Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPINE RIDGE SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY - 3-87B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY. a � � � � � 0 � • 0 0 Q � 0 J O U • 0 z a J w > 0 J • W � Z w � Q z a > z a m � a M h1EhiC�RAhJUUM Ta: E1 dc�n I��ard Ri ck En�.dar•ff co 0 N Q1 cD Ilo i� Fram: Mat t L�e 1 i ch ����, C?ate: January 5, 198? �ubjeet: Traffi� im�+ac# �n�ly�sis for Pine Ridqe =ingle fami ly re=•identiai Thi� me.mCrandum �d�resle=_. specific #raffic cancerns �f the For t Col 1 i r�� Traff i c Eng i neer i ng C�e�+ar tmen t related to the Pine P.idqe dewelopment. Pine Ridge i= 1 ac�ted i n =.au th For t Col 1 i n=_: an the e�=.# = i de of Lem�y apprc�r. i mate 1>• one mi 1 e sau th of Har•mony Ro�d. �pec i f i c concern=. addr•essed i n th i s me�morandum ar�e : - The impacts af �1 1 c��•�i ng the e>ri �t i ng church acce�= ta t+e �faidened ta a 36 faQt �+ual ic �:treet ta acce�.s the 21 1 ats c�f Pi n�e Ri dqe . - �ig�ht dis#a.nce at the prc�posed publ ic �treett Lemay A�,�en��e i n tersec t i on . W d. � C� J W O � � W � a— � Q � Pi ne� P,i dge i s ��r•a�osed si ngl e f�mi l y detached resicien#ial area �aith 21 d4ti�e11ing units. Figure i shaua=_• a schem�t i c of the =_.tree t l ayau #�►r�opose.d �nd the intended �ccess p�int ►�rith Lemay Avenue. Tri�+ genera- t i c�n acct�rdi ng to the ITE Tr i Q Ge�nerat i on Manual i s: A�.�erage 4Jeekdar 'Jeh i c 1 e Tr i� End� - 210 AP1 Peak In - 4 At`�t F'e aK C1u t- 1� F�ht Pe� ak I n - 13 PM F�e�K Qut - � Tr• i p cii �t� i 6u# i cn fc�r the �hart r�nge future { i.�'88) i= es#ima#p�l �t '�C� per•cent ta.'from the north and lt1 percent to/frc+m the �cuth. TriR dis#r�iautian far the l�ng ra.nge future (20Qr7 is estima#Qd at 8Q percent #n/�r•c�m the nartF� �nd �0 percent to/from the south. F i gur•e 2=_�hay.�� the shor• t range a.ss i gnmen t of P i ne P,i dpe tr• i p=• and #he bacl:grc��nd #r�ff i � at the pro�c+�ed �+ubl i c =�tree #iLemay �1�,�enue i n tersec # i on . Church re l ated traff i c 4�aas e=_.t irr��teJ b�=_.ed ��pon a pr i n ted r�ass =chedul e. L�ckqr�cund traff i c on Lemay A��enue w�as est ima#ed from the �al! Ri d�e P��C? Tr�ff i c Impact Study, Septemt�er 1984. U�.i ng the traff i c shc�.�n i n Fi gure 2, tfie �:ey i r� ter•sec t i c�n aper��te� accep t�t�t y wi #h �tap s i gn � z � W W z � z w J � U • z 0 � a s 0 a � Z Q � s U � � a � � � � con tral a=. sha4vn i n F i gu�e 3. Cal cu 1�t i on fc+rms �re pro�� i ded i n t��+pencii r. A. F i gure 4 shcu��= the 1 ang range as= i gnmen t af Pi ne �:idge tri�s and h�ck�raund #raffie �t the proposed puhiic s#reet/Lema.y ���enue intersectian. Using this #r�ffic, the key intersection aper•�tes aa indic�ted in Figure 5 with �t�p� sign cantral. Caicolatian farms are pro�,� i ded i'n Appensii x B. 4Ji th stop si gn cantrol , cpEra# i c+n i s. acceptabl e e:scept fcr• 1 ef t-turn e:�: i#s frcm this access. Pra��ision af sep�rate riqht- and left-torn 1�ne.=. ��i 1 1 canf i ne #he del �ys to ,iust tho4e desi r i ng #C tur•n left. 8ince most of Fort Gc�llins lies ta the north c�f this acce=.s, the delaYs will be experienced 6y a minimal number of �Jehicle=. It i=_. premature to eU�luate sipnal progressian an thi� section of Lemay A�renue, since �.ignals �re not ant i c i pated i n #h i= ar•ea far � number of year�. Si gnal s north and sc�uth af this access �,a�uld 1 il;et>r create g�ps i n the Lemay� A��enue traff i c 4��h i ch wau 1 d imp���o�,�e th�e aperat i cm of the 1 ef t-turn er, i ts fr�m th i s access: to Lema>� r��enu� . Gorner =_;i ght di stan��e wa= e�1a1 u.�ted �t #he acce�s ta Lemay Avenue. It i= de�fined as the distance mea�ured fr•am � pcint c�n a minor ra�d, paraltet to the roadwaY, 15 feet from the edge of the majar road pauemerrt, and from an eye heiqh# af '�.54 feet c�n the minc+r raad ta a heiqht c+f �n c�bject af 4.25 feet c�n the ma,1Qr ra��d. Since Lem.�y A4�enue i� classified �s an artprial, a corn�r =_.ioht di=tance of 500 feet ��as u=ed ��e=ion Cr i#er i a and Stan_dar•.ds f.oc Stre.e_t= , For• t Col 1 i ns, Ju 1 y, 1�'�SE? . To ttie �:outh, ai ght di stance i s i n er.cess of �QQO feet. To #he narth, field mea�urement�.w�ere taken u,�hich indicate a�ight dist�nce af S50 fee# due to a ver•tical eur��e. Bath cf the�e exceed the requirement� stated in the Fort G�llins design criteria. It is ccncluded #hat this access is �uitably lQcated. � � . � a . � 3 « M � 2 m M O � . � �i�� � �`�``. `�'ti �11 �'S ,- � O ` � O :.���r;� '`/yr�. � � I �� � � r�- �'���� • �i , � v - -- _ _ 0 � � �O .. .. \. . �� � � '18 . � }7 ^ .. ��•. ` � / �1 \ ��� \ \ \ � . \ \ . . i8 . ��' . ' . `� ♦ \ Z = � 1-� . "c�� ' .. `� �J _ — _ . .� f \ �— \ `, \��' I _ • � �\ j = �� _ \ � f---�� � � PINE RIDGE Q ` �;y. � '•� a � � , 19 '�1 PROPERTY �- ' ` � ' ___�� � , s I Q\� � � - --. ' � � i � \� '�� ; • , -/ --, . 1J — � , . J { _. � `� � _ '� � � . �. �\ . _ �� • e 20 , ----�• � �. , \ � � . � '� `. ' � . . -- Q .\ � �T � �\ , . � � 3 � ����, ; ��.2 �� 3' � 4 `� , � -- R \ \ \ ' \ � • � �. ` � � �� � o . �'� �`�� 1 ��. . '.\ \ •5` � 21 � ' _ � ) �� I`��\ � �'�� ' ' \ ' ., � , � / ,.�_:� � � . �` . --' '.-. -- - - --.—'{-----=— _ , _ _ � , _ � � . _ �noeosgo � �_ ` LO � a�N. eewt v _ — — — — — ��— — — — —. _ ._ _ rs5,pq� _ _r— [utune s��a .N \ ' lERYIC! l.4 0 ���� ����: PHASE 1 - \ \ �� . . 1 L�\ �\���s������ss���ss I \ \ \. - . � .� ��.Qra���s� . � , \ � - � : � �� � .� � . , `� . ��� y `. I' � � ��� ` ' � � �`�. ` ` ( i � �� \ � . . __ . _ �� .M1: �. � �� � +i � \ � � , -� �' � � \ �. '� � � '� I `� � \ `..\ \ • . \ . . �.\ \ ' � ` p . Ay' , ' \ . � I' � i " , � \�` . ; \ ts�,� �. .� � • ' ; •. ` � � �` \ —" � s�, \ \. ` ' � 4 so � � � �, .. `�X 1 S�'I NG �, C�l U R C�l � � ), '�. m � _ � � � , �. . i � � � . � � : � � . . � � ' �ii�,{�� . I N� � � ` ' PE�OCATE /�� � I m ` - FIR 'NYDRANT �' `° ��r. � � � � /� ` �� A . � , � . BU4DIN0 ENVEIOCE ��� ; . �( , � Q � . ` �. ' •.\ , ,' ! i \\\ _ .�/ l, 00' � � �� � "•7 � ; � � ��� . . �� � f ��\ `Pe. PINE �ZIt�GE SITE PLAN F1CUR� I • � � Q � W Q J N � � N � � �`--- 20�15 � � ��s 1� Q N� 0 M N SHORT RANGE PE/�K accEss AM f PM T�RAFFIC FiGuaE a 0 M O Q tiN i� O +� �-Zo��s �-- s/s 1 � vh ti� AccESS AccEss fPM AM�P� LONG RANGE PEAK TR�FFIC FiGuRE 4 AccEss IPM SNORT RANGE PEAK DPERATl4t� F^IGURE 3 LoN� RaN�E PEAK OPER�TIoN Fi�uR� 5 C� ❑ AFPEFdDI:X A �' vNsicoNnt.tzr•,n tNrr_resrct�vNs -� l�K-� �&'dr��.r�""'�.' UF 7= LOCACION: lIOURLY VULUME.S � � M.ajor Street: �b'/�i/Q � N O N = �] 4_ Vg L�`o Grade � Vi _.� V� ,L[� _� s' v, � N - C1 , --�-� � - v, v, Uate of Counts: �� O S'IDI' Time I'eriod: — — O YIELU Average Runriing Speed: N = � Minc�r Street: r> >r: Grade `Yo � VOLU111E AUJUSi�11REN�IS I�lovement No. I 2 Volum.e (v�h) Vc�l. (rc�h), see'l�ble 10-1 SI�EP 1: RT from Mtnor Street � IU-3� NAME: VOLUMES IN i'C_I'N �� V 2 0 l70 V2_� � V� 20 �`_V�... � � ' / � v, v9 5'� � 3 � 4 I 5 I 7 I 9 2 3o I S Conflicting flow, V� Crifical Gap, T� , and I'otential Ca�acity, c�, Actual Capacity, c,„ S�rEI' 2; LT Erom Major Street Con(licting flow, V� Critical Gap, T� , and I'otential C�pacity, c� i'ercent o( c�, Utilized and Impedance Factot (fig. ]0-5) Actual Capacit}; c,„ S"I�EP 3: L7 From Minor Street T— i o � s-a 5— -z. a 2,0 S�- � 5-� i' V9 1/2 V3 + V� = 3+ z 3v = Z�� vPh (��9) ��� 7� = �s �ec (Table ]0-2) c�,9 =�5� pcph (Fig. 10-3) � `�� cni9 = cP9 =�5� P�Ph � /� - Y V� V, -+- Vz = S-�-� � 0 = Z 35 Ph (���) I_1 S T� _ ���`- sec (Table ]0-2) c�,� = �'��+cph (Tig. 10-3) 9 � S ����cr�) X l00 = �' Z P' _ � • [ � Z ' L" P�'q � � �m� _ �P, — � pepti � l 5 � - -.-- � V,_ Conflicting I�Iow, V� � �2 v,+v2+v,+v, = 3 +Z �� + � +' `�� = 3� 3 �pt, �v�,) � � Critical Gap, ?� , and Potential Capadty, cP 7� = 7�-D sec (�'able 10-2) cp, =�� � pcph (Fig. 10-3) 4-�� Actual Capaclty, cm e,„, = c�,, X P� = X = 5�5 p ph �-S l SIIARED-GANE CAPACCTY htovement No. � s 9 ZU 4 �n � v� -�- v9 j( Iane is shared S}� _ / / 1V7�Cm7� + lV9I�m9� )}t� �m l C tl� CSH � C�1� s'_' �� 45'I f;; � � ��.� Q � s �. _� z v f,'� q r� �, 44 (, q 9 o-fl � g9�1'� LOS � � APF�PJD I X R .1 . '� � -- �4�V CC /�- ��r� �;' t.tzrn �Nir•.rtsr•.crtc�ros VF 7=1N LOCAIlUN: IIOURLY VULUl�9ES A� Major Street:__ C�.L—'�iA i O N N = [] • us,�%ti Grade S`.,5� V2 ,_ V� �f7 —°� � V3 � 1 � N = 0 , V, V9 D�.te of Counts: �i C7 S Tl'7I' Time Period: — O YIELU Average R.��nning Speed: N =[� Minor f'l iF: Grade �/o �-CGC3`� WLU119E AUJUSI�hiEN�I�S Movement No. 2 Uolume (vp1�) ��''. ',��,-`,Z,j Vql, (}�cph), see 'i'able 10-1 SZ EP 1: Rr frvm Mlnor Street Conflic(ing Flow, V� Ctitica) Gap, T� , and Potential Ca}�acity, c� Actual Capacity, cm SIEP 2: L7 from 11�Iajor Street Con(licting Tlow, V� Critical Gap, T� , and Potential Capacity, c�, i'etcent of c� Utilized and Impedance Factor (Fig: 10-5) Actual Capacity� Cm Sl-EP 3: LT From Mlnor Stteet � � NAME; VOLUMES IN TCI'I� �r, ��0 � �s _ � 0 3 0 � : —9.- V� z- v �V� �� � V� �9 �� � 3 _.. �? 4 � (� �D 5 7 `� 7 f� �... 5�- 10-37 9 � C.) � S� i^ V9 ��z v, + v� _�+� �ra= ss � �ph c��9� 7� 3 T� = S. �ec (Table 10-2) c�i9 = ��ph (fig. 10-3) `� �Sr �.. �m9 _ �P9 _ � ��p�ph � �� ` ( -- f V� _- V, + V� _ _`,z + ..�.�`�'2�= 5�";���Ph (��,) � / S..- T� =5 •� sec (�I'able 10-2) c�,� _�$� pcph (Fig. 10-3) � S� ����c��) X 100 =�L P� _ �'�� �. Z 0.97 �m1 - �pl - ��Ph �%' � S V, Con(licting Tlow, V� 1/2 V��-V=-1-V�-�V� = 3-{-SS�_}. �O �{-Jr7�= ��vph (V��) `7�v�% Critical Gap, T� , and I'ot.e.ntial Capacity, c�, 7� _?� 5 sec (�i'able 10-2) cp� _% pcph (Fig. 10-3) 5�� Actual Capacity, cm cm� — cn� X f�= X =�Z �cph �� SilARED-LANE CACACCTY v� -+- v9 i( lane is shared s}i= / �V7��m7I �� \V9ICm9� Movement No. 7 �, _ 9 IV �� 2 :¢ &' S � � '� � �75 �- Z � 1 I �/ � b Sr �; 7 5.. LOS ¢� � L �6a �l A