, CIRCULATION 25%! i 0 1 0,, 0 0 AREAS TOTALI I 01 0 0.,' 0I I ROOMS Conference ' 2001 206 2001 200I 200I 200 1 Files ! I I 801 801 100' 1001 1001 !Copier/Fax/Supplies j :, 7201 120 120i 1201 120' 1 [oat Closet 1 S i 151 15I 151 151 SU0TO7ALi,j I 415: 4351 4351 435! CIRCULATION 25%, I 104I 1091 109I 109 ROOMS TOTAL, I I 1 1: 519! 544' 544 544 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL'; ! 519! 544' S44 5141 TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASFI ', 4 1 5 5 5 j j 1 11,05011,0751 1,0751 7 075I j SWORNI 2 2 'I 2 i [IVILIAN� 3 3 j 3' 3 Fort Collins Police Services 79 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION DRUG TASK FORCE CURRENT LOCATION: OFF SITE ;CURRENT: PROIECTED - STAFF REQUIRED STAFF I UNIT! EXISTAREA REQUIRED SF SF I 2000 2005! 2013! 2020! ! 1 2000 � 2005'. 2013' 2020]NOTES I WORK PLACES IOFFICES I Lieutenant 1 j 1 1 1 180 180, 180 180 180 1 Sergeants j 1 t 2 �, 2 150 150; 150' ISO 150, SUBTOTAL, 2 i 2 3 3 I 150 150! 150 150 CIRCULATION 25%'. ! 'i 1 38 38, 38, 38 OFFICES TOTAL. 2 2 3 3 ! 188 188, 188 188, I WORK STATIONS li I Officers 4 5 6 8 64 256, 320'. 384; 512' Secretary 11 1 I 1 1 1 64 64; 64,, 64! 64! SUBTOTAL] 5 6 !, 7 9 1 I j 3201 3841 448! 5761 CIRCULATION 35%i j 1721 134I�i 157I 202� j WORK STATIONS TOTAL] 5 I 6 7 9 1 1 4321 518' 605" 77W ! WORK PLACES.TOTALI 7 8 10 12 ! 620 706'. 792' 965i % INCREASE IN STAW 14 % 25 % 20% I SPECIAL AREAS I AREAS Monitor Room Telephone Room j !Conference / Training I 1 SUBTOTALI CIRCULATION 25%1 AREAS TOTAL I ROOMS 1 Interview j Equipments Storage I ! Personnel Lockers Computer / File Room SUBTOTAL! CIRCULATION 25%1 ROOMS TOTALI { SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL! TOTAL REDD STAFF & ASFI 7 8 10 12 I 1 11,80711,9561 2,26712,4401 NOTES: SWORN! ( 6 1 7 9 11 I CIVIUAN� , 1 1 I 1 1 Fort Collins Police Services 20 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION YOUTH SCHOOL TEAMS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE CURRENT i PROIECTED - STAFF ! REQUIRED STAFF I UNITi EXIST, AREA REQUIRED SF SF :.. 2000 120051 2013! 20201 '; 1 2000! 20051 2013: 20201 NOTES I WORK PLACES '.. !. I OFFICES 1 Sergeants 1 : 1 2 1 2 I i 150 109 150J 150! 300. 300 SUBTOTALS. I I 150� 150 300' 300' CIRCULATION 25% 38': 38, 75� 75. OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 ! 2 2 ! 188, 188. 375' 375 ! WORK STATIONS' j School Resource Officer 1 7 I 9 11 13 l j 48 !. 288 288 2B8! 288, 1 D.A.R.E. Officer 2 2 1 2 2 1 48 - 481 481 481 48' Officer W.S. 0 0 1 0 0 11 48 1 961 961 961 96! iPatrol Intern / Volunteer 0 0 I 0 I 0 36 72 72 721 72' SUBTOTAL:. 9 I 11 I 13 15 1 . 432 4321 1 4321 4321. CIRCULATION 35%� 1 j 151 151 151I 151I WORK STATIONS TOTAL. 583 5831 583i 5831 WORK PLACES TOTALi 10 12 13 17 7711 771I 9581 958: % INCREASE IN STAFF: ! 20 % 1 25% 13% 1 ! ! 1 SPECIAL AREAS AREAS i SUBTOTAL•. 1 I I 01 Oi CIRCULATION 25%� 1 ! 01 01 0' 0 . AREAS TOTAL. j 01 0 0 0 ROOMS f Conference Interview I 200 1. 180 0 I 01 0 0 Dare Storage 1001 I 150 148I 200 150 2001 1501 2001 150� 1 200'' 150 SUBTOTAL, j 350 350I 350i I 3501 CIRCULATION 25 % 1 ! 88 881 88 88I ROOMS TOTAL 1 1 I II 438 438 438 438 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 1 438 438 4381 438. !_ TOTAL REDD STAFF & ASF1 10 12 15 17 ' j 11,20811,2081 L39611,3961 NOTES: � I 10 I 12 I 15 I 17 CIVILIAN 0 0 0 0 Fort Collins Police Services 27 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION CRIMINAL IMPACT UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE I CURRENT, PROTECTED 1 - STAFF REQUIRED STAFF !. I Ui EXIST'- AREA REQUIRED SF SF 2000 1 20051 2013' 2020 i ! 2012005 20051 2013; 20201 NOTES I WORK PLACES ; OFFICES 1 Sergeant I 1 1 1 1 j ISO j , 150; 150150; 150. SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 150 150I 150 150. CIRCULATION 25%I 1 ! i 1 38 38' 38 38 OFFICES TOTAL, 1 1 1 1 1 1 788 188i 788 188 WORK STATIONS Warrant Clerk 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.i 64 1 128 128, 128! 128' I Officers .. 6 7 8 9 ! 64 448; 5121 5121 576, Volunteer WS 36 I 361 361 31 361 SUBTOTAL I 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 I� 6121 676' 6761 740, CIRCULATION 35%, I 2141 2371 237 259;' WORK STATIONS TOTAL I I 1 8261 9131 913': 999,� WORK PLACES TOTAL % INCREASE IN STAFF. 8.5 1 9.5 1 10.51 12% I 11% 11.51 1 10% 1 j 1 1,014! 1,100I 1,1001 1,187; SPECIAL AREAS I 1 AREAS NCIC Computer WS 1541 128 1281 128L 128 SUBTOTAL i I I I i I 128' 1281 1281 128 CIRCULATION 25%1 AREAS Ti OTALI 1 1 i 32i I 160; 321 160 321 1601 32�i 160' I 1, ROOMS 1 I SUBTOTAL 1 Ol OI 0 O' j CIRCULATION 25%I: 1 O 0) 01 01! ROOMS TOTAU 01 OI 0, O SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 160i 1601 1601 160! TOTAL REOD STAFF & A9F1 ! 8.3 9.5 10.5 11.5 1 11.17411.26011,260 1,347' NOTES: SWORNI 17 I e j 9 10 CIVILIANI 1 .5 1.5 , 1.5 I 1.5 Fort Collins Police Services 22 ENTITY: SECTION CURRENT LOCATION: I WORK PLACES I OFFICES I Sergeants FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS 300 LAPORTE I CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF ! UNIT:' EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF SF 2000 120052013 ! 2020 12000 2005 1 2013 : 2020: NOTES 1 1 2 2 ! 750 150 150. 300 300 ! SUBTOTALI 1 'i, 1 2 2 150 150' 300 300 OFFICES TOTAL! 1 1 2 ! 2 1'. 188' 188 375 375 WORK STATIONS Investigators 6 7 9 11 64 448'. 576: 576, 704'. Victims Svcs. Coordinator 1 1 1 1 64 '; 64, 64: 64. 64 I Victims Svcs. Advocate I 0.5 1 1 1 48 48, 481 48 48�: Clerical i I 0.5 0.5 I 0.5 i OS ' 48 1 1 481 48 4& 48; II SUBTOTAL'1 8 9.5 1 11.5 13.5 512 j 640, 640!, 7681 � 1 CIRCULATION 35% 179, 224 224 269: WORK STATIONS TOTAL' ! I 691 864''. 86411,0371 WORK PLACES TOTAL 1 9 10.51 13.5 15.5 j 879 1,05211,239; 1,4121 % INCREASE IN STAFF' I 17% 29%' 1595 SPECIAL AREAS 1 I AREAS I Reception ! ! i 18 90 90 90' 90 File Storage 1 201 80� 801 801 801 1 Coffee ! 1 60; 60! 601 601 601 SUBTOTAL ! 230 2301 230 230 CIRCULATION 25% 1 58 i 58i 58 58I AREAS TOTAL' I 288 1 2881 2881 2881 ! I ROOMS 1 Conference 1 200 1 0 0I 0 0 Monitor Room I 1 100! 100' 100' 100, 100 General Storage 80 80I 93 120 138 Equipment Storage I j 801 80 93! 120 138 i Interview ! ! 1001 200I 200 200! 200i Soh Interview I 150. 1501 150 150 1501 Coal Closet 1 15' 151 15 15I 15, 'Copy/Fax/Supplies 120,i i 720 120 120I 120 SUBTOTAL i 1 I 1 � 745 772 8251 867 CIRCULATION 25% ROOMS TOTAL' I j I 186 ' 193 206 215 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL' ( 931 17 219 965I 1.25 21 1,031 1 31911,363 1,076 1 TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASFI 1 9 10.5 13.5 15.5' ! 12,09712,30412,558!. 2,7751 1 NOTES: I SWORN 7' 8; Ili 131 CIVILIAN' 21 2.51 2.51 2.5i Foil Collins Police Services 23 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE I CURRENT- PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF UNIT! EXIST AREA REQUIRED I SF SF 2000 1 2005 20131 20201 1 ' 2000; 2005! 2013 20201NOTE5 WORK PLACES I OFFICES Sergeants 1 1 2 1 2 ISO 150! 150 300� 300, SUBTOTAL CIRCULATION 25% I 150 38 150 38 300 75 300 75' OFFICES TOTAL: 1 1 2 2 1 111& 188.. 375 375, WORK STATIONS 1 I Officers 7 1 9.5 11.5 13.51 64 608. 7361 736. 864' Police Report Spec. ! 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 64 64 64i 64' 64 1 Pawn Entry Clerk 0.5 1 1 1 I 64 1 64! 641 64: 641 Volunteers / Interns 0 1 0 0 0 64 1 i 1281 128! 128i 1281 !' i SUBTOTAL I I 8.5 11.5 13.51 15.5 664I 992 992i 1,120 CIRCULATION 35%� 3021 3471 347 392'. WORK STATIONS TOTAL] ! 11,16611,339!1 7 33911,5121 WORK PLACES TOTAL 9.5 i 12Z 15.5 I 17.5 1 7,3541 1,52Y t 714 1,887' % INCREASE IN STAFF I 32% 1 24% 13%I I 1 1 SPECIAL AREAS I i AREAS I Reception I 181 01 OI 0+ 0' File Storage 1 20� 60 79, 98 111 Coffee 60. 60 60 60I 60 Video Imaging -Work Station 1 1 64 64 64 64 64! SUBTOTALi 1 I I 114 203 222 235 i CIRCULATION 25%, I ! 46 57 55 S91 AREAS TOTAL! I 230 254.1 277 2931 I ROOMS Equipment Storage 80 80, 80 ! 80I j 801 I Conference Room / War Room 1 2001 400� 400, 400� 400 1Interview 100' 200 200 200' 200 Monitor Room 100 01 O 0 0 j SUBTOTAL I 680 680 680 680 CIRCULATION 25%i i 1 10 170 170 170 ROOMS TOTALS I 8501 850 8501 850 SPECIAL AREAS TOTALI 1 080 1.104 7 127 1.143 TOTAL REOD STAFF & AST! 1 9.5 12.5 15.5 17.5 1 2.4341 2,6301 2 8421 3,0301 NOTES: SWORN 185 10.5 73.51 15.51 CIVILIAN 2 2 1 2 j Fort Collins Police Services 24 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES CODE: COMMON FACILITIES CURRENT LOCATION: HQ CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF UNIT'. EXIST AREA REQUIRED AUTH SF SF 2000 ! 2005 2013 2020 ! 2000'' 2005 2013 20201 NOTES I WORK PLACES I OFFICES 0 0 0 1 0 0' 0 0. 0 SUBTOTAL' ! 0 0: 0'. 0' CIRCULATION 25%1i 1 0 0: 0 0'. OFFICES TOTALI1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0. 0 OI WORK STATIONS 1 I, SUBTOTAL O ! 0 I 000., 0. 00 CIRCULATION 25%I j OI 0' 0: 0 WORK STATIONS TOTAL; i 0' 0 0. 0'.. WORK PLACES TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0' Oj 0 Oj % INCREASE IN STAFF 0% 1 0% j 0% 1 1 1 I SPECIAL AREAS I'I AREA$ I Sworn Lockers j ! 10'',, 1,420. 1,68012,070, 1,435.. i Civilian Lockers Si 1 436! 500 578: 640; I Trainee Lockers ij 10 j 200" 2001 200 200; I Mens Toilet / Showers 575-. 1 575' 575, 575i 5751 Womens Toilet / Showers ! I I 575, 575; 575I 575I 575' Defensive Tactics I 3844 3,844j 3,844 3,1144 3,844 Exercise i 12000 2,00012,000 2,00012,000 i SUBTOTAL; 9,374� 9,842 10.269 CIRCULATION 25%'; I 2,263; 2,344i 2,460 2,5671 AREAS TOTAL',, ' I 11,313111,74 12,302i 12,836' ROOMS Break Room I i ! 530; 11 530 5301 5301 5301 I Break Room Support 250 250 250! 250I 150 Community Room I 01 01 0', 0 117001 Mens Sleep Rooms 120I I 120, 120' 1201 120 I Womenz Sleep Rooms i 120 120' 120 120' 120� SUBTOTAL; ! ! 1 I1,020; 1,020j 1,02011,020 CIRCULATION 25%1 j 2551 255I I 2551 255 ROOMS TOTAL' 1,275I 1,275I 1,27511,275 1 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL: 112,588'. 12.993 13,577114,111 i TOTAL READ STAFF & NSF! 0 0 0 0 1 11.588' 1x,9971. 73Sn114,n 1 Fort Collins Police Services 25 NIJNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE National Institute of Justice Jeremy Travis Director This technical effort to develop this report was conducted under Interagency Agreement No. 94-IJ-R-004, Project No. 97-0101A. This report was prepared with the assistance of the Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the direction of Alim A. Fatah, Program Manager for Chemical Systems and Materials, and Kathleen M. Higgins, Director of OLES. Editorial support was provided by Aspen Systems Corporation. The work was sponsored by the National Institute of Justice, David G. Boyd, Director, Office of Science and Technology. Findings and conclusions of the research reported here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The National Institute of Justice is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and Office for Victims of Crime. ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES -SUMMARY For HARMONY BUILDING SECTION ALL SECTIONS CURRENT LOCATION: ALL LOCATIONS PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY ' CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF -„EXIST. AREA REQUIRED I -. SF 2000 ! 2005 2013 2020! 2000 2005 2013 2020 I DIVISION (Administration j 5.5 75 '. 10.5 130 2,469 3,244 3,244 3,657 I Patrol/Commander 0. 0.0 o.o�, 0.0 0.0 ( 0� 0'• 0' 0 I Palml 46.0 53.0'. 61.0' 70.0 1 8.591 9,206' 9,5621 9,787, I Patrol / Dist. l III 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ! 0�', 0'; 0:' 0' I Patrol /Traffic 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0, 0 01 1 Patrol /SDU.., 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0'i 0- a !Patrol I P.O.P. O.o 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 ; 0' 0, 0 0: I lniormation Services / Director 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0. 0 0. I Information Services/Systems ! 1.5 1.5 i 3.0 3.0 i 548 548:, 634' 634'.. I Information Services/Dispatch 27.5 31.5 1 36.5 41.0 1 4,0511 4,394, 4622 4,695 I Information Services / Records I I 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0I 259 359 259 Information Services /P&E 7.0 8.0 13.0 7,258 7,756! 8632: 9.941; Investigative Services/Commander 0.0 110.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0' 0, V 0 Investigative Services / DTF 0.0 1 0.0 i 0.0 0.0 ! 1 O 0 0i 0' Investigative Services/Youth School 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0�, 0i 01 0I Investigative Services /Crim. Impact 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 01 Oi 0'; 01 Investigative Services /Person Crimes 00 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 1 ( 01 Di O 0! Investigative Services / Prop. Crimes 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 01 0'., Oi 01 1 Common Facilities 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 9,1521 9,311 9,5021 9,6931 i 1 II I SUBTOTAL, 875 1045I 121.0 143.OI 32.0691 34,7191 36,455i 38,i66,. i B UILDI NG GROSS FACTOR 25%'� 8,0171 8,67911 9,114 9,667'_ STAFF AND GROSS AREA TOTAL' 87.3 104.5 1 124.0 143.0 40,086 43.3971 45.569' 48,333 1 Area totals do not include District 1 SECTION BY DIVISION PROPOSED .LOCATION: HARMONY j CURRENTi PROTECTED Ii STAFF REQUIRED STAFF I EXIST, AREA REQUIRED j I I 2000 2005 1 2013 1 2020 i 1 2000 . 2005 I 2013 2020 I IDIVISION IAdminislotion 5.5 7.5 10.5 13.0 � 3,469 3,2443,2/4 1 3,bi7' 'Patrol ! 46.0 53.0 61.0 1 70.0 I 8,591 9,206 9,5621 9,7871, Information Services 1 36.0 ".01 52.5 60A i 11,8571 1"57i 14,147 15,S291 investigative Services Common Facilities 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 i 0.0 ` 0.0 i 0.0 OA I 1 0 ( 9,1521 0, 0! 9,311i 9,503I 01 9,693 SUBTOTAL, 87.5 104.5 124.0 143.0 ! 32,069I 34,718 36,455 38,666 BUILDING GROSS FACTOR 25% 1 1 1 I ! B,on. 8,679 9,t14 9,w71 STAFF AND GROSS AREA TOTAL 875 104.5 1 114.0 1143 0 i 40,0861 43,3971 /5,569. 48,333I STAFFING SWORN & CIVILIAN PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENiPROTEED STAFF R UIREDSTCTAFF 1 I 2000 1 20052013 2026 sworn 44.0' 5 2.SI 63.51 75.0; , iCivilian 4351 52.01 60.5� 68.0 I i1 1 TOTAL, 87.5' IN.51 124.01 1430 - Notes: 1 District 1 area is not included in the total required area for the new facility. 26 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - ADMINISTRATION SECTION: ADMINISTRATION CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY I CURRENT PROJECTED i STAFF REQUIRED STAFF ! 1 UNIT! EXIST AREA REQUIRED AUTH I i , SF SF 2000 1 2005 ! 2013 12020 ' 2000 2003 2013 1 2020 1 NOTES I WORK PLACES ! I OFFICES I Police Chief 1 1 j 1 1 j ! 225. 263 225 225 225 225', I Deputy Chief 0 I', 0,! 0 0 200'� 0. 0 0 0•' IPmf. Standards Lt. 0 O 0 0 j 200 177;. 0 0 0 0. Exec Staff Proj Mgr. 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 180 123'. 01 0', 0 0 ISuff Psychologist 1. A. Sergeant 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 i 200 151) 127 0 0 0 0 0 U 0' 0' !Training Sergeant Officer 1 1 1 2.5 1 1 5.5 2 7 ISO 120 155 150 120 15D:. 660 150 660 300' 940- ITraining BudgetCnordinalor 0 0 0 0 ! 120 116 0; 01 D'; 0� !Budget Tech 0 0 0 0 120 ! 1201, 1201 1201 120 Legal 0 0 0 0 150 i I Oj D•'. O O! SUBTOTALi 1 615 1,155I 1,15511,4851j CIRCULATION 25 / j OFFICES TOTALI 3 i I 4,5 7.5 I 10 1541 7691 289,i 1,444: 289' 1,44411,8561 371 i WORKSTATIONS I Admin Aide III (Chief's Sec.) 1 1 1 1 1 160 192 • I 160 160i 160I 160 1C/T 1 0 0 0 0 1 64 01 0, 01 01 Training Supply Technician i 0.75 1 1 1 64 64 641 641 6C Supply / Range Tech 0.75 1 1 I 64 I 641 64I 64l 64�, Planning Tech 0 0 1)1 ! 0 64 O' OI OI OI SUBTOTAL! I 2.5 1 3 3 3 I i 2881 2881 2881 288I CIRCULATION 35% I I 1011 1011 loll 101 WORK STATIONS TOTAL I 1 I 3891 3891 389 389 WORK PLACES TOTALI I 5.5 7.5 105 13 I 11,158i 1,833 1,83312,245 % INCREASE IN STAFF! 1 36% 40 % 24% SPECIALAREAS AREAS Waiting and Reception i� { 18� 1801 180 180! LBO, Library/Media 11 200 Oj 01 OI O Exec Staff Wk Room ! I 120 0! 0l 01 0 Volunteer Work Area 1 64 Oi 0l 0� 0 SUBTOTAL �l � CIRCULATION25% i 180� 63i 180; 63 180 63I 1BO 631 AREAS TOTAL !1 243 243I 243 243 +ROOMS Conference ( 480� 574I 480 480! 480 4801 Files 80 80 1201 120I 120 Training Files 80 33! 80 120 120 120' Copier/Fax/Supplies 120 282 120 120 120 120 Coat Closet I 15! 15I 15 15 15 Rest Rooms 40� 80 80 80 80 IA File Storage 801 O 01 01 O Personnel Files I 80I 0 0! OI O� Uniform/Equip. Storage I I O 01 Oi OI Coffee I I I I 60 60) 60 601 60 SUBTOTAL!! I ! 855I 935 935 935 CIRCULATION 25%' ROOMS TOTAL!' , I I 214 11,069i 234 1,769 234 7,769 234 7,169I SPECIAL AREAS TOTAU ! i ! _ i 1,312; 1,41T!, 1,41211,412 f TOTAL REQD STAFF & ASF I 5.3 1 75 10.5 1 13 2,469: 3,244 3.244; 3,657 SWORN 3 4.5 I TS i 10 CIVILIAN! j 2.5 3 3 3 27 ENTITY: SECTION: CURRENT LOCATION: PROPOSED LOCATION: ]OFFICES (Commander [Lieutenant 1 I Operations U. 11 SUBTOTAL; [ CIRCULATION 25%i I OFFICES TOTAL' I WORK STATIONS j �Admin. Aide 1 I Volunteer SUBTOTAL( CIRCULATION 35- WORK STATIONS TOTAL] WORK PLACES TOTAL'. i % INCREASE IN STAFF; AL AREAS S /Fax/Supply SUBTOTAL CIRCULATION 25%1 AREAS TOTAL; '45 rence Room SUBTOTAL CIRCULATION 25%I ROOMS TOTAL FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES PATROL COMMANDER 300 LAPORTE HARMONY I CURRENT. STAFF 2000 PROJECTED REQUIRED STAFF I UNIT EXIST SF SF 2005 2013 12020 i AREA REQUIRED 20001 2005 2013 2220 1 NOTES 0 I 0 0 0 ;�� 200 211 0� 0 0', 0' 0 0 1 0 0 1 180 0 0�1 0. 0' 0 0 0 0 150 1 ' 0'. 0! 0! 0 ; 0 0 0 0 I 01 01 0'. 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 80 01 01 01 0� 1 64 01 0; 0'i Oj 0 1 0 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 0 I I 01 DI 01 01 0'1 0' 01 0 Oi, 0 0 01 60I i 0 0 � 0 I 0 120, 0 01 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 Oi 0 0 0 01 011, 0 0 250 I 0 0 01 0 0 0 0, 0 p; p p' pl 01 0 Oi Oi 0 0 TOTAL READ 0 1 0 0 0 ], 0i 0 00 NOTES: RNORNO 0 0 0 0 CIVILIAN 0 O 0 O 28 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: DISTRICT 1 CURRENT LOCATION: OLD TOWN SQUARE I CURRENT. STAFF AUTH 2000 PROJECTED REQUIRED STAFF ! 2005', 2013 ! 20201 ! UNIT! EXIST SF SF AREA REQUIRED 1 2000 2005 : 2013 2020 ; NOTES I WORK PLACES (OFFICES :Sergeant 0 0 0 0 i 120 0, D 0 0 I! SUBTOTAL!' ! ! ij '., 0 0 0 i 0 CIRCULATION 25%r 0 0. 0 0' OFFICES TOTAL! j 0 0 0! 0! 0 0 0 0 (WORKSTATIONS I C/T 1' 0 0 0 0 1! 64 0 0 OI 0� IONtcer 0 0 0 0 87 0 0. 1) 0�'. SUBTOTAL) 0 0! 0 0 I I 0' 0� 0 CIRCULATION 35 % ! ! ! 0!0I 0 01 WORKSTATIONS TOTALi 01 0! 0! 0� WORKPLACESTOTALI 0 0 0 I 0 I I 00 01, 0; 0 %INCREASE IN STAFF! I #####!#####I#####' ! ISPECIALAREAS IAREAS Open Office( ! 0! OI 0! 0' ! SUBTOTAL( ! I 0! 0: 0; 0 CIRCULATION 25%I AREAS TOTAL' i i ! I I OI 0 0 0,. DI Oi 0 0' ROOMS III I !i Community Room Bicycle Storage j I I 0, 0! 01, 0 OI DI 01. 0 j SUBTOTAL(( I I OI DI 01 0 CIRCULATION 25 %, ROOMSTOTALI ! ! 01 01 01 01 0; 0 0' 01 L SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL! 0, 01 0, 01 j TOTAL READ STAFF & ASFI 0 i 0 i 0 0 ! ! 0! OI 01 0 NOTES: LSWORN( 0 I D! 0 i 0 CIVILIAN, 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 Staff counts are included in staffing and projections. Area is not included in building requirements. 29 ENTITY: fORTCOLUNS POLICESERWCES-PATROL SERVICES SEC N: PATRO'. CURRENTLOCATION: 3IR LAIORTE PR(MOSED LOCATION: HAR6gNY C1111REM PROTECTED STAFF R WRFD STAFF IIWOI MIST, ARFAt R[0 1 Si SF 1W0 xw3 x013 xOxO 20001 MS I M13 I M20 � NOTES 1J1 WORNPIA[FS OFFICE Le .' 2 2 2 2 ISO 360 ]60I l60 360 C07N Wn l I I I I ISO 110I uol Isa lsn u0� R&DA5m3ger 0 0 0 a ISO 0 a 0 01 SUBTOTAL 510 510 51a SID CIRCULATION 25% 1Zoo 13B 11B 128 OFFMTOTAL 3 3 3 3 "al 0e SS "a WORK STATIONS 15L,' < 6 > e Ba 320 080 SW "0 Eaely Weak DAY SHUT Of. 5 6 > 8 0 0 0 0 O 00 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 .Wa DAY 5HIn Oh. 5 6 > 8 CSO 1 1 I 1 EARLY WEEK SWING SHIFT Oman 5 6 > B a 0 D 0 0 cso 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 EARLY WEEK MIDNIGHT SHIFT 00m 5 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 LATE WEEK SWING SMiT Olfan > R 9 10 0 0 0 0 a C30 1 1 1 1 0 0 a 0 a LATEWEEKWONIGMSHoT Off. 3 3 6 J 0 0 0 0 0 Gso 0 D a 0 o D o D a POSTER SHIFT Ofi. 3 E 3 6 SUBTOTAL AJ 50 Se 67 3l0 080 560 w0 ORNLATION 35% 112 168 1% x2a WORK51A110NSTOTAL Tfx 1,1D t,Jii 1.Sw WORK RMES TOTAL 06 53 61 70 1,390 1,>K 1,938 3.10] x IMRE.LSE IN STAFF 15% 151 ux SRAREAS AREAS va8d Re. 18 a o a 0 Repro Writing ze 2N 252 2e0 E p ti0n 250 ISOi _Rie La a Gee., 150 ISO 150 ISO 150 173 File Sorge 120 750 150 In In 120 120 caneR Iza uo Ixo tzo u0: SUBTOTAL 1166 917 9/5 9>3'. CRD3JLATlON2S% 303 321 331 360'i AREAS TOTAL 1,169 1,131 1.276 1,313 ROOWS Inge.SO— IN IN 200 200 WO Son Yrkevr Room ISO ISO ISO ISO ISO Suweet mn^'^ IN 200 200 200 200 Ioee.Imarvknv IN 200 ZOO 2IR zoo RON Call 18 367 3" 3% 501 SIR FTO Training Rm CID 170 120 120 120 C3niemece 200 0 a 0 0 Sn .Cwkoeex IN 1IR ISO IN ISO Ewc Des . 200 200 zW 200 20n 5'w15beR 400 25 0 0 0 0 A^pY 150 0 0 0 0 TnIww% 600 534 1.700 1,>00 VOO 1.700 T.—,R EOC C� 216 216 116 216 Back Sv 330 350 350 330 350 Sall, Pan no no 720 n0 no S01Pe0P .Pz 150 0 a 0 0 Boo1i^g 250 Dz 150 150 ISO 150 Pruaeee P,epmy s 0 0 0 0 mv. Pehaer PeepaAy 23 0 0 0 0 SID cl mW So 10 % % % kop Do 60 IR 6o 60 DRR000 6o 6o w 60 60 AdNkiwd ORD, T1 So 0 0 0 0 W.enik Fbldng Cdh 70 0 0 D 0 Sam,CNl >0 0 0 a a Fot Axi 6o Go 6a SO 60 Liw L3P 252 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL .K836 1.%2 STS6 5.0% C111NIATION 25% 1]07 1241 1,x67 1267 R00615 TOTAL 6AU CSDS 6313 t,II3 SRCFALAREASTOTAL T,xm 'AID IAw TY6 IOTAI YEOO STAFf1 AEF 16 53 61 >a a3F1 B]R6 BtO 5,m NOTES: Il M 36 fii OWLWN S 5 s 30 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: TRAFFIC UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENT' PROIECFED STAFF RE UIRED STAFF )UNIT EXIST' AREA REQUIRED I SF SF 2000 2005 2013 r 2000 2003 2013 2020 I NOTES I WORK PLACES I I OFFICES Sergeant 0 0 0 1 0 I50 0� 0, 0 Oi SUBTOTAL 0� 0� 0 0j CIRCULATION 25% OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0; 01 0 0 0 0 0 0. WORK STATIONS Offers 0 0 0 0 0 0I 0 0 O DUI Officer 0 0 0 0 0 I 01 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 CIRCULATION 35% 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % INCREASE IN STAFF ##### ##### ##### SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Work Stations 28 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 01 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Traffic Storage 200 0 0 0 0 Conference 200 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF 1 0 1 0 1 0 11 1 1 01 01 01 0 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 0 0 CIVILIAN 0 0 0 0 31 ENTRY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: SELECTIVE DUTIES UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENT PROIECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF UNIT EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF 5F 2000 i 2005 2013 1 2020 j 2000 20052013 20201NOTE5 WORK PLACES OFFICES Sergeant 0 0 0 0 150 90 0 0 Oi O I SUBTOTAL 0 0 01 0 CIRCULATION 25% OFFICES TOTAL WORK STATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oi 0i 01 0 0 01 Officers 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 Oj 0 Intern Work Stations - 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIR.CULATION35%1 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % INCREASE IN STAFF xxxxtt tttttttttt tttttttttt SPECIAL AREAS AREAS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION25% 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS jCrime Prev. Storage 100 0 0 0 0 SOU Stor. 150 112 0 0 0 0 Copier/Fax/5upplies 120 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION25% 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTALI I I 1 0 0 0 0 TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASP 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 0 CIVILIAN O 0 D 1 0 32 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: P.O.P. UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY I CURRENT PROTECTED j STAFF REQUIRED STAFF I UNIT I EXIST! AREA RE UIRED SF SF I I 1 2000 2005 1 2013 12020 I I 1 2000 12005 12013 12020 I NOTES WORK PLACES OFFICES Lieutenant 0 0 0 0 180 0 O Oi O SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 WORK STATIONS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 CIRCULATION35% 0 0 0 0 WORKSTATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 O 0 0 0I 0 0 0 % INCREASE IN STAFF xAzez ez.TAs .uu SPECIAL AREAS l AREAS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Conference 200 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION25% 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 0 ol 0 0 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF 1 0 I 0 I 0 F071 1 _ __ 0 0 O Ol NOTES: SWORN 0 D 0 0 CIVILIAN 0 0 0 0 33 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: DIRECTOR CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENT PROTECTED STAFF - RE UIRED STAFF I UNITI EXIST' AREA REQUIRED 2000 2005 2013 12020 SF SF 2000 20051 120201 NOTES WORK PLACES OFFICES Dimao, 0 0 0 0 200 0 0i 0 of SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0' CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i WORK STATIONS Admin. A 1. 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 35 % 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INCREASE IN STAFF ##### #####I##### SPECIAL AREAS AREAS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25 % 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25 % 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 TOTAL R D STAFF & ASF1 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 I I I 0 0 0 0 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 I 0 1 0 CIVILIAN 0 0 0 0 34 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: SYSTEMS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENT PROTECTED STAFF RE UIRED STAFF I UNIT � EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF SF 2002005 1 2013 2020 1 1 2000 12005 1 2013 2020 I NOTES I WORK PLACES OFFICES i SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 DI CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS Volunteers 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 Systems Manager 0 0 0 0 80 I 0 0 0 0 Systems Analyst 1 1 1 1 64 64 64 64 64 Computer Maintenance Spec. 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0, 0 CAD Project Mgr. 0.5 0.5 1 1 64 64 64 64 64 Radio Tech 0 0 1 1 64 0 0 64 64 SUBTOTAL 1.5 1.5 3 3 128 128 192 192 CIRCULATION 35% 45 45 67 67 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 173 173 259 259 WORK PLACES TOTALI 1.5 1.5 3 3 173 173 259 259 % INCREASE IN STAFF 0% 100% 0% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Computer Room 200 200 200 200 200 Computer Storage / Receiving 100 100 100 100 100 SUBTOTAL 300 300 300 300 CIRCULATION 25 % 75 75 75 75 ROOMS TOTAL 375 375 375 375 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 1 375 375 375 375 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF 1.5 1 1.3 j 3 3 548 548 634 634 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 0 0 CIVILIAN 1.5 1.5 3 3 35 Table of Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................................. I TechnicalWorking Group................................................................................................................3 ExecutiveSummary ..........................................................................................................................5 Overview............................................................................................................................................7 Planning..............................................................................................................................................9 Design................................................................................................................................................19 Construction..................................................................................................................................... 51 Moving..............................................................................................................................................59 Appendixes....................................................................................................................................... 71 Appendix I: Description of Spaces by Laboratory Sections Appendix II: Laboratory Design Standards and Modules Appendix III: Forensic Computer Examination Laboratory Statement of Work Appendix IV: Move -in Plan Appendix V: Statement of Work for the Commercial Moving Services References iii ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: DISPATCH CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENT I PROJECTED I STAFF REQUIRED STAFF II UNITI E%IST AREA REQUIRED � SF SF 2000 I2005� 2013 2020 I 2000 1 20051 20131 2020 NOTES I WORK PLACES OFFICES 1180 Communications Manager 1 t 1 1 180 180 180i 180I SUBTOTAL 180 180I 180i 180 CIRCULATION 25% 45 45 45 451 OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 1 1 225 225 225 225 WORK STATIONS Supervisor 5.5 5.5 5.5 6 80 440 440 440 480 Dispatchers / Call Takers 21 25 30 34 80 80 560 800 960 960 Call Taker Consoles 64 32C 320 320 320 SUBTOTAL 26.5 30.5 35.5 40 1,320 1,560 1,720 1,760 CIRCULATION 35 % 462 546 602 616 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 1,782 2,106 2,322 2,376 WORK PLACES TOTAL 275 31.5 36.5 41 2,007 2,331 2547 2,601 % INCREASE IN STAFF 15% 16 % 12% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS 911 Telephone 120 120 120 120 120 120 Radio/Phone 500 217 500 500 500 500 UPS/Switchgear 200 200 200 200 200 SUBTOTAL 820 820 820 820 CIRCULATION 25% 205 205 205 205 AREAS TOTAL 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 ROOMS Conference 200 200 200 200 200 Kitchen / Break 200 200 200 200 200 Training Work Room 150 150 150 150 ISO Copier / Fax / Supplies 120 120 120 120 120 Dispatch Lockers 5 65 80 90 105 Rest Rooms 40 80 80 80 80 SUBTOTAL 615 830 840 855 CIRCULATION 25% 204 208 210 214 ROOMS TOTAL 1,019 1,050 1,069 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 2,044 ""R 2,063 -2,075 2,094 TOTAL REQD STAFF & ASF 1 27.5 315 365 41 14,05114,394 a 622 4,695 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 0 0 CIVILIAN 27.5 31.5 365 41 36 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES- INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: RECORDS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY . CURRENT, PROJECTED ''' STAFF REQUIRED STAFF I UNIT EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF SF 2000 1 2005, 2013 2020 ! 2000; 2005 2013 2020I NOTES I WORK PLACES OFFICES I Records Manager 0 0', 0 0 1 150 137 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL( I ! 0. 0, 0. 0. CIRCULATION 25%i 1 ! 0 0'. 0 0. OFFICES TOTAL' 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0. IWORKSTATIONS !; Supervisor U U' Police Report Specialists i,' 0 3 ' u u I 3 3 ! au i u, ul ui u, 64 1 0192: 192 192! Police Data Tech !I 0 0 i 0 0 64 i 0 0- O 0'. Public Into Database Workstation 0 0 1 0 0 64 01 6 01, 0. Desk Officer 0 O i O i O 64 O 01 OI 0'. SUBTOTAL 1; 0 3 1 3 I 3 I! � 01 192 1 192! 192' CIRCULATION 35%! 1 ! j 01 67! 671 67 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0' 259'. 2591 2591 WORK PLACES TOTA 1 ! 0 3 I 3 3 1 0` 259' 259', 259'I % INCREASE IN STAFF I =91 0% 1 0% i I ISPECIALAREAS (AREAS SUBTOTAL( 1 I I I 0'I 01 0� 0 CIRCULATION 25%j 1 Oj 0 0! 01 AREASTOTALI 01 0 01 01 i ROOMS Conference ! 200 01 0 0 0!, I Records File Storage 200� 0! 0�1 OI 01 (Mail Room I 200. 01 0i 0 O I Central Supply 1 600I 380I 0� 0� O 01 .' I Press Room 1 ! 0! 01 0i Oi Copier / Fax / Supplies / MF 1501 1301 O, 0 0' 0; Rest Rooms 1 ' III 401 651 Oi OI 01 0 Coffee /Break ! I I 1 W 2131 OI 0 OI O SUBTOTAL!1 OI 0 0 01 CIRCULATION 25%j ' 0' 0 0 0 ROOMSTOTAL! 1 I 0 0� 0 OI SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL ' O 0I 0 01 I TOTAL REQD STAFF & ASIF : 0 3 3 3 I D'2591 T59: 259 NOTES: SWORN! i 0 0 0! 0 CIVILIAN! i 0 I 3 3 1 3 1 37 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION PROPERTY / EVIDENCE / LAB CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE & OFF SITE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENT PROTECTED li j STAFF RE UIRED STAFF UNFT EKISTi AREA REQUIRED SF SF 2000 2005 2013 2020 1 2000 2005 2013 20201 NOTES PLACES WORKPLACES OFFICES Supervisor SUBTOTAL CIRCULATION25% OFFICES TOTAL WORK STATIONS Property/ Evidence Technicians Crime Scene Investigators AFIS Tech. Lab Clerical SUBTOTAL CIRCULATION35% WORK STATIONS TOTAL WORK PLACES TOTAL % INCREASE IN STAFF 1 1 2 2 1 1 6 7 t 1 2 3 1 1 7 8 14% 1 1 3 4 1 1 9 10 25% 2 2 4 5 1 1 11 13 30% j 110 64 64 100 64 I 110 150 38 188 128 120 100 64 420 147 5671 755 150 150 38 1881 1281 1921 100 64 484 169 653 841 150i 150 38 188 192 256 100 64 612 214 926 1,014 216 2161 54I 2701 256 320 100 64 740 259 999 1,269 SPECIALAREAS AREAS P/E Storage 1,151 1,151 1151 1,315 1,644 2, 138 Narcotics Storage 150 150 150 150 150 Secure Storage 150 150 150 150 150 Large Property Storage 547 547 547 625 781 1,016 Evidence Processing 150 150 171 214 279 Vehicle Processing 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 Dry Room 80 72 80 91 114 149 Bid - Clean Up 40 40 46 57 74 AFIS/Livescan 80 80 80 80 80 SUBTOTAL 3,448 3.729 4,291 5,135 CIRCULATION 25% 862 932 1,073 1,284 AREAS TOTAL 4,310 4,661 5,364 6,419 ROOMS Conference 200 200 200 200 200 Forensic File Room 120 120 168 168 168 Photo Room 100 9S 100 100 100 100 Change Room 60 60 60 60 60 Crime Lab 430 430 430 43D 43D Latents 100 100 100 100 100 Trace Evidence 115 115 115 115 115 Digital Imaging 120 120 120 120 120 Crime Lab Storage 70 70 70 70 70 Evidence Packaging / Storage 120 120 720 120 120 Viewing Room 200 200 200 20D 20D Copier/Fax 120 98 120 120 120 120 SUBTOTAL 1,755 1,803 1,803 1,803 CIRCULATION 25% 439 451 451 451 ROOMS TOTAL 2,194 2,254 2,254 2,254 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 6,504 6,915 7,618 8,672 TOTAL REQD STAFF & ASF1 7 8 10 13 1 1 1 7X81 7,7561 11,6321 9,941 NOTES: 1 I SWORN 0 0 0 0 CIVILIAN 7 8 10 13 38 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION: COMMANDER CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENTI PROTECTED STAFF RE UIRED STAFFUNIT EXISTi AREA REQUIRED $F SF 1 I j � I 2000 2005 2013 2020 2000 2005 12013 12020 1 NOTES WORK PLACES OFFICES Commander 0 10 0 0 200 213 0 01 01 0 Lieutenant 0 0 0 0 180 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 01 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS Admin. Supervisor 0 0 0 0 80 94 0 0 0 011 Admin. Clerk 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0' SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK 9TATIONSOTOTAL 0 0i 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0', 0 0 % INCREASE IN STAFF ##### ###a# II#### ESPECIAL AREAS AREAS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 D 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Conference 200 206 0 0 0 0 Files j 80 0 0 0 0 Copier/FawSupplies 120 0 0 0 0 Coat Closet 15 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 01 0 0 0 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF 0 0 1 0 F 0 0 0 0 0 SWORN 0 0 0 0 CIVILIAN 0 0 0 0 39 ENTRY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION DRUG TASK FORCE CURRENT LOCATION: OFF SITE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF ! REQUIRED STAFF UNIT EXIST AREA REQUIRED 2000 ! 2005 2013 2020 SF SF 2000 1 2005 2013 12020 I NOTES WORK PLACES OFFICES Lieutenant 0 0 0 0 I 180 0 0 0, 0 Sergeants 0 0 0 0 II 1 150 0 0 0; 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS Officers 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 OI 0 Secretary 11 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 O 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 35% 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % INCREASE IN STAFF zzzzz zzxz zzzzz SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Monitor Room 100 0 O 0 0 Telephone Room 80 0 0 0 0 Conference/Training 100 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Interview 100 0 0 0 0 Equipment Storage 120 0 0 0 0 Personnel Lockers 10 0 0 0 0 Computer / File Room 200 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 TOTAL R D STAFF & ASF 1 0 0 0- 0 11 1 1 01 0 0 0 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 0 0 CIVILIAN 0 0 40 ENTRY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION YOUTH SCHOOL TEAMS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY j CURRENT I PROJECTED i 1 STAFF REQUIRED STAFF UNIT EXISTI AREA RE UIRED 2000 1 2005 2013 2020 SF SF 2000 2005 2013 1 2020 j NOTES WORKPLACES �— OFFICES Sergeants 0 0 D 0 ISO 109 D 0' 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 O CIRCULATION 25% 1 0' 0 0 0 OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 01 0 Oi 0' WORK STATIONS I School Resource Officer 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 D.A.R.E. Officer 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 Patrol Officer W.S. 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 O Intent / Volunteer 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 CIRCULATION35% 0 0 O 0 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INCREASE IN STAFF SPECIAL AREAS AREAS SUBTOTAL 0 0 O 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 O 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Conference 200 180 0 0 0 0 Interview 100 0 0 0 0 Dare Storage 150 148 O 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 D 0 CIRCULATION25% 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF1 0 0 0 01 1 1 0 0 0 0 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 D 0 CIVILIAN 0 0 0 0 41 ENTRY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION CRIMINAL IMPACT UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENT' PROTECTED 1 STAFF AE UIRED STAFF I UNITI SF E%1ST I SF AREA RE UIRED 2000 1 2005 2013 2020 2000 2005 ; 2013 12020 WORKPLACES OFFICES Sergeant 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 01 0 SUBTOTAL 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% O 0 0 Oi OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0' WORK STATIONS Warrant Clerk 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 Officers 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 Volunteer WS 36 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 35% 0 0 0 O WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % INCREASE IN STAFF ##### ##### ##### SPECIAL AREAS AREAS NCIC Computer WS 64 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION25% 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 0 0 CIVILIAN 0 0 0 0 NOTES 42 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENT I PROJECTED ! STAFF RE UIRED STAFF UNIT j EXIST! AREA REQUIRED SF j SF I 2000 2005 2013 2020 12000 1 2005 12013 1 2020 I NOTE5 WORK PLACES I OFFICES Sergeants 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 O Ol I SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 O1 OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 WORK STATIONS Investigators 0 0 0 0 64 0' 0 0 0 Victims Svcs. Coordinator 0 0 0 0 64 0� 0 0 0 Victims Svcs. Advocate 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 Clerical 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 35% 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 It 0 0 p 0 0 0 % INCREASE IN STAFF Czi#kl #aJOR uAF7A SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Reception 18 0 0 0 0 File Storage 20 0 0 0 0 Coffee 60 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Conference 200 0 0 0 0 Monitor Room 100 0 0 0 0 General Storage 60 0 0 0 0 Equipment Storage 80 0 0 0 0 Intervew 100 0 0 0 0 Soft Interview 150 0 0 0 0 Coat Closet Copy/Fax/Supplies 15 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 TOTAL REQD STAFF & ASF 1 0 0 0 0 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 0 0 CIVILIAN 0 0 0 0 43 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF 1 REQUIRED STAFF (UNIT EXIST! AREARE UIRED I SF SF 2000 1 2003 1 2013 j 2020 1 2000 12005 1 2013 12020 l NOTES I WORK PLACES !OFFICES Sergeants 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 01 01 SUBTOTAL 0 D O O CIRCULATION 25 % 0 0 0 0 OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS Officers 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 Police Report Spec. 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 Pawn Entry Clerk 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 Volunteers / Interns 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 35N 0 0 0 0 WORKSTATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLANS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %INCREASE IN STAFF ##### s#### ##### SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Reception 18 0 0 0 0 File Storage 20 0 0 0 0 Cuffee 60 0 0 0 0 Video Imaging Work Station 64 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 255. U 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Equipment Storage BO 0 0 0 0 Conference Room / War Room 200 0 0 0 0 Interview 100 0 0 0 0 Monitor Room 100 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 O 0 0 CIRCULATION 25 k 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 - 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 0 0 901 0 TOTAL RZOD STAFF & ASF1 0 0 0 0 I I 1 0 0 0 0 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 1 0 CIVILIAN 1 0 0 0 0 44 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES CODE: COMMON FACILITIES CURRENT LOCATION: HQ PROPOSED LOCATION: HARMONY CURRENT PROIEC7ED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF UNIT EXISTI AREA REQUIRED AUTH SF Sf 2000 2005 2013 2020 2000 2005 2013 2020 WORK PLACES OFFICES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 jo WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % INCREASE IN STAFF 0% 0% 0% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Swom Lockers 10 440 525 635 750 Civilian Lockers 5 218 260 303 340 Trainee Lockers 10 200 200 200 200 Mens Toilet/Showers 300 300 300 300 300 Womens Toilet/Showers 300 300 300 300 300 Defensive Tactic 3844 3,844 3,844 3,944 3,844 Exercise 1000 11000 110D0 11000 1,000 SUBTOTAL 6,302 6,429 6,582 6,734 CIRCULATION 25% 1,575 1,607 1,645 1,684 AREAS TOTAL 7,877 8,036 8,227 8,418 ROOMS Break Room 530 530 530 530 530 Break Room Support 250 250 250 250 250 Community Room 1700 0 0 0 0 Mens Sleep Roams - 120 120 120 120 120 Womens Sleep Rooms 120 120 120 120 120 SUBTOTAL 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,020 CIRCULATION 25% 255 255 255 255 ROOMS TOTAL 1,275 1,275 1,275 1,275 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 9,152 9,311 9,02 9,693 TOTAL RE D STAFF &NSF 0 0 0 0 9,1521 9,311 9,502 9,693 NOTES: NOTES 45 Foreword As president of the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors (ASCLD) during 1995-96, I received numerous requests for information on many topics. Information on forensic laboratory design was one of the more frequently requested items. The need for a document that dealt with the many aspects of building a new labora- tory was obvious. I requested assistance from Dr. Richard Rau at the National Institute of Justice to develop such a document. Under Dr. Rau's direction and through the leadership of Kathleen Higgins, Director, Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES), this project was funded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology/OLES. Additionally, they provided support and direction throughout the development of this document. The document, Forensic Laboratories: Handbook for Facility Planning, Design, Construction, and Moving, is the product of a 2-day seminar where 23 professionals met, divided into four groups, and created this handbook. The handbook is not a standard but a resource for those faced with building a new facility or the redesign of an existing facility. Each group had its own style, so each section has its own unique format. It is our hope that this document will help laboratory managers maximize organizational efficiency, ensure the economical expenditure of resources, and develop a safe, secure, and well -designed facility. We hope that the resulting facilities will provide adequate space for forensic scientists to perform their very important tasks today and will include adaptability for tomorrow as technologies change. I appreciate the time and effort the committee members and participants have given to this project, the work of the outside reviewers from Harley Ellington Design, and the editorial support of Aspen Systems Corporation. One committee member, Dr. William J. "Bill" Hartner, who has served the forensic science community for 37 years, passed away on February 28, 1997. Everyone deeply mourns his passing and applauds his personal achievements and the tremendous impact he had on forensic science. He was past president of ASCLD, 1993-94, and was com- mander of Metro-Dade's Crime Laboratory Bureau, where he had served since 1960. We therefore dedicate this document to the wonderful memory of : Dr. William J. Hartner February 10, 1935-February 28, 1997 Carrie Morgan Whitcomb Past President 1995-96 ASCLD ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - SUMMARY for DOWNTOWN SECTION ALL SECTIONS CURRENT LOCATION: ALL LOCATIONS PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN DIVISION Administration Patrol / Commander Patrol (Primarily Booking & Holding) Patrol / Dist. I Patrol /Traffic Patrol / SOU Patrol / P.O.P. Information Services / Director Information Services / Systems Information Services / Dispatch Information Services / Records Information Services / P&E Investigative Services / Commander Investigative Services / DTF Investigative Services /Youth School Investigative Services / Crim. Impact Investigative Services / Person Crimes Investigative Services / Prop. Crimes Common Facilities SUBTOTAL BUILDING GR055 FACTOR 25 % STAFF AND GROSS AREA TOTAL 1 Area totals do not includ I CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF RE UIRED STAFF EXISTI AREA REQUIRED SF 2000 2005 2013 2020 I 1 2000 1 2005 2013 2020 75 10.0 14.0 15.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 42.0 1 47.0 57.0 65.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 11.0 14.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 11.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 21.0 25.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 12.0 15.0 17.0 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 9.0 10.5 13.5 15.5 9.5 12.5 15.5 17.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 148.0 167.0 201.5 2295 148.0 1 167.01 2015 1 229.5 District 1 SECr10N BY DIVISION PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF RE UIRED STAFF EXIST AREA RE UIRED SF 2000 2005 2013 2020 i 2000 1 2005 2013 2020 DIVISION Administration Patrol 7.5 65.0 10.0 73.0 14.0 87.0 15.0 101.0 2,824 11,901 3,154 13,051 3,929 13,875 4,M6 14,670 Information Services Investigative Services Common Facilities 26.5 49.0 0.0 26.5 575 0.0 31.0 69.5 0.0 35.0 78.5 0.0 5.908 9,770 4,531 6,102 10,400 4,753 6,236 11.372 5,144 6,433 12,037 5,463 SUBTOTAL BUILDING GROSS FACTOR 25% STAFF AND GROSS AREA TOTAL 148.0 148.0 167.0 167.0 201.5 201.5 229.5 229.5 34,934 8,733 43,667 37,46H 9,767 46,H35 40,556 10,139 50,695 42,618 10,655 53,273 STAFFING SWORN & CIVILIAN PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT STAFF PROJECTED RE UIRED STAFF 2000 2005 20131 2020 Sworn 99.0 115.5 143.5 166.5 Civilian 49.0 51.5 58.0 63.0 TOTAL 148 167 201.5229.5 Notes: I District I area is not included in the total required area for the new facility. 46 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - ADMINISTRATION SECTION: ADMINISTRATION CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN I CURRENTS PROJECTED I STAFF REQUIRED STAFF UNIT EXISTI AREA RE UIRED AUTH IF IF 2000 2005 1 2013 1 2020 1 2000 1 2005 120131 2020 NOTES WORKPLACES OFFICES Police Chief 0 0 0 0 225 263 0� 0� 0 01 Deputy Chief 0 0 1 1 200 0 0 200I 200I Prof. Standards Lt. 1 1 1 I 1 200 177 1 200 200 200� 2001 Exec Staff Proi Mgr- 1 1 1 1 180 123 I 180 180 180 180 Staff Psvchologist 1 1 1 1 200 0 0 0 0 1. A. Sergeant 1 2 3 3 150 127 150 300 450 450 Training Sergeant 0 0 0 0 150 155 0 0 0 O Training Officer 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 Budget Coordinator 1 1 2 2 120 116 120 120 240 240 Budget Tech 0.5 1 1 1 120 120 120 120 120 Legal 0 0 1 1- 150 0 0 150 150 SUBTOTAL 770 920 1,540 1,540 CIRCULATION 25 % 193 230 385 385 OFFICES TOTAL 5.5 7 11 11 963 1,150 1,925 1,923 WORK STATIONS Admin Aide III (Chief's Sec.) 0 0 0 0 160 192 0 0 0 0 07 0.5 1 1 2 64 32 64 64 128 Training Supply Technician 0.75 1 1 1 64 64 64 64 - 64 Supply/Range Tech 0.75 1 1 1 64 64 64 64 64 Planning Tech 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 2 3 3 4 160 192 192 256 CIRCULATION 35 % 56 67 67 90 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 216 2591259 346 WORK PLACES TOTAL 7,5 10 14 15 1,779 1,409 2,184 2,271 % INCREASE IN STAFF 33% 40% 7 SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Waiting and Reception 18 90 90 90 90 Library/Media - 200 200 200 200 200, Exec Staff W k Room 120 120 120 120 120'i Volunteer Work Area 64 128 128 128 1281 SUBTOTAL 538 538 538 538 CIRCULATION 25 % 188 188 188 188 AREAS TOTAL 726 726 726 726 ROOMS Conference 480 574 200 2D0 200 200 Files 80 80 120 120 120 Training Files 80 33 80 120 120 120 Copier/Fax/Supplies 120 282 120 120 120 120 Coat Closet 15 15 15 15 15 Rest Rooms 40 80 80 80 80 IA File Storage 80 80 80 80 80 Personnel Files 80 80 80 8D 80 Uniform / Equip. Storage 500 500 500 5DD Coffee 60 60 60 60 60 SUBTOTAL 735 815 815 815 CIRCULATION25% 184 204 204 204 ROOMS TOTAL 919 1,019 1019 7019 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 1,645 1 745 1,745 1,745 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF 75 10 14 15 2,824 3,154 3,929 4,016 SWORN 2 3 5 5 ❑VILtAiN 5.5 7 9 10 47 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES -PATROL SERVICES SECTION: PATROL COMMANDER CURRENT LOCATION: 300LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT' PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF UNIT EKISTI AREA REQUIRED j SF SF !. 2000 1 2005 1 2011 2020 1200012005 12013 12020 ( NOTES WORK PLACES I — OFFICES Commander i 1 1 1 200 211 200' 200 200 200� Lieutenant 1 7 1 1 180 180 1801 ISM 180 Chief's Office 0 0 0 0 180 180 180 180 180 (Operations Lt. 1 1 1 1 i 150 150 150 150I I50 SUBTOTAL 710 710 710 710 CIRCULATION 25% 178 178 178 178 OFFICES TOTAL 3 3 3 3 888 888 888 BOB WORK STATIONS Admin. Aide 1 1 1 1 80 80 80 80 80 Volunteer 64 128 128 128 128 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 208 208 208 208 CIRCULATION 35 % 73 73 73 73 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 281 281 281 281 WORK PLACES TOTAL 4 4 4 4 11168I 1,168 1,168 1,168 % INCREASE IN STAFF( 0% 0 % 0% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS CoRee 60 60 60 60 60 Copy/Fax/Supply 120 120 120 120 120 SUBTOTAL 180 180 180 180 CIRCULATION 25% 63 63 63 63 AREAS TOTAL 243 243 243 243 ROOMS Conference Room 250 250 250 250 250 SUBTOTAL 250 250 250 250 CIRCULATION 25% 63 63 63 63 ROOMS TOTAL 313 313 313 313 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 556 556 556 556 TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASF 4 4 1 4 1 4 1 1,724 1,724 1,724 1,Z24 NOTES: FSWORN 3 3 1 3 CIVILIAN 1 1 1 1 48 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: DISTRICT 1 CURRENT LOCATION: OLD TOWN SQUARE ' CURRENT',, PROTECTED ! STAFF I REQUIRED_STAFF UNIT( EXIST AREA REQUIRED jAUTH SF 5F 1 j I 2000 12005 12013 12020 2000 12005 12013 ! 2020 NOTES WORK PLACES T—T_ OFFICES i (Sergeant 1 1 1 1 1201 120, 120 SUBTOTAL 120� 120; 120 CIRCULATION 25% 30I 30 30 OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 1 1 150 150 150 WORK STATIONS C7T 1 1 1 1 i 64 64 64 Officer 4 4 4 4 L6464 87 87 67 SUBTOTAL 5 5 5 5 64 64 64 CIRCULATION 35% 22 22 22 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 86 86 86 WORK PLACES TOTAL 6 6 6 6 236 236 236 % INCREASE IN STAFF 0% 0% 0% SPECIAL AREAS ARFAS Open Office 900 900 900 900 SUBTOTAL 900 900 900 900 CIRCULATION 25% 315 315 315 315 AREAS TOTAL 1,215 1,215 1,215 1,215 ROOMS Community. Room 347 347 347 347 Bicycle Storage 320 320 320 320 SUBTOTAL) 667 667 667 667 CIRCULATION2590 167 167 167 167 ROOMS TOTAL 834 834 834 834 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 2,049 2,049 2,049 2,049 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF b 1 6 1 6 6 2,2B5 2,285 2,285 2,285 NOTES: SWORN 5 5 5 5 CIVILIAN 1 1 1 7 1 Staff counts are included in staffing and projections. Area is not included in building requirements. 49 ENITiT: FORTCDUINSP UCESERVICES- PATROL SERVICES SECTION: PATROL CUMEM LO IIC N: 300IAPORTF PROPOSED LOCATION: OOWNFOWN CURRFNT! FROFECTED I STAFF REOUIREOSTMF IUNITIMISTI A0.EA R[OUIUD Sf SF SDW 12WS 13113 1020 NOTES WOMRACES S IOFFIC 4eubunl 1 1 1 1 Teo 1w ISO 180 IN Crime /vulPsl 1 1 1 1 I ISO 110 150 tsoI ISO Ii0l R6O MnuBer 1 1 1 I 1 ISO ISO ISO 1501 150 SUBTOTAL 680 660 40 6M CIRCULATION 13% 120 120 120 120 aFICES TOTAL 3 3 3 3 LM 6M 660 600I WORKSTATIONS 3 6 BO 210 100 /BO 360 E-DAV SHIFT NW Week Oft cso I I 1 1 a a a o 0 IMe Week Onr SHIFT 0 ] B 0 EAR EARLY WEEK SWING SHIFT 0 5 ) B 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 D 0 0 EAR EARN WEEK MIDNIGNL SMfT SO6 6 ) 0 0 O 0 0 Cso 0 o D o o a o a o MATE WEEK SWING SHIFT 6 ) B 10 0 0 0 0 0 CS O cso 1 I 1 I o a o a a MATE WEEK MIDNN2M5HIFT Q6an 1 z 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 C5O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 POWER SHIFT arm 3 3 a SUBTOTAL 39 N 56 fit 260 600 660 560 CIRCUMATION33% 64 140 168 1% WORK STATIONS TOTAL Sw 140 1.1L 1.316 WORK FLACES TOTAL 12 A) 57 63 1,1E 1.SF0 1.T2F 1.916 %INCREASEINSTAFF 12•.: 21% la% '. srECIU AIIEAE AREA �PalWl Recenbn 1B 164 14 IIgol WmmK 1B 1% 1% 224 ISO ISO Iio 150 15a 15,1 ISO Cri F.e Um Fb layan 150 150 I50 150 150 Fk File SwraLc 120 120 120 120 173 cnNee lxa tto 12a ua uo SUBTOTAL 682 933 961 1.017 CIRCUTATION 25% SEE 327 336 256 AREAS TOTAL 1.111 1,J60 1}9) IA73 ROOMS Mlnview Rv ION 100 200 200 200 So61^NNk^'Kmm 15D ISO ISO 150 ISO sager allenkry IM 100 IM loo Into Line"InWVNw 1M 200 2M ]M 2M KAI Ca11 1P 367 3W 3% 500 3a0 fTO TnkOn6 ROum 120 120 120 120 120 Co. 200 a a 0 0 Sa Ng C. 1M ISO I00 1M IM Ewip�lOimiWMm 200 200 200 200 200 Sxa151nKe 600 25 600 4OD [W 600 Amoy ISO a a a 0 TninMS 60D 5)6 0 0 a 0 TOMMFR ECK CmIPo-Nnu o 0 0 0 Bic cws Be 350 0 u 0 0 LILY Pon LIDO 1.100 1.100 1,100 1.1M Selre[1 PaeF[ng ISO 3M 3M 3M 3M RmkMK 250 372 250 250 250 250 Puma[P[pem 25 25 25 25 23 tw. Pnprer P[gmP 25 25 25 23 z Bo-H Clean w M Iw EM 1w M® M 60 W 120 120 OR 60 60 M M SO MPh Sl ,Celh 70 50 2B0 620 SW 3M levmik Hol6 ,S Rs 70 260 2M 2M 20 Lfm CNI 70 70 70 70 70 I. Ntl M 6D w w M LMe UP 252 252 252 252 252 SUBTOTAL 6.572 4.926 5,232 5]32 ORCUTATK3N 23% 1.163 UM 1,W8 I3M RDQWS TUFAI Sill kI. 6}b t,SNI 1RCMMARF45TOTAL C. ).630 ).LE) 7.113 MTM REOD STAFF 6 ASF {2 LJ 5] if I.OP F.