Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEYE CENTER OF NORTHERN COLORADO - FDP - FDP160012 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - REVISIONS1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.corn!deve/opmentrev iew February 5, 2016 Cathy Mathis 444 Mountain Ave Berthoud, CO 80513 RE: Eye Center of Northern Colorado, PDP150029, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepard@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3. Comment Originated: 12/30/2015 12/30/2015: (Carried Over) The site plan needs to call out and graphically indicate the location and the dimensions of all Emergency Access Easements. RESPONSE: The locations of the EAE’s have been labeled. Comment Number: 4. Comment Originated: 12/30/2015 12/30/2015: (Carried Over) Either a Context Plan or an Enlarged Site Plan is needed to show how the site (particularly the driveway location on Precision) aligns with both Main Street Health and Wellness to the north Windsong at Rock Creek to the south (particularly the new southwest E.A.E.). RESPONSE: A Context Diagram has been provided. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 02/03/2016 02/03/2016: Please note that there are two site plans, one from TBG and one from Marasco. Staff is assuming that the TBG site plan prevails and that the Marasco site plan was included for informational purposes only and will not be a part of the Final Plan submittal. RESPONSE: Moving forward, we will be using the TBG site plan. The floor plan, roof plan and architectural site plan have been removed from the Final Plan set. 2 Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 02/03/2016 02/03/2016: On the TBG site plan, please add labeling for decorative screen wall and the emergency access easement that is the north-south private drive along the east side of the site. RESPONSE: The 8’ walls have been labeled as well as the north-south EAE. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 02/03/2016 02/03/2016: On the TBG site plan, please correct the reference to the maximum allowable parking being 4.00 spaces per 1,000 square feet when it is 4.5 due to the facility being considered a medical office building. Also, note that if there is no parking allowed on Precision Drive, then a 20% bonus is allowed. The total of 148 could then be increased to 177. The difference between the proposed number of spaces (199) and the maximum allowed (177) is now reduced to 22. RESPONSE: The parking data has been updated and now we have added compact parking spaces. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 02/03/2016 02/03/2016: The comment response letter indicates that a Context Diagram has been provided but this sheet is not included in the set delivered to the Planning Department. RESPONSE: A Context Diagram has been provided. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 02/03/2016 02/03/2016: On the Landscape Plan, there are two public street lights shown, one along Ziegler and one along Precision. The spacing of the street trees is such that there is 40 feet on either side of these street lights without a tree. Please note that Light and Power allows Ornamental Trees to be placed to within 15 feet of a street light so as to not create an SO-foot gap. Please add two Ornamental Trees on either side of both street lights. RESPONSE: Ornamental trees have been added to the locations specified. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 02/03/2016 02/03/2016: The comment response letter indicates (number 5) that the Wichita Blue Black Hills Spruce has been added but it is not included in the Landscape Plan Schedule. RESPONSE: Please note – these are included on the landscape plan. You will see the latin name matches that on the Windsong plans but the common name is slightly different. We have noted the common name per the local landscape suppliers product lists. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 200 Comment Originated: 12/31/2015 02/05/2016: This appears to still be an issue when comparing to the plan that Windsong is showing that goes to public hearing, but I'll presume will all be coordinated at time of final plan. RESPONSE: Plans are now coordinated. 12/31/2015: The plans don't seem to be coordinated with Windsong at Rock Creek Drive in 3 terms of how the north-south private drive is designed as this project has it angled to the southeast, while Windsong appears to be aligned directly north-south. The access easements depicted on the plats for the two projects are also in different locations. Comment Number: 205 Comment Originated: 12/31/2015 02/05/2016: The response is acknowledged. I would like to receive something from MAVD acknowledgi ng future development to the east is not able to utilize the driveway from this development to Precision Drive as a shared access, and acknowledges that the subdividing of the property will need to consider access locations onto Precision Drive meeting City access spacing requirements. I can reach out to MAVD on this if desired. 12/31/2015: The intent of the north-south driveway for Windsong at Rock Creek south of the property, is to act as a driveway that can be shared between that project and the undeveloped property to the east. This proposal has the driveway access onto Precision Drive, close to the eastern boundary of its property, yet does not provide access easement to the eastern boundary to potentially allow for shared access to the undeveloped property to the east. Ideally, we should be exploring how access points can be consolidated/shared across adjoining properties, as depending on future development, their access options may be hampered by not being able to share/consolidate. RESPONSE: Email and letter from MAVD was sent on February 2, 2016. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Rebecca Everette, 97o-416-2625, reverette@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/01/2016 02/01/2016: The additional plantings and changes to the grading in the detention pond look great. Thank you for making these updates. No additional comments. RESPONSE: Thank you. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/31/2015 02/02/2016: There appears to still be one tree on the east side of the building that is not identified with a symbol. RESPONSE: This has been revised. 12/31/2015: The Shade trees shown at some of the corners of the building with three half- moon indentations on the perimeter of the symbol do not appear to be identified in the plant list. Department: Internal Services Contact: Russell Hovland, 97o-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building lnsp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 12/28/2015: Building Permit Pre-Submittal Meeting: 4 Comment Originated: 12/28/2015 Pre-Submittal meetings are required to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning conceptual review meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi-family projects are advised to call 416-2341 to schedule a pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) 012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com web page to view them. Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117. 1-2009. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF I Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use 1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC. 2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter. 3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter. Department: Light And Power Contact: Coy Althoff, CAlthoff @fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/29/2015 12/29/2015: Primary electric distribution is currently running along the West 5 side of Ziegler Rd. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/29/2015 12/29/2015: Development charges, electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges and any system modification charges necessary will apply to this development. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/29/2015 12/29/2015: Contact Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the transformer and electric meter locations, please show the locations on the utility plans. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/29/2015 12/29/2015: Transformers shall be within 10' of a paved surface and must have 8' clearance from the front and 3' clearance around the sides and back. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/29/2015 02/04/2016: Please show and label the street lights locations on the utility, site, and landscape plans. RESPONSE: Street lights are shown on the site and landscape plans. 12/29/2015: Streetlights will be placed along public streets. A 40 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between canopy trees and streetlights. A 15 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between ornamental trees and streetlights. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/29/2015 12/29/2015: Please provide a one line diagram and a C-1 form to Light and Power Engineering. The C-1 form can be found at: http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWi ki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1 Form.pdf Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/29/2015 12/29/2015: Please contact Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 221-6700. Please reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/busi ness/builders-and-developers. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 97Q-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire. org Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/02/2016 02/02/2016: MARKING > IFC503.3: Where required by the fire code official, approved signs or other approved notices that include the words NO PARKING - FIRE LANE shall be provided for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads or prohibit the obstruction thereof. The means by which fire lanes are designated shall be maintained in a clean and legible condition at all times ad be replaced or repaired when necessary to provide adequate visibility. SIGNS > IFC D103.6: Where required by the fire code official,fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING - FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and have red letters on a white reflective 6 background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2. RESPONSE: Signs have been added and labeled on the Utility Plan. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/09/2015 01/22/2016: Repeat. Will look for in FDP rounds 12/09/2015: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow I Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@ fcgov.com Contact: Shane Boyle, 970-221-6339, sboyle@fcgov.com Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/27/2016 01/27/2016: Please provide verification that the required detention volume is being met in the paver subgrade. RESPONSE: Pavers are no longer being designed. Required detention volume is being met in the Detention and Water Quality pond. Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/30/2015 01/27/2016: Please see additional minor redlines. 12/30/2015: Please see additional minor redlines in the Drainage Report and Utility Plans. RESPONSE: Redlines have been addressed. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov. com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/30/2015 02/02/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 12/30/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. RESPONSE: These have been fixed. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 02/02/2016 02/02/2016: The titles do not match the titles in the index on the Site Plan. See redlines. RESPONSE: The index has been updated on the TBG Site Plan. Moving forward, we will be using the TBG site plan. The floor plan, roof plan and architectural site plan have been removed from the Final Plan set. 7 Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 02/02/2016 02/02/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. RESPONSE: These have been fixed. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/30/2015 02/02/2016: Not all notes have been removed. 12/30/2015: Please remove the reference to Windsong At Rock Creek. This project has not been filed. See redlines. RESPONSE: All references to Windsong at Rock Creek have been removed. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 02/02/2016 02/02/2016: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. RESPONSE: Text has been rotated 180 degrees. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 02/02/2016 02/02/2016: The titles do not match the titles in the index on the Site Plan. See redlines. RESPONSE: The titles now match the Sheet index on the Site plan. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 02/02/2016 02/02/2016: The titles in the sheet index do not match the titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. RESPONSE: The Sheet Index has been updated. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/29/2015 12/29/2015: The site plan shows head-in parking along the east side of the building. Because this connecting roadway will see quite a bit of traffic, the functionality of backing out into traffic is not ideal. Since the proposal has more parking spaces than the max, can they be eliminated? Or, if they can't be eliminated, can speed tables be installed to slow down the north-south traffic and caution drivers that cars may be backing out into the travel lane? Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/02/2016 02/02/2016: The parking lots (both front and back) are laid out in a manner that people parking in the outer aisles will need to snake their way between cars in the closer aisle to get to the entrances. Can a sidewalk be constructed to provide easy access from entrance to outer parking aisles? RESPONSE: A sidewalk has been added. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com 8 Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/22/2015 12/22/2015: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Shane Boyle, 970-221-6339, sboyle@ fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/30/2015 01/27/2016: Please check separation distances for all utilities. It appears the proposed transformer does not meet minimum separation distances from the water service and there are several instances where landscape separations are not being met for both water and sewer services. RESPONSE: 10’ separation is now met. 12/30/2015: Please ensure a minimum of 1O' of separation between the curb stop and the storm sewer. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/27/2016 01/27/2016: Please provide water usage calculations for the 3-inch meter. RESPONSE: There is no longer a 3-inch meter. There are now two taps: a 2 inch and a 1 inch. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@ fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/28/2015 12/28/2015: The lighting plan needs to show the footcandles across the entire property and 20ft beyond the property line. Additionally it should include the cut-sheets for the fixtures that are proposed? Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/28/2015 02/03/2016: The LUCA fixture is not down directional. Please choose a fixture that is down directional and fully shielded. Also please add a not to the lighting plan sheets that the WST LED fixture will not be installed in the inverted position. RESPONSE: The LUCA fixture will be specified with down light only. There will not by any up light. See sheet E1.3 The WST fixture is not specified with the WLU option, so the fixture will be mounted down only. See sheet E1.3 12/28/2015: Are there not any light fixtures proposed on the building? Comment Number: 10 02/03/2016: Please remove the signage form the plans. Signs are approved through a separate sign permit. 9 RESPONSE: Signage detail has been removed from the building elevation sheet A-1. Comment Number: 11 02/03/2016: Add a detail of the wall. The walls are not appearing on the landscape plan. Please add these to verify the appropriate location. RESPONSE: Details of walls and arbors are indicated on the building elevation sheet A-1.