The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPRESTON CENTER AT WILD WOOD BUSINESS PARK - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2008-04-17Selected Issues Report Miry of Fort Collins 4/4/2008 Date: HILTON GARDEN INN AT PRESTON CENTER MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE II SELECTION CRITERIA: Status = All ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dan DeLaughter Topic: Details Number:13 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] Please add the following LCUASS details to the plan set: 701, 702, 707. Number:46 Created:4125/2006 Resolved [4/25/06] RESOLVED at 4/26/06 meeting- this is not a ramp. Please provide a construction detail of the truck ramp on the south side of the building, including elevations. Topic: General Number:5 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] Reference the soils report on the cover or notes sheet. Number:6 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] Note #48 Approved Variances does not appear correct. Is this left over from another project? No variances have been approved yet. Number:8 Created:3/712006 Resolved [4125/061 An access ramp should at least be included next to the handicap space on the north sideof the building. [3/7/06] There is only one access ramp shown to get to the building from the parking lot. Number:9 Created:3/7/2006 Pending [7/3/06] Repeat [6/14/061 1 have not received a letter of intent for this. [4/25/06] Resolved at 4/26/06 meeting: Applicant is limiting grading to on -site, and will obtain a letter from the adjacent landowner indicating willingness to allow minimal staging on their property. [3/7/06] A small amount of offsite grading is shown on the west side of the site. This will require a grading easement from the owner. Number:10 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] It is difficult to tell what is existing and what is new. What does "match existing" mean at the driveway entrance? Number: 12 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved Page 1 [3/7/06] Wall detail shows a maximum of 29", but you have some wall segments that are well over this height. Please provide another detail for the higher walls. Number:14 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] Provide a signature line for your engineer on the cover sheet. Number:15 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] The title block lists the property as Lot 1. From the Preston Center plat, it appears that it should be Lot 2. Number:16 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [4125/061 [3/7/06] Please see redlines for additional changes. Number:17 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] Is there an existing drivecut to be closed on Gifford Ct? If so, label on the plans that it is to be removed and replaced. Number:48 Created:4/25/2006 Resolved [6/14/061 [4/25/06] Sheet 6: North arrow points east. Also, no scale is shown for the storm profile. Number:49 Created:4/25/2006 Resolved [6114/06] Repeat [4/251061 On the wall detail, please include locations of any utility lines (telephone), and easement boundaries. Provide a separate wall detail for the stacked retaining walls showing their locations relative to each other, and any easements. My concern is that the lower wall will be under extra loads from the upper wall and retained earth, that it may not be designed to handle. Number:50 Created:4/26/2006 Resolved [4/26/06] deleted Number:54 Created:6/14/2006 Pending [7/3/06] [6/14/061 See redlines for additional minor comments. Number:55 Created:6/14/2006 Resolved [6/14/061 For all existing easements, please note how they were dedicated (Existing Preston Center 1st plat, or provide reception #). You could do this with a general note saying "all existing easements were dedicated with the Preston Center First Flg. Plat unless otherwise specified. Number:56 Created:6/14/2006 Resolved [6/14/061 Repeat, on sheet 3, the linetypes and weights need to be fixed. Existing utilities should be light and/or dashed. Existing electric looks new, and electric service looks existing. Be sure that the lines on the plan match the legend. Also, add proposed utilities to the legend. Number: 57 [7/3/06] Repeat Created:6/14/2006 Resolved Page 2 [6/14/061 Do you have an agreement to do the offsite pavement cut shown to connect to the 8" water line on the north of the site? It appears that the cut is planned to cross onto the adjacent property. Number:58 Created:6/14/2006 Resolved [6/14/061 Please add city standard street cut note to sheet 4 for where the curb cut is being closed: "Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards." Number:59 Created:6/14/2006 Pending [7/3/06] The detail is illegible due to hatching pattern used. [6/14/061 We will need a construction detail for the several areas where storm pipe is shown crossing under retaining walls. Details should be called out by