Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2145 CENTRE AVE - DISCLOSURES - 10/28/2019ICONERGY WHOLE BUILDING AIRTIGHTNESS TEST REPORT SCOPE OF WORK WHOLE BUILDING AIRTIGHTNESS TEST CONDUCTED AT THE GARDENS ON SPRING CREEK VISITORS CENTER & BUTTERFLY GARDEN – FORT COLLINS, COLORADO PROJECT NUMBER J0886.01-650-50 TEST DATE 10/22/19 ISSUE DATE 10/28/19 RECORD RETENTION END DATE 10/28/23 PAGES 26 © 2018 INTERTEK 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are relevant only to the sample(s) tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program. Version: DRAFT Page 2 of 26 XXXXXXX REPORT ISSUED TO Iconergy 5277 Manhattan Circle Boulder, CO 80303 PROJECT Gardens on Spring Creek Visitors Center & Butterfly Garden Fort Collins, CO SECTION 1 SCOPE Intertek was contracted to perform single zone whole building airtightness testing services at the above-referenced project. This included whole building airtightness testing (ASTM E779) and diagnostic air leakage site detection (ASTM E1186) utilizing smoke tracers. The building met the performance requirements for whole building airtightness testing as specified by the City of Fort Collins Building Air Leakage Test Protocol when prepared as described in the Building Preparation section below. Testing indicated that the building performed at an average leakage rate of 0.246 cfm/ft2 (cubic feet per minute per square foot) at 75 Pa (Pascal) with an average air flow leakage of 5,348 cfm (project allowable rate 5,439 cfm). We identified air leakage paths, which are described in the "Observations" section of the report. For INTERTEK B&C: COMPLETED BY: Tom Kovash REVIEWED BY: Wyatt Nagorski TITLE: Project Lead Building Science Solutions TITLE: Field Technician Building Science Solutions SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: DATE: 10/28/19 DATE: 10/28/19 TK/WN:sb 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 3 of 26 GFT-OP-10c SECTION 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION The project consists of an addition to and remodel of an existing building and will include a conservatory, butterfly garden, greenhouse, classroom, conference room, and support spaces. The building was tested in its entirety with the exception of the mechanical room, and the existing greenhouse and classroom. SECTION 3 TEST METHODS ASTM E779-10, Standard Test Method for Determining Air Leakage Rate by Fan Pressurization1 ASTM E1186-03, Standard Practices for Air Leakage Site Detection in Building Envelopes and Air Barrier Systems, Section 4.2.2 Smoke Tracer in Conjunction with Pressurization SECTION 4 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Per the City of Fort Collins Building Air Leakage Test Protocol, the air leakage rate shall not exceed 0.25 cfm/ft2 of building enclosure area at a pressure differential of 1.57 lb/ft2 (75 Pa). Enclosure Area: The building enclosure area is 21,756 square feet, as provided by Steve Steinbicker with Architecture West, LLC. Specific areas not include in the building enclosure area are the existing greenhouse and mechanical room. 1ASTM E779 is typically utilized with modifications to section 8.9 and 8.10 of the standard as these sections discuss the induced pressure range (10 Pa to 60 Pa) and what increments (5 Pa to 10 Pa) between induced pressure points are required for compliance. Through our testing experience, it has been determined that the lower pressures within the specified range in ASTM E779 are more susceptible to error, due to wind and stack pressure effects that commonly occur in larger structures. Additionally, project specifications typically include whole building airtightness testing performance criteria of a measured air leakage rate at a 75 Pa (not 60 Pa) pressure differential. When testing is limited to higher pressure ranges, induced pressure increments may be less than the increments specified in ASTM E779. The lowest pressure within the induced pressure range may be constrained by weather conditions where the highest pressure within the induced pressure range is typically limited by the fan capacity brought to the site. Ideal weather conditions are difficult to achieve when testing is scheduled weeks in advance. Thus, to achieve the most accurate data and meet the required performance criteria outlined in the project specification, testing is generally limited to smaller induced pressure ranges at higher pressures both above and below the required pressure differential (75 Pa). 