Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOSSIL LAKE ANNEXATION NO. 2 - 33-01A - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)1j Boo ,,US BOUNDARY KECHTER RD. ih SITE FOSSI LA P.U. x Pvopan Estates Z 18 A 01 wetlands and Cit. Jim F K-!!; 22 st 0 g Cit.130 LMDAND CIA, SCA M, 4 REVISION OCT S COMMENT SHEET DATE: October 31, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #33-01, 33-01A, & 33-01B Fossil Lake Annexation #1, #2, & #3 — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff review meeting: 75 November 14, 2001 ❑ No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** i S q � Keac� 2 r3ou��� 2� CC—GRL &L45-e— DAl AL(- P,40661,5. DZeK HERE IF YOU WISH TO R] _ Plat _ site _ Utility _ Redline Utility _ Dramage Report _ Other _ I.andsupe 19 I'd like to tentatively plan to take the item to the Planning and Zoning Board on the next available meeting date, which is January 3, 2002. The item will need to go to Council 3 times. I'd tentatively like to schedule the initiating resolution for January 15, 2002, first reading for February 19, 2002 second reading for March 5, 2002. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dave Stringer 17 Change the term 'town" to "city" on annexation #1 where it points at the hatched area of contiguity with existing city limits. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. ours Tru ly, �v T OY ONES Ci Inner Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Citv of Fort Collins STAN EVERITT Date: 11/21/2001 C/O EVERITT COMPANIES 3030 S. COLLEGE FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for FOSSIL LAKE ANNEXATIONS #1, #2, & #3 - TYPE II (LUC), #33-01 B, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: City Attorney's Office Issue Contact: Paul Eckman 15 Although the landowners in the area are subject to a covenant running with the land which affirmatively consents to the annexation of the Property to the City, the State Constitutional requirement that more than 50% of the landowners of the area to be annexed must sign the petition is not being satisfied. [comment made 10/15/20011 , 23 As I said before, the petition does.not comply with the State Constitution, as far as I know. Will they be filing an untrue petition ..... or a true, but obviously non -compliant petition? Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Troy Jones 18 All 3 annexation maps show slightly incorrect land ownerships in the area south of Fossil Creek Reservoir. Please see the redlined plan of Annexation No. 1 from Doug Moore of the Natural Resources Department for clarification. . 20 The Annexations No. 1 and No. 2 depict their area by a gray tone, while No. 3 only uses a thick line. Please make all three consistent. . 21 The hatching that is used on annexation No. 3 should be changed. That type of hatching is generally used off -site of the property being annexed to show contiguity to city limits. You are showing it on - site, which adds to confusion. Please put this hatching off -site. 22 Item A.8. on the petition for all three annexations states, "more than 50% of the landowners in the area are subject to a covenant running with the land which affirmatively consents to the annexation." As Paul Eckman has commented, this language does not satisfy the requirements of the State Constitution's Poundstone Amendment that requires that at least 50% of the landowners in the area to be annexed to actually sign the petition. Annexations #1 and #2 have the language about the covenant, but at the time the petition was signed, didn't Everline LLC actually constitue 100% of the property owners of the first and second annexation areas? If this is the case, the language for both annexations #1 and #2 can be worded to satisfy the constitution with regard to this issue. The issue of annexation #3 and whether or not it satisfies State Constitution requirements should be discussed in greater detail in a meeting between Lucia Liley, Steve Roy, Paul Eckman, Cameron Gloss, and Troy Jones. Page 1