HomeMy WebLinkAboutRFP - P1055 PLANNING STUDY MEDIUM (6)Administrative Services
Purchasing Divison
215 North Mason Street y 2nd Floor y P.O. Box 580 y Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 y (970) 221-6775 y Fax (970) 221-6707
www.fcgov.com
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
P1055 Planning Study:
Medium Voltage Electric Distribution System
Fort Collins Utilities, Electric Planning & Engineering Services Dept (hereafter referred to as ‘FCU’)
requests your written proposal and quotation on the following scope of work for professional
services for a planning study to revise a former master plan study for the city’s medium voltage
electric distribution system.
Written proposals, six (6) will be received at the City of Fort Collins' Purchasing Division, 215
North Mason St., 2nd floor, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524. Proposals will be received before 3:00
p.m. (our clock), January 22, 2007. Proposal No. P1055. If delivered, they are to be sent to 215
North Mason Street, 2nd Floor, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524. If mailed, the address is P.O. Box
580, Fort Collins, 80522-0580.
Questions concerning the scope of the project should be directed to Project Manager Rocky Ray,
(970)222-5239
Questions regarding proposals submittal or process should be directed to Opal F. Dick, CPPO,
Senior Buyer (970) 221-6778.
A copy of the Proposal may be obtained as follows:
1. Download the Proposal/Bid from the BuySpeed Webpage,
https://secure2.fcgov.com/bso/login.jsp
2. Come by Purchasing at 215 North Mason St., 2nd floor, Fort Collins, and request a
copy of the Bid.
Sales Prohibited/Conflict of Interest: No officer, employee, or member of City Council, shall have a
financial interest in the sale to the City of any real or personal property, equipment, material,
supplies or services where such officer or employee exercises directly or indirectly any decision-
making authority concerning such sale or any supervisory authority over the services to be
rendered. This rule also applies to subcontracts with the City. Soliciting or accepting any gift,
gratuity favor, entertainment, kickback or any items of monetary value from any person who has or
is seeking to do business with the City of Fort Collins is prohibited.
Collusive or sham proposals: Any proposal deemed to be collusive or a sham proposal will be
rejected and reported to authorities as such. Your authorized signature of this proposal assures
that such proposal is genuine and is not a collusive or sham proposal.
The City of Fort Collins reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive any
irregularities or informalities.
Sincerely,
James B. O'Neill II, CPPO, FNIGP
Director of Purchasing & Risk Management
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
P1055
Planning Study: Medium Voltage Electric Distribution System
Fort Collins Utilities, Electric Planning & Engineering Services Dept (hereafter referred to as
‘FCU’) requests your written proposal and quotation on the following scope of work for
professional services for a planning study to revise a former master plan study for the city’s
medium voltage electric distribution system.
SCOPE of WORK FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
In 1984, Fort Collins Utilities (FCU) contracted for professional services to create a long range,
or ‘master’, plan for the projected expansion of the City of Fort Collins (City) out to its then
designated urban growth management area (GMA) boundary, and resultant growth of the
electric utility’s service territory and customer load. That study concluded that the entire service
territory could continue to be served in the most economical manner by what are either now
presently existing substations, or else future substations at currently identified substation sites.
Now that 22 years have passed since that study was completed, as the City has expanded
further, as it has continued to develop internally, and as it has approached its restricted urban
GMA boundary, the purpose of this planning study will be to reexamine and update many of the
assumptions and projections that determined the customer load densities, composition, and
foreseeable growth patterns as applied to the northeastern quadrant of the City. This new study
will similarly reexamine and update the projected construction costs of distribution feeders and
substation sites within this defined quadrant. Consequently, the scope of work for this planning
study will not be to revise the entire previous long range plan, or to generate an entirely new
long range plan, but rather only to produce an updated long range plan for how best to serve the
City’s northeastern areas, given some combination of existing and future substation sites.
To date, the City has not succeeded in securing the real property for a suitable substation site to
be constructed in the future in the far northeastern section of the City, or at least within its GMA
boundary but on county land outside the existing city limits. FCU has thus far been
unsuccessful in identifying a willing seller in the areas where some of the foreseeably least cost
and most favorable sites are located. As a result, in the event the findings of this study confirm
FCU’s current expectation of the need for at least one additional substation in this area and to
the east of I-25, then FCU will have to initiate a condemnation proceeding to obtain either one of
the (2) identified potential sites, or alternatively an as yet unidentified site that would be
recommended as a finding of this planning study. FCU will thus be relying upon the findings
resulting from comparisons of the many case studies that will be performed within the scope of
work for professional services for this planning study to help establish and defend its selection
of a suitable substation site during the condemnation proceeding.