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 4 of 26 GFT-OP-10c SECTION 5 BUILDING PREPARATION (SINGLE ZONE) Per the City of Fort Collins Building Air Leakage Test Protocol, HVAC related openings were excluded from the test (Section 14 – Default Preparations). Upon arrival to the jobsite, Intertek B&C BSS staff, the general contractor, and the architect conducted a walk-through of the building, both interior and exterior, to confirm the building had been prepared as coordinated in advance with Intertek B&C BSS. Exterior doors and windows were closed and latched, and drain traps were filled with water or plugged. Doors connecting the main corridors to any portion of the enclosure, including walls, roofs, and slab on grade conditions were propped open to neutralize pressure differentials. Intake and exhaust louvers and vents were sealed on the exterior of the building utilizing typical isolating procedures and mechanical dampers were placed in the closed position where applicable (Section 12 – Photo Nos. 1 through 6). A hollow metal door frame between Vestibule (309) and the existing greenhouse had no door installed yet. The opening was sealed with plastic and SECTION 6 EQUIPMENT SETUP Computer Setup A laptop computer utilizing TECLOG4 software was set up at the conference room to monitor and control all test equipment. Fan flows, building enclosure pressures, and key interior building pressures were monitored throughout the test (Section 12 – Photo No. 8). Fan Setup TEC (The Energy Conservatory) Model 3 fans were set up at the conference room entry door (Section 12 – Photo Nos. 8 and Section 13 – Location Plans). The number of fans set up was based on the allowable leakage rate to ensure the available cfm achieved the pass/fail criteria of the enclosure. TEC DG1000 manometers were set up to collect fan flows and control fan speeds with the computer. FANS: SERIAL NO.: CALIBRATION DATE TEC Model 3 33855 9/12/18 TEC Model 3 33856 9/12/18 GAUGES: SERIAL NO.: CALIBRATION DATE DG1000 2326 8/27/18 DG1000 2327 8/30/18 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 5 of 26 GFT-OP-10c SECTION 7 TEST PROCEDURE Whole Building Airtightness Test (Single Zone): The whole building airtightness test was performed in general conformance with ASTM E779. Blower door fans were utilized to uniformly pressurize and depressurize the building. Pressurization and depressurization tests consisted of measuring the total fan air flow (cfm) at different building pressure differentials. The test pressure was measured in representative locations such that pressures in the extremities could be monitored to determine if they were within 10% of the induced enclosure pressure. The pressure variation was verified at the highest test pressure. Enclosure pressures from key elevations of the building and interior building pressure differences were reviewed and used to conduct the analysis of the test results. Baseline pressure readings were taken across the enclosure and averaged over two minutes each, before and after the test flow measurements. ASTM E1186, Section 4.2.2 Air Leakage Site Detection with Smoke Tracer: The building was pressurized utilizing blower door fans while moving a smoke tracer source over interior surfaces of the building enclosure. Air leakage sites were detected when currents of air through the enclosure would cause the smoke to move rapidly outward. 