HomeMy WebLinkAboutPVH HEALTH SYSTEMS, HARMONY CAMPUS, 5TH FILING, HEALTHY LIVING CENTER - FDP - 32-98J - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS1. The first floor units shall be designated with 100's.
2. The second floor units with 200's
3. The third floor units with 300's, and so forth.
B. All brass letters and numerals shall be posted on a black background.
C. Some multi -family layouts may require address postings from the back side as well as
the front of the buildings.
D. A clockwise addressing pattern shall be maintained when ever possible. [4/19/05]
Number: 47
WATER SUPPLY: Commercial
No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant.
Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway.
Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at a residual
pressure of 20 psi. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2
Number: 48
(4/19/05] HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:
Corrosive, flammable liquids, reactive, or toxic materials (As defined in the Uniform Fire
Code) if used, stored or handled on site must have a Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis
(HMIA) completed and supplied to the Planning Department and the Fire Department.
FCLUC 3.4.5 (C)
Number: 49
[4/19/05] SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS:
These proposed buildings shall be fire sprinklered.
1997 UFC 1003.2.9
NOTE: When any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of
the building is located more then 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an
approved route around the exterior of the building or facility it shall be fire sprinklered. 1997
UFC 902.2.1
Number: 50
[4/19/05] KNOX BOX:
Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be mounted on the front of every new
building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system.
1997 UFC 902.4; PFA POLICY 88-20
Number: 51
[4/19/05] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT:
Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless
hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line.
Please return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Cameron Gloss
Page 8
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill
Topic: General
Number: 55 Created: 8/23/2005
[8/23/05] All previous comments addressed. Nothing new to add. Thanks.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Topic: General
Number: 13 Created: 3/3/2005
[8/23/05]
[3/3/05] Maintain the required landscape/utility separation distances.
RESPONSE: We have moved the Islands to avoid the storm sewer.
Number: 56 Created: 8/23/2005
[8/23/05] Correctly show sanitary sewer service in the storm sewer profiles. Provide 18-
inches of vertical separation between the storm sewer and sanitary sewer services.
RESPONSE: C900 pipe used for storm drain BA01 crossing the 6" sanitary sewer service —
per Jeff Hill. Approximately 1.3 feet of clearance provided rather than 1.5 feet.
Number: 57 Created: 8/23/2005
[8/23/05] Relocate the proposed fire hydrant and connect to the 12-inch water main in the
north private drive by using a tapping saddle. Clearly define all aspects of the proposed
connections.
RESPONSE: This has been done
Number: 58 Created: 8/23/2005
[8/23/05] See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
Department: Poudre Fire Authority Issue Contact: Mike Chavez
Number: 46
[4/19/05] REQUIRED ACCESS:
A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained
unobstructed. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1; FCLUC
The criteria for a required fire lane contain several conditions that must be met.
1. The minimum width shall be 20 feet.
2. Inside turning radius shall be 25 feet and outside turning radius shall be 50 feet.
3. Compacted road base shall be used during the construction phase only. The
permanent fire lane shall consist of asphalt or concrete and shall be required to support 40
tons
4. The fire lane shall be platted as an "Emergency Access Easement' on the final plat.
RESPONSE: This has been done
Buildings three stories or more in height must have access to a 30 foot unobstructed access
roadway on at least (1) one side for aerial operations. PFA Policy 85-5 (B) [4/19/05]
PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Approved numerals or addresses shall be provided for all
new and existing building in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the
street or road fronting the property. 1997 UFC 901.4.4
A. In Multi -story buildings the following requirements shall pertain.
Pa.-e 7
Topic: Easements
Number: 69 Created: 8/25/2005
[8/25/05) Please provide an off -site drainage easement for the relocated and reconstructed
portion of the outfall channel from this phase of the development. Any existing on -site
easements for the pond and the channel can be vacated by the plat.
RESPONSE: This has been done the easement is shown and will have been recorded in
time for mylars
Topic: Erosion Control
Number: 70 Created: 8/25/2005
[8/25/05]
Second Review
August 22, 2005
Please provide required information in your report (calculations, project schedules, etc.).
RESPONSE: This has been done
Please delete the drainage and erosion control notes on plan sheet 2/16 and replace with
the notes now being used.
RESPONSE: This has been done
The erosion control plan sheet needs a BMP legend.
RESPONSE: This has been done
Topic: Grading Plans
Number: 59 Created: 8/23/2005
[8/23/05] Please clarify grading plans, as currently there is too much information that cannot
be read.
RESPONSE: We have done this to a larger scale and added grading sheets
Topic: Plat
Number: 71 Created: 8/26/2005
[8/26/05] Pease clarify if this project should be the 4th or the 5th filing of the PVH Harmony
Campus. If it is determined to be the 4th, please remove the preliminary label from the plat.
RESPONSE: This is the Fourth Filing
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 60 Created: 8/23/2005
[8/23/05] Please call out what infrastructure is existing, what is being built by others and
what is proposed per these plans, as these are currently confusing.
RESPONSE: We have done more work to clarify this.
Page 6
RESPONSE: The plat now excludes the ROW
[3/11/05] Do not include already dedicated row within the boundary of the plat. That
property no longer belongs to the applicant and can not be rededicated by them.
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 86 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/05] Landscape Plan
Need to show the grease trap and associated service line.
No existing or proposed street trees are shown along Snow Mesa Drive. I believe if not
existing they are required to be installed with this project.
RESPONSE: See Planner Comments
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz
Topic: General
Number: 53 Created: 8/22/2005
[8/22/05] The storm drain on the north edge of the building has been extended further to the
west on this latest plan. This line now encroaches on the proposed new transformer
location and the existing electric vault. The existing vault is also shown intruding into the
sidewalk. I have discussed this with Stantec and will make comments when this area is
revised.
RESPONSE: We have revised the sidewalk and storm sewer layout
Number: 54 Created: 8/22/2005
[8/22/05] A second proposed transformer is shown for the building. If two services are
required for this building contact Engineering for appropriate firewall requirements.
RESPONSE: Comments to be addressed by architect.
Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom
Topic: General
Number: 67 Created: 8/24/2005
[8/24/05] Access doors on south are heavily screened (lilacs offer concealment). Need all
access doors to have viewports and min of 1.Ofc for thirty feet.
RESPONSE: Comments to be addressed by Planner
Number: 68 Created: 8/24/2005
[8/24/05] Check plant materials around remaining elevations. Desirable to have
unobstructed views of parking to provide surveillance.
RESPONSE: Comments to be addressed by Planner
Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Harridan
Topic: Drainage Plan
Number: 61 Created: 8/23/2005
[8/23/05] Please provide a drainage summary table.
RESPONSE: This has been done
Pa-r 5
Number: 83 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/05] Need to provide details #701 vertical c & g, #707 new driveway cut onto Snow
Mesa Drive, #2201 trench detail, and current ramp details.
RESPONSE: This has been done.
Topic: Plat
Number: 84 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/05] Need to show ALL existing easements on this plat. Per the note on the cover
sheet of this plat this property is subject to all easements existing or on record.
RESPONSE: We have shown the offsite easements for informational purposes. For the
Onsite vacation we have provided note 4.
Number: 85 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/05] There is a note on the plat about an easement being vacated by separate
document. By what document and when?
RESPONSE: Since the easements were dedicated to the signers of the plat the easement
is vacated by this plat and the notes removed.
Topic: Plat and Easements
Number: 30 Created: 3/11 /2005
[8/29/05] the following comments from Technical Services still remain 8/29/05
1. Boundary and Legal do not close or match, see redlines.
RESPONSE: The Boundary closes.
2. The north and west boundary of this plat is wrong. Lott only goes to the row as
dedicated in the 1 st filing
RESPONSE: The plat now excludes the ROW
3. Need to see the final plat.
RESPONSE: This is provided
[3/11/05] Comments from Technical Services 3/9/05
1. Boundary and legal do not close and do not match.
2. Please use only one line and curve table.
3. Vicinity map needs work - too busy wont scan well.
4. All easements must be locatable.
5. Will need to see this again.
Number: 32 Created: 3/11/2005
[8/29/05] The area within the boundary of the plat should not include any property
previously dedicated as row to the City. That land is no longer owned by this property
owner and cannot be replatted by this owner.
Page 4
Number: 75 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/05] Throughout the plans there is a hatching that is shown on a portion of Snow Mesa
Drive, but his hatching is not defined anyplace. What is this for?
RESPONSE: Hatching was for PVHS Filing 2 Plans and has been removed.
Number: 76 Created: 8/29/2005
(8/29/05] The grading plan needs to be cleaned up. It doesn't meet our scanning
requirements. There is no point in including text that you cannot read.
RESPONSE: We have changed the scale and added sheets
Number: 77 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/05] Indicate that type III barricades or other accepted barricades need to be placed at
the south end of the sidewalk on Snow Mesa Drive.
RESPONSE: This has been done.
Number: 78 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/051 Site plan shows sidewalk adjacent to the building extending around the building.
This is not shown on the utility plans.
RESPONSE: This has been done.
Number: 79 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/05] Need to show and label the easements at a minimum on the overall utility plans
and the grading plan. We need to know that the easements are being placed correctly.
Also make sure that the row line is clearly labeled so it is clear what sidewalk is within the
row and which sidewalk is not.
RESPONSE: This has been done in the overall utility plan. Easement lines were not shown
in the grading plan because of scannability.
Number: 80 Created: 8/29/2005
(8/29/05] Show the street cut for the new driveway cut on the overall utility plan and include
street cut note.
RESPONSE: This has been done
Number: 81 Created: 8/29/2005
(8/29/05] Remove detail 7-30 do not have a street intersection in these plans.
RESPONSE: This has been done.
Number: 82 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/05] Label the curb and gutter details (that are not the city standard ones) as on -site
details.
RESPONSE: This has been done.
Page 3
RESPONSE: We have Responded to these
Number: 38 Created: 3/11/2005
[8/29/05] There is a sidewalk on this plan (west end) that is label as future. It is not
identified that way on the utility plans. When is future — what triggers this installation?
[3/11/05] The site and utility plans don't quite match.
RESPONSE: Bha has removed this from the site plan.
Number: 41 Created: 3/11/2005
[8/29/05] Site Plan
Please show the portions of the road that exist and are not being built with this project in
dashed or lighter line weight.
RESPONSE: See Planners Comments
[3/11/05] Need to show the existing facilities in dashed or lighter lines — shown pretty well
already except for the site plan and the horizontal control plan.
Number: 42 Created: 3/11/2005
[8/29/05]
[3/11 /05] Need to show where the off -site easements are - not clear on the plans or the plat
where these all are.
RESPONSE: This is now shown on the Plat and the Plans. The new off -site easement for
grading, drainage, utility and access will be recorded before the final plat mylars and a
recordation number put on the plat.
Number: 72 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/05] Need to include the indemnification statement that is in the general notes on the
plans.
RESPONSE: This has been done
Number: 73 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/05] It is not clear on the plans whether the sidewalk on the west side of Snow Mesa
Drive from the private drive south to the new driveway exists or is proposed with this project.
If it exists then you need to show the portion of the walk that needs to be demoed on the
demolition sheet.
RESPONSE: We have shown this in bold and noted that it will be built with this project but
under the 2Id Filing Plans
Number: 74 Created: 8/29/2005
[8/29/05] Show the portion of existing curb and gutter along Snow Mesa Drive that needs to
be removed for the new driveway to be demoed on the demolition plan.
RESPONSE: This has been done
Paac'
aSTAFF PROJECT REVIEW
Citv of Fort Collins
LUKE/ANG I E Date: 08/31 /2005
BHA DESIGN
4803 INNOVATION DR.
FORT COLLINS, CO 80525
Staff has reviewed your submittal for PVH HEALTH SYSTEMS - HARMONY CAMPUS 5TH
FILING, HEALTHY LIVING CENTER PDP, TYPE I AND FINAL PLANS, and we offer the
following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Cameron Gloss
Topic: Building Permit
Number: 65 Created: 8/24/2005
[8/24/05] Rick Lee from Neighborhood and Building Services has provided the following
comment:
Please see attached the applicable codes and minutes from a pre -submittal meet(ing) held
earlier this year.
Topic: Plat and Easements
Number: 63 Created: 8/24/2005
(8/24/051 Christine Bebow from the Larimer County Assessor's Office has expressed the
following concern regarding the subdivision plat:
There is a condominium unit on Lot 1 of this preliminary plat that needs to be identified and
made known whether it is affected by this plat or not a part of it. A note stating it exists and
is not a part of this plat would be fine. On the other hand, if it is supposed to be part of this
plat it needs to be shown and noted.
RESPONSE: See note 5 on the Plat.
Number: 64 Created: 8/24/2005
[8/24/05] Please remove the word "Preliminary" from the Subdivision plat title.
RESPONSE: This has been done.
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 62 Created: 8/24/2005
[8/24/05] Staff acknowledges the inclusion of a sidewalk connecting the Snow Mesa
Drive/private drive intersection with the proposed sidewalk north of the Healthy Living
Center. This revision will ensure compliance with the pedestrian connectivity and LOS
standards.
RESPONSE: See Planner Comments
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
Topic: General
Number: 34 Created: 3/11/2005
[8/29/051
[3/11/051 See plans for additional comments.
Pic i