Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSOUTH 13 SUBDIVISION LOT 11 - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2016-07-115716 Bueno May 11, 2011 The deed format and legal look good for the row dedication. To finalize this I need: a. Processing fee of $250 (check made out to the City of Fort Collins) b. Deed signed by Del Sol, Notary and Del Sol's Attorney. c. A check for the filing fee. 4 pages, so it is $26 and this check needs to be made out to "Larimer County Clerk and Recorder". The DA was sent out for review February 4, 2011. I have not heard back with any questions or comments. If there are no concerns regarding this document it needs to be signed and returned to me with a check for $71 made out to the "Larimer County Clerk and Recorder" for the filing fees for the 13 page document. I have no remaining comments on the Utility Plans. Please make sure you get the districts signature on the mylars before they are submitted to the City. Once the mylars are received they will be routed for signatures, but Engineering will not sign the mylars until the above items have been received. CyMA l a0o5 PAGE 4 April 8, 2011 Project No. 2528-01-10 Re: Lot 11, South 13 Subdivision (5716 Bueno Drive); Ft. Collins, Colorado Response to February 1, 2011 Comments 2. Please add "City of & "Larimer County" to the title of the Utility Plans. R The utility plan title has been modified as directed. 3. There are line over text issues on sheet 2 of 2 of the Utility Plans. R Acknowledged / resolved. Zoning. Peter Barnes, 416-2355 The revised site plan doesn't match Sheet 2 of 2 of the utility plans. The site plan needs to show the sidewalk and revised landscape island dimensions. If the sidewalk results in the need to remove the tree and other landscaping from what remains of the island, then a tree and ground cover will need to be reinstalled. The island has to be at least 10' in depth (distance from sidewalk to east edge of island). If a new tree is required, it must be a 2" minimum caliper deciduous street tree (Linden, Locust, etc). R See revised Site and Landscape Plan prepared by Shear Engineering Corporation. R Tree relocation or replacement note has been added to the site plan. The tree has been situated in the landscape area between the curb and gutter and the detached walk. If you have any questions, please call at (970) 226-5334. Sir. Bri Shear Engineering -Corporation :._ l77 attachments cc: Ken Corriea; Solace Meds Sheri Langenberger; City of Fort Collins Engineering Department January 29, 2003 Project No. 1738-03-02 Larimer County Engineering Department P.O. Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Attn: Roxann Mackenzie Hayes, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Re: Lots 37-38, South 13 Subdivision; Larimer County (Ft. Collins), Colorado Dear Roxann, This letter is in response. to your comments noted in a January 22, 2003 memo to Matt Lafferty. Transportation/Access Issues: comme t: 1. This project will have impact on SH 287, and therefore requires review and approval by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). The applicant will need to contact Tess Jones at (970) 350-2163 of the Greeley office of CDOT for setback and right-of-way needs, as well as general access questions for this proposal. Response • I talked to Tess at 2:20PM on Monday, January 27, 2003. She was not familiar with the project. I sent her a fax package of information with a quick note. Attached is a copy of the letter I sent with the project location information. I called her back on Wednesday, January 29, 2003 and left a message. Have not heard back. Comment: 2. According to Section 9.7.4 of the LCLUC, right-of-way dedication (36-foot half right-of-way for this project must be accomplished by a properly executed Deed of Dedication at the time of final approval. Response • Attached are the right-of-way and easement dedication documents for both Lots 37 and 38. The right-of-way and an easement dedication formats are similar to those that we recently completed in the County associated with Hearthfire P.U.D. Second Filing. These were acceptable to the County. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 Fax (970) 282-0311 www.shearengincering.com PAGE 2 January 27, 2003 Project No. 1738-03-02 Re: Lots 37-38, South 13 Subdivision; Larimer County (Ft. Collins), Colorado Comment: 3. According to Section 1.9.3.B.3 of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards, Bueno Drive must be built to the Commercial Local Street standard where it is adjacent to the subject property, including proper transitions and sidewalks. The following issues must be addressed before staff can recommend approval: • The new cross-section must extend, at minimum, to the property line. It appears the pavement at the south part of the property does not meet this requirement. Please adjust. • It is unclear if curb and gutter will be installed along the new cross-section. Please clarify. What type of curb and gutter will be installed? Rollover, vertical, etc? • The site in relation to the new cross-section does not appear to be the same on every page of the plans. For example, the layout shown on the cover page and page 4 is not the same as what is shown on page 3 and 5. Please adjust. ResRonse • There is an existing pipe invert accommodating the property to the south which must be accommodated with new curb, gutter and walk construction for Lots 37 and 38. Therefore, a small portion of the curb and gutter was removed near the south portion of Lot 38 to allow runoff from the pipe to the south to reach the new curb and gutter to the north. The walk is represented to the south property line. • Construction Item 1 on the Master Improvements Plan (Sheet 4) clearly identifies "vertical curb and gutter". We have "X"d out the rollover curb and gutter detail on the curb and gutter detail referenced on sheet 8. • Sheets 3, 4 and 5 now represent the same conditions. :_1 PAGE 3 January 27, 2003 Project No. 1738-03-02 Re: Lots 37-38, South 13 Subdivision; Larimer County (Ft. Collins),. Colorado Drainage/F loodplain/Erosion Control Issues: Comment: 1. There:. are some drainage concerns with this project, especially in relation to the area storm, sewer crossing near the property and off -site drainage issues. The applicant must contact Rex Burns with the ;Larimer County Engineering Department: to address these issues before the next submittal. Response I talked to Rex. Burns at. 11:15AM on Monday, January 27, 2003_ He indicated that. Ed Woodward sent a letter to the Fossil Creek HOA. Ed provided me with a copy of that letter. It is attached for your immediate reference. The letter gives a February, 14, 2003 deadline date for the Fossil. Creek HOA to respond. Rex also indicated that building permits would be released due to previous understandings and efforts concerning the storm sewer outfall for South.13. If you have any questions or further comments, please call at (470) 226-5334.. Sincerely, "nau W. Shear; P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation. BWS: / bb attachments: cc Ken Scavo, Cactus Rose Development Group Limited Denny Meyer, Sierra Builders, Ltd.. Dave Pettigrew;. Prudential Prime Properties I'''' o� 5716 Bueno These comments identify items still needed to meet the prior comments — A draft development agreement has is with the City Attorneys office for review. Once I receive comments back a draft agreement will be forwarded onto the applicant for review and comment. Legal description, deed, and fees for the area to be dedicated has not yet been received. Once these are received they will be reviewed. The utility plans to improve Bueno Drive adjacent to the property to City Standards have been reviewed. Comments are: General Notes 19, 40, 41, 47, and 48 need to be added to the plans. These are the notes that can not just be referenced since each note is customized to the project. See Redlined plans and utility plan check sheet for additional comments (these are available at the counter for pick up). Centerline and profiles for each flowline including the 500 feet off -site is needed. The flowline profile that has been provided does not include any slope or design information. The street section for this roadway is to be the Industrial Local street section which matches the '/z row width of 33 feet. Thus the curbline needs to be moved west to provide for the standard x-section and minimum parkway width. Ideally the existing centerline profile meets standards and the centerline elevation will not need to be reconstructed, but I don't know at this point if the existing centerline profile can remain as is. Centerline profile and flowline profiles will determine what construction/ reconstruction will need to take place for this section of street in front of this lot to meet standards for design and construction. I don't know if a mill and overlay from centerline to flowline and property line to property line is adequate or does the street section need to be rebuilt? Until cores and pavement design are proposed this won't be known. This also depends on if the current centerline and cross slopes meet standards as to whether this can just be a property to property line job. These plans need to match the site plan and show what is to be done for the landscape area behind the sidewalk and show the new trash enclosure. Where does the curb stop sit in relation to the edge of the sidewalk? If it is within the sidewalk enough concrete sidewalk will need to be on all sides to make