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 6 of 26 GFT-OP-10c SECTION 8 TEST RESULTS Specimen: Gardens on Spring Creek Visitor Center and Butterfly Garden Enclosure area: 21,756 square feet Elevation: 5,000 feet Standard: ASTM E779 Whole Building Airtightness Test (Single Zone) Depressurization Set: Time: 10:48 am to 11:08 am Temperature: Initial indoor 68°F Final indoor 68°F Initial outdoor 52°F Final outdoor 52°F Wind Speed: 8 mph Induced Pressure vs. Flow Pressure, Depressurize Set 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 7 of 26 GFT-OP-10c NOMINAL BUILDING PRESSURE (Pa) BASELINE ADJUSTED BUILDING PRESSURE (Pa) NOMINAL FLOW (cfm) ADJUSTED FLOW (cfm) % ERROR AVG. PRE- BASELINE -0.3 - - - - -25.1 -24.8 2389 2382 -0.1 -29.9 -29.6 2689 2681 0.6 -34.9 -34.6 2920 2912 -0.7 -40.0 -39.8 3182 3173 -0.8 -44.8 -44.6 3484 3474 1.2 -50.1 -49.8 3694 3683 0.1 -55.1 -54.8 3927 3915 0.2 -59.7 -59.4 4101 4089 -0.4 -64.9 -64.6 4323 4310 -0.4 -70.0 -69.7 4557 4544 0.2 -75.0 -74.7 4756 4742 0.1 -79.8 -79.5 4936 4921 -0.0 AVG. POST BASELINE -0.2 - - - - AIR LEAKAGE COEFFICIENT, C 323.6 EXPONENT, n 0.622 CORRELATION COEFFICIENT SQUARED, r2 0.99972 EQLA at -75 Pa (ft2) 2.77 ELA at -4Pa (ft2) 1.51 AIRFLOW at -75 Pa 4747 AIR LEAKAGE PER ENCLOSURE AREA at -75 Pa, (cfm/ft2) MEAN 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL LOWER UPPER 0.218 0.217 0.219 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 8 of 26 GFT-OP-10c Pressurization Set: Time: 12:06 pm to 12:34 pm Temperature: Initial indoor 68°F Final indoor 68°F Initial outdoor 52°F Final outdoor 52°F Wind Speed: 9 mph Induced Pressure vs. Flow Pressure, Pressurize Set 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 9 of 26 GFT-OP-10c NOMINAL BUILDING PRESSURE (Pa) BASELINE ADJUSTED BUILDING PRESSURE (Pa) NOMINAL FLOW (cfm) ADJUSTED FLOW (cfm) % ERROR AVG. PRE- BASELINE -0.5 - - - - 25.0 25.3 3005 3067 0.3 29.6 29.9 3295 3363 -0.7 35.1 35.5 3647 3722 -1.0 39.7 40.0 3964 4045 -0.1 45.0 45.4 4314 4403 0.7 48.8 49.2 4500 4592 0.0 54.6 55.0 4840 4940 0.4 60.0 60.3 5040 5143 -1.2 64.9 65.3 5460 5573 2.0 69.9 70.3 5830 5950 4.1 75.1 75.5 5885 6006 0.6 79.8 80.2 5773 5891 -4.9 AVG. POST BASELINE -0.2 - - - - AIR LEAKAGE COEFFICIENT, C 422.2 EXPONENT, n 0.613 CORRELATION COEFFICIENT SQUARED, r2 0.99569 EQLA at 75 Pa (ft2) 3.53 ELA at 4Pa (ft2) 1.95 AIRFLOW at 75 Pa 5949 AIR LEAKAGE PER ENCLOSURE AREA at 75 Pa, (cfm/ft2) MEAN 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL LOWER UPPER 0.273 0.267 0.279 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 10 of 26 GFT-OP-10c COMBINED TEST DATA (PRESSURIZATION AND DEPRESSURIZATION) AVERAGE AIR FLOW at 75 Pa (cfm) 5348 AVERAGE EQUIVALENT LEAKAGE AREA at 75 Pa (ft2) 3.15 ft2 AVERAGE EFFECTIVE LEAKAGE AREA at 4 Pa (ft2) 1.73 ft2 AIR LEAKAGE PER ENCLOSURE AREA at 75 Pa, (cfm/ft2) MEAN 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL LOWER UPPER 0.246 0.242 0.249 SECTION 9 OBSERVATIONS • Air currents were detected with a smoke tracer confirming air leakage at entry door thresholds, latches, and astragals (Section 12 – Photo Nos. 11 through 14). • Air currents were detected with a smoke tracer confirming air leakage at a number of operable window units (Section 12 – Photo Nos. 15 through 17). • Air currents were detected with a smoke tracer confirming air leakage at electrical service panels in the existing building (Section 12 – Photo Nos. 18 and 19). SECTION 10 CONCLUSION The building met the performance requirements for whole building airtightness testing (ASTM E779) when prepared as described in the Building Preparation section above. Testing indicated that the building performed at an average leakage rate of 0.246 cfm/ft2 at 75 Pa with an average air flow leakage of 5,348 cfm (the project allowable rate is 5,439 cfm). Addressing the observations noted above from diagnostic inspection of the building are not needed at this time to achieve a "passed" test but will likely improve the performance of the building. 