Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLEMAY AVENUE ESTATES - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2006-08-16PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: October 20, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #37-04 Lemay Avenue Estates PDP — Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: nn VV November 10, 2004 Note -PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference �, PJdvtN27N-rZY rr, LEG/It- i Cn:,£ 'i -- lic�SS C1 T j rl� Su r i 1 'r CUc.LiiQ: Sr1n1. ci�d n� 3 i 1 TO 31 L Az A-c3cI- Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS � lat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins .0� FINAL PLAN COMMENT SHEET Citvof Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: June 29, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #37-04B Lemay Avenue Estates PDP, Final Plans All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: July 27, 2005 Note -Please identify your redlines for future reference MJ o Problems ` ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1 Bou�r�r�2Y LEfzAC CLO5k . J iZ wa t( Name (pl ase print) 7 CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Citv of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: July 13, 2005 Project: RIGDEN FARM, 12TH FILING, THE COLONY PDP, TYPE I All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: July 13, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 11 Created: 4/5/2005 [7/12/05] This does not appear to have been addressed, as the curb return radii for the Kansas/Custer intersection is not indicated. [4/5/05] Please indicate the curb return radii for the street intersections and driveway intersections with streets on the construction plan set. Number: 27 Created: 4/5/2005 [7/13105] The existing grade was not indicated on the plans. [4/5/05] On sheet 7 of the construction plans, please show more of the existing centerline (and label the grade) along Kansas Drive south of the site to verify how the preliminary design ties into the existing roadway. Topic: General Number: 12 Created: 4/5/2005 [7112/05] The response letter indicates this was resolved. A revised variance request was not received and is required. [4/5/05] The variance request letter attempts to justify the variance for the alignment offset on Kansas partially based upon a rationale that the geometry of a non -offset Kansas Drive alignment creates a hardship in developing the property and that meeting City criteria for horizontal alignment would make the parcel practically undevelopable. I cannot agree with this rationale. The particular product type proposed by the development may make meeting design criteria difficult, but a different product type could allow for the road to connect without an offset. The previous development proposal on the project (Posto Bella), in fact, met City requirements and did not result in an offset in the design of Kansas Drive. Defining a situation as hardship cannot be used if only for one specific product type. While the City's Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 aProject Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: July 29, 2005 Project: LEMAY AVENUE ESTATES PDP AND FINAL PLANS All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: July 27, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plan Number: 19 Created: 11/5/2004 [7/26/05] The overhead electric doesn't appear on the plans anymore. [2115/05] The note on the plans is not clear as to where are the limits of undergrounding of the overhead electric. [11/51041 There needs to be an indication on the plans that the overhead line adjacent to the site is to be undergrounded with the development. In addition, the work on Lemay south of the site will cause additional sections of line to be undergrounded. Please indicate on the construction plans where the undergrounding in proposed to begin. Number: 22 Created: 11/5/2004 [7126/05] What was the outcome regarding this? Will a perimeter drain system be used and if so how will the systems outfall, or will a subdrain system be designed? If a subdrain system is proposed, the plans need to reflect the design. [2/15/05] The response indicated that the necessity of a subdrain system is to be addressed at final engineering. This is of concern, as if a subdrain system is to be proposed, without a preliminary design at this time, it cannot be verified that a suitable outfall for the subdrain can be designed without perhaps needing to daylight onto property outside of this development (when a letter if intent would be required prior to going to a hearing) or needing to redesign the site after the hearing. The question of a subdrain system needs to be resolved prior to a hearing. [11/5/04] The soils report mentions a perimeter drain system, will an actual subdrain system be proposed by the development? A groundwater report may be required. Number: 84 Created: 7/26/2005 [7/26/05] Per previous discussions after hearing, the following horizontal alignment is required for the northbound Lemay jvefiue right-of-way adjacent to the site: Signature Q k /a 5- Date DECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS 1 Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ �— Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page I At the Mountain Home Drive intersection from the centerline of the street (where a left turn lane exists): - .5' of additional median to the 6' median on the other side of the street for a total median width of 6.5'. - 12' turn lane - 12' travel lane - 12' travel lane - 6' bike lane - 9' parkway - 6' sidewalk Total = 57.5' (half ROW) Past the intersection from the centerline of the street (where no left turn lane exists, median only): - 9.5' of additional median to the 6' median on the other side of the street for a total median width of 15.5' - 12.5' travel lane - 12.5' travel lane - 8' bike lane - 19' parkway - 6' sidewalk Total = 57.5' (half ROW) Number: 85 Created: 7/26/2005 [7/26/051 On Lemay Avenue, the northbound bikelane that currently starts north of Mountain Home Drive shall be striped down to the southern boundary of the site along the curb and gutter. Number: 86 Created: 7/26/2005 (7/26/05] On Lemay Avenue per my conversation with the City Traffic Engineer, the 30:1 tapers shown should be changed to 40:1 tapers. Number:87 — Created: 7/26/2005 [7/26/05] The southbound Lemay design merge should "reverse", the right lane should merge into the left lane. Number: 88 Created: 7/26/2005 [7/26/05] In general the Lemay Avenue design is lacking in vertical information (however the onsite design appears good and complete). 1000' of offsite design per LCUASS standards is also required. Number: 89 Created: 7/29/2005 [7/29/051 Ensure that intersection information is updated on Mountain Home Drive and Lemay Avenue. Number: 91 Created: 7/29/2005 [7/29/05] Please provide detail information on the cul-de-sacs (spot elevations, flow arrows, high points, grades, etc.) per LCUASS detail 7-19. Number: 92 Created: 7/29/2005 Page 2 [7129/05] Please provide detail information at the two street turn intersections (Honholtz & Showline), (Showline & Woods Landing) in order to verify how cross slopes and drainage works. Number: 97 Created: 7/29/2005 [7/29/05] Please provide additional spot elevations at the t-intersections as redlined in the plans for verification of street design. The intersection design details in general look good. Topic: General Number: 18 Created: 11/5/2004 [7/26/051 Carried over as reference. [2/15/05] The response indicated that a letter of acknowledgement of the driveway reconfiguration from the property owner will occur once agreement is made on the plan set (approval?) The letter of acknowledgement will be required prior to any City approval on the engineering plans. [11/51041 In general, it appears that there is sufficient right-of-way south of the site in order to allow for the work along Lemay Avenue. However, we'll need to get evidence from the property owners south of here that they are aware of their driveway configurations being changed by the project. (The construction plans need to show the newly configured driveways with the road improvements and grading to demonstrate that off -site easements are not necessary. Number: 20 Created: 11/5/2004 [7/26/05] Carried over for reference. [2/15/05] Carried over for reference, as it appears the utilities have not been contacted thus far. It is suggested that this issue be verified earlier than prior to construction as it may result (worse case scenario) in having to modify plans that were previously approved. [11/5/04] The utility companies will all need to allow the fencing, columns, and planters which are proposed within the utility easement along Lemay Avenue. Number: 83 Created: 7/26/2005 [7/261051 The sidewalk along Mountain Home Drive within Tracts A & B needs to be in access easement where it falls outside of right-of-way as specified on the site plan. The access easement will -also need to be described in a manner in which the access easement is only for a height of 10' where it lies within the arbors. Topic: Soils Report Number: 14 Created: 11/5/2004 [7/261051 The original soils report was submitted with the final plan. Per the original comment, the potential need for a street drain system needs to be addressed. [2/15/05] The response letter indicates this is to be addressed at the time of final engineering. This is sufficient, comment is carried over for reference. [11/5/04] The soils report will need to address whether street drain systems are recommended as was done in the Stanton Creek subdivision directly north. The general area has high swelling soils and fly ash was used with the recent work on Lemay Avenue. Page 3 FINAL PLAN REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: October 31, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt #37-0413 Lemay Avenue Estates PDP Final Plans Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: November 23, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1 � ?�r�� S ,r/r,q'tj tea,✓ i-Z.! G`r ` W� �///�Li�v� Y.� Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape f Ewa ^4.'t. Project Comments Sheet City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: November 18, 2005 Project: LEMAY AVENUE ESTATES PDP AND FINAL PLANS All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: November 23, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plan Number: 91 Created: 7/29/2005 [11/18/051 The cul-de-sac grading detail appears to specify high points at the center of the cul-de-sac which is not consistent with LCUASS detail 7-19. In addition there are cross slopes in excess of 3% being shown, also not in conformance with 7-19. [7/29/051 Please provide detail information on the cul-de-sacs (spot elevations, flow arrows, high points, grades, etc.) per LCUASS detail 7-19. Topic: General Number: 20 Created: 11/5/2004 [11/18/05] Letter were provided from Xcel and City Electric posing no objection however these are also required from Comcast and Qwest as they could theoretically use this easement. [7/26105] Carried over for reference. [2/15/05] Carried over for reference, as it appears the utilities have not been contacted thus far. It is suggested that this issue be verified earlier than prior to construction as it may result (worse case scenario) in having to modify plans that were previously approved. (11/5/04] The utility companies will all need to allow the fencing, columns, and planters which are proposed within the utility easement along Lemay Avenue. Number: 105 Created: 11/18/2005 [11/18/05] The following comment has been raised by our Pavement Management Engineer: Comments on EEC's Subsurface Exploration Report Dated 9-15-05 Given the high in -situ moisture content in the samples used for the swell consolidation tests and as stated in the report the potential for the mixing of claystone bedrock material during the utility installation I SiRtfature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page I believe the swells in the subgrade soils that we place the pavement on will be higher then indicated the swell tests in this report. I have concerns that moisture treating and flyash treatment alone may not be adequate to avoid future failures of the pavement in this subdivision. At the least we will need to conduct some additional testing to make sure the flyash treatment will adequately reduce the swell to below 2% in the areas were the tests show the highest swells. This could be accomplished by sampling the soils in highest swell areas treating the soil with different partitions of flyash and rerunning the swell consolidation tests. After looking at the streets in the adjacent development to the south of this subdivision it would appear that streets that were treated with flyash and subdrians were added seem to be holding up better then the streets with flyash treatment only. I believe we should consider using flyash and subdrians to mitigate the high swell of the soils in this development. Number: 106 Created: 11/18/2005 (11 /18/05] The amount of vertical information shown for Lemay was apparently limited to the two spot elevations on the intersection detail, which at least matches the elevations shown on the Lemay construction plan set. I've checked with the Lemay design engineer and he is fine with providing the plan and profile sheets adjacent to the site for inclusion as reference in the plan set. I believe this information should be included to at least provide a reference point and show that in theory the grades will match between the road plans and this design. Page 2 A Project Comments Sheet IjAO:ft �" Selected Departments City of Fort Gallins Department: Engineering Date: November 15, 2004 Project: LEMAY AVENUE ESTATES PDP - TYPE I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: November 10, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plan Number: 32 Created: 11/5/2004 [11/5/04] Existing grading needs to be shown surrounding the property to see how everything ties in. With the information currently being shown, a swale is created along the southern boundary that appears to remain all on -site, but with Stanton Creek to the north, I'm concerned that drainage, grading, construction, and/or slope easements will be needed. Number: 33 to Created: 11 /5/2004 [11/5104] Is it the intention notAhow the water and sewer service lines into each lot until after a hearing in conjunction with a final plan? My preference would be to see these now, but would defer to FCLWD/SFCSD. Number: 34 Created: 11/5/2004 [11/5/04] The street design plans, including Lemay Avenue need flowline line and curve data in order to analyze the design proposal. Number: 35 Created: 11 /5/2004 [11/5/04] The right-of-way for the internal streets being 53' applies to a local street when driveover curb is being used. I do not see any labeling confirming driveover curb is proposed, please confirm (Note that the cross section on Sheet R14 appears to imply vertical curb. If vertical curb is desired, driveways should perhaps be shown so they are built in conjunction with the construction of the curb and gutter.) Number: 40 Created: 11 /5/2004 [11/5/04] Provide a signing and striping plan for Lemay Avenue (separate from the plan and profile). // /s Date C CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ✓ Plat ✓' Site Drainage Report Other- 7 Utility Redline Utility ✓Landscape Page 1 Number: 41 Created: 11 /512004 [11/5/041 Was it indicated that the profiles on the street design were for the centerline? Topic: General Number: 13 Created: 11/5/2004 [11/5104] Please indicate the existing platted boundaries across Lemay on all documents in order to ascertain how Rawah Lane lines -up with the property across the street. Number: 15 Created: 11/512004 [1115/04] Coordinate the intended sidewalk design for Rawah Lane as it approaches Lemay Avenue. The utility plan does not correspond with the other plan sets in this regard. The site plan, which shows the meandering walk and bridges, if this is the intention, I'd also like to see the grading information to correspond with this. Number: 16 Created: 11/512004 [11/5/041 The width of Rawah Lane being 30' is perhaps not as ideal with it intersecting onto Lemay Avenue because of Lemay's high speed and volumes. Rawah Lane should transition to 36' from its intersection with Showline Road as this will allow 3 12, lanes to fit at the intersection, which in turn would create more room to allow in, left out, and right out operations for the residents. Number: 17 Created: 11/5/2004 [11/5/04] At the southern boundary of the site there appears to be an existing driveway who is using the driveway and are there any rights associated with its use? Number: 18 Created: 11/5/2004 [11/5/04] In general, it appears that there is sufficient right-of-way south of the site in order to allow for the work along Lemay Avenue. However, we'll need to get evidence from the property owners south of here that they are aware of their driveway configurations being changed by the project. (The construction plans need to show the newly configured driveways with the road improvements and grading to demonstrate that off -site easements are not necessary.) Number: 19 Created: 11 /512004 [11/5/04] There needs to be an indication on the plans that the overhead line adjacent to the site is to be undergrounded with the development. In addition, the work on Lemay south of the site will cause additional sections of line to be undergrounded. Please indicate on the construction plans where the undergrounding in proposed to begin. Number: 20 Created: 11/5/2004 111/5/04] The utility companies will all need to allow the fencing, columns, and planters which are proposed within the utility easement along Lemay Avenue. Number: 21 Created: 11 /512004 111/5/041 The utility easement on Lemay Avenue is required to be 15' not 9' as Lemay Avenue is classified as an arterial street. Number: 22 Created: 11 /5/2004 111/5/04] The soils report mentions a perimeter drain system, will an actual subdrain system be proposed by the development? A groundwater report may be required. Page 2 Number: 23 Created: 11/5/2004 [11/6/04] Please show the standard access ramps along Lemay Avenue across Rawah Drive. Number: 36 Created: 11/5/2004 [11/5/04] Wouldn't a pedestrian connection be worth looking into between lots 1 and 32 to tie the internal development to the sidewalk on Lemay Avenue? It would appear to allow a more direct connection for many in the neighborhood to get to Fossil Creek Community Park who would otherwise have to back track along the public street network. Number: 37 Created: 11/5/2004 111/5/04] A letter of intent is required from SFCSD with their existing easement within the proposed platted boundary. (They need to be a signatory to the plat.) Number: 38 Created: 11/5/2004 [11/5/04] A letter of intent also appears needed for the owner of the "Stanton Creek Easement". (They need to be a signatory to the plat.) Topic: Soils Report Number: 14 Created: 11/5/2004 [11/5/04] The soils report will need to address whether street drain systems are recommended as was done in the Stanton Creek subdivision directly north. The general area has high swelling soils and fly ash was used with the recent work on Lemay Avenue. Topic: Subdivision Plat Number: 39 Created: 11/512004 [11/5/041 Indicate who is to own and maintain the tracts within the development. Page 3 REVISION COMMENT SHEET Current Planning REM '05FEB DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #37-04 Lemay Avenue Estates PDP, Type I All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: J February 16, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 8uw,ry y GEGAL 'AaSr. Name (lease print) CHECK HERE IF Y z. WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility' _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins 2,4 Project Comments Sheet (!:�� S City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: February 17, 2005 Project: LEMAY AVENUE ESTATES PDP -TYPE I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: February 16, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Xy 14e. re% Src. s A"CcelF.a pn,o.; ra Topic: General �( Number:16 Created:11/512004 [2/15/05] The response indicated some concern on this requirement. It is a requirement as it will help ensure that three lanes can comfortably fit. There isn't a need to provide striping on Mountain Home Drive. [11/5/04] The width of Rawah Lane being 30' is perhaps not as ideal with it intersecting onto Lemay Avenue because of Lemay's high speed and volumes. Rawah Lane should transition to 36' from its intersection with Showline Road as this will allow 3 12, lanes to fit at the intersection, which in turn would create more room to allow in, left out, and right out operations for the residents. Number: 18 Created: 11 /5/2004 (2/15/05] The response indicated that a letter of acknowledgement of the driveway reconfiguration from the property owner will occur once agreement is made on the plan set (approval?) The letter of acknowledgement will be required prior to any City approval on the engineering plans. (11/5/04] In general, it appears that there is sufficient right-of-way south of the site in order to allow for the work along Lemay Avenue. However, we'll need to get evidence from the property owners south of here that they are aware of their driveway configurations being changed by the project. (The construction plans need to show the newly configured driveways with the road improvements and grading to demonstrate that off -site easements are not necessary. Number: 19 Created: 11/5/2004 [2/15/051 The note on the plans is not clear as to where are the limits of undergrounding of the overhead electric. , 2 Dad CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility /Landscape Page 1 [11/5/04] There needs to be an indication on the plans that the overhead line adjacent to the site is to be undergrounded with the development. In addition, the work on Lemay south of the site will cause additional sections of line to be undergrounded. Please indicate on the construction plans where the undergrounding in proposed to begin. Number: 20 Created: 11 /5/2004 [2/15/05] Carried over for reference, as it appears the utilities have not been contacted thus far. It is suggested that this issue be verified earlier than prior