HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORT COLLINS NISSAN-KIA - FDP220011 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
1
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6689
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
September 02, 2022
Cathy Mathis
TB Group
444 Mountain Ave.
Berthoud, CO 80513
RE: Fort Collins Nissan-Kia, FDP220011, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of Fort Collins Nissan-Kia. If you have questions about any
comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your
Development Review Coordinator, Brandy Bethurem Harras via phone at 970-416-2744 or
via email at bbethuremharras@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Development Review Coordinator
Contact: Brandy Bethurem Harras, 970-416-2744, bbethuremharras@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
08/30/2022: INFORMATION:
I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and
permitting process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the
project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me
know and I can assist you and your team. Please include me in all email
correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone
conversations. Thank you!
Comment Number: 2
08/30/2022: SUBMITTAL:
As part of your resubmittal, you will respond to the comments provided in this
letter. This letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this
document to insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a
different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in
your responses, as all comments should be thoroughly addressed. Provide
reference to specific project plans or explanations of why comments have not
been addressed, when applicable, avoiding responses like noted or acknowledged.
2
Comment Number: 3
08/30/2022: SUBMITTAL:
Please follow the Electronic Submittal Requirements and File Naming
Standards found at https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic
submittal requirements and file naming standards_v1_8 1 19.pdf?1566857888.
File names should begin with the file type, followed by the project information, and round number.
Example: UTILITY PLANS_PROJECT NAME_PDP_Rd2.pdf
File type acronyms maybe appropriate to avoid extremely long file names.
Example: TIS for Traffic Impact Study, ECS for Ecological Characterization Study.
*Please disregard any references to paper copies, flash drives, or CDs.
Comment Number: 4
08/30/2022: SUBMITTAL:
All plans should be saved as optimized/flattened PDFs to reduce file size and remove layers.
Per the Electronic Submittal Requirements AutoCAD SHX attributes need to be
removed from the PDF’s.
AutoCAD turns drawing text into comments that appear in the PDF plan set,
and these must be removed prior to submittal as they can cause issues with the
PDF file. The default setting is "1" ("on") in AutoCAD. To change the setting
and remove this feature, type "EPDFSHX" (2016.1 version) or “PDFSHX” in the
command line and enter "0".
Read this article at Autodesk.com for more tips on this topic:
https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/autocad/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarti
cles/sfdcarticles/Drawing-text-appears-as-Comments-in-a-PDF-created-by-Aut oCAD.html
Response: The plans have been printed without the AutoCAD pdf comments.
Comment Number: 5
08/30/2022:SUBMITTAL:
Resubmittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being
the cut-off for routing the same week. When you are ready to resubmit your
plans, please notify me with as much advanced notice as possible.
Comment Number: 6
08/30/2022: INFORMATION:
Please resubmit within 180 days, approximately 6 months, to avoid the
expiration of your project. (LUC 2.211 Lapse, Rounds of Review).
Comment Number: 7
08/30/2022: INFORMATION:
ANY project that requires four or more rounds of review would be subject to an
additional fee of $3,000.00.
Comment Number: 8
08/30/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
All "For Final Approval / For Approval" comments need to be addressed and
resolved prior to moving forward with the final documents and recording of this
project. I will provide a recording checklist and process information when we
are closer to this step.
3
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: John Gerwel, , jgerwel@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
08/17/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Per discussion with the applicant team, the College Avenue frontage is not
eligible for TCEF reimbursement.
Response: Noted, thank you.
Comment Number: 2
08/17/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Per discussion with the applicant team, we will be looking for a revised cross
section of the ultimate build-out of College Ave, where the bike lane is moved
off the road and onto the sidewalk - which will be widened into a 12' multi-use
path. Per CDOT standards, the curb should be a rollover curb on the shoulder of
the road. The other dimensions will have been handled through other meetings with the applicant.
Response: The ultimate and interim cross sections for College Avenue have been updated.
Comment Number: 3
08/17/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
On the civil construction plan notes, in the general notes under note 47, the lists
of variances should be listed as number 48.
Response: The missing note has been added.
Comment Number: 4
08/17/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
On the civil construction plan notes, the "Standard Grading and Erosion and
Sediment Control Notes" title is overlapping with a note from the previous section. See redlines.
Response: The overlapping text issue has been corrected.
Comment Number: 5
08/17/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Where are the "Storm Drainage Notes" coming from on the civil construction plan notes?
