The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMAINSTREET HEALTH & WELLNESS SUITES - PDP - PDP140018 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview January 09, 2015 Eric Morff COLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 401 S 18TH STREET SUITE 200 St. Louis, MO 63103 Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General 12/02/2014: The elevations need to show the height of the building to the tallest point. It appears the building may be over 40 ft in height? If so further analysis will need t to be provided. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 12/29/2014: There are a few sections of the building that are large blank walls. These should be broken up by architectural features. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/29/2014 12/29/2014: Are the labels on the bicycle spaces correct? Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 12/29/2014 Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings 01/06/2015: The Cole portion of civil plans appears to show two pipe crossings of Precision Drive, which isn't reflected on the Aspen plans.It should be verified on the number of pipe crossing of Precision Drive. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 01/06/2015 Topic: General Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Noah Beals, at 970-416-2313 or nbeals@fcgov.com. RE: Mainstreet Health & Wellness Suites, PDP140018, Round Number 2 Page 1 of 10 01/06/2015: The site plan does not show the construction of Precision Drive to Technology Parkway. In lieu of expanding the site plan to show this, please add "Constructed to Technology Parkway" directly before "Refer to Plans by Aspen Engineering for Details." 12/03/2014: In general, the plans need to show what infrastructure is to be fully built with the project in bold, with the existing condition faded. The site and civil plans for instance should show Precision Drive not in an existing lineweight, but proposed. On the site and landscape plans, Precision Drive should be shown connecting to Technology Parkway. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/03/2014 01/06/2015: With the understanding that the offsite construction for Precision Drive occurs on MAVD property, who also presently owns the property with the PDP, no letter of intent is needed from MAVD (a letter of intent is still required for Intel). It is expected that the offsite easements for Precision Drive construction will be easement conveyed to the City. 12/03/2014: There appears to be some grading for Precision Drive that falls outside of the Precision Drive right-of-way on the south side. Additionally there appears to be some utility and potentially drainage work that falls outside of right-of-way and outside of the future utility easement. There may be some benefits in having the plat also included the two unplatted properties east and south of the proposed development, as this would allow easements that are needed offsite of the actual development to be provided via the plat. In general, an understanding of what work is occurring outside of the property, right-of-way, and/or an easement needs to be understood at this time. There's two proposed storm sewer for outfall on the south side of Precision Drive that would seem to need easements established onto that property. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/03/2014 01/06/2015: The Cole portion of civil and site plans don't depict the radius for the property boundary at the northeast corner of Ziegler Road and Precision Drive and would imply that a portion of the public walk from Precision Drive to Ziegler Road is being built outside of public right-of-way. Please ensure that the property boundary established on the plat is reflected on these plans for verification that the sidewalk will be placed in right-of-way. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 01/06/2015 01/06/2015: The plans indicate the need for a temporary construction easement on the Intel property. A letter of intent from Intel is needed prior to a hearing for the project. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 01/06/2015 01/06/2015: The plat shows an existing irrigation easement to PSD. The Aspen civil plans show signature blocks pertaining to irrigation for both PSD and MAVD. Is MAVD still required? Can the irrigation appurtenances be identified on the plans as to who owns it (MAVD and/or PSD)? Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 01/06/2015 Topic: Plat Page 2 of 10 01/06/2015: With the existing irrigation easement to PSD shown on the plat, it would seem that PSD would still need to be a party that would sign the plat, especially with the easements and right-of-way conveyed to the City that would overlap portions of the irrigation easement. PSD should be providing a letter of intent at this time. 12/03/2014: Who is the party that would need to sign the plat and plans for the private irrigation easement? In general there should be some description on the intent of the private irrigation easement that differentiates it from the "Easements" indicated in the "Certificate of Dedication". (The Aspen civil set has a signature block for Poudre School District, might this be the party that would need to sign?) The signature for the party should be on the plat and the civil cover sheet (Cole). Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/03/2014 Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberger@fcgov.com Topic: General 11/07/2014: The Transporation Development Review Fee (TDRF) amount that was paid was not correctly calculated and the actual amount owed for the PDP application was less than what you paid. I have requested a refund of $5,977.75 be processed. The total amount that was due based on current building square footage and area being platted is: $21,763.50 Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/07/2014 Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans 12/03/2014: List quantities of trees used in the Plant schedule and the percentage of each tree species use. Minimum tree species diversity should be followed as described in LUC 3.2.1 D 3. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/03/2014 Page 3 of 10 01/06/2015: Please add the following general notes or equivalent to the landscape plan: All turf areas to be irrigated with an automatic pop-up sprinkler system. All shrub beds to be irrigated with automatic drip irrigation system, or acceptable alternative. Trees shall not be planted closer than 4 feet to any gas, no closer than 6 feet to any water or sewer service line, no closer than 10 feet to any water or sewer main, and no closer than 8 feet to a driveway. A horizontal distance of 40 feet between canopy street trees and street lights and 15 feet between ornamental trees and street lights shall be maintained. Shrubs are not to be planted within 4 feet of water or sewer mains. The soil is all landscape areas, including parkways and medians, shall be thoroughly loosened to a depth of not less than (8) inches and soil amendment shall be thoroughly incorporated into the soil of all landscape areas to the depth of at least (6) inches by tilling discing or other suitable method, at a rate of at least three (3) cubic yards to soil amendment per one thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area. Landscaping including street trees shall be installed or secured with a letter of credit, escrow, or performance bond for 125% of the value of the landscaping and installation prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy. All City street trees must be installed and established, of an approved species and of acceptable condition prior to final release of financial security. The landscape irrigation plan shall be submitted to the City of Fort Collins Water Utility for approval. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/06/2015 01/06/2015: In the parkway areas between the sidewalk and curb show the landscape surface with the symbol for seeded lawn. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 01/06/2015 Department: Internal Services Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Page 4 of 10 12/03/2014: Building Permit Pre-Submittal Meeting Pre-Submittal meetings are offered to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning conceptual review meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi-family projects are advised to call 416-2341 to schedule a pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use 1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC. 2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter. 3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/03/2014 Contact: Todd Reidenbach, , Topic: General 11/26/2014: Addresses will be assigned by the GIS Department after the plans have met final approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City Todd Reidenbach, GISP GIS Mapping Specialist treidenbach@fcgov.com 970.416.2483 Work 970.221.6329 Fax Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/26/2014 Department: Light And Power Contact: Justin Fields, 970-224-6150, jfields@fcgov.com Topic: General Page 5 of 10 11/28/2014: A C-1 form and one-line diagram need to submitted to Light and Power Engineering. The C-1 form is available at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/c-1_form.pdf. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/28/2014 Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish@fcgov.com Topic: General 01/06/2015: The proposed transformer location looks to be out of access for our line truck. The proposed location behind the trash dumpsters looks to be about 20' - 22' behind the gate and the dumpsters do not have wheels. We will need to be able to get closer to the transformer. 11/28/2014: The transformer and meter locations need to be coordinated with Light and Power Engineering, 970-221-6700. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/06/2015 Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Don Kapperman, , Topic: General 12/03/2014: Comcast would like to do joint trench with Ft Collins Light and Power -Don Kapperman, Don_Kapperman@cable.comcast.com Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/03/2014 Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General 12/03/2014: Prior PFA comments have been noted or resolved. No further comments at this time. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/03/2014 01/07/2015: The revised site plan shows a different connection to Ziegler Road than previously proposed. The Emergency Access Easement needs to be revised so that it crosses the adjoining property to the north and connects with the Public Way (in this case, Ziegler Rd.) Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/09/2015 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control 12/01/2014: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft and in a sensitive area, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted does not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/01/2014 Contact: Shane Boyle, 970-221-6339, sboyle@fcgov.com Topic: General Page 6 of 10 01/06/2015: The 2nd submittal did a great job of addressing this comment. Please add noted on the Utility Plan, Erosion Control Plan, and any other pertinent sheets referencing which site improvements are contained within the Aspen Engineering Plans. The notes that are in the Aspen Engineering plans to this affect are a good example. 12/02/2014: Please ensure there is separation between the two different plan sets. Many onsite improvements are shown on the Aspen Engineering plans and should be shown on the Cole Engineering plans instead. Examples include onsite LID improvements, drainage basin and hydrologic calculations, and porous pavement section. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/06/2015: The detail and erosion control at the curb cuts is still unclear but is something that can be resolved at FDP stage. 12/02/2014: Please investigate the use of permanent erosion control on the curb cuts into the detention pond. It is not clear from the detail how the presedimentation basin will function with regards to handling erosion. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/06/2015: The proposed curb cuts and cobble dry wells are acceptable. Please install these at all storm sewer stubouts. 12/02/2014: The proposed storm sewer stubouts into undeveloped parcels is not a typical approach unless it is certain how these parcels will develop. It may be best to not install these stubouts unless the development of the adjacent parcels is known. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/06/2015: Scour Stop is the City's preferred alternative to riprap. Please investigate the use of this product for onsite improvements. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/06/2015 01/06/2015: Please show all storm sewers and underdrains on the erosion control plan and show permanent erosion control on all outlets, including the underdrains. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/06/2015 Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Page 7 of 10 01/06/2015: COLE PLANS: This has not been added in the format shown in previous comment. The benchmarks must be labeled with the City's designation. 12/02/2014: COLE PLANS: The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum. Please provide the following information in the format shown below. If your project is started on NAVD88 datum: 1) PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK #1 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK #2 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: OR, if project has already been surveyed in NAVD29 Unadjusted datum: 2) PROJECT DATUM: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (OLD CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) BENCHMARK #1 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK #2 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: If using NGVD29 UNADJUSTED the following equation statement will be needed. NOTE: IF NAVD 88 DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NAVD88 = NGVD29 UNADJUSTED + X.XX' Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/06/2015: COLE PLANS: There are still line over text issues. See redlines. 12/02/2014: COLE PLANS: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/06/2015: COLE PLANS: This has not been done on all sheets. See redlines. 12/02/2014: COLE PLANS: Please remove all linework from signature blocks. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/06/2015: COLE PLANS: There is still text that needs to be masked. See redlines. 12/02/2014: COLE PLANS: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 Page 8 of 10 01/07/2015: ASPEN PLANS: This comment will stay active as a reminder that these reception numbers need to be added. 12/02/2014: ASPEN PLANS: Please make sure the reception numbers for the easements by separate document are added prior to submitting mylars. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/06/2015: COLE PLANS: The lighter text & linework marked is not acceptable. It will not scan or reproduce. Please darken it up. See redlines. Comment Number: 38 Comment Originated: 01/06/2015 Topic: Plat 01/06/2015: This has not been corrected. 12/02/2014: Please add the name & title of the lienholder signature. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/07/2015: This comment will stay active as a reminder that these reception numbers need to be added. 12/02/2014: Please make sure the reception numbers for the easements by separate document are added prior to submitting mylars. Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/06/2015: These were not provided. 12/02/2014: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the aliquot corners shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at jcounty@fcgov.com. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/07/2015: Please add the curve labels & data as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 39 Comment Originated: 01/07/2015 Topic: Site Plan 01/07/2015: There are still line over text issues. See redlines. 12/02/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/07/2015: There is still text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. 12/02/2014: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 12/02/2014 01/07/2015: The legal description has been changed, but still does not match the Subdivision Plat. Please change to match the Subdivision Plat exactly, or remove it and use the title & sub-title. The title & sub-title are an acceptable legal description. Comment Number: 40 Comment Originated: 01/07/2015 01/07/2015: The lighter text & linework marked is not acceptable. It will not scan or reproduce. Please darken it up. See redlines. Comment Number: 41 Comment Originated: 01/07/2015 Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Topic: General Page 9 of 10 11/10/2014: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/10/2014 Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Shane Boyle, 970-221-6339, sboyle@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans 01/06/2015: Please show all utility mains and services on the Landscape Plan and ensure no trees are within easements or within 10' of any utility lines. Some mains and existing services are shown but not proposed services. Also, please make water and sewer main lines and easements darer on this plan set for legibility. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/06/2015 Page 10 of 10