The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF DENVER - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2007-11-28PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current PlanninLj RfC. D DATE: April 20, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #6-96N Harmony Centre PUD, Goodwill PDP - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: May 12, 2004 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference iDUNDRQS� C U S £ 5 G£GftL Da ES A✓oT, j30rlr� PMOYf AA(l, no "Lfa-r1n, TNI S 1�& �T / 9 �--�' 2 �✓dz q c5 Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape _Other Number: 53 Created: 5/14/2004 [5/14/04] The street width of Pavilion Lane proposed needs to be widened to our standard commercial local street cross section of a 50' roadway width within 72' of right-of-way. This widening should occur past the driveway that connects to Pavilion through the current cul-de-sac as redlined. It is suggested that the widening occurs somewhat abruptly to clearly define the parking areas created by the widening (as redlined). Done. Topic: Landscaping Number: 24 Created: 5/11 /2004 [5/11/041 Correct the scale on the landscaping plan. The scale has been corrected. Topic: Plat Number: 14 Created: 5/10/2004 [5/10/04] The plat language has some outdated language in sections. Please update to the latest version as attached. This language can be emailed if desired. The plat language has been updated. Number: 15 Created: 5/10/2004 [5/10/041 Please indicate on the plat the right-of-way to be vacated and dedicated, both onsite and offsite, in order to accommodate the extension of Pavilion Lane. Done. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Landscaping Number: 3 Created: 4/26/2004 [4/26/041 Two street trees along Pavilion Lane need to be adjusted to provide 40 feet clearance to planned streetlight. A street lighting plan is included with the comments. Ornamental trees may be placed within 15 feet of the proposed streetlight so there does not have to be a significant gap on either side of the streetlight. Street trees have been replaced with ornamental trees at the 15' spacing. Topic: Light & Power Number: 1 Created: 4/26/2004 [4/26/04] Relocation of existing electric utility facilities, including streetlights, to extend Pavilion Lane will be at developer expense. The developer will cover this expense. Number: 2 Created: 4/26/2004 [4/26/04] Developer will need to coordinate electric utility facilities, including a location for a transformer and electric development fees with Light & Power Page 4 Engineering (970) 221-6700. Be sure to include the location of the electrical transformer on the revised site and landscape plans. The transformer must be within ten feet of hard surface for emergency change -out, and, at the same time, must be screened from view from the public streets by landscaping or an enclosure that meets clearance specifications. The electrical transformer has been located and shown on the plans. The developer will coordinate with Light & Power Engineering concerning electric developments fees. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Topic: General Number: 45 Created: 5/12/2004 [5/12/04] REQUIRED ACCESS: A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1; FCLUC A fire lane has been added to the plans. Number: 46 Created: 5/12/2004 [5/12/04] PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Approved numerals or addresses shall be provided for all new and existing building in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. 1997 UFC 901.4.4 Premises identification is shown on the elevation of the building facing JFK Parkway. Number: 47 Created: 5/12/2004 [5/12/041 WATER SUPPLY: Commercial No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2 The building is within 300 ft. of two separate fire hydrants. Number: 48 Created: 5/12/2004 [5/12/04] SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS: This proposed building shall be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system. The building will be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system. Number: 50 Created: 5/12/2004 [5/12/04] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT: Buildings that are required to be fire-sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. The building will have a 6" fire line. Page 5 Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: Detention Requirements Number: 35 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/04] This site is in a part of the McClelland's drainage basin where the detention release requirement is 0.23 cfs/Acre not 0.5 cfs/Acre as currently designed. Please revise the calculations for the pond sizing to meet this release rate. The detention release requirement has been revised (i.e., from 0.50 cfs/ac to 0.23 cfs/ac). Topic: Erosion Control Number: 36 Created: 5/11 /2004 [5/11/04] May 5, 2004 Please delete note number 15, and notes 17 through 28 of the "Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Construction Plan Notes" on plan sheet CV02. Notes deleted as requested. Please provide a narrative in your report that indicates where, when, and how the BMP's (Best Management Practices) you have listed will be utilized. A more detailed narrative will be provided with the Final Drainage and Erosion Control Study. Please provide PS, EFF, and surety calculations per City of Fort Collins specifications. The PS, EFF, and surety calculations per City of Fort Collins specifications will be provided with the Final Drainage and Erosion Control Study. The detention pond in the southeast corner of the site should be utilized as a sediment trap during construction. Comment acknowledged. What is the plan to protect downstream/downslope areas from the box culvert extension and construction of Pavilion Lane? The proposed improvement will extend the upstream portion of the existing box culvert. The down stream/downslope areas from the existing box culvert will not be disturbed. Topic: Off -site flows Number: 39 Created: 5/11 /2004 [5/11/04] The design currently routes off -site flows from developed areas to the west through the detention pond. This makes the pond work in a less efficient manner, it is suggested that off -site flows be put in a separate system that would bypass the proposed detention pond. We considered the idea of using a parallel storm drain system to route the offsite flows around the proposed detention pond. Page 6 Topic: Plat Number: 52 Created: 5/14/2004 [5/14/04] The utility easement on Lot 1 Block 2 should be called a utility and drainage easement. Done. Please extend a utility and drainage easement onto Lot 1 Block 1 where the storm sewer stub out of the inlet on Pavilion Lane is to be extended. Done. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 37 Created: 5/11 /2004 [5/11/04] Please provide a profile for all proposed storm sewers, this can be done with a future final compliance submittal. Comment acknowledged. We will provide the storm drain profiles with the final compliance submittal. The drainage plan should show a detention summary table, the 100 year water surface elevation for the detention pond should be called out, pond should have a spillway location designated on the plan and a design for that spillway should be provided. A detention summary table and the 100-year water surface elevation are shown on the plans. The emergency spillway is shown on the plan and a design for the spillway will be provided with the final compliance submittal. At final, water quality outlet details should be provided, rip -rap should be designed and placed at all pipe outlet locations. We will provide a water quality outlet structure with the final compliance submittal. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Construction Plans Number: 31 Created: 5/11 /2004 [5/11/04] There appears to be a tree located in the middle of the ramp that leads from the sidewalk fronting on JFK to the "plaza" area of the proposed building entrance. See landscape plan for redline. The tree has been relocated. Number: 32 Created: 5111 /2004 [5/11/04] Please provide a sidewalk access ramp aligned to cross JFK to the NE at the northernmost point of this proposed development. This will facilitate a pedestrian crossing of JFK to those parcels east of JFK that are currently vacant. Upon further consideration, the City has directed us not to show the sidewalk access ramp aligned to cross JFK Parkway. Page 7 Number: 38 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/04] A 4' detached walk will need to be constructed along the edge of the "open space" at the western end of the property. This walk needs to include a sidewalk ramp for pedestrians to access the main walkway that currently exists to the west of King Soopers. This sidewalk has been added. Topic: General Number: 41 Created: 5/12/2004 [5/12/04] Transportation Planning requests that this development build a sidewalk along the southern edge of the parcel. This drive aisle does not currently have a continuous sidewalk on either its north or south side. A sidewalk on the southern edge of this project would provide a more safe and direct route for pedestrians who wish to reach the main walkway to the west of King Soopers from JFK. IF constructed this sidewalk should also have an access ramp to provide a crossing to the front (west) of King Soopers. This sidewalk has been added. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number: 17 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/04] Coordinate site and landscape plans with the civil plans. All plans have been coordinated. Number: 18 Created: 5/11/2004 [5111/04] Show all water and sewer lines on the landscape plans and maintain the required separation distances from trees and shrubs. Include the standard general notes on the landscape plans pertaining to landscape/utility separation distances and locating utilities prior to planting. All water and sewer lines have been shown on the landscape plans and required separations have been maintained. Standard general landscaping notes have been added to the plans. Number: 19 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/04] Provide profiles of all proposed sanitary sewer and storm sewer lines. Include all water, sanitary and storm sewer crossings in the profiles. Maintain 18- inches of vertical separation between water lines and sewer lines. The requested profiles will be provided with the final compliance submittal. Number: 20 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/04] Show and label concrete encasement of sewer lines which cross above or with in 18-inches vertically of water lines. Done. Page 8 4a i Project Comments Sheet CityofFort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: July 12, 2004 Project: HARMONY CENTRE PUD, GOODWILL PDP, TYPE II, #6-96N All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: July 07, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 30 Created: 5/11/2004 [7/9/04] Left as unresolved for reference at the time further design is made. [5/11/04] Provided the existing Pavilion Lane is shown as commented in #28 and widened as commented in #53, the level of detail required for this project (prior to a hearing) is considered satisfactory. After a public hearing the following items will need to be addressed: - A profile for the centerline of Pavilion Lane is needed. - Because centerline stationing was not used, please provide cross -sections of the roadway at the start and end point of all horizontal curves. - Label additional existing and proposed elevations of Pavilion out to JFK as redlined (and as specified in Figure 7-27 of LCUASS). - The southern flowline profile has a grade break just outside of the curb return and exceeds .4%, which is not allowed in LCUASS 7.4.1.13.3. - The length of the sag vertical curve on the south flowline profile appears to be counterintuitive with the coinciding vertical curve on the north flowline profile. With the south vertical curve being on the outside of the horizontal curve, shouldn't this length of vertical curve be longer? (In general the vertical design will be reviewed in greater detail after hearing when the additional information is provided). Number: 54 Created: 5/14/2004 [7/9/04] Left as unresolved for future reference. [5/14/04] Please add a signing and striping plan sheet for bikelane delineation. (The City will stripe bikelanes out to College Avenue west of the proposed Pavilion Lane extension). Signature Date ,,.CHECK HEREJF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat ✓Site Drainage Report Other —7�Utility Redline Utility = Landscape Page 1 Topic: General Number: 11 Created: 5/10/2004 [7/9/04] Carried forward as it is not resolved. (5/10/04] Prior to any agreement towards Current Planning's scheduling of a public hearing for the project, letters of intent are required to be obtained from all the owners affected by the Pavilion Lane road alignment. This includes Larimer County Canal Ditch No. 2 and FC Timberline Development LLC for the odd shaped parcel southwest of the current cul-de-sac. In addition the property owner(s) directly south and directly west consisting of shopping centers need to provide letters of intent. The parcel map information shows multiple ownership for both of these shopping centers. The property owner(s) to the south will also need to express no objection for the driveway connection onto the private drive which is on their property. Number. 