HomeMy WebLinkAbout1626 RIVERSIDE AVE. SUBDIVISION - PDP - 8-04 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review
and comments at this time. Red -lined plan from City
departments are included with this comment letter. Additional
comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming. Another round
of staff review is determined to be necessary. This proposal
is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement
(from the date of this comment letter, being March 10, 2004)
as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be
sure and return all of your red -lined plans when you re-
submit. The number of copies of each document to re -submit is
shown on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other
issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at
221-6341.
Yours �pTr%ull�y,,�
Steve Olt,
City Planner
cc: Engineering / Dave Stringer
Dan Eckles / Pierre DeMilt
Current Planning File #8-04
Page 5
N
Department:
Martine
Topic: Plat
Light & Power
Issue Contact: Doug
Number: 1 Created: 2/18/2004
[2/18/041 Need a 15 ft. utility easement along Riverside
Avenue.
Department: PFA
Chavez
Topic: Plat
Number: 14
[3/3/04] Poudre Fire Authority
replat; however, when site plans
further comments at that time.
Issue Contact: Michael
Created: 3/3/2004
has no concerns regarding the
are submitted PFA will have
Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph
Gerdom
Topic: Plat
Number: 10 Created: 3/3/2004
[3/3/04] Access: How is access provided to this lot?
Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil
Hamdan
Topic: Plat
Number: 8 Created: 3/2/2004
[3/2/04] Will any drainage easements be needed between the
two properties. Please show if any is needed.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger
Buffington
Topic: Plat
Number: 9 Created: 3/2/2004
[3/2/04] Provide a drawing showing the locations of all
water/sewer service lines to these buildings, and provide
utility easements for utility service lines to south building.
Each building must have separate water, sewer and fire line
services connecting to City water and sanitary mains in
Riverside.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Topic: Plat
Number: 7 Created: 3/2/2004
[3/2/04] Will utility easements be required along the
frontage of this development?
See plat for other comments.
Page 4
Stormwater
1. The parking area needs to be designated a "drainage,
utility, and public access easement".
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dave
Stringer
Topic: Plat
Number: 2 Created: 3/1/2004
[3/1/04] Do not use the address in the legal description. It
is being suggested that you call the plat Riverside
Subdivision, 8th Filing or East Point Subdivision.
Number: 3 Created: 3/1/2004
[3/1/04] What is the existing width of Riverside right-of-
way, and how was it dedicated? Our maps show 90 feet, not 80
feet. Please dedicate additional right-of-way, either 11 feet
or 6 feet depending upon actually existing width.
Number: 4 Created: 3/1/2004
[3/1/04] Who owns property adjacent to the railroad? County
maps show it as belonging to this property owner.
Number: 5 Created: 3/1/2004
[3/1/04] Please use a better Vicinity map. This one will not
scan.
A sketch map is okay.
Number: 6 Created: 3/1/2004
[3/1/04] Do not need Block Number. This is a two lot
subdivision.
Number: 11 Created: 3/3/2004
[3/3/04] Need to dedicate utility, storm water and access
easements on site. Show any existing easements that are on
property.
Number: 12 Created: 3/3/2004
[3/3/04] The subtitle is incorrect. Title in ownership
statement is incorrect.
Number: 13 Created! 3/3/2004
[3/3/04] Are lot lines the same as the existing building? If
so, then lot size should probably should be larger to allow
for exterior work that may otherwise encroach into easement
area or property owned by another individual.
Page 3
a
.,
b. The subtitle on the plat is incorrect. The Township
should be 7 North, not 5 North.
C. There are several errors / omissions in the Statement of
Ownership on the subdivision plat (see red -lined plat).
d. How was the Riverside Avenue ROW dedicated? Please show
the Reception No. on the plat.
Number: 18 Created: 3/11/2004
[3/11/041 The following comments & concerns were expressed at
staff review of this proposal on March 3, 2004:
Engineering
1. Take the address (1626) out of the references to the
Riverside Subdivision on this plat.
2. There is a discrepancy in the ROW dedication on the
subdivision plat. Additional ROW must be dedicated (see
red -lined plat).
3. Who owns the long, narrow piece of land on the east side
of this property, next to the railroad tracks?
4. A better, more legible Vicinity Map is needed on the
plat. It must be able to be scanned.
5. A Block # (1) is not needed on the subdivision plat. It
should be removed.
6. Necessary easements must be included on the subdivision
plat.
Water/Wastewater
1. A drawing must be provided showing water and sanitary
sewer services.
Light & Power
1. Light & Power is not sure about what services there
already are to this property. Please contact Doug, at
224-6152, to discuss this.
9
Page 2
6a STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
o�
EAST POINT STUDIO Date: 03/10/2004
c/o Don Brookshire
3207 Kittery Court
Fort Collins, CO. 80526
Staff has reviewed your submittal for the 1626 RIVERSIDE AVE.
SUBDIVISION - TYPE I (LUC), and we offer the following
comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact:, Steve Olt
Topic: Plat
Number: 15 Created: 3/11/2004
[3/11/041 Dennis Greenwalt of Comcast Cable TV indicated that
they would like a 9' utility easement along Riverside Avenue
outside of the street right-of-way (ROW).
Number: 16 Created: 3/11/2004
[3/11/04] Len Hilderbrand of Xcel Energy (gas) offered the
following comments:
a. There is a 2" MW gas main located along the east edge of
the Riverside Avenue ROW.
b. There is no way to serve gas to Lot 2. Xcel Energy will
need a 10' wide utility easement along the south property
line of Lot 1. It appears that Xcel Energy has existing
gas service to 1628 Riverside Avenue. This is believed to
be Lot 2. They will need a 10' wide easement for this gas
service, 5' on each side of the existing service, or
relocate the service to a proposed utility easement.
C. The subdivision plat shows incorrect legals. 18/5N/68W
should be 7N.
Number: 17 Created: 3/11/2004
(3/11/041 The Technical Services Department offered the
following comments:
a. The boundary and legal description close.
Page 1