Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTETSON CREEK PUD SECOND - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-07-14PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: April 29, 1999 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Stanton Creek 2°d Filing Attached are revised plans for Stanton Creek 2"d Filing showing a proposed underdrain. The drain is proposed to be located directly behind and just below the street curb and gutter. Return all comments to Sheri Wamhoff no later than: Thursday, May 13, 1999 i ENGINEERING DEPT. NOTE: THIS REPRESENTS THE BEST QUALITY IMAGE POSSIBLE TAKEN FROM VERY POOR QUALITY ORIGINALS Date: Signature: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS: _ Plat _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Other Utility _ Redline Utility — Landscape M. C�of t Collins RNEMENNIMCM Plannina DATE PROJECT PLANNER PROJECT COiTVT�ENT All comments must be received by: ❑ No Problems AProblems or Concerns (see below) CREEK 2nd FILING Sheet c� �� 61 Please modify note #15 to state that all storm drainage facilities outside the public r.o.w. shall be maintained by the Homeowner's Association (or owners of lots adjacent to the facilities if there will not be an Association.) Modify note #3 to state that all Tracts shown on this plat shall be owned and maintained by a Homeowner's Association / /1 Date: f ! I Signature:CHECK IF IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS: ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (303)221-6750 Prior to submitting the final plat mylar, the City Surveying and Mapping Departments will review a copy of the final plat if an extra copy is submitted with the next round of plan revisions. That way, the plat can be checked one last time before final signatures are obtained and last minute comments from Mapping and Surveying on the mylar copy can be avoided. Sheet 2/11 • Add C.O. to the legend (subdrain cleanout) Sheet 3/11 • Reference detail sheet for subdrain clean -out • Please provide a copy of the hydrologic study/subdrain design for the Engineering Department to put in the file for the 2nd Filing. Sheet 4/11 • Show inlets on the flowline profiles. Sheet 5/11 This may have been addressed since the last round of review via phone calls, but, as noted on the previous set of redlines, the minimum cul-de-sac radius required is 35 feet from center to flowline. The curve data table shows 31 feet. Please increase the radius to 35 feet or provide proof that there has been a variance granted for some reason. I can't think of any reason a variance would have been, or will be granted, since a 40 foot radius is required for fire access - 35 feet is allowed with rollover curb and gutter since the trucks can drive up over the sidewalk. Sheet 6/11 • Show the sidewalk culvert in the cul-de-sac • Again, the cul-de-sac radius is not 35 feet to flowline. However, since 35 feet is the minimum. and the larger cul-de-sac radius does not create any problems, a 41 foot radius is o.k. Why is the radius more than the 35' required ? • Maintain a 2.00% cross -slope in cul-de-sac bulbs City of Fort Collins CurrentPLanninu PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: 24 April 1995 DEPARTMENT:��';r�: PROJECT: 16-89H STETSON CREEK PUD, Flg 2 - Final PLANNER: Ted Shepard All comments must be received by: Friday, 5 May 1995 o Problems Problems or Concerns (see below) Site Plan • Show City (limits on vicinity map • Show boundary meets and bounds • Show tract A and describe its use • Show topo contours • Does privacy fence apply to north boundary? • Indicate ramps Plat • To establish basis of bearings, you must find two Public lands survey monumeni:s - you indicate only one was found and you assumed a bearing. (Continued) 1 Dater �!� Signature CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS: I:f SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE j' UTILITY COMMUNITY PLANNING and ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES... 281 NORTH COLLEGE, P.O.ROX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750 CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT • Show City (limits on vicinity map • Show approx scale on vicinity map • Show true point of beginning • Correct bearing in legal description • Complete curve data, need r and 0 • The west end of Aspen Brook Ct ROW line appears to overlap the property line • Describe who will own and maintain the tracts Utility plans Title sheet, sheet 1 • Add note to reference soils report/ pavement design • Show City limits on vicinity map • Address maintenance of tracts in general notes Overall Utility Plan, sheet 2 • Show subdrain and explain the by others Sanitary Sewer plan and Profile • Show subdrain Railing Details Box Culvert, sheet 5A • Bridge railiing either needs to be galvanized or aluminum Dry Creek Lane Plan and Profile, sheet 6 • Point where new street construction meets existing is a sump - show existing inlets or provide if they do not exist • Cross pan slope does not meet the minimum required of .60% • Curb return will not drain properly, see detail on sheet 12 Piney Ct Plan and Profile, sheet 7 • Move high point in cul-de-sac to get 2% fall at the back • Cul-de-sac; radii needs to be a minimum of 35 feet Piney Ct Plan And Profile, sheet 8 • See typical intersection detail at sheet 12, this intersection won't drain properly • This cul-de-sac radii is kind of excessive, is there a reason why 41 feet is needed instead of the normal 35? Final Grading and Erosion Control plan, sheet 9 • Identify overflow structure �0C