3
Principal Objectives
To achieve that goal, an acceptable planning study must either incorporate or account for all of
the following objectives, evaluations, and limitations:
1) The principal goal of this planning study is to determine whether or not FCU’s existing
substation (Richard’s Lake) and future distribution substation at the existing transmission
substation site (Timberline) will be sufficient to serve all of the eventual load growth in
the northeast quadrant of the City out to the currently designated GMA boundary at
complete build out.
2) If the projected load growth in the northeast quadrant of the City exceeds the capacity of
these (2) substations to serve, this study will determine the optimum locations for a
future substation based on economics and feasibility. Although the initial iterative
process will require the consultant to evaluate any number of potential sites in its efforts
to rank the sites, once the top ranked site is identified as the one most likely to require
the least investment to construct and operate, it will then be compared in a more detailed
manner against the (2) sites already identified by FCU as potential substation sites to
determine the top contender. This iterative process will then be repeated given a
change in the customer ‘load center’ due to a foreseeable (yet currently not predicted),
expansion of the GMA boundary.
3) Creation of a detailed distribution system model by the consultant using an application
such as WindMil or SynerGee is not specifically required for this planning study,
although if the consultant elects to build such a model for the purpose of achieving the
other mandatory objectives, FCU will require that the model be built in WindMil and be
included along with the consultant’s other documentation to be transmitted to FCU upon
completion of the project.
4) Just as no detailed distribution system model must be delivered to FCU by the
consultant as part of the scope of this project, neither is any detailed distribution feeder
analysis required. At most, the feeders need only be modeled to the extent necessary to
estimate loading limits, maximum distance and allowed voltage drop limit, construction
costs, losses, and possibly some estimated operation and maintenance costs.
5) In addition to the ‘base case’ series of case studies that will evaluate the relative costs
and benefits of the various substation sites given the existing GMA boundary, this
planning study shall also include a synopsis of how these various substation sites would
compare, given an expansion of the service territory to accommodate a limited
expansion of the GMA boundary of a few square miles to the north and east of the
existing GMA boundary. The key observations to be drawn from this additional analysis
of potential additional service territory, and that are to be included in the final report, are
those observations that confirm the trend in how the customer ‘load center’ is expected
to shift, how far, and how drastic of an impact there would be upon the relative cost
discrepancy between the currently identified new sites and an unknown additional site to
serve them.
4
6) Whenever various case studies are compared on a cost basis, the projected costs for
transmission line construction must always be tracked and recorded independently of
the other costs associated with substation and feeder construction. FCU is not directly
responsible for these costs, but they are to be included in the iterative process of
comparing sites.
7) When comparing all of the many case study alternatives to be evaluated, the following
estimates of probable costs are to be included in those evaluations, although no attempt
is to be made to perform a present worth analysis of these future costs (the dates of
construction are too uncertain).
a. Substation construction / expansion
b. Transmission line construction / expansion
c. Distribution feeder construction (750 Al system only)
d. Distribution feeder losses (750 Al system only)
e. Distribution system operation & maintenance costs
Proposed Procedure to Achieve Objectives
To achieve this planning study’s principal objectives as listed in the prior section, the following
procedural goals and process are proposed by FCU for implementation by the consultant,
subject to comment and revision after receipt of the consultant’s more detailed proposals on
how it might comply and / or deviate from this process while still satisfying the principal goals.
1) Develop a land use / infrastructure / load density geospatial model from the street
centerline, hydrographic, topographic, and other shapefiles provided by the City for the
designated northeastern area of the City in ArcGIS, upon which to evaluate the various
case studies for all of the substation sites to be evaluated.
2) Incorporate into the land use / infrastructure / load density model, zoning, and parcel
data representations for load density to permit a determination of hypothetical ‘load
centers’ for each substation site to be evaluated.
3) Calculate the ‘load center’ by combining parcels / zoning areas based upon their
individual geometrically constructed ‘load centers’ to obtain an extrapolated ‘load center’
for the combined parcel / zoning area set. This series of calculations will then consist of
an iterative process, to be performed either manually, or with the aid of some custom
programming by the consultant (either means is acceptable), until a few choice
‘optimized’ solution sets are generated for use in analyzing suitable sites meeting FCU’s
siting restrictions.
4) Identify potential new substation sites using the following criteria to the extent that each
applies to the site under investigation, as it would for the case of the two sites already
identified by FCU:
a. Find the ‘load center’ of the parcels / zoning areas for ‘ultimate’ build out at some
unknown point in the future by the procedure described in Steps 1, 2, & 3.
b. Assign the load surrounding the substation site to the substation up to its
specified capacity (28 MVA per transformer, or 56 MVA total, apportioned among
5
14 distribution feeders) in another iterative procedure, until the entire service
area of the substation can be defined. During this process, the consultant must
account for both proximity of load and the areas parcels / zones / areas served
by either existing or planned feeders from the existing and future identified
substations.
c. Weigh the following parameters in the geospatial model to limit the solution sets:
1. Locations within and/or near the center of the new substation service
area identified in the prior step.
2. Relative ‘balance’ of overlap or gaps in coverage provided by the
combination of new and existing substation sites relative to the ultimate
‘load center.’
3. Proximity of each site to existing and/or planned main feeder trunk
routes
4. Assess the potential solution set of sites identified above relative to the
parcel sizes in the vicinity of the potential locations, and then contrast
them with any restrictive geospatial features (e.g. water features,
railroads, cemeteries, natural areas, etc.).
d. The probable costs associated with each prospective substation site can be
quantified using linear estimates of site acquisition costs (if provided by FCU),
feeder costs to connect to existing and/or planned main trunk feeder routes,
substation construction costs, transmission construction costs, feeder losses,
and feeder operation & maintenance costs (if provided by FCU).
e. The remaining solution set of sites will then be ranked according to the results of
the probable costs associated with each site when weighed in conjunction with
the restrictive geospatial features, until the single ‘best’ site is chosen.
Available Resources and Data
1) Existing distribution system maps in AutoDesk ACAD showing 750 Al feeders. Less
detailed feeder maps available in ESRI ArcGIS file formats.
2) Existing and hypothetical GMA boundaries
3) Existing City land use, zoning, and infrastructure plans available in ESRI ArcGIS file
formats
4) Copy of original 1984 long range planning study (only final report available)
5) Load density values for projected land use classifications and foreseeable development
categories
6) General overview design, construction, and operating standards for substation
transformer loading, feeder loading, substation construction, and feeder construction.
6
7) Billing data on existing substation transformers and feeders if requested by the
consultant. (Not necessarily foreseeably warranted given the assumption that this
planning study is evaluating some version of near ultimate build out for the study area,
but available nonetheless)
Data and Supplied Assumptions
1) Each substation at ultimate build out will consist of (2) 56 MVA ONAN/ONAF/ONAF
substation transformers, and (14) feeders consisting of 750 Al cable. Assume
transformers can only be loaded up to a maximum of 28 MVA, and each feeder up to
300 A.
2) All 750 Al distribution feeders are installed underground in duct banks. No 1/0 Al laterals
need be analyzed or included in the course of this study.
3) The study area to be evaluated within the scope of this project will be served by:
a. One existing substation (Richard’s Lake)
b. One future substation on an existing transmission substation site (Timberline)
c. One potential future substation on identified and unidentified sites for the
evaluation performed at the current GMA boundary
d. One potential future substation on identified and unidentified sites for the
evaluation performed for an expanded GMA boundary
4) Cost of construction will be provided for the following:
a. New distribution feeders and duct bank
b. Substations
c. Transmission line extensions and/or expansion
5) FCU is not responsible for any transmission system construction, including 115 kV lines
and substation bus and equipment construction. Those costs are to be calculated by
and incurred by FCU’s transmission provider, (Platte River Power Authority) PRPA.
6) For the (2) identified future substation sites, the major distribution feeder duct bank
routes connecting back to the existing distribution system will be supplied to the
consultant for use in its cost benefit analysis. For the most part, these routes follow
either the major arterial roads or railroads that currently exist. However, some of the
duct bank routes that extend out from these sites towards the GMA boundary will fall to
the consultant to identify, but only in a general manner to the extent necessary for the
consultant to compile a reasonable cost comparison between the cases.