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 11 of 26 GFT-OP-10c SECTION 11 LIST OF OFFICIAL OBSERVERS NAME COMPANY Brad Smith The City of Fort Collins Steve Steinbicker Architecture West, LLC. Sean Windsor Elder Construction Leif Osmundson Elder Construction Tom Kovash Intertek B&C Wyatt Nagorski Intertek B&C Matthew Tipton Intertek B&C 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 12 of 26 GFT-OP-10c SECTION 12 PHOTOGRAPHS Photo No. 1 Mechanical penetration sealed with plastic and tape Photo No. 2 Mechanical penetrations sealed with plastic and tape 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 13 of 26 GFT-OP-10c Photo No. 3 Mechanical penetrations sealed with plastic and tape Photo No. 4 Mechanical penetrations sealed with plastic 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 14 of 26 GFT-OP-10c Photo No. 5 Cooler vents sealed with plastic and tape Photo No. 6 Cooler vents sealed with plastic and tape 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 15 of 26 GFT-OP-10c Photo No. 7 Doorway sealed with plastic and tape Photo No. 8 Computer setup location 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 16 of 26 GFT-OP-10c Photo No. 9 Blower door setup (interior view) Photo No. 10 Blower door setup (exterior view) 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 17 of 26 GFT-OP-10c Photo No. 11 Air leakage at door threshold Photo No. 12 Air leakage at door latch 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 18 of 26 GFT-OP-10c Photo No. 13 Air leakage at door latch Photo No. 14 Air leakage at door threshold 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 19 of 26 GFT-OP-10c Photo No. 15 Air leakage at operable window Photo No. 16 Air leakage at operable window 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 20 of 26 GFT-OP-10c Photo No. 17 Air leakage at operable window Photo No. 18 Air leakage at electrical panel 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 21 of 26 GFT-OP-10c Photo No. 19 Air leakage at electrical panel 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 22 of 26 GFT-OP-10c SECTION 13 LOCATION PLAN 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 23 of 26 GFT-OP-10c SECTION 14 Default Preparations INTENTIONAL OPENINGS AIR BARRIER SYSTEMS ENCLOSURE TEST (HVAC-Related Openings Excluded) OPERATIONAL ENCLOSURE TEST (Air Barrier Systems and HVAC-Related Openings Included) Doors, hatches, and operable windows inside the test enclosure Open Open Fire Dampers Remain as found Remain as found Windows, doors, skylights, and hatches in the bounding enclosure Closed and latched Closed and latched Identify windows, doors, hatches, and operable windows in Ancillary Spaces. See notes for Ancillary Spaces Treat in accordance with additional notes for Ancillary Spaces Treat in accordance with additional notes for Ancillary Spaces Dryer doors and air handler access panels Closed and latched Closed and latched Vented combustion appliance Off, unable to fire Off, unable to fire Pilot light As found As found Chimney or outlet for vented combustion device in a separate mechanical room As found As found B-vent or other insulated chimney serving a vented combustion appliance located within the test enclosure Sealed*, ** As found Solid fuel appliances (fireplaces, wood burning stoves, pellet stoves) No fires; dampers closed; chimney sealed*, ** No fires; dampers closed Exhaust, outdoor air, make-up air fans, air handlers that serve areas inside and outside the test enclosure Off Off Clothes dryers Off Off 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 24 of 26 GFT-OP-10c INTENTIONAL OPENINGS AIR BARRIER SYSTEMS ENCLOSURE TEST (HVAC-Related Openings Excluded) OPERATIONAL ENCLOSURE TEST (Air Barrier Systems and HVAC-Related