number on the plan sheets. Number:60 Created:6/14/2006 Pending [7/3106] Repeat [6/14/06] Sheet 5: scanability issue in the detention pond area. Number:61 Created:6/14/2006 Resolved [6/14/061 Mid -block pedestrian ramps in public ROW should be city standard details. The separate detail provided for them may be used on -site only. Number:62 Created:6/14/2006 Pending [7/3/06] Easement documents have not yet been received. They must be submitted before the plans can be approved. [6/14/061 Emergency access easements are shown on the site plan but not utility plans. Any easements to be dedicated by separate document must be submitted to engineering with appropriate TDRF and filing fees. Number:63 Created:6/14/2006 Pending [7/3/06] Repeat [6/14/061 Fix overlapping text issues (especially problematic on the grading plan). Number:64 Created:7/3/2006 Pending [7/3/06] Limits of the proposed drainage easement are not clear. Where is the north boundary? Number:65 Created:7/3/2006 Pending [7/3/06] Please adjust the text style on the existing contours. It is the same as the proposed. Number:66 Created:7/3/2006 Pending [7/3/06] There is still a very small amount of offsite grading shown on the west side of the site, Number:67 Created:7/3/2006 Pending [7/3/06] Please call out the sheet # or detail # for the sidewalk chase on your grading plan. Number:68 Created:7/3/2006 Pending [713/06] Fix the hatch pattern for the construction entrance on sheet 5. In the legend it shows up as solid black. Page 3 Number: 69 [7/3/06]deleted Created:7/3/2006 Resolved Number:70 Created:7/5/2006 Pending [7/5/06] 30' Emergency Access is shown on the north side on the site plan but not on the utility plans. Please coordinate. Number:71 Created:715/2006 Pending [7/5/06] Where is the raised crosswalk detail that is called out on sheet 4? Number:72 Created:7/5/2006 Pending [7/5/06] Please dimension parking stalls on the utility plans. Number 73 Created:7/5/2006 Pending [7/5/06] Please coordinate all dimensions and layout between the site plan and utility plans. Several dimensions are slightly different. Refer to redlines Number: 74 deleted Created:7/10/2006 Resolved Topic: grading plan Number:43 Created:4/25/2006 Resolved [6/14/06] still missing [4/25/061 Show proposed contours on the grading plan. They were on the last submittal but seem to have disappeared. Number:44 Created:4/25/2006 Resolved [4125/06) Top of wall locations are not provided at all on the eastern portion of the lower retaining wall, or on a large portion of the upper wall. These elevations are needed to verify the wall's height. Number:45 Created:4/25/2006 Resolved [4/25/061 Will the drainage easement vacation be done by a replat or by a separate document? If it is done by separate document, Transportation Development Review fees and filing fees will apply. A legal description and exhibit showing the portion to be vacated will be required at the time of final compliance. Fees for vacation are $400, and for dedication are $250 (plus filing fees). Number:47 Created:4/25/2006 Resolved [6/14/061 repeat [4/251061 Easement is labeled as "proposed easement." Please specify what type. Topic: Landscape plan Number:20 Created:3/712006 Resolved [3/7/06] Label and dimension all easements and Right of Way. Topic: Overall Utility Plan Number:7 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] Please label and dimension all existing and proposed easements. Page 4 Number:11 Created:3/712006 Resolved [4/25/06] 1 will send an e-mail to the utilities to verify they don't need the easement, but the applicant should coordinate with Qwest regarding the existing telephone line. This should be addressed prior to hearing. A letter of intent from the phone company and positive confirmation that the easement is not needed by other utilities will be accepted in lieu of an official variance request. [3/7/06] Retaining walls cannot be located within a utility easement without the permission of all utilities. An existing telephone line is shown directly under one of the walls. If permitted, a detail should be included to show how this will work. Topic: Site Plan Number:18 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] Change all dimensions to engineering type. Number:19 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] Label and dimension all easements and Right of Way. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Overall Utility Plan Number:53 Created:6/13/2006 Unresolved [6/13/06] Sheet 3 of Utility Plans - please call out the bicycle parking or add the symbol to the legend. Thanks. Topic: Utility plan Number:23 Created:3/21/2006 Resolved [4/241061 1 don't recall what the response to this comment was the last round. How will pedestrian access be enhanced? [3/211061 No connecting walkway is present. Number:24 Created:3/21/2006 Resolved (3/21/061 Please show the location of bicycle racks on utility plans. Page 5