to construction as it may result (worse case scenario) in having to modify plans that were previously approved. [11/5/04] The utility companies will all need to allow the fencing, columns, and planters which are proposed within the utility easement along Lemay Avenue. *Number: 22 Created: 11/512004 [2/15/05] The response indicated that the necessity of a subdrain system is to be addressed at final engineering. This is of concern, as if a subdrain system is to be proposed, without a preliminary design at this time, it cannot be verified that a suitable outfall for the subdrain can be designed without perhaps needing to daylight onto property outside of this development (when a letter if intent would be required prior to going to a hearing) or needing to redesign the site after the hearing. The question of a subdrain system needs to be resolved prior to a hearing. [11/5/04] The soils report mentions a perimeter drain system, will an actual subdrain system be proposed by the development? A groundwater report may be required. Number: 36 Created: 11 /5/2004 (2/15/05] The response indicated that this request is being declined. I'd be curious to know why this wouldn't be a good idea. [11/5/04] Wouldn't a pedestrian connection be worth looking into between lots 1 and 32 to tie the internal development to the sidewalk on Lemay Avenue? It would appear to allow a more direct connection for many in the neighborhood to get to Fossil Creek Community Park who would otherwise have to back track along the public street network. `tC Number:38 Created: 11/512004 [2/16/05) The response letter indicated the applicant has questions on the validity of the easement. As it is shown on the documents for this project, the question of its validity needs to be addressed prior to a hearing and a letter of intent needed assuming it is valid. [11/5/04] A letter of intent also appears needed for the owner of the "Stanton Creek Easement". Number:71 Created:2/15/2005 [2/15/05] The sidewalk connection off the cul-de-sac for Woods Landing Drive was noted to be designed and built by the City. It is my understanding that this is to be the developer's responsibility and that the Parks Department won't construct or maintain the trail within the platted boundary, only north of the site. As such there needs to be some clarification on the responsibilities or changes to Tract D's boundary as this area falls under Tract D. Number:73 Created:2/17/2005 [2/17/05] There is a general concern on the design of the trail connection to Tract D as it is in the same general area as a drainage facility taking flows from Woods Landing Drive. There needs to be verification on the plans that the trail connection can fit in the same area with the standard access ramp and flaring out to the street. If the design shows that there is Page 2 conflict between the trail and drainage facility, the width of the easement between the two lots may need to be widened which I do not know if it brings up lot size and density issues. Number: 75 Created: 2/17/2005 [2/17/05] The width of the trail from Wood Landing Drive is required to be 8' from a transportation perspective, which is standard for these trail connections. With this trail also being used for maintenance by Utilities, the trail should be widened out to 10' in width to ensure drivability and structural support, otherwise if kept at 8', 2' of structurally supportable material on either side of the trail would have to be ensured. It is preferred to widen the trail to 10' from a maintenance standpoint and will likely work better from an aesthetic standpoint. The trail will need to be a minimum of 8" thick in accordance with Chapter 16 of LCUASS. Number: 76 Created: 2/17/2005 [2/17/05] The use of the arbors/pergolas (not sure what is the correct term) for the sidewalk system along Mountain Home Drive east of Lemay Avenue was discussed internally in Transportation (I had originally assumed that these were bridges). Preliminarily, we do not have an objection to the creation of these pergolas, however this situation is unique and verification on the approval process will need to be internally figured out. Upon initial discussion, encroachment permits are likely however this will still need to be verified. Construction & maintenance responsibilities will need to be documented somehow as being that of the HOA/Developer. The clearance underneath must be 10' (and should be scaled out as such on the site plan documents). Number: 14 Created: 11/5/2004 [2/15/05] The response letter indicates this is to be addressed at the time of final engineering. This is sufficient; comment is carried over for reference. [11/5/04] The soils report will need to address whether street drain systems are recommended as was done in the Stanton Creek subdivision directly north. The general area has high swelling soils and fly ash was used with the recent work on Lemay Avenue. �j Topic: Subdivision Plat Number: 39 Created: 11/5/2004 [2/15/05) There appears to be an issue with regards to the maintenance of Tract D with Stormwater. [11/5/04] Indicate who is to own and maintain the tracts within the development. Page 3 FINAL PLAN i�... COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: June 29, 2005 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #37-04B Lemay Avenue Estates PDP, Final Plans All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: July 27, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) RiC Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report _Other ift _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City ofCity of F