Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESPONSE - RFP - P 831April 29, 2002 PROJECT EXPERIENCE Northern Colorado Community Separator Study Northam Colorado Client: City of Greeley acting on behalf of 6 other local govemments • Multi -jurisdictional client This region's thriving economy and attractive setting have drawn many new • Study recommendations adopted by people to the area and resulted in a dramatic increase in the amount of all participants urbanized area. If recent development patterns persist, the communities in the region will eventually merge into an extended metropolitan area with no • Identified regional priority protection apparent boundaries or separations between them. EDAW worked with these areas communities to identify the locations and types of buffers needed to maintain • Public survey using simulation of community separation. An important step in this process was a public survey. growth scenanos The survey used numerous photo simulations and other graphic techniques to • Planning Award, Colorado Chapter prompt responses regarding the size and character of community separators. American Planning Association Does an effective separator require that little or no development occurs or is it possible that certain types of development are compatible with the goals of maintaining community separation? These and other questions were addressed. Most communities in Northern Colorado have recently adopted comprehensive plans and other types of plans that indicate where and what type of development is anticipated in the foreseeable future. This information, along with available mapping on floodplains and other constraints to development, was used to reveal where development can reasonably be anticipated within the region. Those locations where a buffer is desired but development is likely will become priorities for further action. Through cooperative efforts and the utilization of solutions that were fair and acceptable to landowners, EDAW worked with these communities to develop a plan designed to maintain appropriate separators. The project received an award from the Colorado Chapter of the American Planning Association. l DAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Santa Rosa/ Rohnert Park Community Separator Preservation Plan Sonoma County, California Client: Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District A plan to preserve 4,300 acres of "community separator' lands -agricultural and open space lands located between the rapidly developing cities of Santa Rosa and Rohnert Park. Sonoma County designates one -quarter percent of their sales tax to be used for acquisition of agricultural and open space land. The majority of this funding is currently used to purchase conservation easements to protect agricultural and open space uses. The intent of the plan is to identify ways to maximize the acquisition dollars while preserving the critical resources of the area. The project involves identi- fying areas of natural, scenic, agricultural and open space value, and defining critical areas which must be preserved in order to preserve the open space / agricultural separator. Issues include vernal pools, preservation of views, potential recreation use, and biological issues. Implementation methods, cost and phasing will be developed as part of the preservation plan. A landowner outreach program, including workshops and newsletters, is part of the project. KDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Ir r rtrrnr—r—�� ' kkk '1 St. Louis Downtown Core and Riverfront District Master Plan St. Louis, Missouri Client: St. Louis Development Corporation EDAW was lead consultant on a Development Action Plan for the revitalization of the St. Louis Downtown Core and Riverfront District. The team's goal was to recapture some of the City's success for Downtown living, working and entertainment. The plan identified specific catalyst projects, some that began construction before the planning process was complete. The process began with a market analysis that showed a demand for housing, retail and office space within the 180 block core study area, as well as for the surrounding downtown environs. The design component of the process identified four visions for downtown: A 24-Hour, 7 Day a Week Environment; an Entertainment and Tourism Center for the Region; an Education and Technology Continuum; and Creating Streets for People. Our team used the market data and the visions to identify four priority project areas and one priority program for implimentation. The project areas focus on development of a residential neighborhood on underutilized lands on the riverfront; development of a historic loft district for niche retail and residential; development of a true urban square within the heart of the downtown; and improvements to the Jefferson Memorial Arch Grounds and Gateway Mall to better connect downtown with the river's edge. Finally, a'Streets for People' program identified a kit -of -parts for specific pedestrian and retail streets. Other primary components of the process include: creating a transportation strategy for the downtown that addresses proposed interstate changes; an intensive public and advisory involvement process with bi-weekly meetings and five public workshops; and identification of a detailed implementation strategy to make the planning efforts become a reality. The entire planning process covered a 16 month time frame. EDAIN INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Stapleton Airport Site Redevelopment Stapleton Design Guidelines Neighborhood Design Guidelines Denver, Colorado • Setting standards for neighborhoods, Client. Forest City Development architectural and landscape design EDAW created a design book for use by builders and the Design Review • Historic, traditional mixed use and turn Committee to set standards for neighborhood, architectural and landscape of the century neighborhood design design. EDAW also provided conceptual parks and streetscape design for accommodating the needs of a twenty Phase I development. first century community Stapleton neighborhoods are being designed in the tradition of historic Denver through its mixed use design, tree -lined streets, generous parks and gracious homes. Turn of the century neighborhoods such as Park Hill, Hilltop and Washington Park embody the principles for neighborhood design at Stapleton. These places are admired today for their strong character, quality of architecture and humanly -scaled streetscapes. Although these neighborhoods were typically built over a long period of time, the mix of styles share common elements such as simple building forms, quality materials, appropriate massing and proportion, and garageless streetscapes. Inspired by this local palette of landscape and architecture, the Stapleton neighborhoods will form their own special character while accommodating the needs of a twenty-first century community. EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Metro Wastewater Utilities Master Plan Denver, Colorado Client: Metro Wastewater Reclamation District EDAW in conjunction with Carollo Engineers, is developing the service area utility plan for Metro Wastewater Reclamation District. The study covers the Denver region and will center on the development of a user-friendly decision - making information system. EDAW will develop an interactive GIS database that uses local land use plans and TAZ information to generate demand spatially and in a tabular format. The model will allow the user to look at demographic information on a map or in tabular format. The system will also allow the user to query various subareas. The spatial database will link directly to a hydraulic model, flow and load projection model, and H2S predictive model. KDAIN INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Traditional Deveopment Pattern Preferred Cluster Development Pattem %rindaor, Colorado Caatpnhmaivc Plm Updatr a� Comprrh� Plan Windsor Comprehensive Plan Update Windsor, Colorado Client: Town of Windsor The Town of Windsor's growth rate has surpassed 9% for the last several years necessitating an update of their comprehensive plan. EDAW's approach included a review of existing policies based on lessons learned from the last several years. New additions included a housing chapter as well as additional land use, cultural, transportation, utilities, parks, recreation and natural resource policies. The plan encourages new urban forms ranging from clustering to mixed -use development nodes. The resulting land use map captures these new forms illustrating increased densities surrounding the Town's urban center. EDAW INC DESIGN. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Inventory conducted of natural, historic and cultural resources • Policies presented for relating to natural resources, open space and natural hazards • GIS mapping and analysis provided for existingtfuture land use and environmental resources Laramie County Comprehensive Plan Laramie County, Wyoming Client: Laramie County, Wyoming To guide growth and development of 2,686 square miles in southeast Wyoming, EDAW is working with the Laramie County to create a comprehensive plan. This plan will direct the development of the communities in the area for the next 20 years based on their future needs. Incorporating existing plans, directing growth toward existing communities, encouraging economic growth, providing efficient facilities and protecting natural resources are issues that the plan will address. The GIS analysis provided will include a number of future land use scenarios. EDAW will also assess existing natural resources and develop strategies for their protection. The plan will specifically address the Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse, the Butterfly Plant, the Swift Fox and the Mountain Plover. EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE PROJECT EXPERIENCE � NW GKL J, i �d p �C I I oRRan.Yae: L�MSbNN,i I Le e � �i. Corinth Gateway Community Downtown Plan Corinth, MS Client: The Alllanee The purpose of Gateway Community Study is to create a successful plan for downtown that will both sustain/create the character of the community that is desired by residents of Corinth, while providing for the estimated 250,000 visitors per year to the community after the opening of the National Park Service's Civil War Interpretive Center in 2004. Many gateway communities to National Park Service sites often find themselves overwhelmed by the influx of visitors, with no forethought and planning to direct additional activity while conserving the sense of place that makes the community so special. This study primarily focused on Downtown Corinth, to observe traffic patterns, parking habits, current land uses, the character of the built environment, and connections to the Interpretive Center. Secondarily, entry corridors into Downtown from the primary highways and surrounding tourist sites were reviewed to identify the best entries, to identify opportunities and constraints within each of these corridors, and to recommend physical and policy changes that will identify appropriate character and uses for the corridors. Finally, the surrounding outlying communities were reviewed for opportunities for tourism related activities. Initial recommendations identified three core districts within Downtown: A Cultural District, a Retail District, and an Arts and Entertainment District. Policy, physical and strategically phased recommendations will be identified for each Downtown District, as well as the gateway corridor district and for the outlying communities. EDAIN INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Developed future land use map of north Front Range region • GIS water forecasting tool • GIS database allows identification of existing and future land use for any period in the next 40 years. NCWCD Water Demand Study Northam Colorado Client: Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District As municipalities continue to grow in northeastern Colorado, so does the need for water. The ever-increasing water demand will be met through the transfer of existing water rights and the development of new water supplies. The Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) decided to meet the challenge of growing communities along the Front Range through a regional assessment of present and future water demands. EDAW, the prime contractor, prepared existing and future land use components of a fully interactive GIS water forecasting tool. EDAW created a seamless GIS layer depicting future growth as envisioned by land use plans and demographic projections provided by 45 municipalities and counties. The existing land use GIS layer was developed through the classification of Landsat TM and IR51-C satellite imagery. The result was a GIS database that allowed the user to identify the existing and future land use in the study area for any period in the next 40 years. As a separate task, EDAW helped prepare water use factors for different regions in the study area. The water use factors, along with information on time horizons, residential densities and composition, were linked to the various land use classifications in the GIS database. The resulting GIS model will assist the NCWCD in developing long-term water management policies. ■DRW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE FIRM CAPABILITY EDAW References Stapleton Design Book Denise Gammon, Vice President of Development Forest City Stapleton Inc. 1401 17" Street, Suite 510 Denver, CO 80202 303-382-1800 McCarran International Airport Land Use and Disposal Plan Mr. Dennis Mewshaw, Principal Planner Dept. of Aviation P.O. Box 11005 Las Vegas, 89111-1005 702-261-5072 Windsor Comprehensive Plan Update Joe Plummer Planning Director Town of Windsor 301 Walnut Street Windsor, Colorado 80550 970-686-7476 Metro Wastewater Service Area Utility Plan Bob Neal Metro Wastewater Reclamation District 6450 York St. Denver, CO 80229-7499 303-286-3000 EDAW IRC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE EDAW INC 240 EAST MOUNTAIN AVENUE April 29, 2002 FORT COLLINS COLORADO Mr. James B. O'Neill II, CPPO, FNIGP 80824 Director of Purchasing and Risk Management City of Fort Collins- 215 North Mason Street, 2ntl Floor Fort Collins, CO 80524 TEL 970 484 6073 FAX 970 484 8818 Re: Proposal No. P-831, City Plan (Comprehensive Plan) Update www.odaw.com Dear Mr. O'Neill and Members of the Review and Selection Committee: On behalf of the EDAW team of consultants we are pleased to submit the attached proposal to assist the City staff in the update of City Plan and to coordinate with you on the development of the Transportation Master Plan. As many of the review and selection members may know, EDAW has worked with the City of Fort Collins as a locally based, national firm and we have been privileged to serve the people of Fort Collins on a variety of planning and design projects. This association with the City of Fort Collins and its citizens is a relationship that we, as a firm, have cherished and are very grateful for. We see, in the update of City Plan, a unique opportunity to apply our past experience and understanding of Fort Collins to this important assignment, and to assist the City and its residents in answering the question "What type of community does Fort Collins want to be in the next 20 to 50 years?" As the City Council, City staff and many other key leaders in the community view the update of City Plan, there are several key issues that the selected consultant team should address. • Demonstrated Project Continuity and Knowledge of City Plan and its "lessons learned" over the past 5 years, combined with an understanding that the 'Project is an update and not a fundamental restructuring of the City's Comprehensive Plan. • Knowledge and Understanding of Fort Collin's regional context and established relationships with neighboring communities and Larimer County. • Ability to evaluate multiple objectives and find a forum for consent on the critical issues such as density, growth boundaries, transportation corridors, transportation planning, and the plan review process, among others. • Experience in mixed -use development, multi -modal transportation system development, and good urbanism that creates memorable and environmentally and socially 1 asponsible places. • Internal capabilities to conduct public information and communications throughout the process in a variety of public workshops and media. • Passion and dedication to providing the people of City of Fort Collins with UNITED STATES exceptional regional planning, economic planning, comprehensive city planning, transportation/land use planning and urban design services. EUROPE AUSTRALIA ASIA DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE C L A R 1 O N Clarion Associates is a national land -use consulting firm with offices in Fort Collins, Denver, and Snowmass Village in Colorado, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, and affiliate offices in Chicago, Philadelphia and Cincinnati. No firm in the country can match the combination of community planning, land use law, and real estate economics experience of its principals with both public and private sector clients. Clarion principals have worked nationally for a variety of clients including government agencies, municipalities and counties, regional planning agencies, financial institutions, developers, corporations, partnerships, law firms, architects, and not -for -profit organizations. Our unusual combination of talents allows us to develop creative solutions to difficult land use questions. Clarion is particularly known for its expertise in land use and plan implementation. Its principals have written comprehensive plans and drafted ordinances and regulations throughout the United States, with particular emphasis on comprehensive plans, regional plans, growth management strategies, development regulations, design standards, natural resource protection, adequate public facilities programs, and both downtown and suburban zoning systems. Clarion has considerable expertise in working with community and county governments on planning projects and assignments requiring regional cooperation. This experience will be invaluable in the development of the City Plan update. Clarion is particularly adept at working on projects as a team player where more than one community's culture, needs and sensitivities must be met. Clarion Associates offers excellent computer capabilities in spatial data analysis, mapping, and alternatives comparisons. We maintain leading edge skills in graphic design and web -based technology, and are proud of the high quality products we provide our clients. All of our Planning efforts are conducted using GIS technology (ESRI Platform). We also utilize CommunityViz, an ArcView extension, for alternatives development and analysis. Clarion Associates Arapahoe County, Colorado Comprehensive Plan Arapahoe County retained Clarion Associates to prepare a comprehensive plan update for this 806 square mile county located southeast of Denver. The main planning challenge was to define appropriate policies for the County, recognizing the significant differences between the urban, western portion of the county, and the rural, eastern areas and small communities. The adopted plan includes policies to address growth management, housing, economic development, public facilities, fiscal impacts and conservation. Clarion coordinated an extensive public process, including three advisory committees and numerous public workshops. Clarion has alsc been retained to implement the Plan, and is currently conducting an extensive diagnosis of the County's development regulations. Once complete, we will be preparing revisions to their regulations in an updated, unified format. Reference Sue Conaway, Planning Manager Arapahoe County (720) 874-6655 Southern Nevada Regional Plan, Las Vegas, NV Clarion Associates was retained to lead a team to produce a regional plan and growth management strategy for the Las Vegas Valley, the fastest growing region in the nation. Mandated by the state legislature, the regional plan addresses transportation, land use, air quality, infill development, and public services and infrastructure. Working closely with the Regional Planning Coalition, made up of elected officials of the five jurisdictions in the Las Vegas Valley, Clarion Associates crafted a plan that focuses on implementation because all local government plans must conform, by state law, to the regional plan. The team also defined a process to review developments of regional significance, also a feature of the state legislation. Clarion is currently in the process of overseeing compliance review for all of the plans and development ordinances of the local governments within the plan area. Reference Mary Kay Peck, Director of Community Development City of Henderson (702) 565-2474 City of Fort Collins Comprehensive Plan Ben Herman, now a principal of Clarion Associates, was responsible for leading a consulting team that included Calthorpe Associates and Clarion Associates, that prepared a new comprehensive plan and implementation strategy for this fast-growing university community. "City Plan" was a landmark project for Fort Collins for several reasons. Although Fort Collins was known for its innovative approaches to planning, the city had never completed a unified Comprehensive Plan. Prepared over the years as a series of separate elements, the city's Comprehensive Plan consisted of at least 12-15 separate documents. Additionally, Fort Collins had never prepared a Comprehensive Plan Land Use map, but rather had relied on policies and a performance -based approvals system (the Land Development Guidance System). The new City Plan approach, which was adopted unanimously by the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council, consists of a set of goals, principles and policies, and a City Structure Plan that organizes the city's planning area into four basic types of places: Neighborhoods, Districts, Corridors, and Edges. In support of the new direction taken by the plan, Clarion Associates drafted an innovative new zoning code that completely revamped the city's noted Land Development Guidance System and implemented the city plan. Clarion Associates Reference Joe Frank, Director of Advance Planning Fort Collins, Colorado (970) 221-6752 1-25 Corridor Plan, Northern Colorado Communities Clarion Associates prepared a regional corridor plan for 32 miles of Interstate 25, through Northern Colorado. The study process included the participation of 6 municipalities, 2 counties, the Regional Transportation and Air Quality Council, and the Colorado Department of Highways. The study focused on development of three key areas: (1)a set of unified design standards, (2) a conceptual transportation plan, and (3) policies and standards for natural areas and open lands conservation. The project team developed three alternative visions to help participants visualize what the Corridor could look like in the future and determine where community preferences lay. The team responded to the issues identified early on, asking questions such as: If current development patterns were not desirable, then where should development occur? If, tilt -up, concrete panelized structures were not desirable, what characteristics should new construction have? Would agriculture remain a viable use in the Corridor in the long-term? What types of transportation system would best serve future development patterns? Each of these questions, among others, was thoroughly evaluated during this process. During the visioning process, Corridor Design Principles were developed. Each principle represents a broad goal to be addressed by the plan and the accompanying design standards, to achieve the Preferred Vision. These principles were fine-tuned and supplemented throughout the planning process as various issues arose and the Vision became increasingly clear. These principles included: ♦ Establish a range of development types and intensities within the Corridor. Focus urban levels of development within compact "activity centers". - ♦ Coordinate local and regional transportation investments to increase future mobility and mode choices within the Corridor. ♦ Preserve natural areas, open lands, and views that contribute to the open character of the Corridor. ♦ Maximize long-term property values and community benefits within the Corridor by improving the overall quality and functionality of development. Reference Joe Frank, Director of Advance Planning Fort Collins, Colorado (970) 221-6752 Wake County Comprehensive Growth Management Strategy Clarion Associates is leading a multi -disciplinary team to create a comprehensive Growth Management Strategy for Wake County, North Carolina, which has experienced significant and unprecedented economic development and population growth since 1990. While this growth has brought significant benefits, Wake County is bracing for at least 500,000 new residents anticipated to flow into the region over the next 20 years. In an innovative, intergovernmental approach, Clarion Associates is working closely