HomeMy WebLinkAboutPROSPECT PARK EAST PUD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-06-10PROJECT
i..�) COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: February 8, 1999 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #2-99 Advanced Energy, Buildings 7 & 8 — Final
Plan (LUC)
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, March 3, 1999
Advanced Energy, Buildings 7 and 8
March 8, 1999
• Provide the additional easements needed as identified by stormwater
• Please make the project name on the Title Sheet read "Advanced Energy, Buildings 7 and 8"
• Add Timberline Road plan and profile and striping sheet to the index and number it as sheet 9
of l3
On Timberline Road plan and profile and striping sheet.
• The design of Timberline and the right turrilane is not adequate
• For the asphalt pavement joint detail - the cut and additional pavement needs to be in
accordance with the City of Fort Collins `Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and
Guidelines'
• For including this sheet in this set - do not provide the storm sewer references or the Specht
Point Road striping plan as this project will not be putting those improvements in.
• This page needs to be numbered as a part of this set of plans and labeled with this projects
name and not Spring Creek Centers.
• For additional comments on this sheet see Traffic Operations comments (for advanced energy,
buildings 7 and 8) dated 2/27/99 and comments from Tim Blandford on Spring Creek Center
returned previously.
Date:d 9/ Signature: r.
CHECK HERE IF YOU DISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
&U � k
,�X UVli o, Redline Utility
Draidage Repoli
Ok
City of Fort Collins
Prospect Business Park Advanced Energy Building 7 & 8 (page 2 of 2) December 19, 1997
Utility Plans
• Provide dimensions to Centerlines of the driveways from the property line - need to
locate them.
Label the parkway width (8 feet) and the sidewalk width (5 feet). The maximum radius
for the sidewalk is 60 foot centerline radius. This needs to be shown on the plans.
• Need easements for all work out side of the property line. Even with the access
agreements we still need a temporary construction easement for the work to occur.
/ •~' Need to provide the new ramp detail for the detached sidewalk ramps. Also nee a detail
of the ramp for the access drive on Sharp point.
Make necessary changes to he access drive detail. I don't believe that all the access
drives are the same widths and it doesn't appear that they all have the same radii. For the
access drive on sharp point a control joint will need to be placed at the back of the
sidewalk in the drive.
• Make sure all details are readable.
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
Citv of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: November 18, 1997 TO: Engineering Pvmnt
PROJECT: #44-84I Prospect East Business Park, Advanced
Energy Building 7 & 8 - Type II (LUC) PDP
All comments must be received by Mike Ludwig no later than the staff
review meeting;:
Wednesday, December 17,1997
Date:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPES OF REVISIONS
PIS _ Site _ Oram p Report _ Oter
_ U0 — Rcdhc Utility _ Landscape
City of Fort Collins
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
CurrentPlanning
DATE: 29 March 1995 DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT: ADVANCED ENERGY - IL/IP Site Plan Review,
Minor Subdivision
PLANNER: Steve Olt
All comments must be received by: Wed., 12 April 1995
i
❑ No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
1;4t-rLr /5 CJG 7DL-->Ic/47'ru,/ STi�TCNte�vi .
+W rTH NftC 5e r ! ti lrJAc �oeS Uo; r�i _"T-<7h�
a
i�L�r+Se SHuw Gt}oan 8EAIQINy l�O,v A,-L- CvRvaS
IF 7r 4C CONTnu` sN{Uwn1(SBcTraN CURN(:2S (/vA✓zr�Yn Caa�cti\
A2� uSc-o Trtcy YY1v5 - MTL-r Sr�re J
� osu2� ���vo2�m
G !-F e c �<-o ,4 S 2=nr1-S ,
Tt�C O1)-r1 VLGGurroAtz,
rD(STANCe-$ ALoNr, TN}T Q4RTr) SIDS /s
ThF6RE I N0 W,4Y 7-. LOCATGr -ri TWO ZO UTtc.,7 Ef1StTn'1rrNr1 f1-N.o --rH -Mva 05' 4c---e%v L'�SerY/Er✓TS,
Date: Signature:
CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT
COPIES OF REVISIONS: ❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY _
COMMUNM PLANNING and
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, 281 NORTH COLLEGE, F.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-t 50
CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
�.
