The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRIVERBEND - PDP - 39-01 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)them recorded before the plat is filed. If not, just label as "by separate document". 07/30/02: Repeat - outstanding item since 10/16/01. 111 03/19/02: Correct the title. Remove the word "subdivision". Title needs to be consistent among the drawings. 07/30/02: Repeat comment. Please remove the word "subdivision" from the title. 137 See redlines for several typo's and missing items. 140 From Technical Services: Re -label Buildings B and C. Buildings are labeled in a clockwise direction. 141 From Technical Services: Add Vicinity Map. Topic: Utility Plans 19 10/16/01: Cover Sheet, pg 2: Update the General Notes. See Appendix El. Complete lines 19 and 40. 03/19/02: Provide line 48 of the General Notes. Either "NA" or list the variances if applicable. 07/30/02: Thanks, but see redlines : ) 22 10/16/01: Cover Sheet: Provide the typical street section (Detail 7-8F w/out the sidewalk on one side) being proposed. Sections include appropriate horizontal and vertical dimensions and cross slopes. Page 4 to emphasize the pedestrian area. These parking stalls are not designed for pedestrian movement. Topic: Site Plan 139 The walkway or treated pavement in front of the garages needs to clearly delineate the.pedestrian area. Since the driveways are treated the same as the walkway or pedestrian area, the walk needs to emphasize the pedestrians by such means as grade separation from the street, such as a roll over curb, or other means to identify the pedestrian area from the automobile. This development request is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement, from the date of this letter, as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. The number of each document to re -submit is on the attached Revision Routing Sheet. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, AWW- Steve Olt City Planner Page 7 Natural Resources property and for the drainage easement before the public hearing can commence. Repeat 8/6/02 Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control 130 Repent Comment - 8/7/02 kl 1. The legend symbol for silt fencing doesn't match the plan symbol. 2. What is to protect the existing pond to the south from sedimentation from the installation of the 15" RCP WQ pond outlet pipe? 3. How are the properties to the east to be protected from sediment transport during the installation of the 15" RCP along the east side of the development? 4. Previous note #3 has not been addressed with regard to utilizing the WQ pond as a sediment trap with a gravel filter. 5. Previous note #4 has not been addressed. Any reseeding/sodding, etc to be done is a part of the erosion control plan. Whatever is on the landscape plan (which is never seen by the people doing the erosion control) should be repeated on the E.C. plan. 6. What reseeding/mulching is to be done on the excavation going into the Natural Areas pond with the pipeline, and in the natural area that will be disturbed near the silt fence south of the pond? This should be coordinated with Natural Resources, a seed mix/method decided upon with their input, and then a note placed on the erosion control plan stating what was decided. 7. Why are straw bales being placed in the existing Swale to the west? 8. Previous note # 5 has not been addressed. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: Pavement 138 The pavement treatment for the five parking stalls on the cul-de-sac should be consistent with the street material. The special treatment for the pavement is Page 6 03/19/02: It's alright to leave the entire detail on the detail sheet but the actual street section still needs to go on the cover sheet. 07/30/02: The sidewalk and parkway dimensions on sheet 3 and 4 are conflicting with each other. Put "varies" for the utility easement dimension on the east side of the street since it's different depending on what portion of the street you're looking at. 42 10/16/01: Grading/Utility Sheet: Provide easements for all the work that is occurring off -site (culvert, utilities in Natural Areas, construction on neighboring properties, etc.). Contact Doug Moore with Natural Areas ASAP - any request for easements from this department takes quite a long time. 135 Sheet 4 - missing two spot elevations, see redlines. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Electric 109 Due to extremely tight site, meter locations (both gas and electric) need to be. coordinated with each utility and shown on the utility plan. A utility coordination meeting is strongly encouraged. Department: Natural Resources Topic: Utility Easements 142 Utility Easement in Natural Area - Issue Contact: Doug Moore. Easements still need to be acquired from Natural Resources. The Natural Resources Easement policy must be followed to acquire the necessary easement. Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage 126 The City of Fort Collins Natural Resources Department will have to give a letter of intent from their board of directors to allow for the outfall of this site onto Page 5 124 See redlines for other comments. Topic: Plot 5 10/16/01: Update the language in several areas. See attached. 03/19/02: Repeat. 07/30/02: Please update the plat language in several areas, see redlines (third request). Please return the Plat redlines with the next submittal - I did not receive them with this round of review. I attached the Plat Language form again for your reference. 6 10/16/01: Add current date. 03/19/02: Repeat: 07/30/02: Repeat. 8 10/16/01: See attached for the following notice that shall be placed on the plat set apart from the other notes in a box labeled as "NOTICE" when private drives or streets are utilized on the property. 03/19/02: Please place in a box as shown in the example attached in the first round. 07/30/02: Please correct two typo's. 11 10/16/01: Dedicate and show all utility easements as required. Obtain and provide all off -site utility and construction easements. 03/19/02: Repeat. Provide the temporary and permenant offsite easements by separate document. Show on plat and provide reception number - if you get Page 3 Stormwater Utility 1. An easement -is needed through the City's Natural Resources property. This may take some time to acquire because the request for an easement has to be approved by the Natural Resources Advisory Board. 2. A storm drainage easement is needed on this property and has not yet been shown to be dedicated. 3. If the applicant were to propose roll-over curb around the private drive within the development then the 5tormwater Utility would need to evaluate the effects of the curb on the on -site drainage. Transportation Planning There are concerns about the internal pedestrian circulation in this project. The proposed colored, scored concrete area to be shared by pedestrians and vehicles should be grade -separated from the private drive by a roll-over curb. 2. The 5 parking spaces at the northeast corner of the site (and just the parking spaces) should be an asphalt surface consistent with the private drive. They should not be constructed of colored, scored concrete. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Genera/ 123 03/19/02: Re -label the 20' water easement and 20' drainage easement to read "20' utility and drainage easement" or "20' utility easement", whichever is correct. 07/30/02: Utility plans call this out as a "20' utility easement" while the site plan calls it a "proposed 20' utility and drainage easement". The landscape plan doesn't call it anything and the plat doesn't even show it at all. Please coordinate the different plan sets so that they're presenting the same information. All off -site easements still need to be acquired and submitted by separate document before the project can go to hearing. Page 2 4 Citvof Fort Collins HOORAZ, LLC STAFF PROJECT REVIEW c/o Vignette Studios 144 N. Mason Street, Suite 2 Fort Collins, CO. 80524 Date: 8/14/2002 Staff has reviewed your re -submittal documentation for RIVERBEND PDP, #39-01, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt 105 The following comments were expressed at the staff review meeting on August 7, 2001: ' Engineering 1. The subdivision plat needs work. There are repeat comments. 2. There are discrepancies between plans that need to be cleaned up and the plans must be made consistent with one another. 3. The street cross-section has changed and there are some conflicting items between plans. The parkway along Countryside Drive must be 5.5' in width (5' of grass and 6" of curb) and the sidewalk must be 5' in width. Please ensure that all plans are consistent with one another. 4. This development request cannot be scheduled for a public hearing until the required easement through the City's Natural Resources property is resolved. Page 1