HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY CENTER JFK PKWY IMPROVEMENTS - Filed PD-PAVEMENT DESIGN REPORT -REPORT OF PAVEMENT DESIGN
HARMONY CENTRE
COLLEGE AVENUE, HARMONY ROAD AND
JFK PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT HARMONY CENTRE
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
PROJECT NO. 20985048
May 6, 1998
I erracon
REPORT OF PAVEMENT DESIGN
HARMONY CENTRE
COLLEGE AVENUE, HARMONY ROAD AND
JFK PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT HARMONY CENTRE
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
PROJECT NO. 20985048
May 6, 1998
Prepared for.
SAUNDERS CONSTRUCTION INC.
6950 SOUTH JORDAN ROAD
P. O. BOX 3908
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80155
ATTN: MR. MIKE KARLSON
PROJECT MANAGER
Prepared by:
Terracon
301 North Howes Street
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
Irerracon
May 6, 1998
Saunders Construction
P. O. Box 3908
Englewood, Colorado 80155
Irerracon
301 N. Howes • P.O. Box 503
Foil Collins, Colorado 80521-0503
970) 484-0359 Fax: (970) 484-0454
Attn: Mr. Mike Karlson, Project Manager
Re: Report of Pavement Design
Harmony Centre - College Avenue, Harmony Road
and JFK Parkway Improvements at Harmony Centre
Fort Collins, Colorado
Project No. 20985048
Terracon has completed a pavement design for the proposed off -site street improvements
for Harmony Centre located at the intersection of College Avenue and Harmony Road, Fort
Collins, Colorado. This study was performed in general accordance with our proposal
number D2098070 dated March 19, 1998.
The results of our pavement design including design criteria and the pavement
recommendations are attached. A preliminary geotechnical report containing subsurface
data was prepared for the site by Terracon April 16, 1998.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this phase of your project. If you
have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of further service to you, please
do not hesitate to contact us.
t_ Sincerely, Of PROFfgs
TERRACON °.`E;ATE;y
y
Prepared by: e . eviewe by'
AIMPG
eil 0/•
Y•
SHEP O°illiam J. Attwoolh, R. h rrod p90FESSIONa'
Senior Engineering Geologist Office Manager
Copies to: Addressee (2)
City of Fort Collins Engineering - Mr. Rick Richter (1)
City of Fort Collins Engineering - Mr. Keith Meyers (1)
Arizona Arkansas Colorado Idaho Illinois Iowa Kansas Minnesota Missouri Montana
Nebraska Nevada New Mexico North Dakota Oklahoma Tennessee Texas Utah Wisconsin Wyoming
Quality Engineering Since 1965
Terracon
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Letterof Transmittal.............................................................................................................ii
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................1
PROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION..........................................................................................1
PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................1
Pavement Design and Construction........................................................................ 2
GENERALCOMMENTS..................................................................................................... 5
APPENDIX A
Pavement Analysis
Terracon
REPORT OF PAVEMENT DESIGN
HARMONY CENTRE
COLLEGE AVENUE HARMONY ROAD AND
JFK PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT HARMONY CENTRE
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
Project No. 20985048
May 6, 1998
INTRODUCTION
This report contains the results of our pavement design for the proposed off-street
improvement for the Harmony Centre located at the northeast corner of College Avenue
and Harmony Road, Fort Collins, Colorado. The site is located in the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 36, Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian.
The purpose of these services is to provide pavement sections for the proposed off -site
improvements adjacent to the Harmony Centre, Fort Collins, Colorado.
The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the results
of field and laboratory testing, engineering analyses, our experience with similar soil
conditions and our understanding of the proposed project. A preliminary geotechnical
engineering report was prepared for the site by Terracon dated April 16, 1998.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The project as we understand it is based on plans prepared by Drexel Barrell & Company
dated February 24, 1997. The proposed improvements are to consist of a deceleration
lane along northbound College Avenue into the Harmony Centre. Acceleration and
deceleration lanes are to be constructed along Harmony Road at the intersection of JFK
Parkway, the entrance to the Harmony Centre and at College Avenue and Pavilion Lane.
JFK Parkway will be extended northward from Harmony Road to where the existing
pavement ends north of the Harmony Centre project.
PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, it is our opinion the proposed
pavement construction is feasible at the site from a geotechnical engineering point of view.
Asphaltic concrete underlain by crushed aggregate base course, full -depth asphalt
pavement and nonreinforced concrete pavement are feasible alternatives for the proposed
1
Geotechnical Engineering Exploration Terracon
Saunders Construction
Project No. 20985048
pavement sections. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, it is
recommended that all street improvements except for the portion of JFK Parkway north of
Harmony Town Centre be designed using an "R" value of 12. The portion of JFK Parkway
north of Harmony Town Centre may be designed using an "R" value to 25. The equivalent
daily axle loads (EDLAs) were provided by the City of Fort Collins.
Pavement Design and Construction
Design of pavements for the project have been based on the procedures outlined in the
1986 Guideline for Design of Pavement Structures by the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and City of Fort Collins criteria and the
following data. For flexible pavement design, a terminal serviceability index of 2.5 was
utilized and a design life of 20 years. Using the correlated design R-values, appropriate
ESAL/day, environmental criteria and other factors, the structural numbers (SN) of the
pavement sections were determined on the basis of the 1986 AASHTO design equation.
Street Name/Street Type 18 kip
EDLA
ESALs Reliability R Value Structural
No.
