The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHARMONY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTRE P.U.D. - PRELIMINARY - 33-94 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 +xxxx+x#+xtxx##xxxxx###x+xxxx+xxx###+xxxx#xxxx##xx###xxxx###xxxxx#xxx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... king soopers NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm, long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB. SB ____ ____ ---- LEFT O O -- O THRU O 1419 -- O RIGHT O 30 -- 90 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ ----- LANES 2 2 -- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-5 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c - c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB RIGHT 99 504 504 504 405 A IMYiii�R� � IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... king soopers DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am pDM long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... king soopers NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT O 0 -- O THRU O 810 -- 0 RIGHT 0 20 -- 50 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NS SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 2 -- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY- CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB RIGHT 55 727 727 727 672 A rtlwioirGi.7GGlr IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET..., king soopers DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS...... 6/3/94 i C J�pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... r = = M = = = = = M = = M M 1565 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd - DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am e long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 45 25 115 5 THRU 1 1 95 60 RIGHT 75 15 10 45 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LTR CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c - c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 50 617 559 > 561 559 > 510 510 >A A THROUGH 1 703 644 - > 644 > 643 > A RIGHT 83 996 996 996 913 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 29 559 486 > 486 > 459 > A THROUGH 1 688 630 > 602 630 > 557 628 >A A RIGHT 17 995 995 > 995 > 979 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 999 999 999 994 A NB LEFT 127 999 999 999 873 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... king coopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 q am �p m� long OTHER INFORMATION.... �/ 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 *r�itr r•+t+irw+r �+w rrf+wa� w+wrwar�witrr� * w�itr• *at • � err •+r:w+r� sir aarra* �■++� *• IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------ _____________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 _ PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... king coopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. amd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. (!o Pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------------------- ______________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 25 20 65 30 THRU 1. 1 60 70 RIGHT 40 15 45 25 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ ------- LANES 2 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LTR CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c. = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______________ _________ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 28 636 590 > 593 590 > 565 563 >A A THROUGH 1 725 680 > 680 679 > A RIGHT 44 996 996 996 952 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 22 625 570 > 570 > 548 > A THROUGH 1 77-3 668 > 698 6B8 > 658 687 >A A RIGHT 17 996 996 > 996 > 979 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 33 999 999 999 966 A NB LEFT 72 1000 1000 1000 929 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... king coopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ;(!" Pm long OTHER.INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 +xxx+x++xxxxxx+++x++xx+x++++++xx+x++++++xx+x+x++xx+xx++x+x+x+x+x++x++ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am CO long OTHER -INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT <l 125 35 230 THRU 25 25 105 65 RIGHT 20 225 155 30 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ ------- LANES 2 _ 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LT t R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE _ RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT - 288 173 > 246 173 > 197 151 >D D THROUGH 28 477 372 > 372 > 344 > B RIGHT 22 996 996 996 974 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 13B 4.33 322 > 333 322 > 168 184 >D D THROUGH 28 520 405 > 405 > 378 > B RIGHT 248 908 908 908 661 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 253 928 928 928 675 A NB LEFT 39 1000 10i)0 1000 962 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... king soopers NAME_ OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am p long OTHER INFORMATION.... M M = = = = M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERS-cCTIONS Page-1 ��+� r e+r+r+.rr •+t•+++r r+r�rr *+r xrr+w •+r+s ririt • wr• witw++++r•++rir+it �.+w�+w+++ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30, PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 _ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am Pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 50 THRU -- 0 S45 320 RIGHT -- 50 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES -- 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-' --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 357 34.3 > 343 > 338 > B > 675 > 615 >A RIGHT 55 747 747 > 747 > 692 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 55 843 843 843 786 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... mante carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 q am pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------ -------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK: HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton. NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. .imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. dim pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 10 0 90 THRU -- 0 185 230 RIGHT -- 40 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------_ EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES -- 1 I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ---------------------------------------------------------- 7---------- POTEN- ACTUAL .FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 11 487 458 > 458 ? 447 > A :> 756 > 701 1 >A RIGHT 44 903 903 > 903 > 859 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 99 987 987 987 see A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ;6 pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------- ______________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAT: HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte carlo .. - NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET........ mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am (0 long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------- ______________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 10 20 15 15 THRU 15 20 80 80 RIGHT 10 5 60 25 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ ------- LANES I 1 I 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ___________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pr_ph) c (pcph) c - c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______________ _____________________ __- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 11 646 620 > 620 > 609 > A THROUGH 17 742 727 > 748 727 > 709 711 >A A RIGHT 11 995 995 > 995 :> 984 > A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 22 661 635 > 635 > 61.= > A THROUGH 22 757 742 > 708 742 659 720 "A A RIGHT 6 985 985 >. 985 979 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 17 994 994 994 978 A NB LEFT 17 999 999 999 983 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-! IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmo DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. V pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------- ------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- ES WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 10 5 15 THRU 75 5 35 80 RIGHT ,.., 5 60 25 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE - Page-7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------ ------------------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 705 691 > 691 685 > A THROUGH 83 789 778 > 829 778 > 702 696 >A A RIGHT 39 995 995 > 995 > 957 i A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 11 635 573 > 573 > 562 :> A THROUGH 6 605 794 > 695 794 > 673 789 >A A RIGHT 6 997 997 > 997 > 991 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 17 1000 1000 1000 984 A N8 LEFT 6 999 999 999 994 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS.....- 6/3/94 ; Cm pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT **4riiirwr**wawiarara*w*ww*iirirr*wwwirr*wwwra**wwrr****i***r****wrr***wir INTERSECT /ON..harmony/wheaton AREA TYPE..... OTHER. ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 TIME.......... 03 pm 94 COMMENT....... _pA/r _________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY -EB WB NB SB EB WB NS SB LT 75 110 60 90 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1865 1275 55 45 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 200 15 100 70 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 5 5 5 5 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.o 12.0 12.0 12.0- 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PYG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (R) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 u 0.95 5 Y 14.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 fi 0.95 5 Y 14.5 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N O 0 0.95 5 Y 26.5 SB 0.00 1.00 N O 0 0.95 5 Y 26.5 3 ______________________________________-_____-_____________-_____--_______ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT x TH X TH X RT X RT x PD X PD X WB LT X X SB LT x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x GREEN 6.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN IO.0 O.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 O.0 u.ii __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.035 0.700 2.1 A 8.5 B TR 0.857 0.533 S.7 B WB L 0.035 0.700 2.1 A 4.2 A TR 0.522 0.533 4.4 A NB L Q. 207 0.200 15.3 C 14.8 B TR 0.489 0. 200 14.6 B SB L 0. 349 0. 200 16.0 C 14.7 B TR 0. 356 0. 200 13.6 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delav = 7.6 (sec/veh) VIC = 0.623 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ♦ariw*�fiir/w*hYi****i*riai+Faiilrrriiw**a***iiii*r**iiiiiiiii*4**iii*r*arw INTERSECTION..harmony/wheaton AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 TIME.... ... _am `pm 94 COMMENT....... VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 17.5 110 150 70 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1510 2300 115 5o : T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 150 45 150 90 : T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 5 5 5 5 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0- 12.0 12.0 -------- __________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PYG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0.95 5 Y 14.5 4 WB 0. Oi i 2.00 N u O o. 95 5 Y 14.5 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N O O o.95 5 Y 26.5 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 26.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x X NB LT x TH X TH x RT X RT x PD X PD x WB LT X X SS LT X TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x GREEN 6.0 30.0 0.0 O.0 GREEN 10.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 (J.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________-______ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC G/r_ DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.078 0.700 _._ A 5.6 B TR 1. 681 0.573 5.9 B WB L 0.035 o.700 2.1 A 12.3 B TR 0.957, V.5= 12.8 B NB L 0.557 0. 200 18.2 C 22.4 C TR 0.836 0.200 24.8 C SB L 0. 404 0. 200 16.7 C 15.0 C TR o.44o 0.200 14.1 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 10.7 (sec/veh) VIC = 0.765 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..harmony/mcmurray AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 TIME......... pm 94 COMMENT....... __________________________________-_______-___-______-___________________ VOLUMES - GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : ES WB NB SB LT BO 150 135 50 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1695 1200 45 45 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 300 45 90 35 : T - 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 5 3 20 20 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKS BUSES PHF" REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95, 5 Y 20.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 20.5 4 NB 0.00 1.,�u) N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 26.5 7 SB 0,00 1.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 26.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT % RT X RD X RD X WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH % RT X RT X RD X RD X GREEN 9.i., 60.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 O. 0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APR. LOS EB L 0.127, 0.633 6.7 B 16.1 C TR 0.854 0.517 16.5 C WB L 0.496 0.633 10.6 B 9.3 B TR 0.523 0.517 9.1 B NB L 0.035 0.7,17 21.5 C 25.1 D T 0.176 0.150 28.8 D R O. 324 0.150 29.7 D - SB L 0.035 0.317 21.5 C 25.4 D T 0. 176 U. 150 25.3 D R 0. 070 150 28.3 D __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 14.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.582 LOS = B 1965 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..harmonv/mcmur•ray AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 TIME.......... am �1m 94 COMMENT....... -------- __________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 75 100 340 55 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 .L. 12.0 TH 1535 2015 65 65 : T 12.0 T _ 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 120 80 140 40 : T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 5 5 20 20 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.(] 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 --------------------------------------------------------- _________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N n 0 0.95 5 Y 20.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0.95 5 Y 20.5 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N O O 0.95 5 Y 26.5 - SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 O 0.95 5 Y 26.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT % X TH X TH X RT Y RT X RD X RD X WS LT X A SB LT _ X X TH X TH X RT X RT X RD X RD X GREEN 9.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APR. LOS EB L 0.096 0.633 6.5 B 12,0 B TR 0.699 0.517 12.2 B WB L 0.229 0.633 7.7 B 16.9 C TR 0.881 0.517 17.3 C NB L 0.558 0.317 27.7 D 29.0 D T 0.255 0.150 29.2 D R 0.555 0.150 -2.4 D SB L 0.035 0. 317 21.5 C 26.1 D T 0.255 0.150 29.2 D R 0, 093 0, 150 28.4 D __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delav = 16.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.693 LOS - C I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 xwwwwwwxxwwwwxwwwxwwwwxx+twxxwwwwwxxxxxxwwxxxxwxxxxxxx+wxxxwwxxw+wxxxx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------- --------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.................. am & long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------------------- ---------------------------------------------_ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------_ EB WB N8 SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 45 25 ISO 5 THRU 1 1 90 75 RIGHT 190 15 10 45 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB N8 SB --------------------- ------- LANES _ 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LTR CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c - c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 50 561 476 478 476 > 427 427 >A A THROUGH 1 636 546 > 546 > 545 > A RIGHT 209 995 995 995 786 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 28 431 315 > Z15 297 > C THROUGH 1 620 532 > 426 532 > 380 531 76 A RIGHT 17 995 995 > 995 > 979 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 1000 1000 1000 995 A N8 LEFT 198 997 997 997 799 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 I am `pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... m m = m = m = = m = = = = = = = = ! 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 YiF-1FiFltlFiFi4it#w##iiFiFlFiFiF#iY#iF%RiF4iFil+i!#iFih#iFiF#iF#Y#iFiFiFir IF MiFiFiiiF iY iF Mil iitMiFiFiriF+i4 iF1! IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------- ______________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 . PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 - NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.....-.. mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST ................... .imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm long. OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------- _--------------- ______________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LE6 MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ____ LEFT 25 20 100 30 THRU 1 1 60 95 RIGHT 100 15 45 25 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ ------- LANES 2 1 1 1 LANE USAGE. LT + R LTR CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ _________________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 2B 591 534 >. 537 534 > 506 506 >A A THROUGH 1 672 613 > 613 > 612 > A RIGHT 110 987 987 987 877 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 22 537 456 > 456 > 434 > A THROUGH I 6B1 622 > 595 622 556 621 A A RIGHT 17 996 996 996 > 979 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 33 999 999 999 966 A NB LEFT 110 997 997 997 887 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; (am pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... INFORMATION.... `� 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------- _____________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAMEOF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6//94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am 09M long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE ANT! CONTROL ------____.___________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 25 100 35 230 THRU 25 25 35 5 RIGHT 15 225 125 30 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NS 58 _____________________------- LANES - 2 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-S-cRVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- F'OTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 28 370 236 > 314 236 > 259 208 >C C THROUGH 28 589 468 > 468 > 441 > A RIGHT 17 999 999 999 983 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT i10 535 410 > 424 410 > 2S7 700 >C C THROUGH 28 622 495 > 495 468 > A RIGHT 248 995 995 995 748 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 253 991 991 991 738 A NB LEFT 39 1000 1000 1000 962 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET....... king coopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am O long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ++xrt+rt+xxxxx++xxrtrtxrtrt+xxrtrt+xrtxrtrt++•+rtrt++xxrtxxxrtrtrtrtxrtrt+xxrtxx+xx+++xrtx+ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------- ---------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. air PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 - NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... king coopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 45 55 15 130 THRU 15 15 15 10 RIGHT 25 115 70 10 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 - _ 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL - MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- .MINOR STREET _ EB LEFT 50 579 471 > 510 471 > 444 421 >A A THROUGH 17 757 679 > 679 > 662 :, A RIGHT 28 999 999 999 972 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 61 673 586 > 607 586 > 530 525 >A A THROUGH -17 782 701 > 701 > 685 > A RIGHT 127 998 998 998 871 A MAJOR STREET S'B LEFT 143 1000 1000 1000 857 A NS LEFT 17 1000 1000 1000 984 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 i pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... \-� 19e5 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS _ Page-! iiiii:iiiiiwtitwwiiiwwtiw.r*wwwtiiwiwiiwtiwtwitiwwwitsswitiwwwiiwwitis IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. =0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am & long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH _ CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ____________________________________________________________________. EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT -- 5 0 50 THRU -- 0 275 260 RIGHT -- 50 10 0 NUMBER OF LANES ____________________________________________________________________, EB WB NS SB ______________ _______ ------- LANES - -- 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-: ------------------------------------ _________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY _ CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR. STREET W8 LEFT 6 452 416 > 416 > 410 A > 746 > 685 :>A RIGHT 55 810 810 :> 810 > 755 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 55 904 904 904 849 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am rr long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _-__ -------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 10 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1. AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... Wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. .imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/YY)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm long OTHER INFORMATION..... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES - ___________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT -- 10 n 90 THRU -- 0 160 140 RIGHT -- 4n 15 0 NUMBER OF LANES ____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ------- _______ ------- LANES -- I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page_S _ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED .RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) cM(pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH MINOR STREET WS LEFT 11 562 528 > 528 > - 517 > A > B04 749 >A RIGHT 44 924 924 > 924 680 > A MAJOR STREET 58 LEFT 99 989 989 989 - 990 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ____________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... Wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - Page-1 +xxx+++xxxxxx++++xxxxxx++++xxx+++x+xxxx+++x+xxxx++xxxxx++xxxxx+++xxxx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------- _----------------------------- __________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).__... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am 03 long OTHER INFORMATION.-... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB_ ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT l0 35 15 15 THRU 15 2i 1 80 So RIGHT 10 5 55 25 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ ------- LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR - CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS a M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 11 650 624 > 624 > 613 > A THROUGH _ 17 746 731- > 751 731 > 713 715 :>A A RIGHT 11 995 995 > 995 > 9S4 > A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 39 663 637 > 637 > 596 > A THROUGH 22 759 744 > 690 744 > 624 722 iA A RIGHT 6 987 987 ? 987 > 982 > A MAJOR STREET - SS LEFT 17 995 995 995 978 A NB LEFT 17 999 999 999 987. A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 q am ® long OTHER INFORMATION.... m m m m m m m m m m m m m i m m m m S 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 xxxxxxxxxwxxxxxxxxxwwxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxwxxxxwxxwxxxxwxxxxwxwwwxww+!wxwxxx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------- _____-_______________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEEb,'MAJOR STREET.. 30. PEAK. HOUR FACIOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte Carlo' . NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray NAME -OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------------------- ______________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 5 35 5 15 THRU 75 5 35 Big RIGHT 35 5 60 25 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ____________________________________________________________________. EB WB NB SB _______ ______________ ------- LANES 1 1 1 I LANE USAGE LTR LTR CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________--------------------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET - EB LEFT 6 705 691 691 > 685 > A THROUGH 8:3 789 778 > 829 778 > 702 696 >A A RIGHT 39 995 995 > 995 - 957 > A MINOR STREET WS LEFT 39 635 573 > 573 > 535 > A THROUGH 6 805 794 > 622 794 > 572 789 >A A RIGHT 6 997 997 > 997 > 991 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 17 1000 1000 1000 984 A N8 LEFT 6 999 999 999 994 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET....... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 a3 pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ++wwwwwww+wwwx++ww+x++++xwxxwxw+xx+wx+x+xx+wxx+++x+xx++xxx+ww+x+wxwxw IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ........................ 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. .imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am !P long 1...•�� OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ER WB NB SB ---- LEFT ---- 135 ---- 135 ---- 0 0 THRU 927 1398 0 0 RIGHT 150 60 195 120 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB ------- -------------- ------ LANES - - 2 - LANE USAGE L + R L + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH ------- ----------------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET" NB - RIGHT 215 632 632 632 418 A MINOR STREET SB - RIGHT 132 501 501 501 369 - 8 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 149 150 150 150 - E WB LEFT 149 256 256 256 108 D IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am 6 long OTHER INFORMATION.... M = = = = M M M M M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx+xxxxxxx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ........................ 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... -harmony" NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH "STREET ....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST ................... jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. ai pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -______________________________________________________. INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROLTYPENORTHBOUND: STOP -SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ____ ---- LEFT ____ 75 ____ 125 0 0 THRU 1167 762 0 0 RIGHT 200 25 125 90 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------ LANES _ _ 2 LANE USAGE L + R L + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET NB woffmiNEE RIGHT 136. 531 531 531 393 B MINOR STREET SB - e RIGHT 99- 744 744 744 645 A MAJOR STREET - - EB LEFT 83 385- 385 385 302 B WB LEFT 138 171 171 171 :i3 E IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; aml pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY PEPORT INTERSECTION..wheaton/lemay AREA TYPE..... OTHER - ANALYST ....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 TIME......... Pm long COMMENT....... __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 60 40 30 120 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 90 90 550 700 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.ii RT 40.145 20 40 : 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 5 5 5 5 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 - 12.0 12.0 12.0- - 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HVADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. 'ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.95 50 N 25.8 3 WB 0. 00. 2.00 Y 20 0.95 50 N 25.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 -0 0.95 50 N 19.8 _ SB 0.00 - 2.00 Y 20 0 0.95 50 N 19.8 __________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 - PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 ED LT X. NS LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN B. Co _.O 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 O.i, O.ii 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APR. LOS EB L 0.200 0.283 1^.5 B 11.6 B TR 0.343 0.283 11.2 B WS L 0.304 0. 283 12.1 B 14.7 B TR" 0.671 0. 283 15.1 C NB L 0.O^7 0.617 3.4 A 8.7 B TR 0. 495 0. 41-10 8.9 B SB L 0.027 0.617 3.4 A 9.2 B TR 0.646 Co. 400 IA.1 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 10.0 (sec/veh) ViC = 0.505 LOS = 8 19B5 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT - INTERSECTION..wheaton/lemav AREA TYPE..... OTHER - ANALYST ....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 - TIME .......... amCV long COMMENT....... ________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB" NB SB LT 40 20 35 200 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 150 140 1050 700 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 30 175 SO 50 : 12.0" 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 5 5 5 5 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK.G BUSES PHF PEDS PED.- BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N .Nm Nb Y/N min T EB O.00 2.00 Y 20 O 0.93 50 N 25.8 WB 0.00 2.00- Y 20 O 0.95 50 N 25.8 3 NB O. CIO 2.00 Y 20 0 0.95 50 N 19.5 SB O.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.95 50 N 19.8 3 ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 15.0 0.0 O.li O.O GREEN 8.0 22.0 0.0 0.0. YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 __----___________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APR. LOS EB L 0.166 0.283 12.3 B 12.1 B TR 0. 46B 0.287. 12.0 B WB L 0. 053 0.283 11.9 B 26.3 D TR 0.894 0.783 27.2 D NB L Co. 027 0.617 3.4 A 20.2 C TR 0.951 0. 400 20.7 C SB L 0.247 0.617 4.0 A 9.0 B TR Co. 656 o.400 10.2 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delav = 16.2 isec/veh) V/C = 0.763 LOS = C M = = = = M M 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REFORT xwxxxww+ww++xxxxx+xx+xxxxxxxxx++xtwxxx++rxx+xx+rxxx+++r++xwx+xxx++++wxxw++ INTERSECTION..harmony/mcmurray _ AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 TIME .......... (am pm 94 COMMENT....... Gorvg -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES _GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB ! EB WB NB SB LT 105 150 150 90 : L 12.6 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1665 .1190 45 45.: T 12-.0 T 12.0 T L.0 T 12.0 RT 30o 55 90 80 : T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 5 5 20 20 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12. CI 12. A) 12.0 12.0 12.0 GRADE HV EB 0.00 2.00 WB ().00 2.00 NB 0.00 1.U0 SB 0.00 1.00 PH-1 EB LT x TH RT RD WB LT x TH RT PD GREEN 9.Ci YELLOW 5.0 LANE GRP. EB L TR WB L TR NB L T R SB L T R -------------- INTERSECTION: ---------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ'PKG BUSES PHF REDS Y/N Nm Nb -N 0 0. 0.95 5 N 0 0 0.95 N G O 0.95 5 N 0 O 0.95 5 ---------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 X x x X x x x x 60.0 S.V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NB LT TH RT PD SB LT TH RT PD GREEN YELLOW LEVEL OF SERVICE V/C G/C DELAY LOS 0.256 0.633 7.5 B 0.841 0.517 16.1 C 0.496 0.633 10.6 B 0.523 0.317 9.1 B 0. 035 0.317 21.5 C 0.176 0.150 28.8 D 0.324 0. 150 29.7 D . 0.035 0.317 21.5 C 0. 176 0.150 28.8 D 0.278 -------------------------------- 0.150 29.4 D PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N min T Y 20.5 4 Y 20.5 4 Y 26.5 Y 26.5 ------------------------- CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 X x x x x x x x x x 15.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 APR. DELAY APP. LOS 15.7 C 9.3 B 24.9 C 25.6 D Delay = 14.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.576 LOS = B 1983 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT wwxwwwwwrwww++wwwxw+www+wx.ww+xxxx+w+wwxxxwwwwwxwxxwxwwxxxxx+wxxxwxx++wwxx INTERSECTION..harmonv/mcmurray. AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE .......... 6/3/94 TIME.......... am .pi 94 COMMENT....... J�cr,.6 VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 120 100. 400 _ 95 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1500 1995 65 65 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 120 95 140 130 : T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 5 5 20 20 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB O. 00 2.00 N. 0 0 0.95 5 Y 20.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 20.5 4 NB 0. 00 1. ADO N O O 0.95 5 Y 26. 5 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 26.5 _ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 ES LT X x NB LT X X TH X TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x WB LT x x SB LT x x TH x TH x RT X RT x PD x PD x GREEN 9.0 60.0 0.0 O.0 GREEN 15.0 16.0 O.O 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. EB L TR WB L TR NB L T R SB L T R -------------- INTERSECTION: V/C G/C DELAY LOS 0. 336 0.633 B.2 B O. 6B5 517 12.1 B 0.229 0. 633 7.3 B 0. 880 0. 517 17.3 C 0. 780 0. 317 37.2 D 0. 255 0.15G 29.2 D 0.555 i).15i: 32.4 D 6. 035 0.317 21.5 C 0. 255 0.150 29.2 D 0.509 ------------------------------- ),ISO 31.7 D APR. DELAY APR.. LOS ll.B B 16.9 C 35.3 D 27.5 D Delav = 17.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.744 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 1985 HOM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..harmony/lemay INTERSECTION..harmony/lemay AREA TYPE..... OTHER AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... Jmd ANALYST....... Jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 _ DATE.......... 6/3/94 TIME .......... 2^J Pm long TIME.......... am LM long COMMENT........ - - COMMENT....... _--_________--________-_______--_________-________ __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY ------------------------ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NS SB EB WB NS SS : EB - WB NB SB LT 120 05 275 300 : L 12. 0 -L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 LT 200 300 400 150 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 �L 12.0 TH 1715 1055 350 300 : T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 1385 1930 6130 450 : T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 RT 220 100 205 180 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 300 22O 295 150 : T 12.0 T. 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 30, 30 30 30 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 RR 30 30 30 30 : T 12.0 T 12..0 T 12.0 R 12.0 . R 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 . R 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 i 12.0 12.0 12.0 ___________--____ 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PECS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE HV ADJ PY.G BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm No YIN min T (%)(%) YIN Nm N6 - YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N Co 0 0.95 10 N 20.5 4 EB 0. On 2.00- N 0 0 0.95 10 N 20.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 '0.95 10 N 20..5 4 WB 0.i)O 2.00 N Co 0 0.95 10 N 20.5 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N Co 0 0.95 10 N 32.5 3 NB 0.00 1.00 N O O 0.95 10 N 32.5 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 32.5 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 32.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 _____________----__---__________________--_____________--__--_____________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 - PH-1 PH-2 PH-7 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT x X EB LT x x NB LT X X TH X TH - X TH X TH X RT x RT X RT. X RT X PD x PD X PD X PD x WB LT X X SB LT x x WB LT X x SB LT X x TH y TH x TH x TH x RT x RT x RT x RT - x PD x PD x PD x PD x GREEN 15.0 47.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 47.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 Co. C) YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 ___-_____-_______________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE ----__-_______________________-_--_----_--_________-_----_____________--__ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APP. LOS LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.035 0.575 8.4 B 21.5 C EB L 0.533 0.575 13.4 B 15.9 C T 0. 910 0.408 _3.3 C T 0.735 0. 4uS 16.1? C R ).324 0.408 11.E B R Co. 461 0. 40B 12.4 B WB L 0.552 0. 575 13.9 B 13.0 B WB L Co. 907 0,575 38.8 D 35.7 D T 0. 56i1 0.408 13.0 B T 1. )24 Co. 408 37.5 D R 0.119 0. 408 U),4 B R 0.314 (".408 11.5 B NB L 0.062 0.375 16.2 C 22.2 C NB L 0.528 Co. 375 23.7. C 28.1 D T 0.418 0. 258 24.1 C T 0.812 o. 258 30.3 D . R Co. 470 Co. 258 24.8 C R Co. 712 0. 258 29.6 D SB L Co. 248 Co. 375 19.8 C __._ C SS L 0. 050 0.375 IS.- C 23.5 C T 0.358 0.258 23.6 C T v.537 0.256 25.2 D R Q. 403 0.258 24.1 C R 0. 322 0.25B _3.- C __________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 19.4 (sec/veh) V/C = U.646 LOS = C ----------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delav = 26.? _---______________-__-_____ (sec/veh) V/C = O.B85 LOS = 0 1 I 1 [1 1 1 1 LJ i 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX H 11 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 x+xx+xxxx+xx++xx++xx+++xxxxx++xx+xx+xxxx++xxx+x++xx+xx++xxxxxxxx+xxxx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNIING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 50 PEAK: HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100006 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... king soopers NAME OF THE ANALYST_ ................ imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. am pm short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT O 0 THRU a 963 RIGHT O 30 -- 95 NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ I EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ ------- LANES 2 - -- - CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE - page-3 ----------------------------------------------------- ________________ F'OTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcpn) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB- RIGHT 105 6b4 664. 664 560 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... king soopers DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am 6 short OTHER INFORMATION.... = = = = = = = M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 +xxx+xxxxxxxxxxxxrx+xxrxxxxxx+#x++rx++rxxxxxx+xx++xx+rr+++xxxxrrx+xrx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------- ------------------------------------------------------------ AVERAGE.RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR........ .............. 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 10ir000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. ..and DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------- ______________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 45 25 110 5 THRU 1 1 70 Sir RIGHT 70 15 10 50 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ ______________ ------- LANES LANE USAGE LT R LTF CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ----------------------------------------------------- ________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 50 547 589 > 590 589 > 540 5:39 >A A THROUGH 1 716 677 > 677 > 676 > A RIGHT 77 996. 996 996 919 A MINOR STREET WS LEFT -8 589 517 517 > 489 > A THROUGH 1 719 661 > 631 661 586 660 >A A RIGHT 17 996 996, 996 > 990 :> A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 1000 1000 1000 995 A NB LEFT 121 1000 1000 1000 879 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET..... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 q am L� short OTHER INFORMATION.... j?Sg -Hr_M: Ut�PS IGp!ALI=ED iidrF_F:SEr_i—>C'rJS iis#x###�#r##s###xix t-Ri###i'I+F+ri##ii+#Yi#wi+fi##�ri##i#Y;i k�F iiiiii�##�ix4 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. -.0 PEAK: HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA F'OPULATION...................... tOOi��ii1 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... b,inq coopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurrav NAME OF THE ANALYST. ................. jme DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/ho/YY)._.... 'TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. �artj ?m 94 SNOiC% OTHER INFORMATION.... JJ INTERSECTION TYRE AND CONTROL ----------------------- --------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NO SB ---- ---- ---- ---- _EFT _0 65 3� 40 .65 RIGHT .s 45 25 NUMBEFOF LANES AND LANE USACE --------------------------------------------------------------------- E5 WB NB SB -------------- ------- ------- A N E S _ t _ENE USAGE LT + F: LTr: I_AF'4'_. .i T'D `J �,1-EYE-iiF-'SERVICE i'..pe-. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- aGTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TiAL MOVEMENT SHARED R:EEERVE RATE CAPAr_I TY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcpn) c (pcph)- = 1pcpn) r 1pcph) r_ = c v LOS p M SH R SH -------------- --------- ------------ ------------ -- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 2S 6 n 610 61 61Q 585 _'83 ;A A THROUGH _ 746 7(O 7011 699 A FIGHT 3? =96 996 996 MINOR: STREET wB LEFT 64? 59A 594 572 A THROUGH ^1 755 708 716 708 679 707 :'A A FIGHT I7 ?-c o97 997 > 980 ; A MAJOR STREET - SB LEFT -- 1000 10017, I000 ?b7 A NB LEFT 72 1000 10i10 1000 92? A IDENTIFYING INFGF'MA7I OPa NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... king sooper-- - NtiME QF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... .�rmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/2/94 aaii Pm q✓FS NO/1% i OTHER INFORMATION.... - M = = = = M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 70. PEAK: HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... king Soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/vv)...... 6/-/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm snort OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 20 .20 -5 245 THRU 25 25 85 45 RIGHT 20 =5 155 -0 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NE SB ---------------------------- LANES _ - 1 1 LANE USAGE LT t R LT . R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE F'age --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT vrpr_ph) c (pcph) r (pcph) c (pcph) c = r_ - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- ----------------------------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET - EB LEFT -- 294 17Z > 248 173 > 198 151 >D D THROUGH 28 494 -79 > 379 > 352 . 8 RIGHT 997 997 997 975 A MINOR STREET WS LEFT 132 450 330 > 341 33-0 > 182 198 >D D THROUGH 28 538 413 413 > 3185 > B RIGHT 259 929 929 929 671 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 270 947 947 947 678 A NB LEFT 39 1000 L100 1000 962 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton b� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am V short' OTHER INFORMATION.... r i m m m i = m m= m 1'=_5 HCM: UHSIGNALIZED ISVTErt ECT_,0lvS ran=-i '�4i4i4####Y4Y4fTii4fiYY4}#ai#}yy#ii}f'fai#Y4yY#ia}4#l444iia4}ffiaiYay}4 IDEi4TIFYING FNFORMAFION--------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE FUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. _. PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA FnPul_ATTON...................... 10000i) NAME OF THE EAST/WEST 3TF:EET.. ..._... inq SOoPers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET...,... wneaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. .;md DATE OF THE ANALYSIS Imm/Ulj/vvi:..... 6:2/94 TIME F'EF:IOD "Nol_YZED................. pm U/45140 T .OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------- _------------------------------------------------ _____________ INTERSECTION TYPE: A -LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: i•lGRTH/SOUTHH. CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: S.- _iGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB IVB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 65 THRL 15 15 I GHT 40 _25 lu NUIMBER nF ANES AND Ls=NE LS:iGc _____________________________________________________________________ L+ N= :P _______ _______ __ C AF'A1:I TY A" - LEVEL-nF-__FII ICE -r'GTEH- ACTUA;_ FLOW- TIAC MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAP-CIT"+ +CAFACITY CAF'Ar_ITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT JCpcpnl c tpcpni c ipCpnl c 1pcPhi c = r_ - v 1_OS _______ ________ 9 _________ SH ____________ SH ------------- ___ i9INOR STREET -B LEFT 493 392 4ai) .392 390 _59 .9 B THROUGH i7 65c 592 5e2 566 A f;iGHT 44 995 99.5 995 951 A MINOR, STREET WB LEFT 72 577 a91 510 491 422 420 -. .; A THROUGH 17 690 612 612 596 A RIGHT i>e 997 907 997 959 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 154 909 Q99 999 B45 A NB LEFT 17 1C)CW) 1pp0 3000 9e4 A DENTFYTNG INFORMATION NAME nF THP EAST7PIEST STREET...... kinq sooPer=_ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheacon DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/2/94 �� pm 3K spogl_ OTHER ;NFORMAT'_ON.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 +w+wwwwww+wwwwwwirwx*wwwwwwwww+wwwww+rwwww+wwww+++wr.+w+++++++wwaw++w++r IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 710 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... l00000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am ei) short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION- NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB S8 ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 50 THRU 335 315 RIGHT -- 50 5 0 NUMBER. OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- ES WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES -- 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-` --------------------------------------------------------------------- F'OTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcpn) c (pcph) c (pcpn) --c (pcph) c = c - v LOS o M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 366 352 ? 357 346 B 685 i 624 R IGHT 55 756 756 . 756 701 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 55 852 S52 852 797 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am ,en short OTHER INFORMATION.... 198g HEM: UNSfCNALI:ED INTERSECTIONS Pape-t lfi Y �y yi.ta;a44Y}Yfi�af �{Ly{iirt �'�'�i of Yip ............. TY,•...... F}>Y=tYyiY?Y IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR: STREET.. 7..O PEAL::: HOUR: FACTOR ...................... 1 AREA. POPULATION ....................... 1(tl1C11'11 NAME OF THE EAST!IJEST STREET.... .... .-monce Casio NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wneacon NAME OF THE ANALYST. ................. Jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS cmmidd/vv)...... 612194 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED .................t pm i? SHORT OTHER INFORMATION.... .NTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTHiSOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES . _____________________________________________________________________ EB WD NB Se LEFT -- 10 THRU -- _ 175 230 RIGHT -- 40 Z 6 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------- ________________________________________________ EB N5 NE __ _______ _______ _AM_S --I I CAPACITY _PjD LEVEL-OF-SERV._ race FOTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE FATE CAPACITY r_APACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT vtPcPrO e (ccPn) e (Peen) e (pcph) c = _ - v !OS O '1 SH P SH ._______ _________________ ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT II 404 464 i 964 ?57 A 766 711 RIGHT 44 ci4 914 j 914 870 ~ A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 99 q8p- '%88. 989 1:189 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monce Carlo (NAME OF THE NORTH/'SOUTH STREET.... wneaton LATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/2/94 ; Pm y45N09T OTHER INFORMATION.... aD M = = = r M = = M M M M M= M= M M M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. '0 PEAK: HOUR FACTOR ...................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/7/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am `p3 short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SD ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 10 15 15 15 THRU 15 20 80 80 RIGHT t0 5 S5 25 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB N8 SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 , 1 1 LANE USAGE LTF: LTR CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pape --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAFTED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph! C (pcPh) c (pcphi c (pcph) r_ = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT - 11 667- 640 640 i 629 A THROUGH 17 76= 748 i 766 748 727 72 :%A A RIGHT 11 995 995 995 - 984 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 17 671 645 i 645 629 A THROUGH ^__ 767 75 ?29 752 685 "_•0 ::A A RIGHT 6 995 995 i 995 990 i A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 17 998 998 999 ?81 A NB LEFT 17 999 999 999 987- A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte cart❑ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 0 am Ip✓ short OTHER INFORMATION.... m m m m m = m m m m m m m m m m m m = -,FE5 CM: iNSICNALIZED INTF^:SECT 1,11'45 p ans- IDEN7 IFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. -,,) PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ...................... l()(y:)()(:, NAME OF THE EASTiVIEST STREET......... monte cario NAME OF THE NORTH!SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST__ ........ imc DATE OF THE ANALYSIS kmm/ac!v) ...... i-/2/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............ OTHER INFORMATION.... INTEF.SECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIPFC-FiON: 'JORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTFOL. WESTEQUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC UOLUMEE ER WB ND SE, ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT to 5 :1 1z 1501i 75 n RIGHT 15 5 ar, 25 NUMEER OF LANES ",ND LANE jS?GF Es vs mb 09 ------- ------- ------- ----- 7F :,.AFAcivr AND Page-' TE111- ACTUAL Fluvi- TRIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RmrE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v,orpnr c ipcor.! T ''pcpm) c Fpcpr.p c = c - v LOS ------- p -------- M --------- ------------ Sri R W ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 7:23 709 7,je 702 4 THROUGH G 7. G02 7c?-! .347. 7G7 717 714 A A RIGHT 39 951 995 995 457 > MINOR STREET WE LEFT 6 w4d 582 081 3 176 A THROUGH 5 Olt ecN1 757 804 > 7aO 799 ;A A RIGHT 8 997 997 991 992 :: A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 17 1000 I.C100 1000 994 A NB LEFT 6 17Q_? 99F �A17 q04 A. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WESI STREET...... manta carlo NAME OF THE NUFTH/20UTH STREET.... mcimurrav DATE rin11) T!ME OF THE '4WALYS_,3 ..... P! 2/94 ; Pm s14 .5 pOk r OTHERN INFORMATION.... y2 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page -I, IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------- ______________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. =5 - PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA F'OPULATION...................... Ii uJUirir NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... wheaton NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST... ............... imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/vy)...... 6i3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pmi snort OTHER, INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE. WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC 'VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WE NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT =5 lip 30 165 THRU 110 100 219 211. RIGHT 20 150 25 a - NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB JB NS SB ------- ------- ------- ------- _=:NES -4PIE _SAGE L. + F: _i - R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page' --------------------------------------------------------------------- P'OTEN- ACTUAL - FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p P1 SH R SH ________________________ ________________________ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 39 200 109 207 109 47 71 `E E THROUGH 121 351 290 i 290 169 > D RIGHT __ 925 925 925 903 A MINOR STREET W8 LEFT 11 242 142 7-61 142 140 171 >D D THROUGH 130 346 205 i 285 ? 175 ; D RIGHT 165 93_2 932 932 767 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 182 828 828 828 647 A NB LEFT -.3 815 815 815 782 r IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... wheaton NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am `p mi short OTHER INFORMATION.... r m m m m m m m m m m= m= m m m r 7F HCi•!; Op�51GNA, r --_-- - i DENTIFYING I!NFOR:MATP3N . -------------------------------------------------'----- AVERAGE RUNNING 'o3P . MQF � T nEF T .. .-5 HOUh FACTOR. I AREA FOFULA'TION...................... 16pi�pii NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... wheaten NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... :-mav NAME OF THE ANALYST ................... imc DATE OF THE ANALY9iS (mm/cd/Yy).. 6/2/94 T ISJP PERIOD ANALYZED ................. Q?) ?m yj SHORT OTHER: INFOR:MATION.... INTERSECT ION TYF'E AND CONTROL . -----------------------------------.------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: .^InFT�/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOF31GN CONTROL TYPE WEETBOUND; STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -----------------------------------------------------_ EB WE NB Sp ---- ---- ---- ---- uEFT iJ R ISHT 30 135 .O __ ;,IUMLEF OF LANES AND LANE ;.-SAGE _----------------------------------------------------- En We NB SB -------------- ------- ._-----NE - mm-I --------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ - ',U TEi,i- ACTUAL . . FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE_ RA IE CAPPC 11Y CAPAC i TY CA.F'ACi TY CFFACITY MOVEMENT 'r(Pcprt) C IPCPhI - (pcpn) A ._ (PCPhI C = r - v -OS P _____ N --------- ------------ SH A SH ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT - 61 291 206 3S7 '_06 > 14c 146 iD D THROUGH 77 ahp 413 _ 41= , 116 > B FIGHT __ .56 956 956 927 A MINOR 'STREET . YID. -_-. EFT _.. 4_ ^_6o S48 -_6 227 223 >C C 83 452 406 ai 16 _r B R19HT 149 '?_e 95B 95a e09 A MAJOR STREET ,36' L=FT 116 :385 O85 885 769 A ND LEFT 213 874 674 1374 547 r IDENT'_F'ImG 'LNFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STR:EET...... wneaton NPME .HE NOR:THi SOUTH STREET_. linmav DATE ANDTIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/2/94 ;(a3 Pm ;,o� 5,40R 7- OTHER =NFr_,RMATION.... 1965 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT k#Yk*ifi##ati*##kYkk##ki4#Y##k*YY{k4*Yk*ikk*ikkf k*fi i4k{*#kkY*kk**#kkfiY*#kk* INTERSECTION.. narmonv/wneaton AREA TYPE..... OTHER _ ANALYST....... amd DATE .......... 6/-/94 / TIME .......... ar- Pm COMMENT....... ------------------------------ VOLUMES ------------------------------------------- GEOMETRY EB WB NE SB : EB WB NB SB LT 70 75 50 70 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1230 750 45 35 : T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 90 U) 65 70 : T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 20 20 20 '10 : R L.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 GRADE EB 0.00 WB 0.00 NB 0.00 SB 0.00 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT rfi*fi{kwirrr�*r:*firk r{***xrir+�++++k{x++i#k*xxxrwwwfi Y*+iwww***wxwfi***+wki*+ INTERSECTION..harmonv/wheaton AREA TYPE...... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 TIME .......... am COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB % EB WB NB SB LT 140 65 90 55 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 925 -1570 90 40 : T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 40 45 90 90 : T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 20 20 2i: --) : R 12.0 R 12.ir 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 L2.0 12.0 12.C, 12.0 ---------------- 12.0 . ---__------ - -------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS HV ADJ PK:G BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE (%)- Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T (%) 2.00 N O 0 0.90 5 Y 20.5" 4. EB 0.00 2,00 N 0 Cr h.90 5 Y 20.5 4 WB 0.00 1.00 N u O 0.90 5 Y 26.5 _ NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 26.5 SB 0.00 PH-1 EB LT x TH RT PD WB LT X TH RT PD GREEN 6.0 YELLOW 4.0 LANE GRP EB L T R WB L T R NB L TR SB L TR ------------- INTERSECTION: ---------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-.3 PH-4 X NB LT x x TH x X RT X x PD X X SB LT x x TH X x RT x x PD X 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 S.n 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 O.C, 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS 0.035 0.700 2.1 A 6.4 B 0. 755 0.533 6.8 B 0.097 o.s33 77.2 A Cl. 0S5 ii. 700 2.1 A 4.0 A 0. 466 0.533 4.2 A 0.577 . - A 0. 173 0.200 15.1 C 14.0 _ H 0. 303 0. 200 13..3 B 0.245 0.200 15.4 C 14.7 B 0. 290 0. 200 13.3 B -------------------------------------J_----------_-------- Delav 6.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.=21 LOS B PH-1 EB LT X TH RT PD WB LT x TH RT PD GREEN 6.0 YELLOW 4.0 LANE GRP EB L T R WB L T R NB L TR SB L TR ------------- INTERSECTION: 12_C. 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------------------ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T 2.00 N O O 0.90 5 Y 20.5 4 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 i 5 Y 20. 5 4 1.00 N n 0 n.90 5 Y 26.5 1 Oi r N 0 0 0. 90 5 Y 26.5 3 ------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 6ir.0 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 X NB LT x X TH x x RT X X PD X x SB LT x x TH X X RT X x PD x 30.0 0.0 6.0 GREEN 10.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5-.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------------------------ LEVEL OF SERVICE V/C G/C DELAY LOS AFP. DELAY APP. LOS 0. 126 i i, 700 2.7. A 4.3 A 0.568 0.5�3 4.6 A i . i r28 0.533 1 A 0.035 0. 700 2.1 A 14.8 B 0.964 0.533 15.6 C 0.035 0.533 3.1 A 0. 334 0. 200 15.9 C 15.3 C 0. 5-7 6. 200 15.0 B 0.239 0. 200 15.4 C 14.3 B 0. 379 0. 13.7 B ------------------------------------------------------------ Delav = 11.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.713 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT IPITERSECTION...harmany/mcmurray AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 TIME .......... AM Pm ;K' COMMENT...... . ------------------------------ ____________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY ES WB NB SB : EB WB MR SB LT 80 75 100 45 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1185 b55 30 30 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 100 40 65 45 : T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 20 20 20 20 : R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) .(%) Y/N Nm Nb YiN min T ES 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 20.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 O 0.90 5 Y 20.5 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 O 0.90 5 Y 26.5 SB 0.00 ..00 N n 0 0.90 5 Y 26.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2' PH-3 PH-4 PH-i PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X F;T X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 6. 0 Sfr, C) i r, 0 0, ii GREEN U). 0 O. O o. 0 0, 0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY AF'F'. LOS EB L 0. 035 0. 700 2.1 A 6.0 B T 0. 727 0. 533 6.3 B R 0.111 Q. 533 3.7. A WB L Q.035 0. 700 2.1 A 3.8 A T 0. 462 0.533 4.O A R 0.028 0. 533 -.1 A NB L 0.-319 0. 200 15.8 C 14.5 B T 0.093 0.200 12.6 6 R i1.165 0. 200 12.8 B SB L 0.151 0. 200 15.1 C 13.7 B T 0. 093 0. 20(j 12.6 B R 0.092 0.200 12.6 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 6.2 isec vert) V/C = 0.508 LOS = 9 19B5 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ##**♦YYYY#+F**#Y�*Y:F**�Y4*i*Yh*YYf*f***ht4***YY#hi*Y#*********iYt******** INTERSECTION...harmonyimcmurrav AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... jm❑ DATE.......... 6/."`94 S TIME .......... am m $4 C COMMENT....... __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB S8 EB WB NB SB LT 70 b5 60 50 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 900 15-10 50 50 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 10p 70 Z5 45 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 20 20 20 20 R 12.0 R 12.0 r 12.0 12. 0 12.0 12.ii 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS PED. BUT. ARP.. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 t:) 0.90 5 Y 20.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 O 0. 9ir 5 Y 20.5 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 26.5 SB O. Of) 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 26.5 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT % PD X PD X GREEN 6.0 .30.0 0.0 ).0 GREEN 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.O 0. 0 0..0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0. i r 0. 0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APF. LOS EB L 0. 0-5 0. 706 _. A 4. A T 0.552 0.533 a-.5 A R V. 111 0.533 7.7. A WB L 0. 035 0. 760 ? 1 A 12.6 B T 0.939 0.533 i ._ r R 0.069 ii. 533 A NB L 0.202 0.201-- 15.2 C 13.9 B T 0.155 ii.200 1^.B B R 0.656 0. 200 12.5 B SB L 0.164 0.200 15.1 C 13.7 B T 0. 155 0.-_'00 12.8 B R 0.092 .. 200 12.6 a __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = ?.7-=ec.'vehi V/C = 0.608 LOS = B 1985 Hr_M: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT_"* INTERSECTION.. harmony/lemay AREA TYP'E..... OTHER ANALYST....... imd DATE.......... 6/3/94 T I ME .......... la -am Pm 'T4 L COMMENT....... __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB 1118 SB • EB WB NB SB LT 45 110 175 170 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1065 715 210 22O : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 175 45 155 90 : T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 30 30 i!. O R 12. Ci R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.1) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.i, __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK:G BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. APR. TYPE' (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2. i.!O N O O 0.90 10 N 25.9 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 O ii.90 I(D N 25.8 4 NB 0. (XI 1.60 N 0 0 0.90 10 N -1.8 7. SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 ICi N 31.B _______________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-_ PH PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT % X NB LT x X TH 1 TH Y RT X RT PD X PD x WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT [ PD X PD X GREEN 3.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 28.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 O.i! YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 O.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APR. LOS EB L 0.055 0.583 6.2 B 13.7 B T o.7 4 0.4-5 14.5 B P. 0.226 0.475 8.7 B WB L O. L!i5 0.583 8.4 B 10.0 8 T 0.493 0.475 10.3 B R '1.024 0. 475 7.9 B N6 L 0. 050 0.-67 18.6 C --•- C TR 1.1.509 0 250 25.4 D SB L 0. 050 Q. 367 18.6 C 22.5 C TR 0.423 0.250 24.6 C __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delav = 15.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.519 LOS = C 1995 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT iNTERSECTION..harmony/lemay AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST ....... ,lmd DATE.......... 6/-/94 -%- TIME ....... ...am COMMENT....... __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB .SB : EB WB NB SB LT 145 265 225 65 : L 12.0 L 12. C! L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 885 1305 -05 280 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 245 is() 155 90 : T 12.0 T 12-0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR -i.! 30 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 . 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12. i! 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PY.:G BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T ES 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 WB o.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 NH 0.00 1.00 N 0 O 0.90 1i. N 71.a GB 0.00 1.00 N 0 1) 0.90 10 N 31.8 - PH-1 EB LT X TH RT PD WB LT X TH RT RD GREEN 8.0 YELLOW 5.0 LANE GRP. EB L T R w8 L T R NB L TR SB L TR -------------- INTERSECTION __________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-2 F'H-- PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 X NB LT )( X X TH % X RT X X PD X L SB LT % X Y TH X X RT X X PD X 55.0 O.O O.O GREEN 9.0 28.0 0.0 O.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.1i 5.0 0.0 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS 0.551 0.583 14.3 B 12.5 B 0. 610 0.475 12.9 B o.-34 0.475 9.- B 0.526 i1. 58- 13.6 B 16.9 C 0.899 0.475 7-1.0 C 0. 2-- 0.475 8.8 B 0.050 0.367 18-6 C 24.2 C 0. ti32 i!. 250 26. B D 0.050 0.367 18.b C 24.3 C 0.501 i1.250 25.3 D Delav = 18.4 (seciven) V/C = 0.6B5 LOS = C I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 APPENDIX G 1 1 1 i [1 1 1 i I 1985 HCM! UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-t IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. '0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100fr00 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... king soopers _ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray - NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/-/94 - TIME PERIOD ANALYZED— ............... am ® short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ._-------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 45 25 170 5 THRU 1 1 70 50 RIGHT 175 15 10 50 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NS SB ---------------------------- LANES _ LANE USA,iE 1_T + R LiR CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE F'age-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- FOTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE - RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pCPh) c (pCph) c (pcph) c (pr_ph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 50 601 515 517 515 466 466 >A A THROUGH 1 6b3 59Z ? 597. 591 > A RIGHT 197 996 996 '996 804 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 28 475 356 > 356 329 > B THROUGH 1 665 577 471 577 > 426 576 :,A A RIGHT 17 996 996 > 996 986 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 1000 1000 1000 995 A NB LEFT 187 1000 1000 1000 BIT A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME_ OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... king coopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/7/94 ; am pm) short OTHER INFORMATION.... ` r = = m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m . NS ^C:hli+NAl_i Z_0 _i:!l'i=R.'mE._''TONS Paae-I #a'Y>#f4#{ .♦i�##.♦ ##—#----------------4'Y- --------i4#F#f #4fr#wy'+yLyr#h+' :DENTTFy LNG INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNIhIG SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. '0 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ...................... 1Viri10p TAME OF THE FAST/WEST STREET......... .`Iln9 soopers NAME ❑F THE P%OR:TH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST— ............... �mc DATE OF. THE ANALYSIS rmm/tloiyyi...... 6/254 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 0 - pm 92C 514OR r OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL. ------ ----------------- ---------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR: STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASI"BOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------__----------------- EB WB NB -�P ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT _, 20 95 THRU 1 1 RIGHT Of 15 45 __ NUM9ER OF LP=iES AnU l_Ar.iE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- En 14B NB SE ------- --------------------- _ANEE ._ _ . 1 _AI.IE _DOGE ._T r R LTi+ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- Tir_ 0OVEMENT `=HORED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAFAC_ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT vtpcan) c town) ._ tpcpm) _ QC" i - = E_ - v `F: LOS i^ SH SH MINOR STREET EP LEFT 28 "L_- S7a 577 574 54G 547 THROUGH 1 ._. 661 661 . 660 i A RIGHT 105 946 =96 ?96 892 A MINOR STREET WB _EFT 22 =.Fri 490 498 476 A THROUGH 1 729 169 615 669 > 595 668 :'A A RIGHT 17 cF,37 7W > 997 920 A MAJOR STREET SP LEFT _. 000 1000 1000 967 A N8 LEFT 105 I900 1nn0 1000 896 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STR:EET...... 4ina =_capers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurrav DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6%2/94 ; �f/I pm g4 S Nok T OTHER INFORMATION.... ;iNSIGNALI=ED-NTER_ECT TI-INS k4M1'YF k Y Y*'iYf14'Tif �'y's}�if YY iiF}ys.kf t>'� ------RT--'-------- !DEi4TIF"lINC INFORMr TLON _______________________________________________________ A,VERACE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR. STREET.. REAP: HliUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... iiuli u)i� NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......... e.inv =_Ooaers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wiieaton NAME_ OF THE ANALYST..... .............. im0 DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ...... TIME FER?OD ANALYZED.................0 - pm yc SNoR T OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CObfiF:OL_ _______________________________________________________ ?NTERSECTTON TYPE: 4-LEG i1AJOF: STREET DIRECTION: NORTH" SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTEQUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND; STOP Si5N TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------- En i1i& He Se ____ ____ ____ ____ LEF- 45 a5 1?O TH'n'U 15 iS 10 R ISH"i __ 1=5 65 10 NUMBER: IF i ANES AniD '_ONE USAGE _______________________________________________________ EB WWB NC Se ________ _______ _ -_-_ ___ ' T✓ AMi i_EVE-----SEEN I__ sY�f--------------------------------------------------------------------- PnTEP-- 2L TUAL ------ FLOV1- 'L IAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERI%E FATE CAPACI Pe L: .PACITV i=AF AC177 CAPACITY MOVEMENT . pcpni c iacph? c tpcon! r_ 'pcorJ r = _ - v _OS P t'I '_H R `iH MIbiOR STREET to LEFT 50 5:7=: 159 Aq9 459 4.7,1:' 4119 ,A A THROUGH 17 761 676 676 659 A F: EGHi 2G 1 6 t 47- A MINOR STREET WN LEFT hi 675 5E2 e S 2 6 THROUGH 17 7E4 6`rh 696' ~••8p A RIGHT 1`E 9og 9c9 CqS �61i A MAJOR STREET 56 I_E-FT 154 l�ii ii� liuli: 1000 E46 A .____-_ NB LEFT i7 100n 1606 100i, 4E4 H IDEN"fTFVTNG INFORMATION NAME i_iF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... F:in9 s00oers NAME THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaten DATE .-ID TIME GF THE ANALYSIS...., 6/2/174 Pm 5;�rSNoK! OTHER INFOEMATdUN.... 1965 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------ -------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET... 7-0 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... Uji ri �i rir NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte Carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... Wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. Jm❑ DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/vy)...... 6/7/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am �pD snore OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/30UTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 50 THRU -- 0 29(-, 2*75 RIGHT -- 50 10 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EE WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES -- 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE rage-'• -------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE PATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT vipcph) c ipcphr c tpcpn) c ipcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH F: SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT- 6 414 398 > 398 393 B 77-9 666 iA RIGHT 55 7n5 795 > 795 740 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 55 690 890 890 635 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte Carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wneaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 am e short OTHER INFORMATION.... :�ie5 Hcml L-NSI9NAL=L, :I I:t .3ECi t'9v` y.;i.Faaaaaaa�as----a--------*--------------------..a�aaa. f DENTiFYING Ii,,,Fr7RMATIUJ 1 ------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNi NG SPEED, MAJOR STF:EET.. _. PEAK HOUR FACTOR-.................... : AREA POF'LLATION...................... �unpnp NAME OF THE EAST/'WEST STFEET......... monte Carlo NAME OF THE NOR-1-H/SOUTH STREET....... wneaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jme DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (.mm/ddiyv)...... 6/2/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ..... ............ �� pm 5IC 500RT OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTF:OL ______________________________________________________. i N(TERSECTPJN TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR: STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ----------------------- _______________________________ .p W9 ;4B SB. ____ ____ ____ ____ LEFT -- IO - 9, NUMBEF. OF L-NEs ------------------------------------------------------ _B „ir SD ----------------------------LAhiES - --------------------------------------------------------- OTEn;- c,_-LtHL ------ FLOW- TIAL MOVE-MFWT SHARED F'ESEF'.VE ;SATE -AF'AC1 F CA.F AC II'Y iTY' i'AR 1 F'Y "113VEMtNIT i , cpn) - '.pcpn! r ,,pcpnj c (Prpn? c = _ - v LC,S _______ p ________ M _____________________ _-H R CH ____________ ___ Miivn_F; 9TR.EE7 WB :_:: FT li 52-, 512 ' A .66 745 H EIGHT .1 - -_2 92-' 379 z A - MAJOF' STREET SB LEFT 90 qa5 1755 -gO '3G9 H IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME nF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... -:ante Carla NAME OF THE 61JRTHi SOUTH STF:EET.... 4neaton DATr ANID TIFiE OF THE F.NAL'✓CIS..... G/2/94 /am Pm `s4 5HOP-' O'i HER': INFORMATION.... i9S5 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS F'aae-' IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------- -------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE FUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 7-.0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... i0c)1QV NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte Carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ....... mcmurray NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/do/yy)...... 6//94' TIME PERIOD ANALYZED .................. am LpmJ shcrt OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------- ------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG . MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTHiSOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TPAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WE, NB SE ____ ____ ____ ---- I EFT lip 15 15 15 THRU 1t 20 30 30 RIGHT 10 5 55 -- NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------_ En WD ND SE ------- ------- ------- ------- I_AM1IEE - 1 ! t L,,rfE USAGE LTn i_Tn CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-- --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'r OTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE_ RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcpn) r_ (pcphi c (pcph) a (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M ASH R SH --------------- --------- ------------------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 11 n67 640 64"i 629 :> THROUGH t7 76'� 748 > 766 748 > 727 772 .,A A RIGHT 11 995 995 > 995 964 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 17 671 645 h45 629 :> A THROUGH ^-_ 767 75-- > 729 752 665 TO >A A RIGHT 6 995 99S 995 > 990 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 17 998 998 998. 9B1 A NB LEFT 17 999 999 999 98Z A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte Carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/T/94 ; am & short OTHER INFORMATION.... 19S5 moo UNS !_c:e aT ER :ssO . eza. IDENTIF '[I - -- - - - - - -- - -- - -- - - - -- - - - - E RUNNING EPEED, NPjOR s a. a FEf.I;. m le... ........ : ARF, U sa............ w _mv sas Imo . NAME OP 10F7 H? SOUT H STREET ....... eery NAME s— ANALYST ..................,x n«,e,a _ate. ............ .A M -:-x5Ha OTHER I sa.. . woos new -ONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- :mom !a TYPE: e . 0R EFFEET DIRECTION: ::QN . :— m : se s e TRAFFIC VOLUMES - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - THRU z : e s --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- MOVEMENT RESERVE / Z zs s NQUAMENT mre,:e=no c mcph, : a«r =_c -, LOS --- ---- , — — n — -- — a -- — — -- z a — — — -- m ~ LEFT , / 3 ` \843 717 \s!\;5\ MINOR STREET MAJOR STREET !e»ls,m INFORMATION _ex THE EASsWEST STREET ...... scawo NAME z \ /TE \..:/ 4 m :w# 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTF_RSECTiONS F'age-( x wwx x+xwwwwwxx xxxww wxxxwwwwwxwwwww+x+xwxw+xwwwwx+x++wxx+xxwwxxxxwxxwx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. PEA1:: HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... wheaton NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. .imo DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/Z/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am prm short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL.TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------_------------_------------------------- EB WE, NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -5 10 SO 155 THRU 115 100 237 2-- RIGHT 20 1=5 25 45 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES LANE USAGE LT LT R CAPACITY -ND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- f-'OTEN- CTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE FATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT vipcpn) c (pcph) r (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------ ------------------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT ?9 I10 207 110 42 71 E E THROUGH 127 - 294 264 15B D RIGHT -_ 920 920 920 899 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 11 _ 7 17.4 255 1z4 } 134 L27. >D D THROUGH I10 7-17 290 > 290 > 176 '= D RIGHT 149 ?23 ?23 927. 775 A MAJOR STREET SP LEFT 171 811 81I 611 640 A NB LEFT 7. Z 806 306 806 777. A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... wheaton NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANAL'i SIS..... 6/3/94 ; am .Fm short OTHER INFORMATION.... m = = m = = m= m = = m m i = m m= m 19P5 HCi9: UNS L=14r:La_-L iP1iEh::S _[Tirlpi5 ane-1 sx.«s�i asara+a�..o-i.ric+«�st+rr;.a..-...sx�aaaxa x. a-------- ----� :.rrt:•a+a .DENTIFY ❑Na9 IP4FOF:!`IHl_ I-JN ____________________________-_______-_______________________-_-__-___ HNEF:AGE R.UNNIN'3 -REED, i'I-JOP: STRELT.. PEAK HOUR FACTO: . . . ......... ....... i AREA POPULAI'ION...................... lOuOi ii� NAME OF ME: EAST/WEST STREET......,.. weeacon NAME OF THE PIORTH!SOUTH STREE'i....... lemay 14ME OF THE ANAL':-ST.................. ima LATE OF THE ANW_'f5IS ...... 'TIME= :='ERIUD ANALYZED ................. 'm OTHER INFORMATION.... _NTEFSECTION -TYPE AND CONTROL ________________________.___--________-________--_______-_-_--_______- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG !AJOF: STREET DDIECTION: NORTH/SOLD,_H CONTROL TYPE EASTPOUND: STOP SIGN CONTR'UL TYPE WES'IBUUNO: STOP SIC•PI - TRAFFIC vO!_UMES .______-______________________________________________________________ EE W6 NE SA _EFT 5f J _ _ J 1 F4RU 70 13-� _74 EIGHT 10 ___ p _- AMBER OF WNW HND LWE USME ______-_____________________________________________________.______--_ E_: pie Inn =AF AC I?'r APND ' SVEL-OF-SEFV' __ Raw- --------------------------------- 7 ----------------------------------- PUTEi- =1:"(UAL EL:=1a- TIAi MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE APAL-1TY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT . pcpm c imzpnj c (pcph) r_ ipcpn� ._ _ : - v L_ric l 3H R 3H _______________ ---------- ____________------------ --- MINOR STREET ES LEFT 61 2?71 284 209 151 149 :D D 'THROUGH 77 iv_ W l 411 .04 H RIGHT 97-0 a=.0 150 917 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT _ T9 ?h -.na 545 264 2:4 225 iC C THROUGH 83 das A03 > 403 A 121 8 RIGHT 17S 956 -'_0 956 318 A MAJOR STREET SP i_EFT ins 27E _75 875 -71 A NB AFT 28 862 862 862 815 A IDE10"iFVTNC LNFORMP TICK NAME OF THE EAST/WEFT STREt_-. _ ... �aneacan NAME r E•iE N&; (H dDU N 3TPEET.... _emav _ DA E AND TIME OF THE ANALi TS..... bi2i94 ; pm '5�C O ,ER -ON.... -ON.... J M w = = = M = = = = i = M M M M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 wx+wx»++xx+xw+w+wxx++t+++x.r+twxw++ww++wx.twwx++++xxww+aww++x++at+wx+ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. SO PEAK: HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... lOOiriiG NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST................... jma DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/vv)...... 6/:;/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ED WE NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 140 110 0 0 THRU 567 921 0 0 RIGHT 40 55 140 125 NUMBER; OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ED WB NS Sp ------- -------------- ------ LANES LANE USr-GE L + R L + k CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pace-_ FOTF_N- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SN*,iED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAFACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT vtpcph) c (Pcpn) c (pcph) c (r pcph) c = _ - v LOS p M SH P SH ------------------------------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB Ifi- mom RIGHT 154 B27 627 1327 67 A MINOR: STREET SR - 'RIGHT 1T8 671 671 671 537 A MAJOR STREET ED LEFT 154 293 293- 293 13-9 D WB LEFT 121 491 491 491 --7ii B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/!94 ; am <P short OTHER INFORMATION.... r m= m m= m = = m m m m = = = m i +s rx-----.-.a•«�irtta�.i ?----ING I-----MATIOni . _______________________________________________________ VERAGE RUNNING SPEED, Mrii OR.=TREET.. EA.: ;-QU^: FACTOR ..................... 1 &REA POPULATION .................. ..... 1c)(my)n mAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... na.rmomv NAME OF THE NORTH/EOUTH STREET....... wnea-,.on nAME OF THE ANALYST .................. imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (!nm/dd/yy)...... 6%2/9=% TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.................`�r G:n OTHER. INFn_FMATION.... .NTEFSECT ON TYPE AND CnNTROL INTF_FCECT?ON TYpc: -:EG. MA.IOF. STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TAPE hp]RTHROUND: STO'FSIGN ::ONTROL T'!P'E SOU ThIEOUND: sTOF' SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES En WS NE Su - ____ ____ LEFT THRU 762 4u1 ?+?GMT yr. _f:,?':' . UMS3.: LA14PE "NE, L.nir- USA(- ES 14B INS SS _r:nln_ 2 _ _ _,_r:E .. - - _ r'age_'- OpP =CIT`i 9CID �e- jQyEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL 19u'V'=MENT SHARE'' RESERVE RATE =AFAC I'"Y CA.FAC!'Y' =YPACITY CA=Ar_ITY MOVEMENT .,.pcpni r Prphi c ':prpn) ' _ (Pcpr,- �'=H C = C - LOS _______ p ________ M _________ ____________ n Sin ____________ ___ HIPOR STREET NS MINOR STREET SD F:ICHT 89e 398 898 E05 ti dA7UR STREET EE LEFT 77 5 593 516 A WE LEFT 99 ..C_ 352 552 ___ C IDEi;TIFYING UVOROATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... nermony HAMS -3F `FiE NOF H/EOUTM - R-E:Insavon DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS .... 6/ /9a : Fml pm +mrshoK-f JiHEF: `` 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT fi wfi rfirxwfififiwfi rrfi xfifi wrfixrxixfixx4rwfiwxrxwwwww+ixr4wifi xx.wr x.rwfifixrfi ixrxxr.fix INTERSECTION..harmonyimcmur•ray AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 - TIME ......... ,:am pm .Yy C"'T- COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY E8 WE NB S6 : EB WB NS SB LT 105 110 75 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1155 660 30 30 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 100 45 65 75 . T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 20 20 20 20 : R 12.0 R 12.0 12..0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12. C) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES F'HF REDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0. pit 2. 00 N ii 0 0.90 5 Y 20.3 4 WB 0. (A) 2.00 N 0 0 Co. 9i, 5 Y 4 NB Q.On 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 26;5 SB O. Oir 1.00 N 1) 0 o. 9i) 5 Y 26.5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH - X RT X RT X PD X PD X WE, LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT ( RT X RD X PD X GREEN 6.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN i0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0. it 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L :?.035 0. 700 2.1 A 5.8 E T 0.709 0. 5?,3 6.7 B R 0.111 0.533 3.3 A WB L 0.035 Co. 706 2.1 A T 405 0.537 4.0 A R 0.035 0.533 3.1 A NB L 0.580 O. 201) 16.2 C 14.8 B T 0.093 i). 200 12.6 B R 0.165 Co. 200 12.8 B 56 L 0.252 Co. 200 15.5 C 14.1 B T 0. 093 0. 2ir0 12.6 B R Co. 202 2irii 13.0 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 6.3 (sec/ven) VIC = ..511 LOS = 6 1965 HCM: SIGNALIZED -NTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT x wfi rwrfi wfi xwxarxxwxw+wwwwrrw wwxrxrrwraw..x+rx ww+fi x+tr.w+rrr+.w+xr.++..++�•+.�.. INTERSECT ION.. har•mor.v/ mcmurr•ay AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 T I ME.......... am COMMENT....... . -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB W6 NB - SB EB WB NB SB LT 1-0 65 70 75 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 1?.0 TH 865 1505 50 50 T 1 2. 0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 100 80 7.5 125 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 20 20 20 20 R 12. 0- R 12.0 12.0 12.0 ED WB NH 3B 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12. 1 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ('/.) (%) YIN Non Nb YIN min T 04) 2.1-10 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 20.5 4 0.00 2.00 N 0 :) ii. 90 5 Y 20.5 4 0.00 1.00 N 0 Co U.90 5 Y 26.5 7. 0.00 1.0o N it 0 0.90 5 Y 7-6.5 PH-1 EB LT X TH RT PD WB LT X TH RT PD GREEN 6.0 YELLOW 4.0 -------------- LANE ORR. EB L R WB L T R NB _ T R SB L T R -------------- INTERSECTION: ---------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-T_, PH-4 X NB LT X X TH X X RT X X F'D X X SB LT X X TH X X RT X t PD X 3U.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 !i.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 Co.,) 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY AF'F. LOS 0.047 C:.7i:!i 7.1 A 4.1 A 0.531 0.533 4.4 A 0. 111 0.533 3.3 A 0,07;5 0. 700 2.1 A 11.6 S 0.924 0.533 12.3 B 0.Oe-_ Co. 533 A 0. 29a 0.200 15.7 C 14.3 B 0.155 0.2:i!) 12.9 B :.056 _.21!0 12.5 8 :.246 0,?(:)0 15.4. C14.1 B Co. 155 (r. 12.B B O.S85 0. 200 13.S B Delay = 9.= VIC = -,.642 LOS = B 1965 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 1995 HCM: B!GNAL17ED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY F:EFOF:T 3UMMPRi REPORT ♦tx Ott«�ar+rxtxarr«+aaxxaa+rat+arrxaxtrrttxarr.ta+t+sa+++xrr++x++xxxt+++ .xx�a+at+aa+:.xtr+�«+rxa++xa+err++tx+++t+txx+++xxr++txa+r+rxttit+at+t+rx+ar+r INTER.SECTION..harmany/lemav INTERSECTION..harmony/lemay AREA TYPE..... OTHER ;;REA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... i ma ANALYST....... ima DATE.......... 6/3/94 .-�•� DATE.......... 6/3/94 �- ( TIME......... .a� pm 9� �`-c,hL{ TIME.......... am m COMMENT ....... COMMENT....... __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB . EB WB NB SB EB WB NS SB : EB WB NB SB LT 45 110 210 210 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 LT 145 265 =0 85 : L - 12.0 L 12. Cr L 12.0 L I TH 1065 665 230 220 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TH 885 1215 345 290 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T I2.0 T 1-. RT" 175 45 155 90 : T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 FT 245 180 155 90 : T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 30 30 0 O : R 12.0 R 12..0 t2.0 t2.0 - TR 30 30 0 0 : R 12.0 R 1" 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 i2.0 12.0 - 12.0 12.0 1--.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12. f! __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _________--___________________________________--___--________--_____-_____ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK:B BUSES PHF REDS F'F_D. BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES F'HF F'ED5 RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0.90 to N 25.8 4 EB v.002.00 N it O 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N O O 6.90 lf• N 25.8 4 WB 0.00 2. 011 N O O 0.90 10 N 25.a 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N O 0 0.90 10 N 31.8 -• NB 0.00 1.0(, N 0 O 0.90 10 N 31.8 3 SB ii. 00 L00 N O 0 ir. 9ii fir N 31.8 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 31.8 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 ___________________________________-__________________--_________________- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 FH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH" PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT x x EB LT X x NB LT x X TH X TH X TH X TH X RT X FT x RT X RT :t RD X RD x F'D x RD X WE LT X x SB LT X X WB LT X X EB LT X X TH X TH X TH x TH x RT x RT X RT X RT X RD x PD X FD x PD X GREEN 8.0 55.0 0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 28.0 O.Ci O.0 GREEN 8.0 55.0 0,0 0 GREEN 9.0 28.0 O.O O.C, YELLOW 5.0 5.0 i7, ii 0.�i. YELLOW 5.ri 5.0 0. C�.0 YELLOW 5.O 5.0 ____________-___-____________-__________-_--_____________________---______ 0.0 0. ii YELLOW 5.0 5.0 U,Q 0.O __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LEVEL. OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS AFP. DELAY APF. LOS LANE GRP. V/r_ G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APR. LOS ES L 0.055 -0.583 B.2 B 17.7 9 EB L v.551 t5. 563 14.3 B 12.5 E T 0. 734 (/,475 14.5 B T 0.610 ii.475 12.9 B R 0.226 0.475 8.7 B R 0. 334 0. 475 9.3 B WB L !". 105 i.583 9.4 B 9.8 B WB L 0. 526 0.S83 13.6 B 16.6 C T 0.478 Q. 475 10.1 B T '>. 837 0.475 16.4 C R Co. 024 0, 475 7.9 B R 0.23 f!. 475 S.8 B NB L 0.050 0. 367 18.6 C C NB L 0. 602 0. 367 27.0 D 7-7.4 D TR 0. 535 0.250 25.0 D TF: 0.6@4 0. 250 27.7 D SB L 0. 050 (,..367 18.e C _-._ C SB L 0. 050 0.,.67 18.6 C 24.1 C IR 0.423 (1. 2�0 24.6 _ _ TR 0.501 0. "250 25.3 D __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 15.? iseciven! V/C = 0.526 LOS = C ________----------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 16.4 (seciveh) 'J/C = 0.735 LOS = C I 1 1 1 [1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX F 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 MATTHEW J DELICH ARTERIAL PROGRESSION DEGI GN 2AGe 4- POUTS: HARMONY INTERSECTIONS: 7 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 SYSTEM OFFSET: 0 BANDWIDTH LEFT:: 224.Sdt RIGHT: 21 SIC PERFORMANCE INDEX: 33 EFFICIENCY% I8 0 ATTAINABILITY: 34 INTERFERENCE: 24 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO. .........TIME -LOCATION DIAGRAM.......... DISTANCE SPEED RIGHTBOUND ... READ DOWN LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT 1 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X 2020 0 50 50 2 XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX 1290 2020 50 50 3 XXXXXXXXXX 1290 1290 50 50 4 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2620 1290 50 50 5 XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3550 2620 50 50 6 XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX 1760 3550 50 50 7 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 0 1760 50 50 NO. OFFSET .........TIME -LOCATION DIAGRAM......-.... PHASE LENGTHS LEFTBOUND ... READ UP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 58 42 2 35 XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX 62 38 3 27 XXXXXXXXXX 75 25 4 85 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 66 34 5 90 XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX 55 45 6 35 XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX 60 40 7 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X 61 39 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME SPACE DIAGRAM ROUTE: HARMONY CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS: SCALE IINCH=40X OF CYCLE: I LINE= 313 FT xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX 2 CG(A.OxXX XXXXXXXXX 3W.XXXXXX 4MC)4uteAy XXXXXXXX 6a*ae XX / / XXXXXXXXXX 7 e oqkXXXXX/ ; XXXXXXXXXX% x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxi:x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx • \XXXXXXXXXX • XXXXXXXXXX \\ X. �CXXXXXXXXX X` x x�txxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx MATTHEW J DELICH ARTERIAL PROGRESSION DESIGN 3 AGE ROUTE: HARMONY INTERSECTIONS: 7 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 SYSTEM OFFSET: 0 BANDWIDTH LEFT: 24 909 RIGHT: 21 SSC PERFORMANCE INDEX: 36 EFFICIENCY: 18 7 ATTAINABILITY: 34 INTERFERENCE: 23 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO. .........TIME -LOCATION DIAGRAM.......... DISTANCE SPEED RIGHTSOUND ... READ DOWN LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT 1 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X 2020 0 50 50 2 XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX 1290 2020 50 50 3 1290 1290 50 50 4 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2620 1290 50 50 5 XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3550 2620 50 50 6 XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX 1760 3550 50 s0 7 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 0 1760 50 50 NO. OFFSET .........TIME -LOCATION DIAGRAM.......... PHASE LENGTHS LEFTBOUND ... READ UP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 58 42 2 37 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 60 40 3 35 100 4 85 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 66 34 5 90 XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX 55 45 6 37 XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX 60 40 7 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X 61 39 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME SPACE DIAGRAM ROUTE: HARMONY CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS: SCALE 11NCH=40X OF CYCLE: 1 LINE= 313 FT ras s�+*+•e•xr�e:e�rx�+r+r:e�**e***�**�e*e:e*r:e►rya*r:.**��r*:e�**�r*e�r�resrr.*�*.r**es• qQ,�$ XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX r / 2� XXXX \\ XXXXXXXXXX r.''XXXXXXXXXX / x 4fW 4NCMvWY 4p/c$gMX ,�ftif:4:1:13 XXXXXXXXXX 7 C R�XXXXXx/ / XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX xxxxxxxxxxx X MATTHEW J DELICH ARTERIAL PROGRESSION DEGIGN ?AGE e ROUTE: HARMONY INTERSECTIONS: 7 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 SYSTEM OFFSET: 0 BANDWIDTH LEFT: 36 SEC RIGHT: 33 SEC PERFORMANCE INDEX: 39 EFFICIENCY: 28 7 ATTAINABILITY: 53 INTERFERENCE: 20 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO. .........TIME -LOCATION DIAGRAM.......... DISTANCE SPEED RIGHTBOUND ... READ DOWN LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT 1 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2020 0 45 45 2 XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX 1290 2020 45 45 3 XXXXXXXXXX 1290 1290 45 45 4 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2620 1290 45 45 5 XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3550 2620 45 45 6 XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 1760 3550 45 45 7 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 0 1760 45 45 NO. OFFSET .........TIME -LOCATION DIAGRAM.......... PHASE LENGTHS LEFTBOUND ... READ UP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 58 42 2 50 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 62 38 3 35 XXXXXXXX XX 75 25 4 45 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 66 34 5 95 XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX 55 45 6 40 XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX 60 40 7 47 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 61 39 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME SPACE DIAGRAM ROUTE: HARMONY CYCLE LENGTH I20 SECONDS: SCALE ]INCH=40X OF CYCLE: 1 LINE= 313 FT I&A120WAGK XXXXXXXXXX V\\/ xxxxxxxxxx 21 OMA S�Scxxxxxx� xxxXXXXXXXxx 34�H 6llQpeckX XXXXXXXXXX 4 Mt 1NYA*nixXX STG,Nb' /XXXXXXXXXX ' \ \4XXXXXXXXX 6e0RXXX j Ice 91CXXXXXXXx/ / xxxxxxxxxx/ % '\ X XXXXXXXXXXX APPENDIX E i �7jj h J FA i ya;{. �' cam- I'. �: + ♦�3 � � C t '.•j �'� •/1 11 r' r �� i� .. r ruts. _._w., r ` .:ice, • i.. i Sr � ,�"J''!. ; 'S � 11' • � i ieM � Y � I L I w 1I. � ��' i J lit • � 7) 1 s _. 61 }a� a�J,.� �. _=:�! .�.e .�Y?.�.:. .pia '� � � • I 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 d 1 APPENDIX D i 1 1 1 1 1 1 F 1 11 1 LEVEL-UF-SERVICE CRITERIA SIGNALIZED INTEPSE.M ONS Level -of -service for signalized intersections is defined in terma of delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. Specifically, level -of -service orlterie are stated in terms of the average stopped delay per vehicle for a 15-ml ute analysis period. Level -of -service A describes operations with very low delay, i.e., lose than 5.0 seconds per vehicle. Level -of -service 8 describes operations with delay in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. Level -of -service C describes operations with delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 seconds per vehicle. Level -of -service D describes operations with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds per vehicle. Level -of -service E describes operations with delay in the range of 411.1 to 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This Is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. Level -of -service F describes operations with delay in excess of 611.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. RESERVE CAPACITY UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE EXPECTED DELAY TO MINOR STREET TRAFFIC 40U A Little or no delay 30U-399 U Short truffic delays 200-299 C Average truffic delays IOU-199 U Long trnfflo delays 0- 99 E Very lung traffic delays * F *When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lone, extreme dulaye will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congeation affeul:ing other traffic movements in the intersection. flits condition usually wurrants Improvement to the intersection. i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX C 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1935 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED TNTER'3F-CTIONS 1. ?:.K :I..R I:V KI1.1 t!. ?:YSYXXt X.X t F'V !?.K :K I IYYVY.v!Y. C.YX X!Y YF V. K !!.K R. ?'V'.!? V � FY �'.Y Y:V!♦ i0ENTIFYIN6 INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 3C,. S'F-A.K HOAR FACTOR ...... I AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST 'STREET......... monte Carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... Wheaton. NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. .jmd DATE OF "THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).---.. 5/24/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1994 ' OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------------------.-------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTHiSOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUME: F6 WB IN 56 - ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- I D SG RIGHT DUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- E6 WE N6 9E .------------------------,-- L;,,,r.s LAPAClTY ;NU I_LVFL-OF-SERv10E Pa0e-3 ----------------------------------------------------------- '--------- l'(1TEN- ALTU,:L FLOW- TLAL MOVEMENT SHARED RFSER VE RATE IIAPACIIY CAPA.CiTY CAPACIT'( CAPACITY MOVEMENT (PC ph) c (pcph) (ncph) (rcph) - p M SH cH --------------- --------------------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET i46 LEFT t 341 fi13 RIGHT 55 9S9 999 MAJOR STREET S6 LEFT 55 J000 1000 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 513 312 > A > 994 936 >A r 39'A > 944 > 1000 945 A NAME OF THE EAST'/WEST STREET...... monta carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE_ AND T1ME OF THE AN AI_YSI3..... 5,"4/94 : am m 1994 OTHER iNFOR.MATiON.... ;g65 HCM: UNSIONALIZFn INiFr 3Ef TiUN:: -aa-I IDEIJTfFYlNG INFORMATION -------------------------- ------------------------------------------- AVI:RAIE RI INN INO SPEED, NA.Iok STF'.EET.. '.0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR........ 1 A;•EA POPULATION ...................... IOOi100 NAME OF THE, EAST/WEST STREET......... NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ..... when ton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. find DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yO ..... .-5/24 JyA TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am, am 1954 CITHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE ANO CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-iNTFRSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUNDI STOP SIGN TRA.FFI1: VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ FS WE; NB & LEFT --_ _.__6 ___I_ US iHkll -- 11 R:I 1:4T -- a 0 NU..'IRFR ME LANES (;APAC;IY GNU _______________..___-_-_____-___________------_-__--___--_____-_______ LEVEL-Oi=-:>ERV ICE - G'ace-3 POTr_N- AC 'UAL FLOW- TIAL MOVE;dr NT gP•ARED RESERVE . .:A rE CAPAC 1 TY C.Af,ACfTY CAPAC TY CA?AC ITY MUVEMEN'r .(Pc •hl c (PoPh) _ (PcPh1 c (pcFht _ - . I_OJ MitloR STREET Wb LEFT 7 324 777 777 170 A % A R IOH r 42 I000 i00o 1000 955 A J MAJOR STREET SB. LEFT 95 1000 1000 1000 Soy A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte carTo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... Wheaton GATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5/24/94 ain Pm 1994 OTHER 'NFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paye-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------- _--------------- ___________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET" 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..............."".... I AREA POPULATION ................"..... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... monte -carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurray NAME OF THE.ANALYST.................". jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mrn/ddiyy)...... 5/24/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am Cpm 1994 OTHER INFORMATION .... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES - ------------------ --- ------------ -- -- --------- ---- ------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 9 12 12 14 THRU 14 16 .> 28 RIGHT 7 i 14 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USA6E -----------------------------------------------------._____________-_- =8 WA NP. 58 LANE U,„AGE LTR CAPACITY AND LCVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY - CAPACITY 'MOVEMENT v(pcPh} e (pcpha c (pcph) c (pcph) c _ c - v I_OS P M SH R SH ------- ------- ------- ---------- ------------ MINOR STREET EB LEFT - 70 769 I >- 745 > 735 > A .THROUGH 15 863 846 > 842 845 809 832 >A A RIGHT 8 998 998 - > 993 > 990 > A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 13 7" 747 > 747 134 > A THROUGH 18 868 853 > 820 853 > 786 336 >A A RIGHT 3 998 998 > 998 > 994 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 15 -i000 1000 1000 985 A NB LEFT 13 1000 1000 1000 987 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monie carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mcmurray DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS""".. 5/24;94 ; am m 1994 OTHER INFORMATION"... r r r� r r� r r r� r �■ � r r r r� �■ 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZEO INTERSFCTIONS Paae-1 k1 R R.R ;tI CX.Y R.[ry ♦.1'X.F A:Y RRFF Y.Y .t'.aR R.R :RX I.R.R'R A:I.%X;t .R RF.F.FR Y.:R RX R t Y:Y, R :f!.t t:Y,X RI. AX X..YY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---- -------- — - - --- -- -- --- - -- --- - --- - -- - -- - -- -- --- -- -- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 . PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte Carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mcmurrav NAME OF THE ANALYST ................... imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5/24,194 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.. ............... L Pm 1904 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ____________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE E.AS,TBOUNO: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- _,FT 5 5 iHRU 72 4 7 50 RIGHT 33 1 s9 23 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB t,E ------ ----- ------ ------ _; NE IJ S:.GE t_IR L7R CAPACITY AND LEVEL-UF-SERVICE P3ge-3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- T1AL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RA TC CAPACITY CAPACITY _ CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT VrPcph) (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) = : - V LOS p M SH R 3H ------ -------- --------- ------------ -- -- — --- --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 - 795 785 - ?'S '79 'A .. THROUGH 79 875 867 - 898 "c 67 i 777 788 >A A RIGHT. 36 997 _ 997 997 > 961 : A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 705 n47 647 > 641 > A THRnUGH a 883 675 752 875 > 741 871 >A A RIGHT 1 999 399 > 999 > 998 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 12 1000 1006 1000 988 A N8 LEFT. 2 1000 1000 1000 998 A 'IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte Carlo NAME OF THE NORTHiSOUTH STREET.... mcmurrav DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5124;94 ;dam pm 1994 OTHER INFORMATION..., 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED [NTER5•ECTIONS Page- I •:X[XRYX.FXFF'RfX.F.R I.[fitYY[A'. X.t .R .Y..♦.F Y.XMF.tt [K.Y.XI:.Y.I:F.YXt!.XX.I. X.Y..Y XFX Y.k1�lX'Y.Ft �_Y l IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. ;0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 - NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ... -..... wheaten NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... 1emay - NAME OF THE ANALYST. ................. jind DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5/24/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am Cp 1994 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEC MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP 'SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB :i8 ---- ---- ---- ---- EFT 30 9 25 61 T H RU 28 23 Z?8 20 RIGHT IS 52 23 39 NUMBER OF LANES AND 1_ANF t13AGF -------------------------------------------"-------------------------- EB Wli Se ._ ANE L _.AGc _ . CAPACITY :..NO t_EVFL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- IiAt- m0VEMENT SHARED RESERVE - "ATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC[TY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcphI rPcph) , (Pcph) (Pcph) = C - v I_OS M SH R S.ti ------ -------- -------- ----------- --------- --- MINOR STREET FPS LEFT 357 311 > 359 311 ? 295 278 >C C THROUGH 31 459 429 > 429 > 398 B _ RIGHT 20 996 996 996, 976 r. MINOR 'STREET WB LEFT - 10 368 326 > 391 326 > 356 316 >B B THROUGH 25 454 424 > 424 > 396 >- 8 RIGHT 57 '996 996 996 939 A MAJOR STREET. SB LEFT 67 849 849 849 782 A NB LEFT 28 343 Bab 848 821 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME_ OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... whea Con NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREF_T... 1amay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS----- /24/94 ; am a 1994 _ OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: ONSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ':'age-1 Y.Ct K.A F. "t .K.KF R.K 4 Y.Y K ".K.w Y 11.K :1: F..I..K F KT..I 1.A !V. t.Y {.R .1 AxK. I, 1.