Openings Included) Exhaust or relief air outlet with motorized dampers Dampers closed and sealed*, ** Dampers closed Exhaust or relief air outlet with gravity dampers Sealed*, ** As found Exhaust or relief air outlet with no damper Sealed*, ** Open unless fan serving outlet is operated greater than 8000 hours per year, then sealed*, ** Active or passive smoke control systems - air reliefs and intakes Sealed*, ** As found Intended powered or non-powered openings for vented shafts/stairwells Sealed*, ** As found Waste or linen handling systems and equipment Sealed*, **at rooftop chute vent opening. Rooftop chute vent – open, chute intake doors – closed, chute intake room, and chute discharge room doors – closed and latched, fire dampers - left as found Clothes dryer outlets Sealed*, ** As found; sealed*, ** if dryers are not yet installed Exhaust, outdoor air, or make-up air fan that runs >8000 hours per year Sealed*, ** Sealed*, ** Ductwork that serves areas inside and outside the test enclosure Sealed*, ** at supply and return Sealed*, ** at supply and return 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 25 of 26 GFT-OP-10c A. Include an ancillary space within the test enclosure if it is thermally separated from outdoors (i.e. by assemblies that include insulation and continuous air barriers) and is not thermally separated from adjoining indoor portions of the test enclosure. Windows and doors to the outdoors shall be closed and latched. Doors to the adjoining portions of the test enclosure shall be open during the test if it is an Air Barrier Systems Enclosure test and closed if it an Operational Enclosure Test. B. Do not include an ancillary space within the test enclosure if it is thermally separated from all adjoining portions of the test enclosure and is vented to the exterior by passive openings that do not include motorized or gravity dampers. Windows, doors and passive ventilation openings to the outdoors shall be open during the test and doors to all adjoining portions of the test enclosure shall be closed and latched if it is an Air Barrier Systems Enclosure Test. Many older commercial, institutional, and industrial buildings have separate mechanical rooms that contain boilers connected to multi-story chimneys; these spaces often include passive or fan powered make-up air inlets. In this case treat the boiler room as a separate space which is outside the test enclosure. After applying A and B if it is still unclear whether a space is inside or outside the test enclosure, consult with the designer, or close and latch doors and windows to both the test enclosure and the outside during the test. 2500 South Decker Lake Blvd., Suite 23A West Valley City, Utah 84119 Telephone: 385-229-4980 www.intertek.com/building TEST REPORT FOR CUSTOMER NAME Project No.: J0886.01-650-50 Date: 10/28/19 Version: MM/DD/YY Page 26 of 26 GFT-OP-10c SECTION 15 REVISION LOG REVISION # DATE PAGES REVISION 0 10/28/19 N/A Original Report Issue. Floor drains and plumbing Traps filled Traps filled *Sealed means that an opening has been temporarily masked airtight (e.g. covered with self- adhering plastic film, taped polyethylene film, or rigid board stock). ** If the test result meets the passing criteria for the method used then the building is deemed to pass even if not all of the HVAC related openings were sealed during the test. Ancillary Spaces: Make a list of ancillary spaces that are not clearly included in the test enclosure by the test specifications or construction documents (such as mechanical rooms, elevator equipment rooms, loading docks, crawlspaces, basements, and attics). Air intake inlet with motorized dampers Dampers closed and sealed*, ** Dampers closed Air intake inlet with gravity dampers Sealed*, ** As found Air intake inlet with no dampers Sealed*, ** Open unless fan(s) serving inlet is operated greater than 8000 hours per year, then sealed*, **