College Avenue/Major Arterial 450 3,285,000 90 12 3.99
Harmony Road/Major Arterial 400 2,292,000 90 12 3.78
JFK Parkway through Harmony
Centre/Minor Arterial
120 876,000 90 12 3.27
JFK Parkway North of Harmony
Centre/Minor Arterial
120 87,600 90 25 2.56
Pavilion - Collector 42 306,600 85 12 2.66
Local drainage characteristics of proposed pavement areas are considered to vary from fair
to good depending upon location on the site. For purposes of this design analysis, fair
drainage characteristics are considered to control the design. These characteristics,
coupled with the approximate duration of saturated subgrade conditions, results in a design
drainage coefficient of 1.0 when applying the AASHTO criteria for design.
In addition to the flexible pavement design analyses, a rigid pavement design analysis was
completed, based upon AASHTO design procedures. Rigid pavement design is based on
an evaluation of the Modulus of Subgrade Reaction of the soils (K-value), the Modulus of
Rupture of the concrete, and other factors previously outlined. The design K-value of 100
and 140 pounds per cubic inch (pci) for the subgrade soil was determined by correlation to
the laboratory tests results. A modulus of rupture of 600 psi (working stress 450 psi) was
used for pavement concrete. The rigid pavement thicknesses for each traffic category
were determined on the basis of the AASHTO design equation.
2
Geotechnical Engineering Exploration Terracon
Saunders Construction
Project No. 20985048
Recommended alternatives for flexible and rigid pavements, summarized for each street,
are as follows:
Street Alternative Recommended Pavement Thicknesses (Inches)
Asphalt
Concrete
Surface
Aggregate
Base
Course
Plant -Mixed
Bituminous
Base
Portland
Cement
Concrete
Total
College
Avenue
A 6 12 18
B 4 7 11
C 9 9
Harmony
Road
A 6 10 16
B 4 6 10
C 8'/2 8'/z
JFK Parkway
Through the
Site
A 5 10 15
B 4 4Yz 8'/2
C 7'/2 7'/2
JFK Parkway A 4 8 12
North of Site B 3 4 7
C 7 7
Pavilion
Lane
A 4 8 12
B 3 4 7
C 6 6
Each alternative should be investigated with respect to current material availability and
economic conditions.
Aggregate base course (if used on the site) should consist of a blend of sand and gravel
which meets strict specifications for quality and gradation. Use of materials meeting
Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Class 5 or 6 specifications is
recommended for base course.
Aggregate base course should be placed in lifts not exceeding six inches and should be
compacted to a minimum of 95% Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D698).
Asphalt concrete and/or plant -mixed bituminous base course should be composed of a
mixture of aggregate, filler and additives, if required, and approved bituminous material.
3
Geotechnical Engineering Exploration Terracon
Saunders Construction
Project No. 20985048
The bituminous base and/or asphalt concrete should conform to approved mix designs
stating the Hveem properties, optimum asphalt content, job mix formula and recommended
mixing and placing temperatures. Aggregate used in plant -mixed bituminous base course
and/or asphalt concrete should meet particular gradations. Material meeting Colorado
Department of Transportation Grading C or CX specification is recommended for asphalt
concrete. Aggregate meeting Colorado Department of Transportation Grading G or C
specifications is recommended for plant -mixed bituminous base course. Mix designs
should be submitted prior to construction to verify their adequacy. Asphalt material should
be placed in maximum 3-inch lifts and should be compacted to a minimum of 95% Hveem
density (ASTM D1560) (ASTM D1561).
Where rigid pavements are used, the concrete should be obtained from an approved mix
design with the following minimum properties:
Modulus of Rupture @ 28 days .................................................. 600 psi minimum
Strength Requirements.........................................................................ASTM C94
Minimum Cement Content............................................................6.5 sacks/cu. yd.
Cement Type................................................................................. Type I Portland
Entrained Air Content................................................................................. 4 to 8%
Concrete Aggregate ........................................ ASTM C33 and CDOT Section 703
Aggregate Size............................................................................ 1 inch maximum
Maximum Water Content........................................................ 0.49 lb/lb of cement
Maximum Allowable Slump.......................................................................4 inches
Concrete should be deposited by truck mixers or agitators and placed a maximum of 90
minutes from the time the water is added to the mix. Other specifications outlined by the
Colorado Department of Transportation should be followed.
Longitudinal and transverse joints should be provided as needed in concrete pavements
for expansion/contraction and isolation. The location and extent of joints should be based
upon the final pavement geometry and should be placed (in feet) at roughly twice the slab
thickness (in inches) on center in either direction. Sawed joints should be cut within 24-
hours of concrete placement, and should be a minimum of 25% of slab thickness plus 1/4
inch. All joints should be sealed to prevent entry of foreign material and dowelled where
necessary for load transfer.
4
Geotechnical Engineering Exploration Terracon
Saunders Construction
Project No. 20985048
GENERAL COMMENTS
Terracon should be retained to review the final design plans and specifications so
comments can be made regarding interpretation and implementation of our geotechnical
recommendations in the design and specifications. Terracon also should be retained to
provide testing and observation during excavation, grading, and pavement construction
phases of the project. In the event that any changes of the proposed project are planned,
the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should be reviewed and the
report modified or supplemented as necessary.
The analyses and recommendations in this report are based in part upon data obtained
from the borings performed at the indicated locations and from other information discussed
in this report. This report does not reflect variations which may occur between borings or
across the site. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until
construction. If variations appear, it will be necessary to reevaluate the recommendations
of this report.
The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication
any environmental assessment of the site or identification of contaminated or hazardous
materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such
contamination, other studies should be undertaken.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to
the project discussed and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practices. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended
or made. In the event that changes in the nature, design, or location of the project as
outlined in this report, are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this
report shall not be considered valid unless Terracon reviews the changes, and either
verifies or modifies the conclusions of this report in writing.
5