Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIMBERLINE VILLAGE - HARMONY SCHOOL SHOPS, 4TH FILING - PDP - 10-03 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYFUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE Travel Time Worksheet AMR P Destination Disrarice 7me Tune -actor', CSU Campus Transit Center 6.3 21 42 Foothills Fashion Mail 3.2 14 28 Fort Collins High School 1.0 9 15 Downtown Fort Collins 7.0 23 45 Total Travel Time 67 130 1.94 Service Level Standards Worksheet --I Mitt, 4- Hours of Weekday Service 18 hours 16 hours x Weekday Frequency of Service .15 minutes 20 minutes x Travel Time Factor 2.0 x 2.0 x x Peak Load Factor 15:1.2 <_ 1.2 x 4 of 4 = LOS A a Nlultimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p.20 LOS Stnndurds for Development Review - Digcle —_ Ficrure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet u base connectivity: specific connections to priority sites: description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address PovoPG; V4t-LBYn (JoSPfrAc aur+F 49 "R.fuoVY CRossff� destination area classification (see text) C0tttut6KCr AL- cCWMOClAt- level of service -connectivity nwtinnmi actual proposed C I m'm IMIN MAIE .... .......... _...... __......._. . �-., City of fort Collins Transportation Master Plan N Milestone o _ Harmony O � O E SCALE: 1"=1000' BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA I Nfultimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual LOS Smndards for Development Review - Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet 1 � - p. 18 City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan � f• � � t• t• f• f• f� f• f• � � t• � � t• � t• Nialtimodal Transportation Level. of Service Manual P. 18 LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification: aTmc/Z description of applicable destination area destination area within 1,320' classification including address (see text) �V6iGeFb.012lded� TO �ESrDfSUTeAL Alo2reFe'�S-t 0 PoOetza VALLOY L FtCG 140S PUrA t- �b l)TYf CaruwUS lml-- - - -- 401emowl01!0%1mG E eeCrAL !Q 4J SIT (Z0E-lel%0Tz (enter as many as apply) level of service (minimum based on project location classification) Nreanew :mninullr 1.16 nmJe �ieual Inbroel S unuJUee eenulh' mhdmun' g t3 B 6 actual A � a proPnsed p �' B �miwimlmimi ��10101 : 101 mom City of Dort Collins Transportation Master Plan N 1 5 Milestone � G O Harmony O � O E SCALE: 1"=1000' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA 4?Z APPENDIX H �= - IFA(S&'C> Perak) Ag-rw(AL '�r2EET M i auo 2 APPENDIX G -19 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Harmony/MHP Access/Snow Mesa Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 9/24/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: amp Year recent short on bkgr ot tal Project ID: 0221 E/W St: Harmony Road NIS St: MHP Access/Snow Mesa SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R 1 L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I I I I I 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 0 I 1 1 0 I LGConfig I L T R 1 L T R I L TR I L TR I Volume 1115 2215 150 165 2965 35 1495 1 70 I10 1 75 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A Thru P I Thru A A Right P I Right A A Peds X I Peds X WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru P 1 Thru A Right P I Right A Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right I EB Right A A SB Right 1 WB Right A Green 11.0 68.0 8.0 12.0 11.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 177 1770 0.68 0.10 58.7 E T 2881 5085 0.81 0.57 5.2 A 7.5 A R 1227 1583 0.13 0.77 0.8 A Westbound L 177 1770 0.38 0.10 48.2 D T 2881 5085 1.08 0.57 51.7 D 51.1 D R 1069 1583 0.03 0.68 1.0 A Northbound L 601 3433 0.87 0.17 60.9 E TR 304 1587 0.25 0.19 41.6 D 58.5 E Southbound L 133 1770 0.08 0.08 51.9 D TR 145 1587 0.55 0.09 56.6 E 56.1 E Intersection Delay = 34.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS !i7 111.. iJLVVV. ✓1lj J1G11GGU 111LGLJGl. l.1 V11J 1\G IGQJG S.11. 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Harmony/MHP Access/Snow Mesa Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 99/�2.�4/11 ( pm Jurisd: Year Fort Collins recent short tots Dbkgrd 'Period:/aiiy Project 0221 E/W St: Harmony Road NIS St: MHP Access/Snow Mesa SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY . I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I I 1 3 1 i 1 1 3 1 I 1 2 1 0 I I I 1 1 0 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R 1 L TR I L TR I Volume 135 2925 220 190 1605 15 1220 1 50 125 1 100 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I ORTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area.Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A A Thru P I Thru A A Right P I Right A A Peds X i Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right 'A A SB Right I WB Right A 10.0 62.0 6.0 4.0 18.0 'Green Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity ' (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS . Eastbound L 177 1770 0.21 0.10 42.7 D T 2866 5085 1.07 0.56 47:2 D 44.0 D 'R 1108 1583 0.21 0.70 1.1 A Westbound L 177 1770 0.54 0.10 46.8 D T 2866 5085 0.59 0.56 3.1 A 5.4 A R 1051 1583 0.02 0.66 0.9 A Northbound L 343 3433 0.68 0.10 53.0 D ' TR 318 1589 0.17 0.20 36.7 D 49.9 D Southbound L 113 1770 0.23 0.06 50.0 D. ' TR 260 1586 0.41 0.16 42.3 D 43.8 D Intersection Delay = 31.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: (970) 669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS -11 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24102 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Harmony/Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short on bkgr tota Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out/LT-in Access North/South Street: Harmony Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs):. 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 L T R L Westbound 5 6 T R Volume 120 1653 2290 100 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 126 1740 2410 105 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration (li 125 0.95 131 2 0 No 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I R v (vph) 126 131 C(m) (vph) 380 502 v/c 0.33 0.26 95% queue length 1.42 1.04 Control Delay 19.1 14.7 LOS C B Approach Delay 14.7 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm ,Intersection: Harmony/Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short ong bkgrd otal Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out/LT-in Access North/South Street: Harmony Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 60 2120 1253 45 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 63 2231 1318 47 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R tVolume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration Delay, Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config L (vph) 63 'v C(m) (vph) 582 v/c 0.11 95% queue length 0.36 Delay 11.9 'Control LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS t Michael P. ' Matthew J. N 0.95 52 2 0 No 1 R Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 I 1 R HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Delich Delich, P.E. 11.9 B 575 0.09 0.30 11.9 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release'4.lc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24 02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Ti erline/Gerrard Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short QE3>bkgrd otal Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Gerrard Access North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R. volume 1725 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1815 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 50 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R v (vph) 10 C(m) (vph) 273 v/c 0.04 95% queue length 0.11 Control Delay 18.7 LOS C Approach Delay 18.7 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ( +. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: pm ,Intersection:'Timberline/Gerrard Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary falysis Year: recent short ong bkgrd otal oject ID: 0221 st/West Street: Gerrard Access North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1325 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1394 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- Median Type Undivided Channelized? CRT Lanes 2 0 onfiguration T TR Upstream Signal? No No 'Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R- I L T R rVolume 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 50 Percent Grade ($) 0 0 Median Storage Approach: Exists? fRlared Storage T Channelized? No Lanes 1 'configuration R 'Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95%=queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay . Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 1 1 R ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 15.0- B 366 0.01 0.04 15.0- B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: amp PHASE 2 Intersection: Tj er i ilestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short lon bkgrd total , Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1555 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1636 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 Configuration T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration ($I 0.95 210 2 0 No 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R v (vph) 210 C(m) (vph) 339 v/c 0.62 95% queue length 3.93 Control Delay 31.4 LOS D Approach Delay 31.4 Approach LOS D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. -1 Z HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Michael ,Analyst: Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am m PHASE 1 Timberline Milestone 'Intersection: Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary lon Analysis Year: recent short g bkgrd otal Project ID: 0221 ' East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ,Intersection Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R. Volume 1480 75 180 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1541 78 189 0_ Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 _- Median Type Undivided T Channelized? No anes 2 1 CRonfiguration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, 'Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay ■ Approach LOS 200 85 0.95 0.95 210 89 2 2 0 No 1 1 L R 61 Queue Length, and Level of Service SB Westbound Eastbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L I L R I 189 210 89 371 245 498 0.51 0.86 0.18 2.78 6.95 0.64 24.4 69.4 13.8 C F B 52.9 F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. �I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael . Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am m HASE 2 Intersection: imherline Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short ong bkgrK total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R volume 1225 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1289 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 Configuration T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (�) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration C 0.95 121 2 0 No 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config 1 1 R v (vph) 121 C(m) (vph) 339 v/c 0.36 95% queue length 1.57 Control Delay 21.4 LOS C Approach Delay 21.4 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. -10 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am m HASE 1 'Intersection: Timberline Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 i� L T R I L T R Volume 1240 55 105 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1305 57 110 0- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type Undivided- RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 115 70 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 121 73 Heavy Vehicles 2 2 IPercent Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I L R I (vph) 110 121 73 'v C(m) (vph) 474 391 636 v/c 0.23 0.31 0.11 95% queue length 0.89 1.29 0.39 Delay 14.9 18.3 11.4 'Control LOS B C B Approach Delay 15.7 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am/z�m� Intersection: Ti erline/Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgr total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1480 75 180 1555 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1557 78 189 1636 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 200 85 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 210 89 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 Lane Config L I L R I v (vph) 189 210 89 C(m) (vph) 393 93 339 v/c 0.48 2.26 0.26 95% queue length 2.53 18.81 1.03 Control Delay 22.4 672.4 19.4 LOS C F C Approach Delay 478.0 Approach LOS F Eastbound 11 12 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ! �,11 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period:®pm 'Intersection: Timberline/Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short on bkgrd otal Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1240 55 105 1225 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1305 57 110 1289 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL Channelized? No 'RT Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R ( L T R ' Volume 115 70 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 121 73 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes. 1 1 Configuration L R ■ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I L R I v (vph) 110 121 73 C(m) (vph) 501 140 411 v/c 0.22 0.86 0.18 95% queue length 0.83 5.65 0.64 Control Delay 14.2 104.7 15.6 LOS B F C Approach Delay 71.2 Approach LOS F ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. /� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: TN pm Intersection: Ti erline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Timberline Lane/RT-in RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: .Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1475 65 1745 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1536 67 1836 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 2 0 Configuration T R T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume uu 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 84 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I R v (vph) 84 5 C(m) (vph) 344 630 v/c 0.24 0.01 95% queue length 0.94 0.02 Control Delay 18.8 10.8 LOS C B Approach Delay 18.8 10.8 Approach LOS C B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. r_ t0 ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/ 4/02 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: imberline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short lon bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Timberline Lane/RT-in RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? ' Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 0.95 0.95 1315 42 2 1 T R Yes No 0.95 0.95 1405 5- 2 0 T TR Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration Delay, Approach NB Movement 1 ane Config 'v (vpn) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 45 5 0.95 0.95 47 5 2 0 0 0 No No 1 1 R R Queue Length, and Level of Service SB Westbound Eastbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 I R I R 47 5 407 424 0.12 0.01 0.39 0.04 15.0- 13.6 B B 15.0- 13.6 B B ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 6� Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: ....9/24 02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period:;. am(pm)Year recent short long kgr otal Project ID: 0221 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1365 2050 425 1280 2775 505 1505 670 140 1410 725 615 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 67 1 305 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A P 1 Thru A A Right A P I Right A A Peds X X I Peds X X WB Left A I SB Left A Thru P A I Thru A A Right P A 1 Right A A Peds X X 1 Peds X X NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right A Green 12.0 42.0 16.0 0.0 16.0 10.0 14.0 0.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0_0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/� Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 372 3433 1.03 0.11 T 2288 5085 0.94 0.45 R 923 1583 0.48 0.58 Westbound L 486 3433 0.61 0.14 T 2458 5085 1.19 0.48 R 950 1583 0.56 0.60 Northbound L 486 3433 1 T 767 3539 0 R 620 1583 0 Southbound L 429 3433 1 T 708 3539 1 R 541 1583 0 Intersection Delay = 104.4 F 23.2 C 30.5 C 2.1 A 45.2 D 101.2 F 82.8 2.6 A .09 0.14 114.9 F .92 0.22 53.6 D 76.1 .12 0.39 13.4 B .01 0.13 92.7 F .08 0.20 96.7 F 79.8 .60 0.34 23.3 C 65.1 (sec/veh) Intersection F E E LOS = E HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 , E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS (94- ,Analyst:,, Michael ■Agency:: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 9/24/02 ,Period: am m Project :.0221 E/W St: Harmony Road Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent short on tota N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound i Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I 'No. Lanes 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 I 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1280 2455 310 1230 1310 390 1365 620 300 1485 480 375 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 ORTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 150 1 185 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All Signal Phase Combination 1 2 3 EB Left A Thru A P Right A P Peds X X WB . Left A Thru P A Right P A Peds X X NB Right A SB Right A other areas Operations 4 1 5 6 7 8 I NB Left A I Thru A A i Right A A I Peds X X I SB Left A I Thru A A I Right A A I Peds X X I EB Right A i WB Right A 17.0 35.0 8.0 0.0 14.0 8.0 18.0 0.0 . 'Green Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 'Eastbound L 562 3433 0.52 0.16 37.5 D T 2404 5085 1.07 0.47 53.9 D 47.1 D 'R 950 1583 0.34 0.60 1.6 A Westbound L 281 3433 0.86 0.08 69.7 E T 1988 5085 0.69 0.39 17.1 B 20.5 C R 878 1583 0.47 0.55 2.9 A Northbound L 468 3433 0.82 0.14 52.5 D T 708 3539 0.92 0.20 53.6 D 48.8 D 'R 504 1583 0.31 0.32 19.9 B Southbound L 593 3433 0.85 0.17 49.4 D T 836 3539 0.60 0.24 30.8 C 35.2, D R 691 1583 0.29 0.44 9.9 A e Intersection Delay = 38.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Matthew J. Matthew J. 2272 Glen Loveland, HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Delich Delich, P.E. Haven Drive CO 80538 I' Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: (970) 669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX F (oZ ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Michael 'Analyst: Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Harmony/MHP Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent <EDlong bkgr tota Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: MHP Access Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 115 1400 1985 35 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 122 1489 2205 38 ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type TWLTL Channelized? 'RT Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration C 0.85 11 0 1 L 0.85 88 0 0 No 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 'ApproachEB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R (vph) 122 11 88 'v C(m) (vph) 552 196 492 v/c 0.22 0.06 0.18 95% queue length 0.84 0.18 0.65 Control Delay 13.4 24.5 13.9 LOS B C B Approach Delay 15.1 Approach LOS C ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. iI HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9 24/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: armony/MHP Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgr total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: MHP Access Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 35 1820 1380 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 1936 1533 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration A 2b 100 0.85 0.85 29 117 0 0 0 No 1 1 L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 37 29 117 C(m) (vph) 585 185 855 v/c 0.06 0.16 0.14 95% queue length 0.20 0.54 0.47 Control Delay 11.6 28_0 9.9 LOS B D A Approach Delay 13.5 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. •z HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ,Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: pm 'Intersection: Harmony/Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent E long bkgr total ,Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out/LT-in Access North/South Street: Harmony Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 125 1515 1970 90 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 134 1629 2188 100 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 _- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Yes ,Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R s Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration Delay, 'Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config L (vph) 134 'v C(m) (vph) 498 v/c 0.27 95% queue length 1.08 Control Delay 14.9 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS XI 13U 0.85 152 2 0 No 1 R Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 1 I R HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c 14.2 B 541 0.28 1.15 14.2 B Michael ' Matthew P. Delich J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: & pm Intersection: Harmony/Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor long bkgr tota Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out/LT-in Access North/South Street: Harmony Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 65 1855 1440 40 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 68 1952 1694 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 55 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 64 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I R v (vph) 68 64 C(m) (vph) 422 490 v/c 0.16 0.13 95% queue length 0.57 0.45 Control Delay 15.2 13.4 LOS C B Approach Delay 13.4 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am(,GNm� Intersection: Ti tt rline/Gerrard Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units. U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent (SO rt long bkgrd otal Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Gerrard Access North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? ' Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? )E 1495 5 0.93 0.93 1607 5 2 0 T TR No ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes . Configuration 0 'Approach Movement Lane Config 'v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS C 0.85 11 50 0 No 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 I I R HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c 16.8 C 317 0.03 0.11 16.8 C Michael Matthew P. Delich J. Delich, P.E. 5 � HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.:. Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9L24/02 Analysis Time Period: (aV pm Intersection: Timberline/Gerrard Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent ED>long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Gerrard Access North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1110 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1261 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 ' Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (�) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration X 5 0.85 5 50 0 No 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R v (vph) 5 C(m) (vph) 402 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.04 Control Delay 14.1 LOS B Approach Delay 14.1 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 5-(0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/0 Analysis Time Period: p PHASE 2 'Intersection: Ti erline ilestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgr otal 'Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 1305 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 'Peak Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1403 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? 'Lanes 2 Configuration T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes I ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (�) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration Delay, Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config 'v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay ' LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 0 0 1 R 0.85 229 2 No Queue Length, and Level of Service SB Westbound Eastbound 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 1 I R ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1 22.2 C 229 434 0.53 3.00 22.2 C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/0 Analysis Time Period: am pm)PHASE Intersection: Timber ine Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hort long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1190 75 200 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1239 78 215 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 1 Configuration T R L 'T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 195 95 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 229 ill Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L I L R 1 215 229 ill 500 276 606 0.43 0.83 0.18 2.14 6.78 0.67 17.5 59.3 12.3 C F B 44.0 E HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ,Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: aamm Pm RASE 'Intersection: Timberline Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units. U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hort long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1130 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 Configuration T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ■ Volume 110 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 129 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage' RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Approach Movement Lane Config 'v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 I I Eastbound 11 12 R HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. �3 21.0 C 129 353 0.37 1.63 21.0 C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9L 4/02 Analysis Time Period: a pm HASE 1 Intersection: Timberline Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd otal Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1205 55 120 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1324 60 136 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 110 75 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 129 88 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I L R I v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 136 129 88 469 349 577 0.29 0.37 0.15 1.19 1.66 0.54 15.8 21.2 12.4 C C B 17.6 C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. .52 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/29 02 Analysis Time Period: am pm 'Intersection: Ti erline/Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor long bkgr total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1190 75 200 1305 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1239 78 215 1403 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -_ Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L 'T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume 195 95 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 229 111 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 ' Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound 'Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I L R I v (vph) 215 229 ill C(m) (vph) 521 122 431 v/c 0.41 1.88 0.26 95% queue length 2.00 18.12 1.01 Delay 16.7 484.6 16.2 'Control LOS C F C Approach Delay 331.7 Approach LOS F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P ' Matthew J Delich Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: imberline/Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hort long bkgrd otal Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1205 55 120 995 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1324 60 136 1130 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 110 75 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 129 88 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R I v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 136 129 88 491 123 404 0.28 1.05 0.22 1.12 7.34 0.82 15.1 163.3 16.4 C F C 103.7 F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. `J;_0 ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am 'Intersection: Timberline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgr total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Timberline Lane/RT-in RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L t T R I L T R Volume 1175 65 1490 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.91 0.91 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1223 67 1637 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Raised curb Channelized? No 'RT Lanes 2 1 2 0 Configuration T R T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume 90 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 . Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 105 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 ' Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 'Approach Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I R 'v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 105 5 436 529 0.24 0.01 0.93 0.03 15.9 11.9 C B 15.9 11.9 C B ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. G G HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9 24/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: imberline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Timberline Lane/RT-in RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 1210 40 1100 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1329 43 1250 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 2 0 Configuration T R T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 _ 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 50 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 58 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config 1 R 1 R v (vph) 58 5 C(m) (vph) 403 426 v/c 0.14 0.01 95% queue length 0.50 0.04 Control Delay 15.4 13.6 LOS C B Approach Delay 15.4 13.6 Approach LOS C B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ,v alyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony ■Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: eriod: 9/24102 am pm Jurisd: Year Fort Collins recent ort long bkgrd otal roject kP/W ID• 221 St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 LGConfig ( L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1340 1200 240 1285 1460 355 1375 545 115 1325 645 525 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 ORTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.2b Area Type: All Signal Phase Combination 1 2 3 EB Left A Thru A P Right A P Peds X X WB Left A Thru P A Right P A Peds X X NB Right A SB Right A other areas Operations 4 1 5 6 7 I NB Left A I Thru A A I Right A A I Peds X X I SB Left A ( Thru A A I Right A A I Peds X X . I EB Right A I WB Right A 11.0 33.0 11.0 12.0 10.0 13.0 'Green Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Eastbound L 412 3433 0.89 0.12 63.8 E T 1557 3539 0.83 0.44 24.8 C 30.0 C R 886 1583 0.29 0.56 7.8 A Westbound L 412 3433 0.77 0.12 51.3 D T 1557 3539 1.01 0.44 58.3 E 48.9 D 'R 902 1583 0.44 0.57 8.2 A Northbound L 446 3433 0.92 0.13 68.0 E T 779 3539 0.77 0.22 41.3 D 48.5 D 'R 602 1583 0.21 0.38 19.3 B Southbound L 481 3433 0.77 0.14 48.8 D 814 3539 0.90 0.23 50.5 D 51.8 D 'T R 617 1583 0.97 0.39 55.2 E Intersection Delay = 44.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 41 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 9 24/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: 1 m Year recent ort long bkgr total Project ID: 0221 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes I 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 I LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1260 1235 175 1195 910 390 1300 600 280 1405 405 295 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A P I Thru A A Right A P I Right A A Peds X I Peds X X WB Left A I SB Left A Thru P A I Thru A A Right P A I Right A A Peds X I Peds X X NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right A Green 17.0 23.0 12.0 14.0 10.0 14.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 618 3433 0.44 0.18 37.0 D T 1416 3539 0.92 0.40 35.3 D 32.7 C R 855 1583 0.22 0.54 8.5 A Westbound L 446 3433 0.51 0.13 41.6 D T 1239 3539 0.86 0.35 35.2 D 30.9 C R 776 1583 0.59 0.49 15.5 B Northbound L 515 3433 0.62 0.15 42.1 D T 849 3539 0.75 0.24 39.0 D 35.2 D R 649 1583 0.46 0.41 19.5 B Southbound L 515 3433 0.82 0.15 51.3 D T 849 3539 0.50 0.24 33.3 C 35.1 D R 728 1583 0.42 0.46 15.3 B Intersection Delay = 33.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS secs APPENDIX E Analyst: Michael Inter.: Harmony/MHP Access/Snow Mesa Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 9/2$102 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am pm Year recent short kgr total ong Project ID: 0221 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: MHP Access/Snow Mesa SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I I i I I 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 I I 1 3 1 I 1 3 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR I L TR I Volume 1115 2175 150 165 2915 35 1495 1 70 110 1 75 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 10 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A A Thru P I Thru A A Right P I Right A A Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds X i Peds X NB Right I EB Right A A SB Right I WB Right A Green 11.0 68.0 8.0 12.0 11.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 177 1770 0.68 0.10 58.7 E T 2881 5085 0.79 0.57 5.0 A 7.3 A R 1227 1583 0.13 0.77 0.8 A Westbound L 177 1770 0.38 0.10 48.2 D T 2881 5085 1.06 0.57 43.7 D 43.3 D R 1069 1583 0.03 0.68 1.0 A Northbound L 601 3433 0.87 0.17 60.9 E TR 304 1587 0.25 0.19 41.6 D 58.5 E Southbound L 133 1770 0.08 0.08 51.9 D TR 145 1587 0.55 0.09 56.6 E 56.1 E Intersection Delay = 30.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ¢4 alyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 9 24/02 : a Period pm 'Project D 0221 E/W St: Harmony Road Inter.: Harmony/MHP Access/Snow Mesa Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent shortefo-n kgrd total N/S St: MHP Access/Snow Mesa SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ■ I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I 1 L T R t I L T R I I L T R I I I No. Lanes I 1 3 1 I 1 3 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R 1 L TR I L TR 1 Volume 135 2900 220 190 1575 15 1220 1 50 125 1 100 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 ERTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 uurarion u.xArea Type: till Signal Phase Combination 1 2 3 EB Left A Thru P Right P Peds X WB Left A Thru P ' Right P Peds X other areas Operations 4 1 5 6 7 1 NB Left A A I Thru A A I Right A A 1 Peds X I SB Left A I Thru A 1 Right A I Peds X NB Right I EB Right A A SB Right I WB Right A 10.0 62.0 6.0 4.0 18.0 1Green Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 110.0 Intersection Performance Summary tAppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 177 1770 0.21 0.10 42.7 D T 2866 5085 1.07 0.56 43.4 D 40.4 D 1108 1583 0.21 0.70 1.1 A lR Westbound L 177 1770 0.54 0.10 46.8 D T 2866 5011 0.58 0.56 3.0 A 5.3 A 'R 1051 1583 0.02 0.66 0.9 A Northbound L 343 3433 0.68 0.10 53.0 D TR 318 1511 0.17 0.20 36.7 D 49.9 D Southbound L 113 1770 0.23 0.06 50.0 D TR 260 1586 0.41 0.16 42.3 D 43.8 D ' Intersection Delay = 29.