HomeMy WebLinkAboutPONDEROSA PARK PUD, 2ND REPLAT - AMENDED FINAL - 37-96 - MINUTES/NOTES - CORRESPONDENCE-NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING'NTT'Tr-'"LTTnT)UI.1�� TA'TT \- %.,r ITT/-N\T rt--n.r•�r�r�
til`rtiyv�lliV t. ti VL��iii11V1V1�C.L 1
-+: m for,zNE2pSA V!,-kz Y,_
Q Project: W►n1s,"�i-ZS G�1��c�
w Me-ting Location:
3 City of Fart Collins Date: ►lei �(
Attendees: Please sign this sheet. The information will be used to
iP 3 i� update the project mailing list and confirm attendance at neighborhood
I
meetings. Contact the Planning Department (221-67-40) if you wish to
receive minutes of this meeting.
Did You Receive
Written Notificationladdress
of this tneetinv?
�orrect
Name Address Zia
Yes
I No
lYes
I Vol
a y► 4V A y 3 0 ?ov'\ aer
-73a CIla`il`O%C% "F'� Z�
I ✓
I
�`r
Li �eSS N4r(I -7
i
w.
33. What is to prevent every one of the 15 homes from being the two story homes, largest
home?
A. Nothing really, other than the market. We will be trying to divide the 3 or 4 house styles
up evenly.
34. Does the City have a problem with noise ordinance when homes are this close together?
A. No different than any other residential neighborhood.
35. What steps are you taking to market this development?
A. I don't have a marketing plan yet, but I am willing to limit the number of investment
properties (rental) on the cul-de-sac.
36. What will this development do to our properties values?
A. The single family, at this price range, should pull values up.
22. What is the trail connection for between the 2 cul-de-sacs?
A. To provide bikelpedestrian connection between the cul-de-sacs.
23. What is your development time frame?
A. Realistically, summer to fall 1997.
24. Where will you put your mailboxes?
A. We will have to work that out with the Post Office.
25. How far apart are the house in the north cul-de-sac?
A. The are 10 feet apart.
26. The elimination of one lot would enable a 10 foot separation between all buildings.
27. 1 am concerned about the impact of construction on my property.
28. What are the fencing plans for this project?
A. There is existing fences along the east and west property lines. The development to the
south will provide one. The common open space to the north will not be fenced.
29. Will there be fencing design guidelines and restriction.
A. Probably.
30. We are concerned about the appearance of the northerly cul-de-sac and do not want this
to look like it.
A- We will resolve some of that with the HOA, as it develops.
finkldf.gysttiftihstaedili,,thf, commont,-Areas?
-We pl M$gp,plantingp#gr grassesand, inslpg o,sprinkler system.
A
32. What area are you referring to as these homes being similar to our compatible with?
A. The cul-de-sac to the north.
8. Originally, the plan was approved for 12 units, now you are proposing 15. This is
increasing the density in this area. I am concerned about this and the additional traffic
generated.
A. This phase is slightly higher in density but there will be more open space.
9. There will be more people, overall, probably more children and noise.
10. The north cul-de-sac was originally approved for 16 units and has a total of 12.
11. The houses in the north cul-de-sac feel very close to one another and these homes will be
even closer.
12. What is low density residential defines as? Is not the density to be about 5 dwelling units
per acre?
13. The 6 foot separation between buildings is much too short! The buildings should be
further apart.
A. The City's R-L - Low Density Residential District does not have a maximum density.
Planned Unit Developments require a minimum of 5 dwelling units per acre.
14. We do not have to duplicate the 5 foot to 6 foot building separation between buildings like
in other neighborhoods, in our neighborhood.
15. I would rather see townhomes here than these homes so close together.
16. When I bought my home in 1988 I asked someone about what was going to happen on the
vacant lot to the east of my home (this property to be developed).
17. The HOA will be responsible for maintenance of the drive and cul-de-sac, and common
areas (landscaping) not the individual private lots.
18. I could live with this project if 2 units were eliminated from the plan.
19. Why can you not do the same thing with townhomes (owner -occupied) like you want to
do with these houses?
20. The homes are just too close to one another.
A. Differences in marketing.
21. Would the elimination of 1 unit, enabling greater building separation, be acceptable?
A. It would be a step in the right direction.
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
PROJECT: 2ND REPLAT OF PART OFPONDEROSA PARK
DATE: JANUARY 9, 1997
APPLICANT: DANE BRANDT
STAFF: STEVE OLT, CITY PLANNER
QUESTIONS/CONCERNS/COMNffi'NTS
1. These homes are to be priced from $105,000 to $115,000 and be similar in character to
the homes in the cul-de-sac to the north.
2. Home Owners Association- only the homes in the 2 cul-de-sacs off of Ponderosa Drive
'will be included in the Home Owners Association. This will maintain the 2 private drives
& cul-de-sacs. Homes fronting on Ponderosa Drive are welcome to voluntarily join the
HOA.
3. Marketing to HOME Program qualifiers.
4. No units over 3 bedrooms. Do not want investors, want owner -occupied homes.
5. Can you require people living on the cul-de-sac to use designated parking in the cul-de-
sac?
A. Yes, that is the intent.
6. Is the private driveway from Ponderosa Drive already there?
A. Yes, it is a paved drive.
7. I like the idea of the homes being owner occupied.
3