:J'%rANCEB ENERGY - IL/IP Site Plan Review, Minor Subdivision
Storaqe or use of hazardous materials must be in compliance with
the Fire Code and Chapter 9 of the 1991 Uniform Buildinq Code as
adopted by the City of Fort Collins. A list of such materials
with quantities and Uniform Fire Code classifications should be
submitted for review at the time of buildinq permit application..
The site shall be accessible to persons with disabilities in
accordance with Uniform Buildinq Code Section 3103 and UBC
Appendix Section 3106. Provide desiqnated and marked accessible
routes between buildings and the public way and accessible
parkinq and the buildings. Provide parkinq and siqns per
Appendix; Section 3107. Parkinq spaces, siqnaqe, and accessible
routes shall comply with the American National Standards
Institute publication A117.1-1992 titled Accessible and Usable
Buildings and Facilities.
Sharon Getz
Buildinq Inspection
221-6760
; and Environmental Ser
Current Planning
April 24, 1995
Linda Ripley
Ripley Associates
223 Jefferson Street, Suite A
Fort Collins, CO. 80524
Dear Linda,
Staff has reviewed your documents for the Rapist of Lots 3, 4, 11,
and 12 of the Prospect Park East P-U.D. (Minor Subdivision) and the
--Advanced Energy IL/IP Site Plan Review that were submitted to the
City on March 27, 1995, and would like to offer the following
comments:
1. The following comments were received from Public Service
Company:
a. Utility easements adjacent to rights -of -way need to be
such that from the back of walk to the rear line of the
utility easement there is a minimum of 131.
b. No trees can be planted within 4' of gas lines.
2. A copy of the comments received from the Mapping/Surveying
Department is attached to this letter.
3. The following comments were received from the Zoning
Department:
a. The Site Plan appears to show 267 parking stalls, as
opposed to the 269 indicated by note.
b. You need to show parking stall widths. A minimum 8.5,
width is required under the alternative long term plan.
C. A minimum 5' setback is required between parking and the
lot line. A portion of the east side, at the southeast
corner, measures 4' in width.
4. A copy of the comments received from the Building Inspection
Department is attached to this letter.
5. Comments received from the Water/Wastewater Department are on
a red -lined copy of the Landscape Plan that has been forwarded
to Ripley Associates.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750
FAX (303) 221-6378 TDD (303) 224-6002
6. Comments received form the Engineering Department are on a
red -lined copy of the Site Plan that has been forwarded to
Ripley Associates and red -lined utility plans that are being
forwarded to Park Engineering Consultants.
7. In the City of Fort Collins Parkins Lot Deve0 ment Guide
[Sections B. (2)(3)] it states that: "For non-residential
uses, trees should generally be provided in number equal to 1
tree per 25 lineal feet along a public street", and, that "the
zoning ordinance requires parking lots with six or more spaces
to be screened from the streets. Screening from the street
must be of sufficient height and opacity to block at least 20%
of the cross section view of the parking area from the
street." This requirement does not appear to be met along
Prospect Park Way and the short section in the southeast
corner along Midpoint Drive.
Comments have not yet been received from the following departments
of the City:
- Stormwater Utility
- Park Planner
- Natural Resources
- Police
- Advance Planning
- R.O.W. Agent
- Transfort
Revisions to the plans, addressing the comments expressed in this
letter, should be returned to the appropriate City departments as
soon as possible so that an administrative public hearing before
the Planning Director can be scheduled for these two items. Please
contact me at 221-6750 if you have questions about these comments.
Since ely,
Steve Olt,
Project Planner
cc: Sheri Wamhoff
Stormwater Utility
Transportation
The Neenan Company
Park Engineering Consultants
file/Project Planner
ITEM. 44--5-T ACOMMENTS
-
z.
ZPID
kj
.L
� �,,.� �+-�-0� dL� �.-s-f y �.ir oCu e S -•_. �la�, Sye.�..f P� e�c. `"'""7
DATE �TuI �79 ®EPARTE ;-
COMMENTS
tx t 14 s
L�-c. �-c�.ml � �v ✓� S �--1f'.
