Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTESTA - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2008-02-13Selected Issues Report city of Fort Collins 2n/2oos Date: TESTA BEAUTY SALON, 1635 S. LEMAY AVE. PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLANS SELECTION CRITERIA: Status = All ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number:9 Created:6/5/2007 Unresolved [6/25/07] [6/5/07] The Transportation Development Review Fee was not calculated correctly and the fee was underpaid by $522.25. This underpaid amount will be added to the Final Compliance submittal fee of $1000. Total due at final plan submittal will be $1,522.25. Number:10 Created:6/5/2007 Resolved [6/5/07] Please list all of the owners, developers and consultants on the Utility Plan cover sheet (name, address and phone numbers). Number:11 Created:615/2007 Resolved [6/5/07] Please provide a secondary City of Fort Collins bench mark on the Utility Plan cover sheet per LCUASS Appendix E requirements. Number:12 Created:615/2007 Resolved [6/5/07] The Plat sheet shall be added to the Utility Plan set for reference as indicated on the Sheet Index. Number:13 Created:6/512007 Resolved [6/5107] The title on the Utility Plan set, Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Plat should all match to ensure that they are all filed together in the same location under the same name. The recommended tile is Testa Subdivision. Addresses may not be used in the title. Number:14 Created:6/5/2007 Unresolved [6/25/07] The plan is now showing 3.5 feet of sidewalk to be added to the existing attached walk. City Code requires that a minimum of 4 feet of concrete walk be added to existing attached walk. Please revise the Utility Plans, Site Plan and Landscape Plan accordingly. [6/5/07] It is not clear on all of the plan sheets that there is 4 feet of additional new sidewalk being added to the existing walk. Please clearly show, dimension and label the existing sidewalk along the frontage and show how the new sidewalk ties into the existing walk to the north and south. Please disregard all red -line comments requesting a standard detached walk in the Ultimate location. Please keep in mind that some day, an ultimate detached walk will be constructed by the City. This may impact your grading or landscape in the new ROW dedication. Number: 15 Created:6/5/2007 Resolved Page 1 [6/25/07] The detail was added but not called out on the plan. [6/5/07] If the existing drive approach (access) is to be reconstructed, please indicate this on the plans and call out with the standard LCUASS driveway detail. If not, please label to protect existing driveway in place. Number:16 Created:6/5/2007 Resolved [6/5/07] The Grading Plan is showing the parking lot on the east side draining over the pedestrian walk through a curb opening. This condition is not recommended and may lead to maintenance problems and liability risks with icing in the winter months. It is recommended that a drainage pipe or culvert be provided to drain the water under the walk at this location. Number:17 Created:6/5/2007 Unresolved [6125/071 The vicinity map provided does not meet scanning requirements of LCUASS Appendix E. Please change the vicinity map to a one -line street map with the site labeled and shaded, no other shading. [6/5/07] Please refer to the Plat. Show and label the total ROW dedication from the centerline of Lemay Avenue on the Plat. A one -line street Vicinity Map should be provided on the Plat. Number:18 Created:6/5/2007 Resolved [6/5/07] Please refer to the Site Plan. Show the new sidewalk in the Ultimate location and how it ties back into existing walk to the north and south. Number:19 Created:6/5/2007 Resolved [6/5/07] Please refer to the Landscape Plan. Show the new sidewalk in the Ultimate location with street trees in the Ultimate location in the parkway strip. Number:20 Created:615/2007 Resolved [6/5/07] Please see red -lines for any other minor comments related to drafting and labeling. Return all red -line copies with your next submittal. I am OK with scheduling a hearing at this point but will need a revised plan showing the sidewalk corrections to take to the hearing. Number:65 Created:6/25/2007 Unresolved 16/25/07] The sidewalk to the south should use a dimensioned straight line taper or call out a radius so that the contractor will know how to construct new section of sidewalk. Number:66 Created:6/25/2007 Unresolved [6/25/07] OK to address pending comments with final plan submittal. OK to schedule a hearing with current plans. Please re -submit all red -lines with final plans. Topic: Technical Services Number: 24 [6/7/07] Boundary closes but the legal does NOT. Number: 25 [6/7/07] No vicinity map provided ? Created:617/2007 Resolved Created:6/7/2007 Resolved Number:26 Created:6/712007 Resolved [6n107] The lines on the emergency access easement are not parallel. Need to revise to maintain 20 feet wide throughout easement. Page 2 Number:27 Created:6/7/2007 Resolved [6/7/07] Please indicate how Lemay was originally dedicated. Number:28 Created:6/7/2007 Resolved [6/7/07] Please list the area of the ROW dedication. Number:69 Created:6/28/2007 Unresolved [6/28/071 Please add a note for the Lemay ROW - see redlines. Fix vicinity map. Page 3 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: May 18, 2007 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 12-07 TESTA BEAUTY SALON 1635 S. LEMAY AVE. PDP — TYPE I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: June 6, 2007 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) V Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape