The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFORT COLLINS NISSAN-KIA - FDP220011 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS 1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6689 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview July 15, 2022 Cathy Mathis TB Group 444 Mountain Ave. Berthoud, CO 80513 RE: Fort Collins Nissan-Kia, PDP210017, Round Number 4 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of Fort Collins Nissan-Kia. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review Coordinator, Tenae Beane via phone at 970-224-6119 or via email at tbeane@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Development Review Coordinator Contact: Tenae Beane, 970-224-6119, tbeane@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and permitting process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can assist you and your team. Please include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone conversations. Thank you! Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 07/15/2022: INFORMATION: As part of your FDP submittal you will respond to the comments provided in this letter. This letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this document to insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in your responses, as all comments should be thoroughly addressed. Provide reference to specific project plans or explanations of why comments have not 2 been addressed, when applicable, avoiding responses like noted or acknowledged. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: Please follow the Electronic Submittal Requirements and File Naming Standards found at https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic submittal requirements and file naming standards_v1_8 1 19.pdf?1566857888. File names should begin with the file type, followed by the project information, and round number. Example: UTILITY PLANS_PROJECT NAME_PDP_Rd2.pdf Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: LUC 2.211(D) Project Development Plan and Plat. Following the approval of a project development plan and upon the expiration of any right of appeal, or upon the final decision of the City Council following appeal, if applicable, the applicant must submit a final plan for all or part of the project development plan within three (3) years... If such approval is not timely obtained, the project development plan (or any portion thereof which has not received final approval) shall automatically lapse and become null and void. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Dave Betley, 970-221-6573, dbetley@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 10/28/2021 07/15/2022: For Final Approval: Comment left active as request has not been incorporated within the plans. 10/28/2021: For Approval: Please provide spot elevations for the cross pans and the handicapped ramps. Response: All spot elevations are shown on cross pans and handicap ramps. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 10/31/2021 07/15/2022: For Final Approval: Comment left active as request has not been incorporated within the plans. 10/31/2021: For Approval: Please callout the radii for the curb return on the driveways and at the intersection of Venus Street and College Avenue. Response: Radii for curb returns on driveways and intersections are called out on the plans. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 10/31/2021 10/31/2021: For Information: The dimensions of the island for the right in right out will need to be included in the final FDP plans. Response: The dimensions for the island are included on the plans. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 11/03/2021 11/03/2021: For Information: There will need to be further discussion on the improvement that are available for TCEF reimbursement. This will require further investigation from the City's review. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 02/22/2022 02/22/2022: For Information: The cross section used for College Avenue does coordinate with what is approved through the South College Corridor Plan. The 3 plan recommends an eight foot detached multiuse path with bicycle lanes in College Drive. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 07/12/2022 07/12/2022: For Final Approval: There will need to be further discussion on the phasing of the construction on College Avenue. This will also need to be coordinated with the required CDOT permit. It is acknowledged that the lane configuration is safe as long as the driveway entrance is built with phase one as shown. The current proposal would prevent right hand turns onto College Avenue unless the some portion of a transition lane is constructed to merge traffic. This generally requires that the merging lane meet AASHTO requirements. The applicant may find that the cost of the merging lane may not be much cheaper than constructing the remaining improvements. Response: We have revised the phasing plans to include the College Avenue roadway improvements. The College Avenue sidewalk improvements on southern portion of the property will be built with Phase 2 with the KIA Dealership building. Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 07/12/2022 07/12/2022: For Information: The traffic control plan will have to be completed with phase one based on the intersection configuration. Unfortunately this light does not qualify for TCEF reimbursement. Portions of the roadway improvements may qualify. Further discussion will need include Marc Virata. Response: It is the developer’s intent to build the traffic signal with the Phase 1 improvements. It is understood that the signal is not eligible for TCEF reimbursement. Please let us know what roadway improvements are eligible. Comment Number: 46 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: For Final Approval: The comment relates to Comment 32. The demolition plan shows that the improvements south of the proposed driveway will be removed but will not be installed back until phase two of the project. With no curb and gutter, this could create some drainage issues that could impact the roadway. What is the timing between phase 1 and phase 2. This may help staff better understand the impacts. Response: The demo plan does not show phasing. The phasing of the demolition will correspond with the same areas that