HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIGDEN FARM FILING NINETEEN - PDP/FDP - FDP150035 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYm
From: Bob Almirall jmailto:balmirall(@interwestgrp.coml
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:03 AM
To: Martina Wilkinson
Cc: 'Cathy Mathis'
Subject: Rigden Farm M8 and M9
Hi, Martina. We are getting ready to submit a Minor Amendment for these 2 lots in Rigden Farm. We have done similar
plans for other lots in the area, most recently lots M6 and M7 for Habitat for Humanity and I don't believe we have
needed traffic memos but I could be wrong. The question is whether or not anything is needed from a traffic standpoint
to support the units that are proposed vs what might have been assumed originally.
Attached is a sketch of the 3 units that are planned for each lot. Let me know what you think.
Thanks.
Bob Almirall, P.E.
Interwest Consulting Group
(970) 460-8487 Direct
ba l m i ra I I P i me rwestero. co m
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.av�4.com
Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4419/10717 - Release Date: 09/28/15
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.av,.com
Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4435/10737 - Release Date: 10/01/15
2
r
T PAS P0�TiffTI O N I M-P6rT
cathy@tbgroup.us 1�N I L Y S IS
From: Martina Wilkinson <mwilkinson@fcgov.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 4:58 PM
To: cathy@tbgroup.us; 'Bob Almirall'
Subject: RE: Rigden Farm M8 and M9
If 3 units per lot was approved and you're proposing 3 units per lot, then nothing has changed and we're good to go.
ri
From: cathy@tbgroup.us [mailto:cathy@tbgroup.us]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 3:54 PM
To: Martina Wilkinson; 'Bob Almirall'
Subject: RE: Rigden Farm M8 and M9
Martina -
See attached approved PDP for Rigden 6", particularly Page 2 It appears that these multi -family lots (M8 — M16) were
all approved with assumed 3-plexes on each lot. I could not find any other approvals for M8 and M9 so I think the
approved PDP set these lots up with assumed density, then each lot's approval is through a minor amendment.
Let me know if this helps.
Thanks!
Cathy Mathis, APA
TB I Group
444 Mountain Avenue
Berthoud, Colorado 80513
970.532.5891 office
970.217.9480 cell
cathyCo tbgrouo.us
From: Martina Wilkinson [mailto:mwilkinson@fcgov.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 2:24 PM
To: 'Bob Almirall' <balmirall@interwestaro.com>
Cc: cathy@tberoup.us
Subject: RE: Rigden Farm M8 and M9
Hi Bob —
I'm looking at your attachment and am not sure if anything has changed from what was originally proposed /
approved? That would dictate whether we need to review the traffic. If it's a minor amendment, then what was
approved on the lots before?
With that info, I can give you a concrete answer. (But basically, it looks pretty minor to me.... So I'm guessing you're
good to go)