%u 9.f6F fP1 NOTES: SWO0.N 36 1 61 1 51 i9 CMIW 6 6 6 6 50 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: TRAFFIC UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT PROTECTED STAFF RE UIRED STAFF UNIT I EXIST! AREA REQUIRED SF SF r T000 2005 2013 T020 1 200012005 1 2013 12020 I NOTES WORK PLACES OFFICES 1 ! Sergeam 1 1 1 2 150 150 150 150 216 SUBTOTAL 1 150 150 150 216 CIRCULATION 25 % 38 38 36 54 OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 1 2 188 188 188 270� )WORKSTATIONS Officers 3 5 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 DUI Officer 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 5 7 10 12 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 35% 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 6 8 11 14 188 18B 188 270 % INCREASE IN STAFF 33% 38 % 271/6 SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Work Stations 28 84 112 140 168 SUBTOTAL 84 112 140 168 CIRCULATION25% 29 39 49 59 AREAS TOTAL 113 151 189 227 ROOMS Traffic Storage 200 200 267 300 300 Conference 200 200 200 200 200 SUBTOTAL 400 467 500 500 CIRCULATION 25% 100 117 125 125 ROOMS TOTAL 500 583 625 625 SPECIAL AREAS TOTALI 1 61.3 735 814 852 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF 6 8 71 14I I I80l 922 1,002 1,722 NOTES: SWORN 6 8 11 14 CIVILIAN 0 0 0 0 51 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: SELECTIVE DUTIES UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF R UIRED STAFF UNIT SF EXIST SF AREA REQUIRED i T000 2005 2013 2020 20001 2005 2013 2020 WORK PLACES OFFICES I Sergeant 1 1 1 2 150 90 1501 150 150 216 SUBTOTAL 150 150 150 216 CIRCULATION 25% 38 38 36 54 OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 1 2 188 188 180 2701 WORK STATIONS Officers 5 6 7 9 64 320 384 448 576I Intem Work Stations 0 0 0 0 64 64 64 64 64 SUBTOTAL 5 6 7 9 320 384 448 576 CIRCULATION 35% 112 134 157 202 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 432 518 605 778 WORK PLACES TOTAL 6 7 8 11 620 706 792 1,048 % INCREASE IN STAFF 17% 14 % 38% SPECIALAREAS IAREAS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25 % 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTALF 0 0 0 0 ROOMS. Crime Prev. Storage SDU Slor. Copier/Fad Supplies SUBTOTAL CIRCULATION 25% ROOMS TOTAL SPECIALAREAS TOTAL 100 150 120 112 100 150 120 370 93 463 463 117 175 120 472 103 515 515 133 200 120 453 113 567 567 183 275 120 578 145 723 723 TOTAI RE D STAFF & ASf b 7 8 11 1,082 1,220 1,359 1,771 NOTES: SWORN r 6 7 B 11 CIVILIAN 0 0 0 0 NOTES 52 ENTITT: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES -PATROL SERVICES SECTION: P.O.P. UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURB T PROIECIED STAFF RE UIRED STAFF UNIT EXIST AREA REQUIRED i I SF 5F 1 2000 2003 2011 1 2020 L I 1 2000 12005 12013 i 2020 1 NOTES WORK PLACES OFFICES Lieutenant 1 1 1 7 180 180i 180 180I 180, SUBTOTAL 180I 180 1801 180: CIRCULATION25% 45 45 45 45 OFFICES TOTAL WORK STATIONS 1 1 1 1 225 225 225 225I SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 35 % 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 1 1 1 1 225 225 225 225 % INCREASE 1N STAFF 0% 0% 0% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS SUBTOTAL 0 0 c 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 -O AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Conference 200 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASF 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 2251 225 225 225 NOTES: SWORN 1 1 1 CNILIAN 0 0 0 O 53 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: DIRECTOR CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN ALTERNATIVE 3 CURRENT PROIEMD I STAFF RE UIRED STAFF UNIT I EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF I SF 2000 1 200512013 2020 i 1 2000 12005 1 2013 12020 NOTES WORK PLACES OFFICES Director 1 7 1 1 200 200 200 200 200' SUBTOTAL 20C 2D0 200, 200! CIRCULATION25% 50 50 50 Sc OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 1 1 250 250' 250 250 WORK STATIONS ' Admin. Asst. 1 1 1 1 80 80 80I 80 80 SUBTOTAL 1 1 7 1 80 80 80I 80i CIRCULATION 35% WORK STATIONS TOTAL 108 108 108 108 WORK PLACES TOTAL 2 2 2 2 358 358 358 3SB % INCREASE IN STAFF 0% 0% 0% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS SUBTOTAL O 0 O 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RULD STAFF & ASF 2 2 2 2 358 358 358 358 NOTES: SWORN 0 CIVILIAN 2 2 1 2 54 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: SYSTEMS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN I CURRENT I PROTECTED I STAFF RE UIRED STAFF I UNIT EXIST AREA RE UIRED 1 SF SF 2000 20051 2013 2020 2000 20051 2013 20201 WORKPLACES OFFICES i SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25 % 0 0 0 0 OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS Volunteers 0 0 0 0 64 641 64 126 128 Systems Manager 1 1 1 1 80 80 80 80 80 Systems Analyst 1 1 1 3 64 64 64 64 192 Computer Maintenance Spec 1 1 1 1 64 64 64 64 64 CAD Project Mgr. 0.5 03 1 1 64 0 0 0 0 Radio Tech 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 3.5 3.5 4 6 272 272 336 464 CIRCULATION35% 95 95 118 162 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 367 367 454 626 WORKPLACESTOTAL 3.5 3.5 4 6 367 367 454 626 % INCREASEIN STAFF 0 % 14% 50% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25 % 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Computer Room 350 350 350 350 350 Computer Storage/Receiving 200 200 200 200 200 SUBTOTAL 550 550 550 550 CIRCULATION 25% 138 138 138 138 ROOMS TOTAL 688 688 688 688 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 688 688 688 688 I TOTAL REQD STAFF & ASF 3.5 3.5 4 6 1,055 1,055 1,1411 1,314 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 0 0 CIVILIAN 3.5 3.5 4 6 NOTES 55 Technical Working Group Victor Cardona Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Washington, D.C. Kenneth G. DeBoer Earl Walls Associates San Diego, California Dr. Alim A. Fatah NIST/OLES Frank Fitzpatrick** Orange County Sheriff/Coroner Forensic Science Services Dr. William Hartner* Laboratory Bureau Metro -Dade Police Department Kathleen M. Higgins NIST/OLES Dr. Mitchell Holland Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory Robert Horn* Crime Laboratory New York State Police (Retired) * Past President, ASCLD ** President-elect, ASCLD Robert A. Jarzen Sacramento County Laboratory of Forensic Services John Klosterman Illinois State Police Forensic Sciences Command James L. McClaren Ruth and Going, Inc. McClaren & Wilson, Inc. Michael Mount AIA Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Southwest Inc. Dr. Richard Rau National Institute of Justice Office of Science and Technology Dr. Dennis Reeder NIST/Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory Biotechnology Division Earl Roberts FBI Laboratory Dr. Carl M. Selavka New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Forensic Services Michael R. Somin Earl Walls Associates San Diego, California Rich Tanton* Palm Beach Sheriff's Department Crime Laboratory Dr. Victor W. Weedn Department of Defense DNA Registry Carrie Whitcomb* U.S. Postal Inspection Service Crime Laboratory Joseph Wichmann Illinois State Police Joliet Forensic Science Laboratory Dan Wierec Walsh Construction Dr. Richard Wilk New York City Police Laboratory 3 ENTRY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: DISPATCH CURRENT LOCATION: 300LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENTI PROJECTED I STAFF I RE UIREDSTAFF IUNIT I EXISTS AREA REQUIRED _ 2000 200520-1 2020 i SF I SF 2000 1 2005 1 2013 1 2020 NOTES I WORK PLACES OFFICES Communications Manager 0 0 0 0 180 0 Oi Of Oi SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 01 01 0 OFFICES TOTAL 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 01 WORK STATIONS Supervisor 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 Dispatchers/Call Takers 0 0 0 0 80 80 0 0 0 0 Call Taker Consoles 64 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 35% 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O % INCREASE IN STAFF zzxxz zzxxx zzzxx SPECIALAREAS AREAS 911 Telephone 120 120 0 0 0 0 Radio/ Phone 500 217 0 0 0 0 UPS/Switchgear 200 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25 % 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Conference 200 0 0 0 0 Kitchen / Break 200 0 0 0 0 Training Work Room 150 0 0 0 0 Copier/ Fax /5upplies 120 0 0 0 0 Dispatch Lockers 51 0 0 0 0 Rest Rooms 401 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25 % 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL. 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES: SWORN 0 0 0 0 CIVILIAN 0 _0 0 56 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES -INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: RECORDS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN i CURRENT:. PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF ! UNIT] EXIST AREA REQUIRED SIF SF 2000 ! 2005 2013 2020; 2000' 2005' 2013 20201 NOTES I WORK PLACES OFFICES ! Records Manager ! 1 l 1 1 ; 150 1 137 1501 1501, 150, 150. SUBTOTAL ! ! 150' 150i 150 150' CIRCULATION 25%� OFFICESTOTALI 381 38', 38' 38 ]WORKSTATIONS 1 1 j 1 1 7 188' 1881 188' 1881 ]Supervisor i i 2 2 3 3 80 i 160I 240, 240 240I 1 Police Report Specialists 1! 9 9 12 �'� 14 64 j 576' 640! 6401 6401i j Police Data Tech 8 8 8 li 8 64 j 572 512' 512; SIT I Public Info Database Workstation 0 0 0 0 ! 64 64' 64i 64" 641 Desk Officer i 1 j 1 1! 1 64 64 64, 64� 64' SUBTOTAL! j 20 i i 20 24 26 1,376j 1,52011,520I 1,520 CIRCULATION35%' ! 482 5321 5321 532! 1 WORK STATIONS TOTAL] 1,858I 2,052j 2,052' 2,0521 WORK PLACES TOTAL : %.INCREASE IN STAFF 21 21 j 25 27 ! 0 % 19-1 8'b j I 1 2,04512,24012,240 2,240: j SPECIAL AREAS j AREAS I j SUBTOTAL] , 0� 0 0, 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 1 0 0 OI 0 AREAS TOTAL; 01 0 Oi O I ROOMS i! (Conference ! I 200 200 200I 200 200 Records File Storage j 8 I 200I 200 200 238 257I Mail Room ! I 20D 200I 200 200I 200 ]Central Supply j ! 6tX)I 380 600I 6001 6001 600a I Press Room I Copier / Fax / Supplies /MF '. ! 150' 130I 150. Sol 150 80 Sol Rest Rooms ! j 1 150I 150 Cofiee/Break II 40' 65 3 80i 100i 80 100 80 700 80 100 SUBTOTAL !� ; !� ! ' 1,610I 1,610I 1,648 1,667, CIRCULATION 25 % ROOMS TOTAL] j 1 I2,013i 403 403 2,01312,060 412 417 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL ! I j 12,013'2,01312,060 2,OB4 2,084 ! TOTAL READ STAFF & ASF i 21 21 25 27 4,058 4,2521 4 300'I 4 323 NOTES: SWORN! 0 0 0 p ! CIVIUAN! 21 21 25 I 27 57 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION PROPERTY/EVIDENCE/LAB CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE & OFF SITE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT' PROJECTED 1 STAFF ' R UIREDSTAFF ,UNITIEXISTI AREAREQUIRED SF SF 2000 1 20031 20131 2020 1 1 2000 2005 2013 2020 NOTES WORK PLACES OFFICES Supervisor SUBTOTAL CIRCULATION 25% OFFICES TOTAL WORK STATIONS Property/ Evidence Technicians )Crime Scene Investigators AFIS Tech. Lab Clerical SUBTOTAL CIRCULATION 35 % WORK STATIONS TOTAL WORK PLACES TOTAL % INCREASE IN STAFF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8AII8: 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 saxrz 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ttxzxx 150 64 64 100 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 Oi 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS AREAS PIE Storage 1,151 1,151 200 200 200 20J Narcotics Storage 150 0 0 0 0''. Secure Storage 150 0 0 0 0' Large Property Storage: 547 547 0 0 0 0' Evidence Processing 150 150 150 150 150'. Vehicle Processing 1,100 0 0 0 Oi Dry Room 80 72 0 0 0 O Bin - Clean Up 40 0 O 0 0 AFIS / Livescan 80 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 350 350 350 350 CIRCULATION25% 88 88 88 88 AREAS TOTAL 438 438 438 438 ROOMS Conference 200 0 0 D 0 Forensic File Room 120 0 0 0 0 Photo Room 100 95 0 0 0 0 Change Room 60 0 0 0 0 Crime Lab 430 0 0 0 0 Latents 100 0 0 0 O Trace Evidence 115 0 0 0 0 Digital Imaging 120 0 0 O 0 Crime Lab Storage 70 0 0 0 0 Evidence Packaging Storage 120 0 0 0 0 Viewing Room 200 0 0 0 0 Copier/Fax 120 98 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION25% 0 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 438 438 438 438 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF1 0 0 D 0 438 i38 438 438 NOTES: 1 F SWORN 0 0 O 0 CIVILIAN 0 0 0 0 58 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION: COMMANDER CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT PROTECTED STAFF RE UIRED STAFF UNIT EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF SF 2000 1 2005 2013 1 2020 1 1 2000 1 2005 12013 i 2020 I NOTES I WORK PLACES j OFFICES Commander 1 1 1 1 200 213 200 200 2001 200 Lieutenant 1 1 1 1 180 180 1 BO 180 180 SUBTOTAL 200 200 200 200 CIRCULATION 25% 50 50 501 50 OFFICES TOTAL 2 2 2 2 250 250 250I 250 WORK STATIONS Admin- Supervisor 1 1 1 1 80 94 80 80 80 80 Admin. Clerk 2 2 2 2 64 128 128 128 128 SUBTOTAL 3 3 3 3 208 208 208 208 CIRCULATION 35% 73 73 73 73 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 281 281 281 281 WORK PLACES TOTAL 5 5 5 5 531 531 531 531 % INCREASE IN STAFF 046 0% 0 % SPECIAL AREAS AREAS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25 % 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL. 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Conference 200 206 200 200 200 200 Ries 80 80 80 80 80 Copier/Fax/Supplies 120 120 120 120 120 Coat Cioset 15 15 15 15 15 SUBTOTAL 415 415 415 415 CIRCULATION 25% 104 104 104 ID4 ROOMS TOTAL 519 519 519 519 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 519 519 519 519 TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASF S 5 5 5 1,050 1,050 1 O50 1,050 SWORN 2 2 2 CIVILIAN 3 3 3 3 59 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION DRUG TASK FORCE CURRENT LOCATION: OFF SITE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF RE UIRED STAFF I UNITI EXIST AREA UIRED SF SF 2000 2005 2013 2020 2000 200572013 1 2020 WORKPLACES OFFICES Lieutemnt 1 1 1 1 180 180 180 180' 180, Sergeants 1 1 2 2 150 150 150 1501 150 SUBTOTAL 2 2 3 3 150 150 150 1501 CIRCULATION 25% 38 38 38 38 OFFICES TOTAL 2 2 3 3 188 188 1B8 188 WORK STATIONS Officers 4 5 6 8 64 256 320 384 512 Secretary 11 1 1 1 1 64 64 64 64 64 SUBTOTAL 5 6 7 9 320 384 448 576 CIRCULATION 35% 112 134 157 202 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 5 6 7 9 432 518 605 778 WORK PLACES TOTAL 7 8 10 12 620 706 792 965 % INCREASE IN STAFF , 14% 25% 20% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Monitor Room 100 100 100 100 100 Telephone Room 80 80 80 -80 80 Conference/Training 100 100 100 100 100 SUBTOTAL 280 280 200 280 CIRCULATION 25% 70 70 70 70 AREAS TOTAL 350 350 350 350 ROOMS Interview 100 200 200 300 300 Equipment Storage 120 120 120 200 200 Personnel lockers 10 150 150 150 150 Computer/ File Room 200 200 250 250 250 SUBTOTAL 670 720 900 900 CIRCULATION 25% 168 180 225 225 ROOMS TOTAL 838 900 1,125 1,125 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 1,188 1,250 1,475 1,475 71 7 8 10 12 7,807 1,956 2,267 2A40 NOTES: SWORN 6 7 9 11 CIVILIAN 1 1 1 7 NOTES 60 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION YOUTH SCHOOL TEAMS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT PROTECTED STAFF RE UIRED STAFF (UNIT EXIST! AREA REQUIRED j IF SF I 2000 2005 1 2013 2020 1 2000 12005 1 2013 1 2020 1 NOTES I WORK PLACES JOFFICES Sergeants 1 1 2 1 ? 150 109 150 150� 300 300� sueroTAL 150 150 300 300 CIRCULATION25% 38 38 75) 75,, OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 2 2 188 188 375, 375 WORK STATIONS I School Resou¢e Officer 7 9 11 13 48 288 288i 288I 288 D.A-R.E. Officer 2 2 2 2 48 48 481 48 48 Patrol Officer W5, 0 0 0 0 48 96 96 96 96 Intern / Volunteer 0 0 0 0 36 72 72 72 72 SUBTOTAL 9 11 73 15 432 432 432 432 CIRCULATION 35% 151 151 151 151 - WORK STATIONS TOTAL 583 583 S83 583 WORK PLACES TOTAL 10 12 15 17 771 771 958 958 % INCREASE IN STAFF 20% 25% 13% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 0 0 0 0 AREAS TOTAL TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ROOMS Conference 200 180 0 0 0 0 Interview 100 200 200 200 200 Dare Storage I 150 148 150 150 150 150 SUBTOTAL 350 350 350 350 CIRCULATION 25% 88 88 88 88 ROOMS TOTAL 438 438 438 438 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 436 438 438 438 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF. 10 12 15 17 1,208 1,208 1,396 1,396 NOTES: SWORN 10 12 15 17 CIVILIAN m ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION CRIMINAL IMPACT UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT[ PROTECTED STAFF RE UIRED STAFF UNIT EXIST! AREA RE UIRED j SF SF 2000 2003 2013 2020 2000 2005 2013 20201 WORK PLACES OFFICES Sergeant 1 1 1 1 ISO 150 150 150 ISO SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 150 150 150 ISO CIRCULATION 25 % 38 38 38 38 OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 1 1 188 188 188 18B' WORK STATIONS Warrant Clerk 1.5 1.5 1.5 15 64 128 128 128 128 O0rcers 6 7 8 9 64 44B 512 512 576 Volunteer WS 36 36 36 36 36 SUBTOTAL 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 612 676 676 740 CIRCULATION35% 214 237 237 259 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 826 913 913 999 WORK PLACES TOTAL 8.5 9.5 105 115 1,044 1,100 1,100 1,187 % INCREASE IN STAFF 12% 11% 10% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS NCIC Computer WS 64 128 128 128 128 SUBTOTAL 128 128 128 128 CIRCULATION25% 32 32 32 32 AREAS TOTAL 160 160 160 160 ROOMS SUBTOTAL 0 O 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 01 0 0 0 ROOMS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 160 160 160 160 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF R.5 9S 105 715 7,174 1,260 t,Z60 1,347 NOTES: SWORN 7 8 9 10 CIVILIAN 1.5 1.5 1.5 15 NOTES 62 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS CURRENT LOCATION: 300LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT! PROTECTED j STAFF REQUIREDSTAFF UNITS EXIST AREA REQUIRED I SF I SF 2000 2005 2013 2070 I 20001 2003 12013 1 2020 WORKPLACES iT OFFICES Sergeants 1 1 2 2 150 150 ISO! 300 300 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 2 150 150I 300 3001 CIRCULATION25% 38 36 75 751 OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 2 2 188 180 375 375 WORKSTATIONS Investigators 6 7 9 11 64 448 576 576 704 Victims Sva. Coordinator 1 1 1 1 64 64 64 64 64 Vidims Svcs. Advocate O5 1 1 1 48 48 48 48 48 Clerical 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 48 48 48 48 48 SUBTOTAL 8 9.5 11.5 13.5 512 640 640 768 CIRCULATION 35% 179 224 224 269 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 691 864 864 1,037 WORK PLACES TOTAL 9 10S 13.5 15.5 I 879 1,052 1,239 1,412 % INCREASE IN STAFF 17% 29% 15 SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Reception 18 90 90 90 90 File Storage 20 80 80 80 80 Coffee 60 60 60 60 60 SUBTOTAL 230 230 230 230 CIRCULATION 25% 58 58 58 58 AREAS TOTAL 288 288 288 288 ROOMS Conference 200 0 0 0 0 Monitor Room 100 100 100 100 100 General Storage 80 BO 93 120 138 Equipment Storage 80 80 93 120 138 Interview 100 200 200 200 200 .Soft Imerview 150 ISO 150 ISO 150 Coat Closet Copy/Fan/5uppbes 15 15 15 15 15 120 120 120 120 120 SUBTOTAL 745 772 825 861 CIRCULATION25% 186 193 206 215 ROOMS TOTAL 931 965 1,031 1,076 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 1, 219 1,252 1,319 1,363 7OTAL READ STAFF & ASF 9 7 0.5 13S 15.5 2,097 2,304 Z 558 2,7751 NOTES: SWORN 7 8 11 13 -- CIVILIAN 2 2.58 2.5 2.5 NOTES 63 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT PROIECTFD STAFF RE UIR=AFF UNIT LXISTi AREA RE UIRED SF SF 2000 2005 1 2013 1 2020 2000 2005 2013 2020 ] NOTES WORKPLACES 1OFFICES �'- Sergeants 1 1 2 2 150 150i 150 300 300 SUBTOTAL 150 150 300 300 CIRCULATION 25 % 38 38 75 75 OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 2 2 188 188 375 375 WORK STATIONS Officers 7 9.3 11.5 13.5 64 608 736 736 864 Police Report Spec. 1 1 1 1 64 64 64 64 64 Pawn Entry Clerk 0.5 1 1 1 64 64 64 64 64 Volunteers/Interns 0 0 0 0 64 128 128 128 128 SUBTOTAL 8.5 11.5 13.5 15.5 864 992 992 1,120 CIRCULATION 35% 302 347 347 392 WORK STATIONS TOTAL 1,166 1,339 1,339 1,512 WORK PLACES TOTAL 9.5 125 155 17.3 1,354) 1527 1,714 1,887 % INCREASE IN STAFF 32% 24 % 13% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Reception 18 0 0 0 0 File Storage 20 60 79 98 117 Coffee 60 60 60 60 60 Video Imaging Workstation 64 64 64 64 64 SUBTOTAL 184 203 222 235 CIRCULATION 25% 46 51 55 59 AREAS TOTAL 230 254 277 293 ROOMS Equipment Storage 80 80 80 80 80 Conference Room / War Room 200 400 400 400 400 Interview 100 200 200 200 200 Monitor Roam 100 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 680 680 680 680 CIRCULATION 25% 170 170 170 170 ROOMS TOTAL 850 850 850 850 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 1,080 1,104 1,127 1,143 TOTAL RE D STAFF & ASF 9.5 125 755 175 2,434 2,630 2,84T 3,030 NOTES: SWORN 8 10.5 IS 15.5 1. CIVILIAN �.5 2 2 2 64 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES CODE: COMMON FACILITIES CURRENT LOCATION: HQ PROPOSED LOCATION: DOWNTOWN CURRENT PROJECTED i STAFF REQUIRED STAFF I UNIT' EXIST' AREARE UIRED AUFH I SF SF 2000 1 2003 20'31 2020 20001 20051 20131 2020 NOTES WORK PLACES ! j OFFICES I 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 of SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25% 0 0 0 0� OFFICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 CIRCULATION25% 0 0 0 0 WORKSTATIONS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % INCREASE IN STAFF 0% 0% 0% SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Sworn Lockers 10 990 1,155 1,435 1,665 Civilian Lockers 5 245 258 290 315 Trainee Lockers 10 200 200 200 200 Mens Toilet / Showers 250 250 250 250 250 Womens Toilet/Showers 250 250 250 250 250 Defensive Tactics 3844 0 0 0 0 Exercise 1000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,00D SUBTOTAL 2.935 3.113 3,425 3,68o CIRCULATION25% 734 778 856 920 AREAS TOTAL 3,669 3,091 4,281 4,"0 ROOMS Break Room 300 300 300 300 300 Break Room Support 150 150 150 150 150 Community Room 1700 0 0 0 0 Mens Sleep Rooms 120 120 120 120 120 Womens Sleep Rooms 120 120 120 120 120 SUBTOTAL 690 690 690 690 CIRCULATION25% 173 173 173 173 ROOMS TOTAL 863 863 '863 863 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 4,331 4,753 5,144 5A63 TOTAL RE D STAff &NSF 0 0 0 0 1 4,5314,753 5,144 5,463 NOTES: 6S Executive Summary The measure of a forensic laboratory's success is how well it meets the current and future needs of the occupants. Designing and building a forensic laboratory is a complicated undertaking. Design issues include those considerations present when designing any building, with enhanced concern and special requirements involving environmental health and safety,' hazardous materials, management, operational efficiency, adaptability, security of evidence, preser- vation of evidence in an uncontaminated state, as well as budgetary concerns. To help laboratory directors get through the process, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)/Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES), and the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors (ASCLD) held a joint workshop November 13-14, 1996 at NIST in Gaithersburg, Maryland, to develop guidelines for planning, designing, constructing, and moving crime labs. The guidelines serve as a general tool to which forensic laboratory directors can refer when considering building a new laboratory or refurbishing an existing one. There is not one universally correct plan for forensic laboratory design. No two labs are the same. Technical laboratories such as toxicology, biological science/DNA, firearms analysis, or trace evidence have specialized needs unique to their areas of work. Ultra -clean rooms or higher levels of containment may be required for some analytical procedures. Highest performance standards are required for cleanliness, temperature, humidity, and vibration controls to create an environment suitable for forensic science. Staff needs and functional processes are the driving factors. From the start, the scien- tists who will occupy the building should be involved with the design/build team to explain their special requirements for the laboratory. Flexibility is also a key element in driving a forensic laboratory's design and configura- tion. Crime labs must be designed with the flexibility to support adaptability and change or risk obsolescence in a few years.2 At the beginning of the process, it should be decided whether the project is driven primarily by needs or budget. Will the needs of the laboratory determine the budget, or is the budget preset and the laboratory economically limited to a specific amount at the outset? The technical work performed in forensic laboratories must be able to withstand any evidentiary challenge. When detailing the needs of the laboratory, be ready to defend those needs against questions that will arise because of the cost involved. Quality laboratory service is expensive, and the buildings in which these services are provided tend to be expensive as well. Cost-cutting that would jeopardize the lab's testing quality cannot be an option. The guidelines in this handbook are designed to empower laboratory managers to improve their situation. They are designed to safeguard the integrity and objectives of the profession, maximize organizational efficiency, ensure economical expenditure of resour- ces, and provide a safe working environment for employees. Site Analysis Site evaluation for each of the two alternatives is based on the following assumptions • Police services will continue operating a fleet system and Patrol and Investigative Services personnel will take their cars home with them. Parking requirements are thus reduced by personnel cars and represent the two largest consecutive daytime shifts. • 2/3 of all other employees are assumed to drive personal cars to work on any one day. • Parking includes the addition of the Narcotics Unit (DTF). • Infrequent parking requirements of the Training Room are included in the total parking count. • Site size calculation does not include the footprint of the Police facility because the number of floors will vary the footprint. • Planning and Zoning requirements are not included due to possible site variations. Site Calculation Summary Assuming an average footprint of 35,000 SF for each of the alternatives, site size calculation is as follows: BUILDING FOOTPRINT PARKING SITE SIZE ACRES SINGLE FACILITY- 35,000 159,500 194,500 4.5 SPLIT / HARMONY- 35,000 91,253 126,253 2.9 SPLIT / DOWNTOWN - 35,000 90,227 125,227 2.9 66 SINGLE FACILITY SITE CONCEPT I EXIST 2005 20133 202C RFMARrs-- u u < V < SITE VEHICLES / POLICE Patrol, 0 0. 0 350 i Patrol vehicles am personal Icars Traffic Motors, 0 0 0 250 i Motorcycles a, srMed In site lwilding(See wimp , Unmarked Police Cars 350 Unmarked police cars are I pfQonal ears Pool Vehicles 6 2,100 6 2.100 a 2,800 350 Oversized Vehicles 2 1,000 2 1.000 2 LODO 500 Subtotal i 0 a 3.100 8 3,100 10 3,800 SITE VEHICLES / PATROL SHIFT Patrol Staff Vehicles 26 9.100 31 70,850' 36 ]',600 350 kmcweekday&swingshm, Day Shift Motors' 0 0 0 0. 0 0 250 Night Shift Motors: 0 0: 0 0 0 0' 250 Subtotal 0 26 9,100 31 10,850 36 72,600 OTHER STAFF & MISC. VEHICLES Seizure / Public Visito AM Outside Subtotal ADDITIONALREQUIREMENTS Circulation Emergency Generator Trash Removal K-9'Kernels ' Large Property Storage. Vacuum' Site building' Entry / Exit Control: Landscaping' Planning & Zoning'. Subtotal Total Site Area Requirement 743,283 Off shift wool cars arc deducted tmm trait can and 213 of remainder a used to size staff parking. lot Exterior storage Includes Training Room parking nquitements OTF outside agency parking 15 % ohotal parking ama Includes special projects storage 2014 of total parking area 67 SPLIT FACILITY / HARMONY SITE CONCEPT I EXIST 2005 2013 2020 REMARkS G > > < > < L SITE VEHICLES / POLICE Patrol D, 0. 0 350 1 Pauol vehloles are penoeai Traffic Motors 0, 0. I cars 0 250 I Motorrycles am stared in sne I bu idling (Sec Wkw Unmarked Police Cars 350 , Unmarked police cars, dpersonal can Pool Vehicles 3 1,050 3 -' 1.050 4 - 1,400 350 ' Oversized Vehicles. 1 2 1,000 t 1 1.000 2 1 00ff 500 5ubtotal 1 0 5 2,OS0 ! 5 Z050 6 Z400 SITE VEHICLES / PATROL SHIFT Patrol Staff Vehicles 14 4.900'. 16 5.600' 18 6.300 350 I Lae weak day b swing shins Day Shift Motolsl 0 0 0 0' 0 0' 250 Night Shift Motors. 0 - 0 0 0' 0 0'. 250 Subtotal :, 0 14 4,900 16 S,600 18 &300 OTHER STAFF & MISC. VEHICLES Seizure / It Public Visitor ADA Outside 5ubtowl ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS Cin Emergency Ge Trash R K-9 1 Large Property 4 Site b Entry / Exit i Land! Planning & Subtotal Tmal Site Area Requirement 87,548 86,427 Oft shift lutml on arc deducted from staff can and 120 at remainder is used to size I staff parking dot 1 Enamor starage, I Includes Training Room i parking requirements Included in Public Visitor Parking I 1151%of total parking area includes special projects storage 20%of total parking ama Setback requirements 68 SPLIT FACILITY / DOWNTOWN SITE CONCEPT I EXIST 2(X70 2010 202C REMARk� G < U < SITE VEHICLES / POLICE Patrol. 0 0. 0 350 Patrol vehicles are pewnal Traffic Molon� 0� 0; 0, Un 250 11v10torcydes am stored in sit, l Wilding 15m bi xv,, Unmarked Police Cars ''.. 1 350 I Unmarked police can are I personal cars Pool Vehicles 6 1 21100 6'f 2,100 8 2800 350 Oveaized Vehicles: 2 1.000 2 1.000 2 L000 501) Subtotal 1 0 1 e 3,100 8 3,100 10 3800 SITE VEHICLES / PATROL SHIFT Patrol Staff Vehicles 12 4,200 15 -. 5,250' 18 6300 350 iLate week day &swing shilu Day Shift Motors 0 01 0 ! D. 0 0 250 1 Night Shift Motors. 0 01 0 0' 0 0 250 ! Subtotal a ' OTHER STAFF & MISC. VEH 12 4,200 1 15 ! 5250 s8 6,300 1 ICLES Staff Seizure / Impounr Loading Public Visitor Parking ADA Parking Outside Agencg Subtotal ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS Circulation Emergency Generator Trash Removal K-9 Kennels Large Property Storage Vacuum Site building Entry / Exit Control Landscaping Planning & Zoning 5u6mtal Total Site Area Regw emism, R M4 1 600i 1 600! 1 I 600i 1 1 600 1 600, 1 600! _ 0 I 96 0 j 961 0 1 96 1,Lou 1 I 1,0001 1,000 1 ' 800, 2 1 8001 2 8001 400; 400j 4001 39P.' 350 350 10.014 1 11,413i 12,882 I I j � 1 0 t 10 905 11 1 2$353 1 1 1 23,879 auAm 90,222 1 of shift pawl ors arc ideducted from staff ors and 2/3 of remainder a used to isizestaff parking lot 1 Exterior storage or parking only outside agency parking 15 %of total parking area ncludes special projects aoragc !0'%, of tool parking area ietback requirements 69 ATTACHMENT CURRENT STAFFING PLAN (To be used in conjunction with the SPACE PLAN) P954 Police Services Facility-Design/Build C ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - SUMMARY For ONE FACILITY SECTION ALL SECTIONS CURRENT LOCATION: ALL LOCATIONS 'CURRENT! PRO ��A(1 J STAFF RE=rulfiD STAFF : EXIST, AREA REQUIRED SF 52000 200.'213 . , 0� 2020 2000 2005 2013 2020 I DIVISION 14 Administration 11.0 46.-, 22.5 1 26.0 5 - Patrol / Commander 4.0 JAI 4.0 4.0 C11 - 'Patrol 88.0 40e;', 1111.01 137.0: 1 - ! Paool / Dist. 1 1 ! 5.0 j EIS ; 6.0 6.0 Patrol / Traffic I ''. 6.0 11.0 14.0 1 �I Patrol / P.O.P. '1.0 -14 1.0 1.0 Q. Irdomtation Services I Director 1 2.0 1 ?0'1 2.0 2.0 'J,$ 'Information Services / Systems 3.5 ?.T 6.0 8.0 1 3L S -i Information Services / Dispatch 27.5 "1 365 41.0 aL • Information Services / Records 21.0 i ~1 28.0 ' 30.0 .1 .4 Information Services / P&E 63 1 -&&. 1 10.0 13.0 -i Investigative Services / Commander j 4.0 .6A- I 5.0 5.0 1 ..I Investigative Services / DTF 7.0 44-1 10.0 ; 12.0 11 -]investigative Services / Youth School ! 10.a aa,a.: 15.0 17.0 I Investigative Services / Crim. Impact q 8.5:' Ji f. ; 10.51 11.5 - IJ•$ Invest Rative Services / Person Crimes) I 9.0 i 44?r' 13.S 1 15.5 l l• "� Investigative Services / Prop. Crimes I 1 9.5 i t2-.Y1 15.5 1 17.5 Common Facilities I 0.0 0.0 ul I 0.0 10 ; finnaal'ned 1 I SUBTOTALI 229.3 S BUILDING GROSS FACTOR 25%1 i"00I 322.5 1 371S I STAFF AND GROSS AREA TOTAL 1 229.3 I NB:M 73251 371.5' 1 Area totals do not include District 1 4,170 s.116 S,fl/ L,400 1,499 1,499. 1,499 1,499 12,981 14,M 15,113 15,576 2,199 2,28S 2,199 7,385 "1 922 I'm 1,322� 1,082 1,220 1,359 1,771 22S. 225� 22S. 225. 353: 3S0 353 3S8 1,141; 1,141, 1,4" 1,373 4,OS11 4,394 4,622 4,69S� CO5E 4,3811 4,33Si 4,3$9 7,2581 0.091 9,051 10,496 1,650' /,97s; 1,07s! I,87SI IAA 1,956: 3,247 2,440. 1,208 1,20411 1,391, 1.3% 1,174 7,260 1,240 1,347i 21097, 2,304: 3,352i 2,77S; i 2,4341 2,630, 2,942. 3,06 j I7,Su1 I 12,9031 13,57T /4,1111 I 59,941, 65,0491 NJ56 74,71f 14,985� 16,2621 17,464: 18,5621 714,926' 31,31E 97,3201 92,411, SECTION BY DIVISION CURRENT LOCATION: ALL LOCATIONS CURRENT; PROJECTE STAFF I RE UI TAFF I EXIST] AREA REOUIRED I I SF 2000 1 20051 20131 2020I 1 2000 I 2005 I 2013 1 2020 I DIVISION ,4 -!Administration l i q Patrol 11 VS information Services 1 1 -1 Investigative Services j Common Facilities I i0 'unADOC$^C.E I - I SUBTOTAL! BUILDING GROSS FACTOR 25%, STAFF AND GROSS AREA TOTAL' 11.0 110.0 60.3 48.0 0.0 229.25 229.3 •Frrl 22.S 126.01 148.01 j 69.0 82.5 57.5 69.5 0.0 0.0 I •,168• ; 322.5 iiM 322.5' 26.0 173.0 94.0 78.S 0.0 371.5 371 5 STAFFING SWORN if CIVILIAN CURRENT LOCATION: ALL LOCATIONS jCURRENT R PROI DI ALL+haA1 2cd STAFFSTAFF I 2000 I700si201312020 63 J Sworn 142.0 4/�0p80:�d 20].q 243.51 Ipo.s 'Civilian 87.3j 115.51 Iza.O; _ I TOrAL1-aw! 3725i 3715 OIL*3 S Notes: 1 District 1 area is not included in the foul required area for the new facility. Fort Collins Police Services C/ W 1��ta ENTRY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SECTION: ADMINISTRATION CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE I WORK PLACES I OFFICES i Police Chief Deputy Chief 1 1 Prof. Standards Lt. I Exec Staff Proj Mg, Staff Psychologist { I. A. Sergeant I Training Sergeant a3 Training Officer Budget Coordinator . �.� Budget Tech Legal 1 SUSTOTAU CIRCULATION 25%' OFFICES TOTAL I j WORK STATIONS I ! Admin Aide III (Chiefs Sec.) I I I CIT _ ' Training Supply Technician . .+Supply / Range Tech Planning Tech j CIRCULATION 35%., 1 WORK STATIONS TOTAL( i WORK PLACES TOTAL' I CURRENT AUTN / 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 0.5 0 R.S 1 0.5 0.75 0.25 0 2.5 11 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 —t—i 3 3 1 1 ! 2 5.5 i 7 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 IO.7D H4 1 18.51 21 1 1 2 1 i 1 I 1 0'j�- 0 ! 0 +I 4 I 5 04 499'i 22.3 26 AL4ho 2i ze ci . UNRI EXIST; AREA REQUIRED i SF SF i 1 I 12000 ! 2003: 2013 2020NOTES 1 i 1i 225 263 200; 225, 225 225 225 0 0 200' 200 200; 177 200! 200; 200' 200: 1! 180! 123 200 j ISO 180. ISO 180. 1501 127I 0', 1501 01 300; 01 4501 0' 450' 150 155 ! 1 120 1SO' 120! 150; 660: 150! 300 120I 1161 1201 120+ 660, 240, 840 2401 120 ISO 1201 120i 120'- 120' Oj Di 1501 1501 i 1,2651,955, 2,575 2,905; 1 316, 41W 644' 726! 11, S 8112,"41 3, 21913, 631 160 11912 160; 160. 160! 1601 64 1 321 641 641 12a i64 64 i 641 641 64, 64, 64 64 64 64 64 01 01 n n 352I 41 1231 14 !SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Waiting and Reception Library/Media 18� 110 1801 180 1so �.; j 20C 200 200 200, 200 Exec Stall Wk Room ! i I I 120 1� 201 120120 120 11 Volunteer Work Area j ! i 61I 28 128; 129 1281 SUBTOTALI I I I I 1 628 628 628 628 CIRCULATION 25% I I 220 2201 220 220 AREAS TOTAL. 848 844 841 048 I I I ROOMS !Conference. 480 574 I80 480 180 480 Files Training Files 1 I 80 120 120 120 1i I 80 33 80 120 120 120 Copier/Fax/Supplies I 11101 282: 120 1201 120 120 Coat Clmet i I 15 I 15 15 15 15 Rest Rooms 80 Bo 80so Bo IA File Storage I I I � so �1 8080 1 I Personnel Files . 1 I I so 80 Unilorn / Equip. Storage Soo 0 50. Soo, 580 Coffee 60 60 601 60 60 SUBTOTAL( 1,015 1,095 1,095 1,095 CIRCULATION 25%I I I 254 274 274 274 ROOMS TOTAL; I I 1 1,269 1,369 1,369 1,369 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL ! : 2.117 12 217 2 17 17 rTIOT t REQV STAFF i ASF! 71 41*r, 22.3 ' 26 i j 11 13015 136 5 917 f 1091 17 �1 SWORNI S I ;.rl I2.5 15 CIVILIAN i 6 y 10 I Il Fort Collins Police Services 6 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: CURRENT LOCATION: PATROL COMMANDER p (A�.I— r7 - d s K7 Z,ir 300 LAPORTE 'CURRENT ►ROI Chan co STAFF REOW UNITI EXIST AREA REQUIRED ^^ O SF i SIF 2000 2005 i 2013 26201 . �(C) 2000 2005' 2013 2020 - NOTES i WORK PLACES '.OFFICES I Commander 1 1 1 1 200 : 211 200 200 200 200 � Lieutenant 1 1 1 1 ISO - ISO 180 180. I80. Operations Lt. 1 1 1 1 ISO i50i ISO ISO ISO SUBTOTAL' 530. 530' 530 530 CIRCULATION 25%, ! % 133 133' 133 133 OFFICES TOTAL' 3 3 3 3 663 663 663 663. 1 WORK STATIONS 2 ---i Admin, Aide 80 Volunteer 64 so 128' so 128 ao 128 Bo. 128. SUBTOTAL! 1 1 1 1 ! 208 208 208 208: CIRCULATION 35%; 1 73 73. 73, 73' WORK STATIONS TOTAL:. - 281, 201 231 281 WORK PLACES TOTAL; 1 :�X 4 1 943 947: 913 913 % INCREASE IN STAFF' OX 0% ! 0% t SPECIAL AREAS i AREAS', Coffee w 60i 60' 60! Copy Fax /Supply ;! j 120 j 120i 120, 120i 120 SUBTOTAL; ISO 180�� 1801 180; CIRCULATIONTION25%, AREAS TOTALi_ 1 63� 63; 63i 63 I 243i 243, 243i 243 i ROOMS Conference Room i 250� 2501 250i 2501 250! SUBTOTAL! ! CIRCULATION 25%i 1 1 �� j i 250. 250 250I 250: I. ROOMS TOTAL! I 631 3131 631 313' 63: 3131 63 3131 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL I556' 5561 556' S56 TOTAL READ STAFF L ASF' ; 4 4 4 j 1.49911 4991 1 199 NOTES: SWORN; 3 1 3 3 3 1 CIVILIAN' Fort Collins Police Services 7 char ao0S ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES • PATROL SERVICES SECTION: DISTRICT 1 CURRENT LOCATION: OLD TOWN SQUARE :.CURRENTPROI-WED STAFF ll CIE YD STAFF I i UNITi E%IST'; AREA REQUIRED AUTR I II SF SF 2000 ! 20651 20131 2020; 2000' 2003 2013 2020•NOTES 'WORK PLACES ' OFFICES ;Sergeant I I I 1 120 i 120' 120. 120'i 120� 1 SUBTOTAL, r � 1 1201. 120� 120' 120•. I CIRCULATION 25%' } '- f 1 30 30 30i 30: OFFICES TOTAL i 1 1 1 l l i ISO! 1SOi ISO, ISOP 1 WORK STATIONS Q GR 0 ! -F' 1 1 1 I 64 0• 64' 0 64 . ti .� Offittr i, a � -4-1 4 I 1 1 BT I� 1 87i e7: 87 87 II SUBTOTAL, 1 CIRCULATION 35%I I 4 1 I b l 5, I S I ` I 0� 0; 641 221 0, 01 64, 22- I WORK STATIONS TOTAL! 1 1 1 0: 06! 0 06i WORK PLACES TOTAL, 5 y 6 i 1501 2361 150} 236j % INCREASE IN STAFF, 20% 1 0% 1 0% 1 SPECIAL AREAS j AREAS ! Open Office ! i ' 900 9001 900' 9001 SUBTOTAL' I 900i 9001 900I 900' CIRCULATION 25%� 1 j 1 3151 315j 3151 3151 1 AREAS TOTALI � j 1,215 1,21511,215`�` 1.3151 I ROOMS li I Community Room , I I 1 j 3471 347� 1 347; 347I I Bicycle Storage I I I 320i 320. 3201 3201 SUBTOTALi I I 1 ` 6671 667 66 71 667 CIRCULATIONROOMS 1 1 I I TOTAL, 1 i 12,0191 0311 8341 034 03/ SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL; 1 I 2.01fI 2.0191 2.019I TOTAL REOD STAFF i AS 5 — 6 -64 1 t 2.199i 2.20512.1"12,2851 NOTES: ,—; SWORN{ l 5 ! ./J' 5 { 5 d �! CIVILIAN, 0 1 C 1 1 1 1 1 Su0 counts are included in staffing and projections. Area is not included in building requirements. Fort Collins Police Services e I Chnn� n to ofM ENTHY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: PATROL CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE C14i11�Z Zfcd CURRENT, PROLE' - STAFF REOPMRSTAFF UNIT, EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF I SF 2000 200512013i 2020! 2000 2095 2013 2020,NOTES WORK PLACES j OFFICES L4 3 -T- 3 3 ', 160. 540 540 540 540 Crime Analyst 2 2 - 2 2 ISO ; 110 300, 300 300 300 ; R&D Manager 1 1 1 I i ISO, : ISO 150. 150 ISO SUBTOTAL'� '! 990, 990, 990 990 CIRCULATION 25%; 248 248': 248 248 OFFICES TOTALI 6 .F 6 6 11,334 1,238 1,238 1,239 I WORK STATIONS O Sergeant 7 -M-i 13 15 80 i 560 880 1,040 1,200 1 Early Week DAY SHIFT i I - 1C) -+OffKers 10 it 14 I 17 !I 0 C5O 2 2 2 2 0 0: 0- 0 0, Late Week DAY SHIFT 1 ! l0 �: Officers 10 -W 14 16 C5O 2 2 ! 2 2 ! EARLY WEEK SWING SHIFT 12 --}Officers 10 -H' I 14 1 16 0 i 0 0i 0 OI C5O 2 2 2 1 10 0i. 0; 0� 0! I EARLY WEEK MIDNIGHT SHIFT I :Officers 9 10 12 15 0 0 0 0 or 1 C5O j l 0 ! 0 0 0 j O i 0,; 0 0! 0: I LATE WEEK SWING SHIFT i 1 ''Officers 13 4-5r-1 17 i 20 I 0 I 1 0! Oj 0: 0,' CSO 2 2 1 2 2 1 0 1 0', O' OI 01 6 ! LATE WEEK MIDNIGHT SHIFT -}Officer 9 j iQ^, 11 13 I 0 I j 0' I i 0'i 01 011 p I C5O 0 0 0 I 0!! 0 1 01 0 0! 01 POWER SHIFT Officers 6 ! --P-! 9 11 i SUSTOTALi ', 82 **1 112 131 i 5601 `{ 880j 1,040i 1,200I CIRCULATION 35%j ; I I 1961 306' 364! 420 WORK STATIONS TOTAL:' WORK PLACES TOTAL] 86 118 1 137 1,316') 12,55413,306j 2,06612,4441 2,8201 3,68214,058 % INCREASE IN STAFF. { 14% 11" 1&% 1 1 SPECIAL AREAS 1 I AREAS j i I I Patrol Reception i j 11 18i 144 144i 144?- 144 1 Report Writing 1 j 2B 280 318 3751 436 ! Evidence Preparation 250I 2501 250I 250 i Gu File Layout 1501 1 150I 150j ISO ISO File Storage .i 1501 150 I 1701 170 170 Coll" i j 1201 120� 1201 120 120 SUBTOTAL ! ! I ! 1 950I 1,009I 1.06611,126 I CIRCULATION 25%I ! j I I 333! 353; 373' 3941 AREAS TOTAL'. 1. 1 283' 1 36211 439! 1 5211 I ROOMS Interview Room t Soft Interview Room Suspect Interview i luve. Interview .. I I 1 OOI1501 1001 1001 2001 2001 200 1 S01 ISO[ 1501 ISO 2001 200 2130I 200 200i 200. 2001 200I • Fort Collins Police Services 9 Overview The process of constructing a new forensic laboratory revolves around four general activities: planning, design, construction, and moving. Specific activities vary within each phase of the process, and each stage is discussed in detail in the following pages. Through- out the process, from conception through opening day, careful planning and excellent communication among those involved are critical to success. Planning. The key to a successful planning stage is the preparation of a Needs Assess- ment/Design Program, two documents frequently combined into one that form the baseline for the project. The Needs Assessment documents user and facility needs, evaluates the existing facility, defines space requirements, and provides project cost data. The Design Program provides a guide to design the project, translating and expanding the Needs Assessment into a form that will be used by architects and engineers in the design process. The Needs Assessment/Design Program may initially be an idealized statement of require- ments that will later need to be reconciled to the actual budget or resources available. Design. There is not one universally correct plan for forensic laboratory design. Design will vary with each laboratory's specific needs. Functional requirements of specific scien- tific disciplines, equipment, and instrumentation are a few of the variables that generate space, dimension, and adjacency requirements that impact the overall design. Hazardous materials handling and preservation of evidence are just two of the many variables that need to be considered. The future also needs to be considered. A forensic laboratory must be designed with the flexibility to change along with the needs of its occupants, technol- ogy, or scientific methodologies. Construction. Following acceptance of bids and contract negotiation, construction can begin in earnest. The construction stage offers a last chance before occupancy to make changes to the proposed lab structure that were missed in the construction documents or during the planning and design stages. Every change has a potential financial conse- quence. Some changes may be too costly to make. Each laboratory's situation is unique. Changes to local and State regulations may also affect each construction project. Be ready for unforeseen issues that may affect construction such as subsurface conditions or ob- structions. Fixtures, furnishings, and equipment will also need to be budgeted for and purchased. An evaluation process and criteria to ensure that the contractors are qualified to complete the job as specified must be established. Moving. Laboratory work must continue even as the shift is made from the old facility to the new. Develop a strategic plan for the move. Phase and schedule move activities so that routine daily events occur as smoothly and efficiently as possible. Consider the tasks and activities, the order in which they need to be accomplished, and who is going to be responsible for them. The plan can be divided into premove, move, and postmove activi- ties. Always keep in mind the date that the move needs to be completed. VA ' Roll Call ' FTO Training Room 18 120. 367 738 839 900 9W 120- 120 120 Conference 200 120 0 0 0 0 Sergeants Conierence - 100. 100 100 100 too Equipment Distribution 200 200 200 200 200 'Swat Storage : 400 25' 400: 400 400 400 Armory !Training ISO. I j 600. 0. 0 0 0 574 1,700 1,700 1,)O0. 1,700 — Training Roam EOC Components I 216 216 216 216' Bicycle Storage i 350-. 350 350 350 350 Saiiy Port j Suspect ProcessingISOI j 1,100 1,100 1,100' 1,100' 1,100 i Booting 2501 300 300: 300 300 372., 250. 250 250' 250, Prisoner Property 2S! 1 25i 252S- 25 1luv. Prisoner Property i� 25; 25'. 25 25 25 Bin - Haz Clean up 80 80! 160' 160- 160 - Ilntoa I Room 60; 601 - 60' 68- 120 120 60 60� 60 60. Ad A Adult Holding Cells j 70: 50i 250: 420� 560, 560- I Juvenile Holding Cells ! 70: 280 280 280 280 Frst d i 1 Aid 70, . 70 70',. 70 70! L 'Linem Up 601 1 2521 j 60' 60' 60. 60i 252' 252� 2521 I j 2521 SUBTOTALI 1 1 1 1 17,316; 7,745 7,998' 7,9981 CIRCULATION 25%i 1,62911,93612,000; 2,0001 ROOMS TOTALI, AREAS TOTAL - 1 1 9,145; 9,6811 9,9981 9,99� ._ l9w21, 1/ 843r 11 43c 11,518 TOTAL REOD STAFF i ASFI i' 88 I Mtr 1 118 ' 137 I j ' at 981114348i 1311015c+•' NOTES: a9 $WORN ! 77 -yaJ 126 I [IVILIAN 11 i t i107 t I 11 1 Fort Collins Police Services 10 J,. ENTRY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: TRAFFIC UNIT LAPORTE nl,+h aA:2C� CURRENT LOCATION: 300 I CURRENT PROOF fED—; STAFF j R ( D STAFF. i UNIT: EXIST; AREA OEOUIRED 1� VL Y•, Oa; ':' SF SF : �00 2000 20052013' 2020: I 2000 20W 20131 2628 NOTES WORK PLACES 1 IOFFICES I iSergeant 1 1 1 2 ISO ISO- 1501 150'. 2161 SUBTOTAL I �� 1501 150i 150 216: CIRCULATION 2S%I I 1 t 381 38. 35' 54''' OFFICES TOTAL' I I i 1 2 1 I IS& 100' U0 270; 1 WORK STATIONS j 3 —t oB «R 1 ! 3 A-i 8 10 0 0 0' 0; 0. DUI Officer . 1 2 2 2 2 �,. 0 � 0- 0; 01 0' .—r C�meM IZA.L.a 6peLANa.. 11 l � i , 1 ', i SUBTOTAL 5 • b 10 12 I I 0. 0 Oi 04 CIRCULATION 3S% j l 1 O', Oi 01 01 WORK STATIONS TOTAL WORK PLACESTOTAD l 6 i-'I lj 11 14 I 100j 01 uej 01 /0 01 2701 j j % INCREASE IN STAFF! j 33% : 3B% 27% 1 I j SPECIAL AREAS AREAS I Woh Stations I I 26i 84j 1121401 168; � I SUBTOTAL � ! 841: 112 140! I68 CIRCULATION 25% I 29: 39! 491 591 AREAS TOTAL I I 113I 151 189I 2271 I ROOMS j 1 Traffic Storage 1 I 200 200 267 300 300 Conference I I I 200 200 200, 200 200 SUBTOTAL I 400 467 S00 S00 CIRCULATION 25% j 100 117 US 125 ROOMS TOTAL I 500 501 625 625 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL I 613 735 O11 - T TOTAL REOD STAFF 6 ASFI 1 6 ' .0O i 11 1 14 1 j i 8011 9221 1.002I 1,1221 NOTES: to SWORN 1 6 11 I 11 1 1 CIVILIAN j 0 .0� 0 0 Fort Collins Police Services I a (.UPI f d l Ssv 1 d e-vj E FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES S ON: SELECTIVE DUTIES UNIT CU LOGTION: 300 LAPORTE ! CURRENT' PROJECTED STAFF REOUIRED STAFF UNIT, EXIST AREA REQUIRED j SF SF 2000 ' 70052013 2020 2000 2005: 2013 2020, NOTES 'WORK PLACES OFFICES • Sergeant \� 1 1 1 2 ISO 90 150 150 150 216 \ SUBN(3TALI 150 150- 150 216 I ,,. CIRCULATION 15%, 38 38 38 54 OFFICES TOT 7 1 1 - 2 U8 198 198 270 I WORK STATIONS LL !O6toers •'.•, 5 6 7 ! 9 64 320. 384 448' 576, Intern Work Stations 0 O 0 0 1 64 64 64. 64. 64, 1 SUSTOTAL� 5'\ 6 7 9 320i 384:, 448 576! CIRCULATION 35%i I •� 1 WORK STATIONS TOTAL I 1121 4321 1341 IST 2021 i - WORK PLACES TOTALI! 6 1 \S70 71 I 1 620I S10i 706! 605i 79211,040 770; % INCREASE IN STAFF, ;_ _ 1 17A.'i 14% 130% . SPECIAL AREAS 1 AREAS SUBTOTAL 1 ! Oi OI 01 0' CIRCULATION 25%I I 0 0. 0i 01 AREAS TOTAL Oi 0 OI O 1 ROOMS I Crime Prev. Storage ! 1Nii 117� 133� 1831 SDU Stw. - j 1175 200 2751 Copier/Fad Supplies ! 1 1 11201 120I 120' SUBTOTALI1 1 Ij412! 4531 578 CIRCULATION 25% 11031 113 145 ROOMS TOTAL !:. j S15j 567 7231 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL ! 15151 567 723 TOTAL REOD STAFF k ASP! 6 7! 8 1 11 l 1 002! 1 2 1 359 1 771 NOTES: j SWORN, 6 7 8 1 11 i CIVILIAN I 0 0 0 0 - Fort Collins Police Services 12 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: P.O.P. UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE Ac.�-Fhan:Z<d CURRENT; ft D ! STAFF upgamp, STAFF ! UNTT- EXIST, AREA REQUIRED SF SF 20" 20051 2013' 2020i 2000' 2005' 2013 2024 NOTES 1 WORK RACE '.. I OFFICE - - Lieutemnt 1 r 1 1 ! 1 180 ; 180; ISO 180 180 j I SUBTOTAL 180100. ISO ISO CIRCULATION 25% 45IS' 45 45 OFFKIES TOTAL. 1 1 ! 1 d i - 2251 225' 22S. 225 I WORK STATIONS { j i ! SUBTOTAL, : 0 0 0 0 0' 0 01 0! CIRCULATION 35%j 0 0. 0 0 WORK STATIONS TOTL 0 0 0 Or WORK (LACES TOTAL! 22S � 225, 225. 225, % INCREASE IN STAFF' 0% R% 0% I SPECIAL AREAS r I AREAS r j I SUBTOTAL; j 0: 0. 0 0, CIRCULATION 25%; j I 0 O: 0; 0' AREAS TOTALi !I 0' 0 0- 0! ROOMCane rence . ! 200: 0' Oi Q SUBTOTAL j 1 I ! 01 OI O: 0! I CIRCULATIONROOAL5 TOTAL, j (: 0; 0! O Oi SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL, O 0! 0�' TOIL REOD STAff i ASF' I 1 1 1 1 225 225, 225' 2251 NOTES: SWORN' I 1 1 l l CIVILIAN! ! 0 0 0 0 Fort Collins Police Services 13 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: DIRECTOR CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE gI.L,�,h a(L 'ZCcI I CURRENT_ PlOI D STAFF ; 1 EDSTAFF UNIT. EXIST AREA REOUIRED SF SF 2000 200S'. 2013 2020 2000' 2005! 2013, 2020'NOTES I WORK PLAN i OFFICES DiKRor !� 7 1 1 1 1200 ! 200 200 200' 200 SUBTOTAL;i 200;, 200; 200 200 j CIRCULATION 25% I 50 50, 50 50 OFFICES TOTAL: 1 1 1 1 250; 250- 250 250 WORK STATIONS Admin. Asst 1 1 1 I so 80 00. 80' 80 SUSTOTALI _ 1 1 1 �, 1 80 80, 80-: 80 CIRCULATION 35%I1 l 28; 28, 28: 26' WORK STATIONS TOTAL j 100 108, 108 108. WORK PLACES TOTAL i 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 3S8, 350! 358 350 % INCREASE IN STAFF I ox 1 ox ! 0% I SPECIAL AREAS AREAS SUBTOTALi ! CIRCULATION N O 0' 01 0: TALI AREAS TOTAL I I ! 0;� 01 0i 8 ROOMS I I ! SUBTOTAL�i ! II I CIRCULATION 25%: - 0, Oi Oj 0' ROOMS TOTAL p, 0; 0 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL' ! pi 0 Oi 0' TOTAL REDD STAFF i ASFI !_ 2 2 2 1 2 1 3S8 NOTES: SWORN' 0 0! 0 0 j CIVILIAN; 2 2 2 2 Fort Collins Police Services 14 Gh� s- ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: SYSTEMS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE a to 2.Ccl !CURRENT; PRO D STAFF ! RED STAFF UNIT'EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF SF 2000 2005: 20131 3020! 2000; 20OS'. 201320201NOTIES WORK PLACES I OFFICES SUBTOTAL 0, 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25%f 1 ! 0 0 0 0' OFFICES TOTALI 0 0 0 0 '.. 0 0 0 0 WORK STATIONS i! i volunteers 1 0 0 0 I 0 64 61 64, 128 128 Systems Manager ! 1 1 1 1 1 I 80 80, 80; 80 80! ! Sptems Analyst 1 1 2 4 64 64. 64' 128' 256� Computer 01eie1a @gee Spec. ! j CAD "ect Mgr. 4'TPaK TeJ..I 1 ' 1 015 1 015 1 1 I i 1 64 64 64 ! 64: 64• 64: W- 64, 64; FA: Radio Tech 0 0 l 1 64 0; Oi 64i 64. SUBTOTAL! 1 3.5 ! 3.5 6 8 336; 3361 528i 6561I CIRCULATION 35%i ! I I 11 8 j 118i 185, 230i WORK STATIONS TOTAL. 454J 451; 713� 88C WORK PLACES TOTAL! % INCREASE IN STAFF 3.5 3.5 6 0% 71X 1 8 33% 154i I51! 713; B86' SPECIAL AREAS i AREAS i SUBTOTAL! CIRCULATION 25% AREAS TOTALI ROOMS Computer Room Computer Storage / Receiving CIRCULATION ROOMS 74 C I 01 0 0! i 3501 2001 5501 I TOTAL REOD STAFF i ASF1 3.5 3.5 6 ! 8 1 j I 11,1411 1.141 1 400 1 577 NOTES: i SWORNI i 0 0 0 0 I i CIVILIAN 3.5 3.5 6 B I Fort Collins Police Services 15 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: RECORDS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE qL,C�-E10 lLiZC�I CURRENT POOCE _ 1 c%� ST, AFFUED STAFF ; UNIT EXIST. AREA REQUIRED SF SF _ 200 JOBS - 2013 2920 2000 20051 2413 2020' NOTE WORK PLACES ! OFFICES . Records Manager SUBTOTAL�� I t t l ! 150: 137 150 150 ISO ISO CIRCULATION 25%I ! ! 1S0 1S0 150- ISO OFFICES TOTAL.: 1 7 1 1 I ! 3838 3838; 100j ISO: 101 I00= ' WORK STATIONS 3 ►Supervisor I. —Police Report Specialists 2 3 9 4T ! 15 3 17 ; ; So 64 � 160� 210� 240 240� i.-. 4�L3N�ieal Public Info Database Workstation p—�i' D 0 576i 640, 6401 640 64 512; 512i 512i 512.. Desk Officer 1 f 0 64 64 6-4 64. 60' 64 64! 64: 64 641 SUBTOTAL I 20 20 27 29 1,376! 1520! 1,520 1,520 CIRCULATION 35% I I I i 482' 532; 532I 532� WORKSTATIONS OTALi WORK Z1 1 I 1 ! 1,BSBi 2,052 2,052i 2,0321 PLACES TOTAL 21 .W 1 28 3 30 ! 12,045' 2,240! 2,240� 2,2401 %INCREASE IN STAFF' 11% 117% 7% j I SPECIAL AREAS iAREAS I I SUBTOTAL!; CIRCULATIONAREAS j OI i 0 O! 01 TOTAL I l Oi pI pl 01 Oi OI 0. 0! 1 I ROOMSConfemme Records File Storage 2�i 2p0 tool 2001 200 I Mail Roan 1 1 20. 200I 200 ' 2001 229 20D 267I 286 I Cenval Supply ! Press Room I I I 600I 380 600� 600 200 6001 200I 60O Copier / Fax / Supplies / MF ! 1 1 1501 80! 130 1501 8DI 150 80' 80 Rest Roans 150 ISO Co0ee / Break 1 1 401 6SI go W gp 80 TALIj I 100' 213' 100 100 t00 100 CIRCULATIONSUBTO25% I'. I 1,610 1,639 1,677 I,6% j 11 ROOMS TOTAV SPECIAL AREAS TOTALI 1 403 1 2,0113 410 2,048 419 2,096 424 2,130 I 2 OTJ' 2 041 1 096 2 120 . _ TOTAL REOD STAFF i ASF' i_ 21 4114 28 i0 ' 1 /,05014,288 14,33S 14,3591 NOTES: SWORN 1' ! 0 O 1 0 I 0 1 2t CIVILIAN. 27 ar • 28 1 30 Fort Collins Police Services 16 ENTRY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: DISPATCH ' 1 CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE (�lmt+TJ(Z,L'ZCaI :CURRENT PRqjKTED STAFF IWIRED STAFF UNIT. EXIST'. AREA REQUIRED 5F SF 2000 2005'. 2013 2020 12000' 2005: 2013 2020 � NOTES i WORK PLACES ! OFFICES Communications Manager 1 1 1 I 180 180 190 ISO 180 —TCcfi. Jew. tad. F .S AaA. Ase1C SUBTOTAL. 1 ISO ISO. 180, 180, CIRCULATION 25%i 1 ! 45-: 45, 4545! - OFFICES TOTALi:' 1 1 1 225. 225I 2251 225' I WORK STATIONS I (a �iSupervisor 5.5 I 'M! 5.5 6 I 80 ! 1 440j 4401 440i 4801 Dispatchers / Call Takers 21 E9- 30 34 80 I 80 560; 800: 960. 960' Call Taker Consoles ! 64 ! 3201 320! 320. 320I I SUBTOTAU 26.5 11" 1 35.5 II 40 I ! 1,32011,56011,720' 1,7601 CIRCULATION 35%; 462, 546! 602i 6161 WORK STATIONS TOTAL' I i 1,7821 2,106: 2,32Y 2,776' WORK PLACES TOTAL! i 27.5 31.51 36.5 41 i ! 2,00T�, 2,3311 2,517. 2,601; -. % INCREASE IN STAFF! 15K 16% 1 12% j i .SPECIAL AREAS I: I AREAS911 ! ! 1 Plonee I 1201 1201 120j 120. 120� 120! Radio / SOD! 21h 500I 500I 5001 500I UPS / Swilchgear ! 2001 200I 200 200� 200i SUBTOTAL:' ! CIRCULATION 25%,I : I 820 920 820i 820 I 205 205 20Si 205I AREAS TOTAL. i 1,025 1,025 1,025i 1,0251 ;ROOMS j Conference 200 200 200 200 200 I Kitchen /Break 200 200 200 200 200I I Training Work Room ! I ISO! 150 ISO ISO 150 ! Copier / Fax /Supplies 1 i 120! 120 120 120 120 ! Dispatch sooTockers ! 5' 65I 80 90 105 40 i 80i 80 80 80 SUBTOTAL i 815 830 840 8-5-5204 CIRCULATION 25%1 ; ! : � ! I 204 208 210 214 I ROOMS TOTAL' I ! SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 12,044 /,019, 1,078 2 Oi3 1,050 1,0i9 2 075 2 091 TOTAL REDO STAFF i ASF' 27.5 71.5 3i.5 41 / OSl 1 794i 1 i221 695! NOTES: I SWORN' ! 0 ! 01 0 1 O ! CIVILIAN! 27.5 131.5' 36.5 ! 41 Fort Collins Police Services 17 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION PROPERTY / EVIDENCE / LAB CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE H OFF SITE i�u4har2:t 2eelf � �I CURRENT PRO1 STAFF RE 1 DSTAFF ! UNIT, OAST AREA REQUIRED QL� 2000 1 2005120131 2020i SF Ixeao SF xas' 2013 xexo:NOlES 1 WORK PLACES I OFFICES Supervisor j 1 l l 2 1 150 150 150 150 216 SUBTOTAL,' CIRCULATION 25Xi ( !I ISO ISO- 150 216, 38 38- OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 1 2 ,. 3H 54 18� 138 t38 254� 1 WORK STATIONS j j 3—! Properly / Evidence Technicians 1 2 .?. 3 1 4 1 1 61 12B' 121 192' 256i .I Crime Scene Investigators 2 } 1 : 5 I 64 ! ! 120: 1921 256'. 320' T —1 AFIS Tech. .}Lab Clerical 0.5 -1'- 1 1 0.75 4— 1 1 I 100 ! 64 100 i00: 100 100, ! S 1 I i 641 64,' 64 64'. SUBTOTALS 5.25 --7-1 9 it I 4201 464! 612'1 7401 CIRCULATION 3S%I 1 - �} 1471 1691 214! 259j WORK STATIONS TOTAL! WORK PLACES TOTAL, j 6.25 t I l 5671 i53: 826'_ !99' % INCREASE IN STAFF, !_ 10 13 ! 78% 25% 755i 841' 1,014: 1,269: !, SPECIAL AREAS AREAS P/E Storage 1,15111,151: list 1,473I 1,84212,394I Narcotics Storage150i Secure Storage j I 150i 150 150I 'so Large Property Store e B 1 150 547: 150 5I 4S07;1 150I ISO 710902 8751 150 1,71318 Vehicle Processin6 Evidence Processing , 1 , 1S114507I� ,001 1,10011,100 1,01002 .R0^^ I Bin - Clean Up i l 80 I 72 80, 102128 1661 AFIS / Livescan ! /0; 801 80I SOi so! 80 SUBTOTAL i l J.4{6 3,94.629 5,577 CIRCULATION 25XI : AREAS TOTAL 8621991,00011,15711,393I 4,310 4, S,7a61 (,W, I ROOMSCwfer! ! Forensence � ic File Room ! 1 200I 200 200 200I 200 ,Photo Room i, ' 1 1201 100 95 120 100 168 161 f 00 100 168 100 Change Room IC^^m Lab EC 60 60 60 60 Latentc 430 430 4301 430 430 Trace Evidence I I I 100 100 1001 100. 100 Digital Imaging Crime Lab Storage I i I I 1 its 120 I 115 120 115 )15 120 12 0 15 1120 i, ! Evidence Packaging /Storage I I 7 ! 0I 120, 70 1201 0 7701 120 120I 70 120I I Viewing Room Copier/ Fax i ! 200 200 200 200 200 120I 9H 120 120, 12001 120 1 SUBTOTAL: ! 1,755 1,803� I,B03 1,803 CIRCULATION 25X: j j I 139 4511 4S1 451 ROOMS TOTAL, I SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL; I I2,194 2,254 2,254 2,251 6 7 0 9 1 I : 7358 a WA 9 n3110 N0 TOTAL REOD STAFF i ASF' 6.25 41"' 10 13 I NOTES: ♦ SWORN' 0 i 0 1 0 1 0 �? CIVILIAN, 6.25 .0+1 10 16.25 1 133 Fort Collins Police Services 78 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION: COMMANDER CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE A1,1•ii\p(L52fc4 GhcLn_ l CURRENT ►R L.) STAFF RE RED STAFF . UNIT. EXIST AREA REQUIRED n 2000 SF SF dC�O 2005, 2013, 2020! 2000 2003 2013 2020: NOTES 'WORK PLACES .OFFICES .Commander 1 1 1 - 1 200 . 213. 200' 200 200 200 Lieutenant 0 1 1 1 : I80 - 0 180 180 I80 is SUBTOTAL; 200. 200 200 200 CIRCULATION 25%' S0- 50 So SO OFFICES TOTAL, 1 2 2 2 250, 250 230 250 WORK STATIONS ! : Admin. r -P ASS}.. I 1 i Admin. Clerk 2 2 - I 2 1 l 2 80 ! 9/ 64 80! 80 128. 128 80' 128 80 128 SUBTOTAL! 3 3 3 3 : 208: 208. 208, 208. CIRCULATION 35%i i 73 73 73': 73. WORK STATIONS TOTAL! i281. 281 281 281 WORK PLACES TOTAL! 4 5 '. 5 S 531 531 531 331 % INCREASE IN STAFF 25%' 0% 0% ' SPECIAL AREAS 'AREAS . i SUBTOTALi '.I 0. 0,, 0; 0'.; � CIRCULATION 25% � 'i i i AREAS TOTAL,., j 01 0 01 0_ I ROOMSi :Conference : 1 200' 206', 200: 200' 200' 200: ' Files Copier/Fax/Supplies ! 80, 80' too- 100i 100! Coat Closet 120i 1201 120 120! 120: . 15i1 151 15 15! 15,' SUBTOTAL' 415. 435i 435, 435i CIRCULATION 2S% 104I 109T 109' 1091 ROOMS TOTAL : 519 511� 541i 541' SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL' ; 519i 544 S44 5441 TOTAI REOD STAFF 6 AS 4 5 5 5 1.0501 1 0751 i 0731 / 075 SWORN-; 1 2 2 2 1 CIVILIAN' ! 3 : 3 3 3 Fort Collins Police Services 19 Planning Designing and building a forensic science laboratory can be an enormous undertaking. Careful planning is critical to success. Staff needs are the driving factor. From the start, the scientists who will occupy the building should be involved with the design/build team to explain their needs and special requirements for the laboratory. It is crucial to take the necessary time on the front end of the process to gather this important information. Key to the planning stage is a Needs Assessment/Design Program, two documents fre- quently combined into one that form the baseline for the project and are used throughout the entire process. The Needs Assessment documents the requirements for the facility. The Design Program provides a guide to design the project. Keep the document simple and straightforward —the people with budgetary authority need to understand it. What follows is a suggested approach for forensic science laboratory directors to use for the planning stage. Presented in a question and answer format, it covers the essential, basic elements of the planning process that directors need to know. 1. QUESTION: I have a need for new facilities now —what do I need to do and where should I be heading to assure success? ANSWER: Perform a preliminary self -evaluation to define the "mission" of opera- tions/organization and detail your current, past, and future operations. 2. QUESTION: If my self -evaluation reveals the need for new/expanded space, what do I do? ANSWER: Plan to develop an ArchitecturallEngineering Needs Assessment and Design Program. 3. QUESTION: What is a Needs Assessment? ANSWER: [Definition] Needs Assessment —An essential planning tool that must be developed by independent professionals who have requisite experience that quantifies and evaluates operations and ultimately projects present and future requirements. The Needs Assessment is a planning, developmental, and political tool. It assesses user and facility needs, assesses the existing facility, defines all space requirements, provides project cost data, and accounts for external influences such as building codes. 9 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION DRUG TASK FORCE CURRENT LOCATION: OFF SITE ALOrh O&i —Ltd ChQn � PROI D - CURRENTSTAFF Q RE ED STAFF ' ' UNR: EXIST AREA REQUIRED ZI�O 9 I SF SF 2000 2005i 2013: 2028 12000 2005 2013. 2020 NOTES WORK RACES OFFICES Lieutenant 1 1 1 1 I80 180 180 180 too 2 2 150 150 150 150 ISO SUBTOTAL, 2 2 3 3 j I50' 150 I50 150 CIRCULATION 25%. .' 38' 38 38 38 I WORK STATIONS OFFICES TOTAL, 2 2 3 3 IOB 188 188 108 ..1OfOcm 4 --S—! 6 8 64 256320- 384 512 1 Secrtary 01 1 1 1 1 1 j 64 64 64 64 64 SUBTOTALi! 5 rVIS 7 ! 9 1 320P. 364i 448' S76' • CIRCULATION 35%1 ! ! 112 134 157 202'' j WORK STATIONS TOTAL] 1 5 1} 7 i 9 : 432 SIR 605 778 WORK PLACES TOTAL' 7 q 4r i 10 12 - 620 706 792. 965 %INCREASE IN STAFF ! ! 11% 25% 20%! - I SPECIAL AREAS AREAS j Room ! I 100 100i 10O' 100 100! - TelneplbRoom 1� Conference / Training I� 80! 80 8011 801. 80, j I /00i 1 1001 100:, 100 100: I 2801 2801 280 280I, CIRCULATONpTAL25%I ; AREAS TOTAL! 1 701 70' 70 70, j ; I , � 3501 350� 350. 350! j, ! ROOMS IInterview I Equipment Storage ! - j 1001 1201 ! 2001 200j 300, 300� Personnel Locker 1 I 10: 1201 1201 2001 150I 150j ISO, 200j 150 Computer /File Room j 20W 200j 2501 2501 250' j SUBTOTAL;' ! j j.. I 670! 720! 900! g001 CIRCULATION 25%, 168� 180 225; 2TOTAL-! ROOMS TOTAL- I I j 878, 90017,12511,125 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL ! 1,7118' 1,250' 1,47511 475 - TOTAL REDD STAFF 8r ASFI _ 7 ,Y IS 12 I 1,807' 1,956i 2 26712 440 NOTES: SWORN ! 6 CIVILIANI 1 Fort Collins Police Services 20 Chcln � ,�n o� ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION YOUTH SCHOOL TEAMS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE �AL+�►'1alCAZ�eI :CURRENT'- TR9 FD STAFF (1 RED STAFF i : UNIT. EXIST AREA REQUIRED 2000 2105 2017' 2020 ! j 2000: 2005, 2013 - 2020: NOTES WORK PLACES 1 OFFICES i Segeants I 1 2 2 ',, 150 : 109 150' 150 300, 300, SUBTOTAL I { 150i 150i 300' 300 CIRCULATION 25%� ! 1 - 38; 38. 75 7S OFFICES TOTALI '. 1 1 2 j 2 166; in, 31S 375- I WORK STATIONS I I ! - �O — 5chml Resource Officer 1 7 —9- 11 ! 13 1 48 1 288 2881 288 288,. 1 D.A.M. Officer 2 -i- 2 2 I 1 48 48-, 48, 48. 48', 1 PAW Offer W.S. 0 1 0 0 0 I j ! 48 %, 96; 96i %' Imem /Volunteer l 0 1 O I 0 0 36 72 : 721I 72.' 72:, SUBTOTALI 9 1-M 13 15 I 4321 432i 432 4321 CIRCULATION 35%1 i ! :i I 151' 1511 151 151'� ! WORK STATIONS TOTAL; II t : 58 5831 583: $83: WORK PLACES TOTAL % INCREASE IN STAFF! 10 ! -1b 120% 1 15 1 25% 17 13% ( 7711 7711 958! 958. SPECIAL AS I AREA ]UaIUTA, CIRCULATION 2S%' j AREAS TOTALI ROOMS CoMercnce I Interview Dam Storage ' � I SUBTOTALS; i CIRCULATION 25%1 ROOMS TOTALI 1 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL I 1 1,20011.2001 1.3961 1,3961 NOTES: ii } SWORNI; Y2^1 - CIVILIANI 010 -1 O I Ois 110,11 - Fort Collins Police Services 101 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION CRIMINAL IMPACT UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE ALA.vti •LCd O to :CURRENT! R 'I CTED STAFF RE ]RED STAFF ! ! UNIT EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF SF p[.l� 2000 20052013 2020' 2000' 2005 2113 20201 NOTES 1 WORK PLACES ! OFFICES _ ISO : 150! ISO: 150 150; SUBTOTAL] CIRCULATION 25%j 1 1 l 1 11 1 1 1501 150 I50 150.' OFFICES TOTAL! ! WORK STATIONS 1 1 1 1 38- 38- 1as:: 11f; 38 100 38', lea 1 Wanant clerk O(ken 1.5 11.5 1.5 1.5 i 61 128 128: 128! 128 ! Volunteer WS 6 1 -�- 8 9 1 64 36 ! 448I 512' ! 36. 512: 576; -S aClVb(Al Wde g 36! 36: 36' ! SUBTOTAL 1 CIRCULATION 35%� 7.5 1 .br!! 9.5 10.51 612; 676[ 676:. 740I WORK STATIONS TOTAL �] 4 214� 2371 237' 2591 WORK PLACES TOTAL ; ! 8.5 ?.r ! Is.$ Its ; 126! 9131 11,014,. 1,1001,100! 9131 1,U7i 999! % INCREASE IN STAFF 12% 11 % 10% i SPECIAL AREAS AREAS NCIC Computer WS ' SUBTOTAL CIRCULATION 25% ] AREAS TOTAL i :ROOMS CIRCULATION ROOMS TI _ TOTAL REOD STAFF i ASFI �_ B.S -O.-r 10.5 71 S I 'El 17411 260i 1 2PoI 1 3/7' NOTES: F* SWORN] 7 1 8 1 9 10 12 I CIVILIAN] i 1.5 1 i-'9'1 15 1 1.5 Fort Collins Police Services 22 8 . S ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES SECTION CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE iLA{'y'Y'YU 2fd CURRENT PROIFGF� STAFF RE ED STAFF UNIT' EXIST AREA REOUIRED SF SF 2000 1 20051 2013' 2020' 2000 ' 2005 2013 . 2020: NOTES WORX PLACES I OFFICES SogeaMs 1 1 2 2 150.' 150:� 150, 300 300 SUBTOTAL' CIRCULATION 25%! ! I 1 2 2 150;. 150� 300 300� OFFICES TOTAL; ! 1 1 2 2 1 1 38 188: 38 188 75 375 75' 375 1 WORK STATIONS j —i lnvestigatas 6 rT 9 11 1 64 1481 576. 576: 704 Victims Sves. Coordinator 1 1 1 1 64 j ! 64. 64 64 64'. "Victim Svcs. Advocale 1 I O.S ' �Y I 1 i 1 48 ! 48, 48: 48 4& Clerical 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 I 0.5 !1 48 48j 44' 48i 48j I ! I SUBTOTALI ! 8 T .9" 11.5 13.5 I ! 512II 6401 640� I 7fiB, CIRCULATION 35% WORK STATIONS TOTAL! 1 179i i91 2241 224; 2691 WORK PLACES TOTAL 4 9 i i 13.5 15.5 ! !. 86/1 864; 1,0371 879,1,0521 1,23911,4121 % INCREASE IN STAFF! ! 17%' 29% 1 15% _ 1 SPECIAL AREAS i 1 i AREAS j ReceptionFile S i I let 90: 90 901 90 !CoffeeMrage ! 201 801 80i 1 80 80I SUBTOTAL; 1 1 23 2301 23 2 01 CIRCULATION 25%' ' j j l j 581 Sbj Se S81 I AREAS TOTAL, i ! ! 2111111 208I 298 2851 I ROOMS Coni mnce 200 I OI OI 0 0 Monitor Roan General Storage : 100 so I too 801 100 93 100 100 ! Equipment Storage I ' 80 I 12DI 138 , I Interview Soft Interview Coel Clout Copy/Fax/Supplies j SUBTOTAL CIRCULATION 25%! ! ROOMS TOTAL SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL! i I TOTAL REOD STAFF A ASFI i 9 ".4 13.5 15.5 NOTES: C1 SWORNj ! T -0h 11' 131 CIVILIAN' , 2I a.al 25 2.51 80 93 120 138 1001 200' 200 250 200 1501 ISO, 150 150I ISO 151. 15, is, 151 IS 861 215 ' 2 R972 30412 ss62 7751 Fort Collins Police Services 23 c-CAA ea) 2004 ENTITY: SECTION CURRENT LOCATION: WORK PLACES I OFFICES (Sergeants I � SUBTOTALI CIRCULATION 25%! OFFICES TOTAL: g WORK STATIONS Officers IPelieetRapsrF+' w FCAUA Saw.' Pawn Entry Clark SOac• I Volunteers / Interns i .S-FCjC2i t01 mid" 1 SUBTOTAL( i CIRCULATION 35%1 WORK STATIONS TOTAL' WORK PLACES IOTAII % INCREASE IN STAFF( 13MIAL AREAS AREAS 1 Reception I File Storage Coffee 1, Video Imaging Work Station CIRCULATION AREAS T I ROOMS Equipment Storage I Conference Room / War Room I Interview I Monitor Room I SUBTOTAL• j CIRCULATION 25% ROOMS TOTAL( SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL' TOTAL REOD STAFF i ASF NOTES: 9 -.l SWORN( 8 44ii i 13.5 115.5 1 CIVILIAN: 1.5 2 2 2 FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY 300 LAPORTE.J1.hJ� Z�4� CURRENT', F119WED STAFF 1WRIED STAFF I UNIT' EKLst AREA REQUIRED 20" 2a8S 20131 2020 s j SF ; 2000. 7005, 20132020, NOTES 1 : : 1 2 2 150 1 1501 150' 300� 300' 150: 150 300'• 300' 1 ! 38' 38 75 75 1 1 2 2 ' 108: 188 375 375 7 I 1 44-! 11.5 j 13.5 64 1 ! 608� 736' 736' $64' 1 1 1. 1 I 1 I 64 64-: 64i 64 64: 0.S -4-1 1 1 64 64i 64: 64: 641 0 0 1 0! 0 64 128' 128j 128i 1281 8.5 ifi9'1 13.5 15.51 864 9921 99211,120 II ! 3021 347 3471 39211 1,166 1,33911,3391 1,3121 9.5 ".&1 15.5 i 17.5 i I I1,354i 1,52711,714i 1,3071 12.43412,63012.04213 030I Fort Collins Police Services 24 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES CODE: COMMON FACILITIES CURRENT LOCATION: HQ CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF UNIT EXIST AREA REQUIRED AUTH SIF SF 2000 2005 2013'2020 2000: 2005 2013'i 2020!NOTES WORK PLACES OFFICES SUBTOTALS , 0 0. 0 0 CIRCULATION 25%[ 0; 0 0 0 OFFICES TOTAL, 0 0 0 0 11, 00 0: 0. WORK STATIONS SUBTOTAL' 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0, 0 CIRCULATION 25%; 0: 0 0 0-: ' WORK STATIONS TOTAL'. 0. 0 0' 0' WORK PLACES TOTAL' O 0 0', 0! 0, 0 0-, 0 % INCREASE IN STAFF' 0% 0% 0% SPECIAL AREAS .. AREAS !. Swom Lockers to; 1 I,42& 1,6801. 2,070; 2,435' I Civilian Lockers 51 436' 500 578' 640' I Trainee Lockers 16 200; 200. 200 200; Mens Toile / Showers 575; 575' 575; 575 575i Womens Toilet / Showers. 1 1 575, 575! 575 575 5751 Defeesive Tactics - 1 Exercise ! 3844 20001 ! 3,B44I 3,844; 3,8441 3,844' i 2,00012,000j 2,ODOi 2,000 I SUBTOTAL; CIRCULATION 25%, AREAS TOTAL, ROOMS Break Room Break Room Support Community Room Mesa slew Rooms Womens Sleep Rooms SUBTOTAL, CIRCULATION 25%; ROOMS TOTAL' SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL 19, 0501 9, 3 74 9, 8421 10,2691 12,263; 2,3441 2,460,! 2,567j 11,313j 11,71i 12,]02112,834' I I � I i I ! 5301 S30i 530, I 530: 5301 1 2501 2502501 2501 2501 1700j 0' 0i 0' 0 1 120' 120! 120'� 120! 1201 j 120� I 1201 1201 1201 120 i 1,02011,020 I 1,020i 1,0201 255i 255 2551 255 11,27511,2751 1,27Sj 1,275 12SN! 12.Sa1 13.577 N,11/ j TOTAL REQD STAFF i NSF, 0 0 0 0 1 13,SFq 12Af3( 13.377114,311 Fort Collins Police Services 25 ATTACHMENT PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT (Dated July 28, 2000 prepared by CTL Thompson) P954 Police Services Facility-Design/Build M GEOLOGIC AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CUMBERLAND PARCEL NORTHWEST OF DRAKE AND TIMBERLINE ROAD FORT COLLINS, COLORADO Prepared For: THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. 6300 SOUTH SYRACUSE SUITE 293 ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80111 Attention: Mr. Brock Chapman Job No. FC-1447 July 28, 2000 CTUTHOMPSON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 375 E. HORSETOOTH RD. ■ THE SHORES OFFICE PARK ■ BLDG. 3, SUITE 100 ■ FT. COLLINS, CO 80525 (970) 206-9455 TABLE' -OF -CONTENTS SCOPE 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 2 SITE GEOLOGY AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 6 SITE DEVELOPMENT 7 Overiot Grading 7 Utility Construction 8 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 9 Floor System and Slab -on -Grade Construction 10 Basements 10 Surface Drainage 11 RECOMMENDED FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS 11 LIMITATIONS 12 FIG. 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIG. 2 - ESTIMATED DEPTH TO BEDROCK SURFACE FIG. 3 - ESTIMATED BEDROCK SURFACE ELEVATION FIG. 4 - ESTIMATED DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER SURFACE FIG. 5 - ESTIMATED GROUNDWATER SURFACE ELEVATION FIG. 6 - ESTIMATED AREA OF COLLAPSING SOILS FIGS. 7 THROUGH 11 - SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS APPENDIX A - LABORATORY TEST RESULTS APPENDIX B - GUIDELINE SITE GRADING SPECIFICATIONS THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL CTLrr FC-1447 cc - SCOPE This report presents the results of our preliminary geotechnical investigation for the Cumberland Parcel located northwest of the intersection of Drake Road and Timberline Road in Fort Collins, Colorado. It is our understanding that this parcel will include single and multi -family residential construction, and some light commercial construction. Our investigation was performed to evaluate the subsurface conditions to assist in planning for the site. The report includes descriptions of the subsoil and groundwater conditions found in exploratory borings and our opinions, conclusions and recommendations regarding the proposed residential development and construction as influenced by geotechnical considerations. The report was prepared based on engineering analysis of field and laboratory data and our experience with subsurface conditions in this area. The criteria presented in the report are intended for preliminary planning purposes only. Additional investigations will be required to design residential and commercial structures, and roadway pavements. A summary of our conclusions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsoils identified in our borings generally consisted of sandy clays underlain by silty, clayey sands and gravel over claystone (predominant) and sandstone bedrock. Bedrock was penetrated in 11 of the 20 borings at depths of 18 to 29 feet below the existing ground surface. Samples of the sandy clays and clayey sands generally exhibited low swell in laboratory tests. In the southeastern portion of the site a zone of collapse -prone silty clays was encountered at depth of 0 to 4 ft. and claystone samples exhibited slight consolidation to low swell. The silty sands and sandstone are considered non - expansive. 2. Ground water was measured in each of the 20 borings at depths of 7 to 21 feet below the existing ground surface. We expect groundwater may cause problems for basement construction in some parts of the property and utility trenches may require dewatering. 3. The subsoil conditions are generally favorable for the proposed residential construction. We believe the geotechnical issue that will THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL 1 CTLl7 FC-i"7 4. QUESTION: What is a Design Program? ANSWER: [Definition] Design Program —A document that translates and expands the Needs Assessment into a form that will be used by architects and engineers. The Design Program defines design requirements and contains comprehensive information for the architect and engineers. Both the Needs Assessment and Design Program require extensive input from lab staff; these two documents are frequently combined into one. 5. QUESTION: What do I do to get the program started? ANSWER: Assemble an internal team to develop a Request for Proposals (RFP) for conducting an ArchitecturallEngineering Needs AssessmentlDesign Program. 6. QUESTION: What criteria need to be considered in the RFP? ANSWER: The criteria to be considered in the RFP should include: Health/Safety (Liability Issues). Codes. Technologies (existing and projected new). Crime Trends. Existing Constraints: financial, personnel, location, etc. 7. QUESTION: After the consultant selection is made, then what? ANSWER: Assemble the best team to conduct an ArchitecturallEngineering Needs AssessmentlDesign Program. Identify Members of the Team. O Client Representative/Steering Committee, examples could include: • Laboratory representative. • Facilities. • Public works. • Budget. • Contracts. • Data/Telecommunications. • Security. 10 most affect -the proposed development is ,the presence of collapsing -soil .beneath approximately 45 .percent of the °site. Shallow groundwater in isolated areas will also likely be a concern for the site. 4. We expect the residences can be founded with footings bearing on the natural soils. Special design considerations such as minimum deadloads, low pressure footings and over -excavation of collapsing soils may be recommended in portions of the site. If expansive soils are encountered near foundation levels during the design -level geotechnical investigation, drilled piers may be required. 5. We anticipate the swell potential will be nil to low for lots where bedrock is deeper than about 10 feet below finished grades. Higher swell potential is expected for areas where grading results in bedrock that is shallower than about 10 feet. Collapse potential of soils below shallow foundations and stab -on -grade floors will be a concern. 6. Overall surface drainage should be designed to provide rapid run-off of surface water away from the proposed structures. Water should not be allowed to pond near the crest of slopes, on or adjacent to pavements, or adjacent to the structures. SITE CONDITIONS The Cumberland Parcel is located northwest of the intersection of Drake Road and Timberline Road in Fort Collins, Colorado (Fig. 1). The site is currently undeveloped and is irrigated, agricultural land. At the time of our investigation, the property is currently planted with corn on the north and alfalfa on the south. Some parts of the property were inaccessible to our drill rig because of the corn crop (see Fig.1). The topography of the site is relatively level. Several irrigation ditches run through the property. The subject property is bordered on the south and west by residential development, on the north by commercial development, and agricultural land to the east. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT A conceptual plan provided to us shows that the development will include of single and multi family residential development, and light commercial development near the southeast corner of the property. THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL 2CTUT FC-1"7 UT 'Paved streets and driveways will be constructed to provide access. Buried sanitary andstorm sewers and water lines will be constructed: beneath the streets. We anticipate the residences will be one or two-story wood framed structures with basements. Basement excavations are expected to be 5 to 7 feet deep. We assumed the light commercial development will include one and two-story retail and office type construction. SITE GEOLOGY AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS The site geology was investigated by reviewing geologic maps, field observations by one of our engineers and geologists, and by drilling of 20 exploratory borings. The approximate locations of our borings are shown on Fig. 1. This section is intended to discuss concerns related to a geologic hazards review that occurs during planning and zoning for land use changes. Specific requirements of Colorado House Bill 1041 "Areas and Activities of State Interest" and Colorado Senate Bill 35 "County Planning and Building Codes" are addressed. The geology and existence of geologic hazards on this parcel were evaluated by one of our engineering geologists using a review of available literature and field reconnaissance. Mapping by L. A. Hershey and P. A. Schneider (USGS Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map 1-687, Geologic Map of the Lower Cache La Poudre Basin, North-Central Colorado, 1972) indicates the surface of the site is mapped as pediment and alluvial fan materials including reddish clays, and arkosic gravel and sand. The underlying bedrock consists of the Middle and transition zones of the Pierre Shale, which generally consists of olive -gray, sandy, claystone-shale and fine-grained sandstone. We believe the Pierre Shale dips gently to the east at about 10 degrees in the area. Our field exploration generally confirmed the conditions described by published mapping. Overburden clay soils and claystone (shale) portions of the bedrock are often expansive, which can result in damage to improvements or structures when moisture increase occurs. Engineered design of pavements, foundations, slabs -on -grade and THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC_ CUMBERLAND PARCEL 3 CTLIT FC-i"7 surface drainage can mitigate *the -effects of •expansive soils and bedrock. Our preliminary investigation shows -.samples of the overburden clays :and claystone bedrock tested showed low swell potential when the samples were flooded under pressure. The site characteristics suggest swell potential will be variable over the site when the design geotechnical investigations are completed. Some areas of the parcel were underlain by silty clays with significant collapse potential. These soils are discussed below in the SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS and SITE DEVELOPMENT sections. Site soils and bedrock are not expected to be unusually corrosive to concrete or metal. Natural slopes are very gentle and stable. Significant faulting and structural discontinuities are not expected in the bedrock at this site. The soil and bedrock units are not expected to respond unusually to seismic activity. The area is considered by the most recent editions of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as Zone 1, its least active zone designation. Maximum bedrock accelerations at 4 percent of gravity are probable during major earthquakes in the area. Only minor damage to relatively new, properly designed and built residences would be expected. Regarding the potential for radioactive substances on the parcel, it is normal in the Front Range of Colorado and nearby eastern plains area for radon gas to accumulate in poorly ventilated spaces (i.e., full -depth residential basements) in contact with soil or bedrock. The City of Fort Collins addresses the radon issue in Ordinance No. 45, 1997 and other publications that recognize radon as a health hazard. The amount of radon gas that can accumulate in an area is a function of many factors, including the radionuclide activity of the soil and bedrock, construction methods and materials, soil gas pathways and accumulation areas. Typical mitigation methods consist of sealing soil gas entry areas and periodic ventilation of below -grade spaces. Radon rarely accumulates to significant levels in above -grade living spaces. Fort Collins has addressed "Radon Reduction Systems" in their book of amendments to the 1997 Uniform Building Code. The site is probably not flood prone. There are no highly -developed, natural incised drainages on the site. The very gentle topography of the site indicates that THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL 4 CM FC4417 cr= very little, if any, >water.would be expected to flow onto the site from outside the boundaries. During peak precipitation events, some accumulation of surface -sheet flow in drainages is expected. Development typically increases the relative amount of impervious surfaces, which can lead to drainage problems and erosion if surface water flow is not adequately controlled. Evaluation of flooding potential and surface drainage design should be performed by a civil engineer as part of the project design. Erosion potential on the site is considered low, due to the gentle slopes. Erosion potential can be expected to increase during construction, but should return to pre -construction rates or less if proper grading practices, surface drainage design and revegetation efforts are implemented. Groundwater was encountered in our borings at approximate depths of 7 to 23 feet during drilling and 7 to 21 feet several days after drilling. Groundwater levels will likely increase in the wetter months and during wetter years. If groundwater levels increase to foundation levels, related problems will occur. The rise in groundwater to the foundation level will tend to soften the compressible soils, would cause expansion of soils with swell potential if present, and cause persistent wet or moist conditions in "crawl' spaces and basements. Mitigation includes underdrains or interceptor drains to lower the groundwater level, ground improvement techniques to increase the strength of soft soils, and special foundation selection and design criteria if swelling soils are present. We do not believe the site is located above underground mines or is located in a subsidence hazard zone. Site soils and bedrock are not considered subject to ground subsidence related to natural or mining processes. The bedrock below the site is the Pierre Shale formation which does not contain significant coal beds. There is no evidence of past mining activities on the site. We do not believe the site is an economic source of gravel. No other economically important mineral deposits are expected on this site or are known to occur nearby. No geologic hazards which would preclude the proposed development were noted on the subject tract. We believe the geologic hazards can be mitigated with proper engineering design and construction practices, as discussed in this report. THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL CTLIr PC-1447 N 'SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions were investigated by drilling 20 borings to depths of 15 to 35 feet at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The borings were drilled using a truck -mounted drill rig and 4-inch diameter continuous flight auger. A representative of our firm observed the drilling operations, logged the soils and obtained samples for laboratory testing. Graphical logs of the soils identified in the borings drilled for this investigation and results of field penetration resistance tests are presented on Figs. 7 through 11. Samples obtained during drilling were returned to our laboratory where they were visually classified and samples were selected for testing. The results of laboratory testing are presented in Appendix A and summarized on Table A-1. The subsoils identified in our borings consisted predominantly of sandy clays underlain by clayey sands and gravels over claystone and sandstone bedrock. Groundwater was measured at depths ranging from 7 to 21 feet below the existing ground surface when measured several days after drilling. Soils above the bedrock consisted primarily of silty and sandy clays, silty sands and gravel. Field penetration resistance tests indicated the clays are predominantly medium stiff to very stiff, with a few widely scattered deposits of soft clays. in the northern part of the properties the near surface clays were comparatively moist and dense, and generally have a low swell potential. Dry density of these clays ranged from 101 to 111 pcf and natural moisture content ranged from 13 to 22 percent. In the southeast part of the property the shallow clays were less dense, drier and siitier. They exhibited a tendency to collapse when wetted under a pressure of 1,000 psf in our swell/consolidation apparatus. Natural dry density of these samples ranged from 81 to 93 pcf and moisture contents ranged from 8 to 13 percent. Atterberg limits were similar for the two soil groups suggesting the collapse -prone soils may have been more widespread but wetting and densification by natural processes may have occurred in some areas. Penetration tests in the sand and gravel deposits showed them to be medium dense to dense. THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL 6 CM FC-i"7 C L- Sandstone and claystone bedrock were identified in 11 of the 20 borings;at depths ranging from 18 to 29 feet below the ground surface. Contours of estimated depth and elevation of the bedrock surface are presented on Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. Our borings indicate claystone is the predominant bedrock material. However, sandstone was encountered in two of the borings. Field penetration resistance tests indicated the bedrock is hard to very hard. Samples of the claystone bedrock exhibited slight compression to low swell (-0.4 to 0.70 percent) when wetted under an applied pressure of 1000 psf. The sandstone is fine-grained, silty to clayey and weakly cemented, and is considered non -expansive. Ground water was encountered in all 20 of the borings at depths of 7 to 21 feet below the existing ground surface during drilling and when checked several days later. The general direction of groundwater flow appears to be from northwest to southeast. Groundwater levels are expected to vary seasonally and may rise after development as irrigation for landscaping begins. Contours of estimated depth and elevation of the groundwater surface are presented on Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. SITE DEVELOPMENT Grading plans were not available at the time of this report. We assumed that cuts and fills will be minor. Deep cuts will increase the influence of the bedrock and groundwater on the proposed construction. If significant cuts are planned, we should be contacted to review our recommendations. The ground surface in areas to be filled should be stripped of vegetation, scarified, moisture -conditioned to within ± 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). We anticipate stripping will require cuts of 6 to 12 inches for the majority of the site. In areas where grading will result in undisturbed collapse prone soils within 2 ft. of final grades, the soils should be thoroughly scarified, moisture THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL 7 CTL/T FC-1"7 N treated to :within 2 percent of optimum moisture content.and recompacted to:at least 95 percent of Standard Proctor maximum dry density. The on -site soils or similar low or non -swelling soils can be used as site grading fill. The on -site clays and sands or similar imported materials should be moisture treated to within two percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum ASTM D 698 dry density. Higher plasticity clays should be moisture treated to between optimum and three percent above optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 percent of Standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). Clays with moderate or higher swell potential should not be imported to the site as site grading fill. The placement and compaction of site grading fill should be observed and the density tested by a geotechnical engineer during construction. Guideline site grading specifications are provided in Appendix B. Groundwater was measured as shallow as 7 feet below the existing ground surface in two of our borings (TH-10 and TH-15) and at approximately 8 feet in TH-1. The groundwater is shallower along the western edge of the property and near the southeast corner. If it is feasible to raise site grades in those areas, basement construction may not be restricted by the groundwater condition. If site grades in the southeast corner and along the western edge remain at their current level or lower, a subdrain or interceptor drain system may be needed to lower water levels sufficiently to permit basement construction. Basement excavations should be at least 4 feet above the measured groundwater level. We believe the excavations for utility installation can be performed with conventional trenchers or backhoes. Groundwater will likely be encountered near the eastern and western boundaries of the site. Temporary dewatering will be required during utility installation. In shallower excavations, dewatering may be accomplished by sloping the excavations to occasional sumps where water can be removed by pumping. The sumps should be several feet below the bottom of the THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL CM FC-1447 N excavations so that water is pumped down throughthe-soils ratherthan.up'through the bottom of the excavations, which will have a tendency to de -stabilize the floors of the excavations. Deeper excavations may penetrate the sand soils where water infiltration will be greater and the soils will cave to flatter slopes. In those situations, more extensive dewatering may be required. Utility trenches should be sloped or shored to meet local, State and Federal safety regulations. Based on our investigation, we believe the clays and sands are Type B and C soils based on OSHA standards. Excavation slopes specified by OSHA are dependent upon soil types and ground water conditions encountered. For type C soils OSHA specifies a 1 %:1 (horizontal:vertical) slope. Seepage and ground water conditions in trenches may cause the soils to cave to a flatter slope. Initial trench excavations may be unstable and require flatter slopes than required by OSHA. Contractors should identify the soils exposed in the excavation and refer to OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes. Excavations deeper than 20 feet should be designed by a professional engineer. Water and sewer lines are usually constructed beneath paved roads. Compaction of trench backfill can have a significant effect on the life and serviceability of pavements. We believe trench backfill should be placed in thin, loose lifts, moisture -conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95. percent of Standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). The placement and compaction of fill and backfill should be observed and tested by a geotechnical engineer. RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION The near -surface soils identified during our investigation consist of low - expansive clays; non -expansive sands and gravels; and non to low -expansive claystone and sandstone. Laboratory test results indicate that some of the near surface soils exhibit significant collapse potential when wetted. Volume changes up to 10 percent were measured when samples were wetted under an applied pressure of 1,000 psf. These soils should not be used as a bearing strata unless mitigative THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL 9 CTLlT FC-1447 GC: measures are undertaken. A -design -level soils and foundation investigation should be performed after site :grading has been completed to provide lot -specific design recommendations. We believe design level investigations may indicate special foundation recommendations are needed to mitigate the collapsing soils for approximately 40 percent of the site. A map of the approximate area we believe may be underlain by collapsing soils at upper level footing elevations is shown on Fig. 6. Shallow foundations may require deeper footings or subexcavation and recompaction of the site soils. Deep foundations such as drilled piers will be complicated by caving soils and comparatively shallow groundwater. We anticipate the swell potential will be nil to low for lots included in this investigation, unless site grading results in bedrock within about 10 feet of finished grades. Slab -on -grade floors are typically used in unfinished basements and commercial structures for soil conditions similar to those we encountered in our investigation. Ground water was measured in all 20 of our borings at depths of 7 to 21 feet below the existing ground surface. Groundwater was shallowest in the southeast corner of the property and along the western border (specifically near TH-10 and TH- 15). We do not expect groundwater will cause problems for basement construction for most of the site. Site grading should be planned to set basement excavations at least 4 feet above groundwater. We recommend foundation drains be installed around basements. Foundation drains should lead to a sump pit where a pump is installed to remove water or to the subdrain system if such a system is constructed. Comparatively shallow groundwater and softer soils may result in soft and unstable excavations when construction equipment repeatedly travels over the excavation. In such cases the subgrade can be stabilized by over -excavation and replacement or by crowding coarse, crushed aggregate into the soft areas. In some THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL 10 CTL T FC-1447 N situ ations,excavation using track -mounted equipment may be more effective than tire mounted machinery. Basement walls should be designed and constructed to resist lateral earth pressures. The ground surface around the structures should be graded to provide for rapid run-off of surface water away from the structures and off of pavements. We recommend slopes of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet for the areas surrounding residences, where practical. Roof downspouts and other water collection systems should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill around the residences. Water should not be allowed to pond between residences or on or adjacent to pavement. We believe the erosion potential of the near -surface soils at this site is relatively low. Proper control of surface run-off is important to control erosion of surface soils. Sheet flow should not be directed over unprotected slopes. Water should not be allowed to pond either on, or adjacent to, pavements or at the crest of slopes. Permanent overlot slopes should be seeded or mulched to reduce erosion. RECOMMENDED FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS Based on the results of this investigation and the proposed development, we recommend the following investigations be performed: 1. Review of final site grading plans; 2. A pavement and subgrade investigation after grading and utility installation; 3. A design -level soils and foundation investigation after grading; and 4. Testing and observation for site development and residential and commercial building construction such as compaction of grading fill, utility trench backfill, and foundations. THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL 11 CM FCA"7 O Needs Assessment/Design Program Team. • Architectural/Programmer/Engineer. • Cost Consultant. • Others as needed—environmental/traffic. Establish a practical budget to use to retain the consultant team that will conduct the Architectural/Engineering Needs Assessment/Design Program (The Study). Define the Duration of Program (Study). S. QUESTION: What can I expect as I start the Needs Assessment/Design Program? ANSWER: The Needs Assessment/Design Program must: Demand full user/client participation. Show that the final product is not just a customer "wish list" — (provide justification for size/cost). Result in resolving issues related to: expansion, splitting operations, renovations/expansion, or building a new facility. Include answers to How big?; Estimated cost?; Site Evaluation/ Selection —where should the building be placed? 9. QUESTION: What is the process for developing the document that comes from the Needs Assessment/Design Program? ANSWER: There is a Three -Step Process for Needs Assessment/Design Program (the document). Data Gathering. O Questionnaires. O Management and staff interviews. O Comparable facility tours. O Existing facilities assessment. O Users must be involved in process, not just management. Data Synthesis. O Assemble and organize data. O Develop data into usable and meaningful information. O Draw conclusions and then test/check the Needs Assessment/ Design Study against: • Mission/goals. • Operational needs. 11 LIMITATIONS Our borings were widely spaced to provide a general characterization of subsurface conditions for preliminary assessment and planning of residential and light commercial construction. Conditions between borings may vary. We believe this investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily used by geotechnical engineers practicing in this area at this time. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. When we can be of further service in discussing either the contents of this report or the analysis of the influence of subsurface conditions on the design of the proposed development or to conduct the final design soils and foundation investigation, please call. CTLITHOMPSON, INC. Q Irene ar m Reviewe by+$'-W • S ° •• yq r �..��F k E gpAlg. �C `F 10504 �9' 338 = w4 �c c;I�'CF�f�, $P Thomas A. •�.,, � '•� Project Manac,�$s/"'�«.-•.• G'' ��'`.�`. °�s�Sb • •"PQ`�� �'OFE5510� IC:nlj (5 copies sent) THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL 12 CTLrT FCA447 TH 9 TH118 *TH-20 APPROX. SCALE: 1*=3W 0 TH 22 • TH-17 0 TH21 0 TH-15 TH-13 0 THE THB • TH•14 • TH-11 TH-9 TH-7 • TH-16 • TH-1 TH-10 TH-5 •TH-3 • THJ4 40 TH-1 TH 2 The Cumberland Companies, Inc. CUMBERLAND PARCEL Job No. FC-1447 VICINITY MAP (FORTNOOS ALLEAREA) LEGEND: • T" APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING O TH-21 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FUTURE EXPLORATORY BORING TO BE COMPLETED AFTER CROPS ARE HARVESTED TSM TEMPORARY BENCHMARK ESTABLISHED AT MANHOLE AT THE INTERSECTION OF DRAM ROAD AND TIMBERLINE ROAD (ASSUMED ELEVATION - 100 FEET) Locations of Exploratory Borings Fig. 1 Q O JQ_ U LL U 1L z 0 z The Cumberland Companies, Inc. CUMBERLAND PARCEL Job No. FC-1447 L —1 APPROX. SCALE: 1' = 30V INDICATES ESTIMATED DEPTH TO BEDROCK SURFACE (FEET) DOTE: DATA FROM OUR BORINGS AND OUR EXPERIENCE WERE USED TO SUBJECTIVELY ESTIMATE THE 'ESTIMATED DEPTH TO BEDROCK SURFACE' Estimated Depth to Bedrock Surface Fig. 2 E The Cumberland Companies, Inc. CUMBERLAND PARCEL Job No. FC-1447 ral APPROX. SCALE: 1" = 300' INDICATES ESTIMATED BEDROCK SURFACE ELEVATION (FEET) )TE: DATA FROM OUR BORINGS AND OUR EXPERIENCE WERE USED TO SUBJECTIVELY ESTIMATE THE 'ESTIMATED BEDROCK SURFACE ELEVATION Estimated Bedrock Surface Elevation Fig. 3 w The Cumberland Companies, Inc. CUMBERLAND PARCEL Job No. FC-1447 APPROX. SCALE: 1' = 300' �s� m� INDICATES ESTIMATED DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER SURFACE (FEET) NOTE: DATA FROM OUR BORINGS AND OUR EXPERIENCE WERE USED TO SUBJECTIVELY ESTIMATE THE 'ESTIMATED DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER SURFACE' Estimated Depth to Groundwater Surface Fig. 4 The Cumberland Companies, inc. CUMBERLAND PARCEL �b� CL: APPROX.SCALE: 1' = 300' INDICATES ESTIMATED GROUNDWATER SURFACE ELEVATION (FEET) VOTE: DATA FROM OUR BORINGS AND OUR EXPERIENCE WERE USED TO SUBJECTIVELY ESTIMATE THE 'ESTIMATED GROUNDWATER SURFACE ELEVATION' Estimated Groundwater Surface Job No. FC-1447 Elevation Fig. The Cumberland Companies, Inc. CUMBERLAND PARCEL APPROX. SCALE: 1' = 300' END: HS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING H-21 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FUTURE EXPLORATORY BORING TO BE COMPLETED AFTER CROPS ARE HARVESTED INDICATES ESTIMATED AREA OF COLLAPSING SOIL rE: DATA FROM OUR BORINGS AND OUR EXPERIENCE WERE USED TO SUBJECTIVELY ESTIMATE THE 'ESTIMATED AREA OF COLLAPSING SOIL' Estimated Area of Collapsing Job No. FC-1447 Soil TH-1 100 EL. 97.3 L TH-3 TH-4 TH-5 TH-2 EL. 100.9 EL. 100.9 EL. 99.5 EL. 100.2 9/12 00, 5/12 00, e 6/12 7/12 le 00 5/12 40 3/12 Q01* 10/12 00, 10/12 ' = 7/12 � 9/2 i r 12/12 40 10, .4 = ii r40 15/12 .. 40/12 8/12 8/12 v . y. 41/12 = _ 50/12 950/6 10/12 i .• a - - 49/12 50/11 50/2 52/4 50/8 50/3 110 50 40 ka SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS JOB N0. FC-1447 FIG. 7 TH-7 TH-9 TH-10 TH-6 EL. 99.3 TH-8 EL. 96.8 EL. 99.7 EL. 98.0 EL. 97.5 1 5/12 le 5/12 40 10/12 4/12 1 ol Ez 23/12 — 17/12 - 50/1 50/12 50/5 50/3 ' 14/12 8/12 d: 30/12 o 35/12 110 za 90 80uj F- w LL 60 40 30 SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS JOB N0. FC-1447 FIG. 8 TH-16 EL. 98.4 CL' 110 i c. TH-17 Jo 12/12 EL. 92.7 TH-19 EL. 88.4 90 ' 6/12 6/12 TH-18 TH-20 Jo EL. 85.5 7/12 EL. 84.1 r 9/12 00, 6/12 12/12 r 3/1200, op 80 ~ r 20/12 11 6/12 3/12 LL = 11/12 — -' 3/12 z 4/12 0 35/12 13/12 5/1 F 40 oe 3/12 = 19/12 70 = 2/12 —1 w 4/12 oe 19/12 8/12 60 50/10 ED SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS JOB N0. FC-1447 FIG. 10 E. SIGNAGE Building signage, including the site, is an important factor in the functioning of the facility. This work will need to be coordinated in detail during the design phase. F. EMERGENCY GENERATOR The facility shall have an emergency generator capable of operating certain areas of the facility during power outages. This work will need to be coordinated, in detail, during the design phase. G. CRITICAL AREAS OF DESIGN The communication center, short term holding area, evidence storage area, and the crime laboratory will be critical areas. This work will need to be coordinated, in detail, during the design phase. H. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESS 1. The Design/Build Team's project manager will take a very strong leadership role on this project. All communications with the City of Fort Collins on the project will go through this person. This approach will be followed throughout the project. The expectation is this person will schedule all meetings (City anticipates weekly design and construction meetings), develop minutes with "action items" for follow-up on all decisions, and provide leadership during this entire process. 2. The Police Facilities Architect, as well as the appropriate design consultants, will play a major role during both the design and construction process. The City's expectation is the designers will design and recommend the appropriate materials, products, etc. The general contractor and associated sub -contractors will provide their input, review the design and price this information. Substitutions of any products or systems incorporated in the design will be discussed with all parties. 3. It is anticipated that the PDP submission will have been sufficiently prepared and coordinate ahead of time that it will enable us to go to the FDP with one round of comments. The local planning consultant will play a major role in meeting the requirements of the City Plan. The civil design will support this intent by providing drawings that are to a level of detail and accuracy that when submitted for City review, they will eliminate as many questions as possible by the City staff. 5. The City's Project Manager will be informed of all contacts with the City staff and will participate with the Design/Build Team through the development review process. This same approach will apply to contacts with the Police Services Department. At the "kick off' design meeting, a flow chart for the above process will be developed. 6. Major materials and product decisions will be made during the design phase. Therefore, some shop drawings will be required. For items not approved during the design phase, a limited specification will be required for the general contractor and the standard shop drawing/submittal approval process will be used. 7. The appropriate City staff from our Facilities Maintenance organization will be involved at "key" times during the design process to ensure that the products and systems being Page 2 of 7 • Standards, operational codes. • Resource constraints. Document Preparation. O Assemble synthesized data into a usable draft document. O Review, correct, and issue final document. 10. QUESTION: What do the elements of the document include? ANSWER: Elements of the document should include: Preface. O Introductory Statements. • Statement of authorization to perform the study. O Identification of the Team. • Architect, engineers, consultants, etc. O Acknowledgments. Executive Summary. O Introduces the Project. • What the project consists of. • Summary of legal issues. • Accreditation requirements. • National technical working groups, e.g., Technical Work- ing Group on DNA Analysis Methods (TWGDAM), Technical Working Group on Materials (TWGMAT). O Description of Existing Facilities. • Overcrowding, safety and security concerns, inability to meet codes, recent changes in technology, crime trends, liabilities, accreditation issues, etc. O Mission Statement. • Assist investigations. • Testify in court. • Discuss chain -of -custody requirements. • Explain difficulty or impossibility of accomplishing mission under existing conditions. O Summarize All Conclusions. • Area. • Staff. 12 TH-21* TH-22* lu 0 301 F w w LL x x � a a. a w w 40 or SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 60 70 80 JOB NO. FC-1447 LEGEND: Fl CLAY, SANDY TO VERY SANDY, SOFT TO VERY STIFF, SLIGHTLY MOIST TO VERY MOIST, YELLOW BROWN, BROWN, RUST, RED BROWN (CL). SAND, CLAYEY, MEDIUM DENSE, LIGHTLY MOIST TO WET, BROWN (SP). SAND, CLAYEY, GRAVELLY, VERY LOOSE TO DENSE, SLIGHTLY MOIST TO WET, BROWN (SC). GRAVEL, SANDY, OCCASIONALLY CLAYEY, MEDIUM DENSE TO VERY DENSE, SLIGHTLY MOIST TO WET, BROWN, RUST (GP). CLAYSTONE, SANDY, HARD TO VERY HARD, SLIGHTLY MOIST TO MOIST, GRAY, DARK BROWN, OLIVE (BEDROCK). SANDSTONE, HARD TO VERY HARD, VERY MOIST, BROWN, OCCASIONAL CEMENTED SANDSTONE LENSES (BEDROCK). DRIVE SAMPLE. THE SYMBOL 3/12 INDICATES THAT 3 BLOWS OF A 140-POUND HAMMER FALLING 30 INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO DRIVE A 2.5 INCH O.D. SAMPLER 12 INCHES. INDICATES WATER LEVEL MEASURED AT THE TIME OF DRILLING. INDICATES WATER LEVEL MEASURED SEVERAL DAYS AFTER DRILLING. NOTES: *. BORINGS WERE NOT POSSIBLE DUE TO CROPS AND IRRIGATION. BORINGS WILL BE DRILLED AT A LATER DATE AFTER CROP HARVEST. 1. BORINGS WERE DRILLED BETWEEN JUNE 22 AND 28, 2000 USING A TRUCK -MOUNTED DRILL RIG AND 4-INCH DIAMETER, CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER. 2. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON A TEMPORARY BENCHMARK SHOWN ON FIG 1. 3. THESE LOGS ARE SUBJECT TO THE EXPLANATIONS, LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS IN THIS REPORT. FIG. 11 TH-11 EL. 97.3 ol 00, s/10 00, 4/10 1 S 15/12 w 70 LL TH-12 TH-14 EL. 99.0 TH-13 TH-15 EL. 97.9 i-JI EL. 96.7 EL. 97.0 ' 15/12 40 r 40 15/12 -� SZ p: 36/12 °D 'o. 49/12 tr 50/2 9/12 7/12 v� o 9/12 7/12 1 _� � — °ri Q 4/12 4/12 - eD 44/12 28/12 50/2 2 2 12 '5 '4 70I'U,—J 50 40 30 SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS JOB N0. FC-1447 FIG. 9 APPENDIX A LABORATORY TEST RESULTS THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL CTL/T FC-1447 z 0 55 z a a x W a z 0 co rn W IX IL 2 0 U 3 -1 .2 rrc -- -- -- ;------,----; I -- --- - - -- --- -- --- r ,EXF,ANSION UNDER CONSTANT: :PRESSEJ --------------- ---',_._;_,-;-.--______-__.__REDUETOWETTING -- -- 0.1 1.0 10 1 UU APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF Sample of CLAYSTONE From TH- 2 AT 24 FEET 3 2 1 Z 0 rn Q x -1 W 0 Z .2 0 V) M -3 a M 0 U 4 NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 119 PCF NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 4.8 -- - - ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER CONSTANT:PRESSURE DUE TO VWETTING 0.1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF 10 IOU Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 93 PCF From TH- 3 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 13.0 % Swell Consolidation JOB NO.FC-1447 Test Results FIG.A-1 z O W -4 Q a x W a z 0 -E N N W I= a 2 -7 O U -- -- - - - - - -- -- , --- r-- r- r-- - - - - -- r- - - -- - --r - -- EXPAN$ION UNDER CONS`TANt F RI!�$ORE DUE TO W;ETTIN� _______________T_________--__ __--____f__r__�-__�_ ---------------------- T -T -f -T -f -t -t . -f 0.1 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) From TH- 3 AT 14 JOB NO. FC-1447 1.0 10 100 NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 107 PCF NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 16.9 % Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG.A-2 ----- - -;- ---- - - - - ------- - -, ---- - - - - -- AODITIONAL:00MPRESSIdN UNDEF2 - U-RE -D T - , CONTgNj f?F�ES,S UE O VKETTI�IC� - -- --- -- - - - -- - --; 0.1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF 10 Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= From TH- 4 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 100 81 PCF 13.0 % Swell Consolidation JOB NO. FC-1447 Test Results FIG.A-3 z 0 0 U) z X -1 W e Z •2 0 N Uj W. .3 a 0 L) .4 ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER CONS_T_ANT_ P_kESS_U_R_E DOE TO W_�_T_TING_: -1 I ; ------------------------ 0.1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAYSTONE From TH- 6 AT 24 FEET 3 2 1 z 0 O N a a .1 LU e z .2 0 m fA LU IX -3 a 0 V .4 10 NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 100 91 PCF 19.8 % ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER _ -- ;------- , CONSTANT;PR'ESSURE DUE TO WETTING T - - -- 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 89 PCF From TH- 7 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 13.4 % Swell Consolidation JOB NO. FC-1447 Test Results FIG. A-4 6 z 0 a a X W' e z O N W W a 0 0 0.1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) From TH- 7 AT 14 FEET 10 luv NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 113 PCF NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 16.0 % Swell Consolidation JOB NO. FC-1447 Test Results FIG. A-5 z 0 fn a a X W 6 z 0 to fn W W a 2 0 0 -------- --- ;-,----- ------,----- ----- ---- -,- ---- ---- ,- ,-; AbDITIONALOOPAPRESSION UNDER -------; _ --- - llRED T CpN T -Nj PPE'SS UE a:WETTL;NQ 4---------------r-----------------------,---,---�--,--,-,- 6 , -------- ------ 7-------------------------- ------ ---- 0-1 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL From TH- 10 AT 4 FEET 1.0 10 100 NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 86 PCF NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 10.2 % Swell Consolidation JOB NO. FC-1447 Test Results FIG.A-6 • Site. • Budget. O Provides the 'Bottom Line." • Decision makers should be provided with all the informa- tion necessary to make informed decisions. That informa- tion should appear in the executive summary. Objectives and Methodology. O State Goals and Objectives of the Study. • Needs Assessment. • Design Program. • Define both. O Identify Methodology. • State all tasks accomplished to create the document. O Three -Step Process. • Describe in detail. Trends and Influences (demographics). O Analyze Emerging Social, Economic, Political, Population, Environmental, and Crime Trends. • Describe purpose. • Describe methodology. O Relate Data to Staff and Facility Needs. • Show how trends affect individual laboratory sections and impact future requirements. • Relate data to individual and overall caseload. • Relate data to facility needs regarding expansion and flexibility. O Project Future Needs. • Relate data to new size and nature of facility and staff. Facility and Space Descriptions. O Describe the Entire Facility in General Terms. (Provide as much narrative information as possible to tell the designers what is unique and unusual about the laboratory.) O Describe Nomenclature and Acronyms. O Organization Chart. • Chart is an introduction to descriptions of laboratory spaces. 