The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTHUNDERBIRD ESTATES SIXTH DRAKE SHOPS - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2006-11-15City of Fort Collins Current Planning PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 30, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard f j #25-03B Sinclair Redevelopment, College & Drake, The Drake Shops PDP — Type I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: December 21, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference f i"o Problems ❑ Problems or Concems (see below or attached) MoL�-T— I-Z-(Za/o Name (ple4e print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape FINAL PLAN IINLKA401 COMMENT SHEET Citvof Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: February 22, 2006 TO: Engineering PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard #25-03C Sinclair Redevelopment, College and Drake, The Drake Shops Final Plans Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: March 22, 2006 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or concerns (see below or attached) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: October 7, 2005 TO: Engineering PROJECT COMMENT SHEET PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard #25-03A Sinclair Redevelopment, College & Drake Modification of Standard — Type I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: November 2, 2005 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No�Problems —� Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: October 18, 2005 Project: SINCLAIR REDEVELOPMENT, COLLEGE & DRAKE, MODIFICATION OF STANDARD-TYPEI All comments must be received by Tara Leman in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: November 02, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 2 Created: 10/18/2005 [10/18/051 The modification request is denied for the following reason... Parking setbacks must be in accordance with figure 19-6 of the LCUASS as first stated in Conceptual Review. The minimum offstreet parking setback as measured from the flowline of Drake to the closest parking spot is 50', 75' or 100' depending on the Adjusted Daily Trips as determined by a Traffic Study. The layout currently shown does not meet even the most minimum setback required in our standards. A TIS would be required before the actual setback distance can be determined and any variance request would need to be formally submitted by a licensed professional engineer in accordance with 1.9.4 of the LCUASS. The PE would have to show that the public's health and safety is not compromised by the proposed shortened setback distance as requested in the variance. Engineering would review and consider the variance but it is doubtful that a reduced setback would be approved due to the higher speeds and traffic volumes in the area. With that said, it is doubtful that Engineering would support either the variance request or the modification request and the proposed layout would need to be adjusted accordingly. (q /' Date l L CHECK HERE -It YOU"NVISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Cit., of ivrt Collins :,arrert P'l-nninc PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 30, 2005 TO: Enb veering Pavement PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard #25-03B Sinclair Redevelopment, College & Drake, The Drake Shops PDP — Type I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: December 21, 2005 Note - ❑ No Problems �] Problems or Concems (see below or attached) J,% {ram r-e v4&3 ?v 2v05: _Z7.6 7& ;y Cr ,mall NeeJ 4o 6c M:ite;I cf.�,l Name— (pleaseunt) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape i . X l Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Date: December 27, 2005 Project: SINCLAIR REDEVELOPMENT, COLLEGE & DRAKE, THE DRAKE SHOPS PDP-TYPEI Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 19 Created: 12/23/2005 [12123/05] The demo plan specifies a private light to be removed which is east of a traffic control box, this is not the case and needs to remain as it is part of the photo radar system. Number: 20 Created: 12/23/2005 [12/23/05] The demo plan does not indicate the existing photo radar light/camera south of the previously mentioned light. Number: 21 Created: 12/23/2005 [12123/05] The demo plan does not accurately show the location of the overhead electric tower along Drake Road. It appears on the drawing to be situated in the middle of the sidewalk but is located further north. This should be revised on all the drawings to make it more evident that the pedestrian sidewalk path along Drake Road is not as compromised as it appears. Number: 25 Created: 12/27/2005 [12/27/05] The horizontal control plan species curb return radii of 13' for the driveway out to Drake Road. Per LCUASS standards, 20' is required. We may entertain a radii smaller than standards, but further follow up is needed. Number: 26 Created: 12/27/2005 [12/27/05] In checking with the City's Pavement Management Engineer, a mill and inlay will need to be specified for the entire south side of Drake Road from the patch shown for the utilities to the east edge of the driveway approach. If the curb can be removed for the driveway approach without disturbing the pavement, the mill and inlay section can limited to the utility connections, however the entire street width on the south side of Drake needs to be shown. _ � ,nature Z7 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat 1 Site Drainage Report Other i Utility 1 Redline Utility v Landscape Page I Number: 27 Created: 12/27/2005 [12/27/051 For the north side of Drake Road, the mill and inlay needs to be shown as one rectangle without the jog currently shown per our street repair standards. Number: 28 Created: 12/27/2005 [12/27/05] The street repair on College Avenue should be expanded to half the lane width. Number: 29 Created: 12/27/2005 [12/27/051 Provide a second City of Fort Collins vertical control benchmark on the construction drawings. Number: 30 Created: 12/27/2005 (12/271051 We will need a legal description of the emergency access easement shown on site after hearing for evaluation prior to obtaining a deed of dedication for the easement. Topic: General Number: 23 Created: 12/27/2005 [12/27/05] The development is not providing for a 15' utility easement behind the right-of- way on both Drake and College as is typically required per City standards. The applicant will need to provide information from all the utilities indicating that they have no objection to not providing the utility easement corridors. Number: 24 Created: 12✓27/2005 [12/27/05] Should a utility easement be required [related to the previous ID23] private lines such as the roof drain shown on the north side of the building cannot be located within the easement. Topic: Landscape Number: 22 2005 27/ Created: 12/ [12/27/051 The landscaping plan specifies for 2 northem red oaks 7/ planted within existing tree pit areas along College Avenue. In seeing how the mature trunk can reach 3 feet in width, I have some concerns regarding the obstruction this causes for pedestrians. If trees must be located here without any additional sidewalk widening, can a different tree be specified with a more limited trunk width to create less of a pinch point along this pedestrian corridor? Does the pagoda tree and crabapple tree specify requirements such that the northern red oaks can be eliminated? Page 2 REVISION COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: January 18, 2006 TO: Engineering PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard #25-03B Sinclair Redevelopment, College & Drake, The Drake Shops PDP — Type I SECOND ROUND OF REVIEW Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: February 1, 2006 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: February 1, 2006 Project: SINCLAIR REDEVELOPMENT, COLLEGE & DRAKE, THE DRAKE SHOPS PDP-TYPEI All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: February 01, 2006 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 25 Created: 12127/2005 [1/31/061 The variance request to reduce the curb return radii will need to be stamped but is otherwise acceptable. [12/27/051 The horizontal control plan species curb return radii of 13' for the driveway out to Drake Road. Per LCUASS standards, 20' is required. We may entertain a smaller radii than standards, but further follow up is needed. Number: 30 Created: 12/27/2005 (1/31/06] Carried over for reference. [12/27/05] We will need a legal description of the emergency access easement shown on site after hearing for evaluation prior to obtaining a deed of dedication for the easement. Topic: General Number: 23 Created: 12/27/2005 [1/31/06] The applicant provided a variance request which is required to be stamped. The justification included the pertinent utility providers except Qwest, which will need to be verified prior to sign off on the variance request. [12/27/051 The development is not providing for a 15' utility easement behind the right-of- way on both Drake and College as is typically required per City standards. The applicant will need to provide information from all the utilities indicating that they have no objection to not providing the utility easement corridors. Number: 24 Created: 12/27/2005 Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 [1/31/06) Carried over for reference pending ok from Qwest in not providing the full 15' utility easement. [12/27/05] Should a utility easement be required [related to the previous ID23] private lines such as the roof drain shown on the north side of the building cannot be located within the easement. Page 2 F, Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Date: February 7, 2006 Project: SINCLAIR REDEVELOPMENT, COLLEGE & DRAKE, THE DRAKE SHOPS PDP-TYPEI Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 25 Created: 12/27/2005 [1/31/06] The variance request to reduce the curb return radii will need to be stamped but is otherwise acceptable. [12/27/05] The horizontal control plan species curb return radii of 13' for the driveway out to Drake Road. Per LCUASS standards, 20' is required. We may entertain a smaller radii than standards, but further follow up is needed. Number: 30 Created: 12/27/2005 (1/31/06] Carried over for reference. [12/27/051 We will need a legal description of the emergency access easement shown on site after hearing for evaluation prior to obtaining a deed of dedication for the easement. Topic: General Number: 23 Created: 12/27/2005 [1/31/061 The applicant provided a variance request which is required to be stamped. The justification included the pertinent utility providers except Qwest, which will need to be verified prior to sign off on the variance request. [12/27/05] The development is not providing for a 15' utility easement behind the right-of- way on both Drake and College as is typically required per City standards. The applicant will need to provide information from all the utilities indicating that they have no objection to not providing the utility easement corridors. Number: 24 Created: 12/27/2005 (1/31/06] Carried over for reference pending ok from Qwest in not providing the full 15' utility easement. [12127/051 Should a utility easement be required [related to the previous ID23] private lines such as the roof drain shown on the north side of the building cannot be located within the easement. z 7 /05— Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat 1e Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility _ Landscape Page 1 Project Comments Sheet Qz= Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: February 7, 2006 Project: SINCLAIR REDEVELOPMENT, COLLEGE & DRAKE, THE DRAKE SHOPS PDP-TYPEI Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 25 Created: 12/27/2005 [1/31/06] The variance request to reduce the curb return radii will need to be stamped but is otherwise acceptable. [12/271051 The horizontal control plan species curb return radii of 13' for the driveway out to Drake Road. Per LCUASS standards, 20' is required. We may entertain a smaller radii than standards, but further follow up is needed. Number. 30 Created: 12/27/2005 [1/31/06] Carried over for reference. [12/27/05] We will need a legal description of the emergency access easement shown on site after hearing for evaluation prior to obtaining a deed of dedication for the easement. Topic: General Number: 23 Created: 12/27/2005 [1/31/061 The applicant provided a variance request which is required to be stamped. The justification included the pertinent utility providers except Qwest, which will need to be verified prior to sign off on the variance request. [12/27/05] The development is not providing for a 15' utility easement behind the right-of- way on both Drake and College as is typically required per City standards. The applicant will need to provide information from all the utilities indicating that they have no objection to not providing the utility easement corridors. Number: 24 Created: 1212712005 [1131/06] Carried over for reference pending ok from Qwest in not providing the full 15' utility easement. [12/27/05] Should a utility easement be required [related to the previous ID23] private lines such as the roof drain shown on the north side of the building cannot be located within the easement. 2 -7 oS Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility _ Landscape Page 1