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS secs 43 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am(s� Intersection: Timberline/Gerrard Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short on bkgr total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Gerrard Access North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments or Street: Approach Northbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 L T R I L Southbound 5 6 T R Volume 1615 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1700 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 50 Percent Grade ($) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R v (vph) 10 C(m) (vph) 297 v/c 0.03 95% queue length 0.10 Control Delay 17.5 LOS C Approach Delay 17.5 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 42 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: m pm Intersection: imberline/Gerrard Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins nits: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short on bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Gerrard Access North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1250 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1315 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration 'T TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 50 Percent Grade ($) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config 1 1 R (vph) 5 'v C(m) (vph) 388 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.04 Control Delay 14.4 ' LOS B Approach Delay 14.4 Approach LOS B ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ,Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 41 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24 02 Analysis Time Period: p Intersection: Ti erline/Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short lon bkgr total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1440 70 35 1590 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1515 73 36 1673 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume uu 55 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 84 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 3 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 36 120 C(m) (vph) 410 181 v/c '- 0.09 0.66 95% queue length 0.29 3.90 Control Delay 14.6 58.5 LOS B F Approach Delay 58.5 Approach LOS F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: imberline/Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent lon bkgr total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R 1 L T R Volume 1225 45 25 1230 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1289 47 26 1294 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type TWLTL Channelized? No CRT Lanes 2 1 1 2 onfiguration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ,Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume 65 40 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 68 42 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 3 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 ' Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 'Approach Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I (vph) 26 110 'v C(m) (vph) 512 260 v/c 0.05 0.42 95% queue length 0.16 1.99 Control Delay 12.4 32.0 LOS B D Approach Delay 32.0 Approach LOS D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ,Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 3 °� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period:am Intersection: Ti erline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short on bkgr total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Timberline Lane/RT-in RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1500 30 1660 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1562 31 1747 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 2 0 Configuration T R T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1.0 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I R v (vph) 10 5 C(m) (vph) 338 470 v/c 0.03 0.01 95% queue length 0.09 0.03 Control Delay 16.0 12.7 LOS C B Approach Delay 16.0 12.7 Approach LOS C B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 3z HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: Timberline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short on kgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Timberline Lane/RT-in RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 . L T R I L T R Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1321 21 1357 5- Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No ,Lanes 2 1 2 0 Configuration T R T TR ' Upstream Signal? Yes Yes 'Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 5 Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Fercent ercent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 .Configuration R R Approach Movement Lane Config 'v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay ' LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, NB 1 Queue Length, and Level of Service SB Westbound Eastbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 I R 1 R 15 5 406 393 0.04 0.01 0.11 0.04 14.2 14.3 B B 14.2 14.3 B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. fatthew J. Delich Delich, P.E. S1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 9/24/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am( m Year recent shor lon c r total Project ID �221 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 i I I I I No. Lanes I 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 I 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1360 2015 425 1235 2745 505 1505 665 95 1330 720 615 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0-12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 67 1 305 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All Signal Phase Combination 1 2 3 EB Left A Thru A P Right A P Peds X X WB Left A Thru P A Right P A Peds X X NB Right A SB Right A other areas Operations 4 1 5 6 7 1 NB Left A 1 Thru A A 1 Right A A 1 Peds X X 1 SB Left A I Thru A A 1 Right A A 1 Peds X X 1 EB Right A 1 WB Right A Green 12.0 42.0 16.0 0.0 16.0 10.0 14.0 0.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 372 3433 1.02 0.11 100.7 F T 2288 5085 0.93 0.45 21.4 C 28.7 C R 923 1583 0.48 0.58 2.1 A Westbound L 486 3433 0.51 0.14 43.3 D T 2458 5085 1.18 0.48 95.2 F 78.3 E R 950 1583 0.56 0.60 2.6 A Northbound L 486 3433 1.09 0.14 114.9 F T 767 3539 0.91 0.22 52.7 D 78.0 E R 620 1583 0.05 0.39 12.9 B Southbound L 429 3433 0.81 0.13 57.3 E T 708 3539 1.07 0.20 94.3 F 69.2 E R 541 1583 0.60 0.34 23.3 C Intersection Delay = 61.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 3� 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 9/24/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: /amp pm Year recent short on kgrd otal Project 0221 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R 1 'L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I 'No. Lanes 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R i L T R I L T R I Volume 1275 2435 310 1210 1295 390 1365 610 275 1445 475 375 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 ' RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 150 1 185 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A P 1 Thru A A Right A P I Right A A Peds X X I Peds X X WB Left A I SB Left A Thru P A i Thru A A Right P A I Right A A Peds X X I Peds X X NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right A 'Green 17.0 35.0 8.0 0.0 14.0 8.0 18.0 0.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Qelay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 562 3433 0.51 0.16 37.3 D T 2404 5185 1,07 0.47 50.6 D 44.4 D R 950 1583 0.34 0.60 1.6 A Westbound L 281 3433 0.79 0.08 60.4 E T 1988 5085 0.69 0.39 16.9 B 18.9 B R 878 1583 0.47 0.55 2.9 A Northbound L 468 3433 0.82 0.14 52.5 D 708 3539 0.91 0.20 51.3 D 48.0 D 'T R 504 1583 0.26 0.32 19.5 B Southbound L 593 3433 0.78 0.17 44.2 D 836 3539 0.59 0.24 30.7 C 32.6 C 'T R 691 1583 0.29 0.44 9.9 A Intersection Delay = 36.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: (970) 669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 35, APPENDIX D 34 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am(zm-:) Intersection: Harmony/MHP Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hort long kgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: MHP Access Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 115 1360 1945 35 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 122 1446 2161 38 ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 -_ Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R ' Volume 10 75 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 88 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 ' Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 'Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R (vph) 122 11 88 'v C(m) (vph) 598 216 492 v/c 0.20 0.05 0.18 95% queue length 0.76 0.16 0.65 Delay 12.6 22.6 13.9 'Control LOS B C B Approach Delay 14.9 ' Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 33 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: V 24/02 Analysis Time Period: a�m pm Intersection: Harmony/MHP Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd otal Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: MHP Access Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 35 1800 1350 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 1914 1500 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 25 100 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 117 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Approach Movement Lane Config v tvpni C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L I I L R 37 29 117 590 184 869 0.06 0.16 0.13 0.20 0.55 0.46 11.5 28.2 9.8 B D A 13.4 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 3� r ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Ti erline/Gerrard Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long kgr total ID: 0221 . 'Project East/West Street: Gerrard Access North/South Street: Timberline Road Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ,Intersection Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 1365 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1467 5- Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- Median Type Undivided Channelized? 'RT Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 6 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration Delay, Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config 'v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay . Approach LOS 0 U 10 0.85 11 50 0 No 1 R Queue Length, and Level of Service SB Westbound Eastbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 1 1 R HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 3t 15.7 C 349 0.03 0.10 15.7 C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: a pm Intersection: imberline/Gerrard Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hort long kgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Gerrard Access North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 L T R I L Southbound 5 6 T R Volume 1020 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1159 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Approach Movement Lane Config v lvpn) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 0 0 1 R 0.85 5 50 No Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 I 1 R HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c 13.4 B 432 0.01 0.04 13.4 B Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 3� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am m 'Intersection: Ti erline/Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor long kgrd otal Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1140 70 35 1340 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1187 72 37 1440 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -_ Median Type TWLTL Channelized? No 'RT Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration Delay, 'Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config 'v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay ' LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 80 35 0.85 0.85 94 41 2 2 0 Yes 3 0 0 LR Queue SB 4 L 548 0.07 0.22 12.0 B Length, and Level Westbound I 7 8 I LR 135 259 0.52 2.77 35.5 E 35.5 E 0 of Service Eastbound 9 I 10 11 12 ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. p i HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period pm Intersection: imberline/Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgr total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 L T R I L Southbound 5 6 T R Volume 1180 45 25 1000 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1296 49 28 1136 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 76 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 3 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 28 123 C(m) (vph) 508 256 v/c 0.06 0.48 95% queue length 0.17 2.42 Control Delay 12.5 34.9 LOS B D Approach Delay 34.9 Approach LOS D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Z'? ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: a pm 'Intersection: Ti erline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor long kgrd total 'Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Timberline Lane/RT-in RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 1200 30 1410 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1250 31 1549 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 2 0 Configuration T R T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 10 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 5 Heavy Vehicles 2 2 'Percent Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 ' Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I R (vph) 11 5 'v C(m) (vph) 428 389 v/c 0.03 0.01 95% queue length 0.08 0.04 Control Delay 13.6 14.4 ' LOS B B Approach Delay 13.6 14.4 Approach LOS B B ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 211 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: imberline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hort long bkgr total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Timberline Lane/RT-in RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1210 20 1060 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1329 21 1204 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 2 0 Configuration T R T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound .Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I R v (vph) 17 5 C(m) (vph) 403 441 v/c 0.04 0.01 95% queue length 0.13 0.03 Control Delay 14.3 13.3 LOS B B Approach Delay 14.3 13.3 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2& alyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony I FAgency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 9/24 2 Jurisd: Fort Colli s 'Period. m' Year recent iox long kgr total Project ID: 0221 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I ,No. Lanes I 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 I LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1335 1145 240 1250 1415 355 1375 540 75 1255 640 520 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 ERTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All Signal Phase Combination 1 2 3 EB Left A Thru A P Right A P Peds X X WB Left A Thru P A Right P A Peds X X NB Right A SB Right A other areas Operations 4 1 5 6 7 8 I NB Left A I Thru A. A I Right A A I Peds X X I SB Left A I Thru A A I Right A A I Peds X X I EB Right A I WB Right A 10.0 30.0 13.0 14.0 10.0 13.0 'Green Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0:0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 378 3433 0.95 0.11 78.3 E T 1416 3539 0.87 0.40 30.8 C 37.0 D 'R 855 1583 0.30 0.54 9.0 A Westbound L 481 3433 0.58 0.14 42.0 D T 1522 3539 1.03 0.43 56.5 E 46.3 D R 886 1583 0.44 0.56 8.9 A Northbound L 515 3433 0.80 0.15 49.8 D T 849 3539 0.70 0.24 37.2 D 40.4 D 'R 665 1583 0.12 0.42 15.6 B Southbound L 481 3433 0.60 0.14 42.5 D T 814 3539 0.89 0.23 49.6 D 52.1 D R 602 1583 0.98 0.38 60.0 E Intersection Delay = 44.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: (970) 669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E Date: 9/24/02 Period: m Projectam : 0221 E/W St: Harmony Road Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Col Year recent hort long kgr total NIS St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 I LGConfig I L T R( L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1250 1205 175 1175 865 390 1300 590 260 1370 400 295 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A P I Thru A A Right A P I Right A A Peds X I Peds X X WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru P A' 1 Thru A A Right P A 1 Right A A Peds X 1 Peds X X NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right A 1 WB Right A Green 17.0 23.0 12.0 14.0 10.0 14.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 618 3433 0.43 0.18 36.9 D T 1416 3539 0.90 0.40 32.9 C 30.9 C R 855 1583 0.22 0.54 8.5 A Westbound L 446 3433 0.46 0.13 41.0 D T 1239 3539 0.84 0.35 33.6 C 29.6 C R 776 1583 0.59 0.49 15.5 B Northbound L 515 3433 0.62 0.15 42.1 D T 849 3539 0.74 0.24 38.6 b 35.1 D R 649 1583 0.43 0.41 19.1 B Southbound L 515 3433 0.75 0.15 46.6 D T 849 3539 0.49 0.24 33.2 C 32.9 C R 728 1583 0.42 0.46 15.3 B Intersection Delay = 31.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 2A, APPENDIX C 23 Table 4-3 Fort Collins (City Limits) Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (intersections) UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay sec/ve6 A <10 B >10and<<15 C > 15 and _< 25 D > 25 and < 35 E >35and <50. F > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay serlveh A <10 B > I0 and < 20 C > 20 and < 35. D > 35 and _< 55 E > 55 and _< 80 F > 80 21 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Harmony/MHP Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecen short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: MHP Access Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 116 1271 1656 34 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 123 1352 1840 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 10 72 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 84 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0. Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L I I L R 123 11 84 527 167 705 0.23 0.07 0.12 0.90 0.21 0.40 13.9 28.1 10.8 B D B 12.8 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ZU HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c , TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Michael 'Analyst: Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: rmony/MHP Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecen short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: MHP Access Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R 15 Volume 34 1571 1243 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 'Peak Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 36 1671 1381 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- Median Type. TWLTL Channelized? 'RT Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration C 0.85 0.85 28 115 0 0 0 No 1 1 L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Jb 28 115 639 197 854 0.06 0.14 0.13 0.18 0.49 0.46 11.0 26.3 9.9 B D A 13.1 B ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24 02 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: Timberline/Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1074 34 18 1306 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1118 35 19 1404 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound . Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 33 21 , Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 24 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 ' 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 3 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR , Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 , Lane Config L I LR 1 v (vph) 19 62 C(m) (vph) 602 326 , v/c 0.03 0.19 95% queue length 0.10 0.69 Control Delay 11.2 21.7 LOS B C , Approach Delay 21.7 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. �D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 0am 4/02 Analysis Time Period:pm ,Intersection: berline/Milestone Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Milestone North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1165 5 11 971 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1280 5- 12 1103 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -_ Median Type TWLTL Channelized? No 'RT Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume 32 29 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 3 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 ' Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service . Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound 'Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 12 71 C(m) (vph) 536 320 v/c 0.02 0.22 95% queue length 0.07 0.83 Control Delay 11.9 23.9 ' LOS B C Approach Delay 23.9 Approach LOS C ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/24/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Ti erline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Timberline Lane/RT-in RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1101 29 1330 9 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1146 30 1461 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 2 0 Configuration T R T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 7 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config 1 R 1 R v (vph) 8 2 C(m) (vph) 463 427 v/c 0.02 0.00 95% queue length 0.05 0.01 Control Delay 12.9 13.5 LOS B B Approach Delay 12.9 13.5 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. It F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9 24/02 Analysis Time Period: m Intersection: Timberline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0221 East/West Street: Timberline Lane/RT-in RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1159 20 1002 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1273 21 1138 1- Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Raised curb Channelized? No 'RT Lanes 2 1 2 0 Configuration T R T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume 11 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 . Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound 'Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I R 'v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay ' LOS Approach Delay 13.8 Approach LOS B 421 465 0.03 0.00 0.09 0.01 13.8 12.8 B B 12.8 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 9/24/02 Period: a� Project ID: 0221 E/W St: Harmony Road Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent hort long bkgrd total N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes I 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 LGConfig 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1326 999 177 1212 1211 305 1352 499 65 1243 600 489 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A P I Thru A A Right A P I Right A A Peds X X I Peds X X WB Left A I SB Left A Thru P A I Thru A A Right P A I Right A A Peds X X 1 Peds X X NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right A Green 14.0 26.0 13.0 14.0 12.0 11.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 515 3433 0.68 T 1416 3539 0.76 R 855 1583 0.22 Westbound L 481 3433 0.49 T 1380 3539 0.98 R 792 1583 0.43 Northbound L 515 3433 0.75 T 920 3539 0.60. R 697 1583 0.10 Southbound L 412 3433 0.67 T 814 3539 0.84 R 665 1583 0.84 Intersection Delay = 37.8 0.15 43.9 D 0.40 28.3 C 29.8 C 0.54 12.2 B 0.14 40.5 D 0.39 48.6 D 41.9 D 0.50 16.3 B 0.15 46.8 D 0.26 33.5 C 37.4 D 0.44 16.5 B 0.12 46.3 D 0.23 44.4 D 41.3 D 0.42 35.1 D (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: (970) 669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 14- 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 9/24/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: pm Year ecen short long bkgrd total Project YD• 0221 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY . I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R 1. L T R I L T R I L T R I I No. Lanes 1 2 I I I I 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1239 1010 120 1157 818 366 1291 574 249 1346 377 280 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A P 1 Thru A A Right A P I Right A A Peds X 1 Peds X X WB Left A I SB Left A Thru P A 1 Thru A A Right P A I Right A A Peds X I Peds X X NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right A Green 17.0 22.0 13.0 13.0 11.0 14.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 618 3433 0.41 0.18 36.7 D T 1380 3539 0.77 0.39 29.3 C 29.2 C 'R 823 1583 0.15 0.52 12.6 B Westbound L 481 3433 0.38 0.14 39.6 D T 1231 3539 0.78 0.35 32.2 C 29.4 C R 776 1583 0.56 0.49 18.8 B Northbound L 481 3433 0.64 0.14 43.6 D T 841 3539 0.72 0.24 37.9 D 35.5 D �R 665 1583 0.40 0.42 20.6 C Southbound L 515 3433 0.70 0.15 44.5 D 885 3539 0.44 0.25 32.0 C 32.3 C 'T R 744 1583 0.39 0.47 17.6 B Intersection Delay = 31.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ( '> APPENDIX B 1 i (2 MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669.2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 10-15-02 Observer: Michael Day: Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn intersection: Harmony/Mobile Home Park S = straight Time Begins Northbound: Southbound: Home Park Total northisouth Eastbound: Harmony Westbound: Harmony Total eastlwest Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total 7:15 0. - 4 22 26 26 6 359 366 : '.`. 368 3 ,;.371 ;, 736 7:30 0. :,; 3 26 29 29 9 389 398 "; .'; 341 4 3451' ,.:: 743 7:45 0:'. 8 23 31, . ; -. 31 11 405 416 ` 322 5 327; ...: 743 774 ,. 8:00 0;, , :: 9 27 38. 36 8 379 387 `, ::.` 293 3 296.: `, : 683 719 • = .,'. 8:15 0; 11 22 :33. 33 8 364 372 .`',:" 270 2 272: 644 67Z 6:30 0 6 23 29 29 7 344 351.` :, 288 1 2 290 641 170. s. 7:15.8:15 0 : 0: , • 0 0 24 .0 ...00 122 1 122 134 1632 0. 1566 1 0.]113141 15: 1 1339 1 2905 3027:, - PHF nla 0.85 1 0.94 1 0.9 4:15 0': 2 14 116 16 26 303 329; ":! 375 7 382. 711 727 4:30 3 17 ; 20 20 31 316 347' ': l 386 11 397.; 744 4:45 0' 0 21 21 21 28 282 310 ,°' ' 374 6 3t�0 690 5:00 -0; • , :. 5 20 25 .. ; : 25 31 292 323 '';; : ` 425 10 435 ,: , : 758 783 5:15 0; _ 2 15 17. 17 23 273 296 ; .: 362 8 370 666 683 5:30 0' 3 15 18 18 24 285 309 ". .' .: 382 6 386; 697 71$' 4:15.5:15 0- 6 0.1 0 16- 1,4` :72 1 82 1 82 1116 111931 0 1 1309 6 1560 134 1 1594 1 2903 1. 2985:. ' PHF I n1a 1 1 0.82 1 1 0.94 1 1 0.92 R = right turn S = straight MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669.2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 8-28.02 Observer: Harry )ay: Wednesday Junsaiction: tortcorms Intersection: Timberline/Timberline Lane/Access L- ItSIL W I I I Time Begins Northbound: Timberline Southbound: Timberline Total north/south Eastbound: T-line Lane Westbound: Access Total eastlwest Total All L S R Total L S I R Total L S R Total L S R Total 7:00 250 4 254 .. 227 0 :w.. 481 0 0 ::, ;': 3 3 3 484:.. 7:15 315 6321 244 0 `.244 565 1 1' 5 5 - 6 7:30 361 5 368 ;.:: 262 1 .263 629 0 0 .` 2 °2 2 631:`- 7:45 1352 1 5 357 ..; ' 301 0 301- 658 0 0 2 2 2 8:00 1278 1 7 285 , . 250 0 250;"::: 535 0 0 . ':: ;': 2 2 2 537" 8:15 1238 1 5 243 249 0 249.:: 492 1 1..., ,:. 2 2. 8,30 1240 1 9 249 : 275 0 275 `:' .'. 524 0 0 ..°.. 5 5 . _. <. 5 529. '. 8:45 246 6 252 230 0 230 ::: 482 0 7:15.8:15 Ot=Ill366 y23 1329 0' ]111,051.1 1" 1058 1 2387 0;, I,%o 1 : 1 1 0 : 0 11, 11 12 2399 .:. PHF 0.91 0.88 0.25 j 0.55 4:00 1258 8 266i, 307 1 0 3.07 ::. 573 0 0 :,;." 1 1 1 574 4:15 1277 12 289 .; 357 1 1 -458 `: > 647 2 1. '; 3 3 . 5 652 4:30 1260 12 272 ;:> 323 1 324 596 2 2 . `. 0 0. 2 4:45 1314 9 323 315 2 317 : 640 0 0: .:.. 3 3 3 643 5:00 298 5 303 374 2 `976 679 0 0 :;, .: 2 :-2 2 5:15 301 7 306 349 2 =`351 659 2 2 ",' 1 1 : 3 662 5:30 291 11 302 329 3 332 634 0 0 ' :. `+' 1 1 1 635 5:45 267 8 275 320 1 321 596 0 0 ; .: 2 — 2 " - 2 598';`.; 4:45.5:45 0 - 1264. 32 , 1236 0 1361 `9 1376 2612 0 0 2 :: 2 0'1 0 .7-1] 7 9 2621 `.` PHF 1 0.96 0.91 0.25 j 0.58 E%7 MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669.2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 8.29-02 Observer: Harry Day: Thursday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: Timberline/Milestone S = straight Time Begins Northbound: Timberline Southbound: Timberline Total northisouth Eastbound: Westbound: Milestone Total eastiwest Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total 7:00 251 2 253 > ;: 3 '222 ' 225 ': 478 0 `: ,:. 5 8 1.3.:,.. 13 491 7:15 318 2 326 . ' 2 236 238 558 0 :.: 8 10 18 18 576; 7:30 361 2 343 •.,:: 2 249 '261 '..: 614 0 14 8 22 22 7:45 353 1 354 • ,; 2 294 298 650 0 , 7 5 12' .: 12 662 ,• :' 8:00 280 0 260 ' :. ` 5 247 > 262_, . 532 0 3 6 9 , < . 9 541 8:15 239 1 240 ; -,` 7 237 244 484 0 12 12 24 ,,: _ 24 500, 8:30 1 124312 2 265 267_ ;:: 512 0 ` ',-:. 10 6 ;. 1t3 _. - : 16 8:45 246 3 249 5 223 : 226 `:: 477 0 7 7 14. 14 7:15.8:15 ell.: 1312 6 1 1317 11 1928 0 1037 1 2354 1 0 - 0. 11 0 12 1, 6 29, 61 61 2415 PHF 1 0.91 0.88 nla j 0.69 4:00 252 7 269 6 298 304 : > 563 A ,:< , ;, 9 5 14; 14 577 4:15 273 7 160 4 351 ;`3$5 . 635 0 ; ; " 7 14 21: ; 21 656'i'.`; 4:30 250 10 280, r.;.. 10 315 .325 585 0 . `:' r 9 7 16 16 604 4:45 308 9 317 : 6 308 314 631 0 ':;. `. 9 2 11 ' 11 5:00 294 1 6 300 _ ' 2 365 347 667 0 ::, 11 6 5:15 1289 1 13 302 , :.,; 6 343 349 651 0• .'" 8 7 15, ;.:. 15 5:30 286 6 292 4 327 331 623 0 5 6 11:. 5:45 261 8 289 '> 7 313 320, .- : 589 0.: :. 8 8 16 16 4:45.5:45 >:0.: 1177 .34 1211 16 1343 I `0:: 1 1361 1 2572 1.0 : 01 rroir 1 0 143.1 :0' 21.. 54 1 54 ,.262C. PHF 0.96 1 1 0.93 1 1 nla 1 1 0.79 WE R = right turn S = straight MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669.2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 1-16.02 Observer: City of Fort Collins Day: Wednesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Intersection: Timberline/Harmony L = WE Ium Time Begins Northbound: Timberline Southbound: Timberline Total northisouth Eastbound: Harmony Westbound: Harmony Total east/west Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total 7:30 70 142 1 51 263 79 92 77 248 ; 511 68 259 25 352 " 67 249 108 424 ' 776 1287' ,' 7:45 61 126 84 271 " " . 85 92 58 235. 506 38 253 37 328' 32 206 87 325 .:" 653 1159 LE00E 88 133 55 276 75 78 77 230 "' 506 54 238 23 315.' 28 184 59 271; 586 1092' . 8:15 72 100 59 31 :' 88 94 53 235 466 49 260 35 1. 274 618 1084'= 7:30.8:30 291 501" 249 1041 927 358" 265: 948 1989 209 1010 120 1339 157. 918 3,19 1294 2633 46U -` PHF 0.94 0.96 1 0.95 1 0.76 4:30 91 127 20 :238 57 130 88 215 :: 513 58 250 46 354 ;` ;, 43 290 77 . ' 410 764 4:45 93 119 16 228 " 64 135 115 314 542 87 270 38 395'"'<.' 42 276 48 366: 761 5:00 96 100 18 .214 , '; 60 155 122 337 551 77 229 36 342 . ' 68 323 80 471 813 1364 ';: - 5:15 72 107 11 190 " 56 163 150 ; 369 559 74 250 57 381 ' 59 322 71 452 " .. 833 1392'' :i 4:30.5:30 352: 453 6d 870 237 583 475 1295 2165 296 999' 177 1472 212. 1211 276 1699 3171 5336 '- PHF 0.91 1 0.88 0.93 1 1 0.9 I S'c 7e7 I I II Attachment "B" Transportation Impact Study Pedestrian Analysis Worksheet Origin (Project Site) Rec. Res. Inst Ofc/Bus. Com. Ind. Other (Specify) Recreation Residential Institution (school, church, civic) Office/Business Commercial Industrial Other (specify) List the pedestrian destinations within 1320' (1.5 miles for schools) of the project boundary in the spaces above. The pedestrian Level of Service for the facility/corridor linking these destinations to the project site will be based on the directness, continuity, types of street crossings, walkway surface condition, visual interest/amenity, and security of the selected route(s)_ iV CY �6Sf 5�) ev Ti A L �iaeK- �vT (o5 � ��srbE�u-rrA� Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2, 2001 1 E Harmony Rd At Timberline Rd . Fort Collins, CO 80528, US Back All rights reserved. Use Subiect to v EEc� UcenslCoovnaht T ?&V&sTQ� iAl)i5S7WATioillS—112)3r ¢t $_ E3)C,YU&:- D&STIAJA T(Ak6 — -3,4- Privacy Policy & legal Notices © 2002 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved. Z oZD Gravity Model Data NORTH -Timberline SOUTH -Timberline EAST -Milestone EAST -Harmony WEST -Harmony Zone D.U. Zone D.U. Zone D.U. Zone D.U. Zone D.U. 1 /2 117 1966 2/3 120 727 1 /2 121 1010 1 /4 48 32 115 578 1/2 119 697 1/2 132 1050 1/4 48 32 1/2 49 787 1/2116 450 1/4121 505 2/3133 1067 1/4121 505 1/2119 697 122 1423 1/4128 397 1/3120 363 1/2 129 15 1/2 132 1050 1/2 131 421 1/2 130 1311 1/3 133 534 1/2 131 421 Total D.U. 6,338 Total D.U. 2,844 Total D.U. 1,042 Total D.U. 3,305 Total D.U. 2,509 Distribution 39.52% Distribution 17.73% Distribution 6.50% Distribution 20.61% Distribution 15.64% S 20oS Gravity Model Data NORTH -Timberline SOUTH -Timberline EAST -Milestone EAST -Harmony WEST -Harmony Zone D.U. Zone D.U. Zone D.U. Zone D.U. Zone D.U. 1/2 117 905 2/3 120 486 1/2121 739 1/4 48 19 115 513 1/2 119 664 1/2 132 450 1/4 48 19 11249 296 1/2 116 376 1/4 121 370 2/3 133 469 1/4 121 370 1/2 119 664 122 1415 1/4 128 162 1/3 120 243 1/2 129 15 1/2 132 450 1/2 131 370 1/2 130 1313 1/3 133 235 112 131 370 Total D.U. 5,052 Total D.U. 1,405 Total D.U. 758 Total D.U. 1,532 Total D.U. 2,166 Distribution 46.29% Distribution 12.87% Distribution 6.95% Distribution 14.04% Distribution 19.85% B 7' AT Sco�(A)G 149677M)cc TABLE 2 Trip Generation T Pad A 832 Sit-down Restaurant 5.0 KSF 130-34 1 652 4.82 24 4.45 22 1 6.52 33 4.34 22 Intemal Trip Capture 29% 189 11% 2 19% 4 20% 7 200/6 4 Subtotal 463 467c 227 187 f:7,/ 26$ 183 850 Grocery Store 52.443 KSF 111.51 5848 1.98 104 1.27 67 5.87 308 5.64 296 Intemal Trip Capture 25% 1450 28% 29 30% 20 11% 33 13% 39 Subtotal 4398 j.<, 757 'i;: 471 31,/r; 27 25740 Pad B 832 Sit-down Restaurant 7.2 KSF 130.34 938 4.82 35 4.45 32 6.52 1 47 4.34 31 Intemal Up Capture 29% 272 11% 4 19% 6 20% 9 200/6 6 Subtotal 666 -F3VpT I 26,f4 F3& 1 2511 Pad C 814 Specialty Retail 4.4 KSF 40.67 179 1.92 8 1.44 6 1.11 5 1.48 7 Intemal Trip Capture 29% 52 11% 1 19% 1 20% 1 20% 1 Subtotal 127 761 1 5 C 4 i 6 t Pad D 832 Sit-down Restaurant 7.2 KSF 130.34 938 4.82 35 4.45 32 6.52 47 4.34 31 Intemal Up Capture 29% 272 11% 4 19% 6 20% 9 20% 6 Subtotal 666 31iol 26,0 -1 38,11 25a Pad E 912 Drive-in bank 4.0 KSF 265.21 1061 5.10 20 3.85 15 7.44 30 7.60 30 Intemal Up Capture 29% 308 11% 2 1996 1 3 20% 6 20% 6 Subtotal 753 2 3�1�c 185 1 1231 fr/ 24;1 2411 Pad F 814 Specialty Retail 7.2 KSF 40.67 293 1.92 14 1.44 10 1.11 8 1.48 11 Intemal Trip Capture 29% 85 11% 2 19% 2 200/6 2 20% 2 Subtotal 208 1 1 12bl 1 801 1 6 9 Z Pad G 814 Specialty Retail 7.74 KSF 40.67 1 315 1 1.92 1 15 1 1.44 1 11 1 1.11 9 1.48 11 Intemal Up Capture 29% 91 11% 2 19%1-- 2 1 201/6 2 20% 2 Subtotal 1 224 1 13e)l 1 go 1 1 77,1 J 97- Pad H 814 Specialty Retail 15.4 KSF 40.67 626 1.92 30 1.44 22 1.11 17 1.48 23 Intemal Trip Capture 29% 181 11% 3 19% 4 200/6 3 20% 5 Subtotal 445 271 18/ 1467 Total 7950 236 169 395 A Attachment "A" Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions IE�oject [nformation F Project Name 949M60iV aeefpL Sew's Project Location �t/E Q Au+¢e4uT oR steAtJY • raer TL'Sgssvmp#�-- Type of Study Full: ye�5 Intermediate- ,ve Study Area Boundaries North: South: East: west: Study Years Short Range: 2 0,0 (a Long Range: 2,OfO Future Traffic Growth Rate Afkemwy &&Eh ordA 77S Study Intersections 1. All access drives 5. 2. NAA UO,V t-,wA0 -VG 6. 3"TI-moapdub dire: r 6 7. 4•� atl Moe3rls � AeC "�`� 8• Time Period for Study AM: :00-9: PM -A IP&je Sat Noon: Al. Trip Generation Rates S TG% C4 rrrAe uo Trip Adjustment Factors Passby- Yens, Foe ApegopetAreB I -A A 036S Captive ioreevAC To AAW Market: Pee I rE Overall Trip Distribution A-r-rRcK6 @ North South East West Mode Split Assumptions Committed Roadway Improvements C 1'rV — 7-Im66,e t.V,9 ?CM.40A0Vr zd JORSOM0/ Other Traffic Studies PV4 - Sovro AA9-I04VY 0-P.assrA4 Areas Requiring Special Study Date: AyCU57 g , `zoo Z- Traffic Engineer. Local Entity Engi Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2, 2001 . Z, w R1 • �3 APPENDIX A IV. CONCLUSIONS ' This study assessed the impacts of the Timberline Village development on the short range and long range street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: - The development of the Timberline Village is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, the Timberline Village will generate approximately 7857 external daily trip ends, 397 external morning peak hour trip ends, and 777 external afternoon peak hour trip ends. Current operation at the key intersections is acceptable. ' - While the Timberline/Milestone intersection will meet peak hour signal warrants, this intersection will not be signalized according to Fort Collins Traffic Operations. The Harmony/MHP Access/Snow intersection may be signalized at some future date. In the short range (2006) future, given development of the ' Timberline Village and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably, overall. - In the long range (2022) future, given development of the Timberline Village, the key intersections will operate acceptably, overall. ' - A channelized T-intersection will operate acceptably at the Timberline/Milestone intersection. If this is selected, the existing median area will require reconstruction. - Acceptable level of service is achieved for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation guidelines, except for the connectivity standard to ' the Mobile Home Park and the homes on the west side of Timberline Road. 26 Gerrard Access 1 � — - Denotes Lane Milestone Drive ' Timberline Lane 1 1 1 1 N RT-in/RT-out Access $ II� Q c J a 7 0 0' C f f Harmony Road LONG RANGE (2022) GEOMETRY O C N Figure 13 25 The long range (2022) geometry is shown in Figure 13. The only difference between the short range and long range geometry are the additional through lanes on Harmony Road. In the long range future, the geometry is that which is practical at the Harmony/Timberline intersection. If the City widens Timberline Road to a six -lane cross section or builds turn lanes where they do not currently exist, then the level of service shown in Table 6 will be improved. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix H contains a map of the pedestrian influence area that is within 1320 feet of the Timberline Village site. There will be five pedestrian destinations within 1320 feet of the Timberline Village. These are: 1) the residential area northeast of the site, 2) the Poudre Valley Hospital South Campus, 3) the Harmony Crossing commercial area, 4) the Mobile Home Park, and 5) the few homes west of Timberline Road. This site is in an area type termed "transit corridor." There are some sidewalks adjacent to the Timberline Village site. With this development, it is assumed that gaps in the sidewalk system will be completed. The pedestrian level of service (LOS) for this area type is B for all factors, except visual interest and amenities, which is LOS C. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix H. With the assumed future pedestrian facilities adjacent to the site, the pedestrian level of service will be acceptable for those destinations within 1320 feet of the Timberline Village, except for the continuity factor. There will be a gap in the sidewalk adjacent to the Mobile Home Park and on the west side of Timberline Road. Bicycle Level of Service Appendix H contains a map of the bicycle influence area that is within 1320 feet of the Timberline Village site. Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there are two destination areas within 1320 feet of the Timberline Village site. These are the 1) Poudre Valley Hospital South Campus and 2) the Harmony Crossing commercial area. A bicycle LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix H. The bicycle level of service is acceptable. Transit Level of Service ' Currently, this area has no transit service. The Fort Collins Transit System Map shows that Timberline Road will have high frequency (20 minute) transit service and that Harmony Road will be an enhanced travel corridor (10 minute service) in the future. A future transit ' level of service worksheet is provided in Appendix H. Transit level of service will be acceptable. 24 Gerrard Access �I Timberline Lane 0 0: a� m Milestone Drive Tt� N N m U Tt�RT-in/RT-out Access Q � a 0 0 H �of c .00 - Denotes Lane N Harmony Road SHORT RANGE (2006) GEOMETRY Figure 12 23 TABLE Long Range (2022) Total Peak Hour Operation MA Harmony/Timberline (signal) EB D C WB C F NB D E SB D E OVERALL D E Timbedinefr-line Lane/RT Access (RT-in/RT-out) EB RT B B WB RT B C Timberline/Milestone (stop sign) WB LT F F WB RT C C WB LT/RT F F SB LT C C Timberline/Milestone (Channelized T-intersection) WB LT C/C' F/D* WB RT B B SB LT B C Timberline/Gerrard Access (RT-in/RT-out) EB RT B C Harmony/Site Access (RT-in/RT-out/LT-in) SB RT B B EB LT B C Harmony/MHP Access/Snow (signal) EB D A WB A D NB D E SB D E OVERALL C C Crossing Maneuver (Phase 1)/Merging Maneuver (Phase 2) WA ' acceptably. The Timberline/Milestone intersection was analyzed with the current geometric configuration and as a channelized T- intersection. With the current geometry, the delays to the minor ' street leg (Milestone) will be unacceptable. While the level of service is shown to be F, the delays to each approach vehicle are not reasonable. The channelized T-intersection reduces the delays to the ' minor street leg, significantly. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 11, the key intersections operate in the long range total condition as indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. The key intersections will operate acceptably, overall. As with the long range background traffic, some movements and one leg ' are expected to operate at level of service F at the Harmony/Timberline intersection. It is expected that motorists will seek alternative routes if delays become excessive. At the Timberline/Milestone ' intersection, the channelized T-intersection reduces the delays to the minor street leg, significantly. ' Since acceptable operation was achieved at the Timberline/ Milestone intersection with a channelized T-intersection, the connection from the Timberline Village site to the MHP Access was not analyzed. If the City decided that westbound minor street left turns should be ' eliminated at the Timberline/Milestone intersection, then the southbound left turns at the Harmony/Timberline intersection (Figures 8 and 9) would move to the MHP Access. Also, the southbound through vehicles at ' the Harmony/Timberline intersection (Figures 8 and 9) would move to the Harmony/RT-in/RT-out/LT-in intersection and westbound left turns at the Harmony/Timberline intersection. These changes would not cause a significant change in operation of the key intersections. However, elimination of the westbound minor street left turns at the Timberline/Milestone intersection would cause the existing traffic to ' find another route. That route may be through the parking lot of the Timberline Village development. The City should consider this possibility before taking the action of restricting movements at the Timberline/Milestone intersection. Geometry The short range (2006) geometry is shown in Figure 12. The short range geometry is the same as the current geometry at the Harmony/ Timberline intersection. The Timberline/Milestone intersection was analyzed as a channelized T-intersection, as shown in Tables 5 and 6. A schematic diagram of a channelized T-intersection is provided in ' Appendix G. A channelized T-intersection allows the minor street left turns to be made in two steps. In the first step, the minor street left turn crosses the northbound lanes and enters a protected median area. In this maneuver, the major street traffic consists of the northbound traffic and the southbound major street left turns. The second step is a merging maneuver into the southbound through traffic lanes on Timberline Road. A channelized T-intersection requires a raised median. ' The existing median on Timberline Road will require reconstruction in order to accomplish this. 1 21 TABLE Short Range (2006) Total Peak Hour Operation i, RVN Harmony/Timberline (signal) EB C C WB C D NB D D SB D D OVERALL C D Timbedine/T-line Lane/RT Access (RT-in/RT-out) EB RT B B WB RT C C Timberline/Milestone (stop sign) WB LT F F WB RT C C WB LT/RT F F SB LT C C Timberline/Milestone (Channelized T-intersection) WB LT C/C* F/C* WB RT B B SIB LT C C Timberline/Gerrard Access (RT-in/RT-out) EB RT B C Harmony/Site Access (RT-in/RT-out/LT-in) SIB RT B B EB LT C B Harmony/MHP Access (stop sign) SIB LT D C SB RT A B SIB APPROACH B C EB LT B B I- Crossing Maneuver (Phase 1)/Merging Maneuver (Phase 2) 20 TABLE 3 Short Range (2006) Background Peak Hour Operation LevN of Serve -ni - Harmony/Timberline (signal) EB C D WB C D NB D D SB C D OVERALL C D TimbedinefT-line Lane/RT Access EB RT B B WB RT B B -(RT-in/RT-out) Timberline/Milestone (stop sign) WB LT/RT D E SB LT B B Timberline/Gerrard Access (RT-in/RT-out) EB RT B C Harmony/MHP Access (stop sign) SB LT D C SB RT A B " SB APPROACH B B EB LT B B TABLE 4 Long Range (2022) Background Peak Hour Operation z-ge-Zrm p N-p0 M�' tMg R,6 Rt g N� Harmony/Timberline (signal) EB D C WB B E NB D E SB C E OVERALL D E Timberlinerr-line Lane/RT Access (RT-in/RT-out) EB RT B B WB RT B C Timberline/Milestone (stop sign) WB LT/RT D F SB LT B B Timberline/Gerrard Access (RT-in/RT-out) EB RT B C Harmony/MHP Access/Snow (signal) EB D A WB A D NB D E SB D E OVERALL C C MI a m o ' D: N m m N E O M _ ~ Gerrard Access 5/10 AM/PM L Rounded to Nearest o 00 5 Vehicles LO N Ln o 70/85 �115200 rMilestone Drive o Ln 0 Ln v Ln ' n o `n O N N l7 Lo c7 N � 45/80 ' Timberline Lane 5/5 ,/ RT-in/RT-out Access f H m Q c Ln Ln � � O1- J O � N N O a, Ln Ln a t0 N < co� Ln N C a' Ln e 0 O, Ln `�I' `t It J 390/505 0 —1310/2775 in 230280 45/100 1880/3435 o � z N /-- 280/365 1 ( I I 60/120 Harmony Road 35/115 2455/2050 -i N o 0 o n v 31802480 —� _ 29252215 310l425 Ln 220/150 ' C> a Ln � m r) ' LONG RANGE (2022) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 18 A& N Y m a m O m 0 O 15/35 16052965 90/65 f r N Z N N W N m 3 C c U) Figure 11 Gerrard Access 5110 —y Timberline Lane v M 0 m 0 N m E i= 0 0 M rn 75/95 1 � 1101195 Milestone Drive f 0 un O) C 0 0 M N O N O --a*-- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles L N � 50/90 y RT-in/RT-out Access N m Q 5/5 LO LO o c a v 0 0 0 N H o_f N tN N N t0 M Mof C i rn NI J o o v IT � �d/— 390/355 Ln 910/1460 N 195/285 40/90 f_ 1440/1970 260/340 1235/1200 —�- 175/240 I r 65/125 J n v Ln 1855/1515 — w - 0 0 0 0 0 co M co N SHORT RANGE (2006) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 35/115 J 1820/1400 —� m a m E 0 S m Z O 15/35 1380/1985 Harmony Road Figure 10 17 Gerrard Access Timberline Lane v 28/50 �--48/121 tC') r y r N Milestone Drive QO- �V �- 30/70 N m RT-in/RT-out Access c N V) ~ J a N O 17/33 22/44 6/4 --y' t r 21 /36 — m m a� N —•— AM/PM Negative Values Denote Passby Traffic Assignment O C M I-- N � 461100 �— -11 /-46 581118 24/46 —e— m 4) m 0 0 c U) LONG RANGE (2022) SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 16 N Harmony Road Figure 9 Gerrard Access Timberline Lane u- r n `r '? rn 32/57 43/113 / Milestone Drive N M Ln N + AM/PM Negative Values Denote Passby Traffic Assignment 35179 N M RT-in/RT-out Access N fc F- a N 24/46 1 � � 17/35 8/6 --)/ fr 29/51 — Ln Co O M 0) bf c n H N of L 39/87 f- -11 /-46 61/123 19/37 — SHORT RANGE (2006) SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 15 m a m E 0 2 m 0 N Harmony Road Figure 8 resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 8 shows the short range (2006) site generated peak hour traffic assignment for the Timberline Village. Figure 9 shows the long range (2022) site generated peak hour traffic assignment for the Timberline Village. In the initial traffic assignment, no traffic was assigned to the Harmony/MHP Access intersection. Initial site plans indicate no connection from the Timberline Village to the MHP Access. It is expected that this connection would not be made unless it was the only route for Timberline Village exits to the east. It is also the function of the ability to secure easement to the MHP Access. Figure 10 shows the short range (2006) total morning and afternoon peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Figure 11 shows the long range (2022) total peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Signal warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. While the Timberline/Milestone intersection will meet peak hour signal warrants, this intersection will not be signalized according to Fort Collins Traffic Operations. The ' Harmony/MHP Access/Snow intersection may be signalized at some future date. Traffic on the future south leg (Snow Drive) will likely cause the peak hour signal warrant to be met. 1 Operation Analysis ' Capacity analyses were performed at the key intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range analysis, ' reflecting a year 2006 condition. The long range analysis reflects a year 2022 condition. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 6, the key intersections operate in the short range background condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 7, the key intersections operate in the long range background condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably, overall. However, in the afternoon peak hour, some movements are expected to operate at level of service F at the Harmony/Timberline intersection. The geometry at this intersection is the most that could reasonably be expected. If delays become excessive, motorists will seek alternative routes. ' Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 10, the key intersections operate in the short range total condition as indicated in Table 5. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in ' Appendix E. The key intersections, with improvements, will operate 1 14 Ti m oN Gerrard Access 5/10 y co O d .E m r 0 Ln ;kn 00 N N 40/35 --65/80 fMilestone Drive o 0 v Co v Ln co N N O N N L ' 15/10 ' Timberline Lane 5/5 --)� f r RT-in/RT-out Access 0 0 O f2 'n o 6 N N N Ln N M Ln Ln Ln 390/505 `n It v--12952745 ' /-- 210235 ' Harmony Road 275/360 f 24352015 ,n ,n o 310/425 L m L ' t0 O N M f0 LONG RANGE (2022) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 13 +— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles N 0 Z N 35/115 29002175 —� 220/150 15/35 —15752915 �— 90/65 o Z Ln N N /4 C4 N O C Figure 7 v l0 0 m oLn 00 Gerrard Access 5/10 0 o Ln N �40/35 65/80 1 Milestone Drive 0 0 00 ;o o co Ln -15/10 Timberline Lane 5/5 ,/ RT-in/RT-out Access 0 0 o rq N � N O 04 N O O M N 'qt N LIn cl t 390/355 rn o on 885/1415 + 175/250 250/335 --/ 1 f r 1205/1145 —► N O N 175/240 � n eo O 0)N t7 to SHORT RANGE (2006) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC -a*— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Ln 0 0 Ln 35/115 1800/1360 —�► N m a_ N E O S N 0 O 15/35 1350/1945 Harmony Road Figure 6 12 m � N 01 Lo 0 20% - _ 15% _ I�i � 20% Harmony a 0 0 LO N Legend: wort range tong range TRIP DISTRIBUTION SCALE: 1 "=1000' Figure 5 II TABLE 2 Trip Generation "AWICITE AM "k- Building I 850 Grocery Store 52.443 KSF 111.51 5848 1.98 104 1.27 67 5.87 308 5.64 296 Internal Trip Capture 25% 1 1450 28 #%2 9 30% 20 11% 33 1 13% 39 Subtotal - ---T-4398 75 47 275-F- 257 Building 2 814 Specialty Retail 4.4 KSF 40.67 179 1.92 8 1.44 6 1.11 5 1.48 7 Internal Trip Capture 29% 52 11% 1 19% 1 20% 1 20% 1 Subtotal 127 7 5 4 6 Building 3 832 Sit-down Restaurant 7.2 KSF 130.34 938 4.82 35 4.45 32 6.52 47 4.34 31 Internal Trip Capture 29% 272 11% 4 19% 6 20% 9 20% 6 Subtotal 666 31 26 38 1 1 25 Building 4 832 Sit-down Restaurant 4.0 KSF 130.34 521 4.82 19 4.45 18 6.52 26 4.34 17 Internal Trip Capture 29% 151 11% 2 19% 3 20% 5 1 20% 3 Subtotal 370 17 15 21 14 Building 5 832 Sit-down Restaurant 7.2 KSF 130.34 1 938 4.82 35 4.45 32 6.52 47g4.34 31 rn Inteal Trip Capture 29% 272 11% 4 19%6 20% 9 20%/, 6 Subtotal 666 - F317 26 38 25 Building 6 912 Drive4n bank 4.0 KSF 265.21 1061 5.10 20 3.85 15 7.44 30 7.60 30 Internal Trip Capture 29% 308 11% 2 19% 3 2001. 6 20% 6 Subtotal 753 18 12 24 24 Building 7 814 Specialty Retail 7.2 KSF 40.671 293 1.92_ 14 1.44 10 1.11 8 1.48 11 Internal Trip Capture 29% 85 11% 2 19% 2 20% 2 20% 2 Subtotal 208 12 8 6 9 Building 8 814 Specialty Retail 7.75 KSF 40.67 315 1.92 15 1.44 11 1.11 9 1.48 11 Internal Trip Capture 29% 91 11% 2 19% 2 20% 2 20% 2 Subtotal 224 13 9 7 9 Building 9 814 Specialty Retail 15.4 KSF 40.67 626 1.92 30 1.44 22 1.11 17 1.48 23 Internal Trip Capture 29% 181 11% 3 19% 4 20% 3 20% 5 Subtotal 445 27 18 14 18 Total 7857 231 166 IN a a-60- HARMONY ROAD CN SCALE: 1"=200' 4 N SITE PLAN 9 Figure 4 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Timberline Village is a commercial development consisting of a ' grocery store, 3 sit-down restaurants, a drive-in bank, and 34,750 square feet of retail. Timberline Village is located in the northeast quadrant of the Harmony/Timberline intersection in Fort Collins. Figure ' 4 shows a site plan of the Timberline Village. The short range analysis (Year 2006) includes development of the Timberline Village and an appropriate increase in background traffic, due to normal growth and ' other potential developments in the area. The long range analysis year is considered to be 2022. ' The site plan shows three accesses to.the Timberline Village site. One access is a full -movement access to Milestone Drive. Milestone Drive intersects with Timberline Road at a full movement, stop sign controlled intersection. The second access, to Timberline Road, is a ' right-in/right-out only access. The third access, to Harmony Road, is a right-in/right-out/left-in access. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 6t° Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by ' the proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for the Timberline Village. Future year data was obtained from the NFRRTP and other traffic studies. Figure 5 shows the short range (2006) and long range (2022) trip distribution used for the Timberline Village. Background Traffic Projections Figures 6 and 7 show the respective short range (2006) and long range (2022) background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the short range and long range future horizons were obtained by reviewing the NFRRTP, reviewing traffic studies for other developments, and reviewing historic count data for this area of Fort Collins. The long range background traffic assumes that all vacant parcels in the area of the Timberline Village are developed. ' Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are ' expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the 1 8 TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation S'N D .cam yr Harmony/Timberline (signal) EB C C WB C D NB D D SB C D OVERALL C D Timberline/T-line Lane/RT Access (RT-in/RT-out) EB RT B B WB RT B B Timberline/Milestone (stop sign) WB LT/RT C C SB LT B B Harmony/MHP Access (stop sign) SB LT D D SB RT A B SB APPROACH B B EB LT B B Timberline Lane a W 0 d c_ z a� n E 1- 29/21 32/33 Milestone Drive RT-in/RT-out Access rn o Q o 0 N O N r a0o o v 366/305 It m a v IN M M _ 818/1211 157/212 239/326 --)� "'*1 f r 1010/999 N rn N 120/177 a N to N O co 1-t co 34/116 1571/1271 — --a*— AM/PM AVERAGED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 6 L is m o_ m E O m a 0 15/34 1243/1656 Harmony Road Figure 3 Timberline Lane 1/2 a 0 0 D: m c z m E H 29/21 32/33 t� M Ln � N a M Milestone Drive L 11/7 RT-in/RT-out Access 't N O Q N M N <O O M N M 1l- 1�- 00 M ` m (0 N `— 319/276 0 I4 ``' n 818/1211 J � �, 157/212 209/296 --J 1 t 1010/999 —•► NI M Ln 120/177 M v rn O O N N N N O J) N f 34/116 1532/1185 -an- AM/PM RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N t6 a m E O m 0 O 2 15134 �-- 1324/1560 Harmony Road Figure 2 5 Existing Traffic Recent peak hour traffic counts at the key intersections are shown in Figure 2. Raw traffic data is provided in Appendix A. The traffic data for the Harmony/Timberline intersection was collected in January 2002, and the traffic data for the Timberline/Milestone and Timberline/Timberline Lane/RT Access intersections was collected in August 2002. Traffic data at the Harmony/MHP Access intersection was obtained in October 2002. Since the traffic counts were performed on different days and at different times during the year, traffic volumes were averaged and balanced between the key intersections, as shown in Figure 3. Existing Operation The key intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure 3, the current peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are provided in Appendix B. The key intersections operate acceptably during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours in mixed -use districts is defined as level of service E or better, overall. At unsignalized intersections, acceptable operation is considered to be at level of service F for any approach leg for an arterial/local intersection. Pedestrian Facilities There are pedestrian facilities along Harmony Road adjacent to the Harmony School and adjacent to developed properties on the south side of Harmony Road. There are sidewalks on the east side of Timberline Road. Except for a short segment near Harmony Road, there are no sidewalks on the west side of Timberline Road. Sidewalks exist along both sides of Milestone Drive. Sidewalks will be incorporated within and adjacent to this development. Bicycle Facilities Bicycle lanes exist on Harmony Road and Timberline Road. Milestone Drive has no bicycle lanes. Bike lanes are not required on local or connector streets. Transit Facilities Currently, Transfort does not serve this area of Fort Collins. N Horsetooth rMilestone Harmony d =E d cc E E i= m J Kechter tscats: 1°=2000' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 3 ' II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ' The location of the Timberline Village is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. 1 Land Use ' Land uses in the area are primarily either residential or commercial/office. Land adjacent to the site is flat (<2a grade) from a ' traffic operations perspective. The center of Fort Collins lies to the northwest of the proposed Timberline Village. Roads The primary streets near the Timberline Village site are Timberline Road, Harmony Road, Milestone Drive, and the Mobile Home Park Access. Timberline Road is adjacent to the west side of the Timberline Village site. It is classified as a six -lane arterial on the Fort ' Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Timberline Road has a four -lane cross section near the Timberline Village site. At the Harmony/Timberline intersection, Timberline Road has two travel lanes in ' each direction, northbound and southbound dual left -turn lanes, and northbound and southbound right -turn lanes. The Harmony/Timberline intersection is signalized. At the Timberline/Milestone intersection, Timberline Road has two travel lanes in each direction, a southbound ' left -turn lane, and a northbound right -turn lane. The existing speed limit in this area is 40 mph. Harmony Road is adjcent to the south side of the Timberline Village site. It is an east -west street designated as a six -lane arterial street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it has a four -lane cross section with appropriate auxiliary lanes. At the Harmony/Timberline intersection, Harmony Road has two travel lanes in each direction, eastbound and westbound dual left -turn lanes, and eastbound and westbound right -turn lanes. The existing approach speed limit in this area is 45 mph. Milestone Drive is to the north of the Timberline Village site. It is an east -west street designated as a local street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it has a two-lane local street cross section near the site. The Timberline/Milestone intersection has stop sign control on Milestone Drive. The Mobile Home Park (MHP) east of the Timberline Village si connection to the MHP Access. If Timberline/Milestone intersection, provide the ability to exit the Harmony Road. Access intersects with Harmony Road te. Current site plans do not show a unacceptable operation occurred at the a connection to the MHP Access would Timberline Village site to eastbound 3 I. INTRODUCTION ' This transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed development of the Timberline Village. The proposed Timberline Village site is ' located in the northeast quadrant of the Harmony/Timberline intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado. ' During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project developer (Miller/Weingarten), the project planning consultant (Cityscape Urban Design), the project engineering consultant ' (JR Engineering), the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff, and the Fort Collins Transportation Planning staff. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines contained in the "Larimer County Urban Area ' Street Standards." A Base Assumptions Form and related information are provided in Appendix A. The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; ' - Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent Peak Hour Traffic ............................. 5 3. Averaged Recent Peak Hour Traffic .................... 6 4. Site Plan ............................................. 9 5. Trip Distribution .................................... 11 6. Short Range (2006) Background Peak Hour Traffic ...... 12 7. Long Range (2022) Background Peak Hour Traffic ....... 13 8. Short Range (2006) Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic .. 15 9. Long Range (2022) Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ... 16 10. Short Range (2006) Total Peak Hour Traffic ........... 17 11. -Long Range (2022) Total Peak Hour Traffic ............ 18 12. Short Range (2006) Geometry .......................... 23 13. Long Range (2022) Geometry ........................... 25 APPENDIX A Base Assumptions Form/Traffic Counts B Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort Collins LOS Standard C Short Range Background Traffic Operation D Long Range Background Traffic Operation E Short Range Total Traffic Operation F Long Range Total Traffic Operation G Diagram of Channelized T-intersection H Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 LandUse ............................................. 2 Roads................................................ 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 4 Existing Operation ................................... 4 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 4 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 4 Transit Facilities ................................... 4 III. Proposed Development ................................. 8 TripGeneration ...................................... 8 Trip Distribution .................................... 8 Background Traffic Projections ....................... 8 Trip Assignment ...................................... 8 Signal Warrants ...................................... 14 Operation Analysis ................................... 14 Geometry............................................. 21 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 24 Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 24 Transit Level of Service ............................. 24 IV. Conclusions .......................................... 26 LIST OF TABLES Table Page ' 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 7 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 10 3. Short Range (2006) Background Peak Hour Operation .................................. 19 4. Long Range (2022) Background Peak Hour Operation .................................. 19 ' S. Short Range (2006) Total Peak Hour Operation .................................. 20 ' 6. Long Range (2022) Total Peak Hour Operation .... 22 TIMBERLINE VILLAGE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO DECEMBER 2002 Prepared for: Miller Weingarten 2 Inverness Drive East, Suite 200 Englewood, CO 80112 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 d0" �R O E�/ST��W J. p�`,F9 m 15253 i