Response: The “Storm Drainage Notes” have been revised to the correct standard LCUASS notes.:
Comment Number: 6
08/17/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Thank you for providing the page numbers as well as sheet numbers on your
civil construction plan cover sheet, that is very helpful for us. But I am seeing it
list 88 sheets when the pdf has 87 pages. All of the pages after page 82 (sheet
C7.30) are labeled as page 83 and they all have the sheet number of C7.31.
Please clear up the discrepancy.
Response: The pdf did not yet include sheet C2.06 as shown in the sheet index. This sheet is now
included and the sheets have been revised accordingly.
Comment Number: 7
08/17/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please include and label the phasing boundaries in the utility plans.
Response: The phasing boundaries have been added to the utility plans.
Comment Number: 8
08/17/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
Please provide a vertical scale for plan and profile drawings.
4
Response: The vertical scales are located in the lower right portion of each plan sheet.
Comment Number: 9
08/17/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
Please provide spot elevations for sidewalk ramps. This is not a LCUASS
requirement, but it is helpful for inspectors. See redlines.
Response: Spot elevations for ramps are included on the Intersection Detail sheets (C5.30-C5.31).
Comment Number: 10
08/17/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
The section views of College Ave will need to show dimensions on them.
Response: We do not believe there are any applicable dimensions to show on the individual sections. All
applicable dimensions are shown on the plans, profiles, and typical sections.
Comment Number: 11
08/17/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
The plat points out easements that will be dedicated by a separate document.
How will those be dedicated?
Response: They will be dedicated by separate document by the offsite property owner, Silverthorne, LLC
The easements and right of way legal descriptions have been submitted to the City for review prior to the
dedication.
Comment Number: 12
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
The cross section for Venus should have the buffer between the driving lane and
the bicycle lane. Currently, the buffer is between the bike lane and parking. See redlines.
Response: The cross section has been updated.
Comment Number: 13
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
Variance request #1: Make sure you are only referencing Table 7-3 of
LCUASS. Table 7-4 is in reference to Loveland standards. The Silverthorne
property was referenced as being to the east - I believe that should say west?
Which AASHTO publication is being referenced here? I’m having trouble finding
the table being referenced.
Response: Reference to Table 7-4 corrected to 7-3. Silverthorne property reference corrected to west.
AASHTO reference is "Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets". Table reference was
incorrect; has been updated to reference Table 3-13b, not 13-3b.
Comment Number: 14
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
Variance Request #3: The variance request states that the design speed of
Venus is 30 mph. I thought that the speed was Venus was 25 mph. Variance
request #1 and the Signage & Striping sheets also say 25 mph. This may affect
the distance of 120' feet that you came up with from Figure 7-18.
Response: Posted speed will be 25mph, but design speed for Venus Ave is 30mph.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Steve Gilchrist, 970-224-6175, sgilchrist@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
08/29/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Signing and Striping redlines have been provided. Please reach out if you have questions.
5
Response: Redlines have been addressed.
Comment Number: 2
08/29/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Signing and Striping. Further review may be needed based on the CDOT
requirements for a southbound bike lane at Venus and the pedestrian
connection to the north.
Response: Noted, thank you.
Comment Number: 3
08/29/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
See example striping legend for details on different types of striping. Buffered
bike lanes require angled hash marks, standard bike lane is now 6 inch line,
and no buffers in turn lanes.
Response: Revised per PDF redlines.
Department: Erosion Control
Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-222-1801, bhamdan@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 17
08/25/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Based upon the supplied materials, a phased Erosion Control Escrow
Calculation will need to be provided.
The calculations provided do not take into consideration Phase 2
improvements. If this plan is intended for approval of both phases then a
separate Phase 2 EC escrow estimate is required (FCDCM Ch 2 Section 6.1.5)
Response: The Erosion Control Escrow includes (3) pages that show the overall EC Estimate along with
both Phase 1 and Phase 2 estimates.
Comment Number: 18
08/25/2022: INFORMATION:
Based upon the area of disturbance or this project is part of a larger common
development, State permits for stormwater will be required should be pulled
before Construction Activities can begin.
Response: Noted, the State permits will be acquired by the contractor prior to construction beginning.
Comment Number: 19
08/25/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please address all redline comments provided on the plans
Response: Redlines have been addressed.
Topic: Fees
Comment Number: 16
08/25/2022: INFORMATION:
The City Manager’s development review fee schedule under City Code 7.5-2
was updated to include fees for Erosion Control and Stormwater Inspections.
As of January 1st, 2021, these fees will be collected on all projects for such
inspections. The Erosion Control fees are based on; the number of lots, the
total site disturbance, the estimated number of years the project will be active.
Based on the proposed site construction associated with this project we are
assuming 2 building permits, 19 acres of disturbance, 2 years from demo
through build out of construction and an additional 3 years till full vegetative
6
stabilization due to seeding. Which results in an Erosion Control Inspection Fee
estimate of $2,298.30 . Please note that as the plans and any subsequent
review modifications of the above-mentioned values change the fees may need
to be modified. I have provided a copy of the spreadsheet used to arrive at
these estimates for you to review. Please respond to this comment with any
changes to these assumed estimates and why, so that we may have a final fee
estimate ready for this project.
The Stormwater Inspection Fees are based on the number of LID/WQ Features
that are designed for on this project. Based on the plans we identified 1
bioretention, 1 level spreader, 1 extended detention basins, and 2
underground facilities which results in a Stormwater LID/WQ Inspection fee of
$1,710. Please note that as the plans and any subsequent review modifications
of the above-mentioned values change the fees may need to be modified. I
have provided a copy of the spreadsheet used to arrive at these estimates for your review.
Response: Noted, thank you.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Stephen Agenbroad, , sagenbroad@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL - UNRESOLVED:
07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL - UNRESOLVED:
05/03/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN – UPDATED:
The Letter of Intent or Agreement from the North Louden Ditch is acceptable,
however since this is in the form of a legal agreement, the developer will need to
provide the City with written notification within 3-business days in the event that
the ‘agreement’ with the North Louden Ditch Company expires.
11/02/2021: FOR HEARING: (addressed)
The realignment and undergrounding of the North Louden Ditch will require the
ditch company to sign the plans. A Letter of Intent is required before Hearing.
For final approval – the agreement with North Louden Ditch Company will need
to document Ownership and Maintenance responsibilities for relocated ditch
section.
Response: Noted, the final agreement with the ditch company is currently in process.
Comment Number: 2
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL - UNRESOLVED:
The concentration/design points are not present on the drainage plans, both
detailed and overall. The layer associated with these points seem to not have printed.
07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Should label concentration points on drainage plan
Response: Correct, the design points did not print with the submittal plans. Concentration points are
provided (and now print) on both the overall and detailed plans.
Comment Number: 3
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
The detention pond calcs use a weighted average for the C_100 when they
should be using C2 multiplied by 1.25. Only affects pond A1.
7
Response: The C100 value is the weight average of the contributing basins, and the 1.25 factor was
applied with the C100 values for each individual basin. This was coordinated with City Staff during PDP
Round 2.
Comment Number: 4
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
For each design point please label the basins associated with them on the
Rational Peak Runoff Table.
Response: An additional column has been applied to the Rational Method Peak Runoff table in Appendix A
of the Drainage Report.
Comment Number: 5
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please include the design point associated with the inlet in the Inlet Management tables.
Response: Design Points have been applied to the Inlet Management tables.
Comment Number: 6
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Stormline H on the south side of the Kia Dealership building appears to be
within 10ft of the gas line. Please verify.
Response: The gas line has been relocated to provide 10’ from the storm line.
Comment Number: 7
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Inlet H4.5 does not have the allowable flow capacity to capture the Qpeak of a
major storm. Same for Inlet G3, F2
Response: The inlet design and calculations have been revised – these deficiencies were largely a matter
of flow depth. For example, private Inlets H4.5 and Inlet A4.6 may experience a depth up to 8.3” in the 100-
year. This additional, temporary depth within the parking lot is not a concern.
Comment Number: 8
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Looking at the Hydraflow Modeling, it appears that the STMH H3 is exceeded
the EGL. Please revise.
Response: The piping sizes and hydraulics have been revised to lower the EGL.
Comment Number: 9
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please provide the Bioretention sizing calculations.
Response: Required WQCV calculations for the Bioretention Ponds are provided in Appendix B. Stage
Storage tables for Bioretention Ponds A2 & A3 are also now provided in Appendix B.
Comment Number: 10
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
On street profiles, please include the alignment, size and depth of storm sewers.
Response: Per the meeting with staff on 9/7, the full storm profiles do not need to be included in the street
profiles. The storm pipes crossing the street profiles have been added.
Comment Number: 11
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Storm sewer profile of line A14 is not labeled private or public.