64 Created: 7/9/2004 [7/9/04] In general, provided letters of intent are received, the project is set for scheduling a hearing. The thoroughness and detail in which the previous comments were addressed is appreciated. As is standard, please note that additional comments may arise when further vertical design is incorporated into the submittal. Number: 65 Created: 7/9/2004 [7/9/04] Technical Services comments are redlined on the plat. Please ensure this copy is returned with the next resubmittal. Page 2 FINAL PLAN COMMENT SHEET Current DATE: September 14, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #6-96P Harmony Center P.U.D. — Goodwill PDP - Final Plans All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: October 13, 2004 Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference /. 307"N7 &,e 4 4 t_E(�/+L C4.056_ �y� �N4p"d �� L —Ttie $646-9 is Part of i6e irnale Z1a4% t4,e vicihi�j w,aP. vJe can nod rewove {he A,aditi9. �• •Yo Tom- mot/ L✓/Vc5 u2 f/�lTcti�s. �4r1►s� Cownmen4 etc6ow1edged . Refer fa tt,e revised Han. . Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape yh* A City of Fort Collins FINAL PLAN COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Callins Current Planning DATE: September 14, 2004 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #6-96P Harmony Center P.U.D. — Goodwill PDP - Final Plans All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: October 13, 2004 Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference — 4n -?"- e ��c- vT c s -- - /n!:7 rCijrS2c- q �l Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape city of r u Project Comments Sheet City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Date: October 18, 2004 Project: HARMONY CENTRE PLID, GOODWILL PDP, TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: October 13, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 86 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/04] The City was given a draft copy of the agreement required by the ditch company. A copy of this is provided for the Developer's reference. As advance notice, the City will be assigning much of the responsibilities to the Developer in the development agreement. Number: 87 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/04] Please provide legal descriptions of the various offsite easements and right-of- way dedications and vacations necessary for the realignment and extension of Pavilion Lane. There may be concerns regarding the information once presented. Actual signatures of the deeds will be required prior to sign off of construction plan mylars. Number: 93 Created: 10/18/2004 [10/18/04] With the depth of pavement on top of the box culvert extension being less than the standard and there perhaps being a cover issue for the storm drain lines crossing Pavilion Lane (of which an alternative design is still needed), the geotechnical report should be revised to include discussion of this, in conjunction with Comment #90. (Final pavement design will again be specified at the time of the pavement design report). Topic: Plat Number: 91 Created: 10/18/2004 [10/18/04) The right-of-way for Pavilion Lane will need to encompass all of the box culvert/wingwall section (along with the 9' utility easement). Dad �IECK HERE Ii YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS [/_ Plat- L/Site Drainage Report Other C�(jtility �ine Utility L�andscape Page 1 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Foil Collins Current Planning REC. D DATE: April 20, 2004 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #6-96N Harmony Centre PUD, Goodwill PDP - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: May 12, 2004 Note - PLEAsE identify your redlines for future reference No G,p%� Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Topic: Utility Plans Number: 75 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/041 For the two storm sewers crossing Pavilion Lane, there is insufficient clearance from the top of the pipe to the road surface, which compromises the pavement subgrade. Number: 77 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/04] Add signature blocks for the two shopping centers on both side of Pavilion Lane that are affected by the realigning of Pavilion Lane (FC Timberline? & Pavilion Ltd?) Number: 78 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/04] Remove all indications regarding the pavement section for Pavilion Lane being in accordance with the previously submitted soils report. The pavement section will be per the pavement design report which is required after construction starts. Number: 79 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/04] The plan set indicates that an existing electrical line west of the site will be relocated by others. In checking with City Light and Power, they will relocate this line though at the expense of the Developer. Number: 80 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/041 The street design for the north side of Pavilion Lane approaching JFK has a considerable transition length to remove the crown, why was this designed? Considering the flowline design is at the minimum .5%, I'm concerned that the roadway will be close to flat for a considerable distance and areas of ponding will occur. Number: 81 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/041 The centerline profile for Pavilion Lane uses the stationing along the north flowline instead of the stationing shown on the plan view. Number. 83 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/041 Engineering has adopted construction standards effective immediately for access ramps/truncated domes, a copy of which is attached and should be incorporated into the plan set. An electronic version of this can be emailed if desired. Number: 85 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/04] Please provide a couple of cross sections at the neckdown where the parking is removed both at the points of both the expanded and reduced sections. With the flowline grades remaining the same around the neckdowns, there is a general concern that the cross slope will steepen through the neckdown or the crown of the street will rise abruptly. Number: 88 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/041 Please provide more clarity as to the area on the north side of Pavilion Lane between the westernmost driveway on the north side of Pavilion and the point where Pavilion Lane expands. Is sidewalk being shown here? Number: 89 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/04] Shop drawings and structural calcs for the box culvert extension will be required prior to the issuance of a development construction permit. Specify on the utility plans that the box culvert design is to comply with 11.5 of LCUASS and specifically note that the box culvert shall be designed for vehicular loadings of HS-20 or higher. Page 2 Number: 90 