13 z 0 N.4 Q a K W.5 0 z 0 - N6 N Wy W IL Ma 0 U AbDITIONALOOMPRESSION UMDER -- - - - - -T I T ;' --- -f--- URE D T CQN TgNj PJ E-SS UE a:WETT[NQ- I p ------------------- -f -f -T -i -f l -- - fl 0.1 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) From TH- 12 AT 4 FEET JOB NO. FC-1447 1.0 30 100 NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 81 PCF NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 9.8 % Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. A-7 3 z 0 0 V5 Q t2 .1 x w e Z -2 0 N W d 3 2 0 U 4 NO MOVEMENT;DUETO WETTING; ------------------------- 0.1 APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL From TH-12 AT 9 FEET 3 2 1 Z O 0 U5 a d -1 W e Z _2 0 U) W 0: .3 IL 2 0 0 .4 0.1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF 1.0 10 NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 100 111 PCF 17.3 % ----------------------- ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER ; CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE tO W' ETTING 10 100 Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 87 PCF From TH- 14 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 11.0 % Swell Consolidation JOB NO. FC-1447 Test Results FIG. A-8 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 .1 -2 -3 Z O N -4 Q IL K W.5 e Z 0- 6 N N W W IL 2a O U -S --'----`--- 'i- -'- ----- - -� - L - - - - -- -- - -- --- ----- -- I -- --, E xPAN8ION UNDER CON�TANt PRE$�ORE DUE TO W;ETTIN� rT IL IL 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAYSTONE From TH- 15 AT 24 FEET NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 110 PCF NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 13.9 % Swell Consolidation JOB NO. FC-1447 Test Results FIG. A-9 0 -1 -2 -3 •4 -5 .6 .7 -8 .g -10 w .12 o z N -13 N W W 2 -14 O L) -15 0.1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF CL' L-- -- -- , i, ADDITIONAL, COMPRESSION UNDER _ _ - I:,ON.TANT-PRESSURE DQE_TO-W-ETTI.NQ_;_ _ _ I P ;-- ; I -; T -------r--- 10 100 Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 83 PCF From TH- 16 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 7.8 % Swell Consolidation JOB NO. FC-1447 Test Results FIG. A-10 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 25 MR. 7 HR. 45MIN, 15MIN. 60MM. 19MIN. 4MIN, IMIN. '200 -100 '50 '40 '30 '16 -10 '8 14 3/8' 314' 1%' 3' 5.6' 8' 0 100 g0 1110 20 8D � � 130 O 70 I i 40 a 80 _ W I I 150 w 50 IL 0 70 3D 20 ... .. ... _ .. _ .. ... .. .. _ .. 90 10 .. .._ _ . 100 0 0.002 .149 .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 .36.1 76.2 12;� 200 .DD, .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 0.62 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS Sample of SAND, CLAYEY (SC) GRAVEL 1 % SAND 64 % From TH - 3 AT 14 FEET SILT & CLAY 35 % LIQUID LIMIT 29 % PLASTICITY INDEX 9 % HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR. 7 HR. TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 50 MIN. 19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. '2DD '100 '50 '40 '30 '16 -10 '8 '4 M. 314' 1%' 3- S' 6' 8' 0 1D0 90 10 20 80 .... - . - ... 3 0 c7 70 _ .... .. ... �. _ .. w Z 40 vN! 4 6D - . �... ... Ix..... .. ... .. .. ... .. ... _. .. .. . .. 50 z w �' w ... __.. ... _. .. .._ _. ... .. w 60 40 _ 70 30 _.. 80 20 90 1D I 100 D O.OD2 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 t21 200 .001 .W5 .009 .018 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 0.42 15z DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS SANDS GRAVEL CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON -PLASTIC) RNE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES Sample of SAND, CLAYEY (SC) From TH - 5 AT 20 FEET Job No. FC-1447 GRAVEL 41 % SAND 52 % SILT & CLAY 7 % LIQUID LIMIT --% PLASTICITY INDEX - % Gradation Test Results Fig. A-1 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR. 7 HR. TIME READINGS US. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SOUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60 MIN. 19 MIN. 4 MIN, 1 MIN. '200 1100 '50 '40 '30 -16 -10 '6 '4 3I6' 3/4' 1%' 3' 5' 6' 6' 0 100 i BO 1 I 1 20 o 0 70 30 y 40 a 60 - w U 0 5 K � a .. ... 60 a 40 70 30 ... .. ... .. .. .. _ ... - 60 20 .. .. _._ ... _. _: : .. .. 90 10 .. .... _..... ..._ _ .... ,. .::.... .: _ ..:.:. ..:.:. . -. :.:. _ : �2.0 .. ...... ... _ - - .... . r ...... Tao 9 0.002 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 '590 1.19 2.36 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 12152 200 .001 .005 0.42 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) GRAVEL 2 % SAND 27 % From TH - 6 AT 9 FEET SILT & CLAY 71 % LIQUID LIMIT - % PLASTICITY INDEX % HYDROMETER ANALYSISI SIEVE ANALYSIS 77-71 25 HR. 7 HR. TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60 MIN. 19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. '200 '100 '50 '40 '30 -16 '70 '6 '4 SB' 3/4' 11/' 3' 5' 6' 6' 0 100 90 10 ...: :... 60 .� ... .. .. ...... 20 30 70 w - 4U a 50 - i 5 50 K C a 60 40 _ .. ... _ _ .. :. '0070 .. 70 F11 20 60 90 10 or I .-J 100 0.002 .297 .590 1.79 2.0 2.38 476 9.52 19.7 36.1 7fi2 127 200 .001 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .119 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS SANDS GRAVEL CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON -PLASTIC) FINE I MEDIUM COARSE FINE I COARSE COBBLES Sample of SAND, CLAYEY (SC) GRAVEL 22 % SAND 75 % From TH - 10 AT 19 FEET SILT & CLAY 3 % LIQUID LIMIT - % PLASTICITY INDEX Job No. FC-1447 Gradation Test Results Fig. A-1. HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 25 HR, 7 HR. 45 MIN, 15 MIN, 60 MIN. 19 MIN. 4MIN. 1MIN. '200 -100 '50 '40 '30 '16 -10'8 '4 3/8' 314' 11/1' 3- 5'6' E' D 700 I ail 90I 10 20 80 Z 70 30 Z w - 50 w 50 4 18070 _ 4 10 30 .. SO 20 90 100 0 .297 �59D 1.19 2.0 2.364.76 9.52 19.t 3fi.1 76.2 12 .001 0.002 .005 .D09 .019 037 .074 .149 157 200 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) GRAVEL 2 % SAND 41 % From TH - 17 AT 9 FEET SILT & CLAY 57 % LIQUID LIMIT - % PLASTICITY INDEX - % HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR 7 HR. TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60 MIN. 19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. *200 '1DO '50 '40 '30 '16 -10 '6 '4 W. 3/4' 1I/V 3' S' 6^ 6' 0 100 90 10 so.. _ _._. .. .. _ _ ... . ... r20 .. ...._ .. .. ... _ .. _ 3 a 70 ....... ..... .... .. .. _ _ .: .. Z 0 50 50 0 ¢ , 60 A. A. 40 70 30 80 20 100 D.OD2 A49 .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36A 76.2 127 200 .001 .005 .DD9 .019 .037 .074 0.42 15 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS GR/iVEL CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON-PLASTIC)SANDS FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) GRAVEL 1 % SAND 20 % From TH -18 AT 4 FEET SILT & CLAY 79 % LIQUID LIMIT 31 % PLASTICITY INDEX 16 % Gradation Job No. FC-1447 Test Results Fig. A-1. JOB NO. FC-1447 TABLE A-1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS BORING DEPTH ft NATURAL MOISTURE % NATURAL DRY DENSITY c SWELL'LASTICITY %sf RG LIMITS UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SOLUBLE SULFATE CONTENT PASSING NO.200 SIEVE SOIL TYPE F(%(%) INDEX TH-1 9 111 0.009 CLAY, SANDY (CL) CLAYSTONE TH-2 24 _18.2 119 0.70 39 27 TH-3 4 13.0 93 -1.80 33 16 87 CLAY, SANDY (CL)__ TH-3 14 _ 16.9 107 0.20 29 9 35 SAND, CLAYEY (SC) CLAY, SANDY CL) _. CLAYEY (SC) _ TH-4 TH-5 4 20 - 13.0 --- 4.9 81 135 -6.40 7 _SAND, TH-6 9- _ 21.7 102 - 71 CLAY, SANDY (CL)_ - T_H-6 --- 24 --- V9 8 - 91 -0.40 - CLAYSTONE - TH-7 TH-7 TH-8 ---- TH-10_ 4 14 - 9 ---- 4 - 13.4 16.0 --23.0 - - - 10_2 89 113 -99 -- 86 -1.50 0.00 -4.20 32 16 1 000 _ 79 _ CLAY, SANDY (CL)-_ CLAY, SANDY (CL CLAY, SANDY (CL) _CLAY, SANDY (CL) TH-10 - TH-12 ---- TH-12 _ TH-14 - TH-15 TH=15 T --- TH-16 --------- TH 17 - 19 --- 4 ---- 9 4 9 24 - _- 4 _- 4.5 ----- 9.8 -- ---- _ 17.3- 11.0 -- - 21.6 13.9 -- - 7.8 ------------ 10.5 119 -- 81 --- 111 - 87 97 110 83 _ ----0 3.40 0.00 0.10 0.20 -10.60 _ _ 35 - 21 2100 - __ - -- 3 _ _ � _58 -57 SAND, CLAYEY (SC) _- - --- CLAY, SANDY (CL) CLAY, SANDY (CL) - ----- - -- CLAY, SANDY (CL) --- - CLAY, SANDY (CL) -- - - CLAYSTONE CLAY, SANDY (CL)- -- -- CLAY,SANDY(CL)- ---- - CLAY SANDY (C -- - SAND CLAYEY (SC) _ 9 4 109 101 31 16 2950 -79 TH-18 13.9 TH-19 4 13.1 104 0.001 - PAGE 1 OF 1 Swell due to wetting at an applied pressure of 1,000 psf. Negative values indicate consolidation. N APPENDIX B GUIDELINE SITE GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Cumberland Parcel The Cumberland Companies, Inc. THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL CTLIT FC-1"7 tea: GUIDELINE SITE GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Cumberland Parcel Fort Collins, Colorado This item shall consist of the excavation, transportation, placement and compaction of materials from locations indicated on the plans, or staked by the Engineer, as necessary to achieve preliminary street and overlot elevations. These specifications shall also apply to compaction of excess cut materials that may be placed outside of the subdivision and/or filing boundaries. 2. GENERA The Soils Engineer shall be the Owner's representative. The Soils Engineer shall approve fill materials, methods of placement, moisture contents and percent compaction, and shall give written approval of the completed fill. The Contractor shall remove all trees, brush and rubbish before excavation or fill placement is begun. The Contractor shall dispose of the cleared material to provide the Owner with a clean job site. Cleared material shall not be placed in areas to receive fill or where the material will support structures of any kind. All topsoil vegetation shall be removed from the ground surface upon which fill is to be placed. The surface shall then be plowed or scarified until the surface is free from ruts, hummocks or other uneven features which would prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. MINKRreu' ► DEFTINEWImIllml • After the foundation for the fill has been cleared and scarified, it shall be disked or bladed until it is free from large clods, brought to the proper moisture content (within ± 2 percent of optimum) and compacted to not less than 95 percent of maximum density as determined by with ASTM D 698. THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL B-1 CTLIT FC-1447 4 Description of Spaces by Laboratory Sections (see Appendix I). • Describe purpose and function of each laboratory section. • Provided so that design team will have better under- standing. O Space Data Sheets. • Explain that these sometimes are used in lieu of space descriptions and equipment data sheets. Designer Guidelines —Define Special Requirements: covers archi- tectural, ventilation, mechanical, plumbing, and electrical design requirements and includes those design requirements necessary to implement the facility's security strategy. Adaptability needs to be emphasized to allow for interior and exterior changes, flexibility to expand. O Safety, Security, and Adaptability. • Describe primary design objectives. • Examples regarding safety: o Fume hoods and biological safety cabinets. o Emergency deluge shower and eyewashes. o Passage widths between laboratory benches. • Examples regarding security. o Passive security design features. o Electronic security design features. o Proximity access systems. o Site security features including landscape design. • Examples regarding adaptability. o Need for flexibility in each section, e.g., DNA. o Need for expansion of facility. o Growth trends in forensic science. O Building and Site. O Overall Laboratory. O Crime Laboratory Sections. O Special Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical, and Structural. O Unusual or Unique Features. 14 Fill soils °Shall be free from vegetable matter or other deleterious substances, and shall not contain rocks or lumps having a diameter greater than six (6) inches. Fill materials shall be obtained from cut areas shown on the plans or staked in the field by the Engineer. On -site materials classifying as CL, CH, SC, SM, SW, SP, GP, GC and GM are acceptable. Concrete, asphalt, organic matter and other deleterious materials or debris shall not be used as fill. RIEFT• : • ► ► For fill material classifying as CH, CL or SC, the fill shall be moisture - treated to within 0 to 3 percent above optimum moisture content. Granular soils classifying as SM, SW, SP, GP, GC and GM shall be moisture treated to within ±2 percent of optimum moisture content as determined from Proctor compaction tests. Sufficient laboratory compaction tests shall be made to determine the optimum moisture content for the various soils identified in borrow areas. The Contractor may be required to add moisture to the excavation materials in the borrow area if, in the opinion of the Soils Engineer, it is not possible to obtain uniform moisture content by adding water to the fill surface. The Contractor may be required to rake or disc the fill soils to provide uniform moisture content through the soils. The application of water to embankment materials shall be made with any type of watering equipment, approved by the Soils Engineer, which will give the desired results. Water jets from the spreader shall not be directed at the embankment with such force that fill materials are washed out. Should too much water be added to any part of the fill, such that the material is too wet to permit the desired compaction from being obtained, rolling and all work on that section of the fill shall be delayed until the material has been allowed to dry to the required moisture content. The Contractor will be permitted to rework wet material in an approved manner to hasten its drying. Selected fill material shall be placed and mixed in evenly spread layers. After each fill layer has been placed, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than the specified percentage of maximum density. Fill shall be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum density as determined by with ASTM D 698. At the option of the Soils Engineer, soils classifying as SW, GP, GC, or GM may be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density as THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL B-2 CTLIT FCA447 N determined by -ASTM .D 1557. `Fill materials shall be placed such that the thickness of loose materials does not exceed 10 inches.and the compacted lift thickness does ,not exceed 6 inches. Where natural slopes are steeper than 20 percent in grade and the placement of fill is required, cut benches shall be provided at the rate of one bench for each 5 feet in height (minimum of two benches). Benches shall be at least 10 feet in width. Larger bench widths maybe required by the engineer. Fill shall be placed on completed benches as outlined within this specification. Field density tests shall be made by the Solis Engineer at locations and depths of his choosing. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil may be disturbed to a depth of several inches. Density tests shall be taken in compacted material below the disturbed surface. When density tests indicate that the density or moisture content of any layer of fill or portion thereof is below that required, the particular layer or portion shall be reworked until the required density or moisture content has been achieved. 11. SEASONAL LIMITS No fill material shall be placed, spread or rolled while it is frozen, thawing, or during unfavorable weather conditions. When work is interrupted by heavy precipitation, fill operations shall not be resumed until the Soils Engineer indicates that the moisture content and density of previously placed materials are as specified. The Contractor shall submit notification to the Solis Engineer and Owner advising them of the start of grading operations at least three (3) days in advance of the starting date. Notification shall also be submitted at least 3 days in advance of any resumption dates when grading operations have been stopped for any reason other than adverse weather conditions. Density tests made by the Soils Engineer, as specified under Density Tests" above, shall be submitted progressively to the Owner. Dry density, moisture content, and percentage compaction shall be reported for each test taken. THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL B-3 CM FC•1"7 a\ R14161 1l ; The Solis Engineer shall provide a written declaration stating that the site was filled with acceptable materials, .and was placed in general accordance with the specifications. THE CUMBERLAND COMPANIES, INC. CUMBERLAND PARCEL B-4 CTLIT FC-1"7 ATTACHMENT 44E�� PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT P954 Police Services Facility-Design/Build Phase .I :Environmental Site Assessment SC -Group Investments, -LLC Property Northwest of the South Timberline Road and East Drake Road Intersection Fort Collins, -Colorado WALSH Project Number: 5357-010 June 30, 2004 AM Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT SC GROUP INVESTMENTS, LLC PROPERTY NORTHWEST OF THE SOUTH TIMBERLINE ROAD AND EAST DRAKE ROAD INTERSECTION FORT COLLINS, COLORADO June 30, 2004 Prepared for: Mr. Ralph Campano City of Fort Collins Real Estate Services Department P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-0580 Prepared by: Troy C. Sanders, P.G. Senior Geoscientist Reviewed by: Harold A. Stuber, Ph.D. Environmental Chemist Submitted by WALSH ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS, LLC 2629 Redwing Road, Suite 280 Fort Collins, Colorado 80526-2879 (970)223-5655 WALSH Project Number: 5357-010 &LwaWl Environmental -Scientists and Engineers, LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 2 SITE DESCRIPTION.....................................................................................................................1 2.1 Site Location, Description, and Ownership ........... ..................................... »................................ 1 2.2 Physical Setting ..................................... ».................................................................. ...................... 4 2.2.1 Site Geology .............................................. ..........4 .............................................................................. 2.2.2 Hydrology................................................................. .........4 ............................................................... 2.2.3 Soils..................................................................................................................................................4 3 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW...........................................................................................5 3.1 Aerial Photograph Review.............................................................................................................5 3.2 Historic USGS Topographic Maps................................................................................................5 3.3 City Directories...............................................................................................................................5 3.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps ..........» ............................... »...................................................... ....6 4 PUBLIC RECORDS REVIEW......................................................................................................6 4.1 Federal Records..............................................................................................................................7 4.1.1 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Sites ........ 7 4.1.2 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)..........................................................................7 4.1.3 Toxic Release Inventory System(TRIS)...........................................................................................7 4.1.4 Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS).......................................................................... 7 4.2 State and Local Records.................................................................................................................7 4.2.1 State -Equivalent Superfund Site Priority List(SPL).........................................................................7 4.2.2 - Landfill/Solid Waste Activities.........................................................................................................8 4.2.3 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs)................................................................................8 4.2.4 Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks................................................................................................8 42.5 State Spill Sites.................................................................................................................................8 4.2.6 Larimer County Department of Health and Environment................................................................. 8 4.2.7 Poudre Fire Authority....................................................................................................................... 8 4.3 Previous Phase I ESA Report Review...........................................................................................8 5 SITE INSPECTION AND INTERVIEWS....................................................................................9 5.1 Subject Site...................................................................».................................................................9 5.2 Neighboring Properties...................................................................................................................9 5.3 Interviews .......................................... ...................... :.......................................................................9 6 CONCLUSIONS...........................................................................................................................10 7 RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................10 8 QUALIFICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS................................................................................11 9 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................12 LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURE1 SITE VICINITY MAP..........................................................................................................3 TABLE 1 PARCEL INFORMATION ................. ......................... »...................... ............... ......... 2 TABLE 2 LIST OF AGENCY SOURCES.........................................................................................6 ekleoomns and settinp\Q n \deskloplwalsh documenu\pojemkity of fort coltim\phne N\5357-010 se group m report.doc.06.30.04 1 AWA4 Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LL.0 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. - ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS SEARCH APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE APPENDIX C AGENCY/PERSONNEL CONTACT LIST APPENDIXI) QUALIFICATIONS OF CORPORATION AND PREPARERS OF PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT APPENDIX E COMPLETED ASTM QUESTIONNAIRE c:bo� midw=P'Wl usms%dmkwP\waM dornmrn'slpolOM4M Offon cag0m\phm iI 357-otosc group m mpw.dm.ov.3o.oa ii =WalBi1 Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC ACRONYM/ABBREVIATION LIST The following acronyms and abbreviations have been used in this Phase I ESA report for The SC Group Investments, LLC property located northwest of the intersection of South Timberline Road and East Drake Road in Fort Collins, Colorado. AST Above -ground Storage Tank ASTM American Society of Testing and Materials CDPHE Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CFR Code of Federal Regulations CORRACTS Corrective Action Sites EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ERNS Emergency Response Notification System ESA Environmental Site Assessment ESRI Earth Science Research Information FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency HWDMS Hazardous Waste Data Management System LCDHE Larimer County Department of Health and Environment LQG Large Quantity Generator LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank NFRAP No Further Remedial Action Planned NPL National Priority List 01S Colorado Department of Labor and Employment -Oil Inspection Section PINYON Pinyon Environmental Engineering Resources, Inc. PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl PFA Poudre Fire Authority RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCRIS Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Inventory System SPL State (Colorado) Priority List SQG Small Quantity Generator TRIS Toxic Release Inventory System TSD Treatment, storage, and disposal US United States USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture USGS U.S. Geological Survey UST Underground Storage Tank VCUP Voluntary Clean -Up WALSH Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC c:ldactmran mid tatmgaW os %Cksktop\Wmkh d0WMMs4xoja Katy of fort coal *hp tsW57-0t0= ump M mpmAm.06.30.0I iii MWE" Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed by Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC (WALSH) at the SC Group Investments, LLC property located northwest of the intersection of South Timberline Road and East Drake Road in Fort Collins, Colorado. The information obtained from a records review, interviews, aerial photograph interpretation, and visual Site inspection indicates that the environmental condition of the Site does not appear to have been impacted by past or current activities on the Site or surrounding areas. The following is a summary of key findings: • The Site consists of approximately 9.70 acres of undeveloped/vacant land. No permanent structures are located on the Site. • The Site is not and has not been, historically identified as a source of soil or groundwater contamination. No site -specific hazardous materials releases have been documented • Petroleum storage tanks related to the typical farming activities may have been located on the Site. However, no stained or discolored soils, stressed vegetation, or unusual odors were observed during a visual inspection of the Site • No AST/UST, CERCLIS, CORRACTS, ERNS, NFRAP, NPL, RCRA, SPL, SWLF, TRIS, or VCUP facilities were identified in the vicinity of the Site Based on the findings of this Phase I ESA no recognized environmental concerns were identified which would warrant additional assessment or evaluation of soil or groundwater at the subject property. c:\dasnneLLs and =rruW\all—s dm"\welsh dOCuo=ApmjWU\=ty of fan oulhw wse 7st5357-010 sc &aaP eae reptntdoc.06.30.04 IV Space Standards. O Generic Office or Nonlaboratory Standards. O Laboratory Space Standards (customary —Federal require- ments, State requirements, county requirements, etc.). Adjacencies. O Internal —Define what components/sections of the building need to be placed next to each other. • Evidence flow. • Work flow. • Promotion of staff interaction(s)/interactions with supervisor(s). • Compartmentalization/public access. O External —Relationship to Client, e.g. Medical Examiners/ Law Enforcement/District Attorney/Courts/etc. Equipment Data Sheets. O Present and Future Equipment. O Manufacturer's Data/Field Examination of Equipment/ Manufacturer's Specifications. Move -in and Future Staff Needs. O Define Milestones. Move -in and Future Space Needs. O Define Milestones. Site Analysis (NOTE: Issues associated with site analysis may re- quire a more extensive or separate document). O Location and Access Analysis. • Is the site acceptable in terms of its location? • Is the proper and required access to the site available? O Assessment of Existing Physical Features and Conditions. • Topography. • Vegetation. • Rock outcroppings. • Surveys. • Geotechnical analysis. 15 �ww8l1. Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT SC GROUP INVESTMENTS, LLC PROPERTY NORTHWEST OF SOUTH TIMBERLINE ROAD AND EAST DRAKE ROAD INTERSECTION FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted at THE SC Group Investments, LLC property located northwest of the intersection of South Timberline Road and East Drake Road in Fort Collins, Colorado (the Site). This Phase I ESA was conducted by Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC (WALSH) under contract to the City of Fort Collins. It is WALSH'S understanding that the City of Fort Collins has considering acquisition of the property for potential development as a police station. The objective of this assessment is to provide information regarding the environmental condition of the Site. This Phase I ESA consists of a review of available city, county, state, and federal documents; examination of historical aerial photographs; interviews; and a visual inspection of the Site. Listings of the contacts made while conducting this Phase I ESA are included in Appendix C. No sampling of soil, water, or other source material was conducted. This Phase I ESA was prepared for the use of the client and authorized agents only, and was conducted in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Designation El527-00 for performing Phase I ESAs. 2 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Site Location, Description, and Ownership The Site consists of an approximately 9.70 acre portion of parcel number 87194-00-001. The Site is located on the west side of South Timberline Road, approximately 1,200 feet north of the South Timberline Road and East Drake Road intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado (Figure 1). The Site consists of vacant/undeveloped land. There are no permanent structures located on the Site. Several large cottonwood trees are located on the northeast portion of the property. The remaining portions of the Site are occupied by fallow agricultural fields. Odomnenp and swinp\d—VIesh"WaM docmemslprgeonkrtY otrort wHiW\phne Ps15357-010 so group m repo tdoc.06.30.04 =Wa141 Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC The parcel identification number, gross parcel acreage, abbreviated legal description, and owners name on file with the Larimer County Assessor's Office for the parcel is indicated in Table 1. TABLE 1 PARCEL INFORMATION Parcel ID Number Gross Acreage Legal Description Owners Name E 1/2 19-7-68; LESS 35 AC M/L TO CITY OF FTC, 32 AC UP RR, 10 AC C & S RR, 4 AC DRY CREEK, TR IN NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 19-7-68 LOCATED E OF C & S RR RNV & S OF SPRING CREEK DITCH, 55.21 Acres Total LESS 1162-257, 1401-354 & 355, 1488- 87194-00-001 (9.70 Acres - 208, 1382-158, 1700-433, 1913-547, 2050- SC Group Subject of this 178, 88048248, FTC; LESS ROW PER Investments, LLC Phase I ESA) 2001007023 (EX "A" PG 1 OF 4); AKA TR IN SE 19-7-68, BEG S 0 29' 55" W 367.93 FT FROM E 1/4 COR, S 0 29' 55" W 2284.06 FT, S 89 53' 54" W 1056.8 FT, N 0 28' 22" E 2276.85 FT, N 89 30' 30" E 1057.94 FT TPOB c:\do� and a at V'"o \dw op\waM docommt;*oiecusk" of ton cunnz\ph= f M57-010 acgroW caicpun.d=06.30.04 Z Source: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map Fort Collins, Colorado 1960, Photorevised 1984 Site Location: T ❑SC Group Investments Property 1 V Northwest of S. Timberline Road and E. Drake Road Intersection Fort Collins, Colorado 5357-010 Figure 1. cdr SC Group Investments Property 06/22/04 3 =Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC 2.2 Physical Setting Information concerning the geology, hydrology, and soils of the study area was obtained from a review of readily available published literature. 2.2.1 Site Geology The surficial geology for the Site is mapped as Quaternary Eolium. This unit was deposited in the Quaternary age consists of wind-blown deposits of clay (loess), sand, and granules. Within the Quaternary Eolium, each sedimentary type is noted to have a unique range of thickness. Loess deposits can be as thick as 15 feet, but are commonly less than 3 feet thick. Sand dunes are commonly less than 15 feet thick, but may be up to 50 feet thick (Colton, 1978). The topography at the Site is relatively flat and displays a very slight topographic slope to the east. The site elevation ranges between 4,940 and 4,950 feet above mean sea level (USGS, 1984). 2.2.2 Hydrology There are no surface water features on the Site. A small unlined irrigation ditch is located on the northern portion of the subject property. The diversion ditch generally flows in the southeasterly direction until it reaches a culvert which carries water across South Timberline Road. The principal surface water feature in the area is the Cache la Poudre River, which is located approximately 0.75 mile northeast of the Site. A detailed wetlands survey was not completed within or adjacent to the boundaries of the Site. The Site does not appear to be located within the designated 100- and 500-year flood plains of any nearby waterways (ESRPFEMA, 2004). Groundwater in the Site vicinity is mapped as generally ranging from 10 to 20 feet below ground surface (Hillier and Schneider, 1979). The general groundwater flow direction is mapped to the east-northeast towards the Cache la Poudre River drainage basin (Robson et al, 2000). The altitude and configuration of the water table in the shallow alluvial aquifer system is affected by the surficial topography, the altitude of the underlying bedrock surface, the transmissivity of the aquifer, and the rate and distribution of recharge and discharge. Local groundwater flow direction may vary depending on local hydrogeologic conditions. 2.2.3 Soils The surficial soils on the Site are mapped as the Nunn series, 0 — 3 percent slope. The combination of surface deposits and subsoil is about 35 inches thick. The Nunn soils are composed of well drained clay loams which were formed in alluvium. Surface water run r.W� ands inPWIu NAcsktW\wdeh donvn \projecn\chy ofton colhm*bew Ps\5357-0I0 sc gmupesnrepon.dmO6.30.04 4 AEWalsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC off is referenced as slow to medium, with a slight to moderate occurrence of water erosion (USDA, 1980). 3 . HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW 3.1 Aerial Photograph Review Available historical aerial photographs were reviewed for the years 1974, 1981, 1987, and 2002. These images were obtained from the Larimer County -Information Management Division in Fort Collins, Colorado. The 1974, 1981, and 1987 aerial photographs show that the northeastern portion of the Site was occupied by a residential structure and a detached (out -building) structure. The remainder of the property appears to have been cultivated for agricultural use. Undeveloped/vacant land was located on the adjacent parcels to the north, south, east (across South Timberline Road), and west of the Site. The 2002 aerial photograph indicated the Site was occupied by undeveloped/agricultural land. No significant changes were observed o the adjacent parcels to the north, south, east (across South Timberline Road), or west. The review of aerial photographs did not indicate the presence of any structures, land uses, or other activities on the Site or neighboring properties that would be considered to likely have had an impact on the environmental condition of the Site. 3.2 Historic USGS Topographic Maps Historic topographic maps were reviewed for the years 1906, 1960, 1969, and 1984 obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey Library in Lakewood, Colorado. The 1906, topographic map -shows that there was a single structure located on the northeast portion of the property. The remaining portions of the property and adjacent parcels located to the north, south, east (across South Timberline Road), and west were occupied by undeveloped land. The 1960 maps show the structure indicated on the 1906 map was no longer present. No other changes were noted for the Site or adjacent parcels on the 1960, 1969, or 1984 topographic maps. The topographic maps did not indicate the presence of any land uses, mining, or other activities that would be considered likely to have had an impact on the environmental condition of the Site. 3.3 City Directories There is no known street address associated with the Site; therefore it was not possible to effectively research the published city directories. cAdocwnaKs and settmpletl usae\dehtop\welsh doame *gj=\city of fort wffinplmse *\5357-010 sc goup=repo doc.06.30.04 5 Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC 3.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps There was no Sanborn Fire Insurance Map coverage for the subject property and surrounding area. The lack of Sanborn map coverage indicates the area is not within a historically developed area of any local municipality. 4 PUBLIC. RECORDS REVIEW An environmental record search of pertinent agency records was conducted using the Environmental Data Resources, Inc. database system. Table 2 lists the agency records searched. A copy of the environmental database report is included in Appendix A. TABLE 2 LIST OF AGENCY SOURCES e rw,,3ypip. .!r�M�K �� •� r 1. ++R1 � id ' �} � I I yy NPL Sites National Priority List 1.0 mile 4/04 SPL Sites Voluntary Cleanup List 1.0 mile 3/04 RCRA Corrective Action RCRIS database 1.0 mile 4/04 Sites CERCLIS and NFRAP CERCLIS Site Event List 0.5 mile 2/04 RCRA TSD Sites RCRIS database 0.5 mile 4/04 CDPHE current landfills 0.5 mile 11/03 Landfills CDPHE inactive landfills 0.5 mile 11/03 Colorado Transfer Stations List 0.5 mile 11/03 Leaking UST list 0.5 mile 4/04 LUST Sites Trust Fund List 0.5 mile 4/04 Registered AST Sites OPS AST List 0.25 mile 4/04 Registered UST Sites OPS UST List 0.25 mile 4/04 RCRA Violations RCRIS 0.25 mile 4/04 Toxic Release Inventory TRIS 0.25 mile 12/01 RCRA Generators RCRIS 1 0.125 mile 4/04 ERNS S ills FERNS 0.125 mile 12/03 AST = Above Ground Storage Tank CDPHE = Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CERCLIS = Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System ERNS = Emergency Response Notification System LUST = Leaking Underground Storage Tank NFRAP = No Further Remedial Action Planned NPL = National Priority List CIS = Colorado Department of tabor and Employment, Oil Inspection Section RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCRIS = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Inventory System SPL = Colorado Priority List TRIS = Toxic Release Inventory System TSD = Treatment, storage, and disposal UST = Underground Storage Tank VCUP = Voluntary Cleanup cAdocummts a d sattmgsW1=m\dwktop\walsl docomrntapojttt;\cuy of fort cuOAo\phmc fs\5357-010 sc gmtp as—por[.doc.0630.04 6 Wat4i Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC 4.1 Federal Records 4.1.1 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Sites The National Priorities List (NPL) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Inventory System (CERCLIS) inventory of potential Superfund sites were reviewed. There are no NPL sites within 1.0 mile and no CERCLIS or No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) sites within the search radii used. 4.1.2 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) The RCRA Hazardous Waste Notifiers List is an inventory of transporters; burner/blenders; and large, small, and very small quantity generators of hazardous wastes. Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate more than 1,000 kilograms (2,205 pounds) of hazardous waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate 100 kilograms (220 pounds) to 1,000 kilograms per month, and very small quantity generators generate less than 100 kilograms of hazardous waste per month. The RCRA Hazardous Waste Notifiers List; Treatment, Storage, and Disposal (TSD) Sites List; and the RCRA Corrective Action Sites (CORRACTS) List were reviewed. There are no RCRA Notifiers, CORRACTS, or TSD facilities identified within a 1.0 mile radius of the Site. 4.1.3 Toxic Release Inventory System (TRIS) Facilities in certain categories which manufacture, process, or use -listed chemicals in excess of established thresholds are required to report releases to the environment in a biennial report. These reports are maintained by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the TRIS. There were no TRIS reports identified within a 0.25 mile radius of the Site. 4.1.4 Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) Spill reports received by the EPA regarding hazardous materials incidents are maintained in an on-line database called ERNS. When a reportable quantity of a hazardous substance is released, the National Response Center must be notified within 24 hours, and these reports are also included in ERNS. No ERNS reports were identified within a 0.25 mile radius of the Site. 4.2 State and Local Records 4.2.1 State -Equivalent Superfund Site Priority List (SPL) The Colorado Priorities List of potential Colorado Superfund sites and the Voluntary Cleanup (VCUP) site list were reviewed. No State -equivalent Superfimd sites or VCUP sites were identified within a 1.0 mile radius of the subject property. cldocwndtts and s P\211 us—\d-ktop%-a6h doctnnmts\pmi=u city of fort w10ro\phM it\5357-010 se group m mpoh.doe.06.30.04 7 A&WaWi Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC 4.2.2 Landfill/Solid Waste Activities Records from Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) and the Larimer County Health Department were reviewed and no landfills were located within a 0.25 mile radius of the Site. 4.2.3 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTS) The LUST database and trust fund list compiled by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment were searched for LUSTS in the vicinity of the Site. The lists identify locations where releases have been reported; where closures were conducted; where spills, overfills, or upgrades have occurred; and where contamination or tank leaks have been reported. No LUST facilities were located within a 0.5 mile radius of the Site. 4.2.4 Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks The Colorado Department of Labor and Employment also maintains lists of registered above -ground and underground storage tanks (AST/UST). These lists were searched for registered ASTs and USTs in the vicinity of the Site. No registered AST or UST sites were identified within a 0.25 mile radius of the Site. 4.2.5 State Spill Sites The Colorado Spill Events list maintained by CDPHE was reviewed and no spill sites were identified within a 0.25 mile radius of the Site. 4.2.6 Larimer County Department of Health and Environment The Larimer County Department of Health and Environment (LCDHE) was contacted to determine whether any hazardous material incidents/spills had occurred at the Site. There is no known street address associated with the Site; therefore it was not possible for the LCDHE to effectively research their records. 4.2.7 Poudre Fire Authority The Poudre Fire Authority (PFA) was contacted to determine whether any fires or hazardous material incidents/spills had occurred within the confines of the Site. There is no known street address associated with the Site; therefore it was not possible for the PFA to effectively research their records. 4.3 Previous Phase I ESA Report Review WALSH reviewed a historic Phase I ESA report prepared by other researchers for the entire 55 acre property. The report concluded that no evidence of a recognized environmental condition is associated with the property (PINYON, 2000). c\d� wd �9'afl o dmk"p WWBh docox *,Djoml iq of fat cn0 nsVi me F0357-010 sc goop a nreport.doc.05.30.00 2—iWa 1 Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC 5 SITE INSPECTION AND INTERVIEWS 5.1 Subject Site The Site was inspected by WALSH personnel on June 22, 2004. Photographs of the Site are included in Appendix B. The Site consists of approximately 9.70 acres of undeveloped/vacant land. The Site is located on the west side of South Timberline Road, approximately 1,200 feet north of the South Timberline Road and East Drake Road intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado (Figure 1). There are no permanent structures located on the Site. Several large cottonwood trees are located on the northeast portion of the property: The remaining portions of the Site are occupied by fallow agricultural fields. The Site is located to the northwest of the intersection of East Drake Road and Timberline Road in Fort Collins, Colorado (Figure 1). The visual inspection did not reveal evidence of improper hazardous material use or disposal. No stained or discolored soil, stressed vegetation, or unusual odors were noted during the inspection of the subject property. There were no pole- or pad -mounted electric transformers observed within the confines of the Site. The site inspection did not reveal the presence of any recognized environmental conditions at the Site. 5.2 Neighboring Properties North — The Site is bounded to the north by undeveloped/vacant land. South — Undeveloped/vacant (agricultural) land bounds the Site to the south. East — The Site is bounded to the east by undeveloped/vacant (agricultural) land. West — Undeveloped/vacant (agricultural) land bounds the Site to the west. 5.3 Interviews An ASTM questionnaire was completed by Mr. Brock Chapman, Vice-president/SC Group Investments, LLC member and is included in Appendix E of this report. This questionnaire was submitted to Mr. Chapman in order to obtain information about current and historic activities at the Site. According to Mr. Chapman, farming activities have been historically conducted on the Site. Mr. Chapman indicated that petroleum storage tanks related to the typical farming activities may have been located on the Site. According to Mr. Chapman's knowledge, the property and adjacent properties to the south, east, or west have not been used for industrial purposes, and was not aware of any c:ldoputet4a and sampsAUurenldesktopXw&hdocunnts\proje \=y offon wlhmxpim i''0357-0I0 sc group mrcpomdoe.06.30.04 9 Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC environmental violations. He indicated that a metal pipe coating operations were formerly conducted on a parcel located to the north of, but not adjacent to the Site. This facility is not considered to be located hydrogeologically upgradient, and is not expected to impact the environmental condition of the Site. 6 CONCLUSIONS WALSH'S conclusions for this Phase I ESA are based on information provided by available public records, discussions with selected personnel associated with the Site and government agencies, and the general site conditions determined by a visual inspection. Environmental legislation passed in the 1970s and 1980s initiated the current practice of maintaining environmental records and facility inspection reports. Prior to the 1970s, activities may have adversely impacted the area without being documented by government agencies. However, there is also no guarantee that the current record -keeping requirements are adhered to by all facilities. The information obtained from a records review, interviews, aerial photograph interpretation, and visual Site inspection indicates that the environmental condition of the Site does not appear to have been impacted by past or current activities on the Site or surrounding areas. The following is a summary of key findings: • The Site consists of approximately 9.70 acres of undeveloped/vacant land. No permanent structures are located on the Site. • The Site is not and has not been, historically identified as a source of soil or groundwater contamination. No site -specific hazardous materials releases have been documented • Petroleum storage tanks related to the typical farming activities may have been located on the. Site. However, no stained or discolored soils, stressed vegetation, or unusual odors were observed during a visual inspection of the Site • No ASTAUST, CERCLIS, CORRACTS, ERNS, NFRAP, NPL, RCRA, SPL, SWLF, TRIS, or VCUP facilities were identified in the vicinity of the Site 7 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings of this Phase I ESA no recognized environmental concerns were identified which would warrant additional assessment or evaluation of soil or groundwater at the subject property. e:'doemnrno em sanmB. OB —'4NhophW* ,n d�\pojectiWay of Ion ooffirw*aw Ps15351-010 ac Brow, eereprut.doc.06.30.04 10 O Analysis of Building Coverage and Location on the Site. • Allowable coverage per codes and ordinances. • Where is the best location on the site for the building? O Parking Requirements. • Codes and ordinances. • Practical parking needs (safety, etc.). • Evidence delivery parking. O Landscape Requirements. • In terms of security. • Practical issues: leaves, pollen, etc. O Site Security Issues. • Site CCTV surveillance. • Fence enclosures and security gates. • Secured parking. O Public Access. • Public transportation. • Highways —easily accessed. O Who Are My Neighbors? —Various Considerations/Public Relations. O Outdoor Air Quality Issues—e.g., Industrial Emissions. O Other "On -Site Resources" or Proximities. • Training academy. • Conference facilities. • University resources. • Lodging. • Dining/restaurants. Special Studies —Examples To Include. O Multistory vs. Single -Story Building. O Environmental Impact. O Protection from Terrorist Access and Proximity. O Construction Phasing Analysis. O Incinerator Study. 16 & {{441 Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC 8 QUALIFICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS WALSH conducted this Phase I ESA in accordance with the guidelines set forth by ASTM. The qualifications of the personnel preparing this assessment are included in Appendix D. The sources of information obtained to perform this assessment include documents, oral statements, and other information from parties outside of WALSH's control. The accuracy of he information cannot be guaranteed by WALSH. This assessment was limited and did not include: • Collection, testing, or chemical analysis of any samples of soil, groundwater, surface water, wastewater, building materials, or other material which was or could have been on -site, except those specifically mentioned in this report • Interviews, except as specifically noted in this report, with past owners, tenants, employees, or neighboring landowners regarding past site use, waste generation and disposal practices (including disposal at remote sites), or manufacturing processes which may have contributed to environmental contamination at the Site • Evaluation of the potential risks associated with identified concerns from records searches with incomplete addresses, location listings, or sites where. no records were available for review • Ecological evaluation of potential wetlands, waters of the U.S., or threatened and endangered species If additional information concerning site environmental conditions becomes available, the conclusions presented in this report will not be considered valid unless this information is reviewed and the conclusions and recommendations of this report are modified and approved in writing by WALSH. It is possible that additional reports or investigations could alter the conclusions of this assessment. This report was prepared for the use of our client and his agents only. c:\docmmos ndsettmgsWI u \dee&Wkwdsh d000n *Uj"khy offon to114n*hm Pe\535/-010wgmW manpMtdoo.06.30.04 11 ALWawl Environmental Scientists and Engineers,I I C 9 REFERENCES American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2000. Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. American Standards for Testing and Materials Standard Designation E1527-00. Colton, Roger B. 1978. Geologic Map of the Boulder — Fort Collins - Greeley Area, Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-855- G. Earth Science. Research Information/Federal Emergency Management Agency (ESRI/FEMA). June 24, 2004. Flood Hazard Map. Hillier, Donald E. and Schneider, Jr., Paul A. 1979. Depth to the Water Table (1976- 1977) in the Greater Boulder — Fort Collins - Greeley Area, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado. U.S. Geologic Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-855-1. Pinyon Environmental Engineering Resources, Inc. (PINYON) 2000. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Vacant Land, Northwest Corner of Drake and Timberline, Fort Collins, Colorado, dated April 26, 2000. Robson, S.G., Arnold, L.R., and Heiny, J.S. 2000. Geohydrology of the Shallow Aquifers in the. Fort Collins - Loveland Area, Colorado. U.S. Geologic Survey Hydrogeologic Investigations Atlas HA-746-B. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1980. Soil Survey of Larimer County Area, Colorado. - U.SGeological Survey (USGS). 1906. Fort Collins, Colorado. Topographic Map. USGS. 1960. Fort Collins Quadrangle, Colorado. 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic) Map. USGS. 1960, Photorevised 1969. Fort Collins Quadrangle, Colorado. 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic) Map. USGS. 1960, Photorevised 1984. Fort Collins Quadrangle, Colorado. 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic) Map. Odoamiam and su p\,U u \lobo hnlah do�\pmj"\city of fo co1un\OM?s\5357-010 se group mrcpon.doa.06.30.04 12 ALWE" Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC APPENDIX A ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS SEARCH cldocum end seumgsWl usas\desktop\wsbh documrnnlprojem\myoffort co1bw*hw FAMS7-010 sc group® rcport.d00%30.04 The EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck® SC Group Investments Property S. Timberline Rd./E. Drake Rd. Fort Collins, CO 80525 Inquiry Number: 01217067.1r June 22, 2004 EDR" Environmental Data Resources Inc The Standard in Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06460 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com SECTION PAGE Executive Summary-----------------------------------------------------. ES1 OverviewMap---------------------------------------------------------- 2 DetailMap------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Map Findings Summary--------------------------------------------------- 4 MapFindings----------------------------------------------------------- 6 Orphan Summary------------------------------------------------------- 7 Government RecordsSearchedlDataCurrencyTracking-------------------------- GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum-----------------------------------------. A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary------------------------------------------- A-2 Physical Setting Source Map----------------------------------------------- A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings---------------------------------------. A-9 Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------ A-53 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT, ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL EDR BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. It can not be concluded from this report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. Any analyses, estimates, ratings or risk codes provided in this report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Any liability on the part of EDR is strictly limited to a refund of the amount paid for this report. Copyright 2004 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanbom and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC01217067.1r Page 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, E 1527-00. Search distances are per ASTM standard or custom distances requested by the user. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS S. TIMBERLINE RD./E. DRAKE RD. FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 40.557900 - 40' 33' 28.4" 105.040300 - 105.2' 25.1" Zone 13 496588.1 4489471.5 4946 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property: Source: TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS 40105-El FORT COLLINS, CO USGS 7.5 min quad index The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ( "reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the ASTM E 1527-00 search radius around the target property for the following databases: FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL ------------------------ National Priority List Proposed NPL -------------- Proposed National Priority List Sites CERCLIS-------------------- Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERC-NFRAP--------------- CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned CORRACTS--------- -------- Corrective Action Report RCRIS-TSD------------------ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS-LQG ------------------ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS-SQG----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System ERNS------------------------ Emergency Response Notification System STATE ASTM STANDARD SHWS----------------------- This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list and Federal NPL list. TC01217067.1 r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Piz SWF/LF---------------------. Solid Waste Sites & Facilities LUST------------------------ Leaking Underground Storage Tank List CO TRUST------------------. Lust Trust Sites UST------------------------- Underground Storage Tank Database INDIAN UST----------------- Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land INDIAN LUST---------------- Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land VCP------------------------- Voluntary Cleanup & Redevelopment Act Application Tracking Report FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL CONSENT------------------- Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD------------------------- Records Of Decision Delisted NPL--------- ------ National Priority List Deletions FINDS ----------------------- Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report HMIRS----------------------- Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System MLTS------------------------ Material Licensing Tracking System MINES----------------------- Mines Master Index File NPL Liens------------------- Federal Superfund Liens PADS------------------------ PCB Activity Database System DOD------------------------- Department of Defense Sites US BROWNFIELDS---------. A Listing of Brownfields Sites INDIAN RESERV------------ - Indian Reservations FUDS------------------------ Formerly Used Defense Sites RAATS---------------------- RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System TRIS------------------------- Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA------------------------ Toxic Substances Control Act SSTS------------------------ Section 7 Tracking Systems FTTS INSP------------------. FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)1TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL HISTORICAL LANDFILL---- Historical Landfill List AST------------------------- Aboveground Tank List CO ERNS-------------------- Spills Database METHANE SITE------------ Methane Site Investigations -Jefferson County 1980 Methane Investigation------. Methane Gas & Swamp Findings EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES Coal Gas-------------------- Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites BROWNFIELDS DATABASES US BROWNFIELDS---------. A Listing of Brownfields Sites AUL------------------------ Environmental Real Covenants List VCP------------------------- Voluntary Cleanup & Redevelopment Act Application Tracking Report SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were not identified. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. TC01217067.1r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Site Name TUCKER FACILITY ROBERTS FACILITY LONE STAR STEEUFT. COLLINS PIPE I 0 Database(s) SWF/LF SWrlLF VCP TC01217067.ir EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vvtKvitW MAP - uTniubr.ir- Watsn tnv.sctenilsis&tngin.LLc A77� Y1 D Target Property A Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than the target property A. Coal Gasification Sites National Priority List Sites ED Landfill Sites Dept. Defense Sites 3 x es z 0 '+r g 114 112 1 Miles �j Indian Reservations BIA Power transmission lines Oil & Gas pipelines 100-year flood zone 500-year flood zone TARGET PROPERTY: SC Group Investments Property CUSTOMER: Walsh Env. Scientists&Engin.LLC ADDRESS: S. Timberline Rd./E. Drake Rd. CONTACT: Troy C. Sanders CITY/STATE/ZIP: Fort Collins CO 80525 INQUIRY #: 01217067.1r LAT/LONG: 40.55791105.0403 DATE: June 22, 2004 2:10 pm Copyright 0 2004 EDR, Inc. 0 2DD3 GDT, Inc. Rol. 07/=. A0 Rights Reserved. Wt I AIL MAF - U1Zl /Ub/.l r - waISn tnv t So Target Property a vis 178 1/41411sa Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Indian Reservations BIA • Sites at elevations lower than Oil &Gas pipelines the target property E] 1o0-year flood zone 1 Coal Gasification Sites Sensitive Receptors 500-year flood zone National Priority List Sites Landfill Sites Dept. Defense Sites TARGET PROPERTY: SC Group Investments Property CUSTOMER: Walsh Env.Scientists&Engin.LLC ADDRESS: S. Timberline Rd./E. Drake Rd. CONTACT: Troy C. Sanders CITY/STATEIZIP: Fort Collins CO 80525 INQUIRY #: 01217067.1 r LAT/LONG: 40.5579 / 105,0403 DATE: June 22, 2004 2:10 pm Copyn0ht 0 2004 EDR, Inc. C, 2003 GDT, Inc. Rai. 0720IXt. AO Rights Reserved. O Migration Studies. • How to move people. • Impacts on staff. Establish a Reasonable Construction Budget (Range of Costs, Alter- natives). O Square Footage Cost Estimate. • Simple estimate based on estimated cost per square foot. O Materials and Systems Take -Off Cost Estimate. • Professional estimator provides complete take -off estimate. 11. QUESTION: How can I get just a rough idea of how big my crime lab should be? ANSWER: Over the past 5 to 10 years the numerous forensic laboratories that have been designed and constructed seem to point to a space ratio based on area per staff member. This ratio for most new facilities tends to fall within the range of 65.03 to 92.90 m2 (700 to 1000 ft2) per staff member. In "Forensic Sciences Progress 5" (Springer-Verlag, 1991), the ratio of 92.90 m2 (1000 ft2) per staff member is offered as a recommended standard. This ratio refers to gross square feet, not net square feet, and therefore, accounts for a prorated portion of circulation corridors, mechanical rooms, toilet rooms, lobbies, etc., for each technical and support staff member. It must be understood, however, that this ratio represents only a very loose rule of thumb that can be drastically affected by a number of variables. For example, laboratories with large amounts of low occu- pant space, such as evidence storage or vehicle examination bays, will unrealistically skew the ratio. The only way to fully and accurately assess space needs is through the Needs Assessment and Design Program process. 17 FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL Proposed NPL CERCLIS CERC-NFRAP CORRACTS RCRIS-TSD RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen. RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. ERNS STATE ASTM STANDARD State Haz. Waste State Landfill LUST CO TRUST UST INDIAN UST INDIAN LUST VCP FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL CONSENT ROD Delisted NPL FINDS HMIRS MILTS MINES NPL Liens PADS DOD US BROWNFIELDS INDIAN RESERV FUDS RAATS TRIS TSCA SSTS FTTS STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL Historical Landfill AST 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0.500 0 0 -0 NR NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TC01217067.1 r Page 4 - u' T+r � a Search Target Distance Database Property (Miles) < 118 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 CO ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR Methane Site TP NR NR NR NR NR Methane Investigation TP NR NR NR NR NR EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES Coal Gas 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR BROWNFIELDS DATABASES US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR AUL 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR NOTES: AQUIFLOW - see EDR Physical Setting Source Addendum TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database N/A = This State does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list. Total Plotted 0 0 0 0 It TC01217067.1r Page5 Map ID r6AP1N6iNCS Direction Distance Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Coal Gas Site Search: No site was found In a search of Real Property Scan's ENVIROHAZ database NO SITES FOUND TC01217067.1r Page6 City EDR ID Site Name FORT COLLINS S105864480 TUCKER FACILITY FORT COLLINS S106858349 LONE STAR STEEL/FT. COLLINS PIPE I LARIMER COUNTY S105854479 ROBERTS FACILITY ORPHAN SUMMARY Site Address SECTION 15. TOWNSHIP 9, RANGE 68, APPRO) 518 1925 TIMBERLINE DR. ADJ TO SW1/4 OF SWt/4 OF SECT 26, TOWNSHIP 10 Zip Database(s) SWF/LF VCP SWF/LF TC01217067.tr Page 7 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Elapsed ASTM days: Provides confirmation that this EDR report meets or exceeds the 90-day updating requirement of the ASTM standard. FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD RECORDS NPL: National Priority List Source: EPA Telephone: N/A National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 04127104 Date Made Active at EDR: 05/21/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 _ Telephone 617-918-1143 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418 EPA Region 4. Telephone 404-562-8033 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites Source: EPA Telephone: NIA Date of Government Version: 04/27104 Date Made Active at EDR: 05/21/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 05/04/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 17 Date of Last EDR Contact: 05/04104 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 8 Telephone:303-312-6774 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 05/04/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 17 Date of Last EDR Contact: 05/04/04 CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Source: EPA Telephone: 703413-0223 CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 02/26/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 04/02/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/22/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 11 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/22/04 CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Source: EPA Telephone: 703413-0223 As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned' (NFRAP) have been removed from CERCLIS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately 25,000 NFRAP sites to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archived them as historical records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future. This policy change is part of the EPA's Brownfrelds Redevelopment Program to help cities, states, private investors and affected citizens to promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban sites. TC01217067.1r PageGR-1 Date of Government Version, 02/26/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 04/02/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/22/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 11 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03122/04 CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 03/15/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 04/15/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/25/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 21 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/08/04 RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. RCRIS includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs): generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQGs): generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Large quantity generators (LQGs): generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator off -site to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 04/13/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 04/20/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 05/13/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 23 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 04/20/04 ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-260-2342 Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 12/31/03 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/26/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/12/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 46 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 04/26/04 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS BRS: Biennial Reporting System Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data onthe generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LOG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/01/01 Database Release Frequency: Biennially Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/16/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/04 CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Source: EPA Regional Offices Telephone: Varies Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: NIA Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: N/A Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A TC01217067.lr PageGR-2 ROD: Records Of Decision Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 04/08/04 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 04/05/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05104 DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions Source: EPA Telephone: NIA The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 04/27/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 05/04/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08102/04 FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 04108/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 04/05/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/04 HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 02/17/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 04/20/04 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/04 MILTS: Material Licensing Tracking System Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301.415-7169 MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly„bests., Date of Government Version: 04/19/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 04/05/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07105/04 MINES: Mines Master Index File Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Date of Government Version: 03/05/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/30/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06128/04 NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. TC01217067.tr Page GR-3 Date of Government Version: 10/15/91 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/12/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/04 PADS: PCB Activity Database System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-3887 PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 03/30/04 Database Release Frequency: Annually DOD: Department of Defense Sites Date of Last EDR Contact: 05112/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/04 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-692-8801 This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 10/01/03 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually STORMWATER: Stone Water General Permits Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202 564-0746 A listing of all facilities with Stone Water General Permits. Date of Government Version: N/A Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/02/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: N/A Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 10/01/03 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/02/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/04 US BROWN FIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA's Targeted Brownfields Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalities —especially those without EPA Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots —minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with brownfields. Under the TBA program,: EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts under EPA's Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement .Recipients -States, political subdivisions, terttories, and Indian tribes become BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified brownfields-related cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 04/14/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 03115/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14104 RMP: Risk Management Plans Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and aftemative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. TC01217067.lr Page GR-4 i w Date of Government Version: N/A Database Release Frequency: NIA Date of Last EDR Contact: N/A Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A FUDS:.Formerly Used Defense Sites Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 10/01/03 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 04/26/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/04 RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/95 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/OB/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06107/04 TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/01 Database Release Frequency: Annually TSCA. Toxic Substances Control Act Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/23/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/21/04 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/02 Database Release Frequency: Every 4 Years Date of Last EDR Contact• 03/05/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact'. 06/07/04 FITS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2501 Date of Government Version: 04113/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 03/22/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/04 SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-5008 Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat 829) requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31101 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 04/19/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07119/04 TC01217067.lr PageGR-5 FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Ad)ITSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-564-2501 FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/13/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly OF COLORADO ASTM STANDARD RECORDS Date of Last EDR Contact: 03122/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/04 SHWS: This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list and Federal NPL list. Source: EPA Telephone: 703-413-0223 State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Made Active at EDR: N/A Database Release Frequency: N/A Date of Data Arrival at EDR: N/A Elapsed ASTM days: NIA Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/22/04 SWFILF: Solid Waste Sites & Facilities Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3300 Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 11/04/03 Date Made Active at EDR: 12/31103 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/08/03 Elapsed ASTM days: 23 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/11/04 LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank List Source: Department of Labor and Employment, Oil Inspection Section Telephone: 303-318-8521 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version: 04/06/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 04/28/04 Database Release Frequency:_Quartedy Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 04/D6104 Elapsed ASTM days: 22 Date of Last EDR Contact 04/06/04 TRUST: Lust Trust Sites Source: Department of Labor and Employment, Oil Inspection Section Telephone: 303-318-8521 The listing tracks the reimbursement of costs approved and paid to eligible applicants. Date of Government Version: 04/27/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 05/12104 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 04/27/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 15 Date of Last EDR Contact: 04/27/04 UST: Underground Storage Tank Database Source: Department of Labor and Employment, Oil Inspection Section Telephone: 303-318-8521 Registered Underground Storage Tanks. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. - TC01217067.1r PageGR-6 Design Introduction A variety of functional elements can drive the architectural and engineering designs of a forensic laboratory. Functional requirements of scientific disciplines, equipment, and instrumentation are just a few of the variables that generate space, dimension, and adja- cency requirements that affect the overall design. There is not one universally correct plan for a forensic laboratory design, as individual cases will differ according to the needs of the users. For example, technical laboratories such as toxicology, biological science, and firearms analysis have specific needs unique to their specialized areas of work. The suc- cess and efficiency of a forensic laboratory depends on designing a layout that supports and optimizes the individual laboratory's particular fields of expertise. During review of this section, the reader is encouraged to refer to the Laboratory Design Standards and Modules document found in Appendix II. Flexibility should be a key element in driving a forensic laboratory's design and configuration. In recent years, one message in particular has been made clear to the scien- tific, architectural, and building industry professions: Today's forensic laboratories must be designed with the flexibility to support adaptability and change. Adaptability in a laboratory is a function of how the buildings, rooms, and systems can grow and change with the needs of its occupants. For example, over the past 2 years scientific advancement in the field of DNA research has forced forensic laboratories to adapt to new designs in order to decrease the risk of contamination and ensure the accuracy of technical data. As science and technology advance, forensic laboratories must be capable of embracing the future, or risk falling into obsolescence. Although the laboratory building presents some very complex and challenging design issues, elements of the site design must also be addressed in order to ensure a successfully designed forensic laboratory facility. Issues such as site access, proximity of secured and unsecured parking areas, and even landscaping have implications regarding the efficiency and security of the overall site and building design. It cannot be overemphasized that the design standards presented herein are merely recommended guidelines. Although different laboratories possess many identical and similar characteristics, there may be other characteristics that are considered unique to a particu- lar laboratory. The uniqueness of a laboratory is generally dictated by differing laboratory procedures (for example, one laboratory might be doing both Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) procedures in their DNA analysis, while another might be doing only PCR); or administrative policy (for example, one laboratory might require that all in -process evidence be returned to a central vault at the end of the day, while another might allow for it to be stored in individual lockers within the laboratory work space). Building site conditions and characteristics might also show similarities from one laboratory to another, yet in some instances sites might be completely dissimilar. For example, a regional laboratory facility might be located on a spacious rural site, while 19 Date of Government Version: 01106/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 01/20/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137. Underground storage tank locations on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 01/08/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 01/22/04 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/06/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 14 Date of Last EDR Contact: 04/06/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/13104 Elapsed ASTM days:9 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/23/04 INDIAN LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 02/05/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/24/04 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/04/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 20 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/27/04 VCP: Voluntary Cleanup & Redevelopment Act Application Tracking Report Source: Department of Public Health and Environmental Telephone: 303-692-3331 The Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Act is intended to permit and encourage voluntary cleanups by providing a method to determine clean-up responsibilities in planning the reuse of property. The VCRA was intended for sites which were not covered by existing regulatory programs. Date of Government Version: 03/19/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 04/14/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually STATE OF COLORADO ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS HISTORICAL LANDFILL: Historical Landfill List Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3300 Abandoned/Inactive Landfills. Date of Government Version: 01/31/93 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned AST: Aboveground Tank List Source: Department of Labor and Employment, Oil Inspection Section Telephone: 303-318--8521 Aboveground storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: O1/06104 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually CO ERNS: Spills Database Source: Department of Public Health and Environmental Telephone: 303-692-2000 State reported spills. Date of Government Version: 04/28/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Dale. of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/22104 Elapsed ASTM days: 23 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03122104 Date of Last EDR Contact: 09/05196 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Date of Last EDR Contact: 04/06/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 05/03/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/04 TC01217067.lr Page GR-7 i METHANE SITE: Methane Site Investigations - Jefferson County 1980 Source: Jefferson County Health Department Telephone: 303-239-7175 The objectives of the study are to define as closely as possible the boundaries of methane producing solid waste landfills. Date of Government Version: 12/31/80 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 01127195 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A METHANE INVESTIGATION: Methane Gas & Swamp Findings Source: Department of Health Telephone: 303-640-3335 The primary objective of this study was to assess methane gas related hazards at selected landfill sites in Colorado. These sites were selected by the Colorado Department of Health following evaluation of responses received from County and Municipal agencies about completed and existing landfills within their jurisdiction. Date of Government Version: 03/15/79 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01127/95 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A LOCALRECORDS ADAMS COUNTY: Summary Report on Methane Gas Hazards and Surveys Conducted on Domestic and Demolition Landfills in Adams County Source: Tri-County Health Department Telephone: 303-761-1340 As of May 8, 1978, all known landfills or dumping sites in the Adams County area have been surveyed. Date of Government Version: 05/08/78 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/27/95 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A ARAPAHOE COUNTY: A Survey of Landfills in Arapahoe County Source: Tri-County Health Department Telephone: 303-761-1340 A survey of Arapahoe County was conducted from August through November, 1977, of all open and closed landfills and dumpsites in the county. Each of the sites found was classified as domestic or demolition. Date of Government Version: 12131/78 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned BOULDER COUNTY:. Old Landfill Sites Source: Boulder County Health Department Telephone: 303-441-1182 Date of Government Version: 05/01/86 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned DENVER COUNTY: Landfills in Denver County Source:- City and County of Denver Telephone: 303-436-7300 Date of Last EDR Contact 01127/95 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/30/98 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA TC01217067.1r PageGR-8 ... _I, `ct:. ''�x3{- t;f S'✓±.�i'•i'J::` slh. .rs z r:� r w - x l`. Date of Government Version: 12/01/94 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOUGLAS COUNTY: Douglas Count, Landfill Key Source: Tri-County Health Department Telephone: 303-761-1340 Date of Government Version: 06/12/91 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned PUEBLO COUNTY: Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/18/94 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Date of Last EDR Contact: 01127/95 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Designated Disposal & Landfill Sites Source: Pueblo City -County Health Department Telephone: 719-583-4300 Only inert materials. Asphalt, cement, dirt & rock unless otherwise specified. These sites are no longer active. Date of Government Version: 04/30190 Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/13/95 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A TRI COUNTY: Tri-County Area Solid Waste Facilities List (Adams, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties) Source: Tri-County Health Department Telephone: 303-761-1340 Closed Domestic Landfills in Adams.County, Closed Domestic Landfills in Arapahoe County, Closed Demolition Landfills in Arapahoe County, Closed Domestic Landfills in Douglas County. Date of Government Version: 10115/83 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned WELD COUNTY: Solid Waste Facilities in Weld County Source: Weld County Department of Public Health Telephone: 970-304-6415 Date of Government Version: 03101/04 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES Date of Last EDR Contact'. 01/27/95 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/08104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/07/04 Fortner Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites: The existence and location of Coal Gas sites is provided exclusively to EDR by Real Property Scan, Inc. @Copyright 1993 Real Property Scan, Inc. For a technical description of the types of hazards which may be found at such sites, contact your EDR customer service representative. Disclaimer Provided by Real Property Scan, Inc. The information contained in this report has predominantly been obtained from publicly available sources produced by entities other than Real Property Scan. While reasonable steps have been taken to insure the accuracy of this report, Real Property Scan does not guarantee the accuracy of this report. Any liability on the part of Real Property Scan is strictly limited to a refund of the amount paid. No claim is made for the actual existence of toxins at any site. This report does not constitute a legal opinion. TC01217067.1r Page GR-9 BROWNFIELDS DATABASES AUL: Environmental Real Covenants List Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3331 Activity and use limitations include both engineering controls and institutional controls. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment to approve requests to restrict the future use of a property using an enforceable agreement called an environmental real covenant. When a contaminated site is not cleaned up completely, land use restrictions may be used to ensure that the selected cleanup remedy is adequately protective of human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 03/01/04 Database Release Frequency: Varies US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/01/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/04 Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA's Targeted Brownfields Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalities --especially those without EPA Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots —minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts under EPA's Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement Recipients -States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified brownfields-related cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: NIA Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: NIA Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A VCP: Voluntary Cleanup & Redevelopment Act Application Tracking Report Source: Department of Public Health and Environmental Telephone: 303-692-3331 The Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Act is intended to permit and encourage voluntary cleanups by providing a method to determine clean-up responsibilities in planning the reuse of property. The VCRA was intended for sites which were not covered by existing regulatory programs. Date of Government Version: 03/19/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually OTHER DATABASE(S) Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/22/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/04 Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Electric Power Transmission fine Data Source: PennWell Corporation Telephone: (800) 823-6277 This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. TC01217067.1r PageGR-10 L AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone:312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone:301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone:202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Daycare Listing Source: Department of Human Services Telephone: 303-866-5958 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION ® 2003 Geographic Data Technology, Inc., Rel. 0712003. This product contains proprietary and confidential property of Geographic Data Technology, Inc. Unauthorized use, including copying for other than testing and standard backup procedures, of this product is expressly prohibited. TC01217067.1r Page GR-11 4kT TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS SC GROUP INVESTMENTS PROPERTY S. TIMBERLINE RDJE. DRAKE RD. FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 40.557899 - 40' 33' 28.4" 105.040298 - 105' 2' 25.1" Zone 13 496588.1 4489471.5 4946 ft. above sea level EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum has been developed to assist the environmental professional with the collection of physical setting source information in accordance with ASTM 1527-00, Section 7.2.3. Section 7.2.3 requires that a current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent, such as the USGS Digital Elevation Model) be reviewed. It also requires that one or more additional physical setting sources be sought when (1) conditions have been identified in which hazardous substances or petroleum products are likely to migrate to or from the property, and (2) more information than is provided in the current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent) is generally obtained, pursuant to local good commercial or customary practice, to assess the impact of migration of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property_ Such additional physical setting sources generally include information about the topographic, hydrologic, hydrogeologic, and geologic characteristics of a site, and wells in the area. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. TC01217067.1 r Page A-1 54YryY rE jyrc;t3 '� x'y.g. ..b"� F< +�.+s:"�,5y..-:.N v , a- e GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of suntcial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY USGS Topographic Map: 40105-E1 FORT COLLINS, CO General Topographic Gradient: General East Source: USGS 7.5 min quad index SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES r 0 0 Z C 0 .W m W North TP m P Y b n ,o m f`o q 5p a A q West East TP Target Pro 0 112 1 Miles Tar g Property Elevation: 4946 ft. Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC01217067.1r PageA-2 HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Target Property County LARIMER, CO Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: Additional Panels in search area: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Quad at Target Property FORT COLLINS FEMA Flood Electronic Data YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map 0801010193D 0801020012C NWI Electronic Data Coverage Not Available Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW Not Reported TC01217067.1r PageA-3 GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: Mesozoic Category: Stratified Sequence System: Cretaceous Series: Taylor Group Code: uK3 (decoded above as Era, System & Series) Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS -11 (1994). DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data. Soil Component Name: NUNN Soil Surface Texture: clay loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to water table is more than 6 feet. Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil. Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches TC01217067.tr Page A-4 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction Rate (in/hr) (pH) 1 0 inches 10 inches clay loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.60 Max: 7.80 Materials (more SOILS, Silts Min: 0.20 Min: 6.10 than 35 pct. and Clays passing No. (liquid limit 200), Clayey less than 50%), Soils. Lean Clay 2 10 inches 47inches clay loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.20 Max: 8.40 Materials (more SOILS, Silts Min: 0.06 Min: 6.10 than 35 pct. and Clays passing No. (liquid limit 200), Clayey less than 50%), Soils. Lean Clay 3 47 inches 60 inches Gay loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.60 Max: 9.00 Materials (more SOILS, Silts Min: 0.20 Min: 7.90 than 35 pct. and Clays passing No. (liquid limit 200). Clayey less than 50%), Soils. Lean Clay 4 Winches 70 inches sandy clay loam Granular COARSE -GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 8.40 materials (35 SOILS, Sands, Min: 2.00 Min: 7.40 pct. or less Sands with passing No. fines, Clayey 200), Silty, or sand. Clayey Gravel COARSE -GRAINED and Sand. SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Silty Sand. OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may appear within the general area of target property. Soil Surface Textures: No Other Soil Types Surficiai Soil Types: No Other Soil Types Shallow Soil Types: No Other Soil Types Deeper Soil Types: clay loam very gravelly - sand Silty clay weathered bedrock loam TC01217067.1r PageA-5 another laboratory might occupy space in a high-rise urban building. The designers must review all of these recommended design guidelines with appropriate laboratory staff to determine their applicability to that particular laboratory. Site Design • Site access. O It is desirable that the site be designed with access from at least two directions to ensure access to the site despite traffic conditions, street maintenance work, acts of sabotage, or other unforeseen site disruptions. • Emergency and service access. O Coordinate with laboratory staff and local authorities to ensure emergency access for fire department and other emergency vehicles. Access for shipping and receiv- ing must comply with code requirements without compromising site security. • Site lighting. O The site lighting should be designed to enhance security and discourage vandal- ism and unauthorized entry. Lighting comparable to that of a college campus offering night classes might serve as a guideline. • Landscape design. O Landscaping should be designed to enhance site security by preventing potential vandals, burglars, and saboteurs from hiding in the landscaping until after dark. The following types of landscape design should be avoided: • Dense shrubbery within 3.048 m (10 ft) of the building or any security fence. • Large clusters of shrubbery, 0.61 m (2 ft) to 1.83 m (6 ft) high. • Tall evergreens with branches less than 1.52 m (5 ft) above grade. • Parking design. O Like landscaping, the design of parking areas should consider site security re- quirements. The following are recommended levels of security for parking: • Level 1, unsecured. Visitor parking located near the visitors' entrance to the building allowing entry and departure without security barriers. • Level 2, partially secured. Fenced area for use by persons having business at the facility. For example, shipping and receiving, biological and toxic waste pickup, dumpster replacement, and evidence delivery. The area should be gated, and the gate may be left open during business hours and locked after hours. Access might be through the level 1 parking area. • Level 3, secured. Staff parking area secured 24 h, surrounded by a security fence, and accessible by use of a proximity or card key device. Depending on security policy, this level might be eliminated, and staff could park in the level 2 parking area. • Level 4, high security. Vehicle impound parking with limited personnel 20 access and monitored security systems. 'i ,,�Esxm h Xc 9� ��..�X. �•' �'�� a12' i e`lfM1 . _..a .-. �.. -.. ... 1 .i,.:. _,..a ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES According to ASTM E 1527-00, Section 7.2.2, 'one or more additional state or local sources of environmental records may be checked, in the discretion of the environmental professional, to enhance and supplement federal and state sources... Factors to consider in determining which local or additional state records, if any, should be checked include (1) whether they are reasonably ascertainable, (2) whether they are sufficiently useful, accurate, and complete in light of the objective of the records review (see 7.1.1), and (3) whether they are obtained, pursuant to local, good commercial or customary practice" One of the record sources listed in Section 7.2.2 is water well information. Water well information can be used to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact groundwater flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) Federal USGS 1.000 Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile Stale Database 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No Wells Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No PWS System Found Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP Al COWW148637 1/8 -1/4 Mile North A2 COWW148631 118 -1/4 Mile North A3 COW W 148635 114 -1/2 Mile North A4 COW W291023 . 114 -112 Mile NNW A5 COW W291188 1/4 -112 Mile NNW A6 COWWO16407 1/4-112 Mile NNW A7 COWW148636 114-112 Mile North B8 COW W 148632 1/4 -1/2 Mile NNW B9 COW W 148633 1/4 -1/2 Mile NNW 10 COWW148634 1/4-1/2 Mile NNW 11 COW W 148630 1/4 -1/2 Mile North 12 COW W292737 114 -112 Mile ESE C13 COW W292403 112 =1 Mile North C14 COWW292432 112 -1 Mile North TC01217067.1r PageA-6 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 15 COWW291448 1/2 -1 Mile SSE 16 COW W293584 112 -1 Mile North D17 COWW233210 1/2 -1 Mile NNW D18 COWW233209 1/2-1 Mile NNW E19 COWWO16909 1/2 -1 Mile North E20 COWW238380 112 -1 Mile North E21 COWW291950 1/2-1 Mile North E22 COWWO41810 1/2 -1 Mile North 23 COWW291168 1/2 -1 Mile SSE 24 COWWO64470 112 -1 Mile NNE F25 COWW291497 1/2 -1 Mile NNW F26 COWW292414 112 -1 Mile NNW F27 COWW291577 112 -1 Mile NNW 28 COWW290987 112 -1 Mile NE G29 COWWO32663 112 -1 Mile NNE G30 COWWO99662 112 -1 Mile NNE 31 COWWO11444 1/2 -1 Mile NNE 32 COWW237702 1/2 -1 Mile NW 33 COWWO38399 1/2 -1 Mile WSW 34 COWWO33960 1/2 -1 Mile WNW 35 COWWO07495 12 -1 Mile NNE H36 CO W WO07969 1/2 -1 Mile West H37 COWWO07968 112 -1 Mile West TC01217067.1 r Page A-7 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 01217067.1 r Major Roads -., Contour Lines {YQ Airports QO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater Q Water Wells © Public Water Supply Wells • Cluster of Multiple Icons Groundwater Flow Direction c I Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location G v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location •- Oil, gas or related wells TARGET PROPERTY: SC Group Investments Property CUSTOMER: Walsh Env.Scientists&Engin.LLC ADDRESS: S. Timberline RdJE. Drake Rd. CONTACT: Troy C. Sanders CITY/STATEOP: Fort Collins CO 80525 INQUIRY #: 01217067.1 r LAT/LONG: 40.5579 / 105.0403 DATE: June 22, 2004 2:11 pm DchYMUhtp 2004EDR, Inc. 0 2003 GDT, Inc Rai. 0772003. AU fthts Ron mod, ' Map ID Direction Distance .Elevation Database EDR ID Number Al North - CO WELLS COWW148637 1/8 -114 Mile Lower Site Name: LONE STAR STEEL CO Mailing Address: LEAH COOPER LEAH COOPER LONE STAR, TX 75668 Telephone: 9036566317 Water Division: 1 County Code: 35 Receipt: 0358811 H Permit Number: 174170 Suffix Code: Not Reported Replacement Code: Not Reported Parcel: 0 Application Date: 08/12/1993 Application Status: Abandoned Well Permit Status: Not Reported Permit Stat Date: Not Reported Last Action Updated: Abandoned Well Last Action Date: 05107/1996 Permit, Denial (AD) or Monitoring Hole Issued: 11/01/1993 Construction/Test report Received by DWR: 08/12/1993 Well Proposed Yield (Gat(Mtn): 0 Well Proposed Depth (Feet): 30 Proposed Annual Appropriation (Acre Feet): 0 Well Application Type: Not reported Well Type: Exempt First Beneficial Use Date: Not Reported Date Statement of Use Received: Not Reported Date Amended to Include Animals: Not Reported Permit Expiration Date: 11/01/1995 Abandonment Report Received: 05/06/1996 Plugged an Abandoned Date: 04/0811996 Annual Appropriafion in Acre Feet: 0 Depth to Top of 1st Perforated Casing: 0020 Depth to Base of Last Perforated Casing: 0030 Water Court Case Number: Not Reported Yield in Gallons Per Minute: 0 Total Depth of Well: 30 Depth to Static Water Level: 23 Ground Surface Elevation: 0 Acres Irrigated: 0 Totaling Flow Meter Reqd., Installed: N Cross Reference to Another Well or Record: Not Reported Notice of Well Completion Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer: Not Reported Notice of Beneficial Use Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer. Not Reported Well ID Number: 00000 Well Construction Completed Date: 05/04/1992 Pump Installation Completed Date: Not Reported Geophysical is Required and Received: No Contractor's License: 1237 Pump Installer's License: Not Reported Pump Installation Report to DWR: Not Reported Statute Which Permit Issued Under: 6023 Last Staff Member to Update File: NLH Water District: 03 Groundwater Basin Numb: 00 Basin Mgmt Dist Numb: 00 Principal Meridian: S Dist from Section Line: 2256N 450E Range: 0680W Township: 070N Section: 19 1/4 Section: NE 1/4 1/4: SE 1/4 1/4 1/4: Not Reported TC01217067.lr PageA-9 Aquifer: GW 2nd Aquifer: Not Reported Sub Division: Not Reported Lot Number: Not Reported Block Number: Not Reported Filing Number: Not Reported Approval Engineer: DWR Designation Number: MW-B Comments: MH-18696; WELL MW-8 Utm_x: 496582.969 Utmy: 4489799 Loc_source: CarteView 2/17/2000 Usage: Q, Monitoring Well (Permitted) A2 North CO WELLS COWW148631 1/8 -114 Mile Lower Site Name: LONE STAR STEEL CO Mailing Address: LEAH COOPER LEAH COOPER LONE STAR, TX 75668 Telephone: 9036566317 Water Division: 1 County Code: 35 Receipt: 0358811 B Permit Number. 174164 Suffix Code: Not Reported Replacement Code: Not Reported Parcel: 0 Application Date: 08/12/1993 Application Status: Abandoned Well Permit Status: Not Reported Permit Stat Date: Not Reported Last Action Updated: Abandoned Well Last Action Date: 05/07/1996 Permit, Denial (AD) or Monitoring Hole Issued: 11/01/1993 Construction/Test report Received by DWR: 08112/1993 Well Proposed Yield (Gal/Min): 0 Well Proposed Depth (Feet): 28 Proposed Annual Appropriation (Acre Feet): 0 Well Application Type: Not reported Well Type: Exempt First Beneficial Use Date: Not Reported Date Statement of Use Received: Not Reported Date Amended to Include Animals: Not Reported Permit Expiration Date: 11101/1995 Abandonment Report Received: 05/06/1996 Plugged an Abandoned Date: 0410911996 Annual Appropriation in Acre Feet: 0 Depth to Top of 1st Perforated Casing: 0017 Depth to Base of Last Perforated Casing: 0028 Water Court Case Number: Not Reported Yield in Gallons Per Minute: 0 Total Depth of Well: 28 Depth to Static Water Level: 22 Ground Surface Elevation: 0 Acres Irrigated: 0 Totaling Flow Meter Reqd., Installed: N Cross Reference to Another Well or Record: Not Reported Notice of Well Completion Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer: Not Reported Notice of Beneficial Use Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer: Not Reported Well ID Number: 00000 Well Construction Completed Date: 02124/1992 Pump Installation Completed Date: Not Reported Geophysical is Required and Received: No Contractor's License: 1237 Pump Installer's License: Not Reported TC01217067.1r PageA-10 Pump Installation Report to DWR: Not Reported Statute Which Permit Issued Under: 6023 Last Staff Member to Update File: NLH Water District: 03 Groundwater Basin Numb: 00 Principal Meridian: S Range: 068OW Section: 19 1/41/4: SE Aquifer: GW Sub Division: Not Reported Block Number: Not Reported Approval Engineer: DWR Comments: MH-18696; WELL MW-2 Utm x: 496682.031 Utmy: 4489822 Usage: O, Monitoring Well (Permitted) A3 North 114 -1/2 Mile Higher Site Name: LONE STAR STEEL CO Mailing Address: LEAH COOPER LEAH COOPER LONE STAR, TX 75668 Telephone: 9036566317 Water Division: 1 Receipt: 0358811 F Suffix Code: Not Reported Parcel 0 Application Date: 08/12/1993 Application Status: Abandoned Well Permit Status: Not Reported Permit Stet Date: Not Reported Last Action Updated: Abandoned Well Last Action Date: 06/07/1996 Permit, Denial (AD) or Monitoring Hole Issued: Construction/Test report Received by DWR: Well Proposed Yield (Gal/Min): Well Proposed Depth (Feet): Proposed Annual Appropriation (Acre Feet): Well Application Type: Well Type: First Beneficial Use Date: Date Statement of Use Received: Date Amended to Include Animals: Permit Expiration Date: Abandonment Report Received: Plugged an Abandoned Date: Annual Appropriation in Acre Feet: Depth to Top of 1 at Perforated Casing: Depth to Base of Last Perforated Casing: Water Court Case Number: Yield in Gallons Per Minute: Total Depth of Well: Depth to Static Water Level: Ground Surface Elevation: Acres Irrigated: Totaling Flow Meter Regd., Installed: Basin Mgmt Dist Numb: Dist from Section Line: Township: 1/4 Section: 114 114 114: 2nd Aquifer: Lot Number: Filing Number: Designation Number: Loc source: County Code: Permit Number: Replacement Code: 11/01/1993 08/12/1993 0 28 0 Not reported Exempt Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 11/01/1995 05/06/1996 04/08/1996 0 0018 0028 Not Reported 0 28 23 0 0 N r`[ "q 00 2181N 125E 07ON NE Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported MW-2 CarteView 2/1712000 CO WELLS COWW148635 35 174168 Not Reported TC01217067.1r PageA-11 Cross Reference to Another Well or Record: Not Reported Notice of Well Completion Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer: Not Reported Notice of Beneficial Use Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer: Not Reported Well ID Number: - 00000 Well Construction Completed Date: 02/26/1992 Pump Installation Completed Date: Not Reported Geophysical is Required and Received: No Contractors License: 1237 Pump Installer's License: Not Reported Pump Installation Report to DWR: Not Reported Statute Which Permit Issued Under: 6023 Last Staff Member to Update File: NLH Water District: 03 Groundwater Basin Numb: 00 Principal Meridian: S Range: 0680W Section: 19 1/4 1/4: SE Aquifer: GW Sub Division: Not Reported Block Number: Not Reported Approval Engineer: DWR Comments: MHA8696; WELLMW-6 Utm_x: 496563.813 Utmy: 4489890.5 Usage: 'Q, Monitoring Well (Permitted) A4 NNW 1/4 -112 Mile Higher Site Name: TIMBERLINE TUBE CO Mailing Address: Not Reported FT COLLINS, CO 80524 Telephone: Not Reported Water Division: 1 Receipt: 9038240 Suffix Code: F Parcel: 0 Application Date: Not Reported Application Status: Abandoned Well Permit Status: Not Reported Permit Stat Date: Not Reported Last Action Updated: Abandoned Well Last Action Date: 05/07/1996 Permit, Denial (AD) or Monitoring Hole Issued: Construction/Test report Received by DWR: Well Proposed Yield (Gal/Min): Well Proposed Depth (Feet): Proposed Annual Appropriation (Acre Feet): Well Application Type: Well Type: First Beneficial Use Date: Date Statement of Use Received: Date Amended to Include Animals: Permit Expiration Date: Abandonment Report Received: Plugged an Abandoned Date: Annual Appropriation in Acre Feet: Depth to Top of 1st Perforated Casing: 1 f t Basin Mgmt Dist Numb: Dist from Section Line: Township: 114 Section: 1/4 114 114: 2nd Aquifer: Lot Number: Filing Number: Designation Number: Loc_source: County Code: Permit Number: Replacement Code: Not Reported Not Reported 0 0 0 Not reported Non-exempt 07130/1962 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 05106/1996 04109/1996 0 0000 00 1956N 513E 070N NE Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported MW-6 CarteView 2/1712000 CO WELLS COWW291023 35 3633 Not Reported TC01217067.1 r Page A-12 Depth to Base of Last Perforated Casing: 0000 Water Court Case Number: Not Reported Yield in Gallons Per Minute: 60 Total Depth of Well: 31 Depth to Static Water Level: 16 Ground Surface Elevation: 0 Acres Irrigated: 0 Totaling Flow Meter Regd., Installed: N Cross Reference to Another Well or Record: Not Reported Notice of Well Completion Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer: Not Reported Notice of Beneficial Use Recvd. for Non -crib Aquifer: Not Reported Well ID Number: 00000 Well Construction Completed Date: Not Reported Pump Installation Completed Date: Not Reported Geophysical is Required and Received: No Contractors License: Not Reported Pump Installer's License: Not Reported Pump Installation Report to DWR: Not Reported Statute Which Permit Issued Under: Not Reported Last Staff Member to Update File: NLH Water District: 03 Groundwater Basin Numb: 00 Basin Mgmt Dist Numb: 00 Principal Meridian: S Dist from Section Line: 00 Range: 0680W Township: 070N Section: 19 1/4 Section: NE 1/4 1/4: SE 1141/41/4: Not Reported Aquifer. GW 2nd Aquifer: - Not Reported Sub Division: Not Reported Lot Number: Not Reported Block Number: Not Reported Filing Number: Not Reported Approval Engineer: Not Reported Designation Number. Not Reported Comments: Not Reported Utm_x: 496522.188 Utmy: 4489882 Loc_source: CarteView 2117/2000 Usage: Industrial AS NNW CO WELLS COWW291188 1/4 -112 Mile Higher Site Name: SOUTHWESTERN PIPE CO OF COL Mailing Address: Not Reported FT COLLINS, CO 80524 Telephone: Not Reported Water Division: 1 County Code: 35 Receipt: 9038405 Permit Number. 6566 Suffix Code: F Replacement Code: Not Reported Parcel: 0 Application Date: Not Reported Application Status: Abandoned Well Permit Status: Not Reported Permit Stat Date: Not Reported Last Action Updated: Abandoned Well Last Action Date: 05/07/1996 Permit, Denial (AD) or Monitoring Hole Issued: Not Reported Construction/Test report Received by DWR: Not Reported Well Proposed Yield (Gal/Min): 0 Well Proposed Depth (Feet): 0 Proposed Annual Appropriation (Acre Feet): 0 Well Application Type: Not reported Well Type: Non-exempt TC01217067.1r PageA-13 First Beneficial Use Date: Date Statement of Use Received: Date Amended to Include Animals: Permit Expiration Date: Abandonment Report Received: Plugged an Abandoned Date: Annual Appropriation in Acre Feet: Depth to Top of 1st Perforated Casing: Depth to Base of Last Perforated Casing: Water Court Case Number: Yield in Gallons Per Minute: Total Depth of Well: Depth to Static Water Level: Ground Surface Elevation: Acres Irrigated: Totaling Flow Meter Reqd., Installed: Cross Reference to Another Well or Record: Notice of Well Completion Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer: Notice of Beneficial Use Recvd. for Non -crib Aquifer: Well ID Number: Well Construction Completed Date: Pump Installation Completed Date: Geophysical is Required and Received: Contractor's License: Pump Installers License: Pump Installation Report to DWR: Statute Which Permit Issued Under: Last Staff Member to Update File: Water District: Groundwater Basin Numb: 00 Principal Meridian: S Range: 0680W Section: 19 1/4 1/4: SE Aquifer: GW Sub Division: Not Reported Block Number. Not Reported Approval Engineer. Not Reported Comments: Not Reported Utm_x: 496522.188 Utmy: 4489882 Usage: Industrial A6 NNW 1/4 -112 Mile Higher Site Name: Mailing Address: Telephone: Water Division: Receipt: Suffix Code: Parcel: Application Date: Application Status: Permit Status: Permit Stat Date: Last Action Updated: LONE STAR STEEL C/O 1716 HEATH PKWY FT COLLINS, CO 80524 Not Reported 1 0018695 MH 01/06/1965 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 05/0611996 04/09/1996 0000 0000 Not Reported 120 31 21 0 0 N Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 00000 Not Reported Not Reported No Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported NLH 03 . Basin Mgmt Dist Numb: Dist from Section Line: Township: 1/4 Section: 114 1/4 1/4: 2nd Aquifer: Lot Number: Filing Number: Designation Number. Loc source: County Code: Permit Number. Replacement Code: 00 00 070N NE Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported CarteView 2/17/2000 CO WELLS COWW016407 35 1B696 Not Reported 0 02/1911992 Monitoring hole notice of construction. File number and date entered in permit number and permit date fields Not Reported Not Reported Record change. A portion of the file was modified TC01217067.1 r Page A-14 Last Action Date: 10/1612001 Permit, Denial (AD) or Monitoring Hole Issued: Not Reported Constructionfrest report Received by DWR: Not Reported Well Proposed Yield (Gal/Min): 0 Well Proposed Depth (Feet): 0 Proposed Annual Appropriation (Acre Feet): 0 Well Application Type: Not reported Well Type: Non-exempt First Beneficial Use Date: Not Reported Date Statement of Use Received: Not Reported Date Amended to Include Animals: Not Reported Permit Expiration Date: Not Reported Abandonment Report Received: Not Reported Plugged an Abandoned Date: Not Reported Annual Appropriation in Acre Feet: 0 Depth to Top of 1 at Perforated Casing: 0600 Depth to Base of Last Perforated Casing: 0000 Water Court Case Number: Not Reported Yield in Gallons Per Minute: 0 Total Depth of Well: 0 Depth to Static Water Level: 0 Ground Surface Elevation: 0 Acres Irrigated: 0 Totaling Flow Meter Regd., Installed: N Cross Reference to Another Well or Record: 174163 Notice of Well Completion Recvd. for Non-trfb Aquifer: Not Reported Notice of Beneficial Use Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer: Not Reported Well ID Number: 00000 Well Construction Completed Date: Not Reported Pump Installation Completed Date: Not Reported Geophysical is Required and Received: No Contractors License: LIC Pump Installer's License: Not Reported Pump Installation Report to DWR: Not Reported Statute Which Permit Issued Under: Not Reported Last Staff Member to Update File: KRM Water District., 03 Groundwater Basin Numb: 00 Basin Mgmt Dist Numb: Principal Meridian: S Dist from Section Line: Range: 068OW Township: Section: 19 114 Section: 114 1/4: SE 1/4 1/4 1/4: Aquifer: GW 2nd Aquifer: Sub Division: Not Reported Lot Number: Block Number: Not Reported Filing Number. Approval Engineer: Not Reported Designation Number. Comments: X-REF 174163-174170 Utm_x: 496522.188 Utm_y: 4489882 Loc_source: Usage: Q A7 North 114 -112 Mile Higher - 00 00 07ON NE Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported CarteView 2/17/2000 CO WELLS COWW148636 TC01217067.1r PageA-15 General Building Design • Exterior walls. O Materials. Bullet -resistant, such as concrete or fully grouted masonry. O Windows. Reflective and/or bullet -resistant glazing where exposed to public view. O Window sill design. Windows should be installed flush with the exterior surface of the wall, or if recessed, provide a sloped exterior sill to prevent the placement of explosives at the window. • HVAC intakes. O Locate in areas inaccessible to the public, such as in secured fenced areas. Design to prevent the possibility of someone introducing a tear gas canister into the intake. O If located in parking areas, design to prevent introduction of vehicle exhaust. O Locate away and upwind from fume hood exhaust. • Visitor access protection. O Administrative or security receptionist at visitors' access should be protected behind bullet -resistant glazing with adjacent walls of similar bullet -resistive construction. • Duress alarms. O "Call assistance" or duress/panic alarms should be installed in key areas throughout the facility and concealed as appropriate. Locations might include visitor reception desk, bulk chemical storage spaces, weapons ranges, parking garages, and clandestine lab storage and exam spaces. • Laboratory tours. O If the facility is to be designed to accommodate guided tours, tour groups should not be allowed into the laboratory spaces. Guided tours should be conducted through the main corridor system with viewing through strategically placed windows in the corridor walls providing viewing into the laboratory spaces. • Interior glazing. O It is recommended that the use of windows between laboratory spaces be maxi- mized. This is a feature designed to enhance safety of personnel by allowing those in one laboratory space to view the activities of those in other spaces that might be of a more hazardous nature. 21 Site Name: LONE STAR STEEL CO Mailing Address: LEAH COOPER LEAH COOPER LONE STAR, TX 75668 Telephone: 9036566317 Water Division: 1 County Code: 35 Receipt: 0358811 G Permit Number: 174169 Suffix Code: Not Reported Replacement Code: Not Reported Parcel: 0 Application Date: 08/1211993 Application Status: Abandoned Well Permit Status: Not Reported Permit Stat Date: Not Reported Last Action Updated: Abandoned Well Last Action Date: 07/26/1995 Permit, Denial (AD) or Monitoring Hole Issued: 11/01/1993 Constructionlrest report Received by DWR: 08/12/1993 Well Proposed Yield (Gal/Min): 0 Well Proposed Depth (Feet): 30 Proposed Annual Appropriation (Acre Feet): 0 Well Application Type: Not reported Well Type: Exempt First Beneficial Use Date: Not Reported Date Statement of Use Received: Not Reported Date Amended to Include Animals: Not Reported Permit Expiration Date: 11/01/1995 Abandonment Report Received: 07/2111995 Plugged an Abandoned Date: 06/30/1995 Annual Appropriation in Acre Feet: 0 Depth to Top of 1 st Perforated Casing: 0019 Depth to Base of Last Perforated Casing: 0030 Water Court Case Number: Not Reported Yield in Gallons Per Minute: 0 Total Depth of Well: 30 Depth to Static Water Level: 22 Ground Surface Elevation: 0 Acres Irrigated: 0 Totaling Flow Meter Reqd., Installed: N Cross Reference to Another Well or Record: Not Reported Notice of Well Completion Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer: Not Reported Notice of Beneficial Use Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer. Not Reported Well ID Number: 00000 Well Construction Completed Date: 05/04/1992 Pump Installation Completed Date: Not Reported Geophysical is Required and Received: No Contractor's License: 1237 Pump Installer's License: Not Reported Pump Installation Report to DWR: Not Reported Statute Which Permit Issued Under: 6023 Last Staff Member to Update File: NLH Water District: 03 Groundwater Basin Numb: 00 Basin Mgmt Dist Numb: 00 Principal Meridian: S Dist from Section Line: 1931 N 550E Range: 0680W Township: 070N Section: 19 1/4 Section: NE 1141/4: SE 1/41/41/4: Not Reported Aquifer: GW 2nd Aquifer: Not Reported Sub Division: Not Reported Lot Number. Not Reported Block Number. Not Reported Filing Number. Not Reported Approval Engineer. DWR Designation Number: MW-7 Comments: MH-18696: WELL MW-7 Utm_x: 496552.531 Utmy: 4489898 Loc_source: CarteView2117/2000 TC01217067.1 r Page A-16 Usage: Q, Monitoring Well (Permitted) B8 NNW 1/4 -112 Mile Higher Site Name: LONE STAR STEEL CO Mailing Address: LEAH COOPER LEAH COOPER LONE STAR, TX 75668 Telephone: 9036566317 Water Division: 1 County Code: Receipt: 0358811 C Permit Number: Suffix Code: Not Reported Replacement Code: Parcel: 0 Application Date: 08/1211993 Application Status: Abandoned Well Permit Status: Not Reported Permit Stat Date: Not Reported Last Action Updated: Abandoned Well Last Action Date: 05/0711996 CO WELLS COWW148632 35 174165 Not Reported Permit, Denial (AD) or Monitoring Hole Issued: 11/01/1993 Constructionrrest report Received by DWR: 08112/1993 Well Proposed Yield (Gai/Min): 0 Well Proposed Depth (Feet): 28 Proposed Annual Appropriation (Acre Feet): 0 Well Application Type: Not reported Well Type: Exempt First Beneficial Use Date: Not Reported Date Statement of Use Received: Not Reported Date Amended to Include Animals: Not Reported Permit Expiration Date: 11/01/1995 Abandonment Report Received: 05/0611996 Plugged an Abandoned Date: 04/0811996 Annual Appropriation in Acre Feet 0 Depth to Top of 1at. Perforated Casing: 0017 Depth to Base of Last Perforated Casing: 0026 Water Court Case Number. Not Reported Yield in Gallons Per Minute: 0 Total Depth of Well: 28 Depth to Static Water Level: 24 Ground Surface Elevation: 0 Acres Irrigated: 0 Totaling Flow Meter Reqd., Installed: N Cross Reference to Another Well or Record: Not Reported Notice of Well Completion Recvd, for Non-trib Aquifer: Not Reported Notice of Beneficial Use Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer: Not Reported Well ID Number. 00000 Well Construction Completed Date: 02/25/1992 Pump Installation Completed Date: Not Reported Geophysical is Required and Received: No Contractors Licenser 1237 Pump Installers License: Not Reported Pump installation Report to DWR: Not Reported Statute Which Permit Issued Under. 6023 Last Staff Member to Update File: NLH Water District: 03 Groundwater Basin Numb: 00 Basin Mgmt Dist Numb: 00 Principal Meridian: S - Dist from Section Line: 2031 N 913E Range: 06BOW Township: 070N- TC01217067.1r Page A-17 t Section: 19 1/4 Section: NE 1/4 114: SE 1/4 1141/4: Not Reported Aquifer: GW 2nd Aquifer: Not Reported Sub Division: Not Reported Lot Number: Not Reported Block Number: Not Reported Filing Number: Not Reported Approval Engineer: DWR Designation Number: MW-3 Comments: MH-18696; WELL MW-3 Utm_x: 496441.875 Utmy: 4489867.5 Loc source: CarteView 2/1712000 Usage: O, Monitoring Well (Permitted) B9 NNW CO WELLS COWW148633 1/4-1/2Mile Higher Site Name: LONE STAR STEEL CO Mailing Address: LEAH COOPER LEAH COOPER LONE STAR, TX 75668 Telephone: 9036566317 Water Division: 1 County Code: 35 Receipt: 0358811 D Permit Number. 174166 Suffix Code: Not Reported Replacement Code: Not Reported Parcel: 0 Application Date: 08112/1993 Application Status: Abandoned Well Permit Status: Not Reported Permit Stat Date: Not Reported Last Action Updated: Abandoned Well Last Action Date: 05/07/1996 Permit, Denial (AD) or Monitoring Hole Issued: 11101/1993 Construction/Test report Received by DWR: 08/12/1993 Well Proposed Yield (Gal/Min): 0 Well Proposed Depth (Feet): 27 Proposed Annual Appropriation (Acre Feet): 0 Well Application Type: Not reported Well Type: Exempt First Beneficial Use Date: Not Reported Date Statement of Use Received: Not Reported Date Amended to Include Animals: Not Reported Permit Expiration Date: 1110111995 Abandonment Report Received: 05106/1996 Plugged an Abandoned Date: 04/09/1996 Annual Appropriation in Acre Feet: 0 Depth to Top of 1 at Perforated Casing: 0017 Depth to Base of Last Perforated Casing: 0027 Water Court Case Number. Not Reported Yield in Gallons Per Minute: 0 Total Depth of Well: 27 Depth to Static Water Level: 24 Ground Surface Elevation: 0 Acres Irrigated: 0 Totaling Flow Meter Reed., Installed: N Cross Reference to Another Well or Record: Not Reported Notice of Well Completion Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer.. Not Reported. Notice of Beneficial Use Recvd. for Non-trib Aquifer: Not Reported Well ID Number. 00000 Well Construction Completed Date: 02/25/1992 PumpInstallationCompleted Date: Not Reported Geophysical is Required and Received: No TC01217067.1 r Page A-18 AREA RADON INFORMATION State Database: CO Radon Radon Test Results Zip Total Sites Avg % sites<=4 pCl/L 80525 11 8.28 36.36 % sites>4&<10 pCUL 18.18 Federal EPA Radon Zone for LARIMER County: 1 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCUL. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 80525 Number of sites tested: 10 Area Average Activity % <4 pCUL Living Area -1 at Floor Not Reported Not Reported Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Basement 9.110 pCUL 30% % sites>=10&<20 pCi/L % sites>20 pCUL 36.36 9.09 % 4-20 pCi/L Not Reported Not Reported 60% % >20 pCUL Not Reported Not Reported 10% TC01217067.1r Page A-52 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002.7.5-Minute DEMs correspond to the USGS 124,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AOUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. - - GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS -11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. TC01217067.lr PageA-53 STATE RECORDS Colorado GIS Well Database Source: Office of State Engineer, Division of Water Resources Telephone: 30M66-3581 The GIS Well database includes all wells that the Division of Water Resources permits. Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 303-894-2100 RADON State Database: CO Radon Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone:303-692-3090 Radon Study in Colorado Area Radon Information Source:USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 -1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration TC01217067.1r Page A-54 i =��5�1 Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHS OF SITE cAdoaaaads and saunp\atl u =\dal¢op\walsh down Wojects\chy of fat collhntphw W357-010 sc goup me sepon.doU06.30.04 } ; 4 i e t 4. i a' y. Y S i A ;Malfih Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC APPENDIX C AGENCY/PERSONAL CONTACT LIST c:Woavmi¢ and wWftpW1 u mWcskwp\w M doewnrnf *mj=ukiry of f— rnOms)ph—iY15357-010 tt v o p m repm.dc-0630.04 Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC AGENCYIPERSONAL CONTACT LIST The following agencies/people have been contacted for this Phase I ESA conducted at the SC Group Investments, LLC property located northwest of the intersection of South Timberline Road and East Drake Road in Fort Collins, Colorado. Mr. Brock Chapman, (Vice-president/Member) SC Group Investments, LLC City of Fort Collins Public Library City of Fort Collins Real Estate Services Department — Mr. Ralph Campano Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Larimer County - Information Management Division Larimer County Assessor Larimer County Department of Health and Environment Poudre Fire Authority U.S. Geological Survey Library c:Wotamratb and setdWpall u \defkt*p &Wh docummu\pmje \iy of fort co0hnlphneik\5357-010sc groups repmt.doc.0630.04 • Equipment and systems service and maintenance. O Equipment and systems that are part of the building and might require periodic service and maintenance should be located outside of the laboratory spaces, and particularly outside of any space where evidence or drug standards are stored. O Such equipment and systems might include, but are not limited to, electrical panels, VAV boxes, VAV controls, walk-in cooler compressors, and water purifi- cation filters. • Corridors. O Primary circulation and exit corridors: 1.83 m (6 ft) wide, minimum. O Secondary circulation and non -exit corridors: 1.37 m (41/2ft) wide, minimum. • Doors. O Double doors to all laboratory sections and spaces that are expected to receive oversized evidence or equipment. Double doors shall consist of a 0.914 m (36 in) wide active leaf and an 0.457 m (18 in) wide inactive leaf. O Freight elevator doors minimum 1.22 m (48 in) wide. Security Design • Security Strategy Meeting. O Although this is not a design guideline, it is recommended that a security strategy meeting take place upon completion of an approved schematic design of the building and the site. This meeting should be attended by representatives of the building owner, building users, security staff, the architect, the electrical engineer, and a security design consultant. O The purpose of this meeting is to establish and document a comprehensive secu- rity strategy for the new facility. This security strategy will act as a guideline for the design of passive and electronic security systems. This strategy should in- clude, but not be limited to, security policy and procedural issues, site and build- ing access as related to security, types of security electronics systems, perfor- mance requirements for security access systems, ASCLD/Laboratory Accredita- tion Board (LAB) accreditation issues related to security, and any other special security needs that might be identified by the users. Specific considerations regarding hardening the laboratory against terrorist attack may be important, depending on the location and function of the lab. 22 ��1511 Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC APPENDIX D CORPORATE AND PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS c:ldoamrds and se0 wn aU usenldcskm %wahh docame Vmje khy of fort C0U-lphaae 7s15357-010 sc gmup carepMAoc.06.30.07 -Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC CORPORATE CREDENTIALS Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC (WALSH) is a full -service, multidisciplinary environmental consulting firm providing environmental and analytical services nationwide. Founded in 1979 by James P. Walsh, the firm presently employs more than 70 scientists and engineers, including 23 professionals with Master's Degrees and three PILD. graduates. With four offices in two states, WALSH has established a reputation for quality and innovation by successfully completing complex environmental projects. WALSH consists of a diverse group of highly qualified and experienced professional personnel with advanced expertise in environmental engineering, geology, geochemistry, analytical chemistry, hydrology, soil science, water science, industrial hygiene and safety, and computer technology. With more than 150 satisfied clients in 21 states, from small business owners to major oil companies, WALSH emphasizes personalized service provided by highly motivated senior professional staff. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING WALSH is dedicated to accurately assessing and resolving complex environmental problems in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Our practical approach to managing the application of remediation technologies maximizes the company's ability to accomplish the goals of its clients. The company's environmental services include: • Phase I and Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessments • "Superf ind" and Hazardous Waste Site Investigations • Underground Storage Tank Removal and Remediation • Soil Boring, Logging, and Sampling • Installation of Groundwater Monitoring Systems • Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling • Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater Samples • Contaminant Characterization • Solid Waste Landfill Permitting and Closure • Computer Modeling of Environmental Systems • Environmental Impact Assessments/Statements • Expert Witness and Litigation Support Odocumanu end smsnga\all w=\(kslnoplwalsh docomauslpmjectskiry of ton colt a*we f0357-010 sc group esa iepon.doc.06.30.04 TROY C. SANDERS, CPG MWalsh District Manager/Senior Geoscientist KEY EXPERTISE ✓ Soil Ground Water, and Surface Water Investigation and Remediation ✓ Geology/Hydrogeology ✓ Environmental Site Assessments/Audits ✓ Project, Asbestos, and Hazardous Waste Management EDUCATION, CERTIFICATIONS B.S., Geology, Colorado State University, 1984 Certified Professional Geologist, Wyoming #3119 Certified AHERA Asbestos Building Inspector #9364 OSHA 40-hour Hazardous Waste Operations Training OSHA 40-hour Radiation Protection Procedures and Investigative Methods Training OSHA 24-hour Emergency Response Methods Training EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Sanders has over 19 years of professional experience including 17 as an environmental consultant and geologist. He has specialized in performing and reporting on environmental, geologic, and hydrogeologic investigations at numerous sites within the Rocky Mountain Region. Mr. Sanders primary responsibility is evaluating the presence and/or extent of contamination at sites. He is currently the manager of the WALSH Fort Collins, Colorado office. He provides regulatory, technical, and managerial direction on site assessment, and remediation projects including characterizing sites for hazardous materials contamination using geologic, geophysical, hydrogeologic, and atmospheric sampling techniques. Environmental characterization projects have been conducted at aviation, auto salvage, chemical production, landfill, manufacturing, mining, nuclear, petrochemical/refining, pipeline, railroad, and wood treatment facilities. Mr. Sanders has provided emergency response, site characterization, environmental auditing, information management, litigation support, and technical enforcement consulting services on EPA and DOE projects. He has conducted treatability studies on regulated hazardous wastes and extractive metallurgical research activities on metallic ores for government agencies and.private organizations. He has also provided geologic consulting services in support of bulk -tonnage precious metal projects, as well as petroleum, oil shale, and natural gas exploration projects. KEY PROJECTS FORT COLLINS BROWNFIELDS, DOWNTOWN RIVER CORRIDOR - ENVIRONMENTAL SITE INVESTIGATIONS ✓ Mr. Sanders managed and participated in geologic, hydrogeologic, and hydrologic investigations on City -owned property downgradient of a former manufactured gas plant facility. Site investigation information indicates that a plume of hydrocarbons including benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons have impacted off -site soil, groundwater, and surface water. His primary responsibilities included the preparation of bid specification packages, sampling and analysis work plans, health and safety plans, and sampling/ analytical results reports related to the site investigations. He coordinated and supervised all phases of the design and installation of supplemental ground water monitoring wells. Mr. Sanders directed subsurface investigations utilizing hollow -stem auger drilling methods, handled investigation derived wastes, conducted environmental media sampling, and field screening tests. He presented site investigation findings and recommendations to federal, state, and local regulatory representatives. Odocumrnu and smingsWl u \dmla*wahb doeumrnislednunistrativc\r \"04+G+ smkn.dw Troy C. Sanders Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS Mr. Sanders has completed various portions of over 120 Phase I, environmental site assessments (ESAs) and transaction screens on industrial, multi -family residential, retail, warehouse, vacant land, and other commercial properties. These ESAs have diligently followed the American Standards for Testing and Materials standard for performing ESAs, and have revealed hidden contamination of various types. The following projects are typical of Mr. Sanders project management experience: ✓ Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, City of Fort Collins — The ESAs involved assessing potential contamination at approximately 23 industrial, residential, vacant land, and commercial properties within the City of Fort Collins, City of Loveland, and Larimer County area. Primary suspected contaminants of concern identified were asbestos, lead, mercury, PCBs, and petroleum products. In addition, potential indoor air, wetlands, and threatened and endangered species concerns were identified. ✓ Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Various Locations -These projects entailed performing Phase I ESAs on approximately 65 medium to large multi -family residential communities on a nationwide basis. The assessments were performed in anticipation of purchase or refinancing transactions using Fannie Mae/DUS lending requirements. The typical sampling suite included; suspect asbestos -containing building materials, lead based paint, lead in drinking water, and radon. Mr. Sanders provided numerous recommendations concerning environmental site conditions and prepared operations and maintenance plans for handling areas exhibiting regulated quantities of asbestos and lead based paint. ASBESTOS INSPECTIONS/LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEYS Mr. Sanders has performed dozens of asbestos inspections and lead based paint screenings of structures following State of Colorado, AHERA, and HUD protocols. He has managed all types of asbestos - containing materials, focusing on identifying hazards yet eliminating suspect materials from abatement. Screening of painted building components for the presence of lead -based paint using spectrum X-ray fluorescence and sampling techniques was performed. These inspections have resulted in recommendations for handling asbestos -containing materials and lead contaminated building components which generated substantial cost -savings for the clients. CHLORINATED SOLVENT INVESTIGATIONS AND REMEDIATION (DRY CLEANING ESTABLISHMENTS) Mr. Sanders has directed the field investigations at several chlorinated solvent release sites in the Denver, Colorado metropolitan area. The dense non -aqueous phase liquids released near the source had resulted in significant soil and ground water contamination. Vertical and horizontal extent of the plumes were characterized utilizing drilling, sampling, soil gas and indoor air investigation methods. Due diligence door -io- door residential well surveys were conducted in adjacent neighborhoods. Quarterly monitoring events were implemented to characterize seasonal contaminant concentration fluctuations. Historic infomuation was compiled into a comprehensive Voluntary Cleanup Application for state review/approval. A risk assessment was performed and remedial alternatives were reviewed and selected for implementation at these facilities. Mr. Sanders directed and participated in an environmental compliance audit program for metro area dry cleaning establishments. Facilities were inspected for compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations. Summary reports containing relevant findings and recommendations were prepared for facility owners. MONITORING ACTIVITIES FOR LANDFILLS Mr. Sanders performed quarterly ground water and surface water monitoring activities at former solid waste municipal landfills. He designed and installed ground water monitoring well networks, developed and maintained software to perform statistical analysis of analytical data. He prepared post -closure monitoring reports and acted as liaison between state regulators and municipalities. He prepared comprehensive quarterly monitoring and annual data summary reports for an active RCRA hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilityllandfill in California. c:Wonoaaaa and 5WM9SW1 u W=ktop\wash doeumrnn�eMm�isVativekea�mrs12006 rrsume senders.doc Troy C. Sanders Page 3 AST/UST/LUST CLOSURE AND SITE CHARACTERIZATION Mr. Sanders has conducted project management for various municipalities and private sector clients using the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment — Division of Oil and Public Safety guidelines. The projects involved performing AST/UST removal, and closure at multiple sites, characterization of LUST sites, and recommendation/implementation of remedial action, if necessary. Responsibilities of Mr. Sanders have included preparation of work plan and budgets, subcontract preparation, coordination/oversight of field activities, reporting, corrective action plan preparation, and cost reimbursement package preparation activities. UST UPGRADES To comply with revised regulations, tank upgrade work was conducted by Mr. Sanders at several facilities which had USTs supporting emergency power generation equipment. His duties included: project management, proposal and bid writing, preparation of work plans, coordination of subcontractors, oversight of work, and final report preparation. ENVIRONMENTAL SITE CHARACTERIZATIOWEMERGENCY RESPONSE Mr. Sanders worked on numerous emergency response, pre -remedial, and removal projects under the EPA Technical Assistance Team (TAT) contract. He managed and participated in geologic, hydrogeologic, and geophysical investigations at sites containing regulated substances and hazardous waste. His primary responsibilities included conducting preliminary assessments, site characterization surveys, and regulatory compliance audits. He prepared work plans, health and safety plans, QA/QC sampling plans, and sampling/analytical results reports related to site investigations. As the Regional Subcontract Manager, he prepared bid specification packages for aerial photography, decommissioning and demolition, drilling, and professional land survey subcontracts utilizing code of federal acquisition requirements. He coordinated and supervised all phases of the design and installation of ground water monitoring well networks. He conducted environmental sampling, soil gas surveys, geophysical surveys, and sample field screening tests. Mr. Sanders directed subsurface investigations utilizing direct -push technology, as well as with hollow- and solid stem -auger, percussion, and air rotary drilling methods. Examples of Mr. Sanders project management experience include: ✓ Stapleton International Airport/Runways and Fire Training Sites, Denver, Colorado - After closure of a major regional aviation facility, Mr. Sanders managed site characterization efforts to delineate nitrate impacts from historic de-icing operations, as well as regional chlorinated solvent contamination in ground water. A total of 85 monitoring wells were installed throughout the site and sampled for both organic and inorganic constituents. He used hydrogeologic contouring software was utilized to create groundwater flow direction and contaminant concentration figures. Information was compiled and presented in a site characterization summary report. In addition, site characterization activities were conducted at the former fire training area where diesel fuel was.,. dispensed on the ground surface and ignited during training exercises. Soil, ground water, in addition to sediment and surface water samples (from a nearby creek) were collected and analyzed for a variety of organic compounds and metallic elements. ✓ Post and Pole Wood Preserver Site, Black Hills, South Dakota - Site characterization activities were conducted at a major wood treatment facility which utilized pentachlorophenol and chromated copper arsenate as a preservative. Mr. Sanders prepared health and safety plans, project work plans, and QA/QC sampling plans. Field activities included characterizing site soils, ground water, and area surface water impacts. Spectrum X-ray fluorescence field screening techniques were used during the initial phase of the soil contamination assessment. Information was compiled and presented in a detailed site characterization summary report. ✓ Abandoned Refinery Site, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming - Mr. Sanders managed the initial site characterization of an historic oil refinery which resulted in the emergency stabilization and removal of site contaminants. Numerous environmental samples were obtained from soils, surface impoundments, waste oil lagoons, ground water aquifers, and nearby surface water bodies. Bulk asbestos samples were collected from abandoned buildings and machinery remaining on -site. Odom� and swtnpWl usm\dnktopWdsh down \adnmiulndvetruum UW4 � smdas.d= Troy C. Sanders Paae 4 ✓ Chlorinated Solvent Investigations, Various Locations - Mr. Sanders has directed and participated in the field investigations chlorinated solvent release sites in Aspen Park, Colorado, Worland, Wyoming, Pierre, South Dakota, and Elrama, Pennsylvania. The dense non -aqueous phase liquids have resulted in significant areas of impacted ground water. Vertical and horizontal extent of the plumes were characterized utilizing drilling, ground water sampling, and soil gas investigative methods. Several sites included the collection of tap water samples from residential drinking water supply wells within the affected areas. INACTIVE MINE IMPACT STUDIES Mr. Sanders worked with Colorado Department of Natural Resources - Division of Mining and Geology, EPA, and U.S.G.S personnel to implement a ground water and surface water monitoring program to determine impacts to human and environmental receptors by inorganic contaminants from the Summitville Gold Mine in southern Colorado. He performed monthly stream gauging and flow measurement activities, and collected sediment and surface water samples from impacted downgradient streams and reservoirs. He collected tap water samples from residential drinking water supply wells from users within the affected area. As part of an EPA criminal investigation team, Mr. Sanders utilized geophysical (electromagnetic conductivity and magnetometer) survey techniques to successfully detect the location of illegally buried electrical transformers in mine tailings within an abandoned mining district near Eureka, Utah. He conducted sampling and immunoassay field screening tests for PCB liquids contained in the unearthed transformers. MILITARY BASE SURFACE WATER USE ATTAINABILITYANALYSIS Mr. Sanders worked with F.E Warren Air Force Base and state representatives to design and implement a structures scientific assessment to evaluate physical, chemical, biological, ad economic factors of several surface water bodies located on the base. He assisted in the preparation of draft and final field sampling plans, sampling and analysis plans, and quality assurance project plans, as well as summary reports. As the project's designated field team leader, he coordinated and performed stream gauging and flow measurement activities, and collected surface water samples for a variety of organic, inorganic, general chemistry, and biological parameters from subject surface water bodies. AUDITING, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, LITIGATION SUPPORT, TECHNICAL ENFORCEMENT AT EPA AND DOE SITES Mr. Sanders managed assigned personnel, prepared work plans, progress reports, guidelines, and final work products (analytical databases, cost summaries, document inventories, and waste transaction databases) pertaining to Superiund sites. He performed field investigation evidence audits of EPA contractor sampling teams at Superfimd sites; participated in similar audits at numerous DOE facilities. He conducted sample evidence audits at EPA contract laboratories and prepared potentially responsible party (PRP) search reports. Mr. Sanders conducted RCRA compliance audits at regulated chemical manufacturing facilities. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, Inc., District Manager, Fort Collins, Colorado, April 2001 to present Safety-Kleen Consulting, Hydrogeologist, Boulder, Colorado, January 2001 to April 2001 Environmental Sciences Corp., Manager of Technical Operations, Westminster, Colorado, 1999 to 2000 Earth Sciences Consultants, Inc., Project Manager/Geologist IL Westminster, Colorado, 1998 Hazen Research, Inc., Senior Engineering/Research Associate, Golden, Colorado, 1996 to 1997 Ecology and Environment, Inc:, Senior Geologist, Denver, Colorado, 1990 to 1995 TechLaw, Inc., Staff Consultant, Lakewood, Colorado 1985 to 1990 Aberford Minerals (U.S.A.), Inc., Geologist, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 1984 C:dOClYlO6i wW 4ttmgAaU 4 %d=kmpkwWsh&CW \ad�,I'EN110E\2W41®YIIIE fandCS.dw Troy C. Sanders Page 5 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Wyoming Board of Professional Geologists Larimer County Safety Council c:\doemmmu and set uW\z l u \desktap*&M d�\sdrm trnive4aumes\'ZW4 resume smMas.dm HAL STUBER, PH.D. mw&s11 Principal Chemist KEY EXPERTISE ✓ Project Management ✓ Site Assessment and Investigation ✓ Environmental Chemistry ✓ Mobility and Fate of Contaminants ✓ Analytical Methods EDUCATION Ph.D., Analytical Chemistry, University of Colorado, 1980 M.S., Organic Chemistry, University of Colorado, 1976 B.A., Chemistry, Macalester College, 1971 EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Dr. Stuber is an Environmental Chemist with over 18 years of professional environmental experience specializing in the fate of chemical species in the environment and in the analysis of ground water, surface water, and soil contaminants. He has consulted on major hazardous waste and Superfund sites, predicting mobility, partitioning, and degradation rates of contaminants and their response to remediation. He has developed both mobile and fixed environmental laboratories that perform U.S. EPA methods as well as other methods for determining organic contaminants in soils, water, and air. Dr. Stuber has also served as an expert witness for litigation on environmental contamination, environmental liability, analytical methods for environmental contamination, and the fate of chemical species. Dr. Stuber is Vice President, and as Principal Chemist oversees both WALSH's analytical laboratory and Chemical Quality Assurance and Quality Control at WALSH. Dr. Stuber manages and oversees projects involving site assessment and other investigations of soil, air and water contamination. He provides expert technical services in environmental chemistry, and provides senior technical review, evaluation and quality assurance on a wide range of WALSH investigations and remediation projects. KEY PROJECTS SITE INVESTIGATIONS, COLORADO, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION` As program manager for large scale site investigations for the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) since 1989, Dr. Stuber has conducted numerous soil gas investigations, extensive soil boring and monitor well installation programs, and surficial soil sampling and radiation surveys to identify and delineate contamination. His work has involved development of sampling and analysis plans, evaluation of data quality objectives for the programs, assessment of environmental and health risks, and evaluation of applicable standards (including CERCLA applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements), and introduction of image processing and geographic information system into large site assessment projects. Site assessments of hundreds of former industrial properties and landfills for the CDOT have involved development and execution of remediation plans; negotiation with regulatory agencies and property owners; and resolution of financial, environmental, and health risks for large-scale CDOT acquisitions and construction projects. Two typical projects are described below. ✓ Project Manager for Environmental Assessment, Transportation Corridor. Dr. Stuber was responsible for determining the environmental risk for acquisition of over 50 industrial and commercial properties including a portion of an uncharacterized former wood treatment plant, numerous UST cW� and smtuW\an n \dtsiaop\webh douv \ado®ietaivekamrcsl>� nuba.doc Hal Stuber, Ph.D. sites, industrial drainage ditches, and a portion of a major cadmium smelter site. Feasibility, remedial options, regulatory coordination and cost estimation were involved. Management plans and health and safety plans for hazardous wastes and toxic contaminants in soils and ground waters were also completed. ✓ Project Manager for Site Assessment and Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for former waste solvent handling facility and above -ground storage tanks. Contaminants included TCE, PCE, MEK, fuels, and metals. Soil, ground -water sampling, and mobile laboratory soil -gas analysis was involved. Dr. Stuber directed CAP and waste management negotiations with regulatory agencies. MOBILE LABORATORY PROJECTS Dr. Stuber has managed numerous mobile laboratory projects for federal, state, and private clients including numerous soil gas surveys and on -site soil and ground -water analysis projects under the EPA's Underground Storage Tank Trust Program, administered by the Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment. He has directed successful on -site laboratory projects which include the following: ✓ On -site gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analyses for remediation monitoring at a Superfund location in California ✓ Projects at the U.S. Department of Energy's Rocky Flats site in Denver, Colorado, including soil gas surveys by both GC and GC/MS methods, and monitoring of polychlorinated biphenyl remediation ✓ Numerous soil gas surveys and on -site soil and groundwater analysis projects under the EPA's Underground Storage Tank Trust Program, administered by the Colorado Department of Labor, Oil Inspection Section FATE AND TRANSPORT STUDIES Dr. Stuber has extensive experience with soil and ground -water contamination by pesticides, organic solvents, metals, and fuels. At the Rocky Mountain Arsenal in Denver, Colorado, he evaluated the fate and transport of organic contaminants in soils and ground water, used contaminant vertical profiles in soils to quantify pollutant mobility and evaluate transport models, and evaluated new immunoassay methods for pesticide detection. ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY INVESTIGATIONS Dr. Stuber has served as technical and project director for investigations of advanced technologies including immunoassay methods for pesticide determination and assessment of biosensor technologies for environmental applications. ORGANIC CONTAMINANT STUDIES At the U.S. Geological Survey, Dr. Stuber studied the fate of organic contaminants from synthetic fuels processing in soils, ground water and surface waters, and developed new methods for isolating organic species from water. He discovered the reduced sulfur species in oil shale wastewaters. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY STUDIES As a consulting chemist, Dr. Stuber analyzed natural organic compounds in soils and water and performed elemental analysis of humic substances. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY Principal Chemist and Vice President, Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, Inc. (WALSH), Boulder, Colorado, 1987 to Present Analytical Chemist, Sievers Research, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, 1985 to 1987 Analytical Chemist, Independent Consultant, Boulder, Colorado, 1983 to 1984 c:W� ®a satmpc nH wm\d aluop�wahh aocu \admmi uwt Vaunwtrn,,.... noba.aoc Hal Stuber, Ph.D. Page 3 Research Chemist, U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Denver, Colorado, 1977 to 1982 Graduate Student, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 1974 to 1976. Chemist, U.S. Geological Survey, Isotope Geochemistry Group, Denver, Colorado, 1973. PUBLICATIONS, PRESENTATIONS Stuber, H.A., et. al. "Soil Gas Analysis Using On -Site GC/MS and Sorbent Traps", Environmental Restoration 1995, Proceedings, U.S. Department of Energy, 1995. Huffman, E.W.D., Jr. and H.A. Stuber. "Analytical Methodology for Elemental Analysis of Humic Substances," in Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment, and Water. G. Aiken et. al., Editors. John Wiley, New York. 1985. Stuber, H.A. and J.A. Leenheer. "Selective Concentration of Aromatic Bases from Water with a Resin Adsorbent," in Analytical Chemistry. 55,111. 1983. Leenheer, J.A. and H.A. Stuber. "Migration Through Soil of Organic Solutes in an Oil Shale Process Water," in Environmental Science and Technology. 12, 1467. 1981. Stuber, H.A. "Selective Concentration and Isolation of Aromatic Amines from Water." Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado. 1980. Stuber, H.A. and J.A. Leenheer. "Inorganic Sulfur Species in Wastewaters from In -Situ Oil Shale Processing,: in Environmental Science and Health. A13, 663. 1978. Stuber, H.A. and J.A. Leenheer. "Fractionation of Oil Shale Re -tort Water for Sorption Studies on Processing Shale," in Proceedings Fuel Science Division, American Chemical Society. 23, 168. 1978. Stuber, H.A. and J.A. Leenheer. "Evaluation of a Resin -Based Procedure for Monitoring Aqueous Wastes from Oil Shale Processing," in Establishment of Water Quality Monitoring Programs. L.G. Everett and K.D. Schmidt, Editors. American Water Re -sources Association, Minneapolis. 1978. Stuber, H.A. and B.M. Tolbert. "A New Synthesis of Saccharo-ascorbic Acid: A Method for the Protection of the Enediol of Ascorbic Acid," in Carbohydrate Research. 60, 251. 1978. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS American Chemical Society, Analytical Division, Environmental Division, 1974 - Present cAd� wW settwp l ut d®hopXwWsh mtutraziw�munrstr smbm.dw installed are compatible with other such products/systems within other City facilities and are maintainable. 8. Utility Services personnel will be involved in the Sustainable Design process as well as the Commissioning process. EXISTING BOUNDARY SURVEY Contact Jim Allen Morley (Stantec) at 970-482-5922 for the AutoCad drawings of the existing boundary survey and existing topographic map at the site. He will send this information to you electronically. Stantec is currently designing the infrastructure (roads, etc.) around the site. You are welcome to contact them for a current plat of the entire site, which will show the net acreage for our facility. J. SOILS REPORT A copy of the preliminary soils report, dated July 28, 2000, prepared by CTL Thompson, is provided as Attachment "D". The City has employed the services of CTL Thompson to obtain a more site specific soils report that will be provided at the November 161h Pre -proposal Meeting. The City will employ the services of CTL Thompson further, as required, once the Site Plan has been developed. K. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The Phase I Environmental Assessment is provided as Attachment "E". No additional assessment or evaluation will be required. L. lm SCHEDULE Following is the revised schedule for the selection process: STEP II Submit Information to Three Design/Build Teams Pre -proposal Meeting with Three Design/Build Teams @ Operations Services, 117 North Mason Receive Design/Build Proposals Interviews with Three Design/Build Teams Select Final Design/Build Team Notice to Proceed for the Design/Build Team DATE November 4, 2004 November 16, 2004 9:30 — 11:30 A.M. December 13, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 29, 2004 January 31, 2005 RESPONSES TO CONCERNS ABOUT THE AGREEMENT FROM STEP I (To be provided by Purchasing) Page 3 of 7 • Escort only design. O The design of the building should incorporate a security perimeter within which unauthorized persons may enter under an "escort only" policy. This security perimeter should be defined during the Security Strategy Meeting. O The sign -in and badging area should be located at the visitors' entrance. • Door access systems. O Access to and circulation throughout the facility, as well as key zones of the building, should be provided with controlled access through the use of proximity or card -key access systems. The system should be capable of programming access devices for specific areas and times, and should fully document all access at- tempts. The system must prevent unauthorized entry while maintaining safe and legal exiting. This security must be maintained in multistory buildings having shared elevator access. • Door status monitoring. O Key doors throughout the building, particularly exterior doors and doors to evidence storage spaces, should be electronically monitored for open/closed status. • Closed circuit television (CCTV) systems. O Key areas of the building, both interior and exterior, should be kept under video surveillance. Key areas might include, but are not limited to, exterior doors, lobby/reception areas, parking lots, and evidence delivery areas. Placement of CCTV cameras and features (pan, zoom, tilt, constant sweep, time lapse record- ing, etc.) should be defined during the Security Strategy Meeting. • Special security design features. O The security design of the facility should include consideration of such special features as: • Motion detection in evidence storage spaces, circulation corridors, or other key areas. • Additional security protection for storage of high -value evidence items such as money and jewelry. • DEA guidelines for the storage of narcotics. Mechanical Systems Design Checklist • Isolation of various spaces. O Biologically hazardous spaces. O PCR amplification room(s). 23 AWalsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC APPENDIX E COMPLETED ASTM QUESTIONNAIRE c:ldoeumaus and sen%wWl u \ciaktop�weh6 docmrma\pmjmm\c" of fort oallmslphac fA5357-010 sc group as mpomdoc.06.30.0d Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Questionnaire (to be completed by Owner or Tenant of the Property) Description of Site: (Address including zip code and county) SSA Ac�'c5 47- J./acTXAJCSr CC/lnJ�l c /l�E n..o/�F�C/n/E CaGL/�S, �'O L+4�S�n�E�2. CaJ.JTj� THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WAS COMPLETED BY: Name: 3Rae% Caon>.gnl Firm (Title): Address: (0�900 S. syle4cos c_Jn1. ,#zs-z Phone Number: Notes/Comments (use addl. Question Owner Occupant Observed During space on paee 4 if (if applicable) Site Visit applicable) 1. Is the Property or any Adjoining Property used for any Yes No nknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown industrial use? 2. To the best of your knowledge, has the Property or any Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown piemt P1,0 - eeg7� JGy Fiat � a� Pl. Adjoining Property been used for any industrial use in the &10rT1 TO 7*£ AX�� TH • a(U T' past? teA'JfYj /tit USE. 3. Is the Property or any Adjoining Property used as a Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown gasoline station, motor repair facility, commercial printing facility, dry cleaners, photo developing laboratory, junkyard or landfill, or as a waste treatment, storage, disposal, processing, or recycling facility? 4. To the best of your knowledge, has the Property or any Ye No nknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown Adjoining Property been used as a gasoline station, motor repair facility, commercial printing facility, dry cleaners, photo developing laboratory, junkyard or landfill, or as a waste treatment, storage, disposal, processing, or recycling facility? Page I Notes/Comments (use addl. Question Owner Occupant Observed During space on vaee 4 if (if applicable) Site Visit applicable) 5. Are there currently, or to the best of your knowledge have Yes NEUnknown) Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown �n E c>SCb 70 BC `,an.n HoU)SC there been previously, any damaged or discarded automotive a o�� aJ 771-E 0eC.(qA7`/, JXS or industrial batteries, pesticides, paints, or other chemicals p2oPe�z r�r in individual containers of greater than 5 gallons in volume FAL or 50 gallons in the aggregate, stored on or used at the Property or at the facility? 6. Are there currently, or to the best of your knowledge have Ye N Unknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown been previously, any industrial drums (typically 55-gallon) or sacks of chemicals located on the Property or at the facility? 7. Has Fill Dirt been brought onto the Property which YcC No nknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown originated from a contaminated site or which is of an unknown origin? 8. Are there currently, or to the best of your knowledge have Ye N Unknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown there been previously, any pits, ponds, or lagoons located on the Property in connection with waste treatment or waste disposal? 9. Is there currently, or to the best of your knowledge has Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown there been previously, any stained soil on the Property? 10. Are there currently, or to the best of your knowledge Yes N 'Unknow Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown r.ss�,44 U Scb IAJ �� rr o nl w/�1�-D) have there been previously, any registered or unregistered co, ip1z �u �G A n V/- storage tanks (above or underground) located on the �rE• DJE3CZ r�9 ,,➢c s Property? 11. Are there currently, or to the best of your knowledge Yes No nknown- Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown have there been previously, any vent pipes, fill pipes, or access ways indicating a fill pipe protruding from the ground on the Property or adjacent to any structure located on the Property? 12. Are there currently, or to the best of your knowledge Ye No nknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown have there been previously, any flooring, drains, or walls located within the facility that are stained by substances other than water or are emitting foul odors? Page 2 Notes/Comments (use adds. Question Owner Occupant Observed During space on pace 4 if (if applicable) Site Visit applicable) 13. If the Property is served by a private well or non-public Yes No nknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown water system, have contaminants been identified in the well or system that exceed guidelines applicable to the water system or has the well been designated as contaminated by any government environmental/ health agency? 14. Does the Owner or Occupant of the Property have any Ye No nknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown knowledge of environmental liens or governmental notification relating to past or current violations of environmental laws with respect to the Property or any facility located on the Property? 15. Has the Owner or Occupant of the Property been Ye No nknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown informed of the past or current existence of hazardous substances or petroleum products or environmental ,, violations with respect to the Property or any facility. located on the Property? 16. Does the Owner or Occupant of the Property have any Y s No nknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown knowledge of any environmental site assessment of the Property or facility that indicates the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products on, or contamination of, the Property or recommended further assessment of the Property? 17. Does the Owner or Occupant of the Property know of Y s No nknown Yes No ,Unknown Yes No Unknown any past, threatened, or pending lawsuits or administrative proceedings concerning a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products involving the Property by any Owner or Occupant of the Property!' 18. Does the Property, or land adjacent to the property, Y No nknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown discharge wastewater other than storm water or into a sanitary sewer system? 19. To the best of your knowledge, have any hazardous Yes No nknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown substances or petroleum products, unidentified waste materials, tires, automotive or industrial batteries, or any other waste materials been dumped above grade, buried, and/or burned on the Property? Page 3 Notes/Comments (use adds. Question Owner Occupant Observed During space on pace 4 if (if applicable) Site Visit applicable) 20. Is there a transformer, capacitor, or any hydraulic Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown equipment for which there are any records indicating the presence of PCBs? 21. If there are transformers or hydraulic equipment, have Yes o Unknown Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown they ever leaked onto the Property or adjacent properties? Notes/Comments Continued: Ouestion Number Supplemental Notes/Comments o r o P Z /�/ �iJ�oJ Il//�anJv�IE7✓T�`1L ON 4PVIL ZG, 7-000 00403Z.7 1/1P3-o/.330 >S ,pthtSE'y F�ai AMS Aeav' �0 7>t Gi7Y Q� rzi . �GG DNS 1� �'�, za�4 CesJ4. U116.0 dF 771/S 4SScS50-Ar-x1r / 4IL14'l� �a�15 dL4 4/iO EoF fj RrC4j6,t1126D E71Jv1"AJr'1C;U 4. 