Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPROSPECT INDUSTRIAL PARK - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-06-10REVISION COMMENT SHEET DAT ember 3, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 928-98 Prospect Industrial Park PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Utility Plan Comments: G See rcdlined cornments on all sheets of the utility plan. Utility, Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan; Sheet 3 of 4: z e.osr le t L 0 Show cross-section ofthe retaining wall. ow---j -Re Ref•"„ w.tlle�f%<..w.f+/.../r, • Sec rcdlined access ramp. It will not provide enough clearance behind ?he walk for pedestrians. There should be a minimum of 4 feet. z N,/ DI.4 �,_n Site and Landscape Comments: O See redlined access ramp. It will not provide enough clearance behind the walk for pedestrians. There should be a minimum of 4 feet. T- u d/...t W/ elo k vw—'o w 4114 lr Ea. w./k .. 40 ✓Mw/ 7 PaCp-SuD Phi L we &'i4e't tlt I.d. t414- la.gw.,�c. Date: Signature: Please send copies of marked revisions Plat Y Site _Utility _Landscape City of Fort Conins The saw cut boundary for the eastern access should be made so as to not be in the flow of traffic. The saw cut should extend to the centerline. Final saw cut and asphalt patch limits shall be determined in the field by the City Construction Inspector..Z ea jj4 . 7. The utility plans differ from the site and landscape plans as follows: ,(a! The utility plan does not demonstrate a sidewalk at the western access. S: lJ<✓fA'c, _ (11) The utility plan depicts access ramps crossing both accesses. Utilitv Plan Comments: Cover Sheet: Include the legal description below the project name on the cover sheet. Txe 145"1 ANC. N L'fiS Reference the updated/current soils investigation report. Replat; Sheet 2 of 4: /Date of preparation must be provided. T'ti+! Label all adjoining properties. 2 L � W 4- ,, 41 L f } Two(2) ties to section comers must be included. T 4, i, notVeq ,� ./ '- a Rrr/,F of Goe Utility and Grading & Drainage Plan and Erosion Control Plan: Sheet 3 of 4: �1. Plans should show centerline of Midpoint Drive. The basin line should not depict the centerline. Tke o'e e�;e f••r. / Show all existing underground utilities including gas, electric. utility plans }kc telephone, and cable on all JV. To make the overall grading, drainage, and erosion control plan more clear submit it as a separate sheets. Se 6 e» « e + 0. P.D.P. Plan Comments: 16. The configuration of the access and all access ramps should be representative of the utility plan. See comment 97. 7y Show surrounding features for a minimum of 150 feet around the entire site. �/. Streets and/or driveways shall align with each other on opposite sides of a residential or collector street otherwise be separated by a minimum of.; feet from the center. Distance less than 200 feet must be verified as being adequate and supported with the traffic analysis. k)The parking space setback along a two-lane collector roadway with an average daily traffic less than 750 requires 50 feet of setback. Date: /�/ Signature:, PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: Er- PLAT SITE UTILITY LANDSCAPE PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: July 2, 1998 TO: Engineering Pvmt. PROJECT: #28-98 Prospect Industrial Park, Lot 15 - (LUC) Type I PDP All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, August 5,1998 /vd C' " Date: Z 6 CHECK HERE IF YOU VSH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat _ Site _ Dtai* Report _ Oter _ Utility _ Redline Utility _ Lads* PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 24, July 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #28-98 Prospect Industrial Park, Lot 15 (LUC) Type I PDP PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum A11 comments must be received by: 08/05/98 No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) General Comments: Midpoint Drive is designed with 36 feet of roadway width and 60 feet of right -of way. According to the Fort Collins Master Street Plan Midpoint Drive is a two-lane collector without parking which should allow for 40 feet of roadway width and 66 feet of right-of- way. Under the Fort Collins Master Street Plan the proposed development will have to dedicate an additional three feet of right-of-way along their property frontage to allow for 33 feet from the roadway centerline to their property. 2. In order for a more detailed review I would like to see page 3 of 4 of the utility plan separated into two pages: (a) Utility Plan (b) Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan 3. Show surrounding features for a minimum of 150 feet around the entire site. 4. Streets and/or driveways shall align with each other on opposite sides of a residential or collector street otherwise be separated by a minimum of 200 feet on center. Distance less than 200 feet must be verified as adequate and supported with the traffic analysis. 5. The parking space setback along a two-lane collector roadway with an average daily traffic Tess than 750 requires 50 feet of setback. The saw cut boundary for the eastern access should be made so as to not be in the flow of traffic. The saw cut should extend to the centerline. Final saw cut and asphalt patch limits shall be determined in the field by the City Construction Inspector. The utility plans differ from the site and landscape plans as follows: (a.) The utility plan does not demonstrate a sidewalk at the western access. (b) The utility plan depicts access ramps crossing both accesses. Utility Plan Comments: Cover Sheet: 8. Include the legal description below the project name on the cover sheet. 9. Reference the updated/current soils investigation report. Replat; Sheet 2 of 4: 10. Date of preparation must be provided. 11. Label all adjoining properties. 12. Two(2) ties to section corners must be included. Utility and Grading & Drainage Plan and Erosion Control Plan; Sheet 3 of 4: 13. Plans should show centerline of Midpoint Drive. The basin line should not depict the centerline. 14. Show all existing underground utilities including gas, electric. telephone, and cable on all utility plans. 15. To make the overall grading, drainage, and erosion control plan more clear submit it as a separate sheets. P.D.P. Plan Comments: 16. The configuration of the access and all access ramps should be representative of the utility plan. See comment #7. 17. Show surrounding features for a minimum of 150 feet around the entire site. 20. Streets and/or driveways shall align with each other on opposite sides of a residential or collector street otherwise be separated by a minimum of 200 feet from the center. Distance less than 200 feet must be verified as being adequate and supported with the traffic analysis. 21. The parking space setback along a two-lane collector roadway, with an average daily traffic less than 750 requires 50 feet of setback. Date: ��3� Signature - PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: -PLAT SITE UTILITY LANDSCAPE REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: January 17, 2001 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #28-98 PROSPECT INDUSTRIAL PARK, LOT 32, MIDPOINT SELF -STORAGE — PDP — TYPE I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: February 7, 2001 ElNo Comment roblems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** Prospect Industrial Park, Lot 32, Midpoint Self -Storage - PDP sheet 1 of 2 February 6, 2001 Letters of intent are needed for the two oft -site easements (grading easement along the SE property line and the drainage easement for the drainage pipe) prior to this project being able to be scheduled for a hearing. Since you are not planning to plat the property (still recommend a replat) dedication of easements and row will need to be done by separate document. ALL casements and row documents will need to be received prior to signing of mylars. Please note you are responsible for the county filing fees for all easement and row documents. The filing fee is $5 per sheet and each easement is typically 4 sheets (do not pay this until we have determined how many pages there are). List of easements and row documents that I am aware that you need: 1)row dedication; 2) 9 foot utility dedication behind row; 3) waterline easement through site; 4) emergen.cy access casement through site; 5) drainage easement(s); 6) sewer easement through site; 7) off -site grading casement, 8) off -site drainage easement Please let me know if you need sample documents. Site Plan ➢ The access drive needs to be a driveway cut per Section 3.6.2(L)(2)(e) of the LUC. This is shown correctly on the utility plans, but not on the site and landscape plans. With the driveway cut concrete to the property line needs to be provided. ➢ The sidewalk between the building and the parking stalls needs to be a min of 6 feet wide. y Show a type III barricade at the end of the sidewalk improvements. (continued on next page) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat �'X Site _ Drainage Report _ Other Utility 't.2� Redline UfiEO7 Landscape Date: , 7O/ Si¢natnr Prospect Industrial Park, Lot 32, Midpoint Self -Storage - PDP sheet 2 of 2 February 6, 2001 Utility Plans I. Adjust the numbering for the general notes and make changes as shown. 2. Show the patch area in the street for the utility installation and the driveway installation. 3. Provide a type III barricade at the end of any sidewalk construction. 4. Label all existing and proposed easements on the plans. 5. What does the fence look like and how does the swale and v-pan go under it? Response to this was the fence was relocated and no longer crosses over the swale. Per the plans, the fence crosses the back swale twice and the drainage Swale along the NW property line crosses under the t'ence. The fence is located differently on the site and utility plans. 6. On sheet 4 label "Future Sharp Point Drive'. Z Make changes to the driveway detail as shown. PROJECT IMMAZI COMMENT SHEET City of Foil Collins Current Planning DATE: October 27, 2000 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #28-98 Prospect Industrial Park, Lot 32, Midpoint Self -Storage — PDP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by S�t in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: November 29, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for firture reference 5 P e u I re u9 1 Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat site Drainage Report other Utility Redline Utility Landscape PROJECT /A�MM i� COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning; DATE: October 271,2000 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #28-98 Prospect Industrial Park, Lot 32, Midpoint Self -Storage — PDP — Type II (LUG) All comments must be received by � 011--in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: November 29, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference NO Si -nature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility __Landscape city of Fort Collins L REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: December 31 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #28-98 Prospect Industrial Park PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting Utility Plan Comments: C see redlined comments on all sheets ofthe utility plan. Uldily, Grading, Drainage, and Frosion Confrol Plan, Sheei 3 of . 17 '['here is a note on the landscape plan and/ or site plan in regard to 2:1 slope and retaining wall. 'fhe slope should be shown on the utility plan with grading lines. Also, the retaining wall shOUld be shown with a detail. S del e d t. Je C Show all access ramps and painted crosswalks as shown on the site and landscape plan. T a d .1 f A ,, . t ra -, e, 4 0 i+ "'L _ . , F':'. ,, . Site and Landscape Comments: 0 The site, landscape and utility plans should all depict the same design. _T id.l.d A,xi, 4. •.• iej C Include the following sentence as a note on the landscape plan. In the areas where sight distance easements will need to be dedicated three landscaping criteria will have to be met: • Fences shall not exceed 42" in height and shall be of open design. If fences exceed 32" in height, thev shall be constructed of split rail with a minimum dimension of 12" between horizontal members. • Berms, hedges, and shrubs shall not exceed 32" in height. • Tree planting; shall be restricted to deciduous trees only. 'Ihc lowest branch of anv tree shall be no Tess than 42" from grade. C The driveways are not designed to have curb returns as shown on the utility plans. 0 The cedar fence should not be within any easements. Date. %l�A signature: Please send copies of marked revisions _flat t 'site _Utility .'Landscape City of Furt Collins PROJECT i...COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins 111111111 Current Planning DATE: October 27, 2000 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #28-98 Prospect Industrial Park, Lot 32, Midpoint Self -Storage — PDP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received b in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: November 29, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlinestr future reference Prospect Industrial Park, Lot 32, Midpoint Self -Storage - PDY ecem er 7, 2000 Site Plan Need to show the emergency access drive through the property and show that it meets minimum radius requirements for PFA ➢ "rhe access drive needs to be a driveway cut per Section 3. 62(L)(2)(e) of the LUC. ➢ ed to know if there are any conflicts with the proposed driveway location. Show any curb cuts on the property across the street. Ne ➢ Indicate what is existing sidewalk and what is new sidewalk. ➢ Does the 9-foot utility easement shown based on the additional 3 feet of row that needs to be dedicated? 'r Don't show the curb return for the Sharp Point extension unless you plan on designing and building it. Utility Plans I. See updated general notes. 2. Need to show where the driveways adjacent and across the street are located. The drives need to align or be adequately offset 3. Indicate the location of the driveway cut in relation to the property line. 4. The access drive needs to be a driveway cut per Section 3.6.2(L)(2)(e) of the LUC. Provide the driveway PP a roach detail. 5. Indicate what is existing sidewalk and what_is new sidewalk. Indicate the width and provide a type III barricade at the end of any sidewalk construction. 6. Provide a new plat or provide a copy of the existing plat as part of the plans. If you do not plat, you will need to dedicate the row and al necessary easements by separate document. I prefer you replat the property. 7. Label all existing and proposed easements on the plans. g. What is the building set back from the new row? 9. What does the fence look like and how does the Swale and v-pan go under it? 10. It wuld probably help if you indicated what is gravel, what is paved and what is landscape area on the grading plan. o IL . Need off -site casements from the adjacent property for off -site grading and the drainage pipe. be 12 aDo not nd the the curb. Sinnd ce rt ial for not included n e Sharp this plan set I assumint extension. ee you arenot now where it n t designing it. KeepSharpPoint Drive (future) ced until the row is ted label. Corrections to the'CIS that should he noted. The development of the adjacent lot will require the dedication of row for the extension of Sharp Point Drive. Midpoint Drive and Sharp Point Drive are designed for two travel lanes and two bike lanes not parking lanes. And the traffic study indicates that the intersections will function acceptably for the short term, but do not indicate how they will function for the long term. Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS XPlatSite Drainage Report Other ,/\Utility �Aedline Utility 'landscape City of Fort Collins lAdom Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: June 3, 2001 PROJECT: PROSPECT INDUS.PARK,LOT 32,MIDPOINT SELF -STORAGE 928- 98B All comments must be received by STEVE OLT in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: 1Vote - Please identify your redlines for future reference Dept: Engineering Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Since you are not planning to plat the property (still recommend a replat) dedication of easements and row will need to be done by separate document. ALL easements and row documents will need to be received prior to signing of mylars. Please note you are responsible for the county filing fees for all easement and row documents. The filing fee is $5 per sheet and each easement is typically 4 sheets (do not pay this until we have determined how many pages there are). List of easements and row documents that I am aware that you need: 1)row dedication; 2) 9 foot utility dedication behind row; 3) waterline easement through site; 4) emergency access easement through site; 5) drainage easement(s); 6) sewer easement through site; 7) off -site grading easement; 8) off -site drainage easement. Please let me know if you need sample documents. 6 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Label all existing and proposed easements on the plans. - haven't labeled the storm drainage easement along the southern boundary of the property, nor the emergency access easement through the property. 7 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff What does the fence look like and how does the swale and v-pan go under it? Per the plans, the fence crosses the back swale. The fence detail is on the elevations - how does the v-pan go under - Need a detail showing how it works and that the pan is not blocked - this should be on the utility plans. 1 of 2 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Fill out "information for development agreement sheet and return" Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff I have also attached a "Development Construction Permit (DCP) application" and brochure. The DCP will need to be issued prior to starting any work on the site. — Sign------ — CHECK HERE IF YOU WIS CEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat _ _ Site Drainage Report _ Other _ Utility i <Redline Utility Landscape 2 of M *ad TO: Frank Fisch, Street Department FROM: Marc Engemoen, Engineering Services RE: Subdivision Utility Plans DATE: 2-3 — 78 Submitted for your review and comment are utility plans for Please respond at your earliest convenience. y DATE: 7I;?- I� l DEPART M QNT&wwm , tlr4 0, 0 E E O 0 Item -71-$1 �cf �ndue�x',c.c PA.k Comments �eeve�DPer Neer to C-7&-+ 0le"aKC--e 6W 641 ✓�� � / Z (Z40 / +l kf� �o, TfLI v e 4' U e7V--k 6r r GU/%l c h4 a�/9 O�C79N VAJ � D �� m, �oZ-D -1-c 4LBed' Qr r r , 114CA-7E 7{11g Gil ILL " eriAb1k)AkcF N6 WILL � dlkrNs T3cufLcflfRs &J(('vEE.2 'f 7"t/j 6Tlf � N©RK1AL AU) Hfcrf W itc of, :,.. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: December 3, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #28-98 Prospect Industrial Park PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Utility Plan Commtents: a See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility plan. Utility, Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan; Sheet 3 of 4: 13 Show cross-section of the retaining wall. 13 See redlined access ramp. It will not provide enough clearance behind the walk for pedestrians. There should be a minimum of 4 feet. Site and Landscape Comments: O See redlined access ramp. It will not provide enough clearance behind the walk for pedestrians. There should be a minimum of 4 feet. Date: �z h Signature: i Please send copies of marked revisions flat x Site (Jtility _Landscape (A OLA% City of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: December 3, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #28-98 Prospect Industrial Park PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Utility Plan Comments: C See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility plan. Utility, Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan, Sheet 3 of 4 13 There is a note on the landscape plan and/ or site plan in regard to 2:1 slope and retaining wall. The slope should be shown on the utility plan with grading lines. Also, the retaining wall should be shown with a detail. C Show all access ramps and painted crosswalks as shown on the site and landscape plan. Site and Landscape Comments: G The site, landscape and utility plans should all depict the same design. C Include the following sentence as a note on the landscape plan. In the areas where sight distance casements will need to be dedicated three landscaping criteria will have to be met: • Fences shall not exceed 42" in height and shall be of open design. If fences exceed 32" in height, they shall be constructed of split rail with a minimum dimension of 12" between horizontal members. • Berms, hedges, and shrubs shall not exceed 32" in height. • Tree planting; shall be restricted to deciduous trees only. The lowest branch of any tree shall be no less than 42" from grade. O The driveways are not designed to have curb returns as shown on the utility plans. 0 The cedar fence should not be within any easements. Date: ej % Signature: Please send copies of marked revisions 1Plat Site Utility i Landscape City of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 28, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #28-98 Prospect Industrial Park PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER,: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Utility Plan Comments: 13 See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility plan. Replat; Sheet 2 of 4: O A sight distance easements will have to be dedicated due to the sight distance issues associated with the driveways/accesses. Utility, Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan; Sheet 3 of 4: O The sidewalk should be a minimum of 5 feet in width, and it should be adjusted so the back of the walk is abuts the property line. This in turn will increase the parkway width to the required 8 feet. 0 The driveway access details do not match, and they do not represent the standard driveway detail. To clarify: • The eastern driveway is showing a concrete pan, instead of the typical drive -over detail. This is acceptable if modifications are made to the driveway detail. • The western driveway is showing that the drive -over pan at the driveway is existing. If it is not existing than depict the flowline drive -over portion of the curb. • The driveways do not have to be exactly the same, but details do have be included on the detail sheet. If the detail shown for the driveway is the one being used, please clarify your intent. • The parking space setback along a two-lane collector with an average daily traffic less than 750 requires 50 feet of setback. See the redlined parking stall that does not meet the requirement. 0 Include note to curb cuts within the ROW for the accesses. 0 Show the ROW dimensions as redlined on the utility plan. Detail Sheet; Sheet 4 of 4: 0 Include the following details: • Concrete pan • 2 foot metal sidewalk culvert. • Sidewalk transition detail. Site and Landscape Comments: 0 The sidewalk should be detached and the parkway should be 8 feet from the street flowline to the sidewalk. O The access ramps appear to be shown in the driveway. Move the access ramps, as shown with redlined comments. O Show an additional three feet of ROW that will be dedicated as a result of this development. 0 The parking space setback along a two-lane collector with an average daily traffic less than 750 requires 50 feet of setback. See the redlined parking stall that does not meet the requirement. O In the areas where sight distance easements will need to be dedicated three landscaping criteria will have to be met: • Fences shall not exceed 42" in height and shall be of open design. If fences exceed 32" in height, they shall be constructed of split rail with a minimum dimension of 12" between horizontal members. • Berms, hedges, and shrubs shall not exceed 32" in height. • Tree planting shall be restricted to deciduous trees only. The lowest branch of any tree shall be: no less than 42" from grade. 0 Show cross -pans at the driveway as shown on the utility plan. Name:��.�� �• �%��� Please send copies of marked revisions L^at Site amity ✓landscape go City of Fort Collins i v REVISION x COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 28, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #28-98 Prospect Industrial Park PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Utility Plan Comments: O See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility plan. Replat; Sheet 2 of 4: 1 A sight distance easements will have to be dedicated due to the sight distance issues associated with the driveways/accesses. Utility, Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan; Sheet 3 of 4: 0 The sidewalk should be a minimum of 5 feet in width, and it should be adjusted so the back of the walk is abuts the property line. This in turn will increase the parkwayy width to the required 8 feet. T" ma-:<-�riK ti �� r'.=k •, - 0 The driveway access details do not match, and they do not represent the standard driveway detail. To clarify: • The eastern driveway is showing a concrete pan, instead of the typical drive -over detail. This is acceptable if modifications are made to the driveway detail. • The western driveway is showing that the drive -over pan at the driveway is existing. If it is not existingthan depict the flowline drive -over portion of the curb. gf._ t-:,i .-k y: t'<"`r s ��w ;�awy� d :f ou:.: '� j fr /'a ;T`,.� t..a .. c.. • The drivewayss do not have to be exactly the same, but details do have be mcluded on the detail sheet. If the detail shown for the driveway is the one being used, please clarify your intent. a The parking space setback along a two-lane collector with an average daily traffic less than 750 requires 50 feet of setback. See the redlined parking stall that does not meet the requirement. —. '?e >e '4: ,�K_r:,� �" A Include note to curb cuts within the ROW for the accesses. Z Show the ROW dimensions as redlined on the utility plan. 7 Hi. . Detail Sheet, Sheet 4 of 4: 0 Include the following details: • Concrete pan y 2 foot metal sidewalk culvert. D -io • Sidewalk transition detail. z 2 sq -f c:Fnii �. ,'k �� pc+..A„"i ,. albs ,c(c t.�4•J S'w.�K Site and Landscape Comments: 0 The sidewalk should be detached and the parkway should be 8 feet from the street flowline to the sidewalk. 0 The access ramps appear to be shown in the driveway. Move the access ramps, as shown with redlined comments. 0 Show an additional three feet of ROW that will be dedicated as a result of this development. O The parking space setback along a two-lane collector with an average daily traffic less than 750 requires 50 feet of setback. See the redlined parking stall that does not meet the requirement. 0 In the areas where sight distance easements will need to be dedicated three landscaping criteria will have to be met: • Fences shall not exceed 42" in height and shall be of open design. If fences exceed 32" in height, they shall be constructed of split rail with a minimum dimension of 12" between horizontal members. • Berms, hedges, and shrubs shall not exceed 32" in height. • Tree planting shall be restricted to deciduous trees only. The lowest branch of any tree shall be no less than 42" from grade. 0 Show cross -pans at the driveway as shown on the utility plan. Please send copies of marked revisions L41at Site _amity ✓Candscape City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 24, July 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 928-98 Prospect Industrial Park, Lot 15 (LUC) Type I PDP PLANNER: ,Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: 08/05/98 No Problems Pr oblemms or Concerns (see below or attached) General Comment<: 1. Midpoint Drive is designed with 36 feet of roadway width and 60 feet of right -of way. According to the Fort Collins Master Street Plan Midpoint Drive is a two-lane collector without parking which should allow for 40 feet of roadway width and 66 feet of right-of- way. Under the Fort Collins Master Street Plan the proposed development will have to dedicate an addiitional three feet of right-of-way along their property frontage to allow for 33 feet from the roadway centerline to their property. We. -1t.1,e, r, ,0e, In order for a more detailed review I would like to see page 3 of 4 of the utility plan separated into two pages: M.•k AoC4r/4k, z je A/; (a) Utility Plan 0'e, . (b) Grad;ing, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan ��Na✓f.�` -f i��•ai -ram Show surroundinjg features for a minimum of 150 feet around/the entire site. �� I Tkc N. u7. � �.Er Ea✓i- .fl�o 44c vtc.,� t /e�iLo-F /J n✓ . av ))LL .Gl�.f IO )< I+i.IJ1LI1 j44J,' Streets and/or driveways shall align with each other on opposite sides of a residential or �collector street otherwise be separated by a minimum of 200 feet on center. Distance less thaq2LL feet must be verified as adequate and supported with the traffic analysis. Let. .avue✓ 4rr✓cww-,. 5. The parking space setback along a two-lane collector roadway with an average daily traffic less than 750 requires 50 feet of setback. w .t )04, 4, t J/,'« �/, k.