HomeMy WebLinkAboutLINCOLN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1600 LANCER DRIVE - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2008-03-03dr
y7111' K)e/' ` llj
Post Office Box 580
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
October 9, L974
Mike Ballard
Livingston Construction Co.
L717 Willox Court:
Port Collins, Colorado 80n21
near Sir:
Telephone 303 484-4220
In is letter is in reference to the improvements for the new Lincoln Jr.
High School located on Vine Street.
fhcre are tnlccu areas of immediate concern as listed:
1. The grades of the curb and gutter approaching Vine Street are unsatisfactory,
as built.
2. The cover provided for the sewer main does not meet City specifications.
J. ProtCC&Dll for the to" Dort Collins water line was not provided where
it is crossed by the sewer line.
There is also the possibility that a sewer manhole was placed immediately
on top of the 16" Port Collins water line.
In order to rectify the problems, as mentioned, the following is recommended:
1. Rudesign the curb and gutter grades of both approaches to Vine Street.
Consider a 2" overlay on the existing Vine Street, paving to be the
proposed grade with a street width of 60t from flowline to flowline. An
investigation of the situation indicates that if the curb and gutter
were raised to be compatible with Vine Street there would be sufficient
cover over the sewer line as constructed. Submit this design to the
City Engineer for his approval.
October 9, 1974
Page l
2. The location of tau 16" Port Collins water line should be oxactiy
determined. If it is found to no under the base of a sewer manhole,
the mNnnolc should be relocated and proper protection for the water
Who provided. If the water line is adjacent to tine manhole, simply
provide the required water line protection.
Please foul free to contact the City hngiueer's Office if there are
questions concerning this letter.
Sincerely,
/ -
Donald M. Parsons
City Lugineer
cc: Richard Graef, Poudre R-1 School District
OMP:ke
Post Office Box 580
Fart Collins, Colorado 80521
October 15, 1974
Mr. Livingston
Livingston Construction Inc.
1717 Willox Court
Port Collins, Colorado 80521
Dear Mr. Livingston:
Telephone 303 484.4220
This letter is in reference to the utilities, as built, for tic new. Lincoln
Jr. Iligh School Ion Vine Street.
After a thorough review of the curb and gutter grades on the approaches to
Vine Street, it is believed that if Vine Street were to be improved with curb
and gutter, it could be designed to match these approaches. The City will require
tnat too radii at the intersection of tile access roads and Vine Street be
installed under tile present construction. These radii should be designed for a
street width of 60 feet from flowliue to flowline on Vine Street.
The second item of concern is the cover proviued for tic sanitary sewer. It
has been indicated that the cover varies to a minimum of 2.9 feet in one section.
phis does not meet the 3.5 feet of cover as required by City specifications.
Therefore, this section of toe sanitary sewer must be replaced to meet City
specifications before it can be connected to too City sewer collection system.
It is suggested that plans for the curb and gutter radii and reconstruction
of the sanitary sewer the submitted to this office for approval prior to construction.
Please feel free to contact the City Engineer's Office if there are questions
concerning this letter.
Sincerely,
Donald M. Par-ons
City Engineer
cc: Richard Graef, Poudre R-1 School District
DMP:ke
a
Post Office Box 580 Telephone 303 484.4220
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
October 1, 1974
Richard C. Graef
Poudre R-1 School District
2407 Laporte Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado
Dear Sir:
This letter is in reference to the utilities as proposed for Lincoln Junior
high school 10c-Ited north of Vine Drive approximately one-half mile east of
Taft Hill Rozd.
The original set of plans for these utilities was submitted to the City
Engineer's office April 25, 1974 for review and comment. These plans were
returned to the developer's engineer April 30, 1974 with deficiencies to be
corrected in order to bring the plans up to City specifications for approval
by the City Engineer.
Two comments of major design importance were as follows:
1. There was not provided a sanitary sewer profile. It was requested
that this be sho�,in before the design could be evaluated.
2. The elevations at both the East and Nest approaches to Vine Drive
were not compatible with those of Vine Drive for drainage purposes.
It w-ss requested that these approaches be redesigned with higher
elevations to prevent pending of storm water at the Vine Drive
approaches.
The plans ✓ere resubmitted June 27, 1974 for review by the City Engin-
eering Department.
Items of design importance noted by the department were as follows:
1. The sewer elevations on the plan did not match the elevations
Indic Led on the se'.ier nro;"ile. It was re-uested that this be
corrected before the sewer design could be evaluated.
2. The elevations of the approach of the main driveway were as submitted
on the original plans. It was again requested that these elevations
be raised to be more compatible with Vine Drive.
f
TIME CENTER OF THE WORLD ""'
Page 2
October 1, 1974
The plans were returned to the developer's engineer August 30, 1974
with a request for the ,above design alterations.
The plans were again submitted to the City Engineer's office September 20,
1974 at which time it wos noted that the sanitary sewer, and curb and gutter
had been constructed.
Inspection of the as built construction revealed the following deficiencies:
1. The curb and gutter at the approach to Vine Drive is not compatible
with the grades on Vine Drive and would present a design problem
when improvements are made on Vine Drive.
2. The ground cover for the sanitary sewer varies to a minimum of two
and one-half feet in sections, which does not meet city specifications.
Also rioted was that the sewer crosses the Port Collins sixteen -inch
w.=.ter main without providing for the required protection against
water contamination.
pith the deficiencies as noted, the City Engineering Department does not
feel they can accent the utilities as constructed and the items deficient should
be properly designed and the construction rectified.
Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Donald M. Parsons
City Engineer
LGM/cls
cc: Robert L.. Brunton, City Manager
Roy A. Bingman, Director of Community Development