4a,Jd177d,J ASSaG*TXb W/ 7AAC S')7CC, =-7=- VOL) 06Z7V co 1s r .nc .C1um+O jfqAO 1 wIc SQJ0 r 70 K, - BoO 7 Copies of the completed questionnaire have been mailed or delivered to: L42-kpy Sfl1� ohs c�flCSf/tJV /�o t1,,,E�u77PL . zG z g �Enry /'J4 ,e o �Y 60 e-u AJ S co e-0 if A 100 FjoS zG Preparer represents that to the best of the preparer's knowledge, the above statements and facts are true and correct and to the best of the Qreparer's actual knowledge no material facts have been suppressed or misstated. Date: Z 3 0 Page 4 O Mitochondrial DNA room(s). O Firing range. • HEPA filtered exhausts. O Verify need per local authorities. • Differential pressure of adjacent spaces. O Verify need for positive and negative pressure spaces. • Supplemental cooling. O Instrument rooms. O Other spaces with heat -generating equipment. • Evidence drying room exhausts. O Special handling for putrid items. • Firing range exhaust. Plumbing Systems Design Checklist • Emergency shower and eyewashes and floor drains. O In laboratory spaces. O In areas of refuge. • Caustic (acid/alkali) waste systems, i.e., neutralization/hazardous waste systems. • Fume hood and biological hood plumbing utilities. • Water treatment systems. O Recirculating deionized water. O Point -of -use type 1 water polisher. • Laboratory gas types. O Hydrogen, nitrogen, helium, air, argon. O Manifolded instrument gas systems. O Central instrument gas distribution systems. O Laboratory compressed air. 24 O Laboratory vacuum. O Consider hydrogen generators to avoid NFPA gas plumbing requirements. O Natural gas. • Rarely used in most modern forensic laboratories. • Consider small gas cylinders stored beneath fume hood. • Laboratory gas locations. O At laboratory benches. O In fume hoods and biological hoods. O In instrumentation rooms. O At scanning electron microscope. • Dry fire suppression systems. O Instrumentation rooms. O Computer room(s). O Scanning electron microscope room(s). Electrical Systems Design Checklist • Emergency generator. O Recommend emergency power and lighting for the following spaces: • Entire evidence section. • All refrigerators and freezers, including walk-in units. • Photography darkroom(s). • Entire security section, including electronic security systems and telephones. • X-ray processing room(s). O Recommend one duplex outlet per 92.90 mz (1000 ftz) and 25 percent lighting for the following spaces: • All technical laboratory, examination, and investigation spaces. O Minimal emergency power and lighting per applicable codes: • All other spaces in the building not identified above. • Uninterruptable power supply (UPS). O All computer -driven systems and equipment including, but not limited to, labora- tory instrumentation, Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS), Com- bined DNA Identification System (CODIS), Laboratory Information Management 25 System (LIMS), Drugfire, Integrated Ballistic Imaging System (IBIS), and LABNET. O Central UPS system is preferred, but local UPS units are acceptable. • Task lighting. O Verify locations, types, and color temperatures with users. • Local light level control. O Verify locations with users. • Bench power. O General: single outlets at 0.457 m (18 in) on centers, or duplex outlets at 0.914 m (36 in) on centers. O Special bench power requirements to be verified. General Laboratory Design • Fume hoods. O Class A, chemical fume hood with remotely located exhaust blower. • Biological hoods. O Class II, types A, B2, or B3, depending on specific application, with remotely located exhaust blower. • Bench top work surfaces. O Epoxy resin in laboratory spaces where fume hood or chemically rated biological hood is installed. O Stainless steel in spaces where biologically contaminated evidence is to be placed on the work surface. O 3.81 cm 01/2-in) thick laminated maple in physical examination spaces such as firearms shop and vehicle examination work bench. O Chemical resistant plastic laminate in all other laboratory spaces not identified above. O Standard plastic laminate in nonlaboratory spaces such as offices, conference rooms, lunch room, toilet rooms, etc. 26 • Laboratory sinks. O Epoxy resin in epoxy resin countertops, all other locations stainless steel. • Hands -free sinks. O At all clean sinks. O Verify other special locations with users. • Clean sink areas. O Located at the entrance to every laboratory section. O Used only to wash hands upon leaving a laboratory section. O Provide lab coat hangers. O Provide cabinetry for storage of soap, paper towels, rubber gloves, and other protective garments as determined necessary by the users. • Caustic (acid/alkali) waste plumbing. O At all epoxy resin sinks and fume hood cup sinks. O May include dilution system, neutralizing filters, or holding vessels, depending on local authority and plumbing design. • Evidence drying rooms. O Recommended minimum of 12 to 15 air changes per hour, direct exhaust to exterior. O Washable finishes. • Biovestibules. O Locate between "clean" and "dirty' spaces, for example, between main circula- tion corridor and entrance to a laboratory section that potentially contains haz- ardous airborne contaminants. O Shall be designed as an interlock between clean and dirty spaces with air handled through differential pressurization to prevent exfiltration of contaminated air. O Shall contain all the features of the clean sink areas described above. O Minimum size: 5.95 m2 (64 ft2). 27 • Bulk chemical and clandestine lab evidence storage rooms. O Exhaust system to expel both heavier- and lighter -than -air vapors. • Explosion -proof electrical fixtures. • Blowout panel. • Chemical spill containment. • Finishes. O Laboratory floors. • Chemical -resistant sheet vinyl or vinyl tiles with welded seams. O Laboratory walls. • Epoxy in all spaces considered highly biologically or chemically hazardous, such as examination rooms, bulk drug analysis, and bulk chemical storage. • Semi -gloss latex enamel in all other spaces. O Laboratory ceilings. • Epoxy in all spaces considered highly biologically or chemically hazardous, such as examination rooms, bulk drug analysis, and bulk chemical storage. • Suspended acoustical in all other spaces. O Nonlaboratory spaces. • Acceptable interior finish standards for offices and nonlaboratory support spaces. • Laboratory casework. O Standard laboratory casework with utility access space behind base cabinets. O Steel or wood preferred, plastic laminate acceptable. O Maximize use of flexible laboratory casework systems. • Files. O Generally, one four -drawer filing cabinet, or the equivalent file storage space, should be provided for each analyst at the area of the nonlaboratory workstation. • Special considerations. O Acoustics. O Reflective surfaces. O Vibration -proof flooring. O High -strength flooring. 28 Technical Laboratory Sections General Design Comments The forensic laboratory consists of various laboratories within the overall facility. These various laboratories are commonly referred to as laboratory sections or units. The recommended guidelines provided here are intended to serve as checklists for the design of laboratory space in the technical laboratory sections. Included are functional areas, equipment, and instrumentation that are listed to remind designers of needs that should be considered when designing a layout. Many of the items listed, such as laboratory workstations, are universal components of technical sections. Other items may or may not be necessities, depending upon the needs and size of individual laboratory sections. In some instances area (ml, ftz) of floor space or linear footage (lin in, ft) of bench space have been assigned to represent minimum guidelines for space requirements. Items and areas that are not assigned measurements will vary as needed by individual laboratories and the sections within those laboratories. For most laboratory sections the checklist below follows a common theme. This theme consists of the concept of a main laboratory space for each section, and supporting spaces that are enclosed rooms with direct adjacency to the main laboratory. The main laboratory is where each analyst will have an individual laboratory workstation. The adjacent sup- porting spaces will be spaces devoted to specific procedures or equipment items and that might be used by each analyst from time to time during the course of his or her examinations. Administrative Work Spaces Each laboratory section will identify various nonlaboratory work spaces. A significant amount of the forensic analyst's responsibilities include nonlaboratory tasks such as data analysis, report writing, court testimony preparation, and other administrative responsi- bilities. The design should provide the analyst with an administrative work area, away from the hazards of the laboratory, where these tasks can be conducted in an efficient and safe environment. Supervisors' offices, case review areas, and space for files can also be included in this environment. With the exception of the supervisors' offices, which shall be private offices, all other spaces in the administrative work area can be designed as open office systems workstations. Some analysts, such as document and latent print examiners, require additional administrative work space since a significant amount of their technical examinations can occur outside of the laboratory environment. Controlled Substance Section • Main Controlled Substances Laboratory Space. O Individual analyst laboratory workstation. • 4.57 in (151in ft) bench space per analyst. • Individual in -process secure evidence storage. • Individual spot ventilation or fume hood. • Sink (may be shared between two analysts). 29 O Miscellaneous bench space with hood(s) and sink(s) as required for specific equipment and procedures. O Floor space for refrigerators and other lab equipment as required. O Vibration -isolation benches as required for analytical balances. • Instrumentation room. O Bench space for each instrument with adjacent layout bench space. O Free access space to the rear of each instrument for maintenance and utility access. O Instrument maintenance space within the instrument room with fume hood, solvent storage, and sink. O Shelving for the storage of references and manuals. O Dry fire suppression system. O Adequate ports for computers/workstations. • Evidence storage room. O As required in addition to in -process storage in workstations. • Standards storage room. O Lab refrigerator. O Secure storage units. • Reagent preparation. O May be separate room or may be part of the main laboratory space. O Chemical layout bench space. O Fume hood(s) with solvent and separate acid/alkali storage base cabinets. O Glassware washer with bench space for glassware sorting. O Double sink. O Bench space as required for specific equipment and procedures. O Flammable materials storage refrigerator. 30 • Robotics. O May be separate room or may be part of the main laboratory space. O Type of robotics equipment and apparatus will dictate space and utility requirements. O Dry fire -suppression systems. • Other considerations. O Large bulk seizures. O Light -free room for alternate -light viewing. • Administrative work spaces. O Supervisor's office: 11.48 m2 (120 W). O Analyst's administrative workstation: 5.95 mz (64 ft2) per analyst. O Case review: space for small table and chairs where three or four analysts can confer informally. Toxicology Section • Design as biologically hazardous space with biovestibule, while ensuring no cross - contamination from the drug section. • Main Toxicology Laboratory Space. O Individual analyst laboratory workstation. • 4.57 m (151in ft) bench space per analyst. • Individual in -process secure evidence storage. • Individual spot ventilation, fume hood, or biological hood. • Sink (may be shared between two analysts). O Miscellaneous bench space with hood(s) and sink(s) as required for specific equipment and procedures. O Stand-alone specimen processing room may be required in addition to analyst workstations, depending on operation and accreditation requirements. O Special processing of waste may be required. • Instrumentation room. O Bench space for each instrument with adjacent layout bench space. O Free access space to the rear of each instrument for maintenance and utility access. 31 O Instrument maintenance space within the instrument room with fume hood, solvent storage, and sink. O Shelving for the storage of references and manuals. O Dry fire -suppression system. O Adequate ports for computers/workstations. • Refrigerated storage. O As required in addition to in -process evidence storage in workstations.' O May be refrigerators in main laboratory space or in separate room. O Maybe walk-in refrigerator and/or freezer. • Reagent preparation. O May be separate room or may be part of the main laboratory space. O Chemical layout bench space. O Fume hood(s) with solvent and separate acid/alkali storage base cabinets. O Glasswares washer with bench space for glassware sorting. O Double sink. O Bench space as required for specific equipment and procedures. O Flammable materials storage refrigerator. • Robotics. O May be separate room or may be part of the main laboratory space. O Type of robotics equipment and apparatus will dictate space and utility requirements. • Radioimmunoassay room. O 11.48 mz (120 ftz). O Fume/biological hood. O Sink. O Bench space as required for equipment and procedures. 32 REVISIONS TO: CHAPTER 7 AGREEMENT AGREEMENT: Article 3 Contract Times ADD the following language in Article 3, Contract Times: Paragraph 3.01, Days to Achieve Substantial Completion and Final Payment: 3.01 Days to Achieve Substantial Completion and Final Payment The Work will be substantially completed within 1064 days after the date when the Contract Times commence to run as provided in paragraph 2.02.A of the General Conditions and completed and ready for final payment in accordance with paragraph 13.09 of the General Conditions within 1094 days after the date when the Contract Times commence to run. Article 13 Miscellaneous DELETE the following language in Article 13. Miscellaneous, Paragraph 13.03. the Bank of Cherry Creek, N.A.: and REPLACE with the following language: U.S. Bank National Association. Page 4 of 7 • Administrative work spaces. O Supervisor's office: 11.48 mz (120 ft'). O Analyst's administrative workstation: 5.95 mz (64 ft') per analyst. O Case review: space for small table and chairs where three or four analysts can confer informally. Firearms/Toolmarks Section • Design as biologically hazardous space with biovestibule. • Main Firearms/Toolmarks Laboratory Space. O Individual analyst laboratory workstation. • 4.57 m (151in ft) bench space per analyst (6.1 m [20 lin ft] if individual comparison microscope is included). • Individual in -process secure evidence storage. • Sink (may be shared between two or more analysts). O Miscellaneous bench space with hood(s) and sink(s) as required for specific equipment and procedures. O Floor space for refrigerators and other lab equipment as required. • Comparison microscopy room. O 1.5241in m (51in ft) per microscope (allow for attachment of power and light sources). O Some users may prefer individual microscopes in their individual workstations. O Light level control. • Test fire range. O Minimum width, 2.438 m (8 ft); optimum width, 6.096 m (20 ft). O Minimum length,12.192 m (40 ft); optimum length 22.86 m (75 ft). O 2.438 lin m (8 lin ft) bench for weapon layout. O Ventilation for airborne unspent powder and lead/metal particulates (see OSHA and NIOSH regulations). O Acoustically designed for containment and absorption of sound. 33 • Projectile recovery room. O Ventilated water tank. 4 Ventilated cotton box. O Ventilated test fire container. O Acoustically designed for containment and absorption of sound. • Toolmarks shop. O Tools storage. O Sink. O Drill press. O Grinder. O Compressed air. O Additional bench space as required for tools and equipment. • Computer room. O Drugfire workstation(s). O IBIS workstation(s). O Server(s) associated with automation platform, if applicable. O Dedicated phone line(s) and additional data ports as required. • Chemistry lab. O Might be part of the main laboratory space. O Fume hood(s) with solvent and separate acid/alkali storage base cabinets. O Sink(s). O Additional bench space as required for evidence layout and equipment. • Gunshot residue room. (Note: could be part of chemistry lab.) O Biovestibule entry. O Biological hood(s). 34 O Sink. O Stainless steel examination surface (bench or mobile table). • Gun references storage room. • Ammunition storage room. O Follow safety recommendations. • Standards storage. O Might be in main laboratory space. • Evidence storage. O As required in addition to in -process storage in workstations. • Administrative work spaces. O Supervisor's office: 11.48 m2 (120 ft2). O Analyst's administrative workstation: 5.95 mz (64 ftz) per analyst. O Case review: space for small table and chairs where three or four analysts can confer informally. Trace Analysis Section • Design as biologically hazardous space with biovestibule. • Main Trace Analysis Laboratory Space. O Individual analyst laboratory workstation. • 4.57 m (151in ft) bench space per analyst. • Individual in -process secure evidence storage. • Individual spot ventilation, fume hood, or biological hood. • Sink (may be shared between two analysts). O Miscellaneous bench space with hood(s) and sink(s) as required for specific equipment and procedures. O Floor space for refrigerators and other lab equipment as required. • Instrumentation room. O Bench space for each instrument with adjacent layout bench space. O Free access space to the rear of each instrument for maintenance and utility access. 35 O Instrument maintenance space within the instrument room with fume hood, solvent storage, and sink. O Shelving for the storage of references and manuals. O Miscellaneous bench space with hood(s) and sink(s) as required for specific equipment and procedures. O X-ray Diffraction (XRD). O Space for remotely located chiller. O Dry fire -suppression system. • Microscopy room. O 1.524 lin m (5 lin ft) bench space per microscope. O Light level control. • Scanning electron microscope room. O 11.48 mz (120 ft2). O 2.438 lin m (8 lin ft) bench space with sink. O Manuals and references shelves. O Light level control. O Dry fire -suppression system. O Isolation pad or minimal floor vibration. • Evidence storage room. O As required in addition to in -process storage in workstations. • Standards storage. O May be separate room or may be part of the main laboratory space. • Arson investigation room. O Fume hood(s) for vacuum extraction, if required. O Bench space and sink(s) as required for layout and examination. 36 • Evidence drying room(s). O See "General Laboratory Design." O May be within the laboratory section or centrally located outside of the laboratory section. • Evidence examination (scraping or processing) rooms. O Minimum of two rooms to separate victim and suspect evidence. One additional room for every six analysts. O Minimum 13.935 mz (150 ftz)each room. O Mobile exam table with access all around. O Evidence hanging apparatus above exam table. O 2.438 lin m (8 lin ft) bench layout space with sink. O Light level control. • Administrative work spaces. O Supervisor's office: 11.48 mz (120 ftz). O Analyst's administrative workstation: 5.95 m2 (64 ftz) per analyst. O Case review: space for small table and chairs where three or four analysts can confer informally. Forensic Biology/DNA Section • Provide general requirements for separation of laboratory space in accordance with TWGDAM guidelines. • Design as biologically hazardous space with biovestibule. • General contamination prevention is critical. • Main Forensic Biology Laboratory Space. O Individual analyst laboratory workstation. • 4.57 m (151in ft) bench space per analyst. •. Individual in -process secure evidence storage. • Sink (may be shared between two analysts). O Miscellaneous bench space with hood(s) and sink(s) as required for specific equipment and procedures. O Floor space for refrigerators and other lab equipment as required. 37 • Evidence examination (scraping or processing) rooms. O Minimum of two rooms to separate victim and suspect evidence. One additional room for every six analysts. O Minimum 13.935 mz (150 ftz) each room. O Mobile exam table with access all around. O Evidence hanging apparatus above exam table. O 2.438 lin m (8 lin ft) bench layout space with sink. O Light level control. • Wet blood preparation. O Minimum 9.29 m2 (100 ft2). O Biological hood(s). O Sink(s). • Refrigerated storage. O As required in addition to in -process evidence storage in workstations. O May be refrigerators in main laboratory space or in separate room. O May be walk-in refrigerator. • Freezer storage. O May be walk-in freezer. O Ultra -low temperature freezer storage. • Evidence drying room(s). O See "General Laboratory Design." O May be within the laboratory section or centrally located outside of the laboratory section. • Reagent preparation room. O Fume hood(s) with solvent and separate acid/alkali storage base cabinets. O Double sink. O Glasswares washing and storage. 38 O Autoclave. O Flammable materials storage refrigerator. d Minimum 18.581 m2 (200 ft2). O Negative pressure ventilation. • Electrophoresis. O May be in separate room or on benches in main laboratory space. O Approximately 18.581 m2 (200 ft2). • Photo room. O 1.83 lin m (61in ft) bench space per photo station for equipment and layout. O Light level control. • X-ray processing room. (Note: needed only if using radioisotopes.) O Photographic darkroom design. O X-ray viewer. O Minimum 13.935 m2 (150 ft2). O Safe lights. O Some processing equipment requires supplemental water connections and floor drains. • PCR preparation room. O Minimum 11.48 m2 (120 ft2). O Biological hood(s). O Refrigerator. O Layout bench space with sink. • PCR amplification/detection room. O Interlock vestibule entry designed like biovestibule. Design to prevent cross - contamination of airborne product from PCR room to surrounding spaces. O Negative pressure relative to adjacent spaces. O Refrigerator(s). 39 O 9.29 mz (100 ft) per analyst. O Miscellaneous bench space for equipment and layout. O Storage space. • Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) room. O Interlock vestibule entry designed similar to biovestibule. Design to prevent double cross -contamination, i.e., airborne product from mtDNA room to sur- rounding spaces, and airborne materials from surrounding spaces to mtDNA room. O Minimum 18.581 m2 (200 ft'). O Miscellaneous bench space with hood(s) and sink(s) as required for specific equipment and procedures. • Research and development/methods development. O Minimum 18.581 m2 (200 ft'). 4 Miscellaneous bench space with hood(s) and sink(s) as required for specific equipment and procedures. • Computer lab (CODIS). O 1.524 lin m (5 lin ft) bench space for each computer workstation. O 0.9144 m Q lin ft) bench space for each video imager. O One video imager shared between two computer workstations. O Shelving for references and manuals. O Space for network servers and/or other computer hardware. O Dedicated phone line(s) and additional data ports as required. O X-ray viewer(s). O Can be considered nonlaboratory space and located accordingly. O Secure storage areas. • Administrative work spaces. O Supervisor's office: 11.48 mz (120 ft'), 21L O Analyst's administrative workstation: 5.95 mz (64 ft') per analyst. O Case review: space for small table and chairs where three or four analysts can confer informally. Latent Prints Section • Design as biologically hazardous space with biovestibule. • Main Latent Prints Laboratory Space. O Individual analyst laboratory workstation. • 3.048 fin m (10 lin ft) bench space per analyst. • Individual in -process secure evidence storage. • Sink (may be shared between two analysts). O Miscellaneous bench space with hood(s) and sink(s) as required for specific equipment and procedures. O Floor space for refrigerators and other lab equipment as required. • Evidence storage. O As required in addition to in -process storage in workstations. • Cyanoacrylate processing. O May be part of the main latent prints laboratory space. O Multichambered cabinets with individually controlled exhaust. • Dusting stations. O May be part of the main latent prints laboratory space. O 1.524 lin m (5 lin ft) bench space per dusting station. O Task lighting. • Chemical processing. O May be part of the main latent prints laboratory space. O Bench space with hood(s) and sink(s) as required for specific equipment and procedures. O Humidity test chamber. 41 • Alternate light source room(s). O Fume hood with large sink for dye processing. O Layout bench. O Minimum 11.48 mz (120 W). • Laser room. O Light level control. O Minimum 13.935 m2 (150 ft') O Design as darkroom with sink, or provide access to darkroom with sink. • Photo room. O 1.83 lin m (6 lin ft) bench space per photo station for equipment and layout. O Light level control. • Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) room. O 1.524 lin m (5 lin ft) per computer workstation. O Hardware and other space requirements vary per vendor. O Light level control. O Can be considered nonlaboratory space and located accordingly. • Administrative work spaces. O Supervisor's office: 13.935 mz (150 ft'). O Analyst's administrative workstation: 9.29 mz (100 ft) per analyst. O Case review: space for small table and chairs where three or four analysts can confer informally. Questioned Documents Section • Main Questioned Documents Laboratory Space. O North exposure with natural light. O Individual in -process secure evidence storage (may be at nonlaboratory worksta- tions). EFA REVISIONS TO: STANDARD GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT BETWEEN OWNER AND DESIGN/BUILDER Article 3 3.02 Al Reference Standards RESTORE the following language in Article 3 Section 3.02 Reference Standards, Paragraph A.1: 1. ... in effect on the last day for receipt of Proposals except as may be otherwise specifically stated in the Contract Documents. Article 5 5.04 Design/Builder's Liability Insurance DELETE the following language in Article 5 Section 5.04 Design/Builder's Liability Insurance Paragraph BA: ...and 5.04. DELETE Article 5, Section 5.04, Paragraph C: Design/Builder's Professional Liability Errors & Omissions Insurance. REPLACE the text "Property" from the title of Section 5.06 Property Insurance with the text "Builder's Risk. RESTORE the following language in Article 5 Section 5.06 Builder's Risk Insurance Paragraphs A., A.1, A.2, A.3, A.4, A.5, A.6, A.7, B., C., D., E.: A. Unless otherwise provided in the Supplementary Conditions, Owner shall purchase and maintain property insurance upon the Construction at the Site in the amount of the full replacement cost thereof (subject to such deductible amounts as may be provided in the Supplementary Conditions or required by Laws or Regulations). This insurance will: 1. Include the interests of Owner, Owner's Consultant, Design/Builder, Subcontractors, and any other individuals or entities indicated in the Supplementary Conditions, and the officers, directors, partners, employees, agents, and other consultants and subcontractors of each and any of them, each of whom is deemed to have an insurable interest and shall be listed as an insured or additional insured; 2. Be written on a Builder's Risk "all-risk" or open peril or special causes of loss policy form that shall at least include insurance for physical loss and damage to the Construction, temporary buildings, falsework and all materials and equipment in transit, and shall insure against at least the .following perils or causes of loss: fire, lightning, extended coverage, theft, vandalism and malicious mischief, earthquake, collapse, debris removal, demolition occasioned by enforcement of Laws or Regulations, water damage, and such other perils or causes of loss as may be specifically required by the Supplementary Conditions; Page 5 of 7 O Miscellaneous bench and floor space as required for specific equipment and procedures. 4 Mobile tables for individual case examination; approximately one table per examiner. • Evidence storage room. O As required in addition to in -process storage at workstations. • Chemical processing room. O Fume hood(s) with solvent and separate acid/alkali storage base cabinets. O Bench space for equipment and evidence layout with sink. O Minimum 11.48 m2 (120 ft2). • Administrative work spaces. O Supervisor's office: 13.935 m2 (150 ft2). O Analyst's administrative workstation: 9.29 m2 (100 ft2) per analyst. O Case review: space for small table and chairs where three or four analysts can confer informally. Computer Evidence Section • May be designed as computer hardware space. Chemical and biological hazards will not be present. A sample statement of work (SOW) for a forensic computer examina- tion laboratory is found in Appendix III. • Main computer evidence laboratory space. O Individual analyst laboratory workstation: 7.621in m (25 lin ft) bench space per analyst. O Miscellaneous computer evidence bench: 7.62 lin m (25 lin ft) bench space per analyst. O Independent data line with two jacks. O Various types of telephone lines. • Evidence room. O 9.29 m2 (100 ft2) per analyst. • Equipment room. O 9.29 m2 (100 ft2) per analyst. 43 • Administrative work spaces. O May be included as part of the main computer evidence laboratory space. O Supervisor's office: 13.935 mz (150 ft2). O Analyst's administrative workstation: 9.29 m2 (100 ftz) per analyst. O Independent data line with two jacks. O Various types of telephone lines. O Two National White Collar Crime Center (NWCCC) network connections. • Dry fire -suppression system. Universal Facility Design Components Although no two forensic laboratories are alike, there are basic functional components and areas that are universal to most laboratory buildings. For example, office space, training rooms, and technical support areas are standard necessities that must be consid- ered for space during the design phase. The following set of checklists serve as recom- mended guidelines and requirements for universal laboratory building components, and have been divided into four categories: administrative, building, technical support, and general technical. Administrative areas are nontechnical and primarily consist of office space used for evidence support. Building areas are not directly related to evidence analy- sis, and needs will vary for freestanding laboratories or laboratories occupying only part of a building. Technical support areas are directly related to, but are not used for, evidence analysis. General technical areas are shared by most laboratory sections within a building, and needs will vary depending upon laboratory size and functions. Administrative • Design standards for these spaces should be based on acceptable office space design standards. • Private offices. O Based on existing space standards, if any. • Offices for support personnel. O Shared offices or open office systems furniture. • Files for active cases. • Clerical, administrative, and case support. • Mail, photocopy, and facsimile. 44 • Conference room(s). • Lobby/reception. • Consultant offices. • Library. 4 Book stacks. O Periodicals shelves. O Study carrel(s) O Study table(s) O Computer information terminal(s) Building • Mechanical. O Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment rooms. O Air handling systems. O Fume and biological hood exhaust equipment. O Laboratory compressed air and vacuum systems. d Central plant water treatment systems. O Domestic hot and cold water systems. O Fire extinguishing systems and sprinkler control rooms. O Instrument gas manifold and distribution systems. • Communications. O Computer rooms and/or closets. O Telephone equipment rooms and/or closets. O Premise wiring rooms and/or closets. O Data line provisions. 45 • Electrical. O Service entrance and main switch gear. O Emergency generator. O Uninterruptable power supply (UPS) equipment. O Electrical closets. O Electrical service panels. • Staff use. O Lunch room. O Break room(s). O Locker rooms with showers. O Rest rooms. • Other. O Janitorial closet(s). O Passenger and/or freight elevator(s). O Recycling. O Lab coat cleaning. O Shipping and receiving. O Hazardous waste disposal. O Compressed gas cylinder storage. O General waste disposal. Technical Support • Storage. O General laboratory storage. O General supplies storage. O Long-term files storage. .M O Chemical storage. • Dry fire -suppression system. • Evidence. O Evidence receiving and return counter from and to submitting agencies. O After-hours secure evidence lockers. O Evidence disbursal and return counter to and from laboratory sections. O Evidence custodian workstations: minimum 5.95 mz (64 ft2). O Evidence supervisor office: minimum 11.48 m2 (120 ft2). O Evidence storage. • General evidence storage shelving. • Refrigerated and frozen evidence storage: refrigerators and freezers or walk-in units. • Secure narcotics storage. • Secure valuables storage. • Flammable evidence storage: fire -rated, ventilated storage room, or venti- lated flammable storage cabinets. • Biohazardous evidence storage. • Gun storage. • Long-term evidence storage. O Evidence workroom. • Mail room features for packaging, sending, and receiving evidence. • Layout countertop space with sink. • Photocopy and facsimile. O Evidence case review/triage/conference room(s). O Evidence drying. General Technical • Vehicle processing. O Securable and air conditioned/heated forensic garage bay(s). • At least one bay large enough to accommodate vans and motor homes. O Workbench space: 3.0481in m (10 lin ft) per bay. O One shop sink per bay. O Laser or remote fiber light source. 47 O Vehicle lift (fixed or portable). O High -intensity lighting. O Additional pull -down lighting. O Tools storage. O Evidence drying room(s). O Compressed air. • Forensic photography. O Can be utilized for laboratory support only or offer full services, including public relations and graphic arts. O Film and print for black and white and color processing. O Chemical storage and mixing space. O Studio. O Finishing. O Computer -aided design and drafting (CADD) for graphic arts. O Photographic equipment and supplies storage. O Refrigerator. • Computer imaging. O Video and photographic enhancement. O General enhancement of latent prints, footprints, etc. O Virtual reality crime scene recording. • Training. O Classroom(s). 4 Audio/visual media room. O Exhibit storage. O Mock crime scene room(s). O Training laboratory. ie O Breath alcohol training. O Video conferencing. O Computer and television networking. • Quality assurance. O Proficiency testing/sample preparation laboratory (might be shared with training laboratory). O Conference/office. O Record storage and archival facilities. • Crime scene unit. O Equipment storage. O Staging area. 49 Construction The Construction Process During this phase all the facility planning and design work will be brought to fruition and the forensic laboratory facility will be built. During the construction phase a team of individuals represents the laboratory's inter- ests, ensuring that all the laboratory concepts are fully implemented. Each member of the team has a defined set of responsibilities. The laboratory will need to rely on the team members' collective expertise with respect to interpretation of the contract documents, resolution of technical construction issues, and unforeseen construction conditions, such as ground water or bad soil. This team often includes: • The building owner's project manager or site representative, usually from facilities planning and design, the laboratory planner, and the contracting officer. • Members of the design team, including the architect, and structural, mechanical, and electrical engineers. It is critical that the laboratory director monitor progress during construction and make available to the project team an individual who is knowledgeable about all labora- tory design requirements. This person will assist and act as a resource to the project team, answering questions and responding to issues directly affecting the forensic laboratory's functional design requirements and facilitating the exchange of information between laboratory staff and the construction team when required. Laboratory Technical Coordinating Officer (LTCO) The laboratory technical coordinating officer (LTCO) is the individual assigned to represent the laboratory's interests and to act as a facilitator/coordinator during the construction phase. The LTCO must be: • Knowledgeable about the project requirements. • Readily available and willing to continue to serve through the construction phase. • Familiar with the design requirements and concepts and previously involved in the design process. • Able to clearly communicate and effectively work with all team members to realize complete success. Remember, this is a once in a lifetime responsibility that: • Requires a great deal of time and commitment. • May require the LTCO to give up other responsibilities. • The LTCO is probably not formally trained to do. 51 All construction team members, including the LTCO, must understand their responsi- bilities and the limits of their authority and rely on the other members of the team for support. The LTCO has a role on and is part of a much larger team. The LTCO should report and work through the individual responsible for administration of the construction con- tract on the owner's behalf. The LTCO should not be allowed to work directly with the contractor or his subcontractors. A very complex set of relationships exists between the contractor, subcontractors suppliers, the building owner, and the architect/engineer. These relationships are clearly defined by the contract agreements. These documents must be fully understood. If the LTCO has questions or concerns, they should be discussed with the contracting officer and the project manager. Defining Responsibility and Authority It is difficult to outline precisely everyone's role and responsibility during the con- struction of a facility. Each project is different. The form of contract agreement by which the construction project is being delivered and differences in a building owner's ability to manage a construction project can vary. It is therefore important that the laboratory director and the LTCO both review and understand the contract agreement and formal lines of communication established for their project 3 Forms of Construction Contracts Traditional Construction Contract Under a traditional construction contract, drawings and specifications are advertised for receipt of bids from interested contractors. (The contractors submitting bids on the project may or may not be prequalified). Each general contractor and their subcontractors estimate the cost of construction and submit a binding bid to the owner's representative. Bids are generally received and opened at a public opening. The qualified bidder deemed to provide the "best value" to the government is normally awarded the construction contract. A construction contract is then signed. The drawings and specifications are enjoined as part of the contract agreement defining the facility to be constructed for the contracted amount. The general contractor is the sole point of responsibility to construct the building as defined by these documents, including the work of his subcontractors. The greatest advantage to this method of construction delivery is that there is one point of accountability. Construction Management Contract Under this type of contract, construction managers (CM's) actually manage the con- struction of a facility for or with the building owner. Construction managers are often integrally involved during the design process, recommending alternative construction materials and methods based on their experience with local construction practices. 52 The CM is responsible for managing construction for the owner, guaranteeing that construction will not exceed an agreed -upon maximum price for the facility. The construc- tion manager may elect to do some of the construction, usually the work of general trades. The construction manager negotiates and oversees the work completed by other subcontractors. The two advantages of this form of construction delivery are the input a construction manager can provide during the design process and the ability to guarantee a maximum price for the facility cost early in the design process. Design/Build Contract Based on a definitive description of the facility in a detailed project program, the design/build contractor completes facility plans and specifications and then constructs the facility for a guaranteed maximum price. In this form of contract, it is imperative that the facility description be extremely accurate and complete whether it is a written narrative, drawings, or a combination. This description establishes a contractual scope of work for the design/build team; additional requirements or changes must be negotiated. The advantage of this form of contract is speed. Methods To Administer Construction Contracts The most common way to administer a construction contract is through a facilities management and planning office or contracting agency within the organization. However, some organizations do not have internal groups and must contract with another outside agency. For example, some Federal organizations work through GSA or the Army Corps of Engineers. Some State organizations work through a State facilities management and planning office. Some State or local agencies will contract with a construction management firm under separate contract outside of the construction agreement. It is important for the LTCO to understand who contractually represents the owner through the construction process. Process As the construction process moves through a series of steps, there are issues about which the laboratory director should be concerned to ensure the satisfactory completion of the facility. Prequalify Bidders Forensic laboratory facilities are extremely complex and require a contractor with demonstrated experience building this type of project. The bidding process (especially for government facilities) awards the contract to the lowest bidder; lab directors will not be 53 3. Include expenses incurred in the repair or replacement of any insured property (including but not limited to fees and charges of engineers and architects); 4. Cover materials and equipment stored at the Site or at another location that was agreed to in writing by Owner prior to being incorporated in the Construction, provided that such materials and equipment have been included in an Application for Payment approved by Owner; 5. Allow partial utilization in accordance with paragraph 13.06; 6. Include testing and startup; and 7. Be maintained in effect until final payment is made unless otherwise agreed to in writing by Owner and Design/Builder with thirty days' written notice to each other additional insured to whom a certificate of insurance has been issued. B. Owner shall purchase and maintain such boiler and machinery insurance or additional property insurance as may be required by the Supplementary Conditions or Laws or Regulations which will include the interests of Owner, Owner's Consultants, Design/Builder, Subcontractors, and any other individuals or entities indicated in the Supplementary Conditions, each of whom is deemed to have an insurable interest and shall be listed as an insured or additional insured Builder's Risk Insurance -- Unless otherwise provided, Owner shall purchase and maintain, in a company or companies lawfully authorized to do business in the iurisdiction where the Proiect is located, Builder's Risk Insurance in the amount of the initial Contract Amount, as well as subsequent modifications for the entire Project at the Site, on a replacement cost basis without voluntary deductibles. Such Builder's Risk Insurance shall be maintained until final payment has been made or until no person or entity other than Owner has an insurable interest in the property to be covered, whichever is earlier. Builder's Risk Insurance coverage shall be on a Special Covered Cause of Loss form, and shall include theft, vandalism, malicious mischief, collapse, temporary buildings or structures, and all below- and above -ground structures. Coverages shall be written for 100% of the completed value of the Work being performed. Design/Builder shall be responsible for the first $10,000 of any insurable loss under this policy. C. All the policies of insurance (and the certificates or other evidence thereof required to be purchased and maintained by Owner in accordance with paragraph 5.06 will contain a provision or endorsement that the coverage afforded will not be canceled or materially changed or renewal refused until at least 30 days' prior written notice has been given to Design/Builder and to each other additional insured to whom a certificate of insurance has been issued and will contain waiver provisions in accordance with paragraph 5.07. D. Owner shall not be responsible for purchasing and maintaining any property insurance to protect the interests of Design/Builder, Subcontractors, Suppliers, or others in the Work to the extent of any deductible amounts that are identified in the Supplementary Conditions. The risk of loss within such identified deductible amount, will be borne by Design/Builder, Subcontractor or others suffering any such loss and if any of them wishes property insurance coverage within the limits of such amounts, each may purchase and maintain it at the purchaser's own expense. E. If Design/Builder requests in writing that other special insurance be included in the property insurance policies provided under paragraph 5.06, Owner shall, if possible, include such insurance, and the cost thereof will be charged to Design/Builder by appropriate Change Order. Prior to commencement o/ the Work at the Site, Owner shall in writing advise Design/Builder whether or not such other insurance has been procured by Owner. Page 6 of 7 allowed to disqualify unqualified bidders after bids are received and opened. Therefore, if possible, include a process to prequalify bidders. Prequalification should be based on the following: • Company experience. Has the company: O Successfully constructed similar types of projects? O Successfully constructed projects of similar size? O Provided adequate bonding capacity? O Provided verifiable references? O Met previous construction schedules? O Demonstrated an acceptable record with respect to cost control and change orders? O Been involved with, or had a history of, litigation? • Key personnel. Keep the following in mind when considering key personnel: O Have key personnel, such as the project superintendent, successfully completed similar types of projects? O Have key personnel successfully completed projects of a similar size? O Review key personnel references. O What kind of commitment is the company willing to make with respect to assign- ing these individuals to the project? Bidding During the bidding process, the qualified bidders are invited to prepare bids for the construction of the forensic laboratory. Steps include: • Solicitation. Invitations to bid can take many forms, including: O Direct notification of qualified contractors. O Advertisement in local newspapers. O Advertisement in trade journals. • Prebid conference. This serves to notify all contractors interested in preparing bids of any special conditions of which they should be aware, or issues not clearly addressed in the contract documents. 54 • Issue documents. All interested contractors are provided with sets of plans and specifications, including all necessary bid forms. A nominal fee is usually applied to cover the cost of printing and handling. • Requests for Information (RFI's) and addendums. During the bidding process, many questions will be received from prospective bidders. These questions are referred to as Requests for Information (RFI's). Most RFI's can be simply answered by the design team. However, if there is incomplete or conflicting information, or an error in the documents, it is imperative that all bidders are notified of any revisions in order to make bids comparable. This is called an addendum. Addendums are issued during the bidding process for this purpose and should be issued no later than 14 days prior to bid opening. • Bid opening. Bids received are normally opened and recorded at a public bid opening. • Analysis of bids and alternates. All bids must be evaluated carefully. Often a project includes alternates. Alternates are portions of the work that may or may not be executed. An additive alternate is additional work that the building owner may elect to do if the bid cost is within his budget. A deductive alternate is work that may be de- leted from the contract if the bid cost of construction is too high. Deductive alternates should be avoided as much as possible, as the cost savings realized will be less than if the same portion of work were an additive alternate. Multiple alternates in the bid package can make the evaluation of the bids extremely complex. • Award of the construction contract. Once the successful bidder has been identified and the bid certified as bona fide, the construction contract between the owner and contractor can be signed. Construction Hold a preconstruction conference. This facilitates reaching an understanding by members of the construction team of the procedures that are to be followed during con- struction, establishing: • Chain of communication. • Construction schedule. • Procedures for processing shop drawings, change orders, RFI's, and payments. • Coordination drawings. Any areas of specific concern also should be discussed, such as: • Site security. • Mockups. Often for critical systems or materials where high expectations of quality exist, a sample panel or mockup is constructed to establish a benchmark or standard for the project. Often, a mockup of an entire laboratory module is constructed and the casework used in the mockup can be reused in the facility. • Coordination of work. 55 Periodic Site Inspections, Punch List, and Final Inspection Hold periodic site inspections throughout construction. Toward the end of construc- tion, compile a punch list. A punch list is a list of items compiled by the contractor that are incomplete or need to be fixed. The list should be reviewed by the building owner and the architect, who should walk through the structure and add to the list as necessary. Architect/Engineer WE) It should be noted that the Architect/Engineer WE) usually has primary (but not sole) responsibility for periodic site inspection, punch list and numerous other tasks. A/E services in this area are delivered as a part of his "PCAS" Services. (Post Construction Award Services). These services have usual and customary areas of responsibility/perfor- mance, which should be defined in the contract between the Owner and the Architect/ Engineer. Some owners may seek to economize on professional services by omitting or reducing these services. This is a false economy. Commissioning/Occupancy Ensure that systems are in place and in working order, and that laboratory staff and facilities engineers understand how the building systems work. Obtain training for the facilities engineer and custodial staff on new equipment and systems and arrange for service for the equipment and systems. Pitfalls During the construction process, events can occur that may prevent a facility from achieving the laboratory's level of expectation. Many of the issues will be beyond the laboratory's authority to control and the lab will have to rely on the expertise of others to control. Following are common pitfalls to anticipate: Quality Standards/Expectations Mockups. For critical systems where high quality is specified and expected, mockups provide a method of examining the systems before the bulk of the materials are either fabricated or installed. If the mockup does not meet specified levels of quality, it is much easier to change. Shop drawing. Shop drawings are drawings from materials suppliers or subcontrac- tors that precisely detail the installation and materials they propose to use. These draw- ings should be carefully reviewed by the design team for their compliance with the plans and specifications and by the LTCO for meeting the intent of the laboratory concepts. Fully Implementing Building and Systems Concepts Often, as a facility is constructed, design concepts are not fully carried out. In labora- tory facilities, the organization of utility distributed systems is critical for adaptability and 56 ease of maintenance. Yet, often during construction, utilities are routed first come, first served, and form a tangled web incapable of serving or fulfilling future project needs. The coordination of drawings of building systems is an issue that should be carefully reviewed at the preconstruction conference and enforced in the contract general conditions. Equipment Installation and Coordination The purchase and installation of fixed or major movable equipment is complicated and can result in coordination problems. Often, "or equal" equipment that is bid does not have the same utility requirements or is a different dimension than that used as the basis of design. For example, pit -mounted washers or autoclaves with similar capacity have different requirements for utility connections and require a different pit dimension. These variations must be carefully reviewed early on to avoid problems later in the construction process when equipment is installed. Existing equipment to be relocated presents a different set of issues. This includes moving the equipment, connecting the equipment, and the potential that some equipment may be replaced during the construction period. The LTCO must be aware of any changes in equipment that may affect the building or utility requirements. Laboratory Layout Revisions During the construction process, it is not unusual for a large percentage of the labora- tory users to change. This may lead to revisions in the laboratory fit -up. A significant amount of time may be required of the LTCO to coordinate these revisions during con- structions. 57 Moving Executing the move of a forensic laboratory requires a strategic plan. Without such a plan, the move may not be done properly and the consequences can be formidable (see figure 1). Work must continue even as the shift is made from the old facility to the new. The laboratory and its operations don't stop because the laboratory moves. Phase and schedule move activities so that routine daily events occur as smoothly and efficiently as possible. This requires logistics and planning. When considering or planning a move, address the following questions: • What are the tasks or activities? • In what order are they performed? • Who is going to do them? And, who has approval or sign -off authority? 59 A move plan should be based on the projected move -in date and time required to accomplish tasks. Tasks can be assigned "L" for long-range, "I" for intermediate, "S" for short-term, "P" for postmove, or any combination of these terms. The plan should be chronological —a three-phase framework that includes premove, move, and postmove activities. A move plan should consolidate premove, move, and postmove activities into indi- vidual paths. Establish a specific plan and articulate it early and often. Initially, the plan is fluid. It will grow and evolve constantly. Always keep in mind the date the move needs to be completed. Define the end first. Then decide how far prior to this date move activities need to start in order to complete the move successfully. An example of a detailed move plan demonstrating many of the concepts discussed in this section is found in Appendix IV. Specific questions as to labeling, codes, application or intent should be addressed to Robert A. Jarzen of the Sacramento County Laboratory of Forensic Services. Moving Activities • Brainstorm and Sequence Activities. Get organized. Write down all the tasks that are part of a strategic move plan. There's a tremendous amount of detail —everything from whether the lab's loading platforms fit the movers' trucks to refrigeration concerns when transporting evidence. Will large pieces of equipment (for example, electron microscopes) fit through the door? If not, should these be moved before the window frames are installed? Are State/county lines being crossed? If so, has the lab complied with the regulations for each region? Just as with the LTCO, someone in the laboratory —not the laboratory director, who is generally too busy — should be assigned to attend to these and the many other details pertinent to the total move process. Prioritize tasks. The key to the process is the sequencing of events. Sequencing con- sists of listing every activity necessary for the move, putting the activities into a bounded timeframe, and assigning the tasks. It might be helpful to chart the tasks using available project planning software. Charting the move allows the chief planner to view, review, and modify the plan as needed while making it easily accessible to other interested parties (the State's attorney or agency chief executive). Transition plan. Include a transition plan for satisfying the lab's clients. Consider an interim step that protects the validity of reagents and materials during the move and keeps the lab operating. Plan for security needs, heating and cooling systems, and espe- cially plan to protect the safety of people. When renovating a facility, identify hazardous conditions, such as the presence of asbestos. Ensure that repairs are complete before staff move in. Contingency plan. A contingency plan is essential. Plan for late deliveries. What if the lab needs to rent equipment because some of it was dropped from the back of the truck? What will the lab do if the electrical system does not work properly? 60 • Assign Human and Dollar Resources. Anchor responsibility for the move. Allocate resources, both human and financial. Assign one staff person the responsibility for the move and prioritize specific tasks, in- cluding the time it will take to accomplish them. • Designate Team/Sector Captains. Assign a team captain. Under the team captain, assign sector captains in charge of specific areas such as DNA, firearms, or documents. The sector captains work with the team captain and the movers to decide how to communicate moving instructions. For example, whether boxed materials should have a room number or a color that designates the department (red for serology, green for firearms). • Develop a Move Manual. Decide the elements of the complete, well -integrated move plan and develop a move manual. The manual may include the following information: How to select a mover. Selecting a mover varies with individual circumstance. Often, an RFP is required and bids evaluated. There also may be minority vendor set -aside requirements. Articulation of the plan. Articulate the needs and services required. Is one mover needed, or 14? Security may be needed. Staff time may be needed to ensure that computer ports are functional. Articulate a plan and notify other individuals (clients, staff, other departments involved, the State's attorney's office). Notify them of changes in the plan as well. Plan for new purchases. Don't wait until 6 months before the move to begin to con- sider purchasing new equipment. This decision must be made early. The pack -up. As the move draws near, packing begins. Packing can be done in stages to minimize disruption. Some materials can be packed early, such as those used only monthly. Progress eventually to the equipment which, once it is removed, work stops. The last items packed are those used every day. Before completely halting the old lab's opera- tions, validate the systems in the new facility to ensure it is ready to immediately support lab functions. • Devise a New Facilities Manual. The new facilities manual will serve as a guidebook of signposts and activities in the new building. Add any new policies and restate those policies from the old facility that will be continued. 61 Continuous Activity Several activities are continuous from the time the decision is made to either refurbish an existing facility or build a new one until after the move is completed. • Inventory. Before issuing a request for proposals (RFP), determine the size of the job. Specifica- tions include an inventory of the items to be moved. For RFP submission, know how the lab's equipment is currently positioned and future needs. Inventory is crucial because there are different kinds of movers for different kinds of equipment. Speciality movers may be needed. Inventory each section. Staff in each section of the lab should work with the move captain to plan how their section will move and to where. To enable this planning, be sure that staff are familiar with the new facility. Interim storage. Arrange for interim secure storage, especially if the lab is moving from one building to another or being renovated in stages, so that inventory can be stored if it needs to be moved before the facility is ready. Rented trailers or a warehouse can be used for interim storage. • Personnel Coordination. Personnel coordination is imperative and good communication essential. Hold meet- ings with staff to discuss how the move should occur and once the course of action is decided, issue memos so there is no misunderstanding. Within the laboratory, everyone should know the plan or their section of it. During the move, one person (the move cap- tain) needs to know what is happening at all times. Have this individual monitor the whole process and report regularly to the lab director. • Security Assurance and Training. Maintaining security assurance in the old laboratory while moving and training on the security systems in the new building is essential throughout the process. • Chemical and Biological Hazards. Chemical and biological hazards play a large role in determining the type of facility to be built, the placement of equipment, and how items will be moved. They also affect liability and indemnification. Federal, State, and local regulations may apply. • Custodial Requirements. Plan to have a special custodial staff ready as the move occurs in case of spills or breakage. It may be possible to draw from the professional movers or laboratory staff. Plan for custodial requirements in the old and new facilities. The old one needs to be left clean. The new facility requires appropriate maintenance, trained custodial staff, and functioning equipment. 62 Long -Range Activities • Request for Proposals. Long-range activities include developing the RFP for movers and considering any specialty aspects such as evaluation of bids, insurance, and instrument handling associ- ated with the move. Meet with the appropriate individual who oversees the RFP process before developing an RFP document. Consider all tasks that need to be performed and when the move must be completed. A sample Statement of Work (SOW) is provided for your information in Appendix V. • Warranty Issues. Check with the manufacturer(s) before moving equipment to ensure that warranties are not invalidated by a move. Address warranty issues for both the professional movers and laboratory staff. Develop a list of equipment that would require the manufacturers' participation in the move and post -move setup. Allocate funds and set up schedules. • Liability Issues. Coordinate liability issues. Determine the extent of the laboratory's responsibility if the move is executed in a certain way. Ensure that appropriate bonding is in force for all contractors. • Rules of the Game. Know the financing rules. Meet with the comptroller or agency that oversees expendi- tures in the lab's municipality or State. • Temporary Storage Needs. Temporary storage needs must be part of long-range planning. Waiting until too close to the date of the move may mean that temporary facilities are unavailable. • Specialty Movers. If specialty movers are needed to handle equipment, build enough time into the plan to accomplish it on schedule. Keep in mind that there are different kinds of movers for different sorts of materials. • Furniture/Equipment/Computers. For furniture, equipment, and computer systems, decide early in the process: O What will be kept? O What will be refurbished? 63 O What will be disposed of? O What will be acquired? (If new supplies will be bought, build in validation time and money.) Intermediate Activities • Evaluate Bids and Select Mover(s)/Contractor(s). Intermediate activities include evaluating bids received in response to the RFP and selecting movers and other contractors. • Library Considerations. Consider the weight of boxes when packing library contents. Boxes that are too heavy may be too difficult to lift. Also consider issues pertinent to the lab's geographic area and climate. For example, do the books need fumigation, or do the shelves require earthquake protection? Build in those kinds of considerations with respect to the library and other items that will be moved from one building to another. • Update Lab Information. Build in time to update the laboratory's phone numbers, correspondence, stationery, business cards, license, and other permits before the move. Intermediate to Short -Range Activities • Specialty Equipment Coordination. Intermediate to short-range activity considerations include any specialty equipment needed to move items from the old building to the new, such as cranes and forklifts. • Notification of Clients/Users. Notify lab clients (State's attorney's offices, courts, police agencies) well ahead of the actual move, just before the move, and immediately following the move. • Refrigeration Concerns. Another intermediate to short-range activity that requires lead time is refrigeration. Build in refrigeration and other ways of preserving fragile or friable evidence during the move. Transfer refrigerated items to the new facility quickly. Prior to the transfer, ensure there is power and that systems are operating in the new facility. 64 RESTORE the following language in Article 5 Section 5.07 Waiver of Rights Paragraphs A., B., B.1, B.2, C.: A. Owner and Design/Builder intend that all policies purchased in accordance with paragraph 5.06 will protect Owner, Owner's Consultant, Design/Builder, Subcontractors, Suppliers, and all other individuals or entities indicated in the Supplementary Conditions to be listed as insureds or additional insureds (and the officers, directors, partners, employees, agents, and other consultants and subcontractors of each and any of them) in such policies and will provide primary coverage for all losses and damages caused by the perils or causes of loss covered thereby. All such policies shall contain provisions to the effect that in the event of payment of any loss or damage the insurers will have no rights of recovery against any of the insureds or additional insureds thereunder. Owner and Design/Builder waive all rights against each other and their respective officers, directors, partners, employees, agents, and other consultants and subcontractors of each and any of them for all losses and damages caused by, arising out of or resulting from any of the perils or causes of loss covered by such policies and any other property insurance applicable to the Work; and, in addition, waive all such rights against Owner's Consultant, Subcontractors, Suppliers, and all other individuals or entities indicated in the Supplementary Conditions to be listed as insureds or additional insureds under such policies for losses and damages so caused. None of the above waivers shall extend to the rights that any party making such waiver may have to the proceeds of insurance held by Owner as trustee or otherwise payable under any policy so issued. B. Owner waives all rights against Design/Builder, Subcontractors, and Suppliers and the ofcers, directors, employees and agents of any of them for: 1. Loss due to business interruption, loss of use, or other consequential loss extending beyond direct physical loss or damage to Owner's property caused by, arising out of or resulting from fire or other peril whether or not insured by Owner; and 2. Loss or damage to the completed Project or any part thereof caused by, arising out of or resulting from fire or other insured peril or cause or loss covered by any property insurance maintained on the completed Project or part thereof by Owner during partial utilization pursuant to paragraph 13.06, after Substantial Completion pursuant to paragraph 13.05, or after final payment pursuant toparagraph 13,08. C. Any insurance policy maintained by Owner covering any loss, damage or consequential loss referred to in paragraph 5.07.B shall contain provisions to the effect that in the event ofpayment ofany such loss, damage, or consequential loss, the insurers will have no rights of recovery against Design/Builder, Subcontractors, Owner's Consultant, and the officers, directors, partners, employees, agents, and other consultants and subcontractors of each and any of them. Page 7 of 7 • Systems for Filing of Records, Inventory of Materials, Supplies/Restock. Planning is needed for systems of filing, the inventory of materials, and supplies and restocking procedures in the new building. Plan so that people will understand how the system is going to work and build in a method that will make it work correctly. Short -Range Activities • Key/Card Assignments. Short-range planning includes determining key and card access assignments. Decide who is going to have access to the building and to which doors. • Parking Concerns. Where is everybody going to park? Will there be a class system or a free-for-all? Will parking assignments be based on shift work? Build parking concerns into the move process. • Assign Work Areas/Office Space. At first think of work areas generally as the space where forensic examiners will be assigned. Decide toward the end of the move planning process exactly who is going to sit where. This can be done with more lead time, but choosing to give short-term notification to staff can reduce grievances about personal seating arrangements. • Notification of U.S. Postal Service, Couriers, Utilities. Notify the U.S. Postal Service, couriers, and other delivery services of the move, as well as the utility companies. Talk to them about timing of services such as shutting off power in the old building on time and turning on power in the new building on time. Cover all billing issues (contractor's liability versus the laboratory's responsibility) well in advance of the move. • Electronic/Computer Setups. More short-range planning is needed for electronic and computer setups. Ensure that network nodes are working before the move. Then transfer the electronic/computer equipment and set up the network. • Packing/Moving Materials. Ensure that all the necessary packing and moving materials are on hand if the lab is going to do some of its own packing and moving. 65 • Extension Cords. Have extension cords on hand on moving day. Items may not be placed exactly as originally directed. • Training Related to the Move: Safety, Security, Proper Lifting. Train staff prior to the move on the facility's new systems, on safety and security issues, and on how to properly lift items. • Determine Facility Hours. Decide the facility's hours of operation. For example, there may have been three shifts in the old facility to make adequate use of a small space, and the new larger facility may allow for either two shifts or one. Determine when the facility will be open. • Verbal Rehearsal. Hold a verbal rehearsal of the move. Talk through the process with everyone involved to familiarize staff with the procedure planned for moving day. • Walk Through With Staff and Mover. Walk through the move process with staff and the movers together. • Test New Facility Systems: Elevator, UPS, Water, Power. Before occupying the new facility, ensure that building functions such as elevators, card readers, water systems, and electrical power work. Shut the power off and ensure the emergency lights come on and backup systems are operating. Train staff how to operate these systems. • Notification of Normal Vendors and Delivery Schedules. Notify the lab's normal vendors (for example, compressed gases, food). Provide vendors proper access to the property and directions on where they should deliver goods. Know the vendors' delivery schedules and have receiving people on hand. • Access to Property. If the new facility is a stand-alone building, determine building hours and access. If the facility is within a shared building, find out about normal operating hours and after-hours access. 66 During the Move Activities • Monitoring the Movers. Station staff members at the old site to ensure that the movers pick up only items that are to be moved. Station staff members at the new site to direct movers on where to bring and place items. Document damage/breakage or injury to personnel. • Temporary Signs. Laboratory staff and movers need to know where equipment and materials are going to go. Prepare temporary signs to direct the movement of materials into the new facility. Temporary signs can help answer questions before they are asked. • Alarms. It is imperative that the alarm/security system is in place and operational at the time evidence is moved into the new facility. Just before the move, check the operation and responsiveness of alarm systems for security and for items such as hood monitors and temperature control. Check these again after the move. If it is necessary to have people lock up at night, ensure that it won't set off the building alarm. Check that the alarm works. Know what constitutes an intrusion and what the reaction is to it. Does the alarm merely sound, or do people respond? Another issue of alarm/security is the monitoring by cameras. Will it be done from the first day? Make sure. • Computer Shake -Out. Have a good computer shake -out. Try to log some evidence into the new computer system. Ensure that all the nodes work for report generation and tracking evidence. • Equipment/Evidence Audits. Have a clear audit of movement of the lab's equipment and evidence from the old building to the new one. This is helpful both for the lab director and to ensure that the contractors do their jobs. • Security Compliance: Restrictions, Tours. Consider security compliance concerns. Decide how access will be restricted to lab staff, tour groups, and the general public. • Evidence Transfer Integrity. The ability to prove integrity of evidence transfer is important. Document it. Seal the evidence in a box, label it, put it on the truck, and send a person along with the truck. An armed guard or police escort may be necessary (for example, with drug evidence). Coordi- nate this with the county, city, or State's attorney. It is probably best to get approval in 67 writing of the lab's moving plan. For refrigerated evidence (rape kits, biological evidence), leave it in the refrigerator, seal it, put it on the truck, and move it to the new facility. When it arrives, verify that the seals and the evidence are intact. • Train Staff on New Systems. Training staff on the new building systems is useful. For example, if the temperature is too hot or too cold staff need to know what to do. They need to know the person to call, the button to push, and which monitor to change to correct the situation. Postmove Activities • Gather Feedback. After the move, request feedback from staff. Compile a list of problems so the prob- lems can be corrected. Obtaining feedback from staff should be an ongoing process. Staff will feel included and the director will receive a better response if it is a routine and regular practice. • Damage and Breakage. Identify and list items lost, damaged, or broken during the move and determine responsibility for repair or replacement. • Conduct Fire Drill/Safety Inspection. Conduct a fire drill and a safety inspection. Ensure everyone knows the location of eyewash stations and first aid kits. • Discard Used Moving Materials. Discard used moving materials quickly. Many movers will take back boxes and other items. If they do not, the lab is responsible. Set Up and Verify Operation of Equipment, Method Changes, Tracking Systems. Set up and verify the operation of any new equipment. Test new computer and evi- dence tracking systems. If the gas chromatograph has been moved, revalidate it. If work methods have been changed because of the geometry of a room or the availability of new venting, ensure that the methods are verified and are operating appropriately. Test gases and water to ensure they meet specifications. 68 • Introductions/Tours for Media Representatives/Dignitaries and the Staff Party. Postmove activities may include tours for the media and dignitaries and a staff party. • New Facilities Manual. Create a new facilities manual. This will establish a system that will allow staff to best use the laboratory and enable a lab director to change policies carried over from the old facility. The manual can address policies such as: 4 Security issues. O Fire- and/or safety -related issues. O HVAC controls. O Building evacuation. O Placement of personal art, photos, and belongings. O Smoking. O Food and drinks. 69 REFERENCES [11 Diberardinis, L.J.; Baum, J.S.; First, M.W.; Gatwood, G.T.; Groden, E.; Seth, A.K. Guide- lines for Laboratory Design: Health and Safety Considerations, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons; New York,1993. [21 Research Facilities of the Future; Stark, S., Ed.; Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 735; The New York Academy of Sciences; New York, 1994. (Note: Copies of this journal are available from: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Office of Law Enforcement Standards, Bldg. 225, Rm. A323, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899.) [31 The Architects Handbook of Professional Practice; American Institute of Architects, Manual 4, "Documents." (Includes sample documents for many of the forms of agreement and other documents used during the construction phase.) (Note: Additionally, the American Institute of Architects (AIA) publishes a number of useful brochures, forms, consultant contract forms and even helpful advice on how to select an architect. While not applicable in all cases, these could prove helpful as a refer- ence. The AIA published 3 or 4 "Handbooks of Professional Practice," which are available through the national headquarters in Washington, DC, and/or through contact with State AIA Chapters.) For more information on the National Institute of Justice, please contact: National Criminal Justice Reference Service Box 6000 Rockville, MD 20849-6000 800-851-3420 e-mail: askncjrs@ncirs.org You can view or obtain an electronic version of this document from the NCJRS Justice Information Center World Wide Web site. To access the World Wide Web site, go to http://www.ncjrs.org Other Department of Justice publications noted in this report can be ordered from NCJRS. Most are available free of charge and most can be downloaded from the Justice Information Center Web site. If you have any questions, call or e-mail NCJRS. About the Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program The Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program is sponsored by the Office of Science and Technology of the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), U.S. Department of Justice. The program responds to mandates of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, as amended, which created NIJ and directed it to encourage research and development to improve the criminal justice system and to disseminate the results to Federal, State, and local agencies. The Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program is an applied research effort that determines the technological needs of justice system agencies, sets minimum performance stan- dards for specific devices, tests commercially available equipment against those standards, and disseminates the standards and the test results to criminal justice agencies nationwide and interna- tionally. The program operates through: The Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Advisory Council (LECTAC), consisting of nationally recognized criminal justice practitioners from Federal, State, and local agencies, which assesses technological needs and sets priorities for research programs and items to be evaluated and tested. The Qffice of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES) at the National Institute of Standards and Tech- nology, which develops voluntary national performance standards for compliance testing to ensure that individual items of equipment are suitable for use by criminal justice agencies. The standards are based upon laboratory testing and evaluation of representative samples of each item of equipment to determine the key attributes, develop test methods, and establish minimum performance require- ments for each essential attribute. In addition to the highly technical standards, OLES also produces technical reports and user guidelines that explain in nontechnical terms the capabilities of available equipment. The National haw Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLF,CTC), operated by a grantee, supervises a national compliance testing program conducted by independent agencies. The standards developed by OLES serve as performance benchmarks against which commercial equip- ment is measured. The facilities, personnel, and testing capabilities of the independent laboratories are evaluated by OLES prior to testing each item of equipment, and OLES helps the technology center staff review and analyze data. Test results are published in Consumer Product Reports designed to help justice system procurement officials make informed purchasing decisions. Publications issued by the National Institute of Justice, including those of the Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program, are available from the National Criminal Justice Refer- ence Service (NCJRS), which serves as a central information and reference source for the Nation's criminal justice community. Electronic copies can be downloaded from the Justice Information Center World Wide Web site: http://www.ncjrs.org. For further information, or to register with NCJRS, write to the National Institute of Justice, National Criminal Justice Reference Service, Washington, DC 20531. U. S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street N.W. Washington, DC 20531 Janet Reno Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice Raymond C. Fisher Associate Attorney General Laurie Robinson Assistant Attorney General Noel Brennan Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jeremy Travis Director, National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice World Wide Web Site: World Wide Web Site: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov http://www-ojp.usdoj.gov/nij Forensic Laboratories: Handbook for Facility Planning, Design, Construction, and Moving Some figures, charts, forms, and tables are not included in this PDF file. To view this document in its entirety, order a print copy from NORS at 800-851-3420. ATTACHMENT THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIME LAB DIRECTORS/LAB ACCREDITATION STANDARDS P954 Police Service Facility-Design/Build ATTACHMENT SPACE PLAN (Developed in September 2000) P954 Police Services Facility-Design/Build FOt't0&lj1SA4MME p�� Ed , FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE DECENTRALIZATION OF POLICE SERVICES SEPTEMBER 2000 PREPARED BY- ROTH : SH EPPARD A R C H I T E C T S 1623 BLAKE ST. SUITE 350 DENVER, COLORADO 80202 303.534.7007 303.534.7722(FAX) ALLER•LINGLEARCHITECTS P.0 748 WHALERS WAY BLDG. E SUITE 200 FORT COL JNS, COLORADO 80525 970.223.1820 970.223. 1833 (FAX) ROTH ^ SHEPPARD F c H;- E c s September 11, 2000 1 G_ F L A K E C j, s u b E 3 S n D E V E R. c O L o R .A D o a n 0, Chief Dennis Harrison 30;.,3;. uo 303.534.—;>> ,Fr Fort Collins Police Services 300 Laporte Fort Collins, Colorado Re: Fort Collins Police Services Facilities Plan DENNIS: Attached is a final draft of the alternative facilities plan we developed over the last month. The plan includes the projected space and site needs of a single centrally located facility that will house all of Police Services (with the exception of satellite storefronts such as the existing District 1) and a decentralized plan in which a Patrol/ Training / Property & Evidence / Dispatch facility is located on the proposed PVH property on Harmony and a Patrol / Investigations / Administration facility is located somewhere in the Downtown area in an as yet undetermined location. A summary is included in the first part of the study that reports the following in more detail: The single facility will require approximately 92,000 gross square feet (GSF) to satisfy the needs of Police Services projected to the year 2020 given the identified and approved staff increase projections. Assuming the footprint of this facility at 35,000 GSF the site required to support staff, Department and visitor parking will be a minimum of 4.5 acres. The split facility concept will require a total of approximately 100,001 GSF in two facilities. The Harmony facility is projected to be approximately 48,000 GSF and occupy a minimum 2.9acre site. The Downtown facility will be approximately 53,000 GSF and will occupy a minimum 2.9acre site as well. Duplication of staff positions and support spaces accounts for the difference in the GSF in the two schemes. The differences are identified in the detail spreadsheets for each of the alternatives. This phase of the report is organized in 5 sections as follows: 1. Summary 2. Single Facility Detail 3. Split Facility / Harmony Detail 4. Split Facility / Downtown Detail 5. Site Detail The next phase of the project will develop concept plans and projected construction costs for each of the alternatives. We look forward to the next phases of the study and to the successful completion of new facilities for Police Services. FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF DECENTRALIZATION OF POLICE SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary 1-4 SINGLE FACILITY STUDY Single Facility Summary 5 Administration 6 Patrol Services Commander 7 District 1 8 Patrol 9-10 Traffic Unit 11 Selective Duties Unit 12 P,O.P Unit 13 Information Services Director 14 Systems 15 Records 16 Dispatch 17 Property / Evidence / Lab 18 Investigative Services Commander 19 Drug Task Force 20 Youth School Teams 71 Criminal Impact Unit 22 Crimes Against Persons 23 Crimes Against Property 24 Common Facilities 25 SPLIT FACILITY / HARMONY STUDY Harmony Facility Summary 26 Administration 27 Patrol Services Commander 28 District 1 )9 Patrol 30 Traffic Unit 31 Selective Duties Unit 32 P.O_P Unit 33 Information Services Director 34 Systems 35 Records 36 Dispatch 37 Property / Evidence / Lab 38 Investigative Services Commander 39 Drug Task Force 40 Youth School Teams 41 TOC1 Criminal Impact Unit 42 Crimes Against Persons 43 Crimes Against Property 44 Common Facilities 45 SPLIT FACILITY / DOWNTOWN STUDY Downtown Facility Summary 46 Administration 47 Patrol Services Commander 48 District 1 49 Patrol 50 Traffic Unit 51 Selective Duties Unit 52 P.O.P Unit 53 Information Services Director 54 Systems 55 Records 56 Dispatch 57 Property / Evidence / Lab 58 Investigative Services Commander 59 Drug Task Force 60 Youth School Teams 61 Criminal Impact Unit 62 Crimes Against Persons 63 Crimes Against Property 64 Common Facilities 65 SITE ANALYSIS Site Analysis & Site Calculation Summary 66 Single Facility Site Calculation 67 Split Facility Harmony Site Calculation 58 Split Facility Downtown Site Calculation 69 TOC2 FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF DECENTRALIZATION OF POLICE SERVICES Summary A needs assessment and staff projections for Fort Collins Police Services was performed through work sessions with key Department staff during the months of ILily and August 2000. Staff projections were developed for the years 2005, 2013 and 2020 using the following formula: • Sworn and civilian personnel increases were calculated at 5 and 2 per year, respectively, through the year 2073 • Sworn and civilian personnel increases were calculated at 6 and 2 per year, respectively, between year 2013 and year 2020 Single Facility Analysis An analysis of a single Police Services location, in an undetermined location resulted in a facility of approximately 92,800 gross square feet with division area and staff allocations as identified in the following table: DIVISION Administration Patrol Information Services Investigative Services Common Facilities BUILDING GROSS FACTOR I CURRENT PROJECTED .'STAFF REQUIRED STAFF j 2000 1 !� 1 2005 ! 2013: 2020 I 11.0 tss i ! zzs I I j 26.0 j 110.0 126.0 i 148.0 173.0 I 60.3 48.0 69.0 57.5 i 82.5 I 69.5 I 94.0 78.5 0.0 oo . oo5 I o.o. 229.25 26 322371. 5 268 2.5 371.5229.3 I I EXIST � AREA REQUIRED SF 2000 2005 1 2013 i 2020 i 4,1301 I 5,1361 I 5,9111 6,409 16,588! 18,214! 19,202' 20,19V 16,866� 18,274 19,7691 21,475' 9,770 10,433 11,397 12,062 72,588 12,993i 13,577 14,111 59,941� 65,049 69,856 74,249I 14,985i 11,262I 17,464 18,562I 74,926 81,311 87,3201 92,811 Table 1 — Single Fort Collins Police Services Facility — Location to be determined Split Facility Analysis Several split facility analyses were explored based on decentralizing into two locations, one location being the PVH property on Harmony Road and the other undetermined but located in the downtown vicinity. The studies included complete, as well as partial Division relocations. After careful consideration of service to the community, it was determined to focus on splitting the Patrol Division into equal strengths at both the Harmony and Downtown sites. • A Patrol, Communications, Property / Evidence and Crime Lab facility of approximately 48,333 gross square feet at the Harmony site and; Fort Collins Police Services • A Patrol, Administrative and Investigations facility of approximately 53,273 gross square feet in the downtown vicinity at an as yet undetermined site Split Facility Detail - Harmony Facility The Harmony Facility is intended to provide Fort Collins Police Services with a Patrol, Property & Evidence, Training and Communications facility. Functions programmed are as follows: • Chief of Police • Patrol Services — Patrol, half of the total Patrol strength will be stationed at the Harmony facility • Centralized Property and Evidence storage • Criminalistics Laboratory • Training Facility (Training Room to have dual use as a Community Room) • Communications / Dispatch (with access to the Training Room as an Emergency Operations Center) Patrol Services functions of Briefing, Patrol lockers, Exercise and Training will be located within the facility. Alternative 2 divides Patrol strength Access to Police records (Records Section of Information Services is proposed to be located in the Downtown facility) The Chief of Police and his Executive Secretary will represent the Administration Division of Police Services. Information Services functions will include a complete Property & Evidence Processing and Storage facility, Crime Laboratory, Communications / Dispatch and a satellite location of Information Systems - Systems for maintenance of Harmony computer systems). The facility is intended to be full service with 24/7 operations. Split Facility Detail - Downtown Facility Functions proposed for the Downtown facility are as follows: • Information Services • Patrol Services — Administration • Patrol Services — Patrol, half of Police Services Patrol strength will be located at the Downtown facility • Patrol Services — Traffic • Patrol Services — Selective Duties Unit • Patrol Services — Problem Oriented Policing • Investigation Services - Commander • Investigation Services - DTF • Investigation Services - Youth School • Investigation Services - Criminal impact Unit • Investigation Services - Person Crimes • Investigation Services - Property Crimes Fort Collins Police Services Information Services at the Downtown facility will include the Information Services Director, a component of the Systems Section and the Records Section. The Records Management System is proposed to be modified to allow for secure electronic transfer of Police records to the Harmony facility. A minimal Property / Evidence processing component will be included at the Downtown facility to provide packaging and secure storing of evidence until it can be deposited at the main storage facility at the Harmony facility. Patrol functions at the Downtown site will include Patrol Administration and command, half of Police Services Patrol strength, a satellite report writing and property preparation (drop-off) facility and all booking and holding components identified in the Single Facility concept. All of Investigations Services are proposed to be located at the Downtown facility. The following tables represent the two facility alternative area requirements and staffing: CURRENT PROJECTED Ij STAFF REQUIRED STAFF EXIST AREA REQUIRED 1 2000 2005 i 2013I 20201 SF 2000 1 2005 12013 2020 Administration j i 5.5 7.5 10.5 13.0 Patrol 46.0 53.0 61.0 70.0 Information Services 36.0 I 44.0 52.5 60.0 Investigative Services 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 o.o Common Facilities 1 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 SUBTOTAL 87.5 104.5 1124.0I 143.0 BUILDING GROSS FACTOR 25% i' I'� STAFF AND GROSS AREA TOTALi j 87.5 104.5I 124.0 i 14331 TABLE 2- Harmony Facility DIVISION Administration Patrol Information Services Investigative Services Common Facilities BUILDING GROSS FACTOR 2,469 3,244I 312441 3,657' 8,591i 9,206 9,562� 9,787I 17,857 12,9571 14,1471 15,5291 of al ai 0; 9,152 9,311 9,502, 9,693i 1 32,0691 34,718 36,455 38,666 8,017 8,679I 9,114 9,6671 _ 40,08 43 397I 45 5191 48 3331 CURRENTI PROJECTED 1! STAFF I REQUIRED STAFF I iFXISTI AREA REQUIRED I I i 2000 SF 200512013 2020I I 2000 1 2005 I 2013 I 2020 7,5 1 10.0 14.0 15.0 65.0 1 73.0 87.0 101.0 26.5 26.5 31.0 35.0 49.0 57.5 69.5 78.5 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 148.0 ! 167.01 201.5 229.5 I_ 1 148.0 167.01 201.51 229 51 I ALILL 3- LJowntOwn Facility Foil Collins Police Services 3 Detail area and staff projection worksheets for a single facility and the two -facility alternative follow. Fort Collins Police Services ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - SUMMARY For ONE FACILITY SECTION ALL SECTIONS CURRENT LOCATION: ALL LOCATIONS I CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF I EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF 2000 12005j 201312020� 2000 2005 2013 2020 I DIVISION i j I Administration 11.0 15.5 22.5 26.0 4,130 5,136 5,911 6,409 Patrol /Commander I Patrol 4.0 4.1) 1 4.0 4.0 1,499 1,499 1,499: 1,499 ' I Patrol / Dist. 1 88.0 1 100.0 1118.0' 137.0, 12,987' 14,348. 15,118' 15,576 Patrol / Traffic 1 SA 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 11.0 j 14.0 21/99 em' 2,285 92Z' 2,199 1,002 2,285 I,lzx Patrol / SDU 6.0 7.0 1 8.0 11.0 I 1,082 1,220 11339. 11771 I Patrol / P.O.P. 1.0 1 1.0 1-0 1.0 1 '', 225 22i' 325 225 information Services /Director Information Services I ems3.5 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 1 358 358 358 758 I information Services / Dispatch arch P 1 27,5 3.5 1 6.0 8.0 31.5 36S 41.0 j 1,141,, 4,051i 1,141 4394 1,400 4,622 1,573. 1Information Services / Records i 1 21.0 24.0 1 28.0 30.0 4,0581 4,288i 4575' 4,695 4,159. information Services / P&E Investigative Services /Commander 6.3 4.0 8.0 1D.D 13.0 I 7,258; 8,093 9,053 10,190 1 Investigative Services / DTF 1 7.0 5.o SA S'D 1 1 6.0 1 10.0 1 12.0 1,0501 1,807j 1,075�, 1,9561 1,075, 1,26T, 1,0]51 2,140. Investigative Services /Youth School 1 ! 10.0 L.0 15.0 17.0 1,208 1,208 1,396' 1,396. Investigative Services / Crim. Impact j 8.5 - 9.5 10.5 1 11.5 1,174 1,260; 1,260'i, 1,260,, t,341, 1,347, Investigative Services / Person Crimesl 'i. 9.0 10.5 1 13.5 15.5 2.09Ti 3,304' 775 Investigative Services /Prop. Crimes 1 9,5 12.5 15.5 17.5 (i 1 2,4311 z,6301 2,8421 3,030 Common Facilities 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 12,588, 12,993j 13577 14,111 SUBTOTAL; 1 229.3 268.01 322.51 371.5 I 59.9411 65,019 69,856 74,219'.. BUILDING GROSS FACTOR 25%j I 1 t4,9851 16,262 17,4641 18,562, STAFF AND GROSS AREA TOTALI : 229.3 266.01322.5 371.5 , I_ _ 74.9261 81.311' SL720' ffi Bll' 1 Area totals do not include District 1 SECTION BY DIVISION CURRENT LOCATION: ALL LOCATIONS !CURRENT'I PRO IREECTED STAFF REQUD STAFF 11 I EXIST' AREA REQUIRED 1 I 5F j 1 2000 2005: 201112020I 1 1 2000 1 2005 I 2013 1 2020 DIVISION 1 Administration j 11.0 1S5 1 225 26.0 I I 4,1301 5,1361 5,911 6,4091 1 Patrol 1 110.0 126A1 148.O, 173.01 1 16,58Bj 18,21{1 19,302i 20,192 Information Services 603 1 69.0 82.5 1 94.0 1 16,866' 18,2]{i 19,769 21,175 Investigative Services I i 48.0 j 57.5 1 69.5 I 78.5 : j 1 9,770' 11,433� 11,397 A, 062 Common Facilities 0.0 0.0 i 0.0 0.0 i I 12,5881 12,993 13,577 14,111I i SUBTOTAL BUILDING GROSS FACTOR 25%1 22925 1 268 1 3225 3715 59,9411 65,049I 69,8s6, 7{,2/9, STAFF AND GROSS AREA TOTAL' 229.3 1 268.0' I 1 14,9851 16,3621 1],{64j 18562: 321.5 371 5 74,92fi 8L31/i 87320' _ 92_8111 STAFFING SWORN & CIVILIAN CURRENT LOCATION: ALL LOCATIONS CURRENT I PROJECTED J STAFF REQUIRED STAFF i 2000 2005I 2013120201 Sworn 142-0' 168,6 207.11 243.5 Civilian 81.3j 100.0 115.5 128.0'. 7OTAL1 I 229251 268 32251 3715I Notes: 1 District 1 area is not included in the total required area for the new facility. Fort Collins Police services 5 rK of ll -\Rai REPORT .4 ., 1` t r Y9: ENTITY: SECTION: CURRENT LOCATION: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 300 LAPORTE !-CURRENT: PROIECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF i i UNITi EXIST. AREA REOUIRED AUTH SF SF 2000 ! 20051 20132020I1 j 2000' 2005, 2013! 20201NOTES I WORK PLACES OFFICES - i Police Chief 1 1 1 1 225 263 1' _0,, 2251 225 225. Deputy Chief Prof. Standards Lt. 0 1 0 j ', 1 1 j 200 0: 200! 200 Exec Staff Proj Mgr. 1 1 1 1 200 1 177 �' 200' 200, 200- 200'. 1 SUIT Psychologist I 7 1 1 7 1 180 1 200 I 123 180! 180'. 180 180 ! I. A. Sergeant 17raining Sergeant 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 150 ' 150 i p 127 150,. 155 0 300 01 450:. 0 450'. Training Officer Budget Coordinator I 1 i 2.5 5.5 7 120 1501 120 150. 660i 150� 660' 300. 840''. Budget Tech 1 0.5 j 1 ! 1 2 i 2 1 I 120 120 116 11201 120, 240. 2401 Legal 0 1 0 7 j 1 150 120 0j 120. 011 1201 1501 120j 150� SUBTOTAL' ! 1 i 1 26511,9551 2,575! 2,9051 ! CIRCULATION j 25 / OFFICES TOTAL i 1: : 8.5 11.51 18.5 21 13161 ! 489! 644' 1 1,581! 2,444! 3,219i 3,631 726 WORK STATIONS � 1 Admin Aide III (Chief's Sec.) I i 160 192 11760, 160i 760!, 160; C/T Training Supply Technician 0.5 0.75 1 7 I 1 2 64 i 321 641 64i 128 Supply /Range Tech ii 0.25 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 64 64 641 641 64 64 Planning Tech 0 0 1 0 O 64 0, 0 DI 0 SUBTOTALf I 2.5 4 4 , 5 I 320I I 1 352� 352 4161 CIRCULATION 35%' I I 1 112' n31 1521 146I WORK STATIONS TO7ALI WORK PLACES TOTAL 11 1 11 I 4321 4751' 4751 562 1 155 122,5 1 26 1. 12,013I 2,91 913169414,193I % INCREASE IN STAFF! ' 1 41% 45% 16% 1 1 SPECIAL AREAS ! 1 1 AREAS Waiting and Reception i� 18j 180I 1801 1801 180 Library / Media 2001 200 2001 200 200- Exec Staff Wk Room ! I 120 120 120120I 120 Volunteer Work Area I 64 I 128 128128� 128 1 I I SUBTOTAL' I 628 6281 628 628 CIRCULATION 25 AREAS TOTALi 220 220 220 220, 848 848 848 848 ROOMS Conference (I I 1 I 480� 5741 480 480 480 480 Files ! I TrainingFiles 8080 120 120 120 1 Copier/Fax/5upplies 801 33 80 1201 120 120 1 1201 282 120 1201 720 120 Coat Closes Rest Rooms 40 15 15 15 15 IA File Storage BO 80 so 801 801 80 Personnel Files 80 80 80 !� 80 80i 80I 80 80 Uniform / Equip. Storage 1 Coffee 5005001 500 500 1' I I 60 60I 60 60 60 SUBTOTAL'' I 11015 11095 1,095 1,095 CIRCULATION 25%i I I I I 1,369 1,369 254I 274, 274 274 ROOMS TOTAL' 1 1 � I 1 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL' ! ! 1,2691,3692,117 2,217 2 21712 217 TOTAL REOD STAFF & �C I 11 1 1 S.5 1 22.3 26 1 4.130' S 13b 1 5 9l l b 4091 SWORN! j 5 1 77,5 I 12.5 15 1 CIVILIAN' i 6 1 8 10 11 Fort Collins Police Services 6 ENTRY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: PATROL COMMANDER CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE 1 CURRENT: PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF UNITi EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF SF 2000 29052013!2020 2000':: 20051 2013, 20201NOTES I WORK PLACES 1 ! OFFICES !Commander 1 1 1 t 200 211 200 200 200 200 Lieutenant 1 1 1 1 180 180 180 180 180, Operations Lt. 1 i 1 1 1 1 150 ! 150: 150 . 150 150' SUBTOTAL',, j 530. 530: 530 530 ! CIRCULATION 25%'. 133'. 133 133 133 OFFICES TOTAL] i 1 WORK STATIONS 3 3 3 1 3 663. 663. 663 663, Admin. Aide I 1 1 1 1 j 80 80, 80 80; 80� Volunteer 1 64 128. 1281 '� 128 I 128'� SUBTOTAL 1 ! t 7 1 1 I ! 208. 2081' 2081 I 208I 1 CIRCULATION 3E% 1 ! ! 731 731 73: 731 ! WORK STATIONS TOTAL, ] 11 ! 281: 2811 2811 2811 WORK PLACES TOTAL i 4 1 4 1 4 4 943 943� 943! 943i 1, % INCREASE IN STAFF' ii 0% 0% 0% : I SPECIAL AREAS I 1 1 AREAS Coffee 1 I ] 601 60 60 601 60� Copy Fax / SuPPIY 1 120I 1201 120i 1201 120 SUBTOTAL- _ I iBOI 180 1801 180 CIRCULATIONN 25561 AREAS TOTAL ] I 1 I 63 63j 31 31 I 243' 2431 243 243 ROOMS 1 j ii Conference Room 250 2501 250 2501 250 SUBTOTAL] I I I1 250� Z501 2501 2501 1 CIRCULATION 25%1 1 I ] 63;. 631 63' 631 ROOMS TOTAL: I I j t 313] 3131 313� 3131 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL! I I 556 5565561 5561 TOTAL REOD STAFF S ASFi 4 4 4 ! 4 I I 1,49911,49911 49 111 4991 NOTES: SWORN I 3 3 3 3 CIVILIAN] ! 1 1 1 I 1 s Fort Collins Police Services 7 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: DISTRICT 1 CURRENT LOCATION: OLD TOWN SQUARE I CURRENT PROJECTED STAFF -' REQUIRED STAFF 1 UNIT', EXIST AREA REQUIRED AUTH SF SF 2000 2005 120132020' 2000: 2005: 2013 -. 20201 NOTES I WORK PLACES i OFFICES Sergeant 1 1 t 1 120 -; 120, 120' 120: 120 .'. SUB7OTAL!I li 1 120' 120, 120 120' CIRCULATION 25%: j 1 1 30' 30: 30' 30' ! OFFICES TOTAL[ 1 1 1 l l 1 150 I WORK STATIONS 150i 150 1501 ClT Officer 0 1 1 1 l 64 4 4 1 1 0 64: 01 1 64', 4 4 87 87. BT 87; 87, SUBTOTAL[,[ 4 1 5 1 5 5 II 1 1 D I 64I ' 0 641 CIRCULATION 35%j 01 221 01 221 WORK STATIONS TOTAL; j 01 86 0! 86 t WORK PLACES TOTAL[ 5 6 6 6 I 150� 236 1501 236I % INCREASE IN STAFF, ! 20% 0 % 05. 1 SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Open Office CIRCULATION AREAS T I ROOMS 1 Community Room 347 347 347 347 Bicycle Storage 320 320 320, 320 SUBTOTAL. :� 667 667i 6671 667 CIRCULATION 25%! 167 167 167 167 ROOMS TOTAL[ 1 834 8341 8341 8341 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL[ j ! 2.049 2.049I 2 049! 2.0491 TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASFi 5 i 6 1 6 6 1 j 1 12,1991 2 2851 2 1991 2 285 NOTES: 1 SWORN[ 5 1 5 5 5 1 CIVILIANI j 0 1 1 l 1 Staff counts are included in staffing and projections. Area is not included in building requirements. Fort Collins Police Services 8 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: PATROL CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE I CURRENT, . PROIECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF ! UNIT! EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF SF 2000 1 2005 2013 •, 2020. ' 1 2000: 20051 20131 2020' NOTES I WORK PLACES '.. OFFICES Lieutenant ! 3 3 3 3 180 ! 540, 5401 540: 540 Crime Analyst 2 2 2 2 150 1 110 300 300: 300 300 I R&D Manager 1 1 1 1 j 1 150 ' 150 150, 150. 150. SUBTOTAL',,, CIRCULATION 25%1 1 ! 990� 990 990 990.. OFFICES TOTAL'! 6 j 6 6 6 248. 1,238 2484. 248 7,238' 1,238•. 1,238: 248: I WORK STATIONS I Sergeant 7 �'I 11 ! 13 1.5 80 560! j 1 Early Week DAY SHIFT Officers I 880; 1,040I 1,200' 10 11 14 17 0 I ! OI 0' 0, 0! CSO 2 i 2 1 2 2 O OI OI 0 0 Late Week DAY SHIFT ! 1 j IOffccers 10 11 14 76 CSO 2 1 2 2 2 EARLY WEEK SWING SHIFT Officers � � 10 i 11 I 14 16 � O i Oi 0,, 0• OI C5O > 2 2 2 ! 0 0:! Oi OI 0, EARLY WEEK MIDNIGHT SHIFT I I 1 I Officers 9 10 1 12 ! 15 0 0� ; 01 01 01 C5O ' 0 0 0 1 0 0� 01 01 D! Oi I LATE WEEK SWING SHIFT ! 1 Officers 13 15 17 20 0 1 0� 0� D1 01 C5O 2 2 1 ''-i 2i 0i OI OI Oi Oi LATE WEEK MIDNIGHT SHIFT I I Officers 9 10 ! 11 1 CSO 0 I 0 j 13 0 ! O 0; OI 01 0 I POWER SHIFT 0 0 1 0, 0 OI 0' Officers 6 7 9 I B2 SUBTOTAL 94 112 131 I 1 1 560, I 88011,04011,200 CIRCULATION 35%I I I 7961 3081 3641 420 WORK STATIONS TOTAL WORK PLACES TOTALI 88 100 I 118 137 I 1,316 I2,5541 2,0681 2,444! 2,8201 I : 3,306! 3,682j 4,058 % INCREASE IN STAFF,' 1 74% 78% lb% SPECIAL AREAS I AREAS Palrol Reception I I 18 144 144 144• 1441 Report Writing Evidence Preparation ; I 28 280 318� 375 436� Case File Layout 150 250 150I 250 ISO 250 I50 250 ISO File Storage Coffee 11 i 1 150 150, 170I 170i 170 120! 1201 120! 1201 120 SUBTOTAL! ! ! ! I 950' 1,009I 1,066I 1,126 CIRCULATION 25°IeI AREAS TOTAL' j 1 i ! {{II 1 ! 3331 1,283j 353� 1,362I 373I 1,4391 394 1,527 ROOMS Interview Room Soft Interview Room Suspect Interview hive. Interview I 1001 2001 2 150I 1501 1 Fort Collins Police Services g I Roll Call 18 367. 738 839 900 900 1 FTO Training Room 120- 720 720 120 120 l Conterence 200 0 0 0 0 !Sergeants Conference 100 100 10G 100 100 I Equipment Distribution 200 200 200 200 200 I Swat Storage :. 400 25 400 400 400 400 1 Armory 150 0. 0 0 0 Training ! 600, 57411,700: 1,70011,700 1,700 !Training Room EOC Components ! 216 216 276 216' 1 Bicycle Storage ! - 350: 350; 350 350 350 I Sally Pon ! 11,100 1,10011,100 1,100, 11100 1 Suspect Processing 150' - 300. 300 300. 300 I Booking 250 372. 250 250. 250 250 1Prisoner Property ji 25 1 25 25! 25 25' Ilw. Prisoner Property ! 25' 25 25, 25 25. Bio- Haz. Clean up ! 801 80: 160' 160' 160' !Intox ! ! 60, 60'. 68. 120. 120', 1 DR Room I 60. 60. 60 60, 60! ! Adult Holding Cells I'' 70: 50' 280 420, 560. 560 I luvenile Holding Cells ! 70; 280; 280. 280: 280, Saiety, Cell 70. 70I 70' 70 : 70 I First Aid Line Up ! : 601 60 60. 60i 60'. 252, ! 252. 2521 252 2521 SUBTOTAL;! iI 1 7,316 7 745: 7,998, 7 998 CIRCULATION 25°i I ' 1 1,829 1,936: 2,000, 2,000 ROOMS TOTALS1 9,145r 9,681Y 9998 9998, ! SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL' 10,428 11,043 11 436 11,518' I_ TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASF { BB '. 100 ' 118 ' 737 . 112,981 14.3I8 li,t 18 13Sf6' NOTES: SWORNI 77 ! 89 107 - 726 C1=Ni 11 I 11 11 11 Fort Collins Police Services 10 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: TRAFFIC UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE - ICURRENT. PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF ' UNITI EXISTS AREA REQUIRED '..I SF SF 1 2000 200512013'2020! 200W 200512013' 2020I NOTES I WORK PLACES OFFICES 1 Sergeant 2 150 1 150' 150i 150 216' SUBTOTAL! 1 ! 150 150' 150. 216' CIRCULATION 25% 38 381 38 54, OFFICES TOTAL 1 1 1 2 188, 188 1813i 270. I WORK STATIONS Officers 3 I 5 j 8 1 10 0 0 0' 01 0 DUI Officer 2 2 2 2 0 0. 0• 0 0 SUBTOTAL! 5 7 10 ! 12 ! 0 0j 0! 0.,, CIRCULATION 35%1 WORK STATIONS TOTAL ; OI O pl Oj pj i 1 O 01 0' WORK PLACES TOTAL 6 8 11 14 188 188` 1881� 270 % INCREASE IN STAFF 33 % 38 % 27% , 1 SPECIAL AREAS AREAS Work Stations ROOMS Traffic Storage Conference CIRCULATION AREAS T4 CIRCULATION ROOMS T 1 1 281 84i 112 1401 16E i 84' 1121 140 16E 29 39j 49 5S 1131 151 189' 227 200 20011 267I 300 30C 200 2001 2001 200 20C 4001 467 SOOT 500 100! 1171 125' 125 I 5001 5831 6251 625 TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASFI 6 8 71 14 1 8011 922t 1 0021 1 1221 NOTES: I SWORNI 6 0 1 11 1 14 1 1 CIVILIAN; 0 0 1 o I 0 Fort Collins Police Services I 1 ENTRY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: SELECTIVE DUTIES UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE I CURRENT PROTECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF i UNITI EXIST- AREA REOUIRED I'. SF 1 SF 2000:' 20051 2013' 2020' j 20001 20051 20131 20201NOTES 1 WORK PLACES OFFICES I Sergeant 1 1 1 i 2 i! 150 90 150 150. 150 216. SUBTOTALS 150' 150'. 150. 216' CIRCULATION 259% 38 38. 38 54. OFFICES TOTAL. 11 1 j 1 ; 1 1 2 ! 788 188 188' 270' I WORK STATIONS ' "' j Intern Work Stations SUBTOTAL CIRCULATION 35% WORK STATIONS TOTAL WORK PLACES TOTAL % INCREASE IN STAFF I 1 0 5 I 6 I j iU j 0 6 7 17% 1 / 1 t, 1 0 O 7 9 II l 8 11 1 14% I 38 C4 64 3LU. Sr14'l. 448 576. 64, 64 64 64. i 320 3841 448 576; 112 1341 757 202 I 432 518, 605 778. 620, 706,E 792; 1,0481 t SPECIAL AREAS ' I AREAS SUBTOTAL ( i 01 0, 01 0 CIRCULATION 25% I 0�1 Oi Oi 0 ! AREAS TOTALi 01 0:! 0, 0� ROOMS I Crime Prev. Storage 1001 1 1001 117 133;' 183 1SDU Stoc Copier/fax/ Supplies 150' 112' 110' 171 200i 2751 I 7201 120 120 120I 720 5UBTOTAL I 370• 412i 453! 5781 CIRCULATION 25% i ! 93; 1031 113I 145 ROOMS TOTAL i I I 463j 575; 567 723 SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL I_ - 1 .1 1 4631 5151 5671 723 I TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASFI 6 7 H 71 1 1 1.0821 1220� 135911 7711 NOTES: $WORN! 6 7 j 8 i 77 CIVILIANI I 0 0! 0 0 Fort Collins Police Services 12 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - PATROL SERVICES SECTION: P.O.P. UNIT CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE I CURRENT: PROJECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF - I UNIT! EXIST, AREA REQUIRED SF SF 2000 5 2005I 20131 2020i ; i 2000'. 20051 2013! 2020NOTES I WORK PLACES I OFFICES' _ I Lieutenant 1 1 7 1 180 ','. 180'. 180 180 180 SUBTOTAL, 180 180 180. 180' CIRCULATION 25%I !'. 45:, 45 451 45'' OFFICES TOTAL, I 225: 225''. 225; 225' I WORK STATIONS SUBTOTAL, 0 0 0 0 : 01 0' Q 0, CIRCULATION 35%' 01 0 0' 0, WORK STATIONS TOTALI q! ! 0; 0; 0 0 WORK PLACES TOTAL, , 1 l 1 1 1 2251 225 225 225; i % INCREASE IN STAFF, I 0% i 0 % 0".6 1 I SPECIAL AREAS 1 I AREAS 1 1 SUBTOTAL j 0� 0 0. 0. CIRCULATION 25%i I , i . o': p, AREAS TOTAL 1 pi p! pl 0i I ROOMS I 1 Conference ' 1 2001 ! 0'1 01 0 0 SUBTOTAL] 0! 0: 0i 0 CIRCULATION 25%1 1 1 Oj 0, 01 O) ROOMS TOTAL! 1 TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASF1 F 1 1 i 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 2251 225i 225i 225 NOTES: ' SWORN, 1 I 1 1 1 1 CIVILIAN! 0 0 1 0 0 Fort Collins Police Services 13 ENTITY: SECTION: CURRENT LOCATION: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES DIRECTOR 300 LAPORTE CURRENT. PROTECTED STAFF REQUIRED STAFF UNITi EXIST AREA REQUIRED SF ': SF 2000 2005! 2013! 20201 120001 2003'. 2013 20201NOTES 1 WORK PLACES I OFFICES I Director SUBTOTAL!, CIRCULATION 25%j OFFICES TOTAL' 1 1 1 ! 1 1 WORK STATIONS ;Admin. Asst. 1 I 1 1 1 � i SUBTOTAL: . 1 1 1 1 CIRCULATION 35%1 j WORK STATIONS TOTAL, i WORK PLACES TOTAL; 2 1 2 2 2 % INCREASE IN STAFF! ! I SPECIAL AREAS IAREAS 200 200 200, 200 200 •, 200, 200, 200. 200'. 50: 50, 50 50. 250, 250. 250, 250., 80 80', j 80. 80 80. 80. 80 80. 80 28 28 28. 28' 108' 108 IDS '. 108' 3581 3581 3S8'. 358 i i I i i SUBTOTALI 1 j ! 0� 01 0! 0� ! CIRCULATION 25%i ; i I 1 0! 0' 0; O AREAS TOTAL I , 0. O 0j pI I ROOMS I SUBTOTAL j ! i 0, 01 0 0 : CIRCULATION 255 ! 0 0 0 of ' ROOMS TOTAti ! O O 0' 0! SPECIAL AREAS TOTAL ! 0 0' 0; 01 TOTAL REDD STAFF & ASFI 2 2 2 2 358' 358' 3581 358 NOTES: SWORN! 0 i 0 0 1 o CIVILIAN'r 2 2 2 2 Fort Collins Police Services 14 ENTITY: FORT COLLINS POLICE SERVICES - INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION: SYSTEMS CURRENT LOCATION: 300 LAPORTE CURRENT, PROJECTED STAFF REOUIRED STAFF: I UNITi EXIST AREA REQUIRED '. SF � SF 2000 20051 2013 2020' f 2000! 2005 2013 20201NOTES I WORK PLACES 1 I OFFICES SUBTOTAL! ! 0- 0 0 0 CIRCULATION 25 %I 0' 0' 0 0 OFFICES TOTAL ! 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0. WORK STATIONS ! Volunteers ! : 0 0 0 0 64 64, 641 128 128. Systems Manager i 1 1 ! 1 1 1 j 8D 80 BO 80; 80' j Svstems Analyse 1 1 2 4 64 64I 64. 128i 256.' Computer Maintenance Spec. j 1 1 1 1 64 ! 64 64! 64. 64, CAD Project Mgr. ! 0.5 j 0.5 1 1 I 64 ! 64: 641 641 64 Radio Tech 0 0 1 1 1 64 1 i 0' 0' 64'� 64' SUBTOTAU 3.5 i 3.5 6 8 j 3361 3361 528, 6561 CIRCULATION 35 % 1 i j WORK STATIONS TOTAL!, j ! 118 118! 454! 434'. 185; 7131 230 886! WORK PLACES TOTAL: 3.5 1 3.5 1 6 B 1 ! 454! 454' 7131 886� % INCREASE IN STAFF!, 1 0 % 71% 1 33% j ! 1 SPECIAL AREAS AREAS i1 li I SUBTOTAL:: CIRCULATION 25%1 1 AREAS TOTALI ! ROOMS Computer Room Computer Storage I Receiving SUBTOT CIRCULATION 2! ROOMS TOT j TOTAL REOD STAFF & ASF1 3.5 3.5 6 8 1 i 1.141! 1.141 1 1 400I 1 5731 NOTES: SWORN i 0 O O O ! CIVILIAN! 3.5 ! 3 5 b 8 Fort Collins Police Services 75