Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBANK OF CHOICE - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2008-02-13,e1 Selected Issues Report Gte of FortCo111ru: Date: 2/8/2008 FIRST MAINSTREET BANK PDP - TYPE I (LUC) AND FINAL PLANS SELECTION CRITERIA: Status = All ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number:51 Created:l2/2/2003 Resolved [4/13/04] With the additional buildings now being known and the street cuts being shown on Whalers. The plans now need to indicate a mill and inlay for the entire south side of Whalers Way from Boardwalk to the abandonment as required by the City's Pavement Engineer. [12/2/03] Engineering Pavement offered the following comment: Whalers Way was paved in 2001, triple impact fees will be assessed if the street is cut. A mill and inlay may be needed. Number:77 Created:4/21/2004 Pending [8/31/04] Left as unresolved for reference, noting that the last comment is now addressed. When/If stormwater requests signed and stamped drainage reports, please provide an additional signed and stamped report to me in order to forward to CDOT. [8/3/04] Left as unresolved for reference. Note that the previous last comment was not addressed on the plat. [4/21/04] In discussion with CDOT, an access control permit will not be required. However, the following items are needed to be addressed: - CDOT would like to review the latest drainage report for the development (please route to Engineering). - A CDOT landscape permit will be required prior to construction. - CDOT's access ramp detail (with truncated domes) is required for the ramp construction at Boardwalk and Harmony. - A note is required on the plat stating: "Any future widening of Boardwalk Drive at the intersection of Harmony Road will require modification to CDOT's existing deeded access control line." Number:80 Created:4/21/2004 Resolved [4/21/04] Remove "PDP" from all document names/titles. Topic: Landscape plan Number:79 Created:4/21/2004 Resolved [4121/04] The street trees along Boardwalk need to be placed 4' from the sidewalk to accommodate the future widening of Boardwalk Drive (the sidewalk itself will need to shift Page 1 Current Planning PROJECT COMMENT SHEET BASIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DATE: September 3, 2004 DEPT: Water & Wastewater PROJECT: First Main Street Bank. All comments must be received by Mark Virrata no later than: Wednesday, September 8, 2004 ➢ There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main which was extended from the development to the east of this site. This main must be used or abandoned at the manhole. The existing stub from Boardwalk on the north end of this project is a 4-inch service and not a main. No manholes or additional service may be installed on this existing service. ➢ Maintain the required landscape/utility separation distance on the utility plans. ➢ See utility plans for other comments. Date: 9-7 0 � Signature: �i CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF SIGNS X PLAT X SITE DRAINAGE REPORT O HER X UTILITY X REDLINE UTILITY X LANDSCAPE City of Fort Collins east as the right-of-way dedication does not appear to be sufficient with the right -turn lane being counted as part of the required width.) Topic: Plat Number:11 Created:11/24/2003 Resolved [8/3/04] The right-of-way dedication has not changed from the previous submittal. With the sidewalk now being shown outside of right-of-way, either additional right-of-way should be dedicated or the sidewalk needs to be within an access and transit easement. [4/13/04] The right-of-way dedicated includes the right turn lane for the site as part of the 56', again the right-of-way dedication of 56' should be exclusive of the developer's right -turn lane. Ensure the sidewalk is then placed along the back of this right-of-way. [11/24/03] The TIS indicates that all the curbs at the Harmony and Boardwalk intersection are at "finished" locations. The current street width would need to change in order to allow for future double lefts; the Bank One project across the street dedicated additional right-of- way to allow for this future widening. Please ensure 56' of right-of-way is provided from the existing street centerline of Boardwalk Drive; this width is exclusive of the developer's right turn lane which is additional right-of-way required. Number:18 Created:11/24/2003 Resolved [11/24/03] The plat should dedicate an emergency access easement to satisfy PFA requirements. This is for the main drive aisle from Whalers Way to Boardwalk Drive as well as the internal parking lot loop which connects to the main drive aisle. Will the building be sprinklered? Number:50 Created:12/2/2003 Resolved [8/3104] Technical Services offers the following comments: -Previous comment #2 not resolved ("being a replat of Rafferty's P.U.D."). -Vicinity Map will not scan or duplicate. [12/2/03] Technical Services offered the following comments: 1. Legal and plat close, see typo in curve table (redlined). 2. The "sub title" of the plat needs to say: "Being a replat of Rafferty's P.U.D.", located in the southeast 1/4 ..... 3. A "Block 1" designation isn't needed, lot 1 and lot 2 is sufficient and less confusing. Topic: Site Plan Number:78 Created:4/21/2004 Resolved [8/3/04] Show the same information regarding the sidewalk on the east side of the driveway. [4/21/041 The site plan labels the sidewalk along Whalers Way as existing. Topic: Street Design Number:88 Created:8/3/2004 Resolved [8/3/04] Remove the CDOT approval block on sheet 8. CDOT will not sign off on the plan set. Number: 90 Created:8/3/2004 Resolved Page 2 [8/31041 Please provide cross slope measurements (on both the existing and additional pavement) on each of the cross sections on sheet 10. In addition, label the elevations at the flowline and crown. Number:95 Created:8/3/2004 Pending [8/31/041 Correct this on Sheet 4. [8/31041 The sidewalk along Boardwalk south of the Harmony sidewalk needs to be realigned such that it better aligns with the crosswalk. Number:96 Created:8/3/2004 Pending [8/31/041 Correct this on Sheet 4. [8/3/04] The access ramp at the Whalers/Boardwalk intersection should not lead out to the "corner" and should direct pedestrians "north" across the street along Boardwalk. Number:103 Created:8/412004 Resolved [8/4/04] 1 don't believe the striping plan for Boardwalk is correct, I was under the impression that Traffic Operations required a continuous center turn lane for Boardwalk instead of creating the striped turning pockets. Number:104 Created:8/4/2004 Resolved [8/4/04] Remove the sight distance line from the signing and striping plan as well as the shaded additional street width notation, it makes the striping plan difficult to read. Number:105 Created:814/2004 Resolved (814/04] The striping plan shows that the new eastern edge of the north bound through lane does not coincide with the seam for the new pavement edge. The patching of the street should be shown to the center of the new through lane to prevent the pavement seam from being within the wheel path of vehicles. Number:109 Created:8/6/2004 Pending [8/31/041 With the area cleaned up, the centerlane striping appears confusing, it doesn't line up with each other from Harmony to Whalers. Remove the "diamond" striping in the bikelanes, they are no longer used. [816/04] In discussion with Traffic Operations, the following comments are offered on the singing and striping plan: - Remove the shading, the showing of utilities, and sight distance hatching. - Continue the centerlane striping across the access to the site off Boardwalk (there should be no break in the striping from Whalers to Harmony). - Remove the indication of striping two sets of opposing arrows between Whalers and the driveway. - Add right turn only signage directly east of the right turn arrow striping. Number:111 Created:8/6/2004 Resolved [816/04] The minimum flowline grade is not being met for Boardwalk Drive across Whalers Way. Number:112 Created:8/6/2004 Pending [8/31/04] Provide additional elevation points as redlined on both sides of the intersection. Page 3 [8/6/04] Provide spot elevations for the Whalers/Boardwalk intersection (in accordance with LCUASS 7-27). Topic: Transportation Number:10 Created:11124/2003 Resolved [11/24/03] In discussion with City Transportation, the striping plan proposed by the development (which would eliminate separate through and right -turn movements on both legs for Boardwalk Drive) is not acceptable. Separate through and right turn movements must be maintained due to the high number of right -turn turning movements. As a result, the TIS will need to be amended based upon single left turning movements instead of the double lefts assumed in the study. Number:13 Created: 11/2412003 Resolved [11/24/03] The sidewalk along Boardwalk shall be placed at the edge of the new right-of- way as noted in issue 11. Number:15 Created:11/24/2003 Pending [9/2/04] 1 didn't see this in my packet for the resubmittal. It's procedural at this point, so