are shown on the phasing plan. Comment Number: 47 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: For Final Approval: There is a short patch of paving to the south of the valley pan in Venus Drive. The paving and saw cutting are determined in the field based on LUCASS Standards. There made need to be a larger patch carried out to the middle of the lane or the centerline removing the seam from the wheel path. The engineer may want to perform some investigatory work or specify on the plans that any incompatibility in the existing and proposed asphalt section will need to be rectified in the pavement design report. Response: Thanks for the recommendations. After further discussions and our assumption is that the existing pavement is likely not up to current standards. We have shown removing and replacing the existing pavement out to the crown line. It’s also understood that additional pavement may need to be removed to the south of the pan on the east side of the crown. Comment Number: 48 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: For Final Approval: Please add spot elevations to the corners of the handicapped ramps and slopes. This will help with the inspections in the 4 field. Response: All spot elevations are shown on handicap ramps. Comment Number: 49 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: For Final Approval: What kind of wall will be used for retainage along Venus? Will the footer interfere with the utility easement? Response: A concrete retaining wall is planned along Venus. The structural engineer is designing the retaining wall and is looking into options that won’t impact the utility easement. We will provide more information and include a section of the wall in the plans with the next submittal. Comment Number: 50 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: For Final Approval: The stormwater facility located along Venus Avenue appears to infiltrate water. Will this water have an detrimental impact on the road base? Response: We are including an impermeable membrane around this stormwater facility so that it doesn’t impact the adjacent road and adjacent wall. Comment Number: 51 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: For Information: A draft of the development agreement is due to the City Attorneys office at the time of second round FDP comments. We usually do not see first round FDP submittals until after the project has gone to hearing. To develop a draft of the DA the project will need to go to hearing first. City staff will still work to prioritize the timing of completion of the Development agreement but will have to wait for the approval through hearing to complete a working draft if second round of FDP happens before the hearing. Response: Understood, we hope that a draft of the DA can begin now that we have been through the hearing process and we are essentially submitting our second round of FDP documents. Comment Number: 52 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: For Hearing: It appears that the Surveyor is dedicating an easement for the North Louden Ditch which is overlaid also with an emergency access easement. The plat will need a signature block for the North Louden Ditch Company. Response: A signature block has been added to the Plat. Comment Number: 53 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: For Final Approval: The easements and right of way will need to be submitted and recorded before approval of the plat. Response: Understood. We are working on getting these signed and recorded with the adjacent property owner. Contact: John Gerwel, jgerwel@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL Please use the most current construction notes found in Appendix E of LCUASS. "Traffic Signing and Pavement Marking Construction Notes" seem to be missing a few items, and the "Standard Grading and Erosion and Sediment Control Construction Plan Notes" do not appear to be included. Response: “Traffic Signing and Pavement Marking Construction Notes” updated. “Standard Grading and Erosion and Sediment Control Construction Plan Notes” added. Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL 5 On the utility plans set, please use the preamble title of "Utility Plans for…" Response: Preamble updated to “Civil Construction Plans for” per discussion. Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL The vicinity map on the cover sheet must have two arterial streets. Response: Vicinity map updated. Comment Number: 37 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL Is the owner also the developer? There is no specified developer in the cover sheet of the utility plans. Response: Correct, the owner is developer. Cover updated with “Owner/Developer”. Comment Number: 38 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL I am not seeing the statement regarding minimum building elevations required for 100-year storm protection. It is marked as Included in the FDP checklist (II) (E). Please note that your checklist is not current, and the building elevation statement you see in your checklist is not current. Please see https://www.larimer.gov/engineering/standards-and-guides/urban-area-street-st andards for the most current checklist. Response: Statement has been added to notes on grading plan sheets and drainage plan sheets. Comment Number: 39 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL When the proposed section of Venus Drive ties into the existing Venus Drive, the arc length is listed as 88 feet. The minimum arc length is 200 feet (LCUASS Table 7-5). Deviating from standards will require a variance request. Response: This is an existing condition. A variance request will be provided. Comment Number: 40 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL Please include utilities in street plan and profiles. See LCUASS App E-4 (IV) (R). Response: In the checklist, section IV covers utility plan sheets, while section V covers road plan & profile sheets. There does appear to be a requirement in section V to include utilities on road plan & profile sheets. We are concerned that adding the utilities to the roadway plan and profile sheets may add confusion to those sheets. We have the storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and waterlines profiled separately from the road plan & profile sheets. Comment Number: 41 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL Street profile views are missing some curve and grade information. See redlines. Response: Curve and grade labels updated with all info included per redlines. Comment Number: 42 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL There are some vertical curve lengths that are below LCUASS standards (see Figure 7-18). They either need adjusting, or variance requests. See redlines. Response: This is an existing condition. A variance request will be provided. Comment Number: 43 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL The proposed cross slope grade of College Ave at station 25+00 is at 4.72%. The LCUASS maximum allowable cross slope for reconstruction is 4%. Please 6 adjust or submit a variance request. Response: This is an existing condition. A variance request will be provided. Comment Number: 44 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR APPROVAL Please provide a legend or some type of labeling for the features in the cross sectional views of College. See LCUASS App E (XXI)(A)(1). Response: Cross section features added to legend. Comment Number: 45 Comment Originated: 07/13/2022 07/13/2022: FOR APPROVAL The line of sight distances for streets with posted speed limits of 30mph is 300 feet. The current sight triangles do not reflect this. If the speed were reduced to 25mph, the sight distances would be acceptable. See redlines. Response: Posted speed limit to be 25 MPH. Signage & Striping Plan legend updated to reflect 25 MPH. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Nicole Hahn, nhahn@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 02/23/2022: INFORMATION ONLY Because Venus is local roadway, the Venus/College intersection is not eligible for TCEF reimbursement. 11/02/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN Please note that full design of College Ave., including the proposed traffic signal, signing and striping, etc. will be the responsibility of the developer and subject to review and approval by CDOT. The traffic signal is not eligible for City funding and will be the full responsibility of the development. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/04/2022 07/12/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL - UPDATED: What to include on signal plan: • Mastarm signal head centered over bike lane and through lane • Streetname sign • Side of pole • Video detection on all four approaches • Ped push buttons (within 10’ from the flowline max) • Underground infrastructure to ped poles • Show landings on the corners on the Eastside and ADA measurements (10” reach to ped push button) – West side (to be completed by others) o Landing 4x4 pad, less than 2% cross slope, ped push button accessible from this pad 05/04/2022: FOR HEARING Please add callouts where appropriate that indicate the future traffic signal at Venus/College. I just want it to be clear on the plans that there will be a signal there. As discussed previously, the design for the signal is not needed until FDP. When the traffic signal plans are sent to Traffic Ops to review prior to your FDP submittal, please include Tyler Siegmund from Light and Power as well (tsiegmund@fcgov.com). Delich: The signal plans have been revised including the above items. 7 Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/04/2022 07/12/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: See Redlines 05/04/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN Signing and striping was not reviewed in much detail during PDP. At FDP, we will do a thorough review of these plans, along with the traffic signal design, street tree spacing/conflicts with light poles, signals, etc. Department: Erosion Control Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 42 Comment Originated: 07/12/2022 07/12/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: It was requested that this project be treated as an FDP as such, this project failed to provide erosion control plans meeting City Criteria. These plans need erosion control sequencing sheets (not chart as this project is over 3 acres) and phasing (as this is over 5 acres) taken into account. The erosion control plans were missing key components for review including calculation chart. I will not provide redlines on the sheets until the erosion control phasing and sequences are provided as they will change significantly from what was provided. The erosion control report also seems to be lacking any discussion of sequencing or phasing. Also the final stabilization section seems not to meet the criteria at just a cursory glance. Escrow Calculation doesn't take into account phasing as well. At this point I will wait for the next round of submittals to provide sequencing and phasing that was requested of submittal at FDP by Basil Hamdan back in October. Please use the check sheet provided in the relines folder and at www.fcgov.com/erosion for this and all future submittals also a re-read of FCSCM Ch 2 Sec 6 in its entirety before submitting these plans would not go amiss. Response: All erosion control items have been updated to meet City criteria, including detailed information for phasing and sequencing. Separate phasing and sequenced Erosion Control Plan sheets have been included in the utility plans per City criteria. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL - REMINDER: 05/03/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN – UPDATED: The Letter of Intent or Agreement from the North Louden Ditch is acceptable, however since this is in the form of a legal agreement, the developer will need to provide the City with written notification within 3-business days in the event that the ‘agreement’ with the North Louden Ditch Company expires. 11/02/2021: FOR HEARING: (addressed) The realignment and undergrounding of the North Louden Ditch will require the ditch company to sign the plans. A Letter of Intent is required before Hearing. For final approval – the agreement with North Louden Ditch Company will need to document Ownership and Maintenance responsibilities for relocated ditch section. 8 Response: Noted, thank you. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: REMINDER The table you mentioned was not found within the report. Please verify that it has been put into the text. 11/02/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN: Provide documentation that the detention ponds meet the State drain time criteria. Response: Refer to the Conclusion section under the “Compliance with Standards” heading (Section VI.A). A brief statement confirms compliance to the Senate Bill 15-212 requirements and points to Appendix C for the spreadsheets. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 02/22/2022 07/07/2022: FOR HEARING - CONDITION OF APPROVAL - REMINDER: 05/03/2022: FOR HEARING - CONDITION OF APPROVAL: **Regarding the drainage easement through the City Natural Areas property. Per recent discussions I understand the applicant has a desire to take this project to Planning and Zoning Hearing without the "letter of intent" from the Natural Areas Department. This is called an "at risk" approach and would be a condition of Hearing approval. Condition of approval: "For approval of the Final Development Plan the developer shall obtain a drainage easement from the City Natural Areas Department and it's governing authorities. This includes a recommendation from the Land Conservation and Stewardship Board as well as ultimate approval from City Council." 02/22/2022: FOR HEARING: Follow up on comment 13 – a drainage easement will be needed through the Natural Areas property for formalization of this drainage flow path. A ‘letter of intent’ for this will be required before Hearing. The Natural Areas staff has indicated that a recommendation from the Natural Areas Board will be needed before this LOI can be written. The final easement approval is through City Council however. Response: Noted, thank you. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 05/03/2022 07/07/2022: INFORMATION All redlines were addressed or gave satisfactory reasons as to why. The city agrees that due to the storm sewer being private, no manhole is needed. 05/03/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: Please see the redlines of the Utility Plans, Drainage Report, and Landscape Plans for further comments. You will need to provide a written or annotated response to these with the FDP submittal. Response: Noted, thank you. Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 05/04/2022 07/07/2022: FOR HEARING - REMINDER: 05/04/2022: Stormwater is Ready for Hearing! Please note the condition of approval in Comment 21. Response: Noted, thank you. Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 07/07/2022 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: 9 Should label concentration points on drainage plan Response: Design/concentration points are labeled on the Detailed Drainage Plans. Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 07/07/2022 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Missing corner lot elevations for all lots. Response: Spot elevations are placed on the Detailed Grading Plans. Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 07/07/2022 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Missing highpoints and other spot elevations to define flow patterns. Response: High point and low point spot elevations have been included on the Detailed Drainage Plans for contextual help. Numerous spot elevations are also provided on the Detailed Grading Plans. Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 07/07/2022 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please add the WSEL for the 100 yr storm in the Pond Summary table on the Drainage. Response: A 100-yr WSEL column has been included with the Pond Summary table. Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 07/07/2022 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL ARPPROVAL: When using the RCP for storm sewer piping material in the profiles, please state the class of RCP. Response: The storm sewer profile RCP labels have been updated. Comment Number: 37 Comment Originated: 07/07/2022 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Missing the 100 yr HGL for Storm Sewer Profile A3. Response: The 100-yr HGL has been applied to the Storm Line A3 profile. Comment Number: 38 Comment Originated: 07/07/2022 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: When the storm sewer lines cross over a water main, the water main will have to be encased in concrete for protection in order to adhere to Fort Collins Standards. This should be reflected in the profile plans, example of one case is Storm Line H4.2 Profile. Response: Per coordination with Wes Lamarque, this comment does not apply as the on-site water mains are associated with the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District. Comment Number: 39 Comment Originated: 07/07/2022 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: WSEL at pond outfalls should be labeled in profile plans. Response: 100-yr WSEL’s provided on the plan view portion of the plan and profile sheets. Comment Number: 40 Comment Originated: 07/07/2022 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Designate which storm sewer lines are public vs. private on profile plans. Response: Both “Private” and “Public” designations are provided on the plan view portion of the plan and profile sheets. Comment Number: 41 Comment Originated: 07/07/2022 07/07/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Detail for Bioretention Pond seems to be out of date. Please verify detail by using the following link to our current detail drawings 10 https://citydocs.fcgov.com/index.php? dn=UTILITIES&vid=189&dt=DETAIL+DRAWINGS&cmd=showdt&sp=2 Response: The construction detail has been updated. Department: Light And Power Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-2772, tsiegmund@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: Light and Power has existing electric facilities along the College Ave frontage of the property that will need to be extended north to feed the site. Light and Power also has electric facilities along the east side of existing Venus Ave that will need to extend down the parkway of realigned Venus. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: Streetlights will be placed along public streets. 40ft of separation on both sides of the light is required between canopy trees and streetlights. 15ft separation on both sides of the light is required between ornamental trees and streetlights. A link to the City of Fort Collins street lighting requirements can be found at: http://www.larimer.org/engineering/GMARdStds/Ch15_04_01_2007.pdf Response: Noted. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: During utility infrastructure design, please provide adequate space along the public roads and private drives to ensure proper utility installation and to meet minimum utility spacing requirements. 10ft minimum separation is needed between all water, sewer, storm water, and irrigation main lines. Light and Power has a 3ft minimum separation requirement from all utility lines/infrastructure. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: Any existing electric infrastructure that needs to be relocated as part of this project will be at the expense of the developer. Please coordinate relocations with Light and Power Engineering. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: Any existing and/or proposed Light and Power electric facilities that are within the limits of the project must be located within a utility easement. All utility easements and required permits (crossing agreements, flood plain, etc.) needed for the development will need to be obtained and paid for by the developer. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one line diagram for all commercial meters will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering for review. A link to the C-1 form is below: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development- forms-guidelines-regulations Response: A C-1 form will be provided with Round 2. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: For additional information on our renewal energy programs please visit the website below or contact John Phelan (jphelan@fcgov.com). https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/go renewable Response: Noted. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: The City of Fort Collins now offers gig-speed fiber internet, video and phone service. Contact Brad Ward with Fort Collins Connexion at 970-224-6003 or bward@fcgov.com for commercial grade account support, RFPs and bulk agreements Response: Noted. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 11/02/2021: INFORMATION: Please contact Tyler Siegmund with Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970.416.2772 Please reference our policies, construction practices, development charge processes, electric service standards, and use our fee estimator at: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Response: Noted. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/15/2022 02/15/2022: INFORMATION: Due to the College Ave road widening, it appears that our existing primary vault will need to be relocated to the parkway. Please show this on the utility plans. All electric system relocations/modifications will be at the expense of the developer. Response: Noted, this is shown on the Utility Plans. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/04/2022 07/13/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL- UPDATED: Please confirm that (1) transformer can service the Kia building and the EV charging stations and meet our commercial service standards. Link to our electric service standards: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Reach out if you have questions or want to discuss service requirements. 05/04/2022: FOR FINAL: An additional transformer will likely need to be added to the site for the electric vehicle charging stations. Once a location for the EV stations are determined, 12 please provide space for a transformer. Response: The design team electrical engineer has confirmed that only one transformer is required for the Kia facility plus EV charging stations and has provided the following information: · EV Service 480Y/277 V o 600 Amps Today o 600 Amps Future o 1,200 Amps Total · Kia Service 480Y/277 V o 1,200 Amps · Total Service size on Transformer o 1,800 Amps Today o 600 Amps Future o 2,400 Amps Total Today + Future Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Scott Benton, (970)416-4290, sbenton@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 10/29/2021 07/12/2022: (UPDATED) FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Additional language will be required in the even that ‘unusual’ fossils are unearthed during the construction process. This is a rarity for the City so there will likely be some iteration as to the specific language, location (a plan vs the development agreement), etc. The language will be provided for the DA in the next round (FDP Round 1, but typically FDP Round 2). Response: Noted. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 10/29/2021 07/12/2022: (UPDATED) FOR FINAL APPROVAL AND DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ISSUANCE: Language regarding the protection and enhancement of the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone will be included in the Development Agreement for this project. A security will need to be provided prior to the issuance of a Development Construction Permit that accounts for the installation and establishment of the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone. Prior to the FDP approval please provide an estimate of the landscaping costs for the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone, including materials, labor, monitoring for a minimum of three years, weed mitigation and irrigation. We will then use the approved estimate to collect a security (bond or escrow) at 125% of the total amount prior to the issuance of a Development Construction Permit. The NHBZ Estimator has been provided to the DRC. Response (TBG): Department: Forestry Contact: Christine Holtz, choltz@fcgov.com Topic: General 13 Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/04/2021 7/12/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL 5/3/2022: FOR FINAL 2/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL Final review of species counts and labeling will be reviewed at final. Thank you! 2/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL Final review of species counts and labeling will be reviewed at final. Thank you! 11/3/2021: FOR HEARING In addition to unique symbols for each species, please directly label species with their associated abbreviation. If space allows, please include a condensed version of the plant list on each sheet. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/04/2021 7/12/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL 5/3/2022: FOR FINAL Continued: No major conflicts noted at PDP round 3 stage. Final tree-utility separations will be reviewed during FDP. 2/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL Forestry will review final tree-utility conflicts during final plan review. 11/3/2021: FOR HEARING Please review Forestry redlines – several tree-utility conflicts are highlighted. Adjust trees and/or utilities as needed to meet separation requirements. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 11/04/2021 7/12/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL 5/3/2022: FOR FINAL 2/22/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL Forestry will review final tree-street light and tree-stop sign separations during final plan review. Please provide their locations with clear symbols on the plans and in a legend. 11/3/2021: FOR HEARING Please include street light and stop light locations on the site/landscape plan. Street trees shall be placed 50-ft from stop signs. Canopy shade trees shall be 40-ft from street lights and ornamental trees shall be 15-ft from street lights. Provide unique symbols for stop signs and street lights and include in a legend. Department: Park Planning Contact: Kyle Lambrecht, 970-221-6566, klambrecht@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/25/2021 10/25/2021: INFORMATION: The Park Planning & Development Department is available to discuss these comments in more detail. Please contact Kyle Lambrecht, PE at 970 416 4340, klambrecht@fcgov.com. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/25/2021 07/12/22: INFORMATION: Thank you for the coordination regarding a connection to the Fossil Creek Trail via Venus Drive. Additional coordination 14 may be required during final plan development. Please continue to work with PPD staff throughout this phase. 05/03/22: FOR FINAL PLAN: Park Planning and Development must approve the alignment of a connection to Fossil Creek Trail. 2/22/2022: FOR HEARING: Park Planning and Development must approve the trail alignment and design. The developer will be required to develop a preliminary layout for hearing. A centerline profile and cross-sections for the trail will be required as part of final design. 10/25/2021: INFORMATION: Park Planning and Development must approve the trail alignment and design. The developer will be required to develop a centerline profile and cross-sections for the trail as part of the site design. Response: Noted, the team will continue to coordinate with City staff regarding this topic. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 10/25/2021 10/25/2021: INFORMATION: A trail easement may not be located within a ditch easement unless the applicant provides written approval for the trail easement within the ditch easement from the ditch company. The paved trail surface cannot function as a ditch access road if heavy equipment will use or cross the trail to maintain the ditch. Response: Noted. Department: GIS Contact: Lauren Wade, 970-302-5962, lwade@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/28/2022 06/28/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Site plan mislabels the road Milky Way as Milky Way Drive. No "Drive" in the suffix, "Way" is the suffix. The plat has the street name correct. Response: The plans have been corrected. Department: Building Services Contact: Katy Hand, khand@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/22/2021 10/22/2021: FOR BUILDING PERMIT: Please visit our website for current adopted codes, local amendments and submittal requirements. https://www.fcgov.com/building/application.php https://www.fcgov.com/building/codes.php https://www.fcgov.com/building/energycode Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/22/2021 10/22/2021: FOR BUILDING PERMIT: Each structure requires a separate building permit. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings 15 Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/08/2022 07/08/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Some of the sheet titles & sheet numbers in the sheet index do not match the noted sheets. See redlines. Response: Sheet titles and names have been corrected. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 07/08/2022 07/08/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Plans have been corrected. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 07/08/2022 07/08/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Mask all text in the cross-sections. See redlines. Response: Plans have been corrected. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 07/08/2022 07/08/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: There are sheet numbering issues. See redlines. Response: Plans have been corrected. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 07/08/2022 07/08/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Response: Plans have been corrected. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/08/2022 07/08/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 07/08/2022 07/08/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 07/08/2022 07/08/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/08/2022 07/08/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please contact John Von Nieda at 970-221-6565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.com Response: Redlines have been addressed. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/08/2022 07/08/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: 16 Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Sam Lowe, FCLWD, 970-226-3104, slowe@fclwd.com, Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/02/2021 07/11/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please see attached for comments from the FCLWD and SFCSD. 04/29/2022: See attached for comments from the FCLWD and SFCSD. We will want to see further information and detail as this project moves into the FDP phase, but don’t have significant comments on the PDP at this point. 02/17/2022: See attached for updated comments from FCLWD. 11/02/2021: Attached are the Districts’ comments for the Nissan-Kia proposal. Response: Plans have been revised per the redlines provided. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/22/2021 10/22/2021: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com