Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFALCON RIDGE PUD - FINAL - 2-94G - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSw Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY CRITERION Is the criterion applicable? Will the criterion be satisfied? If no, please explain Z $ z Y s Yes No Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA 1.1 Solar Orientation V1✓ 1.2 Comprehensive Plan V1 ✓ 1.3 Wildlife Habitat 1.4 Mineral Deposit 1.5 Ecologically Sensitive Areas reserved reren,ed 1.6 Lands of Agricultural Importance 1.7 Energy Conservation 1.8 Air Quality V ✓ 1.9 Water Quality (r 1,10 Sewane, and Wastes V ✓ A 2. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA 2.1 Vehicular Pedestrian Bike Transportation ✓ r/ 2.2 Building Placement and Orientation ✓ 2.3 Natural Features 2.4 Vehicular Circulation and Parking I/ ✓ 2.5 Emergency Access / 1/ 2.6 Pedestrian Circulation ✓ 2.7 Architecture 2.8 Building Height and Views 2.9 Shading 2.10 Solar Access t/ ✓ 2.11 Historic Resources 2.12 Setbacks ✓ V 2.13 Landscape i/ 2.14 Signs 2.15 Site Lighting V. V 2.16 Noise and Vibration 2.17 Glare or Heat I I Vi 1V1 2.18 Hazardous Materials A 3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA 3.1 Utility Capacity ✓ 3.2 Design Standards v V 3.3 Water Hazards ✓ 3.4 Geologic Hazards 13 Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994 -61- "fLiT L-r-vF-L- f-L F-VP,,TIOW ,ki,,,. it -= i -- -= i �- - �i- �ey�L e��y�?iota .��=�� fNAN cH t,� W� VWFI O" 'W', ,, GL MtfNIUL IMHE eye tua ,epvnta ycEAr+e^: FB' .5' eie YUYxW+ pBnxe�LVbNr1 "M�'S�1N5 ZBBP.Eeb� 1i1'i B16 d:i-0It�1a tFMbANM65 nAFHx+'eN)VBHKtIFUk 6Y0 .,JvIVr. s9ash MIX �6uBa I ib FIBty •:a/Ab %MIX mop .on .NBNBRx ,Juea?mRAye AKF.3A 19.e ry5 5.e txI1fW6Fue yFK4,i a 56 to L1 niwaxts oPMA EUtfe 10,9 0 V.1 [9FEBN Nuv"BgFA55 .owFn It.1 ryv ry.4 NOtE2. I. AS y A, 15E 'JFILLBV to b of . ' i4 4o Aq" ASP btIALL NAVE A FaW 5FM-11 eF i0• OR A � 4. esboec I[[Aa ./ EE H-W 4 Jrtx d 'A A'! tKs KAis Yi I. roue /Ae. axv eE cFinrEv 4•vR .,.qy IN}o AMs , L. AWVB eBBB MY A 4NEe:A � fHNEWI M.tppBF 1 Yo MAY 15. Mt [ ." 1 u s 1—..w...[-i.`... y >v I �In k vtvie�w ai uwki�`I - 'u►l,1 TWO L—r-,----�I -XI "Mr -- _ FANp - �I� wrrL 6 4 u" "sfv'ma v.•.ox•s.r.oc ..r' i'r�.�� - - -- -- - - -- -- ---- - -------' i I ; I d WA = I- I ,I i -_-7 :: `I 51 m' I / I m I ; a Z. �r- iinct v' r:nc an r.•aeulc Y ��nLw wvl _ _- 3 -1: ¢#� `I •o i� 1-- i "• i r .. 33 Itta e y 8 Itl1 I I 'f I �_�_; r----1.. I- --- - ; I,. -- r--s l ~ a it lir lil tla& I I °I•''� I �_--'ro`-J i - I� i I JF ml i mi ----------- -- �I �• iL _ II „ : �,� :p L,x,' �v L .I rs #1 1 • j ','F / I' ss -KF j .-1 I y '°I ° I d I I 1/ ; I ; # :-f-- L-- , L! • w Ljf?•— I � { p-s � FALCON RIDGE DRIVE f mP� Ir ��-r•Y- I "_! J -CK�Efi I g wit--- dil7G DA I `M v «' r _ AU.R54�ESH' NAhE d' �fALGW� klWi PY.D u� yy TIM1LY �y:� ARDby ARM-19.)MO �\WNI'Yldl l� f 9 PFT bGNIN4 r p ry[mpmsso WiE ax4s PANNN uLLNSiK op 1pYe: 61 P•W{, Npy,C -�G y _ � __ CE{Robs caxseh— al5 axis/,e. �\ -1�r Y pllY, LO{ 4LLI[ 695L 5( _ NAV. 9L Vq. VM.P•q N "� -v /ARxIYQ `{'ILK 2 Lfr oll YYl{ �- �;., rove{cAye ID'Ioam. abx �btw.`• ^^�,•�� YpLI}Y {hN{ i ^E > )6lbA{EO s{ Rm �1 qt5 Ac. {6Y ti r ge{aL— 19 a1 A4 l oo y. 16' ttuq sNv. qy aW. g � UYE � g0 g INIR IPP ArSsaLmaLuUviaaukl. NlxAa Walulew RM"1 TRAes 01 e aes ryR - .... R iyxc. 1111bP:9'U ,/�, LO{i OI MkY 56 YPA Ibt-N Al1mN60 }L Nevs vawwLaK e',cr5 'rtYp P 6of 'IYer. (RiDf;cAQRe{t �}' e{. wnLct<i9RC5, e1o61�9 WuwILLiWtW1ispvx5�AA.VtgOaumut0 pyvs aKIaULaK <wf #pRM WKY ek. n. emu. ti rrM++•�r+�»u� se ml` •e..,. »�.a.......... iY% l3lDC� $flVf:t-((I°B PI AFC hurt: i •se TERRY LAKE J two - 1� N Ft6N15_. � 5 y 3 2 W A P 0 L E W � 5 Y m if O4 's e rERRY R/OSE7 s � rs 9 g a v u Z i v � o n rip ITEM.• FALCON RIDGE PUD 0 North Final NUMBER: 2-94G SCHOOL PROJECTIONS PROPOSAL: FALCON RIDGE PUD -Final DESCRIPTION: 61 single family homes on 19.34 DENSITY: 3.15 du/acre General Population 61 (units) x 3.5 (persons/unit) = 213.5 SchoolAge Population Elementary - 61 (units) x .450 Junior High - 61 (units) x .210 Senior High - 61 (units) x .185 (pupils/unit) = 27.45 (pupils/unit) = 12.81 (pupils/unit) = 11.29 Design Affected Schools Capacity Enrollment Tavelli Elementary 728 020 Lincoln Junior High 740 617 Poudre Senior High 1235 1009 Falcon Ridge PUD - Final, #2-94G August 22, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 5 presentation is made at the next succeeding or second succeeding monthly meeting of the Board. The Board may table any such decision, until both the staff and the developer have had reasonable time to present sufficient information to the Board to enable it to make its decision. (If the Board elects to table the decision, it shall also extend the term of this condition until the date such decision is made.) If this condition is not met within the time established herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final approval of this planned unit development shall become null and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for this planned unit development shall be deemed to be the date that the condition is met, for purposes of determining the vesting of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of time for the filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II, Division 3, of the City Code, the "final decision1l of the Board shall be deemed to have been made at the time of this conditional approval; however, in the event that a dispute is presented to the Board for resolution regarding provisions to be included in the development agreement, the running of time for the filing of an appeal of such "final decisionew shall be counted from the date of the Board1s decision resolving such dispute. Falcon Ridge PUD - Final, #2-94G August 22, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 4 * The proposal is in conformance with the approved Falcon Ridge P.U.D., Preliminary. * The proposal meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S.. * The two conditions of Preliminary approval, concerning an additional access point directly onto Country Club Road and the Board getting some building sketch plan elevations for review, have been met. Both of these conditions were imposed by the Board. * The Preliminary was appealed to the City Council by two separate appellants on June 20, 1994. City Council upheld the decision of the Planning and Zoning Board. A requirement that the developer provide the subdivision plat and appropriate P.U.D. documents, signed by the property owners of record (with the plat being certified by an attorney), to the City prior to going to the Board for a decision on the Final P.U.D. has been met. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Falcon Ridge P.U.D., Final - #2-94G, with the following condition: 1. The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit development final plan upon the condition that the development agreement, final utility plans, and final P.U.D. plans for the planned unit development be negotiated between the developer and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the second monthly meeting (October 24, 1994) of the Planning and Zoning Board following the meeting at which this planned unit development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not so executed, that the developer, at said subsequent monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an extension of time. The Board shall not grant any such extension of time unless it shall first find that there exists with respect to said planned unit development final plan certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances which require the granting of the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner or developer of such property and provided that such extension can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to be included in the development agreement, the developer may present such dispute to the Board for resolution if such Falcon Ridge PUD - Final, #2-94G August 22, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 3 as required by the Land Development Guidance System (L.D.G.S.). The Final P.U.D. is in conformance with the approved Falcon Ridge P.U.D., Preliminary and meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S.. The two conditions of Preliminary approval, concerning an additional access point directly onto Country Club Road and the Board getting some building sketch plan elevations (see attached) for review, have been met. Both of these conditions were imposed by the Board. 3. Design: Landscaping: Street trees will be provided at approximately 50' on -center along the rear lot lines on Country Club Road and Spaulding Lane. Additionally, the developer will plant one street tree per lot frontage throughout the development. 4. Transportation: Falcon Ridge P.U.D. will gain primary access from Country Club Road and Spaulding Lane via internal local streets and cul-de-sacs. There will be two points of access into this development from Country Club Road - one via existing Ford Lane in the Rimrock Subdivision (in Larimer County), and one directly into the development on Fox Den Trail. A single point of access from Spaulding Lane is proposed at the southwest corner of this development. Both Country Club Road and Spaulding Lane are designated as collector streets. The Board's condition of Preliminary approval that directed staff and the developer to explore an additional access point directly onto Country Club Road, before the proposal gets to Final, has been met. 5. Resource Protection: An existing single family residence, on approximately 2 acres, is excluded from the Falcon Ridge P.U.D. to enable the owners/developers to preserve two significant groves of trees in the middle of this property. The tree groves will be preserved on the small farmstead. FINDINGS of FACT/CONCLUSIONS: In evaluating the request for the Falcon Ridge P.U.D., Final, staff makes the following findings of fact: * The gross residential density is 3.15 dwelling units per acre, exceeding the minimum of 3 dwelling units per acre as required by the L.D.G.S.. Falcon Ridge PUD - Final, #2-94G August 22, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background• The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: R; existing single family residential (on Larimer County S: C, Ml; existing single family residential County (Valley View Subdivision, mobile E: FA; existing single family residential County (Rimrock Subdivision) acreage) in in Larimer home park) in Larimer W: C, M1, R; Terry Lake and vacant land in Larimer County The Planning and Zoning Board approved the Falcon Ridge P.U.D., Preliminary on June 6, 1994 for 60 single family residential lots on 19.17 acres (3.13 D.U.'s/acre) with two conditions: 1) Staff and developer explore the question of an additional access point onto Country Club Road before the proposal gets to Final; and 2) the Board get some sketch plan elevations, since the neighborhood has requested that, prior to the Final. The Planning and Zoning Board's decision on the Falcon Ridge P.U.D., Preliminary was appealed to the City Council by two separate appellants on June 20, 1994. The grounds of the appeals were that the Board abused its discretion, in that its decision was arbitrary and without the support of competent evidence in the record; that the Board failed to conduct a fair hearing in that it considered evidence relevant to its findings which was substantially false or grossly misleading; that the Board failed to conduct a fair hearing in that it improperly failed to receive all relevant evidence offered by the appellant; that the Board failed to properly interpret and apply relevant provisions of the Code and Charter. City Council heard the appeals on July 19, 1994 and upheld the decision of the Planning and Zoning Board. However, they did add a requirement that the developer provide the subdivision plat and appropriate P.U.D. documents, signed by the property owners of record (with the plat being certified by an attorney), to the City prior to going to the Board for a decision on the Final P.U.D. 2. Land Use: This is a request for 61 single family residential lots on 19.34 acres located east of Colorado Highway 1 (Terry Lake Road) and North College Avenue, south of Country Club Road, and north of Spaulding Lane. The gross residential density is 3.15 dwelling units per acre, exceeding the minimum of 3 dwelling units per acre ITEM NO. 9 MEETING DATE 8122194 STAFF Steve Olt PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Falcon Ridge P.U.D., Final - #2-94G APPLICANT: Ed Lawler Sandcreek Associates, L.L.C. P.O. Box 9684 Fort Collins, CO. 80522 OWNER: Sandcreek Associates, L.L.C. P.O. Box 9684 Fort Collins, CO. 80522 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for 61 single family residential lots on 19.34 acres located east of Colorado Highway 1 (Terry Lake Road) and North College Avenue, south of Country Club Road, and north of Spaulding Lane. The property is zoned rp, Planned Residential. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with a condition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This request for Final P.U.D. approval: * Provides a gross residential density of 3.15 dwelling units per acre, which exceeds the minimum of 3 dwelling units per acre as required by the L.D.G.S.; * Is in conformance with the approved Falcon Ridge P.U.D., Preliminary; * Meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S.; * Satisfies two conditions of Preliminary approval that directed staff and the developer to explore an additional access point directly onto Country Club Road and required the developer to provide the Board with some building sketch plan elevations for review. Both of these conditions were imposed by the Board and have been met; * Meets a requirement of City Council that the developer provide the subdivision plat and appropriate P.U.D. documents, signed by the property owners of record (with the plat being certified by an attorney), to the City prior to a decision on the Final P.U.D. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT