The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTRAILHEAD - FDP - 43-02B - CORRESPONDENCE -�i City of Fort Collins STAFF PROJECT REVIEW VF RIPLEY ASSOC. LINDA RIPLEY 401 W. MOUNTAIN AVE. #201 FT. COLLINS, CO 80521 Date: 10/04/2004 Staff has reviewed your submittal for TRAILHEAD PDP - TYPE I (LUC) AND FINAL PLAN, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Bob Barkeen Topic: Landscape Number: 335 Created: 10/4/2004 [10/4/04] The site plan for the day care center will need to be updated to show the removal of the recreation center. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: East Vine Drive Interim Number: 269 Created: 8/27/2004 [9/23/04] Since the utility connections are all now shown in the Trailhead PDP plans, please provide another note that states: Please refer to Trailhead Utility Plans for all utility connections in Vine Drive. Or something like that. [8/27/04] Add the street cut note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City Street repair standards. Topic: East Vine Drive Ultimate Number: 309 Created: 9/23/2004 [9/23/04] Cross Section Sheets - show the slope ratio on each section, both sides (cannot exceed 4:1) Number: 318 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/04] Sheet 15-22, note 2 - Correct the spelling of Whitman to Whitham. Topic: General Number: 36 Created: 1 /13/2004 [9/23/04] [8/24/04] [5/18/04) A change has been made to the requirements below. The trees will not be installed at this time along Vine and their costs will be included in the contribution in aid for the developer's local street portion. Please continue to show the trees on the plans but label the landscaping and utility plans that the trees will be installed with the Vine Drive Road Improvements. [3/19/04] [1/13/04] Engineering will require an interim and ultimate road design for Vine Drive. The TIS shows the need for a right turn lane from Vine to Greenfields in the long range. This project is responsible for dedicating the additional ROW and designing it in the ultimate design. This project is also responsible for construction of Vine Drive along their frontage, however, the City's Street Oversizing Dept prefers to construct the entire length of Vine when it's realigned at some point in the future. This project will only construct the sidewalk along their frontage and install the landscaping. A Contribution in Aid will be Page 1 A reminder that the irrigation easement needs to be abandoned and all off -site easements signed before mylar signing. Number: 246 Created: 8/27/2004 [10/1 /04] Please provide a plan view for all the lot grading templates (Type A, B, G, W) to better clarify typical lot grading. Topic: Stormwater Number: 321 Created: 10/1/2004 Please see minor comments on the redlined plans. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Site Number: 317 Created: 9/27/2004 (9/27/04] Comment pertaining to E. Vine proposed arterial design improvements - Please show locations for bicycle lane symbols/signs to be applied/installed. Topic: Transportation Number: 239 Created: 8/24/2004 [9/27/04] [8/24/04] Sheet 81 of Utility Plans: Ultimate Vine/Greenfields - please add a ramp on NE corner that directs pedestrians south across Vine to the refuge provided in the median. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Yours Truly, Bob Barkeen City Planner Page 4 Number: 330 Created: 10/1 /2004 [10/1/04] Sheet B11 - Bridge Rail Anchorage detail - we drew in the rebar from the other detail and just wanted to make sure that there won't be any conflict. Could you take a look at this? Number: 331 Created: 10/1 /2004 [10/1/04] Please provide the shop drawings for the reinforcing steel. Number: 332 Created: 10/1 /2004 [10/1/04] See attached sheets to comment letter. Topic: Landscape Number: 319 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/04] Sheet 4 - Tree located over shared driveway, lots 1 and 24, block 4. Number: 334 Created: 10/1 /2004 [10/1/04] There are 4 trees shown in an area that will be regraded in the future to accommodate the ultimate Vine Drive improvements. As a policy, the city does not allow trees to be planted in areas that will require their removal in the future. The developer does have a choice in this case ... if he chooses to have the trees there, then they must be ornamentals and the developer would have to escrow for the future trees as well. That would mean that he has to pay for 8 trees rather than 4. The other choice, of course, is to not install the trees at this time and include their cost in the Vine Drive estimate. Topic: Plat Number: 259 Created: 8/27/2004 [10/1/04] [8/27/04] From Technical Services: Boundary and legal close. Number: 322 Created: 10/1 /2004 [10/1/04] From Technical Services: Curve designation missing on lot 1, blk 4, sheet 4 and 5. Number: 323 Created: 10/1 /2004 [10/1/04] From Technical Services: You might want to change the legal as suggested on Sheet 1. Topic: Site Number: 316 Created: 9/23/2004 [9/23/04] Please add a note: Please refer to the Trailhead Utility Plans for the interim improvements along Vine Drive. Department: Police Topic: Landscape Number: 320 [9/29/04] No comments Department: Stormwater Utility Topic: Drainage Number: 244 [10/1/04] Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Created: 9/29/2004 Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Created: 8/27/2004 Page 3 accepted for the rest of their local street portion. An estimate prepared by JR Engineering will be required prior to drafting the Development Agreement so that this amount can be added to the DA. Number: 91 Created: 1 /16/2004 [9/23/04] [8/24/04] [5/18/04] [3/18/04] Just keeping this comment alive until we do the DA. (1/16/04] Glacier Creek will not need to be constructed to the property line per the discussion at Staff Review, January 14th. Cash in lieu of will be accepted so that the street can be built at some point in the future. An estimate will be required from JR Engineering for the City's review and approval so that the dollar amount can be included in the DA. Number: 333 Created: 10/1/2004 [10/1/04] Engineering is ready for mylars provided that the remaining issues are addressed. Topic: Greenfields Arterial Number: 324 Created: 10/1/2004 [10/1/04] Sheet B2 - See redlines. Question/suggestion on the placement of the wingwalls. There is a concern that there will be scouring - is there another way to place these or will we need to do something with the embankment to account for that? Also, the typical section for the bridge girds show that you will be laying the girds at an angle. This is OK, just that it is harder to lay this out in the field and could cost more. Another option would be to pour a stepped deck instead (but this is not required). Number: 325 Created: 10/1/2004 [10/1/04] Sheet B4 - Please provide an elevation for the other side of the Abutment. Also, the bearing seats talc out at 1.33% slope one way and 2.66% the other. Our minimum is 2%. Detail A - See redlines for questions and some dimensioning requirements. Please call if you have questions or if you need to meet with me. I also went over these redlines with Tim Halopoff and you could call him as well. Number: 326 Created: 10/1/2004 [10/1/04] Sheet B5 - Please show the L bar in detail A so that it doesn't get missed when they're forming this up. Please provide an elevation for the other side of Abutment 2. Number: 327 Created: 10/1/2004 [10/1/04] Sheet B6 - Typical Wingwall Section - Where is this in plan view? And does the galv sheet metal piece go all the way over the top or just around it? Number: 328 Created: 10/1/2004 [10/1/04] SheetB8 - Plan View - Detail A on B4 and B5 add up to 9" while this detail adds up to 10 and 3/8". See redlines. Number: 329 Created: 10/1/2004 [10/1/04] Sheet 1310 - Detail 2 - Is there another way to run the deck drain? The way it is now leaves 3" of concrete for the sidewalk and by the time you subtract out the rebar, you don't have a lot of concrete left. It won't stand up to traffic very long. Page 2