The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGREENBRIAR VILLAGE PUD, SECOND FILING PRELIMINARY - 19 93C - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSDENSITY CHART Maximum Criterion Credit IfAll 'ImellingUnits Are Wimin• Cec:r a I 200, 2000 I", or on e.enng o,eoolovev regr00r-coe v'ooe-rig cen,er b 10 a I SO leer or cn eemtp,crvvoa C 100,e aOCObe, of Cne mnrq Crcc vo].ea' eg'o c,v arg emet w d 20 o I J5l)D'eel Ol ar enlnnq Onesehea re9raamoaC;F1kC:.t^,�uniN aqn vrCOr.r-„ry N'.;C�h ./ a 10010 I '.gyp reef at a xrta«. meerN=11^lllaWf•t^enn C,TI C O r^O�ION IaI.CCPcn rpal.^.I T e] Fort@Ot c�:C„ o. Q/1 � 20°0 ,Caaree,otvm««ema,ar-enroenret rJ cram g 1000 rest of o cma care center h 20% Vorm'foe Conntt I 209a '*•Canna B,.Iv+asl0�t1rrc7 � ab•a yw•Of• oounaary Is ccnngya.t ra •.•arvq upon arr.•.o«.t•nr G•an tr.ar a •«n•a vl,alo.a O : —fa oraxn.ro» aao•rn oosvmv, �10 fo 10". cornq,lr,r '7 to 15S—.01 Orarcn.ncse o,cc,ev aDW+ObyrV3 r0 to 20: c«'nqur, 30of 1a ,51020%—t0"crbecrs.n o,cl:00%, oby'rs 20 to SOS connqu . 2p to 25S-%o, orcxr owtxcoenv oaroavrc.lo to apt 25 to SOS — car oralarn .nas orooety oauracnt ^cn a0 ,0 SOS ccnr,gs,l . k II 'can Oe o•mannb•a marine «aleCiwn,eal.c•ron•MI.CIS• ene,Q/ yseag• emer mrolar mecc,l son of altMre erl.I:v wemlam,xpc min mea ere gy<crla va on rvOyyel oevoro+aronnaw,ear✓eawC.MC A•ai 400nus mavweomea roe eyery SS,so.,enon �n aria. Qr u1•• I �cewaeO' :xn.f for e�ery 3p aCrn inCtttOea �n Te «o�Kf. m I C� `are me oe,cM"090 of f latOlb:fm^me ae'ea math' Ce+c'earO10Cfeab,aW errlt,•2 ate`a1OMCrMnog•Cl a corny n 1 meaafilCC�*J-T�n rO Cr•1.M1+ng Oem^anMl[^LID OO•n tOOC•TGTnY•n frV L.IJi mfl�Rla llUwrY.VnM1 cc) V1"OMc&,"090 cl Tn:,a•I, 100c! Q: wpe rq me rorgl Gbveoomenl a: •oG MrM �t ow<enroq• am C COrt6 O I="of me,pra CI+eOcrt`MfcuoJ41,1,0 oe 1a fcnneSY,aal`CC!'^tbteanvl loc�}yly.ncn are rofc,' " req-rea o, C.Wc. en,et 2% 001� ✓ e.ery i'00 oar c..e�w1q Inn �nvesr•a r� I^,Cn Cr me,C,CCrra�atr+ent cl.Cger•110 Ce taenrdnnq+�a«1KCa';�•Ily.«]O yeryrCel rniCn b•,q, o.'nef'�f•reaWlea OV C.,V qua! enrMalt oorza:aeety ilea altlL'MFnq urVt�ne11•a u J lac7rn•m..yry-,e.p rroo•roaeveooatoect.eQ oetcenrcq•a-s,c+a nmosr arvar. rq:,ryn r«,u. +rcorry rom��ys •nrar mar Q .:a,eenraq•ac xrla�oroammrrter, or JOS Z nac7mmm.y,rrtiv.grr+oo•fo cs.soaafoeG:.sa Oa,cen,op•a�e n:ql numo•f of a.•uqurrtst«t,p A•ana fro•E'nca�Occooea ^aLLYnt,7 am OMreC OV fne CRV O, fart C,;Iwy Cbcl.+,.T• me oonua O'C+C�S O r 'ye -A't M 5n crb w,n W 'vw'B"-Iptrw 'w8',nrts ara unm n no cams f7ta ^e carnoeteo oonle ce Rearm, mar _O I nv A «ooQor+lStA•,N C:nrvn m nr+t«+C wO„9 a o,oc• : xn.l rnav Os e«nea 2y m•,plmwtq; J1 - f«orw.rn..q«rnmJgrnq purya•Inrl4ancnl•a!,*^avrer-.almal.ye aelrtvnc ecrn«ncy c»botfacmrocyan•ro �n 5 Or•e•nana'< JS - f« aar.�G'Ia rsey tltttli•f w. w...sear.g.n,s ny c aou�r cr m• ou„ong a occ• .mle �N fora unm SS - fa aoo�tq oo�rr.•Wof rna wonpac•ocs mrn.., racc�n ccnnn�atce ors.•ryanm rra mo,owr.•n,., an aooraac•rtavw n a o«•rn a a a ti t•ola,•o ob+rnq n ma mamba r«ryti ora•c i r_�c•a ur]oatCou,n wmns ma wotq ar n an e.•.a•o t]cnrM srUc'.ia a an ac•>sav W ro tn• arxna,v 11RJc:llre. C OOnul rt+W W ea:va am tarot[ t `S -far oroo�q/S%«a+or•d ma OarinnQ�nalln•cva JS - farc,ovja"950.74%cf McQr"ninamst . JS - fa oralanq-3-sot of me onnrp In amtc�f• U I Icczi,,""rs ce"7-ice v«vnae ceora.e0 c_f0 oTla .re v.^^¢in�tyq rmemslor mea .,q 1rM1 en,M a DatwG Jf Ip1 TOTAL 00 \46LA*e, V , 2rv.4 C—j�-- fr-l�VA. ACTIVITY: Residenti0 DEFINITION Uses All residential uses. Uses would include single family attached dwellings, townhomes, duplexes, mobile homes, and multiple family dwellings; group homes; boarding and rooming houses; fraternity and sorority houses; nursing homes; public and private schools; public and non-profit quasi -public rec- reational uses as a principal use; uses providing meeting places and plaee's for public assembly with incidental office space; and child care centers. CRITERIA Each of the following applicable criteria must be answered "yes" and implemented within the develop- ment plan. Yes No 1. On a gross acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project at least three (3) dwelling units per acre (calculated for El portion of the site only)? 2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE POINTS AS CALCULATED ON THE FOLLOWING "DENSITY CHART" FOR THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF THE RESI- DENTIAL PROJECT? THE REQUIRED EARNED ❑ CREDIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: 30-40 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 3-4 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 40-50 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 4-5 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 50-60 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 5-6 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 60-70 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 6-7 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 70-80 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 7-8 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 80-90 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 8-9 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 90-100 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 9-10 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 100 OR MORE PERCENTAGE POINTS = 10 OR MORE DWELLING UNITS/ACRE. in �t�.�%ri.a� V i �l� _ �L1•p , Z�,�l. �� (i It� - `ire �t u-1 ALL DEVELOPMENT; NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY CRITERION Is the criterion apAlicbble? Will the criterion be Satisfied? If no, please explain e.�'`,�` ��e Yes No NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY 1. Social Compatability 2. Neighborhood Character 3. Land Use Conflicts t 4. Adverse Traffic Impact PLANS AND POLICIES 5. Comprehensive Plan PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY 6. Street Capacity ✓ 7. Utility Capacity V 8. Design Standards 9. Emergency Access 10. Security Lighting 11. Water Hazards RESOURCE PROTECTION 12. Soils & Slope Hazard 13. Significant Vegetation 14. Wildlife Habitat 15. Historical Landmark 16. Mineral Deposit 17. Eco-Sensitive Areas 18. Agricultural Lands ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS 19. Air Quality 20. Water Quality 21. Noise 22. Glare & Heat 23. Vibrations 24. EXTerior Lighting 25. Sewages & Wastes SITE DESIGN 26. Community Organization 27. Site Organization 28. Natural Features 29. Energy Conservation 30.Shadows 31. Solar Access f 32. Privacy 33. Ocen Space Arrangement 34. Building Height 35. Vehicular Movement V, 36. Venicular Design 37. Parking t/ 38. Ac-ive Recreational Areas 39. Private Outdoor Areas 40. Pedestrian Convenience 41. Pedestrian Conflicts v I 42. Lcnascaping/Open Areas I t/ 43. LcnascapingfBuildings V 1 44. LanoscaoingrScreening 45. Pudic Access 46. Sicns GREENBRIAR VILLAGE - SECOND FILING DENSITY CHART Maximum Earned Criterion Crust If AJl Dwelling Units Are Within: Credil 0 20% 20MI" ofon eAsfiVOr approved rsosysborhood OwPPNV aer'f«. 20% 10% b 10% 650fee10(Onednupk0nitno() C 10% a000f9efo(one=tkVorgparovearepiarso(stsoppin0con«. 0% d 20% 3500 feet arm a dMVo,resened nelQt0orhood park ODrttrt"typOh« parrvnwJty(00"1 20% Lli e 10% 1000 reel o(o s hoof r*se al of ha o«np Aso y eo�fon b 0f Me st" of ca«ooa. 0% Q( 20% 30001" o(omgar emlAwneN caner. 20% mg 5% 1000faefo(ochAdoorecenW. O% h 20% 74oM"FodCow 20% i 20% thecefltral&lmness0strld 0% A proieCt fS boundary Is oanfigr to edsting urban deyebprfwd. Ctedn mW be earned Ce 10O 0%— Far prgeCh.fn property boundary tq 0101o%ooneanv 30% 10b 15%—For projectswt a property, boundary has 10 b 20%oontgfAfy 30% 15to 20%—For pfdeCts'..t+ property boundary rx 20 so30% o«yllpsity. 20to25*k—For protects wto property boundary rm 3010 AO%O«nlguly. 