with a 42-member task force, consisting of representatives from the County, the school district and twelve municipalities. This planning process, which is not legislatively mandated, is focusing on growth concerns in seven areas: community character, cost of growth, water/sewer, schools, transportation, open space, and land development standards. Reference Britt Stoddard, Wake County Planning Department Clarion Associates (919) 856-2641 The Cosh of Sprawl in Pennsylvania Even while Pennsylvania and its largest metropolitan areas continue to lose population, many parts of the Keystone State are struggling with issues related to unmanaged suburban and rural growth, particularly the loss of agricultural and other sensitive lands and habitats, the abandonment of many older urban cores, and threats to historic and cultural resources. In response to increasing citizen concerns, a consortium of non-profit organizations -with 10,000 Friends of Pennsylvania in the lead -retained Clarion Associates to conduct an analysis of the costs of growth in Pennsylvania. Given a project with limited funding, Clarion Associates first conducted an in-depth analysis of national and state literature on the subjects of sprawl and costs of growth to distill findings that would be equally applicable to the State of Pennsylvania. Working closely with a statewide advisory committee, Clarion then organized and conducted six case studies around the state. Each case study grouping consisted of an older core city, an inner -ring suburb, and a relatively fast-growing outer suburb. Clarion gathered data from these case studies and used the information to formulate a final report on the various costs of growth in Pennsylvania, including public infrastructure costs, transportation costs, land costs, social costs, and economic costs. The client planned to use this report to bolster arguments in favor of coordinated and comprehensive state, regional, and local legislative and policy responses to the issues of growth. Reference Joanne Denworth, 10,000 Friends of Pennsylvania (215) 568-2225 Clarion Associates ABOUT ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS The Firm Economic & Planning Systems is a land economics consulting firm experienced in the full spectrum of services related to real estate development, the financing of government services and public infrastructure, land use and conservation planning, and government organization. Guiding Principle EPS was founded on the principle that real estate development and land use -related public policy should be built upon realistic assessment of market forces and economic trends, feasible implementation measures, and recognition of public policy objectives, including provisions for required public facilities and services. Areas of Expertise Real Estate Market and Feasibility Analysis Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis Public Finance Urban Revitalization and Redevelopment Real Estate Reuse and Disposition Regional Economics and Industry Analysis Land Use and Conservation Planning Government Organization Information Systems Clients Served Since 1983, EPS has provided consulting services to hundreds of public and private sector clients throughout the United States. Clients include cities, counties, special districts, multi - jurisdictional authorities, property owners, developers, financial institutions, and land use attorneys. Staff Capabilities Each of the firm's principals has over twenty years of professional experience providing a broad range of economics consulting services. The professional staff includes specialists in public finance, real estate development, land use and transportation planning, government organization, and computer applications. The firm excels in preparing concise analyses that disclose risks and impacts, support decision - making, and provide solutions to real estate development and land use -related problems. Offices Berkeley and Sacramento, California and Denver, Colorado COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING QUALIFICATIONS LAND USE AND CONSERVATION PLANNING EPS participates in the preparation of land use plans and related implementation programs. We combine a thorough working knowledge of land use planning and regulatory practices with fiscal and economic expertise, ensuring feasible land use plans and implementation measures. EPS's services typically are engaged to help prepare comprehensive plans, specific plans, and resource management plans. Skills applied to these efforts include economic and demographic forecasts; market analysis as input to plan formulation, including housing needs and jobs/housing balance; development of land use information systems; land use policy development; fiscal and financial evaluation of plan alternatives; and development of implementation programs, such as open space preservation programs and housing programs. Iraq : Ilc 111l0r.110Low In order to support the range of local government activities necessary to fund and build capital improvements, EPS provides services including planning facilities, arranging for funding, and administering financing programs. EPS's goal is to ensure successful development of projects and land use plans by preparing feasible financing plans that respond to public and private objectives and make creative use of available financing mechanisms. EPS services include: forecasting demand to assist in infrastructure design, sizing, and timing; identifying and forecasting potential funding sources; allocating capital costs among participating entities; assessing the impacts of capital financing alternatives on project feasibility and public finance negotiations, including drafting development agreements; and formulating assessment rates, special tax formulas, and fee ordinances. MARKET AND FEASIBLITY ANALYSIS EPS prepares real estate market and feasibility analysis for a diversity of real estate development projects and land use planning programs. Our services provide a realistic assessment of real estate market trends to determine the potential market support for a given project or land use plan. EPS's feasibility analysis evaluates the potential financial returns and feasibility of a project, drawing upon our market research of product types, absorption, and pricing. This market and feasibility information is used in a wide variety of applications, such as assessing individual project feasibility, development project design and programming, property disposition strategies, downtown revitalization and redevelopment efforts, specific and comprehensive land use planning, and economic analysis of impact fees and other public finance programs. The firm's market analysis efforts range from evaluations of existing market information to detailed project -specific market forecasts that utilize consumer surveys and other primary research. Pro forma cash flow models test feasibility under a range of project alternatives, financing, and partnership options, disposition strategies, and measures of financial return. PROJECT PROFILES Park City / Snyderville Basin Growth Management Plan Summit County, Utah The unincorporated Snyderville Basin and Park City have experienced strong growth pressures due to their dual functions as a rapidly expanding destination resort and an affluent residential suburb to the Greater Salt Lake Area. In response to these growth pressures, the County adopted a new General Plan that established a new vision for the Snyderville Basin in terms of general planning objectives, policies, and design standards. As a next step, the County required a more detailed analysis of the geographic and financial impacts of growth, and the policy tools available to manage this growth consistent with its new vision. EPS prepared a growth management report that considered the following: (1) real estate market development pressures; (2) the likelihood that the existing policy regime would produce outcomes consistent with the new vision; (3) an additional set of policy options that could more closely guide growth towards the community's vision; and (4) an analysis of the costs of growth and the measures available to ensure levels of service are maintained or enhanced as the Basin grows. The information, analysis, and recommendations included in the report provided the County with a quantitative and graphic basis for the interpretation and implementation of their new General Plan. Metro Vision 2020 Plan Urban Centers Project Denver, Colorado Metro Vision 2020 Plan is the integrated land use and transportation plan for the Denver metropolitan region. A compact urban form with freestanding communities was chosen as the desired development pattern. To direct land use and development patterns towards the desired urban form, the plan included core elements including an Urban Growth Boundary, Urban Centers, Regional Open Space, Multi -modal Transportation System, and Environmental Preservation. EPS (with an urban design subconsultant) worked with DRCOG on a program to implement the Urban Centers core element. Although many cities were interested in designating urban Center locations, there was a lack of agreement on center requirements and regional commitments. EPS identified comparable urban centers in other cities and identified the common elements contained in them. The planning team then selected two locations in the Denver region to undergo an intensive pilot center planning process to develop a concept plan illustrating how the site could develop to an Urban Center over the next 20 years. EPS then evaluated the existing Urban Centers criteria and characteristics contained in the Plan and recommended modifications based on the experience of other cities and the workshop process. The implementation plan recommended a common set of criteria for urban centers of all sizes and a locally initiated designation process that allowed each center to develop to its market threshold level over time. Preservation Strategies for the Santa Rosa/Rohnert Park Community Separator Area Santa Rosa, California The Santa Rosa/Rohnert Park Community Separator Area consisted of 4,300 acres of important agricultural and scenic lands located between the two growing cities. It has been recognized that land use designations alone could not ensure preservation of this area. Budget Limitations prompted the Sonoma County Agriculture Preservation and Open Space District to explore a range of acquisition technique and alternative conservation strategies. EPS, working with EDAW, provided a mix of preservation tools and supplemental funding sources that were appropriate to the resources and land characteristics within the Separator and which maximized limited District funding. EPS estimated the projected costs of the program over time to assist the District make strategic preservation decisions that resulted in permanent land protection. North Livermore General Plan Amendment Open Space Strategy Livermore, California EPS prepared an open space strategy for a proposed 30,000 population development in the North Livermore Area for a General Plan Amendment. Based on a land use plan prepared by Calthorpe Associates, EPS developed appropriate open space preservation strategies and estimated the costs and feasibility of implementing them. The land was categorized according to the degree of physical constraints to development and the resource values. The recommendations included requiring dedications under a Specific Plan; the creation of an Open Space Conservation Zone and a Future Study Area; identification of Acquisition Target Areas; and the establishment of a land trust to implement the acquisition strategy. The costs of implementing the proposed open space strategies were estimated and the financial feasibility evaluated. Recommendations were made regarding appropriate sharing of the cost burdens. Porter Trust Master Plan and Annexation Jackson, Wyoming EPS was economic and financial consultant on the consultant team preparing a master plan and annexation agreement for the 822 acre Porter Trust property in Jackson, Wyoming. The Town initiated annexation on the property to address its long-term growth and community needs over the next 25 years. The property is immediately contiguous to the Town's southern boundary. The property is envisioned as the best opportunity to provide community -oriented affordable and attainable residential and commercial uses as contiguous development to the Town. Much of the remaining private land in the County has been developed for exclusive second home projects. EPS was responsible for forecasting commercial and residential demand in the region and determining the appropriate amount, type and density of development for this parcel vis a vis other locations in the County including infitl development and redevelopment. Based on the demand forecasts, EPS recommended a development program for the site that was incorporated into land use alternatives and the recommended master plan. The firm was also responsible for evaluating capital facilities needs and fiscal impacts of the project on the Town and the County and recommending exaction and mitigation requirements to address the expected impacts. Santa Fe Corridor Subarea Plan Littleton, Colorado The study area included over 500 acres of largely underdeveloped land lying between Santa Fe Boulevard and the South Platte River. The study area was undergoing significant changes including: completion of RTD's southwest light rail line, completion of the South Platte River Park, and reconstruction and widening of South Santa Fe Boulevard. The City wanted to ensure that the future development of its undeveloped land met its land use and economic development objectives. EPS was economic consultant on a consultant team to develop a land use, zoning and urban design plan for the Santa Fe Corridor and Historic Downtown Littleton. The economic analysis identified the types of higher quality development that would be consistent with the City's goals, evaluated the market potentials for attracting the appropriate types of development to the corridor and specified the appropriate type and intensity of land uses by subarea. EPS also estimated the fiscal and overall economic benefits of public investments and recommended regulatory and public investment changes necessary for attracting desired development. The project team incorporated the recommendations of the study into the Santa Fe Corridor Subarea Plan as an element of the City's overall comprehensive plan. Marin - Sonoma Land Use and Transportation Study Marin and Sonoma Counties, California As part of a consultant team, EPS collaborated on a transportation study for the Sonoma County Transportation Authority. The goal was to define and implement improvements to the transportation system in Sonoma and Marin Counties along with other efforts that could reduce congestion and improve efficiency. EPS analyzed demographic trends and journey - to -work patterns for Sonoma and Marin Counties, as well as the framework for analyses. The consultant team formulated alternative land use and transportation scenarios to illustrate the transportation and economic linkages of land use with transportation systems. The end result was a preferred land use and transportation scenario, for which EPS prepared an investment strategy. RESOLVE Oualification RESOLVE, Inc. is a non-profit organization specializing in neutral mediation, facilitation, and consensus building services with particular expertise in planning, transportation, natural resource and public health issues. For twenty-five years, RESOLVE has been dedicated to improving public dialogue to develop common perspectives and answer complex public policy questions. RESOLVE has extensive and varied experience with convening, designing and conducting consensus building and public involvement efforts in the areas of growth, land use and resource management. These efforts have included work for government regulatory agencies, fish and wildlife management, wetlands conservation, marine fisheries, Native American tribes, conservation organizations, industry, and combinations of these entities working in collaborative partnerships in the U.S. and internationally. RESOLVE mediators have earned outstanding reputations for neutrality and credibility with clients and stakeholders. Our Senior Mediators each have 10-25 years of experience, combining mediation and facilitation with a foundation in science, public policy, law, planning, and natural resource management and policy. RESOLVE staff have facilitated processes on a spectrum of land use and environmental issues including: water quality and quantity, wetlands, hydro -dam relicensing, fishery management, marine mammal interactions with commercial fisheries and many other issues. RESOLVE In composing our team, EDAW thought carefully about these project related issues, our past performance, and the unique project requirements. It is in consideration of these issues and conditions that our project approach, organization, preliminary scope of work and team composition was formed. We sincerely believe that our proposed approach will provide the City with outstanding and cost-effective results. As we composed, our team our first and primary objective was to provide you with a team that sincerely possessed the following characteristics: • A demonstrated passion and enthusiasm for the City of Fort Collins. We are especially pleased to have Clarion led by Ben Herman as a key team member. His past experience as a key participant on first City Plan consulting team will provide and invaluable asset. • A practical knowledge and commitment to working with the City of Fort Collins Planning Department. The EDAW team has had recent experience with the City in developing corridor plans with East Mulberry Plan and the I-25 Corridor. An essential component of these assignments has been an integrated approach to transportation and land use planning. • A leadership group that has both Public Polio/Growth Management and planning policy expertise. We offer the services of Douglas Porter for the national perspective of other community experience with growth management and the services of Anne Warhover for additional expertise in Colorado cities in housing, transportation, and urban growth policy issues. • A project team that sincerely wants and desires to work with the City of Fort Collins for many years in the future through the implementation of an updated City Plan. We believe our team resources are uniquely organized to provide the City of Fort Collins with the professional services you are requesting. We do not consider the update of city plan as simply another planning study for the study - we view this effort as another cornerstone to the City. To this end, we appreciate your consideration of our team's qualifications and hope that we have the opportunity to discuss our enthusiasm and approach with you in person. Finally, we acknowledge the receipt of the Addendum to Proposal No. P-831, City Plan Update. We understand that the original opening date was 3:00 pm April 22, 2002, and that the new opening date is 3:00 pm (Fort Collin's clock) April 29, 2002. We look forward to hearing from you soon (K A7 `r Bruce Meighen Project Manager DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE RESOLVE Services and Relevant Organizational Experience RESOLVE's primary services include: • Situation Assessment for convening stakeholder groups and assisting parties to evaluate whether and how a collaborative process could be useful; • Designing and Facilitating technical work groups, workshops, public meetings, joint fact-finding efforts, strategic planning processes, resource management planning efforts, and public -private collaboratives; • Mediating negotiated rulemakings, policy dialogues, site -specific disputes, and litigation settlement efforts, • Project and Contract Management for contracts including multi -million dollar indefinite quantity contracts and small short-term projects. • Training in facilitation, dispute resolution, negotiation, and consensus building; and • Applied Research in the use of facilitation, mediation and other dispute resolution techniques for policy -making. Convening, Desienine and Conductine Facilitation, Mediation, Consensus Buildinz, and Public Involvement for Natural Resource Mannement Proiects (sample list) • Rocky Flats Future Site Use Working Group • East Mulberry Corridor Plan • City of Boulder Jobs/Population Balance Task Force • Summit County's Lower Blue Master Plan • T-Rex Partnering Workshops • California Marine Life Management Act Constituent Involvement Project • Potomac River Conference: Developing Watershed Action Agendas • Southeast States Wetlands Conservation Planning Workshop • Summitville Superfund Site/Colorado Water Quality Goals Convening VJ30111[�I �1 • Federal/State Wetlands Regulatory Streamlining Workshops • Wetlands Policy Forum Developine Aereements, Partnerships Stratezic Plans and Natural Resource Manazement Plans Pacific Fishery Management Council Groundfish Fishery Management Strategic Plan Development Process • USDA Forest Service Strategic Planning Process • State of Maryland Oyster Management Plan • Strategic Planning Workshop for NOAA Constituent and Public Affairs Office • Cape Cod Commercial Hook Fisherman's Association Strategic Planning Workshop • U.S. EPA Wetlands Division Strategic Plan Development • Collaborative Stewardship Symposium for National Forest Management RESOLVE DOUG PORTER CURRENT AND RECENT PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Selected Clients: Abell Foundation (Baltimore, MD) Baltimore County, MD Boise Future Foundation Calvert County, MD Planning Dept. The Conservation Fund Delaware Dept. of Transportation Del Webb Corporation Fannie Mae and Fannie Mae Foundation Florida Energy Office Georgia Department of Community Affairs Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Maryland Department of Transportation Metro (Portland, OR regional agency) New Jersey State Planning Office City of Pittsburgh Transportation Research Board U.S. Conference of Mayors U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Dept. ofHousing/Urban Development U.S. Department of Transportation The Urban Land Institute Washington Township (Mercer County), NJ Planning and Regulatory Aspects of Growth Management Palm Beach County Peer Review Process. Porter is serving on the peer review committee advising the Palm Beach County planning and zoning office on proposed new zoning and subdivision regulations. The new regulations are being prepared to implement "tier system" plan recently adopted by the county as a growth management tool. Regulations are focused on promoting specific "models" of development such as compact. mixed -use town centers and traditional neighborhoods. Overcoming Barriers to Infill Housing. As part of a program sponsored by HUD and the Urban Land Institute, working with the City of Chicago and the suburban jurisdictions of Highland Park and Hanover Park to stimulate development of affordable inftll housing. Program efforts include round -table discussions. organization of a workshop to provide workable approaches for the communities involved, and collaborative efforts with each of the jurisdictions to pursue specific objectives in production of infill housing, including development of community land trusts and establishment of inclusionary zoning approaches. Regional Urban Restoration Program. Managed the three-year cooperative agreement between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and The Growth Management Institute to work collaboratively with state, regional, and local agencies to promote sustainable urban restoration and revitalization as an alternative to sprawl. Efforts were focused on South Florida and the EPA Region 5 office in Chicago. In South Florida, GNU assisted regional and local groups in implementing the "Eastward Ho!" strategy to restore the urban corridor from Dade through Palm Beach counties to prevent further sprawl into the Everglades. The efforts including organizing workshops to define specific regional strategies for the corridor, with preparation of subsequent reports. Porter also managed development of a scoping study to determine potential needs for a regional travel demand model sensitive to land use and transit scenarios. In the EPA midwestern region, GMI worked with regional EPA and metropolitan planning staff to promote sustainable development in metropolitan areas, resulting in conferences on sustainable development in Detroit and Peoria. Through a follow-up contract with the EPA Region 5 office, GMI has drafted a white paper on transportation and land use effects on regional air quality for the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission. Effects of Smart Growth Programs on Availability of Developable Land. With a grant from the Fannie Mae Foundation, GNU participated in a survey of state and local measures to accommodate production of affordable The Growth Management Institute housing as part of regionwide Smart Growth programs Studies of Market -Rate Housing Production in Central Cities: For the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National Association of Home Builders, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, prepared case studies of progress in the "Building Homes in America's Cities" program promoting regulatory simplification, public incentives, and private actions for production of market -rate housing in central cities. Studies of Affordable Housing Developments: Preparing descriptions and analyses of affordable infill and redevelopment housing projects assisted by Fannie Mae programs, for Fannie Mae's internal educational and external promotional purposes. Exploration of "Ad Hoc" Regionalism. With a grant from the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, organized a workshop with representatives of non -governmental organizations formed to promote regional growth management, to explore the origins, working styles, and planned or actual outcomes of their efforts. Growth Management Tools: For the Georgia Department of Community Affairs, preparing descriptive analyses of techniques commonly used in local management of growth, including mixed -use zoning, performance zoning, and acquisition of conservation easement. The monographs are to be published on the web as guides for local governments. Charlotte/Mecklenburg County Intermodal Facility Study. For the Charlotte Chamber of Commerce, evaluated alternative development plans related to proposed construction of an intermodal facility at the regional airport and recommended a land use strategy for areas to be affected by the facility operations. Playa Vista Sustainable Development Advisory Committee. Selected as member of committee advising the Center for Sustainable Urban Design at Playa Vista on ways to promote sustainable communities through monitoring and evaluation of the organization, design, construction, and occupancy of Playa Vista and other sustainable developments. Southeast Massachusetts Regional Growth Management. Participated in a consensus -building process to generate agreement among an ad hoc, broadly representative committee formed to consider regional approaches to growth management in Southeastern Massachusetts. The committee is developing a vision and action program in response to both high -growth and slow -growth forces in communities south and east of Boston. Transferable Development Rights Program. Advised Washington Township, NJ in structuring a transferable development rights program to stimulate town center development (based on neo-traditional development patterns) while conserving open space and farmland. Maryland State Growth Management. With a grant from the Abell Foundation, evaluated Maryland's recent "Smart Growth" legislation to determine improvements or new provisions that would ensure achievement of state development objectives, including consideration of measurable outcomes. The report contains 21 recommendations for strengthening the program to meet stated goals. Analyses of Proposed Iowa and Colorado State Growth Management Acts. For the Home Builders Association of Greater Des Moines, analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of proposed state legislation to guide local decision making on development issues. Evaluated alternative proposed state legislative acts and participated in workshop discussion of potential approaches and provisions organized by the Growth Management Alliance of Colorado. Highway Corridor Growth Management. For the Maryland Department of Transportation, advised a 75-member task force on growth management approaches to linking land use planning and development to transportation improvements in the U.S. 301 corridor. For the task force, Porter prepared case studies of growth management, evaluating current county growth management practices, conducted a survey and analysis of intergovernmental agreements, defined land use scenarios for evaluation by the transportation model, determined land use inputs and The Growth Management Institute resulting impacts of land use, and helped to guide the Task Force's decisions on recommended actions. Evaluation of Growth Management Strategies. In workshop formats, advised elected officials and staff in Huntersville, NC; Cary, NC; and Eagle County, CO on potential growth management techniques for guiding growth. State Guidelines for Large -Scale Development. Conducted a survey and analysis of state growth management programs for the Florida Energy Office to determine their treatment of large-scale development within the framework of state objectives and policies; as part of this project, Porter participated in discussions of Reid Ewing's research program that resulted in the publication of Best Development Practices. Analysis of Slow -Growth Scenario Issues for Portland Metro. In connection with Portland, Oregon's long-range metropolitan planning, worked with ECO Northwest to analyze issues related to a potential slow -growth scenario, including possible techniques for achieving slow -growth and probable consequences of those actions. Pittsburgh's Industrial Zoning Regulations. As part of a consultant team that is revising Pittsburgh's zoning ordinance for the city planning department, researched industrial zoning approaches in other cities and prepared an issue paper and provisions to guide industrial development to reflect modem needs. The work will draw from Porter's previous research on zoning and covenants for research/business parks. Consensus -Building Case Studies. Prepared four case studies for the Urban Land Institute to exemplify consensus -building efforts in managing development, ranging from downtown revitalization to highway corridor planning. These built on other case studies and research prepared for an earlier ULI publication entitled Working With the Community:.4 Developer's Guide. Regional Advisory Panels. Participated as a member of ULI advisory panels for regional growth management issues in Boise, Idaho; Monterrey, Mexico, and Las Vegas, Nevada; wrote and edited reports for each. Growth Management Workshops. As faculty associate of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Porter assisted in organizing and participated in workshops on growth issues in New Hampshire and Lexington, Kentucky. Growth Management Research. For the Growth Management Leadership Project, conducted an evaluation of the growth management research efforts of national associations allied to regional and local development concerns. Growth Management Practice. Continuing research and publication about growth management practices in specific states, regions, and communities, as evidenced in the list of publications. These efforts are aided by frequent speaking engagements in regional and local conferences on growth management issues. Infrastructure Planning and Analyses Land Use Implications of Planned Highway Improvements. Participated in three expert panels evaluating the land use implications of alternative highway improvements and potential effects on adjoining communities. The highway corridors included I-5 north of Vancouver, Washington; I-270 north of Washington, D.C.; and Maryland 32 in Howard County, Maryland. The analyses involved determinations of potential changes in land use projections due to proposed highway improvements. Boise Region Infrastructure Vision and Program. Worked with a multi -stakeholder group in the Boise, Idaho region to define regional infrastructure needs and frame a regionwide strategy for infrastructure development and financing. Surveyed 18 intergovernmental service delivery organizations as potential models. Recommendations included new intedurisdictional arrangements for planning and developing infrastructure systems and identification of new revenue sources to finance infrastructure needs. Washington Region Transportation Summit. For the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Deputy The Growth Management Institute Assistant Secretary for Governmental Affairs, assisted in organizing a Congressionally -directed summit to define a transportation action plan for the Washington, D.C. region, including interviews, agenda -setting, identification of speakers and sessions, and preparation of a white paper and subsequent action plan. Transit Station -Area Development. Commissioned by the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences to prepare a synthesis of research and experience with transit -focused development. He studied policies and practices in 19 regions in the United States and Canada as part of the study, which has been published by the Transportation Research Board. Transit -Oriented Land Use. Participated as a panel member and report editor for the Urban Land Institute Panel Advisory Service week-long evaluation of Charlotte, North Carolina's transit proposal for the South Corridor. The panel was requested to propose appropriate land uses and development guidelines for transit station areas along the proposed rail transit line. Growth Management and Local Schools. Worked with Baltimore and Calvert County administrations in Maryland to recommend regulatory and policy responses to growth issues concerning school capacities and school development programs, both involving development moratoriums and recommendations for revisions to adequate public facility ordinances. New Jersey Infrastructure and Monitoring Programs. For the Office of State Planning, prepared the final report projecting 20-year infrastructure needs in connection with the state development and redevelopment plan. including projections of costs. In addition, he formulated a monitoring and evaluation program for tracking the effectiveness of the plan as it is implemented. Growth Management and Transportation. Worked with the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Porter assisted in organizing a workshop on metropolitan issues in land use and transportation relationships for the Federal Highwav Administration, including presentation of a paper on metropolitan growth management prospects and editing of the workshop summary publication. Financing Infrastructure with Special Districts. Porter prepared a second, updated and revised edition of Special Districts: A Useful Technique for Financing Infrastructure, published by ULI, including a new chapter on the formative procedures for districts and updating of many case studies. Land-Use/Transit Linkages. Porter prepared an issue paper on indicators of supportive land use for proposed transit systems for the Federal Transit Administration, under contract to the Urban Land Institute. Regional Infrastructure Financing Issues. For the Johns Hopkins University Berman Real Estate Institute, Porter organized and managed a Washington/Baltimore regional conference on public/private financing issues. Metropolitan Transportation Planning. For the Transportation Research Board, prepared and presented two papers at national conferences concerning planning and data issues in metropolitan transportation planning. In addition, prepared a summary of discussions at a regional consensus -building workshop organized by the Triangle Transit Authority in the Raleigh -Durham (NC) region. The Growth Management Institute TEAM OROANIZATItN1AL CHART GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mike Hughes, RI Team Leader Jody Erickson, RI Public Involvement Key EDAW - EDAW, Inc. CA - Clarion Associates EPS - Economic & Planning Systems RI - RESOLVE, Inc. SB - Sear -Brown Group GMI - Growth Management Institute Client Group H Cales Givens, EDAW Principal -in -Charge Bruce Meighen, EDAW Project Manager Dan Guimond, EPS Team Leader Anne Warhover Affordable Housing / Economic Policy Jane Blackstone, EPS Public Policy Expert TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN TEAM Ben Herman, CA Team Leader Deana Swetlik EDA W Urban Design / Planning Doug Porter, GMI Growth Management Expert Chris Duerksen, CA Legal / Intergovernmental / Zoning / Land Use Issues Don Silar, SB Civil Engineering Tbm Kekh, EDAW Team Leader Tina Axelrad, CA Growth Management/ Open Space Preservation ASSIGNED PERSONNEL assigned personnel EDAW, Inc. Cales Givens will serve as Principal in Charge. With over twenty-six vears in planning and landscape architecture, Cales Givens has extensive experience in master planning, urban design, public/private development planning, resort and golf course community planning and landscape architecture design. His responsibilities include strategic land use planning, rezoning and master plan processing, design guidelines and implementation. Mr. Givens has particular expertise in directing large multi -discipline consultant teams and leading planning and design projects involving community participation. Bruce Meighen will serve as Project Manager. Bruce is a certified planner with experience in comprehensive planning, regional planning and environmental analysis. He specializes in local and regional land use and environmental analyzes for comprehensive plans, resource management studies, demographic forecasting, NEPA documents and water demand studies. Bruce brings to this project ample experience in directing other large regional planning studies. He recently completed a land use and demographic analysis addressing future growth beyond 2020 for Metro Wastewater that covered the entire Denver Region. He has provided similar services for communities along the Front Range including three other regional growth studies that examined land use beyond 2020 -- the Greeley Water Demand Study, the Northern Colorado Regional Planning Study and the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Water Demand Study. He recently completed comprehensive plans for Laramie County, Wyoming and the Town of Windsor. Colorado and is currently working on the East Mulberry Corridor Plan and the Steamboat Springs Comprehensive Plan. Tom Keith will serve as Environmental/ Open Space/ Regional Planner. Tom has over 20 years of experience in a wide range of resource management and regional planning assignments. He has been involved in open lands projects for more than a decade. He is highly skilled at the analysis of land use and natural resource information, and integrating the results of the analysis into public policy and decision -making efforts. Tom has participated in numerous regional studies, including work for the City of Fort Collins, Town of Windsor and Larimer County. Examples of his work include the Northern Colorado Community Separator Study, Fossil Creek Reservoir Resource Management Study, Regional Water Demand Study for the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, Fort Collins-Timnath-Windsor Separator Implementation Study, and East Mulberry Corridor Plan. Deana Swetlik, AICP will serve as Urban Designer/ Planner. Deana's background as both architect and planner allows for keen insight into the collaboration of planning issues with urban form. Deana has worked on a broad range of project types including land use plans, zoning ordinances, neighborhood plans, revitalization plans, design guidelines, streetscape projects, site development, park plans and bikeway planning. Ms. Swetlik's specialty is in directing multi -disciplinary teams and in leading public workshops. EDAW ]NO DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE ASSIGNED PERSONNEL Clarion Associates Ben Herman, AICP, will be the lead team member for Land Use and Growth Management. He has more than 24 years of local, regional, and international experience in all aspects of community and environmental planning. He has been responsible for managing and conducting complex, multidisciplinary assignments for both private and public sector clients. He has extensive experience in community planning, and he has completed comprehensive planning assignments for numerous towns and counties in Colorado — including Arapahoe County; the City of Westminster; the City of Fort Collins; Adams County; Colorado Springs; the City of Evans; the City of Broomfield; Arapahoe County; and others. He served as project director for the preparation of City Plan in 1996/97. µChristopher Duerksen will provide expertise with zoning, land use, intergovernmental, and legal issues related to the implementation of the Area Plan. He has represented local governments, nonprofits, and the private sector in a variety of land -use and zoning matters and specializes in development code revisions, growth management planning, historic preservation, natural resource and scenic area protection strategies, airport -area development, and market development strategies. A co-founder of the Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute, Mr. Duerksen has written and spoken extensively on land use issues in Colorado and nationally. Tina Axelrad is a Senior Associate with Clarion. Ms. Axelrad's areas of expertise include development code drafting, comprehensive and growth management planning, and open space/natural resources preservation strategies. Ms. Axelrad has a Bachelor of Arts in Economics, from Connecticut College; a Master of Urban Planning — New York University Wagner School of Public Service; and a law degree from New York University School of Law. Her role will be to provide technical support for growth management and implementation tasks. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Daniel R. Guimond, AICP will be the task leader for economics and will also lead the capital improvements planning analysis. Dan is a principal with EPS and manager of the Denver office of the firm. He has extensive experience in land use policy analysis and the preparation of comprehensive plans and capital improvement programs at the local and regional level. He has been at the forefront of regional growth management efforts including the analysis of alternative urban forms and preparation of integrated regional growth and transportation plans for metropolitan planning organizations and councils of government. He was the principal consultant working with the Denver Regional Council of Governments with the development of Metro Vision 2020 from the initial development of alternative urban forms until plan adoption. Dan is also a specialist in implementation programming, in particular the development of capital improvement plans. He has also been active in civic affairs related to planning and development and has served on the Denver Planning Board since 1992. Walter Kieser, Managing Principal of EPS, will be a senior advisor in the area of growth management and urban form. Mr. Kieser has on over 50 comprehensive land use and transportation plans for cities and counties. His broad -based experience with land use, transportation and conservation planning, public/private financing agreements, inter -governmental agreements, infrastructure financing programs, local government reorganization, and real estate development projects combine to provide balanced and pragmatic solutions, ensuring that land use plans can be successfully implemented, infrastructure can be financed, and that real estate projects meet private -sector financial objectives while supporting public policy objectives. Walter has worked extensively in Colorado including successfully [DEW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE ASSIGNED PERSONNEL implementing the state's first rural transportation authority for RFTA in the Roaring Fork Valley and Aspen's recently approved affordable housing strategic plan. . Jane Blackstone, Vice President of EPS, will be responsible for the evaluation of plan alternatives against economic and policy measures. Ms. Blackstone has more than twenty years of project management, public policy and planning experience. Prior to joining EPS, she was a deputy director responsible for planning and real estate activities at two former military bases — the Presidio of San Francisco and the former Lowry Air Force Base in Denver. This experience with public mixed -use planning and development projects, including integration of economic, public policy, environmental, historic preservation, transportation and natural resource considerations, informs a practical, interdisciplinary approach to land use planning assignments. Jane's work has also employed extensive public participation efforts, resulting in projects that meet public and private objectives and are successfully implemented. Andy Knudtsen, Associate with EPS, will be responsible for market analysis and growth forecasts. Mr. Knudtsen has extensive expertise evaluating demand for commercial and residential development. Concerning housing needs, Andrew has completed numerous regional assessments and jobs/ housing balance studies, including recent projects for Aspen, Winter Park, and Mesa County, Colorado. Andy has enabled communities to recognize the key role affordable housing plays in sustaining economic viability and the need for a range of housing options to reflect the community's economic profile. He has also completed community -wide commercial market assessments to identify supportable square footage for commercial and employment based land uses for balanced growth. RESOLVE, Inc. Mike Hughes, RESOLVE will lead the public involvement effort, working with the project staff and consultant team to ensure a consistent, inclusive and effective public involvement strategy. Mike will work with the staff to ensure that the mass communication effort (press relations, press releases, newsletters, web site communication, etc.) supports the face-to-face strategies (public meetings, lectures, workshops and Citizen Advisory Committee). Mike will facilitate some of the CAC meetings and will facilitate public meetings. Mike has experience in public involvement in Ft. Collins as the facilitator for the City's Fluoride Technical Study Group and the East Mulberry Citizens Advisory Committee. He has worked with other members of the project team in Ft. Collins, Boulder and Arvada. Jody Erikson, RESOLVE will facilitate Citizen Advisory Committee meetings. She is currently leading the Citizen Advisory Group for EPA's cleanup of the Shattuck site, a highly controversial remediation in Denver. Jody has additional experience working with public advisory committees focused on planning, health policy, energy and environmental quality. Project Advisors Douglas Porter of The Growth Management Institute will serve as an advisor related to growth management issues. Doug is a nationally -recognized authority on all forms of growth management. For many years he has monitored, analyzed, and written about growth management programs, techniques, and issues at state, regional, and local levels throughout the United States. He returned to private practice in 1991 after 12 years at the Urban Land Institute, where he directed ULI's public policy research program. Since 1991 he has engaged in a broad variety of assignments grounded on his wide LDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE contents 1 FIRM CAPABILITY 2 ASSIGNED PERSONNEL S APPROACH 4 SCOPE OF PROPOSAL AND SCHEDULE 5 COST AND WORK HOURS [PAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE ASSIGNED PERSONNEL knowledge of growth management issues and practices. In 1992 he founded The Growth Management Institute as a nonprofit organization to carry on his ULI experience in information exchange, research, and educational endeavors. In his prior career, he had completed 20 years of consulting in planning and development, mostly as a principal at Marcou, O'Leary and Associates in Washington, D.0 Anne Warhover will serve as an advisor related to Policy and Growth Management Issues. She is the President and CEO of the Downtown Denver Partnership, a private, non-profit corporation. The Partnership, a group of three separate corporate entities and one quasi governmental entity, markets Downtown as a vibrant and diverse place to work, live, play and invest. A six million dollar annual budget provides funds for services designed to give downtown Denver a competitive edge as the business center and entertainment destination for the Rocky Mountain Region. Services include keeping downtown clean and safe, retaining and recruiting jobs, facilitating housing development, marketing entertainment and retail destinations to the metro area residents, and producing three major annual events. In her role as President, Anne is responsible for implementing the policies set by four separate boards of directors who represent 475 member businesses and over 600 downtown property owners. Don Silar, P.E., Sear Brown, will serve as consultant related to utility and infrastructure issues. Don is a Project Manager for Sear -Brown and has worked in civil engineering and construction since 1976. He emphasizes thorough and efficient planning, design, contract document preparation and construction inspection/administration. Don is experienced in site investigations, report preparation, computer aided and conventional planning and design, and construction inspection/administration. SDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE RESUME ( 1 EDUCATION B.I.A. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1975 REGISTRATIONS Registered Landscape Architect, Virginia, 1978 Maryland 1988 AFFILIATIONS Urban Land Institute American Society of Landscape Architects Chair, Landscape Architecture Alumni Committee at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University College of Architecture Advisory Board member HONORS + AWARDS Merit Award for Research, Summer Student Program 2001, Colorado Chapter ASLA,2001 Outstanding Planning Award, St. Louis Downtown Development Action Plan, APA, 2000, Missouri Chapter Honor Award for Urban Design and Planning, St. Louis Downtown Development Action Plan, ASLA, 2000 Honor Award for Planning and Urban Design, St. Louis Downtown Development Action Plan, CCASLA, 2000 Honor Award for Planning and Urban Design, Stapleton Design Book, CCASLA 2000 Merit Award, Lansdowne and the NVRPA Conservation Easement, ASLA Potomac Chapter, 1991 Planning Award, Alexandria 2020, Potomac Yard, APA National Capital Chapter, 1990 Merit Award, Alexandria 2020, Potomac Yard, ASLA Potomac Chapter, 1990 Planning Award, Lansdowne, APA Virginia Chapter, 1989 Honor Award, A Memorial to the 56 Signers of the Declaration of Independence, ASLA Potomac Chapter, 1984 Faculty Design Award, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 1975 Merit Award, NAIE Urban Design Competition, 1973 H. CALES GIVENS Principal/Vice President With over twenty-six years in planning and landscape architecture, Cales Givens has extensive experience in master planning, urban design, public/private development planning, resort and golf course community planning and landscape architecture design. His responsibilities include strategic land use planning, rezoning and master plan processing, design guidelines and implementation. Mr. Givens has particular expertise in directing large multi -discipline consultant teams and leading planning and design projects involving community participation. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Mulberry Street Gateway Corridor Plan, Fort Collins, CO Co -Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: City of Fort Collins Corridor plan, design standards and gateway imaging for Highway 14, the main access from 1-25 into Downtown Fort Collins including economic, land use, and environmental analysis of the 2,600 acre site. Town of Castle Rock Vision 2020, Castle Rock, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Town of Castle Rock Updating the Town of Castle Rock Vision 2020 which included leading the visioning charrettes, building public consensus and engaging the citizens to determine their future destiny. Stapleton Redevelopment Plan for Developer Selection, Denver, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Terrabrook Strategic Master Plan for the redevelopment of the former Stapleton Airport site prepared during master developer selection process. Design Guidelines for the Redevelopment of the Stapleton Airport Site, Denver, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Forest City EDAW created a set of design guidelines to augment the City and County of Denver's ordinances that will build upon the developer's master plan to set the tone for development of the first phase of the project, and will be used as a foundation for future phases. Corinth Downtown Plan, Corinth, Mississippi Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: National Park Service A ten year plan for the City of Corinth, Alcorn County and the Siege and Battlefield Commission to guide redevelopment of the City of Corinth. Special focus issues are downtown parking including circulation, tourism, signage and wayfinding, and other important planning elements. Partnering with the National Park Service Gateway Communities, the goal is to prepare for the sesquicentennial celebration of the Civil War and to increase tourism. MCCarran International Airport Land Use + Disposal Plan, Las Vegas, NV Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: McCarran International Airport/Clark County Department of Aviation Ii ING DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE RESUME 1 i N. CALEB GIVENS Economic market analysis, interim disposal plan, land use plan, environmental analysis, infrastructure analysis, and strategic management policy for a 5,234 acre site which is compatible with the airport environs including such uses as open space, golf courses, commercial, office, retail, industrial, manufacturing, warehousing, easements and rights -of -way. St. Louis Downtown Core + Riverfront District Master Plan, St. Louis, MO Co- Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Downtown Now! EDAW developed a plan aimed at the identification of specific catalyst projects some that would begin construction before the planning process was complete. Our team's goal is to recapture some of the City's success for Downtown living, working and entertainment. Guidelines for St. Louis Downtown Plan, St. Louis, MO Co- Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Downtown Now! EDAW created a set of typology guidelines for the St. Louis Downtown Development Action Plan which included identification of street typologies, open space, landscape, historic building, new construction, parking structures and wayfinding systems. Jacksonville Downtown Plan, Jacksonville, FL Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: City of Jacksonville EDAW participated in a highly interactive workshop process to prepare a Master Plan for downtown including development of an overall vision, goals and policies, action plans and programs as well as design criteria and standards needed to provide a high level of urban design for downtown development. Coliseum Central Business Improvement District, Hampton, VA Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Coliseum Central Business Improvement District EDAW developed a master plan which addressed market potentials, redevelopment/revitalization concepts, development and financing, impact of automobiles, concerns of safety, and the lack of an appropriate environment for pedestrians. Strategic Planning for the St. Joe Company's 1,000,000-acre Land Holdings, Florida Panhandle, FL Principal Planner CLIENT: St. Joe Company Development of a business strategy for St. Joe to create market -driven programs, identify analogues, evolve inducer strategies, and segment properties into manageable increments, as well as detailed master planning for selected sites. CDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE RESUME 11 BRUCE MEIGHEN, AICP Associate EDUCATION Bruce Meighen is a certified land use planner with experience in Master of City Planning, Georgia Institute of comprehensive planning, regional planning, environmental analysis and Technology geog raphic information systems. He specializes in local and regional land use Bachelor Arts, Geography Urban Systems, McGill University, Montreal, M and environmental analysis for comprehensive ement plans, resource mans P g Quebec studies, demographic analysis, NEPA documents and water demand studies. Commerce Degree, Champlain College, As a project manager, Bruce has directed large environmental projects Montreal, Quebec throughout the western United States. REGISTRATIONS PROJECT EXPERIENCE Certified Planner (AICP), 1995 Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) Certified, 1999 East Mulberry Street (Highway 14) Corridor Plan, Fort Collins, CO Project Manager CLIENT: City of Fort Collins AFFILIATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners Subarea plan for the primary gateway into Fort Collins. The study includes a American Planning Association land use plan, transportation studies and an economic analysis. Colorado Planning Association Ladmer Land Trust Project ID Team Windsor Comprehensive Plan Update, Windsor, CO Nature Conservancy Project Manager CLIENT: Town of Windsor HONORS + AWARDS Comprehensive plan update, including the addition of housing policies Colorado Chapter ASLA Honor Award, 2001 addressing workforce and affordable housing. Other components included -California National Historic Trails environmental, transportation, infrastructure and economic development. Interpretive Center Siting Study Colorado Chapter ASLA Land Stewardship Award, 2001 - California National Historic Steamboat Springs Comprehensive Plan, Steamboat Springs, CO Trails Interpretive Center Siting Study Project Manager Partnership for Community Design Award, CLIENT: Clarion Associates/Town of Steamboat Springs Colorado springs Parks, Recreation and Trai12000-2010 Master Plan Comprehensive Ian update addressing the future growth of Steamboat P P P g Merit Award, American Society of Springs. Key components include carrying capacity, recreation, parks, open Landscape Architect, Colorado Chapter, space, natural environment, urban form, and economic viability. Colorado Springs Parks Recreation and Trail 2000 - 2010 Master Plan Metro Wastewater Service Area Utility, Land Use + Demographic Chapter Award, Colorado Chapter of the American Planning Association, 1999- Forecasting Model, Denver, CO Northern Colorado Community Separator Project Manager Study CLIENT: Metro Wastewater Reclamation District Georgia ASLA Award, Mass in Kennesaw Battlefield Earthworks Mapping and Service area utilityplan for Denver metropolitan area, including demographic P Preservation Plan and economic forecasts and future land use analyses. The project included an GPA Award, 1997 - Kennesaw Battlefield automated CIS model to assist in the generation of demographic data at any Earthworks Mapping scale, utilizing TAZ data, land use information and census data. The project Corporal of the Year Award for Outstanding examined future growth for the Denver Region for key points in time from 2000 Leadership and Top Candidate Award to build -out. /1988, Canadian Military Reserve B.A. Geography Graduate with Distinction, 1992 NCWCD Water Demand Study, CO Project Manager SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS CLIENT: Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District(NCWCD) ERDAS southeastern Users conference, Study assessing and quantifying present and future water demands for the 1995, Shoreline Management region along Colorado's northern Front Range. Developed CIS database NALMS Southeastern User's Conference, utilizing satellite imagery, existing CIS databases and future land use plans to 1995, Shoreline Management assist planners in meeting water demands into the next century. National Conference on Battlefield Preservation, 1996, Earthwork Preservation EEI, 1997, Recreation Planning Northern Colorado Community Separator Study, CO Colorado Wildlife Society, 2001, CDOW Project Planner Master Management Plans CLIENT: Various Northern Colorado Communities GIS analysis to identify key parcels for preservation and model future growth as a way to evaluate different perceptions of open space. CDAW INC DESIGN. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE RESUME 12 BRUCE MEIONEN, AICP Greeley Parks + Recreation Master Plan Update, 2001, Greeley, CO Project Manager CLIENT: City of Greeley Master plan update inventorying existing resources, analysis of recreational uses and trends, and a plan of development to meet future needs. Greeley Water Demand Study, Greeley, CO Project Manager CLIENT: City of Greeley Long-range, GIS-based water demand forecast utilizing alternative land use scenarios for the years of 1999, 2020 and 2050. Larlmer County Landfill Siting Study, Latimer County, CO Project Manager CLIENT: Latimer County Siting study using a CIS model to evaluate over 20 environmental, land use and cultural factors, and to identify land suitability for a new landfill. Colorado Springs Parks, Recreation + Open Space Plan, Colorado Springs, CO Project Planner CLIENT: City of Colorado Springs Master plan recommendations focused on recreation facility distribution, staffing needs, development impact fees and expansion of parkland, open space areas and urban trails to meet current and anticipated future demand. Laramie County Comprehensive Plan, Cheyenne, WY Project Manager CLIENT: Laramie County, Wyoming Comprehensive plan that evaluated natural resources, natural hazards and open space; and identified and developed policies to protect these natural communities. Incorporated multi -species habitat conservation plan to protect species such, as the Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse. Arvada Parks, Trails + Open Space Master Plan, Arvada, CO Project Planner CLIENT: City of Arvada Trails and open space master plan involving inventory of existing resources, survey design and implementation, needs assessment and identification of priorities. Master plan recommendations focused on expansion of parkland, open space areas and urban trails to meet current and anticipated future demand. Fossil Creek Reservoir Resource Management Plan, Fort Collins, CO Project Planner CLIENT: City of Fort Collins and Latimer County Created resource management plan for 750-acre reservoir to document site resources, protect and enhance important wildlife habitat, and provide for public use. Elbert County Open Lands + Trails Master Plan, Elbert County, CO Project Manager CLIENT: Elbert County, Colorado Master plan for development and implementation of a working open lands program stressing the acquisition of a conservation easement and public education based on an evaluation of Elbert County's natural resources. EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE RESUME 11 TOM KEITH PrincipallVlce President EDUCATION Mr. Keith is an Environmental and Land Use Planner who is highly M.S., Regional Resource Planning, experienced in master planning and natural resource management He has Colorado State university specialized in regional -scale studies for the past 20 years and has worked A.B., Bowdoin College throughout Colorado and most of the nation. Much of his work focuses on the theme of balancing resource protection and development objectives. He is ACTIVITIES highly experienced in public involvement Latimer County Open Lands Advisory Board PROJECT EXPERIENCE HONORS • AWARDS Merit Award, American Society of Landscape Architects, Colorado State Trails East Mulberry Street (Highway 14) Corridor Plan, Fort Collins, CO Master Plan Co -Principal -in -Charge Honor Award, American Society of CLIENT: City of Fort Collins Colorado Chapter, Landscape Architects, arksand Recreation Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Subarea plan for a 3-mile rime corridor from I-25 to downtown Fort Collins. P primary Plan Chapter Award, Colorado Chapter of the Northern Colorado Community Separator Study, Northern Colorado American Planning Association, Northern Principal -in -Charge Colorado Community Separator Study Merit Award, American Society of CLIENT: Six Northern Colorado communities Landscape Architect, Colorado Chapter, Study identifying key areas for protection of agricultural and open lands Colorado Springs Parks Recreation and separating six Northern Colorado communities. Project received an award Trail 2000 - 2010 Master Plan from the Colorado Chapter of the American Planning Association. Partnership for Community Design Award, Colorado Springs Parks, Recreation and Trail 2DOO-2010 Master Plan Steamboat Springs Comprehensive Plan, Steamboat Springs, CO Colorado Chapter ASLA Honor Award. 2001 Principal -in -Charge -California National Historic Trails CLIENT: Clarion Associates/Town of Steamboat Springs Interpretive Center Siting Study Comprehensive plan update addressing the future growth of Steamboat Colorado Chapter ASLA Land Stewardship Award, 2001 - California National Historic Springs. Key components include carrying capacity, recreation, parks, open Trails Interpretive Center Siting Study space, natural environment, urban form, and economic viability. Windsor Comprehensive Plan Update, Windsor, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Town of Windsor Update of the Town's current comprehensive plan, including the addition of housing policies addressing workforce and affordable housing. Other components include environmental, transportation, infrastructure and economic development. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Water Demand Study, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) Study assessing and quantifying present and future water demands for the region along Colorado's northern Front Range. Developed CIS database utilizing satellite imagery, existing CIS databases and future land use plans to assist planners in meeting wa ter demands into the next century. Metro Wastewater Service Area Utility Plan, Denver, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Metro Wastewater Reclamation District Service area utility plan for Denver metropolitan area, including future land use forecast and development of CIS -based decision support system. Larimer County Parks Comprehensive Master Plan, Larimer County, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Larimer County, Colorado County -wide inventory and assessment of existing parks, natural resource areas and identification of high priority open space areas. EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE RESUME 1 2 TOM KEITH Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Policy Plan, Fort Collins, CO Principal -In -Charge CLIENT: City of Fort Collins Update of 1989 master plan emphasizing appropriate balance of programmed versus unprogrammed space in neighborhood and community parks in this rapidly growing community of 100,000. Poudre River Drainage Master Plan, Fort Collins, CO Principal -In -Charge CLIENT: City of Fort Collins Utilities Integration of environmental protection + enhancement measures in develop- ment of flood control plan for a 12-mile corridor through Fort Collins, CO. Little Thompson River Corridor Conservation Study, Latmer County, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Latimer County Strategy for conservation of significant lands within the lower Little Thompson River drainage, including inventory of ecological factors, assessment of land- scape characteristics and scenic values, and other land use and resource factors. Lower Poudre Canyon Concept Plan, Fort Collins, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Cities of Greeley + Fort Collins, Latimer County, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, Colorado State Parks, "Friends of the Poudre." Joint action plan for protection and enhancement of important recreation resource, including extension of regional trail system, development of additional nver access points, and development of two new regional parks. Arvada Parks, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan, Arvada, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Citv of Arvada Master plan recommendations for expansion of parkland, open space areas and urban trails to meet current and anticipated future demand. Included inventory of existing resources, survey design and implementation, needs assessment, an extensive prioritization exercise with the Citizens Committee, and detailed financing plan, Weld County Open Space Plan, Weld County, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: Weld County Open space element of the County's Comprehensive Plan recommended establishment of community buffers and a series of open space corridors along the South Platte, Big Thompson and Cache La Poudre Rivers. Castle Rock Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plan, Castle Rock, CO Principal -In -Charge CLIENT: City of Castle Rock Master plan involving population distribution analysis, recreational needs assessment, and inventory and evaluation of existing parks + open space areas. El Paso County Parks, Trails + Open Space Plan, Colorado Springs, CO Principal -in -Charge CLIENT: El Paso County Master plan guiding overall direction for parks program, including identification and protection of key open space areas and expansion of the regional trails system. EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE RESUME I 1 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Architectural Studies, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Master of Architecture, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Master of Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee REGISTRATIONS Registered Planner: AICP AFFILIATIONS Member, American Planning Association Member, Congress for the New Urbanism Member, Colorado Chapter of the American Planning Association Member, Wisconsin Chapter of the American Planning Association Member, American Society of Landscape Architects Member, American Institute of Architects HONORS +AWARDS Merit Award for Research, Summer Student Program 2001, Colorado Chapter ASLA, 2001 Honor Award for Urban Design and Planning, St. Louis Downtown Development Action Plan, ASLA, 2000 Honor Award for Urban Design and Planning, St. Louis Downtown Development Action Plan, Colorado Chapter ASLA, 2000 Honor Award for Urban Design and Planning, Stapleton Design Book, Colorado Chapter ASLA, 2000 Outstanding Planning Award, St. Louis Downtown Development Action Plan, APA, 2000, Missouri Chapter PUBLICATIONS No More'John Doe, Seven -Gabled Snout Houses:' Please, A&E Quarterly, Summer 2001, pp. 22-25 Design of Stapleton Reinvents Status Quo, Colorado Real Estate Journal, October 2001 DEANA L. SWETLIK, AICP, ASLA Associate Deana Swetlik's background as both architect and planner allows for keen insight into the collaboration of planning issues with building scale and character. Her initial training as an architect spawned further interest in the issues of urban decay, sporadic growth and the overall need for urban design as an integral part of the development process. Deana has worked on a broad range of project types, including: land use plans, zoning ordinances, new neighborhood plans, revitalization plans, district guidelines, streetscape projects, site development, park plans and bikeway planning. Experience in both the private and public sector provides Ms. Swetlik with a clear understanding of how projects are taken from conceptual design through permitting and construction. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Mulberry Street Gateway Corridor Plan, Fort Collins, CO Project Planner CLIENT: City of Fort Collins Corridor plan, design standards and gateway imaging for Highway 14, including economic, land use, and environmental analysis of the 2,600 acre site. Town of Castle Rock Vision 2020, Castle Rock, CO Project Manager CLIENT: Town of Castle Rock Vision 2020 which included leading the visioning charrettes, building public consensus and engaging the citizens to determine their future destiny. Corinth Downtown Plan, Corinth, Mississippi Project Manager CLIENT: National Park Service A ten year plan for the City of Corinth, Alcorn County and the Siege and Battlefield Commission to guide redevelopment of the City of Corinth. Special focus issues are downtown parking including circulation, tourism, signage and wayfinding, and other important planning elements. Partnering with the National Park Service Gateway Communities, the goal is to prepare for the sesquicentennial celebration of the Civil War and to increase tourism. Stapleton Redevelopment Plan for Master Developer Selection Process, Denver, CO Urban Designer CLIENT: Terrabrook Strategic Master Plan for the redevelopment of the former Stapleton Airport site prepared during master developer selection process. Design Guidelines for the Redevelopment of the Stapleton Airport Site, Denver, CO Project Manager CLIENT: Forest City EDAW created a set of design guidelines to augment the City and County of Denvei s ordinances that will build upon the developer's master plan to set the tone for development of the first phase of the project, and will be used as a foundation for future phases. EDAW INC DESIGN. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE RESUME 12 DEANA L. SWETLIK, AICP Union Pacific Urban Design Plan, Las Vegas, NV Project Manager CLIENT: City of Las Vegas Alternative infill development scenarios for underutilized lands in downtown Las Vegas, which included: a new residential and mixed -use neighborhood, a specialty commercial district and an urban entertainment center, connected to Fremont Street via an elevated transit system. Neighborhood Master Plan, Waupun, WI Urban Designer CLIENT: City of Waupum Private Developer Neighborhood plan for 120 acres of infill land which included multi -family housing, duplex lots and single family lots at higher densities developed around a greenway system. Town of Raymond Land Use Plan, Racine County, WI Project Manager CLIENT: Town of Raymond Comprehensive land use plan which identified both a 15 and 30 year growth scenarios, identification of a multi -modal trail system to be established throughout the Town, and a Town Center Development Plan. St. Louis Downtown and Riverfront Master Plan, St, Louis, MO Project Manager CLIENT: Downtown Now! EDAW completed a comprehensive downtown land use and urban design plan. The heart of the plan identified the downtown intermodal station around the Old Post Office that included metrolink, commuter and local bus routes, taxi and bicycle facilities. Typology Guidelines for St. Louis Downtown Plan, St. Louis, MO Project Manager CLIENT: Downtown Now! EDAW created a set of typology guidelines for the St. Louis Downtown Development Action Plan which included identification of street typologies, open space, landscape, historic building, new construction, parking structures and wayfinding systems. Urban Design Infill Guidelines, Reno, NV Project Manager CLIENT: City of Reno Infill design guidelines for 8 existing neighborhoods, which include and address land use pattems/zoning, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, parking, historic and architectural features, setbacks, and landscape/open space requirements. Menasha Downtown Urban Design Plan, Menasha, WI Project Manager CLIENT: City of Menasha The document provided specific design strategies for three districts within the downtown: a waterfront district, a downtown business district and an infill-housing district. EDAW INC DESIGN. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE C L A R 1 O N Qualifications of Benjamin A. Herman, AICP Clarion Associates Ben Herman is Vice President of Clarion Associates, a national consulting firm with offices in Chicago, Denver, Fort Collins, Philadelphia, and Cincinnati. The firm emphasizes land use planning and zoning, growth management techniques, market analysis, appraisal, and real estate consulting. Clarion's clients include numerous local governments and private sector clients throughout Colorado and the West, as well as the rest of the United States. Mr. Herman is a Land Use Planner with more than 24 years of professional experience in all aspects of land use and environmental planning. He has been responsible for managing and conducting complex, multi -disciplinary assignments for both private and public sector clients. Mr. Herman's areas of expertise include preparation of land use master plans for communities and regions; land use analyses and development feasibility studies; growth management strategies; and preparation of land use ordinances. He has extensive experience in planning assignments involving local, state, and federal regulatory agencies. Mr. Herman has also served as an expert witness in assignments involving land use planning, open space, and historic development patterns. PROJECT EXPERIENCE The following projects are representative of Mr. Herman's experience Comprehensive Land Use and Growth Management Plans • Adams County Comprehensive Plan, Adams County, Colorado • Arapahoe County Comprehensive Plan, Arapahoe County, Colorado • Avon Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan Update, Avon, Colorado • Berthoud Land Use Plan, Berthoud, Colorado • Broomfield Comprehensive Plan, Broomfield, Colorado • Casper Area Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Casper, Wyoming • Colorado Springs Comprehensive Plan, Colorado Springs, Colorado • Deadwood Comprehensive Plan, Deadwood, South Dakota • Flagstaff Area Regional Land Use and Transportation Plan, Flagstaff, Arizona • Fort Collins City Plan, Fort Collins, Colorado • Fort Collins Downtown Civic Center Master Plan, Fort Collins, Colorado • Greenwood Village Comprehensive Plan, Greenwood Village, Colorado • Hamilton Township Comprehensive Plan, Hamilton Township, New Jersey • I-25 Mixed -Use Development Area Plan, Weld County, Colorado • Northern Colorado Regional Planning Study, Latimer and Weld Counties, Coloradc • Northeast Plains Land Use and Infrastructure Study, Aurora, Colorado • Northwest Cheyenne Infrastructure and Development Plan, Cheyenne, Wyoming • Plan for the Region Between Loveland and Fort Collins, Latmer County, Colorado • Salida Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Salida, Colorado • Second Century Plan, Twin Falls, Idaho • Town of Superior Comprehensive Plan, Superior, Colorado • Ventnor City Comprehensive Plan, Ventnor, New Jersey • Westminster Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Westminster, Colorado FIRM CAPABILITY firm capability SERVICES Practice Landscape Architecture EDAW has been a guiding force in the fields of landscape architecture, urban Urban Planning + Design design, and environmental planning for over half a century. EDAW's special Resource Management emphasis on the broad and increasingly complex issues of land use planning and design both encourages appropriate use of resources and enhances the Environmental Analysis environment. Biological Services Economic Development Much of EDAW's planning work involves large sites. Landscape design Ecological Restoration projects, however, are at all scales, from small monuments to broad sweeps of property. Clients range from corporations and institutions to public agencies Site Engineering and architectural firms. Their common need is resolution of a land -based Water Feature Design problem, which is why EDAW, with its multi -disciplined staff— from planners and designers to geographers and irrigation engineers — is consistently OFFICES effective. ' Alexandria Philosophy Atlanta EDAW's concern is with every aspect of environmental management. We see Beijing planning and policy -making, environmental analysis, physical design and Brisbane implementation as a continuum of related professional activities. Through the Denver application of our professional skills, we strive to improve the quality of the Fort Collins relationship between people and their environment throughout the world. Glasgow Our firm is interested in significant work, not measured by size, but by Hong Kong relevance to a project's impact on its investors, community and setting. As Huntsville practiced by EDAW, planning and design are action -oriented processes that identify problems and create and evaluate alternate solutions to meet the Irvine client's goals. Each project is approached with this philosophy. Through London rigorous management and flexible decision -making processes, results are Los Angeles maximized within given time and cost constraints. Melbourne Miami Staff Montclair 750 professional, technical and administrative employees in 24 offices Paris worldwide, including 49 in Denver and 48 in Fort Collins. Sacramento Recognition San Diego Over 120 local, state and national awards in the last 20 years — both client- and San Francisco industry -based — exemplify EDAW's strong design and planning capabilities. Seattle Shanghai Shenzhen Sydney Tempe 9DAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE Land Use/Transportation Plans • I-25 Corridor Plan, Northern Colorado Communities • Light Rail Station Development Program, Denver, Colorado • Mason Street Corridor Plan, Fort Collins, Colorado • Rail -Oriented Development Handbook: Strategies & Tools to Support Passenger Rail, Colorado Department of Transportation • West Corridor Light Rail Environmental Impact Statement, Denver, Colorado Public Policy and Environmental Planning • Denver Federal Center Master Site Plan, Lakewood, Colorado • I-25 Regional Corridor Plan, Northern Colorado Communities • Liberty State Park Development and Implementation Strategy, Jersey City, New Jersey • Resource Recovery Financing Plan, State of New Jersey • St. Mary's Munitions Facility Environmental Assessment and Development Suitability Study, Sydney, Australia • Urban Land Institute Panel Advisory Studies - Mobile, Alabama, Peoria, Illinois, Denver, Colorado • Ventnor West Redevelopment Strategy, Ventnor, New Jersey • Wastewater Infrastructure Financing Program, State of New Jersey PREVIOUS PROFESSIONAL HISTORY • Director of Planning, Balloffet and Associates, Inc., Fort Collins, Colorado (1995-2000) • Principal, BHA Design, Inc., Fort Collins, Colorado (1992-1995) • Managing Director, EDAW Australia Pty. Ltd. (1989-1992) • Senior Associate/Director of Operations, EDAW, Inc. (1982-1989) • Assistant to the Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (1980-1982) • Senior Associate, RE Hughey and Associates, Inc. (1978-1980) EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY Declared expert in the discipline of land use planning in United States District Court, District of Idaho and County District Court, County of Jefferson, Colorado EDUCATION B.S., Environmental Studies and Planning, Richard Stockton College of New Jersey PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS • Member, American Institute of Certified Planners • Member, American Planning Association • Past President, Colorado Chapter of American Planning Association • Past Member, American Planning Association Chapter Presidents Council L L A R 1 0 N C L A R 1 O N Qualifications of Christopher J. Duerksen Clarion Associates Chris Duerksen is Managing Director of Clarion Associates, a land use -consulting firm with offices in Denver, Fort Collins, Snowmass Village, Chapel Hill, Chicago, Cincinnati, and Philadelphia. He has represented local governments, nonprofits, and the private sector in a variety of land -use and zoning matters and specializes in development code revisions, growth management planning, historic preservation, natural resource and scenic area protection strategies, airport -area development, and market development strategies. A co-founder of the Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute, Mr. Duerksen has written and spoken extensively on land use issues in Colorado and nationally. He has authored many books and articles on land use and conservation issues, including Takings Law in Plain English and Aesthetics, Community Character, and the Law. MAJOR PROJECTS • Henderson, Nevada, Comprehensive Zoning Code Revisions • Ft. Collins, Colorado, Land Development Code • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Zoning Ordinance • St. Louis, Missouri, Lambert Airport Economic Development Strategy • Cary, North Carolina, Unified Development Ordinance and Growth Management Plan • Wake County, North Carolina Growth Management Strategy • Southern Nevada Regional Growth Management Plan PROFESSIONAL HISTORY • Director - Gateway/Stapleton Development Office, City and County of Denver, 1988-1991 • Director of Development and Public Policy - The Enterprise Foundation, Columbia, Maryland, 1987- 1988 • Senior Associate and Director of Land Program - The Conservation Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1978-1987 • Associate and Attorney - Ross & Hardies, Chicago, 1973-1978 EDUCATION Juris Doctor - University of Chicago Bachelor of Arts, Cum Laude - Kansas State College Ford Foundation Local Government Fellowship - City of Oak Park, Illinois PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS AND OFFICES • Member, American Planning Association • Former Chair, American Bar Association Committee on Land Use, Planning, & Zoning • Member, Illinois Bar • Elected member of Fredericksburg, Va., City Council (1983-1987) PUBLICATIONS • Author or co-author of five major books on historic preservation law, environmental regulation of siting of major industrial facilities, river conservation, and national parks • Author or co-author of four major planning advisory service reports for the American Planning Association C L A R 1 O N Qualifications of Tina Axelrad Clarion Associates Tina Axelrad is a Planner and Attorney with Clarion Associates of Colorado, LLC, a land use -consulting firm with offices in Denver, Fort Collins, Snowmass Village, Chapel Hill, Chicago, Cincinnati, and Philadelphia. Ms. Axelrad's areas of expertise include development code drafting, comprehensive and growth management planning, open space/natural resources preservation, demographic/economic/market analysis, and identification of market opportunities and related land use issues and constraints. MAJOR PROJECTS • Adams County, Colorado, Comprehensive Plan • Chaffee County, Colorado, Comprehensive Plan • Colorado Springs Mixed -Use Development Standards • South Platte River/Santa Fe Corridor Master Plan, Englewood, Colorado • City Plan, Fort Collins, Colorado • Downtown Master Plan, Edmond, Oklahoma • Comprehensive Plan for the Downtown Historic District, Natchitoches, Louisiana PROFESSIONAL HISTORY • Associate and Attorney, Cox, Castle & Nicholson, Los Angeles, CA • Law Clerk, Berle, Kass & Case, New York, NY • Law Clerk, Robinson & Cole, Hartford, CT • Law Clerk, Siemon, Larsen & Purdy, Chicago, II, • Planning Assistant, Marlene Pawlowski, A.I.C.P., Wilkes-Barre, PA • Research Assistant, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. EDUCATION • Juris Doctor, cum laude -- New York University School of Law • Master of Urban Planning -- New York University Wagner School of Public Service • Bachelor of Arts in Economics, summa cum laude -- Connecticut College PUBLICATIONS • "The Search for Constitutionally Protected `Property' in Land Use Law," (with Kenneth B. Bley) The Urban Lawyer, Spring 1997 • "A Land Use Lawyer's Guide to Writs of Mandate," (with Kenneth B. Bley) California Land Use Forum, Spring1992 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Past Vice -President of External Affairs, Colorado Chapter of the American Planning Association Member, American Planning Association Member, California Bar Economic L- Planning Systems rI........ I.. DANIEL R. GUIMOND, AICP Background Dan Guimond is an economist and planner with over 20 years experience in economic and financial analysis and development planning for the public and private sectors. His activities on both land use and transportation -related projects include market and financial analyses, economic development and impact analyses, and implementation and capital improvements programming. Mr. Guimond is a Principal with Economic & Planning Systems, an urban economics firm with offices in Berkeley and Sacramento, California, and Denver, Colorado. Expertise Community and Regional Planning - Dan Guimond has extensive experience in land use policy analysis and the preparation of comprehensive plans and capital improvement programs at the local and regional level. He has been at the forefront of regional growth management efforts including the analysis of alternative urban forms and preparation of integrated regional growth and transportation plans for metropolitan planning organizations and councils of government. Redevelopment - Mr. Guimond has extensive project experience in large-scale redevelopment planning including the reuse of nine former military bases for civilian uses. His experience includes overall project management, evaluation of reuse potentials, development strategies, developer selection and negotiation, land and facility valuation, financing, and grants preparation. Downtown Development - Dan Guimond has been the director or principal analyst on over 25 projects concerning downtown development, urban revitalization, and historic preservation. These assignments addressed the economic, land use, and financial aspects of development including market analysis and determination of retail, residential and other development potentials; overall development strategy; specific project feasibility; financing; and implementation strategies. He has also been an economic consultant to the National Main Street Center of the National Trust For Historic Preservation in small communities in six states. D E N V E R Si C RC M E N TO 8 E R RL EY 7101 Arc,1Sulk 63U phnno_ Ili (,',I ph m:. H166.19-N010 pinnr. �Iu 11]')IR11 )"1",080,0_'-3i11 tor. 3iU 69-9019 1 91e p111 "1, hn 111111 9'U,V II rv)) I um DANIEL R. GuimoND ECONOMIC % PLANNING SYSTEMS PAGE 2 Retail Analysis - Mr. Guimond has specialized in retail market analysis, including market studies for neighborhood and regional shopping centers, department stores, discounters, and grocery store chains. For the public sector, he has evaluated the impacts of new retail facilities on the existing retail locations and measured the economic and financial benefits of new developments. He has also conducted over 25 downtown retail market studies for cities of all sizes. Economic Development - Dan Guimond has advised cities, counties, state, and federal agencies on a range of economic development issues, including preparation of economic development plans and strategies, capital improvement programs, fiscal impact analyses, and project development feasibility and funding. Specific project feasibility studies have addressed convention and conference centers, golf courses, and recreation facilities. He has also conducted feasibility studies and environmental impact statements on a wide range of tourism development projects including ski resorts, conference facilities, marinas, and resort developments. Transportation - Mr. Guimond has provided economic consulting services on all phases of transit and highway projects including major investment studies, environmental impact studies, preliminary engineering, and financing plans and programs. He has specialized in the land use/ relationship, examining a range of issues including alternative alignments, station locations, and potentials for economic development, transit -oriented development, and joint development. Tourism -oriented transportation projects include tourist trolleys and scenic byway plans. He has also focused on transportation investment policy including developing decision support systems for allocating financial resources based on outcomes and results. He has also developed special district financing plans and conducted benefit studies for other transportation improvements. Employment 1999-Present Principal, Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1997-1999 Principal, In Motion, Inc. 1993-1997 Vice President, BRW Inc. 1978-1992 Vice President, Hammer Siler, George Associates 1976-1978 Planner, Jefferson County Planning Department Education M.A., Urban Geography, University of Colorado, 1976 B.A., Political Science, University of Colorado, 1972 Affiliations American Institute of Certified Planners National Trust for Historic Preservation 0ENVEP SAC RA M E N 7 0 BE P N L EV 7;01-, SIrS<I-SUIIL(,)o 111 ...11 I10103 phnnc )1"'09-1010 phony- `110 fl41 "I911 1)lmer_(OW10_' d511 C¢. F1116'4911g9 I.n_ 916 b1L''o] I.n_ 310%119R11 '4' 'I") . .cllll Economic c. Planning; 'I i WALTER F. KIESER Background Walter Kieser is an urban economist and land use planner who during his 28- year professional career has specialized in applying economic and financial analysis methods to land use planning, real estate development, government organization, and public financing. Mr. Kieser is an expert in managing complex technical analyses and communicating planning, economic and financial concepts in a manner that effectively supports sound land use planning, public policy development, real estate investment decision making, strategic planning, and conflict resolution. His broad -based experience with land use, transportation and conservation planning, public/private financing agreements, inter -governmental agreements, infrastructure financing programs, local government reorganization, and real estate development projects combine to provide balanced and pragmatic solutions, ensuring that land use plans can be successfully implemented, infrastructure can be financed, and that real estate projects meet private -sector financial objectives while supporting public policy objectives. Walter Kieser is a founding Partner and Managing Principal of Economic & Planning Systems, Inc., an urban economics consulting firm with offices in Berkeley and Sacramento, California, and Denver, Colorado. Expertise Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis — Walter Kieser prepared and participated in several hundred fiscal and economic impact analyses on a wide variety of land use plans, development projects, and infrastructure improvements. These quantitative analyses have focused upon determining the cost of growth, policy refinement, and ensuring implementation within the context of land use plans, environmental impact analyses, and initiative ballot measures. Public Finance — Mr. Kieser has helped establish public financing for a wide variety of public services and infrastructure projects including development project -related infrastructure, area -wide capital improvement programs, and specific infrastructure projects. Financing techniques applied include formulation of area -specific and facility -specific impact fees, special tax bonds, and redevelopment tax increment financing. OENVER SRC NR ME NTO BEN NE L EY -1iU 19 Slr_eL S u. IC Gu I%"11' lh10`1 :. .-- phnr. 1116"1', ",1" [1L.n III, 'I]-')1'Ili n-:mc. 1.II.`01 WALTER F. KIESER ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS PAGE 2 Financial Negotiations — Walter Kieser prepared numerous feasibility studies and economic analyses and participated in real estate and infrastructure financing negotiations involving public agencies and private participants. These negotiations have resulted in mitigation and tax sharing agreements, development agreements, owner participation agreements, and real estate disposition agreements. Resource Conservation — Mr. Kieser developed and participated in numerous programs and projects designed to preserve open space and natural habitats, preserve agricultural lands, and ensure productive and sustainable use of natural resources. These programs have creatively applied regulatory mechanisms, compensatory regulations, and public acquisition techniques. Government Organization — Walter Kieser prepared and participated in over 50 feasibility studies addressing municipal incorporation, major annexations, special district formations and consolidations, and inter- governmental agreements. These feasibility studies involve preparation of detailed pro forma operational and capital budgets and analysis of impacts of reorganization upon existing agencies. Land Use and Transportation Planning — Mr. Meser participated in the preparation of over 50 comprehensive land use and transportation plans for cities and counties, with emphasis upon preparation of demographic and economic forecasts, land use analysis, and developing policies and programs related to resource conservation, public services, and infrastructure. Employment 1983-present Managing Principal, Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1977-1983 Managing Associate, Angus McDonald and Associates 1971-1976 Associate Planner, Sonoma County Planning Department 1967-1970 U.S. Army (Military Intelligence) Education Bachelor of Arts degree in Environmental Studies and Biology from Sonoma State University in 1974. Completed graduate courses in economics and public administration at Sonoma State University and the University of California, Berkeley. Affiliations American Planning Association, Member California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions, Associate Member International Society for Ecological Economics, Member Friends of the River, Member of the Board of Directors Yosemite Restoration Trust, Member of the Board and Vice President Econonl ii ,' Planninp, SN tems JANE BLACKSTONE Background Jane Blackstone is a planning and public policy professional with extensive experience managing complex redevelopment projects. During a twenty-two year career, Ms. Blackstone has specialized in program and policy analysis, the structuring and implementation of systems and organizations to manage public projects, and the facilitation of consensus on land use and other public policy issues. Her broad -based experience working on two successful military base conversions drives a practical, interdisciplinary approach to project planning and implementation. Ms. Blackstone is a Vice President with Economic & Planning Systems, an urban economics firm with offices in Berkeley and Sacramento, California, and Denver, Colorado. Expertise Military Base Redevelopment — As a senior manager of both the Lowry Air Force Base redevelopment and the conversion of the Presidio to a self-sustaining national park, Ms. Blackstone has participated in reuse planning, economic development conveyance negotiations, financing strategies, and implementation of mixed -use projects. Mixed -Use Redevelopment Projects — Jane Blackstone has developed and implemented reuse plans and financing strategies for redevelopment projects including commercial, mixed -income residential, recreational, and educational uses. Her work has ranged from planning to real estate leasing, sales, and property management. She has experience working in the context of both national and local historic designations. Land Use and Transportation Plannine and Proiect Management — Ms. Blackstone has planned and implemented practical solutions to land use and transportation issues. Her work has included natural resource and vegetation management programs, alternative zoning for new urbanist projects, subdivision platting, cultural landscape planning, and compliance with environmental and historic preservation regulations. She has managed transportation programs including traffic analysis, transportation demand management, a clean -fuel shuttle system, parking management, and multi -modal planning. D E N V E R SAC RA M E NTO BE RN EL EV ,,]O 17 S,rcel. lobe 6:0 I`hn u.'. t 111. 