The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1310 LAPORTE AVE., MCKINLEY COTTAGES SUBDIVISION - FDP - 35-04B - CORRESPONDENCE -Number: 79 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] Finish grade elevations must be provided for all streets, lot comers, finish floor/ top of foundations of buildings (existing) for all lots. Department: Light & Power Topic: General Number: 32 [9/29/05] [7/1/05] No comments. Department: Natural Resources Topic: General Number: 58 [10/13/05] No issues. Issue Contact: Doug Martine Created: 7/1 /2005 Issue Contact: Doug Moore Created: 10/13/2005 Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Kurt Ravenschlag Topic: Plat Number: 93 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] Label and dimension all easements, sidewalks, parkways, and ROW on overall utility plan. Department: Water Utilities Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 50 Created: 7/15/2005 [10/28/05] Please include the note on the grading plan regarding the allowed impervious area per lot on the plat and site plan. [7/15/05] Please show on the grading plan the amount of impervious area for each lot per drainage report calculations. The plat should only have a note referencing the grading plan. Number: 95 Created: 10/28/2005 [10/28/05] Please provide a flow calculation for the swale along the east property boundary. The swale needs to carry 1.33 times the 100-year flow. Department: Water Utilities Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Utility Plan Number: 76 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] Show location of gas and electric to identify potential conflicts with curb stop locations. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, 4 h Le. Aspen City Planner Page 4 Topic: label Number: 61 Created: 10/21 /2005 [10/21/05] Dimensions are still not shown on the overall utility plan for sidewalks, easements, and ROW. Label actual dimensions of ROW for the alley so that limits of paving are entirely clear. Number: 63 Created: 10/21 /2005 [10/21/05] Label and dimension all easements on all plans, including Sight distance easement. Easements should match exactly as shown on the plat. Number: 64 Created: 10/21 /2005 [10/21/05] Label surrounding structures on ALL sheets Number: 77 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] The current date (month and year) should be shown under the legal description (plat and plans). Number: 80 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] Sidewalks are not labeled or dimensioned. Number: 83 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05]Label curb return radii (must conform w/ Table 8-2) Number: 84 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] Please label Portland cement concrete to back of ROW for all access/driveway approaches. Number: 85 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] Label the existing 6' wide crosspan along LaPorte Topic: Plat Number: 90 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] Provide the reception # for ROW dedication from Reclamation Village in the Alley. Number: 91 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] please include dimension arrows for boundaries on easements. Number: 92 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] More clarification is needed regarding the private access easements= provide a note with who is to maintain, and who it is for. Number: 94 Created: 10/26/2005 [10/26/05] Include the following standard drawings from LCUASS: 701-(for replacement of curb cut and of damaged sections if necessary) 1601, 1602, 1403. Topic: Utility Plan Number: 78 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] Provide a typical section for the paved alley and sections for each street with new/widened sidewalk showing dimensions and labels. For the alley, and sidewalks- please show the crossslopes on the sections. Page 3 Number: 69 Created: 10/21/2005 [10/21/05] The sidewalk transition from detached on your property to attached to the east must be smoother. Angular changes are not pedestrian friendly. Number: 71 Created: 10/21 /2005 [10/21/05] The proposed sight distance easement is not shown on all plans. Please update all sheets. Number: 72 Created: 10/21 /2005 [10/21/05] Are spot elevations shown on the Plan and Profile sheets existing or proposed? Several spot elevations also do not have descriptive abbreviations. More elevations are required to ensure that cross slopes are adequate. At minimum, we need to see the elevations along the north edge of paving (existing and proposed). Number: 73 Created: 10/21 /2005 [10/21/05] Provide a typical cross section for the alley. Also, provide cross sections for the streets where new sidewalks are proposed. Number: 74 Created: 10/21 /2005 [10/21/05] See redlines for additional minor comments. Number: 75 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] There is a dip in the south flowline (presumably where the swale begins). If the dip is in a large portion of the street section, a crosspan should be provided to increase durability of the alley, and to promote drainage into your swale. Number: 81 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] No crosswalks are shown on the plans. Please revise per city standards. Number: 82 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] Where your new curb cut is proposed, spot elevations are required to ensure that minimum flowline grades are met. Number: 86 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] List the variance for the sight distance easement in the general notes #48. Number: 87 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] Linetypes should be solid for proposed and ghosted or dashed for existing features. Number: 88 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] The City signature block should be 3.5" high by 4.5" long. Number: 89 Created: 10/25/2005 [10/25/05] All symbols must be included in a legend for both existing and proposed features. Legend does not have to be on each sheet but must include all symbols and linetypes. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Cityof Fort Collins M TORGERSON ARCHITECTS Date: 10/28/2005 MIKAL TORGERSON 223 N COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 1310 LAPORTE AVE, MCKINLEY COTTAGES SUBDIVISION PDP, TYPE I AND FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen - Topic: General Number: 56 Created: 10/12/2005 [10/12/05] The following departments have indicated that they do not have comments or concerns at this time: Comcast, County Assessor, Park Planning, Zoning, Xcel and Post Office. Number: 57 Created: 10/12/2005 [10/12/05] No further comments. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dan DeLaughter Topic: format Number: 65 Created: 10/21/2005 [10/21/05] - Still some scanability issues on the grading and erosion control plan- see redlines. Number: 70 Created: 10/21 /2005 [10/21/05] When referring to details, please refer to specific detail numbers and speck sheets (as opposed to describing the detail). Please number your details accordingly. Topic: General Number: 60 Created: 10/21 /2005 [10/21/05] Provide a reference to the current soils investigation report on your cover sheet (title, author). Number: 62 Created: 10/21 /2005 [10/21/05] Please provide our standard street cut note on both overall utility and grading sheets: "Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards." Reference the note where street cuts are shown. Number: 66 Created: 10/21 /2005 [10/21/05] The driveway leading into the alley should be flared according to Detail 1 in Fig. 7.12F. This detail requires 6' by 8' flares on both sides with the same material as the driveway. We'll need a detail to see how this will work with your drainage swale on the east side. Page 1