<Y. Y.Y:K ♦ KKYK 171<Y, �' R I t 1. R �:A.Y .Y .Y IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJUR STREET.. �0 PEAK HOUR. FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... Wheaton NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemav NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5/24/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. (ao pm 1991 OTHER INFORMATION ---- INTERSECTION TYPE_ AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN " I-RAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NR S8 ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 49 33 20 46 THRII 12 24 170 158 RIGHT 25 64 8 31 NUMBER OF LANES-ANO LANE USAGE ------------------------------------ -------------- EB WB :1F. 'in ------- ------- !,,,NE J-1ACIE LT R LT P CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-tiERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TEAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY t;AFAC I TY CAPACITY CAPAC I T'( MOVEMENT v(pcph).c (pcpn) C (oCPh, c (pcph) = . - v LOS M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 54 431 382 > 417 382 33c 323 >B B THROUGH 714 548 522 522 , 498 > A RIGHT 28 997 997 997 969 A MINOR STREET W8 LEFT 36 451 411 > 449 411 386, 375 >6 9 THROUGH 26 540 515 >515 > 488 > A RIGHT 70 997 997 997 927 A MAJOR STREET 3B LEFT 51 913 913 913 863 A NB LEFT « - 902 902 902 880 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... wheaton - NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.— 1:may DATE AND "TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5/24/94 am pm 1994 OTHER INFORMATION.... ..� 1965 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 10()V�O NAME OF THE FEAST/WEST STREET......... hat -many NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am � 94 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NS SB ---- ---- --- LEFT 10 21 O 0 THRU 487 787 O 0 RIGHT 6 29 29 4 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB -------------- ------- ------ LANES - _ - - LANE USAGE L + R L + F; CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v -LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET NB -- _ RIGHT - 882 862 882 851 A MINOR STREET Sb - RIGHT 4 732 732 732 727 A MAJOR STREET - EB LEFT it 369 369 369 358 B WB LEFT 23 570 570 570 547 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET..... wheaton � DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... .6/3/94 ; am �- 94 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 r rrr+r++rr++++++++rr+++++++++r++rr++++r++++rr++r+++++++++rr++++r+r+++ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET... 50 PEAK: HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME_ OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. .imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. . �a3 pm 94 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 7. 27 O 0 THRU 680 400 0 0 RIGHT 35 5 29 6 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------ ------- ------- ------- LANES _ - - LANE USAGE L + R L + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pager3' POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE FATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) r (pcphi c (pcph) r (pcph). c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET NB RIGHT 777 777 777 745 A MINOR STREET SB - RIGHT 7 926 926 926 919 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 3 632 632 632 - 629 A WS LEFT 30 427 427 427 397 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6i3/94 ;"am pm 94 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..harmony/mcmurrav - AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 - TIME .......... an Pm 94 COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NE SB : EB WB, NB S6 LT 50 45 32" 38 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L. 12.0 L 12.0 TH 859 515 4 7 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 95 26 38 31 : T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 20 20 20 20 : R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12-.0 12.0. 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ---------------------------------------------- --------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N- 0 0 0.90 5 Y 20.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 20.5 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N. 0 0 0.90 5 Y 26.5 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 26.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH Y RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X TH X FH X RT R RT X RD v PD X GREEN 6.0 30.0 O.0 0.0 GREEN 10. 0 0. 0 i i. 0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 O.0 O:0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAYLOS APR. DELAY APR. LOS EB L 0.035 0.700 2.1 A 4.2 A T 0.527 0.533 4.4 A R 0. 104 0.533 A WB L 0.035 0.700 2.1 A 3.6 A T 0..-116 0.533 A F 0, 009 0.533 .1 A - NB L 0.099 0. 200 14.9 B 13.9 6 T 0. 012 1i. 200 12.4 B R 0.067 12.6 B SB L Co. 118 0. 200 15.0 B 14.2 B T 0.022 0. 12.5 6 R 0.041 0. 200 12.5- B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delav = 4.6 (sec/veh? V/C = iJ.-45 LOS = A 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REFORT INTERSECTION..harmony/mcmurr•ay AREA TYPE..... OTHER. - ANALYST ....... jmd - DATE .......... 6/3/94 TIME.......... am r 94 COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY E6 WB NB SB : EB WB N6 SB LT 26 41 59 26 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 112.0 TH 795 1164 6 7 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T- 12.V RT- 96 44 26 . T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 20 20 20 20 : R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 EB WB NB SB EB LT TH RT PD WB LT TH RT PD GREEN YELLOW 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (7.) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T 0. cot) 2.1-10 N 0 V 0.90 = Y 20.5 4 0.00 2.00 N 0.90 5 Y 20.5 4 i'. n0 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 26.5- .O,00 1.!i0 N 0 o 0.90 5 Y 26.5 d -------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 Y X NB LT X X TH X X RT X X PD X ( X SB LT X X TH X X RT X t PD X 6.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LANE GRP EB L T R WB L T R NB L T R SB L T R INTEF:SECTION: --------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APP. LOS 0. 035 0.700 2.1 A 4.1 - A 0. 488 0.537 4.:. A 0. 1105 0. 533 A o.035 0.700 2.1 A 6.1 B i1. 71 a 6. 533 6.7 B i., OZ7 O. 5- _7.1 A 0. 183 0. 200 15.2 C 14.7 - B 0,J19 0. 200 12.4 B 0. 023 0. 200 12.5 B 0.083 0. 200 14.3 6 -13.3 B O.i!22 0.200 12.5 B 0.046 0. 200 12.5 B --------------------------------------------------------- Deiav = 5.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.471 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT rw+++++xx++++++w+wwxrxxxxxxxxx+x+x++xxxx+xw++xx++xx++w+wx+xxxww+xw++xx++++ INTERSECTION..harmony/lemay - AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd _ DATE ......... 6/3/94 TIME......... 1. Pm 94 - COMMENT ....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 62 56 96 122 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 931 559 150 112 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 60 43 89 61 T 12. is T 12. 1) TR 12: i) TR 12.0 RR 30 30 0 'O R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 . .. 12. 0. L.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV . ADJ PK:GBUSES. PHF PEDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) '(%) YIN -Nm Nh YIN min T -ED 0.00 2.00 N it 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N . 0 Co 0.90 10 N 25.6 4 . NB 0.00 1.00 N O 0 0.90 10 N 31.8 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0- 0 0.90 10 N 31.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------ --` -- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 120.0 '.,PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WS LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X RD X GREEN S.ir 55.o Co. Co O.O GREEN 9.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0. C) 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APR. LOS EB L 0.055 0. 5B3 8.2 - B 12.8 B T 6. 642 0.475 13.3 B R i�,047 0.475 8.i1 8 WB L 0. 055 0. 58.3 - 8.2 B 9.4 B T 0.385 0.475 9.6 B F. 0.021 0.475 7.9 B NB L 0.050 .0.367 16.6 C 22.4 C TR Co. 330 0.230 _ 3. a C SB L 0. 050 0. 367 16.6 C 21.4 C TR 0.238 0. 250 -..- C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 14.4 (sec/veh) VIC = 0.420 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT wxx+wx++xwxx+xx+x++xxxx+++xx+w+w+xxx+++wwx+xxxxwww+xxwxxx++w++x+xwxax+x++x INTERSECTION..harmony/lemay AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6//94 TIME .......... am :em, 94 COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES _ - GEOMETRY EB WB NE SB : EB - WB NB SB LT 113 169 126 60 : L 12. it L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 72S 1036 189 7-47 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 90 ill 72 77 : T i2.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 30 30 lr O : R 2.0 R' 12.o 12.0 12.0 1--.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1--.0 12. i, 12.ir 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- .ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) ('/.) YIN Nm No YIN min T EB ri. 00 2.00 N 0 O 0.90 10 . N = .8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N O O 0.90 10 N 31.a _ SB 0.00 1.00 N Co O 0.90 10 N 31.8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH - 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WS LT % X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 8.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.ir 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 O. ii 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APR. LOS EB L Co. 055 0.583 8.2 B 10.0 B T 1). 502 11. 475 10.4 B R: O.n94 ".475 8.2 B WB L 0.055 0.563 3.- B 1_.1 B T 0.714 0.475 14.2 B R 0. 126 0. 475 9.3 B NB L Co. 050 0. 367 18.6 C 22.33 C TR 0.355 Co. 250 24.0 C SB - L 0.050 0.367 18.6 C 23.8 C TR Co. 438 0.250 24.7 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSEr_TION: Delay = 14.7 (sec/veh) VIC = -1.485 LOS = 9 APPENDIX B MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO 80535 A M TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Ooservar Date L1b Day F(LI p/1 y City iT. Cn L L : n/S R = Right tom 11 5 = Stmlom INTERSECTION OF LEHf}`/ AND Lit NE19 T0N 0A L. F If S L e Lett wan TIMECrrAL BEGINS LEHA./ LBMA� TOTAL Sown t.)r1FATo.I L�h!/1LE,4S TOTAL East Wm TALL qly from NORTH from SDUTH from EAST from WEST R S L TotW I R 5 I L I TotW I R I S I L I Toth I R S I L TOW 7:30AI3-155- 7:as 1110 1 5/0 14 14 1 l7q IAO z I / 1615 /67 fz1 9 I N 11 I/f1 316117 I /91 /0112-1 v0 I 5 1/6 13 6 113 1 30 zz 5 6 z. 11 I dZ d7 p0,3 :r5' I I To I9ISS/o f I I s 13 571 zl 6z I/ 5 I Y I 6 q I/ 1151 v 1 7 1.26 11317IFIZ9 IS I917 /0 /01o2S / f yS 11 s3 /fo I II I I I I I I II I I I I 1 I I yaraC 13/I 613 / I f af31.901 31l II 65-z jq I ;Ly 1331 /Z/ IA51 .zzl qq 19 11/ 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I *:3nPl 1 741 of 1 I 01 93 IS1 94 II 19.5 1/21 7 I .231q I 'V 17I /5 138 I 1 y:a li 0 11F 1/ I 9 9I A z. I/z s 10 I /7 I6 36 I b 5, DO 5:15 I /o I 1 8 17z a l/ N 1 9 16 l y 1/ I o1J I /32. 1 a s 7 05. 1 /6 1 7 13 1 12. I I z l/ I 5'1 1 3 P /0 10 6 A 1 Iq 9 1-3 11 J6 II a/ z L 3 38 6 1 y39 Ia3136325 / 4 �I a31 1 /F aP o b l /60 1/ 0 I I I I I I I I I MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO80538 TABULAR SUMMARY OF COUNTS i ®I�Om�lO®�©�I®�A®I1•��I®I® ®IIIIIII'III�III�mIIII�III�IIIII,IIIII��IIIi_III�IIII� IIIIIII�� n MA17HEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO 80538 A M rre�lx err A M y TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Otuerver Date �12101'7y Day -rm ES City FORT COL L.rA 5 R a Right turn �-/�/ui2'/�'Ay TG CA/ GO L o Loft urn INTERSECTION OF AND �/�ti. TIME BEGINS /t7. /".'A',eAV /"/c'//iL :t'.0 /U/ TOTAL Novo SOU111 /iON TF_ CAiC zA /�/o,,TF CA ez D TOTAL East Wlst TOTAL ALL hom NORTH them SOUTH Them EAST them WEST R S L Total R S L Total R S L Total R S L Total 7.)o 3 6 o 0 0 /g 0 0 0 O / t a/ o 33 33 S/ 7vs H '7 0 /3 7 3 al a as 0 3- 3 6 /7 aY z7 I S2 Soo 3 /A d /7 7 1 O a 6 0 0 0 0 6 /O 0 /6 /6 y/ �/5 11 /3 23 9 V s 3 19 6 / a V 7 9 A V 4 137 yV /O 73083 3 So // Y 3 7 d YB /ya / S /0 33 72 S //0 /20 14 .I gooI I I y?o 3 S 0 a // a/ a9 / a o 3 o a / 6 135 vvs 7 / 6 /r /a 9 3 aY 3 o a 3 5 /V 52 Soo Y I q 6 / 9 /6 V I O a0 /7 E /Y 1 - 3 9 8 a l /3 ;1,/Y 9 / / 38 / 5 3 Y 3 /o / s7 y10-S3o a3 z8 /V 6$ 3Y 33 /a 79 /YY 3 /6 /a 3/ 7 /V 9 30 6/- 2os MAMEW J. DELICH, P.E. - 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO BD538 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Ooservef Date If S pay F/LIOA`j City Ff CDc L / Af S R . Right tum 1 5 . Straight INTERSECTION OF {fARMONy AND la)HE:A oAl L=Lott tum TIME BEGINS w HE P. rO .) iJNeA TD ..J TOTAL a SouthI YA4 MONy I ffAP,MONY TOTAL them WEST Ew I R I S I L Total W°" TOTALALL from NORTH them SOUTH them EAST R I 5 I L I Tmal R S I L I Total R I S I L I Total 093o II ZI I 2- 1 7 1- I I 7 B 9 o f f4 I I I IYSI q I a551 I oleo Yo511 4 r 0-?,j511 / I / 11 q I I I q M I Z I 8zl SI /pq I 9 A951 1 1 290 7 III 484 oPoo II ZI I z 11 9 1 1 I 9 II 11 3 119,11 i5l ZtZ I 1f1 3!' 1 o I 33qH s4 c II 5-5 a9I5"I 1 1 1 f 11 9 1 1 I 0 11014 vl /.r3 11 11A?31/I2 1q4 IIN 11 1 I 11 1 1 I q 11 1 1 I 11 1 1 1 I 11 7DTAL. 1 6 1 L 12 I l a II 3 I sl I.L71 1.99 135111341 31 //?zl /B71 1 /90 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II I I I I U I I I I I I II I I I I0 A I I II $:3o 1 0 1 1 0 16 I I b y 4 13101 1 1 31fl Y Vs 11 1 I 11 8 S II 9 I /o I 3A?1 4 134 I z /93 S r, s441 1 55 a S:ao- I I 1 1 I I 17 1 /0 1 7 13501 71 344 l 1 d211 / I 2 I S8S 11 SH s/solal I I I G IPI al 3351/Iao3 �IaoGI541 I54 I 1 I I I I I I I I 7orAL I I q2tl I I a9 -33 l a /3/ I a1 13L 1 6 1 91/ /01 a ! KV 122.Z1 I I I I I I A M MATTHEW J. DEUCH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO 805M TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COnnUNTS Observer Date 9 qd- Day06M. city �oe�' C ALL/41 S R = Righttum cMuP.P_AY 4Aey_OIJ� s = LeftStras r INTERSECTION OF AND L =Lett turn TIME BEGINS NLcl�ir�ee�Y �fc+Uvee�w Nor I South �A��oiJY �/.'�'NfG�J' TOTAL TOTAL East ALL 11e't from NORTH from SOUTH from EAST from WEST R I S I L I Total II R I S I L I Total R I S I L I Totai II R I S I L I Total '7 7- C' III to Ilo 11-7 III o I 1 IC zsIll 2.1Z7-71 14(oi �4S Iis 1 1 I g I I¢ Ii 9 I I l o l zo II 34 11 7 I . q 1131 1(o9 IIZ71 150 114 1231 11 4-00 11 4-34- II s 1 4- I I o I I g III Z I o 1131 z 11 4-4- 114- 1 1Z6o! 9 It 39 IIZ0IZI9 I IS- I Z5T5 11 3n, 11 4-3 3 I e. 1114 1 Z 110 1 2(o II 9 I Z 131 1 4- II 4-2 iI $ 17 i 1 1 1 T., 113472>3 19 74& I f II 41 Z. II I I II i I I II II I I i II I I I II II 130MI131 17 13 I (p 113$I 4- 13Z1 7 4i 1�0112(o1615145Is8(DII95185916011004111.�,90111740 (I I ( I II I I I II II I I I II i I I I it II i I I II I I I II II I I I II I I i II II it I I I II I I 1 II II I I I II I I I I II II I I I II I I i II II I I I II I I I II ii II i I I II I I I II II I I I it I I I II II 430 1114-1 1 15- 1 ZO 118 I Z IIIp 12(fl 124-ZI9 I?-5&111411$(0l3 IZa1? 11 7 II S/0 44-i5 114 1 3 14- Ill 113 1 Z In I 1 & II Z-7 1169 IZg9 I f- 1310 111(fl l i-7sl -!�- l 19(v II sO(o 11 S33 5&o II 3 1 Z 1 -7 1 1 2 11(o I I I to 1 1-7 11 Z If 1114 IZ90 11,5 131 I1Z6o1Zoo 1(o I Z3Z II 55l 11 .-(e4 s1 s IIIZ I 1 110 1 z3 Ill 1 1 1221 3 Z II 5-s Il l g 13331131364.114-01Z341 I2�5 1 11( II 700 it I I I II I I I II II I I I II I I I II II I �0-15SvII33I -7 12of ((o IIZ(pI 6 Imo`? 1 cl 11 16 7114411164I41 I1?4-j IIq(o I-79.5IZ&j 91-7 I ZI&& 11Z323 APPENDIX A I ' Elementary School. Most of the site generated traffic on McMurray Avenue north of Monte Carlo will be neighborhood traffic accessing the center. School pedestrian/bike traffic crossing McMurray occurs north of Monte Carlo. The Harmony Neighborhood Centre will minimally impact the school pedestrian/bike activity. Creating pedestrian "bulbs" at the McMurray/Monte Carlo intersection will ' shorten the crossing time/distance of McMurray Avenue. With the recommended control and geometrics, the accident ' rate should be at an acceptable level for typical urban conditions. 7 L I L ' 10 L ' is a wide street in this area. It narrows to a residential local width north of the school. Narrowing the entire street is not a practical solution to reducing the crossing distance for pedestrian/bikes. Creating pedestrian "bulbs" on McMurray near this intersection can shorten the crossing distance to 36 feet. While most of the pedestrian/bike activity is on the north side of Monte Carlo, creating a "bulb" on McMurray south of Monte Carlo can "give notice" to motorists that they are leaving a commercial area and entering a residential/school area. ' Accidents ' The recommended geometry, roadway cross sections, and control for the area streets should minimize vehicle conflicts and maximize vehicle separation. The accident rate should be normal for typical ' urban conditions. ' IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of the Harmony Neighborhood ' Centre on the short range (1997) and long range (2015) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: ' - The development of the Harmony Neighborhood Centre is le feasibfrom a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, approximately 13,900 trip ends will be generated at ' this development daily. - Current operation at the all of the key intersections is acceptable. However, it is recommended that northbound and ' southbound left -turn lanes be provided on Lemay Avenue at Whalers Way/Wheaton Drive. - In the short range future (1997), operation will be acceptable at all key intersections, except for eastbound street left-turns/throughs at the Lemay/Whalers/Wheaton intersection in ' the afternoon peak hour. The geometry shown in Figure 12 is recommended for the short range future condition (5 years +). It is recommended that this development have a right-in/right-out access on Harmony Road, and that the Harmony/Wheaton intersection be opened to full -turning movements and signalized. - In the long range future (2015), all intersections will ' operate acceptably in the peak hours with the geometry shown in Figure 13. A signal will be warranted at the Lemay/Whalers/Wheaton intersection. ' - The Harmony Neighborhood Centre is designed to minimize traffic impact to the neighborhood to the north and to the Kruse 1 9 t 9 3 KR USE MCMURRAY 49 ELEMENTARY N t SCHOOL „^ 7 MONTE CARLO o t 0 1.0 Hour ' 68 23 N t-, tO 0 1 ' 7:45 - 8:45 AM t1 A& AR USE MCMURRAY 6 ELEMENTARY N SCHOOL cv P) 00 0 MONTE CARLO 7 D ' 1.5 Hours 28— 14 "r— ,._ 0 1 1 11:00 AM - 12:30 PM KR USE A& MCMURRAY —.,,- 6 ELEMENTARY N MONTE CARLO - DENOTES PEDESTRIAN / 6 BIKE ACTIVITY t` � 3 cq a) 5 r-13 13 35 — °O N N 7 —, 2:30 = 3:30 PM SCHOOL VEHICLE / PEDESTRIAN / BIKE ACTIVITY DURING SCHOOL HOURS 1.0 Hour Figure 14 - DENOTES LANE P1 A, N co v .�• w =3 � ..r-oxrS CARLO WHEAT Site �. TAPER I �_ HARMONY W LONG RANGE GEOMETRY Figure 13 N — DENOTES LANE SHORT RANGE GEOMETRY Figure 12 I 1 Geometric Analysis 1 The geometry at the various intersections was analyzed using the short range traffic and long range traffic conditions. The short range geometry is shown in Figure 12. All of the 1 geometric improvements shown can be accomplished with restriping of the various roads with the exception of Lemay Avenue at Whalers Way and Wheaton Drive. The northbound and southbound left -turn 1 lanes on Lemay Drive can be striped, but the lanes will not be standard 12 foot lanes. These lanes were recommended under the existing conditions analysis. The required auxiliary lanes for the 1 right-in/right-out access currently exist as a continuous shoulder lane between McMurray and Wheaton. The long range geometry is shown in Figure 13. At the ' signalized intersections, the geometry is determined by the operation of the intersections. As mentioned earlier, Harmony Road is expected to have three lanes in each direction. With three 1 lanes in each direction, the State Highway Access Code does not require right -turn acceleration/deceleration lanes. Therefore, the right-in/right-out access can be designed with a radius and taper 1 rather than a full deceleration lane. Kruse Elementary School Considerations 1 Kruse Elementary School is located in the northeast quadrant of the McMurray/Monte Carlo intersection. The proposed Harmony 1 Neighborhood Centre is located in the southwest quadrant of the same intersection. The site design minimizes the potential impact on McMurray Avenue north of Monte Carlo. The traffic that will be 1 on McMurray north of Monte Carlo will primarily be neighborhood traffic using the center. There will not likely be much, if any, "cut through" traffic via Ticonderoga and McMurray. 1 At the neighborhood meeting and in conversations with staff and others, concern about the start, lunch, and dismissal times of the school was expressed. Therefore, observation and counts of 1 vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle traffic at the McMurray/Monte Carlo intersection were undertaken. Figure 14 shows the results of these counts. As can be seen, the primary pedestrian/bike activity crosses McMurray Avenue north of Monte Carlo. This indicates that the school pedestrian/bike activity will only be impacted by the neighborhood traffic to/from the north. The vehicular traffic is low during these times and the operation is 1 at level of service A with the existing traffic and with the short and long range future traffic. 1 There will not be any inherent safety concerns pertaining to this intersection and the relationship to the school pedestrian/bike activity. As mentioned earlier, McMurray Avenue 1 8 Table 6 Long Range Peak Hour Operation Alternative Access Scheme Level of Service Intersection AM PM Harmony/Lemay (signal) C D Harmony/McMurray (signal) B C Harmony/Wheaton (signal) B B Lemay/Whalers/Wheaton (signal) B B McMurray/Monte Carlo (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Wheaton/Monte Carlo (stop sign) WB LT/RT A A SB LT A A Wheaton/Harmony Neighborhood Centre Access/Stonebridge Access (stop sign) EB LT/T B D EB RT A A WB LT/T A D WB RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A McMurray/Harmony Neighborhood Centre Access/Office Access (stop sign) EB LT/T A A EB RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Harmony/Right-in/Right-out Access (stop sign) SB RT A A Table 5 Long Range Peak Hour Operation Existing Access Scheme Level of Service Intersection AM PM Harmony/Lemay (signal) C D Harmony/McMurray (signal) B C Harmony/Wheaton (stop sign) NB RT B A SB RT A B EB LT B E WB LT E D Lemay/Whalers/Wheaton (signal) B C McMurray/Monte Carlo (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Wheaton/Monte Carlo (stop sign) WB LT/RT A A SB LT A A Wheaton/Harmony Neighborhood Centre Access/Stonebridge Access (stop sign) EB LT/T A C EB RT A A WB LT/T A C WB RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A McMurray/Harmony Neighborhood Centre Access/Office Access (stop sign) EB LT/T A A EB RT A A WB LT/T/RT A B SB LT A A NB LT A A Table 4 Short Range Peak Hour Operation Alternative Access Scheme Level of Service Intersection AM PM Harmony/Lemay (signal) C C Harmony/McMurray (signal) B B Harmony/Wheaton (signal) B B Lemay/Whalers/Wheaton (stop sign) EB LT/T D E EB RT A A WB LT/T C D WB RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A McMurray/Monte Carlo (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Wheaton/Monte Carlo (stop sign) WB LT/RT A A SB LT A A Wheaton/Harmony Neighborhood Centre Access/Stonebridge Access (stop sign) EB LT/T B D EB RT A A WB LT/T A D WB RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A McMurray/Harmony Neighborhood Centre Access/Office Access (stop sign) EB LT/T A A EB RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Harmony/Right-in/Right-out Access (stop sign) SB RT A A Table 3 Short Range Peak Hour Operation Existing Access Scheme Level of Service Intersection AM PM Harmony/Lemay (signal) C C Harmony/McMurray (signal) B B Harmony/Wheaton (stop sign) NB RT A A SB RT A A EB LT A D WB LT C B Lemay/Whalers/Wheaton (stop sign) EB LT/T D E EB RT A A WB LT/T C D WB RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A McMurray/Monte Carlo (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Wheaton/Monte Carlo (stop sign) WB LT/RT A A SB LT A A Wheaton/Harmony Neighborhood Centre Access/Stonebridge Access (stop sign) EB LT/T A C EB RT A A WB LT/T A C WB RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A McMurray/Harmony Neighborhood Centre Access/Office Access (stop sign) EB LT/T A A EB RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. All intersections will operate acceptably, except for Whalers Way eastbound left-turns/throughs at the Lemay/Whalers/ Wheaton intersection in the afternoon peak hour. At the Harmony/ Lemay and Harmony/McMurray signalized intersections, acceptable operation is achieved with the existing geometry. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 9, the key intersections operate in the short range condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix G. This depicts the operation with right-in/right-out access on Harmony Road and a signal at the Harmony/Wheaton intersection. All intersections will operate acceptably, except for Whalers Way eastbound left-turns/throughs at the Lemay/Whalers/ Wheaton intersection in the afternoon peak hour. There will be subtle changes in the operation at the Harmony/Lemay and Harmony/ McMurray intersections due to a redistribution of traffic due to the introduction of the Harmony/Wheaton signalized intersection. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 10, the key intersections operate in the long range condition with the proposed developments as indicated in Table 5. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix H. At this level of background traffic and site generated traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably, except for Harmony Road eastbound and westbound left -turns during the peak hours. These left turns will be at level of service F due to the high eastbound and westbound traffic on Harmony Road during the peak hours. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 11, the key intersections operate in the long range condition with the proposed developments as indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these ' analyses are shown in Appendix I. This depicts the intersection operation with the right-in/right-out access on Harmony Road and a signal at the Harmony/Wheaton intersection. All intersections will operate acceptably. Recommended Site Access ' Given the operational considerations of the two access schemes in the short and long range futures, it is recommended that a right-in/right-out access be provided to the site from Harmony Road ' as shown in Figure 5. It is also recommended that the Harmony/ Wheaton intersection be opened to full movements and signalized. This will subtly improve the operation at adjacent signalized ' intersections. These recommendations will also provide a second signalized intersection to Harmony, which will serve the neighborhood to the north. This signal will likely reduce the ' traffic on Monte Carlo Drive and McMurray Avenue. 1 Centre Access. North of this access, the increase in traffic on McMurray is primarily attributable to the neighborhood to the north (Golden Meadows) utilizing this shopping area. The likelihood of traffic utilizing McMurray and Ticonderoga to/from Lemay is small, since this traffic will find utilizing Wheaton a more convenient and faster route. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. No new signals are anticipated at any of the key intersections in the short range future, except at the Harmony/Wheaton intersection with the access scheme shown in Figure 5. In the long range future, a signal would also be warranted at the Lemay/Wheaton/Whalers intersection under either access scheme. Signal Progression Signal progression was evaluated along Harmony Road under the existing access scheme and the alternative access scheme with a signal located at the Harmony/Wheaton intersection. Appendix E shows time -space diagrams for Harmony Road from Boardwalk Drive to County Road 9. Signal timing from the long range intersection analyses were used in these analyses. Traffic studies for the South Timberline Properties, the NCR Site, and Oak/Cottonwood Farm were used for intersections not evaluated in this study. Appendix E, pages 1 and 3 show the time -space diagrams for Harmony Road without a signal at Wheaton Drive. At 45 mph progressed speed (page 1), the efficiency is 26% with bandwidths of 36 seconds and 33 seconds. At 50 mph progressed speed (page 3), the efficiency is 18% with bandwidths of 24 seconds and 21 seconds. Appendix E, pages 2 and 4 show the time -space diagrams for Harmony Road with a signal at Wheaton Drive. Both the efficiencies and bandwidths are identical to pages 1 and 3. It is concluded that introducing a signal at Wheaton Drive will not negatively impact the progression along Harmony Road. Operations Analysis Capacity analyses were performed on key intersections adjacent to and near the Harmony Neighborhood Centre. The key intersections were suggested by Fort Collins staff. Both the short and long range futures included full development of the Harmony Neighborhood Centre. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 8, the key intersections operate in the short range condition as indicated in Ci I LJ 1 II � v Q J a3 00 3 ago�-145 175 ^ -�-- 90/140 , + r- 40/20 p 90%150 40/30 o - M N Ln LO �,$ nol5o WHEATON 1.1 AM / PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles. Ln o ,n "'c co r IN CARLO / j 5/10 75/15 -�Ln 35/10 -� fro 00 �� n i o --15/15 225 20/25 15 25 �55,100 Site 25/45 —} 45/25 —� } `� r NOM. o 0 0 15/25 25/15 N �� 100/190 � D o '0 + 000 ,n v � -A o '� r� CD 0 g g 100/220 c �-- 25/60 0 o 55/95 1055/1930 °i -1270/2330 °D °' � 1190/1995 'or-- 205/300 HARMONY 125/135 J } --150/100 120/200 } 75y135 105y120 } 1715 1385 ---� o o Ln 1945 1545 --� Ln 1665 1500 o Un o 220/300 -� � 200/150 300/120 -- 0� Ul N � �N I�InO Nn" Q a W ' LONG RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (Existing Access Scheme) 1 Figure 10 IJ I 7 II A. Q6 3 U� o-135/150 r'7 N 75/100 35/10 55/35 70/110 30/20 -� � o\ N Ln• M N WHEA AM / PM Rounded to Nearest b Vehicles. A. r� C,j 5/5 `IC" °O° ^-�- 5/20 Lo ,015° MONTE CARLO 5/15 5 10-� � r \ ° 75/15 I 300 5/10-� ,OUio M d� TON O a v� u, 125/235 15 25 65/120 � " _ _ _ %. ; Site41 i�� ,) LO C\ N f O M I 1 / 1 25/45 01 15/15 � 20/25 30/20 } I NOM. -- C> o O 15/25 M L�n 35/70 �� O 40/20 -�Ln N O \\ o �-- 45/180 Of u7 L 10/45 O O LOLB LO \, 40/70 N 0\ o\ '0 o ` �- 715/1305 ^ ^ + - 750/1570 �I "jj' +- 655/1530 110/265 HARMONY + 75/85 L 15/0 785311605 1 /� 75/65 45/145 f 70/140 -� } 80 70 } 1065/885 --� n Ln to 1230/925 o 0 0 1185 900 — O o in 175/245 -� o 90/40 -� �� 100/100 -� uOto OPI) CD ^ N - a Z a o w i SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (Alternative Access Scheme) Figure s II I 1 1 1 II II [J A. N v Q a� 3 Lon 3LOP) a 125 135 0' 75/1100 /-- 35/10 55/35 } 70/115 o rn N 30/20 -� �\ N O CD 50 ' ��015 S\y� WHEATONr04 AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles. A. A- N 5/5 `O"' — 5/20 fir- 5/15 5/10 ) O 75/15 - ! o 35/10 -� to M Cp o� a o �- 15/15 ,;,; �12�235 ��` I 1-20/25 �i� I" 1 I�g r— 55/105 � } S i l e 1 1 25/45 45/25 # r __�� NOW o o 15/25 - I 0 95/175 --� ^ �<, 0 25/15 n o \ LO � 40 o N 45/180 -- 20/55 45/80 " CI' N - 665/1215 , co 735/1535 , o\, r` r ) r` +- 660/1505 110/215 HARMONY ,,— 90/110 + /-- 75/65 45/145 --� } 70/140 - 105/120 f 1065/885 — o uo Ln 1270/945 y 1155/865 —r o o Ln 175/245 -� �4Z� 90/40 -� 100/100 �� ototo CD rOi Ul M .- Z Q Q W � V SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (Existing Access Scheme) Figure 8 A& N NO SCALE LONG RANGE TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 7 i A& N NO SCALE SHORT RANGE TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 6 Trip Distribution Two directional distributions of the generated trips were determined for the Harmony Neighborhood Centre. The typical market area for a neighborhood centre is 2-2.5 miles from the site. The trip distribution assumed that 50% would come from the area shown in the aerial photo in Appendix D. This area is within 0.5+ miles of the site. This distribution was determined by counting roof tops. The remaining 50% would come from the remainder of the market area and as passby traffic from the major street (Harmony Road). The short range trip distribution is.shown in Figure 6 and the long range trip distribution is shown in Figure 7. It is expected that this area of Fort Collins will grow to the south and east. This, coupled with the introduction of other neighborhood centers (grocery stores), will cause a modification to the trip distribution that is reflected in Figure 7. Background Traffic Background traffic is defined as the traffic that is and/or will be on the area streets that is not related to the proposed development. Future analysis years were 1997 (short range) and 2015 (long range). This is a developing area of Fort Collins and, as such, the traffic increases are largely dependent upon land development. Background traffic was increased incrementally by 3 percent per year on Harmony Road and Lemay Avenue for the short range future analysis year. Traffic on local streets was increased to reflect the proposed development in the area. The traffic projections from the City of Fort Collins Transportation and Air Quality Planning Program and previously completed traffic studies in the area were used to obtain the long range background traffic projections. Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figures B, 9, 10, and 11 show the short range and long range morning and afternoon peak hour site generated traffic plus background traffic at the key intersections. Figures B and 9 show the short range assignments for the two access schemes described earlier. Figures 10 and 11 show the long range assignments for the two access schemes. ' With the Harmony Neighborhood Centre, traffic will increase on all streets. Wheaton traffic will increase most significantly, since it will function as an access from Harmony Road, and as an ' access from Lemay Avenue, Whalers Way, and a portion of the neighborhood to the north. The McMurray traffic will increase most significantly between Harmony Road and the Harmony Neighborhood 1 5 Table 2 Trip Generation Daily Land Use Trips King Soopers - 66.692 KSF 8370 Day Care - 3.5 KSF 280 NE Retail - 12.4 KSF 500 NE Office - 8.0 KSF 200 E. Restaurant - 6.5 KSF 1330 W. Bank - 7.25 KSF 1920 Retail/Coffee Shop - 620 5.0 KSF Attached Retail - 36.6 KSF 1490 Service/Retail - 8.6 KSF 360 TOTAL 15070 ADJUSTED TOTAL 13860 A.M. Peak Trips Trips in out 94 40 29 24 38 41 23 3 51 51 45 36 27 28 P.M. Peak Trips Trips in out 351 338 25 29 35 26 5 23 57 49 152 165 29 24 113 122 103 78 27 29 25 19 447 374 782 751 332 269 594 571 ' It should be noted that the proposed use on this parcel has been posted for a number of years. Access to the site itself is ' proposed from McMurray Avenue and Wheaton Drive under both access schemes. There is an additional access shown to Harmony Road in Figure 5. No vehicular access is shown to Monte Carlo Drive in either access scheme. It is the intention of the developer to not ' have truck traffic on either McMurray or Wheaton north of the site access driveways. ' Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information, prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers dated 1987, was used to ' project trips that would be generated by the proposed uses at the Harmony Neighborhood Centre. Table 2 shows the trip generation expected from the various individual uses within the Harmony Neighborhood Centre. Table 2 shows the trip generation for each use expected on ' this site. This is a common method of forecasting trips. This method does not take into consideration the fact that some of the trips counted at stand-alone sites are not being made within the multi -use development, either by vehicle or an alternate mode such as walking, bicycle, or transit. Probably the most common example of this trip -making occurs at multi -use developments containing office and a shopping/service area. Some of the trips made from ' the offices to shops, to restaurants, or to banks may be made on - site. These types of trips thus become internal to the multi -use site. They are "captured" on -site. Recent research indicated that: ' 1. At multi -use centers, 77% of the trips made one stop, 16% of the trips made two stops, and 7% of the trips made three or ' more stops. 2: This results in a reduction of 8% for daily trips. 3. The calculated morning peak hour traffic is 28% higher than ' observed. 4. The calculated afternoon peak hour traffic is 24% higher than observed. ' The line labelled "Adjusted Total" in Table 2 reflects the above adjustments to the trip generation for the individual uses. Another method of adjusting for multi -use centers is to use the ' shopping center category in Trip Generation, 5th Edition. This would result in a daily trip generation of 9620 vehicle trip ends. This is a reduction of 37%. The more conservative (high) trip ' generation, shown in Table 2, was used for analysis purposes. ' 4 I SITE PLAN (Alternative Access Scheme) 4z NO SCALE G a 0 M a Figure 5 SITE PLAN (Existing Access Scheme) Figure 4 Table 1 1994 Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Harmony/Lemay (signal) B B Harmony/McMurray (signal) B B Harmony/Wheaton (stop sign) NB RT A A SB RT A A EB LT A B WB LT B A Lemay/Whalers/Wheaton (stop sign) EB LT/T B C EB RT A A WB LT/T B B WB RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A McMurray/Monte Carlo (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Wheaton/Monte Carlo (stop sign) WB LT/RT A A SB LT A A traffic counts on Harmony Road indicate a higher eastbound directional split in the morning peak hour and a higher westbound directional split in the afternoon peak hour. Existing Operation ' Table 1 shows the operation at the Harmony/Timberline intersection during the peak hours. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. Appendix C describes level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the IM Highway Capacity Manual. All intersections operate acceptably. Acceptable ' operation is defined as level of service D or better. In the analysis at the Lemay/Whalers/Wheaton intersection, the through volumes on Lemay Avenue were factored by 1.2 and then divided by 2 to reflect the two through lanes in each direction. This ' accounts for traffic volumes being distributed over the two lanes, but not necessarily equally distributed. This modification to the technique is based upon recent research and discussions with the ' Chairman of the Transportation Research Board Committee on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service. ' The existing cross section of Lemay Avenue at Whalers Way/ Wheaton Drive has the throughs and right turns in a shared lane and the throughs and left turns in a shared lane. The through/ right combination is normal. However, the through/left combination ' is inefficient and, potentially, a safety concern. It is recommended that northbound and southbound left -turn lanes be provided on Lemay Avenue at Whalers Way/Wheaton Drive. ' III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ' The Harmony Neighborhood Centre is a commercial development located north of Harmony Road and between McMurray Avenue and Wheaton Drive in Fort Collins. Figure 4 shows a site plan of the ' Harmony Neighborhood Centre. This site plan reflects the current access in this area in accordance with the Harmony Road Access Control Plan. The Harmony/McMurray intersection is currently signalized. The Harmony/Wheaton intersection functions as a right- ' in/right-out/left-in. There is a traffic diverter island in Harmony Road that prevents northbound and southbound left turns and through movements. Figure 5 shows the site plan of the Harmony Neighborhood Centre with a right-in/right-out access to Harmony Road between ' McMurray and Wheaton. This site plan also shows a signal at the Harmony/Wheaton intersection. Consideration of this access scheme was suggested by Fort Collins staff as a potential mitigation ' measure to reduce the traffic impacts to area streets. ' 3 A. W} J a 3 v (--64/52 m � 24/23 J + 33/9 49/30 22/28 N 25/18� oco N r) co N ^o �N N �— 43/111 rD - 559/1036 �-- 56/169 HARMONY 62/113 - } I 931 /728 - to m N .71-71 to o 00 CD N a J O H a w 2 C� 5/29 667/1311 % 27/21 3/10 —' 1134/811 -- rn 35/6 - N RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N r) , 1/3 r�io5 `� "' - �- 4/16 /`— 5/12 .. 9 I 72 14 - / 33/7-� Nr,c" n co t L12/12 "' -18/25 26/44 515/1164 45/41 5026 859 795 - rn 95/96 - N co 17 M a v Figure 3 N ' NO SCALE ' PRIMARY STREETS Figure 2 I J ' Land Use ' Land uses in the area are primarily institutional, commercial or residential. Residential uses exist or will exist to the west and north of the Harmony Neighborhood Centre. The Courtney Park Apartments and future Stonebridge Apartments are west of the site. ' The Golden Meadows Neighborhood is north of the site. This consists of primarily single family detached dwelling units. East of the site are office and light industrial (distribution) uses. ' Kruse Elementary School is in the northeast quadrant of the McMurray/Monte Carlo intersection. Oak Ridge PUD is south of the site. The north portion of Oak Ridge PUD has commercial (office, ' bank, service, etc.) uses and the south portion of Oak Ridge has residential uses. Land in the area is essentially flat. The center of Fort ' Collins lies to the north of the Harmony Neighborhood Centre. ' Roads The primary streets near the Harmony Neighborhood Centre are ' shown in Figure of the site. It 2. Lemay Avenue is a north -south is approximately 0.25 miles west street designated as an arterial street. In this area, it has a four lane urban cross section north and south of Harmony Road. There are turn lanes at some intersections. Specifics of the Lemay cross section will be addressed in this study. There is a signal at the Harmony/Lemay intersection. ' Harmony Road is a four lane state highway, designated as a major arterial. Harmony Road has an interchange with I-25. In the ' vicinity of the site, the cross section consists of two lanes in each direction with a grass median. There are right- and left -turn lanes at most intersections, including Lemay Avenue. The posted speed is 50 mph. In the future, Harmony Road is expected to be ' widened to six through lanes. Other streets in the area (Wheaton, Whalers Way, Monte Carlo, ' and McMurray) are not designated by the City of Fort Collins and are, therefore, considered to be local streets. Wheaton connects Lemay Avenue and Harmony Road and functions as a minor collector ' in this area. McMurray, between Harmony and Monte Carlo, also functions as a collector street. Both of these streets are built to collector widths in these areas. Existing Traffic ' Peak hour traffic flow at Figure 3. These count volumes 1994. Raw traffic count data the key intersections is shown in were obtained in 1992, 1993, and is provided in Appendix A. The 2 LJ I. INTRODUCTION ' This traffic impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed Harmony Neighborhood Centre in Fort Collins, Colorado. Harmony ' Neighborhood Centre is a commercial development comprised of a grocery store, restaurant, bank, day care, office, and miscellaneous retail uses. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planning consultant (Vaught*Frye, Architects), the developer (SullivanHayes), the Principal at Kruse Elementary ' School, the Fort Collins Planning Department, and the Fort Collins Transportation Division. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in typical traffic impact study guidelines. The ' study involved the following steps: Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; ' _ Analyze signal warrants; Analyze signal progression; - Analyze potential changes in accidents and safety ' considerations. This report is prepared for the following purposes: Evaluate the existing conditions at key intersections; Estimate the trip generation by the proposed developments; Determine the trip distribution of site generated traffic; Evaluate operation at key intersections; Determine the geometrics at key intersections; Determine the impacts of site generated traffic on key intersections. ' Information used in this report was obtained from the City of Fort Collins, the planning consultant, the developer, research sources (ITE, TRB, etc.), and field reconnaissance. At the ' direction of the Fort Collins Transportation Division, this study assumes that development of the Oak Ridge PUD (south of the site) will be at a level and use as has been approved by the City of Fort ' Collins. This study does not include traffic from the conceptual Walmart Superstore. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Harmony Neighborhood Centre is shown in ' Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. [1 1 17 ' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Harmony Neighborhood Centre is a grocery store based multi -use commercial development located north of Harmony Road between McMurray Avenue and Wheaton Drive in Fort Collins. This traffic impact study involved the steps of trip generation, trip ' distribution, trip assignment, capacity analysis, traffic signal warrant analysis, traffic signal progression analysis, and safety analysis. This study assessed the impacts of the Harmony Neighborhood Centre on the short range (1997) and long range (2015) street ' system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis; the following is concluded: The development of the Harmony Neighborhood Centre is ' feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, approximately 13,900 trip ends will be generated at this development daily. - Current operation at the all of the key intersections is acceptable. However, it is recommended that northbound and southbound left -turn lanes be provided on Lemay Avenue at Whalers Way/Wheaton Drive. In the short range future (1997), operation will be ' acceptable at all key intersections, except for eastbound street left-turns/throughs at the Lemay/Whal ers /Wheaton intersection in the afternoon peak hour. The geometry shown in Figure 12 is recommended for the short range future condition (5 years +). It is recommended that this development have a right-in/right-out access on Harmony Road, and that the Harmony/Wheaton intersection be opened to full -turning movements and signalized. - In the long range future (2015), all intersections will operate acceptably in the peak hours with the geometry shown in I , Figure 13. A signal will be warranted at the Lemay/Whalers/Wheaton intersection. ' - The Harmony Neighborhood Centre is designed to minimize traffic impact to the neighborhood to the north and to the Kruse Elementary School. Most of the site generated traffic on McMurray Avenue north of Monte Carlo will be neighborhood traffic accessing ' the center. School pedestrian/bike traffic crossing McMurray occurs north of Monte Carlo. The Harmony Neighborhood Centre will minimally impact the school pedestrian/bike activity. Creating ' pedestrian "bulbs" at the McMurray/Monte Carlo intersection will shorten the crossing time/distance of McMurray Avenue. ' - With the recommended control and geometrics, the accident should rate be at an acceptable level for typical urban conditions. I i HARMONY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTRE tSITE ACCESS STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JUNE 1994 1 ' Prepared for: SullivanHayes, Brokerage 1001 Lincoln Street ' Denver, CO 80203 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 Banyan Avenue Loveland, CO 80538 ' Phone: 303-669-2061 1 r�I 1 1 i 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 *11 N „11 JJ h r'I k�1 tl1 f1t =co i '� I�,L� 1 f__ I :—. /' �� ]� �[lC` lf`H� ��F�p[y4y_`ll,r�l� •l 1�i�~✓rI �I o Ao s T �I I"L ��L ;� UNIVha 1'RY f �"��"�n��l_E�I��I IIS�f. - 7 1f �I lrnr r! I L=�11 I• L �1 �! fll 111C ll:. 1 �I•I�I�I�ILf_uT[VyII ILl[ ],�� 7r__]C 7 L JL7r�L,li I E 71-]I_JC.n I� �� ]l71 .l�a[ 1L 1 r J(.11rlIV-ld)/L_ �� . S I IIr'�!� JL Jf - l �; I I C']f� �/ r,• 1 BM4954 �- L� flU9 1 ; r. •, I ravel Pit I�.11f' I I i , •. - el -,;_—_—' _— ,i ,- f�. :- t, a, Radic 065 /5Gc C • l A. 1' iI'I JJi f '�r r U f(— L 7L_l I .S rlrI TF eal rr�7 � �.�o,o _ _. \ _ r 'I o ITowpi1 1I�1�'� r 11 %• ,� i I1j 1 /26 i .38n rIARINrEB .:..�N-'•fin 1��)� n�nl:�(1(�_:]� TT 20 �I -III I it �L r iuu �..z rakes �Cl�� = tL�l � N " _= IY LAn- J111L7 __��a�� . -- c•.'_. __ II'rlr�jlr� 1pL L— II II J I \_�vrr11 w95B1 'UI 5 -'�--?'-----�_ 30' i Oinegh I�� a55412 p 1549 11 rlI ..r c. i /I •• -_ Ie??�;. 499/ 5. / �� W Me clellanck _ 1 1 Le ,!�ii)�ONY RD..,1 ,.� I F� •mouj (�_j�� 503 . - Ce I I' SPA �� .._._ —_ _ .. __ 5el.e _. ______.._ N .. I/: . _--__ ._ __ J. - _ — -='- . HARMONY— w' NEIGHBORHOOD CENTRE P.U.D. I _ i I tltl U�.f4li , l:1 rlll)r;rl`, i<se 1 I Iona/ n I • " ,__ IQ /r Il ll� Q. n Trilby :� ii Centel:.. I II ri'• _ yl' I l /50/ -- 4923 I _ - . II 1( r' rr rrlrr I r %II'll.'. r I r 1 SITE LOCATION NO SCALE Figure 1 7 L_1 L [I 1 N v as 3 �o 3 ��N moo -135/165 -+- 90/140 40/20 60 40 '� 901150�' o 15!' 40/30 -� o o noN WHEAT AM / PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles. go150 0015 000 s� r i o C -15/15 NOM. 115 . l (--20/25 15 2� � /r we 5/5 Ln o N m — 5/20 CARLO Aj 1 10/20 5/10 75/15 Ln o 35/10 -4� Ln o r) Ca 65/125 Site 25/45 30/20 -� r } I `__�� NOW — Ln Ln o 15/25 -� n g 40/75 --y -P�\ Lo o 40/20 -� �� ` LO m 'n�� C) o co 100/220 o00 0, o - 15/45 45/80 M N -1100/2020 ` v " o 1275/2300 8 l) dl" LO �-1200 2015 �205/300 HARMONY + %110/110 �1350 �1soj o0 2365f 1 120/200 r 75/135 - + 80/75 -f } 1715 1385 o o rn 1885 1510 -� co ^ 0 1695/1535 -� � Ln 220/300 �Gc 200/150 �� 300/120 -� �z NMN t0LO CD Z a o M --� W V LONG RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (Alternative Access Scheme) Figure 11 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m CITY CF PA7 COLL:%.S TRAFFIC LNS!NEE3111 sit! coal : AvOia fArE: I Ni Will: LzHAY AVE. RU: 98-1c-32 E-1 Street: 0 M, KTA leather : 5.1%y lovemis IV: 'Mary )AT5: 10125M :EA4 -RICO ANALYSIS FCR THE FERI-M 1:210 Al - 03:20 AM ;IRECTION START PEAK IiR ........... YOUNES ........... ...... ORZ7 S ....... F.V PEAK M :AC-,CR PEDS Rignt Tthm Left Totli ;7S Rip: -.hm Uf' lirth 1:39 AN 0.93 2 ST 112 122 295 !i ii 1! :lv 7:10 AN 0.51 2 13 "! Si SSE South 1:10 AN 0.72 a -:0 35 test 7:30 AN 0.23 S 64 iSl 52 Entire litarsect:n 1:30 AY, . 1.3 2 it 112 13 M 2! Al :lit C.S! 2 i! Zi. 56 !-a 3 *—un 96 335 21. 21 east 0.33 i 60 3 '1 i 52 1053 5 33 5 LEMAY AVE. N W— E ............ S (PEDS 2 81 112 ............. ... 255 122 : . . . . . . . ... : . . . . . 2 C PEDS I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295 43 .................. 716 ... HARMONY ROAD 658 559 62 56 931 1053 HARMONY ROAD ... .................. 1142 . . . . . . . : '. 60 335 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • (PEDS 1 6 ............. 96 150 89 5 [PEDS 228 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ ............ LEKAY AVE. Site Coal : 0098MIS N-S Street: L-YAY AVE.FILE: E-W Street: 4ARV.0" RCAO leather SM CITY -.-I iNRT M' USS ERGI4i:-qlF- Avegents :Y: Imary Plitt: I 18-!0-12 DATE: 10/25192 PEAK ANALYSIS FC1 THE ;:•iM :1:10 PS - 05:.0 r3 MR;CTION START 21'-( Pit ........... . ICU -NE* ........... ...... ?E:Yt ....... F.;Cm P.:A( NOUN :117.3 .-EDS R;gftt lhrj ?!t Total E)i q1AZ Toru Lift lorth 1:10 PH MI it IT ill V. IS4 20 U 15 East 4:10 PM :.21 2 M 10" .i T3 It South 4:10 PH 2.22 9 12- i:3 11 isi ;I 43 il test ,:! .0 IN 3.:2 3 90 7;^. !i3 931 10 78 .1 cvre hv!,i 4:" PH 1.ii ii 77 Stun J 2 9 12 :^i 117 ;i Ig t3 jest 3 ?0 723 i13 M :2 LEMAY AVE. N 9f ; E ............ ............. S 413 .... (PEDS 7 11 77 247 60 ............ 2 [PEDS ............ . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . A 384 ill .......... .................. 1239 . . . HARI'M ROAD 1316 1038 113 169 728 931 RAFMNY ROAD . . . .................. 860 .......... 90 387 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . (PEDS 1 3 • ............ 125 189 72 9 [PEDS :.. 506 ... ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . LEMAY AVE. MATTHEW J DELICH /✓� C ARTERIAL PROGRESSION DEGION ROUTE: HARMONY INTERSECTIONS: 7 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 SYSTEM OFFSETS 0 BANDWIDTH LEFT: 36 SEC RIGHT! 33 SEC PERFORMANCE INDEX: 40 EFFICIENCY: 28 ATTAINABILITY: 53 INTERFERENCE: 21 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO. .........TIME -LOCATION DIAGRAM.......... DISTANCE SPEED RIGHTSOUND ... READ DOWN LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT 1 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2020 0 45 45 2 XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX 1290 2020 45 45 3 1290 1290 45 45 4 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2620 1290 45 45 5 XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3550 2620 45 45 6 XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 1760 3550 45 45 7 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 0 1760 45 45 NO. OFFSET .........TIME -LOCATION DIAGRAM.......... PHASE LENGTHS LEFTBOUND ... READ UP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 58 42 2 50 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 60 40 3 0 I00 4 45 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 66 34 5 95 XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX 55 45 6 40 XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX 60 40 7 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 47 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 61 39 T111E SPACE DIAGRAM ROUTE: HARMONY CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS: SCALE ]INCH=40X OF CYCLE: I LINE= 313 FT 2 3 4 5 6 7 x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxsxxxxxxxxxxxx 1995 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION. ------ _--------------- _______________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. SO PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... Wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST.......... imd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/w)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am .pm snort OTHER -INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------- _______________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG I`IAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ___________________________--_______________-______-______________-__ ES WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 25 1ir5 35 245 THRU -5 25 40 5 RIGHT 15 235 120 O NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ____________________________________________________________________. EB i48 NB 58 _____________________ ------- LANES _ .. 1 LANE USAGE LT - R CAPACITY AND L-=VEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) r (pcphi c (prpn) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH ______ _________________ ____---_____ MINOR STREET - ES LEFT 28 S56 219 295 219 i 240 191 ;>r- D THROUGH 28 578 451 > 451 > 423 i A RIGHT 17 599 999 999 98S A MINOR STREET WD LEFT 116 523 392 40e 392 26.3 277 ?C C THROUGH 28 610 475 > 475 448 i A -RIGHT 259 995 995 995 777 A MAJOR. STREET SB LEFT 270 991. 991 991 722 A NB LEFT S9 1000 1000 100ii 962 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME_ OF THE EAST/WEST STR'EET...... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... Wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ; am ;v short OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSF_CTION9 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------ --------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR FTREET.. 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA. pOPULATIr_N...................... 100(jOi� NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... king soopers NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. .jmd - DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/2/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. a`pm 9/F >l:Okr, OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION; EAST/WEST- CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT O O -- O THRU O 471 -- O RIGHT a 15 __ 5p NUMBER OF LANE= --------------------------------------------------------------------- __ WB NB SE, ------- -------------- ------- LANES _ _ -- 2 CAFACIT`i AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE ----------------------------- page-g POTEN- ACTL SAL FLOW- TIAI_ MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC I T'Y .CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pc?ni r (PcPh) tp-Pn? c IpcPh) r = c - v LOS p rM - ------------ SH R 6H ------------ --- MINOF: STREET Sb RIGHT 55 886 686 886 9711 A 1DENTIFFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/NEST STREET...... harmonv . NAME_ OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... king soopers DATE_ AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... b/2/94 �m pm Ya SHOk f OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZE➢ INTERSECTIONS 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT SUMMARY REPORT ++rt++r+rtrtrxxrrxx++rtxrt+xx++rrtxrt++rtrtsxrt++rt+rtrtrtxxxxrtrtrtrt+x+rtrtrtrtx+++xx+.+++rtrtxx x+r:xrrtr+rt+rx+rtxrtrxrtrtrtxxrt+rtrtrtrtrtrt+rtrtrtxr+x++rtrtrt+rrt+xrtrtxxxrtxrtrtt+rtrtrtxr++rtrtrtx+x INTERSECTION..harmonyilemay INTERSECTION..harmony/lemay AREA TYPE..... OTHER AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd ANALYST....... jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 DATE.......... 6/3/94 TIME ........... ai Pm long TIME.......... am long COMMENT....... COMMENT....... ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB . EB WB NB SB EB WB NB S8 : ES WB NB S8 LT 120 205 23U 240 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 LT 200 306 310 115 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1715 1100 320 300 : T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 1385 2020 610 450 : T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 T L.O RT 220 100 205 180 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 300 220 295 150 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 30 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 RR 30 30 -0 30 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 RR GO 30 30 : R 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 . R 12.0 12: 12.0 12.0 12.0 1^.0 ---__------------------------------_-------------------------------------- 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm No Y/N min T (%) (%) Y/N Nm N6 Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0.95 SO N 20.5 4 EB 0.00 2.iN N O 0 0.95 10 N 20.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 20.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 i( 0.95 10 N 20.5 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 2.5 3 NB 0.00 1.00 N O 0 0.95 10 N 32.5 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 32.5 3 SB 0.00 1.00 -----__-----------------------------------_----------_-------------------- N 0 O 0.95 10 N 32.5 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 12-0.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x x NB LT x X EB LT x X NB LT :x x TH x TH x TH x TH x RT x RT x RT x RT x PD x PD x PD x PD x WB LT x x S8 LT x x WB LT x x SB LT x x TH x TH x TH x TH x RT x RT x RT x RT x PD x PD x PD x PD x GREEN 15.0 47.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 8.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 f(.O YELLOW 5.0 5.0 -------------------------------_--_-------------_------------------------- 0.0 !i.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.097 0.575 6.7 8 21.5 C EB L 0.533 0.600 12.3 B 14.5 B T 0.910 0.408 23.3 C T 0.592 0.433 15.3 C R 0. 324 0. 406 11.5 B R 0. 435 0.433 11.4 B WB L 0.552 0.575 13.8 B 13.1 B WB L 0. 307 0.600 37.6 D 32.1 D T 0.563 O. 408 13.2 B T 1.vlu 0. 433 D R 0.119 0.408 10.4 B R 0. 306 0. 433 10.5 B NB L 0.026 0.375 18.0 C 22.2 C NIS L 0. 373 0. 350 22.0 C 28.5 D T (j.382 O.258 23.8 C T 0. 779 o.242 30.2 D R 0.470 0. 258 24.8 C R 0. 761 0. 242 72.6 D SB L 0. 050 0.3.75 18.2 C 21.9 C SB L 0. 054 0.350 19.6 C 25.ii D T 0.'58 0.258 23.6 C T 0.575 6. 242 26.5 D R 0.403 0.258 24.1 C R 0. 344 --------------------------------------------------------------'_---------- 6,242 24.5 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 19.2 (=_ec/ven) V/C = 0.622 LOS = C INTERSECTION: Delay = 25.4 (SeC/veh) V/C = 6.856 LOS = D 1995 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 1000OO NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ....... -wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/3/94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED .................. e3m pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG - MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 30 65 15 130 THRU 15 15 45 100 RIGHT 40 115 85 10 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NS SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT -SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT .33 486 394 > 439 394 > 390 361 >8 B THROUGH 17 638 572 > 57^1- 555 > A RIGHT 44 990 990 990 946 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 72 562 482 501 482 413 411 >A A THROUGH 17 672 602 > 602 565 > A RIGHT 127 996 996 996 869 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 14.3 996 996 996 853 A N8 LEFT 17 999 999 999 9B2 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... king soopers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton � DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/3/94 ;,em/ pm long OTHER INFORMATION.... �./ 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION- wheaton/lemay AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... jmd DATE .......... 6i3/94 TIME......... Pm long COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB S8 LT 60 40 70 160 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 90 90 530 640 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 40 135 20 40 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 5 5 5 5 - 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 - 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (Y.) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2. CIO Y 20 O 0.95 50 N 25.3 Z. WB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0.95 50 N 25.8 NB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.95 50 N 19.8 3 SB O. of) 2.00 Y 20 0 0.95 50 N 19.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X x TH x TH X RT x RT x PD x PD x WS LT X SB LT X x TH x TH x RT X RT X RD x PD x GREEN 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE ORR. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.245 0.233 14.3 B 17.5 B TR 0.417 0. 233 17.1 B WB L 0.125 0.233 13.B B 19.8 C TR 0. 777 Q. 233 20.9 C NB L 0.025 0.667 2.6 A 7.6 B TR 0. 441 0.433 7.8 B SB L 0.025 0.667 2.6 A 7.4 B TR 0.548 0.473 8.5 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 9.7 (sec/ven) V/C = 0.472 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..wheaton/lemav AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST........ jmd DATE.......... 6/3/94 TIME.......... am pm long COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NS SB : EB WB NB SB LT 40 20 35 230 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH ISO 140 990 665 : TR 12.0- TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 30 165 40 50 : 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 5 5 5 5 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 EB WB NB SB EB LT TH RT RD WB LT TH RT PD GREEN YELLOW 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T 0.00 2.00 Y 20 O 0.95 50 N 25.8 = 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0_95 50 N 25.9 3 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0. 95 50 N 19.8 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0.95 50 N 19.8 LANE GRP. EB L TR WB L TR NB L TR SB L TR -------------- INTERSECTION: ---------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 NB LT X x TH x RT x PD X SB LT x x TH x RT x PD x 0.0 O.O u_0 GREEN 8.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APR. LOS 0.163 0.283 12.3 B 12.1 B 0. 466 0.283 12.0 B 0.058 0.28T. 11.9 B 23.4 C 0.862 0.283 24.1 C 0.027 0.617 3.4 A 15.9 C 0.898 0.400 16.3 C V.310 0.617 4.= A 8.6 B 0.626 0.400 9.9 B Delav = 13.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.746 LOS = B