it doesn't need to hold up going to mylars, but please (re)provide this for processing. [8/3/04] No variance request was apparently submitted. [4/13/041 While the traffic study discusses the striping design, a variance request is still required for not meeting the driveway separation requirements. [11/24/03] The access drive out to Boardwalk Drive is a variance to the LCUASS, Chapter 7 with regards to its separation from Whalers as well as offset from the driveway into the apartments across the street. A variance request is required from the consultants design or traffic engineer. Of particular concern in my opinion is the center turn lane being shared between the Bank's entrance off of Boardwalk and the apartments across the street. With about only 40' of separation between the drives and Boardwalk an arterial street, isn't there a possibility that the proposed striping design will result in movements for northbound into the apartments and southbound into the bank wanting to both utilize this center turn lane at the same time? I'd like for the TIS or the design engineer to address this concern as I feel it's unsafe. Number:16 Created:11/24/2003 Resolved [11/24/03] The new sidewalk along Whalers Way is required to be detached 8' from the existing curb with a 5' sidewalk, not attached as shown. Right-of-way should then be dedicated to the back of walk. Topic: Utility Plans Number:14 Created: 11 /24/2003 Resolved [8/3/04] We're currently in the process of finalizing the access ramp detail for truncated domes in City right-of-way, these details will be sent out when completed. [4/13104] Not required at this time but, please ensure LCUASS Detail 1606 is included in the detail sheet. [11/24/03] The access ramps at the intersection of Harmony and Boardwalk shall be "directional" as recently constructed on the Bank One site across the street. Page 4 Number:17 Created:11/24/2003 Resolved [11/24/03] Indicate the curb return sizes proposed for all intersections on both public and private areas and ensure these curb returns meet LCUASS access requirements in Chapter 8. Number:44 Created:1212/2003 Resolved [8/3/04] (4/13/04] [Carried forward just as notice] [12/2/03] While not required at this time, as a head -up, at time of final submittal after a theoretical hearing, the utility plans will need to show flowline profiles and cross sections along Boardwalk Drive to demonstrate the widening of the roadway for the right turn lane will meet all LCUASS requirements. Number:48 Created:1212/2003 Resolved [12/2/03] The driveway out to Whalers Way appears to be exceeding the amount of area sheetflowing drainage across the public walk. 750 square feet of influence area is the maximum area allowed to be designed to drain out the driveway. For the driveway out to Boardwalk Drive, the flow arrows indicate no drainage across the sidewalk, although there appears to be a discrepancy or issue with not enough grade with a spot elevation of 03.99 behind the sidewalk combined with the 04 contour being 40 feet east. Number:64 Created:4/13/2004 Resolved [4/13/041 With the reconstruction of the Whalers and Boardwalk intersection resulting in vehicles being set back further from Boardwalk on Whalers, the constuction plans striping sheet needs to show more of existing Boardwalk heading northwest to ascertain if this change results in any sight distance issues. With Boardwalk being classified as a minor arterial, sight distance at an intersection is required to be 1030'. which needs to be demonstrated if this criterion is being met. Number:65 Created:4/13/2004 Resolved [8/3/04] Ensure that the phasing plan sheet is given a distinct sheet number and the title block calls it out as a phasing plan. (4/13104] If it is intended to not construct utility services to the other non bank buildings at the same time as the construction of the bank (phase out the entire development), a phasing plan in the utility plan set should be provided. Number:113 Created:8/6/2004 Unresolved [8/6/04] Provide detail 2501 Additions to Existing Sidewalk on the detail sheet. Number:117 Created:8/31/2004 Pending [8/31/04] Please remove detail 1607 and add 1601. Add the attached sheets to the detail sheets with regards to the use of truncated domes at the Whalers/Boardwalk intersection. Along with this add a note on these truncated dome details that the contractor shall coordinate with City Engineering to obtain the most recent truncated dome details prior to any construction of the access