HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE PARK TOWNHOMES AT FOSSIL RIDGE (FORMERLY ZIEGLER TOWNHOMES) - PDP/FDP - FDP160043 - CORRESPONDENCE - (4)11/17/2016: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the
aliquot corners shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at
jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/17/2016
11 /17/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/17/2016
11/17/2016: Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-6820, nhahn(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016: The traffic study was received and reviewed. The study does not
define the methodology used to redistribute traffic through the new connection of
County Fair. In the absence of this methodology, we calculated several
scenarios trying to recreate the numbers used in the study. In the least
conservative (most favorable to the development) scenario the south bound
right turn lane warrant was met.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016: Due to the proximity of the access locations to the intersection of
Ziegler and County Fair, the center left turn lane needs to be extended to allow
for left turns into the development. We are happy to work with you on lane
widths, and striping.
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson(cDfc_qov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/15/2016
11/15/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building
permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section
3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation
requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Department: Zoning
Contact: Ali van Deutekom, 970-416-2743, avancleutekom(a�fcgov.com
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: The scale appears to be wrong on the site plan.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: The 30 foot setback required along Ziegler Rd should be to the
patio covers, I believe you are just under 30 on a few of the southern most units.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016. Please add a note referencing the modification request for the
County Fair Lane setback on the site plan.
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/17/2016
11/17/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated:
11/17/2016
11/17/2016: Please change the Basis Of Bearings statement to match the
revised Subdivision Plat Basis Of Bearings statement.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated:
11/17/2016
11/17/2016: All Basis Of Bearings statements must match on all sheets.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated:
11/17/2016
11/17/2016: There are sheet title & numbering issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated:
11/17/2016
11/17/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 15
11/17/2016: There are cut off text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 16
11 /17/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 17
11/17/2016: There are match line issues. See redlines.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 7
11/17/2016: There are match line issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 8
11/17/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 9
11/17/2016: No comments.
Topic: Plat
Comment Originated: 11/17/2016
Comment Originated: 11/17/2016
Comment Originated: 11/17/2016
Comment Originated: 11/17/2016
Comment Originated: 11/17/2016
Comment Originated: 11/17/2016
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated:
11/17/2016: Please make changes to the Basis Of Bearings statements as
marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated:
11/17/2016: Please make changes to the Owners & Lien holders signature
blocks as marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated:
11/17/2016: Please make changes to sheet 2 as marked. If changes are not
made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why
corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets
and/or in response letter.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated:
11/17/2016
11/17/2016
11/17/2016
11/17/2016
11103/2016-. Is there an opportunity to provide more guest parking for
bicyclists? Staff would prefer if there were more bike racks provided outside for
visitors.
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11 /03/2016: None of the side entrances have walkways that connect to the
sidewalk network. Add sidewalks that connect each of the side building
entrances to the pedestrian network.
Comment Number: 15
Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: The northern most unit in Building C is only 18' wide and shows a
two car garage. How will two cars fit side by side with such a narrow unit? Is it
possible to convert the southern most unit in Building C to 24' so that the
northern most unit could be 20' wide like the other narrower units?
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Basil Harridan, 970-224-6035, bhamdan(a)fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/14/2016
11/14/2016: Please note that no erosion control report or calculations were
submitted with this first submittal. Since this is a combined PDP and FDP a
report is required. Please provide one for review with next round.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/14/2016
11/14/2016-. Please provide erosion control protection for the inlet along
Ziegler Road and please address any other redlined comments on the plans.
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue(Mcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/1612016: Any interior impervious area within the site's boundaries needs to
be included in the LID calculation. This would include any new public streets.
Please include basins B1 and B2 in the LID sizing calculations.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: It is unclear how the chamber system will operate with the major
flows entering the chambers and no bypass system.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: Basins D1 and D2 are flip flopped in the Drainage Report.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: Please provide drainage easements for all 100-year conveyance
systems and for the LID vaults.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: There are some locations where trees are not 10 feet away from
storm sewers. Please revise.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970.221-6588, icounty(a)fcgov.com
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: It looks like there is a dormer on the garage side of the 7-plex
building. Is this accurate? It looks random and out of place. Remove this dormer
if it is not necessary.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: What is the scale shown on the elevations? Include a scale and
clearly indicate how tall each structure is on the elevations. Staff needs to
ensure compliance with the maximum building height.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: This submittal did not include elevations of the trash and recycling
enclosure. Include these elevations with your subsequent submittal.
Comment Number: 14
Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: How far does each building module recess and project? Include a
diagram showing the projections and recesses so staff can ensure compliance
with sections 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 of the Land Use Code.
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: Thank you for your modification requests for Land Use Code
sections 3.5.2(E)(2) and 3.5.2(D)(1)(b). Staff did not receive a modification
request for Land Use Code section 4.5(D)(1)(b). Staff will look for this
modification request for the second round of review.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016. Individually, staff would normally support all of the modifications
requested. Staff is concerned, however, that when taken as a whole, the
development is not performing as well as a compliant development. Would it be
possible to dedicate four of the units as affordable to households earning 80%
of Area Median Income? This would boost the allowed density to 12 dwelling
units per acre and would help fulfill a City-wide goal identified in City Plan and
the Affordable Housing Strategic Plan. Alternatively, you could remove the unit
furthest south in Building E and no longer need a modification to 3.5.2(D)(1)(b)
or 4.5(D)(1)(b). Losing that unit would also allow buildings F and E to move
further south and thus coming into compliance with 3.5.2(E)(2).
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: What will the fence look like? Please provide details.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: Street trees can only be counted as mitigation trees if they are
upsized to 3" caliper. None of the street trees shown on the site plan are shown
as being upsized. If this was an affordable housing project, 2" caliper trees
would count as mitigation since they would be considered to be upsized.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: The scale indicated on the site plan is incorrect. The scale used is
V = 30'. Please update the scale to reflect the correct scale.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
Hydrant spacing and flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of
occupancy. A hydrant is required within 400' of any Residential Building as
measured along an approved path of vehicle travel. The proposed site plan
places units in Buildings D & E out of compliance and another hydrant will be
required. Code language provided below.
> IFC 507.5 and PFA Policy: RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS: Within the
Urban Growth Area, hydrants to provide 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure,
spaced not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: FIRE LANES
Fire access is required to within 150' of all exterior portions of any building, or
facility as measured by an approved route around the perimeter. For the
purposes of this section, fire access cannot be measured from an arterial road
(Ziegler Rd). All buildings (except Bldg. C) are out of access by definition. Bldg.
has the greatest deficiency at 130' out of access, however as all buildings will
be equipped with a fire sprinkler system, the out of access conditions are
considered acceptable. Code language and fire lane specifications provided
below.
> IFC 503.1.1: Approved fire Lanes shall be provided for every facility, building
or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the
jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements
of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and
all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by
an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. When any
portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the
building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access, the fire code
official is authorized to increase the dimension if the building is equipped
throughout with an approved, automatic fire -sprinkler system.
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickeyc( fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: The 7-plex elevations only show 5 front doors. Where are the
entrances to the other two units? Each unit should have a clearly defined front
entry feature to meet Land Use Code section 4.5(E)(4)(e).
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11 /03/2016: The 5-plex elevations only show 4 front doors. Show the fifth
entrance and clearly define the entrance.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: The 4-plex elevations only show 2 front doors. Show the other two
entrances and clearly define both of them.
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 11/03/2016
11/03/2016: None of the side entrances have clear definition. Please add an
awning or some other feature over the building entrances on the sides to
improve their presence along the street.
> IFC 503.2.5, Appendix D, and FCLUC 3.6.2(B)2006: Dead-end fire access
roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area
for turning around fire apparatus.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016. TURNING RADII
Curve Table - C12 & C13 need to be increased from 20' to 25' turning radii
which is the minimum turning radii for a 20' wide fire lane. Code language
provided below.
> IFC 503.2.4 and Local Amendments: The required turning radii of a fire
apparatus access road shall be a minimum of 25 feet inside and 50 feet
outside.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: FIRE LANE SPECIFICATIONS
Information provided for planning purposes: A fire lane plan shall be submitted
for approval prior to installation. In addition to the design criteria already
contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the
following general requirements:
> Shall be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement.
> Maintain the required 20 foot minimum unobstructed width & 14 foot minimum
overhead clearance.
> Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface capable of supporting
40 tons.
> Dead-end fire access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided
with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus.
> The required turning radii of a fire apparatus access road shall be a minimum
of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside. Turning radii shall be detailed on
submitted plans.
> Be visible by painting and/or signage, and maintained unobstructed at all
times. Sign locations or red curbing should be labeled and detailed on final
plans.
> Additional access requirements exist for buildings greater than 30' in height.
Refer to Appendix D of the 2012 IFC or contact PFA for details.
International Fire Code 503.2.3, 503.2.4, 503.2.5, 503.3, 503.4 and Appendix
D; FCLUC 3.6.2(B)2006 and Local Amendments.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: FIRE LANE SIGNS
The limits of the fire lane shall be fully defined. Fire lane sign locations should be
indicated on future plan sets however the applicant should also be advised that
additional on -site signage may be required at time of field inspection and final
CO. Code language provided below.
> IFC D103.6: Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access
roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING - FIRE LANE signs
complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12
inches wide by 18 inches high and have red letters on a white reflective
background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus
road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: WATER SUPPLY
developer and their electrical consultant or contractor.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016: Transformer locations shall be within 10' of a paved surface and
must have a minimum of an 8' clearance from the front side and a 3clearance
around the sides and rear.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016: Contact Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the
transformer and electric meter locations, please show the locations on the utility
plans.
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016: Please provide a one line diagram and a C-1 form to Light and
Power Engineering. The C-1 form can be found at:
http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1 Form.pdf
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016: You may contact FCU Light & Power, project engineering if you
have questions. (970) 221-6700. You may reference Light & Power's Electric
Service Standards at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStandar
ds_FI NAL_17June2016. pdf
You may reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our
fee estimator at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers.
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickeyaa�fcclov.com
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/07/2016
11/07/2016: Comment from the County Assessor: There is an additional 'call'
that has been added. Immediately following the verbiage, 'POINT OF
BEGINNING;' the following call is not needed;
'thence continuing along said East line, South 01 4551" East, 701.48 ft;'
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
Single family attached buildings will require an automatic fire sprinkler system
under a separate permit. Please contact the city building department or
Assistant Fire Marshal, Joe Jaramillo (970-416-2868) with any fire sprinkler
related questions.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: DEAD-END FIRE LANES
The dead-end fire lane to the north is approximately 270' in length without a
turnaround. The dead-end fire lane to the south is approximately 240' in length
without a turnaround. Code language provided below.
If there are street lights, please show their locations and proper tree separation:
forty (40) feet between shade trees and streetlights; fifteen (15) feet between
ornamental trees and streetlights.
Please show locations of stop signs and proper tree separation: twenty (20)
feet between shade and/or ornamental trees and traffic control signs and
devices.
The first tree north of County Fair Ln on Ziegler appears to impact sight line
visibility. Please evaluate eliminating this street tree for improved visibility.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016:
Plant List:
Three shrubs are undersized at 1 gallon (Arctic Fire Dogwood, Tall Green
Rabbitbrush, and Three Leaf Sumac. The minimum size for shrubs is 5 gallons.
Please correct these sizes in the Plant List.
Please provide percentages for Minimum Species Diversity. Check for
minimum tree species diversity and adjust quantity as necessary. Refer to Land
Use Code.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016:
Please look at placing additional trees along the west of edge of the project
north of County Fair Rd to increase the buffer for adjacent homes.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Coy Althoff, CAlthoffa()fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016: Light & Power will need to extend electric facilities to this area by
installing primary conduit and cable along the west side of Ziegler Rd. and also
along the north side of County Fair Ln. (as it will become a through road to
Ziegler Rd.)
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016: Development charges, electric Capacity Fee, Building Site
charges and any system modification charges necessary will apply to this
development.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016: Streetlights will be placed along public streets. A 40 feet
separation on both sides of the light is required between canopy trees and
streetlights. A 15 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between
ornamental trees and streetlights.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016: Multifamily buildings are treated as commercial services;
therefore a(C 1) form must be filled out and submitted to Light & Power
Engineering. All secondary electric service work is the responsibility of the
recommendations. This mix has been vetted to ensure that the species can be
easily sourced and is likely to establish quickly in seeded areas.
I will follow up in an email with more information. Please use this mix for any
disturbed areas in the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone, and preferably anywhere
else on -site where the native seed mix is proposed.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: On the Landscape Notes sheet, please add the following
calculations to the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone information:
- minimum width of buffer from wetlands
- maximum width of buffer from wetlands
- average width of buffer from wetlands
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: It appears that many of the street trees are being used to account
for mitigation, but they do not appear to have been upsized (Y caliber for
canopy shade trees, 2.5"caliper for ornamental trees, 8' height B&B for
evergreen trees), per LUC Section 3.2.1(F).
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: The label for the wetland offset on the landscape plan should be
updated to 100' (currently labeled as 50').
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated
11/16/2016: It appears that one or more of the trees in the buffer zone conflict
with underground utilities. Please double check and correct if needed.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanana()fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1
11/18/2016:
Tree Inventory/Mitigation Plan
11/16/2016
Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
It appears that there is an adequate number of new trees on the site to account
for 35 mitigation trees. Off -site mitigation is not necessary. Please review
placing 35 upsized mitigation trees on site.
Tree #58 is listed as to be protected, but should be removed based on its size
and condition. Proper mitigation will need to be discussed.
Please set up a site visit to discuss construction impact of trees #59
(Cottonwood) and #47 (Green Ash — multi -stemmed). These existing trees
seem appear to be pretty close to proposed foundations.
In regards to tree #43 (Hackberry), please explore placing the proposed
sidewalk at a further distance away to reduce the impact to the roots.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016-.
Street Trees
with information regarding ADT's from the driveways as well as County Fair
Lane. It appears likely that the ADT on County Fair Lane are above 100 ADT,
and would require a minimum parking setback distance of 40 feet off of County
Fair Lane, in all cases the first garage/parking spot is 30 feet or less.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: The previous project had widened out to 36 feet inroad width for
County Fair Lane further west than this proposal, which allowed for the three
lane cross section and protected left turn movements into both access points of
the development. This proposal does not create this. A traffic study to look into
the implications behind this is needed, as having the third lane across the
driveways I suspect would certainly be preferred.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: The plat's certificate of dedication statement does not call out the
dedication of streets/right-of-way. The certificate of dedication statement should
utilize our full standard language.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: The sidewalk along Ziegler Road heading north of the property
becomes further detached. Is it due to an onsite constraint (such as a tree?)
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: Please verify the status of the existing overhead line along Ziegler
Road abutting the property. It would appear that this is no longer needed with
the development and would then be undergrounded (or removed) with this
project and should be indicated as such on the plans.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: What is the 5' curb transition shown on the plan and profile sheet
pertaining to when tying the existing to new County Fair Lane?
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: Please provide additional spot elevations and cross slopes along
the access ramps/sidewalk at County Fair Lane and Ziegler Road to verify that
street standards/ADA compliance is being met. There is the implication that at
least the cross slope for the access ramp at the north leg exceeds 2% cross
slope.
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: Please confirm the ability to construct the work fully within the
project's development boundary. The grading plan is a little difficult to follow in
some regards, and I'm aware that the previous submittal was doing offsite work
on the Harvest Park property.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: A repay for the local street portion of asphalt for Ziegler Road is
required and will be referenced in the development agreement.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reveretteaa�fc4ov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: We are currently recommending a new seed mix for native grass
areas, which has been prepared by the City's botanist along with planting
Fort Collins
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov. com/developmentreview
November 18, 2016
Cathy Mathis
TB Group
444 Mountain Ave
Berthoud, CO 80513
RE: Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about
any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through
the Project Planner, Clay Frickey, at 970-224-6045 or cfrickey@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Virata, 970.221.6567, mvirata(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/16/2016
11/16/2016: The street design has three different tangents (a tangent between
the existing curve on County Fair Lane and the proposed curve, a tangent
between the two proposed curves, and the tangent from the intersection) that
are short of the required 100 feet specified in Table 7-3 of LCUASS (the three
tangents are 56.81, 75, and 50.95 respectively). A variance request is needed
for the minimum tangent lengths not being met. It is acknowledged that a similar
variance request was needed from the previous proposal on the property and
was granted.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated:
11/16/2016: Figure 7-16 in LCUASS would appear to demonstrate the need for
a sight distance easement at the northern drive approach onto County Fair
Lane heading west.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated:
11/16/2016: There didn't appear to be a traffic study submitted with this
development. The information from the traffic study would be needed to verify
assumptions and requirement regarding any threshold for auxiliary turn lanes. In
addition, LCUASS parking setbacks (Figure 19-6) would need to be looked at
11/16/2016
11/16/2016