611,.5011, i. iJ D nq r. (IU NO'0 `-?SII ten. f ,.yule fnc elo fiJ, 1" lot. �In s11 o]uH ov�.eps uim JANE BLACKSTONE ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS PAGE Government Organization — Jane Blackstone has participated in the start-up of several organizations and inter -agency projects, in both local government and federal contexts. Her work has included strategic planning, fiscal and feasibility analysis, budgeting and forecasting, as well as the management of logistics, information, and human resources associated with government organization. Public Participation Strategies — Ms. Blackstone has extensive experience developing and implementing public participation strategies using a range of techniques including public information, media placement, public meetings, and citizen committees. Her work has emphasized effective communication and consensus building. Employment 2001-present Vice President, Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1998-2000 Deputy Director for Planning & Real Estate, Presidio Trust 1993-1997 Deputy Director, Lowry Redevelopment Authority 1991-1992 Management Analyst, City of Aurora 1989-1990 Real Estate Sales Associate, Norris, Beggs & Simpson 1981-1988 Program/Project Management, King County 1977-1980 Personnel Management Specialist, U.S. EPA Education M.A., Public Administration, Daniel Evans School of Public Policy at the University of Washington, 1982 B.A., English, Cornell University,1977 � nw Economic & Planning Systems ANDREW M. KNUDTSEN, AICP Background Andrew Knudtsen has extensive experience with real estate feasibility analysis, fiscal impact assessment, market research, housing needs assessment, and policy development. Expertise Commercial Development Market Assessment — Mr. Knudtsen has extensive expertise evaluating demand for commercial and residential development. In addition to numerous residential market studies, he has completed commercial market assessments that identify supportable square footage for large-scale market areas over extended forecasting periods. His work has provided a basis for policy development that is grounded in market -based research and analysis. Fiscal Impact Assessment — Andrew Knudsen has built economic models designed to estimate the economic impacts to local government under various growth scenarios. His work includes economic and demographic growth projections that are used to quantify the costs and revenues attributable to development. Clients have benefited from these assessments as they are able set policy that directs future growth. His work has evaluated projected funding levels, accounting for future expenditures and identifying the surplus or deficit likely to occur under various modeling assumptions. Housing Needs Assessment — Mr. Knudtsen has completed numerous housing needs assessments and jobs/housing balance studies. He has quantified overall supply and demand for housing enabling communities to focus their policy and development efforts on specific sectors. He has enabled communities to recognize the key role affordable housing plays in sustaining economic viability and the need for a range of housing options to reflect the community's economic profile. Land Use Analysis — Andrew Knudtsen has forecast growth for residential, commercial, and industrial sectors and has helped communities determine the optimal development capacity for each, based on community values and economic needs. 0 E N V E S 71011'Sl mei. So,, Gi90 phouo. =10fi'S jgs] Unnor. ( 0 80'02_1ilI'll, 11111�10111 l Yue_ i0_ 911-: i S AC BRM E NTO BEP K EI EY pl w. "if,61') 01" hl unc `10->1[ '[90 PROJECT EXPERIENCE Castle Rock Vision 2020 Castle Rock, Colorado Client: Town of Castle Rock EDAW worked closely with the Town of Castle Rock to update their Vision document. This process included numerous meetings with Town Planners and Vision Committee members, as well as four neighborhood forums held throughout the community. The process included an in-depth look at existing goals for the Town, updating these goals and determining an overall vision statement. 'Vision 2020' is Castle Rock's collective idea or concept of what it wants to become in the future. Its purpose is fourfold: to declare, guide, unite, and motivate. The Vision is organized into two parts: an overall Vision Statement and four sub -categories called 'Cornerstones of the Town of Castle Rock.' The Four Cornerstones are the fundamental town -making principles of a community and they expand upon the overall Vision Statement. Each of these four categories contains a series of goals that, when accomplished, will drive the town toward its desired future. Future phases of the project include an update to the comprehensive plan and completion of design guidelines, both to coincide with the overall Vision established for the Town. EDAIN INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE ANDREW M. KNUDTSEN ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS PACE Public Policy - Mr. Knudtsen has worked extensively with elected officials and community representatives regarding policy evaluation and implementation. His work is geared to providing a basis for public officials to make informed policy decisions. Employment 2001—present Associate, Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1998-2001 Principal, Knudtsen and Company Consulting 1995-1998 Housing Division Director, Town of Vail 1990-1995 Senior Planner, Town of Vail 1988-1990 Planning Associate, City of Boulder Education Courses in real estate investment analysis, Commercial Investment Real Estate Institute 1996through 1998 Bachelors of Environmental Design, Magna Cum Laude, Univ. of Colorado, 1987 DENY EN SAC RA M E N TO B E R KE LEV 75o 1' Y1,, 1. Sun, 6 lhonm ;10 6"-5557 Ino-('11) IM) phnnc �10-141 01011 Uen .. ('OFU'0"5911 fv.. ;o e'yyp P� (a._ `�lo-o;H-_'ll% L�. ,1U I RESOLVE, Inc. MICHAEL HUGHES EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Michael Hughes, MCP, AICP, is a mediator and trainer with experience in public policy mediation, workplace mediation and mediator training. He has conducted regulatory negotiations, policy dialogues and site -specific mediations at the local, state and federal level and is knowledgeable about a broad range of land use, transportation, air quality, waste, health and other related issues. Mike has extensive experience in conflict resolution, facilitation, and training in the public sector. He uses those same principles to assist employees in private companies, non-profit organizations and government agencies to effectively recognize, raise, and resolve their own conflicts. Mike holds a Master's Degree in City Planning from the University of Pennsylvania (1984), worked as a planner in local government and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners. He received a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and Sociology from the University of Denver magna cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa (1981). He received leadership training through the University of Colorado Center for the Improvement of Public Management's Rocky Mountain Program (1986) and was trained in mediation by CDR Associates (1991). EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 2000 - present Senior Mediator. RESOLVE Previously Partner, CDR Associates SELECTED MEDIATION AND FACILITATION PROJECTS East Mulberry Corridor, Ft. Collins and Larimer County, Colorado (2001-2002) Facilitating the work of a Community Advisory Panel as its members assist the city and county develop a land use, urban design and transportation plan for the corridor and assess whether the city should annex the area. Fluoride Technical Study Group, City of Ft. Collins, Colorado (2002) Facilitating the work of a technical study group charged with reviewing scientific information about the risk and benefits of fluoridating drinking water supplies and reporting those findings to the Board of Health and Water Board so that they might make recommendations to the City Council concerning the current practice of adding fluoride to community drinking water supplies. Jobs -to -Population Task Force, City of Boulder, Colorado (2001-2002) Assisted the City Manager in selecting participants that represent the widest array of perspectives on whether the City of Boulder should make changes in zoning, land use regulation or other policies to ensure that future development yields a match between jobs and housing as one method of reducing regional commuting, realizing the City's vision of a compact urban form, reducing pressure on housing prices and addressing other community and environmentalconcerns. Facilitating task force work aimed at evaluating job and population forecasts, generating alternative future development scenarios, evaluating the scenarios and developing a public process to gather wider community input about the scenarios and the policies required to achieve them. Children's Health Protection, U.S. EPA (2000-2001) Led the work of the Science and Research Work Group of EPA's Federal Advisory Committee on Children's Health. Assisted the work group as its members initiated a new research project to link children's disease and environmental causes at specific life stages. Facilitated work group meetings, convened a subgroup that included outside expertise and managed the work of an external consultant. 1NIICHAEL A. HUGHES Community Advisory Committee, Pikes Peak Regional Council of Governments, Year-2025 Plan (2001) Assisted the community advisory committee to review and revise elements of the transportation plan and develop consensus recommendations to the council's board of directors. The committee's success in concluding its deliberations helped the regional council meet its deadline and protect Federal funding for the transit, highway, trail and enhancement projects in the plan. Lower Blue Basin Master Plan Summit County, Colorado (2001) Assisted the County's Lower Blue Planning Commission to meet its deadline in producing a draft plan for the basin. The plan addressed important policy questions including agricultural preservation, utility location, transportation, design, recreation, environmental quality, urban growth boundaries and Town/County cooperation. Boulder County AIDS Project, Board of Director's Retreat (2001) Designed and facilitated the board's - annual retreat. In a one -day session, the board was able to make significant progress on questions of the proper role of board members vis-a-vis staff members, clarify board structure and decision -making protocols. and begin work on a revision to the board's by-laws. Planning Commission Retreat, City of Boulder, Colorado (2000) Interviewed all planning commission members, designed the agenda and facilitated both the retreat and follow-on meetings. U.S. EPA Center for Drinking Water Optimization Strategic Plan (2000) Designed and facilitated the strategic planning retreat for EPA and contractor staff members interested in setting the direction for the center. Denver Radium Site— Citizen Advisory Group (2000) Convened a citizens group that will advise U.S. EPA as the agency removes radioactive material form the Shattuck Site. Working with key stakeholders to reach consensus on the group composition and the operating agreements that will guide their deliberations. Silver Creek Watershed Remediation (2000) Facilitated meetings among Federal. state and local officials, environmental, historic, business and community activists and representatives of a mining company to assist them in reaching consensus on the manner, timing, cost and cost allocation of remediation efforts. TREX (Southeast Corridor Transportation Expansion) Partnering Workshops (2000-2001) Designed and facilitated partnering workshops for a 70-member team that included the Colorado Department of Transportation, Regional Transportation District, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Authority and the private contractors as they developed the design -build request for proposal. The partnering workshops focused on problem -solving skills and strategies and produced a partnering charter. Evergreen Transportation (2000) Facilitated a consensus -building process aimed at selecting a preferred alternative for improving the intersection of County Road 73 and State Highway 74 in Evergreen, Colorado. The stakeholders successfully created a preferred alternative. Arvada Parks, Trails and Open Space Master Plan (2000) Convened and facilitated citizen advisory committee discussions that will direct the city's investment in parks and open space. The committee includes homeowners, developers, environmentalists and representatives from different recreation programs. The committee reached agreement on a recommended plan and submitted the plan to the City Council. City of Boulder Comprehensive Plan, Mixed -use Designation (2000). Assisted the planning department and neighborhood interests to design and conduct a public meeting to explore concerns over designating a commercial area for mixed -use development. City of Boulder, Housing Strategy and Residential Growth Management. (1999). Assisted the planning and housing departments in their efforts to design a public process that would lead to community support for MICHAEL A. HUGHES a new housing strategy. Facilitated public meetings to exchange information and provide an opportunity for community dialogue about city housing policy. Rocky Mountain Arsenal, Restoration Advisory Board (1998). Evaluated the citizen advisory component of the Arsenal's restoration process, including issues of meeting management, planning, group dynamics and public participation. Developed a set of recommendations to improve the function and increase the effectiveness of the advisory board. Transportation Policy and Plan, Arapahoe County, Colorado (1997). Successfully mediated an agreement among five elected officials from Arapahoe County, Greenwood Village and Aurora, Colorado. The resolution brings the three jurisdictions' transportation plans into agreement and resolves long-standing differences in transportation policy. Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Facility Future Site Use Working Group (1993-95) Assessed the feasibility of facilitating a public planning process and then convened and facilitated the working group that was charged with making future site use recommendations to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). PUBLICATIONS Co -Author of "Facilitating Statewide HIV/AIDS Pcficies and Priorities in Colorado," The Consensus Building Handbook, Susskind, McKearnan and Thomas-Larner, eds., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1999. EDUCATION 1984 Masters in City Planning, University of Pennsylvania 1981 Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Sociology, University of Denver, CO. magna cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa RESOLVE, Inc. JODY ERIKSON MEDIATIONNACIUrATION EXPERIENCE 6/01- HIV Resources Planning Council, Denver, CO Assist the planning council in creating the process for a two-day council retreat and three community meetings. The goal is priority setting and resource allocation for dispersing congressional funds from the Ryan White Care Act to HIV services in Denver. Facilitate the two-day retreat, and three community meetings. Draft and finalize a report detailing the outcomes and describing the process that led to those results. 6/00- Shattuck Citizen Advisory Group, Denver, CO Three-year commitment to facilitate the CAG's monthly meetings and task group meetings. Generate agendas, and meeting summaries. Communicate with all CAG members and U.S. EPA 5/31/01- Business Council for HealthCare Competition, Denver CO Facilitated the Board of Directors yearly retreat. The BCHC is an issue council of Colorado Association of Commerce & Industry (CACI). BCHC lobbies the Colorado legislature on health care issues for the business community. Members included Pacificare, CEO of the Alliance. NFIB. Director of Government for Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shields, and the CEO of CACI. 2/01- American Lands Alliance, Forest Restoration Summit, Boulder, CO Facilitated sessions focused on reforestation principles and implementation 4/19/99 and 5/19/99 CLEANIT, and ONEW, Denver, CO Facilitated two meetings between the two community groups. The groups were challenging EPA to reverse its decision to bury hazardous waste on site in the city of Denver, in their neighborhood. Anticipated conflict due to past history between the two organizations. Focused on their goal to work together and present a unified front. EXPERIENCE River Guide, Clear Creek Rafting, Idaho Springs, CO 4- current/ 2001, 5-9/2000 Guided rafts with 6-8 guests on Clear Creek and the Arkansas river Instructed guests on paddling technique and safety procedures Created and encouraged group cohesiveness, and a team atmosphere River Guide, River Heritage Society, Denver, CO 5-9/1998,1999 Motivated & encouraged guests. fostered a team atmosphere Created a safe environment, Maintained safety, both on and off the water Guided rafts with 6-8 guests on the Platte, Arkansas, and Colorado rivers Education University of Denver, Colorado, B.A., 1993: Major: Human Communications, Minor: Studio Art University of Denver, Colorado, Alternative Dispute Resolution graduate program CDR, Boulder, Colorado, 10/00: Collaborative Processes for Public Policy Clashes Douglas R Porter President, The Growth Management Institute Growth Management Advisor, Planning and Development Consultant 5406 Trent Street, Chevy Chase, MD 20815 Telephone/FAX 301/656-9560 e-mail: dporter@GMIonline.org Douglas Porter is a nationally -recognized authority on all forms of growth management. For many years he has monitored, analyzed, and written about growth management programs, techniques, and issues at state, regional, and local levels throughout the United States. He returned to private practice in 1991 after 12 years at the Urban Land Institute, where he directed ULI's public policy research program. Since 1991 he has engaged in a broad variety of assignments grounded on his wide knowledge of growth management issues and practices. In 1992 he founded The Growth Management Institute as a nonprofit organization to carry on his ULI experience in information exchange, research, and educational endeavors. In his prior career, he had completed 20 years of consulting in planning and development, mostly as a principal at Marcou, O'Leary and Associates in Washington, D.0 Through the Institute and in private practice, Porter has focused on several aspects of urban development. • Evaluations of existing and proposed growth management policies, regulations, and practices as they relate to the development process at community and project scales; • Assistance in formulating strategies and resolving issues concerning community development at local, regional, and state levels; • Analyses of linkages between land use panems, transportation systems, and environmental concerns; • Organizing, managing, and participating in conferences, workshops, and small -group discussions to explore growth management issues. Porter brings a breadth of expertise that bridges interdisciplinary boundaries. His work focuses on essential technical, administrative, and political issues that influence urban development. In addition, in his experience with ULI, Porter learned the value of meshing public and private interests to achieve community development objectives. His extensive previous experience in redevelopment, downtown revitalization, project approvals, and impact analyses provided a valuable foundation for his work in growth management. These efforts have been carried out in close working relationships with consultant teams, local advisory groups, public administrators at federal, state, and local levels, environmental groups, and development firms. Porter was appointed a Fellow of the Urban Land Institute in 1998. Governor Glendening appointed him Chairman of the Maryland Transportation Commission from 1995 to 1997. The Growth Management Institute EDUCATION AND TEACHING B.S. in Urban Planning, Michigan State University, 1957. M.S. in Urban and Regional Planning, University of Illinois, 1960, Adjunct Professor, Berman Real Estate Institute, Johns Hopkins University (1992 - 1996). Graduate course on planning and regulatory techniques. Adjunct Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Virginia (1993 - ongoing). Course on state and regional growth management (current). Fellow, Urban Land Institute, 1999-. Faculty Associate, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (1992-93, 2000-2001) Coordinator, Urban and Regional Planning Program, Catholic University, Washington, DC, 1976-79. Lecturer, Department of Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Illinois, 1960. Visiting Lecturer at numerous universities. Organizational Memberships and Activities Member, American Planning Association, American Institute of Certified Planners, Urban Land Institute Lambda Alpha International (land economics honorary society), Transportation Research Board (Land Development Committee), and Urban Land Institute. Appointed Fellow of the Urban Land Institute in 1999. Professionally Related Activities: Shaw Area Cooperative Housing Council, Washington, D.C., 1968. Mayor's Downtown Housing Committee, Washington, D.C., 1990. Friendship Heights Sector Plan Advisory Committee for Montgomery County, 1991-2. Infrastructure Financing Subcommittee, Economic Development Advisory Committee, Montgomery County, 1992. Member of the Board of Directors, Chesapeake and Potomac Regional Alliance, 1992 Member of the Steering Committee, Partnership for Excellence Task Force, Washington Regional Council of Governments (1993 - 1994). Chairman, Maryland Transportation Commission (1995 - 97) Member, Steering Committee for Metropolitan Development Public Advisory Committee, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (1997 - ) Member, Technical Advisory Committee, Center for Sustainable Development at Playa Vista (1998 -) The Growth Management Institute ANNE WARHOVER Anne Warhover is the President and CEO of the Downtown Denver Partnership, a private, non-profit corporation. The Partnership, a group of three separate corporate entities and one quasi governmental entity, markets Downtown as a vibrant and diverse place to work, live, play and invest. A six million dollar annual budget provides funds for services designed to give downtown Denver a competitive edge as the business center and entertainment destination for the Rocky Mountain Region. Services include keeping downtown clean and safe, retaining and recruiting jobs, facilitating housing development, marketing entertainment and retail destinations to the metro area residents, and producing three major annual events. In her role as President, Anne is responsible for implementing the policies set by four separate boards of directors who represent 475 member businesses and over 600 downtown property owners. Prior to joining the Partnership in 1992, Anne was a vice president of First Interstate Bank of Denver. As a banker for over 15 years, Anne provided corporate banking services to regional and national customers and managed the Community Relations Department. She graduated from the University of Colorado. Volunteer activities include or have included: Women's Bean Project Board of Directors Warren Village Board of Directors Colorado Housing Assistance Corporation Board of Directors Friends of the River (Greenway Foundation) Meals On Wheels Volunteer Adopt A Family Volunteer Denver Public Schools Volunteer Founding Chair, Business Capital Corporation Denver Athletic Club Board of Directors Leadership Denver Class of 1992 Donald F. Silar, P.E. Sear -Brown Education Professional Experience B.S., Civil Engineering, Colorado State Don Silar, a Project Manager for Sear -Brown has worked in civil engineering University, 1976 and construction since 1976. He emphasizes thorough and efficient planning, design, contract document preparation and construction ' Professional Registration inspection/administration. Don is experienced in site investigations, report Professional Engineer, Colorado, and preparation, computer aided and conventional planting and design, and Wyoming construction inspection/administration. Details of Mr. Silar's project experience are described below: Professional Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers Water System Design and Construction Experience - Projects totaling over " American Water Works Association 36 miles of 6-inch to 30-inch distribution and transmission lines Special District Association containing unique features including river crossings; bored railroad. Colorado Municipal League highway crossings; aerial crossings: construction in hazardous - environments (e.g., gasoline contaminated soils); analysis of freezing potential for shallow cover and exposed installation: alternate restraining systems: corrosion assessment and abatement programs: wetlands assessment and impact mitigation: raw water diversion structures: development of traffic control plans. well design: metering and pressure control stations/vaults; and installations employing trenchless technologies. All of these designs involved close coordination and negotiation for easements across private, state, and federal lands: preparation of casement documents. preparation of crossing permits: preparation of traffic control plans: and assessment of Trenchless Technology applications. Additionally, Mr. Silar's experience includes pump stations. river diversion structures for the interception of raw water. and storage