2560 30%— Far proleca vha property boundary has AO to 50% COnnguN. k tR oasbe demonstrated ew( the prdeC � feauce non-rene.K"e e00rpyfaeo0e ere+ef dxwp+me o0ofoaro^a wernoMe ene,gy system or ttrough 07rnmW arocgyconsersofion rneoar<es beyondflal n0fMAfyreQuU&d by Utv Cooe.o 5% oonnrrov be earned 0% for eery5%reA><4on neneVysm I COc"e 0 t% bonus for every50 ones k'ckld Oin the Protect 0% m CalcuiOte Me percentage of the 1010(0CPMnthe prajec-f RKll are de.Oled to reagotbna uze. enter V2 at tat Par lope as a bor 0% R Me oppficonl cpavnttt b prese.*V pemyanen rAWO open spore Mat meek the Ctys rrdrwunrequkensan% cclo oe me pe, a loJe 0% n dMa open space oaedge to the bloc oe+vapns.tno,reo0e, enter this percer400e as o bona t pWarthe Soto( deselopmerst budgel is to be spent onneyh[»mood PUbac trmst IOCNtey wtJU are nos ofnerwereQ kea by CJfv Cane. 0% O enter 2% bona for a ey$100 PerO-e&V use—esled tPW of the toladaelopnn Vbudge, Sob be Weft enneighb«haod toddles and seryiaes..A ch are not ofryerWse le«freO by CM Caae. 0% P erdeta 1%bons far 8v yS100per d e&rq unK untested V t o oalmlbnens h aekV node to de.ebp o WecWed percenoge d the tokg ranlDarar O.&V sets far lo" ytOafM fan"M ienter"V 0% / petcenfoge ma bOnaup to norimurn o(3M RocornMneNhbetgnsadelOdeyebpOWeoOedper0enfogeo("Io"rM1xrberordwe"LWhbrtype-A' ondlypeghorcocopped Z hou$kVmdeRnedbyllsa Cuyo(Fod CoWr colaAale Mebonamfol0. lype'A"-- SlNyes t 0% Or i co ty0e-6-7lIMsx tvpelr Wh rolRrnw- nnomse shot Me oombned bonscbe greater Mon 30%. R Me sne orodloGaN property OD**s an hM«Ic brAd Vo, pbae. a bcr army be earned l«Me foto.�a 3% — Farprevecdk)garnvtIQO"Ouhldenf4«sees(e0envkonmandlmduse.oasthetcecOr mcCrosOca foaon)oa. IOM 0% — fpr S 3%orfmlNpnsot newstruo(ues s.,fl Ue isseep'vsgslm tse CSyarpdetpf ttse OUlldrpaPfoCe. vhie v.dd+q bkA UrVh 3.. — Farpropo*VOdOPf eUsed Me W16r9arPko "% lv $OWIOhOOnflnfayCe. preserWtbnond YnarWemenlln On opproPrblemanlef. ------------------- t O portion aratdthe required p0'Wlg n the ffxAhpte (arnRy prpleCi h prONtleC trndergr«nsd wmin the bUitWfg «non elevated Doting strucMe os on occessayuse b tse PAmofV structure o borxn mcrybo earned ns (dlowc 0% t V% — Faraa.6dnp75%arm«eof" ePOewnginoslnichxO: o% — fo gxoyiQng547d%ame PorsdfVnosfsuclue: 3% — Farpr«Advg25-49%0("DOednginoskuCMe. U ROCarttsvhysenlhbeng rtn0abat>"Soe oOaPetl anorssaflcfve 0stnprhNng ryslertnl«R+e w+e�ingrMs en« 0 aonn of,o% 0% 20 TOTAL I% GREENBRIAR VILLAGE PUD-SECOND FILING ACTIVITY: [residential Uses DEFINITION: H All residential uses. Uses would include single family attached dwellings, townhomes, duplexes, mobile homes, and multiple family dwellings; group homes; boarding and rooming houses; fraternity and sorority houses; nursing homes; public and private schools; public and non-profit quasi -public rec- reational uses as a principal use; uses providing meeting places and places for public assembly with incidental office space; and child care centers. CRTE IA; Each of the following applicable criteria must be answered "yes" and implemented within the develop- nent plan. Yes Nc 1. On a gross acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project at least three (3) dwelling units per acre (calculated for residential portion of the site only)? ❑ ❑ 2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE POINTS AS CALCULATED ON THE FOLLOWING "DENSITY CHART" FOR THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF THE RESI- DENTIAL PROJECT? THE REQUIRED EARNED CREDIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ❑ ❑ SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: 30-40 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 3-4 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 40-50 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 4-5 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 50-60 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 5-6 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 60-70 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 6-7 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 70-80 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 7-8 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 80-90 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 8-9 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 90-100 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 9-10 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 13.79 100 OR MORE PERCENTAGE POINTS = 10 OR MORE DWELLING UNITS/ACRE. ENERGY CONSERVATION WORKSHEET METHOD 2 2. RATIO OF EXTENSION WALL 6. OVERALL WALL "V" VALUE 0.2 1.0 10. AUTOMATIC NIGHT TEMPERATURE SETBACK 0.4 12. LOW LEAKAGE OUTSIDE AIR 0.3 17. FURNACE EFFICIENCY 0.2 18. AUTOMATIC SPARK IGNITION 0.1 24. ELECTRIC RESISTANCE NOT USED 0.2 25. LIGHTING WATTAGE LESS THAN 2 W/SF 0.3 TOTAL 2.7 GREENBRIAR VILLAGE PUD - SECOND FILING ALL DEVELOPMENT: NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY Will me criterion Is me crttedon OPPtk;dMe7 be softsfied? CRITERION ��'��' Yes No If no, please explain NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY 0 PLANS AND POLICIES PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY 7. RESOURCE PROTECTION 12. Soils & Slope Paz( 110- ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS r DESIGN Features Outdoor Are Ian Convenit !an Conflicts 42. EAST WILLOX LPNe MULTI —FAMILY ■ 2.6 AC 78 Du/Ac ■�� PO D SINGLE FAMILY 21.7 Ac 5.0 Du/Ac MULTI —FAMILY 10.0 Ac 20 Du/Ac ... � 4 SINGLE FAMILY 3.4 Ac 3.4 Du/Ac PHASE 1 1993-1994 PHASE 2 1993-1994 PHASE 3 1994 PHASE 4 1994-1995 : ! L�. mi DEVELOPMENT PHASING PLAN We have no plans for business, commercial or industrial uses other than any service business that might in the future operate as a functional part of the residential development. Any employment which might result from these endeavors would be minor in nature and any guess as to the numerical equivalent would be purely circumspect. We have accumulated the property designated in the overall development plan (ODP) and designed the initial phase of the project to be a natural extension of the existing development. The properties east of our development have been developed as single family and duplex residential with the inclusion of a neighborhood park and major open spaces. West of our plan lies higher density residential development, a major office and industrial park and a planned retail development along College Avenue. North of the development lies a small area of highway business zoning, an irrigation canal and wetlands areas. Our southern neighbor is a health care facility containing both educational and residential functions. We have a major detention facility within our project which services our overall storm drainage needs. In addition to its storm drainage function we are planning to utilize this area for its natural beauty and wildlife support functions as well as a natural buffer to the industrial development west of our site. LOCATIONAL POLICIES FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES. 64, Alternative transportation modes such as pedestrian and bike access shall be planned for as primary modes of transportation to neighborhood service centers from adjoining residential uses. 75, Residential areas should provide for a mix of housing densities. 76. Density bonuses should be provided to developers who provide low and moderate income housing. 78. Residential development should be directed into areas with reinforces the phasing plan in the Urban Growth Area. 79. Low density residential uses should locate in areas: a. Which have easy access to existing or planned neighborhood and regional/community shopping centers; b. Which have easy access to major employment centers; C. Within walking distance to an existing or planned elementary school; d. Within walking distance to an existing or planned neighborhood park and within easy access to a community park; and e. In which a collector street affords the primary access. 80. Higher density residential uses should locate: a. Near the core area, regionat/community shopping centers, CSU main campus, or the hospital; b. Within close proximity to community or neighborhood park facilities; C. Where water and sewer facilities can be adequately provided; d. Within easy access to major employment centers; e. With access. to public transportation; and f. In areas with provisions for alternative modes of transportation. 82. Higher density residential uses should locate in planned unit developments or in close proximity to existing higher density areas. All open space areas have been designed to be privately owned and maintained. within redevelopment areas with increased population densities. A second element of the COMPREHENSIVE PLAN is the I AND USE POLICIES PLAN which offers insight into the appropriateness of special development. GENERAL POLICIES. 3. The City shall promote A. Maximum utilization of land within the City B. Alternative transportation modes C. Efficient mass transit systems D. Location of residential development close to employment, recreation and shopping facilities. GROWTH MANAGEMENT. 12. Urban density residential development usually at three or more units to the acre should be encouraged in the urban growth area. 26. Availability of existing services shall be used as a criteria in determining the location of higher intensity areas in the City. 39. The City should direct efforts to promote improved traffic and pedestrian circulation and public transit to areas north and northeast of the City. 40, The City should promote the utilization of existing vacant land in the northeast by offering incentives such as utility and infrastructure provisions or revenue bonds and tax increment financing. 41. The City should encourage residential development in the northeast, particularly giving special consideration to the undeveloped industrially zoned land in the area adjacent to the existing residential areas. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 49. The City's LAND USE POLICIES PLAN shall be directed toward minimizing the use of private automobiles and toward alleviating and mitigating the air quality impacts of concentrated use of automobiles. 50. Mass transit should be used as a tool which leads development patterns, rather than following growth. LAND USE. " Encourage residential, commercial, and industrial development in the northeastern area of Fort Collins in a manner conducive to the desirable redevelopment of North College Avenue and the central City, especially downtown. " Encourage the location and development of a service oriented shopping area including a supermarket in the northern part of the City compatible with the objectives of redevelopment. " Urban Development in the urban service area should be consistent with the provision of utilities, schools, parks, and other public services and preferably contiguous to existing development. Encourage housing development within the City and immediately adjacent to the City. " Encourage urban density residential development to occur within the City. " Use open space as a buffer between conflicting land uses and to preserve neighborhood identity. ' Encourage joint use of drainage facilities, such as open channels and detention ponds for open space purposes. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Encourage the development of a future land use plan which deals sensitively with the relationships between the man-made and natural environments. Support with subsidies if necessary, public transit in the Fort Collins area, and facilitate bicycling, walking and car-pooling. _ " Develop small neighborhood parks and greenspaces throughout the City to provide both recreational and non -recreational open space. " Coordinate the development of facilities and parks GREENBRIAR VILLAGE PUD - ODP AND SECOND FILING STATEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTIVES Greenbriar Village is a mixed use residential development located in northeast Fort Collins. It is adjacent to two high density residential projects; Coachlight Apartments and Sundance Condominiums, and in close proximity to a major employment center, a planned neighborhood commercial center, a neighborhood park and City owned open space. Reviewing the GOALS AND OBJECTIVES and the LAND USE POLICIES PLAN of the City of Fort Collins reveals several areas of close conformance: We are locating a high density residential development in an appropriate place, 2. We are providing a mixed density housing project located close to employment and shopping. - 3. We are locating our in -fill project close to existing city infrastructure such as utilities, parks, mass transit and open space. The following is an outline of how the project more specifically follows in relation to the appropriate elements of the City's COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. The foundational element of the Comprehensive Plan is the Statement of GOALS AND OBJECTIVES adopted by the City in 1977. This statement clearly delineates the City's goals as they relate to northeast Fort Collins in several sections. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Promote increased development in the north and northeastern areas of the City. Encourage increased residential development of the northeastern area in order to support and direct the redevelopment of the area. Provide a rational pattern of land use for the older parts of the City which promotes the integrated redevelopment and development of business, industrial, and residential areas in the northern and northeastern areas of the City. SCHOOL PROJECTIONS PROPOSAL: GREENBRIAR VILLAGE PUD, 2nd Filing DESCRIPTION: 63 single family, 18 duplexes on 19.063 acres DENSITY: 4.25 du/acre General Population 63 (units) x 3.5 (persons/unit) = 220.5 18 3.2 57.6 School Ate Population Elementary - 63 (units) x .450 18 .120 Junior High - 63 (units) x .210 18 .055 Senior High - 63 (units) x .185 18 .050 278.1 (pupils/unit) = 28.35( 30.51 2.16( (pupils/unit) = 13.23( 14.22 .99( (pupils/unit) = 11.66( 12.56 0.9( Design Affected Schools Ca aci Enrollment Putnam/Fullana Elementary 600 570 Lincoln Junior High 740 617 Poudre Senior High 1235 1009 GREEN BRIAR VILLGE P.U.D. SECOND FILING LIST OF OWNERS Rudy H. Knievel 6205 Constellation Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Greenbriar Village, LLC 1220 South College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80525 oa a ................ FENCE DETAL sxunncE lau rAuul.FArnnv RcgmLUnAc— _ 6FEENBIMRVpU6F gRuTHW.. FCW pIF@9 COACXIIIE MWFI{AWl IiF51pE , CUL-DE-SAC PLANTING DETAIL SCALE'. \ R10.EFM.lYgFmgFlyy i� \\ NEIGHBORHOOD PARK a r ' �Lnt2Rt /M�•' CONFER TREE PLANTING LANDSCAPE NOTES TREE PLANTING IRRIGATED AREA AW ' SHRUB PLANTING IRRIGATED AREA AWWF J. IBPJ AWLIST 3. IWS JULY S. 1993 JUNE ]. 1995 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PL. _ j Greenbriar Village P.U.D. SECOND FILING IG WE M�.= oT 02 LEGEND MH WA FH FIRE NVORAM P RIEPXIXIF ROESIAL V EIECRIICVAVLl It ..DiCAPPFO RAMv 4 mn L'OHI % ww 0 pRSI[NAL9 5 b LOT CEONE NRZONF tarDn pICN wnwxcE rRus MUL11{AM0.V WEOEMFS�`�`�� _i Ll ., Ll Lam+ a� •I ORFEMIM1PRV0.UGF HRSIPLI/I.IG �rCh'c yc \ P M Wll{AIAY RHDFMML � _,j aronE � �� Dnemc r POND i vACAM RMP:onE ; DETENTION DREEnxAAxvuAdE vAwn�1 POND FounH Euw I1MULrVFAMer Ie9mE«II+L/ / I Nolm ENE SA11 = �^daa..a41+o..uo iamlm bw ImmA �rnAn m+m mmv '�ovrnR m,m nm am m� .ow aim. I.m�RLwy w.Rw sm wn ni Aa M,„ NEIGHBORHOOD PARK VICINITY MAP AMI TS. 1W3 AMMT3.I%3 J y 3, 1993 MIS 7, 1993 PRELIMINARY SITE PLATY Greenbriar Village P.U.D. SECOND FILING 17 [jzR D Ot Nq ■k St LA- cr Country Cl J c a) E cr Hill 0 L N r� c 3 a a cn > v LL 3 Sp0uIdIn9 c Lori d c St 1 M Mj Blue Teal o m > 1 a 5? N CD 1.- 1 t 1• �. 3 o D� 1 > 1 N c E. W IIox n 1 A o Bromblebush St. Sundan d ik Bu tch Coss °r 01 t✓ir. �� co � Grouse R n r. o Q Peregrine o Quail Run � \Q t Run � C t r r Br,stlecone Dr �' �� o $ OU C f r a 3 r, a Fa'q�il $ Qj co a3iCi S w` 0 m S+ika St — .Glii lu m ILI : ul ; , Q Conifer St �� uv w 1_upine0� Yarrow Cir, Z Spur e = si ITEM: GREENBRIARVILLAGE PUD �/ 2nd Filing - Preliminary North NUMBER: 19-93C Greenbriar Village PUD, 2nd Filing - Preliminary, #19-93C August 26, 1993 P & Z Meeting Page 4 Village O.D.P. and First Filing on April 14, 1993. In attendance were the owners/applicants of the property/development proposal and the City's project planner. Although a fairly extensive mailing was done, no area residents attended the meeting. The proposed uses in the Second Filing are in substantial conformance with the approved O.D.P. and are considered to be compatible with uses in the surrounding area; therefore, an additional neighborhood information meeting was considered not to be necessary for this request. 5. Transportation: The development will gain primary access from Willox Lane and Redwood Street on internal local public streets and cul-de-sacs. Bayberry Circle serves as a local collector connecting willox Lane and Redwood Street. RECOMMENDATION: This request earns 90% on the Residential Uses Density Point Chart, meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System, and is in substantial conformance with the approved Greenbriar Village P.U.D., Overall Development Plan. Therefore, staff recommends approval of Greenbriar Village P.U.D., Second Filing, Preliminary - #19-93C. Greenbriar Village PUD, 2nd Filing - Preliminary, #19-93C August 26, 1993 P & Z Meeting Page 3 2. Land Use• This is a request for preliminary P.U.D. approval for 63 single family lots and 9 duplex lots, for a total of 81 residential dwelling units on 19.063 acres. The resultant gross residential density is 4.25 dwelling units per acre, exceeding the City's minimum urban residential density requirement of 3 dwelling units per acre. The development proposal was evaluated against the Residential Uses Density Point Chart and the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System. It scores 90% on the point chart, earning credit for: a) a portion of the dwelling units being within 650' of an existing transit stop, b) all dwelling units being within 3,500' of an existing neighborhood park (Greenbriar), c) all dwelling units being within 3,000' of a major employment center (Evergreen Park), d) being located in "north" Fort Collins, and e) its property boundary having 40% contiguity to existing urban development. The point chart supports the proposed residential density for this development plan. The proposal is in substantial conformance with the approved Greenbriar Village P.U.D., Overall Development Plan (O.D.P.). 3. Design: Landscaping: Street trees at 40' on -center will be provided in the parkways along Willox Lane and Redwood Street. There will be breaks in the rear and side yard fences on lots at the ends of the cul-de-sacs adjacent to Willox and redwood to provide for bicycle/pedestrian access between the culs and the streets. The fences will drop down to 4' in height in these access areas, with planting beds and ornamental trees as accents. There will be a Homeowner's Association formed that will maintain all landscaping, including that in the street rights -of -way, associated with this development. Solar orientation: This request is subject to the Solar Orientation Ordinance that requires at least 65% of the lots less than 15,000 square feet in area in single family and two-family residential developments conform to the definition of a solar -oriented lot in order to preserve the potential for solar energy usage. There are 47 of the 72 lots in Greenbriar Village, Second Filing that are in compliance with the ordinance, equalling 65%. 4. Neighborhood Compatibility: A neighborhood information meeting was held for the Greenbriar Greenbriar Village PUD, 2nd Filing - Preliminary, #19-93C August 26, 1993 P & Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background,• The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: C, FA-1; vacant S: RMP; planned multi -family residential (Greenbrier Village) E: RLP; vacant, open area, planned and existing single family residential (Greenbriar Village, Evergreen Park, Greenbriar P.U.D.) W: RP; planned and existing multi -family residential (Greenbriar Village, Sundance Hills, Coachlight Plaza) This property was annexed into the City with the Pine Tree Park Annexation in November, 1972, the Evergreen Park Annexation in December, 1973, and the Val Vista Annexation in January, 1974. Greenbriar Village P.U.D., Second Filing contains a portion of Sundance Hills P.U.D., Filing Two, which received preliminary approval from City Council in August, 1978, for 152 multi -family dwelling units on 17.9 acres. * Sundance Hills P.U.D., Filing Two (Phase 2) preliminary was approved by City Council in July, 1979, for 32 multi -family dwelling units on 3.74 acres. * Sundance Hills P.U.D., Filing Two (Phase 3) preliminary was approved by City Council in August, 1979, for 120 multi -family dwelling units on 12.5 acres. * Sundance Hills P.U.D., Filing Two (Phases 2 & 3) received final approval from the Planning and Zoning Board in November, 1980, for 152 multi -family dwelling units on 16.2 acres. Four buildings, containing 16 units on 2 acres, at the west end of this development have been constructed. Greenbriar Village P.U.D., Second Filing replaces the Redwood Court P.U.D. (13 multi -family dwelling units on 1.5 acres) on the west side of Redwood Street. This proposal was given preliminary approval by the Planning and Zoning Board in August, 1978. This development proposal is a portion of the Greenbriar Village P.U.D., Overall Development Plan (O.D.P.), which was approved by the Planning and Zoning Board on June 28, 1993 for 115 single family/duplex and 230 multi -family residential dwelling units on 38.03 acres. ITEM NO. —2 MEETING DATE 8/23/93 STAFF Steve Olt - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD - STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Greenbriar Village P.U.D., Second Preliminary - #19-93C APPLICANT: ZTI Group 1220 South College Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80524 OWNER: Greenbriar Village, LLC 1220 South College Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO. 80524 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Filing, This is a request for preliminary planned unit development (P.U.D.) approval for 81 single family and duplex residential dwelling units on 19.063 acres located south of Willox Lane and west of the future Redwood Street. The property is zoned RP, Planned Residential and RMP, Medium Density Planned Residential. RECOMMENDATION: Approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request for preliminary planned unit development (P.U.D.) approval for 81 single family and duplex residential dwelling units on 19.063 acres. It earns 90% on the Residential Uses Density Point Chart, meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System, and is in substantial conformance with the approved Greenbriar Village P.U.D., Overall Development Plan (O.D.P.). The overall gross residential density of 4.25 dwelling units per acre is supported by the density point chart. Street trees will be planted at 40' on -center along Willox Lane and Redwood Street, and breaks in the lot fences will occur to provide bicycle/pedestrian access between the internal cul-de-sacs and the adjacent streets. There are 47 of the 72 lots, equalling 65%, in compliance with the solar Orientation Ordinance. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Boa 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT