Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGEORGE T SANDERS COMPANY PUD - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 76-88H - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSITEM NO. 7 MEETING DATE 10 / 2'119 S STAFF _Mike Ludwig City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT PROJECT: George T. Sanders Company P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, #76-88H APPLICANT: George T. Sanders Company c/o Ripley Associates 223 Jefferson Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 OWNER: George T. Sanders Company c/o Thomas C. Tooley 10201 West 49th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) approval for two warehouse buildings of 15,587 square feet and 14,178 square feet (29,765 square feet total) on 2.725 acres known as Parcel B of the Weberg Master Plan. The property is located on the west side of Fossil Boulevard at Fairway Lane, west of Weberg's Furniture. The property is zoned b-p, Planned Business with a P.U.D. condition. RECOMMENDATION: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Approval with conditions. This request for Preliminary and Final P.U.D. approval: * is in conformance with the approved uses on Parcel B of the Weberg Master Plan; * earns 58% of the maximum applicable points on the Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial point chart of the L.D.G.S. (exceeding the minimum required 50%); * meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT G.T. Sanders Company P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, # 76-88H October 23, 1995 P & Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS: Background: The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: C (county); undeveloped County. B (county); Poudre Valley REA. S: bp; existing Mills Brothers Nursery. W: FA-1 (county); Burlington Northern Rail -Road tracks, County Subdivision (Brookwood Estates). E: bp; existing Weberg's Furniture. This property was a part of the Pace Annexation and PUD requests which were withdrawn on October 18, 1988. This property was annexed into the City with the McLanahan Annexation on April 18, 1989 and zoned b-p, Planned Business with a P.U.D. condition. On May 22, 1989, the Planning and Zoning Board approved the Weberg Master Plan, #76-88E by a vote of 6-0. The Master Plan showed three parcels. Parcel A was for 70,000 square feet of warehouse/retail showroom use. Parcel B was for 30,000 square feet of warehouse/retail use. Parcel C was for 15,000 square feet of retail/office/restaurant use. On May 22, 1989, the Planning and Zoning Board also approved the Weberg P.U.D., Preliminary, #76-88F on Parcel A, with conditions, by a vote of 6-0. The six conditions of Preliminary approval were as follows: 1. The applicant provide mitigation for the loss of existing trees on the final plans. 2. A unified signage design be provided with the final plans. 3. Final building elevations provide fluting in selective areas of the exposed aggregate panels for all elevations of the Weberg building, and a consistent architectural theme for the entire site be established. 4. Preliminary design for Fossil Boulevard off -site be provided with the final plans including the incorporation of trees in the median of the extension of Fossil Creek Boulevard. 5. That staff review the possibility of a fence on the south side of the property. 6. That the drainage be monitored on a yearly basis or as needed and the results reported to City staff. G.T. Sanders Company P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, # 76-88H October 23, 1995 P & Z Meeting Page 3 On July 24, 1989, the Planning and Zoning Board approved the Weberg P.U.D., Final, #76-88G by a vote of 5-0. The record indicated that the following measures would be required of future development on the remaining parcels in order to address the six conditions of Preliminary approval. They are as follows: a. Future development on the Weberg Master Plan will provide 3" caliper street trees and above average foundation plantings. b. Graphic coordination of signage on all parcels. C. A consistent architectural theme for the entire site be established. 2. Land Use: This is a request for Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) approval for two warehouse buildings of 15,587 square feet and 14,178 square feet (29,765 square feet total) on 2.725 acres known as Parcel B of the Weberg P.U.D. Master Plan. The property is located on the west side of Fossil Boulevard at Fairway Lane, west of Weberg's Furniture. The proposed warehouse uses are consistent with the anticipated uses for Parcel B of the Weberg Master Plan and meets all applicable All -Development Criteria. The request has been evaluated against the Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial Uses point chart of the Land Development Guidance System, and earns 58% of the maximum applicable points on the point chart. Points were awarded for meeting the following criterion: a) being located other than at the intersection of two arterial streets - 4 points. c) primary access to the activity from a non arterial street - 8 points. d) the project is on at least two acres of land - 6 points. h) the project is located with at least one -sixth (1/6) of its property contiguous to existing urban development - 10 points. 3. Design: Architecture: Both structures are one-story, pre -finished metal siding buildings with a maximum height of 26'. The siding of each of the buildings will be of an earthtone color named "parchment" which is consistent with the architectural theme of the Weberg Furniture building. The northern most warehouse building (G.T. Sanders Warehouse) will have a double -bay truck dock and single -bay overhead door on the east side of the building and two, single -wide overhead doors and a building entrance on the south side. The pre -finished metal, standing seam roof features over the double bay G.T. Sanders Company P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, # 76-88H October 23, 1995 P & Z Meeting Page 4 truck dock and the entrance to the building will be teal green in color. The southern most warehouse building (speculative tenant building) will have a double -bay truck dock, single -bay overhead door, and building entrance on the east side of the building and a single -bay overhead door and building entrance on the north side of the building. The pre -finished metal, standing seam roof features over the double -bay truck dock and the entrance to the building will be bristol blue in color. There is a gravel storage yard between the two buildings which is enclosed by the a chain link fence on the north, south, and west sides and a 6' wooden fence on the east side. In evaluating this proposals architecture, staff finds that the scale, form, and color of the proposed warehouse buildings is consistent with the architectural theme of the Weberg's facility. Landscaping: The Landscape Plan currently shows 9 - 2" caliper Marshall Green Ash trees are proposed at 40' intervals along Fossil Boulevard. One Radiant Crabapple tree is proposed near the proposed entrance to each building. A combination of coniferous trees, shrubs and perennials comprise the heavily landscaped entry features, parking lot/streetscape and foundation plantings. A six foot wooden fence and cottoneaster shrubs are proposed along the east side of the outside storage yard for adequate screening from the public right-of-way. However, the record of the Weberg P.U.D., Final, #76-88G indicated that the "future development on the Weberg Master Plan will provide 3" caliper street trees and above average foundation plantings" to mitigate the loss of existing trees which were originally on the Weberg Master Plan site. Therefore, staff recommends that a condition of approval be that the Landscape Plan be revised to show 9 - 3" caliper Marshall Green Ash street trees along Fossil Boulevard. Staff feels that the proposed foundation plantings are "above average". Parking: There are a combined 27 standard parking spaces and 2 handicap parking spaces being provided for