HomeMy WebLinkAboutGENERAL CARE HEALTH SERVICES - PDP - 22-00 - CORRESPONDENCE -18-99 15:29
P.07
connection to the street. "Maximum extent feasible" is defined in Article 5 of the LUC
as "no feasible and prudent alternative exists, and all possible efforts to comply with the
regulation or minimize harm or adverse impacts have been undertaken." "Connecting
walkway" is defined in Article 5 of the LUC as "any street sidewalk, or any walkway that
directly connects a building entrance(s) to the street sidewalk... without requiring
pedestrians to walk across parking lots or driveways, around buildings, or follow parking
lot outlines which are not aligned to a logical route." If the primary entrance were
located on the south facade, it would not be facing the adjacent street, since a
pedestrian would have to walk around the building to get to the street sidewalk. Please
revise the site plan to satisfy this requirement.
5. The windows shall satisfy Section 3.5.1(F)(3)(c) of the LUC, where windows are
required to be individually defined with detail elements such as frames, sills, and lintels.
6. Please indicate all building dimensions, including doors, windows, et cetera, on building
elevations.
7. The building should be shifted to the northwest comer (the southeast intersection of
Lemay Avenue and Poudre River Drive) of the site.
7. The architectural elevations shall accommodate all provisions of the Land Use Code.
r. Delineate all property lines and all rights -of -way, sidewalk widths and improvements on all
plans.
s. All signs will require an additional sign permit outside this comment review.
t. The burden of demonstrating compliance with all Land Use Code criteria is with the
applicant.
u. The applicant/developer shall coordinate all emergency and utility infrastructure needs to
ensure that all infrastructure provisions are fully met.
v. All modifications to code standards will be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board.
18-99 15:28
P.O6
due at the time of submittal of the required Project Development Plan and compliance
phases of the development review by City staff and affected outside reviewing agencies.
b. Per LUC Section 3.2.1(I7)(2) street trees shall be placed at thirty-foot to forty -foot spacing
intervals in the center of all parkway areas. The trees shall be placed at least eight (8) feet
away from the edges of driveways and alleys, and forty feet (shade trees)/fifteen feet
(ornamental trees) (LUC 3.2.1(K) from any street light. All driveway locations and utilities
shall be shown to ensure compliance with the Land Use Code.
c. Show existing trees (including species and diameter) and designate whether they are to
remain or be removed. Tree protection will be required in accordance with Section 3.2.1(F)
of the Land Use Code.
d. Address all visual clearance and sight distance triangle areas per Section 3.2.1(L) of the
Land Use Code. A
e. According to Section 3.2.1(E)(4)(b) of the Land Use Code thefparking lot perimeter must
include elements that achieve a minimum height of 30 inches. Such landscaping needs to
extend a minimum of seventy (70) percent of the length of the street frontage of the parking
lot and any boundary of the parking lot exterior abutting any nonresidential use.
f. All parking lots need to meet the parameters addressed in LUC Section 3.2.1(E)(5)(a) — (e)
including 3.2.2(13)(5)(a) walkways shall have one (1) canopy shade tree per forty (40) lineal
feet of walkways planted in a landscape strip within five (6) feet of such walkway.
g. Per Section 3.2.2(M) and Section 3.2.1(E)(5) — (6) requires at least six (6) percent of the
interior space of any parking lot be devoted to interior parking landscaping. The actual
interior parking lot landscaping percentages need to be shown.
h. The requirement for "full tree stocking" [LUC Section 3.2.1(D)(1)(c)] applies. This section of
the code requires that formal or informal groupings of trees must be planted in all areas
within 50 feet of the building spaced at 30 to 40 feet intervals.
i. The sitellandscape shall accommodate the minimum species diversity is provided in
accordance with Section 3.2.1(D)(3) of the Land Use Code.
j. Indicate all bus, pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle circulation routes and loading areas.
k. Verification of the irrigation system connection points to ensure all landscaping is
continuously maintained per Section 3.2.1 [J].
I. Please show the location of all transformers on the revised Site and Landscape Plans.
They must be located no more than 10 feet from a paved surface and must be screened
from view.
m. Provide a detailed light plan (spec. sheet for all wall and pole mounted fixtures) insuring that
all lighting apparatuses are shielded down, which meets the Section 3.2.4 including Section
3.2.2.
n. Please show and note all exterior mechanical devises, meters, et cetera, must be screened.
o. Coordinate the sidewalk system through out the development with Transportation Planning
Services.
p. All street, pedestrian, bike corridors and mid -block connections shall be accommodated
and connect to adjacent and proposed facilities, please contact Kathleen Reavis of
Transportation Planning.
q. Product Design Concems:
1. The site plan should include building envelope/footprint dimensions and distance to
nearest property lines.
2. Please indicate all building colors on the Building Elevations in accordance with Section
3.5.1(G) of the Land Use Code.
3. Label the appropriate scale(s) for each illustrative elevation and sheet plan.
7 Per Section 3.5.1(C) of the LUC. to the maximum extent feasible, primary facades
and entries shall face the adjacent street. If facing a street is not feasible, at a
minimum, a main entrance shall face a connecting walkway with a direct pedestrian
18-99 15:28
P.05
4. Transportation Planning:
®a. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) is required with your Development Plan submittal. To
coordinate the parameters of this study, please contact Eric Bracke, the City's Traffic
Engineer, and Kathleen Reavis, the City's Transportation Planner.
b. The site shall meet ADA requirements.
l —� All street, pedestrian ways internal and external to the site, and bike corridor connections
shall be accommodated and connect to adjacent and proposed facilities.
5. The Natural Resources Department offers the following comments: gt -G6eo
a. Delineate all natural features, as defined in the Land Use Code.
--o An ecological characterization study is required. Pease call to set parameters of study.
c. Accommodate potential trail access corridors through Parks and Recreation Planning.
d. You will need to file a fugitive dust control permit and coordinate this through the Larimer
County Environmental Health Department Please contact them directly.
e. Provide adequate dumpster and trash enclosure area to accommodate a recycling
container(s) (see attachment).
f. One trash hauler should be used to minimize traffic impact as well as impact on the roads.
g. Native grasses and plant materials should be used wherever appropriate and bluegrass
should be minimized.
6. Fire Department
a. Please contact Ron Gonzales with Poudre Fire Authority to discuss requirements.
0 WatertWastewater.
a. 6-inch water and 8-inch sewer in Hoffman Mill Road: 6-inch water in Poudre River Drive
b. There may be water/sewer services stubbed into the site. These services must be used or
abandoned at the main.
c. The water conservation standards for landscape and irrigation will apply to the project and
PIF's and water rights will be due at time of building permit.
0 tight and Power offers the following comments:
a. Electrical services are available in Poudre River Drive improvements.
b. The applicant/developer shall acquire all necessary access corridors/easements.
c. The normal electric development charges will apply to this project.
d. Coordinate all transformer and utility locations with Light and Power.
9. Advance Planning offers the following:
a. The development shall comply with all Land Use Code provisions.
V-110. The Current Planning Department offers the following comments:
a. This development request will be subject to the Development Review Fee Schedule that is
available in the Current Planning Department office. The development review fees are
I8-99 15:28 P.04
1)
Division 3.1
General Provisions
2)
Division 3.2
Site Planning and Design Standards
3)
Division 3.3
Engineering Standards
4)
Division 3.4
Environmental, Natural Area, Recreational and Cultural Resource
Protection Standards
5)
Division 3.5
Building Standards
6)
Division 3.6
Transportation and Circulation
7)
Division 3.7
Compact Urban Growth Standards
8)
Division 3.8
Supplementary Regulations.
l 2. Stormwater Utility offered the following comments:
�/ a. This site is located in the Old Town drainage basin where theOiew development fees are
$4,150/acre and is subject to the runoff coefficient reduction. The site is in inventory grid
#101.
b. The standard drainage and erosion control reports and plans are required and they must be
prepared by a professional engineer registered in Colorado.
c. Onsite water quality extended detention is required and flood control detention could be
required if the outfall system is not designed to carry the 100 year site release. The
standard release rate is the 2 year historic.
d. There is a large stormsewer along the western property line and an inlet with a 24"
stormsewer outfall at the north east corner of the lot. The original drainage study for the
existing medical buildings will need to be reviewed by the design engineer. It may identify
the areas intended to use the 24". The larger pipe is another possibility for an outfall
system. However, the capacity may need to be analyzed. The pipe has not been modeled
using the present standards and it does drain the Riverside Shopping Center.
e. The existing pipes on the property may need easements dedicated over to them. The
larger pipe along Lemay may have an easement already dedicated from the time of the
Riverside Shopping Center construction. If not, the normal requirement is for 20 feet or the
easement width needed to repaidreplace the pipe. That would be the width from one foot
either side of the pipe and a 1:1 slope to the surface. There was a smaller pipe added to
connect from an existing inlet on Riverside to the large pipe along Lemay. There may not
be an easement over that pipe either.
The Engineering Department offers the following comments:
a. The standard utility plan and development agreement requirements must be submitted to
the City for review and approval.
b. Street oversizing fees will apply to this development. The street oversizing fee will be as
follows: ZZ • Medical clinic - $3.61 square feet
�'(�0(Z
c. Please contact Matt Baker for additional information regarding the actu ees related to
your proposed development.
----� d. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) is required with your Develo ent Plan submittal. To
coordinate the parameters of this study, please contact Eric Bracke, the City's Traffic
Engineer, and Kathleen Reavis, the City's Transportation Planner.
7 e Roadway improvements to standards along the property's frontage are required. All gtreet
improvements need to meet State and City Street Design Standards. SHerl'
f. A railroad permit may be required, please contact.
7 Additional right-of-way adjacent to property's frontage will be required. f3i!v'A,,�,
Parking stalls need to meet setback requirements_ from Lemay Avenue based on ADT.
ti5s`n �lu>°Ui3 !, f
'As-99 15:25
r Vrl
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS
City of Fort Collins
MEETING DATE: November 1, 1999
ITEM: General Care Health Services Project Development Plan
APPLICANT: Mr. Charles Hatchette
General Care Health Services, Inc.
700 East Elizabeth f
Fort Collins, CO 80524
LAND USE DATA: Request to develop a medical clinic. The site is located at the southeast
intersection of Lemay Avenue and Poudre River Drive. The comments listed below are
conceptual comments based upon a preliminary plan provided at the November 1, 1999
conceptual review meeting. The applicant is expected to apply all pertinent Land Use Code.
Harmony Corridor Plan, and Street Design Standards in their final design. The comments are to
provide a reasonable amount of direction prior to the submittal of a development plan. The
following comments shall not preclude staff from making additional comments in the future in
regard to overall layout of the site.
DEPARTMENTAL CONTACTS:
Current Planning
Ron Fuchs
970.221-6750
Zoning Department
Peter Barnes
970.221.6760
Engineering Department
Marc Virata
970.221.6505
Street Oversizing Coordinator
Matt Baker
970.224.6108
City Traffic Engineer
Eric Bracke
970.224.6062
Poudre Fire Authority
Ron Gonzales
970:221.6570
Stormwater Utilities
Glen Schlueter
970.221.6681
Water & Sewer Utilities
Roger Buffington
970.221.6681
Natural Resources
Kim Kreimeyer
970.221.6750
Light and Power
Alan Rutz
970.221.6700
Historic Preservation
Karen MacWilliams
970.221.6376
Transportation Services
Mark Jackson
970.416.2029
Parks and Recreation
Janet Meisel -Bums
970.221.6367
Advance Planning
Pete Wray
970.221.6376
COMMENTS:
1. The Zoning Department offered the following comments:
a. The site is located in the CCR, Community Commercial — Poudre River District and the
project will be regulated under the Land Use Code (LUC).
b. The proposed land development will be subject to a Type 1 review.
c. This development must comply with all applicable General Development Standards as set
forth in Article 3 of the Land Use Code, including but not limited to the requirements for
vehicle and bicycle parking, parking, building setbacks, landscaping, fence screening, et
cetera. These development standards are set forth in the following divisions:
COMMUNIIYMANNING ANORNWRONMENTALSPRYICES 211 N.(:ollegvAve. RO.ilowS p FuriCeiling, C(1NOi2;-0.�Ci0 (Yi11jZL6750
CLIRRr\'T PLANNINCI UEPARTURVI
Nov-18-99 15:27
P.02
Community Planning and Environmental Services
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
November 16. 1999
Mr. Charles Hatchette
General Care. Health Services, Inc.
700 East Elizabeth
Fort Collins, CO 80524 F
Dear Mr. Hatchette:
For your information, attached is a copy of Staffs comments concerning the
Development Plan located at the southeast intersection of Lemay Avenue and Poudre
River Drive presented before the Conceptual Review Team on November 1, 1999.
The comments are offered informally by Staff to assist you in preparing the detailed
components of the project application. Modifications and additions to these comments
may be made at the time of formal review of this project.
The burden of demonstrating compliance with all Land Use Code criteria is with the
applicant. Please contact me at 970.221.6750 and/or e-mail: _rfuchso-ci.fort-collins.co.us
if you should have any questions or concerns related to these comments.
Sincerely
Ronald G. Fuchs
City Planner
cc: File
Hatchette Medical concept review letter
281 North College Avenue -.PO. Box 580 - Fort Collins, CO80522d15R0 - (979) 2214i75Q • FAX (970).116-2020