3. V4 V u,,Z� 4c. Lam to c-lc,..d,
05
TO: Bob Smith, Assistant City Engineer - Drainage
FROM: Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator
RE: Subdivision Utility Plans
DATE: -7
Submitted for your review and comment are utility plans for
Please respond by
7-
` ►'tkt" 4--at `"1 COUL44
2
�i✓Lao( l4eetr�^mow a
rUee� ✓�fi� pis CIO,
A)-C� k- risn I I �l &,Lxe
t"t A�� V44, A
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: /49I
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: Tt-crzpec �a�
PLANNER: Stye (4- d 1
ENGINEER:
❑ _No Problems
LU Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Prospect East Business Park. Advanced Energy buildings 7 and 8
January 14, 1999
The Planing and Zoning Board conditioned this project with constructing a traffic control device
to limit the left turns off of Midpoint Drive at Timberline Road. It has been determined by the
City that this structure is to be a glue down pork chop in Midpoint Drive due to the inability to
place a raised median in Timberline at this point in time.
Therefore this project needs to provide a design for the installation of the porkchop and
associated improvements or wait for the approval and recording of utility plans for Spring Creek
Center (which is currently working on a design) before the plans for this project can be approved
and recorded. The design that Northern Engineering is working on could be included in this
utility plan set.
No other comments on the utility plans.
I
Date'. Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISION,
(� LANDSCAPE
%W ,"d
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
July 18, 1984
Mr. Roger Thorp
Thorp Associates
PO Box 129
Estes Park, CO 80517
Dear Roger,
The staff has reviewed the application for Master Plan and preliminary/final
PUD approval of the Prospect East Business Park and offers the following com-
ments:
MASTER PLAN COMMENTS
1. The Master Plan should include a more defined set of land uses being
proposed rather than "high tech business park". Please revise Master Plan.
2. The land use data should include acres as well as square feet. Please
revise.
3. The land use data is unclear as to what is meant by "public development"?
Please clarify.
4. The phasing of public improvements and future phases of development
should be included on the Master Plan. Please revise.
5. The Master Plan should include the attorney's certification block.
6. The Master Plan includes too much detail. Please delete from the site plan
all lot lines, parking and building detail. The land use data on the
Master Plan should be for the total site rather than including the Phase 1
information. This comment also applies to the "notes". The Master Plan
should note that final architectural design of buildings will address
consistency among building treatment to provide a uniform, well planned
appearance.
7. The Master Plan should reflect that combined curb cuts will be pursued
between lots. Location of curb cuts will be determined by intensity of
use, design and City standards. Please note this on site plan.
AND DEVELOPMENT
�O�Ul Lc HVe. 0 ru. dox ❑du . tort Wilms, Colorado 80522 . (303) 221-6750
Roger Thorp Letter
7/18/84 - Page 2
8. The soils report does not give design information for Specht Road nor
Sharp Point Road. Please provide this additional information as soon as
ssible.
9. The staff questions the desireability from a public standpoint of pre-
maturely installing the extensive amount of streets as planned. Unused
streets can pressent serious problems to the City. Please provide evidence
to justify proposed public improvement phasing schedule.
10. The Spring Creek floodway should be shown on the Master Plan. No building
permits will be issued in this area that does not meet city requirements.
The Spring Creek overflow floodway will create major problems for future
development. Variances will need to be sought from the Storm Drainage
Board for issuance of building permits in this area. The applicants will
need to submit an information package to FEMA to get flood maps amended.
11. The Master Plan should include a note that "individual PUD site plans and
other supporting data will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Board
for approval for future phases of development in the Master Plan area per
PUD regulations".
PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAN COMMENTS
12. In earlier discussions, it was my understanding that a master plan would
be submitted for the entire site. The required first phase would consist
of the Advanced Energy project, major street improvements, and landscape
plan for public streets and greenbelt, including a subdivision plat for
the entire property. The pre liminary/final site plan as submitted is
unclear as to what exactly the City is approving. Please clarify.
13. The Advance Energy Phase should be on a separate sheet at a scale consist-
ent with the site plan recently approved by the Planning staff. This
plan should include the required detail for parking lot and building
dimensions, widths of open space areas, setbacks, curb cut widths, etc.
Also, a detailed landscape plan for this phase of development will be
required.
14. The title of the preliminary/final site plan should be either First Phase
of Prospect Park East or Lots 3 and 4 of Prospect Park East.
15. The sidewalks along the public streets should be located in the ROW where
possible. If not possible or desireable, access easements should be pro-
vided. The sidewalks appear to meander more than necessary. Excessive
meandering creates maintenance problems as well as problems for bicycl-
ists. Please eliminate excessive meandering of sidewalks.