the two proposed buildings. Based on the total amount of square feet of floor of the two buildings, the parking ratio equates to approximately 1 space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The amount of parking being provided has been determined by staff to be adequate for the proposed use. Signage: The record of the Weberg P.U.D., Final, 476-88G indicated that there should be "graphic coordination of signage on all parcels of the Weberg Master Plan. This site is excluded from the Residential Neighborhood Sign District, therefore, as stated in Neighborhood Compatibility Criteria A-2.14, all of the project signage is regulated by Chapter 29, Article IV of the City Code (the City Sign Code) and administered by the Zoning Department. Staff feels that City Sign Code is capable ensuring graphic coordination of signage and recommends a condition of approval be that a note be G.T. Sanders Company P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, # 76-88H October 23, 1995 P & Z Meeting Page 5 added to the Site Plan which states: "All signage to comply with the Chapter 29, Article IV of the City Code (the City Sign Code)." 4. Transportation: There will be two points of access to this site from Fossil Boulevard. As a condition of approval of the Weberg P.U.D., Preliminary, #76-88G, a design for a Fossil Boulevard extension to the south of the Weberg O.D.P. was submitted with the Weberg PUD, Final, #76-88G. The developer of the G.T. Sanders P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, #76-88H is not required to extend Fossil Boulevard nor is there presently a need to extend Fossil Boulevard. 5. Storm Drainage: All stormwater drainage requirements have been met. FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSION: The G.T. Sanders P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, #76-88H is in conformance with the approved uses on Parcel B of the Weberg Master Plan; 2. The G.T. Sanders P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, #76-88H earns 58% of the maximum applicable points on the Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial point chart of the L.D.G.S. (exceeding the minimum required 50%); The G.T. Sanders P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, #76-88H meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the G.T. Sanders P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, #76-88H, with the following conditions: 1. The Landscape Plan be revised to show 9 - 3" caliper Marshall Green Ash street trees along Fossil Boulevard. 2. A note be added to the Site Plan which states: "All signage to comply with the Chapter 29, Article IV of the City Code (the City Sign Code)." 3. The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit development final plan upon the condition that the development agreement, final utility plans, and final P.U.D., plans for the planned unit development be negotiated between the developer G.T. Sanders Company P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, # 76-88H October 23, 1995 P & Z Meeting Page 6 and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the second monthly meeting (December 18,1995) of the Planning and Zoning Board following the meeting at which this planned unit development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not so executed, that the developer, at said subsequent monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an extension of time. The Board shall not grant any such extension of time unless it shall first find that there exists with respect to said planned unit development final plan certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances which require the granting of the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner or developer of such property and provided that such extension can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to be included in the development agreement, the developer may present such dispute to the Board for resolution if such presentation is made at the next succeeding or second succeeding monthly meeting of the Board. The Board may table any such decision, until both the staff and the developer have had reasonable time to present sufficient information to the Board to enable it to make its decision. (If the Board elects to table the decision, it shall also extend the term of this condition until the date such decision is made). If this condition is not met within the time established herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final approval of this planned unit development shall become null and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for this planned unit development shall be deemed to be the date that the condition is met, for purposes of determining the vesting of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of time for the filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II, Division 3, of the City Code, the "final decision" of the Board shall be deemed to have been made at the time of this conditional approval; however, in the event that the dispute is presented to the Board for resolution regarding provisions to be included in the development agreement, the running of time for the filing of an appeal of such "final decision" shall be counted from the date of the Board's decision resolving such dispute. C 0 b] n:{+` KI • 9 HB b HARMO 0 hb M° i r z Ede grtigCl Q o W C7 W J a O U * + OUT o 11�g F �ebsc9 s o BL f as s o" � Z c o a c_ •L L m Tr r o hb Y t � r °°a } Pp � -ems r VICINITY MAP 07/31 /95 76-88H GEORGE T. SANDERS COMPANY PUD Preliminary & Final OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION inneRswTreo ME DAY OF MTFY T-T. A5 OF _ OF FAtrts — — souo—. or eeww OF rsr�c ca. co n— AS aTS romtcev 1-1 w — it-oitt�TYID.s snownal-xa- pccotcNc To SAD — c...z. M s.m. O.s>•r 10201 oer. c.e. me —GOING I—' -S Actnow.zocco snot[ Fs TINS DAY OF ... �., . 34—. er A5 NY —I- -- FIT XAFD YID OF.GI.L Stu. PLANNING + ZONING CERTIFICATE .T TM nANtwc A.m zorwc eoum Of me — OF FotT coups. caotAoo . Fto zo w ms —__ OAr ar _____ ______ nw. LEGEND R RA Y Fi nuAxAr .Atnw sMAu ElRASn pa05AK VICINITY MAP . r.:000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTES w�t _tkm ..t wwt.r .r tM wwr� A.- I� ..... taro rw � a. r.e.. u a.....a w saes .�e wiww or ww.wMs. z. y A�c<"a°se`re.M : ww .o e.e :.'.l— II- m. `w t wt m s....te.n a A.... IS—..e s. eeea.+e .... en. Gsr •a..m s..... s,..... ae.a .. us> . s...q.s.e .wA .� .,s...m ,.�g.we ..N.e„..r•s.. r F, m TO 5 e sw ru �.0 v T. T.,u •..r ammomm�� GEORGE T. SANDERS W. PUD PRELIMINARY • FINAL SITE PLAN L!IPLEY ASSOCIATES RCVISIONS� sn.F ca.axrs IS AGAR• GiSAMDCItDWG SM[[T• is NO ao � oATel 4A.T t.. xR9i I OF SGALc• r IF NORTH DRAWN IT, GS 0 • PLANT LIST S�w,.T�rw n.rW �oNNon n.nE s¢[ a�.nTR. A.P me.tW � n�„ T .a URIpEVELPFE12 D PN F. e y 6 Pmu. mgv a�wtrb+ . ].163Y z__x ___ 5i.w _ - req hale Spvevter S Ybi 3y ' csc P w svrseena Ju,ger a o: w 8-JST 5-J5A' - J5T peas aeb.e tvT.er «Robe Arco- • gw. U GEORGET. SANDERS. 8 soo n„ nemero<eee rp e. T•e=• r a a 3 1 STORY BUILDING -- - 3-U WAREHOUSE o e-JnaG .off a 15.557 SF k � 9000 z 3 PLANTING NOTES O z 3-Jsp 3- Z l-c5c ---- y Al pint coterie aneo mcei ape w o/ to OF oo Twtew vocrc FAIRWAY LANE z er t IF F- �m tn.� F,W rr Po 4-JST 6-JSp 11-JFIb over Z 3-IPLI ----- - 26-JnBe. N•ane. s o-ca a wbet.., .reek trcca me a• a ew _ —t— mreMc[ NN.. z A « peP..t vnat ee vnto-we fry tre crtr rvre,ter before tree, o-e pmtne o. i<vN4T 39-cA r rq�t-of-rey uav[y 2-11T I Al Imtowmtewer xo .y, � r e prnr a �rwmce m w00o[n Y?-Ld Q .1 pa" :me[ s- x t tna err>m . uyz of ue rewe of csa a.e«epee prbr W,.eK� a . iar<nrecee zeo IF IF erCHL[aNrt �TDm a 3-JST _ - wM OeWete r<a inv WetcrSM1Mi Bna ± 111 IF e.o W d[_oo rz 2-J5T 13-JH13c z L uacn B-JIfBc DEVE_GPED 23-c5c ye. - WEBERG FURNITURE 1-m 7 col a-J$T 3-PN 8 — 1 STORY BUILDING 1 Y WARE"OU;E GEORGE T. SANDERS CO. a 175 SF dde [ LEGEND �77�77�� \ R rm mew '� F1 —1 Poem° IT— _ _ PRELIMINARY &FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN nKy.�[nctosuee O as Tres RIPLE ASSOCIATES L � 9ebfa iP[cTo66 =T= TA MILk�RO ERS o a�Wd s�s REVISIONS• O ev[eueeN sinews , uenAno sem �AGAR• cTSdNOCRDWG D� ^5MC[T•/%�) .AA DATE, T 24, 1993 //OF LS scALE• 1' - 3o' NoRT" DRAWN BY- cs LS 7 0 -I,cEINI^.�KO METAL PREFiNl3+,6o nET � cMfi ANO 'fUn- 4ToxJGIN6 •�E4n RFcc - � uMrfi.CWRHAE'�T)� �x�r� s,.eecNCtw.)TW. ' • . "7 u I Y !• —P ��1Te-o ?SEA �fi•I&NMEff) T?, Al EAST ELEVATION Al NORTH ELEVATION - nETAa- __REAYrYIEO +ESA sale, Aw7 TG�+. - oFl< riNT[ (}'RAtlN6iif) M: -�I[ESW�3xfi> � W HRG CTYI')F� Al WEST ELEVATION o�V Al SOUTH ELEVATION RB+B Jos tiu" 9508 DRA ONAYIN ASH CHECKED GAB ISSUE JULY 24. 1995 flE\lSKINS arnxR �� II'19{6 SHEET NAME ELEVATIONS NUMBER 3 C* i mtN-oFF WIMT� t!�ui�1�n')'>* aY 1 I N 1 EAST ELEVATION ly F77 . _________________ " _OFa=:vN r1eC'nr�xn�K)M J l NORTH ELEVATION 4B?IN 14,lb Neoa. w>°E•on+++rvclrr�• El SOUTH ELEVATION Al WEST ELEVATION Do RB+B NUMBER 9805 DRAWN JTD ZWgl GAB 65UE JULY 2A0995 REVISIONS a'-xee� 4 wvc atafl� IT i4,z SHEET NAME BUILDING ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER 4 OF 4 SITS VICINITY MAP I L_�. «:AIK� _ -4i. FOSSE. CREEK NLIRSERY PLANNING AND ZONING OWNER'S SIGNATURE BOARD APPROVAL -- ►-1 ,1 JI COUNTY ZONED KATOTODIS PARCEL C RETAILJOFFICE/RESTAURANT 150008F FAIRWAY LANE o f 01j 0 0 0 TYM4 PEDESTRIAN OVULATION In 0 EL B PA .1=1 MELIR AIL /30�!): RE ��SE/RETAIL 3000SFi 0 o PARCEL A WAREHOUSE/RETAIL SHOWROOM 7OC(QOSF IV WEBERG P.I.I.D. MXS-TER PLAN IS ZONED BP WITH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONDITION)., MILLS BROTHERS NURSERY WER SUB DIVIS Im N\ LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLANNING OBJECT . .. ..... .... .. ...... .. . ..... . NOTES LAND USE .... .. .. .. ... ....... . ......... E. .. ... ... M11,Mh KpIrntl,�,I, %. DEVEL OPMEN T AREA PRIMARY ROADWAY ...... ... .. . r., .... ... ... SECONDARY ACCESS PIS-(-Dj EXISTWG VEGETATION F6� LANDSCAPE BUFFER Rull DRAINAGE /OPEN SPACE T 8 PLAN e.S 1088WE .., A CESS POINTS IN FORMA CE WITH THE CITY OF OR7 C tINS SOUTH C EGE A CES8 CONTROL PLAN, POIEN TOGNAL k, WEBERG P.0 .D. WEBERG ENTERPRISES MASTER PLAN VAU(JI FRYE. aw wm aaazs rx 1 '1116(% T . s, P. v.n , P F Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ALL CRITERIA I APPLICABLE CRITER1.4, CNLY Is the crctenon Will the terio acclicable7 t>e satisfiea? sl � CRITERICN I o = _.IYes INo A1. COMMUNITY -WIDE CR1T"1,=. I Sciar Orientation I I Ivor' 1.2 Comorehensive Plan I10460or I 1 1.3 Wildlife Habitat ( I 1.4 Mireral Deocsit I I 1 1. 5 =-::ic-iC2lIv Sensitive Areas I reserved I I 1.6 Lands -Of F,cric7_,ltural Imocrarca I reserved I 1.7 E."erCV Ccr,servatior I I- 1.8 Air Qualitv worl 1.9 Water Qualitv I I 1 CSrd \/Vasies I I 1.11 �/�/c-nrr`On c^/^ 1.12 Residential Densitv woor 2 NE?G 'BGF.HOOD COMPATiBIL1TY CR1 T c ^ .1 Bike Transccration I i Z 2 °uiici-c P!actzrrent and Orientaticn 2' Natu. 'al Fiat 'res I 2.4 VC..1 aar Circ:.iation and Far�kinc 2... Emer^�ncy Zcass 2.6 Peaesr, iar C1:rc:.1latior I i 2.7 Aronitec:ure I I 2.8 cuiicinc HeiCrt and Views I I f I 2.S//�}} Shading ' 2.1 V SC1Gr 1-% CC I I 2.11 HiStCric Rescurces I I I 2.12 Settaccks 2.13 Laresc_=ce 2.14 Sicrs I I I 2.15 Site Lighting I Oryor, III Vool 1 2.16 Ncise and Vibration 2.17 Glare or Heat I I 1 2.18 Haz.=rdcus Materials A 3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA 3.1 Utility Capacity VF1 VorI 3.2 Design Standards 3.3 Water Hazards 3.4 Gecicgic Hazards I I dof I If no, please ex-_Iain Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised 1994 -61- U '�� 0 E SWMRS P. v.D . ACTIVITY. Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial D DEFINITION: Those retail and wholesale commercial activities which are generally considered and typically found along highways and arterial streets. Uses include free-standing department stores; auction rooms; automobile service stations, repair facilities, car washes; boat, car, trailer, motorcycle showrooms, sales, and repair; fuel and ice sales; greenhouses and nurseries; warehouses and storage; repair or rental of any article; exterminating shops; drive-in restaurants; adult book stores; eating places with adult amusement or entertainment; adult photo studios; adult theaters; any uses intended to provide adult amusement or entertainment; and, other uses which are of the same general character. CRITERIA: Each of the following applicable criteria must be answered "yes" and implemented within the development plan. Yes No 1. Does the project gain its primary vehicular access from a street other than ❑ South College Avenue? 