HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORT COLLINS SUBSTATION - ANNEXATION & ZONING - 15-89, A - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 27, 1989
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at
approximately 6:34 P.M., in the Council Chambers, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort
Collins, Colorado. Board members present included: Chairwoman Laurie O'Dell,
Sanford Kern, Jim Klataske, Frank Groznik, Lloyd Walker, Jan Shepard and
Alternate Rex Burns. Staff members present included: Tom Peterson, Joe
Frank, Mike Herzig, Eric Bracke, Sherry Albertson -Clark, Gail Ault, and Paul
Eckman.
Planning Director Tom Peterson reviewed the Consent and Discussion Agenda.
The Consent Agenda included: Item 1 - Minutes of the February 27, 1989 and
March 6, 1989 meetings; Item 2 - West Elizabeth Properties PUD, Final
-#51-88A; Item 3 - OakRidge Village PUD, 8th Filing, Preliminary-#13-82AP;
Item 4 - Southridge Greens PUD, Fairway Seven, Final - #9-82Y; and Item 6
-Resolution PZ89-1, Vacation of a Utility Easement - #5-84CV. Item 5 -Warren
Farms 3rd Filing, Final Subdivision - #53-84G, was continued until the April
24, 1989, meeting; Item 7 - Milne Annexation and Zoning-#I1-89, A; Item 8
-Harmony Number Six Annexation and Zoning - #12-89, A; Item 9 - Fort Col-
lins Substation Annexation and Zoning - #15-89, A; Item 10 -McClanahan First
Annexation and Zoning - #76-88, C & D; and Item 11 -Amendment to the City
Zoning Code-#18-89.
Chairwoman O'Dell asked if there were other items to be pulled from the
Consent Agenda. There were none.
Member Kern moved for approval of Items 1 - 11 except the continued Item 5
which was continued one month. Member Groznik seconded the motion and
the motion carried 6-0.
#94-88A - FOSSIL CREEK DESIGN CENTER PUD - Final
(Formerly The Carpet Exchange PUD)
Sherry Albertson -Clark gave a description of the proposed project.
Ken Goff of Hunter Architectural Group, represented Mr. Odette, the owner.
He described the project and noted he had met two times with the Board and
four times with the neighborhood in an attempt to resolve issues and concerns.
The December 19 Board meeting approved the preliminary with two conditions;
1) that there would be a second neighborhood meeting; and 2) that storm
drainage problems be resolved. The Board had also expressed concern on
building height although did not condition the issue.
All
three concerns
had been addressed
with additional neighborhood meetings.
The
building was
lowered in height; and,
while the storm drainage concept is
not
significantly different,
the revised
project added a diversion structure to
help
alleviate any
erosion problems_ Snead Drive would not be completed with
this
project; however,
the developer
will provide funds for building the
extension of Snead
Drive when it does
occur. The temporary right-in/right-out
to College
Avenue
would be eliminated
when Snead Drive was completed.
•