16. All existing and proposed utility easements should be shown on the prelim-
inary/final site plan. Fifteen (15) foot utility easements along Prospect
Road and 8 foot utility easements along all other public streets will
be required.
:Roger Thorp Letter
7/18/84 - Page 3 *4W r/'
17. The vacation of any unneeded ROW or utility easements will need to be
done by a special instrument. Vacation information for these ROW or ease-
ments should be submitted as soon as possible to the Development Center
for processing. The information should include a letter requesting the
vacation; legal description of the vacation, and; 8�" X 11" map indicat-
ing the area of the vacation. Vacations will need to be approved by the
City Council.
18. All curb cuts should be located at least 200 feet apart from one another.
Also, all parking aisles and spaces should be setback a minimum of fifty
(50) feet from the flowline of public streets at curb cuts. Applicant
should provide evidence to justify the plan design.
19. The entrances to the Advanced Energy parking lot should be designed as
curb cuts rather than curb returns. Please revise.
20. The parking lot of Advanced Energy should provide for future pedestrian
�Y and vehicular connects to future development in Lots 5, 6, 11, and 12.
C\YoY Please revise site plan.
21. The curb cut locations would appear to conflict with the location of
landscaping on the overall street planting plan. Please clarify.
22. The Spring Creek Floodway should be shown on the preliminary/final site
plan.
23. Access easements will need to be provided across all parking lots.
24. There appears to be some water supply problems in the area that could
seriously impact the development of the properties within the Master
Plan area.
25. A repay exists on the 16" waterline that was installed by the developers
of the Seven Lakes Business Park.
26. The site plan should indicate the radii of parking lot which would enable
the maneuvering of fire equipment. The location of the sprinkler connec-
tion that was approved previously on the Advanced Energy Building will
need to be shifted. Please locate this connection on the site plan.
27. A new note should be added to the site plan indicating that the Advanced
Energy building will be equipped with automatic fire extinguishing sys-
tems.
28. The preliminary/final site plan should indicate location of motorcycle,
bicycle, and handicapped parking spaces. The "small car" spaces will
need to be signed for "employees only". Please indicate this on site
plan. 17' staff lengths on regular sized spaces also should be used on
6' sidewalks or adjacent to open space/landscape areas.
Roger Thorp Letter
7/18/84 - Page 4
29. At least four additional parking islands should be provided along the
south property line of the Advanced Energy site.
30. The preliminary/final site plan should provide for pedestrian circulation
between the site and future adjacent development and between the site and
the recreation trail.
31. The preliminary/final site plan should include detailed evidence as to how
the site and building reduce energy use.
32. Exact building height of the Advanced Energy phase should be indicated on
the site plan.
33. The preliminary/final site plan should indicate sidewalk treatment between
building and surrounding public street system. Also, special pavement
treatment should be provided in high use pedestrian crossing areas in
parking lot.
34. Trash areas and unloading/loading areas should be indicated on the site
plan including screening treatment thereof. Parking and building lighting
should be shown.
35. Is there going to be any hazardous waste materials stored on the site. If
so, please indicate nature of storage and removal procedures.
36. The plant sizes as listed on the landscape plan do not appear to conform
to the City's minimum requirements. Please revise to meet these require-
ments.
37. The plant list should be revised to include the number of plantings anti-
cipated. Also, the plan should indicate a key to shrub variety locations.
38. The landscape plan should be re-evaluated in terms of providing more
formality of street tree plantings.
39. The landscape plan should be coordinated with the approved landscape plan
for Advance Energy.
40. The subdivision plat should indicate location of potential combined curb
cuts, including dedication of access easements for this purpose.
41. On Monday, August 20, 1984, 8�" X 11" PMT reductions of all plans and
elevations should be submitted. Also, on that date, signed mylars of the
master plan, preliminary/final PUD plan, subdivision plat and building
elevations should be provided. A signed copy of the Site and Landscape
Covenants should also be submitted. Colored renderings of the master plan,
preliminary/final site plan and building elevations should be provided on
August 20, 1984.
Roger Thorp Letter
7/18/84 - Page 5
I would recommend we meet as soon as possible to discuss the above comments.
Revisions to the plans should be submitted no later than Friday, August 10,
1984. If you should have any questions, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely n
,�1�/IjI' kk
J e F ank
S r City Planner
JF/kb
CC: Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator
DATE `' DEPARTMEN*'
ITEM: �/oS�Pc� �a✓�c — �l.� t s� phasei�q l
COMMENTSOeaje�7
---
3 . X6 v¢
s V4 � �
j
J�Nf J
Lots 13, 14, 15 & 16 - PriAe
ct Park East I-L sit(., Plan Review - #44-840
NO 7-
.— ka-ce �
January 25, 2007
City of Fort Collins
Engineering — Development Review
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado 80522
RE: Letter of Intent for Slope Easement
Lot 19, Prospect Industrial Park (Holsinger Drywall)
To Whom It May Concern:
Liberty Common School has been made aware that a certain amount of grading is needed
on our site (Lot 6, Prospect Industrial Park) for the development of the above project. It
appears that this construction will not adversely impact our property, and we feel that it
will be possible to negotiate and dedicate a 2' wide Slope Easement adjacent to the
Project prior to the approval of the Final Development Plans.
Sincerely,
&—
Peter Kast, President
1725 Sharp Point Drive
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: NU(4 619 g DEPT: Engineering
PR0JECT:'rq-b5PELT ' l:PY V - AtNAt`LF�c)
PLANNER: ST*F-uE OLr
ENGINEER: lbMV-1 W"rrrnt40F'r
❑ _ No Problems
Ly" Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Advanced Energy August 5, 1998
• The access drive detail and additions to existing walks detail were deleted. Please put
these back into the plans. Also provide Detail No. 4
• No place on the utility plans or on the site plan is there a note indicating that enhanced
crossings need to be provided at the drive entrances. They are shown on the site plan, but
a note should be provided some place.
Date: Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ PLAT
[+� SITE
[� UTILITY
❑ LANDSCAPE
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: December 24, 1997 TO: g*��(1(C16
PROJECT: #44-84I Prospect East Business Park, Advanced
Energy, Buildings 7 & 8 - Type H (LUC) PDP
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting:
*Wednesday,t�Em��1998
JcxAV-
*This is a priority processing project by directi e of the City Manager..
Je� -�x 4(neu !, l 8-;:t, 1F t --?--
Prospect East Business Park, Advanced Energy, Buildings 7 & 8 June 21, 1998
The easement documents have been received and are in the process of being reviewed.
No comments on the site Plan
Utility Plans
• Add the following note to the utility plans: Access drive is temporary until such time as
March Ct is extended to Midpoint Dr.
• Shade the access pan off of Sharp Point Dr (like the others are) on the Grading and
Drainage Plan. Also indicate the curb details shown on this sheet are for ON SITE work
only.
• Provide NEW city standard ramp details D-12.3 and D-12.5. The old ramp detail shown
can be used on site if desired, but must be labeled as such.
• Provide Detail No. 4 (doweling detail)
• Make changes shown to access drive detail.
Date: co/2,
CHEa HERE IF YOU WEE TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ Pld z Site _ Dram p Report
L'-'Uffiy xRedlme Utik r, Lmdope
City of Fort Conins
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: Decemlber 24, 1997 TO:II v��ext
PROJECT: #44-84I Prospect East Business Park, Advanced
Energy, Buildings 7 & 8 - Type H (LUC) PDP
All comments must be re ate than the staff
review meeting:
*Wednesday, 1998
*This is a priority process' ro'ect by direetide of the City M r.
Prospect East Business Park - Advanced Energy April 1, 1998
Site Plan
• Add the following note to the site plan and utility plan: Access drive is temporary until
such time -as March Ct is extended to Midpoint Dr.
• Show where the sidewalk exists on Sharp Point Drive.
• Need letters ofr,ntent for all offsite easements prior to the project being taken to the
board.
Will need all easements before final plans will be signed - these can be turned in at any
time for us to check the legal description and format. A sketch is needed with each
easement.
• What is the intended truck pattern thru the site now with the change in building layout?
If trucks are intended to go thru the parking lot and out the south drive than they can not
make the turn in the parking lot. If this is not the intended route than the southern access
point should be changed back to having 15 foot radii. (For the northern access point it
appears that a 20 foot radius would be adequate)
• Minor amendment in needed for the site to the north for the modification to the parking
lot to provide for the cross access and island changes.
(Continued on next page)
Date: z
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
—Utday —Iedko Ugly
CityCity of�
Prospect East Business Park -Advanced Energy (page 2 of 2 ) April 1, 1998
Utility Plans
• The existing plats need to be a part of the final utility plans (they were included in the
index in the previous submittal.
• and utility plan: Access drive is temporary until
Add the following note to the site plan
such time as March Ct is extended to Midpoint Dr.
• Need letters of intent for all offsite easements prior to the project being taken to the
board.
• Will need all easements before final plans will be signed - these can be turned in at any
time for us to check the legal description and format. A sketch is needed with -each
easement.
• Show where the sidewalk exists on Sharp Point Drive.
What is the intended truck pattern thru the site now with the change in building layout?
If trucks are intended to go thru the parking lot and out the south drive than they can not
make the turn in the parking lot. If this is not the intended route than the southern access
point should be changed back to having 15 foot radii. (For the northern access point it
appears that a 2.0 foot radius would be adequate)
Minor amendment in needed for the site to the north for the modification to the parking
lot to provide for the cross access and island changes.
• 100 year Swale section - is this typical all thru the parking lot? Is there a cone e to cation.
pan
down the center? What is the water level elevation? Indicate the property
Provide NEW city standard ramp details D-12.3 and D-12.5. The old ramp shown can be
used on site if desired but must be labeled as such.
Provide detail No. 4 (doweling detail)
• Make changes shown to access drive detail.
• See plans for additional comments.
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: December 24, 1997 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #44-84I Prospect East Business Park, Advanced
Energy, Buildings 7 & 8 - Type II (LUC) PDP
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting;:
*Wednesday, January 7, 1998
*This is a priority processing project by directive of the City Manager.
Prospect East Business Park, Advanced Energy Building 7 & 8 January 9, 1998
• The one-way access from the liberty commons site will not be allowed. This drive
should be modified so that it connects into the parking lot where a two way drive can be
provided_ The access as shown is to close to the property line and too close the adjacent
access.
• Entrance radii for the access drives shall be 15 foot.
• Provide distances from the property line to the centerline of the drives.
• Provide an pedestrian/access easement adjacent to midpoint on Lot 23. This is needed for
the sidewalk.
• Drainage easements are needed across the site and off site?. Letter of intent for any off
site easements is needed prior to the project being scheduled for hearing.
• 1 believe that a minor amendment is needed on the adjacent advanced energy site for the
elimination of 4 parking spaces and the addition of the landscaped median to provide for
the cross access.
• The access drive detail should be modified as shown.
• provide ramp details D12.3 or D12.5 for the detached sidewalk on Midpoint.
• Provide a ramp detail for the ramps at the entrance drive on Sharp Point.
• See Plans for additional comments.
Date: Signature x"-
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat K Site _ Drainage Report _ Mer
�� -fam u ih City of Port Collins
No Text
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort CoWns
Current Planning
DATE: Member 18, 1997 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #44-84I Prospect East Business Park, Advanced
Energy Building 7 & 8 - Type II (LUC) PDP
All comments must be received by Mike Ludwig no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, December 17,1997
Prospect Business Park Advanced Energy Building 7 & 8 December 19, 1997
• In meetings we had prior to the submittal the applicant was told that the access points on
the adjacent lots would need to be shown on the plans, in order evaluate the locations of
the proposed drives. This has not been shown on the site or utility plans provided. By
reviewing the soils report and looking at the site plan that is in that document Lot 22 (the
lot to the south of the project on Midpoint Drive) has a driveway access point on the
north side of this lot. If that is the case than there is a real concern regarding the location
of the drive from the back of Liberty Commons. A plan to scale is needed showing all
existing and proposed access points in order to determine if the southern access drive will
be allowed.
• How does this southern access drive tie into the Liberty commons site? How is this to
function what striping and signage is being proposed?
• Will need to provide copies of the easement agreements with the county reception
numbers at the time of final compliance submittal.
Site Plan
• Label sidewalk and parkway widths.
Plat
• No plat was received for review.
(Continued on next page)
Date:
CHECK HERE IF YOU 'PUSH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Pit X Site _ Repod
�/ Udt L Re u
✓!
Ciry of Fort Collins