The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About112 W. MAGNOLIA STREET PARKING LOT - PDP - PDP160040 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS (2)Glt'�► O�f Fc�rt ��ll�r�� May 24, 2017 Cara Scohy CS DESIGN, INC. 2519 S. Shields St #129 Fort Collins, CO 80526 RE: 112 W. Magnolia Street Parking Lot, PDP160040, Round Number 2 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/deVe/opmentreview Please see the followi_ng summa.ry of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have queStions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Meaghan Overton, at 970-416-2283 or moverton@fcgov.com. Comment Summarv: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: flAorgan Uhlman, 970-416-4344, muhlman(a�fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/27/2016 12/27/2016: The applicant will need to obtain access permits from CDOT for closing the access point on S College Ave. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/27/2016 12/27/2016: Gurves C7 and C8 do not meet LCUASS standard 82.9, the minimum curb return radii is 15'. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 12/27/2016 12/27/2016: Need to detail the sidewalk connecfion on the east side of the driveway to show how this will meet ADA requirements. 05/23/17 - The elevations of the east driveway curb ramp show fhat'it meets ADA requirements but the west curb ramp slope is too steep. Comment Number: 18 Commen# Originated: 12/27/2016 12/27/2016: There can not be more than 750sqft of water draining overthe sidewalk. 05/23/17: It looks like there might be a ridge that helps control the amount of flow over the driveway on the drainage plans, but the grading plans do not indicate that. Please provide additional spot elevations here to show this. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 12/27/2016 12/27/2016: On detail sheet, need to add 7-11 F, 1601, 1602, 1607; 2201, 701, 803, D-10B 05/23/17 : Please add details 701. Page 1 of 8 Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated; 05l23/2017 ' � 05/23/2017: Please add numbering to the Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Construction Plan Notes. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated` 05/23/2017 05/23/2017: The date listed in comment #2 of the Storm Drainage notes should be May not March. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 05/23/2017: Is the potholing for the underdrain (Note 6, sheet G3.0) being performed in the driveway? Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 05723/2017 05/23/2017: Grading plan shows that the alley curb and gutter will be the "onsite 18" valley pan", they should use a city standard because it is public ROW. If this is for the driveway, it should be designed as a standard drive approach. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originafed: 05/23/2017 05/23/2017: Grading plan does not show what detail will be in place where the access point on Magnolia is being taken off. This should be LCUASS detail 701. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 05Y24/2017: Engineering still needs the documentation for the easements that are being dedicated with this project. Contact: Sheri Langenberge�, 970-221-6573, slanaenb�raer(a�fcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 01/06/2017 01/06/2017: The project owes an additional $71 for the TDRFees. This is based on the site being .72 acres. Department: Forestry Contact: Molly Roche, , mrocheC�fcctov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/05/2017 01 /04/2017: Please schedwle a site visit with the City Forester to obtain Tree Invento .ry and Mitigation information to include on the Landscape Plans. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/05/2017 01 /04/2017.: Please replace the existing Permit Box note with the correct Required Street Tree note, which is placed in a bolded box. This is available from the City Forester. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated;: 01/05/2017 01 /04/2017: Please explore widening the parking lot island widths, if at all possible. The City Forester suggests Regal Prince Oak or Prairie Sentinel Hackberry as alternative species that would fit better in these narrow spaces. Comment Number: 4 Comrnent Originated: 01/05/2017 01 /04/2017: Please consider using Red Barron Crabapple where Adirondack Crabapples are currently proposed. Reci Barron will likely have better availability. Page 2 of 8 Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/05/2017 01 /04/2016: Please explore using Linden in place of Honeylocust, due to their adaptability to shade. Department: Light And Power Contact: Coy Althoff, 970-224-6150, CAlthoff(a�fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017; Light 8 Power have existing facilities in this area. There is primary 3-phase power available in the alley way east of this property as well as sfreetlight and flood light circuits along Magnolia St. and College Ave. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: The existing 400W HPS light on the north-central part of this property is part of the Fort Collins Light & Power "floodlight" program. At this time, the monthly fee is part of the Wells Fargo utility bill. Please contact Light 8 Power, Project Engineering to haVe this struefure removed prior to demolition. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/03l2017 01/03/2017: As your project begins to move forward please contact Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the streetlight; transfocmer and electric meter locations, please show the locations on the utility plans. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01./03/2017: Please provide a one line diagram and a C-1 form to Light and Power Engineering. The C-1 form can be found at: http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1 Form.pdf Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: U1/03%2017 01/03/2017; You may conta.ct FCU Light 8� Power, project engineering if you have questions. (970) 221-6700. You may reference Light 8� Power's Eleefric Service Standards at http://www.fcgov. com/utilities/img/site_specific/u ploads/ElectricServiceStandards_F INAL_17June2016.pdf You may reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www,fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 05/23/2017: All eomments frorn 1/3/17 are still accurate at this time. Department: PFA Contact: Cal Sheesley, 970-416-2599, csheeslev(a�poudre-fire.orq Topic: General Comment Number: 1 05/16/2017: NO COMMENT Comment Originated: 05/16/2017 PFA has no comment related to improvement of the parking lot at 112 W. Magnolia. Department: Planning Services Contact: Nieaghan Overton, 970-416-2283, moverton(a�fcaov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Page 3 of 8 Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/22/2017 ' 05/22/2017: The maximum percentage of any one tree species in a development. plan with 20-39 trees is 33 percent, or 9 of the 27 total trees proposed on the site. As currently proposed there are too many Spartan Juniper trees; Please add a different species, bringing the total number of any one tree species to 9 or below. Topic: Modi�cation of Standard Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 05/22/2017: Please revise the justification so that it is only addressing criteria 1; "equally well or better than." Redueing the setback by nearly half is not nominal or inconsequential. 01/03/2017: The justification for the modification of standard should focus more on why the proposed solutions meet the general purpose of the standard in 3:2:2(J) "equally well or better than" a plan that complied with the standard. The justifieation as written emphasizes the impact to the parking lot, not how well the proposed solution meets the purpose of the standard. Also note that the 15 foot setback applies only to the College Avenue side of the parking lot. The setback from the alley only needs to be a minimum ofi5 feet: Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 05/23/2017: If the project and assoeiated modification is approved by the decision maker (Planning and Zoning Board) please add the following note to the site plan for first round FDP submittal; "Modification: At the hearing for#his Project Development Plan, the decision maker approved a mod'ification to the setback requirements in Section 3.2.2(J) to permit an 8-foot setback along College Avenue and a 3-foot setback along fhe alley to the west." Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact; Heather iVlcDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell(c�fcpov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 05/24/2017: Horizontal Control Plan: Please update the $ite Tabulation ta.ble to include existing site conditions so stormwater fees can be accurately assessed. This table indicates asphalt paving but the drainage report indicates concrete..:please make surethese match. If you are proposing asphalt, then the paver areas will be required to be surrounded by a concrete apron. Also, the percentages listed on the table are confusing. Please see redlines. (final) Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 05i24/2017 05/24/2017: Drai.nage Plan: The run-on areas to the paver areas still needs some work. There are sections of pavers that still don't show any run-on area, resulting in other sections that have too much run-on area. It seems like some modifications to the parking lot grading to show a erown down the middle of the drive aisles might fix this issue. Please see redlines. (preliminary) Comment Idumber: 20 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 05/24/2017: Drainage Plan: This plan is basically showing 4 separate detention basin areas (below each of the paver sections). In tha#, you will want to look at ways to mitigate the migration of water from the detention area to below the standard paved areas. You should consider placing an impermeable liner befinreen the detention and the standard parking lot areas. In addition, the underdrain pipes below the standard paved areas should not be pertorated. (final) Page 4 of 8 Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 05/24/2017: Site Details; Please coordinate the orifice plate diameter that is called out in the plans with the size that is provided in the drainage report. (final) Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 05/24/2017: It doesn't look like you've assumed an imperviousness Percentage for the permeable paver areas. These are required to be assumed to be 50% impervious over the long term. Please update your calculations accordingly. (preliminary) Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 05/24/2017: This project is basically proposing 4 separate underground detention areas. As such, you will need to provide volume calculations for each area, separately. Utilizing the UD stage-storage spreadsheet for this application is confusing because that spreadsheet is based on a conic volume calculation and these detention areas can simply be calculated with an area x depth x 30% calculation. (preliminary) Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 05/24%2017: There are redlines on page 1 and 2 of the narrative that need to be addressed. (preliminary) Topic; General Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/03/2017 02/03/2017: Please note that stormwater PIF's (and water fees if needed) will need to be paid prior to us signing mylars on this project because there is no building permit process associated with this project. Contact: Heidi Hansen, 970-221-6854, hhansen(�fcqov.com. Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 05723/2017: The boundary befinreen the flood fringe and the moderate risk floodplain is mislabeled on the Site Plan. Please change as per the red-lined comments on the Site Plan. _ 01/03/2017: Per the Floodplain Review Checklist, please add and label the 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the Site Plan. Contacta iVlark Taylor, 970-416-2494, mtavlorCa�fcaov.com Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 05/23/2017: In the Drainage Report; in the 2nd paragraph of I.B change the desc�iption of the floodplain to state that the sife is located wifhin the City-regulatory 100-year Old Town Basin Floodplain, prepared by Andeeson Consulting Engineers, July 15, 2003. Comment Idumber: 17 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 05/23/2017: fn Appendix A of the Drainage Report, please include a copy of fhe FIRM Panel with the site location outlined in red. Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 05[23/2017: Please add a note to Sheets C3.0, C4.0, C5.0, and C5.2 stating "A Floodplain Use Permit must be approved by the City Floodplain Administration prior to beginning any construction activities in the 100-year Flood Fringe or Floodway." Page 5 of 8 Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 ' 05/23/2017: Please add a note to Sheets G3.0, C4.0, C5.0, and C5.2 stating "A No-Rise Certification must be approved by the City Floodplain Administration prior to beginning any construction activities in the 100-year Floociway." Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated; 05[23/2017 05/23/2017: On Sheet C5.0, please include all floodplain cross-sections, including the stationing and Base Flood Elevations (BFE) for each. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 05/23/2017: On Sheet C5.0, please add a note stating ''Temporary or Pe�manent storage of equipment or material is not allowed within the 100-year Floodway." Department: Technical Services Contact; Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountvCa�fcaov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Idumber: 9 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: Please change the titles so they match the other plan sets: See redlines. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum, and as of January 1, 2015, all projects a�e required to be on NAVD88 datum. Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below. PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. _ _ SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. _ _ IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED = NAVD88 - X.XX'. Comment Number: 11 Gomment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines. Comment Numberc 12 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines: _ Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: Please revise the legal description in the title block as marked. See redlines. . Page 6 of 8 r �� Comment Number: 6 � Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: Please revise the legal description in the title block as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: Please change the titles so they match, See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match fhe sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 2 Gomment Originated; 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines; Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated; 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: There are notes with missing text. See redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-6820, nhahn(a�fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated; 05/23/2017 05/23/2017: The parking lot access location onto College Ave. is very close to the alley, has the team considered closing this access to gain additional on street parking space? Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson(�fcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of puilding permit_: The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(Jj of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: VUater-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell(a�fcaov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Gomment Originated: 05/24/2017 05/24/2017: Horizontal Gontrol Plan: Please show and callout the location of the curb stop and materials for the service. The meter pit will need to be shown and placed behind the ROW. (final) Department: Zoning Page 7 of 8 Contact: Marcus Glasgow, 970-416-2338, mqlasaowCa�fcaov.com �`� ~ Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/21/2016 12/21/2016: Site and landscape plan will to be on a larger scale. Page 8 of 8