7
FINAL DOCUMENTATION
A final report and brief Powerpoint presentation must be prepared and submitted to FCU in a
bound paper and electronic format (MS Word and Excel) describing:
1) Data used
2) Operating assumptions made
3) Alternatives investigated
4) Evaluation results
5) Recommendation of the least cost and most reasonable alternative
This final report must also summarize the development of the site selection process, and
include extensive graphics generated in ArcGIS file formats to convey the quantitative
geospatial process used to determine the potential substation sites, substation service areas,
and parcel / zoning / infrastructure customer load densities. This report will also include a
schedule / tabular summary in Excel format of the probable cost estimates used to determine
the site rankings. ArcGIS files, including maps, layers, and supporting shapefiles, shall be
provided to FCU upon completion of the report. Maps will include symbol legends and be
defined for plotting both at ANSI B, D, and E sizes. At least one full size, and one reduced size
map of each principal site choice shall be submitted along with the report and electronic files.
SCHEDULE
Partial completion of this planning study is required by February 16, to the extent that a
reasonable projection can be made with substantial probability as to the necessity of at least
one additional substation site to the east of I-25. However, full completion is requested within
(12) twelve weeks of award of the professional services agreement.
8
REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT
Professional firms will be evaluated on the following criteria. These criteria will be the basis for
review of the written proposals and interview session. Interviews may be conducted at the
option of the City of Fort Collins. The rating scale shall be from 1 to 5, with 1 being a poor
rating, 3 being an average rating, and 5 being an outstanding rating.
WEIGHTING
FACTOR
QUALIFICATION
STANDARD
2.0 Scope of Proposal Does the proposal show an understanding of the project
objective, methodology to be used and results that are
desired from the project?
2.0 Assigned
Personnel
Do the persons who will be working on the project have the
necessary skills? Are sufficient people of the requisite skills
assigned to the project?
1.0 Availability Can the work be completed in the necessary time? Can the
target start and completion dates be met? Are other
qualified personnel available to assist in meeting the project
schedule if required? Is the project team available to attend
meetings as required by the Scope of Work?
1.0 Motivation Is the firm interested and are they capable of doing the
work in the required time frame?
2.0 Cost and
Work Hours
Do the proposed cost and work hours compare favorably
with the project Manager's estimate? Are the work hours
presented reasonable for the effort required in each project
task or phase?
2.0 Firm Capability Does the firm have the support capabilities the assigned
personnel require? Has the firm done previous projects of
this type and scope?
Reference evaluation (Top Ranked Firm)
The project Manager will check references using the following criteria. The evaluation rankings
will be labeled Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory.
QUALIFICATION STANDARD
Overall Performance Would you hire this Professional again?
Did they show the skills required by this project?
Timetable
Was the original Scope of Work completed within the specified time?
Were interim deadlines met in a timely manner?
Completeness Was the Professional responsive to client needs; did the Professional
anticipate problems? Were problems solved quickly and effectively?
Budget Was the original Scope of Work completed within the project budget?
Job Knowledge a) If a study, did it meet the Scope of Work?
b) If Professional administered a construction contract, was the project
functional upon completion and did it operate properly?
c) Were problems corrected quickly and effectively?
9
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into the day and year set forth below, by and
between THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter
referred to as the "City" and _____, [insert either a corporation, a partnership or an
individual,doing business as _______________, hereinafter referred to as "Professional".
WITNESSETH:
In consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations herein expressed, it is agreed
by and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. Scope of Services. The Professional agrees to provide services in accordance
with the scope of services attached hereto as Exhibit "A", consisting of ( )
pages, and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. The Work Schedule. [Optional] The services to be performed pursuant to this
Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the Work Schedule attached hereto as
Exhibit "B", consisting of ( ) pages, and incorporated herein by this
reference.
3. Contract Period. This Agreement shall commence 2006, and shall
continue in full force and effect until 2006, unless sooner terminated as herein
provided. In addition, at the option of the City, the Agreement may be extended for additional
one year periods not to exceed four (4) additional one year periods. Renewals and pricing
changes shall be negotiated by and agreed to by both parties. The Denver Boulder Greeley
CPIU published by the Colorado State Planning and Budget Office will be used as a guide. .
Written notice of renewal shall be provided to the Service Provider and mailed no later than
ninety (90) days prior to contract end.
10
4. Early Termination by City. Notwithstanding the time periods contained herein,
the City may terminate this Agreement at any time without cause by providing written notice of
termination to the Professional. Such notice shall be delivered at least fifteen (15) days prior to
the termination date contained in said notice unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties.
All notices provided under this Agreement shall be effective when mailed, postage prepaid and
sent to the following addresses:
Professional:
City:
With Copy to:
City of Fort Collins, Purchasing
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
In the event of any such early termination by the City, the Professional shall be paid for services
rendered prior to the date of termination, subject only to the satisfactory performance of the
Professional's obligations under this Agreement. Such payment shall be the Professional's sole
right and remedy for such termination.
5. Design, Project Indemnity and Insurance Responsibility. The Professional shall
be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, timely completion and the
coordination of all services rendered by the Professional, including but not limited to designs,
plans, reports, specifications, and drawings and shall, without additional compensation,
promptly remedy and correct any errors, omissions, or other deficiencies. The Professional
shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the City, its officers and employees in accordance with
Colorado law, from all damages whatsoever claimed by third parties against the City; and for the
City's costs and reasonable attorneys fees, arising directly or indirectly out of the Professional's
performance of any of the services furnished under this Agreement. The Professional shall
maintain commercial general liability insurance in the amount of $500,000 combined single
limits and errors and omissions insurance in the amount of $ .
6. Compensation. [Use this paragraph or Option 1 below.] In consideration of
11
the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement, the City agrees to pay Professional a
fixed fee in the amount of ($ ) plus reimbursable direct costs. All such
fees and costs shall not exceed ($ ). Monthly partial payments based
upon the Professional's billings and itemized statements are permissible. The amounts of all
such partial payments shall be based upon the Professional's City-verified progress in
completing the services to be performed pursuant hereto and upon the City's approval of the
Professional's actual reimbursable expenses. [Optional] Insert Subcontractor ClauseFinal
payment shall be made following acceptance of the work by the City. Upon final payment, all
designs, plans, reports, specifications, drawings, and other services rendered by the
Professional shall become the sole property of the City.
6. Compensation. [Option 1] In consideration of the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement, the City agrees to pay Professional on a time and reimbursable
direct cost basis according to the following schedule:
Hourly billing rates:
Reimbursable direct costs:
with maximum compensation (for both Professional's time and reimbursable direct costs) not to
exceed ($ ). Monthly partial payments based upon the Professional's
billings and itemized statements of reimbursable direct costs are permissible. The amounts of
all such partial payments shall be based upon the Professional's City-verified progress in
completing the services to be performed pursuant hereto and upon the City's approval of the
Professional's reimbursable direct costs. Final payment shall be made following acceptance of
the work by the City. Upon final payment, all designs, plans, reports, specifications, drawings
and other services rendered by the Professional shall become the sole property of the City.
7. City Representative. The City will designate, prior to commencement of work, its
12
project representative who shall make, within the scope of his or her authority, all necessary and
proper decisions with reference to the project. All requests for contract interpretations, change
orders, and other clarification or instruction shall be directed to the City Representative.
8. Project Drawings. [Optional] Upon conclusion of the project and before final
payment, the Professional shall provide the City with reproducible drawings of the project
containing accurate information on the project as constructed. Drawings shall be of archival,
prepared on stable mylar base material using a non-fading process to provide for long storage
and high quality reproduction. "CD" disc of the as-built drawings shall also be submitted to the
owner in and AutoCAD version no older then the established city standard.
9. Monthly Report. Commencing thirty (30) days after the date of execution of this
Agreement and every thirty (30) days thereafter, Professional is required to provide the City
Representative with a written report of the status of the work with respect to the Scope of
Services, Work Schedule, and other material information. Failure to provide any required
monthly report may, at the option of the City, suspend the processing of any partial payment
request.
10. Independent Contractor. The services to be performed by Professional are those
of an independent contractor and not of an employee of the City of Fort Collins. The City shall
not be responsible for withholding any portion of Professional's compensation hereunder for the
payment of FICA, Workers' Compensation, other taxes or benefits or for any other purpose.
11. Personal Services. It is understood that the City enters into this Agreement
based on the special abilities of the Professional and that this Agreement shall be considered as
an agreement for personal services. Accordingly, the Professional shall neither assign any
responsibilities nor delegate any duties arising under this Agreement without the prior written
consent of the City.
12. Acceptance Not Waiver. The City's approval of drawings, designs, plans,
13
specifications, reports, and incidental work or materials furnished hereunder shall not in any way
relieve the Professional of responsibility for the quality or technical accuracy of the work. The
City's approval or acceptance of, or payment for, any of the services shall not be construed to
operate as a waiver of any rights or benefits provided to the City under this Agreement.
