HomeMy WebLinkAbout120 CHERRY ST., CHERRY ST. STATION - PDP - 9-05 - CORRESPONDENCE - FIRE AUTHORITY REQUIREMENTSAnne Aspen - RE: Chevy St Station Page 2
CC: "'Kevin Wilson"' <kmwilson@poudre-fire.org>, "'Mikal Torgerson"'
<m ikal @architex.com>
Anne As en - RE: Cherry St Station Page 1
From: "Ron Gonzales" <ronzales@poudre-fire.org>
To: "'Anne Aspen'" <AAspen@fcgov.com>
Date: 07/21/2005 9:03:56 AM
Subject: RE: Cherry St Station
Anne,
Thanks for allowing us to process this... here's the resolution for this
project...
Because the access to this project site is poor, the PFA could not
support the development. I have negotiated with the developer and the
Fire Marshal that if a code defined "high-rise" package was to be
installed in the building, PFA could and would support the development
of this site.
Owners have agreed to install the "high-rise" package of engineered
systems, less the fire pump and standpipe provisions. PFA concurred.
The only reason for a fire pump would be if the city water pressure was
not adequate enough to support the fire sprinkler system.
Thanks again ... hope you can enjoy your vacation... bye now
Ron Gonzales
Assistant Fire Marshal
Poudre Fire Authority
970.416.2864
—Original Message —
From: Anne Aspen [mailto:AAspen@fcgov.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:59 AM
To: ronzales@poudre-f!re.org
Subject: Cherry St Station
Importance: High
" High Priority "
Hi Ron,
I've phoned and paged you too. Sorry for the barrage but I don't know
which is the best and fastest way to get to you.
Mikal is pressuring me to set up their hearing before I go on vacation
for two weeks starting Monday. My understanding is that PFA has not
accepted this plan. I have not seen anything back on how the Fire Chief
responded to Mikal's letter. Do you know anything?
There are a few other issues that they have not worked out but if PFA
gave the go ahead, I may need to do some fancy footwork in the next two
days to get them scheduled. Please let me know ASAP!
Thanks Ron!
Anne