Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWESTFIELD PARK (STOCKBRIDGE) PUD - FINAL - 27-94A - CORRESPONDENCE - STORMWATER-RELATED DOCUMENTSPAGE 3 November 22, 1996 Project No: 1005-44-94 Re: Stockbridge P.U.D.; Ft. Collins, Colorado Sincerely, Brian W. Shear, P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation BWS / mb cc: Leo Schuster; Progressive Living Structures, Inc. Don Frederick; Frederick Land Surveying Andrea Faucett; Faucett Engineering Services Kerrie Ashbeck; City Engineering Steve Olt; CityPlanning j PAGE 2 November 22, 1996 Project No: 1005-44-94 Re: Stockbridge P.U.D.; Ft. Collins, Colorado Matt's comments have indicated that we are responsible for the outfall provision for the undeveloped Bassinger property on the north side of Horsetooth, north of Stockbridge (Identified as Basin 3 of the Foothills Basin addendum exhibit). We are unsure if we are also being directed to accommodate the undeveloped property located at the southeast corner of Rossborough, directly west of the Bassinger property. Apparently we are held responsible since Kingston Woods did not provide an outfall for these properties. Since the currently undeveloped property north of Horsetooth has not contributed historically to Stockbridge, Stockbridge should not be responsible for accommodating this property. Who is? We are documenting the additional costs associated with this requirement in specific detail and intend to request reimbursement for these costs, including the loss of land for the potential detention volume requirements. * The proposed regional detention pond noted at the southwest corner of Horsetooth and Shields in the original Foothills Basin Report, may not actually ever be installed, based on the possibility that Skyline acres may not re -develop. How is this to be handled. Is this just another burden to the Stockbridge project? Andrea has indicated that the historic stormwater contribution from Skyline acres is actually 31 cfs, HISTORIC. * Susan Hayes has indicated that the developer is responsible for conveyance of upstream flows from Imperial Estates. Our opinion is that all conveyance appurtenances for increased flows due to a developed property is not the responsibility of the developer. We intend to request reimbursement for a portion of the additional storm sewer costs associated with conveyance of Lnperial Estates contributing flows. Susan Hayes has indicated that the City will pay for the increased detention requirement for the contribution from Imperial Estates. Any volume and subsequent loss of developable land will be the responsibility of the City. Stockbridge is responsible for the detention volumes required for Stockbridge only. This has been determined to be six (6) acre feet. We are documenting all volume requirements and associated costs in specific detail and intend to request reimbursement for these costs. We fully intend to provide a complete and detailed presentation of the apparent regional detention requirements as they compare to the specific Stockbridge development detention volume requirement. Based on SWMM modeling, we have determined that Stockbridge has a detention volume requirement of approximately seventeen (17) acre feet. The Stockbridge preliminary plat was approved for 117 lots. Progressive Living Structures, Inc. fully intends to recover the cost of any loss of the quantity of lots due to the increased detention requirements of the amended Foothills Basin regional SWMM modeling and City expectations for Stockbridge accommodating additional detention for Imperial Estates, the undeveloped property north of Stockbridge, reduction in allowable release rates due to downstream restricted conditions. If you have any questions concerning our intent to request reimbursement, please give us a call at 226-5334 or call Leo Schuster at 669-0870. We would appreciate a complete response in writing if there are any disagreements with those items for which we feel reimbursement requests are justified. NOV 2 5 RECD November 22, 1996 Project No: 1005-44-94 Susan Hayes / Sue Paquette / Basil Hamdan / Matt Fater / Link Mueller City of Fort Collins Stormwater Utility P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80522 Re: Stockbridge P.U.D.; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Susan, Sue, Basil, Matt and Link, We have proceeded with the Foothills Basin SWMM model update with Andrea Faucett of Faucett Engineering Services. There have been several issues and requirements during the course of project review discussions with staff and data presentation to staff. Many items require further verification and discussion. Primarily as these items relate to cost, developer and City responsibility, and reimbursement requests for the extra costs for offsite analysis and improvements. Several issues, which we feel require further discussion and clarification from the City, include the following: We have been asked to supply a complete detailed analysis of the existing storm drainage system downstream of Stockbridge from the existing storm sewer terminus point at the Front Range Baptist Church, to the outfall at Cunningham Corner. Our understanding is the City will pay 100% of the engineering cost to provide this analysis. This would include all field data accumulation, UDSEWER analysis, coordination and presentation of all results, all coordination time with Dennis Donovan and the Shields Street improvements project associated with Mountain Ridge Farm P.U.D. We are documenting these costs in specific detail and intend to request reimbursement for these costs. We have "as built" the entire storm sewer system. The following areas contribute stormwater runoff to the existing storm sewer system: * Cobblestone Corners * Skyline Acres * A majority of Horsetooth Commons (not including Kingston Woods Second Filing) * Mountain Range Baptist Church * South Shields Street (Including a portion of Shields south of Cobblestone Corner) * West Horsetooth Road Cobblestone Corner was not originally a part of the Foothills Basin to the best of our knowledge based on reviewing aerial and historic conditions and based on the original Foothills Basin Report. Since Cobblestone Corner has not contributed historically to the Foothills Basin, Stockbridge should not be responsible for accommodating the additional detention storage due to the release from this property utilizing Foothills Basin storm sewer capacity. Who is? We are documenting the additional costs associated with Cobblestone Corner affects on the Foothills Basin in specific detail and intend to request reimbursement for these costs. Our understanding is that the City will pay for all master drainage improvements downstream of the Pleasant Valley and Lake Canal. This would include costs to secure all right-of-way and easements required, as well as actual infrastructure installation costs. We are documenting these costs in specific detail and intend to request reimbursement for these costs. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282.031 1