sure it is a solid section and will not break off (sidewalk may need to be widened around the curb stop to achieve this. What are the driveway widths. Maximum driveway width is 36 feet. Need additional details for the driveways. How they are to be built, the grades and enough information to verify grades can be tied into within the ROW or identify any off - site easements that might be needed. Make changes to details so they match our details or provide City details. Additional details 1601 and 1602 are needed as well. Technical Services Comments 1/31/11 Minor Amendment CFMA10005 5716 Bueno Drive 1. The benchmarks shown on sheet 1 of 2 of the Utility Plans, no longer reflect the City of Fort Collins Vertical Control Network. Please contact the City Surveying Department @ 221-6605 or Technical Services @ 221-6588, to get current information for benchmarks. 2. Please add "City of & "Larimer County" to the title of the Utility Plans. 3. There are line over text issues on sheet 2 of 2 of the Utility Plans. 1 MA1000089 5716 Bueno In order for the redevelopment of this site (change of use), the following apply: This property was developed in the county and recently annexed into the City. Under the annexation policy the street in front of this property remains the obligation of the property owners for maintenance, until such time as the street is brought up to City standards (curb, gutter, sidewalk, width and pavement design). As identified above Bueno has not been constructed and improved to City street standards. This creates a couple of complications and requirements in order for this property to gain approval. First in accordance with Section 3.3.2(F) of the Land Use Code a development is required to have an improved connection to the arterial roadway, which in this case is College Avenue. As identified above Bueno is not considered improved. One way to meet this requirement is for Bueno to be improved from this property out to College Ave. The code also identifies a waiver possibility. I have not been able to meet with the City Engineer yet to determine if the waiver option is a possibility and what if anything might be needed to provide the information for a waiver consideration. I am hoping to find this information out within the next couple of days and will update the comments when I have that information. This property is responsible for improving the adjacent portion of Bueno, not just because of the annexation policy, but also the City Code requires this at the time of development or redevelopment of the property prior to issuance of a building permit. To accommodate the industrial local street cross-section this property will need to dedicate an additional 3 feet of row along the frontage of the property. Engineering development review can provide sample documents and information on this. There is a $250 processing fee and Larimer county recording fees will apply). If a waiver to the improved street connection requirement identified above can not be granted the project will need to design and constructed from this property to College Avenue. If a waiver to the improved street connection requirement is granted, this project will be required to provide a cash escrow to cover the costs of the design and construction of the improvements adjacent to this site. A development agreement will also need to be entered into documenting the requirements. Please contact Engineering Development Review to get a copy of the information for development agreement sheet, so we can gather the owner and property information needed to start drafting this document. Larimer County Recording fees will apply as this document once signed will be recorded at the county. May 5, 2011 Project No. 2528-01-10 (ENGINEERINGHEAR City of Fort Collins RPORATION Current Planning / Zoning 281 North College Avenue Ft Collins, Colorado 80524-2404 Attn: Peter Barnes, Zoning Supervisor Re: Lot 11, South 13 Subdivision (5716 Bueno Drive); Ft. Collins, Colorado Response to April 22, 2011 Comments Dear Mr. Barnes, This letter is a response to the most recent City of Fort Collins review comments concerning Lot 11, South 13 Subdivision (5716 Bueno Drive) received by e-mail from Sheri Langenberger on Friday, April 22, 2011. The deed format and legal look good for the row dedication. To finalize this I need: a. Processing fee of $250 (check made out to the City of Fort Collins) R The fee will be provided by Ken Corriea. b. Deed signed by Del Sol, Notary and Del Sol 's Attorney. R The deed of dedication for right-of-way will be provided by Ken Corriea. c. A check for the filing fee. 4 pages, so it is $26 and this check needs to be made out to "Larimer County Clerk and Recorder ". R The check for filing fee will be provided by Ken Corriea. The DA was sent out for review February 4, 2011. I have not heard back with any questions or comments. If there are no concerns regarding this document it needs to be signed and returned to me with a check for $71 made out to the "Larimer County Clerk and Recorder" for the filing fees for the 13 page document. R The signed development agreement and a check for $71.00 made out to Larimer County Clerk and Recorder will be provided by Ken Corriea. Sheet 2 a. Need to add City signature block to this sheet. R A City signature block has been added. b. Remove Not for Construction from this sheet. This sheet provides the fl and cl design for the construction. Label the limits of construction and what is design for this project and what is preliminary off -site design if you have a concern regarding limits. R "Not for Construction" has been removed from this sheet and the "limits of construction" for this project has been added. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 Fax (970) 282-0311 www.shearengineering.com PAGE 2 May 5, 2011 Project No. 2528-01-10 Re: Lot 11, South 13 Subdivision (5716 Bueno Drive); Ft. Collins, Colorado Response to April 22, 2011 Comments c. Limits of driveway construction don't match sheet 4. Either design works for me — just looking for constancy. R Limits of driveway construction are now consistent. Sheet 4 has been revised to show entire proposed driveway. d. Cl, per the sections it looks like much of this matches existing grades. Please clarify where the two match (existing and proposed) and where the two differ. R The entire design matches the existing Bueno Drive centerline elevations. e. There are several places where the grade breaks exceed standards (4%). Need to look at adjusting the grades or providing variances with justification. R The grades have been adjusted and the grade breaks do not exceed the standard .4%. f. Where do the grade breaks occur along the flowline? R We have labeled "grade break" at each station in which a grade break occurs. Grade breaks at the flowline are generally the same as the grade breaks at the centerline. g. The fl grades on this sheet do not match those shown on sheet 4. R Foowline grades match those on Sheet 4. h. Elevation numbers along the side of the grid are off. They don't appear to match the grades labeled on the profile. R Elevations along the side of the grid now match the grades labeled in the profile. Sheet 3 Please add City signature block to this sheet. R A City signature block has been added. Sheet 4 a. Add information on the plan view regarding the proposed limit of street reconstruction. As you can see by my markings on the plans it took a bit before I think I understand what your proposed limits are. R The proposed limit of street reconstruction has been labeled. b. Slopes on the flowline profile you copied onto this sheet do not match the design shown on sheet 2. R The flowline profile slopes now match sheet 2. This profile is proposed for this project. c. To help clarify, for folks like me, can you add future' to sections DD, EE, and FF. Also please label the x-slope on these sections as I want to verify that they are within the parameters. R Sections DD, EE, and FF have been labeled future. The x-slopes for these sections have been labeled. PAGE 3 May 5, 2011 Project No. 2528-01-10 Re: Lot 11, South 13 Subdivision (5716 Bueno Drive); Ft. Collins, Colorado Response to April 22, 2011 Comments d. Need to add City signature block. R A City signature block has been added. Sheet S a. Need to add City signature block R A City signature block has been added. b. Love the limits of disturbance line on this page. The pavement tie-in lines will need to meet standards, which mean squared off cuts. Please adjust this to reflect that. R The pavement tie-in lines are now squared off cuts. Sheet 6 a. Please add City signature block. R A City signature block has been added. b. Unless I read the plans wrong it doesn't look like you need drawing 707. So to avoid confusion with the inspector and contractor as to which driveway style is to be installed please remove this detail. R Drawing 707 has been removed. Overall the plans are looking pretty good, just a few things to address. I am hoping that after a final check we will be able to go to mylars. If you have any questions, please call at (970) 226-5334. Shear Engineering Corporation BWS / brb cc: Ken Corriea; Solace Meds Sheri Langenberger; City of Fort Collins Engineering Department N(tA % 0 C:C7C7 �� CF•M'(-i 1 bC�J i 5716 Bueno April 22, 2011 The deed format and legal look good for the row dedication. To finalize this I need: a. Processing fee of $250 (check made out to the City of Fort Collins) b. Deed signed by Del Sol, Notary and Del Sol's Attorney. c. A check for the filing fee. 4 pages, so it is $26 and this check needs to be made out to "Larimer County Clerk and Recorder". The DA was sent out for review February 4, 2011. I have not heard back with any questions or comments. If there are no concerns regarding this document it needs to be signed and returned to me with a check for $71 made out to the "Larimer County Clerk and Recorder" for the filing fees for the 13 page document. Sheet 2 a. Need to add City signature block to this sheet. b. Remove Not for Construction from this sheet. This sheet provides the fl and cl design for the construction. Label the limits of construction and what is design for this project and what is preliminary off -site design if you have a concern regarding limits. c. Limits of driveway construction don't match sheet 4. Either design works for me — just looking for constancy. d. Cl, per the sections it looks like much of this matches existing grades. Please clarify where the two match (existing and proposed) and where the two differ. e. There are several places where the grade breaks exceed standards (.4%). Need to look at adjusting the grades or providing variances with justification. f. Where do the grade breaks occur along the flowline? g. The fl grades on this sheet do not match those shown on sheet 4. h. Elevation numbers along the side of the grid are off. They don't appear to match the grades labeled on the profile. Sheet 3 Please add City signature block to this sheet. Sheet 4 a. Add information on the plan view regarding the proposed limit of street reconstruction. As you can see by my markings on the plans it took a bit before I think I understand what your proposed limits are. b. Slopes on the flowline profile you copied onto this sheet do not match the design shown on sheet 2. C. To help clarify, for folks like me, can you add `future' to sections DD, EE, and FF. Also please label the x-slope on these sections as I want to verify that they are within the parameters. d. Need to add City signature block. Sheet 5 a. Need to add City signature block. b. Love the limits of disturbance line on this page. The pavement tie-in lines will need to meet standards, which mean squared off cuts. Please adjust this to reflect that. Sheet 6 a. Please add City signature block. b. Unless I read the plans wrong it doesn't look like you need drawing 707. So to avoid confusion with the inspector and contractor as to which driveway style is to be installed please remove this detail. Overall the plans are looking pretty good, just a few things to address. I am hoping that after a final check we will be able to go to mylars. x April 8, 2011 Project No. 2528-01-10 City of Fort Collins Current Planning / Zoning 281 North College Avenue Ft Collins, Colorado 80524-2404 Attn: Peter Barnes, Zoning Supervisor Re: Lot 11, South 13 Subdivision (5716 Bueno Drive); Ft. Collins, Colorado Response to February 1, 2011 Comments Dear Mr. Barnes, This letter is a response to the most recent City of Fort Collins review comments concerning Lot 11, South 13 Subdivision (5716 Bueno Drive) received by e-mail on February 1, 2011. Engineering, Sheri Lan eg nberger, 221-6573 These comments identify items still needed to meet the prior comments 1 A draft development agreement has is with the City Attorneys office for review. Once I receive comments back a draft agreement will be forwarded onto the applicant for review and comment. Legal description, deed, and fees for the area to be dedicated has not yet been received. Once these are received they will be reviewed. R The proposed Bueno Drive right-of-way dedication documents are included with this resubmittal for review and comment. Thank you for sending us the standard deed of dedication format. The utility plans to improve Bueno Drive adjacent to the property to City Standards have been reviewed. Comments are: General Notes 19, 40, 41, 47, and 48 need to be added to the plans. These are the notes that cannot just be referenced since each note is customized to the project. R General Notes 19, 40, 41, 47, and 48 have been added to the plans. See Redlined plans and utility plan check sheet for additional comments (these are available at the counter for pick up). R Redlines have been addressed. Redlined set is being returned with this resubmittal. Centerline and profiles for each flowline including the 500 feet off -site is needed. The flowline profile that has been provided does not include any slope or design information. R Profile designs have been extended 500' south and also north to the existing curb, gutter and storm inlet at the intersection of Bueno Drive and Caji Drive. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 Fax (970) 282-0311 www.shearengineering.com PAGE 2 April 8, 2011 Project No. 2528-01-10 Re: Lot 11, South 13 Subdivision (5716 Bueno Drive); Ft. Collins, Colorado Response to February 1, 2011 Comments The street section for this roadway is to be the Industrial Local street section which matches the %Z row width of 33 feet. Thus the curbline needs to be moved west to provide for the standard x-section and minimum parkway width. R In order to meet Fort Collins — Loveland Water District separation requirements from the existing water line on the east side of Bueno Drive, A twenty five foot (25') one-half street section has been provided on the east side of Bueno Drive. R A thirty six foot (36') right-of-way will be dedicated with Lot 11. R The twenty five foot (25') one-half street section and the thirty six foot (36) right-of-way adjacent to Lots 37-38 on the west side of Bueno Drive are noted because that is what exists today for Lots 37-38. Refer to attached response letter to Roxann Mackenzie Hayes, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer with Larimer County; letter dated: January 29, 2003. Ideally the existing centerline profile meets standards and the centerline elevation will not need to be reconstructed, but 1 don't know at this point if the existing centerline profile can remain as is. Centerline profile and jlowline profiles will determine what construction / reconstruction will need to take place for this section of street in front of this lot to meet standards for design and construction. R Based on the profiles and cross sections provided, the centerline will remain in place and curb and gutter profiles have beens designed accordingly to meet Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards requirements including street cross slopes. I don't know if a mill and overlay from centerline to flowline and property line to property line is adequate or does the street section need to be rebuilt? Until cores and pavement design are proposed this won't be known. This also depends on if the current centerline and cross slopes meet standards as to whether this can just be a property to property line job. R Refer to design proles and cross sections. These plans need to match the site plan and show what is to be done for the landscape area behind the sidewalk and show the new trash enclosure. R Trash enclosure is now shown. A replacement tree is now noted between the curb and gutter and detached sidewalk. Where does the curb stop sit in relation to the edge of the sidewalk? If it is within the sidewalk enough concrete sidewalk will need to be on all sides to make sure it is a solid section and will not break off (sidewalk may need to be widened around the curb stop to achieve this. R The water meter pit ends up in the detached sidewalk. A construction note has been added to the plan that indicates additional concrete if required. PAGE 3 April 8, 2011 Project No. 2528-01-10 Re: Lot 11, South 13 Subdivision (5716 Bueno Drive); Ft. Collins, Colorado Response to February 1, 2011 Comments What are the driveway widths? Maximum driveway width is 36 feet. R A maximum thirty six foot (36') driveway width is acknowledged. R One-half of the north driveway is twelve feet (12'). The ultimate driveway width is expected to be twenty four feet (24') wide to accommodate the existing ten foot (10') access easements on each lot. R One-half of the south driveway is twelve feet (12'). The ultimate driveway width is expected to be twenty four feet (241) wide to accommodate the existing ten foot (10') access easements on each lot. Need additional details for the driveways. How they are to be built, the grades and enough information to verify grades can be tied into within the ROW or identify any off -site easements that might be needed. R LCUASS commercial driveway details have been added. The driveway designs meet these details. R Limits of disturbance and construction have been No offsite easements are necessary. R One-half of the north driveway is twelve feet (12'). The ultimate driveway width is expected to be twenty four feet (241) wide to accommodate the existing ten foot (10') access easements on each lot. R One-half of the south driveway is twelve feet (12'). The ultimate driveway width is expected to be twenty four feet (24) wide to accommodate the existing ten foot (10') access easements on each lot. Make changes to details so they match our details or provide City details. Additional details 1601 and 1602 are needed as well R All LCUASS details have been provided. Technical Services, Jeff Cog= 221-6588 1. The benchmarks shown on sheet 1 of 2 of the Utility Plans, no longer reflect the City of Fort Collins Vertical Control Network. Please contact the City Surveying Department @ 221-6605 or Technical Services @ 221-6588, to get current information for benchmarks. R Benchmark data has been revised.