2. Are all repair, painting and body work activities, including the storage of ❑ ❑ refuse and vehicle parts, planned to take place within an enclosed structure? 3. If the project contains any uses intended to provide adult amusement or ❑ ❑ entertainment, does it meet the following requirements? a. Is the use established, operated or maintained no less than 500 feet from a residential neighborhood, church, and/or school meeting all of the requirements of the compulsory education laws of the State of Colorado?; b. Is the use established, operated, or maintained no less than one thousand (1,000) feet from another similar use? 4. DOES THE PROJECT EARN AT LEAST FIFTY (50%) PERCENT OF ❑ THE MAXIMUM POINTS AS CALCULATED ON POINT CHART "B" FOR THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA? a. Is the activity located other than at the intersection of two arterial streets? b. Is the project contiguous to and functionally a part of an existing neighborhood or community/regional shopping center, office, or industrial park? c. Is the primary access to the activity from a non -arterial street? d. Is the project on at least two (2) acres of land? N/A 'IN !92 e. Does the project contain two (2) or more significant uses (for instance retail, office, residential, hotel/motel, or recreation)? Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994 !if 2 • 0 Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial (continued) f. Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on -site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off -site parking areas which contain more than ten (10) spaces? g. Does the activity reduce non-renewable energy usage through the application of alternative energy systems or through energy conservation measures beyond those normally required by the Model Energy Code as adopted by the City? Refer to Appendix " E" for energy conservation methods to use for calculating energy conservation points. h. Is the project located with at least one -sixth (1/6) of its property boundary contiguous to existing urban development? i. If the site contains a building or place in which a historic event occurred, has special public value because of notable architecture, or is of cultural significance, does the project fulfill the following criteria? 1. Prevent creation of influences adverse to its preservation; 2. Assure that new structures and uses will be in keeping with the character of the building or place. Imitation of period styles should be avoided; and 3. Propose adaptive use of the building or place that will lead to its continuance, conservation, and improvement in an appropriate manner while respecting the integrity of the neighborhood. Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994 =� -69- AUTO -RELATED AND ROADSIDE COMMERCIAL POINT CHART D For All Criteria Applicable Criteria Only Criterion Is tr,e Criterion Applicable Yes No I II III IV Circle the Correct Score Multiplier Points Earned Ixll Maximum Applicable Points a. Not at Two Arterials X 1XIC) 0 2 14 4 b, Part of Planned Center X IX 1 2 3 0 6 c. On Non -Arterial X IXI(Z) 0 4 8 8 d. Two Acres or More X X A 0 3 (� 6 e. Mixed -Use X X 12 0 3 6 f, Joint Parking X 1 1 2 0 3 _.., g. Energy Conservation X 112 3 1401 2 0 8 h. Contiguity X X © 0 5 10 10 i, Historic Preservation x 1 2 0 2 _ j. 1 2 0 k. 1 2 0 l 1 2 0 Totals 2 v vi Percentage Earned of Maximum Applicable Points V/VI = VII 5 % vu Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The Citv of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994 -70-