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/04] Please provide more detail regarding the wingwalls in how the grading ties into them, TOW and BOW elevations, etc. The soils report did not appear to address the extension of the box culvert, has there been evaluation as to how deep the wingwalls need to be, thickness, etc? Number: 92 Created: 10/18/2004 [10/18/04] Please see the marked up information in green on the plans, which was reviewed by the Engineering Design section of Engineering. In general more questions and concerns regarding the design of the box culvert extension. Page 3 I ■ pm IN O o Marc Virata - Goodwill Industries of Denver - J.F.K.Parkway Project Site Page 1 From: "Feissner, Herman" <Herman.Feissner@Nolte.com> To: "Marc Virata" <MVIRATA@fcgov.com> Date: 1112104 10:37AM Subject: Goodwill Industries of Denver - J.F.K.Parkway Project Site Marc, Regarding Comment No. 89: "Shop drawings and structural calcs for the box culvert extension will be required prior to the issuance of a development construction permit. . . " With this project, we propose to extend the box culvert that was designed by Drexel Barrell & Co. The approved plans for this project are dated 01/09/98. To what extent are you requiring structural calculations? Also, can I provide the shop drawings for the box culvert during construction? It seems premature to request that they be provided prior to issuance of the development construction permit. Here is some history on the box culvert section and reinforcement details. I talked with Michael Middleton at Drexel Barrell & Co. prior to my last submittal. During our conversation, I asked Mr. Middleton if we could use the box culvert section and reinforcement information from sheet 18 of 75 of the plans that he stamped and signed. He agreed to allow us to use the section and reinforcement details as long as I was willing to sign off on the design. I agreed. Since we are proposing to extend an existing box culvert with no proposed change in the loading requirements or hydraulics. I felt it was best to use the existing design without proposing modifications. Can I reference the structural calcs that were completed for the box culvert by Drexel Barrell? With regards to comment No. 93: "With the depth of pavement on top of the box culvert extension ..." I am working with Terracon on this matter to update the geotechnical report. Prior to the most recent submittal we revised our design to maximize the cover that we provide over the existing and the extended box culvert section. In fact, our proposed design increases the cover over the existing box culvert section. Sincerely, Herman Feissner, P.E. Associate Engineer Nolte Associates, Inc. Fort Collins, Colorado Direct: (970) 419-1340 Office: (970) 221-2400 FAX: (970) 221-2415 E-mail: herman.feissner@nolte.com Number 86: Comment acknowledged Number 87: Comment acknowledged Number 93: Comment acknowledged. Refer to Terracon's response to this comment (See attached response). Number 91: Comment acknowledged. Number 75: The two (2)-storm sewers that cross Pavilion Lane were revised. The 24" CLIII RCP (i.e., SDA) was replaced with a 19" x 30" HEIII and the 18" CLIII RCP (i.e., SDC) was replaced with a 14" x 23" HEIII. Listed below is the cover over each pipe at the flowline (FL) and edge of pavement (EOP) on the north and south sides of Pavilion Lane: ** All distances are measured to the outside top of pipe. FL EOP SDA-IST-100: 1.38' 1.55' SDA-IST-101: 1.63' 1.80' SDC-IST-102: 1.41' 1.59' SDC-IST-103: 1.54' 1.70' In all cases, at least 18" of cover is provided at the EOP. At the FL, the cover drops below 18" in front of SDA-IST-100 and SDC-IST-102 by 0.12' and 0.09'. Is it necessary to request a variance? Number 77: Comment acknowledged. Signature blocks for both parties have been added to the cover sheet. Number 78: Comment acknowledged. Number 79: The note on sheet EX01 was revised. The note reads Existing electrical line to be relocated away from reset fire hydrant (BY CITY OF FORT COLLINS)". Number 80: Comment acknowledged. The street design along the north side of Pavilion Lane was revised. Number 81: Comment acknowledged. The centerline profile for Pavilion Lane uses the stationing shown in the plan view. Number 83: Comment acknowledged. The construction standards for access ramps/truncated domes were incorporated into the plan set. Number 85: Comment acknowledged. Please refer to the attachment that illustrates the cross -slope at three different locations along the neck -down. The cross -slopes at each cross-section are not excessively steep. Number 88: Yes, we are proposing sidewalk on the north side of Pavilion Lane between the westernmost driveway on the north side of Pavilion Lane and the point where Pavilion Lane expands. Additionally, we are proposing a standard driveway approach for the ditch rider to use to access the ditch road. Number 89: The structural calculations for the box culvert extension are included with this submittal. The shop drawings will be provided prior to the issuance of the development construction permit. Number 90: Comment acknowledged. Refer to sheet FG01 for TOW and BOW elevations. Refer to sheet DT01 for more information about the box culvert and how it ties to the existing irrigation baox culvert. Terracon prepared a response to this comment that addresses the singwall support and soil preparation. (See attached response). Number 92: Comment acknowledged. Number 82: The reinforcement detail for the water quality box outlet structure is shown on sheet DR03 as Standard Plan No. M-604-11: Inlet, Type D. Number 67: Comment acknowledged. Number 69: Comment acknowledged. Refer to sheet DR02 for the retaining wall construction detail. Number 84: Comment acknowledged. See response and/or revised plan from the Landscape Architect. Number 70: Comment acknowledged. The construction plans call for Oakum Chord to be used on the elliptical pipes that are surcharged. Number 76: See response to comment Number 75. Number 72: We moved the storm drain (i.e., SDC) to the west side of the sidewalk along J.F.K. Parkway for a couple of reasons. This move created more distance between the existing fire hydrant and the proposed storm drain, but not a full 10'. The access hole for the proposed storm drain manhole must stay out of the sidewalk; the east side of the sidewalk allowed us to design it that way. There is not room for the manhole on the west side of the sidewalk. The distance between the existing fire hydrant and the proposed storm drain is f6'. Can we use flow fill or some other fill material between the fire hydrant and the storm drain? Can the fire hydrant be moved north on Pavilion Lane until there is 10' of clearance between it and the storm drain? Number 73: Comment acknowledged. See sheet UT01 for revisions. Number 74: Comment acknowledged. The retaining wall on the south side of the proposed detention pond was moved out of the utility easement. NOV-02-2004 TUE 11:25 AN NOLTE ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 9702212415 P. 02 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF DENVER Date: 10/19/2004 ALLER LINGLE ARCHITECTS, SHAUN MOSCRIP 712 WHALERS WAY, SUITE B-100 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for HARMONY CENTRE PUD, GOODWILL PDP, TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 86 Created: 10/15/2004 [10115/04] The City was given a draft copy of the agreement required by the ditch company, A copy of this is provided for the Developer's reference. As advance notice, the City will be assigning much of the responsibilities to the Developer in the development agreement. Number: 87 Created: 10/15/2004 110/15/04] Please provide legal descriptions of the various offsite easements and right-of-way dedications and vacations necessary for the realignment and extension of Pavilion Lane. There may be concerns regarding the information once presented. Actual signatures of the deeds will be required prior to sign off of construction plan mylars. Number:93 ' Created:10/18/2004� 110/18/041 With the depth of pavement on top of the box culvert extension being less than the standard and there perhaps being a cover issue for the storm drain lines crossing Pavilion Lane (of which an alternative design is still needed), the geotechnical report should be revised to include discussion of this, in conjunction with Comment #90. (Final pavement design will again be specified at the time of the pavement design report). Topic: Plat Number: 91 Created: 10/18/2004 [10/16/04] The right-of-way for Pavilion Lane will need to encompass all of the box culvert/wingwall section (along with the 9' utility easement)_ Topic: Utility Plans Number: 75 Created: 10/15/2004 (10/15/041 For the two storm sewers crossing Pavilion Lane, there is insufficient clearance from the top of the pipe to the road surface, which compromises the pavement subgrade. Page 1 NOV-02-2004 TUE 11:25 AM NOLTE ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 9702212415 P. 03 Number: 77 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/04] Add signature blocks for the two shopping centers on both side of Pavilion Lane that are affected by the realigning of Pavilion Lane (FC Timberline? & Pavilion Ltd?) Number. 78 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/041 Remove all indications regarding the pavement section for Pavilion Lane being in accordance with the previously submitted soils report. The pavement section will be per the pavement design report which is required after construction starts. Number; 79 Created: 1011512004 [10115/041 The plan set indicates that an existing electrical line west of the site will be relocated by others. In checking with City Light and Power, they will relocate this line though at the expense of the Developer. Number: 80 Created. 10/15/2004 [10/15/041 The street design for the north side of Pavilion Lane approaching JFK has a considerable transition length to remove the crown, why was this designed? Considering the flowline design is at the minimum .5%, I'm concerned that the roadway will be close to flat for a considerable distance and areas of pond Ing will occur. Number: 81 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/041 The centerline profile for Pavilion Lane uses the stationing along the north flowline instead of the stationing shown on the plan view, Number: 83 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/04] Engineering has adopted construction standards effective immediately for access ramps/truncated domes, a copy of which is attached and should be incorporated into the plan set. An electronic version of this can be emailed if desired. Number: 85 Created; 10/15/2004 [10/15104] Please provide a couple of cross sections at the neckdown where the parking is removed both-atthe points of both the expanded and reduced sections. With the flowline grades remaiiiing.fhe same around the neckdowns, there is a general concern that the cross slope will steepen through the neckdown or the crown of the street will rise abruptly. Number: 88 Created: 10115/2004 [10/15104] Please provide more clarity as to the area on the north side of Pavilion Lane between the westernmost driveway on the north side of Pavilion and the point where Pavilion Lane expands. Is sidewalk being shown here? Number: 89 Created: 10/15/2004 Page 2 NOV-02-2004 TUE 11:25 AN NOLTE ASSOCIATES FAX NO, 9702212415 M [10/15/04] Shop drawings and structural talcs for the box culvert extension will be required prior to the issuance of a development construction permit, Specify on the utility plans that the box culvert design is to comply with 11.5 of LCUASS and specifically note that the box culvert shall be designed for vehicular loadings of HS- 20 or higher. Number: 90 Created: 10/15/2004 [l D/15/04] Please provide more detail regarding the wingwalls in how the grading ties into them, TOW and BOW elevations, etc. The soils report did not appear to address the extention of the box culvert, has there been evaluation as to how deep the wingwalls need to be, thickness, etc? Number: 92 Created: 10/18/2004 [10/18/04] Please see the marked up information in green on the plans, which was reviewed by the Engineering Design section of Engineering. In general more questions and concerns regarding the design of the box culvert extension. Department: 5tormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: Details Number: 82 Created: 10/15/2004 [10/15/041 Please provide a reinTorcement detail for the water quality box outlet structure. Topic: Erosion Control Number: 67 Created: 7/12/2004 [10/121041 Third Review O,-tober 8, 2004 1. Please schedule a short meeting at the Utilities office with Bob Zakely to discuss this plan. [7/12/04] 1, One or more of the previous comments has not been addressed. Please do so. Topic: Grading Plan Number: 69 Created: 10/12/2004 [10/12/041 Please provide a construction detail for the proposed retaining wall in the detention pond. Please keep retaining wall outside of the existing utility easement. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 84 Created: 10/15/2004 [1D/15/04] Please maintain 10 feet of horizontal separation between proposed storm sewer along JFK (Storm Line C) and the street trees shown on landscape plan. Page 3 NOV-02-2004 TUE 11:25 AM NOLTE ASSOCIATES FAX NO, 9702212415 wl m Ravi l;oH Leme FE I elROPO ED CULVERT CONLN E TE B-OX S TA..-- + 7 E ''VI ELEV = 502E A. D. —4.02 K = 31.08 7 1 5.0 1 0��-T -59 87 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fait Collins Current Planning DATE: April 20, 2004 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #6-96N Harmony Centre PUD, Goodwill PDP - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: May 12, 2004 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins NOV-02-2004 TUE 11:26 AN NOLTE ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 9702212415 P. 07 PAvi lron Lune 5 a� �l► � •J I CN O Ln W U m —EXISTING CONCR BOX CULVFF T VI STA = 21 6E PVI_4Lr V 302E- A�D. _ —13.63 K — 3440 -- 1._��.0000L VC NOV-02-2004 TUE 11:26 AN NOLTE ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 9702212415 P. 08 Pax; I i o m LAP%e Cc;,4t-li he f- LY) Ln m I - r-EXIST NG CONCRL\TU aOX CULVERT \ \ PVI STA - 11-1- 79.17 PVI E-LEV 5027.37 A.D. �---3-80 K —. 32.09 125.0000' VC -- — NOV-02-2004 TUE 11:25 AN NOLTE ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 9702212415 P. 05 0 0 1 00 Pavi lioh Lane GA scale: ,"c ZO. ---Proposed Box C�Iver� is+ion9 x Culvert x+ Project Comments Sheet S City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Date: August 31, 2005 Project: HARMONY CENTRE PUD, GOODWILL PDP, TYPE 11 AND FINAL PLANS All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: August 24, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 100 Created: 8/29/2005 [8129/05] On the striping plan for Pavilion Lane please change the right turn stripe at the intersection to a combined right turn and through movement in order to accommodate the alignment with the development of Settler's Creek east of the site. Number: 101 Created: 8/30/2005 [8/30/05] The culvert extension detail should provide bedding material information and compaction requirements in order to know how the culvert will be seated, as was redlined in the previous plan set. This should typically be designed by the geotech engineer. Not knowing the soil conditions underlying the culvert extension, shouldn't a note be added specifying potential overexcavation until suitable soils are found? Number: 102 Created: 8/30/2005 [8/30/05] The box culvert sections AI -Al and B1-B1 on sheet DT04 are not specified anywhere on the actual plan set. Number: 103 Created: 8/30/2005 [8/30/05] The standard CDOT detail M-601-20 included in the plan set does not have actual dimensions specified to be specific to this culvert. Number: 104 Created: 8/31/2005 [8/31/05] Based upon the comments, another formal round of review is not required. However, before mylars can be submitted, paper copies of the plans are needed for verification of the previous items being addressed. i 3! Date / CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat v- Site Drainage Report Other k Utility >� Redline Utility �L Landscape Page I Topic: General Number: 86 Created: 10/15/2004 [8/26/05] Carried over for reference. [10/15/041 The City was given a draft copy of the agreement required by the ditch company. A copy of this is provided for the Developer's reference. As advance notice, the City will be assigning much of the responsibities to the Developer in the development agreement. Number: 98 Created: 8/26/2005 [8/26/05] Thanks for the submittal of the offsite document drafts and legal descriptions. The vacation process of Pavilion Drive will start after completion of the construction of the realigned roadway. Number: 99 Created: 8/29/2005 [8/29/05] Please add to the easement dedication document after the first sentence in the second paragraph that: "it is understood by the undersigned that, by acceptance of this dedication, the City of Fort Collins will not accept the duty of maintenance of such easement." Topic: Utility Plans Number: 88 Created: 10/15/2004 [8/26/05] Please label the sidewalk width being proposed for this section. [10/15/04] Please provide more clarity as to the area on the north side of Pavilion Lane between the westernmost driveway on the north side of Pavilion and the point where Pavilion Lane expands. Is sidewalk being shown here? Page 2 FINAL PLAN REVISION COMMENT Current Planning DATE: July 27, 2005 TO: Technical Services SHEET PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard #6-96P Harmony Center PUD, Goodwill PDP - Final Plans Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: M 1 >00' August 24, 2005 Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems Poblems or Concerns (see below or attached) I •-ov,��A-e_y �- L_0e_A4_ G4.05E. Z. lrrz: r %/v(S D/t/� s Illy-- — /tea/i'� c �gN6c fI S {'9D•ya r_410ncGvC-o�ui�5 Fi�ti 7—ecla LciTS . Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Covina I.Aorilem Project Comments Sheet S City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Transportation Planning Date: May 12, 2004 Project: HARMONY CENTRE PUD, GOODWILL PDP, TYPE II, #6-96N All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: No Review Date Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: David Averill Tor; Construction Plans Pr. 31 Created: 5/11/2004 [6' t' ;oai i here appears to be tree located in the middle of the ramp that leads from the sidwalk fronting on JFK to the "plaza" area of the proposed building entrance. See landscape plan for redline. Number: 32 Created: 5111 /2004 15/11/041 Please provide a sidewalk access ramp aligned to cross JFK to the NE at the northernmost point of this proposed development. This will facilitate a pedestrian crossing of JFK to those parcels east of JFK that are currently vac:a; Number: 38 Created: 5/11 /2004 [5111104] A 4' detached walk will need to be constructed along the edge of the "open space" at the western end of the property. This walk needs to include a sidewalk ramp for pedestrians to access the main walkway that currently exists to the west of King Soopers. Topic: General Number: 41 Created: 5/12/2004 [51121041 Transportation Planning requests that this development build a sidewalk along the southern edge of the parcel. This drive aisle does not currenUy have a continuous sidewalk on either its north or south side. A sidewalk on the southern edge of this project would provide a more safe and direct route for pedestrians who wish to reach the main walkway to the west of King Soopers from JFK. IF constructed this sidewalk should also have an access ramp to provide a crossing to the front (west) of King Soopers. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Project Comments Sheet City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Date: May 14, 2004 Project: HARMONY CENTRE PUD, GOODWILL PDP, TYPE II, #6-96N Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 28 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/04] Please show 150' of existing Pavilion Lane west of the new section of roadway on the plan and profile view of the construction plan set. Indicate what the existing tangents/horizontal curves are that the plans tie into as well as the existing flowline profiles. Number: 29 Created: 5/11/2004 [5111104] Show concrete to the right-of-way line for all new driveways. Number: 30 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/04] Provided the existing Pavilion Lane is shown as commented in #28 and widened as commented in #53, the level of detail required for this project (prior to a hearing) is considered satisfactory. After a public hearing the following items will need to be addressed: - A profile for the centerline of Pavilion Lane is needed. - Because centerline stationing was not used, please provide cross -sections of the roadway at the start and end point of all horizontal curves. - Label additional existing and proposed elevations of Pavilion out to JFK as redlined (and as specified in Figure 7-27 of LCUASS). - The southern flowline profile has a grade break just outside of the curb return and exceeds .4%, which is not allowed in LCUASS 7.4.1.6.3. - The length of the sag vertical curve on the south flowline profile appears to be counterintuitive with the coinciding vertical curve on the north flowline profile. With the south vertical curve being on the outside of the horizontal curve, shouldn't this length of vertical curve be longer? (In general the vertical design will be reviewed in greater detail after hearing when the additional information is provided). Number: 33 Created: 5/11/2004 [5111/04] Replace "Director of Engineering" with "City Engineer" in the utility plan approval block. Add'Traffic Engineer" to the approval block. Number: 54 Created: 5/14/2004 [5/14/04] Please add a signing and striping plan sheet for bikelane delineation. (The City will stripe bikelanes out to College Avenue west of the proposed Pavilion Lane extension). Topic: General Number: 11 Created: 5/10/2004 [5/10/04] Prior to any agreement towards Current Planning's scheduling of a public hearing for the project, letters of intent are required to be obtained from all the owners affected by the Pavilion Lane road alignment. This includes Larimer County Canal Ditch No. 2 and FC Timberline Development LLC for the odd shaped parcel southwest of the current cul-de-sac. a n the property owne s) directly south and directly west consisting of shopping enters -.v c Sig utare Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat ✓ Site Drainage Report Other ✓Utility —� Redline Utility `Landscape Page I need to provide letters of intent. The parcel map information shows multiple ownerships for both of these shopping centers. The property owner(s) to the south will also need to express no objection for the driveway connection onto the private drive which is on their property. Number: 12 Created: 5/10/2004 15/10/041 With the area of land on the north side of Pavilion lane remaining as undeveloped, Engineering sees benefit in not construction the sidewalk running parallel on the north side of Pavilion Lane (as well as any placement of street tress, which isn't shown as proposed at this time). This may prevent future utility installation conflicts along this area in the future. Number: 13 Created: 5/10/2004 [5/10/041 Please use one consistent title for the project on all documents, including the plat. (Do not add "PDP", "FOP" or any other suffix to the title). Number: 16 Created: 5/10/2004 [5/10/04] From a process standpoint, it is preferred if the excess right-of-way is vacated after the new road is constructed, not before. In this manner, a legal description of the right-of-way vacation is required at time of final compliance with recordation fees collected at the time the right-of-way vacation goes to City Council (again after the road has been constructed). If the applicant wishes to have the right-of-way vacated prior to the extension of Pavilion Lane, an access easement will need to be retained at that time and subsequently vacated after the road is constructed. The offsite right-of-way required to be dedicated for the road to be built must be received at the time of final compliance. Number: 25 Created: 5/11/2004 15/11/041 Just a comment - the parkway strip between the sidewalk and curb on Pavilion Lane is shown at 13', this is greater (twice the amount) than what our standards require, but can remain if desired by the applicant. (See Comment #53, which results in the parkway reduced and roadway widened, but the right-of-way remains the same). Number: 26 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/04) All the radii for the driveways out to Pavilion Lane are required to be a maximum of 16 in accordance with LCUASS 8.2.9. The plans specify 25' radii in some locations. Number: 27 Created: 5/11/2004 [51111041 Where the sidewalk is attached along Pavilion lane, it is required to be widened an additional foot from the detached portion, provided Transportation Planning is comfortable with attaching the sidewalk. Number. 34 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/041 With the undeveloped property to the north likely having to take driveway access to Pavilion Lane directly across the street from this project to meet driveway separation requirements, wouldn't it be beneficial to build the driveway cut at this time? Future development of the northern parcel will likely have to pay for street cut penalty fees in constructing the driveway at that time. Number: 53 Created: 5/14/2004 (5114/041 The street width of Pavilion Lane proposed needs to be widened to our standard commercial local street cross section of a 50' roadway width within 72' of right-of-way. This widening should occur past the driveway that connects to Pavilion through the current cultJe-sac as redlined. It is suggested that the widening occurs somewhat abruptly to clearly define the parking areas created by the widening (as reclined). Topic: Landscaping Number: 24 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/04] Correct the scale on the landscaping plan. Topic: Plat Number: 14 Created: 5/10/2004 15/10104] The plat language has some outdated language in sections. Please update to the latest version as attached. This language can be emailed if desired. Number. 15 Created: 5/10/2004 [5/10/041 Please indicate on the plat the right-of-way to be vacated and dedicated, both onsite and offsite, in order to accommodate the extension of Pavilion Lane. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Goodwill Industries of Denver Date: May 17, 2004 L . o.:r. C/o Mr. Shaun Moscrip Aller — Lingle Architects 712 Whalers Way, Suite B-100 �t-;o � Fort Collins, CO 80525 rF_� �e>._ Staff has reviewed your submittal for HARMONY CENTRE PUD, GOODWILL PDP, TYPE II, #6-96N, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Engineering Topic: Construction Plans Issue Contact: Marc Virata Number: 28 Created: 5/11 /2004 [5/11/04] Please show 150' of existing Pavilion Lane west of the new section of roadway on the plan and profile view of the construction plan set. Indicate what the existing tangents/horizontal curves are that the plans tie into as well as the existing flowline profiles. We added approximately 80 In. ft. of existing Pavilion Lane information. This information represents the limits of the survey information that we have available to us. Refer to Sheet RD01 for the existing tangents/horizontal curves and the existing flowline profiles. Number: 29 Created: 5/11 /2004 [5/11/04] Show concrete to the right-of-way line for all new driveways. t Done. Number: 30 Created: 5/11 /2004 [5/11/04] Provided the existing Pavilion Lane is shown as commented in #28 and widened as commented in #53, the level of detail required for this project (prior to a hearing) is considered satisfactory. After a public hearing the following items will need to be addressed: - A profile for the centerline of Pavilion Lane is needed. - Because centerline stationing was not used, please provide cross -sections of the roadway at the start and end point of all horizontal curves. - Label additional existing and proposed elevations of Pavilion out to JFK as redlined (and as specified in Figure 7-27 of LCUASS). - The southern flowline profile has a grade break just outside of the curb return and exceeds .4%, which is not allowed in LCUASS 7.4.1.B.3. - The length of the sag vertical curve on the south flowline profile appears to be counterintuitive with the coinciding vertical curve on the north flowline profile. With the south vertical curve being on the outside of the horizontal curve, shouldn't this length of vertical curve be longer? (In general the vertical design will be reviewed in greater detail after hearing when the additional information is provided). Page 1 Comment acknowledged. Is it necessary to provide a centerline profile? We provided flowline profiles for the north and south flowlines of Pavilion Lane and will provide cross -sections of the roadway at the start and end point of all horizontal curves. Number: 33 Created: 5/11 /2004 [5/11/04] Replace "Director of Engineering" with "City Engineer" in the utility plan approval block. Add "Traffic Engineer" to the approval block. Done. Number: 54 Created: 5/14/2004 [5/14/04] Please add a signing and striping plan sheet for bikelane delineation. (The City will stripe bikelanes out to College Avenue west of the proposed Pavilion Lane extension). Comment acknowledged. The Signing and Striping Plan will be included with the final design documents. Topic: General Number: 11 Created: 5/10/2004 [5/10/04] Prior to any agreement towards Current Planning's scheduling of a public hearing for the project, letters of intent are required to be obtained from all the owners affected by the Pavilion Lane road alignment. This includes Larimer County Canal Ditch No. 2 and FC Timberline Development LLC for the odd shaped parcel southwest of the current cul-de-sac. In addition the property owner(s) directly south and directly west consisting of shopping centers need to provide letters of intent. The parcel map information shows multiple ownership for both of these shopping centers. The property owner(s) to the south will also need to express no objection for the driveway connection onto the private drive which is on their property. Signed Letters of Intent are being obtained from FC Timberline Development LLC, GS Pavilion Development LLC, and Larimer County No. 2 Ditch concerning the new Pavilion Lane align and extension to JFK Parkway as well as the new access to the King Soopers service drive. These letters will be submitted prior to the Public Hearing. Number: 12 Created: 5/10/2004 [5/10/04] With the area of land on the north side of Pavilion Lane remaining as undeveloped, Engineering sees benefit in not construction the sidewalk running parallel on the north side of Pavilion Lane (as well as any placement of street trees, which isn't shown as proposed at this time). This may prevent future utility installation conflicts along this area in the future. The sidewalk along the north side of Pavilion Lane is not being installed with this development. Number: 13 Created: 5/10/2004 [5/10/04] Please use one consistent title for the project on all documents, including the plat. (Do not add "PDP", "FDP" or any other suffix to the title). Page 2 The title for all parts of the project have been coordinated to read: Goodwill Industries of Denver JFK Parkway Fort Collins, Colorado Number: 16 Created: 5/10/2004 [5/10/04] From a process standpoint, it is preferred if the excess right-of-way is vacated after the new road is constructed, not before. In this manner, a legal description of the right-of-way vacation is required at time of final compliance with recordation fees collected at the time the right-of-way vacation goes to City Council (again after the road has been constructed). If the applicant wishes to have the right-of-way vacated prior to the extension of Pavilion Lane, an access easement will need to be retained at that time and subsequently vacated after the road is constructed. The offsite right-of-way required to be dedicated for the road to be built must be received at the time of final compliance. The excess right-of-way will be vacated after the new road is constructed. Number: 25 Created: 5/11/2004 (5/11/04] Just a comment - the parkway strip between the sidewalk and curb on Pavilion Lane is shown at 13', this is greater (twice the amount) than what our standards require, but can remain if desired by the applicant. (See Comment #53, which results in the parkway reduced and roadway widened, but the right-of-way remains the same). Comment acknowledged. Number: 26 Created: 5/11/2004 (5/11/04] All the radii for the driveways out to Pavilion Lane are required to be a maximum of 15' in accordance with LCUASS 8.2.9. The plans specify 25' radii in some locations. All radii were revised to 15'. Number: 27 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/04] Where the sidewalk is attached along Pavilion Lane, it is required to be widened an additional foot from the detached portion, provided Transportation Planning is comfortable with attaching the sidewalk. The sidewalk has not been widened by one (1) foot. The proposed walk was designed to match the width of the existing sidewalk. Number: 34 Created: 5/11/2004 [5/11/04] With the undeveloped property to the north likely having to take driveway access to Pavilion Lane directly across the street from this project to meet driveway separation requirements, wouldn't it be beneficial to build the driveway cut at this time? Future development of the northern parcel will likely have to pay for street cut penalty fees in constructing the driveway at that time. The driveway cut for the undeveloped property to the north has been included in this project. Page 3