The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBRAZIL 2004 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-08-02PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 9 September, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROTECT: #45-98 Campus West Redevelopment -Additions and Alterations to the Campus West Theater-PDP-Type I PLANNER: Mike Ludwig ENGINEER.: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: 10/07/98 No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) General Comments: ❑► See the redlined comments on all sheets of the utility plan. More specific comments and concerns will be mentioned below. ❑► Show surrounding features for 150 feet around the entire site. ❑► It would be helpful to depict all details on a separate sheet. If any more details are added to the utility plan, it will be required. Utility Plan Comments: Cover Sheet; Sheet I of 4: ❑► Include the date prepared and a legal description under the title. ❑► Reference the current soil investigation report. ❑► The subdivision plat should be included with the utility plans. ❑► There is a new vertical control listing for the City which negates the use of the black bolt as a benchmark. Call Wally Muscott at 221-6605 for more information. ❑► The General Notes should include the redline comments on the cover page. Grading and Drainage Plan; Sheet 2 of 4: ❑► The redlined parking stalls at the entrance for W. Elizabeth Street should be omitted due to the 50-foot setback required along arterial streets with average daily traffic volumes between 100 and 750 vehicles. E The driveway/access radii should not exceed 15 feet. 1]► The access ramps should be a modified, one-way version of Detail 12.7 in the City Street Design Manual. See redline sketch. Erosion Control Plan; Sheet 3 of 4: ❑► See comments made above for the Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet 2 of 4). Site Utility Plan; ,Sheet 4 of 4: 0 See comments made above for the Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet 2 of 4). ❑► The site utility plan must show the complete horizontal alignment including but not limited to the following: driveway/access radii, street, sidewalk, and ROW dimensions, and indication of all locations of outfall curb and gutter and where transitions occur back to inflow curb and gutter. 0 Show all easements. ❑► All existing and proposed sanitary sewer lines should show where applicable the following, but not limited to: Type of pipe, slopes, lengths of segments, manholes, and clean -outs. ❑► Include note pertaining to the depth of cover and polywrapping of D.I.P., and depth of cover. Also, show the type of pipe and length of pipe between all fittings. Detail Comments; (Detail Sheet optional at this point): ❑► See redlined comments. The following comments correspond to the redlined comments: The street intersection detail needs to be modified to specify that it is a driveway detail. The cross-section should be retrofitted to the driveway detail shown in the City design standards as D-15. For details 3 and 4, it should be indicated that these curbs will be used internally and not in the ROW. The access ramp details at the driveways should be a modified, one-way version of Detail 12.7. See redline sketch on sheet 2 of 4. Plat Comments: IF] Additional ROW will have to be dedicated for both W. Elizabeth Street (17.5 feet llrarrr� and City Park Avenue (5 feet ❑► A 9 foot utility easement should be dedicated for City Park Avenue. ❑► A 15 foot utility easement should be dedicated for W. Elizabeth Street. The building will encroach into the easement so the easement should extend to the building. Site Plan Comments: ❑► The redlined parking stalls at the entrance for W. Elizabeth Street should be omitted due to the 50 foot setback required along arterial streets with average daily traffic volumes between 100 and 750. ❑► The sidewalk width along W. Elizabeth Street should be a minimum of 6 feet. ❑► The Utility Plan does not depict the same locations for pans as the Site Plan. The utility plan does not depict the saw -cut and demolition of existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pan to the south of the City Park Avenue access. ❑► The access ramps should be a modified, one-way version of Detail 12.7. Date: l �o Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: [PLAT [� SITE 0� UTILITY LANDSCAPE PROJECT i..� COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Callins REC. D Current Planninq DATE: June 22, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #23-04 Brazil 2004 Subdivision - Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Anne Aspen no later than the staff review meeting: sa July 14, 2004 Note - PL,EasE identify your redlines for future reference /. AgovorrtY # 1_E6A'1 e�,,oSr. Name (please print) CHEC HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS L7lat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape x%§fir, City of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: July 13, 2004 Project: BRAZIL 2004 SUBDIVISION- TYPE I (LUC) All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: July 14, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Plat Number: 3 [7/8/04] Most of the plat language shown is incorrect. Language to kevin@ztigroup.com on 7/12/04. Created: 7/8/2004 1 have emailed the correct Plat Number: 4 Created: 7/8/2004 [7/8/04] West Elizabeth Avenue is considered a constrained 4 lane arterial. Because the centerline in Elizabeth wanders a little through the curve, the only way to tell whether or not the correct amount of row is being dedicated is to measure 15' from the back (not the face) of the existing curb. Please provide an exhibit (8.5xl1 is fine) showing this information so that I can tell whether the plat is correct. No utility easement is required along this portion of Elizabeth. Da CHECK HERE Y U WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility __ Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 cmwmm) Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Citvof Dort Collins am Department: Engineering Date: January 12, 2005 Project: BRAZIL 2004 SUBDIVISION- TYPE I (LUC), Final Compliance All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 12, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Plat Number: 3 Created: 7/8/2004 [1/12/05] Please see the attached for the latest version of the Plat Language. I can also email you with this document so that you don't have to retype it all. Please send me an email at sjoy@fcgov.com if you would like this. Please see redlines for other corrections. [7/30/04] Corrections are still required, see redlines. I emailed the correct plat language to eric@northernengineering.com on 8/2/4. [7/8/04] Most of the plat language shown is incorrect. I have emailed the correct Plat Language to kevin@7tigroup.com on 7/12/04. Number: 18 Created: 1/10/2005 [1/10/05] The 24' Access and Utility Easement needs to be called "24' Public Access and Utility Easement". Topic: Utility Number: 19 Created: 1/10/2005 [1/10/05] Please remove the word "subdivision" from the title. The title needs to match the plat. Number: 20 Created: 1/10/2005 [1/10/05] General Note 39 (should be 40) requires two project benchmarks. Number: 21 Created: 1/10/2005 [1/10/05] There are 48 notes in all, one is missing from the plan set. Number: 22 .Signature Created: 1/10/2005 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 [1/10/051 See Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. The shaded areas on the plans will not scan. You may want to see Tech Services and have them scan the plans to see if the grey tones will scan, they appear too light to scan well. Number: 23 Created: 1 /10/2005 [1/10/05] Sheet 3 - Please label the patio (or is it a building addition?). No structures of any kind are allowed in utility easements (patios are ok). Please clarify the drawings. Number: 24 Created: 1 /10/2005 [1/10/05] Sheet 3 - turn off the landscape layer. Number: 25 Created: 1/10/2005 [1/10/05] See redlines for other comments. Pape 2