Response: This storm line has been labeled as private in plan view.
8
Comment Number: 12
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
We have updated our Bioretention Details, we will send you an email.
Response: Noted, thank you. These details have replaced the original documents.
Comment Number: 13
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Since the storm tech water quality is split between two rows that are not
adjacent, the FAA calculated volume has to be looked at independently of one another.
Response: The two rows have been analyzed separately. The WQCV spreadsheet has been revised,
additional FAA spreadsheet have been included, and the Underground Detention spreadsheet has been
updated. The separate isolated rows are adequately sized to treat the related drainage basins.
Comment Number: 14
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please remove the word optional for the inspection ports on the storm tech details.
Response: The “optional” term has been removed from the storm tech details. “Inspection ports are not
optional” notes have also been included on the details.
Comment Number: 15
08/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Additional storm manifold details are needed to include weir heights and
location of 2 year orifice. Also please label this information on the storm sewer profiles.
Response: Additional details related to the underground detention system have been included in the
Construction Detail sheets. The downstream structure (i.e., Basin A6) includes a 100-year orifice sized for
the required 0.2 cfs/acre rather than the 2-year historic event. This is the only structure (with a weir) that
includes an orifice design.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-2772, tsiegmund@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
08/31/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
A short stretch of primary electric lines were added from the Kia transformer out
to Venus Ave to loop the transformer. Please add to the plans. See LP markups.
Response: The primary electric per the redlines has been added to the plans.
Comment Number: 2
08/31/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Light and Power is modeling the streetlight locations that will be placed along
College Ave to determine if streetlights should be placed at the interim back of
curb location or in the ultimate road section back of curb. Minor adjustments to
the streetlight locations may be needed after modeling is complete.
Response: Noted, thank you. The plans will be revised once information from the City is received.
Comment Number: 3
08/31/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please submit preliminary C-1 forms for each electric service for the project.
https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-forms-guidelines-regulations
Response: C-1 Forms are included.
9
Comment Number: 4
08/31/2022: INFORMATION:
Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and any system
modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this development.
Please contact me to discuss development fees or visit the following website for
an estimate of charges and fees related to this project:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investment-development-fees
Response: Noted, thank you.
Comment Number: 5
08/31/2022: INFORMATION:
Light & Power will need AutoCAD files of the site plan, utility plans, and
landscape drawings once plans are approved.
Response: Noted, thank you.
Comment Number: 6
08/31/2022: INFORMATION:
Please document the size of the existing electrical service(s) that feeds the
property prior to demolition of buildings to receive capacity fee credits.
Response: Noted. A note has been added to sheet C1.00 regarding this.
Comment Number: 7
08/31/2022: INFORMATION:
The City of Fort Collins offers gig-speed fiber internet, video and phone service.
Contact John Stark with Fort Collins Connexion at 970-207-7890 or
jstark@fcgov.com for commercial grade account support, RFPs and bulk agreements.
Response: Noted, thank you.
Comment Number: 8
08/31/2022: INFORMATION:
For additional information on our renewal energy programs please visit the website below
or contact John Phelan (jphelan@fcgov.com). https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/go renewable
Response: Noted, thank you.
Comment Number: 9
08/31/2022: INFORMATION:
You may reference Light & Power’s Electric Service Standards at:
https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/electricservicestandards.pdf?1645038437
Reference our policies and processes at: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers.
Response: Noted, thank you.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Scott Benton, (970)416-4290, sbenton@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
08/29/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
A weed management cost estimate will be needed in order for the cost
estimate to be accepted.
RESPONSE: Weed management estimate sent by Blue Mountain Environmental will be included in next
submittal.
Comment Number: 2
08/29/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
10
Please specifically include the restoration work that will need to occur in all
portions of the NHBZ in the phasing plan included in the Utility Plan. I
recommend including weed management in Phase 1 – the sooner the better.
Response: The phasing plan has been revised to include the restoration work within Phase I of the project.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Christine Holtz, , choltz@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
08/30/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please include the quantity of each tree species being planted on the plant schedule.
RESPONSE: Quantities have been added to plant schedule.
Department: PFA
Contact: Marcus Glasgow, 970-416-2869, marcus.glasgow@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
08/23/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
PREMISE IDENTIFICATION: ADDRESS POSTING & WAYFINDING:
Where possible, the naming of private drives is usually recommended to aid in
wayfinding. New and existing buildings shall be provided with approved
address identification. The address identification shall be legible and placed in
a position that is visible from the street or road fronting the property. Address
identification characters shall contrast with their background. Address numbers
shall be rabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall not be spelled
out. The address numerals for any commercial or industrial buildings shall be
placed at a height to be clearly visible from the street. They shall be a minimum
of 8 inches in height unless distance from the street or other factors dictate
larger numbers. Refer to Table 505.1.3 of the 2021 IFC as amended. If bronze
or brass numerals are used, they shall only be posted on a black background for
visibility. Monument signs may be used in lieu of address numerals on the
building as approved by the fire code official. Buildings, either individually or
part of a multi- building complex, that have emergency access lanes on sides
other than on the addressed street side, shall have the address numbers and
street name on each side that fronts the fire lane.
Both buildings will require address signage on multiple sides of the building.
Wayfinding signage will be required on the lot to the West and may be required
throughout the site as needed. Please include addressing with appropriate size
on elevations and wayfinding signage on site plan.
RESPONSE: The applicants are working on a street name for the former Crestridge Drive.
Comment Number: 2
08/23/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
FIRE LANE SIGN PLACEMENT:
Many of the fire lanes are only showing fire lane signage on 1 side. Please
update civil plans with compliant signage.
- IFC D103.6.1; ROADS 20 TO 26 FEET IN WIDTH: Fire lane signs as
specified in Section D103.6 shall be posted on both sides of fire apparatus
11
access roads that are 20 to 26 feet wide.
- IFC D103.6.1; ROADS MORE THAN 26 FEET IN WIDTH: Fire lane signs as
specified in Section D103.6 shall be posted on one side of fire apparatus
access roads more than 26 feet wide and less than 32 feet wide.
Response: Additional fire lane signs have been added.
Department: Building Services
Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 1
08/29/2022: BUILDING PERMIT:
Construction shall comply with adopted codes as amended. Current adopted codes are:
2021 International Building Code (IBC) with local amendments
2021 International Existing Building Code (IEBC) with local amendments
2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) with local amendments
2021 International Mechanical Code (IMC) with local amendments
2021 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) with local amendments
2021 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code (ISPSC) with local amendments
Colorado Plumbing Code & state amendments (currently 2018 IPC)
2020 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado
Copies of current City of Fort Collins code amendments can be found at fcgov.com/building.
· Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2017.
· Snow Live Load: Ground Snow Load 35 PSF.
· Frost Depth: 30 inches.
· Wind Loads: Risk Category II (most structures):
· 140mph (Ultimate) exposure B or Front Range Gust Map published by The
Structural Engineer's Association of Colorado
· Seismic Design: Category B.
· Climate Zone: Zone 5
· Energy Code: 2021 IECC commercial chapter.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
· Commercial occupancies must provide 10ft setback from property line and 20
feet between other buildings or provide fire rated walls and openings per chapter 6 and 7 of the IBC.
· City of Fort Collins adopted International Fire Code (IFC) and amendments to
the 2018/2021 IFC require a full NFPA-13 sprinkler system per IBC chapter 9 or
when building exceeds 5000 sq.ft. (or meet fire containment requirements).
· Buildings using electric heat, must use heat pump equipment.
· A City licensed commercial general contractor is required to construct any new commercial structure.
· Plans must be signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed architect or
engineer and must be included in the permit application.
· Electric vehicle parking spaces are now required per local amendment to the IBC. See section 3604.
· For projects located in Metro Districts, there are special additional code requirements for new buildings.
Please contact the plan review team to obtain the requirements for each district.
BUILDING PERMIT PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING:
Please schedule a pre-submittal meeting with Building Services for this project.
Pre-Submittal meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the
12
design, that the new projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted
City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the
early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective. Applicants of new
projects should email your Development Review Coordinator to schedule a
pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans,
floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy,
square footage, type of construction, and energy compliance method being proposed.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 4
08/25/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
There are cut off text issues. See redlines.
Response: Text overlap has been fixed.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1
08/25/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree
with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not
made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response
letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please contact John
Von Nieda at 970-221-6565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.com
Response: Redlines have been addressed.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 2
08/25/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please revise the legal description to match the legal description on the
Subdivision Plat.
RESPONSE: Legal description has been revised to match the plat.
Comment Number: 3
08/25/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Response: Line over text has been fixed.
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
08/17/2022: BUILDING PERMIT:
Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The
irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of
the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric
Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com