13. Default. Each and every term and condition hereof shall be deemed to be a
material element of this Agreement. In the event either party should fail or refuse to perform
according to the terms of this agreement, such party may be declared in default.
14. Remedies. In the event a party has been declared in default, such defaulting
party shall be allowed a period of ten (10) days within which to cure said default. In the event
the default remains uncorrected, the party declaring default may elect to (a) terminate the
Agreement and seek damages; (b) treat the Agreement as continuing and require specific
performance; or (c) avail himself of any other remedy at law or equity. If the non-defaulting
party commences legal or equitable actions against the defaulting party, the defaulting party
shall be liable to the non-defaulting party for the non-defaulting party's reasonable attorney fees
and costs incurred because of the default.
15. Binding Effect. This writing, together with the exhibits hereto, constitutes the
entire agreement between the parties and shall be binding upon said parties, their officers,
employees, agents and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of the respective survivors, heirs,
personal representatives, successors and assigns of said parties.
16. Law/Severability. The laws of the State of Colorado shall govern the
construction, interpretation, execution and enforcement of this Agreement. In the event any
provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision of this
Agreement.
14
17. Prohibition Against Employing Illegal Aliens. This paragraph shall apply
to all Contractors whose performance of work under this Agreement does not involve the
delivery of a specific end product other than reports that are merely incidental to the
performance of said work. Pursuant to Section 8-17.5-101, C.R.S., et. seq., Contractor
represents and agrees that:
A. As of the date of this Agreement:
1. Contractor does not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien; and
2. Contractor has participated or attempted to participate in the basic pilot
employment verification program created in Public Law 208, 104th
Congress, as amended, and expanded in Public Law 156, 108th
Congress, as amended, administered by the United States Department of
Homeland Security (the “Basic Pilot Program”) in order to verify that
Contractor does not employ any illegal aliens.
B. Contractor shall not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien to
perform works under this Agreement or enter into a contract with a
subcontractor that fails to certify to Contractor that the subcontractor shall not
knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien to perform work under this
Agreement.
C. Contractor shall continue to apply to participate in the Basic Pilot Program and
shall in writing verify same every three (3) calendar months thereafter, until
Contractor is accepted or the public contract for services has been completed,
whichever is earlier. The requirements of this section shall not be required or
effective if the Basic Pilot Program is discontinued.
D. Contractor is prohibited from using Basic Pilot Program procedures to
undertake pre-employment screening of job applicants while this Agreement is
being performed.
E. If Contractor obtains actual knowledge that a subcontractor performing work
under this Agreement knowingly employs or contracts with an illegal alien,
Contractor shall:
1. Notify such subcontractor and the City within three days that Contractor
has actual knowledge that the subcontractor is employing or contracting
with an illegal alien; and
2. Terminate the subcontract with the subcontractor if within three days of
receiving the notice required pursuant to this section the subcontractor
does not cease employing or contracting with the illegal alien; except that
Contractor shall not terminate the contract with the subcontractor if during
such three days the subcontractor provides information to establish that
15
the subcontractor has not knowingly employed or contracted with an illegal
alien.
F. Contractor shall comply with any reasonable request by the Colorado
Department of Labor and Employment (the “Department”) made in the course
of an investigation that the Department undertakes or is undertaking pursuant
to the authority established in Subsection 8-17.5-102 (5), C.R.S.
G. If Contractor violates any provision of this Agreement pertaining to the duties
imposed by Subsection 8-17.5-102, C.R.S. the City may terminate this
Agreement. If this Agreement is so terminated, Contractor shall be liable for
actual and consequential damages to the City arising out of Contractor’s
violation of Subsection 8-17.5-102, C.R.S.
H. The City will notify the Office of the Secretary of State if Contractor violates
this provision of this Agreement and the City terminates the Agreement for
such breach.
17. Special Provisions. [Optional] Special provisions or conditions relating to the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement are set forth in Exhibit " ",
consisting of ( ) pages, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
16
THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
By: _________________________________
James B. O'Neill II, CPPO, FNIGP
Director of Purchasing & Risk Management
DATE: ______________________________
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Assistant City Attorney
[Insert Professional's name] or
[Insert Partnership Name] or
[Insert individual's name] or
Doing business as [insert name of business]
By: __________________________________
Title: _______________________________
CORPORATE PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT
Date: _______________________________
ATTEST:
_________________________________ (Corporate Seal)
Corporate Secretary