ramp. Department: Transportation Planning Topic: Transportation Number: 30 Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Created: 11 /26/2003 Resolved Page 5 [11/26/03] Construct the entire length of the sidewalk along Boardwalk as a detached walk to Harmony Road. At Harmony Road directional access ramps, similar to the ones on the SW corner of the intersection need to be constructed. Number:31 Created:11/26/2003 Resolved [4/13/04] [11/26/03] Consider relocating the bike rack near the entrance and the HC parking stalls so that cyclists can utilize the HC ramp as well. Number:32 Created:11/26/2003 Resolved [11/26/03] Due to ditch constraints along Whalers Way, if the standard 5' detached sidewalk with a narrowed parkway width is not possible than an 6' attached walk would be sufficient. Also directional access ramps are required at the Boardwalk / Whalers Way intersection as well as the driveway at Whalers Way. Number:33 Created:11/26/2003 Resolved [11/26/03] The intersection striping for southbound traffic on Boardwalk will remain the same. Therefore, the 6' bike lane needs to be placed between the right turn lane and the through travel lane per City standards. Number:34 Created:11/26/2003 Resolved [11/26/031 City standards require that an 8' bike lane be striped on a 2-Lane Arterial when adjacent to the curb. The proposed 5' bike lane with the new left turn lane into Whalers Way will require additional internal transportation discussions. Number:35 Created:11/26/2003 Resolved [4113/04] After further internal discussions it is required that the bike lane remain adjacent to the curb the entire length of Boardwalk to Whalers Way. Also as previously mentioned the bike lane width along the property's Boardwalk frontage must be 8 feet in width along the continuous right turn lane to comply with City standards for a 2-Lane Arterial. The 6 feet that is shown along the curb at the Harmony intersection is an existing condition and does not need to change with this plan. Please correct for the next submittal. [11/26/03] The Boardwalk bike lane along the development's proposed right turn lane into the site needs to be located adjacent to the curb rather than being exposed to traffic for over 500 feet. However, to transition between the right turn lane at Whalers Way and align to the existing bike lane north of the site, the bike lane will need to transition between the right turn lane and the through lane approximately 60 feet from Whalers Way with roughly a 50' transition period (see red lines). This will also require that the bike lane width be constructed to 8' as per City standards. Number:36 Created:11/26/2003 Resolved [11/26/03] Is the entire length of the development's proposed right turn lane necessary? Number:67 Created:4/14/2004 Resolved [4/14/04] For the next submittal please include all necessary access ramps for the new internal walkways that cross drive aisles and connect buildings. Number:85 Created:7/16/2004 Unresolved Page 6 [7/16/04] Please note that the crosswalks striping for the east side crossing Harmony does not align with the new ramp. This may create a bit of a skew in the crosswalk striping, which is OK. Please correct. Page 7 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: March 31, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #37-03 First Mainstreet Bank PDP - Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: �. Slr(T (PcAP- sera Re--O(I)Qe-c April 14, 2004 7. NhNK M,sstNf f❑ No Comment G>,1 67A-1(-rn 6izT1 C %L F7Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) "*PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** Z , (a�EE kFvcrniES> NUMB�s �tRroo n�m'r��lrar! �fi✓Er�tJLEr,/I�� yc.9T 3e 1l'rc/i,�r� %%A/� Ak&OJ 7v f3L' CUReL-tii . /� lJ/J�z esJ a REM '84APR S- �vrlc✓o '� /�. �� FiZon llT(-(r-- IA- l-4mF / (D , 1q0"4_j c T'c34-LL, 7/4 2 GCJi�7f / c r� D UT� /1 z3i� a� G� �2iv �•t l y �J l' cr L'LC2 A I N�4T6 Vi�7- Name (please print) Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS L4lat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fart Collins FINAL PLAN COMMENT SHEET !C1poffortCAaUi�ns Current REM '81JUL DATE: July 7, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #37-03A First Main StreetBinal Plans All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: `n August 4, 2004 V Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference �` 7�D/t/ - 14, /-t '13 Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ✓Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape 3_q,