reservoirs and tanks. • Water System Hydraulic Analysis - Performed hydraulic analysis on distribution and transmission systems for numerous communities. These analyses involved in -field data collection, model calibration, and analyses to determine existing system constraints, future improvements, and optimization of the performance of the distribution grid and associated appurtenances (e.g., booster stations, control valves, and storage facilities); and transient wave (surge) assessment and mitigation. '0 Wastewater and Stormwater System Design and Construction Experience - Design and construction inspection/administration services on projects totaling 36 miles of interceptor lines and force mains to 144 inches in ' diameter, lift stations, metering facilities, and special appurtenances such as comminutor facilities, grease traps, and diversion and energy dissipation structures. These projects contained numerous unique aspects, including ' river crossings: bored railroad, state, county, and federal highway crossings: aerial crossings of water courses: construction in petroleum contaminated soils: assessment of freeze potentials in shallow cover and ' exposed installations; construction in unstable soil conditions; wetlands assessment and mitigation; development of traffic control plans: assessment of the corrosion potential; design metering stations; and ' assessment, design and construction of Trenchless Technology applications. "The Vision is to make change work for Fort Collins... while protecting the best of what we have... and recognizing who and what Fort Collins will become ... by preserving a sense of community identity and pride. Fort Collins will confront and mitigate the negative impacts of the car on our lives. Fort Collins will share in the region's responsibilities." - Fort Collins City Plan PROJECT EXPERIENCE East Mulberry Street (Hwy 14) Corridor Plan Fort Collins, Colorado Client: City of Fort Collins/Lorimer County EDAW is currently working with the City of Fort Collins and Larimer County to complete a sub -area plan for a three-mile primary corridor that brings people from I-25 to Downtown Fort Collins. The project is anticipated to be 14 months in length, with extensive public open houses and almost weekly meetings with a Technical Advisory Group. A Community Advisory Group has also been established to aid in the process. The team has been undertaking an analysis of physical conditions and is currently conducting a market analysis to determine what future land uses would be viable in the corridor over time. Development on the site will be closely tied to the local marketplace and regional economy. Critical to the financial and market success of the corridor will be a land use plan that reflects an understanding of the market, the mix of uses in demand, the interrelationship of activities that create synergy and what types of development create positive returns. The project includes identification of issues, establishment of goals and objectives, creating alternative and a preferred framework plan, completing transportation modeling, and creating a corridor streetscape design and design standards for implementation. Select early physical improvement projects will be identified for Phase I implementation. The preferred plan will include a specific implementation package that assesses the feasibility for the City of Fort Collins to annex county lands. ■DAMN INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE APPROACH approach PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH The City of Fort Collins, with issuance of this request for proposal, has demonstrated a serious commitment to monitoring and guiding growth within the community. A great deal of thorough, thoughtful work went into creating City Flan. The next step is to sustain the Vision for Fort Collins through a methodical updating of City Plan based on new needs, insights gained from the past five years, the ongoing challenges of effectively managing growth, and citizen concerns. Clearly, Fort Collins is a community on the forefront of growth management policy, supporting good urban form, and balancing the wishes of individual citizens with the realities of maintaining and enhancing the living environment of our community. The update will build on these strengths. As the City Pl, n vision states, Fort Collins recognizes the importance of its role in the region. The City exerts a strong influence on the regional economy and on other communities in Larimer County and beyond. In turn, the City will continue to be profoundly affected by land use and other decisions made in these surrounding communities. The need for regional coordination is critical. There are practical limits, however, to what can be accomplished through regional cooperation and an exploration of strategies for a more direct involvement in shaping land use within adjacent areas should be considered. These strategies can range from strengthening Intergovernmental agreements to conservation easements to strategic annexations. The underlying framework for this exploration will be an intensive evaluation of how and where the community wants to direct future growth and the influence these decisions have on the City's form. Our overall approach to this project is summarized below. More detail is provided in subsequent sections. APPROACH TO PLANNING This project must accomplish five key goals: Identify market demand for the City and the region and establish an understanding of how these forces influence land use decisions. • Complete a 'what -if' process that identifies the short and long tern desires of the community. • Review existing policies and tools to analyze their effectiveness towards achieving an updated vision for the community. • Establish a new City Plan map that reflects any modifications in growth management strategy for the community. Create an implementation plan that includes both physical and policy recommendations to support the City Plan update. EDAW INC DESIGN. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE APPROACH These goals must be met within the context of the four basic components to the City: Neighborhoods, Districts, Corridors, and Edges. These basic building blocks to a community will be reviewed in context of growth, infill, open space (corridors and edges) and revitalization/densifrcation as a component to this planning process to define the future urban form for the community. We have structured the planning process into two parts to best meet these goals. Part I is designed to achieve the first two goals and Part II will address the other three. An effective planning approach must be community -driven, multi -disciplinary, and focused on achieving consensus where it can. Even in those areas lacking consensus, however, appropriate decisions must be made. APPROACH TO DESIGN Even though this is a Comprehensive Plan Update, Urban Design considerations need to be addressed at this scale in order to set the physical and policy framework for individual project implementation down the road. These considerations include: • Urban Form Each building, collection of buildings, open space, and the urban form created by the delicate inter -relationships of these elements creates the place, the density and the 'features' that makes a community special. The integration of design, market realities, ecology, and engineering will be the key to maintaining a memorable sense of place for Fort Collins. Infrastructure and the Environment Critical to this project will be the integration with the Transportation Alaster Plan. The integration of Land Use and Transportation is paramount to creating a livable community that promotes smart growth policies. Land Uses affect the need for transportation, and, vice versa, transportation can be used as a tool to guide land uses, ultimately promoting smart growth policies. The resolution of current and future infrastructure demands such as vehicular and pedestrian flow, utilities, and parking appropriately combined with the design and implementation of streetscape and pedestrian enhancements will create a unique connected system of urban places in Fort Collins. We will suggest smart growth solutions to support future development within Fort Collins, and through the integrated planning and transportation process, will strive to design for sustainability and longevity. • Sense of Place The decisions made on where to grow, how the growth occurs, and what the growth looks like will affect the long term sense of place for Fort Collins. This City Plan update will need to address these issues in order to preserve the sense of place that the leaders and citizens of Fort Collins desire for the future. APPROACH TO COMMUNICATION Successful planning and implementation outcomes are generated through resourceful and productive interaction among the City and their staff and project committees and working groups, community and neighborhood representatives, the media, the general public and the planning team. We understand the importance of involving a wide and diverse audience during the evolution of development plans. In fact, we believe that nurturing client and community involvement and understanding is the first step in any successful project. LDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE APPROACH We utilize a number of techniques and tools to ensure success for our clients and the communities in which we have worked. These methods include both technology based communication methods and hands-on meetings and workshops. These methods as proposed for each contact group involved are described below. Communication Amongst Team Members: Communication among all team members is critical to the success of the project process. Our team will begin the project by establishing a Team Communications Collaborative to be used throughout the process. EDAW will act as primary contact with the client group, and will provide coordination through team leaders from Clarion, EPS, Resolve, Sear Brown and Growth Management Institute. This Communications Collaborative will, aside from day-to-day phone calls, also include the numerous forms of communication and transfer of data typically used today, including email, Federal Express, facsimile, File Transfer Protocol, and conference calling. We will also support the City's project Web site by supplying graphics and text for the City to post. Communication with the Client Group: Communication with the Client Group is also critical to the project's success. We have found that projects of this scale often include several weekly calls by the Project Manager and weekly calls with the Project Director. We have included monthly meetings with the Citv Staff Group. Day-to-day calls and emails between the EDAW Team Project Manager and the City of Fort Collins Project Manager assures a smooth process from those elements from planning and market strategies to logistical items such as where a meeting will take place and checking on the status of a document. Conference calls may also occur between key EDAW team members and City Staff in order to focus on individual items that may come up during the planning process. Interim meetings throughout the process with Council members, Plan Commission members, and/or stakeholders will occur as necessary to assure open communication and support consensus building. Communication with the Transportation Master Plan Team: This will be critical to the success of both projects. Land Use and Transportation are intimately interrelated, and therefore the EDAW team will work with the Staff Group in the project kick-off meeting to establish the precise communication techniques to be used in collaboration between the two teams throughout the process. In addition, we have identified key meeting times for both teams in our Scope of Services Embracing Collective Input: We understand the need to work together with the Project Manager, the Staff Group, and designated Stakeholders throughout the design process. Active client, stakeholder and community participation is always an integral part of our approach. We welcome input from users throughout the planning team's process as that input educates us to issues, facts and stories we might otherwise miss. Further, it builds stronger ownership of the plan and, ultimately, of the built environment. We have included five public workshops in the current scope outline based on the project schedule, but are open to adding additional workshops or informal meetings as necessary to promote consensus from the public and greater stakeholders. • Communication with the Public: We wholeheartedly embrace public participation as an integral component of the design process. We can reach out to the public through: EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE APPROACH Public workshops where ideas are presented and planning concepts evolve through public dialogue and small group work. Feedback and comments from the public will be gathered during pubic meetings. Project newsletters, fact sheets, press releases and web site communication to provide access to drawings, photographs, meeting highlights, interview summaries and plan drafts. In the project start-up, it is important to establish the broad outlines of the public outreach strategy, including: • Whether to create a Citizens Advisory Committee, and if so, the composition, purpose, timeframe and expected outcome. • Whether to use a survey instrument, when and with what goal in mind. • When to include face-to-face communication between the staff team/ project team and the general public (lectures, public meetings, open houses, charrettes) and with what goals in mind. • How to effectively work with existing civic and community organizations (neighborhood associations, community groups, services clubs, advocacy groups) and to what end. • When to use mass communication (newsletters, press releases, press conferences, mailings) and with what goals in mind. • How to use electronic communication (web sites, e-mail distribution lists) and for what purpose. EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL & SCHEDULE scope of proposal & schedule IfI , ....A......a - CITY PLAN UPDATE PART 1: TYPE OF COMMUNITY, GMA PURPOSEIBOUNDARY DECISION (6 MONTHS) PHASE 7 - INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS (4 MONTHS) TASK 1 PROJECT START-UP The EDAW team will coordinate project initiation, data gathering, establishment of a public outreach program, and development of a comprehensive work program, budget and project schedule. City staff will preliminarily define the Growth Management Committee (GMC), Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC), and assist in gathering information and generating GIS mapping products. A project kick-off meeting will occur to complete the following subtasks. Subtasks: • Finalize the detailed work program pertaining to the EDAW team and staff tasks, budget, and the project schedule. • Establish document formats, project notebooks, project website, project directory and reporting requirements. The EDAW team will create a project directory, and will utilize e-mail as a primary form of communication amongst team members and client contacts. Facsimile, conference calls and other means of communication will be used to assure the most efficient planning process. Document and mapping formats will also be established at this time between team members and with the City of Fort Collins. • Define a Growth Management Committee (GMC), which is comprised of a basic staff core, as well as selected other agency representatives as appropriate. • Establish the final Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC). We presume that the committee will be broadly representative of the community interests and would include growth management advocates and skeptics, environmentalists, business interests, University affiliates, young, old, men, women, long-time residents, newcomers, etc. Among the members should be several who are also serving in an advisory role for the transportation planning process. These members would have an additional liaison role to play. We presume that there would be a similar Citizen Advisory Committee for transportation and that a membership overlap will be an essential part of the effort to coordinate the two planning processes. In addition, we anticipate several combined CAC meetings that will include all members of the Transportation and City Plan Update CAC Committees. EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL & SCHEDULE • Discuss mass media, electronic communication and the network of existing community organizations. • Discuss project expectations. • Finalize the comprehensive public outreach and public participation process. The EDAW team will review and enhance, as appropriate, following discussion with the GMC. It is anticipated that the public participation process will include four public workshops, public lectures, and a series of Citizen Advisory Committee meetings. This will include the preparation of presentation materials, PowerPoint presentations and -- other handout information. • Obtain any additional background information, including an electronic copy of City Plan. • As part of this early phase, we propose to announce the plan update, the formation of the Citizen Advisory Committee and the public involvement framework to the general public. • Discuss and finalize coordination between the Citv Plan Update and Transportation Master Plan. (Group meetings to be noted as CPU/TMP/ Staff) • Document City Council and Staff Issues. Duration: 2 weeks Deliverables: One camera-ready/electronic final detailed work program, budget, project schedule, Growth Management Committee roster, and final Citizen Advisory Committee roster Meetings: Staff-1 TASK 2 INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS The EDAW team will develop an inventory of information relating to existing plans, studies, agreements and ordinances. This information will be shared with the Consultant selected for the Transportation Plan. These include, but may not be limited to: A) The current City Plan. B) Other Elements of City Plan: Specific Sub -area and Corridor Plans. Examples include the Historic Old Town Area Plan, the Harmony Corridor Plan and the Campus West Plan. Members of the EDAW team have recently been working on the Mountain Vista Sub -Area Plan, the I- 25 Sub -Area Plan, the East Mulberry Corridor Plan, the Mason Street Corridor Plan and several other plans in the Fort Collins Area. C) Utility/Service Master Plans. Examples include the 1989 Poudre Fire Authority Strategic Plan, the Box Elder Drainage Study, the Cooper Slough Drainage Study and the Light and Power Master Plan. D) Implementation Tools. Examples include the City's Land Use Code, Growth Management Area Agreement with Larimer County, and the Capital Improvements Program. E) Other Non -City Plans and Programs. Examples include special purpose districts, Larimer County PLUS, CSU Master Campus Plan, and the 1992 Poudre R-1 Master Plan. F) The review should also include new and emerging plans which have been adopted but not yet implemented so that the policies required for implementation and any associated costs are included in the analysis such as the Downtown Strategic Plan. EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL S SCHEDULE Aerial view of Fort Collins, CO G) The City Council's Themes, Goals and Objectives. H) Regional Data sets, including comprehensive/land use plans, parks and open space plans, IGA's and GMA's from surrounding municipalities and counties. These will be entered into a GIS system to be used during Phase 2. EDAW is working on the implementation of the Northern Colorado Separator Study, recently developed several long-term land use scenarios for the City of Greeley and just completed the Windsor Comprehensive Plan. This information about local land use plans in the area should facilitate this task. I) Property ownership and land status (public, private, protected etc..) for lands surrounding the GMA. J) Natural resources information including sensitive wildlife habitat, prime farmland, natural hazards, wetlands and flood plains. Ubtasks: • Base maps of the City will be provided from the City's existing database of City Plan Mapping. In subsequent tasks, data overlays/changes will be created in Arc View format in keeping with the standards specified by the City. • Review, inventory and evaluate existing information, relations to existing public master plans or private development plans, and context of adjoining areas. • Interview service providers to document their capacity to serve existing and future development as well as to understand future plans and potential improvement costs. Sear -Brown, the project civil engineer, will bring their knowledge of existing systems, which will allow the team to be efficient in the collection of information and the assessment of the City's future needs. • Review, inventory and evaluate the existing county/municipal services, including fire, police, school, library, etc. for existing service levels and the possibility of incurring additional service areas for the City. • Facilitate up to 20 stakeholder interviews with key property owners, business owners, developers, and City officials. These interviews will take place during a scheduled two-day stakeholder's session. The stakeholder interviews will also include market and economic questions in order to understand the community's attitude toward growth management strategies. Other interviews may be conducted via phone. • Examine the boundaries of the City's Growth Management Area (GMA) and the intents and purpose of the GMA boundary. Duration: 10 weeks Deliverables: One camera-ready/electronic draft and one final Assessment and Analysis of Existing Conditions Summary Report and Maps. Meetings: Staff-4 GMC — 2 (coinciding with Tasks 3 and 4) CAC —1 (coinciding with Tasks 3 and 4) CPU/TMP/Staff -1 EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL S SCHEDULE TASK 3 GROWTH FORECASTS EPS will develop baseline growth forecasts and growth distributions for the Fort Collins region for the 2002 to 2025 time period. Forecasts will be based on the state demographer's figures of projected population, household, and employment growth for the Fort Collins MSA and will provide an accepted baseline of growth as a starting point for the planning process. Based on the growth and development objectives of the communities in the MSA, EPS will develop distributions of growth between Fort Collins and the other cities in the MSA (Larimer County). EPS will also refine employment forecasts to consider growth by major job sector and to evaluate a range of jobs/housing balance options. The EDAW team will correlate these population forecasts against the GIS-based land use plans collected in Task 2 to determine discrepancies, refine demographic numbers and determine potential build -out scenarios. EDAW has just completed this task for the entire Denver area. These forecasts will provide major input to the development of urban form alternatives for the region. Subtasks: • Evaluate state demographer growth forecasts for MSA level population, households, and employment for the 2002 to 2025 time period. • Forecast population and household growth by city for the region. • Forecast employment growth by sector and by major area (Fort Collins, Loveland and other). • Develop jobs/housing balance alternatives. Duration: 10 weeks (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 4) Deliverables: One camera-ready/electronic draft and one final Technical Memorandum Meetings: Staff-4 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 4) GMC- 2 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 4) CAC - 1 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 4) CPU/TMP/Staff -1 TASK 4 MARKET ANALYSIS EPS will quantify the demand for selected land uses. The RFP indicated the need to evaluate residential densities prescribed by the City Plan. Based on the population and household forecasts, the land area needed to accommodate future multi -family and single-family housing will be identified. A spectrum of densities will be evaluated, including those currently, identified in the City Plan as well as more conventional single- and multi -family densities, to determine the appropriate area and locations for future housing development. Retail demand will be estimated based on population and housing forecasts by location and expected levels of store growth needed to serve population growth. The existing retail development pattern will be evaluated to determine the need for and appropriate location of additional community and regional retail centers. A regional market framework will be developed to address the City's position related to emerging trends and opportunities. The primary focus of the framework will be on economic development opportunities for the City and their impact on future revenues. Subtasks: • Develop forecast of single-family and multi -family housing needs based on demographic projections. • Based on market research, provide land area estimates required to meet future demand for both uses under various density alternatives. [CAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL a SCHEDULE Centerra Conceptual Master Plan, Loveland, CO • Review available data related to existing retail uses by type and location and estimate retail sales levels by location from City sales tax data. • Determine need for and appropriate location of additional retail. • Evaluate regional market trends and assess the City's ability to accommodate new development. • Compare existing City Plan land uses to market demand. Duration: 10 weeks (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) Deliverables: One camera-ready/electronic draft and one final Technical Memorandum - Market Analysis Meetings: Staff - 4 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) GMC-1 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) CAC -1 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) TASK 5 OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS After Tasks 2 through 4 have been completed in draft form, the EDAW team will compile an Opportunities and Constraints map. With the background information collected and analyzed and existing conditions reviewed, we will develop a summary memorandum and map that translates the physical and market findings into physical and policy opportunities and constraints such as: ...growth management boundaries, regional linkages, infill opportunities, site and infrastructure resources, real and perceived barriers - such as physical, environmental, social, economic, employment and educational, fledgling initiatives... The meeting will consist of a presentation of Task 2 through 4 findings and a presentation of the teams initial Opportunities and Constraints. These will be documented both in map format and in written format. Vacant and underutilized parcels, GMA's, IGA's, land status, as well as potential environmentally sensitive areas, are some of the base layers that comprise this analysis tool. A discussion will follow to focus on the market analysis and on the key physical opportunities and constraints of the site. Duration: 3 weeks Deliverables: One camera-ready/electronic draft and one final Opportunities and Constraints Summary Report and Map. Meetings: Staff -1 GMC - 1 CAC-1 CPU/TMP/Staff -1 TASK 6 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT/PUBLIC MEETING (91) In Tasks 2 through 4 of this phase, the goal of the public involvement effort will be to condense and disseminate existing information and clarify its relationship to the plan update. To accomplish this end, the team will present information to the Citizen Advisory Committee and communicate key data to the general public. This second goal will be accomplished through a public meeting/lecture early in the process. The team recommends a public lecture at Colorado State University at Fort Collins that will focus on educating the public on the importance of growth management, tools utilized for growth management, and case study examples of successes and failures in managing growth. Doug Porter of the Growth Management Institute will lead this lecture. The evening will end with a small presentation on the status of the City Plan Update. EDAW INC DESIGN. PLANNINGAND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL 8 SCHEDULE Duration: 1 week Deliverables: Graphic, PowerPoint Presentation and/or hand outs as necessary Meetings: Public Meeting/Lecture -1 PHASE 2 - DETERMINE TYPE OF COMMUNITY. CITY SIZE. PURPOSE AND PERMANENCY OF THE GMA BOUNDARY (2 MONTHS) TASK 1 "WHAT IF" At the conclusion of the analysis phase, the team will present a preliminary summary of major issues and opportunities, and weaknesses. The EDAW team will work collaboratively with the Fort Collins Staff Group, GMC, CAC, and the public to begin preliminary "What if" scenarios for the future of the community. First, a brainstorming workshop will occur with the Staff Group and GMC. Questions to be asked during this task will include: • What type of community does Fort Collins want to be? • Is there an optimal size for the community? • What are the key quality of life factors that need to be accommodated within any growth scenario? • Where can the City grow? • What is the GMA's population and job employment potential using City Plan density policies? • What role can redevelopment feasibility play for continued employment opportunities and population growth? • What policies and implementation techniques does the City need to establish to achieve its desired outcome? • What should the relationship of Fort Collins be in the context of the regional growth? • What elements of good urbanism should be adopted within the community? • What are the appropriate housing densities and community form for each neighborhood in the community? • How do the growth objectives of Larimer County and other surrounding communities affect growth in the region? • What is the appropriate balance between growth and preservation of natural resources and open space? This is a time to think boldly. In order to do this we will pose a series of "What if?" questions to explore the range of options for changes/growth and their consequences for the community. To assist in this discussion, the EDAW team will also provide a matrix from several other communities that compares community growth with quality of life factors. The "big ideas" that emerge will be tested, massaged, and refined to create the preliminary growth management scenarios for the City. Schematic drawings that begin to illustrate these opportunities will begin to formalize during this brainstorming session. The EDAW team will utilize Image Preference Surveying, Visual Simulations, CommunityViz and other communications techniques in order to communicate scenarios for the community. The alternatives will be defined in spatial terms including land consumption EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE PROJECT EXPERIENCE J 3` • •:� ..qe.. .......... i ...q.....: i �.....� .....i..... s........ �ti., .`..___. City's first Comprehensive Plan after incorporation Extension of the RTA system offered unique opportunities for development Comprehensive Plan and EIS were prepared concurrently resulting in a self -mitigating plan Lakewood Comprehensive Plan + Environmental Impact Statement Lakewood, Washington Client: City of Lakewood This recently incorporated suburban city, with a population of over 60,000, was experiencing rapid growth, increased traffic congestion, and incompatible land uses. Other challenges facing the community were to identify and support a viable, pedestrian -oriented downtown while preserving the natural character of its numerous lakes and forested areas, diversifying its commercial and economic base, and maintaining its existing neighborhoods. Unique opportunities for the city included the extension of a Regional Transit Authority light rail station to the city and the planning for appropriate land use densities around the station to support rapid transit. The Comprehensive Plan was the first effort for the city to deal with major growth and design issues related to this emerging "edge city." EDAW prepared the EIS concurrently with the Comprehensive Plan to identify and analyze critical environmental issues as part of the EIS alternatives analysis. Many of the issues identified in the EIS analysis led to policy changes in the plan, thereby producing a self -mitigating plan. Key issues addressed by the plan included urban design components to create an improved image of the City and to support economic development. One component of the urban design element focused on the Central Business District and used design elements to link the Lakewood Mall, historic city core, and the proposed City Hall into a cohesive urban core. EDAIN INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL & SCHEDULE (amount and location), transportation requirements, and open space potential. The alternatives will be visualized in CIS (using visualization software or other techniques) in order to better understand the future growth pattern and its relationship to surrounding municipalities. These techniques have been used on several recent efforts for the Denver Area, the Front Range and the City of Greeley. Towards the end of this task, there will be a working session with City Council to review the "What if" scenarios and growth management strategies discussed to date. Duration: 2 weeks Deliverables: One draft and one final camera-ready summary memorandum outlining the "What if" process, feedback and results. Meetings: Staff-1 CAC-1 GMC- 1 Council Working Session - 1 TASK 2 EVALUATION OF "WHAT IF" SCENARIOS The EDAW team will evaluate the growth options against a range of land use, growth management, fiscal and economic, infrastructure, implementation/ policy implications, and urban service considerations. It is anticipated that the methodology for this analysis will include the preparation of a set of evaluation criteria based upon the City Plan goals, as well as other factors (to be determined through public input). The application of the criteria will allow measurement of the relative benefits and tradeoffs associated with each scenario and the formulation of a preferred option based on the best characteristics and strengths of the options tested. Subtasks: • Define evaluation criteria based on City Plan goals and other factors developed with public input. • Evaluate growth options against defined criteria. • Prepare a matrix summarizing the evaluation of alternatives. • Formulate a preferred option drawing from evaluation findings. Duration: 4 weeks Deliverables: One draft and one final camera-ready summary memorandum outlining the "What if" process, feedback and results. Meetings: Staff-2 CAC-1 GMC- 1 CPU/TMP/Staff- I TASK 3 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT/PUBLIC MEETING (#2) Public involvement is essential in this phase. Our goal will be to involve as many members of the community as possible, asking that each interested participant contribute to the vision for Fort Collins' future. Citizen Advisory Committee meetings in this phase will explore alternative futures and allow the committee members to envision the community as they want it to be. EDAW will also compare Fort Collins to other communities and address quality of life factors as it relates to growth. A public workshop will occur to [DAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL & SCHEDULE present the "What if' scenarios that the Staff, GMC, CAC and consultant team had devised. The second part of the workshop will include an interactive "What if" session with the public. This workshop will help members of the community translate imprecise images into specific visual details that capture the desired future. This phase could also include a survey or focus group aimed at adding detail to the community vision. Media relations will ensure that community members know when, where and how they can contribute to the visioning process. Our approach will be to provide as many options as possible for contributing ideas, including attending public meetings, offering ideas in writing (electronically or in hard copy), communicating through existing organizations or contacting the Citizen Advisory Committee, project team or staff. Duration: 1 week Deliverables: Graphic, PowerPoint Presentation and/or hand outs as necessary Meetings: Public Meeting/Lecture - 1 CITY PLAN UPDATE PART II: IDENTIFIED CITY PLAN UPDATE AND OTHER RELATED ISSUES (e MONTHS) PHASE 1- ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATIONS FOR UPDATING CITY PLAN COMPONENTS (2.5 MONTHS) TASK 1 GOALS, PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES REVIEW The EDAW team will lead a review and reconfirmation of the assumptions, fundamental principles and policies, and major choices made at the adoption of Citv Plan. The team will focus on those issues/policies that have come up since the adoption of City Plan, as well as those new principles that City leaders have identified for consideration. All elements will be reviewed in the context of growth management for the community and surrounding region. This review will also occur in the context of the outcome of the "What if' exercises of Part I of the planning process. This Task will also include a review of the 'lessons leamed'to date with City Plan and current growth management strategies. This will include both successes and those areas/policies that were not as successful. The EDAW team will analyze Fort Collins' Growth Management Strategies and examine other communities that have been successful, and those that have failed. Duration: 5 weeks Deliverables: One camera-ready/electronic draft and one final Recommended changes to Goals, Principles, and Policies (outline format) Meetings: Staff-2 - GMC- 1 CAC - 1 CPU/TMP/Staff - 1 CDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL & SCHEDULE TASK 2 RECONFIRM VISION This Task will include a review and reconfirmation of the vision identified in City Plan in context with both the major choices made at the adoption of City Plan and the decisions made to date within the City Plan Update planning process. Duration: 4 weeks Deliverables: One camera-ready/electronic draft and one final Vision Statement (if update necessary) Meetings: Staff-2 GMC- 1 CAC-1 TASK 3 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT/PUBLIC MEETING (#3) The essential public involvement objectives in this phase are: 1. Restate the vision in a compelling way and disseminate it to the public. 2. Provide venues for the public to help translate the vision into specific goals, principles and policies in context with the "What if" outcomes in Part 1. 3. Demonstrate the relationship between the vision and the goals, policies and principles. 4. Disseminate the vision statement and the goal/principle/policy statements. The Citizen Advisory Committee will be instrumental in reviewing and helping to revise the staff team/project team work in this phase. A Public Informational Meeting in this phase will include presentations of the vision, goals, principles and policies and provide the public with the opportunity to offer feedback, pointing out those cases where the vision statement is not adequately reflected. This meeting will include a display of the vision statement and the existing principles established in City Plan. Should the project and staff team elect not to use a survey or focus group earlier in the process, this is a time when it might be warranted. In this phase, this kind of public involvement tool allows the project/staff team to gauge community reactions to the vision statement and the other draft plan elements. Mass communication and electronic communication can provide support for the public involvement process at this point, ensuring wide distribution of these elements and providing the means of offering community feedback. Duration: 1 week Deliverables: Graphic, PowerPoint Presentation and/or handouts as necessary Meetings: Public Meeting/Informational Session - 1 RDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL 8 SCHEDULE Stapleton Redevelopment Plan for Developer Selection Denver, CO PHASE 2 — CITY PLAN UPDATES (3 MONTHS) TASK / POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Based on planning to date, the EDAW team will identify and outline new policies and modifications to existing policies that should be considered to support Growth Management strategies. Subtasks: • Prepare recommendations in an outline format for revisions to existing policies and preparation of new policies to address issues and directions established for City Plan during Phase 1 of the City Plan update. It is anticipated that these new policy directions and/or "course corrections" may include, among others, the following: Growth Management Area strategies Housing Density/Community Form Redeveloping Areas Enhanced Transportation Corridors Jobs/Housing Balance Affordable Housing • Review policy recommendations with staff technical team and Citizens Advisory Committee. Duration: 8 weeks Deliverables: Recommended changes to Goals, Principles, and Policies (outline format) Meetings: Staff — 3 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) CAC — 2 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) GMC —1 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) CPU/TMP/Staff-1(coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) TASK 2 PREPARE REVISED CITY PLAN GOALS, PRINCIPLES, AND POLICIES Based on the policy direction established during Task 1, the consultant will prepare draft revisions to the City Plan Vision, Goals, Principles, and Policies. These will be reviewed with staff, members of the CAC, and elected and appointed officials and refined as necessary to develop a set of revised Goals, Principles, and Policies for adoption. Subtasks: Refine policy recommendations and draft new/revised Goals, Principles, and Policies as appropriate to address issues and directions established in Task 1. • Review draft policy revisions with Staff Technical Team, CAC, and Council Growth Management Committee. • Revise documents as needed to address issues that arise during review and prepare final Goals, Principles, and Policies for adoption by City Council. Duration: 12 weeks (coinciding with Tasks 1 and 3) Deliverables: Text changes to Goals, Principles, and Policies Meetings: Staff — 4 (coinciding with Tasks 1 and 3) CAC — 3 (coinciding with Tasks 1 and 3) GMC — 2 (coinciding with Tasks 1 and 3) CPU/TMP/Staff -1 (coinciding with Tasks 1 and 3) EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL 8 SCHEDULE TASK 3 CITY STRUCTURE PLAN As a result of planning to date, including questioned policies and principles, reaffirmation of the vision, and review and inclusion of sub -area plans completed since City Plan, the EDAW team will review and recommend modifications to the City Structure Plan map. At this time, there will be a working session with City Council to review Tasks 1-3. Duration: 4 weeks (coinciding with Tasks 1 and 2) Deliverables: One camera-ready/electronic draft and one final _- Recommended Changes to the City Plan Map (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) Meetings: Staff-2 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) GMC- 1 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) CAC - 1 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) CPU/TMP/Staff -1 (coinciding with Tasks 2 and 3) Council Working Session - 1 TASK 4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT/PUBLIC MEETING (#4) The detailed work of reviewing and evaluating policy changes is best accomplished, from a public involvement perspective, through the Citizen Advisory Committee with updates to the general public that help interested citizens follow the progression from vision to policy. Duration: 1 week Deliverables: Graphic, PowerPoint Presentation and/or handouts as necessary Meetings: Public Meeting/ Informational Session-1 PHASE 3 - IMPLEMENTATION (3.5 MONTHS) TASK 1 REVIEW EXISTING DEVELOPMENT CODES AND PRACTICES Once the primary revisions to City Plan have been determined, it is likely that amendments to the Citp's Development Code will be needed to implement the Plan. Clarion Associates will take the lead in reviewing the City's regulatory documents and procedures, including the Development Code, Adequate Public Facility requirements, and Capital Improvements Plans, to recommend needed revisions to implement the Plan's vision. Subtasks: • Review City's Development Code and other regulatory documents. • Produce a summary "Diagnosis' report in memorandum format that identifies areas that may need to be changed to reflect City Plan changes. Duration: 4 weeks Deliverables: Development Code Diagnosis Memorandum Report Meetings: Staff-2 CAC - 1 GMC-1 CPU/TMP/Staff - 7 CDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL a SCHEDULE TASK 2 DEVELOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Based on revisions to the City Plan, the team will develop an updated summary of capital improvements needed for plan implementation, including estimated project costs, available funding, and project priorities within available funding. This Capital Improvements Program will focus on short- term high -priority action items, and will be coordinated with the capital improvements recommendations coming out of the concurrent Transportation Master Plan effort. Subtasks: Prepare a summary of capital improvements needed to implement the updated City Plan. • Assign initial priorities to improvements. • Prepare order -of -magnitude cost estimates for priority improvements. • Identify existing levels of revenue for capital projects. • Identify revenue shortfalls and unmet needs. Duration: 4 weeks (coinciding with Task 1) Deliverables: Draft Capital Improvements Program Meetings: Staff-2 TASK 3 PREPARE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the consultant's review of the City's regulatory documents completed in Task 1, the EDAW team will prepare a detailed implementation strategy and Action Plan for City Plan. The Implementation Action Plan will be in summary report and matrix format. Subtasks: Prepare an Implementation Strategy and Action Plan, to include consideration of the following: - New or Changed Development Regulations - Recommendations for revisions to the City's Intergovernmental Agreements - GMA Boundaries and Policies - Funding primary services - Priority CIP needs (from Task 2) Review Implementation Strategy with the Staff Technical Team, CAC, and Council Growth Management Committee and revise as necessary. Duration: 8 weeks Deliverables: One camera-ready/electronic draft and one final Implementation Strategy and Action Plan Meetings: Staff-3 CAC - 2 GMC-2 CPU/TMP/Staff -1 EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE SCOPE OF PROPOSAL 8 SCHEDULE TASK 4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT/PUBLIC MEETING (#5) Close communication with the Citizen Advisory Committee is critical in this phase. At this point in the process, the expertise gained by the committee members will allow them to provide highly informed reactions to the implementation strategies. This is the third and final point at which a survey or focus group can be useful. Survey or focus group questions can focus on the implementation details including the tradeoffs and priority setting inherent in this phase. Of all of the opportunities to use this type of public involvement tool, we believe this is the most appropriate. Survey or focus group interview questions should be as detailed as possible. The time, effort and expense of focus group or survey work make it a less useful choice for open-ended, visionary questions. Were we to use this kind of technique in the final phase of the project, we could explore tolerance for tax changes, reaction to specific ordinance changes and preference among competing capital improvement projects. A joint effort with the transportation planning process is possible in this phase. As the implementation details emerge, the public should have one final opportunity to react to the plan draft and offer feedback. Public meetings at this point give members of the public a forum where thev can confirm their support for the plan or explain any remaining concerns. The final public involvement task in this phase is dissemination of the final plan. Mass communication can be useful to disseminate information about the plan's core content and about the fact that the plan is complete. Duration: 1 week Deliverables: Graphic, PowerPoint Presentation and/or handouts as necessary Meetings: Public Meeting/Informational Session - 1 TASK 5 FINAL` DOCUMENTATION AND PLAN IMPLEMENTATION After all meetings, the EDAW team will compile all'Summary Memorandums' into a final City Plan Update report. EDAW will also assist the City with Council Meetings necessary to ensure the Plan's adoption. Duration: 4 weeks Deliverables: One camera-ready/electronic draft and one final City Plan Update Plan Meetings: Staff - 1, Council Meetings - 3 6DAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE PROJECT EXPERIENCE McCarron International Airport Land Use and Disposal Plan Las Vegas, Nevada Client: McCarron International Airport Clark County Dept. of Aviation EDAW provided market analysis and land planning services for a 20,543 acre site, the Cooperative Management Area, (CMA) defined by the aircraft departure flight corridors. Within the CMA, the Bureau of Land Management transferred ownership of 5,234 acres to Clark County. EDAW prepared the economic market analysis, interim disposal plan, land use planning, environmental analysis, infrastructure analysis, strategic management policies and application for purchasing the property. The land use planning was compatible with the airport environs including uses such as open space, golf courses, commercial, office, retail, industrial, manufacturing, warehousing, easements and rights -of -way. Public input and consensus -building was conducted in workshops and presentations throughout the planning process. The preferred land use plan amended three existing township comprehensive plans and was adopted by the County Commissioners. EDAW INC DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE