HomeMy WebLinkAboutWINGSHADOW, 1225 REDWOOD STREET - PDP/FDP - 30-02A - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)Ted Shepard - Re: Wingshadow P&Z Sc` 'ule Page 1
From: Bob Smith
To: Cameron Gloss; Glen Schlueter; Heidi Phelps; Jim Hibbard; Marsha
HiImes- Robinson; Ted Shepard
Date: 2/9/03 9:19AM
Subject: Re: Wingshadow P&Z Schedule
My thoughts are "highlighted" below.
>>> Ted Shepard 02/06/03 03:16PM >>>
Marsha and Glen have brought us up to speed regarding the Water Board's conditions of approval for
Wingshadow. The conditions are of a technical nature and require a fairly sophisticated early flood
detection system upstream within the Dry Creek Basin to allow approximately two hours of lead time for a
safe and complete evacuation of the building and grounds.
The question is now that the Water Board has ruled, when do we take the P.D.P. to the public hearing with
the P & Z Board?
Marsha suggested I send this e-mail to get a response.
I propose that we take the P.D.P. to P & Z at the March 6th or Marc_ h_20 public hearing for the following
reasons:
1. This would allow Wingshadow to keep working on their project concurrent with satisfying the Water
Board conditions versus working sequentially. OK
2. Staff would recommend that Wingshadow be approved subject to meeting the Water Board's
conditions. That would be the Utilities position on the approval.
3. There's an outside chance that the P.D.P. could be appealed to Council by the neighbor's. This would
add 4 - 6 weeks to the process. (For example, In -Situ was heard by the Board on Dec. 19th and by
Council on appeal on Feb. 4th.)
4. Utilities would retain control over the issuance of a building permit. We don't need to have control over
the building permit. That can happen as it normally does. Our concern of meeting the conditions adopted
by the Water Board which are in conjunction with the C.O.
5. Utilities would retain control over the issuance of a C.O. Utilities would only administer the C.O. as
stated in #4 above. There might be other issues that develop during the PDP review.
6. Utilities would require an engineer's certification of equipment installation, finish floor elevation, etc.
True
I would be comfortable with this scenario given the control points we have prior to the building being
occupied.
CC: Carrie Daggett; Mike Smith; Paul Eckman